Homilies on Luke 39
Latin text: Migne, PL 26 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 39
39PL 26:303d–306c
De quaestione Sadducaeorum, quam proposueram Domino, mulieris ejus quae septem viros habuit; et rursus de denario quem sibi Salvator jussit ostendi. Cap. XX. Est haeresis in Judaeis, quae dicitur Sadducaeorum, haec resurrectionem mortuorum negat, et putat animam interire cum corpore, nec post mortem ultra respirare. Igitur quaestionem Domino proponente, composuerunt fabulam mulieris septem virorum, quae post primum virum ad resuscitandum semen prioris alterum duxerit: quo mortuo, tertium quoque, et rursum quartum: atque in hunc modum ad septimum usque pervenerat. Quaeritur ergo in resurrectione mortuorum, quis eam sibi e septem fratribus sit vindicaturus uxorem. Hoc autem problema insidiantes verbis Salvatoris, eo tempore proposuerunt, quo eum viderant de resurrectione docere discipulos. Quibus respondens Salvator ait: Erratis, nescientes Scripturas, neque virtutem Dei. In resurrectione enim mortuorum neque nubent, neque nubentur, sed erunt sicut angeli in caelis. Qui erunt sicut angeli, utique angeli erunt. Simulque discendum, quod angeli connubia non habeant. Hic vero ubi mors, et nuptiae, et liberi necessarii sunt: ubi immortales, nec conjugio opus est, nec filiis. Proponam mihi quaestionem valde molestam, et quae non facile solvitur, ex persona eorum, qui studiosissimi Scripturarum sunt, et die ac nocte meditantur in Lege Domini (Ps. i). Ubi, inquiunt, scriptum est: Quia neque nubent, neque nubentur? Tam vetus quam novum Testamentum memoria ac mente perlustrans, nusquam memini tale quid relatum. Quod si forte me fallit, qui plus novit doceat. Libenter disco quod nescio. Sed quantum ego existimo, nec in veteri, nec in novo instrumento quidquam tale reperiet. Omnis ergo eorum error de prophetica, quam non intelligunt, lectione surrexit: e quibus illud est in Isaia: Lecti mei non habebunt liberos in maledictionem (Isai, lxv). Et in Deuteronomio in benedictionibus: Benedicti filii uteri tui (Deut. xxviii). Et putant haec futura in resurrectione, non intelligentes spiritales benedictiones esse praedictas. Paulus enim vas electionis, omnes has benedictiones, quae ponuntur in Lege, spiritaliter interpretans, et sciens non esse carnales, ad Ephesios loquitur: Benedictus Deus, et Pater Domini nostri Jesu Christi, qui benedixit nos in omni benedictione spiritali, cum a mortuis resurgentes aeternam beatitudinem consequeremur Sed et in psalmis simile quid reperientes, eodem labuntur errore Uxor, inquit, tua sicut vitis abundans in lateribus domus tuae filii tui sicut novella olivarum in circuitu mensa tuae (Ps. cxxvii), usque ad eum locum ubi ait: Benedicat te Dominus ex Sion, et videas quae bona sunt Jerusalem. Ergo cum instructa fuerit Jerusalem, et instaurata in antiquum statum, tunc visurus est bona quae Scriptura commemorat. Qui spiritaliter intelligunt Jerusalem, et de ea dici sciunt quae coelestis est, quae sursum est, quae est mater nostra (Gal, iv): videbunt bona illius, de quibus saepe diximus, et id quod nunc de psalmo posuimus: Uxor tua sicut vitis abundans in lateribus domus tuae, filii tui sicut novellae olivarum in circuitu mensa tuae. Quae omnia corporaliter intelligentibus Sadducaeis, qui erant portio Judaeorum, dicit Salvator: Nescitis Scripturas, neque virtutem Dei, Haec de quaestione, quam Sadducaei Domino proposuerunt, breviter dicta sint. Porro quod adjectum est de imagine Caesaris, etiam super hoc debemus pauca perstringere. Putant quidam a Salvatore dictum esse simpliciter: Reddite quae sunt Caesaris, Caesari, id est, tributum reddite quod debetis. Quis enim nostrum de tributis reddendis Caesari contradicit? Habet igitur locus quiddam mystici atque secreti. Duae sunt imagines hominis, unam quam accepit a Deo factus in principio, sicut in Genesi scriptum est: Juxta imaginem et similitudinem Dei (Gen. i); altera choici, id est, terreni, postquam propter inobedientiam atque peccatum ejectus de paradiso assumpsit eam, principis saeculi hujus suasus illecebris. Sicut enim nummus atque denarius habet imaginem imperatorum mundi; sic qui facit opera rectoris tenebrarum istarum, portat imaginem ejus cujus habet opera; quam praecepit Jesus esse reddendam et projiciendam de vultu nostro, assumendamque eam imaginem, juxta quam a principio ad similitudinem Dei conditi sumus. Atque ita fit, ut quae Caesaris sunt, Caesari, et quae Dei, reddamus Deo. Ostendite, inquit, mihi nummum. Pro quo in Matthaeo scribitur denarius. Quem cum accepisset, ait: Cujus scriptionem habet? Qui respondentes, dixerunt: Caesaris. Ad quos rursum; reddite ergo, inquit, quae sunt Caesaris Caesari, et quae sunt Dei Deo. Quorum consequentiam et Paulus locutus est, dicens: Sicut portavimus imaginem choici, portemus et imaginem caelestis (I Cor. xv). Quod ergo ait: Reddite quae sunt Caesaris Caesari, hoc dicit: Deponite personam choici, abjicite imaginem terrenam, ut possitis vobis personam coelestis imponentes, reddere quae sunt Dei Deo. Repetit nos Deus. Quidnam repetit? Lege Moysen: Et nunc quid Dominus repetit a te? et reliqua quae sequuntur. Postulat igitur a nobis Deus, et deprecatur, non quia necessarium habet aliquid, ut ei tribuamus: postulat et postquam ei dederimus, idipsum tribuat in salutem. Quod ut manifestius fiat, ponam parabolam mnarum. Qui unam acceperat mnam, et fecerat decem; et obtulit Domino, a quo sibi credita mna fuerat, accepit et aliam quam antea non habebat. Illius enim mnam, qui non multiplicaverat quod accepit, jubet Dominus auferri, et dari ei qui alias habet. Tollite, inquit, mnam, et date ei qui habet decem mnas. Atque in hunc modum quae dederimus Deo, nobis ea ipsa restituet cum his quae ante non habueramus. Exigit et postulat a nobis Deus, ut habeat occasionem donandi, ut ipsi tribuat qui erogavit. Ipsius enim gratia duplicata est mna, et dignus quibusque plus datum est quam sperabant. Quapropter surgentes oremus Deum, ut digni simus offerre ei munera quae nobis restituat, et pro terrenis coelestia largiatur, in Christo Jesu, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the question of the Sadducees which they put to the Lord, about the woman who had seven husbands; and again on the denarius which the Saviour ordered to be shown to him. Chapter 20. There is a sect among the Jews called the Sadducees; it denies the resurrection of the dead and holds that the soul perishes with the body and does not breathe again after death. So, putting a question to the Lord, they made up a story of a woman with seven husbands, who after her first husband married a second to raise up seed for the former; and when he died, a third, and again a fourth; and in this way she had come to the seventh. The question is asked, then, which of the seven brothers will claim her as wife in the resurrection of the dead. They put forward this problem, laying a trap for the Saviour’s words, at the time when they had seen him teaching his disciples about the resurrection. The Saviour answered them: “You are wrong, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection of the dead they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but will be like the angels in heaven.” Those who will be like angels will surely be angels. And at the same time we learn that angels do not have marriages. Here, where there is death, marriage and children are necessary; where there are immortals, there is need neither of marriage nor of children. I will put to myself a very troublesome question, not easily solved, in the person of those who are most zealous for the Scriptures and meditate day and night on the law of the Lord (Ps 1:2). Where, they say, is it written, “They neither marry nor are given in marriage”? Going over both the Old and the New Testament in memory and mind, I do not remember such a thing related anywhere. If perhaps it escapes me, let one who knows more teach me; I gladly learn what I do not know. But as far as I can judge, he will find nothing of the kind in either the Old or the New Testament. The whole error of these people arose from the prophetic readings, which they do not understand; among them is this in Isaiah: “My elect will not have children for a curse” (Isa 65:23). And in Deuteronomy, among the blessings: “Blessed are the children of your womb” (Deut 28:4). And they think these things will be in the resurrection, not understanding that spiritual blessings were foretold. For Paul, the chosen vessel, interpreting spiritually all these blessings set down in the law, and knowing that they are not fleshly, says to the Ephesians: “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing” (Eph 1:3), when, rising from the dead, we attain eternal blessedness. And finding something similar in the psalms, they slip into the same error: “Your wife,” it says, “like a fruitful vine on the sides of your house; your children like young olive shoots around your table,” up to the place where it says, “May the Lord bless you from Zion, and may you see the good things of Jerusalem” (Ps 128:3–5). So, they say, when Jerusalem has been rebuilt and restored to its ancient state, then he will see the good things that Scripture records. Those who understand Jerusalem spiritually, and know that this is said of the Jerusalem which is heavenly, which is above, which is our mother (Gal 4:26), will see its good things, of which we have often spoken, and what we have just quoted from the psalm: “Your wife like a fruitful vine on the sides of your house, your children like young olive shoots around your table.” To the Sadducees, a part of the Jews, who understood all this bodily, the Saviour says: “You do not know the Scriptures nor the power of God.” Let this be said briefly about the question the Sadducees put to the Lord. Further, on what is added about the image of Caesar we must touch on a few points too. Some think the Saviour meant simply, “Render the things that are Caesar’s to Caesar,” that is, pay the tribute you owe. But which of us objects to paying tribute to Caesar? The passage, then, has something mystical and secret. There are two images of man: one which he received from God when he was made in the beginning, as is written in Genesis, “after the image and likeness of God” (Gen 1:26); the other, that of the man of dust, that is, the earthly, which he took on after he was cast out of paradise because of disobedience and sin, persuaded by the allurements of the prince of this age. For as a coin or denarius bears the image of the emperors of the world, so he who does the works of the ruler of this darkness bears the image of him whose works he does; and Jesus commanded that this image be rendered and cast away from our face, and that we take up that image after which from the beginning we were made in the likeness of God. And so it comes about that we render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s. “Show me,” he says, “a coin”; for which Matthew writes “denarius.” When he had received it, he said, “Whose inscription does it have?” They answered and said, “Caesar’s.” To them he said again, “Render, then, the things that are Caesar’s to Caesar, and the things that are God’s to God.” In agreement with this Paul too spoke, saying, “As we have borne the image of the man of dust, let us bear also the image of the heavenly man” (1 Cor 15:49). When he says, then, “Render the things that are Caesar’s to Caesar,” he means: lay aside the person of the man of dust, cast away the earthly image, so that, putting on the person of the heavenly man, you may render to God the things that are God’s. God asks something back from us. What does he ask back? Read Moses: “And now what does the Lord ask of you?” and the rest that follows. God, then, asks of us and entreats us, not because he needs anything that we should give him; he asks so that, after we have given it to him, he may give that very thing back for our salvation. To make this clearer, I will set out the parable of the minas. He who had received one mina and made ten, and offered it to the Lord by whom the mina had been entrusted to him, received another as well, which he did not have before. For the Lord commands the mina of him who had not multiplied what he received to be taken away and given to him who has the others. “Take away,” he says, “the mina and give it to him who has ten minas” (Luke 19:24). In this way what we give to God he will restore to us, together with what we did not have before. God demands and asks of us so that he may have occasion to give, so that he may give to the very one who paid out. For by his grace the mina was multiplied, and to each who was worthy more was given than he hoped. Therefore let us rise and pray God that we may be worthy to offer him gifts which he may restore to us, and that he may grant heavenly things in place of earthly ones, in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 20:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 22:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 20:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:36 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 1:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 65:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 28:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 9:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 128:3 (127:3 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 128:5 (127:5 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 4:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 20:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 20:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:49 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 10:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 19:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 19:24 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against the Sadducees, the risen do not marry but are like the angels, and the blessings of children promised in Scripture are spiritual; “render to Caesar” means casting off the earthly image and restoring God’s image, which God asks of us in order to give back more.
- “Those who will be like angels will surely be angels” is Origen’s inference, translated as written. The objection that “they neither marry nor are given in marriage” is not found in the Old Testament is put in the mouth of zealous readers of Scripture. “What does the Lord ask of you?” is Deut 10:12. “The person” renders persona (also “mask”). The Sadducees’ denial of the resurrection is Luke 20:27.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (split word); OCR and footnote letter; footnote letter): mulieris ejus qnae → mulieris ejus quae; Domino preponente → Domino proponente; semen prio(??)is → semen prioris; sicut angel(??), utique a angeli erunt → sicut angeli, utique angeli erunt; Liben(??)er → Libenter; OmniS ergo → Omnis ergo; Et putant baec → Et putant haec; benedictione ipiritali → benedictione spiritali; Jerusalem, ei instaurata → Jerusalem, et instaurata; tune visurus → tunc visurus; qurae sursum est → quae sursum est; nunc da psalmo → nunc de psalmo; in ci cuitu → in circuitu; intelligenlihus Sadducaeis, a qui erant porlio → intelligentibus Sadducaeis, qui erant portio; Porro b quod → Porro quod; eliam super hoc → etiam super hoc; Cae· sa(??)is → Caesaris; nos(??)rum → nostrum; qu(??)m praecepit → quam praecepit; consequen(??)iam → consequentiam; Paulus loculus est → Paulus locutus est; in hune modum → in hunc modum; coele(??)tia → coelestia; saecula saecculorum → saecula saeculorum.
Topics: Marriage, Eschatology, Divorce and remarriage
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 39 (PL 26:303d–306c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/39/#p-39). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-39) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.