On Genesis against the Manichaeans 1.1–1.13

Latin text: Migne, PL 34 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 1

1.1PL 34:174

Si eligerent Manichæi quos deciperent, eligere­ mus et nos verba quibus eis responderemus: cum vero ilii et doctos IiUcris, et indoctos errore suo per­ sequantur, et cum promittunt veritatem, a veritate conentur avertere; non ornato politoque sermone, sed rebus manifestis convincenda est vanitas eorum, Placuit enim mihi quorumdam vere christianorum sententia, qui cum sint eruditi liberalibus litteris, ta­ men alios libros nostros, quos adversus Manichæos edidimus, cum legissent, viderunt eos ab imperitiori­ bus, aut non aut difficile intelligi, et me benevolen­ tissime monuerunt ut communem loquendi consuetu­ diuem non desererem, si errores illos tam pernicio­ sos ab animis etiam imperitorum expellere cogitarem. Hunc enim sermonem usitatum et simplicem etiam docti intelligunt, illum autem indocti non intelligunt. Solent ergo Manichæi Scripturas Veteris Testa­ menti, quas non noverunt, vituperare, et ea vitupe­ ratione infirmos et parvulos nostros, non invenientes quomodo sibi respondeant, irridere atque decipere: quia nulla Scriptura est, quae non apud eos qui illam non intelligunt, facile possit reprehendi. Sed ideo di­ vina providentia multos diversi erroris haereticos esse permiuit, ut cum insultant nobis, et interrogant nos ea quæ nescimus, vel sic excutiamus pigritiam, et di­ vinas Scripturas nosse cupiamus. Propterea et Apo­ stolus dicit: Oportet hæreses me I, ut probati mani­ festi fiant inter νοs (I Cor. at, 19). Illi enim Deo pro­ bati sunt, qui bene possunt docere: sed manifesti hominibus esse non possunt, nisi cum docent; docere autem nolunt, nisi eos qui doceri quaerunt. Sed multi ad quaerendum pigri sunt, nisi per molestias et insul­ tationes haereticorum quasi de somno excitentur, et de imperitia sua erubescant sibi, et de illa imperitia sua periclitari se sentiant. Qui homines si bonae sunt fidei, non cedunt hæreticis, sed quid cis respon­ deant diligenter inquirunt. Nec eos deserit Deus, ut petentes accipiant, et quærentes inveniant, et pul­ santibus aperiatur. Qui autem despe­ rant se posse in catholica disciplina invenire quod quærunt, atteruntur erroribus; et si perseveranter inquirunt, ad ipsos fontes a quibus aberraverunt, post magnos labores fatigati atque sitientes, et pene mor­ tui revertuntur.

If the Manichees chose whom to deceive, we too would choose the words with which to answer them. But since they pursue with their error both the learned in letters and the unlearned, and, while they promise the truth, try to turn people away from the truth, their emptiness must be refuted not with an ornate and polished style but with plain facts. For I was pleased by the advice of certain truly Christian men who, though they are educated in the liberal arts, saw, when they had read the other books that we published against the Manichees, that the less skilled either did not understand them or understood them with difficulty; and they most kindly advised me not to abandon the ordinary manner of speaking, if I intended to drive those so pernicious errors out of the minds of the unskilled as well. For this usual and simple language the learned also understand, but the other the unlearned do not understand. The Manichees, then, are accustomed to find fault with the Scriptures of the Old Testament, which they do not know, and by this faultfinding to mock and deceive our weak and little ones, who do not find how to answer them; for there is no Scripture that cannot easily be criticized by those who do not understand it. But divine providence has permitted many heretics of various errors to exist for this reason: that when they insult us and ask us things we do not know, we may at least in this way shake off our sloth and desire to know the divine Scriptures. That is why the Apostle too says, “There must be heresies, so that those who are approved may become manifest among you.” For those are approved by God who are able to teach well; but they cannot become manifest to people except when they teach, and they are not willing to teach any except those who seek to be taught. But many are slow to seek unless they are roused as if from sleep by the annoyances and insults of the heretics, and are ashamed of their ignorance, and feel that they are endangered by that ignorance. If such people are of good faith, they do not give way to the heretics but diligently inquire what to answer them. Nor does God abandon them; so that those who ask receive, and those who seek find, and to those who knock it is opened. But those who despair of being able to find in the catholic teaching what they seek are worn down by errors; and if they keep on searching, they come back to the very springs from which they strayed, after great labors, weary and thirsty and nearly dead.

1 Cor 11:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 7:8 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that he writes in plain language so that even the unlearned can answer the Manichees' attacks on the Old Testament, and that God permits heresies to rouse believers to study Scripture.

  • Quotations: 1 Cor 11:19; Matt 7:7–8. The “other books” are probably De moribus ecclesiae catholicae et de moribus Manichaeorum.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): hæreticis1, → hæreticis,; quaerunt1. → quaerunt..

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.1 (PL 34:174; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.2PL 34:174–175

Primum ergo librum Veteris Testamenti, qui inscribitur Genesis, sic solent Manichaei reprehendere. Quod scriptum est, In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram, quierunt, in quo principio; et dicunt: Si in principio aliquo temporis fccil Deus coelum et terram, quid agebat antequam faceret cœlum et terram? et quid ei subito placuit facere, quod nunquam antea fe­ cerat per tempora æterna? Ilis respondemus, Deum in principio fecisse coelum et terram, non in princi­ pio temporis, sed in Christo, cum Verbum esset apud Patrem, per quod facta et in quo facta sunt omnia (Joan. i, i, 3). Dominus enim noster Jesus Christus, cum eum Judoci interrogassent quis esset, respondit, Principium, quia et loquor νοbis (1 d. VIII, 25). Sed etsi in principio temporis Deum fecisse caelum et terram credamus, debemus utique intelligere quod ante prin. cipium temporis non erat tempus. Deus enim feeit et tempora: et ideo antequam faccret tempora, non erant tempora. Non ergo possumus dicere fuisse ali­ quod tempus quando Deus nondum aliquid fecerat. Quomodo enim erat tempus quod Deus non fecerat,. cum omnium temporum ipse sit fabricator? Et si tempus cum caelo et terra esse cœpit, non potest in­ veniri tempus quo Deus nondum fecerat coelum et terram. Cum autem dicitur, Quid ei placuit subito, sic dicitur, quasi aliqua tempora transierint, quibus Deus nihil operatus est. Non enim transire poterat tempus, quod nondum fecerat Dvus; quia non potest esse operator temporum, nisi qui est ante tempora. Certe et ipsi Manichæi legunt apostolum Paulmn, et laudant et honorant; et ejus Epistolas male interpre­ tando multos decipiunt. Dicant ergo nobis quid dixe­ rit apostolus Paulus, Agnitionem veritatis quae est se­ cundum pietatem Dei in apem vitas æternæ, quam pro­ misit non mendax Deus ante tempora aeterna: æterna euim tempora quid ante se habere potuerunt? Hoc ergo cogantur expnere, ut intelligant se non in­ telligere, cuin temere volunt reprehendere quod dili­ genter quærere debuerunt. Si autem non dicunt, Quid placuit Deo subito fa­ cere coelum et terram, sed tollunt inde, subito; et hoc tantum dicunt, Quid placuit Deo facere coelum et te.-ram? Non euim coævum Deo mundum istum dici­ uius, quia non ejus aeternitatis est hic mundus, cujus æternitatis est Deus: mundum quippe fecit Deus, et sic cum ipsa creatura quam Deus fecit, tempora esse coeperunt; et ideo dicuntur tempora æterna. Non ta­ men sic sunt æterna tempora quomodo aeternus est Deus, quia Deus est ante tempora, qui fabricator est temporum: sicut omnia quae fecit Deus bona sunt valde, sed non sic bona sunt, quomodo bonus est Deus, quia ille fecit, hæc autem facta sunt: nec ea genuit de seipso, ut hoc essent quod ipse est; sed ea lecit de nihilo, ut non essem æqualia, nec ei a quo facta sunt; nec Filio ejus per quem facta sunt; justum est enim. Si ergo isti dixerint, Quid placuit Deo fa­ cere coelum et lerram? respondendum est eis, ut prius discant vim voluntatis humanae, qui voluntatem Dei nosse desiderant. Causas enim voluntatis Dei scire quærunt, cum voluntas Dei omnium quae sunt, ipsa sit causa. Si enim habet causam voluntas Dei, est aliquid quod antecedat voluntatem Dei, quod ne­ fas csJ credere. Qui ergo dicit, Quare fecit Deus cœ­ lum et terram? respondendum est ei, Quia voluit. Vo­ kintas enim Del causa est coeli et terrae, et ideo ma­ jor est voluntas Dei quam coelum et terra. Qui autem dicit, Quare voluit facere coelum et terram? majus ali­ quid quærit quam est voluntas Dei: nihil autein ma­ jus inveniri potest. Compescat ergo se humana teme­ ritas, et id quod non est non. quærat, ne id quod est non inveniat. Et si voluntatem Dei nosse quisquam desiderat, fiat amicus Deo: quia si voluntatem homi­ nis nosse quisquam vellet, cujus amicus non esset, omnes ejus impudentiam ac stultitiam deriderent. Non autem quisquam efficitur amicus Dei, nisi purgatissi- Diis moribus, et illo fine praecepti de quo Apostolus dicit, Finis autem νræcepti est charitas de corde pare, et conscientia bona, et Hde non fieta: quod isti si haberent, non essent hæretici.

So the first book of the Old Testament, which is entitled Genesis, the Manichees usually criticize in this way. Concerning what is written, “In the beginning God made heaven and earth,” they ask, in what beginning? And they say: If God made heaven and earth in some beginning of time, what was he doing before he made heaven and earth? And why did it suddenly please him to make what he had never made before through eternal times? We answer them that God made heaven and earth in the beginning, not in the beginning of time but in Christ, since the Word was with the Father, through whom and in whom all things were made. For our Lord Jesus Christ, when the Jews asked him who he was, answered, “The Beginning, who also speak to you.” But even if we believe that God made heaven and earth in the beginning of time, we certainly ought to understand that before the beginning of time there was no time. For God made times too, and therefore before he made times there were no times. So we cannot say that there was some time when God had not yet made anything. For how could there be a time that God had not made, since he himself is the maker of all times? And if time began to exist with heaven and earth, no time can be found in which God had not yet made heaven and earth. But when it is said, “Why did it suddenly please him?”, it is said as if some times had passed in which God did nothing. For time could not pass that God had not yet made, since no one can be the maker of times except one who is before times. Surely the Manichees themselves read the apostle Paul, and praise and honor him, and by interpreting his letters badly they deceive many. Let them tell us, then, what the apostle Paul meant: “The knowledge of the truth which is according to the piety of God, in the hope of eternal life, which God, who does not lie, promised before eternal times.” For what could eternal times have before them? Let them be forced to explain this, so that they may understand that they do not understand, when they rashly wish to find fault with what they ought to have studied carefully.

But suppose they do not say, “Why did it suddenly please God to make heaven and earth?” but take away “suddenly,” and say only, “Why did it please God to make heaven and earth?” For we do not say that this world is coeternal with God, because this world is not of the same eternity as God: God made the world, and so times began to exist together with the creature that God made, and that is why they are called eternal times. Yet times are not eternal in the way that God is eternal, because God, who is the maker of times, is before times; just as all things that God made are very good, but are not good in the way that God is good, because he made them and they were made. Nor did he beget them from himself, so that they would be what he himself is; but he made them from nothing, so that they would not be equal either to him by whom they were made or to his Son through whom they were made; for that is just. If, then, they say, “Why did it please God to make heaven and earth?”, they must be answered that those who want to know the will of God should first learn the power of the human will. For they seek to know the causes of God's will, when the will of God is itself the cause of all things that are. For if God's will has a cause, there is something that precedes God's will, which it is impious to believe. So whoever says, “Why did God make heaven and earth?” must be answered, “Because he willed to.” For God's will is the cause of heaven and earth, and therefore God's will is greater than heaven and earth. But whoever says, “Why did he will to make heaven and earth?” is seeking something greater than God's will; but nothing greater can be found. Let human rashness then restrain itself, and not seek what is not, lest it fail to find what is. And if anyone desires to know the will of God, let him become a friend of God; for if anyone wanted to know the will of a man whose friend he was not, everyone would laugh at his impudence and folly. But no one becomes a friend of God except by most purified morals and by that end of the commandment of which the Apostle says, “But the end of the commandment is charity from a pure heart and a good conscience and unfeigned faith.” If they had this, they would not be heretics.

Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (allusion, high confidence) · John 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · John 8:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Titus 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Titus 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:31 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 1:5 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine answers the Manichaean question about what God did before creation: the beginning is Christ, time itself was created, and God's will, the cause of all things, has no prior cause.

  • Quotations: Gen 1:1; John 1:1, 3; John 8:25 (Latin “Principium, quia et loquor vobis”, following the Old Latin and Vulgate reading); Titus 1:1–2; 1 Tim 1:5. Gen 1:31 is alluded to (“very good”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): justum est enim 1. → justum est enim..

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.2 (PL 34:174–175; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.3PL 34:175

Quod autem sequitur in libro Geneseos, Terra autem erat invisibilis et incomposita, sic reprehen­ dunt Manichaei, ut dicant: Quomodo fecit Deus in principio cœlum et terram, si jam et terra erat invi­ sibilis et incomposita? Ita, cum volunt Scripturas die vinas prius vituperare quam nosse, etiam res aper­ tissimas non intelligunt. Quid enim manifestius did potuit, quam hoc dictum est, In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram; terra autem erut invhibilis et ineo. posita; id est, In priucipio fecit Deus cœlum et ter­ ram; terra autem ipsa quam fecit Deus, invisibilis erat et incomposita, antequam Deus omnium rerum formas locis et sedibus suis ordinata distinctione dis­ poneret: antequam diceret, Fiat lux, et, Fiat firma­ mentum, et, Congregentur aquæ, et, Appareat arida, et caetera quae in eodem libro sic exponuntur per ordi­ nem, quemadmodum possint ea parvuli capere? Quai omnia continent lam magna mysteria, ut quisquis-ea didicerit, omnium hæreticorum vanitatem vel doleat quia homines sunt, vel derideat quia superbi sunt. Sequitur in eodem libro, Et tenebrae erant super abyssum. Quod Manichaei reprehendunt dicentes: In tenebris ergo erat Deus, antequam faceret lucem? Vere ipsi sunt in tenebris ignorantiae, et ideo non in­ telligunt lucem, in qua Deus erat antequam faceret istam lucem. Non enim norunt isti lucem, Risi quam carneis oculis vident. Et ideo istum solem, quem pa­ riter non solum cum bestiis majoribus, sed ctiam cum muscis et vermiculis cernimus, illi sic cohmt ut particulam dicant esse lucis illius in qua habitat Deus. Sed nos intelligamus aliam lucem esse in qua Deus habitat, unde est illud lumen de quo in Evangelio te­ gitur, Erat lumen verum, quod illuminat omnem homi­ nem νenientem in hunc mundum. Nam so­ lis istius lumen non illuminat omnem hominem, sed corpus hominis et mortales oculos, in quibus nos vin­ cunt aquilarum oculi, qui solem istum multo melius quam nos dicuntur aspicere. Illud autem lumen non irrationabilium avium i oculos pascit, sed pura corda eorum qui Deo credunt, et ab amore visibilium rerum et temporalium se ad ejus praecepta implenda conver­ tunt. Quod omnes homines possunt si velint, quia illud lumen omnem hominem illuminat venientem in hunc mundum. Ergo tenebræ erant super abyssum antequam lux ista fieret: de qua consequenter hoc loco dicitur.

What follows in the book of Genesis, “But the earth was invisible and unformed,” the Manichees criticize so as to say: How did God make heaven and earth in the beginning, if the earth was already invisible and unformed? Thus, since they want to find fault with the divine Scriptures before they know them, they fail to understand even the plainest things. For what could be said more clearly than what is said here: “In the beginning God made heaven and earth; but the earth was invisible and unformed”? That is: In the beginning God made heaven and earth; but the earth itself which God made was invisible and unformed, before God arranged the forms of all things in their places and seats by an ordered distinction; before he said, “Let there be light,” and “Let there be a firmament,” and “Let the waters be gathered,” and “Let the dry land appear,” and the rest that are set out in order in the same book in a way that little ones can grasp. All these things contain such great mysteries that whoever has learned them will either grieve at the emptiness of all heretics because they are human beings, or laugh at it because they are proud.

There follows in the same book, “And darkness was over the abyss.” This the Manichees criticize, saying: Was God, then, in darkness before he made light? Truly they themselves are in the darkness of ignorance, and that is why they do not understand the light in which God was before he made this light. For they know no light except what they see with fleshly eyes. And so they worship this sun, which we see not only along with the larger beasts but even with flies and little worms, in such a way that they say it is a particle of that light in which God dwells. But let us understand that the light in which God dwells is another light, from which comes that light of which it is read in the Gospel, “He was the true light, which enlightens every man coming into this world.” For the light of this sun does not enlighten the whole man, but the body of man and his mortal eyes, in which the eyes of eagles surpass us, since they are said to look at this sun much better than we do. But that light does not feed the eyes of irrational birds, but the pure hearts of those who believe in God and turn from love of visible and temporal things to fulfilling his commandments. All men can do this if they will, because that light enlightens every man coming into this world. So darkness was over the abyss before this light came to be, of which the passage goes on next to speak.

Gen 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that the earth God made was at first invisible and unformed, and that the light in which God dwells is not the sun the Manichees worship but the true light that enlightens every person.

  • Quotations: Gen 1:2, 3, 6, 9; John 1:9. The Old Latin “invisibilis et incomposita” renders the LXX of Gen 1:2. On the Manichaean reverence for the sun as a vessel of the divine light, Augustine reports their view. Augustine takes omnem hominem in John 1:9 both as “every man” and, in contrast with the sun, as “the whole man”.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.3 (PL 34:175; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.4PL 34:175–177

Et dixit Deus, Fiat lux. Quia ubi lux non est, tenebrae sunt, non quia aliquid sunt tenebrae, sed ipsa lucis absentia tenebrae dicuntur. Sicut silentium non aliqua res est, sed ubi sonus non est, silentium dicitur. Et nudius aliqua res non est, sed in corpore ubi tegumentum non est, nuditas dicitur. Et inanitas non est aliquid, sed locus ubi corpus non est, inanis dicitur. Sie tenebrae nonaliquid sunt, sed ubi lux non est, tenebræ dicuntur. Hoc ideo dicimus, quia so­ lent dicere: Unde erant ipsae tenebræ super abyssum, antequam faceret Deus lucem? quis illas fecerat vel genuerat? aut si nemo fecerat vel genuerat eas, aeter­ nae erant tenebrae. Quasi aliquid sint tenebrae: sed, ut dictum est, lucis absentia hoc nomen accepit. Sed quia ipsi fabulis suis decepti crediderunt gentem esse tenebrarum, in qua et corpora et formas et animas m illis corporibus fuisse arbitrantur, ideoputant quod tenebrae aliquid sint: et non intelligunt non sentiri tenebras, nisi quando non videmus, sicut non sentitur silentium, nisi quando non audimus. Sicut autem silentium nihil est, sic et tenebrae nihil sunt. Sicut autem isti dicunt gentem tenebrarum contra lucem Dei pugnasse; sic potest et alius similiter va­ nus dicere, gentem silentiorum contra vocem Dei pugnasse. Sed iilas vanitates modo. non suscepimus refellere atque convincere. Nunc enim ea quae repre­ hendunt in Veteri Testamento, statuimus defendere quantum vires Dominus praestare dignatur, et in eis ostendere contra veritatem Dei nihil valere hominum caecitatem.

“And God said, Let there be light.” For where there is no light there is darkness, not because darkness is something, but the very absence of light is called darkness. Just as silence is not a thing, but where there is no sound it is called silence. And nakedness is not a thing, but on a body where there is no covering it is called nakedness. And emptiness is not something, but a place where there is no body is called empty. So darkness is not something, but where there is no light it is called darkness. We say this because they usually say: Where did that darkness over the abyss come from, before God made light? Who had made or begotten it? Or if no one had made or begotten it, the darkness was eternal. As if darkness were something; but, as has been said, the absence of light has received this name. But because they, deceived by their fables, have believed that there is a race of darkness, in which they suppose there were bodies and forms and souls in those bodies, they therefore think that darkness is something; and they do not understand that darkness is not perceived except when we do not see, just as silence is not perceived except when we do not hear. And just as silence is nothing, so darkness is nothing. And just as they say that a race of darkness fought against the light of God, so another man equally vain could say that a race of silences fought against the voice of God. But we have not undertaken at present to refute and convict those vanities. For now we have resolved to defend the things they criticize in the Old Testament, as far as the Lord deigns to grant strength, and to show in them that human blindness has no power against the truth of God.

Gen 1:3 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine argues that darkness, like silence or nakedness, is not a thing but an absence, and so the Manichaean myth of a race of darkness is empty.

  • Quotation: Gen 1:3. The “race of darkness” (gens tenebrarum) is the Manichaean kingdom of darkness that attacked the realm of light; Augustine reports their myth.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.4 (PL 34:175–177; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.5PL 34:177

Quod autem scriptum est, Et Spiritus Dei su­ perferebatur super aquam, sic solent Manichaei repre­ hendere, ut dicant: Aqua ergo erat habitaculum Spi­ ritus Dei, et ipsa continebat Spiritum Dei? Totum conantur perversa mente pervertere, et excæcantur malitia sua. Cum enim dicimus, Sol superfertur super terram, numquid hoc intelligi volumus, qnod in terra habitet sol, et terra solem contineat? Et tamen non sic Spiritus Dei superferebatur super aquam; sic­ ut superfertur sol super terram; sed alio modo quem pauci intelligunt. Non enim per spatia locorum super­ ferebatur aquæ ille Spiritus, sicut sol terrae super­ fertur; sed per potentiam invisibilis sublimitatis suae. Dicant autem nobis isti, quomodo iis rebus quae fabri­ candae sunt, superferatur voluntas fabri. Quod si haec humana et quotidiana non comprehendunt, timeant Deum, et simplici corde quod non intelligunt quoe­ rant, ne cum volunt verbis sacrilegis concidere ve­ ritatem quam videre non possunt, redeat illis securis in crura. Nam illa concidi non potest quae incommuta­ bilis manet; sed quaecumque plagae in illam emissæ fuerint repercutiur.tur, et majore ictu redeunt in eos qui cædere audent, quod credere deberent, ut intel­ ligere mererentur. ' Deinde quærunt, et insultando interrogant: Unde erat ipsa aqua super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei? numquid cnim superius scriptum est quod Deus aquam fecerit? Hoc si pie quaererent, invenirent quem­ admodum inlelligendurn esset. Non enim aqua sic appellata est hoc loco, ut hæc a nobis inteHigatur quam videre jam possulnus et tangere: quomodo nec terra quoe incomposita et invisibilis dicta est, talis erat qualis ista quæ jam videri et tractari potest. Sed illud quod dictum est, In principio fecit Dcus cælum et terram, cœli et terrae nomine universa creatura si­ gnificata est, quam fecit et condidit Deus. Ideo autem nominibus visibilium rerum haec appellata sunt, pro­ pter parvulorum infirmitatem, qui minus idonei sunt invisibilia comprehendere. Primo ergo maleria facta est confusa et informis, unde omnia fierent quae dis­ tincta atque formata sunt, quod credo a Graecis chaos appellari. Sic enim et alio loco legimus dictum in laudibus Dei, Qui fecisti mundum de materia informi: quod aliqui codices habent, de mate ria invisa.

What is written, “And the Spirit of God was borne over the water,” the Manichees usually criticize so as to say: Was water, then, the dwelling of the Spirit of God, and did it contain the Spirit of God? They try to pervert everything with a perverse mind, and they are blinded by their malice. For when we say, “The sun is borne over the earth,” do we mean it to be understood that the sun dwells in the earth and the earth contains the sun? And yet the Spirit of God was not borne over the water in the way the sun is borne over the earth, but in another way that few understand. For that Spirit was not borne over the water through spaces of place, as the sun is borne over the earth, but through the power of his invisible sublimity. Let them tell us how the will of a craftsman is borne over the things that are to be fashioned. And if they do not grasp these human and everyday things, let them fear God and with a simple heart seek what they do not understand, lest, when they want to hack at the truth they cannot see with sacrilegious words, the axe comes back onto their own legs. For the truth, which remains unchangeable, cannot be cut down; but whatever blows are aimed at it rebound, and return with a greater stroke on those who dare to strike at what they ought to believe in order to deserve to understand.

Then they ask, and mockingly inquire: Where did that water come from over which the Spirit of God was borne? For was it written earlier that God made water? If they asked this piously, they would find how it should be understood. For water is not so called in this place in order that we should understand by it this water which we can now see and touch; just as the earth that was called unformed and invisible was not such as this earth which can now be seen and handled. But in what was said, “In the beginning God made heaven and earth,” the whole creation which God made and established was signified by the name of heaven and earth. These things were called by the names of visible things on account of the weakness of the little ones, who are less fit to grasp invisible things. So first matter was made, confused and formless, from which all things would be made that are distinct and formed; this, I believe, the Greeks call chaos. For so we read in another place, in the praises of God, “You who made the world from formless matter,” which some manuscripts have as “from unseen matter.”

Gen 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that the Spirit was borne over the waters by power, not by place, and that “heaven and earth” and “water” name the formless matter God first created.

  • Quotations: Gen 1:2; Gen 1:1; Wis 11:17 (11:18 in some numberings), “qui fecisti mundum de materia informi” (Greek ἐξ ἀμόρφου ὕλης). The proverb of the axe rebounding on the striker's legs is a Latin saying.

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 11:17 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.5 (PL 34:177; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.6PL 34:177

Et ideo Deus rectissime creditur omnia de ni­ hilo fecisse, quia etiamsi omnia formata de ista materia facta|sunt, haec ipsa materia tamen de omnino nihilo facta est. Non enim debemus esse similes istis qui omnipoten­ tem Deum non creduntaliquidde nihilo facere potuisse, cum considerant fabros et quoslibet opifices non posse aliquid fabricare, nisi habuerint unde fabricent. Et ligna enim adjuvant fabrum, et argentum adjuvat argenta­ rium, et aurum aurificem, et terra figulum adjuvat ut possit perficere opera sua. Si enim non adjuventur ea materia unde aliquid faciunt, nihil possunt facere, cum materiam ipsam ipsi non faciant. Non enim fa­ ber lignum facit, sed de ligno facit aliquid: sic et caeteri omnes hujusmodi opiOces. Omnipotens autem Deus nulla re adJuvandus erat, quam ipse non fece­ rat, ut quod volebat cfficeret. Si enim ad eas res quas facere volebat, adjuvabat eum aliqua res quam ipse non fecerat, non erat omnipotens: quod sacrilegum est credere.

And so God is most rightly believed to have made all things from nothing, because, even if all formed things were made from this matter, this matter itself was nevertheless made from absolutely nothing. For we must not be like those who do not believe that almighty God could make anything from nothing, when they consider that carpenters and craftsmen of every kind cannot fashion anything unless they have something to fashion it from. For wood helps the carpenter, silver helps the silversmith, gold the goldsmith, and clay helps the potter to complete his works. For if they are not helped by the material from which they make something, they can make nothing, since they do not make the material itself. The carpenter does not make wood, but makes something from wood; and so with all other craftsmen of this kind. But almighty God needed to be helped by nothing that he had not made himself in order to accomplish what he willed. For if, in making the things he wished to make, he was helped by some thing he had not made, he was not almighty; and it is sacrilegious to believe that.

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine teaches that God made even formless matter from nothing, since an almighty God needs no material he did not make himself.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.6 (PL 34:177; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.7PL 34:177–179

Informis ergo illa materia quam de nihilo Deus fecit, appellata est primo coelum et terra, et dicium est, In principio fecit Deus cælum et terram; non quia jam hoc erat, sed quia hoc esse poterat: nam et coe­ lum scribitur postea factum. Quemadmodum si se­ men arboris considerantes, dicamus ibi esse radices, ct robur, et ramos, et fructus, et folia; non quia jam sunt, sed quia inde futura sunt: sic dictum esi, In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram, quasi semen caeli et terrae, cum in confuso adhuc esset caeli et terrae materia; sed quia certum erat inde futurum esse coelum et terram, jam et ipsa materia cœlum et terra appellata est. Isto genere locutionis etiam Do­ minus loquitur, cum dicit, Jam non dicam vos servos, quia servus nescit quid faciat dominus ejus. Vos autemdixi amicos, quia omnia quæ audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis: non quia jam factum erat, sed quia certissime futurum erat. Nam post paululum dicit illis: Adhuc multa habeo vobis dicere, sed non po­ testis portare modo. Utquid ergo dixerat, Omma quæ audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis; nisi quia se sciebat hoc esse facturum? Sic etiam cœlum et terra potuit dici maicria unde nondum erat factum cælum et terra, sed tamen non crat aliunde facien­ dum. Innumerabiles tales locutiones in Scripturis di­ vinis inveniuntur. Sicut in consuetudine sermonis no­ stri, cum id quod certissime speramus futurum dici­ mus, Jam factum puta. ilanc autem adhuc informem materiam, etiam terram invisibilcm atque incompositam voluit appel­ lare, quia inter omnia elementa mundi terra videtur minus speciosa quam cætera. Invisibilem autem dixit, propter obscuritatem; et incompositam, propter in­ formitatem. Eamdem ipsam materiam etiam aquam appellavit, super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei, sicut superfertur rebus fabricandis voluntas artificis. Quod etsi paucorum intelligentia potest attingere, humanis tamen verbis, nescio utrum vel a paucis hominibus, possit exponi. Propterea vero non absurde etiam. aqua dicta est ista materia, quia omnia quae in terra nascuntur, sive animalia, sive arbores vel herbæ, et si qua similia, ab humore incipiunt formari atque nutriri. Hæc ergo nomina omnia, sive cœlam et terra, sive terra invisibilis et incomposita et abyssus cum tenebris, sive aqua super quam Spiritus ferebatur, nomina sunt informis materiæ: ut res ignota notis vocabulis insinuaretur imperitioribus; et non uno vocabulo, sed multis, ne si unum esset, hoc putare­ tur esse quod consueverant homines in illo vocabulo intelligere. Dictum est ergo caelum et terra, quia inde futurum crat cœlum et terra. Dicta est terra invisi­ bilis et incomposita et tenebrc super abyssum, quia informis erat, et nulla specie cerni aut tractari pote­ rat, etiamsi esset homo qui videret atque tractaret. Dicta est aqua, quia facilis et ductilis subjacebat ope­ ranti, ut de iila omnia formarentur. Sed sub his omnibus nominibus materia erat invisa et informis, de qua Deus condidit mundum.

So that formless matter which God made from nothing was first called heaven and earth, and it was said, “In the beginning God made heaven and earth,” not because it already was this, but because it could be this; for it is written that heaven was made afterward. Just as, if we were considering the seed of a tree, we might say that the roots and the trunk and the branches and the fruit and the leaves are there, not because they already are, but because they will come from it: so it was said, “In the beginning God made heaven and earth,” as the seed, as it were, of heaven and earth, when the matter of heaven and earth was still in confusion; but because it was certain that heaven and earth would come from it, the matter itself was already called heaven and earth. The Lord too speaks in this kind of expression when he says, “I will no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know what his master does. But I have called you friends, because all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you”: not because it had already been done, but because it was most certainly going to be done. For a little later he says to them, “I still have many things to tell you, but you cannot bear them now.” Why, then, had he said, “All that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you,” except that he knew he would do it? So too the matter from which heaven and earth had not yet been made could be called heaven and earth, since they were not to be made from anything else. Countless such expressions are found in the divine Scriptures. So also in our ordinary speech, when we speak of what we most certainly hope will happen, we say, “Consider it done.”

This still formless matter he also chose to call the earth invisible and unformed, because among all the elements of the world earth seems less beautiful than the others. He called it invisible on account of its obscurity, and unformed on account of its formlessness. The same matter he also called water, over which the Spirit of God was borne, as the will of a craftsman is borne over the things to be fashioned. Although the understanding of a few can reach this, I do not know whether it can be explained in human words even by a few. Matter was also not unreasonably called water because all things that are born on earth, whether animals or trees or plants and anything similar, begin to be formed and nourished from moisture. All these names, then, whether heaven and earth, or earth invisible and unformed, and the abyss with darkness, or water over which the Spirit was borne, are names of formless matter, so that an unknown thing might be conveyed to the less skilled by known words; and not by one word but by many, lest, if there were one, it should be thought to be what people were accustomed to understand by that word. It was called heaven and earth, then, because heaven and earth were going to come from it. It was called earth invisible and unformed and darkness over the abyss, because it was formless and could not be seen or handled in any form, even if there were a man to see and handle it. It was called water because it lay easy and pliant under the one working on it, so that all things might be formed from it. But under all these names was matter, unseen and formless, from which God established the world.

Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 15:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:2 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that formless matter is called “heaven and earth,” “invisible earth,” “abyss” and “water” because of what would be made from it, as a seed is named by the tree it will become.

  • Quotations: Gen 1:1; John 15:15; John 16:12. Gen 1:2 and 1:8 are alluded to.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.7 (PL 34:177–179; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.8PL 34:179

Et dixit Deus, Flat lux. Et facta eat lux. Hoc non solent reprehendere Manichæi. sed illud quod sequitur, Et vidit Deus lucem quia bona eat. Dicunt cuim: Ergo non noverat Deus lucem, aut non nove­ rat bonum. Miseri homines, quibus displicet, quod Deo placuerunt opera sua, cum videant ctiam homi­ nem artificem, yerbi gratia, lignarium fabrum, quamvis in comparatione sapientiæ et potentiæ Dei pene nullus sit, tamen tam din lignum caedere atque tractare dolando, asciando, planando, vel tornando atque poliendo quousque ad artis regulas perduca­ tur, quantum potest, et placeat artifici suo. Numquid ergo quia placet ei quod fecit, ideo non noverat bo­ num? Prorsus noverat intus in animo, ubi ars ipsa pulchrior est, quam illa quæ arte fabricantur. Sed quod videt artifex intus in arte, hoc foris probat in opere, et hoc est perfectum quod artifici suo placet. Vidit ergo Deus lucem quia bona est: quibus verbis non ostenditur eluxisse Deo insolitum bonum, sed placuisse perfectum. Quid si dictum esset, Miratus est Deus lucem quia bona est? quantum clamarent? quantum litiga­ rent? Admiratio enim revera de rebus insperatis nasci solet, et tamen legunt isti, et laudant Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum in Evangelio admiratum esse fidem credentium ( Matth. vin, 10 ). Quis autem in illis fecerat ipsam fidem, nisi ipse qui eam mira­ batur? Quod si et alius eam fecisset, utquid mirare­ tur, qui praescius erat? Si solvunt Manichæi quæstio­ nem istam, videant quia et illa solvi potest. Si autem non solvunt, quid ista reprehendunt quæ ad se nolunt pertinere, cum illa quae ad se pertinere dicunt, non noverint? Quod enim miratur Dominus noster, nobis mirandum esse significat, quibus adhuc est opus sic moveri. Omnes ergo tales motus ejus non perturbati animi sunt signa, sed docentis magistri. Sic sunt et verba Veteris Testamenti, quae non Deum infirmum docent, sed nostrae infirmitati blandiuntur. Nihil enim de Deo digne dici potest. Nobis tamen ut nutriamur, et ad ea perveniamus quae nullo humano sermone dici possunt, ea dicuntur quae capere possumus.

“And God said, Let there be light. And light was made.” The Manichees do not usually criticize this, but what follows: “And God saw the light, that it was good.” For they say: So God did not know light, or did not know the good. Wretched men, who are displeased that God was pleased with his works, though they see that even a human craftsman, a carpenter for example, who is almost nothing in comparison with the wisdom and power of God, nevertheless cuts and works the wood so long, by hewing, adzing, planing, or turning and polishing, until it is brought, as far as he can, to the rules of his art and pleases its craftsman. Because what he has made pleases him, did he therefore not know the good? Of course he knew it, inwardly in his mind, where the art itself is more beautiful than the things fashioned by the art. But what the craftsman sees inwardly in his art, he approves outwardly in the work; and that is finished which pleases its craftsman. So God saw the light, that it is good: by these words it is not shown that an unaccustomed good shone out for God, but that the finished work pleased him.

What if it had been said, “God marveled at the light, that it is good”? How they would shout! How they would quarrel! For marveling truly tends to arise from unexpected things; and yet they read and praise our Lord Jesus Christ, who in the Gospel marveled at the faith of those who believed. But who had made that very faith in them, if not he who marveled at it? And if another had made it, why would he marvel, who knew it beforehand? If the Manichees solve this question, let them see that the other can be solved too. If they do not solve it, why do they criticize these things, which they hold do not concern them, when they do not understand those that they say do concern them? For when our Lord marvels, he signifies that we, who still need to be moved in this way, ought to marvel. So all such emotions of his are signs, not of a disturbed mind, but of a teaching master. So too are the words of the Old Testament, which do not teach that God is weak, but come down kindly to our weakness. For nothing can be said worthily of God. Yet to us, so that we may be nourished and come to those things that cannot be said in any human speech, those things are said that we can grasp.

Gen 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:10 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine answers the objection that “God saw that it was good” implies ignorance: like a craftsman approving a finished work, God's approval shows the work pleased him, and Scripture speaks to our weakness.

  • Quotations: Gen 1:3–4. The marveling of Jesus at faith: Matt 8:10. The Manichees rejected the Old Testament but accepted the Gospels, hence Augustine's argument.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text; stray section number (11) in the digital text): i i. Quid si → Quid si; nutriamur i, → nutriamur,.

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.8 (PL 34:179; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.9PL 34:179

Et divisit Deus inter lucem et tenebras, et vocavit Deus diem lucem, et tenebras vocavit noctem. Hie non dictum est, Fecit Deus tenebras; quia tenebrae, sicut superius dictum est, lucis absentia est: distinctio tamen facta est inter lucem et tenebras. Quemadmo­ dum nos clamando vocem facimus; silentium autcm non sonando facimus, quia cessatio vocis silentium est: distinguimus tamen sensu quodam inter vocem et silentium, et illud vocamus vocem, illud silentium; quemadmodum ergo recte dicimur facere silentium, sic recte multis divinarum Scripturarum locis Deus dicitur facere tenebras, quia lucem quibus vult tem­ poribus et locis vel non dat, vel detrahit. Hoc autem totum ad intellectum nostrum dictum est. Qua enim lingua vocavit Deus diem lucem, et tenebras noctem? utrum hebraea, an graeca, an latina, an aliqua alia? et sic omnia quae vocavit, quæri potest qua lingua vocaverit. Sed apud Deum purus intellectus est, sine strepitu et diversitate linguarum. Vocavit autem di­ ctum est, vocari fecit; quia sic distinxit omnia, et ordinavit, ut et discerni possent, et nomina accipere. Sed postea suo loco requiremus, utrum vere sic est accipiendum, quia vocavit Deus; quoniam quantum accedimus in Scripturis et in eis assuescimus, tantum nobis locutiones earum innotescunt. Sic enim dicimus, Ille paterfamilias aedificavit domum istam, id est sedi­ ficari fecit, et multa talia per omnes libros divinarum Scripturarum inveniuntur.

“And God divided between the light and the darkness, and God called the light day, and the darkness he called night.” Here it is not said, “God made darkness,” because darkness, as was said above, is the absence of light; yet a distinction was made between light and darkness. Just as we make a sound by shouting, but make silence by not sounding, because silence is the ceasing of sound; yet we distinguish by a certain sense between sound and silence, and call the one sound and the other silence. So, just as we are rightly said to make silence, so in many places of the divine Scriptures God is rightly said to make darkness, because at whatever times and places he wills he either does not give light or withdraws it. But all this was said for our understanding. For in what language did God call the light day and the darkness night? Hebrew, or Greek, or Latin, or some other? And so of everything he called, it can be asked in what language he called it. But with God there is pure understanding, without the noise and diversity of languages. “He called” was said for “he caused to be called,” because he so distinguished and ordered all things that they could both be discerned and receive names. But we shall inquire later in its place whether “God called” is really to be taken in this way; for the more we approach the Scriptures and grow used to them, the more their ways of speaking become known to us. So we say, “That householder built this house,” that is, had it built; and many such expressions are found throughout all the books of the divine Scriptures.

Gen 1:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:5 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that God did not make darkness but distinguished light from it, and that “God called” means he ordered things so that they could receive names, not that he spoke a human language.

  • Quotation: Gen 1:4–5. On God “making darkness” elsewhere in Scripture, compare Ps 104:20 and Isa 45:7 (not cited by name).

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.9 (PL 34:179; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.10PL 34:179–181

Et facta est vespera, et factum eat mane diei unus. Et hic calumniantur Manichaei, dum putant ita dictum esse, quasi a vespera dies. coeperit. Non in­ telligunt operationem illam qua lux facta est, et divi sum est inter lucem et tenebras, et vocata est lui dies, et tenebræ nox; hanc ergo totam operationem non intelligunt ad diem pertinere: post bane autem operationem tanquam finito die facta est vespera. Sed quia etiam nox ad diem suum pertinet, non dicitur transisse dies unus, nisi etiam nocte transacta cum tactum est mane: sic deinceps reliqui dies computantur a mane usque in mane. Nunc enim cum factum est mane, et transactus est unus dies, incipit opera­ lio, quæ sequitur ab ipso mane quod jam factum est, et post ipsam operationem fit vespera, deinde mane, et transit alter dies: atque ita deinceps caeteri dies transeunt.

“And evening was made, and morning was made, one day.” Here too the Manichees bring false charges, since they think it was said as if the day began from evening. They do not understand that the work by which light was made, and light was divided from darkness, and the light was called day and the darkness night, that this whole work belongs to the day; and that after this work, as though the day were finished, evening was made. But because the night too belongs to its day, one day is not said to have passed until the night also had passed, when morning was made; and so the remaining days are counted from morning to morning. For now, when morning has come and one day has passed, the work begins that follows from that very morning which has now come; and after that work evening comes, then morning, and the second day passes; and so the other days pass in turn.

Gen 1:5 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that each day of creation runs from morning to morning, the work belonging to the day and the evening closing it.

  • Quotation: Gen 1:5.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): vespera I, → vespera,.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.10 (PL 34:179–181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.11PL 34:181

Et dixit Deus, Fiat firmamentum in medio aquæ, ei sit divisio inter aquam et aquam; et sic factum est. Et fecit Deus firmamentum. et divisit Deus inter aquam quæ est super firmamentum, et inter aquam quæ eat sub firmamento, et vocavit Deus firmamentum cælum: et vidit Deus quia bonum est. Haec non memini Manichaeos reprehendere solere: tamen quod divisæ sunt aquae ut aliae essent super firmamentum, et aliae sub firma­ mento, quoniam materiam illam dicebamus nomine aquae appellatam, credo firmamento coeli materiam corporalem rerum visibilium ab illa incorporali re­ rum invisibilium fuisse discretam. Cum enim coelum sit corpus pulcherrimum, omnis invisibilis creatura excedit etiam pulchritudinem coeli; et ideo fortasse super coelum esse dicuntur aquae invisibiles, quae a paucis intelliguntur non locorum sedibus, sed digni­ tate naturæ superare ccelum: quanquam de hac re nihil temere affirmandum est; obscura est enim, et remota a sensibus hominum: sed quoquo modo se habeat, antequam intelligatur, credenda est. Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies secundus. Jam omnia haec quae repetuntur, sicut superius intelligenda atque tractanda sunt.

“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water, and let it be a division between water and water; and so it was done. And God made the firmament, and God divided between the water that is above the firmament and the water that is below the firmament; and God called the firmament heaven; and God saw that it is good.” I do not remember that the Manichees usually criticize this. Still, as to the waters being divided so that some were above the firmament and some below it: since we said that that matter was called by the name of water, I believe that by the firmament of heaven the bodily matter of visible things was separated from the incorporeal matter of invisible things. For though heaven is a most beautiful body, every invisible creature surpasses even the beauty of heaven; and that is perhaps why invisible waters are said to be above heaven, which few understand to surpass heaven not in location but in the dignity of their nature. Yet nothing should be rashly affirmed on this matter; for it is obscure and remote from human senses. But however it may be, it must be believed before it is understood. “And evening was made, and morning was made, the second day.” All these things that are now repeated are to be understood and treated as above.

Gen 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:8 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine tentatively suggests that the waters above and below the firmament signify invisible and visible matter, while warning against rash assertion.

  • Quotation: Gen 1:6–8.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.11 (PL 34:181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.12PL 34:181

Et dixit Deus, Congregetur aqua, qum eat sub cœlo, in congregationem unam, et appareat arida; et sic factum est. Et congregata est aqua, quæ erat sub caelo, in congregationem unam, et apparuit arida. Et vocavit Deus aridam, terram; et congregationem aquæ vocavit mare. Et vidit Deus quia bonum est. In isto loco Manichaei dicunt: Si totum aquis pleuum erat, quo­ modo poterant aquae congregari in unum? Sed jam superius dictum est, nomine aquarum materiam illam appellatam super quam ferebatur Spiritus Dei, unde erat Deus omnia formaturus. Nunc vero cum dicitur, Congregetur aqua, quæ eat sub coelo, in congregationem unam; hoc dicitur ut illa materia corporalis formetur in eam speciem quam habent aquae istae visibilcs. Ipsa enim congregatio in unum, ipsa est aquarum istarum formatio, quas videmus et tangimus. Omnis enim forma ad unitatis regulam cogitur. Et quod dicitur, Appareat arida, quid aliud dici intelligendum est, nisi at illa materies accipiat visibilem formam, qnam nunc habet terra ista quam videmus et tangimus? Superius ergo quod nominabatur terra invisibilis et incom­ posita, materiae confusio et obscuritas nominabatur; et quod nominabatur aqua super quam ferebatur Spi­ ritus Dei, eadem rursus materia nominabatur. Nune vero aqua ista et terra formantur ei illa materia, quæ ipsis nominibus appellabatur, antequam formas istas, quas nunc videmus, acciperet. Sane dicitur, in hebraea locutione omnem aquarum congregationem, sive sal­ sarum sive dulcium, mare appellari.

“And God said, Let the water that is under heaven be gathered into one gathering, and let the dry land appear; and so it was done. And the water that was under heaven was gathered into one gathering, and the dry land appeared. And God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the water he called sea. And God saw that it is good.” At this place the Manichees say: If everything was full of waters, how could the waters be gathered into one? But it was already said above that the matter over which the Spirit of God was borne, from which God was going to form all things, was called by the name of waters. Now, when it is said, “Let the water that is under heaven be gathered into one gathering,” it is said so that that bodily matter may be formed into the appearance that these visible waters have. For the very gathering into one is the very forming of these waters that we see and touch; for every form is brought to the rule of unity. And when it is said, “Let the dry land appear,” what else should we understand to be said than that that matter should receive the visible form that this earth we see and touch now has? So above, what was called earth invisible and unformed was the confusion and obscurity of matter; and what was called water, over which the Spirit of God was borne, was again the same matter. But now this water and earth are formed from that matter which was called by these very names before it received these forms that we now see. Indeed, it is said that in Hebrew usage every gathering of waters, whether salt or fresh, is called sea.

Gen 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that the gathering of the waters and the appearing of dry land mean the forming of visible water and earth out of formless matter.

  • Quotation: Gen 1:9–10.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.12 (PL 34:181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

1.13PL 34:181

Et dixit Deus, Germinet terra herbam pabuh ferentem semen secundum suum genus et similitudinem, et lignum fructiferum faciens fructum, cujus semen sit in se secundum suam similitudinem. Et sic eat factum. Et ejectt terra herbam pabuli, ferentem semen secundum suum genus, et lignum fructiferum faciens fructum, cujus semen eat in se secundum suam simliiudinem, secundum suum genus super terram. Et vidit Deus quia bonum est. Et facta eat vespera, et factum est mane dies tertius. Hic solent dicere: Si Deus jussit nasci de terra herbam pabuli; et lignum fructiferum, quis jussit nasci tantas herbas vel spinosas vel venenosas, quae ad pabulum non proficiunt,et tam multa ligna quae nutlum fructum ferunt? Quibus sic respondendum est, ut nulla indignis aperiantur mysteria, neque ostendatur in qua figura futurorum ista sic dicta sint.. Ergo dicendutn est, quod per peccatum hominis terra maledicta sit, ut spinas pareret: non ut ipsa poenas sentiret, quae sine sensu est, sed ut peccati humani crimen. semper bominibus ante oculos poneret, quo admonerentur aliquando averti a peccatis, et ad Dei praecepta con­ verti. Herbae autem venenosæ ad poenam, vel ad exercitationem mortalium creatae sunt; et hoc totum propter peccatum, quia mortales post peccatum facti sumus. Per infructuosas vero arbores insultatur ho­ minibus, ut intelligant quam sit erubescendum sine fructu bonorum operum esse in agro Dei, hoc est in Ecclesia; et timeant ne deserat eos Deus, quia ct ipsi in agris suis infructuosas arbores deserunt, nec ali­ quam culturam eis adhibent. Ante peccatum ergo ho­ minis non est scriptum, quod terra aliud protulerit nisi herbam pabuli et ligna fructuosa: post peccatum autem videmus multa horrida et infructuosa de terra nasci, credo propter eam causam quam diximus. Sic enim dicitur ad primum hominem posteaquam pecca­ vit: Maledicta erit terra tibi in, omnibus operibus tuis; in tristitia et gemitu edes ex ea omnibus diebus vituæ: Spinas et tribulos ejiciet tibi, et edes pabulum agri tui: in sudore νultus tui edes panem tuum, donec revertaris in terram, de qua sumptus ea; quia terra es, et in ter­ ram ibis.

“And God said, Let the earth bring forth the grass of the field bearing seed according to its kind and likeness, and the fruit-bearing tree making fruit whose seed is in itself according to its likeness. And so it was done. And the earth brought forth the grass of the field bearing seed according to its kind, and the fruit-bearing tree making fruit whose seed is in itself according to its likeness, according to its kind upon the earth. And God saw that it is good. And evening was made, and morning was made, the third day.” Here they usually say: If God commanded the grass of the field and the fruit-bearing tree to spring from the earth, who commanded so many plants to spring up, thorny or poisonous, that are of no use for fodder, and so many trees that bear no fruit? They must be answered in such a way that no mysteries are opened to the unworthy, and it is not shown in what figure of future things these were so spoken. So it must be said that through man's sin the earth was cursed so as to bear thorns: not so that it should feel punishment, since it is without sense, but so that it should always set the guilt of human sin before people's eyes, by which they might be warned at some time to turn away from sins and to turn to God's commandments. Poisonous plants, however, were created for the punishment or the exercise of mortals; and all this on account of sin, because we were made mortal after sin. And by unfruitful trees people are rebuked, so that they may understand how shameful it is to be without the fruit of good works in God's field, that is, in the church; and may fear lest God abandon them, since they too abandon unfruitful trees in their fields and give them no cultivation. So before man's sin it is not written that the earth produced anything except the grass of the field and fruitful trees; but after sin we see many rough and unfruitful things spring from the earth, I believe for the reason we have given. For so it is said to the first man after he sinned: “Cursed shall the earth be to you in all your works; in sadness and groaning you shall eat of it all the days of your life. Thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you, and you shall eat the grass of your field. In the sweat of your face you shall eat your bread, until you return to the earth from which you were taken; for earth you are, and to earth you shall go.”

Gen 1:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:9 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that thorny, poisonous and unfruitful plants appeared because of human sin, as warnings and punishments, and that barren trees rebuke those without good works in the church.

  • Quotations: Gen 1:11–13; Gen 3:17–19, in the Old Latin form. The church as God's field: compare 1 Cor 3:9.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray section number in the digital text): 19 Et dixit → Et dixit.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.13 (PL 34:181; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-1/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.