Homilies on Leviticus 4.10–5.4
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 4
4.10PG 12:444a–446b
Additur in sequentibus "z ε Et locutus est Dominus ad Moysen, dicens: Hoc munus Aaron et filiorum ejus, quod offerent Domino in die qua unxeris eum, decimam partem ephi similaginis iu sacrificio semper, dimidium ejus mane, et dimidium ejus post meridiem. lu sartagine ex oleo fiet et conspersatn offeret eam teneram, sacrificium de fragmentis, sacrilicium in odorem suavitatis Domino. Sacerdos qui unctus fuerit pro eo ex filiis ejus, faciat ea : lex a3terna : omnia consunuuabuntur. Et omne sacrificium sacerdotis holocaustum erit,et non edetur. In caeteris quidem prurceptis, pontifex in ofl‘ereudis sacrificiis populo praebet officium; in hoc vero mandato, quae propria sunt curat, et quod ad se spectat, exsequitur. Jubetur enim ex die, qua unctus fuerit, semper et in perpetuum nflerre similaginem oleo conspersam, teneram ex sartagine. quue cognominat sacrificium ex fragmentis, in odorem suavitatis; et hoc lege aeterna permanere, et transmitti ad posteros jubet. Addit sane observandum, ue ullum sacrificium sacerdotis, hoc est, quod pro seipse offeret, edatur a quoquam; sed holocaustum fiat, quod est igni absumi. l’rmceptum quidem secundum litteram clarum est, velim tamen videre qui in hoc typus, ct quae figura formetur. Dimidium sacrificii hujus mane vult offerri, et dimidium vespere, certa mensura simila: oleo conspersa: tenera: a sartagine. Vide si non, ut ego suspicor, sacrificium sacerdotis haec ipsa sit lex, quae per Moysen promulgatur, cujus dimidium mane jubetur offerri, dimidium vero ad vesperam. Quam legem in duas partes dividi praecepit, in litteram videlicet et spiritum. Et dimidiam quidem partem, quae est littera, offerri jubet mane, primo scilicet legis tempore: quod illis quibus tunc secundum litteram data est, novatn lucem et novum protulit diem, dimidium vero ejus offerri jussit in vesperam. In vespera enim nobis datus est Salvatoris adventus, in quo pars illa dimidia, hoc est sensus vel spiritus legis, secundum quod lex spiritalis est, offeratur oleo conspersa tenera. Oleum ad misericordiam revocatur, quae debet in sacerdotibus abundare. 'l‘enera ad subtilem et puram intelligentiam pertinet. Quod autem a sartagine dicitur, puto quod districtum, et multa continentia aridum, et torridum velit esse sacerdotem, in quo nihil remissum haberi ad luxuriam, nihil fluitans ad libidinem possit. Quod autem sacrificium ipsum ex fragmentis nominavit in odorem suavitatis, puto quod fragmenta sacerdotum velit intelligi : cum legis per eos littera frangitur, et cibus ex ea latens intrinsecus spiritalis elicitur; ut audientes turba: reficiantnr, sicut et Dominus fecisse refertur in Evangeliis , ubi benedixit panes, et dedit discipulis, et discipuli confringentes apposucrunt turbis. Et cum satiati fuissent omnes, superfuerunt, inquit, fragmentorum eophini duodecim. lstud est ergo sacrificium ex fragmentis, cum minutatim qua: Sunt legis sancta discutimus, ut spiritalem ex his cibum purumque capiamus. Et haec, inquit, est lex aeterna. Joannes quidem apostolus in Apocalypsi dicit esse Evangelium aeternum : invenimus et hic scriptum esse legem aeternam, sed isti qui legem secundum litteram sequi volunt, velim mihi nunc dicerent quomodo lex hujus sacrificii esse possitazterna : cum utique destructo templo, subverso altari, et omnibus quae dicebantur sancta profanatis, ritus iste sacrificiorum non potuerit permanere. Quomodo ergo mternum dicent, quod olim cessasse et finitum esse jam constat? Restat ut secundum eam partem lex haec :ctcrua dicatur, qua nos dicimus legem esse spiritalem, et per eam spiritalia posse offerri sacrificia , quze neque interrumpi unquam neque cessare possunt. Non enim in loco sunt, qui subvertitur, aut in tempore quod mutatur, sed in fide credentis, et in corde sacrificantis. Sane quod ait, Non edetur de sacrificio Sacerdotis, sed holocaustum erit, certum est ad Domini et Salvatoris nostri personam referri. De illius enim sacrificio non edetur, sed holocaustum erit. Hoc in loco sacrificium, verbum ipsum accipiendum est, et doctrina, de qua nullus edet, hoc est nullus disputat, nullus retractat, sed holocaustum est. Quidquid enim dixit, quidquid statuit, aeterna consecratione perdurat, nec aliquis ita insanus invenitur aut profanus, qui retractare de ejus sermonibus possit; quos tauquam h0locaustum, sacrificium Deo oblatum, itt omni cultu et veneratione habere debemus : quia ‹ caelum et terra transibunt, verba autem ejus non transibunt ",3 sed semper manent, sicut et ipse semper manet. Per ipsum Deo l’atri cum Spiritu sancto gloria et imperiumin saecula samulorum. Amen.
It is added in what follows: “And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: This is the gift of Aaron and of his sons, which they shall offer to the Lord on the day when you anoint him: the tenth part of an ephah of fine flour in sacrifice continually, half of it in the morning and half of it in the afternoon. It shall be made in a frying pan with oil, and mixed, he shall offer it tender, a sacrifice of broken pieces, a sacrifice for an odour of sweetness to the Lord. The priest who is anointed in his place from among his sons shall make it: an eternal law; all of it shall be consumed. And every sacrifice of the priest shall be a whole burnt offering, and shall not be eaten.” In the other precepts the high priest renders a service to the people in offering sacrifices; but in this commandment he attends to his own affairs and carries out what concerns himself. For he is commanded, from the day on which he is anointed, to offer continually and for ever fine flour mixed with oil, tender, from the frying pan, which he names a sacrifice of broken pieces, for an odour of sweetness; and he commands that this remain by an eternal law and be handed on to posterity. He adds, indeed, that it must be observed that no sacrifice of the priest, that is, what he offers for himself, be eaten by anyone, but that it become a whole burnt offering, that is, be consumed by fire. The precept is clear according to the letter; yet I should like to see what type is formed in this, and what figure. He wishes half of this sacrifice to be offered in the morning and half in the evening, a fixed measure of fine flour mixed with oil, tender, from the frying pan. See whether, as I suspect, the sacrifice of the priest is not this very law which is promulgated through Moses, half of which is commanded to be offered in the morning, and half toward evening. This law he commanded to be divided into two parts, namely into letter and spirit. And the half part, which is the letter, he commands to be offered in the morning, that is, in the first time of the law, because to those to whom it was then given according to the letter it brought forth a new light and a new day; but the other half of it he commanded to be offered toward evening. For in the evening the coming of the Saviour was given to us, in which that other half, that is, the sense or spirit of the law, according to which the law is spiritual, may be offered, mixed with oil and tender. The oil refers to mercy, which ought to abound in priests. “Tender” pertains to subtle and pure understanding. And as to its being said to be “from the frying pan”, I think he wishes the priest to be strict, and dry and parched by much continence, so that nothing slack toward wantonness, nothing loose toward lust, can be found in him. And as to his naming the sacrifice itself “of broken pieces, for an odour of sweetness”, I think he wishes the broken pieces of the priests to be understood: when the letter of the law is broken by them, and the spiritual food hidden within it is drawn out, so that the listening crowds may be refreshed, as the Lord too is related in the Gospels to have done, where he blessed the loaves and gave them to the disciples, and the disciples, breaking them, set them before the crowds. And when all had been satisfied, there were left over, it says, twelve baskets of broken pieces. This, then, is the sacrifice of broken pieces: when we examine bit by bit the holy things of the law, so as to take from them spiritual and pure food. “And this,” he says, “is an eternal law.” The apostle John in the Apocalypse says that there is an eternal Gospel; we find here too that it is written that there is an eternal law. But I should like those who wish to follow the law according to the letter to tell me now how the law of this sacrifice can be eternal, since certainly, once the temple was destroyed, the altar overthrown, and all the things that were called holy profaned, this rite of sacrifices could not remain. How, then, will they call eternal what is agreed to have long since ceased and come to an end? It remains that this law be called eternal according to that aspect in which we say that the law is spiritual, and that through it spiritual sacrifices can be offered, which can never be interrupted nor cease. For they are not in a place which is overthrown, nor in a time which changes, but in the faith of the believer and in the heart of the one who sacrifices. And as to his saying, “Of the sacrifice of the priest none shall be eaten, but it shall be a whole burnt offering”, it is certain that this refers to the person of our Lord and Saviour. For of his sacrifice none shall be eaten, but it shall be a whole burnt offering. In this place the sacrifice is to be taken as his very word and teaching, of which no one shall eat, that is, no one disputes it, no one revises it; but it is a whole burnt offering. For whatever he said, whatever he established, endures by an eternal consecration, and no one is found so mad or profane as to be able to revise any of his words; which we ought to hold with all worship and veneration as a whole burnt offering, a sacrifice offered to God, because “heaven and earth will pass away, but his words will not pass away,” but remain for ever, as he himself remains for ever. Through him to God the Father with the Holy Spirit be glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Lev 6:19 (6:12 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:20 (6:13 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:21 (6:14 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:22 (6:15 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:23 (6:16 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 14:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 14:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 14:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 24:35 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The high priest's daily offering, half morning and half evening, is the law in its letter and its spirit, the latter given at the Saviour's coming; the law is 'eternal' only spiritually, and Christ's own word, like a whole burnt offering, is not to be revised.
- Sources: Lev 6:19–23 (LXX 6:12–16); Rom 7:14; Matt 14:19–20; Rev 14:6; Matt 24:35.
- The destruction of the temple is cited, as often by Origen, as proof that the sacrificial law cannot be eternal in the literal sense; translated as written.
- A Migne footnote (Scripture references and manuscript readings) leaked into the quotation of Lev 6:19 and is removed by logged correction, with a page number and stray marks.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote leaked into the text; Migne's footnote marker; OCR slip; page number leaked into the text; stray marks): Et locutus est l Cor. xttt, ll. Philip. tv, 18. "llCor. 14. Idem ms.,‘t ex his, manducabunt. Libb. Dominus → Et locutus est Dominus; aeternam, 205 sed isti → aeternam, sed isti; in loco sunt ('5), qui → in loco sunt, qui; nihil remissum ι) haberi → nihil remissum haberi; pepqu praebet otii: cium → populo praebet officium.
Topics: Scripture and canon, Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 4.10 (PG 12:444a–446b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/4-10/#p-4-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-4-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 5
5.1PG 12:446b–448a
locutus est Dominus ad Moysen dicens : Loquere ad Aaron, et ad filios ejus dicens: llaec est lex peccati : lu loco quo jugulantur holocausta, occident et id quod peccati est contra Dominum : Sancta sanctorum sunt. Sacerdos qui offeret illud, in loco sancto edet, in atrio tabernaculi testimonii. Omnis qui tangit de carnibus ejus, sanctificabitur; et cuicunque aspersum fuerit ex sanguine ejus, super vestimentum quodcunque respersum fuerit, et ipsum lavabitur in loco sancto. Et vas fictile in quocunque coctum fuerit, confringetur : si autern in vase aereo coctum fuerit, defricabit illud et diluet aqua. Omnis masculus ex sacerdotibus edet ea : Sancta sanctorum sunt Domino. Et omnia quae pro peccato sunt, ex quibus illatum fuerit a sanguine eorum in tabernaculo testimonii deprecari in loco sancto, non edentur, sed igni comburentur . Ηωο omnia nisi alio sensu accipiamus, quam litterae textus ostendit, sicut sape jam diximus, cum in ecclesia‘ recitantur, obstaculum magis et subversionem Christianae religioni, quam bertationem :cdificationemque praestabunt. Si vero discutiatur et inveniatur quo sensu haec dicta sunt, et digne Deo qui haec scribere dicitur, advertantur, fiet quidem Judzeus qui hate audit, sed non ille qui in manifesto, sed qui in occulto Judaeus est: secundum illam difierentiam Judaei, quam distinguit apostolus Paulus dicens : non enim qui in manifesto Iudaeus est, neque quae manifeste in carne est circumcisio. sed qui in occulto Judatus est eircumcisione cordis, qui spiritu. non littera, cui laus non ab hominibus, sed ex Deo est. › Quam differentiam Judaei visibilis et Judzei invisibilis non intelligentes impii haeretici, non solum ab his Scripturis refugerunt, sed et ab ipso Deo, qui legem banc etScripturas divinas hominibus dedit. atque alium sibi deum, prrcter illum qui caelum et terram condidit, confinxerunt, cum utique fidei veritas unum eumdemque Deum legis et Evangeliorum teneat, visibilium et invisibilinm creatorem : quia et cognationem plurimam visibilia cum invisibilibus servant, ita ut Apostolus dicat”, quia ‹ invisibilia Dei a creatura mundi per ea quae facta sunt, intcllecta conspiciuntur.tSicut ergo cognationem sui ad invicem gerunt visibilia et invisibilia, terra et caelum, anima et caro, corpus ctspiritus, et ex borum conjunctionibus constat hie mundus; ita etiaut sanctam Scripturam credendqu est ex visibilibus et invisibilibus conSIare : veluti ex corpore quodam, litterae scilicet quae videtur; et anima, sensus qui intra ipsam deprehenditur; et spiritu, secundum id quod etiam quaedam in se caelestia teneat, sicut Apostolus dixit quia exemplari et umbrae deserviunt caelestium. Quia ergo haec ita se habent, invocantes Deum, qui fecit Scripturae animam et corpus et spiritum, corpus quidem his qui ante nos fuerunt, animam vero nobis, spiritum autem his qui in futuro lmreditatem vitae aeternae consequentur, per quam perveniautad regna coelestia : eam nunc quam diximus legis animam requiramus, quantum ad praesens interim spectat. Nescio autem si possumus etiam ad spiritum ejus ascendere in bis, quae nobis de sacrificiis lecta sunt. Debemus enim eum, quem diximus in occulto Judaeum, sicut ostendimus quia non carne, sed corde circumciditur; ita ostendere quia et sacrificat non in carne, sed corde, et quia edet de sacrificiis non carnem, sed spiritum.
“The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Speak to Aaron and to his sons, saying: This is the law of the sin offering. In the place where the burnt offerings are slaughtered, they shall kill also that which is for sin before the Lord: they are holy of holies. The priest who offers it shall eat it in a holy place, in the court of the tabernacle of witness. Everyone who touches its flesh shall be sanctified; and on whomever any of its blood is sprinkled, whatever garment it is sprinkled on, that too shall be washed in a holy place. And the earthen vessel in which it is boiled shall be broken; but if it is boiled in a bronze vessel, he shall scour it and rinse it with water. Every male among the priests shall eat them: they are holy of holies to the Lord. And all the sin offerings, from whose blood some is brought into the tabernacle of witness to make entreaty in the holy place, shall not be eaten, but shall be burned with fire.” All these things, unless we take them in another sense than the text of the letter shows, will, as we have often said already, when they are read in church, offer an obstacle and an overthrow to the Christian religion rather than exhortation and edification. But if it is examined and found in what sense these things were said, and they are considered in a manner worthy of God, who is said to have written them, the one who hears them will indeed become a Jew, but not he who is one outwardly, but he who is a Jew inwardly; according to that distinction of the Jew which the apostle Paul draws, saying: “For not he is a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; but he is a Jew who is one inwardly, by circumcision of the heart, in spirit, not in the letter, whose praise is not from men but from God.” Not understanding this difference between the visible Jew and the invisible Jew, the impious heretics have fled not only from these Scriptures but also from God himself, who gave this law and the divine Scriptures to men, and have fashioned for themselves another god besides him who made heaven and earth; whereas surely the truth of the faith holds that one and the same God is God of the law and of the Gospels, creator of things visible and invisible: since the visible things too keep a very great kinship with the invisible, so that the Apostle says that “the invisible things of God from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made.” Just as, then, visible and invisible things bear a kinship to one another, earth and heaven, soul and flesh, body and spirit, and this world consists of their conjunctions, so also we must believe that holy Scripture consists of visible and invisible things: as of a kind of body, namely the letter which is seen; and of a soul, the sense which is grasped within it; and of a spirit, in that it also holds certain heavenly things within itself, as the Apostle said: “they serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things.” Since, then, these things are so, calling upon God, who made the soul and body and spirit of Scripture (the body for those who were before us, the soul for us, and the spirit for those who “in the future will obtain the inheritance of eternal life,” through which they may reach the heavenly kingdoms), let us now seek that soul of the law of which we spoke, as far as concerns the present for the time being. And I do not know whether we can rise even to its spirit in what has been read to us about the sacrifices. For we ought to show of him whom we called a Jew inwardly that, just as we showed that he is circumcised not in the flesh but in the heart, so also he sacrifices not in the flesh but in the heart, and that he will eat of the sacrifices not flesh but spirit.
Lev 6:25 (6:18 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:26 (6:19 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:27 (6:20 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:28 (6:21 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:29 (6:22 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:30 (6:23 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 8:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Read literally, the laws of sacrifice would hinder Christianity; read spiritually, they make the hearer a Jew inwardly, and the heretics who reject them fail to see that Scripture, like the world, has body, soul, and spirit.
- Sources: Lev 6:24–30 (LXX 6:17–23); Rom 2:28–29; Rom 1:20.
- “The impious heretics” who invent “another god” are the Marcionites and Gnostics, though Origen does not name them here; his wording is kept.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote marker; OCR slip; OCR split word; stray footnote number; split word): jugulantur holocaua sta → jugulantur holocausta; testi- 15. monii → testimonii; ab his Serio pluris refugerunt → ab his Scripturis refugerunt; non carnem, sed spiritum (l0). → non carnem, sed spiritum.; unum euunlemqne Deum → unum eumdemque Deum.
Topics: Scripture and canon, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 5.1 (PG 12:446b–448a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/4-10/#p-5-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-5-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
5.2PG 12:448a–450b
Sed videamus jam quae sunt illa quae referuntur in lege. Et locutus est, inquit, Dominus ad Moysen dicens : Loquere ad Aaron, et filios ejus dicens : Haec lex peccati; et cmtera quae in prasenti recitata sunt. Et ante jam dixisse nos memini, quia lex non semper eisdem datur :sed alia quidem datur filiis lsrael, alia autem filiis Aaron, alia etiam, sicut jampridem observavimus,Moysi et Aaron: est et alia lex quae soli Moysi datur, ita ut nec Aaron legis ipsius particeps fiat. Quarum persinguladistinctiones et diversitates , quis ita scientia dono illuminatus a Deo est, ut possit integre aperteque disserere? Invenimus enim in consequentibus pratceptum Domini ad solum Moysen dari, et juberi ut pectusculum arietis perfectionis Moysi detur, sicut prmccpit, inquit, Dominus Moysi. ln qua portione neque Aaron, neque filii ejus participes tiunt. Et invenitur lex quae pertinet ad arietem perfectionis, non posse pervenire usque ad Aaron, neque ad filios ejus, multo magis nec ad reliquos filios Israel, sed ad solum Moysen, qui erat amicus Dei. Verum quid opus est, quae postmodum recitand: sunt, prmvenire ? Nunc interim lex recitata est, qua: ad Aaron et filios ejus promulgatur, lex peccati, hoc est hostiae quae offertur pro peccato : ε In loco, inquit, in quo jugulanlur holocausta, ibi occident et id quod pro peccato est, in conspectu Domini : Sancta sanctorum sunt. › Multa quidem jam, Deo juvante, de sacrificiorum ritu secundum spiritalem intelligentiam in superioribus dicta sunt, sed et nunc si gratia Domini nos visitare dignetur, et vos oratioaibus adnitamini, addemus quae dederit Dominus. llostiarum qumdam quidem suntDei solius, ita ut nullus hominum participct ex ipsis. Onredam sunt Aaron sacerdotis, et iiiiorutn ejus : quaedam ipsius, et iilioruut, et filiarum ejus, ita utetiam uxorem sacerdotis edere liceat ex his. Quadam sunt sacerdotum, et filiorum ac filiarum eorum, sed de quibus edere liceat etiam filios Israel. Et in illis quidem hostiis de quibus licet edere filios Israel, sine dubio habent participium etiam sacerdotes et filii sacerdotum; non tamen ex omni hostia, quam edet sacerdos, etiam filios Israel edere licebit. Igitur cum ista; sint hostiarum diflerettlim, illam quant diximus solius Dei esse, ex qua neque Moysen, neque Aaron, neque filios ejus participare I'as est, aliquando quidem holocaustomata nominari invenimus; aliquando vero non holocaustumata, sed holocarpomata, veluti si dicamus quod totus fructus sit, ille scilicet qui Deo ofi‘ertur. Est ergo prima legislatio de sacrificiis, si tamen vel observastis vel retinetis diligenter quae lecta sunt ac disserta, et non transcurrunt aures vestras in vanum, vel quae a nobis dicuntur, vel qua? ex divinis voluminibus recitantur. Prima ergo est ltostia, holocaustomata. Neque enim oportebat aliam primo hostiam nominari, nisi eant quae omnipotenti Deo ofl'erebatur. Secunda hostia est, quae ad edendum sacerdotibus mancipatur. Tertia, de qua etiam filios Israel contingere, vel edere, ipsos scilicet qui offerunt, fas cst. Sed filios Israel non omnes, nisi illos tantum qui mundi sunt. Soli enim qui mundi sunt de sacrificiis edere jubentur. Verum istas omnes hostias tu qui in occulto Judmuses, non in anlmalibus requiras visibilibus : nec in mutis pecoribus inveniri putes, quod olTerri deceat Deo. Istas hostias intra teipsum require, et invenies eas intra animam tuam. Intellige te habere intra temetipsum greges boum, illos qui benedicuntur in Abraham. Intellige habere te et greges ovium et greges caprarum, in quibus benedicti et inultiplicali sunt patriarchae. Intellige esse intra te etiam aves cceli. Nec mireris quod haec intra te esse dicimus, intcllige te et alium mundum esse parvum, et esse intra te solem, esse lunam, etiam stellas. Hoc enim si ita non esset, nunquam dixisset Dominus ad Abraham "’ : Aspice in ctelum, et vide stellas, si dinumerari possunt a multitudine, sic erit semen tuum. Nec mireris, inquam, si dicitur ad Abraham, quia sic erit semen tuum sicut stellae sunt C(Bll; de illis scilicet qui ex fide ejus geniti rationabiliter vivant, ac divinas leges et praecepta custodiant. Audi amplius aliquid Salvatorem ad discipulos dicentem : Vos estis lux mundi. Dubitasne esse intra te solem et lunam, ad quem dicitur, quia lux sis mundi? Vis adhuc amplius aliquid de te ipso audire, ne forte parva de te et humilia cogitans, tanquam vilem negligas vitam tuam? Habet hic mundus gubernatoretn‘suum, habet qui eum regat et habitet in ipso omnipotentem Deum, sicut ipse per prophetam dicit θ’ : Nonne cmlum et terram ego repleo, dicit Dominus?» Audi ergo, ipse omnipotens Dens quid etiam de te,hoc est,quid de hominibus dicat: Habitabo, inquit”, in eis, et.inter ipsos ambulabo. Plus aliquid addit erga personam tuam: Ero, inquit, eis in patrem, et ipsi erunt mihi in filios et filias, dicit Dominus.» Habet hic mundus Filium Dei, habet Spiritum sanctum, secundum quod dicit Prupheta : Verbo Doutini cadi firmati sunt, et spiritu oris ejus omnis virtus eorum. Et iterum alibi 9° : Spiritus enim Domini replevit orbem terrarum.) Audi et tibi quid dicit Christus ’7: Ecce ego vobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi. Et de Spiritu sancto dicitur 9° : Effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem, et prophetabunt. Cum ergo videas habere te omnia quae mundus habet, dubitare non debes quod etiam animalia quae offeruntur in hostiis, habeas intra te, et ex ipsis spirituales ofl‘erre debeas hostias.
But let us now see what the things are that are related in the law. “And the Lord spoke,” it says, “to Moses, saying: Speak to Aaron and his sons, saying: This is the law of the sin offering,” and the rest that has been read at present. And I remember that we have said before that the law is not always given to the same persons; but one is given to the children of Israel, another to the sons of Aaron, another again, as we observed long ago, to Moses and Aaron; and there is also another law which is given to Moses alone, so that not even Aaron becomes a partaker of that law. Who is so illumined by God with the gift of knowledge that he can discuss wholly and openly the distinctions and differences of each of these? For we find in what follows a precept of the Lord given to Moses alone, and it is commanded that the breast of the ram of perfection be given to Moses, “as the Lord commanded Moses,” it says. In this portion neither Aaron nor his sons become partakers. And the law which pertains to the ram of perfection is found unable to reach as far as Aaron or his sons, much less the rest of the children of Israel, but only Moses, who was the friend of God. But what need is there to anticipate what is to be read later? For the moment, the law has been read which is promulgated to Aaron and his sons, the law of sin, that is, of the victim which is offered for sin: “In the place,” it says, “in which the burnt offerings are slaughtered, there they shall kill also that which is for sin, in the sight of the Lord: they are holy of holies.” Much indeed has already been said above, with God's help, about the rite of the sacrifices according to the spiritual understanding; but now too, if the grace of the Lord deigns to visit us and you strive with your prayers, we shall add what the Lord gives. Some victims are God's alone, so that no human being partakes of them. Some are Aaron the priest's and his sons'; some are his, and his sons', and his daughters', so that even the priest's wife may eat of them. Some are the priests' and their sons' and daughters', but such that the children of Israel too may eat of them. And in those victims of which the children of Israel may eat, no doubt the priests and the priests' sons also have a share; yet not every victim which the priest eats may the children of Israel also eat. Since, then, there are these differences of victims, that one which we said is God's alone, of which it is not lawful for Moses, nor Aaron, nor his sons to partake, we find sometimes named holocaustomata, and sometimes not holocaustomata but holocarpomata, as if we should say that it is the whole fruit, namely that which is offered to God. The first legislation about sacrifices, then, if you have observed or diligently retain what was read and discussed, and if neither what we say nor what is read from the divine books runs past your ears in vain, the first victim, then, is the whole burnt offering. For it was not fitting that any other victim should be named first than that which was offered to almighty God. The second victim is the one assigned to the priests for eating. The third, that of which even the children of Israel may lawfully touch or eat, namely those who offer it. But not all the children of Israel, only those who are clean. For only those who are clean are bidden to eat of the sacrifices. But all these victims, you who are a Jew inwardly, do not seek among visible animals, nor think that what is fitting to offer to God is found among dumb beasts. Seek these victims within yourself, and you will find them within your soul. Understand that you have within yourself herds of cattle, those which are blessed in Abraham. Understand that you also have flocks of sheep and flocks of goats, in which the patriarchs were blessed and multiplied. Understand that there are within you even the birds of the sky. And do not be surprised that we say these things are within you: understand that you are another world in miniature, and that within you there is a sun, there is a moon, there are also stars. For if this were not so, the Lord would never have said to Abraham: “Look into the sky and see the stars, whether they can be numbered for multitude; so shall your offspring be.” Do not be surprised, I say, if it is said to Abraham, “So shall your offspring be, as the stars of the sky are,” namely of those who, born of his faith, live rationally and keep the divine laws and precepts. Hear something more: the Saviour saying to the disciples, “You are the light of the world.” Do you doubt that there is a sun and moon within you, to whom it is said that you are the light of the world? Do you wish to hear something still greater about yourself, lest perhaps, thinking small and lowly things of yourself, you neglect your life as cheap? This world has its governor; it has almighty God, who rules it and dwells in it, as he himself says through the prophet: “Do I not fill heaven and earth, says the Lord?” Hear, then, what almighty God himself says also about you, that is, about human beings: “I will dwell,” he says, “in them, and walk among them.” He adds something more toward your person: “I will be,” he says, “a father to them, and they shall be my sons and daughters, says the Lord.” This world has the Son of God, it has the Holy Spirit, according to what the prophet says: “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made firm, and all their power by the spirit of his mouth.” And again elsewhere: “For the Spirit of the Lord has filled the world.” Hear also what Christ says to you: “Behold, I am with you all days, until the end of the age.” And of the Holy Spirit it is said: “I will pour out of my Spirit on all flesh, and they shall prophesy.” Since, then, you see that you have all that the world has, you ought not to doubt that you have within you even the animals which are offered as victims, and that from them you ought to offer spiritual victims.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Lev 6:25 (6:18 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 33:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 10:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 22:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 30:43 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 15:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 23:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 33:6 (32:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 28:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Joel 2:28 (3:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Some victims belong to God alone, some to priests, some also to the people; but the inward Jew must seek these victims within his own soul, a world in miniature containing all that the world contains.
- Sources: Lev 6:25 (LXX 6:18); Lev 8:29 (the breast of the ram for Moses); Exod 33:11 (friend of God); Lev 10:14; Gen 12:3, 22:18 (blessed in Abraham); Gen 30:43; Gen 15:5; Matt 5:14; Jer 23:24; 2 Cor 6:16, 18; Ps 33:6 (LXX 32:6); Wis 1:7; Matt 28:20; Joel 2:28 (LXX 3:1).
- Holocaustomata (“whole burnt offerings”) and holocarpomata (“whole fruit offerings”) are the Greek terms of the Septuagint, kept by Rufinus.
- “Namely those who offer it”: the scan's “qui oderunt” (“who hate”) is corrected to “qui offerunt” from Baehrens's edition.
- A Migne footnote (Scripture reference and manuscript readings) leaked into the text and is removed by logged correction, with footnote markers and a page number.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote leaked into the text; Migne's footnote marker; Migne's footnote marker, page number, and OCR slips; Migne's footnote marker; OCR slip; OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; OCR slip (Baehrens reads offerunt)): licet edere filios θ’ Hebr. vm, 5. reperiturin codice ms. Sangerm. codex Sangerm. ‹ cui laus. Libb. editi, cujus laus. Δ(1-0) idem ms., _¢ carnem; sedspiritum: Libb. Israel → licet edere filios Israel; Hinc lex peccati → Haec lex peccati; juberi ttt pectusculum → juberi ut pectusculum; reliquos filios (ll) Israel → reliquos filios Israel; hostiae quae offertur (l2) pro peccato : ε Ιιι loco → hostiae quae offertur pro peccato : ε In loco; quod totus (l3) fructus → quod totus fructus; Νεε mireris, inquam, si ιιιcitur → Nec mireris, inquam, si dicitur; Dubitasrie → Dubitasne; lux sis mutuli → lux sis mundi; terram ego repleo (l6), dicit → terram ego repleo, dicit; hominibus dicam IIabitabo → hominibus dicat: Habitabo; Plus aliquid addit (I7) erga personam tuttth litero, inquit 9‘, eis in patrem, 207 et ipsi erunt tnihi itt filios → Plus aliquid addit erga personam tuam: Ero, inquit, eis in patrem, et ipsi erunt mihi in filios; scilicet qui oderunt → scilicet qui offerunt.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 1:7 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 5.2 (PG 12:448a–450b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/4-10/#p-5-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-5-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
5.3PG 12:450b–453a
Sed de illis, prout potuimus, in superioribus explanavimus. Nunc vero illud addimus quod dicit, quia in loco itt quo jugttlantur holocausta, ibi etiam hostia: pro peccato. Vide quam multa misericordia et benignitas Dei est, ut ubi holocaustum iugulatur illud quod soli Deo: offertur, ibi etiam hostia quae pro peccato est, immolari iubeatur; quo scilicet intelligat se qui peccavit, et poenitet, et conversus ad Dominum contribulati spiritus hostiam jugulat, in loco jam sancto stare, et sociari his quae pertinent ad Deum. lbi ergo immolatur hostia pro peccato, ubi et holocaustum, in conspectu, inquit, Domini. Est fortassis in conspectu Domini offerre sacrificium, et non ollerre in conspectu Domini. Quis ergo est qui offert in conspectu Domini? Ille, utopinor, qui non exiit a conspectu Domini, sicut Cain 9°, et ell‘ectus est timens et tremens. Si quis ergo est qui habet fiduciam astare in conspectu Domini, et non fugit a facie ejus, nec aspectum ejus peccati conscientia declinat, iste in conspectu Domini olfert'sacrifieium. Hanc ergo hostiam qua: oll‘ertur pro peccatis, dicit esse Sancta sanctorum. Majus aliquid audere vult sermo, si tamen et vester sequatur auditus. Qua: est hostia quae pro peccatis oITertur, et est Sancta sanctorum, nisi unigenitus Filius Dei, Dominus meus Jesus Christus? Ipse solus est hostia pro peccatis, et ipse est hostia Sancta sanctorum. Sed quod addit: Sacerdos, inquit, qui ofi‘ert illud, edet illud, videtur difficile esse ad intellectum. Illud enim quod edendum dicit, ad peccatum referri videtur : sicut et alibi dicit dc sacerdotibus propheta , quia ε peccata populi mei manducabunt. Unde et hic ostendit sacerdotem peccatum offerentis comedere debere. Saepe ostendimus ex divinis Scripturis, Christum esse et hostiam quae pro peccato tnundi oITcrtttr, et sacerdotem qui oITerat hostiam. Quod uno verbo Apostolus explicavit, cum dicit‘: Qui seipsum obtulit Deo. IIic ergo est sacerdos, qui peccata populi comedit et consumit, de quo dictum est : t Tu es sacerdos in aeternum secundum ordinem Melchisedech. Salvator ergo et Dominus meus peccata populi edit. Quomodo edit peccata populi? audi quid scriptum est. : ε Deus, inquit‘, uoster, ignis consumens est. 3 Quid consumit Deus ignis? Nunquid tatu inepti erimus, ut putemus quod Deus ignis ligna consumat, aut stipulam, aut fenum? Sed consumit Deus - ignis humana peccata, illa absumit, illa devorat, illa purgat, secundum quod et alibi dicit : ς Et purgabo te igni ad purum. IIoc est manducare peccatum ejus qui oil'ert sacrilicium pro peccato. Ipse enim peccata nostra suscepit, et in semetipso ea tanquam ignis comedit et absumit. Sic denique eeontrario eos qui permanent in peccatis, ntors dicitur deglutisse, sicut scriptum est : Deglutiet mors praevalens. IIoc puto esse quod in Evangelio Salvator dicebat ε ‹ Ignem veni mittere in terram, et quam volo ut accendatur. Atque utinant et mea terra accendatur igni divino, ut ultra non aIIerat spinas‘et tribulos. Sic intelligere debes et illud, quod scriptum est' : t Ignis accensus est ab ira mea. comedet terram et gcncrationes ejus.3 Dicit ergo lex 3: Sacerdos qui obtulerit, edet illud in loco sancto, in atrio tabernaculi testimonii. Consequens enim est, ut sccundum imaginem eius qui sacerdotium Ecclesia dedit, etiam ministri et sacerdotes Ecclesia: peccata pepuli accipiant, et ipsi imitantes mag strum, remissionem peccatorum populo tribuant. Debent ergo et ipsi Ecclesiae sacerdotes ita pet fecti esse, et in otiiciis semper sacerdotalibus ert diti, ut peccata p0puli in loco sancto, in atriis tabernaculi testimonii, ipsi non peccando cousu mant. Quid autem est in loco sancto manducare peccatum? Locus erat sanctus, in quem perve nerat Moyses, secundum quod dictum est a eum θ : ε Locus enim in quo stas, terra sancta est. Similiter ergo ct in Ecclesia Dei locus sanctus est, fides perfecta, charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona. Qui in his stat in Ecclesia, in loco sancto stare se agnoscat. Neque enim in terra quzercndus est locus sanctus, in quam semel data sententia est a Deo dicente": Maledicta terra in operibus tuis. Fides ergo integra et san. cta conversatio, locus est sanctus. In hoc itaque loco positus sacerdos Ecclesire, populi peccata consumat, ut hostiam jugulans verbi Dei, et doctrina: sana: victimas otierens, purget a peccatis conscientias auditorum. Edet ergo sacerdos carnes sacrificii in atrio tabernaculi testimonii, cum intelligere poluerit quae sit ratio in "his, quaeve mysteria, qua! describuntur de atriis tabernaculi testimonii. Ad haec enim atria secreta et recondita nullus accedit, nulli hmc nisi sacerdotibus pateant: si tamen pateant, si scientia sua et intellectu mystico potuerint eorum secreta peuetrare. Scio autem esse et alia quaedam in Ecclesia dogmata secretiora, quae adire nec ipsis sacerdotibus liceat. Illa dico, ubi arca reconditur, ubi urna. ubi manna et tabula: testamenti. Illuc ne ipsis quidem sacerdotibus datur accessus, sed uni tantum pontilici. et huic semel in anno certis quibusque et mysticis puriticatiOnihus concedituristnd intrare secretum. Sunt et alia Ecclesia: dogmata, ad qute possnnt pervenire etiam Levitzc, Sed iu- (ς feriora sunt ab his quae sacerdotibus adire coucessum est. Scio et alia esse ad quae possunt accedere etiam tilii Israel, hoc est, laici; non tamen alienigenae, nisi ascripti jam fuerint in Ecclesia Domini, Aegyptius enim tertia generatione intrabit in Ecclesiam Dei“. Credo propter Iidem Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, in quam credit omnis qui sociatur Ecclesia: Dei, tertiam generationem mystice dictam. Verumtamen sciendum est, quod ex hostiis quae ofl‘crunutr, licet concedantur sacerdotibus ad edendum, non tamen omnia conceduntur; sed pars ex ipsis aiiqua Deo offertur, et altaris ignibus traditur: ut sciamus etiam nos quod et si conceditur nobis aliqua ex divinis Scriptnris apprehendere et agnoscere, sunt tamen aliqua quae Deo reservanda sunt: quae cum intelligentiam nostram superent,, sensusque eorum supra nos sit, ne forte aliter a nobis quam se habet veritas, proferantur, lllt'iills igni ista scrvanius. Et ideo etiam in hoc loco, quae quidem concessa sunt hominibus ad edendum, prout ρο·tuimus intra tabernaculmn Domini consumpsimus; si qua vero supersunt, et vel vos in audiendo, vel nos superant in dicendo, servemus igni altaris, tanquam eam partem, quae pro peccato super altare Domini jubetur olTerri.
But of these things we have explained above as best we could. Now we add what he says, that in the place in which the burnt offerings are slaughtered, there also are the victims for sin. See how great the mercy and kindness of God is, that where the burnt offering is slaughtered, that which is offered to God alone, there also the victim which is for sin is commanded to be sacrificed; so that, namely, one who has sinned, and repents, and, turned to the Lord, slaughters the victim of a contrite spirit, may understand that he now stands in a holy place and is joined to the things that pertain to God. There, then, the victim for sin is sacrificed where the burnt offering also is, “in the sight,” it says, “of the Lord.” Perhaps it is possible to offer a sacrifice in the sight of the Lord, and not to offer it in the sight of the Lord. Who, then, is it that offers in the sight of the Lord? He, I think, who has not gone out from the sight of the Lord, as Cain did, and become fearful and trembling. If, then, there is anyone who has the confidence to stand in the sight of the Lord, and does not flee from his face, nor avoid his gaze from consciousness of sin, this one offers a sacrifice in the sight of the Lord. This victim, then, which is offered for sins, he says is holy of holies. The word wishes to dare something greater, if only your hearing follows. What is the victim which is offered for sins and is holy of holies, if not the only-begotten Son of God, my Lord Jesus Christ? He alone is the victim for sins, and he is the victim that is holy of holies. But what he adds, “The priest,” he says, “who offers it shall eat it,” seems difficult to understand. For what he says is to be eaten seems to refer to the sin; as the prophet too says elsewhere of the priests that “they will eat the sins of my people.” Hence here too he shows that the priest ought to eat the sin of the one who offers. We have often shown from the divine Scriptures that Christ is both the victim which is offered for the sin of the world and the priest who offers the victim. This the Apostle explained in a single phrase when he says: “Who offered himself to God.” This, then, is the priest who eats and consumes the sins of the people, of whom it was said: “You are a priest for ever according to the order of Melchizedek.” My Saviour and Lord, then, eats the sins of the people. How does he eat the sins of the people? Hear what is written: “Our God,” it says, “is a consuming fire.” What does God, the fire, consume? Shall we be so foolish as to think that God, the fire, consumes wood, or straw, or hay? But God, the fire, consumes human sins: he takes them away, he devours them, he purges them, according to what he says elsewhere too: “And I will purge you with fire until you are pure.” This is to eat the sin of the one who offers a sacrifice for sin. For he himself took up our sins, and in himself, like fire, eats and consumes them. So, indeed, conversely, those who remain in sins are said to have been swallowed by death, as it is written: “Death, prevailing, will swallow them up.” This I think is what the Saviour said in the Gospel: “I came to cast fire on the earth, and how I wish that it be kindled.” And would that my earth too might be kindled with the divine fire, so that it no longer bears thorns and thistles. So you ought to understand also what is written: “A fire has been kindled by my anger; it will devour the earth and its generations.” The law says, then: “The priest who has offered it shall eat it in a holy place, in the court of the tabernacle of witness.” For it follows that, after the image of him who gave the priesthood to the church, the ministers and priests of the church also should receive the sins of the people, and they too, imitating the master, should grant remission of sins to the people. The priests of the church themselves, then, ought to be so perfect and so always learned in their priestly duties that they consume the sins of the people in a holy place, in the courts of the tabernacle of witness, by not sinning themselves. And what is it to eat sin in a holy place? There was a holy place to which Moses had come, according to what was said to him: “For the place on which you stand is holy ground.” Likewise, then, in the church of God the holy place is perfect faith, love from a pure heart, and a good conscience. Whoever stands in these in the church, let him recognize that he stands in a holy place. For the holy place is not to be sought on earth, on which sentence was once given by God, who said: “Cursed is the earth in your works.” Whole faith, then, and holy conduct is the holy place. Placed in this place, therefore, let the priest of the church consume the sins of the people, so that, slaughtering the victim of the word of God and offering the victims of sound doctrine, he may purge the consciences of his hearers from sins. The priest, then, will eat the flesh of the sacrifice in the court of the tabernacle of witness when he has been able to understand what reason there is in these things, or what mysteries, which are described concerning the courts of the tabernacle of witness. For to these secret and hidden courts no one approaches; they are open to none but the priests: if indeed they are open, if by their knowledge and mystical understanding they have been able to penetrate their secrets. And I know that there are also certain other, more secret doctrines in the church, which not even the priests themselves may approach. I mean those where the ark is hidden, where the urn, where the manna and the tablets of the covenant are. Not even the priests themselves are given access there, but only the one high priest, and to him it is granted to enter that secret place once a year with certain mystical purifications. There are also other doctrines of the church which even Levites can reach, but they are lower than those which the priests are permitted to approach. I know also that there are others which even the children of Israel, that is, the laity, can approach; yet not foreigners, unless they have already been enrolled in the church of the Lord; for “the Egyptian will enter the church of God in the third generation.” I believe it is because of the faith of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in which everyone believes who is joined to the church of God, that the third generation is mystically spoken of. Nevertheless, it must be known that of the victims that are offered, although they are granted to the priests to eat, not all of them are granted; but some part of them is offered to God and handed over to the fires of the altar: so that we too may know that even if it is granted to us to grasp and recognize some things from the divine Scriptures, there are yet some things which must be reserved for God; which, since they surpass our understanding and their sense is above us, we keep for the divine fire, lest perhaps they be set forth by us otherwise than the truth is. And therefore in this place too, the things which have been granted to human beings to eat we have consumed, as best we could, within the tabernacle of the Lord; but if any things remain over, and surpass either you in hearing or us in speaking, let us keep them for the fire of the altar, as that part which is commanded to be offered on the altar of the Lord for sin.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Lev 6:25 (6:18 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 6:26 (6:19 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 4:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Hos 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 9:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 110:4 (109:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 4:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:25 (quotation, medium confidence) · Isa 25:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:49 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 32:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 3:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 1:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 9:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 9:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 23:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The sin offering slain where the burnt offering is shows God's mercy; Christ is both the holy victim and the priest who 'eats', that is consumes like fire, the people's sins, and the church's priests must imitate him; some mysteries are reserved for God alone.
- Sources: Lev 6:25–26 (LXX 6:18–19); Ps 51:17; Gen 4:16 (Cain); Hos 4:8; Heb 9:14; Ps 110:4 (LXX 109:4); Deut 4:24 and Heb 12:29; Isa 1:25 (LXX); Isa 25:8 (LXX); Luke 12:49; Gen 3:18; Deut 32:22; Exod 3:5; 1 Tim 1:5; Gen 3:17; Heb 9:4, 7; Deut 23:8.
- The grades of doctrine in the church (for the high priest, priests, Levites, and laity), and the priests' granting remission of sins to the people, are translated exactly as written.
- A Migne footnote (Scripture references and manuscript readings) leaked into the text and is removed by logged correction, with footnote markers.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote leaked into the text; Migne's footnote marker; OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; OCR slips; Migne's footnote marker): videtur Psal. unt, ipsis ambulabo. ms., addit. Libb. editi, adhuc I. :ul‘lii)’ Ms., spirituales. Libb. editi, spirita- Ilcr. offeret, et paulo post, ille, Opinor, qui non exit. diflicilc → videtur difficile; qui offert (l9) in conspectu → qui offert in conspectu; nisi imigcuitus Filius Dei → nisi unigenitus Filius Dei; peccatum offerentis comodere debere → peccatum offerentis comedere debere; in atriis ιε bernaculi → in atriis tabernaculi; locus £2!!ctus est → locus sanctus est; Maledicta tem in operibus → Maledicta terra in operibus; consumat, ιιι hostiam jugulans → consumat, ut hostiam jugulans; Egyptins enim tertia generatione intrabit (‘27) in Ecclesium Dei → Aegyptius enim tertia generatione intrabit in Ecclesiam Dei.
Topics: Christology, Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 5.3 (PG 12:450b–453a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/4-10/#p-5-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-5-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
5.4PG 12:453a–454b
Et haec est, inquit , lex arietis qui pro delicto est : Sancta sanctorum. In loco in quo jngulant holocaustomata, jugulabunt et arietem qui pro delicto est contra Dominum, › etc. Videtur quidem in Scripturis divinis frequenter peccatitm pro delicto, et delictum pro peccato indiliercnter et absque aliqua distinctione nominari: in hoc tamen loco invenitur esse discretum. Nam cum superius in hostia pro peccato ritum sacrificii atque ordinem tradidisset, mtnc separatim mandat sacrificium pro delicto; et quamvis eodem ordine atque eadem observantia cuncta mandentur, et addat in novissimis ε Sicut id quod pro peccato est, ita et id quod pro delicto cst, lex una erit eorum;i tamen voluit ostendere esse aliquid dill'erentize in his, quibus sacrificia divisa mandavit. In quo ego puto delictum quidem commissum esse levius aliquanto, quam peccatum. Nam invenimus de peccato dici, quod sit peccatum ad mortem “. Dc delicto non legimus quod esse dicatur ad mortem. Scio tamen et illam differentiam, quae nonnullis sapientium visa est, quod delictum quidem sit, cum non facimus ea quae facere debemus; peccatum vero sit, cum committimus ea quae committere non debemus. Sed hmo quoniam non semper in Scripturis divinis sub ista distinctione ir.- ’ venimus, idcirco generaliter afiirmare non possumus. lgitur eodem modo atque eadem traditione de sacrificio quod pro delicto ofl‘ertur, accipiendum cst, quo et supra exposuimus de eo quod pro peccato est. Similiter enim iubentur adipes arietis, ii qui circa renes sunt, et ii qui interiora operiunt, imponi super altare: ut et tu qui haec audis, scias omne quod est intra te crassius et operit interiora tua, debere te oll'erre igni altaris, ut purgentur omnia interiora tua, et dicas ct tu, sicut et David dicebat "z Benedic, anima mea, Dominmn, et omnia interiora mea nomen sanctum ejus. Nisi enim ablata fuerit crassitudo illa quae tegit interiora tua, non possunt subtilem et Spiritalcm capere sensum, nec possunt intellectum capere sapientiaz, et ideo Dominum laudare non possunt. Quod si ablatum fuerit omne quod pingue est de renibus, et omnibus interioribus viscerum , tunc vere purgatus omni vitio libidinis jugulasti hostiam pro delicto, et obtulisti sacrificium Deo in odorem suavitatis. Sacerdotis, inquit , qui olTeret et repropitiabit illud, ipsius erit. Discant sacerdotes Domini, qui Ecclesiis praesunt, quia pars eis dat-a est eum his, quorum delicta reprOpitiaverint. Quid autem est repropitiare delictum? Si assumpseris peccatorem, et monendo, hortando, docendo, instruendo, adduxeris eum ad pmnitenliam, ab errore correxeris, a vitiis emendaveris, et cfl‘eecris eum talem, ut ei converso prOpitius fiat Deus pro delicto, repropitiasse diceris. Si ergo talis fueris sacerdos, et talis fuerit doctrina tua et. sermo tuus, pars tibi datur eorum quos correxeris; ut illorum meritum tua merces sit, et illorum salus tua gloria. Aut non et Apostolus hazc ostendit, ubi dicit ’, quia ‹ quod supermilific:iverit quis mercedem accipiet? Intelligant igitur sacerdotes Domini, ubi eis data portio est, etin hoc vacent atque his operam dent. Non se inanibus et superfiuis actibus implicent, sed sciant se in nullo alio partem habituros apud Deum, nisi in eo quod olTerunt pro peccatis, id est, quod a via peccati converterint peceatores. Notandum ctiam illud est, quod quae ofi‘eruntur in holocaustum, interiora sunt; quod vero exterius est, Domino non oll‘ertur. Pellis Domino non olfertur, nec cedit in holocaustomata. Talis fuit et ille filius Juda, qui dicebatur Her ‘8, quod interpretatur pellis. Propterea et Μαι- pessimus erat, et occidit eum Deus, quia isti tales Domino non olferuntur.
“And this,” he says, “is the law of the ram which is for offence: it is holy of holies. In the place in which they slaughter the burnt offerings, they shall slaughter also the ram which is for offence before the Lord,” and so on. In the divine Scriptures “sin” indeed often seems to be named for “offence”, and “offence” for “sin”, indifferently and without any distinction; in this place, however, it is found to be distinguished. For after giving above the rite and order of the sacrifice in the victim for sin, he now commands separately the sacrifice for offence; and although everything is commanded in the same order and with the same observance, and he adds at the end, “As that which is for sin, so also that which is for offence: there shall be one law for them,” yet he wished to show that there is some difference between those for which he commanded separate sacrifices. In this I think that an offence committed is somewhat lighter than a sin. For we find it said of sin that there is a sin unto death; of offence we do not read that it is said to be unto death. I know, however, also that difference which has seemed right to some of the wise: that an offence is when we do not do what we ought to do, while a sin is when we commit what we ought not to commit. But since we do not always find these things under this distinction in the divine Scriptures, we cannot affirm it generally. The sacrifice which is offered for offence, then, is to be taken in the same way and according to the same tradition as we expounded above concerning that which is for sin. For likewise the fat of the ram, that which is around the kidneys and that which covers the inward parts, is commanded to be laid on the altar: so that you too who hear these things may know that everything within you that is grosser and covers your inward parts you ought to offer to the fire of the altar, so that all your inward parts may be purged, and you too may say, as David said: “Bless the Lord, O my soul, and all that is within me, his holy name.” For unless that grossness which covers your inward parts is taken away, they cannot grasp the subtle and spiritual sense, nor grasp the understanding of wisdom, and therefore they cannot praise the Lord. But if all that is fat has been taken away from the kidneys and from all the inward parts of the bowels, then, truly purged of every vice of lust, you have slaughtered the victim for offence and offered a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness. “It shall belong,” he says, “to the priest who offers it and makes propitiation with it.” Let the priests of the Lord who preside over the churches learn that a portion is given to them with those whose offences they have propitiated. And what is it to propitiate an offence? If you take up a sinner, and by warning, exhorting, teaching, instructing, lead him to repentance, correct him from error, reform him from vices, and make him such that, once he is converted, God becomes propitious to him for his offence, you will be said to have propitiated it. If, then, you are such a priest, and such is your teaching and your word, a portion is given to you of those whom you have corrected; so that their merit may be your reward, and their salvation your glory. Or does not the Apostle too show this, where he says that “what someone has built on, he will receive a reward”? Let the priests of the Lord understand, then, where their portion has been given them, and let them devote themselves to this and give their effort to it. Let them not entangle themselves in empty and superfluous activities, but let them know that they will have a portion with God in nothing else than in what they offer for sins, that is, in having converted sinners from the way of sin. This too must be noted, that what is offered as a burnt offering is the inward parts; what is outward is not offered to the Lord. The hide is not offered to the Lord, nor does it go into the whole burnt offerings. Such was that son of Judah who was called Er, which is interpreted “hide”. Therefore he was very wicked, and God killed him, because such as these are not offered to the Lord.
Lev 7:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 7:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 103:1 (102:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:14 (quotation, medium confidence) · 2 Tim 2:4 (allusion, low confidence) · Gen 38:7 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: An 'offence' is lighter than a 'sin'; the fat offered signifies the grossness within that must be burned away, and the priest's portion is in the sinners he brings to repentance.
- Sources: Lev 7:1–7; 1 John 5:16; Ps 103:1 (LXX 102:1); 1 Cor 3:14; 2 Tim 2:4 (not entangled); Gen 38:7.
- “Offence” renders delictum (Greek πλημμέλεια), “sin” peccatum (ἁμαρτία).
- “Er … interpreted ‘hide’”: from the Hebrew ʿôr, “skin”, an etymology Origen uses elsewhere.
- Paenitentia is rendered “repentance” here (pastoral conversion of a sinner).
- A Migne footnote marker, a page number, and a stray letter are removed by logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; Migne's footnote marker; page number leaked into the text; stray letter; words joined): repropitiahit illud (39.) → repropitiabit illud; merces sit, et 209 illorum → merces sit, et illorum; Talis fuit et ille Ο filius → Talis fuit et ille filius; Intelligantigitur → Intelligant igitur.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 5.4 (PG 12:453a–454b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/4-10/#p-5-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-5-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.