The Harmony of the Gospels 1.26–1.44
Latin text: Weihrich, CSEL 43 (Latin text: Weihrich, De consensu evangelistarum (CSEL 43), digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 6 (1888), "The Harmony of the Gospels.".
Chapter 1
1.26CSEL 43:23–25
Postremo quod nolunt de illo sentiant. numquid Romani etiam malos deos colendos non putant, qui Pallori et Febri fana fecerunt? qui et agathus demonas inuitandos et cacus demonas placandos monent? quodlibet ergo de illo existiment, cur eum solum sibi nec aduocandum nec propitiandum esse duxerunt? quis est deus iste uel ita ignotus, ut in tam multis dis solus adhuc non inueniatur, uel ita notus, ut a tam multis hominibus iam solus colatur? nihil ergo restat, ut dicant, cur huius dei sacra recipere noluerint, nisi quia solum se coli uoluerit, illos autem deos gentium, quos isti iam colebant, coli prohibuerit. sed hoc ipsum magis ab eis requirendum est, quemnam uel qualem putent esse istum deum, qui noluerit coli deos alios, quibus isti templa et simulacra fecerunt, tantumque potuerit, ut plus ualeret eius uoluntas ad eorum simulacra euertenda quam illorum ad eius sacra non recipienda. certe sententia illius eorum philosophi proditur, quem sapientissimum omnium hominum etiam oraculo fuisse firmarunt. Socratis enim sententia est unumquemque deum sic coli oportere, quomodo se ipse colendum esse praeceperit. proinde istis summa necessitas facta est non colendi deum Hebraeorum, quia, si alio modo eum colere uellent quam se colendum ipse dixisset, non utique illum colerent, sed quod ipsi finxissent. si autem illo modo uellent quo ipse diceret, alios sibi colendos non esse cernebant quos ipse coli prohibebat. ac per hoc respuerunt unius ueri dei cultum, ne multos falsos offenderent, magis arbitrantes sibi obfuturam fuisse istorum iracundiam quam illius beniuolentiam profuturam.
Finally, let them think of him what they like. Do the Romans not think that even evil gods should be worshiped, they who built shrines to Pallor and Fever, and who advise that good demons be invited and evil demons appeased? Whatever, then, they think of him, why did they judge that he alone was neither to be called upon nor propitiated? Who is this God, either so unknown that among so many gods he alone has not yet been found, or so well known that he alone is now worshiped by so many people? Nothing remains for them to say as to why they refused to receive this God's rites, except that he wanted to be worshiped alone and forbade the worship of those gods of the nations whom they were already worshiping. But this itself must be asked of them all the more: whom, or what kind of God, do they think this one to be, who refused to allow the worship of the other gods to whom they made temples and images, and was so powerful that his will to overturn their images prevailed more than their will not to receive his rites? Certainly the opinion of that philosopher of theirs whom they affirmed, even by an oracle, to have been the wisest of all men, makes the matter plain. For it is Socrates' opinion that each god should be worshiped in the way he himself has commanded that he be worshiped. Hence they were under the utmost necessity of not worshiping the God of the Hebrews, because if they wanted to worship him in a way other than he himself had said he was to be worshiped, they would certainly not be worshiping him but what they themselves had invented; but if they wanted to worship him in the way he himself said, they saw that they must not worship the others whom he forbade to be worshiped. And for this reason they rejected the worship of the one true God so as not to offend many false ones, thinking that their anger would harm them more than his goodwill would profit them.
Notes and citation
Summary: The Romans refused the God of Israel because, as Socrates said each god should be worshiped as he commands, his worship excluded all others.
- The temples to Pallor and Febris: compare Augustine, City of God 4.15 and 4.23. The saying ascribed to Socrates is probably from Xenophon, Memorabilia 4.3.16 (worship each god according to the law of the city); Augustine gives it in another form.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray period in the digital text): putent. esse istum → putent esse istum; quam se. colendum → quam se colendum.
Extrabiblical texts: Xenophon, Mem. 4.3.16 (Xenophon, Memorabilia; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.26 (CSEL 43:23–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-26). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-26) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.27CSEL 43:25–26
Sed fuerit ista uana necessitas et ridenda timiditas: nunc quaerimus, quid de isto deo sentiant homines, quibus placet omnes deos colendos esse. si enim iste colendus non est, quomodo coluntur omnes, cum iste non colitur? si autem colendus est, non omnes colendi sunt, quia, nisi solus colatur, iste non colitur. an forte dicturi sunt istum non esse deum, cum illos deos dicant, qui, sicut nos credimus, nihil possunt nisi quod illius iudicio permittuntur, non ut alicui prosint, sed ut nec laedere ualeant nisi eos, quos ita laedendos esse ille iudicat, qui omnia potest? sicut autem ipsi coguntur fateri, minora certe quam ille potuerunt. si enim di sunt, quorum uates consulti ab hominibus ut non dicam fefellerunt, proxima tamen priuatis negotiis responderunt, quomodo non est deus, cuius uates non solum ea, quae ad tempus consulebantur, congrue responderunt, uerum etiam unde non consulebantur de uniuerso genere humano adque omnibus gentibus ea tanto ante praedixerunt, quae nunc et legimus et uidemus? si deum dicunt, quo impleta Sibylla fata cecinit Romanorum, quomodo non est deus, qui et Romanos et omnes nationes in se unum deum per Christi euangelium credituras et omnia patrum suorum simulacra euersuras, sicut praenuntiauit, exhibuit? postremo, si illos deos dicunt, qui numquam ausi sunt per uates suos contra istum deum aliquid dicere, quomodo non est deus, qui per uates suos istorum simulacra non solum euerti iussit, uerum etiam in omnibus gentibus euersum iri praedixit ab eis qui illis desertis se unum deum colere iuberentur et iussi famularentur?
But let that have been an empty necessity and a laughable timidity. Now we ask what people who hold that all the gods should be worshiped think of this God. For if he is not to be worshiped, how are all worshiped when he is not worshiped? But if he is to be worshiped, not all are to be worshiped, because unless he is worshiped alone, he is not worshiped. Or will they perhaps say that he is not God, while they call gods those who, as we believe, can do nothing except what they are permitted by his judgment, not to benefit anyone, but so that they cannot even harm except those whom he who can do all things judges should be harmed in this way? Yet, as they themselves are forced to admit, they have certainly been able to do less than he. For if those are gods whose seers, consulted by human beings, gave answers (I will not say they deceived) on matters close to private affairs, how is he not God whose seers not only answered fittingly what they were consulted about for the time, but also, where they were not consulted, foretold so long before, concerning the whole human race and all nations, the things we now both read and see? If they call him a god by whom the Sibyl was filled when she sang the fates of the Romans, how is he not God who brought about, as he foretold, that both the Romans and all nations would believe in him as the one God through the gospel of Christ and would overturn all the images of their fathers? Finally, if they call those gods who never dared to say anything through their seers against this God, how is he not God who through his seers not only commanded that their images be overturned, but also foretold that they would be overturned in all nations by those who, having abandoned them, would be commanded to worship him as the one God and, being commanded, would serve him?
Notes and citation
Summary: If the pagans call gods those whose seers gave petty answers, the God whose prophets foretold the conversion of all nations is surely God.
- The god said to inspire the Sibyl is Apollo; compare Virgil, Aeneid 6.77–102.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: 'euersuiri' for 'euersum iri'; stray period in the digital text): tanto ante. praedixerunt → tanto ante praedixerunt; euersuiri → euersum iri.
Extrabiblical texts: Sib. Or. (Sibylline Oracles; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.27 (CSEL 43:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-27). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-27) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.28CSEL 43:26–27
Aut legant, si possunt, uel aliquam Sibyllarum uel quemlibet aliorum uatum suorum praedixisse hoc futurum, ut deus Hebraeorum deus Israhel ab omnibus gentibus coleretur, et quod eum cultores aliorum deorum recte antea respuissent, futuras etiam litteras prophetarum eius in auctoritate ita sublimi, ut his obtemperans etiam imperium Romanorum iuberet deleri simulacra, monuisse etiam, ne talibus praeceptis obtemperaretur: legant ista, si possunt, ex aliquibus libris uatum suorum. omitto enim dicere, quod ea quae in illorum libris leguntur pro nostra, hoc est christiana religione testimonium dicunt, quod a sanctis angelis et ab ipsis prophetis nostris audire potuerunt, sicut et praesentem in carne Christum etiam demonia coacta sunt confiteri. sed haec omitto, quae cum proferimus a nostris ficta esse contendunt: ipsi omnino, ipsi urgendi sunt, ut proferant a uatibus deorum suorum contra deum Hebraeorum aliquid prophetatum, sicut nos tot et tanta de libris prophetarum nostrorum contra deos eorum et iussa obseruamus et praedicta recitamus et facta monstramus. quae illi iam qui perpauci remanserunt malunt dolere conpleta quam illum deum agnoscere qui potuit praenuntiare conplenda, cum in suis dis falsis, quae sunt uera demonia, nihil aliud pro magno appetant, quam cum aliquid eorum responsis sibi futurum esse didicerint.
Or let them read out, if they can, that any one of the Sibyls or any other of their seers foretold that this would come to pass, that the God of the Hebrews, the God of Israel, would be worshiped by all nations, and that the worshipers of the other gods had been right to spurn him before; that they foretold too that the writings of his prophets would be of such lofty authority that, in obedience to them, even the Roman empire would command images to be destroyed, and that they warned that such precepts should not be obeyed. Let them read this out, if they can, from any books of their seers. I pass over saying that the things read in their books bear witness for our religion, that is, the Christian religion, which they may have heard from the holy angels and from our prophets themselves, just as the demons were compelled to confess Christ when he was present in the flesh. But I pass over these things, which, when we bring them forward, they contend were invented by our people. They themselves, they themselves above all must be pressed to bring forward something prophesied against the God of the Hebrews by the seers of their gods, as we, from the books of our prophets, observe so many great commands against their gods, recite their predictions, and show their fulfillment. The very few of them who now remain prefer to grieve that these things have been fulfilled rather than acknowledge the God who was able to foretell what was to be fulfilled, though in their own false gods, who are really demons, they seek nothing else as a great thing than when they have learned from their responses that something will happen to them.
Mark 3:11 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: No pagan seer foretold the triumph of the God of Israel or warned against obeying him, while the prophets foretold the fall of the idols.
Extrabiblical texts: Sib. Or. (Sibylline Oracles; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.28 (CSEL 43:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-28). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-28) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.29CSEL 43:27–28
Quae cum ita sint, cur non potius miseri intellegunt illum esse deum uerum, quem sic uident a suorum deorum societate seiunctum, ut quem deum fateri coguntur, qui omnes deos colendos esse profitentur, cum ceteris colere non sinantur? cum ergo simul coli non possunt, cur non ille eligitur qui istos coli uetat relictis istis qui illum coli non uetant? aut si uetant, legatur. quid enim magis populis eorum in templis eorum debuit recitari, ubi nihil umquam tale personuit? et utique prohibitio tam multorum contra unum quam unius contra tam multos notior et potentior esse deberet. nam si huius dei cultus est impius, inutiles sunt di, qui homines ab impietate non prohibent: si uero pius est huius cultus, quoniam in illo praecipitur ne isti colantur, impius est cultus illorum. si autem tam fidenter istum coli prohibent, ut plus audiri timeant quam prohibere audeant, hoc ipso quis non sapiat, quia non sentiat illum esse potius eligendum, qui istos coli tam publice prohibet, qui eorum simulacra euerti iussit, praedixit, euertit, quam istos, quos, ut ille non colatur, iussisse nescimus, praedixisse non legimus, ualuisse aliquid non uidemus? rogo, respondeant: quis est deus iste, qui omnes deos gentium sic persequitur, qui omnia eorum sacra sic prodit, sic extinguit?
Since this is so, why do the wretched not rather understand that he is the true God whom they see so separated from the company of their gods that the very people who profess that all gods should be worshiped are not permitted to worship him whom they are forced to confess as God, together with the rest? Since, then, they cannot be worshiped together, why is he not chosen who forbids these to be worshiped, and these abandoned who do not forbid him to be worshiped? Or if they forbid it, let it be read out. For what ought more to have been recited to their peoples in their temples, where nothing of the kind has ever resounded? And surely the prohibition of so many against one ought to be more widely known and more powerful than that of one against so many. For if the worship of this God is impious, the gods who do not keep people from impiety are useless; but if his worship is pious, then, since it commands that these not be worshiped, their worship is impious. But if they forbid his worship so timidly that they fear being heard more than they dare to forbid, who is so lacking in wisdom as not to perceive from this very fact that he is rather to be chosen who forbids their worship so publicly, who commanded, foretold, and accomplished the overturning of their images, rather than these, whom we do not know to have commanded that he not be worshiped, whom we do not read to have foretold it, and whom we do not see to have been able to do anything? I ask, let them answer: who is this God who thus pursues all the gods of the nations, thus exposes all their rites, thus extinguishes them?
Notes and citation
Summary: Since the God of Israel publicly forbids the other gods while they never forbid him, he is the one to be chosen.
- The clause “quis non sapiat, quia non sentiat” is awkward in the digital text; it is translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: 'quia' for 'quis'; stray period in the digital text): contra tam multos. notior → contra tam multos notior; quia est deus iste → quis est deus iste.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.29 (CSEL 43:27–28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-29). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-29) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.30CSEL 43:28–29
Quid interrogem homines, qui euanuerunt cogitando, quis iste sit? alii dicunt: Saturnus est, credo propter sabbati sanctificationem, quia isti eum diem Saturno tribuerunt. Varro autem ipsorum, quo doctiorem aput se neminem inueniunt, deum Iudaeorum Iouem putauit nihil interesse censens, quo nomine nuncupetur, dum eadem res intellegatur, credo illius summitate deterritus. nam quia nihil superius solent colere Romani quam Iouem, quod Capitolium eorum satis aperteque testatur, eumque regem omnium deorum arbitrantur, cum animaduerteret Iudaeos summum deum colere, nihil aliud potuit suspicari quam Iouem. sed siue qui Saturnum siue qui Iouem deum Iudaeorum putant, dicant: quando Saturnus prohibere ausus est coli alterum deum, nec ipsum Iouem, qui eum regno expulisse perhibetur, patrem filius? qui si tamquam potentior et uictor placuit cultoribus suis, Saturnum uictum expulsumque non colant. sed neque istum coli Iouis prohibuit, et quem uincere potuit, deum tamen esse permisit.
Why should I ask people who have become futile in their thinking who he is? Some say, “He is Saturn,” I suppose because of the hallowing of the Sabbath, since they have assigned that day to Saturn. But their Varro, than whom they find no one more learned among them, thought the God of the Jews was Jupiter, judging that it makes no difference by what name he is called so long as the same reality is understood; I suppose he was overawed by his supremacy. For since the Romans usually worship nothing higher than Jupiter, as their Capitol testifies clearly and openly, and regard him as king of all the gods, when he noticed that the Jews worship the supreme God, he could suspect nothing else than Jupiter. But whether they think the God of the Jews is Saturn or Jupiter, let them say: when did Saturn dare to forbid the worship of another god, not even Jupiter himself, who is said to have driven him from his kingdom, the son his father? And if Jupiter pleased his worshipers as the more powerful and the victor, let them not worship Saturn, the conquered and expelled. But Jupiter did not forbid him to be worshiped either; and the one he was able to conquer he nevertheless allowed to be a god.
Rom 1:21 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Some identify the God of the Jews with Saturn or, like Varro, with Jupiter, yet neither of those gods forbade the worship of the other.
- Varro's identification of the God of the Jews with Jove: compare Augustine, City of God 4.31. The words “sed neque istum coli Iouis prohibuit” are translated by sense ('Iouis' as subject).
Extrabiblical texts: Varro (Varro; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.30 (CSEL 43:28–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-30). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-30) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.31CSEL 43:29–30
Istae, inquiunt, fabulae sunt aut interpretandae a sapientibus aut ridendae; nos autem Iouem colimus, de quo ait Maro: Iouis omnia plena, id est omnia uiuificantem spiritum. merito ergo et Varro Iouem opinatus est coli a Iudaeis, quia dicit per prophetam: caelum et terram ego impleo. quid illud quod idem poeta dicit aethera? quomodo accipiunt? sic enim ait: tum pater omnipotens fecundis imbribus aether coniugis in gremium laetae descendit. aetherem quippe non spiritum, sed corpus esse dicunt sublime, quo caelum super aerem distenditur. an poetae conceditur nunc secundum Platonicos, ut non corpus, sed spiritus, nunc secundum Stoicos loqui, ut corpus sit deus? quid ergo in Capitolio colunt? si spiritum, si denique ipsum caelum corporeum, quid illic facit scutum illud Iouis, quod appellant Aegida? nempe origo nominis huius ita redditur, quia Iouem a matre occultatum capra nutriuit. an et hoc poetae mentiuntur? numquid et Capitolia Romanorum opera sunt poetarum? quid sibi autem uult ista non poetica, sed plane mimica uarietas, deos secundum philosophos in libris quaerere, secundum poetas in templis adorare?
“These,” they say, “are fables, either to be interpreted by the wise or to be laughed at. But we worship the Jupiter of whom Maro says, ‘All things are full of Jove,’ that is, the spirit that gives life to all things.” Rightly, then, did Varro too suppose that Jupiter is worshiped by the Jews, since he says through the prophet, “I fill heaven and earth.” What of what the same poet calls the ether? How do they take it? For he says thus: “Then the almighty father Ether, with fruitful showers, descends into the lap of his joyful spouse.” For they say that the ether is not spirit but a lofty body, by which the sky is stretched out above the air. Or is the poet allowed to speak now according to the Platonists, so that God is not body but spirit, now according to the Stoics, so that he is body? What, then, do they worship in the Capitol? If spirit, or finally the bodily sky itself, what is that shield of Jupiter doing there, which they call the aegis? Surely the origin of this name is explained thus: because a she-goat nursed Jupiter when he was hidden by his mother. Or do the poets lie about this too? Are the Capitols of the Romans also the works of poets? And what is the meaning of this inconsistency, not poetic but plainly fit for a mime, to seek the gods in books according to the philosophers, and to adore them in temples according to the poets?
Jer 23:24 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The pagans' Jupiter wavers between the philosophers' all-filling spirit, the poets' ether, and the goat-nursed god of the Capitol.
- Quotations: Virgil, Eclogues 3.60; Georgics 2.325–326. The Scripture quotation is Jer 23:24.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: 'libri' for 'libris'; OCR slip: 'secundam' for 'secundum'; stray letters in the digital text): Iouis i s omnia plena → Iouis omnia plena; secundam Stoicos → secundum Stoicos; in libri quaerere → in libris quaerere.
Extrabiblical texts: Virgil, Ecl. 3.60 (Virgil; quotation); Virgil, Georg. 2.325 (Virgil; quotation); Varro (Varro; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.31 (CSEL 43:29–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-31). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-31) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.32CSEL 43:30–31
Sed numquid etiam ille Euhemerus poeta fuit, qui et ipsum Iouem et Saturnum patrem eius et Plutonem adque Neptunum fratres eius ita planissime homines fuisse prodit, ut eorum cultores gratias magis poetis agere debeant, quia non ad eos dehonestandos, sed potius ad exornandos multa finxerunt? quamuis et ipsum Euhemerum ab Ennio poeta in Latinam linguam esse conuersum Cicero commemoret. numquid et ipse Cicero poeta fuit, qui eum, cum quo in Tusculanis disputat, tamquam secretorum conscium admonet dicens: si uero scrutari uetera et ex eis quae scriptores Graeciae prodiderunt eruere coner, ipsi illi maiorum gentium di hinc a nobis profecti in caelum repperientur. quaere, quorum demonstrentur sepulchra in Graecia, reminiscere, quoniam es initiatus, quae tradantur mysteriis, tum denique, quam hoc late pateat, intelleges. hic certe istorum deos homines fuisse satis confitetur, in caelum autem peruenisse beniuole suspicatur. quamquam et hunc honorem opinionis ab hominibus eis esse delatum, non dubitauit publice dicere, cum de Romulo loqueretur: qui hanc, inquit, urbem condidit, Romulum ad deos inmortales beniuolentia famaque sustulimus. quid igitur mirum est, si hoc fecerunt antiquiores homines de Ioue et Saturno et ceteris, quod Romani de Romulo, quod denique iam recentioribus temporibus etiam de Caesare facere uoluerunt? quibus et Vergilius adulationem carminis addidit dicens: ecce Dionaei processit Caesaris astrum. uideant ergo, ne forte historica ueritas sepulchra falsorum deorum ostendat in terra, uanitas autem poetica stellas eorum non figat, sed fingat in caelo. neque enim re uera stella illa Iouis est aut illa Saturni; sed post eorum mortem sideribus ab initio mundi conditis haec nomina inposuerunt homines, qui illos mortuos quasi deos haberi uoluerunt. de quibus quid tantum mali castitas aut quid tantum boni uoluptas conmeruit, ut inter astra, quae cum sole et luna circumeunt, Venus habeat stellam et Minerua non habeat?
But was that Euhemerus too a poet, who reveals so very plainly that Jupiter himself and his father Saturn and his brothers Pluto and Neptune were human beings, that their worshipers ought rather to thank the poets, since they invented many things not to dishonor them but rather to adorn them? Although Cicero records that Euhemerus himself was translated into Latin by the poet Ennius. Was Cicero himself a poet too, who, as though to someone privy to the secrets, admonishes the person with whom he argues in the Tusculan Disputations, saying: “If indeed I were to try to search out ancient things and dig out from them what the writers of Greece have handed down, those very gods of the greater clans will be found to have set out from us to heaven. Ask whose tombs are shown in Greece; recall, since you have been initiated, what is handed down in the mysteries; then at last you will understand how widely this extends.” Here he certainly admits clearly enough that their gods were human beings, though he kindly supposes that they reached heaven. Yet he did not hesitate to say publicly that even this honor of reputation was conferred on them by human beings, when he spoke of Romulus: “Romulus,” he says, “who founded this city, we have raised to the immortal gods by goodwill and report.” What wonder is it, then, if earlier people did with Jupiter and Saturn and the rest what the Romans did with Romulus, and finally, in more recent times, wanted to do also with Caesar? To these Virgil added the flattery of a poem, saying, “Behold, the star of Dionean Caesar has come forth.” Let them see to it, then, that historical truth does not show the tombs of the false gods on earth, while poetic vanity does not fix, but feigns, their stars in heaven. For in truth that star is not Jupiter's nor that one Saturn's; rather, after their death, people who wanted those dead men to be held as gods imposed these names on stars founded from the beginning of the world. As to these, what so great evil did chastity deserve, or what so great good did pleasure, that among the stars that go round with the sun and moon Venus should have a star and Minerva should not?
Notes and citation
Summary: Euhemerus, Cicero, and the deification of Romulus and Caesar show that the pagan gods were dead men whose names were later given to the stars.
- Quotations: Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 1.13.29; Against Catiline 3.1.2; Virgil, Eclogues 9.47. Ennius's translation of Euhemerus: Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods 1.42.119.
Extrabiblical texts: Euhemerus (Euhemerus, Sacred Record; allusion); Ennius (Ennius; allusion); Cicero, Tusc. 1.13.29 (Cicero; quotation); Cicero, Cat. 3.1.2 (Cicero; quotation); Virgil, Ecl. 9.47 (Virgil; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.32 (CSEL 43:30–31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-32). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-32) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.33CSEL 43:31–32
Sed fuerit et Cicero Academicus incertior quam poetae, qui sepulchra deorum commemorare ausus est litterisque mandare, quamuis hoc non ei opinione propria praesumserit, sed ex ipsorum sacrorum traditione commemorauerit. numquid et Varro uel tamquam poeta fingit uel tamquam Academicus dubie ponit, quod dicit talium deorum sacra ex cuiusque eorum uita uel morte, qua inter homines uixerunt uel obierunt, esse conposita? numquid et Leon ille sacerdos Aegyptius poeta uel Academicus fuit, qui Macedoni Alexandro diuersam quidem a Graecorum opinione istorum deorum originem uerum tamen ita prodit, ut eos homines fuisse declaret?
But let Cicero, as an Academic, have been more uncertain than the poets, though he dared to mention the tombs of the gods and commit it to writing, even if he did not presume this from his own opinion but recorded it from the tradition of their rites themselves. Is Varro too either inventing as a poet or setting down doubtfully as an Academic when he says that the rites of such gods were composed from the life or death of each of them, in which they lived or died among human beings? Was that Leon, the Egyptian priest, a poet or an Academic, who revealed to Alexander of Macedon an origin of these gods different, indeed, from the opinion of the Greeks, but in such a way as to declare that they had been human beings?
Notes and citation
Summary: Varro and the Egyptian priest Leon also show that the pagan gods were once human beings.
- Leon of Egypt's account to Alexander is also cited in Augustine, City of God 8.5 and 8.27; no entry for it exists on this site.
Extrabiblical texts: Varro (Varro; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.33 (CSEL 43:31–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-33). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-33) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.34CSEL 43:32–33
Sed quid ad nos? dicant se Iouem non hominem mortuum colere nec homini mortuo Capitolium dedicasse, sed spiritui uiuificanti omnia, quo mundus impletur, et scutum eius in honorem nutricis eius factum de pelle caprina interpretentur ut uolunt. quid dicunt de Saturno? quem Saturnum colunt? nonne ille est, qui primus ab Olympo uenit arma Iouis fugiens et regnis exsul ademptis, qui genus indocile et dispersum montibus altis conposuit legesque dedit Latiumque uocari maluit, his quoniam latuisset tutus in oris? nonne ipsum eius simulacrum, quod cooperto capite fingitur, quasi latentem indicat? nonne ipse Italis ostendit agriculturam, quod falce demonstrat? non, inquiunt; nam uideris, si fuit ille homo et rex quidam, de quo ista narrantur, nos tamen Saturnum interpretamur uniuersum tempus, quod Graecum etiam uocabulum eius ostendit; uocatur enim Cronos, quod adspiratione addita etiam temporis nomen est, unde et Latine Saturnus appellatur, quasi saturetur annis. quid iam cum istis agendum sit, nescio, qui conantes in melius interpretari nomina et simulacra deorum suorum fatentur maiorem deum suum et patrem ceterorum tempus esse. quid enim aliud indicant quam omnes deos suos temporales esse, quorum patrem ipsum tempus constituunt?
But what is that to us? Let them say that they worship Jupiter not as a dead man and did not dedicate the Capitol to a dead man, but to the spirit that gives life to all things, with which the world is filled; and let them interpret as they will his shield, made from goatskin in honor of his nurse. What do they say of Saturn? Which Saturn do they worship? Is he not the one who “first came from Olympus, fleeing the arms of Jupiter, an exile with his kingdom taken from him, who brought together the unruly race scattered on the high mountains, gave them laws, and chose that it be called Latium, since he had lain hidden safe on these shores”? Does not his very image, which is made with the head covered, show him as one in hiding? Did he not show agriculture to the Italians, as the sickle shows? “No,” they say; “you may see to it whether he was a man and a certain king about whom these things are told; we, however, interpret Saturn as the whole of time, as his Greek name too shows. For he is called Cronos, which, with an aspirate added, is also the name of time; hence too in Latin he is called Saturnus, as though he were sated (saturetur) with years.” I do not know what is to be done any more with these people, who, trying to interpret the names and images of their gods for the better, admit that their greater god and the father of the others is time. For what else do they indicate than that all their gods are temporal, since they make time itself their father?
Notes and citation
Summary: If Saturn is interpreted as time, the pagans admit that all their gods, his offspring, are temporal.
- The verses are Virgil, Aeneid 8.320–323.
Extrabiblical texts: Virgil, Aen. 8.320 (Virgil; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.34 (CSEL 43:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-34). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-34) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.35CSEL 43:33–35
Erubuerunt hinc philosophi eorum recentiores Platonici, qui iam christianis temporibus fuerunt, et Saturnum aliter interpretari conati sunt dicentes appellatum Cronon uelut a satietate intellectus eo, quod Graece satietas coros, intellectus autem siue mens nus dicitur. cui uidetur suffragari et Latinum nomen quasi ex prima Latina parte et Graeca posteriore conpositum, ut diceretur Saturnus tamquam satur nus. uiderunt, quam esset absurdum, si filius temporis Iuppiter haberetur, quem deum aeternum uel putabant uel putari uolebant. at uero secundum istam nouellam interpretationem, quam ueteres eorum si habuissent, mirum si Ciceronem Varronemque latuisset, Saturni filium Iouem dicunt tamquam ab illa summa mente profluentem spiritum, quam uolunt esse uelut animam mundi huius omnia caelestia et terrena corpora implentem. unde illud Maronis est, quod paulo ante commemoraui: Iouis is omnia plena. numquid non, si possent, isti sicut ipsam interpretationem ita etiam superstitionem hominum commutarent et aut nulla simulacra aut certe Saturno potius quam Ioui Capitolia constituerent? neque enim ullam animam rationalem sapientem fieri disputant nisi participatione summae illius incommutabilisque sapientiae, non solum cuiusquam hominis animam, sed ipsius etiam mundi, quam dicunt Iouem; nos uero esse quandam summam dei sapientiam, cuius participatione fit sapiens, quaecumque anima fit uere sapiens, non tantum concedimus, uerum etiam maxime praedicamus. utrum autem uniuersa ista corporalis moles, quae mundus appellatur, habeat quandam animam uel quasi animam suam, id est rationalem uitam, qua ita regatur sicut unumquodque animal, magna adque abdita quaestio est, nec adfirmari debet ista opinio nisi conperta, quod uera sit, nec refelli nisi conperta, quod falsa sit. quid autem hoc ad hominem, etiamsi semper eum lateat, quando quidem nulla anima fit sapiens uel beata ex alia quacumque anima, sed ex illa sola summa adque incommutabili dei sapientia?
Their more recent philosophers, the Platonists, who lived in Christian times, were ashamed of this and tried to interpret Saturn otherwise, saying that he was called Cronos as though from the fullness of intellect, because in Greek fullness is called koros and intellect or mind nous. The Latin name too seems to support this, as though compounded of a first, Latin part and a second, Greek part, so that he was called Saturnus as being satur nous, “full mind.” They saw how absurd it would be if Jupiter, whom they either thought or wanted to be thought an eternal god, were held to be the son of time. But according to this novel interpretation (and if their ancients had held it, it would be strange that it escaped Cicero and Varro), they say that Jupiter is the son of Saturn as the spirit flowing forth from that supreme mind, which they want to be as it were the soul of this world, filling all heavenly and earthly bodies. Hence that line of Maro which I quoted a little earlier: “All things are full of Jove.” Would these men not, if they could, change people's superstition just as they changed the interpretation, and either set up no images at all, or at least build Capitols to Saturn rather than to Jupiter? For they argue that no rational soul becomes wise except by participation in that supreme and unchangeable wisdom, not only the soul of any human being but even that of the world itself, which they call Jupiter. We, for our part, not only grant but proclaim most strongly that there is a certain supreme wisdom of God, by participation in which every soul that becomes truly wise becomes wise. But whether this whole bodily mass which is called the world has some soul, or as it were a soul of its own, that is, a rational life by which it is ruled as each animal is, is a great and hidden question; and this opinion ought not to be affirmed unless it is found to be true, nor refuted unless it is found to be false. But what does this matter to a human being, even if it always remains hidden from him, since no soul becomes wise or happy from any other soul whatever, but only from that supreme and unchangeable wisdom of God?
Notes and citation
Summary: Later Platonists reinterpreted Saturn as 'full mind' and Jupiter as the world-soul; Augustine leaves the world-soul an open question, since wisdom comes only from God's wisdom.
- The quotation is Virgil, Eclogues 3.60, cited at 1.31.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: 'sine' for 'siue'; stray period in the digital text): intellectus autem sine mens → intellectus autem siue mens; mundus appellatur. habeat → mundus appellatur, habeat.
Extrabiblical texts: Virgil, Ecl. 3.60 (Virgil; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.35 (CSEL 43:33–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-35). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-35) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.36CSEL 43:35–36
Romani tamen, qui non Saturno, sed Ioui Capitolium condiderunt, uel aliae nationes, quae Iouem praecipue supra ceteros deos colendum esse putauerunt, non hoc quod isti senserunt. qui secundum istam suam nouam opinionem et summas arces, si quicquam in his rebus potestatis habuissent, Saturno potius dedicarent et mathematicos uel genethliacos maxime delerent, qui Saturnum, quem sapientum effectorem isti dicerent, maleficum deum inter alia sidera constituerent. quae opinio tantum contra illos in animis humanis praeualuit, ut nec nominare illum uelint, senem potius quam Saturnum appellantes, tam timida superstitione, ut iam Carthaginienses paene uico suo nomen mutauerint uicum senis crebrius quam uicum Saturni appellantes.
Yet the Romans, who founded the Capitol not to Saturn but to Jupiter, or other nations who thought that Jupiter should be worshiped above the other gods, did not hold what these men held. According to this new opinion of theirs, these men, if they had had any power in such matters, would have dedicated the highest citadels to Saturn instead, and would above all have done away with the astrologers and casters of nativities, who placed Saturn, whom these men would call the maker of the wise, among the other stars as a malevolent god. This opinion has so prevailed against them in human minds that people do not even want to name him, calling him “the Old Man” rather than Saturn, with so fearful a superstition that the Carthaginians have now almost changed the name of their village, calling it more often “the Old Man's village” than “Saturn's village.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The Romans did not share the Platonists' exalted Saturn, whom astrologers made a malevolent star and people feared to name.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray character in the digital text): uicum Saturni* appellantes → uicum Saturni appellantes.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.36 (CSEL 43:35–36; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-36). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-36) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.37CSEL 43:36
Notum est ergo, quid colere conuincantur et quid colorare conentur adoratores simulacrorum. uerum et ab istis nouiciis Saturni interpretatoribus requirendum est, quid de deo sentiant Hebraeorum. etiam ipsis enim placuit omnes deos cum gentibus colere, cum eos superbos puderet pro peccatorum remissione humilari sub Christo. quid ergo sentiunt de deo Israhel? quem si non colunt, non omnes deos colunt, si autem colunt, non colunt sicut se coli iussit, quia et alios colunt, quos coli ille prohibuit. per eos enim uates ista prohibuit, per quos haec ipsa, quae nunc a Christianis eorum simulacra patiuntur, futura praedixit. siue enim angeli ad illos prophetas missi sint, qui eis deum omnium creatorem unum uerum deum, cui uniuersa subiecta sunt, et per sensibilium rerum congruam speciem figurate ostenderent et quemadmodum se coli praeciperet indicarent, siue aliquorum in eis mentes per spiritum sanctum ita sublimatae sint, ut eo uisu ea uiderent quo et ipsi angeli uident, constat tamen eos illi deo seruisse, qui alios deos coli prohibuit, seruisse autem fide pietatis in regno et sacerdotio reipublicae suae et Christum uenturum regem ac sacerdotem significantibus sacris.
It is known, then, what the worshipers of images are convicted of worshiping and what they try to color over. But these new interpreters of Saturn too must be asked what they think of the God of the Hebrews. For they too chose to worship all the gods together with the nations, since in their pride they were ashamed to humble themselves under Christ for the forgiveness of sins. What, then, do they think of the God of Israel? If they do not worship him, they do not worship all the gods; but if they worship him, they do not worship him as he commanded himself to be worshiped, because they also worship others whom he forbade to be worshiped. For he forbade these things through those seers through whom he foretold the very things that their images are now suffering from the Christians. For whether angels were sent to those prophets to show them, figuratively and through a fitting appearance of things perceptible to the senses, the one true God, the creator of all, to whom all things are subject, and to indicate how he commanded that he be worshiped, or whether the minds of some among them were so raised up by the Holy Spirit that they saw these things with that sight with which the angels themselves see, it is nevertheless certain that they served the God who forbade other gods to be worshiped, and served him with the faithfulness of piety in the kingdom and priesthood of their commonwealth and in sacred rites that signified Christ, who was to come as king and priest.
Notes and citation
Summary: The Platonists who worship all gods cannot rightly worship the God of Israel, who through his prophets forbade all others.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.37 (CSEL 43:36; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-37). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-37) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.38CSEL 43:36–38
Porro autem in dis gentium, quos isti dum colere nolunt illum qui cum istis coli non potest colere nolunt, dicant, quid causae est, ut nullus eorum inueniatur qui alterum coli prohibeat, cum eos in diuersis officiis muneribusque constituant et rebus ad quemque proprie pertinentibus praesides uelint. si enim Iuppiter non prohibet Saturnum coli, quia non est ille homo, qui illum hominem patrem de regno expulit, sed aut caeli corpus aut spiritus implens caelum et terram, et ideo non potest prohibere coli mentem supernam, ex qua dicitur emanasse, si ea ratione nec Saturnus Iouem coli prohibet, quia non ab eo rebellante superatus est sicut ille a Ioue nescio quo, cuius arma fugiens uenit in Italiam, sed fauet prima mens animae a se genitae, saltem Vulcanus prohiberet coli Martem uxoris adulterum, Hercules Iunonem persecutricem suam. quae ista inter eos est tam foeda consensio, ut nec Diana uirgo casta coli prohibeat non dicam Venerem sed Priapum? nam si unus homo et uenator et agricola esse uoluerit, seruus erit amborum, quibus tamen uel uicina templa fabricare erubescit. sed interpretentur Dianam uirtutem quam uolunt, interpretentur et Priapum fecunditatis deum, ita sane ut in fetandis feminis pudeat Iunonem talem habere adiutorem, dicant quod placet, interpretentur quod sapiunt, dum tamen omnia eorum argumenta perturbet deus Israhel. qui cum illos omnes coli prohibuerit et a nullo eorum coli prohibitus sit eorumque simulacris et sacris euersionem praeceperit, praedixerit, fecerit, satis ostendit illos falsos adque fallaces et se esse uerum ac ueracem deum.
Furthermore, as to the gods of the nations, whom these men will not give up worshiping and for whose sake they will not worship him who cannot be worshiped together with them, let them say why none of them is found who forbids another to be worshiped, though they place them in different offices and functions and want them to preside over the matters that belong properly to each. For if Jupiter does not forbid Saturn to be worshiped, because he is not the man who drove that man, his father, from his kingdom, but either the body of the sky or the spirit that fills heaven and earth, and therefore cannot forbid the worship of the supreme mind from which he is said to have flowed; if for that reason Saturn too does not forbid the worship of Jupiter, because he was not overcome by him in rebellion, as that other Saturn was by some Jupiter or other whose arms he fled when he came to Italy, but the first mind favors the soul begotten from itself: at least Vulcan should forbid the worship of Mars, the adulterer with his wife, and Hercules that of Juno, his persecutor. What is this so shameful agreement among them, that not even Diana, the chaste virgin, forbids the worship, I will not say of Venus, but of Priapus? For if one man wanted to be both a hunter and a farmer, he would be the servant of both, yet he would blush even to build their temples next to each other. But let them interpret Diana as whatever virtue they like; let them interpret Priapus too as the god of fertility, though surely Juno would be ashamed to have such a helper in making women fruitful; let them say what they please, let them interpret as they see fit, so long as the God of Israel throws all their arguments into confusion. Since he has forbidden all of them to be worshiped and has been forbidden to be worshiped by none of them, and has commanded, foretold, and accomplished the overthrow of their images and rites, he has shown clearly enough that they are false and deceiving, and that he is the true and truthful God.
Notes and citation
Summary: No pagan god forbids the worship of another, however shameful, while the God of Israel forbids them all and has overthrown them.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: 'ei' for 'ex'; OCR slip: 'loue' for 'Ioue'; words run together in the digital text): mentem supernam, ei qua → mentem supernam, ex qua; a loue nescio → a Ioue nescio; esseuoluerit → esse uoluerit.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.38 (CSEL 43:36–38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-38) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.39CSEL 43:38–39
Istos autem iam paucos deorum multorum falsorumque cultores quis non miretur nolle obtemperare illi, de quo cum ab eis quaeritur quisnam deus sit, quodlibet opinando respondeant, deum tamen esse negare non audent, quia si negent, operibus eius et praedictis adque conpletis facillime conuincuntur? neque enim ea dico, quae liberum sibi putant esse non credere, quia ipse in principio fecit caelum et terram et omnia quae in eis sunt, neque illa nimis antiqua, quod Enoch transtulit; quod impios diluuio deleuit, quod Noe iustum domumque eius per lignum inde liberauit ab Abraham in hominibus facta eius exordior. huic enim facta est per angelicum oraculum manifesta promissio, quam nunc uidemus impleri. huic quippe dictum est: in semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes, ex cuius semine populus Israhel, unde uirgo Maria, quae peperit Christum, in quo benedici omnes gentes audeant iam negare, si possunt. haec promissio facta est etiam ad Isaac filium Abrahae, haec et ad Iacob nepotem Abrahae, qui etiam Israhel appellatus est, ex quo uniuersus populus et propagatus et nominatus est, ut huius populi deus appellaretur deus Israhel, non quod ipse non sit deus omnium gentium siue nescientium siue iam scientium, sed quia in isto populo uoluit manifestius apparere uirtutem promissorum suorum. ille enim populus primo in Aegypto multiplicatus et de illa seruitute per Moysen in multis signis portentisque liberatus debellatis plurimis gentibus terram etiam promissionis accepit, in qua regnauit per reges suos de tribu Iuda exortos. qui Iudas unus fuit ex duodecim filiis Israhel nepotis Abrahae. adque inde Iudaei cognominati multa ipso deo adiuuante fecerunt, multa pro peccatis suis ipso flagellante perpessi sunt, donec ueniret semen, cui promissum est, in quo benedicerentur omnes gentes et patrum suorum simulacra sponte confringerent.
And who would not wonder that these now few worshipers of many false gods are unwilling to obey him? When they are asked what God he is, they may answer whatever they think, yet they do not dare to deny that he is God, because if they denied it, they would very easily be refuted by his works and by his predictions and their fulfillment. For I do not mean the things which they think they are free not to believe, that he himself in the beginning made heaven and earth and all that is in them, nor those very ancient things, that he translated Enoch, that he destroyed the ungodly by the flood, that he delivered righteous Noah and his household from it by means of wood. I begin his deeds among human beings with Abraham. For to him a clear promise was made through an angelic oracle, which we now see being fulfilled. For to him it was said, “In your seed shall all the nations be blessed.” From his seed came the people of Israel, and from it the Virgin Mary, who gave birth to Christ, in whom let them now dare to deny, if they can, that all nations are blessed. This promise was also made to Isaac, Abraham's son, and to Jacob, Abraham's grandson, who was also called Israel, from whom the whole people both descended and took its name, so that the God of this people was called the God of Israel; not that he is not the God of all nations, whether they know him or already know him, but because he willed that the power of his promises should appear more clearly in this people. For that people, first multiplied in Egypt and delivered from that slavery through Moses with many signs and wonders, after many nations had been defeated, received also the land of promise, in which it reigned through its kings, sprung from the tribe of Judah. This Judah was one of the twelve sons of Israel, the grandson of Abraham. And from him they were called Jews, and with the help of this same God they did many things, and suffered many things under his scourge for their sins, until the seed should come to whom the promise was made, in whom all nations would be blessed and would of their own accord break the images of their fathers.
Gen 1:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 5:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 7:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 22:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 26:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 28:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 32:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 1:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 7:3 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The pagans cannot deny the God of Israel, whose promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that all nations would be blessed in their seed is now being fulfilled in Christ.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: 'ludas' for 'Iudas'; OCR slip: 'quia' for 'quis'; stray period at the start of the section; words run together in the digital text): . Istos autem → Istos autem; quia non miretur → quis non miretur; uthuius → ut huius; qui ludas unus → qui Iudas unus.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.39 (CSEL 43:38–39; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-39). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-39) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.40CSEL 43:39–40
Neque enim temporibus christianis, sed tanto ante praedictum est quod per Christianos impletur. ipsi Iudaei qui remanserunt inimici nominis Christi, de quorum etiam futura perfidia in illis propheticis litteris tacitum non est, ipsi habent et legunt prophetam dicentem: domine deus meus et refugium meum in die malorum, ad te gentes uenient ab extremo terrae et dicent: uere mendacia coluerunt patres nostri simulacra et non est in illis utilitas. ecce nunc fit, ecce nunc gentes ab extremo terrae ueniunt ad Christum ista dicentes et simulacra frangentes. et hoc enim magnum est, quod deus praestitit ecclesiae suae ubique diffusae, ut gens Iudaea merito debellata et dispersa per terras, ne a nobis haec conposita putarentur, codices prophetarum nostrorum ubique portaret et inimica fidei nostrae testis fieret ueritatis nostrae. quomodo ergo discipuli Christi docuerunt quod a Christo non didicerunt, sicut stulti desipiendo iactitant, ut deorum gentilium et simulacrorum superstitio deleretur? numquid et illas prophetias, quae nunc leguntur in codicibus inimicorum Christi, possunt dici finxisse discipuli Christi?
For what is being fulfilled through the Christians was foretold not in Christian times but so long before. The Jews themselves who have remained enemies of the name of Christ, whose future unbelief too is not passed over in silence in those prophetic writings, they themselves have and read the prophet who says, “O Lord my God and my refuge in the day of evils, to you shall the nations come from the end of the earth and say, ‘Truly our fathers worshiped lying images, and there is no profit in them.’” See, now it is happening; see, now the nations are coming from the end of the earth to Christ, saying this and breaking images. And this too is a great thing that God has granted to his church spread everywhere: that the Jewish nation, deservedly defeated and scattered throughout the lands, should carry everywhere the books of our prophets, so that these should not be thought to have been composed by us, and, though hostile to our faith, should become a witness to our truth. How, then, did the disciples of Christ teach what they did not learn from Christ, as fools in their folly keep boasting, namely that the superstition of the gentile gods and images should be destroyed? Can it be said that the disciples of Christ also invented those prophecies which are now read in the books of the enemies of Christ?
Jer 16:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The prophets, whose books the Jews themselves carry everywhere, foretold that the nations would abandon their idols, so the disciples did not invent this teaching.
- The quotation is Jer 16:19 in an Old Latin form close to the Septuagint. Augustine's statements about the Jews are translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray period in the digital text): ubique diffusae. ut gens → ubique diffusae, ut gens.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.40 (CSEL 43:39–40; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-40). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-40) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.41CSEL 43:40–41
Quis enim haec euertit nisi deus Israhel? ipsi enim populo dictum est per diuinas uoces factas ad Moysen: audi Israhel, dominus deus tuus dominus unus est. non facies tibi idolum neque cuius quam similitudinem, neque quae in caelo sursum neque quae in terra deorsum. ut autem etiam euertat ista, ubi potestatem acceperit, sic ei praecipitur: non adorabis deos illorum, sed neque seruies eis: non facies secundum opera ipsorum, sed deponendo depones et confringendo confringes simulacra eorum. quis autem dicat Christum adque Christianos non pertinere ad Israhel, cum Israhel nepos fuerit Abrahae, cui primo et deinde Isaac filio eius et deinde ipsi Israhel nepoti eius dictum est quod iam commemoraui: in semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes? quod fieri iam uidemus in Christo, cum inde exorta sit illa uirgo, de qua propheta populi Israhel et dei Israhel cecinit dicens: ecce uirgo concipiet et pariet filium, et uocabunt nomen eius Emmanuhel. interpretatur autem Emmanuhel nobiscum deus. deus ergo Israhel, qui prohibuit alios deos coli, qui prohibuit idola fabricari, qui praecepit euerti, qui per prophetam praedixit gentes ab extremo terrae dicturas: uere mendacia coluerunt patres nostri simulacra, in quibus non est utilitas, ipse per Christi nomen et Christianorum fidem istarum omnium superstitionum euersionem iussit, promisit, exhibuit. frustra ergo miseri, quia blasphemare Christum etiam a dis suis, hoc est demonibus, nomen Christi metuentibus prohibiti sunt, uolunt ab eo doctrinam istam facere alienam, qua Christiani contra idola disputant easque omnes falsas religiones, ubi potuerint, eradicant.
For who overthrows these things but the God of Israel? For to that people it was said through the divine utterances made to Moses: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one Lord. You shall not make for yourself an idol, nor the likeness of anything, neither of what is in heaven above nor of what is on the earth beneath.” And so that it would also overthrow these things where it received power, it is commanded thus: “You shall not worship their gods nor serve them; you shall not do according to their works, but you shall utterly throw down and utterly break their images.” And who would say that Christ and the Christians do not belong to Israel, since Israel was the grandson of Abraham, to whom first, then to his son Isaac, and then to his grandson Israel himself, was said what I have already recalled: “In your seed shall all nations be blessed”? We now see this happening in Christ, since from that line arose the virgin of whom the prophet of the people of Israel and of the God of Israel sang, saying, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel,” and Emmanuel means “God with us.” The God of Israel, then, who forbade other gods to be worshiped, who forbade idols to be made, who commanded that they be overthrown, who foretold through the prophet that the nations would say from the end of the earth, “Truly our fathers worshiped lying images, in which there is no profit,” he himself, through the name of Christ and the faith of the Christians, commanded, promised, and accomplished the overthrow of all these superstitions. In vain, then, do the wretches, since they have been forbidden to blaspheme Christ even by their own gods, that is, demons who fear the name of Christ, want to make foreign to him that teaching by which Christians argue against idols and, where they can, uproot all those false religions.
Deut 6:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 20:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 23:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 22:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 7:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 1:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 16:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The God of Israel, who forbade idols through Moses and promised blessing to all nations in Abraham's seed, has overthrown idolatry through Christ.
- The prohibition of idols is quoted from Deut 6:4 and Exod 20:4 (compare Deut 5:8); the command to destroy images is Exod 23:24.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR dropped a letter; OCR slips: 'Quia' for 'Quis', capital L; stray parenthesis and period in the digital text): Quia enim haec euertit nisi deus IsraheL → Quis enim haec euertit nisi deus Israhel; Ab ahae → Abrahae; nobiscum deus). deus ergo Israhel. qui → nobiscum deus. deus ergo Israhel, qui.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.41 (CSEL 43:40–41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-41). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-41) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.42CSEL 43:41–42
De deo Israhel respondeant, quem docere ista et iubere non tantum Christianorum, sed etiam Iudaeorum libri testantur, de ipso consulant deos suos, qui Christum blasphemari prohibuerunt, de deo Israhel, si audeant aliqua contumeliosa, respondeant. sed quos consulant? aut ubi iam consulant? libros suorum legant. si deum Israhel Iouem putant, sicut Varro scripsit, interim ut secundum eorum opinionem loquar, cur ergo Ioui non credunt idola esse delenda? si Saturnum putant, cur eum non colunt? aut cur non sic colunt, quemadmodum se coli per eos uates praecepit, per quos ea quae praedixit impleuit? cur ei non credunt simulacra euertenda esse et alios deos colendos non esse? si nec Iouis nec Saturnus est — quia, si unus eorum esset, contra sacra Iouis et Saturni eorum tanta non diceret —, quis ergo est, qui propter deos alios solus ab istis non colitur et euersis dis aliis tam euidenter efficit, ut solus colatur, humilata omni superba altitudine, quae se aduersus Christum erexerat pro idolis persequens interficiensque Christianos? nunc certe quaerunt, ubi se abscondant, cum sacrificare uolunt, uel ubi deos ipsos suos recludant, ne a Christianis inueniantur adque frangantur. unde hoc nisi a timore legum adque regum, per quos deus Israhel suam exserit potestatem iam subditos Christi nomini, sicut longe ante promisit dicens per prophetam: et adorabunt eum omnes reges terrae, omnes gentes seruient illi?
Let them answer about the God of Israel, whom not only the books of the Christians but also those of the Jews testify teaches and commands these things. Let them consult their gods about him, those gods who forbade Christ to be blasphemed; let them give some insulting answer about the God of Israel, if they dare. But whom are they to consult? Or where can they consult now? Let them read the books of their own people. If they think the God of Israel is Jupiter, as Varro wrote (to speak for the moment according to their opinion), why then do they not believe Jupiter that idols are to be destroyed? If they think he is Saturn, why do they not worship him? Or why do they not worship him in the way he commanded that he be worshiped through those seers through whom he fulfilled what he foretold? Why do they not believe him that images are to be overturned and other gods are not to be worshiped? If he is neither Jupiter nor Saturn (for if he were one of them, he would not say such things against the rites of their Jupiter and Saturn), who then is he who alone is not worshiped by them for the sake of other gods, and yet, with the other gods overturned, so evidently brings it about that he alone is worshiped, with every proud height humbled which had raised itself against Christ, persecuting and killing Christians for the sake of idols? Now certainly they look for places to hide when they want to sacrifice, or where to shut up their very gods so that they are not found and broken by the Christians. From where does this come, if not from fear of the laws and of the kings through whom the God of Israel shows his power, kings now subject to the name of Christ, as he promised long before, saying through the prophet, “And all the kings of the earth shall worship him; all nations shall serve him”?
Ps 72:11 (71:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Whether the pagans identify the God of Israel with Jupiter or Saturn, they do not obey him, though he has now subjected kings to Christ and made the idolaters hide.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip: audiant for audeant): si audiant aliqua contumeliosa → si audeant aliqua contumeliosa.
Extrabiblical texts: Varro (Varro; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.42 (CSEL 43:41–42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-42). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-42) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.43CSEL 43:42–43
Nempe iam impletur quod per prophetam identidem canitur, quod remissurus esset impiam plebem suam — non quidem totam, quia multi ex Israhelitis crediderunt in Christum; nam inde erant et apostoli eius —, et humilaturus omnem superbum adque iniuriosum, ut ipse solus exaltaretur, id est solus altus et potens hominibus manifestaretur, donec proicerentur a credentibus idola et a non credentibus absconderentur, cum eius timore terra confringitur, id est terreni homines timore franguntur, timendo legem uel ipsius uel eorum qui credentes in eum gentibusque regnantes talia sacrilegia prohiberent.
Surely what is repeatedly sung through the prophet is now being fulfilled: that he would cast off his ungodly people (not, indeed, the whole of it, for many of the Israelites believed in Christ; his apostles too were from them), and would humble everything proud and insolent, so that he alone would be exalted, that is, so that he alone would be made manifest to human beings as high and powerful, until idols were cast away by believers and hidden by unbelievers, when the earth is shattered by the fear of him, that is, when earthly people are broken by fear, fearing the law either of God himself or of those who, believing in him and reigning over the nations, would forbid such sacrileges.
Isa 2:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 2:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 2:19 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine introduces Isaiah's prophecy that the Lord alone would be exalted and idols cast away in fear.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.43 (CSEL 43:42–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-43). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-43) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
1.44CSEL 43:43–44
Haec enim, quae ut facilius intellegerentur breuiter praelocutus sum, propheta sic dicit: Et nunc tu, domus Iacob, uenite, ambulemus in lucem domini. remisit enim plebem suam, domum Israhel, quoniam repleta est sicut ab initio regio eorum auguriis sicut alienigenarum, et filii multi alienigenae nati sunt illis. repleta est enim regio eorum argento et auro, nec erat numerus thensaurorum illorum. et repleta est terra equis, nec erat numerus currum illorum. et repleta est terra abominationibus operum manuum ipsorum, et adorauerunt ea quae fecerunt digiti eorum. et inclinauit se homo et humilauit se uir, et non remittam illis. "et nunc intrate in petras et abscondite uos in terra a facie timoris domini et a maiestate uirtutis eius, cum surrexerit confringere terram. "oculi enim domini excelsi, homo autem humilis. et humilabitur altitudo hominum, et exaltabitur dominus solus in illa die. "Dies enim domini sabaoth in omnem iniuriosum et superbum et supra omnem altum et elatum, qui humilabuntur, "et super omnem cedrum Libani excelsorum et elatorum et super omnem arborem balani Basan, et super omnem montem et super omnem collem altum, et super omnem nauem maris et super omne spectaculum nauium decoris. "et humilabitur et cadet contumelia hominum, et exaltabitur dominus solus in illa die. "Et manibus fabricata omnia abscondent in speluncis et in scissuris petrarum et in cauernis terrae a facie timoris domini et a maiestate uirtutis eius, cum exsurrexerit confringere terram. illa enim die proiciet homo abominationes aureas et argenteas, quae fecerunt ut adorarent superuacuanea et noxia, ut intrent in foramina solidae petrae et in scissuras petrarum, a facie timoris domini et a maiestate uirtutis eius, cum exsurrexerit comminuere terram.
For what I have said briefly beforehand, so that it might be understood more easily, the prophet says thus: “And now you, house of Jacob, come, let us walk in the light of the Lord. For he has cast off his people, the house of Israel, because their land is filled, as from the beginning, with auguries like that of foreigners, and many foreign children have been born to them. For their land is filled with silver and gold, and there was no number of their treasures. And the land is filled with horses, and there was no number of their chariots. And the land is filled with the abominations of the works of their hands, and they have worshiped what their fingers have made. And man has bowed down and man has humbled himself, and I will not forgive them. And now enter into the rocks and hide yourselves in the earth from the face of the fear of the Lord and from the majesty of his power, when he rises to shatter the earth. For the eyes of the Lord are lofty, but man is lowly; and the height of men shall be humbled, and the Lord alone shall be exalted on that day. For the day of the Lord of hosts shall be upon everyone insolent and proud, and upon everyone lofty and lifted up, and they shall be humbled; and upon every cedar of Lebanon of the lofty and lifted up, and upon every oak of Bashan, and upon every mountain and upon every high hill, and upon every ship of the sea, and upon every sight of the beauty of ships. And the insolence of men shall be humbled and shall fall, and the Lord alone shall be exalted on that day. And all things made by hands they shall hide in caves and in clefts of the rocks and in hollows of the earth, from the face of the fear of the Lord and from the majesty of his power, when he rises to shatter the earth. For on that day a man shall cast away the abominations of gold and silver which they made to worship, vain and harmful things, so as to enter the holes of the solid rock and the clefts of the rocks, from the face of the fear of the Lord and from the majesty of his power, when he rises to crush the earth.”
Isa 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 2:21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine quotes Isaiah 2:5–21 on the Lord alone being exalted and idols being hidden and cast away.
- The quotation is Isa 2:5–21 in an Old Latin form close to the Septuagint.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray characters in the digital text; stray letter (quotation mark read as 'u'); word split in the digital text): *Et nunc tu, -domus Iacob → Et nunc tu, domus Iacob; remi sit enim → remisit enim; uet super omnem montem → et super omnem montem.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Cons. 1.44 (CSEL 43:43–44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-consensu-evangelistarum/1-26/#p-1-44). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-consensu-evangelistarum-1-44) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Weihrich, CSEL 43 (1904; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Weihrich's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 6 (Salmond, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.