History of the Arians 73–80

Greek text: PG 25.English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 4 (1892).

Show

Chapter 73

73PG 25:781a–784b

Ti; οὖν ταῦτα βλέπων ἢ ἀκούων, τίς ὁρῶν τὴν ἀλαζονείαν τῶν ἀσεβῶν, καὶ τοσαύτην ἀδικίαν, εἰ δίκαιός ἐστιν, οὐ στενάξειεν; Ἐν τόποις γὰρ ἀσεβῶν στένουσι δίκαιοι. Τίς, τούτων γιγνομένωε καὶ τῆς ἀσεβείας τοσαύτην ἀναισχυντίαν λαβούσης, ἔτι τολμᾷ λέγειν Κωστύλλιον Χριστιανὸν, καὶ μᾶλλον Ἀντιχρίστου τὴν εἰκόνα; Τί γὰρ τῶν τούτου γνωρισμάτων παραλέλοιπεν; Ἦ πῶς ού πανταχόθεν οὗτος ἐκεῖνος εἶναι νομισθήσεται, κἀκεῖνος τοιοῦτος ἂν ὑπονοηθείη, οἷός ἐστιν οὗτος; Οὐ τὰς ἐν τῇ μεγάλῃ ἐκκλησίᾳ, τῇ ἐν τῷ Καισαρείῳ, γινομένας θυσίας, καὶ κατὰ Χριστοῦ βλασφημίας, ὡς ἐξ ἐντολῆς αὐτοῦ πεποιήκασιν Ἀρειανοί τε καὶ Ἕλληνες; οὐχ ή ὅρασις τοῦ Δανιὴλ οὕτω σημαίνει τὸν Ἀντίχριστον, δτι ποιήσει πόλεμον μετά τῶν ἁγίων, καὶ ἰσχύσει πρὸς αὐτοὺς, καὶ ὑπεροίσει ἐν κακοῖς πάντας τοὺς ἔμπροσθεν, καὶ τρεῖς βασιλεῖς ταπεινώσει, καὶ λόγους πρὸς τὸν ’Ὕψιστον λαλήσει, καὶ ύπονοήσει τοί ἀλλοιῶσαι καιρόν καὶ νόμονς Τίς οὖν ἄλλος πῶν ποτε τοιαῦτα ἐπεχείρησε πρᾶξαι ἧ μόνος Κωνστάντιος; Οὗτος γὰρ τοιοῦτός ἐστιν, οἶος ἂν ἐκεῖνος γε. νοιτο. Λαλεῖ γὰρ λόγους πρὸς τὸν Ὕψιστον, προϊστάμενος τῆς ἀσεβοῦς αἱρέσεως· καὶ πρὸς τοὺς ἁγίους ποιεῖ πόλεμον, ἐξορίζων τοὺς ἐπισκόπους ei ml πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐπὶ τῇ ἑαυτοῦ ἀπωλείᾳ ταύτην τὴν ἐξουσίαν ἔχει, Καὶ γὰρ οὗτος τοὺς πρὸ αὐτοῦ νενίκηκεν ἐν κακίᾳ, καινὸν ἐπινοήσας τρόπον τοῦ διωγμοῦ· καὶ τρεῖς βασιλεῖς, Βρετανίωνα, καὶ Μαγνὲν- ’τιον, καὶ Γάλλον καθελὼν, εὐθὺς προέστη τῆς ἀσεβείας· καὶ ὡς γίγας πρὸς τόν ’Ὕψιστον ἐτόλμησεν ἐπαρθῆναι τῇ ἀλαζονεία. Οὗτος ὑπενόησεν ἀλλοιῶσαι νόμον, παραλύων τὴν μὲν τοῦ Κυρίου διὰ ὠν ἁποστόλων διάταξιν, τὰ δὲ τῆς Ἑκκλησίας ἀλλάττων ἔθη, καὶ καινὸν αὐτὸς ἐπινοῶν τρόπον τῶν καταστάσεων. Ἐξ ἄλλων γὰρ τόπων καὶ πρὸ πεντήκοντα μονῶν μετὰ στρατιωτῶν ἐπισκόπους ἀποστέλλει πρὸς τοὺς μὴ θέλοντας λαούς · καὶ ἀντὶ γνώσεως τῆς πρὸς τοὺςλαοὺς, ἐκείνοι φέρουσι τὰς ἀπειλὰς, καὶτὰ πρὸς τοὺς δικαστὰς γράμματα. Οὕτω Γρηγόριον ἀπὸ Καππαδοκίας ἔπεμψεν είς Ἀλεξάνδρειαν ο καὶ είς μὲν τό Σίρμιον ἀπὸ Κυζίκου μετεπέμψατο Γερμίνιονο ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς Λαοδικείας Κεκρόπιον εἰς τὴν Νικομήδειαν ἀπέστειλεν.

Ti? oun tauta blepōn ē akouōn, tis horōn tēn alazoneian tōn asebōn, kai tosautēn adikian, ei dikaios estin, ou stenaxeien? En topois gar asebōn stenousi dikaioi. Tis, toutōn gignomenōe kai tēs asebeias tosautēn anaischyntian labousēs, eti tolmą legein Kōstyllion Christianon, kai mallon Antichristou tēn eikona? Ti gar tōn toutou gnōrismatōn paraleloipen? Ē pōs ou pantachothen houtos ekeinos einai nomisthēsetai, kakeinos toioutos an hyponoētheiē, hoios estin houtos? Ou tas en tę̄ megalę̄ ekklēsią, tę̄ en tǭ Kaisareiǭ, ginomenas thysias, kai kata Christou blasphēmias, hōs ex entolēs autou pepoiēkasin Areianoi te kai Hellēnes? ouch ē horasis tou Daniēl houtō sēmainei ton Antichriston, dti poiēsei polemon meta tōn hagiōn, kai ischysei pros autous, kai hyperoisei en kakois pantas tous emprosthen, kai treis basileis tapeinōsei, kai logous pros ton ’Hypsiston lalēsei, kai yponoēsei toi alloiōsai kairon kai nomons Tis oun allos pōn pote toiauta epecheirēse praxai hē monos Kōnstantios? Houtos gar toioutos estin, oios an ekeinos ge. noito. Lalei gar logous pros ton Hypsiston, proïstamenos tēs asebous haireseōs; kai pros tous hagious poiei polemon, exorizōn tous episkopous ei ml pros oligon epi tę̄ heautou apōleią tautēn tēn exousian echei, Kai gar houtos tous pro autou nenikēken en kakią, kainon epinoēsas tropon tou diōgmou; kai treis basileis, Bretaniōna, kai Magnen- ’tion, kai Gallon kathelōn, euthys proestē tēs asebeias; kai hōs gigas pros ton ’Hypsiston etolmēsen eparthēnai tę̄ alazoneia. Houtos hypenoēsen alloiōsai nomon, paralyōn tēn men tou Kyriou dia ōn hapostolōn diataxin, ta de tēs Hekklēsias allattōn ethē, kai kainon autos epinoōn tropon tōn katastaseōn. Ex allōn gar topōn kai pro pentēkonta monōn meta stratiōtōn episkopous apostellei pros tous mē thelontas laous ; kai anti gnōseōs tēs pros touslaous, ekeinoi pherousi tas apeilas, kaita pros tous dikastas grammata. Houtō Grēgorion apo Kappadokias epempsen eis Alexandreian o kai eis men to Sirmion apo Kyzikou metepempsato Germiniono apo de tēs Laodikeias Kekropion eis tēn Nikomēdeian apesteilen.

Who then, seeing or hearing these things, seeing the arrogance of the impious and such great injustice, if he is righteous, would not groan? For in the places of the impious the righteous groan. Who, when these things are being done and impiety has taken on such shamelessness, still dares to call this Costyllius a Christian, and not rather the image of Antichrist? For which of his marks has he omitted? Or how will this man not be thought in every respect to be that one, and that one be supposed to be such as this man is? Were not the sacrifices in the great church in the Caesareum and the blasphemies against Christ done by the Arians and pagans as at his command? Does not the vision of Daniel describe the Antichrist thus: that he will make war with the saints and prevail against them, and will surpass in evils all who were before him, and will humble three kings, and will speak words against the Most High, and will think to change times and law? Who else, then, has ever attempted to do such things but Constantius alone? For he is such as that one would be. He speaks words against the Most High, championing the impious heresy; and he makes war against the saints, exiling the bishops—though he has this power only for a little while, to his own destruction. For he has surpassed those before him in wickedness, having devised a new manner of persecution; and having overthrown three kings—Vetranio, Magnentius, and Gallus—he at once championed impiety, and like a giant has dared to exalt himself in arrogance against the Most High. He has thought to change law, setting aside the ordinance of the Lord given through the apostles, changing the customs of the Church, and himself devising a new manner of appointments. For he sends bishops from other places, even fifty stages away, with soldiers, to people who do not want them; and instead of making themselves known to the people, those men bring threats and letters to the magistrates. Thus he sent Gregory from Cappadocia to Alexandria, sent for Germinius from Cyzicus to Sirmium, and sent Cecropius from Laodicea to Nicomedia.

Prov 28:28 (quotation, medium confidence) · Dan 7:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Dan 7:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Dan 7:25 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius applies Daniel’s vision of the Antichrist to Constantius, who wars against the saints, overthrew three rulers, and changes the Church’s laws by imposing bishops from afar.

  • This staged section corresponds to ch. 74 in NPNF² 4. “In the places of the impious the righteous groan”: Prov 28:28 (LXX). Daniel’s vision: Dan 7:21, 24–25. Vetranio, Magnentius, and Gallus were overthrown in 350–354; Gallus was a Caesar. The identification of Constantius with the forerunner or image of Antichrist is Athanasius’s polemic, translated as written. “Costyllius” (Κωστύλλιον) is a contemptuous diminutive of Constantius’s name. The scan is badly garbled here; legible words are reassembled by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Latin-letter OCR debris for a word; OCR debris; OCR debris inside a word; OCR misreading in Latin letters; OCR misreading; letters reassembled; line doubled and scattered by the OCR; legible words reassembled; lines doubled and scattered by the OCR; legible words reassembled; words run together and misread by the OCR): ὁρῶν τὴν "'- --1 ··-- ν-ν-νν,-ν wn. ο,, _, ἀλαζονείαν → ὁρῶν τὴν ἀλαζονείαν; ἀδικίαν, ε Bixa‘to'; ἐστιν, ού στενάξειενς Ἐν τόίττοις γάρ άσε σῶν → ἀδικίαν, εἰ δίκαιός ἐστιν, οὐ στενάξειεν; Ἐν τόποις γὰρ ἀσεβῶν; ἀναισχυντίανυλαὸούσης ιτι τολμᾷ λέγεινʼΚ-οστῂύλλίονΧριᾶιανὸν, καὶ μᾶλλονᾝντιᾶρίστου- τήν εἰκόνα → ἀναισχυντίαν λαβούσης, ἔτι τολμᾷ λέγειν Κωστύλλιον Χριστιανὸν, καὶ μᾶλλον Ἀντιχρίστου τὴν εἰκόνα; Τί γάρὶτόίν τούτω P""'“" “'"M'""' ν-ιν ι. 1 γνωρισμάτων → Τί γὰρ τῶν τούτου γνωρισμάτων; πανταχόθε . ην. ~.. ν οὗτος → πανταχόθεν οὗτος; -κάκεῖνος τοιοῦτο ἂν ύζτονοηθείη, οἷός ἐςτινοὗτοςν; δύʼτάς ἐν τί αν υπυνυηυιιιι, tum, ὕννιν ww", μτΙ, ν- -..ν,, η μεγάλῃ ἐκκλησίᾳ → κἀκεῖνος τοιοῦτος ἂν ὑπονοηθείη, οἷός ἐστιν οὗτος; Οὐ τὰς ἐν τῇ μεγάλῃ ἐκκλησίᾳ; γινομένα. μεῖαλῃ ικδλιιυιιιν ‘ll θʼ ’Ψ """"‘l“'"t" l"'t""" θυσίας, καὶ κατὰ Χριστοῦ βλασφημίας, ὡς ἐξ ἐντο υυσιας, και κατίοι AEN; ιιυν ιδΛυιυγιηΑ-ιυυνθ w‘ -, -.-ν λῆς αὑτοῦ πεποιήκασιν Ἀρειανοί τε καὶ ’Έλληνες Αης αυτυυ Ἱιτιιινυιψιυιυιν ηιιςιωωο η. η.......-...--, οὐχ → γινομένας θυσίας, καὶ κατὰ Χριστοῦ βλασφημίας, ὡς ἐξ ἐντολῆς αὐτοῦ πεποιήκασιν Ἀρειανοί τε καὶ Ἕλληνες; οὐχ; τὸν Ἀντί oux ιι agtur-5 »νυ μυιιυμι νυιψ -..βψ-π-- --ν -7 7 7 χριστον → τὸν Ἀντίχριστον; ἁγίων, κα Ipsum". un "usque...νηηιηη τη-.. μ.- --.---7, 77 ἑσχύσει → ἁγίων, καὶ ἰσχύσει; πάντα ισχυσιι "at-{Ius υιυιυυιη που υιιιι-ιινσσυν -....η---ς ηπ-,ᾐη τοὺς → πάντας τοὺς; ταπεινώσει, κα sum, ιμνιιγυυυι-ιν, mm,γι-ν, των-..-η.-.ην-.--Ἰ λόγους → ταπεινώσει, καὶ λόγους; Κωνστάνstoc; → Κωνστάντιος;; τὸν "rabiosae, → τὸν Ὕψιστον,; τῶν acutas-ttiσεων → τῶν καταστάσεων; duo δὲ τῆς → ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς.

Topics: Persecution, Eschatology, Church office

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 73 (PG 25:781a–784b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-73). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-73) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.

Chapter 75

75PG 25:784b–784d

Καὶ Αὐξὲντιον μέν τινα φιλοπράγμονα μᾶλλον ἥ Χριστιανὸν ἀπὸ Καππαδοκίας εἰς Μεδιόλανον μιτεστείλατοο ἵνʼ, ἐπειδὴ τὸν ἐπίσκοπον τὸν ἐκεῖ Διονύσιον, ἄνθρωπον εὐλαβῆ, διὰ τὴν είς Χριστὸν εὒσέο σειαν ἐξώρισε, τοῦτον ἐκεῖ κελεύσῃ εἶναι· ἄνθρωπον μήπω μηδὲ τὴν Ῥωμαϊκὴν εἰδότα γλῶτταν, ἦ μόνον ἀσεβεῖν· νῦν δέ πάλιν Γεώργιόν τινα Καππαδόκην ἄνθρωπον, ὑποδέκτην ἐν Κωνσταντινουπόλει ταμιακῶν γενόμενον, καὶ σφετερισάμενον πάντα, καὶ διʼ αὐτὸ τοῦτο φυγόντα, προσέταξεν είς Ἀλεξάνδρειαν είσελθεῖν μετὰ στρατιωτικῆς φαντασίας, καλ τῆς τοῦ στρατηλάτου ἐξουσίας. Εἶτα εὑρὼν Ἐπίκτητόν τινα νεόφυτον, καὶ νεώτερον θρασὺν, ἠγάπησεν, ὁρῶν αὑτὸν ἕτοιμον είς κακίαν ' καὶ διʼ αὒτοῦ οἷς ἐθέλοι λοιπὸν ἐπισκόποις ἐπιβουλεύει· ’ἐτοιμος γὰρ ἐκεῖνός ἐστι πάντα ποιεῖν ἃ βούλεται βασιλεύς. Τούτῳ γοῦν ὑπηρέτῃ χρώμενος, καὶ ἐν τῇ Ῥώμῃ πεποίηκε πα· ράδοξον,καὶ ἀληθῶς ὁμοίωμα τῆς ’Λντιχρίστου κακοί νοίας · ἀντὶ γὰρ τῆς ἐκκλησίας τὸ παλάτιον παρασκευάσας, καὶ ἀντὶ τῶν λαῶν τρεῖς που θλαδίας eauτοῦ πεποίηκε παρεῖναιο καὶ λοιπὸν ἠνάγκασε τρεῖς κακοήθεις κατασκόπους (οὐ γὰρ am; ἐπισκόπους εἴποιο) καταστῆσαι δῆθεν ἐπίσκοπον ἐν τῷ παλατίῳ Φήλικά τινα ἄξιον ἐαυτῶν. 0i γὰρ λαολ πάντες. εἰδότες τὴν παρανομίαν τῶν αἱρετικῶν, οὔτε συνεχώρησαν αὐτοῖς εἱς τὰς ἐκκλησίας εἰσελθεῖν, ἀλλὰ μακρὰν ἀπʼ αὐτῶν ἀνεχώρησαν.

Kai Auxention men tina philopragmona mallon hē Christianon apo Kappadokias eis Mediolanon mitesteilatoo hinʼ, epeidē ton episkopon ton ekei Dionysion, anthrōpon eulabē, dia tēn eis Christon euseo seian exōrise, touton ekei keleusę̄ einai; anthrōpon mēpō mēde tēn Rhōmaïkēn eidota glōttan, ē monon asebein; nyn de palin Geōrgion tina Kappadokēn anthrōpon, hypodektēn en Kōnstantinoupolei tamiakōn genomenon, kai spheterisamenon panta, kai diʼ auto touto phygonta, prosetaxen eis Alexandreian eiselthein meta stratiōtikēs phantasias, kal tēs tou stratēlatou exousias. Eita heurōn Epiktēton tina neophyton, kai neōteron thrasyn, ēgapēsen, horōn hauton hetoimon eis kakian ' kai diʼ autou hois etheloi loipon episkopois epibouleuei; ’etoimos gar ekeinos esti panta poiein ha bouletai basileus. Toutǭ goun hypēretę̄ chrōmenos, kai en tę̄ Rhōmę̄ pepoiēke pa; radoxon,kai alēthōs homoiōma tēs ’Lntichristou kakoi noias ; anti gar tēs ekklēsias to palation paraskeuasas, kai anti tōn laōn treis pou thladias eautou pepoiēke pareinaio kai loipon ēnankase treis kakoētheis kataskopous (ou gar am? episkopous eipoio) katastēsai dēthen episkopon en tǭ palatiǭ Phēlika tina axion eautōn. 0i gar laol pantes. eidotes tēn paranomian tōn hairetikōn, oute synechōrēsan autois heis tas ekklēsias eiselthein, alla makran apʼ autōn anechōrēsan.

And one Auxentius, a busybody rather than a Christian, he transferred from Cappadocia to Milan, so that, since he had exiled the bishop there, Dionysius, a devout man, for his piety toward Christ, he might order this man to be there—a man who did not yet even know the Latin language, nor anything but impiety. And now again one George, a Cappadocian, who had been a receiver of the treasury at Constantinople and had appropriated everything and fled for that very reason, he ordered to enter Alexandria with military pomp and the authority of the general. Then, having found one Epictetus, a neophyte and a bold young man, he took a liking to him, seeing him ready for wickedness; and through him he now plots against whatever bishops he wishes; for that man is ready to do everything the emperor wishes. Using this man as his servant, he did a strange thing at Rome too, truly a likeness of the malice of Antichrist: having prepared the palace instead of the church, and having had about three of his own eunuchs present instead of the people, he then compelled three wicked spies (for one could not call them bishops) to appoint, forsooth, as bishop in the palace one Felix, worthy of them. For all the people, knowing the lawlessness of the heretics, did not allow them to enter the churches, but withdrew far from them.

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius describes the intrusion of Auxentius at Milan and George at Alexandria, and the consecration of Felix as bishop of Rome in the palace, with eunuchs for a congregation.

  • Auxentius of Milan (355–374); George of Cappadocia, intruded at Alexandria in 357; Epictetus of Centumcellae; Felix II, set up at Rome in 355 after Liberius’s exile.

Topics: Church office, Persecution

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 75 (PG 25:784b–784d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-75). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-75) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.

Chapter 76

76PG 25:785a–785c

Τί οὖν οὒτος τοῦ ’Λντιχρίστου παραλέλοιπενς ἢ τί πλέον ἐκεῖνος έλθὼν τούτου ποιήσειεν; Ἢ πῶς ὶκεῖνος ἐλθὼν οὐχ εὑρήσει πρὸς ἀπάτην εὔκολον προετοιμασθεῖσαν αὑτῷ παρὰ τούτου τὴν ὀδόν; Καὶ γὰρ πάλιν ἀντ) τῶν ἐκκλησιῶν είς τὰ παλάτια πρὸς ἑαυτὸν τὰς κρίσεις προκαλεῖται. Καὶ τούτων μὲν αὺτὺς ιξάρχει· τὸ δὲ θαυμαστὸν, ὃτι, κᾶν θεωρήσῃ τοὺς κατηγόρους ἀποροῦντας, αὐτὸς ἀναδέχεται τὴν κατηγορίαν· ῖνα μηδὲ ἀπολογεῖσθαι λοιπὸν ἐξῇ , τοῖς ἀδικουμένοις διὰ τὴν παρʼ αὑτοῦ βίαν. Καὶ τοῦτο πεποίηκεν ὲν τοῖς κατὰ Ἀθανασίου · τὴν γὰρ Παυλίνου, καὶ Λουκιιρέρου, καὶ Εὐσεὸίου, καὶ Διονυσίου τῶν ἐπισκόπων παρρησίαν βλέπων, καὶ ὡς ἐκ τῆς μετανοίας Οὐρσακίου καὶ Οὐάλεντος διήλεγχον τοὺς κατὰ τοῦ ἐπισκόπου λέγοντας, καὶ συνεῦούλευον μηκέτι χρῆναι πιστεύεσθαι τοὺς περὶ Οὐάλεντα μεταγνόντας ἐφʼ οἷς λέγουσι νῦν, εὐθὺς ἀναστὰς εἶπεν· Ἐγὼ κατήγορός ειμι νῦν Ἀθανασίου, δι”ὲμὲ πιστεύσατε οἷς ἐὰν λέγωσιν οὗτοι. Εἶτα, ἐκείνων λεγόντων, πῶς δύνασαι κατήγορος εἶναι, μὴ παρόντος τοῦ κατ- - ηγορουμένου; ει γὰρ σὺ κατήγορος εἷ, ἀλλʼ ἐκεῖνος μὴ παρὼν, οὐ δύναται κρίνεσθαι. Οὐ γὰρ Ῥωμαῖκή ἐστιν ή κρίσις, ἵνʼ ὡς βασιλεὺς πιστευθῇς, ἀλλὰ περὶ ἐπισκόπου ἐστὶ τὸ κρῖμα· καὶ δεῖ τὴν κρίσιν ῖσην εἶναι τῷ κατηγοροῦντι καὶ τῷ κρινομένῳ. Πῶς δὲ καὶ κατηγορεῖς; συνεῖναι γὰρ οὐκ ὴδύνασο τῷ μακράν σου τυγχάνοντι · εί δὲ παρὰ τούτων ἀκούσας λέγεις, δίκαιόν ἐστί σε καὶτὰ παρʼ ἐκείνου λεγόμενα πιστεύειν · εἰ δὲ μὴ πιστεύεις ἐκείνῳ, πιστεύεις δὲ τούτοις, φαίνονται μᾶλλον οὗτοι διὰ σὲ λέγοντες ταῦτα, c tul εἰς σὴν χάριν κατηγοροῦντες Ἀθανασίου. Ταῦτα ἀκούσας, καὶ νομίσας ὓβριν εἶναι τό λεχθὲν ὀρθῶς, ἐκείνους μὲν ἐξώρισε · κινηθεὶς δὲ κατὰ ’Δθανασίου, ἀγριώτερον ἔγραψεν αὐτόν τε παθεῖν τὰ γενόμενα, καὶτοῖς Ἀρειανοῖς παραδοθῆναι τὰς ἐκκλησίας, καὶ τούτοις ἐξεῖναι πράττειν ἃ βούλονται.

Ti oun outos tou ’Lntichristou paraleloipens ē ti pleon ekeinos elthōn toutou poiēseien? Ē pōs ikeinos elthōn ouch heurēsei pros apatēn eukolon proetoimastheisan hautǭ para toutou tēn odon? Kai gar palin ant) tōn ekklēsiōn eis ta palatia pros heauton tas kriseis prokaleitai. Kai toutōn men autys ixarchei; to de thaumaston, hoti, kan theōrēsę̄ tous katēgorous aporountas, autos anadechetai tēn katēgorian; ina mēde apologeisthai loipon exę̄ , tois adikoumenois dia tēn parʼ hautou bian. Kai touto pepoiēken en tois kata Athanasiou ; tēn gar Paulinou, kai Loukiirerou, kai Euseoiou, kai Dionysiou tōn episkopōn parrēsian blepōn, kai hōs ek tēs metanoias Oursakiou kai Oualentos diēlenchon tous kata tou episkopou legontas, kai syneuouleuon mēketi chrēnai pisteuesthai tous peri Oualenta metagnontas ephʼ hois legousi nyn, euthys anastas eipen; Egō katēgoros eimi nyn Athanasiou, di”eme pisteusate hois ean legōsin houtoi. Eita, ekeinōn legontōn, pōs dynasai katēgoros einai, mē parontos tou kat- - ēgoroumenou? ei gar sy katēgoros hei, allʼ ekeinos mē parōn, ou dynatai krinesthai. Ou gar Rhōmaikē estin ē krisis, hinʼ hōs basileus pisteuthę̄s, alla peri episkopou esti to krima; kai dei tēn krisin isēn einai tǭ katēgorounti kai tǭ krinomenǭ. Pōs de kai katēgoreis? syneinai gar ouk ēdynaso tǭ makran sou tynchanonti ; ei de para toutōn akousas legeis, dikaion esti se kaita parʼ ekeinou legomena pisteuein ; ei de mē pisteueis ekeinǭ, pisteueis de toutois, phainontai mallon houtoi dia se legontes tauta, c tul eis sēn charin katēgorountes Athanasiou. Tauta akousas, kai nomisas hybrin einai to lechthen orthōs, ekeinous men exōrise ; kinētheis de kata ’Dthanasiou, agriōteron egrapsen auton te pathein ta genomena, kaitois Areianois paradothēnai tas ekklēsias, kai toutois exeinai prattein ha boulontai.

What, then, of the Antichrist has this man omitted? Or what more will that one do than this man when he comes? Or how will that one, when he comes, not find the way to deceit made easy, prepared for him by this man? For again, instead of the churches, he summons the trials to himself in the palaces, and presides over them himself; and the astonishing thing is that, if he sees the accusers at a loss, he himself takes up the accusation, so that the wronged may no longer even be able to make a defense because of his violence. This he did in the case of Athanasius. For seeing the boldness of the bishops Paulinus, Lucifer, Eusebius, and Dionysius, and how from the repentance of Ursacius and Valens they refuted those who spoke against the bishop, and advised that Valens and his party, having changed their minds, should no longer be believed in what they now say, he at once stood up and said, “I am now the accuser of Athanasius; for my sake believe whatever these men say.” Then they said: “How can you be the accuser when the accused is not present? For even if you are the accuser, he, not being present, cannot be judged. For the trial is not a Roman one, that you should be believed as emperor; the judgment concerns a bishop, and the trial must be equal for the accuser and the accused. And how do you accuse? For you could not have been with one who lived far from you; but if you speak because you have heard it from these men, it is just that you should believe also what is said by him; and if you do not believe him but believe these, it appears rather that these men say these things for your sake and accuse Athanasius to please you.” Hearing this, and thinking what was rightly said an insult, he exiled them; and, enraged against Athanasius, he wrote more savagely that he should suffer what was done, that the churches should be handed over to the Arians, and that they should be free to do whatever they wished.

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius recounts how at the Council of Milan Constantius made himself Athanasius’s accuser and exiled the bishops who protested that an absent man could not be tried.

  • The Council of Milan (355).

Topics: Church office, Persecution, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 76 (PG 25:785a–785c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-76). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-76) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.

Chapter 77

77PG 25:785c–788b

Δεινὰ μὲν οὖν καὶ πέρα δεινῶν τὰ τοιαῦτα· - πρέπουσα δὲ πρᾶξις ὅμως τῷ σχηματιζομένῳ τὰ τοῦ ’Δντιχρίστου. Τίς γὰρ, βλέπων αὑτὸν ὲξάρχοντα τῶν νομιζομένων ἐπισκόπων καὶ προκαθήμενον τῶν ὲκκλησιαστικῶν κρίσεων, οὐκ ᾲκολούοως ἂν εἴποι τοῦτʼ εἷναι τὸ διὰ τοῦ Δανιὴλ εἰρημένον βδέλυγμα τῆς ἐρημώσεωςς Τὸν γὰρ Χριστιανισμὺν περιβεβλημένος, καὶ είς τοὺς ἁγίους τόπους είσερχόμενος, ἑστηκώς τε ὲν αὐτοῖς, ἐρημοῖ τὰς ἐκκλησίας, παραλύων τοὺς τούτων κανόνας, καὶ τὰ ἴδια κρατεῖν βιαζόμενος. Ἀρι τίς ἔτι τολμᾷ λέγειν τὸν καιρὸν τοῦτον εἰρηνικὸν εἶναι Χριστιανῶν, καὶ οὺ μᾶλλον διωγμόν; καὶ διωγμὸν, οἷος οὔτε πώποτε γέγονεν, οὗτε τάχα τις ποιήσει ποτὲ τοιοῦτον, εἰ μὴ ἄρα ὁ υἱὸς τῆς ἀνομίας, οἱ Χριστομάχοι δεικνύουσιν, ἁναζωγραφοῦντες ἐν αὐτοῖς ἠδη. Διὸ κα) μάλιστα προσήκει νήφειν, μήπως ἡ αῐρεσις αὕτη, πολλὴν ἀναισχυντίαν ἔχουσα, καὶ διαχυνομινη ὡς ἰὸς κεράστου, καθὼς ὲν ταῖς Παροιμίαις γέγραπται, διδάσκουσα τε κατὰ τοῦι Σωτῆρος φρονεῖν, αὕτη ἂν εἴη ἡ ἀποστασία μεθʼ ἢν ἐκεῖνος ἀποκαλυφθήσεται, πάντως ἔχων τὸν πρόδρομον ἔαυτοῦ Κωνατάντιον. Ἐπεὶ διὰ τί οὕτως μαίνεται κατὰ τῶν εὐσεῧῶνς διὰ τί ὡς ὑπὲρ ἰδίας αἱρέσεως ἀγωνίζεται; καὶ ἐχθρὸν μὲν [διον λέγει τὸν μὴ πειθόμενον τῇ Ἀρείου μανίᾳ, τὰ δὲ παρὰ τῶν Χριστομάχων λεγόμενα καταθυμίως δέχεται, κα). τοιαύτας καὶ τοσαύτας συνόδους ἀτιμάζει; διὰ τι τοῖς ’Δρειανοίς ἐκέλευσε τὰς ἐκκλησίας παραδίδοσθαι; οὐχ ἵνα ἐκεῖνος ἐλθὼν εὕρῃ, πῶς είς αὑτὰς εἰσέλθῃ, καὶ ἀποδέξηται τοῦτον ὲτοιμάσαντα τοὺς τόπους αὑτῷ; οἰ μὲν γὰρ ἀπὸ Ἀλεξάνδρου, κα), τοῦ πρὸ αὐτοῦ Ἀχιλλᾶ, καὶ πάλιν τοῦ πρὸ τούτου Πέτρου, γέροντες ἐπίσκοο ποι ἐξεβάλλοντοο ὲκεῐνοι δὲ εἰσήγοντο, οὓς ἃν ελεγον οι ἀκολουθοῦντες τοῖς στρατιώταις · ελεγον δὲ τοὺς τὰ αὐτῶν φρονεῖν ἐπαγγελλομένους.

Deina men oun kai pera deinōn ta toiauta; - prepousa de praxis homōs tǭ schēmatizomenǭ ta tou ’Dntichristou. Tis gar, blepōn hauton exarchonta tōn nomizomenōn episkopōn kai prokathēmenon tōn ekklēsiastikōn kriseōn, ouk ąkolouoōs an eipoi toutʼ heinai to dia tou Daniēl eirēmenon bdelygma tēs erēmōseōss Ton gar Christianismyn peribeblēmenos, kai eis tous hagious topous eiserchomenos, hestēkōs te en autois, erēmoi tas ekklēsias, paralyōn tous toutōn kanonas, kai ta idia kratein biazomenos. Ari tis eti tolmą legein ton kairon touton eirēnikon einai Christianōn, kai ou mallon diōgmon? kai diōgmon, hoios oute pōpote gegonen, houte tacha tis poiēsei pote toiouton, ei mē ara ho huios tēs anomias, hoi Christomachoi deiknyousin, hanazōgraphountes en autois ēdē. Dio ka) malista prosēkei nēphein, mēpōs hē airesis hautē, pollēn anaischyntian echousa, kai diachynominē hōs ios kerastou, kathōs en tais Paroimiais gegraptai, didaskousa te kata toui Sōtēros phronein, hautē an eiē hē apostasia methʼ ēn ekeinos apokalyphthēsetai, pantōs echōn ton prodromon eautou Kōnatantion. Epei dia ti houtōs mainetai kata tōn euseÿōns dia ti hōs hyper idias haireseōs agōnizetai? kai echthron men [dion legei ton mē peithomenon tę̄ Areiou manią, ta de para tōn Christomachōn legomena katathymiōs dechetai, ka). toiautas kai tosautas synodous atimazei? dia ti tois ’Dreianois ekeleuse tas ekklēsias paradidosthai? ouch hina ekeinos elthōn heurę̄, pōs eis hautas eiselthę̄, kai apodexētai touton etoimasanta tous topous hautǭ? oi men gar apo Alexandrou, ka), tou pro autou Achilla, kai palin tou pro toutou Petrou, gerontes episkoo poi exeballontoo ekeinoi de eisēgonto, hous han elegon oi akolouthountes tois stratiōtais ; elegon de tous ta autōn phronein epangellomenous.

Such things are terrible, and beyond terrible; yet the conduct befits one who is playing the part of Antichrist. For who, seeing him leading the so-called bishops and presiding over the church trials, would not fittingly say that this is the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel? For clothing himself with Christianity, and entering the holy places and standing in them, he makes the churches desolate, setting aside their canons and forcing his own to prevail. Does anyone still dare to say that this time is one of peace for Christians, and not rather of persecution—a persecution such as never happened before, and such as perhaps no one will ever carry out again, unless it be the son of lawlessness, whom the Christ-fighters display, already portraying him in themselves? Therefore it is especially fitting to be watchful, lest this heresy, which has great shamelessness and spreads like the venom of the horned serpent, as is written in the Proverbs, and teaches men to think against the Savior, be the apostasy after which that one will be revealed, having Constantius as his forerunner. For why else does he rage so against the pious? Why does he contend as for his own heresy, and call his own enemy whoever does not yield to the madness of Arius, while gladly receiving what is said by the Christ-fighters, and dishonoring such and so many synods? Why did he order the churches to be handed over to the Arians? Was it not so that that one, when he comes, may find a way to enter them, and may welcome this man who prepared the places for him? For the old bishops, appointed from the time of Alexander, and of Achillas before him, and again of Peter before him, were cast out; and those were brought in whom the followers of the soldiers named; and they named those who promised to hold their views.

Dan 9:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 24:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Thess 2:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Prov 23:32 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius calls Constantius’s presiding over the church and handing it to the Arians the “abomination of desolation”, and warns that the heresy may be the apostasy preceding Antichrist.

  • The abomination of desolation: Dan 9:27; 11:31 (Matt 24:15). The son of lawlessness and the apostasy: 2 Thess 2:3. The horned serpent: Prov 23:32 (LXX). The eschatological identification is Athanasius’s polemic. A Latin-letter misreading is corrected by a logged correction.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in Latin letters): ὡς loc κεράστου → ὡς ἰὸς κεράστου.

Topics: Eschatology, Persecution, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 77 (PG 25:785c–788b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-77). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-77) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.

Chapter 78

78PG 25:788b–789a

Εὕκολον δὲ τοῦτο Μελιτιανοϊς ἦν τὺ πρόβλημα· οι γὰρ πλεῖστοι, μᾶλλον δὲ οι πάντες, οὐκ ἀπὸ θεοσεβοῦς ἀγωγῆς εἰσιν, οὐδὲ γινώσκουσι τὴν εις Χριστὸν ὑγιαίνουσαν πίστιν, οὐδʼ ὅλως τί ἐστι Χριστιανισμὸς, ἢ ποίας ἔχομεν ἡμεῖς οἱ Χριστιανοὶ Γραφάς. Οἱ μὲν γὰρ αὐτῶν ἐξ εἰδώλων ἐλθόντες, οἱ δὲ ὲκ τοῦ βουλευτηρίου καὶ τῆς πρώτης πολιτείας διὰ τὴν ταλαίπωρον ἀλειτουργησίαν κα). προστασίαν · πείσαντές τε χρήμασι τοὺς πρὸ αὐτῶν Μελιτιανοὺς. είς τοῦτο παρῆλθον, κα). πρὶν ητηχηθῶσιν. El. δὲ καὶ ἔδοξαν, ποία κατήχησις παρὰ Μελιτιανοίς ἐστινς ὅμως οὐδὲ δόξαντες κατηχείσθαι, ἦλθον ᾶμα- καὶ εὐθὺς, ὥσπερ παῖδες ὄνομα λαβόντες, ἐκλήθησαν ἐπίσκοποι. Καὶ διὰ τοῦτο, τοιοῦτοι ὅντες, οὐδὲν ἡγήσαντο τὸ πρᾶγμα, οὐδὲ διαφέρειν εὐσέβειαν ἀσεβείας ὲνόμισαν. Προθύμως γοῦν καὶ ταχέως ὲκ Μελιτιανῶν ’Δρειανοὶ γεγόνασιν. Ἂν δὲ καὶ ἕτερόν τι προστάξῃ βασιλεὺς. καὶ εἰς τοῦτο πάλιν εἰσὶν ἕτοιμοι μεταβάλλεσθαι, Ἡ γὰρ τῆς εὐσεβείας ἄγνοια ταχέως ἐπὶ τὴν συνήθη κα). τὴν ἐξ ἀρχῆς, ἣν μεμαθήκασιν, ἀφροσύνην καταφέρει τούτους. Καὶ γὰρ οὐδέν ἐστιν αὺτοῖς ἀνέμῳ παντὶ καὶ κλύδωνι περιφέρεσθαι. ἕως μόνον εἰσὶν ἀλειτούργητοι, καὶ προστασίαν ἀνθρωπίνην ἔχουσι· τάχα δὲ οὐδὲ μεταβάλλεσθαι, οἷοι καὶ πρὸ τούτου ἦσαν, καὶ οἷοι ἦσαν ὅτε πάλιν ’Έλληνες ἐτύγχανον. Ἀμέλει, τοιοῦτοι τὸν τρόπον ὄντες εὔκολοι, κα). νομίζοντες πολιτείαν βουλῆς εἶναιτὴν Ἐκκλησίαν, κα). τὰ τῶν εἰδώλων φρονοῦντες, ὥσπερ ἔθνη, εἰσελθόντες εἰς τὺ καλὸν δνομα τοῦ Σωτῆρος, ἐμίαναν τὴν Αἴγυπτον πᾶ.σαν · ποιήσαντες κᾶν ὅλως ὀνομασθῆναι τὴν Ἀρειανὴν αἰρεσιν ἐν αὐτῇ. Ἔτι γὰρ ὲν ὁλοκλήρῳ μόνῃ τῇ Αἰγύπτῳ παρρησία τῆς ὁρθοδοξίας ἦν· καὶ διὰ τοῦτʼ ἐσπούδασαν καὶ ταύτῃ φθόνον ἐπαγαγεῖν οι δυσσεδεῖς, μᾶλλον δὲ οὐκ αὐτοὶ. ἀλλʼ ὸ κινήσας αὐτοὺς διάὸολος· ἵνʼ ἐλθὼν ὁ τούτου κῆρυξ ’Δντίχριστος εὕρῃ κα). ὲντῇ Αἰγύπτῳ τὰς ἐκκλησίας ἑαυτοῦ γινομένας, τούς τι Μελιτιανοὺς προκατηχηθένται ἠδη τά ἐκείνου, καί ἐπιγνῷ ἑαυτὸν ὲν ἐκείνοις ήδη μορφωθέντα.

Heukolon de touto Melitianoïs ēn ty problēma; oi gar pleistoi, mallon de oi pantes, ouk apo theosebous agōgēs eisin, oude ginōskousi tēn eis Christon hygiainousan pistin, oudʼ holōs ti esti Christianismos, ē poias echomen hēmeis hoi Christianoi Graphas. Hoi men gar autōn ex eidōlōn elthontes, hoi de ek tou bouleutēriou kai tēs prōtēs politeias dia tēn talaipōron aleitourgēsian ka). prostasian ; peisantes te chrēmasi tous pro autōn Melitianous. eis touto parēlthon, ka). prin ētēchēthōsin. El. de kai edoxan, poia katēchēsis para Melitianois estins homōs oude doxantes katēcheisthai, ēlthon ama- kai euthys, hōsper paides onoma labontes, eklēthēsan episkopoi. Kai dia touto, toioutoi hontes, ouden hēgēsanto to pragma, oude diapherein eusebeian asebeias enomisan. Prothymōs goun kai tacheōs ek Melitianōn ’Dreianoi gegonasin. An de kai heteron ti prostaxę̄ basileus. kai eis touto palin eisin hetoimoi metaballesthai, Hē gar tēs eusebeias agnoia tacheōs epi tēn synēthē ka). tēn ex archēs, hēn memathēkasin, aphrosynēn katapherei toutous. Kai gar ouden estin autois anemǭ panti kai klydōni peripheresthai. heōs monon eisin aleitourgētoi, kai prostasian anthrōpinēn echousi; tacha de oude metaballesthai, hoioi kai pro toutou ēsan, kai hoioi ēsan hote palin ’Ellēnes etynchanon. Amelei, toioutoi ton tropon ontes eukoloi, ka). nomizontes politeian boulēs einaitēn Ekklēsian, ka). ta tōn eidōlōn phronountes, hōsper ethnē, eiselthontes eis ty kalon dnoma tou Sōtēros, emianan tēn Aigypton pa.san ; poiēsantes kan holōs onomasthēnai tēn Areianēn airesin en autę̄. Eti gar en holoklērǭ monę̄ tę̄ Aigyptǭ parrēsia tēs horthodoxias ēn; kai dia toutʼ espoudasan kai tautę̄ phthonon epagagein oi dyssedeis, mallon de ouk autoi. allʼ o kinēsas autous diaoolos; hinʼ elthōn ho toutou kēryx ’Dntichristos heurę̄ ka). entę̄ Aigyptǭ tas ekklēsias heautou ginomenas, tous ti Melitianous prokatēchēthentai ēdē ta ekeinou, kai epignǭ heauton en ekeinois ēdē morphōthenta.

This proposal was easy for the Meletians; for most of them, or rather all, are not of godly upbringing, nor do they know the sound faith in Christ, nor at all what Christianity is or what Scriptures we Christians have. For some of them came from the idols, others from the council chamber and the chief civic offices, for the sake of the wretched immunity from public duties and the patronage; and having persuaded with money the Meletians before them, they came to this office even before being catechized. And even if they seemed to have been, what catechizing is there among the Meletians? Yet without even seeming to be catechized they came, and at once, like children receiving a name, they were called bishops. And therefore, being such, they thought nothing of the matter, nor considered piety to differ from impiety. So eagerly and quickly they became Arians from Meletians; and if the emperor orders something else, they are ready to change to that too. For their ignorance of piety quickly carries them back to the folly they had from the beginning and learned. For it is nothing to them to be carried about by every wind and wave, so long as they are exempt from public duties and have human patronage; perhaps they would not even be changing, but be such as they were before, and as they were when they were pagans. Indeed, being of such pliable character, thinking the Church a civic council, and holding the views of idolaters, entering like gentiles into the beautiful name of the Savior, they have defiled all Egypt, causing the Arian heresy even to be named in it. For in Egypt alone was there still full freedom for orthodoxy; and for this reason the impious were eager to bring ill will upon it too—or rather not they, but the devil who moved them—so that, when his herald the Antichrist comes, he may find the churches in Egypt too become his, and the Meletians already catechized in his ways, and may recognize himself already formed in them.

Eph 4:14 (echo, medium confidence) · Jas 2:7 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius describes the Meletians chosen as bishops: pagans and councillors seeking tax immunity, uncatechized and ready to become Arians at the emperor’s word.

  • “Carried about by every wind”: cf. Eph 4:14. “The beautiful name”: cf. Jas 2:7. The characterization of the Meletian clergy is Athanasius’s polemic.

Topics: Church office, Heresy, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 78 (PG 25:788b–789a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-78). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-78) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.

Chapter 79

79PG 25:789a–792a

Τοιοῦτον μὲν οὖν ἐστι το ἐξελθὸν παράκΚωνυ σταντίου παράνομον πρόσταγμα τῶν δὲ λαῶν προθυμία μὲν ἦν εἰς μαρτύριον, καὶ μᾶλλον μῖσος κατά τῆς ἀσεβεστάτης αἱρέσεως, πένθος δὲ ὅμως διά τὰς Ἐκκλησίας, καὶ στεναγμὸς παρά πάντων, βοώντων πρὸς τὸν Κύριον ο Φεῖσαι, Κύριε, τοῦ λαοῦ σου, καὶμὴ δῷς τὴν κληρονομίαν σου εις ὄνειδος τοῖς ἐχθροῖς σου ’ ἀλλὰ καὶ τάχυνον τοῦ ἐξελέσθαι ἡμᾶς ὲκ χειρὸς ἀνόμων. Ἰδοὺ γάρ τῶν μέν σου θεραπόντων οὐκ ἐφείσαντο, τῷ δὲ Ἀντιχρίστῳ τὴν ὁδὸν παρασκευάζουσιν. Οὐ γάρ ἀντιστήσονταί ποτε Μελιτιανοὶ τούτῳ, οὐδὲ φροντίσουσι περὶ ἀληθείας, οὐδὲ ἀρνήσασθαι τὸν Χριστὸν φαῦλον ἡγήσονταιο ἄνθρωποι μηδόλως γνη σίως προσελθόντες τῷ Λόγῳ, πρὸς πάντα κατά τὸν χαμαιλέοντα σχηματιζόμενοι, καὶ μισθωτοὶ τῶν ἀνυόντων αὐτῶν τὴν χρείαν γιγνόμενοι. Οὐ γάρ πρὸς τὴν ἀλήθειαν ἔχουσι τὸν σκοπὸν, ἀλλά ταύτης τὴν παραυτίκα προκρίνουσιν ἡδονήν· καὶ μόνον λέγουσι* Φάγωμεν καὶ πίωμεν αὔριον γὰρ ἀποθνήσκομεν. Τῶν μὲν οὖν ύποκριτῶνἘπικριτιανῶν ἀντὶ Μελιτιανῶν ἡ πρόθεσις τοιαύτη, καὶ ό τρόπος ἄπιστος · oi δὲ πιστοὶ δοῦλοι τοῦ Σωτῆρος καὶ ἀληθῶς ἐπίσκοποι, οἱ γνησίως πιστεύσαντες, καὶ μὴ ἑαυτοῖς. ἀλλά τῷ Κυρίῳ ζῶντες, οὗτοι, πιστῶς εὐσεβοῦντες είς τὸν Κύριον ήμῶν Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν, καὶ γινώσκοντες, καθά προεῖπον, ὡς κατά τῆς ἀληθείας προφάσεις εἰσὶ ψευδεῖς, καὶ φανερῶς ὲπλάσθησαν διά τὴν Ἀρειανὴν αἵρεσιν καὶ γὰρ ἐκ τῆς Οὐρσακίου καὶ Οὐάλεντος μετανοίας κατεμάνθανον τὴν κατά ’Δθανασίου συντεθεῖσαν συκοφαντίαν· ῖνα αὐτὸν μὲν ἐκποδὼν ἄρωσι, τὴν δὲ ἀσέβειαν τῶν Χριστομάχων είς τὰς Ἐκκλησίας είσάξωσι ° ταῦτα συνορῶντες, ὡς ἀληθείας ὄντες ύπὲρμαχοι καὶ κήρυκες, ὑβρισθῆναι καὶ ἐξορισθῆναι μᾶλλον εἴλοντο, καὶ ὑπέμειναν, ἦ κατʼ αὑτοῦ ὑπογράψαι, καὶ τοτςὶἋρειομανίταις κοινωνῆσαι. Οὐ γάρ ἑπελάθοντο, ἀ ἐδίδαξαν· ἀλλά καὶ μᾶλλον γιγνώσκουσιν, ὼς τοῖς μὲν προδόταις ἀτιμία πολλὴ, τοῖς δὲ ὁμολογοῦσι τὴν ἀλήθειαν, βασιλεία οὐρανῶν καὶ τοῖς μὲν όλιγὼροις καὶ φοβηθεῖσι Κωνστάντιον οὐδὲν ἔσται ἀγαθόν · τοῖς δὲ ὑπομείνασι τάς ὧδε θλίψεις, ὡς ὲκ χειμῶνος ναύταις εὔδιος λιμὴν, ὡς ἀθληταῖς μετά τὸν ἀγῶνα στέφανος, οὕτω καὶ αὐτοῖς με·γάλη καὶ αἰώνιος χαρά καὶ εὐφροσύνη ὲν τοῖς ούραο νοῖς γενήσεται· οἵαν ἔσχεν Ἰωσὴφ μετά τάς θλίψεις ἐκείνας* οἵαν ό μέγας Δανιὴλ μετά τοὺς πειρασμοὺς καὶ τάς πολλὰς ἐπιβουλὰς τῶν βασιλικῶνο οἵαν ἔχει νῦν ὁ Παῦλος στεφανούμενος ὑπὸ τοῦ Σωτῆρος ο οἵαν προσδοκῶντες καὶ oi πανταχοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ λαοὶ, ταῦτα βλέποντες, οὐκ ὴσθένησαν τῇ προαιρέσει, ἀλλά μᾶλλον ὲνεδυναμώθησαν τῇ πίστει, καὶ πλέον ηὔξησαν τὴν προθυμίαν. Πληροφορηθέντες γάρ ὑπὲρ τῆς συκοφαντίας καὶ ἀσεβείας τῶν αἱρετικῶν, καταγινῶσκουσι μὲν τοῦ διώκοντος, συντρέχουσι δὲ τοῖς διωκομένοις τῇ γνώμῃ καὶ τῇ ὁμοφροσύνῃ · ἵνα καὶ αὐτοὶ τὸν τῆς ὁμολογίας ἀπολάβωσι στέφανον.

Toiouton men oun esti to exelthon parakKōny stantiou paranomon prostagma tōn de laōn prothymia men ēn eis martyrion, kai mallon misos kata tēs asebestatēs haireseōs, penthos de homōs dia tas Ekklēsias, kai stenagmos para pantōn, boōntōn pros ton Kyrion o Pheisai, Kyrie, tou laou sou, kaimē dǭs tēn klēronomian sou eis oneidos tois echthrois sou ’ alla kai tachynon tou exelesthai hēmas ek cheiros anomōn. Idou gar tōn men sou therapontōn ouk epheisanto, tǭ de Antichristǭ tēn hodon paraskeuazousin. Ou gar antistēsontai pote Melitianoi toutǭ, oude phrontisousi peri alētheias, oude arnēsasthai ton Christon phaulon hēgēsontaio anthrōpoi mēdolōs gnē siōs proselthontes tǭ Logǭ, pros panta kata ton chamaileonta schēmatizomenoi, kai misthōtoi tōn anyontōn autōn tēn chreian gignomenoi. Ou gar pros tēn alētheian echousi ton skopon, alla tautēs tēn parautika prokrinousin hēdonēn; kai monon legousi* Phagōmen kai piōmen aurion gar apothnēskomen. Tōn men oun ypokritōnEpikritianōn anti Melitianōn hē prothesis toiautē, kai o tropos apistos ; oi de pistoi douloi tou Sōtēros kai alēthōs episkopoi, hoi gnēsiōs pisteusantes, kai mē heautois. alla tǭ Kyriǭ zōntes, houtoi, pistōs eusebountes eis ton Kyrion ēmōn Iēsoun Christon, kai ginōskontes, katha proeipon, hōs kata tēs alētheias prophaseis eisi pseudeis, kai phanerōs eplasthēsan dia tēn Areianēn hairesin kai gar ek tēs Oursakiou kai Oualentos metanoias katemanthanon tēn kata ’Dthanasiou syntetheisan sykophantian; ina auton men ekpodōn arōsi, tēn de asebeian tōn Christomachōn eis tas Ekklēsias eisaxōsi ° tauta synorōntes, hōs alētheias ontes ypermachoi kai kērykes, hybristhēnai kai exoristhēnai mallon eilonto, kai hypemeinan, ē katʼ hautou hypograpsai, kai totsiAreiomanitais koinōnēsai. Ou gar hepelathonto, a edidaxan; alla kai mallon gignōskousin, ōs tois men prodotais atimia pollē, tois de homologousi tēn alētheian, basileia ouranōn kai tois men oligōrois kai phobētheisi Kōnstantion ouden estai agathon ; tois de hypomeinasi tas hōde thlipseis, hōs ek cheimōnos nautais eudios limēn, hōs athlētais meta ton agōna stephanos, houtō kai autois me;galē kai aiōnios chara kai euphrosynē en tois ourao nois genēsetai; hoian eschen Iōsēph meta tas thlipseis ekeinas* hoian o megas Daniēl meta tous peirasmous kai tas pollas epiboulas tōn basilikōno hoian echei nyn ho Paulos stephanoumenos hypo tou Sōtēros o hoian prosdokōntes kai oi pantachou tou Theou laoi, tauta blepontes, ouk ēsthenēsan tę̄ proairesei, alla mallon enedynamōthēsan tę̄ pistei, kai pleon ēuxēsan tēn prothymian. Plērophorēthentes gar hyper tēs sykophantias kai asebeias tōn hairetikōn, kataginōskousi men tou diōkontos, syntrechousi de tois diōkomenois tę̄ gnōmę̄ kai tę̄ homophrosynę̄ ; hina kai autoi ton tēs homologias apolabōsi stephanon.

Such, then, is the lawless order that went out from Constantius. Among the people there was eagerness for martyrdom and still greater hatred of the most impious heresy; yet there was mourning for the churches and groaning from all, crying to the Lord: “Spare your people, O Lord, and do not give your inheritance to reproach to your enemies; but make haste to deliver us from the hand of the lawless. For see, they have not spared your servants, and they are preparing the way for Antichrist.” For the Meletians will never resist him, nor care for the truth, nor think it a bad thing to deny Christ—men who have never genuinely come to the Word, taking every shape like the chameleon, and becoming the hirelings of those who serve their needs. For their aim is not the truth; they prefer to it the pleasure of the moment, and say only, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” Such is the purpose of the hypocrites—“Epicritians” rather than Meletians—and such their faithless character. But the faithful servants of the Savior and true bishops, who believe genuinely and live not for themselves but for the Lord—these, faithfully pious toward our Lord Jesus Christ, and knowing, as I said before, that the pretexts against the truth are false and were plainly invented for the sake of the Arian heresy (for from the repentance of Ursacius and Valens they learned of the false accusation composed against Athanasius, in order to put him out of the way and bring the impiety of the Christ-fighters into the churches)—seeing this, as champions and heralds of the truth, chose rather to be insulted and exiled, and endured it, than to sign against him and communicate with the Ariomaniacs. For they did not forget what they had taught; but they know all the more that for traitors there is great dishonor, and for those who confess the truth the kingdom of heaven; and that for the careless and those who feared Constantius there will be nothing good, but for those who endured afflictions here, as a calm harbor for sailors after a storm, as a crown for athletes after the contest, so for them there will be great and eternal joy and gladness in heaven—such as Joseph had after those afflictions, such as the great Daniel had after his trials and the many plots of the courtiers, such as Paul now has, crowned by the Savior. Such joy the peoples of God everywhere also await; and seeing these things, they have not weakened in purpose, but rather been strengthened in faith and increased their zeal the more. For being fully assured of the false accusation and impiety of the heretics, they condemn the persecutor and run with the persecuted in mind and accord, so that they too may receive the crown of confession.

Joel 2:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 144:7 (143:7 LXX) (echo, low confidence) · 1 Cor 15:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 14:7 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius contrasts the time-serving Meletian bishops with the faithful bishops who chose exile rather than condemn him, and who await the reward of confessors.

  • “Spare your people …”: Joel 2:17. “Make haste to deliver us”: cf. Ps 144:7 (143:7 LXX). “Let us eat and drink …”: 1 Cor 15:32 (Isa 22:13). “Live not for themselves but for the Lord”: cf. Rom 14:7–8. “Epicritians” (Ἐπικριτιανῶν) is an uncertain word, apparently a jibe playing on “Meletians”. OCR slips are corrected by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in Latin letters): UO γάρ → Οὐ γάρ; “rupere καὶ πίωμεν → Φάγωμεν καὶ πίωμεν; Ἐκκληsint; → Ἐκκλησίας; ἀθληrei; → ἀθληταῖς.

Topics: Persecution, Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 79 (PG 25:789a–792a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-79). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-79) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.

Chapter 80

80PG 25:792a–796d

Πολλᾶ μὶν οὖν ἄν τις δύναιτο λέγειν κατὰ τῆς μυσαρᾶς καὶ Χριστομάχου ταύτης αἱρέσεως ° πολλὰ δὲ καὶ ἀποδείξειεν ἄν τις εἶναι προοιμια του Αντιχρίστου, τὰ ἐπιτηδεύματα Κωνσταντίου ἔπειδή δὲ, ὡς εἶπεν 6 προφήτης, ἀπὸ ποδῶν ’ἐως κεφαλῆς οὐδὲν ἐστιν εὔλογον έν αὐτῇ, παντὸς δὲ ῥύπου καὶ πάσης ἀσεβείας πεπλήρωται, ὥστε καὶ μόνον ἐξ ἀκοῆς φευκτέαν αὐτὴν εἶναι, ὡς ἐξέραμα κυνὸς, καὶ δρακόντων ἰόν · ἔστι δὲ καὶ Κοστύλλιος ἐκ φανεροῦ τήν εἰκόνα φέρων τοῦ ἀντικειμένου ο ’ἱνα μή μακρὸς 6 λόγος γένηται, διὰ τοῦτο καλὸν ἀρκεσθῆναι τῇ θείᾳ Γραφῇ, καὶ πάντας αὐτῇ πεισθῆναι παραγγελλούσῃ διά τε τὰς ἄλλας αἱρέσεις, καὶ μάλιστα διά ταυτην ἔστι δὲ αὐτῆς τὸ παράγγελμα τοῦτο Ἀπόστητε, ἀπόστητε, έξέλθετε ἐκεῖθεν, καὶ ἀκαθάρτου μὴ ’ἅψησθε, ἐξέλθετε ἐκ μέσου αὐτῶν, καὶ ἀφ ορίσθητε, οἱ φέροντες τὰ σκεύή Κυρίου Τοῦτο γὰρ πρὸς διδασκαλίαν ἀρκεῖ πᾶσιν ἵνʼ, εί μὲν τις ἠπατήθη παρʼ αὐτῶν, ἐξελθὼν ὡς ἀπὸ Σοδόμων, μηκέτι πρὸς αὐτοὺς ἐπιστρέψῃ, μήποτε πάθῃ τὰ τῆς γυναικὸς τοῦ Λώτ · εἰ δὲ τις καθαρὸς ἐξ,ἀρχῆς ἀπὸ τῆς ἀσεβοῦς ταύτης αἱρέσεως διέμεινεν, ἔχῃ,τὸ καύχημα ἐν Χριστῷ λέγων · Οὐκ έξεπετάσαμεν χεῖρας ἡμῶν πρὸς Θεὸν ἀλλότριον, οὐδὲ προσελυνήσαμεν τοῖς ἔργοις τῶν χειρῶν ἡμῶν, οόδὲ έλατρεύσαρμεν τῇ κτίσει παρά σὲ τὸν κτίσαντα τὰ πάντα Θεὸν, διὰ τοῦ σοῦ Λόγου τοῦ μονογενοῦς Υἱοῦ τοῦ Κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, διʼ οὗ σοὶ τῷ Πατρὶ … αὐτῷ, ὡς οὔτε θορύβου γενομένου, οὔτε τινὸς ἀποθανόντος· ἔλεγχος δὲ οὗτος οὐκ ὀλίγος μὴ γεγενῆσθαι ταῦτα κατὰ γνώμην τοῦ φιλανθρωποτάτου Αὐγούστου Κωνσταντίου. Οὐκ ἂν γὰρ ἐφοβήθη ἐπὶ τοῖς οὕτω γενομένοις, εἰ ἐκ προστάξεως ταῦτα ἐπεποιήκει. Καὶ γάρ καὶ ἀπελθόντας ἡμᾶς πρὸς αὐτὸν, καὶ ἀξιοῦντας μηδενὶ βίαν ποιεῖν, μηδὲ ἀρνεῖσθαι τὰ γενόμενα, ἐκέλεοσε, Χριστιανοὺς ἡμᾶς ὄντας, κατακοπῆναι ῥοπάλοις · δεικνὺς καὶ ἐκ τούτων τὸν γενόμενον νυκτὸς πόλεμον κατὰ τῆς Ἐκκλησίας. Διά τοῦτο καὶ νῦν ταῦτα διαμαρτυρόμεθα, ἤδη καὶ μελλόντων τινῶν ἐξ ἡμῶν ἀποδημεῖν παρὰ τὸν εὐσεβέστατον Αὔγουστον. Ὁρκίζομεν δὲ κατὰ τοῦ παντοκράτορος θεοῦ ὑπὲρ τῆς σωτηρίας τοῦ εὐσεβεστάτου Αὐγούστου Κωνσταντίου, τὸν τε ἔπαρχον τῆς Αἰγύπτου Μάξιμον καὶ τούς κουριώσους ἀνενεγκεῖν πάντα ἐπὶ τὴν εὐσέβειαν τοῦ Αὐγούστου, καὶ τὴν ἐξουσίαν τῶν λαμπροτάτων ἐπάρχων. Ὀρκίζομεν δὲ καὶ τοὺς ναυκλήρους πάντας κηρύξαι ταῦτα πανταγοῦ, καὶ εἷς ἀκοὰς τοῦ εὐσεβεστάτου Αὐγούστου ἀνενεγκεῖν, καὶ εἰς τοὺς ἐπάρχους, καὶ εἰς τοὺς κατὰ τόπον δικαστάςοτίνα γνωσθῇ 6 γενόμενος πόλεμος κατὰ τῆςἘκκλησίας, καὶ ’ὁτι ἐν καιροῖς τοῦ Αὐγούστου Κωνσταντίου ἐποίησε Συριανὸς γενέσθαι μάρτυρας παρθένους τε καὶ ἄλλους πολλούς Ἐπιφωσκούσης γὰρ τῇ πρὸ πέντε εἰδῶν Φευβρουαρίων, τουτέστι τῆς ιδʼ τοῦ Μεγὶρ μηνὸς, ἀγρυπνούντων ἡμῶν ἐν τῷ Κυριακῷ, καὶ ταῖς εὐχαῖς σχολαζόντων (σύναξις γὰρ ἔμελλε τῇ παραγίνεσθαι), ἐξαίφνης περὶ τὸ μεσονύκτιον ἐπῆλθεν ἡμῖν τε καὶ τῇ ἐκκλησίᾳ ὁ λαμπρότατος δοὺξ Συριανὸς μετὰ πολλῶν λεγεώνων στρατιωτῶν, ἐχόντων ὅπλα, καὶ ξίφη γυμνὰ, καὶ βέλη, καὶ ἄλλα πολεμικὰ σκεύη, καὶ τὰς περικεφαλαίας ἐπὶ τῶν κεφαλῶν.Καὶ άληθῶς εὐχομένων ἡμῶν καὶ ἀναγνώσεως γινομένης, τὰς μὲν θύρας κατέαξαν · ὡς δὲ τῇ βίᾳ τοῦ πλήθους ὴνεῷγεισαν αί θύραι, ἐκέλευσε καὶ οἱ μὲν ἐτόξευον, οἱ δὲ ἠλάλαζον, καὶ κτύπος ἐγίγνετο τῶν ὅπλων, καὶ τὰ ξίφη ἀντέλαμπον τῷ ἐκ τῶν λύχνων ωτί. Καὶ λοιπὸν τὰ ἐκ τούτων, παρθένοι άνῃροῦντο, καὶ πολλοὶ κατεπατοῦντο, καὶ συνέπιπτον ἀλλήλοις, ἐπερχομένων τῶν στρατιωτῶν, καὶ ἄνδρες τοξευόμενοι ἐθανατουντο ’ἔνιοι δὲ τῶν στρατιωτῶν καὶ ἐπὶ τὸ διαρπάζειν ἐτρέποντο, καὶ γυμνὰς ἴστων τὰς παρθένους, ὁπότε φόβος ἦν αὐταῖς μείζων τοῦ θανάτου, τὸ κᾶν ὅλως ἅπτεσθαί τινας αὐτῶν. Καὶ 6 μὲν ἐπίσκοπος ἐκάθητο ἐπὶ τοῦ θρονου, προτρέπων πάντας εὔχεσθαι· ὁ δὲ δοὺξ ἐστρατἡγει, ἔχων μεθʼ ἑαυτοῦ καὶ Ἰλάριον τὸν νοτάο ριον, ἐνεργοῦτα τοιαῦτα, οἷα καὶ τὸ τέλος ἔδειξεν. '0 μὲν γὰρ ἐπίσκοπος, ἑλκόμενος, παρʼ ὀλίγον διεσπάσθη. Παραλυθεὶς γοῦν μεγάλως, καὶ ὡς νεκρὸς γενόμενος, οὐκ οἷʼὃαμεν ποῦ γέγονεν ἀφανὴς παρʼ αὐτῶν ’ ἀποκτεῖναι γὰρ αὐτὸν ἐσπούδαζον. Oi δὲ, ὡς εἷδον πολλοὺς ἀποθανόντας, προσέταττον τοῖς στρατιώταις ἀφανῆ τὰ σώματα καταστῆσαι τῶν τετελευτηκότων. Αἱ δὲ καταλειφθεῖσαν. νεκραὶ ἀγιώταται παρθένοι ἐτάφησαν ἐν τοῖς μνήμασιν, ἔχουσαι καύχημα, ὅτι ἐν τοῖς καιροῖς τοῦ εὐσεβεστάτου Κωνσταντίου γεγόνασι μάρτυρες. Διάκονοι δὲ έν αὖτῷ τῷ Κυριακῷ κατεκόπτοντο πληγαῖς, καὶ συνεκλείοντο. Οὐκ ἅχρὶ δὲ τούτων ἔστη τὸ πρᾶγμα ἀλλᾶ γὰρ μετᾶ τὸ ταῦτα γενέσθαι, ὁ βουλόμενος λοιπὸν ἤν ἠδύνατο θύραν κατεάσσων ἤνοιγε, καὶ ἠρεύνα, καὶ ἥρπαζε τὰ ἔνδον· καὶ εἰς τοιούτους τόπους εἰσήρχοντο, εἰς οὓς οὐδὲ πᾶσι τοῖς Χριστιανοῖς ἔξεστιν εἰσελθεῖν. Οἵδε ταῦτα καὶ ὁ στρατηγὸς τῆς πόλεως Γοργόνιος · Δἐκεῖ γὰρ ἦν. Οὔ μικρὸς γὰρ ἔλεγχος τῆς τοιαύτης πολεμικῆς ἐφόδου τὸ ἐν τῷ Κυριακῷ καταλιπεῖν τὰ παρὰ τῶν εἰσελθόντων ὅπλα καὶ βέλη, καὶ ξίφη· μέχρι γὰρ νῦν ἐκρεμάσθη ἐν τῇ ἐκκλησίᾳ, ἵνα μή ἀρνήσασθαι δυνηθῶσι, Καὶ γὰρ πολλάκις ἀπέστειλε τὸν τῆς τάξεως Δυνάμιον καὶ τὸν στρατηγὸν, θέλων αὐτά ἆραι ’ καὶ τέως οὐ συνεχωρήσαμεν, ἵνα … γνωσθῇ. Εἰ μὲν οὖν πρόσταγμά ἐστι διώκεσθαι ἡμᾶς, ἕτοιμοι πάντες μαρτυρῆσαι· εἷ δὲ μή ἔστι τοῦ Αὖγούστου πρόσταγμα, ἀξιοῦμεν τὸν ἔπαρχον τῆς Αἷγύπτου Μάξιμον, καὶ τοὺς πολιτευτὰς πάντας, ἀξιῶσαι αὐτὸν μηκέτι τοιαῦτα ἐπιχειρῆσαι. Ἀξιοῢμεν δὲ καὶ ταύτην ἡμῶν τὴν δέησιν ἀνενεχθῆναι ἵνα μή ἄλλον τινὰ ἐπίσκοπον ἐπιχειρήσωσιν εἰσαγαγεῖν ὧδε μέχρι γὰρ θανάτου ἑστήκαμεν, αὐτὸν ἐπιθυμοῦντες τὸν αἰδεσιμώτατον ’Δθανάσιον, ’ὀν ἐς ἀρχῆς ὁ Θεὸς ἡμῖν δέδωκε κατὰ διαδοχήν τῶν Πατέρων ἡμῶν.

Polla min oun an tis dynaito legein kata tēs mysaras kai Christomachou tautēs haireseōs ° polla de kai apodeixeien an tis einai prooimia tou Antichristou, ta epitēdeumata Kōnstantiou epeidē de, hōs eipen 6 prophētēs, apo podōn ’eōs kephalēs ouden estin eulogon en autę̄, pantos de rhypou kai pasēs asebeias peplērōtai, hōste kai monon ex akoēs pheuktean autēn einai, hōs exerama kynos, kai drakontōn ion ; esti de kai Kostyllios ek phanerou tēn eikona pherōn tou antikeimenou o ’hina mē makros 6 logos genētai, dia touto kalon arkesthēnai tę̄ theią Graphę̄, kai pantas autę̄ peisthēnai parangellousę̄ dia te tas allas haireseis, kai malista dia tautēn esti de autēs to parangelma touto Apostēte, apostēte, exelthete ekeithen, kai akathartou mē ’hapsēsthe, exelthete ek mesou autōn, kai aph oristhēte, hoi pherontes ta skeuē Kyriou Touto gar pros didaskalian arkei pasin hinʼ, ei men tis ēpatēthē parʼ autōn, exelthōn hōs apo Sodomōn, mēketi pros autous epistrepsę̄, mēpote pathę̄ ta tēs gynaikos tou Lōt ; ei de tis katharos ex,archēs apo tēs asebous tautēs haireseōs diemeinen, echę̄,to kauchēma en Christǭ legōn ; Ouk exepetasamen cheiras hēmōn pros Theon allotrion, oude proselynēsamen tois ergois tōn cheirōn hēmōn, oode elatreusarmen tę̄ ktisei para se ton ktisanta ta panta Theon, dia tou sou Logou tou monogenous Huiou tou Kyriou hēmōn Iēsou Christou, diʼ hou soi tǭ Patri … autǭ, hōs oute thorybou genomenou, oute tinos apothanontos; elenchos de houtos ouk oligos mē gegenēsthai tauta kata gnōmēn tou philanthrōpotatou Augoustou Kōnstantiou. Ouk an gar ephobēthē epi tois houtō genomenois, ei ek prostaxeōs tauta epepoiēkei. Kai gar kai apelthontas hēmas pros auton, kai axiountas mēdeni bian poiein, mēde arneisthai ta genomena, ekeleose, Christianous hēmas ontas, katakopēnai rhopalois ; deiknys kai ek toutōn ton genomenon nyktos polemon kata tēs Ekklēsias. Dia touto kai nyn tauta diamartyrometha, ēdē kai mellontōn tinōn ex hēmōn apodēmein para ton eusebestaton Augouston. Horkizomen de kata tou pantokratoros theou hyper tēs sōtērias tou eusebestatou Augoustou Kōnstantiou, ton te eparchon tēs Aigyptou Maximon kai tous kouriōsous anenenkein panta epi tēn eusebeian tou Augoustou, kai tēn exousian tōn lamprotatōn eparchōn. Orkizomen de kai tous nauklērous pantas kēryxai tauta pantagou, kai heis akoas tou eusebestatou Augoustou anenenkein, kai eis tous eparchous, kai eis tous kata topon dikastasotina gnōsthę̄ 6 genomenos polemos kata tēsEkklēsias, kai ’hoti en kairois tou Augoustou Kōnstantiou epoiēse Syrianos genesthai martyras parthenous te kai allous pollous Epiphōskousēs gar tę̄ pro pente eidōn Pheubrouariōn, toutesti tēs idʼ tou Megir mēnos, agrypnountōn hēmōn en tǭ Kyriakǭ, kai tais euchais scholazontōn (synaxis gar emelle tę̄ paraginesthai), exaiphnēs peri to mesonyktion epēlthen hēmin te kai tę̄ ekklēsią ho lamprotatos doux Syrianos meta pollōn legeōnōn stratiōtōn, echontōn hopla, kai xiphē gymna, kai belē, kai alla polemika skeuē, kai tas perikephalaias epi tōn kephalōn.Kai alēthōs euchomenōn hēmōn kai anagnōseōs ginomenēs, tas men thyras kateaxan ; hōs de tę̄ bią tou plēthous ēneǭgeisan ai thyrai, ekeleuse kai hoi men etoxeuon, hoi de ēlalazon, kai ktypos egigneto tōn hoplōn, kai ta xiphē antelampon tǭ ek tōn lychnōn ōti. Kai loipon ta ek toutōn, parthenoi anę̄rounto, kai polloi katepatounto, kai synepipton allēlois, eperchomenōn tōn stratiōtōn, kai andres toxeuomenoi ethanatounto ’enioi de tōn stratiōtōn kai epi to diarpazein etreponto, kai gymnas istōn tas parthenous, hopote phobos ēn autais meizōn tou thanatou, to kan holōs haptesthai tinas autōn. Kai 6 men episkopos ekathēto epi tou thronou, protrepōn pantas euchesthai; ho de doux estratēgei, echōn methʼ heautou kai Ilarion ton notao rion, energouta toiauta, hoia kai to telos edeixen. '0 men gar episkopos, helkomenos, parʼ oligon diespasthē. Paralytheis goun megalōs, kai hōs nekros genomenos, ouk hoiʼhoamen pou gegonen aphanēs parʼ autōn ’ apokteinai gar auton espoudazon. Oi de, hōs heidon pollous apothanontas, prosetatton tois stratiōtais aphanē ta sōmata katastēsai tōn teteleutēkotōn. Hai de kataleiphtheisan. nekrai agiōtatai parthenoi etaphēsan en tois mnēmasin, echousai kauchēma, hoti en tois kairois tou eusebestatou Kōnstantiou gegonasi martyres. Diakonoi de en autǭ tǭ Kyriakǭ katekoptonto plēgais, kai synekleionto. Ouk hachri de toutōn estē to pragma alla gar meta to tauta genesthai, ho boulomenos loipon ēn ēdynato thyran kateassōn ēnoige, kai ēreuna, kai hērpaze ta endon; kai eis toioutous topous eisērchonto, eis hous oude pasi tois Christianois exestin eiselthein. Hoide tauta kai ho stratēgos tēs poleōs Gorgonios ; Dekei gar ēn. Ou mikros gar elenchos tēs toiautēs polemikēs ephodou to en tǭ Kyriakǭ katalipein ta para tōn eiselthontōn hopla kai belē, kai xiphē; mechri gar nyn ekremasthē en tę̄ ekklēsią, hina mē arnēsasthai dynēthōsi, Kai gar pollakis apesteile ton tēs taxeōs Dynamion kai ton stratēgon, thelōn auta arai ’ kai teōs ou synechōrēsamen, hina … gnōsthę̄. Ei men oun prostagma esti diōkesthai hēmas, hetoimoi pantes martyrēsai; hei de mē esti tou Augoustou prostagma, axioumen ton eparchon tēs Haigyptou Maximon, kai tous politeutas pantas, axiōsai auton mēketi toiauta epicheirēsai. Axioÿmen de kai tautēn hēmōn tēn deēsin anenechthēnai hina mē allon tina episkopon epicheirēsōsin eisagagein hōde mechri gar thanatou hestēkamen, auton epithymountes ton aidesimōtaton ’Dthanasion, ’on es archēs ho Theos hēmin dedōke kata diadochēn tōn Paterōn hēmōn.

Many things one could say against this abominable and Christ-fighting heresy; and one could show that many of Constantius’s practices are preludes of Antichrist. But since, as the prophet said, from the feet to the head there is nothing sound in it, but it is full of all filth and all impiety, so that it is to be shunned even on hearsay alone, like a dog’s vomit and the venom of serpents; and since Costyllius openly bears the image of the adversary—so that the account may not be long, it is good to be content with the divine Scripture, and for all to obey it as it commands, both concerning the other heresies and especially concerning this one. Its command is this: “Depart, depart, go out from there, and touch no unclean thing; go out from the midst of them and be separate, you who bear the vessels of the Lord.” This suffices for the instruction of all: so that, if anyone has been deceived by them, he may go out as from Sodom and no longer return to them, lest he suffer the fate of Lot’s wife; and if anyone has remained pure from this impious heresy from the beginning, he may have his boast in Christ, saying: “We have not stretched out our hands to a strange god, nor worshipped the works of our hands, nor served the creature rather than you, God, who created all things through your Word, the only-begotten Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom to you, the Father, and with … ” … [81] … him, as though there had been neither tumult nor anyone killed. This is no small proof that these things were not done according to the mind of the most humane Augustus Constantius; for he would not have been afraid over what had happened, if he had done it by command. Indeed, when we went to him and asked him to do violence to no one and not to deny what had happened, he ordered us, Christians as we are, to be beaten with clubs, showing by this too the war waged by night against the Church. For this reason we now make this protest, since some of us are already about to travel to the most pious Augustus. And we adjure, by God Almighty and for the safety of the most pious Augustus Constantius, Maximus the prefect of Egypt and the curiosi, to report everything to the piety of the Augustus and to the authority of the most illustrious prefects. We adjure also all the shipmasters to proclaim these things everywhere, and to bring them to the ears of the most pious Augustus, and to the prefects, and to the magistrates in every place, so that it may be known that a war was made against the Church, and that in the times of Augustus Constantius Syrianus caused virgins and many others to become martyrs. For as the day was dawning on the fifth before the Ides of February, that is, the fourteenth of the month Mechir, while we were keeping vigil in the Lord’s house and devoting ourselves to prayers (for a synaxis was to take place …), suddenly about midnight the most illustrious duke Syrianus came upon us and the church with many legions of soldiers, having arms and drawn swords and bows and other implements of war, and helmets on their heads. And while we were actually praying and the reading was going on, they broke down the doors; and when the doors had been forced open by the mass of men, he gave the order: some shot arrows, others raised the war cry, there was a clashing of arms, and the swords flashed in the light of the lamps. And then, as a result, virgins were killed, many were trampled underfoot and fell over one another as the soldiers came on, and men were shot with arrows and died. Some of the soldiers also turned to plunder and stripped the virgins, for whom even to be touched by some of them was a fear greater than death. And the bishop sat on his throne, urging all to pray; and the duke led the attack, having with him Hilary the notary, who was working such things as the outcome showed. For the bishop, being dragged, was nearly torn to pieces; and being greatly weakened, and become as one dead, he disappeared from them, we know not where; for they were eager to kill him. And when they saw that many had died, they ordered the soldiers to make the bodies of the dead disappear. But the most holy virgins who were left dead were buried in the tombs, having the boast that they became martyrs in the times of the most pious Constantius. And deacons were beaten with blows in the very Lord’s house and shut up there. Nor did the matter stop there; but after this had happened, whoever wished broke down and opened whatever door he could, searched, and seized what was inside; and they entered places that not even all Christians may enter. Gorgonius, the general of the city, knows this, for he was there. And no small proof of such a warlike attack is that the arms, arrows, and swords of those who entered were left in the Lord’s house; for to this day they have been hung up in the church, so that they cannot deny it. Indeed he has often sent Dynamius of the office and the general, wishing to remove them; and so far we have not allowed it, so that … it may be known. If, then, there is an order that we be persecuted, we are all ready to be martyred; but if it is not the order of the Augustus, we ask Maximus the prefect of Egypt and all the councillors to ask him not to attempt such things again. And we ask that this petition of ours too be reported, that they not attempt to bring in any other bishop here; for we stand firm unto death, desiring the most reverend Athanasius himself, whom God gave us from the beginning in succession to our fathers.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Isa 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 26:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Deut 32:33 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 52:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 19:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 44:20 (43:21 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:25 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Athanasius closes the History by urging the faithful to separate from the heresy; after a gap there follows the end of the Alexandrian people’s protest describing the night attack of the duke Syrianus on the church in February 356.

  • “From the feet to the head there is nothing sound”: Isa 1:6. The dog’s vomit: Prov 26:11 (2 Pet 2:22); the venom of serpents: Deut 32:33. “Depart, depart …”: Isa 52:11. Lot’s wife: Gen 19:26. “We have not stretched out our hands to a strange god”: Ps 44:20 (43:21 LXX); serving the creature rather than the Creator: Rom 1:25. “Costyllius” is a contemptuous diminutive of Constantius.
  • The end of the History (ch. 81, after the doxology) is lost in the scan; what follows the gap (“… him, as though there had been neither tumult nor anyone killed”) is the latter part of the protest of the Alexandrian people against the attack of Syrianus (9 February 356). Its opening and a few words inside it are lost (“…”). A note by the editor or scribe on the order of the letters that followed the History in the manuscript is removed by a logged correction. OCR debris is removed by logged corrections.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Latin-letter OCR debris; a word lost; OCR debris; line scattered by the OCR; letters reassembled; lines lost and scattered by the OCR; legible words reassembled; note on the order of the letters in the manuscript, not part of the text): πολλὰ δκ \ 9 ’κρῖ τι 1 ~ ν ε και αποὸειξειεν αν τις → πολλὰ δὲ καὶ ἀποδείξειεν ἄν τις; ’σοὶ τῷ Ππρῖ, καὶ ’σὺν Ίῦθι τινὸς ἀποθα-, αὐτῷ, ὡς οὕτε θορύβου γενομένου, οὔτε νόντοςν ο → σοὶ τῷ Πατρὶ … αὐτῷ, ὡς οὔτε θορύβου γενομένου, οὔτε τινὸς ἀποθανόντος·; εἰσήρχοντο, ἰ η,9 ’ΝΚ η- ν υ,θ υ ε ς ους oues πασι τοις Χριστιανοις εξεστιν εἷσελθειν → εἰσήρχοντο, εἰς οὓς οὐδὲ πᾶσι τοῖς Χριστιανοῖς ἔξεστιν εἰσελθεῖν; gannitu γνωσθῇ → ἵνα … γνωσθῇ; (Ἠ μὲν προγεγραμμένη πρὸς τοὺς ἅπανταχοῦ μοναχοὺς ἐπιστολή τελευτᾷ εἷς τὰ γεγενημένα ἐν Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ ἐπὶ τῇ χειροτονίᾳ Γεωργίου τοῦ Καπ. πάδοκος ἀπὸ ὁποδεκτῶν, τοῦ ’Δρειανοῦ ο ἡ 8e ἑξῆς ἐπιστολὴ, περὶ τῶν ἐν τῇ Ἀριμίνῳ καὶέν Σελευκείᾳ τῆς Ἰσαυρίας γεγενημένων συνόδων διηγουμένη, τὸν προειρημένον Γεώργιον ἐν τῇ Σελευκείᾳ καθῃρῆσθαί φησιν. Ὥστε καλῶς πρώτη τέτακταιή πρὸς τοὺς μοναχοὺς, ἐν τῷ ἀντιγράφω δευτέρα κειμένη) → .

Topics: Heresy, Persecution, Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Athanasius, H. Ar. 80 (PG 25:792a–796d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/athanasius-historia-arianorum/73/#p-80). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-athanasius-historia-arianorum-80) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Migne PG 25 scan text; compared in full afterwards with NPNF² 4.