On Genesis against the Manichaeans 1.14–1.22
Latin text: Migne, PL 34 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 1
1.14PL 34:181–182
Et dixit Deus, Fiant sidera in firmamento cœli. sic ut luceant super terram, et dividant inter diem et noctem, et sint in ligna, et in tempora, et in dies, et in annos; et sint in splendorem in firmamento cœli, sic ut luceant super terram. Et sic eat factum. Et fecit Deus duo luminaria, majus et minus: luminare majus in in choationem diei, et luminare minus in inchoationem no ctiS, ct stellas. Et posuit illas Deus in firmamento coeli, sic ut luceant super terram, et prœsint diei et nocti, et dividant inter diem et noctem. Et vidit Deus quia bo num eat. Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies quartus. Hic primo quaerunt quomodo quarto die facta sint sidera, id est sol, ct luna, et stellae. Tres enim dies superiores quomodo esse sine sole potucrunt, cum videamus nunc solis ortu et occasu diem transigi, noctem vero nobis fieri solis absentia, cum ab alia parte mundi ad oricntem redit? Quibus respondemus, po tuisse fieri ut tres supcriorcs dies singuli per tantam moram temporis computarentur, per quantam moram circumit sol, ex quo procedit ab oriente quousque rursus ad orientem revertitur. Ilanc enim moram et longitudinem temporis possent sentire homines etiamsi in speluncis habitarent, ubi orientem et occi dentem solem videre non possent. Atque ita sentitur potuisse istam moram fieri etiam sine sole antequam sol factus esset, atque ipsam moram in illo triduo per dies singulos computatam. Hoc ergo responderemus, nisi nos revocaret quod ibi dicitur, Et facta eat vespe ra, et factum eat mane, quod nunc sine solis cursu vi demus fieri non posse. Restat ergo ut intelligamus, in ipsa quidem mora temporis ipsas distinctiones ope rum sic appellatas, vesperam propter transactionem consummati operis, et mane propter inchoationem. futuri operis; de similitudine scilicet humanorum ope rum, quia plerumque a mane incipiunt, et ad vespc ram desinunt. Habent enim consuetudinem divinae Scripturae de rebus humanis ad divinas res verba trans ferre. Deinde quærunt utquid dictum sit de sideribus: Et sint in signa et in tempora. Numquid enim, aiunt, tres illi dies sine temporibus esse potuerunt, aut ad temporis spatia non pertinent? Sed, in signa et tem pora dictum est, ut per hæc sidera tempora distin guantur, et ab hominibus dignoscantur: quia si currant tempora, et nullis distinguantur articulis, qui articuli per siderum cursus notantur, possunt quidem currere tempora atque practerire; sed intelligi et discerni ab hominibus non possunt. Sicut horæ quando nubilus dies est, transeunt quidem, et sua spatia peragunt; sed distingui a nobis et notari non possunt. Quod autem dictum est, Et fecit Deus duo tu minaria; luminare majus in inchoationem diei, et lumi nare minus in inchoationem noctis, pro eo dictum est ac si diceretur, in principatum diei et in principatum noctis. Non enim sol tantummodo inchoat diem, et non etiam peragit et finit: luna vero aliquando media nocte vel in fine noctis ad nos procedit; si ergo illae noctes, quibus hoc facit, non ab ista inchoantur, quo modo in inchoationem noctis facta est? Si autem per inchoationem principium intelligas, et per principium prircipatum, manifestum est, quia per diem sol prin eipatum tenet; luna vero per noctem, quia etsi cætera sidera tunc apparent, illa tamen suo fulgore superat omnia, et ideo princeps eorum rectissime dieitur. Quod autem dictum est, Et dividant inter diem et noctem; potest Iiic fieri calumnia, ut dicatur: Quo modo jam Deus diviserat superius inter diem et no ctem, si hoc, quarto die, sidera faciunt? Sic igitur hic. dictum est, Dividant inter diem et noctem, tanquam si diceretur, Sic inter se diem dividant et noctem, ut soli dies detur, nox autem lunae et sideribus cæteris. Quæ duo jam divisa erant, sed nondum inter sidera, ut jam certum esset de siderum numero, quid pa diem, et quid per noctem appareret hominibus.
“And God said, Let there be stars in the firmament of heaven, so that they may shine upon the earth and divide between day and night, and let them be for signs and for times and for days and for years; and let them be for splendor in the firmament of heaven, so that they may shine upon the earth. And so it was done. And God made two lights, a greater and a lesser: the greater light for the beginning of the day, and the lesser light for the beginning of the night, and the stars. And God set them in the firmament of heaven, so that they might shine upon the earth and rule the day and the night and divide between day and night. And God saw that it is good. And evening was made, and morning was made, the fourth day.” Here they first ask how the stars, that is, the sun and the moon and the stars, were made on the fourth day. For how could the three earlier days exist without the sun, since we now see the day pass by the rising and setting of the sun, and the night come about for us by the sun's absence, when it returns from the other side of the world to the east? We answer them that it could have happened that each of the three earlier days was counted by as long a stretch of time as the sun takes to go round, from when it sets out from the east until it returns again to the east. For people could sense this stretch and length of time even if they lived in caves where they could not see the sun rise and set. And so it is seen that this stretch could have happened even without the sun, before the sun was made, and that this very stretch was counted in that period of three days, day by day. This, then, is what we would answer, if we were not called back by what is said there, “And evening was made, and morning was made,” which we now see cannot happen without the course of the sun. It remains, then, that we understand that within that stretch of time the very divisions of the works were so named: evening on account of the completion of a finished work, and morning on account of the beginning of a work to come; that is, from the likeness of human works, because they usually begin in the morning and stop toward evening. For the divine Scriptures have the custom of transferring words from human things to divine things.
Then they ask why it is said of the stars, “And let them be for signs and for times.” For, they say, could those three days have been without times, or do they not belong to the spaces of time? But “for signs and times” was said so that by these stars times might be distinguished and recognized by people; because if times run on and are distinguished by no joints, which joints are marked by the courses of the stars, times can indeed run on and pass, but cannot be understood and discerned by people. Just as hours on a cloudy day do pass and complete their spans, but cannot be distinguished and marked by us. And what is said, “And God made two lights, the greater light for the beginning of the day and the lesser light for the beginning of the night,” was said as if it had been said, “for the rule of the day and for the rule of the night.” For the sun does not only begin the day without also carrying it through and ending it; and the moon sometimes comes out to us at midnight or at the end of the night. So if those nights on which it does this are not begun by it, how was it made for the beginning of the night? But if by “beginning” you understand principle, and by principle principality, it is clear that the sun holds the principality during the day, and the moon during the night, because even though the other stars appear then, it nonetheless surpasses all by its brightness, and so is most rightly called their prince. And concerning what is said, “And let them divide between day and night,” a false charge can be made here, so as to say: How had God already divided above between day and night, if the stars do this on the fourth day? So here “Let them divide between day and night” was said as if it had been said, “Let them so divide day and night among themselves that the day is given to the sun, and the night to the moon and the other stars.” These two had already been divided, but not yet among the stars, so that it might now be fixed, as to the number of the stars, what appears to people through the day and what through the night.
Gen 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine answers objections to the creation of sun, moon and stars on the fourth day: the evenings and mornings before them mark the completion and beginning of works, and the lights were made to mark times and to rule day and night.
- Quotation: Gen 1:14–19, Old Latin; “in inchoationem diei” renders the LXX εἰς ἀρχὰς τῆς ἡμέρας (“for the rule/beginning of the day”), which Augustine explains as “principality”.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray section number in the digital text): it. Deinde → Deinde.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.14 (PL 34:181–182; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.15PL 34:182
Et dixit Deus, Ejiciant aquœreptilia animarum vivarum, et volatilia volantia super terram sub firma mento cæli. Et sic jactum est. Et fecit Deus cetos ma gnos, et omnem animam animalium et repentium quœ ejecerunt aquœ secundum uniuscujusque genua, et omne genus volatile pennatum secundum genus. Et vidit Deus quia bona sunt; et benedixit illa Deus dicens: Crescite et multiplicamini, et replete aquas maris, et volatilia multiplicentur super terram. Et facta est vespera, et factum est mane dies quintus. Hic solent reprehendere, quærentes vel potius calumniantes, quare animalia non solum ea quae in aquis vivunt, sed etiam ea quæ in aere volitant, et omnia pennata de aquis nata scri ptum sit. Sed sciant omnes quos haec movent, istum aerem nebulosum et humidum, in quo aves volant, a doctissimis hominibus qui haec diligenter inquirunt, cum aquis solere deputari. Concrescit enim et crassus efficitur exhalationibus et quasi vaporibus maris et terræ, et de ipso humore pinguescit quodammodo ut volatus avium portare possit. Ideo per noctes serenas etiam rorat, cujus roris guttæ mane in herbis inve niuntur. Nam mons ille Macedoniae, qui Olympus vo catur, tantae altitudinis esse dicitur, ut in ejus cacu mine nec ventus sentiatur, nec nubes se colligant, quia excedit altitudine sua totum istum aerem humi dum in quo aves volant, et ideo nec aves ibi volare asseverantur. Quod ab eis proditum dicitur, qui per singulos annos solebant, nescio quorum sacrificiorum causa, memorati montis cacumen ascendere, et ali quas notas in pulvere scribere, quas alio anno integras inveniebant: quod fieri non posset, si ventum aut pluviam locus ille pateretur. Deinde quia tenuitas aeris illius qui ibi est, non eos inspirabat, durare ibi non poterant, nisi spongias humectas naribus applicarent, unde crassiorem et consuetum spiritum ducerent: hi ergo indicaverunt se etiam nullam avem in eo loco aliquando vidisse. Non itaque immerito non solum pisces et cætera quae in aquis sunt animalia, sed etiam aves de aquis natas esse, fidelissima Scriptura com memorat; quia per istum aerem volare possunt, qui de maris et terrae humoribus surgit.
“And God said, Let the waters bring forth creeping things of living souls, and flying things flying over the earth under the firmament of heaven. And so it was done. And God made great sea monsters, and every soul of animals and creeping things which the waters brought forth according to each one's kind, and every winged flying kind according to its kind. And God saw that they are good; and God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the waters of the sea, and let the flying things multiply upon the earth. And evening was made, and morning was made, the fifth day.” Here they usually find fault, asking, or rather making false charges, why it is written that not only the animals that live in the waters but also those that fly in the air, and all winged things, were born from the waters. But let all who are troubled by this know that this cloudy and moist air in which birds fly is usually counted with the waters by the most learned men who study these things carefully. For it thickens and becomes dense from the exhalations and, as it were, the vapors of the sea and the earth, and from this very moisture it grows somehow heavy, so that it can carry the flight of birds. That is why on clear nights it even drops dew, whose drops are found on the grass in the morning. For that mountain of Macedonia called Olympus is said to be of such height that on its summit no wind is felt and no clouds gather, because by its height it rises above all this moist air in which birds fly; and so it is asserted that birds do not fly there either. This is said to have been reported by those who used to climb the summit of that mountain every year, for the sake of I do not know what sacrifices, and wrote certain marks in the dust, which they found intact the next year; which could not happen if that place were exposed to wind or rain. Further, because the thinness of the air there did not let them breathe, they could not stay there unless they held wet sponges to their nostrils, from which they drew the thicker air they were used to. These, then, reported that they had also never seen any bird in that place. So not without reason does the most trustworthy Scripture record that not only fish and the other animals that are in the waters, but also birds, were born from the waters; because they can fly through this air, which rises from the moisture of the sea and the earth.
Gen 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:23 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine explains why birds are said to come from the waters: the moist lower air in which they fly is counted with water, as the reports about the summit of Mount Olympus illustrate.
- Quotation: Gen 1:20–23. The report about the summit of Olympus (letters in the ash, wet sponges) circulated in ancient natural science; Augustine does not name his source.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.15 (PL 34:182; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.16PL 34:182–183
Et dixit Deus, Ejiciat terra animam vivam se cundum unumquodque genus quadrupedum et serpentium et bestiarum terrœ. Et sic est factum. Et fecit Deus bestias terrœ tecundum genus, et pecora secundum ge nus, et omnia repentia terrce secundum genus. Et vidit Deus quia bona sunt. Solent eliam istam Manichaei movere quæstionem ut dicant: Quid opus erat ut tam multa animalia Deus faceret, sive in aquis, sive in terra, quae hominibus non sunt necessaria? multa etiam perniciosa sunt et timenda. Sed cum ista dicunt, non intelligunt quemadmodum omnia pulchra sunt conditori et artifici suo, qui omnibus utitur ad gubcr nationem universitatis, cui summa lege dominatur. Si enim in alicujus opificis officinam imperitus intra verit, videt ibi multa instrumenta quorum causas ignorat, et si multum est insipiens, superflua putat. Jamvero si in fornacem incautus ceciderit, aut ferra mento aliquo acuto, cum id male tractat, seipsum vulneraverit, etiam perniciosa et noxia existimat ibi esse multa. Quorum tamen usum quoniam novit artifex, insipientiam ejus irridet, et verba inepta non curans, officinam suam instanter exercet. Et tamen tam stulti sunt homines, ut apud artificem hominem non au deant vituperare quae ignorant, sed cum ea viderint credant esse necessaria, et propter usus aliquos institu ta: in hoc autem mundo cujus conditor et administrator prædicatur Deus, audent multa reprehendere quorum causas non vident, et in operibus atque instrumentis omnipotentis artificis volunt se videri scire quod ne sciunt. Ego vero fateor me nescire mures et ranæ qua re creatæ sint, aut muscæ aut vermiculi: video ta men omnia in suo genere pulchra esse, quamvis pro pter peccata nostra multa nobis videantur adversa. Non enim animalis alicujus corpus et membra considc ro, ubi non mensuras et numeros et ordinem inveniam ad unitatem concordiæ pertinere. Quae omnia unde veniant non intelligo, nisi a summa mensura et nu mero et ordine, quae in ipsa Dei sublimitate incommu tabili atque aeterna consistunt. Quod si cogitarent isti loquacissimi etineptissimi, non nobis tædium facerent, sed ipsi considerando omnes pulchritudines et summas et infimas, Deum artificem ubique laudarent; et quo niam nusquam offenditur ratio, sicubi forte sensus carnalis offenditur, non rerum ipsarum vitio, sed no strae mortalitatis meritis imputarent. Et certe omnia animalia aut utilia nobis sunt, aut perniciosa, aut su perflua. Adversus utilia non habent quid dicant. De perniciosis autem vel punimur, vel exercemur, vel terremur, ut non vitam istam multis periculis et labo nbus subditam, sed aliam meliorem, ubi securitas summa est, diligamus et desideremus, et eam nobis pietatis meritis comparemus. De superfluis vero quid nobis est quaerere? Si tibi displicet quod non prosunt, placcat quod non obsunt; quia etsi domui nostrae non sunt necessaria, eis tamen completur hujus uni versitatis integritas, quæ multo major est quam domus nostra et multo melior. Hanc enim multo melius ad ministrat Deus, quam unusquisque nostrum domum suam. Usurpa ergo utilia, cave perniciosa, relinque superflua. In omnibus tamen cum mensuras et nume ros et ordinem vides, artificem quaere. Nec alium in venies, nisi ubi summa mensura, et summus numerus, et summus ordo est, id est Deum, de quo verissime dictum est, quod omnia in mensura, et numero, et pondere disposuerit ( Sap. XI, 24). Sic fortasse ube. riorem capies fructum, cum Deum laudas in humilita te formicæ,quam cum transis fluvium in alicujus ju menti altitudine.
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living soul according to each kind, of four-footed beasts and serpents and wild animals of the earth. And so it was done. And God made the wild animals of the earth according to their kind, and the cattle according to their kind, and all the creeping things of the earth according to their kind. And God saw that they are good.” The Manichees also usually raise this question, saying: What need was there for God to make so many animals, whether in the waters or on land, that are not necessary for human beings? Many are even harmful and to be feared. But when they say this, they do not understand how all things are beautiful to their maker and craftsman, who uses all things for the governing of the universe, over which he rules by the highest law. For if an unskilled person enters some craftsman's workshop, he sees there many tools whose purposes he does not know, and if he is very foolish he thinks them superfluous. And if he carelessly falls into the furnace, or wounds himself with some sharp iron tool while handling it badly, he even thinks that there are many harmful and injurious things there. Yet because the craftsman knows their use, he laughs at his foolishness and, paying no attention to his silly words, busily carries on his workshop. And yet people are so foolish that in the case of a human craftsman they do not dare to find fault with what they do not know, but when they see such things they believe them to be necessary and provided for some uses; but in this world, whose maker and governor God is proclaimed to be, they dare to criticize many things whose causes they do not see, and in the works and tools of the almighty craftsman they wish to seem to know what they do not know. For my part, I confess that I do not know why mice and frogs were created, or flies or little worms; yet I see that all things are beautiful in their own kind, although on account of our sins many seem hostile to us. For I do not consider the body and limbs of any animal without finding measures and numbers and order belonging to the unity of harmony. Where all these come from I do not understand, unless from the highest measure and number and order, which reside in the unchangeable and eternal sublimity of God himself. If these most talkative and most foolish men thought about this, they would not weary us, but would themselves, by considering all beauties, both the highest and the lowest, praise God the craftsman everywhere; and since reason is nowhere offended, if perhaps fleshly sense is offended somewhere, they would ascribe it not to a fault in the things themselves but to what our mortality has deserved. And certainly all animals are either useful to us, or harmful, or superfluous. Against the useful they have nothing to say. As for the harmful, by them we are either punished, or exercised, or frightened, so that we may love and desire not this life, subject to many dangers and labors, but another, better one, where there is perfect security, and may win it for ourselves by the merits of piety. As for the superfluous, what business is it of ours to inquire? If you are displeased that they are of no use, be pleased that they do no harm; because, even if they are not necessary for our house, the completeness of this universe is filled out by them, which is much greater than our house and much better. For God governs it much better than each of us governs his own house. So make use of the useful, beware of the harmful, leave the superfluous alone. Yet in all things, when you see measures and numbers and order, look for the craftsman. And you will find no other than where the highest measure and the highest number and the highest order are, that is, God, of whom it is most truly said that he arranged all things in measure and number and weight. So perhaps you will gain richer fruit when you praise God in the lowliness of an ant than when you cross a river on the height of some beast of burden.
Gen 1:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:25 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine answers the objection that many animals are useless or harmful: like tools in a workshop, all have their place in the beauty of the universe, which shows measure, number and order from God.
- Quotations: Gen 1:24–25; Wis 11:20 (11:21 in some numberings; Migne cites 11:24), “omnia in mensura et numero et pondere disposuisti”.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 11:20 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.16 (PL 34:182–183; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-16) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.17PL 34:183–184
Et dixit Deus: Faciamus hominem ad imaginem. et similitudinem nostram; et habeat potestatem piscium maria et volatilium cœli, et omnium pecorum et ferarum, et omnis terrœ, et omnium reptilium, quæ super terram repunt, et caetera usque ad vesperam et mane quo com pletur dies sextus. Istam maxime quæstionem solent Manichaei loquaciter agitare, et insultare nobis quod hominem credamus factum ad imaginem et similitudi nem Dei. Attendunt enim figuram corporis nostri, et infeliciter quaerunt utrum habeat Deus nares et den tcs et barbam, et membra etiam interiora, et cætera quae in nobis sunt necessaria. In Deo antem talia ri diculum cst, imo impium credere, et ideo negant bo minem factum esse ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei. Quibus respondemus, membra quidem ista in Scripturis plerumque nominari, cum Deus insinuatur audientibus parvulis; et hoc non solum in Veteris Testamenti libris, sed etiam in Novi. Nam et oculi Dei commemorantur, et aures, et labia, et pedes, et ad dexteram Dei Patris sedere evangelizatur Filius. Et ipse Dominus dicit: Nolite per cœlum jurare, quia sedes Dei est; neque per terram, quia scabellum pedum ejus eat. Item ipse dicit quod in digito Dei ejiciebat daemonia ( Luc. XI, 20 ). Sed omnes qui spiritualiter intelligunt Scripturas, non membra corporea per ista nomina, sed spirituales potentias accipere didicerunt, sicut galeas, et scutum, et gla dium ( Ephes. VI, 16,17 ), et alia multa. Primo ergo istis hæreticis dicendum est, qua impudentia de tali bus verbis Veteri Testamento calumnientur, cum etiam in Novo haec posita videant, aut fortasse non videant, sed cum litigant excaecentur. Sed tamen novcrinL in catholica disciplina spi rituales fideles non credere Deum forma corporea definitum; et quod homo ad imaginem Dei factus di citur, secundum interiorem hominem dici, ubi est ra tio et intellectus: unde etiam habet potestatem pi scium maris, et volatilium coeli, et omnium pecorum et ferarum, et omnis terrae, et omnium repentium quae repunt super terram. Cum enim dixisset, Facia. mus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram; addidit continuo, Et habeat potestatem piscium maris et volatilium cæli, et caetera: ut intelligeremus non propter corpus dici hominem factum ad imaginem Dei, sed propter eam potestatem qua omnia pecora superat. Omniaenim animalia cætera subjecta sunt homini, non propter corpus, sed propter intellectum, quem nos habemus, et illa non habent: quamvis cuamcorpus nostrum sic fabricatum sit, ut indicet nos melioresesse quam bestias, et propterea Deo si miles. Omnium enim animalium corpora, sive quae in aquis, sive quæ in terra vivunt, sive quæ in aere vo litant, inclinata sunt ad terram, et non sunt erecta sic iit hominis corpus. Quo significatur, etiam animum nostrum in superna sua, id est in æterna spiritualia,. crectum esse debere. Ila intelligitur per animumma xime, attestante etiam erecta corporis forma, homo lactus ad imngincm ct similitudinem Dei.
“And God said: Let us make man to our image and likeness; and let him have power over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven, and all the cattle and wild beasts, and all the earth, and all the creeping things that creep upon the earth,” and the rest, up to the evening and morning with which the sixth day is completed. The Manichees usually stir up this question most of all, talkatively, and mock us because we believe that man was made to the image and likeness of God. For they look at the shape of our body and ask, unhappily, whether God has nostrils and teeth and a beard, and also inner organs, and the other things that are necessary in us. To believe such things of God is ridiculous, indeed impious; and so they deny that man was made to the image and likeness of God. We answer them that these members are often named in the Scriptures when God is being made known to little ones who are listening; and this not only in the books of the Old Testament but also in those of the New. For the eyes of God are mentioned, and the ears and the lips and the feet, and the Gospel proclaims that the Son sits at the right hand of God the Father. And the Lord himself says: “Do not swear by heaven, because it is the throne of God; nor by the earth, because it is the footstool of his feet.” Likewise he himself says that he cast out demons by the finger of God. But all who understand the Scriptures spiritually have learned to take by these names not bodily members but spiritual powers, like helmets and shield and sword, and many other things. So first these heretics must be told with what impudence they bring false charges against the Old Testament over such words, when they see them set down in the New as well; or perhaps they do not see, but are blinded when they quarrel.
But let them know that in the catholic teaching the spiritual faithful do not believe that God is bounded by a bodily form; and that when man is said to have been made to the image of God, this is said with respect to the inner man, where reason and understanding are; and that is why he also has power over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven, and all cattle and wild beasts, and all the earth, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth. For when he had said, “Let us make man to our image and likeness,” he immediately added, “And let him have power over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven,” and so on: so that we might understand that man is said to have been made to the image of God not on account of the body but on account of that power by which he surpasses all cattle. For all other animals are subject to man not on account of the body but on account of the understanding, which we have and they do not have; although even our body is so fashioned as to show that we are better than the beasts, and therefore like God. For the bodies of all animals, whether those that live in the waters or on land or that fly in the air, are bent toward the earth and are not upright as man's body is. By this it is signified that our mind too ought to be raised up toward its own higher things, that is, toward eternal spiritual things. So it is understood that man was made to the image and likeness of God chiefly with respect to the mind, the upright form of the body also bearing witness to it.
Gen 1:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 11:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 16:19 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against the Manichaean mockery of God's image as bodily, Augustine argues that Scripture's bodily language about God is figurative and that man is God's image in his inner self, reason and understanding, shown also by his upright posture.
- Quotations: Gen 1:26 (and 1:27–31 summarized); Matt 5:34–35; Luke 11:20; Eph 6:16–17 (the spiritual armor). The Son at the right hand: e.g. Mark 16:19. On the Manichaean objection that the image of God implies a bodily God, Augustine reports their view.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): et labia t, → et labia,; in superna sua t, → in superna sua,.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.17 (PL 34:183–184; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-17) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.18PL 34:184
Aliquando etiam solent dicere: Quomodo acce pit homo potestatem piscium maris et volatilium coeli et omnium pecorum et ferarum, cum videamus a multis feris homines occidi, et a multis volatilibus no bis noceri, quæ volumus vel vitare vel capere et ple rumque non possumus? quomodo ergo in haec acce pimus potestatem? Hic illis priino dicendum est quod inultum errent qui post peccatum considerant homi nom, cum in hujus vitæ mortalitatem damnatus est, et amisit perfectionem illam qua factus est ad imagi nem Dei. Sed si damnatio ejus tantum valet, ut tam iniitis pecoribus imperct: quamvis enim a multis fe ris propter fragilitatem corporis possit occidi, a nul tis tamcn domari potest, cum ipse tam multas et pro pe omnes domet: si ergo hæc hominis damnatio tan tum valet, quid de regno cjus cogitandum est, quod ei renovato et liberato divina voce promittitur?
Sometimes they also say: How did man receive power over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven and all cattle and wild beasts, when we see people killed by many wild beasts and harmed by many birds, which we wish either to avoid or to catch and often cannot? How, then, did we receive power over them? Here they must first be told that they err greatly who consider man after sin, when he was condemned to the mortality of this life and lost that perfection by which he was made to the image of God. But if even his condemned state has so much power that he rules so many cattle (for although he can be killed by many wild beasts because of the frailty of his body, yet he can be tamed by none, while he himself tames so many, nearly all), if, then, man's condemned state has so much power, what should we think of his kingdom, which is promised by the divine voice to him when he is renewed and set free?
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine answers that man's present weakness before wild animals belongs to his fallen state, yet even now he tames nearly all beasts, which hints at the dominion promised to him when renewed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): damnatio I ejus → damnatio ejus.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.18 (PL 34:184; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-18) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.19PL 34:184
Quod autem scriptum est, Masculum et feminam fecit illos; et benedixit eoa Deus dicens, Crescite et mul tipticamini, et generate, et replete terram; rectissime quæritur quemadmodum accipienda sit conjunctio ma sculiet feminae ante peccatum, et ista benedictio qua dictum est, Crescite et multiplicamini, et generate, et replete terram: utrum carnaliter, an spiritualiter acci picnda sit. Licet enim nobis eam etiam spiritualiter accipere, ut in carnalem fecunditatem post peccatum conversa esse credatur. Erat enim prius casta con junctio masculi ct feminae; hujus ad regendum, illius ad obtemperandum accommodata: et spiritualis fetus intelligibilium et immortalium gaudiorum replens ter rain, id est, vivificans corpus, et dominans ejus; id est, ita subjectum habens, ut nullam ex eo adversita tem, nullam molestiam patcretur. Quod ideo sic cre dendum est, quia nondum erant filii saeculi hujus an tequam peccarent. Filii enim saeculi hujus generant etgenerantur, sicut Dominus dicit, cum in compara tionefuturae vitae quoe nobis promittitur, carnalem istam generationem contemnendam esse demonstrat ( Luc. xx, 34-36 ).
As for what is written, “Male and female he made them; and God blessed them, saying, Increase and multiply, and generate, and fill the earth,” it is most rightly asked how the union of male and female before sin is to be understood, and this blessing in which it was said, “Increase and multiply, and generate, and fill the earth”: whether it is to be taken carnally or spiritually. For we are permitted to take it also spiritually, so as to believe that it was turned into carnal fruitfulness after sin. For at first there was a chaste union of male and female, his suited to ruling and hers to obeying; and a spiritual offspring of intelligible and immortal joys filling the earth, that is, giving life to the body and ruling it, that is, holding it so subject that it suffered no opposition and no trouble from it. This is to be believed for this reason: that before they sinned they were not yet children of this world. For the children of this world beget and are begotten, as the Lord says when he shows that, in comparison with the future life promised to us, this carnal generation is to be held of little account.
Gen 1:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 20:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:36 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine proposes that the blessing “Increase and multiply” may be taken spiritually before the fall, as a chaste union bearing spiritual offspring, which turned into carnal fruitfulness after sin.
- Quotations: Gen 1:27–28; Luke 20:34–36 (alluded to). Augustine's spiritual reading of the first couple's fruitfulness here is tentative (“licet”); in his Retractations (1.10.2) and in The Literal Meaning of Genesis (9.3–9) he later accepted bodily procreation in paradise. Translated as written.
Topics: Marriage
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.19 (PL 34:184; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.20PL 34:184
Et quod eis dictum est, Habete potestatem pi scium maris, et volatilium cœli, et repentium omnium qucerepunt super terram: salvo quidem intellectu, quo manifestum cst omnibus his animalibus hominem ra tione dominari; recte tamcn intelligitur etiam spiritua liter, ut omnes aflectioncs et motus animi, quos habe mus istis animalibus similes, subditos haberemus, ct eorum dominaremur per temperantiam et modestiam, Cum enim non reguntur isti motus, erumpunt et per gunt in. fœdissimas consuetudines, et per diversas perniciosasque delectationes nos rapiunt, et faciunt similes omni generi bestiarum. Cum autem reguntur et subjiciuntur, omnino mansuescunt et nobiscum concorditer vivunt. Non enim a nobis alieni sunt mo tus animi nostri. Pascuntur etiam nobiscum cognitio ne rationum ct morum optimorum, et vitæ aeternae, tanquam herbis seminalibus et lignis fructiferis et her bis viridibus. Et hæc est hominis vita beata atquo tranquilla, cum omnes motus ejus rationi veritatique consentiunt; et vocantur gaudia, et amores sancti, et casti et boni. Si autem non consentiunt, nihilomi nus dum negligenter geruntur, conscindunt et dissi pant animum, et faciunt vitam miserrimam; et vocan tur perturbationes, et libidines, et concupigcentiae ma lae. De quibus jam nobis praecipitur, ut cas cum quanto possumus labore crucifigamus in nobis, donec absor beatur mors in victoriam ( I Cor., XV,54 ). Dicit enim Apostolus: Qui autem Jesu Christi sunt, carnem suam crucifixerunt cum perturbationibus et concupiscentiis ( Galat. v, 24 ). Vel hinc enim quivis admoneri debet non carnaliter haec esse intelligenda, quia herbae vi rides et ligna fructifera omni generi bestiarum, et omnibus volatilibus et omnibus serpentibus in Genesi dantur ad cibum, cum videamus leones, et accipitres, et milvos, et aquilas non pasci nisi carnibus, et inter fectione aliorum animalium. Quod etiam de nonnul lis serpentibus credo, qui sunt in arenosis et desertis locis, ubi nec lignumnee herba nascitur.
And what was said to them, “Have power over the fish of the sea and the birds of heaven and all creeping things that creep upon the earth”: without prejudice to the understanding by which it is plain to all that man rules all these animals by reason, it is rightly also understood spiritually, so that we should hold in subjection all the affections and movements of the mind which we have that are like these animals, and rule them by temperance and moderation. For when these movements are not ruled, they break out and rush into the foulest habits, and drag us through various and ruinous pleasures, and make us like every kind of beast. But when they are ruled and made subject, they become entirely tame and live with us in harmony. For the movements of our mind are not foreign to us. They are also fed with us on the knowledge of reasons and of the best morals and of eternal life, as on seed-bearing plants and fruit-bearing trees and green plants. And this is the happy and tranquil life of man, when all his movements agree with reason and truth; and they are called joys, and holy, chaste and good loves. But if they do not agree, then, while they are carelessly handled, they tear apart and scatter the mind and make life most wretched; and they are called disturbances and lusts and evil desires. These we are now commanded to crucify in ourselves with as much labor as we can, until death is swallowed up in victory. For the Apostle says: “But those who are Jesus Christ's have crucified their flesh with its passions and desires.” For from this at least anyone ought to be warned that these things are not to be understood carnally: that green plants and fruit-bearing trees are given in Genesis as food to every kind of beast and to all birds and all serpents, when we see that lions and hawks and kites and eagles feed only on flesh and on the killing of other animals. I believe this is true also of some serpents that are in sandy and desert places, where neither tree nor plant grows.
Gen 1:28 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:54 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 5:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:30 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine reads man's dominion over animals also spiritually, as reason ruling the soul's animal-like impulses, and notes that plants given as food to carnivores show the passage is not meant only literally.
- Quotations: Gen 1:28; 1 Cor 15:54; Gal 5:24 (Old Latin “cum perturbationibus et concupiscentiis”). Gen 1:29–30 is alluded to.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): nus I dum → nus dum.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.20 (PL 34:184; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.21PL 34:184–185
Sane non est negligenter praetereundum quod dictum est, Et vidit Deus omnia quacumque fecit, esse bona valde. Cum enim de singulis ageret, dicebat tantum, Vidit Deus quia bonum eat: cum autem de omnibus diceretur, parum fuit dicere bona, nisi ad deretur et valde. Si enim singula opera Dei cum con siderantur a prudentibus, inveniuntur habere lauda biles mensuras et numeros et ordines in suo quæque genere constituta; quanto magis omnia simul, id est ipsa universitas, quae istis singulis in unum collectis impletur? Omnis enim pulchritudo quæ partibus con stat, multo est laudabilior in toto quam in parte: sic ut in corpore humano, si laudamus oculos solos, si nasum solum, si solas genas, aut solum caput, aut so las manus, aut solos pedes, et caetera si pulchra sin gula et sola laudamus; quanto magis totum corpus, cui omnia membra, quae singula pulchra sunt, con ferunt pulchritudinem suam: ila ut manus pulchra, quae cHam sola laudabatur in corpore, si separetur a corpore, et ipsa amiltat gratiam suam, et cætera sine illa inhonesta sint? Tanta est vis et potentia in tegritatis et unitatis, ut etiam quae multa sunt bona tunc placeant, cnm in universun aliquid conve niunt atque conCurrunt. Universum autem ab unitate nomen accepit. Quod si Manichæi considerarent, lau darent universitatis auctorem et conditorem Deum; et quod eos propter conditionem nostrae mortalitatis in parte offendit, redigerent ad universi pulchritudi nem, et vidcrent quemadmodum Detis fecerit omnia non solum bona, sed etiam bona valde. Quia etiam in sermone aliquo ornato atque composito si conside remos singulas syllabas, vel eliam singulas litteras, quae cum sonuerint statini transeunt, non in eis inve nimus quid delectet atque laudandum sit. Totus enim ille sermo non de singulis syllabis aut litteris, sed de omnibus pulcher est.
Certainly we should not pass carelessly over what is said, “And God saw all the things he had made, that they were very good.” For when he dealt with each one, he said only, “God saw that it is good”; but when it was said of all, it was not enough to say “good” unless “very” was added. For if the individual works of God, when they are considered by the wise, are found to have praiseworthy measures and numbers and orders established each in its own kind, how much more all of them together, that is, the universe itself, which is filled out by these individual things gathered into one? For all beauty made up of parts is much more praiseworthy in the whole than in a part: as in the human body, if we praise the eyes alone, or the nose alone, or the cheeks alone, or the head alone, or the hands alone, or the feet alone, and so on, if we praise the individual beautiful parts by themselves, how much more the whole body, to which all the members, each beautiful by itself, contribute their beauty; so that a beautiful hand, which was praised even by itself in the body, if it is separated from the body, itself loses its grace, and the other parts without it are unsightly? So great is the force and power of wholeness and unity that even things which are many and good please only when they come together and agree in one universe. For “universe” has its name from unity. If the Manichees considered this, they would praise God as the author and maker of the universe; and what offends them in a part because of the condition of our mortality they would bring back to the beauty of the whole, and they would see how God made all things not only good but very good. For in an ornate and well-composed speech too, if we consider the individual syllables, or even the individual letters, which pass away as soon as they have sounded, we do not find in them anything that delights or deserves praise. For that whole speech is beautiful not from single syllables or letters but from all of them.
Gen 1:31 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine explains why creation as a whole is called “very good”: the beauty of the parts is far greater in the ordered whole, as in a body or a well-composed speech.
- Quotation: Gen 1:31; Gen 1:4 etc. (“God saw that it is good”). The etymology universum from unitas is Augustine's.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): placeant 1, → placeant,.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.21 (PL 34:184–185; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
1.22PL 34:185
Jam nunc videamus etiam illud, quod solent majore impudentia, quam imperitia deridere, quod scriptum est, Deum consummato coelo et terra et omnibus quæ fecit, requievisse die septimo ab omni bus operibus suis, et benedixisse diem septimum, et sanctificasse eum, quia requievit ab operibus suis. Dicunt enim: Quid opus erat ut Deus requiesseret? an forte opcribus sex dierum fatigatus et lassatus erat? Addunt ctiam Domini testimonium, ubi ait, Pater meus usque nunc operatur; et hinc multos imperitos decipiunt, quibus persuadere co nantur Novum Testamentum Veteri Testamento ad versari. Sed sicut illi quibus Dominus dicit, Pater meus usque nunc operatur, carnaliter opinabantur re quiem Dei, et carnaliter sabbatum observantes non videbant quid illius diei significatio figuraret; sic et isti diversa quidem voluntate, pariter tamen non in telligunt sabbati sacramentum. Et illi enim carnaliter observando, et isti carnaliter exsecrando, sabbatum non noverunt. Transeat ergo unusquisque ad Chri stum ut auferatur velamen, sicut Apostolus dicit. Velamen enim aufertur, quando si militudinis et allegoriæ cooperimento ablato, veritas nudatur, ut possit videri. Primo ergo hnjus locutionis regula in multis divinarum Scripturarum locis animadvertenda atqne discenda est. Quid euim aliud significat, quod dici tur Deus requievisse ab omnibus operibus suis, quae fecit bona valde, nisi requiem nostram, quam nobis daturus est ab omnibus operibus nostris, si et nos bona opera fecerimus? Secundum ipsam figuram lo cutionis dicit ct Apostolus: Quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus; sed ipse Spiritus postulat pro nobis gemitibus inenarrabilibus. Non cnim Spiritus sanctus gemit, quasi indigeat aut angustias patiatur, qui secundum Deum interpellat pro sanctis: sed quia ipse nos movet ad orandum cum gemimus, qood ipso movente nos facimus, ipse facere dictus est. Sie dicitur etiam illud: Tentat vos Dominus Deus ne ster, ut sciat si diligitis eum ( Deut. XIII, 3). Non enim. ut sciat ipse quem nihil latet, sed ut scire nos faciat, quantum in ejus dilectione profecerimus, tentari nos permittit. Secundum ipsam locutionem dicit et Do minus noster, nescire se diem et horam de fine sae culi. Quid enim potest esse quod ille nesciat? Sed quia hoc utiliter occultabat discipu lis, nescientem se esse dixit, quia illos nescientes occultando faciebat. Secundum hanc figuram eliam Patrem solum dixit scire diem ipsum, quia eumdem Filium scire facerct. Ex hac figura multae quaestiones in divinis Scripturis, eis qui jam genus locutionis hujus noverunt, sine ulla difficultate solvuntur. Tali bus locutionibus etiam abundat nostra consuetudo, cum dicimus lætumdiem, quia nos lætos facit; et pi grum frigus, quia nos pigros facit; et fossam cæcam, quia nos eam non videmus; et linguam politam, quia verba polita facit: postremo etiam quietum ab omni bus molestiis tempus dicimus, in quo nos ab omnibus molestiis quieti sumus. Sed et Deus requievisse dictus est ab omnibus operibus suis, quae fecit bona valde, quia in illo requiescemus ab omnibus operibus no stris, si opera bona fecerimus: quia et ipsa bona opera nostra illi tribuenda sunt qui vocat, qui præ cipit, qui viam veritatis ostendit, qui ut et velimus invitat, et vires implendi ea quae imperat, submi nistrat.
Now let us also look at what they usually mock with more impudence than ignorance: what is written, that God, when heaven and earth and all that he made were finished, rested on the seventh day from all his works, and blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because he rested from his works. For they say: What need was there for God to rest? Was he perhaps tired and worn out by the works of six days? They also add the testimony of the Lord where he says, “My Father works until now”; and from this they deceive many unskilled people, whom they try to persuade that the New Testament is opposed to the Old. But just as those to whom the Lord said, “My Father works until now,” thought of God's rest in a carnal way, and, keeping the sabbath carnally, did not see what the meaning of that day prefigured; so these too, though with a different will, equally fail to understand the mystery of the sabbath. For the former by keeping it carnally, and the latter by cursing it carnally, did not know the sabbath. Let each one, then, pass over to Christ, so that the veil may be taken away, as the Apostle says. For the veil is taken away when the covering of likeness and allegory is removed and the truth is laid bare so that it can be seen. First, then, the rule of this way of speaking must be noticed and learned in many places of the divine Scriptures. For what else does it signify that God is said to have rested from all his works, which he made very good, except our rest, which he will give us from all our works, if we too have done good works? According to this same figure of speech the Apostle too says: “For we do not know what to pray for as we ought; but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with unutterable groanings.” For the Holy Spirit, who intercedes for the saints according to God, does not groan as though he were in need or suffered distress; but because he moves us to pray when we groan, what we do by his moving he is said to do. So too it is said: “The Lord your God tests you, to know whether you love him.” For he permits us to be tested not so that he may know, from whom nothing is hidden, but so that he may make us know how far we have advanced in love of him. According to this same way of speaking our Lord too says that he does not know the day and the hour of the end of the world. For what can there be that he does not know? But because he was usefully hiding this from his disciples, he said that he did not know, because by hiding it he made them not know. According to this figure he also said that only the Father knows that day, because he made the same Son know it. By this figure many questions in the divine Scriptures are solved without any difficulty for those who already know this kind of expression. Our ordinary usage too abounds in such expressions, when we say a glad day, because it makes us glad; and a sluggish cold, because it makes us sluggish; and a blind ditch, because we do not see it; and a polished tongue, because it makes polished words; and finally we call a time quiet from all troubles, in which we are quiet from all troubles. So too God is said to have rested from all his works, which he made very good, because in him we shall rest from all our works, if we have done good works; for even our good works themselves are to be ascribed to him who calls, who commands, who shows the way of truth, who invites us to will, and supplies the strength to fulfill what he commands.
Gen 2:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:3 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 13:32 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 24:36 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine answers the mockery of God's rest on the seventh day: by a common figure of speech God is said to rest because he will give rest to us after our good works, which are themselves his gift.
- Quotations: Gen 2:2–3; John 5:17; 2 Cor 3:16; Rom 8:26–27; Deut 13:3; Mark 13:32 (Matt 24:36). On the Manichaean claim that the New Testament contradicts the Old, and on the sabbath kept carnally by the Jews of Jesus' day, Augustine states his own view.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote marker in the digital text): discenda est 2. → discenda est..
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Gen. Man. 1.22 (PL 34:185; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-genesi-manichaeos/1-14/#p-1-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-genesi-manichaeos-1-22) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.