Against Marcion 4.43
Summary: The burial, the women at the tomb, the road to Emmaus, and the risen Christ's showing of his hands and feet all fulfill the prophets and prove his real body, so that the Christ of Marcion's own gospel is the Creator's Christ.
Textual problem in this passage: the printed text is uncertain or disputed here. See the notes.
Latin text · CSEL 47:565–568
Oportuerat etiam sepultorem domini prophetari ac iam tunc merito benedici, si nec mulierum illarum officium praeterit prophetia, quae ante lucem conuenerunt ad sepulcrum cum odorum paratura. de hoc enim per Osee: et quaerent, inquit, faciem meam; ante lucem uigilabunt ad me dicentes: eamus et conuertamur ad dominum, quia ipse eripuit [dixit] et curabit nos, percussit et miserebitur nostri, sanabit nos post biduum, in die tertia resurgemus. quis enim haec non credat in recogitatu mulierum illarum uolutata inter dolorem praesentis destitutionis, qua percussae sibi uidebantur a domino, et spem resurrectionis ipsius, qua restitutum iri se arbitrabantur? corpore autem non inuento sublata erat sepultura eius de medio secundum Esaiam. sed et duo ibidem angeli apparuerunt. tot fere laterensibus uti solebat in duobus testibus consistens dei sermo. reuertentes quoque a sepulcro mulieres et ab illa angelorum uisione prospiciebat Esaias: mulieres, inquit, [uenite] uenientes a uisione, uenite, ad renuntiandam scilicet domini resurrectionem. Bene autem, quod incredulitas discipulorum perseuerabat, ut in finem usque defensio nostra consisteret Christum Iesum non alium se discipulis edidisse quam prophetarum. nam cum duo ex illis iter agerent et dominus eis adhaesisset, non comparens quod ipse esset, etiam dissimulans de conscientia rei gestae: nos autem putabamus, inquiunt, ipsum esse redemptorem Israhelis, utique suum Christum, id est creatoris. adeo nec alium se ediderat illis. ceterum non existimarent eum creatoris, et cum creatoris existimaretur, non sustinuisset hanc de se existimationem, si non is esset, qui existimabatur. aut ipse erit auctor erroris et praeuaricator ueritatis aduersus dei optimi titulum. sed nec post resurrectionem alium se eis ostendit quam quem existimatum sibi dixerant. plane inuectus est in illos: o insensati et tardi corde in non credendo omnibus, quae locutus est ad uos. quaenam locutus? alterius se dei esse? proba, et manus dedo. an eadem et angeli ad mulieres: rememoramini, quae locutus sit uobis in Galilaea dicens, quod oportet tradi filium hominis et crucifigi et tertia die resurgere? et quare oportebat, nisi quia ita a deo creatore scriptum? igitur increpuit illos ut de sola passione scandalizatos et ut dubios de fide resurrectionis adnuntiatae sibi a feminis, per quae non crediderant ipsum fuisse, quem existimauerant. itaque quod existimauerant, id uolens credi se eum se confirmabat, quem existimauerant, creatoris scilicet Christum, redemptorem Israhelis. De corporis autem ueritate quid potest clarius? cum haesitantibus eis, ne phantasma esset, immo phantasma credentibus: quid turbati estis? (in quit,) et quid cogitationes subeunt in corda uestra? uidete manus meas et pedes, quia ipse ego sum, quoniam spiritus ossa non habet, sicut me habentem uidetis. et Marcion quaedam contraria sibi illa, credo, industria eradere de euangelio suo noluit, ut ex his, quae eradere potuit nec erasit, illa, quae erasit, aut negetur erasisse aut merito erasisse dicatur; nec parcit nisi eis, quae non minus aliter interpretando quam delendo subuertit. uult itaque sic dictum: spiritus ossa non habet, sicut me uidetis habentem, quasi ad spiritum referatur sicut me uidetis habentem, id est non habentem ossa, sicut et spiritus. et quae ratio tortuositatis istius, cum simpliciter pronuntiare potuisset: quia spiritus ossa non habet, sicut me uidetis non habentem? cur autem inspectui eorum manus et pedes suos offert, quae membra ex ossibus constant, si ossa non habebat? cur adicit: et scitote, quia ego sum, quem scilicet corporeum retro nouerant? aut si phantasma erat usquequaque, cur illos phantasma credentes increpabat? atquin adhuc eis non credentibus propterea cibum desiderauit, ut se ostenderet etiam dentes habere. Impleuimus, ut opinor, sponsionem. exhibuimus Iesum Christum prophetarum doctrinis sententiis adfectibus sensibus uirtutibus passionibus etiam resurrectione non alium quam creatoris, siquidem et apostolos mittens ad praedicandum uniuersis nationibus in omnem terram exire sonum eorum et in terminos terrae uoces eorum psalmum adimplendo praecepit. misereor tui, Marcion; frustra laborasti. Christus enim Iesus in euangelio tuo meus est.
English · Claude translation
The one who buried the Lord had to be foretold too, and even then deservedly blessed, if prophecy did not pass over even the service of those women who came together at the tomb before dawn with the spices they had prepared. For of this he speaks through Hosea: “And they will seek my face; before dawn they will watch for me, saying: Let us go and return to the Lord, for he has torn and he will heal us; he has struck and he will have mercy on us; he will heal us after two days; on the third day we shall rise again.” For who would not believe that these words were turning over in the minds of those women, between the grief of their present bereavement, by which they seemed to themselves to have been struck by the Lord, and the hope of his resurrection, by which they thought they would be restored? But since the body was not found, his burial had been taken away from the midst, according to Isaiah. And two angels also appeared there. God's word, which stands on two witnesses, used generally to employ about that many attendants. The women too returning from the tomb and from that vision of angels Isaiah foresaw: “Women,” he says, “coming from the vision, come,” namely to announce the Lord's resurrection.
And it is well that the disciples' unbelief persisted, so that our defense might stand firm to the end: that Christ Jesus revealed himself to the disciples as no other than the Christ of the prophets. For when two of them were on a journey and the Lord had joined them, without its being apparent that it was he, and even feigning ignorance of what had happened, they said: “But we thought that he was the redeemer of Israel,” surely meaning their own Christ, that is, the Creator's. So far had he been from revealing himself to them as another. Otherwise they would not have thought him the Creator's; and when he was thought to be the Creator's, he would not have tolerated this opinion of himself if he were not the one he was thought to be. Or he himself will be the author of error and a betrayer of the truth, contrary to the title of the most good god. But neither after the resurrection did he show himself to them as other than the one they had told him they thought he was. He plainly inveighed against them: “O foolish and slow of heart in not believing all that he spoke to you.” What had he spoken? That he belonged to another god? Prove it, and I surrender. Or the same things the angels said to the women: “Remember what he said to you in Galilee, saying that the Son of Man must be betrayed and crucified and rise on the third day”? And why “must,” unless because it had been so written by God the Creator? So he rebuked them as men offended at the passion alone and doubtful about the resurrection announced to them by the women, and because of this they had not believed that he was the one they had thought him to be. So, wishing them to believe what they had thought, he confirmed that he was the one they had thought him to be, namely the Creator's Christ, the redeemer of Israel.
And as for the reality of his body, what could be clearer? When they hesitated whether he might be a phantom, or rather believed him to be a phantom, he says: “Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself; for a spirit does not have bones, as you see that I have.” And Marcion was unwilling to erase from his gospel certain things that tell against him — deliberately, I suppose — so that, from what he could have erased and did not, it might either be denied that he erased what he did erase, or be said that he had good reason to erase it; and he spares only those passages which he subverts no less by misinterpreting than he would by deleting. So he wants it to have been said thus: “A spirit does not have bones, as you see me having,” as though “as you see me having” referred to the spirit, that is, not having bones, like a spirit. And what is the reason for this contortion, when he could simply have said: “Because a spirit does not have bones, as you see me not having”? And why does he offer to their inspection his hands and feet, which are members made of bones, if he did not have bones? Why does he add, “And know that it is I,” whom, of course, they had known before as having a body? Or if he was a phantom through and through, why did he rebuke them for believing him a phantom? But in fact, when they still did not believe, he asked for food, so as to show that he had teeth too.
We have fulfilled our undertaking, I think. We have exhibited Jesus Christ, in his teachings, sayings, affections, thoughts, mighty works, sufferings, and even his resurrection, as the Christ of the prophets and none other than the Creator's, since also, in sending the apostles to preach to all nations, he commanded them in fulfillment of the psalm: that their sound should go out into all the earth and their words to the ends of the earth. I pity you, Marcion: you have labored in vain. For the Christ Jesus in your gospel is mine.
About this passage
Notes
Translation notes
- The quotations and allusions are Luke 23:50–53; Ps 1:1; Luke 24:1–47; Hos 5:15–6:2; Isa 57:2 and Isa 27:11 (both in the Greek form); Deut 19:15; Ps 19:4 (18:5 Vulg.). Tertullian reports that Marcion's gospel kept Luke 24:39 but read it to mean that Christ, like a spirit, had no bones. Two corrections restore “Jesus” where the digital text has legum (misread for Iesum). The word restitutuiri is taken as restitutum iri (“would be restored”). The editor deletes as spurious dixit (after eripuit) and the first uenite (before uenientes); they are left out of the translation.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (letters misread in the digital text; name misread in the digital text; stray character in the digital text; stray point in the digital text; words run together and misread in the digital text; words run together in the digital text): restitutuiri → restitutum iri; prospiciebatEsaias → prospiciebat Esaias; Bene autem,I quod → Bene autem, quod; Christum legum non alium → Christum Iesum non alium; creatoris,I et → creatoris, et; aut ipse! erit → aut ipse erit; potuisset:. quia → potuisset: quia; exhibuimus legum Christum → exhibuimus Iesum Christum; resun-ectione → resurrectione.
Cite this passage
Tertullian, Marc. 4.43 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-marcionem/4/43/).
Plain text
Tertullian, Marc. 4.43 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-marcionem/4/43/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text