On Patience 5

Summary: Impatience was born in the devil, who could not bear God's favor to man; through it Eve and Adam sinned, Cain murdered, and Israel repeatedly rebelled; every sin springs from impatience.

Textual problem in this passage: the printed text is uncertain or disputed here. See the notes.

Show

Latin text · CSEL 47:6–10

Verumtamen procudere disputationem de necessariis fidei non est otiosum, quia nec infructuosum. loquacitas in aedificatione nulla turpis, si quando turpis. itaque si de aliquo bono sermo est, res postulat contrarium quoque boni recensere. quid enim sectandum sit, magis inluminabis, si, quid uitandum sit, proinde digesseris. consideremus igitur de impatientia, an sicut patientia in deo, ita aduersaria eius in aduersario nostro nata atque comperta sit, ut ex isto appareat, quam principaliter fidei aduersetur. nam quod ab aemulo dei conceptum est utique non est amicum dei rebus. eadem discordia est rerum quae et auctorum. porro cum deus optimus, diabolus e contrario pessimus, ipsa sui diuersitate testantur neutrum alterius facere, ut nobis non magis a malo aliquid boni quam a bono aliquid mali editum uideri possit. igitur natales impatientiae in ipso diabolo deprehendo, iam tunc, cum dominum deum uniuersa opera, quae fecisset, imagini suae, id est homini, subiecisse impatienter tulit nec enim doluisset, si sustinuisset, nec inuidisset homini, si non doluisset. adeo decepit eum, quia inuiderat; inuiderat autem, quia doluerat; doluerat (autem,) quia patienter utique non tulerat. quid prius fuerit ille angelus perditionis, malus an impatiens, contemno quaerere, palam cum sit aut impatientiam ab malitia aut malitiam ab impatientia auspicatam deinde inter se conspirasse et indiuiduas in uno patris sinu adoleuisse. at enim quam prius senserat, per quam [primus] delinquere intrauerat, de suo experimento quid ad peccandum adiutaret (in)structus, eandem impingendo in crimen homini aduocauit. conuenta statim illi mulier, non temere dixerim, per conloquium ipsum eius afflata est spiritu impatientia infecto. usque adeo numquam omnino peccasset, si diuino interdicto patientiam perseruasset. quid, quod non sustinuit sola conuenta, sed apud Adam, nondum maritum, nondum aures sibi debentem, impatiens etiam tacendi est ac traducem illum eius, quod a malo hauserat, facit? perit igitur et alius homo per impatientiam alterius, perit(urus) mox et ipse per impatientiam suam utrobique commissam et circa dei praemonitionem et circa diaboli circumscriptionem, illam seruare, hanc refutare non sustinens. hinc prima iudicii, unde delicti, origo; hinc deus irasci exorsus, unde offendere homo inductus. [inde in deo prima patientia, unde indignatio prima, qui tunc maledictione sola contentus ab animaduersionis impetu in diabolo temptatoris] aut quod crimen ante istud impatientiae admissum homini imputatur? innocens erat et deo de proximo amicus et paradisi colonus. at ubi semel succidit impatientiae, desiuit deo sapere, desiuit caelestia sustinere posse, exinde homo, terrae datus et ab oculis dei eiectus, facile usurpari ab impatientia coepit in omne, quod deum offenderet. nam statim illa semine diaboli concepta malitiae fecunditate iram filium procreauit, editum suis artibus erudiit. quod enim ipsa Adam et Euam morti inmerserat, docuit et filium ab homicidio incipere. frustra istud impatientiae adscripserim, si Cain ille primus homicida et primus fratricida oblationes suas a domino recusatas aequanimiter nec impatienter tulit, si iratus fratri suo non est, si neminem denique interemit. cum uero nec occidere potuerit nisi iratus nec irasci nisi impatiens, demonstrat quod per iram gessit ad eam referendum, a qua ira suggesta est. [per] haec impatientiae tunc infantis quodammodo incunabula. ceterum quanta mox incrementa! nec mirum. nam si prima deliquit, consequens est, ut, quia prima, idcirco et sola sit matrix in omne delictum, defundens de suo fonte uarias criminum uenas. de homicidio quidem dictum est. sed ira editum a primordio, etiam quascumque postmodum causas sibi inuenit ad impatientiam ut ad originem sui confert. siue enim quis inimicitiis siue praedae gratia id scelus conficit, prius est, ut aut odii aut auaritiae fiat impatiens. quidquid compellit, sine impatientia scelus non est ut perfici possit. quis adulterium sine libidinis impatientia subiit? quod et si pretio in feminis cogitur, uenditio illa pudicitiae utique impatientia contemnendi lucri ordinatur. haec ut principalia penes dominum delicta. nam ut compendio dictum sit, omne peccatum impatientiae adscribendum. malum impatientia est boni. nemo impudicus non impatiens pudicitiae et improbus probitatis et impius pietatis et inquietus quietis. ut malus unusquisque fiat, bonus perseuerare non poterit. talis igitur excetra delictorum cur non dominum offendat improbatorem malorum? an non ipsum quoque Israhel per impatientiam semper in deum deliquisse manifestum est, exinde, cum oblitus brachii caelestis, quo Aegyptiis adflictationibus fuerat extractus, de Aaron deos sibi duces postulat, cum in idolum auri sui conlationes defundit? tam necessarias enim Moysei cum domino congredientis impatienter exceperat moras. post mannae escatilem pluuiam, post petrae aquatilem sequellam desperant de domino, tridui sitim non sustinendo. nam haec quoque illis impatientia a domino exprobratur. ac ne singula peruagemur: numquam non per impatientiam delinquendo (per impatientiam) perierunt. quomodo autem manus prophetis intulerunt, nisi per impatientiam audiendi? domino autem ipso, per impatientiam etiam uidendi. quodsi patientiam inissent, liberarentur.

English · Claude translation

Nevertheless, to forge out a discussion of things necessary to faith is not idle, because it is not fruitless. Talkativeness in edification is never shameful, if it is ever shameful. So if the subject is some good, the case requires that its contrary also be reviewed. For you will throw more light on what is to be pursued if you set out likewise what is to be avoided. Let us consider, then, whether, just as patience was born and found in God, so its adversary, impatience, was born and found in our adversary, so that from this it may appear how fundamentally it is opposed to faith. For what was conceived by God's rival is certainly not friendly to the things of God. The discord of things is the same as that of their authors. Further, since God is supremely good and the devil, on the contrary, supremely evil, by their very difference they testify that neither acts for the other, so that it cannot seem to us that anything good is produced by evil any more than anything evil by good. I find, then, the birth of impatience in the devil himself, already at the time when he bore impatiently that the Lord God had subjected all the works he had made to his own image, that is, to man. For he would not have grieved if he had endured it, nor envied man if he had not grieved. So he deceived him because he had envied him; and he had envied because he had grieved; and he had grieved because, of course, he had not borne it patiently. Which that angel of perdition was first, evil or impatient, I do not care to ask, since it is plain that either impatience began from malice or malice from impatience, and that they then conspired together and grew up inseparable in the one bosom of their father. But that which he had felt first, through which he had entered upon sinning, instructed by his own experience in what helps toward sin, he called in against man, to drive him into crime. The woman, as soon as he met her, was (I would not say it rashly) breathed upon, through the very conversation, with a spirit infected by impatience. Indeed, she would never have sinned at all if she had kept patience toward the divine prohibition. What of the fact that she did not endure having been met alone, but, before Adam, not yet her husband, not yet owing her his ears, she is impatient even of keeping silent, and makes him the transmitter of what she had drawn from the evil one? So the other human being too perishes through the impatience of another, soon himself to perish through his own impatience, committed in both directions, both concerning God's forewarning and concerning the devil's deceit: not enduring to keep the one or to refute the other. Here the origin of judgment lies where that of sin lies; here God began to be angry where man was led to offend. Or what crime before this one of impatience is imputed to man? He was innocent, a close friend of God, and a tiller of paradise. But once he gave way to impatience, he ceased to savor God, ceased to be able to endure heavenly things. From then on man, given to the earth and cast out from the sight of God, began easily to be seized by impatience for everything that would offend God. For at once, conceived from the seed of the devil, with the fertility of malice, it produced a son, anger, and trained its offspring in its own arts. For what had plunged Adam and Eve into death it taught the son too, to begin with murder. In vain would I ascribe this to impatience, if Cain, that first murderer and first fratricide, bore the refusal of his offerings by the Lord calmly and not impatiently; if he was not angry with his brother; if, in short, he killed no one. But since he could neither kill unless angry, nor be angry unless impatient, it shows that what he did through anger must be referred to that from which anger was prompted. These were in a manner the cradle of impatience, then an infant. But how great its growth soon was! Nor is it surprising. For if it was the first to sin, it follows that, because it was the first, it is for that very reason the sole womb of every sin, pouring out from its spring the various veins of crimes. Of murder something has been said. But, born of anger from the beginning, whatever causes it later finds for itself it refers to impatience as to its origin. For whether one commits that crime out of enmity or for plunder, it comes first that he becomes impatient either of hatred or of avarice. Whatever drives him, without impatience the crime cannot be accomplished. Who has undertaken adultery without impatience of lust? And if among women it is compelled by a price, that sale of chastity is certainly arranged by impatience of despising gain. These I mention as the chief sins in the Lord's sight. For, to put it briefly, every sin is to be ascribed to impatience. Evil is impatience of good. No one is unchaste who is not impatient of chastity, dishonest of honesty, impious of piety, restless of quiet. In order that each may become evil, he will be unable to persevere in being good. Why then should such a hydra of sins not offend the Lord, the condemner of evils? Is it not plain that Israel too always sinned against God through impatience, from the time when, forgetting the heavenly arm by which it had been drawn out of the afflictions of Egypt, it demanded of Aaron gods as its leaders, when it poured its contributions of gold into an idol? For it had impatiently borne the so necessary delays of Moses conversing with the Lord. After the rain of manna for food, after the water-giving rock that followed them, they despair of the Lord, not enduring a thirst of three days. For this impatience too is reproached them by the Lord. And not to go over details: never ceasing to sin through impatience, they perished through impatience. And how did they lay hands on the prophets, except through impatience of hearing them? On the Lord himself, through impatience even of seeing him. But if they had entered on patience, they would have been set free.

About this passage

Source
CSEL 47:6–10 · Emil Kroymann, ed., Quinti Septimi Florentis Tertulliani Opera, Pars 3, CSEL 47 (Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag, 1906), 1–24 · Latin text: Emil Kroymann (CSEL 47), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in CSEL 47. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; the problem in this passage is discussed in the notes.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Ethics

Notes

Translation notes

  • The editor deletes the word “primus” and the incomplete sentence “inde in deo prima patientia … in diabolo temptatoris” (roughly “thence God's first patience, whence his first indignation, who, content then with a curse alone, … from the onslaught of punishment on the devil the tempter”); they are left untranslated. “Transmitter” renders tradux. “Adultery” renders adulterium. The allusions are Gen 1:26–28; Gen 3:1–6; Gen 3:14–19; Gen 4:3–8; Exod 32:1–4; Exod 16; Exod 15:22 and 17:1–7 (1 Cor 10:4); Matt 23:37.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray character in the digital text; stray hyphen in the digital text; stray punctuation in the digital text): -nec inuidisset → nec inuidisset; est, at, quia → est, ut, quia; + defundens → defundens; impatientiam at ad → impatientiam ut ad; sine enim quis → siue enim quis; cogitur., → cogitur,.

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Pat. 5 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-patientia/5/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Pat. 5 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-patientia/5/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage