Prescription against Heretics 30

Summary: Marcion, Valentinus, and Apelles were recent, expelled from the church at Rome, and their own innovations prove them later than the truth; they cannot show apostolic authority or apostolic miracles.

Textual problem in this passage: the printed text is uncertain or disputed here. See the notes.

Show

Latin text · Oehler 2:26–29

Ubi tunc Marcion, Ponticus nauclerus, Stoicae studiosus? Ubi tunc Valentinus, Platonicae sectator? Nam constat illos neque adeo olim fuisse, Antonini fere principatu, et in catholicae primo doctrinam credidisse apud ecclesiam Romanensem sub episcopatu Eleutheri benedicti, donec ob inquietam semper curiositatem, qua fratres quoque vitiabant, semel et iterum eiecti, Marcion quidem cum ducentis sestertiis quae ecclesiae intulerat, novissime in perpetuum discidium relegati venena doctrinarum suarum disseminaverunt. Postmodum Marcion paenitentiam confessus cum condicioni datae sibi occurrit, ita pacem recepturus, si ceteros quos perditioni erudisset ecclesiae restitueret, morte praeventus est. Oportebat enim haereses esse. Nec tamen ideo bonum haereses quia esse eas oportebat. Quasi non et malum oportuerit esse. Nam et dominum tradi oportebat, sed vae traditori, ne quis etiam hinc haereses defendat. Si et Apellis stemma retractandum est, tam non vetus et ipse quam Marcion institutor et praeformator eius, sed lapsus in feminam desertor continentiae Marcionensis ab oculis sanctissimi magistri Alexandriam secessit. Inde post annos regressus non melior, nisi tantum qua iam non Marcionites, in alteram feminam impegit, illam virginem Philumenen, quam supra edidimus, postea vero immane prostibulum et ipsam, cuius energemate circumventus quae ab ea didicit Phaneroseis scripsit. Adhuc in saeculo supersunt qui meminerint eorum, etiam proprii discentes et successores ipsorum, ne posteriores negare possint. Quamquam et de operibus suis, ut dixit dominus, revincuntur. Si enim Marcion novum testamentum a vetere separavit, posterior est eo quod separavit, quia separare non posset nisi quod unitum fuit. Unitum ergo antequam separaretur postea factum separatum posteriorem ostendit separatorem. Item Valentinus aliter exponens et sine dubio emendans hoc nomine quicquid emendat, ut mendosum retro, alterius fuisse demonstrat. Hos ut insigniores et frequentiores adulteros veritatis nominamus. Ceterum et Nigidius nescio qui, et Hermogenes, et multi alii adhuc ambulant pervertentes vias domini. Ostendant mihi ex qua auctoritate prodierint? Si alium deum praedicant, quomodo eius dei rebus et litteris et nominibus utuntur adversus quem praedicant? si eundem, quomodo aliter? Probent se novos apostolos esse?, dicant Christum iterum descendisse, iterum ipsum docuisse, iterum crucifixum, iterum mortuum, iterum resuscitatum. Sic enim apostolus descripsit, sic enim apostolos solet facere, dare praeterea illis virtutem eadem signa edendi quae et ipse. Volo igitur et virtutes eorum proferri; nisi quod agnosco maximam virtutem eorum qua apostolos in perversum aemulantur. Illi enim de mortuis vivos faciebant, isti de vivis mortuos faciunt.

English · Claude translation

Where was Marcion then, the shipmaster of Pontus, the devotee of Stoicism? Where was Valentinus then, the follower of Platonism? For it is well known that they lived not so very long ago, about the reign of Antoninus, and that at first they believed the catholic doctrine in the church of Rome under the episcopate of the blessed Eleutherus, until, because of their ever restless curiosity, with which they corrupted the brothers too, they were expelled once and again (Marcion, indeed, with the two hundred sesterces he had brought to the church), and at last, banished to permanent separation, they spread the poisons of their doctrines. Afterwards Marcion professed repentance and accepted the condition set him, that he would receive peace if he restored to the church the others whom he had trained for perdition; but he was overtaken by death. For there had to be heresies. Yet heresies are not good because there had to be heresies; as if there did not also have to be evil! For the Lord too had to be betrayed, but woe to the betrayer; so let no one defend heresies on this ground either. If the pedigree of Apelles also must be traced, he too is no more ancient than Marcion, his founder and model; but, having fallen with a woman, a deserter from Marcionite continence, he withdrew from the sight of his most holy master to Alexandria. Returning from there years later no better, except that he was no longer a Marcionite, he ran into another woman, that virgin Philumene whom we mentioned above, who afterwards became a monstrous prostitute herself; ensnared by her energy, he wrote down what he learned from her as “Revelations.” There are still people in the world who remember them, even their own disciples and successors, so that the later ones cannot deny it. Besides, they are convicted by their own works, as the Lord said. For if Marcion separated the New Testament from the Old, he is later than what he separated, since he could not separate what had not been united. What was united before it was separated, being afterwards made separate, shows that the separator is later. Likewise Valentinus, by expounding differently and without doubt correcting, proves by this very name that whatever he corrects, as faulty before, belonged to another. We name these as the more notable and more frequent adulterers of the truth. But also a certain Nigidius, and Hermogenes, and many others still walk about perverting the ways of the Lord. Let them show me by what authority they came forth! If they preach another God, how do they use the things and writings and names of the God against whom they preach? If the same, why differently? Let them prove that they are new apostles; let them say that Christ has come down again, taught again in person, been crucified again, died again, been raised again. For so the apostle has described him; for so is he accustomed to make apostles, giving them besides the power to perform the same signs as he himself. I want their miracles, then, to be produced too; except that I recognize their greatest miracle, by which they imitate the apostles in reverse: those made the dead alive; these make the living dead.

About this passage

Source
Oehler 2:26–29 · Franz Oehler, ed., Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani quae supersunt omnia, vol. 2 (Leipzig: T. O. Weigel, 1854), 3–46 · Latin text: Franz Oehler (Oehler 2), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library (canonical-latinLit), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Oehler 2. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; the problem in this passage is discussed in the notes.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Oehler, vol. 2 (1854); made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Heresy, Scripture and canon

Notes

Translation notes

  • The allusions are 1 Cor 11:19, Matt 18:7 and 26:24, Matt 7:16, Acts 13:10, and 2 Cor 12:12. Tertullian's dating (Antoninus Pius, Eleutherus as bishop) is chronologically difficult, since Eleutherus was bishop ca. 174–189; this is translated as written. “Phaneroseis” (Revelations) is the title of Apelles' book of Philumene's oracles. Nigidius is otherwise unknown. “Two hundred sesterces” renders ducentis sestertiis; if the word is taken as sestertia (thousands of sesterces), as many scholars take it, the gift was 200,000 sesterces, a large sum. The phrase “in catholicae primo doctrinam” appears to be corrupt; it is rendered by the sense. “Energy” renders energema, a spirit's working (possession).

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Praescr. 30 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-praescriptione/30/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Praescr. 30 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-praescriptione/30/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage