Against the Academics 1.20–2.13

Latin text: Knöll, CSEL 63 (Latin text: Pius Knöll, ed., Sancti Aureli Augustini opera, sect. I, pars 3, CSEL 63 (Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag, 1922), digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 1

1.20CSEL 63:18–19

Deinde res humanas esse ut concedam res hominum, quidquam tu existimas nostrum esse, quod nobis uel dare uel eripere casus potest? aut cum rerum humanarum scientia dicitur, ea dicitur, qua quisque nouit uel quot uel quales fundos habeamus, quid auri, quid argenti, quid denique alienorum carminum cogitemus? illa est humanarum rerum scientia, quae nouit lumen prudentiae, temperantiae decus, fortitudinis robur, iustitiae sanctitatem. haec enim sunt, quae nullam fortunam metuentes uere nostra dicere audemus; quae si Albicerius ille didicisset, numquam, mihi crede, tam luxuriose deformiterque uixisset. quod autem dixit, quem uersum uolueret animo ille, quo consulebatur, neque hoc puto inter res nostras esse numerandum, non quo negem honestissimas disciplinas ad possessionem quandam nostri animi pertinere, sed quia uersum alienum etiam inperitissimis canere ac pronuntiare concessum est. ideo talia cum in memoriam nostram incurrerint, non mirum, si sentiri possunt ab huius aeris animalibus quibusdam uilissimis, quos daemonas uocant, a quibus nos superari acumine ac subtilitate sensuum posse concedo, ratione autem nego, atque id fieri nescio quo modo secretissimo atque a nostris sensibus remotissimo. non enim, si miramur apiculam melle posito nescio qua sagacitate, qua hominem uincit, undeunde aduolare, ideo eam nobis praeponere aut saltem comparare debemus.

"Next, even if I grant that human things are the things of men, do you think anything is ours that chance can give us or snatch from us? Or when we speak of knowledge of human things, do we mean the knowledge by which someone knows how many farms we have or of what kind, how much gold, how much silver, or, finally, what verses of others we are thinking of? That is the knowledge of human things which knows the light of prudence, the beauty of temperance, the strength of fortitude, the holiness of justice. For these are the things which, fearing no fortune, we dare to call truly ours; and if that Albicerius had learned them, believe me, he would never have lived so luxuriously and shamefully. As for his telling what verse the one who consulted him was turning over in his mind, I do not think that is to be counted among our goods either; not that I deny that the most honorable studies belong to a kind of possession of our mind, but because even the most ignorant are allowed to sing and recite another's verse. So when such things have come into our memory, it is no wonder if they can be sensed by certain very base animals of this air, whom they call demons; I grant that they can surpass us in sharpness and subtlety of the senses, but I deny that they surpass us in reason; and this happens in some very hidden way, far removed from our senses. For if we marvel that a little bee, when honey has been set out, flies to it from wherever it may be by some keenness of scent in which it surpasses man, we need not on that account rank it above us or even compare it with us."

Notes and citation

Summary: Trygetius argues that true knowledge of human things is knowledge of the virtues, which Albicerius lacked, and that his feats may be explained by demons of the air, who excel in sense but not in reason.

  • The demons as animals of the air is a Platonist and Christian commonplace.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR garbled nobis.): quod no ns uel dare → quod nobis uel dare.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 1.20 (CSEL 63:18–19; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-1-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-1-20) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.21CSEL 63:19

Itaque uellem magis iste Albicerius ab eo, qui discere cuperet, interrogatus ipsa metra docuisset uel coactus a quopiam consultorum de re sibi statim proposita uersus proprios cecinisset. quod eundem Flaccianum saepe dixisse soles commemorare, cum illud diuinationis genus magna mentis altitudine derideret atque despiceret idque nescio cui abiectissimae animulae—sic enim dicebat — tribueret, quo ille quasi spiritu admonitus uel inflatus haec respondere solitus esset. quaerebat enim uir ille doctissimus ab his, qui talia mirarentur, num grammaticam uel musicam uel geometricam posset Albicerius docere. quis autem illum nosset et non istorum omnium imperitissimum fateretur? quam ob rem ad extremum hortabatur, ut animos suos hi, qui talia didicissent, illi diuinationi sine dubitatione praeferrent darentque operam his disciplinis instruere atque adminiculare suam mentem, quibus aeriam istam inuisibilium animantium naturam transilire et eam supereuolare contingeret.

"So I would rather that this Albicerius, when questioned by someone eager to learn, had taught the meters themselves, or, when pressed by one of his clients, had sung verses of his own on a subject just put to him. You often recall that the same Flaccianus used to say this, when with great loftiness of mind he mocked and despised that kind of divination and attributed it to some utterly contemptible little soul (for so he used to call it), by whose prompting or inspiration, as by a spirit, the man used to give these answers. For that most learned man used to ask those who marveled at such things whether Albicerius could teach grammar or music or geometry. And who that knew him would not admit that he was utterly ignorant of all these? Therefore he used to urge in the end that those who had learned such things should without hesitation prefer their own minds to that divination, and should take pains to instruct and support their minds with those disciplines by which they might leap over and fly above that airy nature of invisible animals."

Notes and citation

Summary: Trygetius recalls Flaccianus's scorn for such divination, which he ascribed to a contemptible spirit, and his advice to prefer the liberal disciplines that raise the mind above the demons.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Stray period joining two words.; Word split in the digital text.): dice bat → dicebat; respondere.solitus → respondere solitus.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 1.21 (CSEL 63:19; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-1-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-1-21) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.22CSEL 63:19–20

Iam res diuinae cum omnibus concedentibus meliores augustioresque multo quam humanae sint, quo pacto eas ille adsequi poterat, qui quid esset ipse nesciebat, nisi forte existimans sidera, quae cotidie contemplamur, magnum quiddam esse in conparatione uerissimi et secretissimi dei, quem raro fortasse intellectus, sensus autem nullus attingit? haec autem praesto sunt oculis nostris. nec ista igitur sunt illa diuina, qualia se sola scire sapientia profitetur; cetera autem, quibus isti nescio qui diuinantes uel ad uanam iactantiam uel ad quaestum abutuntur, prae sideribus profecto uiliora sunt. non igitur Albicerius rerum humanarum ac diuinarum scientiae particeps fuit frustraque abs te isto modo definitio nostra temptata est. postremo cum quidquid praeter res humanas atque diuinas est, nos uilissimum ducere et omnino contemnere oporteat, quaero, in quibus rebus quaerat tuus ille sapiens ueritatem. — In diuinis, ait ille; nam uirtus etiam in homine sine dubitatione diuina est. — Has igitur Albicerius iam sciebat, quas tuus sapiens semper inquiret? — Tum Licentius: Diuinas, ait, et ille nouerat, sed non eas, quae a sapiente quaerendae sunt. quis enim non euertat omnem loquendi consuetudinem, si ei diuinationem concedat, adimat res diuinas, e quibus diuinatio nominata est? quare illa uestra definitio, nisi fallor, nescio quid aliud, quod ad sapientiam non pertineret, inclusit.

"Now since divine things, as everyone grants, are much better and more august than human things, how could he attain them who did not know what he himself was? Unless perhaps he thinks the stars, which we contemplate every day, are something great in comparison with the most true and most hidden God, whom the intellect perhaps rarely touches and no sense touches at all. But these are present to our eyes. So these are not those divine things which wisdom professes that she alone knows; and the other things, which these diviners, whoever they are, misuse for vain boasting or for gain, are surely more worthless than the stars. So Albicerius did not share in the knowledge of things human and divine, and our definition was attacked by you in this way in vain. Finally, since we ought to regard as most worthless and altogether despise whatever lies outside things human and divine, I ask in what things that wise man of yours seeks the truth." "In divine things," said Licentius; "for virtue, even in man, is without doubt divine." "So Albicerius already knew these things which your wise man will always be seeking?" Then Licentius said: "He too knew divine things, but not those that the wise man must seek. For who would not overturn all usage of speech if he granted him divination but took away divine things, from which divination is named? So that definition of yours, unless I am mistaken, included something else that did not belong to wisdom."

Notes and citation

Summary: Trygetius argues that Albicerius did not know the truly divine things, and Licentius replies that divination implies some knowledge of divine things, so the definition includes too much.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 1.22 (CSEL 63:19–20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-1-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-1-22) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.23CSEL 63:20–21

Tum Trygetius: Definitionem istam, inquit, defendet, si libebit, ille qui protulit. nunc mihi tu responde, ut tandem ad id quod agitur ueniamus. — Istic sum, inquit ille. — Dasne, ait, Albicerium scisse uerum? — Do, inquit. — Melior igitur tuo sapiente. — Nullo modo, ait ille; nam quod genus ueri sapiens requirit, non solum ille delirus ariolus sed ne ipse quidem sapiens, dum in hoc corpore uiuit, adsequitur. quod tamen tantum est, ut multo sit praestabilius hoc semper quaerere quam illud aliquando inuenire. — Necesse est, ait Trygetius, ut mihi in angustiis definitio illa subueniat. quae si propterea tibi uitiosa uisa est, quia complexa est eum, quem non possumus uocare sapientem, quaero, utrum eam probes, si sapientiam rerum humanarum diuinarumque scientiam dicamus, sed earum, quae ad beatam uitam pertineant. — Est, inquit ille, et ista sapientia et non sola. unde superior definitio inuasit alienum, haec autem proprium deseruit; quare illa auaritiae, ista stultitiae coargui potest. etenim ut iam ipse explicem definitione quod sentio, sapientia mihi uidetur esse rerum humanarum et diuinarum, quae ad beatam uitam pertineant, non scientia solum sed etiam diligens inquisitio. quam descriptionem si partiri uelis, prima pars, quae scientiam tenet, dei est, haec autem, quae inquisitione contenta est, hominis. illa igitur deus, hac autem homo beatus est. — Tum ille: Miror, inquit, sapientem tuum quomodo asseris frustra operam consumere. — Quomodo, inquit Licentius, frustra operam consumere, cum tanta mercede conquirat? nam hoc ipso, quo quaerit, sapiens est, et quo sapiens, eo beatus, cum ab omnibus inuolucris corporis mentem quantum potest euoluit et se ipsum in semet ipsum colligit, cum se non permittit cupiditatibus laniandum, sed in se atque in deum semper tranquillus intenditur, ut et hic, quod beatum esse supra inter nos conuenit, ratione perfruatur et extremo die uitae ad id quod concupiuit adipiscendum reperiatur paratus fruaturque merito diuina beatitudine, qui humana sit ante perfruitus.

Then Trygetius said: "That definition will be defended, if he pleases, by the one who put it forward. Now answer me, so that we may at last come to the point at issue." "I am ready," said Licentius. "Do you grant," he said, "that Albicerius knew the truth?" "I grant it," he said. "Then he is better than your wise man." "Not at all," said Licentius; "for the kind of truth the wise man seeks is attained not only not by that crazy soothsayer but not even by the wise man himself while he lives in this body. Yet it is so great that it is far more excellent always to seek it than sometimes to find that other." "In my straits," said Trygetius, "that definition must come to my aid. If it seemed faulty to you because it included one whom we cannot call wise, I ask whether you would approve it if we said that wisdom is the knowledge of things human and divine, but of those that pertain to the happy life." "That too is wisdom," said Licentius, "but not the only wisdom. So the former definition invaded what belonged to another, and this one abandoned what belongs to it; the former can be convicted of greed, this one of folly. For to explain now by a definition what I myself think, wisdom seems to me to be not only the knowledge but also the diligent search of things human and divine that pertain to the happy life. If you wish to divide this description, the first part, which holds knowledge, belongs to God, and this part, which is content with searching, to man. By the former, then, God is happy, by the latter man." Then Trygetius said: "I wonder how you claim that your wise man spends his effort in vain." "How does he spend his effort in vain," said Licentius, "when he seeks for so great a reward? For by the very fact that he seeks he is wise, and in that he is wise he is happy, since he unwinds his mind as much as he can from all the wrappings of the body and gathers himself into himself, since he does not let himself be torn by desires but always tranquilly directs himself toward himself and toward God; so that here he enjoys reason, which we agreed above is happiness, and on the last day of his life he is found ready to attain what he desired, and deservedly enjoys divine blessedness, having first enjoyed the human."

Notes and citation

Summary: Licentius defines wisdom as both the knowledge, which belongs to God, and the diligent search, which belongs to man, of the things pertaining to the happy life, and argues that the seeker is wise and happy now and blessed hereafter.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 1.23 (CSEL 63:20–21; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-1-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-1-23) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.24CSEL 63:21–22

Tum ego, cum Trygetius quid sit respondendum diu quaereret: Non puto, inquam, Licenti, etiam huic argumenta defutura, si eum otiose quaerere permittamus. quid enim ei quouis loco defuit ad respondendum? nam primo ipse intulit, quoniam de beata uita quaestio nata est et beatum solum necesse est esse sapientem, si quidem stultitia etiam stultorum iudicio misera est, perfectum sapientem esse debere, non autem perfectum esse qui adhuc uerum quid sit inquirit, unde ne beatum quidem. cui loco tu cum molem auctoritatis obiceres, modeste aliquantum Ciceronis nomine perturbatus tamen se statim erexit et generosa quadam contumacia in uerticem libertatis exsiluit rursumque arripuit quod erat de manibus uiolenter excussum quaesiuitque abs te, utrum tibi perfectus qui adhuc quaereret uideretur, ut, si fatereris non esse perfectum, ad caput recurreret demonstraretque, si posset, per illam definitionem perfectum esse hominem, qui secundum legem mentis uitam gubernaret, ac per hoc beatum nisi perfectum esse non posse. quo te laqueo cum expedisses cautius, quam putabam, et perfectum hominem esse diceres inquisitorem diligentissimum ueritatis ipsaque illa definitione, qua beatam uitam illam demum esse dixeramus, quae secundum rationem ageretur, tu praefidentius apertiusque pugnasses, ille tibi plane reposuit; nam occupauit praesidium tuum, unde pulsus omnino summam rerum amiseras, ni te indutiae reparassent. ubi enim arcem locauerunt Academici, quorum tueris sententiam, nisi in erroris definitione? quae tibi nisi noctu fortasse per somnium rediret in mentem, iam quid responderes non habebas, cum in exponenda Ciceronis sententia id ipsum tu ipse ante commemoraueris. deinde uentum est ad definitionem sapientiae, quam cum tanta calliditate labefactare conareris, ut tua furta nec ipse auxiliator tuus Albicerius fortasse comprehenderet, quanta tibi uigilantia, quantis uiribus restitit, quam te paene inuoluit atque depressit, nisi te postremo tua definitione noua tutareris diceresque humanam esse sapientiam inquisitionem ueritatis, ex qua propter animi tranquillitatem beata uita contingeret! huic iste sententiae non respondebit, praesertim si in proroganda diei uel parte, quae restat, reddi sibi gratiam postulabit.

Then, as Trygetius was searching a long time for an answer, I said: "I do not think, Licentius, that arguments will fail him either, if we let him search at leisure. For what has he lacked for answering at any point? First he himself brought forward that, since the question had arisen about the happy life, and only the wise man can be happy (since folly is wretched even in the judgment of fools), the wise man must be perfect, but one who is still inquiring what the truth is is not perfect, and therefore not happy either. When you threw against this point the mass of authority, he was somewhat modestly disturbed by Cicero's name, yet he at once rose up again and with a noble defiance leapt to the summit of freedom, seized again what had been violently struck from his hands, and asked you whether one who was still seeking seemed to you perfect; so that, if you admitted he was not perfect, he could run back to the beginning and show, if he could, by that definition, that the man is perfect who governs his life by the law of the mind, and hence that one cannot be happy unless he is perfect. When you had freed yourself from that snare more cautiously than I expected, saying that the perfect man is the most diligent inquirer after truth, and had fought too confidently and too openly with that very definition by which we had said that the happy life is the one lived according to reason, he plainly paid you back; for he seized your stronghold, and, driven from it, you would have lost the whole battle had not the truce restored you. For where did the Academics, whose opinion you defend, place their citadel, if not in the definition of error? Had it not perhaps come back to your mind at night in a dream, you would have had no answer, though you yourself had mentioned that very point earlier in setting out Cicero's opinion. Then we came to the definition of wisdom. You tried to undermine it with such cunning that perhaps not even your helper Albicerius would have detected your thefts; yet with what vigilance, with what strength he resisted you, how nearly he entangled and overthrew you, had you not at last protected yourself with your new definition, saying that human wisdom is the search for truth, from which, through tranquility of mind, the happy life comes! He will not answer this view, especially if he asks that the favor be returned to him by putting off the matter for the day, or for the part of it that remains."

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine reviews the course of the debate, praising both young men and noting that the Academics' stronghold lies in their definition of error.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 1.24 (CSEL 63:21–22; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-1-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-1-24) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.25CSEL 63:22–23

Sed, ne longum faciamus, iam, si placet, sermo iste claudatur, in quo immorari etiam superfluum puto. tractata enim res est pro suscepto negotio satis; quae post pauca omnino posset uerba finiri. nisi exercere uos uellem neruosque uestros et studia, quae mihi magna cura est, explorare. nam cum instituissem uos ad quaerendam ueritatem magno opere hortari, coeperam ex uobis quaerere, quantum in ea momenti poneretis; omnes autem posuistis tantum, ut plus non desiderem. nam cum beati esse cupiamus, siue id fieri non potest nisi inuenta siue non nisi diligenter quaesita ueritate, postpositis ceteris omnibus rebus nobis, si beati esse uolumus, perquirenda est. quam ob rem iam istam, ut dixi, disputationem terminemus et relatam in litteras mittamus, Licenti, potissimum patri tuo. cuius erga philosophiam iam prorsus animum teneo. sed adhuc quae admittat quaero fortunam. incendi autem in haec studia uehementius poterit, cum te ipsum iam mecum sic uiuere non audiendo solum uerum etiam legendo ista cognouerit. tibi autem, si, ut sentio, Academici placent, uires ad eos defendendos ualidiores para; nam illos ego accusare decreui. — Quae cum essent dicta, surreximus.

"But not to make it long, let this discussion now be closed, if you please; I think it even superfluous to linger in it. For the matter has been treated sufficiently for the task we took up; it could have been finished altogether in a few words, had I not wanted to exercise you and to test your strength and your zeal, which is a great concern to me. For when I had set out to urge you strongly to seek the truth, I had begun to ask you how much importance you placed on it; and all of you placed so much on it that I want no more. For since we desire to be happy, whether that cannot come about except by finding the truth or only by seeking it diligently, we must, setting aside all other things, search it out if we want to be happy. Therefore, as I said, let us now end this discussion and, Licentius, send it written down above all to your father. I already hold his mind for philosophy entirely, but I am still looking for the fortune that will admit him to it. He can be set more ardently on fire for these studies when he learns, not only by hearing but also by reading this, that you yourself are already living with me in this way. As for you, if, as I sense, the Academics please you, prepare stronger forces to defend them; for I have decided to accuse them." When this had been said, we rose.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine closes the first book, concluding that whether happiness lies in finding or in seeking the truth, the truth must be pursued above all, and announces that he will attack the Academics.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 1.25 (CSEL 63:22–23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-1-25). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-1-25) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 2

2.1CSEL 63:23–24

Si quam necesse est disciplina atque scientia sapientiae uacuum esse non posse sapientem, tam eam necesse esset inuenire, dum quaeritur, omnis profecto Academicorum uel calumnia uel pertinacia uel peruicacia uel, ut ego interdum arbitror, congrua illi tempori ratio simul cum ipso tempore et cum ipsius Carneadis Ciceronisque corporibus sepulta foret. sed quia siue uitae huius multis uariisque iactationibus, Romaniane, ut in eodem te probas, siue ingeniorum quodam stupore uel socordia uel tarditate torpentium siue desperatione inueniendi — quia non quam facile oculis ista lux, tam facile mentibus sapientiae sidus oboritur — siue etiam, qui error omnino populorum est, falsa opinione inuentae a se ueritatis nec diligenter homines quaerunt, si qui quaerunt, et a quaerendi uoluntate auertuntur, euenit, ut scientia raro paucisque proueniat, eoque fit, ut Academicorum arma, quando cum eis ad manus uenitur, nec mediocribus uiris sed acutis et bene eruditis inuicta et quasi Uulcania uideantur. quam ob rem contra illos fluctus procellasque fortunae cum obnitendum remis qualiumcumque uirtutum tum in primis diuinum auxilium omni deuotione atque pietate implorandum est, ut intentio constantissima bonorum studiorum teneat cursum suum, a quo eam nullus casus excutiat, quominus illam philosophiae tutissimus iucundissimusque portus accipiat. haec prima tua causa est; hinc tibi metuo, hinc te cupio liberari, hinc, si modo dignus sum, qui impetrem, cotidianis uotis auras tibi prosperas orare non cesso; oro autem ipsam summi dei uirtutem atque sapientiam. quid est enim aliud, quem mysteria nobis tradunt dei filium?

If it were as necessary that wisdom be found while it is sought as it is necessary that the wise man cannot be without the discipline and knowledge of wisdom, then surely every quibble or obstinacy or stubbornness of the Academics, or, as I sometimes think, their reasoning suited to that time, would have been buried together with that time and with the bodies of Carneades and Cicero themselves. But whether because of the many and various tossings of this life, Romanianus, as you prove in your own case, or because of a certain stupor or sluggishness or slowness of dull minds, or because of despair of finding (since the star of wisdom does not rise as easily to minds as this light rises to eyes), or also because of what is the error of whole peoples, the false opinion that they have found the truth, men do not seek diligently, if any do seek, and are turned away from the will to seek; and so it happens that knowledge comes rarely and to few. Hence the weapons of the Academics, when one comes to grips with them, seem invincible and as if forged by Vulcan, not to mediocre men but to sharp and well-educated ones. Therefore, against those waves and storms of fortune we must both strive with the oars of whatever virtues we have and, above all, implore divine help with all devotion and piety, so that the most constant intent of good studies may hold its course, from which no chance may shake it so as to keep the safest and most pleasant harbor of philosophy from receiving it. This is your first cause; on this account I fear for you, on this account I long for you to be freed; on this account, if only I am worthy to obtain it, I do not cease to pray in daily prayers for favorable winds for you; and I pray to the very power and wisdom of the most high God. For what else is he whom the mysteries hand down to us as the Son of God?

1 Cor 1:24 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine, addressing Romanianus again, explains why the Academics' arguments seem invincible and prays for him to the power and wisdom of God, the Son of God.

  • "The power and wisdom of God" echoes 1 Cor 1:24. "The mysteries" are the Christian sacraments and teaching.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Words joined and the vocative Romaniane garbled in the digital text.): uariisqueiactationibus,Romamaneut in eodem teprobas → uariisque iactationibus, Romaniane, ut in eodem te probas.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.1 (CSEL 63:23–24; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.2CSEL 63:24–25

Multum me autem adiuuabis pro te deprecantem, si non nos exaudiri posse desperes nitarisque nobiscum et non solum uotis sed etiam uoluntate atque illa tua naturali mentis altitudine, propter quam te quaero, qua singulariter delector, quam semper admiror, quae in te — pro nefas! — illis rerum domesticarum nubibus quasi fulmen inuoluitur et multos ac paene omnes latet, me autem et alium uel tertium familiarissimos tuos latere non potest, qui saepe non solum attente audiuimus murmura tua sed etiam nonnulla fulgora fulminibus propiora conspeximus. quis enim, ut cetera pro tempore taceam et unum commemorem, quis, inquam, tam subito umquam tantum intonuit tantumque lumine mentis emicuit, ut sub uno fremitu rationis et quodam coruscamine temperantiae uno die illa pridie saeuissima penitus libido moreretur? ergo non erumpet aliquando ista uirtus et multorum desperantium risus in horrorem stuporemque conuertet et locuta in terris quasi quaedam futurorum signa rursus proiecto totius corporis onere recurret in caelum? ergone Augustinus de Romaniano frustra ista dixit? non sinet ille. cui me totum dedi, quem nunc recognoscere aliquantum coepi.

You will help me greatly as I pray for you if you do not despair that we can be heard, and strive with us not only by prayers but also by will and by that natural loftiness of your mind for which I seek you, in which I take singular delight, which I always admire, which in you (alas!) is wrapped up like lightning in those clouds of domestic affairs and is hidden from many, indeed from almost all, but cannot be hidden from me and from one or two others, your closest friends, who have often not only listened attentively to your rumblings but also seen some flashes nearer to thunderbolts. For, to pass over other things for the present and mention one, who, I ask, ever thundered so suddenly and flashed so brightly with the light of the mind that, under one roar of reason and a kind of lightning of temperance, a lust that had been most savage the day before died utterly in one day? Will not this virtue, then, one day break out and turn the laughter of many who despair into dread and amazement, and, having spoken on earth like a sign of things to come, return again to heaven, the burden of the whole body cast off? Has Augustine, then, said these things of Romanianus in vain? He will not allow it, to whom I have given myself wholly, and whom I have now begun to know again in some measure.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine praises Romanianus's hidden greatness of mind, recalling how he once overcame a fierce passion in a single day, and trusts God that his hopes for him will not be vain.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Words joined in the digital text.): singulariterdelector → singulariter delector.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.2 (CSEL 63:24–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.3CSEL 63:25

Ergo adgredere mecum philosophiam; hic est quidquid te anxium saepe atque dubitantem mirabiliter solet mouere. non enim metuo aut a socordia morum aut a tarditate ingenio tuo. quis te, quando aliquantum respirare concessum est, in sermonibus nostris uigilantior, quis acutior apparuit? ego tibi gratiam non repensabo? an fortasse paululum debeo? tu me adulescentulum pauperem ad studia pergentem et domo et sumtu et, quod plus est, animo excepisti; tu patre orbatum amicitia consolatus es, hortatione animasti, ope adiuuisti; tu in nostro ipso municipio fauore familiaritate communicatione domus tuae paene tecum clarum primatemque fecisti; tu Karthaginem inlustrioris professionis gratia remeantem, cum tibi et meorum nulli consilium meum spemque aperuissem, quamuis aliquantum illo tibi insito — quia ibi iam docebam — patriae amore cunctatus es, tamen ubi euincere adulescentis cupiditatem ad ea quae uidebantur meliora tendentis nequiuisti, ex dehortatore in adiutorem mira beniuolentiae moderatione conuersus es. tu necessariis omnibus iter adminiculasti meum; tu ibidem rursus, qui cunabula et quasi nidum studiorum meorum foueras, iam uolare audentis sustentasti rudimenta; tu etiam, cum te absente atque ignorante nauigassem, nonnihil suscensens, quod non tecum communicassem, ut solerem, atque aliud quiduis quam contumaciam suspicans mansisti inconcussus in amicitia nec plus ante oculos tuos liberi deserti a magistro quam nostrae mentis penetralia puritasque uersata est.

So undertake philosophy with me; here is whatever wonderfully moves you when you are often anxious and in doubt. For I do not fear for your mind either from sluggish habits or from slowness of wit. Who, when you were allowed to breathe a little, appeared more alert in our conversations, who sharper? Shall I not repay your kindness? Or perhaps I owe you only a little? When I was a poor young man setting out for my studies, you received me with your home, your money, and, what is more, your heart. When I was bereft of my father, you consoled me with friendship, encouraged me with exhortation, helped me with your resources. In our own town you made me, by your favor, your friendship, and the sharing of your house, almost as distinguished and prominent as yourself. When I was returning to Carthage for the sake of a more illustrious profession, and had disclosed my plan and hope to you and to none of my own, you hesitated a while, out of that love of our homeland implanted in you, because I was already teaching there; yet when you could not overcome the desire of a young man striving toward what seemed better, you turned with a wonderful restraint of goodwill from dissuader to helper. You furnished my journey with everything necessary; there again you, who had cherished the cradle and as it were the nest of my studies, supported the first attempts of one now daring to fly. Even when I had sailed away in your absence and without your knowledge, though you were somewhat angry that I had not consulted you as I used to, and suspected anything but defiance, you remained unshaken in friendship, and the children abandoned by their teacher were no more before your eyes than the inner chambers and purity of my mind.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine urges Romanianus to take up philosophy and gratefully recounts his patron's generosity throughout his studies and career.

  • The departure without telling Romanianus is Augustine's voyage from Carthage to Rome (cf. Confessions 5.8).

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.3 (CSEL 63:25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.4CSEL 63:25–26

Postremo quidquid de otio meo modo gaudeo, quod a superfluarum cupiditatium uinculis euolaui, quod depositis oneribus mortuarum curarum respiro resipisco redeo ad me, quod quaero intentissimus ueritatem. quod inuenire iam ingredior, quod me ad summum ipsum modum peruenturum esse confido, tu animasti, tu inpulisti, tu fecisti. cuius autem minister fueris, plus adhuc fide concepi quam ratione conprehendi. num cum praesens praesenti tibi exposuissem interiores metus animi mei uehementerque ac saepius assererem nullam mihi uideri prosperam fortunam, nisi quae otium philosophandi daret, nullam beatam uitam, nisi qua in philosophia uiueretur, sed me tanto meorum onere, quorum ex officio meo uita penderet, multisque necessitatibus uel pudoris uel ineptae meorum miseriae refrenari, tam magno es elatus gaudio, tam sancto huius uitae inflammatus ardore, ut te diceres, si tu ab illarum importunarum litium uinculis aliquo modo eximereris, omnia mea uincula etiam patrimonii tui mecum participatione rupturum.

Finally, whatever I now rejoice in from my leisure, that I have flown free of the chains of superfluous desires, that having laid down the burdens of dead cares I breathe again, come to my senses, return to myself, that I seek the truth with the greatest intent, that I am now beginning to find it, that I trust I shall reach the very highest measure: you encouraged it, you urged it, you brought it about. But whose minister you were, I have so far conceived more by faith than grasped by reason. For when, face to face, I had set out to you the inner fears of my mind, and asserted strongly and repeatedly that no fortune seemed favorable to me unless it gave leisure for philosophy, no life happy unless it were lived in philosophy, but that I was held back by the great burden of my dependents, whose living hung on my office, and by many necessities, whether of propriety or of the foolish distress of my people, you were lifted up with such great joy, so inflamed with holy ardor for this life, that you said that if you could somehow be freed from the chains of those troublesome lawsuits, you would break all my chains too by sharing even your patrimony with me.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine credits Romanianus, as the minister of a higher providence, with his present philosophical leisure, recalling his offer to share his patrimony.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.4 (CSEL 63:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.5CSEL 63:26–27

Itaque cum admoto nobis fomite discessisses, numquam cessauimus inhiantes in philosophiam atque illam uitam, quae inter nos placuit atque conuenit, prorsus nihil aliud cogitare atque id constanter quidem, sed minus acriter agebamus, putabamus tamen satis nos agere. et quoniam nondum aderat ea flamma, quae summa nos arreptura erat, illam qualem aestuabamus arbitrabamur esse uel maximam, cum ecce tibi libri quidam pleni, ut ait Celsinus, bonas res Arabicas ubi exhalarunt in nos, ubi illi flammulae instillarunt pretiosissimi unguenti guttas paucissimas, incredibile, Romaniane, incredibile et ultra quam de me fortasse et tu credis — quid amplius dicam? — etiam mihi ipsi de me ipso incredibile incendium concitarunt. quis me tunc honor, quae hominum pompa, quae inanis famae cupiditas, quod denique huius mortalis uitae fomentum atque retinaculum commouebat? prorsus totus in me cursim redibam. respexi tamen, confitebor, quasi de itinere in illam religionem, quae pueris nobis insita est et medullitus inplicata; uerum autem ipsa ad se nescientem rapiebat. itaque titubans properans haesitans arripio apostolum Paulum. neque enim uere, inquam, isti tanta potuissent uixissentque ita, ut eos uixisse manifestum est, si eorum litterae atque rationes huic tanto bono aduersarentur. perlegi totum intentissime atque castissime.

So when you had applied the kindling to us and departed, we never ceased longing for philosophy and thinking of absolutely nothing but that life which we had agreed upon among ourselves; and we pursued it steadily indeed, but less keenly, though we thought we were doing enough. And since the flame that was to seize us completely had not yet come, we thought the one with which we glowed was the very greatest, when behold, certain books full, as Celsinus says, of good things from Arabia breathed them upon us; when they let fall a very few drops of most precious ointment on that little flame, they kindled, incredibly, Romanianus, incredibly, and beyond what perhaps even you believe of me (what more shall I say?), a fire incredible even to myself about myself. What honor, what human pomp, what desire for empty fame, in short what comfort or tie of this mortal life moved me then? I was returning wholly and swiftly into myself. Yet I looked back, I confess, as if from the road, to that religion which was implanted in us as boys and woven into our very marrow; but she herself was drawing me to herself without my knowing it. So, stumbling, hurrying, hesitating, I seized the apostle Paul. For truly, I said, those men could not have done such great things or lived as they clearly lived, if their writings and reasonings were opposed to this great good. I read it all through with the greatest attention and reverence.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine tells how certain books of the Platonists set him on fire for philosophy and how he then turned back to the religion of his childhood and read the apostle Paul through.

  • The "books" are Platonist writings, probably Plotinus in Latin translation (cf. Confessions 7.9). Celsinus is probably the author of a handbook of philosophical opinions; the phrase is his, otherwise unidentified.

Extrabiblical texts: Plotinus (Plotinus, Enneads; allusion)

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.5 (CSEL 63:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.6CSEL 63:27–28

Tunc uero quantulocumque iam lumine adsperso tanta se mihi philosophiae facies aperuit, ut non dicam tibi, qui eius incognitae fame semper arsisti, sed si ipsi aduersario tuo, quo nescio utrum plus exercearis quam inpediaris, eam demonstrare potuissem, ne ille et Baias et amoena pomeria et delicata nitidaque conuiuia et domesticos histriones, postremo quidquid eum acriter commouet in quascumque delicias abiciens et relinquens ad huius pulchritudinem blandus amator et sanctus mirans anhelans aestuans aduolaret. habet enim et ille, quod confitendum est, quoddam decus animi uel potius decoris quasi sementem, quod erumpere in ueram pulchritudinem nitens tortuose ac deformiter inter scabra uitiorum et inter opinionum fallacium dumeta frondescit; tamen non cessat frondescere et paucis acute ac diligenter in densa intuentibus, quantum sinitur, eminere. inde est illa hospitalitas, inde in conuiuiis multa humanitatis condimenta, inde ipsa elegantia nitor mundissima facies rerum omnium et undique cuncta perfundens adumbratae uenustatis urbanitas.

Then indeed, with however little light already sprinkled on me, so great a face of philosophy opened itself to me that, I will not say to you, who have always burned with hunger for her though you did not know her, but if I could have shown her even to your opponent himself, by whom I do not know whether you are more exercised or hindered, he would have cast away and left behind Baiae and pleasant gardens and delicate and elegant banquets and his household actors, and finally whatever keenly stirs him toward any delights, and would have flown to her beauty as a gentle and chaste lover, marveling, panting, glowing. For he too has, it must be confessed, a certain beauty of mind, or rather a kind of seed of beauty, which, striving to break out into true beauty, puts forth leaves crookedly and misshapenly among the roughness of vices and the thickets of false opinions; yet it does not cease to put forth leaves and to stand out, as far as it is allowed, to the few who look keenly and carefully into the thicket. From this comes that hospitality, from this the many seasonings of humanity at his banquets, from this the elegance, the polish, the very neat appearance of all things, and the refinement of shadowed grace that suffuses everything on every side.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine describes the beauty of philosophy that opened to him, so great that even Romanianus's pleasure-loving opponent at law would have abandoned everything for it, since he too has a seed of true beauty.

  • Baiae was a luxurious resort on the Bay of Naples.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.6 (CSEL 63:27–28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.7CSEL 63:28

Philocalia ista uulgo dicitur. ne contemnas nomen hoc ex uulgi nomine. nam philocalia et philosophia prope similiter cognominatae sunt et quasi gentiles inter se uideri uolunt et sunt. quid est enim philosophia? amor sapientiae. quid philocalia? amor pulchritudinis. quaere de Graecis. quid ergo sapientia? nonne ipsa uera est pulchritudo? germanae igitur istae prorsus et eodem parente procreatae; sed illa uisco libidinis detracta caelo suo et inclusa cauea populari uiciniam tamen nominis tenuit ad commonendum aucupem, ne illam contemnat. hanc igitur sine pinnis sordidatam et egentem uolitans libere soror saepe agnoscit, sed raro liberat; non enim philocalia ista unde genus ducat, agnoscit nisi philosophia. quam totam fabulam — nam subito Aesopus factus sum — Licentius tibi carmine suauius indicabit; poeta est enim paene perfectus. ergo ille, si ueram pulchritudinem, cuius falsae amator est, sanatis renudatisque paululum oculis possit intueri, quanta uoluptate philosophiae gremio se inuolueret? quomodo ibi te cognitum sicut uerum fratrem amplecteretur? miraris haec et forsitan rides. quid, si haec explicarem, ut uolebam? quid, si saltem uox, si adhuc facies uideri a te non potest, ipsius philosophiae posset audiri? mirareris profecto, sed non rideres, non desperares. crede mihi, de nullo desperandum est, de talibus autem minime; omnino sunt exempla. facile euadit, facile reuolat hoc genus auium multis inclusis multum mirantibus.

This is commonly called philocalia. Do not despise this name because of its common use. For philocalia and philosophia are named almost alike and want to appear as kin to each other, and they are. For what is philosophy? The love of wisdom. What is philocalia? The love of beauty. Ask the Greeks. What, then, is wisdom? Is it not itself true beauty? So these two are full sisters, born of the same parent; but the one, dragged down from her heaven by the birdlime of lust and shut up in the common cage, has still kept the closeness of the name to warn the fowler not to despise her. Her sister, flying freely, often recognizes her, wingless, soiled, and needy, but rarely frees her; for this philocalia does not recognize her lineage except through philosophy. This whole fable (for I have suddenly become Aesop) Licentius will tell you more sweetly in a poem, for he is almost a perfect poet. So if that man could behold, with his eyes healed and uncovered a little, the true beauty of which he loves a false one, with what pleasure would he wrap himself in the lap of philosophy! How would he embrace you there, recognized as a true brother! You wonder at this and perhaps laugh. What if I explained these things as I wished? What if at least the voice of philosophy herself could be heard by you, if her face cannot yet be seen? You would surely wonder, but you would not laugh or despair. Believe me, one must despair of no one, least of all of such men; there are examples everywhere. This kind of bird easily escapes and easily flies back, while many who are shut in greatly marvel.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine compares philocalia, the love of beauty, to philosophy, the love of wisdom, as sisters, one of them caged by lust, and expresses hope for Romanianus's pleasure-loving opponent.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.7 (CSEL 63:28; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.8CSEL 63:28–29

Sed ad nos redeam. nos, inquam, Romaniane, philosophemur; reddam tibi gratiam, filius tuus coepit philosophari. ego eum reprimo, ut disciplinis necessariis prius excultus uigentior et firmior insurgat. quarum te ne metuas expertem, si bene te noui, auras tibi liberas tantum opto. nam de indole quid dicam? utinam non tam rara esset in hominibus, quam certa est in te! restant duo uitia et impedimenta inueniendae ueritatis, a quibus tibi non multum timeo; timeo tamen, ne te contemnas atque inuenturum esse desperes, aut certe, ne inuenisse te credas. quorum primum si tamen inest, ista tibi fortasse disputatio detrahet. saepius enim suscensuisti Academicis eo quidem grauius, quo minus eruditus esses, eo libentius, quod ueritatis amore inliciebaris. itaque iam cum Alypio te fautore confligam et tibi facile persuadebo quod uolo, probabiliter tamen; nam ipsum uerum non uidebis, nisi in philosophiam totus intraueris. illud autem alterum, quod te fortasse aliquid inuenisse praesumis, quamuis a nobis iam quaerens dubitansque discesseris, tamen, si quid superstitionis in animum reuolutum est, eicietur profecto, uel cum tibi aliquam inter nos disputationem de religione misero uel cum praesens tecum multa contulero.

But let me return to us. Let us, I say, Romanianus, do philosophy; I will repay your kindness: your son has begun to do philosophy. I hold him back, so that, first trained in the necessary disciplines, he may rise up more vigorous and firmer. Do not fear that you lack these; if I know you well, I wish you only free winds. For what shall I say of your natural gifts? Would that they were as rare in men as they are sure in you! There remain two faults and obstacles to finding the truth, for which I do not much fear on your account; yet I do fear that you may despise yourself and despair of finding it, or certainly that you may believe you have found it. If the first of these is in you, this discussion will perhaps take it away. For you have often been angry with the Academics, the more seriously the less educated you were, and the more willingly because you were drawn by love of truth. So now I will contend with Alypius with you as my supporter, and I will easily persuade you of what I want, though only probably; for you will not see the truth itself unless you enter wholly into philosophy. As for the other, that you perhaps presume you have found something: although you left us still seeking and doubting, yet if any superstition has rolled back into your mind, it will surely be cast out, either when I send you some discussion between us on religion, or when I talk over many things with you in person.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine urges Romanianus to philosophy, warning against despair of finding the truth and against the belief that one has already found it, by which he means a relapse into superstition.

  • The "superstition" is again Manichaeism.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.8 (CSEL 63:28–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.9CSEL 63:29–30

Ego enim nunc aliud nihil ago, quam me ipse purgo a uanis perniciosisque opinionibus. itaque non dubito melius mihi esse quam tibi. unum tantum est, unde inuideam fortunae tuae, quod solus frueris Luciliano meo. an et tu inuides, quia dixi meo? sed quid dixi aliud quam tuo et omnium, quicumque unum sumus? de quo tamen ut subuenias desiderio meo, quid te rogem? aut te ipse promereor? tantum scis, quia debes. sed nunc ambobus dico: cauete, ne quid uos nosse arbitremini, nisi quod ita didiceritis saltem, ut nostis unum duo tria quattuor simul collecta in summa fieri decem. sed item cauete, ne uos philosophia ueritatem aut non cognituros aut nullo modo ita posse cognosci arbitremini. nam mihi uel potius illi credite, qui ait: quaerite et inuenietis, nec cognitionem desperandam esse et manifestiorem futuram, quam sunt illi numeri. nunc ad propositum ueniamus. iam enim sero coepi metuere, ne hoc principium modum excederet. et non est leue. nam modus procul dubio diuinus est, sed fefellerit, cum dulciter ducit. ero cautior. cum sapiens fuero.

For I am now doing nothing else but purging myself of vain and harmful opinions. So I do not doubt that I am better off than you. There is only one thing for which I envy your fortune: that you alone enjoy my Lucilianus. Or do you envy me too, because I said "my"? But what did I say except "yours" and "all of ours," all of us who are one? Yet what shall I ask of you to meet my longing for him? Or shall I earn it from you myself? You know only that you owe it. But now I say to you both: beware of thinking you know anything unless you have learned it at least as well as you know that one, two, three, and four added together make ten. But likewise beware of thinking that you will not come to know the truth by philosophy, or that it cannot be known in this way at all. For believe me, or rather believe him who says, "Seek and you will find," that knowledge is not to be despaired of, and that it will be clearer than those numbers. Now let us come to the subject. For I have begun, too late, to fear that this preface may exceed due measure. And that is no light thing. For measure is without doubt divine, but it deceives when it leads us on sweetly. I will be more careful when I am wise.

Matt 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 11:9 (quotation, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine warns Romanianus and Lucilianus neither to think they know what they have not learned with mathematical certainty nor to despair of knowing the truth, citing Christ's promise "Seek and you will find."

  • "Seek and you will find": Matt 7:7 (Luke 11:9). Lucilianus was a friend from Thagaste.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.9 (CSEL 63:29–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.10CSEL 63:30–31

Post pristinum sermonem, quem in primum librum contulimus, septem fere diebus a disputando fuimus otiosi, cum tres tamen Uergilii libros post primum recenseremus atque, ut in tempore congruere uidebatur. tractaremus. quo tamen opere Licentius in poeticae studium sic inflammatus est, ut aliquantum mihi etiam reprimendus uideretur. iam enim ab hac intentione ad nullam se rem deuocari libenter ferebat. tandem tamen ad retractandam quam distuleramus de Academicis quaestionem cum a me, quantum potui. lumen philosophiae laudaretur, non inuitus accessit. et forte dies ita serenus effulserat, ut nulli prorsus rei magis quam serenandis animis nostris congruere uideretur. maturius itaque solito lectos reliquimus paulumque cum rusticis egimus quod tempus urgebat. - Tum Alypius: Antequam uos. inquit, audiam de Academicis disputantes. uolo mihi legatur sermo ille uester, quem dicitis me absente perfectum; non enim possum aliter, cum inde huius disceptationis occasio nata, sit in audiendis uobis non aut errare aut certe laborare. — Quod cum factum esset et in eo paene totum antemeridianum tempus consumtum uideremus, redire ab agro, qui deambulantes nos acceperat, domum instituimus. — Et Licentius: Quaeso, inquit. ante prandium mihi breuiter totam Academicorum sententiam exponendo repetere ne graueris, ne quid in ea me fugiat, quod pro partibus meis sit. — Faciam, inquam, et eo libentius, quo de hac re cogitans parum prandeas. — Ne, inquit ille, istinc securus sis; nam et multos et maxime patrem meum saepe animaduerti eo edaciorem, quo refertior curis esset. deinde tu quoque de istis metris cogitantem non sic expertus es, ut cura mea mensa secura sit. quod quidem apud me ipsum mirari soleo; quid enim sibi uult. quod tunc primum pertinacius appetimus. cum in aliud intendimus animum? aut quis est, qui manibus et dentibus nostris occupatis nobis nimis imperiosus fit? — Audi potius, inquam. de Academicis quod rogaueras, ne te metra ista uoluentem non solum in epulis sine metro sed etiam in quaestionibus patiar. si quid autem pro mea parte occultabo, prodet Alypius. — Bona fide tua opus est, inquit Alypius; nam si metuendum est, ne aliquid occultes, a me deprehendi posse difficile arbitror cum, a quo me ista didicisse nullus qui me nouit ignorat, praesertim cum in prodendo uero non magis uictoriae quam animo tuo consulturus sis.

After the earlier conversation, which we put into the first book, we were free from disputing for about seven days, though we went over three books of Vergil after the first and discussed them as seemed suitable at the time. Licentius was so inflamed by this work with zeal for poetry that it seemed to me he should even be held back somewhat; for he was no longer willing to be called away from this pursuit to anything else. At last, however, when I had praised the light of philosophy as much as I could, he came not unwillingly to take up again the question about the Academics that we had put off. And by chance the day had dawned so clear that it seemed suited to nothing so much as to clearing our minds. So we left our beds earlier than usual and attended a little with the farmhands to what the season pressed for. Then Alypius said: "Before I hear you disputing about the Academics, I want that conversation of yours read to me which you say was completed in my absence; for since the occasion of this debate arose from it, I cannot otherwise avoid either erring or at least struggling in hearing you." When this had been done, and we saw that almost the whole morning had been spent on it, we decided to return home from the field that had received us on our walk. And Licentius said: "Please do not mind briefly going over the whole opinion of the Academics for me before lunch, so that nothing in it escapes me that is in my favor." "I will," I said, "and the more gladly because, thinking about this, you may eat less." "Do not feel safe on that score," he said; "for I have often noticed that many people, and especially my father, are the greedier the fuller they are of cares. Then too, you have not found me, when I was thinking about those meters, such that my table is safe from my cares. I often wonder at this myself; for what does it mean that we go for food more stubbornly when we have turned our mind to something else? Or who is it that becomes so imperious over us when our hands and teeth are occupied?" "Listen rather," I said, "to what you asked about the Academics, so that I do not have to put up with you turning over those meters not only at meals without meter but also in our questions. And if I hide anything that is in favor of my side, Alypius will reveal it." "Your good faith is needed," said Alypius; "for if there is any fear that you may hide something, I think it would be hard for me to catch you, since no one who knows me is unaware from whom I learned these things, especially since in revealing the truth you will be considering not victory so much as your own mind."

Notes and citation

Summary: After a week's break the friends resume, Alypius hears the first book read, and Licentius asks Augustine to set out the Academics' opinion before lunch.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR misreading of epulis.; Repeated syllable in the digital text.): audiendis uobis bis non → audiendis uobis non; in l pulis → in epulis.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.10 (CSEL 63:30–31; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.11CSEL 63:31–32

Agam, inquam. bona fide, quoniam de iure praescribis. nam et Academicis placuit nec homini scientiam posse contingere earum dumtaxat rerum, quae ad philosophiam pertinent — nam cetera curare se Carneades negabat — et tamen hominem posse esse sapientem sapientisque totum munus, ut abs te quoque, Licenti, illo sermone dissertum est, in conquisitione ueri explicari: ex quo confici, ut nulli etiam rei sapiens adsentiatur; erret enim necesse est, quod sapienti nefas est, si adsentiatur rebus incertis. et omnia incerta esse non dicebant solum uerum etiam copiosissimis rationibus adfirmabant. sed uerum non posse comprehendi ex illa Stoici Zenonis definitione arripuisse uidebantur, qui ait id uerum percipi posse, quod ita esset animo inpressum ex eo, unde esset, ut esse non posset ex eo, unde non esset. quod breuius planiusque sic dicitur. his signis uerum posse conprehendi, quae signa non potest habere quod falsum est. hoc prorsus non posse inueniri uehementissime ut conuincerent incubuerunt. inde dissensiones philosophorum. inde sensuum fallaciae, inde somnia furoresque, inde pseudomenoe et soritae in illius causae patrocinio uiguerunt. et cum ab eodem Zenone accepissent nihil esse turpius quam opinari, confecerunt callidissime, ut, si nihil percipi posset et esset opinatio turpissima, nihil umquam sapiens approbaret.

"I will do it," I said, "in good faith, since you lay down the rule of law. For the Academics held both that knowledge cannot come to man, at least of those things that pertain to philosophy (for Carneades said he did not care about the rest), and yet that man can be wise, and that the whole task of the wise man, as you too, Licentius, argued in that conversation, is carried out in the search for truth. From this it followed that the wise man assents to nothing at all; for he must err, which is impious for the wise man, if he assents to uncertain things. And they not only said that all things are uncertain but asserted it with the most abundant reasons. But they seemed to have seized on the view that the truth cannot be grasped from that definition of the Stoic Zeno, who said that that true thing can be perceived which is so impressed on the mind from the source from which it comes that it could not come from a source from which it does not come. This is said more briefly and plainly thus: the truth can be grasped by those marks which what is false cannot have. They set themselves most vigorously to prove that this can never be found. Hence the disagreements of philosophers, hence the deceptions of the senses, hence dreams and madness, hence the liar arguments and sorites flourished in the defense of that cause. And since they had received from the same Zeno that nothing is more shameful than to hold opinions, they concluded most cleverly that, if nothing could be perceived and opinion was most shameful, the wise man would never approve anything."

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine sets out the Academics' position that nothing can be known, built on Zeno's Stoic definition of what can be perceived, and their conclusion that the wise man assents to nothing.

  • The definition is that of the Stoic "cataleptic impression" (Cicero, Academica 2.18, 77). Pseudomenoe and soritae are the "liar" paradox and the "heap" argument.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR capital inside a word.; Stray letter in the digital text.; Stray mark in the digital text.): si a adsentiatur → si adsentiatur; incerta » esse → incerta esse; pLaniusque → planiusque.

Extrabiblical texts: Cicero, Acad. 2.77 (Cicero; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.11 (CSEL 63:31–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.12CSEL 63:32

Hinc eis inuidia magna conflata est; uidebatur enim esse consequens, ut nihil ageret qui nihil adprobaret. unde dormientem semper et officiorum omnium desertorem sapientem tuum Academici describere uidebantur, quem nihil adprobare censebant. hic illi inducto quodam probabili, quod etiam ueri simile nominabant, nullo modo cessare sapientem ab officiis asserebant, cum haberet quid sequeretur, ueritas autem siue propter naturae tenebras quasdam siue propter similitudinem rerum uel obruta uel confusa latitaret, quamuis et ipsam refrenationem et quasi suspensionem assensionis prorsus magnam actionem sapientis esse dicebant. uideor mihi breuiter totum, ut uoluisti, exposuisse nihilque recessisse a praescriptione, Alypi, tua, id est egisse, ut dicitur, bona fide. si enim aliquid uel non ita, ut est, dixi uel forte non dixi, nihil uoluntate a me factum est. bona ergo fides est ex animi sententia. homini enim homo falsus docendus, fallax cauendus debet uideri, quorum prius magistrum bonum, posterius discipulum cautum desiderat.

"From this great ill will arose against them; for it seemed to follow that one who approved nothing would do nothing. Hence the Academics seemed to describe your wise man, whom they held to approve nothing, as always asleep and a deserter of all duties. Here they introduced a certain 'probable,' which they also called 'like the truth,' and asserted that the wise man in no way fails in his duties, since he has something to follow, while the truth lies hidden, either buried or confused, whether because of a certain darkness of nature or because of the likeness of things; although they said that this very restraint and, as it were, suspension of assent is a great act of the wise man. I think I have set out the whole briefly, as you wished, and have not departed from your rule, Alypius, that is, I have acted, as the saying goes, in good faith. For if I have said anything not as it is, or perhaps not said something, nothing has been done by me on purpose. Good faith, then, is according to the mind's intent. For a man who is mistaken ought to seem to another man someone to be taught, and a deceiver someone to be guarded against; the first requires a good teacher, the second a careful pupil."

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains how the Academics answered the charge of inactivity by appealing to the probable or truthlike as a guide to action.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.12 (CSEL 63:32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

2.13CSEL 63:32–33

Tum Alypius: Gratum, inquit, habeo, cum et Licentio a te satisfactum est et me onere inposito releuasti. non enim magis tibi uerendum erat, ne quid explorandi mei causa minus a te diceretur - nam alio modo qui fieri poterat? — quam mihi, si in quoquam te prodere fuisset necesse. quare faxis, ut illud quod deest non tam percontationi quam ipsi percontanti de differentia nouae ac ueteris Academiae ne te pigeat exponere. — Prorsus. inquam, fateor, piget. quare beneficium dederis — nam hoc quod commemoras ad rem maxime pertinere negare non possum — si me paululum conquiescente apud me distinguere ista nomina et causam nouae Academiae aperire uolueris. — Crederem, inquit, me quoque a prandio te auocare uoluisse, ni et magis a Licentio territum dudum putarem et eius postulatio ita nobis praescripsisset, ut ei ante prandium quidquid huius inuolutionis esset expediretur. — Et cum reliqua dicere tenderet, mater nostra — nam domi iam eramus — ita nos trudere in prandium coepit, ut uerba faciendi locus non esset.

Then Alypius said: "I am grateful that you have both satisfied Licentius and relieved me of the burden placed on me. For you had no more reason to fear saying anything less in order to test me (how else could it have been done?) than I would have had if it had been necessary to expose you in anything. So please do not be reluctant to explain, not so much for the inquiry as for the inquirer himself, what is lacking: the difference between the New and the Old Academy." "I confess," I said, "I am quite reluctant. So you will do me a favor (for I cannot deny that what you mention is very much to the point) if, while I rest a little, you will distinguish these names in my presence and explain the case of the New Academy." "I would think," he said, "that you too wanted to call me away from lunch, if I did not think you more frightened by Licentius a while ago, and if his request had not prescribed to us that whatever of this tangle there was should be unraveled for him before lunch." And as he was going on to say the rest, our mother (for we were already at home) began to push us so to lunch that there was no room for words.

Notes and citation

Summary: Alypius asks for an account of the difference between the New and the Old Academy, Augustine asks him to give it, and Monica calls them to lunch.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, C. Acad. 2.13 (CSEL 63:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-contra-academicos/1-20/#p-2-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-contra-academicos-2-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Knöll (CSEL 63, 1922); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.