Tractates on the Gospel of John 63.1–66.2
Latin text: Migne, PL 35 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 7 (1888).
Chapter 63
63.1PL 35:1803
Intendamus mentis obtutum, et adjuvante Do mino, Deum requiramus. Divini cantici vox est, Quærite Deum,et vivet anima vestra. Quæramus inveniendum, quæramus inventum. Ut inveniendus quæratur, occultus est; ut inventus quæratur, immensus est. Unde alibi dicitur, Quærite faciem ejus semper. Satiat enim quæren tem in quantum capit; et invenientem capaciorem facit ut rursus quærat impleri, ubi plus capere cœperit. Non ergo ita dictum est, Quærite faciem ejus semper, quemadmodum de quibusdam. Semper discen tes, ct ad scientiam veritatis nunquam pervenientes; sed potius sicut ille ait, Cum consummaverit homo, tunc incipit: donec ad illam vitam veniamus, ubi sic impleamur, ut ca paciores non efficiamur, quia ita perfecti erimus, ut jam non proficiamus. Tunc cnim ostendetur nobis quod sufficit nobis. Hic autem semper quæramus, et fructus inventionis non sit finis inquisitionis. Neque enim propterea non semper, quia hic tantum; sed idco hic semper dicimus esse quærendum, ne ali quando hic putemus ab inquisitione cessandum. Nam et dc quibus dictum est, Semper discentes, et ad veri tatis scientiam nunquam pervenientes; hic sunt utique semper discentes; cum vero de hac vita exierint, jam non erunt discentes, sed, erroris sui mercedem reci pientes. Sic enim dictum est, Semper discentes, ct ad veritatis scientiam nunquam pervenientes; tamquam di ceretur, Semper ambulantes, et ad viam nunquam pervenientes. Nos autem semper ambulemus in via, donec eo veniamus quo ducit via; nusquam in ea re maneamus, donec perducat ubi maneamus: atque ita, et quærendo tendimus, ct inveniendo ad aliquid pervenimus, ct ad id quod restat quaerendo et inve niendo transimus, quo usquc ibi fiat finis quaerendi, ubi perfectioni non superest intentio proficiendi. Hæc prælocutio, dilectissimi, intentam fecerit Charitatem vestram ad istum Domini sermonem, quem ad disci pulos habuit ante passionem: profundus est enim, et utique ubi multum laboraturus est disputator, non re missus debet esse auditor.
Let us direct the gaze of the mind and, with the Lord's help, seek God. It is the voice of a divine song: "Seek God, and your soul shall live." Let us seek him in order to find him; let us seek him when he has been found. That he may be sought in order to be found, he is hidden; that he may be sought when he has been found, he is immeasurable. Hence it is said elsewhere: "Seek his face always." For he satisfies the seeker as far as he can take him in, and he makes the finder more capacious, so that he seeks again to be filled when he has begun to hold more. So it was not said, "Seek his face always," in the sense in which it was said of certain people, "always learning, and never arriving at the knowledge of the truth," but rather as that writer says: "When a man has finished, then he begins"; until we come to that life where we shall be so filled that we are made no more capacious, because we shall be so perfect that we no longer make progress. For then what suffices us will be shown to us. But here let us always seek, and let the fruit of finding not be the end of seeking. Nor is it any less "always" because it is only here; rather, we say that here one must always seek precisely so that we may never think that here we should stop seeking. For those too of whom it was said, "always learning, and never arriving at the knowledge of the truth," are certainly always learning here; but when they have departed this life they will no longer be learning, but receiving the reward of their error. For it was said, "always learning, and never arriving at the knowledge of the truth," as though it were said, "always walking, and never arriving at the road." But let us always walk on the road, until we come to where the road leads; let us nowhere stay on it, until it brings us where we may stay. And so by seeking we press on, and by finding we arrive at something, and by seeking and finding we pass on to what remains, until the end of seeking comes there where perfection has no further effort to make progress. May this preface, beloved, have made your Love attentive to this discourse of the Lord which he gave his disciples before his passion; for it is deep, and certainly where the expounder is going to labor much, the hearer ought not to be slack.
Ps 69:32 (68:33 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 105:4 (104:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:7 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God is sought both in order to be found and, once found, because he is immeasurable; so the seeking never ends in this life.
- Ps 69:32 (LXX 68:33), Ps 105:4 (LXX 104:4), and 2 Tim 3:7 are quoted. "When a man has finished, then he begins" is Sir 18:7 (18:6 in the Vulgate).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's inline Scripture reference (leaked); OCR slip; stray mark): ct adjuvante → et adjuvante; rcquiramus → requiramus; invenicndus → inveniendus; impleri I, → impleri,; crgo ita → ergo ita; dictum esl → dictum est; quemadmo lum → quemadmodum; potitis → potius; illc ait → ille ait; ( Eccli. XVIII, G ) → ; donce ad → donec ad; vitant veniamus → vitam veniamus; uon sil fluis → non sit finis; putcmus → putemus; Sic euim → Sic enim; teritatis → veritatis; donee co veniamus → donec eo veniamus; donee perducat → donec perducat; uhi perfectioni non'superest → ubi perfectioni non superest; Domiui sermonem → Domini sermonem; mullum laboraturus → multum laboraturus.
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 18:7 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 63.1 (PL 35:1803; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-63-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-63-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
63.2PL 35:1803–1805
Quid ergo ait Dominus posteaquam Judas exiit, ut citius faceret quod erat facturus, hoc est, Dominum traditurus? Quid ait dies, cum exisset nox? Quid ait Redemptor, cum exisset venditor? Nunc, inquit, cla rificatus est Filius hominis. Quare nunc? Numquid quia exiit qui tradat, quia imminent qui teneant et occidant? Itane nunc clarificatus eat, quia prope est ut humilietur amplius: cui jam impendet ut alligetur, ut judicetur, ut condemnetur, ut irrideatur, ut crucifigatur, ut interima tur? Hæceine est clarificatio, an potius humiliatio? Nonne quando miracula faciebat, attamen de illo iste Joannes, Spiritus non erat datus, quia Jesus nondum erat glorifica tus? Tunc ergo nondum erat glorificatus, cum mortuos suscitaret; et nunc est glorificatus, cum mortuis propinquaret? nondum erat glorilicatus faciens divina, et glorificatus est passurus humana? Mirum, si hoc Deus ille magister significabat et docebat his verbis. Altius est perscrutandum Altissimi dictum, qui se aliquantum manifestat ut inveniamus, et ile rum occultat ut inquiramus, et de inventis ad inve nicnda tanquam passibus innitamur. Video hic aliquid quod præfiguret magnum aliquid. Exiit Judas, et cla rificatus est Jesus; exiit filius perditionis, et clarifi catus est Filius hominis. Ille quippe exierat, propter quem dictum erat eis, Et vos mundi estis, sed non omnes. Exeunte itaque immundo. omnes mundi remanserunt, et cum suo mundatore manserunt. Tale aliquid erit cum victus a Christo transierit hic mundus, ct nemo in populo Christi remanebit immundus; cum zizaniis a tritico sepa ratis, justi fulgebunt sicut sol in regno Patris sui. Hoc futurum praevidens Dominus, et nunc significatum esse contestans, discedente Juda tanquam zizaniis separatis, remanentibus tanquam tritico Apostolis sanctis, Nunc, inquit, clarificatus est Filius hominis: tanquam diceret, Ecce in illa mca cla rificatione quod erit, ubi malorum nullus erit, ubi bonorum nullus perit. Sic autem non cst dictum, Nunc significata est clarificatio Filii hominis; sed dictum est, Nunc clarificatus est Filius hominis: quem admodum non est dictum, Petra significabat Chri stum; sed, Petra erat Christus. Nec di ctum est, Bonum semen signiflcabat filios regni, aut, zizania significabant filios maligni, sed dictum est, Bonum semen hi sunt filii regni; zizania autem, filii maligni. Sicut ergo solet loqui Scri plura, res significantes tanquam illas quae significan tur appellans; ita locutus est Dominus dicens, Nunc clarificatus est Filius hominis: posteaquam separato inde nequissimo, et secum remanentibus sanctis, si gnificata est glorificatio ejus, quando separatis iniquis manebit in æternitate cum sanctis.
What then does the Lord say after Judas went out to do more quickly what he was going to do, that is, to hand over the Lord? What does the day say when the night had gone out? What does the Redeemer say when the seller had gone out? "Now," he says, "the Son of Man is glorified." Why now? Is it because the one who would hand him over has gone out, because those who would seize and kill him are at hand? Is he now glorified because he is close to being humbled further, he who now faces being bound, judged, condemned, mocked, crucified, killed? Is this glorification, or rather humiliation? When he was working miracles, did not this same John nevertheless say of him: "The Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified"? Then he was not yet glorified when he raised the dead; and is he glorified now, when he is drawing near to death? He was not yet glorified when doing divine things, and is he glorified when about to suffer human things? It would be strange if God, that teacher, signified and taught this by these words. The saying of the Most High must be searched more deeply; he shows himself a little so that we may find him, and hides himself again so that we may search, and so that we may lean, step by step as it were, from what has been found toward what is yet to be found. I see here something that prefigures something great. Judas went out, and Jesus was glorified; the son of perdition went out, and the Son of Man was glorified. For he had gone out on whose account it had been said to them, "And you are clean, but not all." So when the unclean one went out, all the clean remained, and remained with their cleanser. Something like this will happen when this world, conquered by Christ, has passed away, and no one unclean will remain among Christ's people; when, the weeds having been separated from the wheat, "the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father." The Lord, foreseeing that this would be, and testifying that it was now signified, with Judas departing like weeds separated off and the holy apostles remaining like wheat, said, "Now the Son of Man is glorified," as if he said: See what there will be in that glorification of mine, where none of the evil will be, and none of the good will perish. Yet it was not said, "Now the glorification of the Son of Man is signified," but "Now the Son of Man is glorified"; just as it was not said, "The rock signified Christ," but "The rock was Christ." Nor was it said, "The good seed signified the sons of the kingdom," or "The weeds signified the sons of the evil one," but "The good seed, these are the sons of the kingdom; the weeds are the sons of the evil one." Just as Scripture is accustomed to speak, then, calling the things that signify by the names of the things they signify, so the Lord spoke when he said, "Now the Son of Man is glorified": once the most wicked one had been separated from there and the holy ones remained with him, his glorification was signified, when, the wicked having been separated, he will remain in eternity with the holy ones.
John 13:31 (quotation, high confidence) · John 7:39 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 13:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:43 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:38 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Judas's departure, leaving only the clean with Christ, prefigures Christ's glorification when the wicked will be separated from the righteous.
- John 13:31, 7:39, 13:10, Matt 13:43, 1 Cor 10:4, and Matt 13:38 are quoted; "son of perdition" is from John 17:12.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (joined words)): facturns → facturus; cxisset nox Quid → exisset nox? Quid; imminentqui → imminent qui; occident? → occidant?; humilielur → humilietur; anpotius → an potius; eratdatus → erat datus; eratglorificatus → erat glorificatus; glorilicatns → glorificatus; facient divina → faciens divina; innitainur → innitamur; pecrditionis → perditionis; qucm dictum → quem dictum; Excunte → Exeunte; cnm suo mundalore → cum suo mundatore; transicrit → transierit; nenio → nemo; rcmancbil → remanebit; scparalis → separatis; bouorum nullUs → bonorum nullus; era! Christus → erat Christus; filius maligni → filios maligni; sat Filius → est Filius.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 63.2 (PL 35:1803–1805; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-63-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-63-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
63.3PL 35:1805
Cum autem dixisset, Nunc clarificatus est Filius hominis, adjunxit, Et Deus clarificatus est in eo. Ipsa est enim clarificatio Filii hominis, ut Deus clarifice tur in eo. Si enim non ipse in scipso, sed Deus in illo clarificatur, tunc illum Deus in se clarificat. De nique tanquam ista exponens, adjungit, et dicit: Si Deus clarificatus est in eo, et Deus clarificabit eum in semetipso. Hoc est, Si Deus clarificatus est in eo, quia non venit facere voluntatem suam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit illum; et Deus clarificabit eum in semet ipso, ut natura humana in qua est filius hominis, quae a Verbo æterno suscepta est, etiam immortali æter nitate donetur. Et continuo, inquit, clarificabit eum. Resurrectionem scilicet suam, non sicut nostram in fine sæculi, sed continuo futuram hac attestatione prædicens. Ipsa est enim clarificatio, de qua Evan gelista jam dixerat, quod paulo ante commemoravi, quia propterea nondum Spiritus datus erat illo novo modo in eis, quibus fuerat eo modo post resurre ctionem credentibus dandus, quia Jesus nondum Cuc rat clarificatus: id est, nondum fuerat mortalitas im mortalitate vestita, et in æternam virtutem temporalis infirmitas commutata. Potest et de ista clarificatione dictum videri, Nunc clarificatus est Filius hominis; ut quod ait nunc, non ad imminentem passionem, sed ad vicinam resurrectionem pertinere credatur, tan quam fuerit factum quod erat tam proxime jam futu rum. Hodie Dilectioni vestrae ista suffecerint; cum donaverit Dominus, de consequentibus disseremus.
But when he had said, "Now the Son of Man is glorified," he added, "And God is glorified in him." For this itself is the glorification of the Son of Man, that God be glorified in him. For if he is not glorified in himself, but God is glorified in him, then God glorifies him in himself. Finally, as if explaining these things, he adds and says: "If God is glorified in him, God will also glorify him in himself." That is: "If God is glorified in him," because he came not to do his own will but the will of him who sent him, "God will also glorify him in himself," so that the human nature in which he is the Son of Man, which was taken up by the eternal Word, may also be endowed with immortal eternity. "And at once," he says, "he will glorify him": by this declaration foretelling his resurrection, which would come not, like ours, at the end of the age, but at once. For this is the glorification of which the evangelist had already said, as I mentioned a little before, that the Spirit had not yet been given in that new way to those to whom he was to be given in that way when they believed after the resurrection, because Jesus was not yet glorified: that is, mortality had not yet been clothed with immortality, and temporal weakness changed into eternal power. It may also seem that "Now the Son of Man is glorified" was said of this glorification, so that his "now" is believed to refer not to the impending passion but to the near resurrection, as though what was now so close at hand had already been done. Let this suffice for your Love today; when the Lord grants it, we will discuss what follows.
John 13:31 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:32 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:38 (allusion, high confidence) · John 7:39 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God glorifies the Son of Man in himself by raising the human nature assumed by the Word to immortality at once in the resurrection.
- John 13:31–32 is quoted; John 6:38, 7:39, and 1 Cor 15:53–54 are in view.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray mark): adjungi!, → adjungit,; Si Deus clarificatus eat in eo → Si Deus clarificatus est in eo; iacere voluntatem → facere voluntatem; donelur → donetur; nou sicut → non sicut; commutata I. → commutata.; Nunc clarificatus eat Filius → Nunc clarificatus est Filius.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 63.3 (PL 35:1805; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-63-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-63-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
Chapter 64
64.1PL 35:1805
Advertenda est, charissimi, dominicorum vcf borum ordinata connexio. Cum enim superius dixis set, posteaquam Judas egressus est, et ab illa san ctorum etiam corporali conversatione sejunctus est, Nunc clarificatus est Filius hominis, et Deus clarifica tus est in eo: quod sive futurum regnum significans dixit, quando mali separabuntur a bonis, sive quod ejus resurrectio tunc futura esset, id est, differenda non esset, sicut in finem sæculi nostra differtur: ac deinde addidisset, Si Deus clarificatus eat in eo, et Deus clarificabit eum in semetipso, et continuo clarificabit eum, quod sine ulla ambiguitate de sua resur. rectione continuo futura testatus est: adjecit, atque ait, Filioli, adhuc modicum vobiscum sum. Ne puta. rent ergo quod sic eum clarificaturus esset Deus, ut non eis conjungeretur ulterius ea conversatione qua in terra est; Adhuc modicum, inquit, vobiscum sum: tanquam diceret, Continuo quidem resurrectione cla rificabor; non tamen continuo ascensurus in cœlum, sed adhuc modicum vobiscum sum. Sicut enim scriptum est in Actibus Apostolorum, fecit cum eis post resur. rectionem quadraginta dies intrans et exiens, man ducans et bibens: non quidcm habens esuriendi ac sitiendi egestatem, sed usque ad isti carnis insinuans veritatem, quæ cibandi ac potandi jam non habebat necessitatem, sed potestatem. Hos ergo quadraginta dies significavit dicendo, Adhuc modicum vobiscum sum, an aliquid aliud? Potest enim et sic intelligi, Adhuc modicum vobiscum sum, Adhuc, sicut vos, in hac infirmitate carnis etiam ipse sum, donec scilicet moreretur atque resurgeret: quia post eaquam resurrexit, cum illis quidem fuit diebus, ut dictum est, quadraginta exhibitione corporalis prarsentiae; sed non cum illis fuit consortio infirmi tatis humanæ.
We must notice, beloved, the ordered connection of the Lord's words. For when he had said above, after Judas had gone out and been separated even from that bodily fellowship with the saints, "Now the Son of Man is glorified, and God is glorified in him" (whether he said this signifying the future kingdom, when the evil will be separated from the good, or because his resurrection was then about to take place, that is, would not be deferred, as ours is deferred to the end of the age), and had then added, "If God is glorified in him, God will also glorify him in himself, and will glorify him at once," by which he testified without any ambiguity to his resurrection that was to come at once, he went on and said: "Little children, yet a little while I am with you." So that they would not think, then, that God would glorify him in such a way that he would never again be joined to them in the kind of fellowship there is on earth, he says, "Yet a little while I am with you," as if he said: I shall indeed be glorified at once by resurrection, yet I shall not at once ascend into heaven, but yet a little while I am with you. For as it is written in the Acts of the Apostles, after the resurrection he spent forty days with them, going in and out, eating and drinking: not indeed having the need of hunger and thirst, but by these very things intimating the reality of the flesh, which no longer had the necessity of eating and drinking, but the power. Did he then signify these forty days by saying, "Yet a little while I am with you," or something else? For it can also be understood in this way: "Yet a little while I am with you" means, I too am still, like you, in this weakness of the flesh, that is, until he should die and rise again; because after he rose, he was indeed with them for forty days, as has been said, by the display of bodily presence, but he was not with them in the sharing of human weakness.
John 13:31 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:32 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 1:21 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 10:41 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: "Yet a little while I am with you" may mean either the forty days after the resurrection or his time in mortal weakness before the passion.
- John 13:31–33 is quoted; Acts 1:3, 1:21, and 10:41 are in view.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Cum cin superius → Cum enim superius; ei ab illa → et ab illa; sejunetus → sejunctus; sinem sacculi → finem sæculi; clarificabi, eum → clarificabit eum; qaod sic cum → quod sic eum; non cis conjungeretur → non eis conjungeretur; ulterius ca conversatione → ulterius ea conversatione; in terra cst; → in terra est;; Continuo quidcm → Continuo quidem; siticndi → sitiendi; vcritatem → veritatem; nccessitatem → necessitatem; carRis → carnis; dicbus → diebus; cxhibitione → exhibitione.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 64.1 (PL 35:1805; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-64-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-64-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
64.2PL 35:1805–1807
Est et alia divina præsentia sensibus ignota mortalibus, de qua item dicit: Ecce ego vobiscum sum usque ad consummationem sæculi. Hoc certe non est, Adhuc modicum vobiscum sum: non enim modicum est usque ad consumma tionem saeculi. Aut si et hoc modicum est (volat enim ætas, et in oculis Dei mille anni sicut dies unus, aut sicut vigilia in nocte, non tamen hoc significare voluisse credendus est nunc, quandoqui dem secutus adjunxit, Quæretis me, et sicut dixi Ju dæis, quo ego vado, vos non potestis venire. Utique post hoc modicum quo vobiscum sum, Quæretis me, et quo ego vado, vos non potestis venire. Numquid post consummationem sæculi, quo ipse vadit, venire non poterunt? Et ubi est quod aliquanto post in hoc ipso sermone dicturus est: Pater, volo ut ubi ego sum, et ipsi sint mecum? Non ergo de illa sua cum suis præsentia, qua cum illis est usque ad consummationem sæculi, nunc locutus est, ubi ait, Adhuc modicum vobiscum sum: sed vel de infirmitate mortali, qua cum illis erat usque ad pas. sionem suam; aut de præsentia corporali, qua cum illis futurus erat usque ad ascensionem suam. Quodlibet horum quis eligat, cum fide non litigat.
There is also another divine presence, unknown to mortal senses, of which he likewise says: "Behold, I am with you until the end of the age." This certainly is not "Yet a little while I am with you"; for until the end of the age is not a little while. Or if this too is a little while (for time flies, and "in the eyes of God a thousand years are as one day," or "as a watch in the night"), still he must not be believed to have meant this now, since he went on to add: "You will seek me, and as I said to the Jews, Where I am going you cannot come." Certainly after this little while in which I am with you, "you will seek me, and where I am going you cannot come." Will they be unable, after the end of the age, to come where he is going? And where then is what he will say a little later in this same discourse: "Father, I will that where I am, they also may be with me"? So it was not of that presence of his with his own, by which he is with them until the end of the age, that he now spoke when he said, "Yet a little while I am with you," but either of the mortal weakness in which he was with them until his passion, or of the bodily presence in which he was going to be with them until his ascension. Whichever of these one chooses, he is not at odds with the faith.
Matt 28:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 90:4 (89:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Pet 3:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 13:33 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:24 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The "little while" is not Christ's abiding presence to the end of the age but his mortal life or his bodily presence before the ascension.
- Matt 28:20, Ps 90:4 (LXX 89:4; cf. 2 Pet 3:8), John 13:33, and John 17:24 are quoted.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): ant sicut vigilia → aut sicut vigilia; non tarnen → non tamen; scculus adjunxit → secutus adjunxit; Quæretis met et → Quæretis me, et; modiculn → modicum; vcuire → venire; hoe ipso → hoc ipso; uhi ait → ubi ait; cuin illis crat → cum illis erat; ant de præsentia → aut de præsentia; rum illis futurus crat → cum illis futurus erat; cum fitlc non → cum fide non.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 64.2 (PL 35:1805–1807; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-64-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-64-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
64.3PL 35:1807
Ne cui autem videatur abhorrere iste sensus a vero, quo dicimus Dominum mortalis carnis commu nionem, in qua cum discipulis usque ad passionem fuit, significare potuisse dicendo, Adhuc modicum vo biscum sum; apud alium quoque evangelistam post resurrectionem verba ejus attendat, ubi ait, Hœc lo cutus sum vobis, cum adhuc essem vobiscum: quasi tunc non erat cum ipsis simul assistenti bus, videntibus, tangentibus, colloquentibus. Quid est ergo, cum adhuc essem vobiscum, nisi, cum adhuc essem in carne mortali, in qua estis et vos? Tunc enim quidem in eadem carne resuscitatas erat; sed cum illis in eadem mortalitate jam non erat. Qua propter sicut ibi jam immortalitate carnis indutusve raciter ait, cum adhuc essem vobiscum; ubi nihil aliud intelligere possumus, nisi, cum adhuc essem in carnis mortalitate vobiscum: ita et hic non absurde dixisse intelligitur, Adhuc modicum vobiscum sum, tanquam diceret, adhuc modicum sicut vos estis, mortalis sum ego. Ergo sequentia videamus.
But lest this sense seem to anyone foreign to the truth, the sense in which we say that the Lord could have signified by "Yet a little while I am with you" his sharing of mortal flesh, in which he was with the disciples until the passion, let him attend to his words after the resurrection in another evangelist, where he says: "These things I spoke to you while I was still with you," as if he were not then with them while they stood with him, saw him, touched him, and talked with him. What then is "while I was still with you," except "while I was still in mortal flesh, in which you also are"? For then he had indeed been raised in the same flesh, but he was no longer with them in the same mortality. Therefore, just as there, already clothed with the immortality of the flesh, he says truly, "while I was still with you," where we can understand nothing else than "while I was still with you in the mortality of the flesh," so here too he is not absurdly understood to have said, "Yet a little while I am with you," as if he said: Yet a little while I am mortal, as you are. So let us look at what follows.
Luke 24:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:33 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Luke 24:44 shows that "with you" can mean sharing their mortality, which supports that reading of "Yet a little while I am with you."
- Luke 24:44 is quoted.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): aulcm → autem; a 'cro → a vero; cjus attendat → ejus attendat; non crat cum → non erat cum; colloqucnlibus → colloquentibus; Quid csi ergo → Quid est ergo; Tunc cnim quidem in cadem → Tunc enim quidem in eadem; in cadem mortalitate → in eadem mortalitate; iutelligere → intelligere; Ergo scquentia → Ergo sequentia.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 64.3 (PL 35:1807; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-64-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-64-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
64.4PL 35:1807
Quœretis me, et sicut dixi Judœis, quo ego vado, vos non potestis venire, et vobis dico modo. Hoc est, modo non potestis Judæis autem cum hoc diceret, non addidit modo. Isti itaque venire non poterant tunc quo ille ibat, sed poterant postea: nam hoc apostolo Petro apertissime paulo post ait. Cum enim dixisset ille, Domine, quo vadis? respondit ei, Quo ego vado, non potes me modo sequi; sequeris autem postea. Sed hoc quid sit, non negligenter est præ tereundum. Quo enim sequi tunc non poterant disci puli Dominum, sed postea poterant? Si dixerimus ad mortem: homini nato quod invenitur tempus, quo ad moriendum non sit idoneus; quandoquidem talis est in corpore corruptibili hominum sors, ut non sit in ea facilior vita quam mors? Non igitur adhuc mi nus idonei erant sequi Dominum ad mortem, sed minus idonei erant sequi Dominum ad vitam quæ non habet mortem. Illo quippe ibat Dominus, ut surgens a mortuis jam non moreretur, et mors ei ultra non dominaretur. Moriturum quippe Domi num pro justitia quomodo jam fucrant secuturi, adhuc martyrio non maturi? Aut iturum Dominum ad immortalitatem carnis, quomodo jam fuerant se cUturi, quandolibet morituri, sed in sæculi fine resur tecturi? Aut iturum Dominum ad sinum Patris, nec re licturum eos, unde nec recessit cum venisset ad eos, quomodo jam fuerant secuturi; cum esse nemo pos sit in illa felicitate nisi perfectus in charitate? Ideoque docens quomodo idonei esse possint pergere quo ille antecedebat, Mandatum, inquit, novum do vobis, ut diligatis invicem. Hi sunt gressus qui bus sequendus est Christus: sed de his sermo uberior in aliud tempus est differendus.
"You will seek me, and as I said to the Jews, Where I am going you cannot come, so I say to you now." That is, now you cannot. But when he said this to the Jews, he did not add "now." These, then, could not come at that time where he was going, but they could later; for he says this most plainly a little later to the apostle Peter. For when Peter said, "Lord, where are you going?" he answered him, "Where I am going you cannot follow me now; but you will follow later." But what this means must not be passed over carelessly. For where was it that the disciples could not follow the Lord then, but could later? If we say "to death": what time can be found for a human being once born at which he is not fit to die, since such is the lot of human beings in a corruptible body that life in it is not easier than death? So they were not yet less fit to follow the Lord to death; but they were less fit to follow the Lord to the life that has no death. For that is where the Lord was going, so that, rising from the dead, he would no longer die, and death would no longer have dominion over him. For how could they already have followed the Lord who was about to die for righteousness, when they were not yet ripe for martyrdom? Or how could they already have followed the Lord who was going to the immortality of the flesh, when they would die at some time or other but rise only at the end of the age? Or how could they already have followed the Lord who was going to the bosom of the Father, and yet not leaving them, just as he had not withdrawn from there when he came to them, since no one can be in that happiness except one who is perfect in love? And so, teaching how they could become fit to go where he was going ahead of them, he says: "A new commandment I give you, that you love one another." These are the steps by which Christ must be followed; but a fuller discourse on them must be put off to another time.
John 13:33 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 6:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:34 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The disciples could not yet follow Christ to the deathless life; the new commandment of love is the way by which they would follow him later.
- John 13:33, 13:36, 13:34 and Rom 6:9 are quoted.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (joined words)): nox addidit modo → non addidit modo; veniro non polcrant → venire non poterant; dixisset illc → dixisset ille; negligenter cst → negligenter est; liabct → habet; Autiturum → Aut iturum; adsinum → ad sinum; uude nec → unde nec; vcnisset → venisset; idonci → idonei; IIi suut → Hi sunt.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 64.4 (PL 35:1807; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-64-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-64-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
Chapter 65
65.1PL 35:1807–1809
Dominus Jesus mandatum novum se discipulis suis dare testatur, ut diligant invicem: Mandatum, inquit, novum do vobis, ut diligatis invicem. Nonne jam erat hoc mandatum in antiqua Dei lege, ubi scri ptum est, Diliges proximum tuum tanquam teipsum? Cur ergo novum appellatur a Domino, quod tam vetus esse convincitur? An ideo est manda lum novum, quia exuto vetere induit nos hominem novum? Innovat quippe audientem, vel potius obe dientem, non omnis, sed ista dilectio quam Dominus ut a carnali dilectione distingueret, addidit, sicut di lexi vos. Nam diligunt invicem mariti et uxores, pa rentes et filii, et quæcumque alia inter se homines necessitudo humana devinxerit: ut taceamus dc di lectione culpabili atque damnabili, qua diligunt invi cem adulteri et adulterae, scortatores et meretrices, et quoscumque alios non humana necessitudo, sed humanae vitae noxia turpitudo conjungit. Mandatum ergo novum dedit nobis Christus, ut diligamus invi cem, sicut et ipse dilexit nos. Dilectio ista nos inno vat, ut simus homines novi, hæredes Testamenti Novi, cantatores cantici novi. Hæc dilectio, fratres charissimi, antiquos etiam tunc justos, tunc Patriar chas et Prophetas, sicut postea beatos Apostolos in novavit: Ipsa et nunc innovat gentes, et ex universo genere humano quod diffunditur toto orbe terrarum, facit et colligit populum novum, corpus novæ nuptæ Filii Dei unigeniti sponsæ, de qua dicitur in Cantico canticorum, Quæ est ista quæ ascendit dealbata? utique dealbata, quia innovata; unde nisi mandato novo? Propter quod pro invicem sollicita sunt membra in ea; et si patitur unum mem brum, compatiuntur omnia membra, et si glorifica tur unum membrum, congaudent omnia membra. Audiunt enim, atque custodiunt, Mandatum novum do vobis, ut vos invicem diligatis: non sicut se diligunt qui corrumpunt, nec sicut se diligunt homincs, quoniam homines sunt; sed sicut se diligunt, quoniam dii sunt et filii Altissimi omnes, ut sint Filio ejus unico fratres, ea dilectione invicem diligentes, qua ipse dilexit eos, perducturus eos ad illum finem qui sufficiat eis, ubi satietur in bonis de sidorium eorum. Tunc enim aliquid de siderio non deerit, quando omnia in omnibus Deus erit. Talis finis non habet finem. Nemo ibi moritur, quo nemo pervenit, nisi huic sacculo nro riatur, non morte omnium, qua corpus ab anima de. seritur; sed morte electorum, qua etiam cum in carne mortali adhuc manetur, cor sursum ponitur. De quali morte dicebat Apostolus, Mortui enim estis, et vita vestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo. Hinc fortasse dictum est, Valida est sicut mors di lectio. Hac enim dilectione fit ut in isto adhuc corruptibili corpore constituti moriamur huic sæculo, et vita nostra abscondatur cum Christo in Deo; imo ipsa dilectio est mors nostra sæculo, et vita cum Deo. Si enim mors est quando de corpore anima exit, quomodo non est mors quando de mundo amor noster exit? Valida est ergo sicut mors dilectio. Quid ea validius, qua vincitur mundus?
The Lord Jesus declares that he gives his disciples a new commandment, that they love one another: "A new commandment," he says, "I give you, that you love one another." Was this commandment not already in the ancient law of God, where it is written, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself"? Why then is it called new by the Lord, when it is shown to be so old? Or is it a new commandment because, having stripped off the old man, he has clothed us with the new? For what renews the one who hears, or rather obeys, is not every love, but this love, which the Lord, to distinguish it from fleshly love, qualified by adding, "as I have loved you." For husbands and wives love one another, parents and children, and all whom any other human tie has bound together; to say nothing of the blameworthy and damnable love with which adulterers and adulteresses, fornicators and prostitutes love one another, and any others whom not a human tie but the harmful shamefulness of human life joins together. So Christ gave us a new commandment, that we love one another as he too loved us. This love renews us, so that we are new men, heirs of the New Testament, singers of the new song. This love, dearest brothers, renewed even the righteous of old, the patriarchs and prophets of that time, as afterward the blessed apostles; it is this that now renews the nations, and from the whole human race spread over the whole world it makes and gathers a new people, the body of the new bride, the spouse of the only-begotten Son of God, of whom it is said in the Song of Songs, "Who is this who comes up made white?" Made white indeed, because renewed; and by what, if not by the new commandment? Therefore the members in her are concerned for one another; and "if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it; and if one member is glorified, all the members rejoice with it." For they hear and keep "A new commandment I give you, that you love one another": not as those love one another who corrupt each other, nor as men love one another because they are men, but as they love one another because they are all gods and sons of the Most High, so that they may be brothers to his only Son, loving one another with the love with which he loved them, he who will lead them to that end which will suffice them, where their desire will be satisfied with good things. For then nothing will be lacking to desire, when God will be all in all. Such an end has no end. No one dies there, where no one arrives unless he dies to this world: not by the death of all, by which the body is abandoned by the soul, but by the death of the elect, by which, while one still remains in mortal flesh, the heart is set on high. Of such a death the Apostle said: "For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God." Perhaps this is why it was said, "Love is strong as death." For by this love it comes about that, while still placed in this corruptible body, we die to this world and our life is hidden with Christ in God; indeed, this love itself is our death to the world and our life with God. For if it is death when the soul goes out of the body, how is it not death when our love goes out of the world? Love, then, is strong as death. What is stronger than that by which the world is conquered?
John 13:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 19:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Col 3:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 96:1 (95:1 LXX) (echo, low confidence) · Song 8:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 82:6 (81:6 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 103:5 (102:5 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Song 8:6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The commandment of love is new because Christ's love, unlike natural or sinful love, renews us and makes us die to the world.
- John 13:34, Lev 19:18, Song 8:5 (Old Latin "made white"), 1 Cor 12:26, Col 3:3, and Song 8:6 are quoted; Col 3:9–10, Ps 96:1, Ps 82:6, Ps 103:5, and 1 Cor 15:28 are echoed. Qua vincitur mundus may also be read "by which the world is bound".
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Nonno jao erat hoc mandatum in antiqua Bet lege → Nonne jam erat hoc mandatum in antiqua Dei lege; vctus esse → vetus esse; exuto vctere → exuto vetere; vcl potius → vel potius; mariti ct uxores → mariti et uxores; homincs necessitudo → homines necessitudo; hxredes Testamcnii → hæredes Testamenti; Hac dilectio, fratres → Hæc dilectio, fratres; nee sicut → nec sicut; Allissimi → Altissimi; Filio cjus → Filio ejus; perducturus cos → perducturus eos; uhi salietur → ubi satietur; Tunc cnim → Tunc enim; Dcus erit → Deus erit; qdo nemo → quo nemo; mOrte → morte; abscondita eat → abscondita est; Mine fortasse → Hinc fortasse; cam Christo in Deo imo → cum Christo in Deo; imo; dilectio cst mors → dilectio est mors; nvors est → mors est; anma exit → anima exit; djleclia Quid → dilectio. Quid.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 65.1 (PL 35:1807–1809; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-65-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-65-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
65.2PL 35:1809
Nolite itaque, fratres mei, putare in hoc quod ait Dominus, Mandatum novum do vobis, ut vos invi cem diligatis, illud majus praetermissum esse manda tum, quo præcipitur ut diligamus Dominum Deum. nostrum ex toto corde, ex tota anima, et ex tota mente: tanquam enim hoc prætermisso videtur di ctum, ut diligatis invicem, velut hoc ad illud alterum non pertineat, quo dictum est, Diliges proximum tuum tanquam teipsum. In his enim duobus præceptis, inquit, tota Lex pendet, et Prophetæ. Sed bene intelligentibus utrumque invenitur in singulis. Nam et qui diligit Deum, non eum potest contemnere praecipientem ut diligat proximum; et qui sancte ac spiritualiter diligit proximum, quid in eo diligit nisi Deum? Ipsa est dilectio ab omni mun dana dilectione discreta, quam distinguendo addidit Dominus, sicut dilexi vos. Quid enim nisi Deum di lexit in nobis? Non quod habebamus, sed ut habere mus: ut perducat nos, sicut paulo ante dixi, ubi sit Deus omnia in omnibus. Sic etiam medicus recte dici. tur aegros diligere: et quid in eis nisi salutem diligit, quam cupit utique revocare, non morbum, quem ve nit expellere? Sic ergo et nos invicem diligamus, ut quantum possumus, invicem ad habendum in nobis Deum cura dilectionis attrahamus. Hanc dilectionem nobis donat ipse qui ait, Sicut dilexi vos, ut et vos diligatis invicem. Ad hoc ergo nos dilexit, ut et nos diligamus invicem; hoc nobis conferens diligendo nos, ut mutua dilectione constringamur inter nos, et tam dulci vinculo connexis membris corpus tanti ca piti simus.
So do not think, my brothers, that in the Lord's saying, "A new commandment I give you, that you love one another," that greater commandment has been passed over by which we are commanded to love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, and with all our mind. For with this apparently passed over, "that you love one another" seems to have been said as if it did not even belong to that other commandment, in which it was said, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." "On these two commandments," he says, "hang the whole Law and the Prophets." But for those who understand rightly, both are found in each. For he who loves God cannot despise him when he commands him to love his neighbor; and he who loves his neighbor in a holy and spiritual way, what does he love in him but God? This is the love set apart from all worldly love, which the Lord, to distinguish it, qualified by adding, "as I have loved you." For what did he love in us but God? Not that we had him, but that we might have him: that he might lead us, as I said a little before, to where God is all in all. So too a doctor is rightly said to love the sick: and what does he love in them but health, which he certainly desires to restore, not the disease, which he came to drive out? So let us also love one another in such a way that, as far as we can, we draw one another by the care of love to have God in us. This love is given to us by him who says, "As I have loved you, that you also love one another." For this, then, he loved us, that we also might love one another; granting us this by loving us, that we might be bound together by mutual love and, our members joined by so sweet a bond, be the body of so great a head.
John 13:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:37 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 6:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Lev 19:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:40 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Love of God and love of neighbor contain each other, for to love one's neighbor rightly is to love God in him.
- John 13:34, Lev 19:18, and Matt 22:40 are quoted; Matt 22:37 (Deut 6:5) and 1 Cor 15:28 are in view.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Mandutum → Mandatum; iota anima → tota anima; eniin → enim; vidctur → videtur; alterunl HoR pertincat → alterum non pertineat; proximum mum → proximum tuum; euim duobus → enim duobus; diligit Dcum, non cum potest → diligit Deum, non eum potest; dislingucndo → distinguendo; habcbamus → habebamus; quaro cupit → quam cupit; polis donat → nobis donat; diligalis → diligatis; inter uos → inter nos; lam dulci → tam dulci.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 65.2 (PL 35:1809; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-65-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-65-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
65.3PL 35:1809
Jn hoc cognoscent, inquit, omnes quia mei disci puli estis, si dilectionem habueritis in invicem: tanquam diceret, Alia munera mea habent vobiscum etiam non mei, non solum naturam, vitam, sensum, rationem, et eam salutem quæ hominibus pecoribusque commu, nis est; verum etiam linguas, Sacramenta, prophe tiam, scientiam, fidem, distributionem rerum sna rum pauperibus, et traditionem corporis sui ut ar deant: sed quoniam charitatem non habent, ut cym bala concrepantia, nihil sunt, nihil illis prodest. Non ergo in illis quamvis bonis muneribus meis, quæ habere possunt etiam non discipuli mei; sed in hoc cognoscent omnes quia mei discipuli estis, si dilectionem habueritis in invicem. O sponsa Christi put chra inter mulieres! o dealbata ascendens, et incum bens super fratruelem tuum! quoniam cujus lumine illustraris ut candeas, ejus adjutorio fulciris ne cadas: o quam bene cantatur tibi in illo Cantico canticorum velut epithalamio tuo, Quia charitas in deliciis tuis! Ipsa non comperdit cum impiis animam tuam; ipsa discernit causam tuam, et sicut mors valida est, et in deliciis tuis est. Quam mi randi generis mors est, cui parum fuit non esse in poenis, nisi esset insuper in deliciis! Sed hic jam iste sermo claudatur: ab alio exordio tractanda sunt quæ sequuntur.
"By this," he says, "all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." As if he said: Others who are not mine have my other gifts along with you, not only nature, life, sense, reason, and that well-being which is common to humans and beasts, but also tongues, sacraments, prophecy, knowledge, faith, the distribution of their goods to the poor, and the handing over of their body to be burned; but because they do not have love, they are like clanging cymbals, they are nothing, it profits them nothing. So it is not by those gifts of mine, good as they are, which even those who are not my disciples can have, but "by this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." O bride of Christ, fair among women! O you who come up made white, leaning upon your kinsman! For by his light you are lit so that you shine white; by his help you are propped up so that you do not fall. O how well it is sung to you in that Song of Songs, as in your wedding song, "For love is in your delights"! It is this that does not let your soul perish with the ungodly; it is this that judges your cause, and it is strong as death, and it is in your delights. What a wonderful kind of death it is, for which it was too little not to be in punishments, unless it were in delights besides! But let this sermon now be closed here; what follows must be treated from another beginning.
John 13:35 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:2 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Song 1:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Song 8:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Song 7:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 26:9 (25:9 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 43:1 (42:1 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Song 8:6 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Love, not other gifts that outsiders may share, is the mark of Christ's disciples and the delight of his bride the church.
- John 13:35 is quoted; 1 Cor 13:1–3 is paraphrased. The bride texts are Song 1:8, Song 8:5 (Old Latin "leaning upon her kinsman"), and Song 7:6 (Vulgate "love in delights"); Ps 26:9 (LXX 25:9), Ps 43:1 (LXX 42:1), and Song 8:6 are echoed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): nou solum → non solum; vcrum etiam → verum etiam; concrepaui → concrepantia; possuut → possunt; fralruelcm → fratruelem; quoniain → quoniam; libi in → tibi in; vclut → velut; comperdiL → comperdit; paruo fuit uon → parum fuit non; insupcr → insuper; elaudatur → claudatur; ab aio exordio tractanda suart → ab alio exordio tractanda sunt.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 65.3 (PL 35:1809; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-65-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-65-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
Chapter 66
66.1PL 35:1809
Cum Dominus Jesus sanctam dilectioncm qua se invicem diligerent, discipulis commendaret, Dicit ei Simon Petrus: Domine, quo vadis? Sic utique hoc dixit Magistro discipulus, et Domino servus, tanquam sequi paratus. Propterea quippe Dominus, qui ejus animum vidit quare hoc interrogaverit, sic ei re spondit: Quo ego vado, non potes me modo sequi: tanquam diceret, Propter quod interrogas, non potes modo. Non ait, non potes; sed non potes modo: di - lationem intulit, non spem tulit; et eamdem spem quam non tulit, sed potius dedit, sequenti voce fir mavit, addendo atque dicendo, Sequeris autem postea. Quid festinas, Petre? Nondum suo spiritu solidavit petra. Noli extolli praesumendo, non potes modo: noli dejici desperando, sequeris postea. Sed adhuc ille quid dicit? Quare te non possum sequi modo? Animam meam pro te ponam. Quid in animo ejus esset cupiditatis, videbat; quid virium, non videbat. Voluntatem suam jactabat infirmus, sed inspiciebat valetudinem mcdi cus; iste promittebat, ille prænoscebat: qui nescie bat, audebat; qui præsciebat, docebat. Quantum sibi assumpserat Petrus intuendo quid vellet, ignorando quid posset? quantum sibi assumpserat, ut cum vc nisset Dominus animam suam ponere pro amicis suis, ac per hoc et pro ipso, ille hoc Domino offerre con- Meret: et nondum pro se posita anima Christi, ani mam suam polliceretur se positurum esse pro Christo? Respondit ergo Jesus, Animam tuam pro me pones? Itane facies pro me, quod nondum ego pro te? Ani mam tuum pro me pones? Præire potes, qui sequi non potes? Quid tantum præsumis? quid de te sentis? quid esse te credis? Audi quid sis: Amen, amen dico tibi; non cantabit gallus, donec ter me neges. Ecce quomodo tibi cito apparebis, qui magna loqueris, et te parvulum nescis. Qui mihi promittis mortem tuam, ter negabis vitam tuam. Qui te jam putas mori posse pro me, prius vive pro te: nam timendo mortem carnis tuæ, mortem dabis animæ tuæ. Quanta enim vita est confiteri Christum, tanta mors est negare Christum.
When the Lord Jesus was commending to his disciples the holy love with which they should love one another, "Simon Peter said to him: Lord, where are you going?" He said this, certainly, as a disciple to his master and a servant to his Lord, as one ready to follow. That is why the Lord, who saw in his mind why he asked this, answered him thus: "Where I am going you cannot follow me now," as if he said: For the purpose for which you ask, you cannot now. He did not say, You cannot, but, You cannot now: he brought in delay, he did not take away hope; and that same hope, which he did not take away but rather gave, he confirmed with his next words, adding and saying, "But you will follow later." Why are you hurrying, Peter? The Rock has not yet made you firm by his Spirit. Do not be lifted up by presumption: you cannot now; do not be cast down by despair: you will follow later. But what does he say still? "Why can I not follow you now? I will lay down my life for you." He saw what desire was in his mind; what strength there was, he did not see. The weak man boasted of his will, but the physician was examining his health; the one promised, the other foreknew; the one who did not know was bold, the one who knew beforehand was teaching. How much Peter had taken on himself, looking at what he wanted and ignorant of what he could do! How much he had taken on himself, that when the Lord had come to lay down his life for his friends, and so for him too, he should offer to do this for the Lord, and, before Christ's life had been laid down for him, should promise that he would lay down his life for Christ! So Jesus answered: "Will you lay down your life for me?" Will you do for me what I have not yet done for you? "Will you lay down your life for me?" Can you go before, when you cannot follow? Why do you presume so much? What do you think of yourself? What do you believe yourself to be? Hear what you are: "Truly, truly, I say to you, the cock will not crow until you deny me three times." See how soon you will appear to yourself, you who speak great things and do not know that you are a little child. You who promise me your death will deny your life three times. You who think you can already die for me, first live for yourself; for by fearing the death of your flesh you will give death to your soul. As great a life as it is to confess Christ, so great a death it is to deny Christ.
John 13:36 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:37 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:38 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:13 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ delays but does not deny Peter's hope of following him, and foretells that Peter, presuming on his own strength, will deny him three times.
- John 13:36–38 is quoted; John 15:13 is in view. "The Rock" (petra) plays on Peter's name. The words con- Meret in the digital text are unclear; translated by sense as "should offer".
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (joined words)): cjus animum → ejus animum; dioeret → diceret; poLos → potes; suospiritu → suo spiritu; diCit → dicit; Quare le non → Quare te non; posiLurum → positurum; pro vic pones → pro me pones; Ecco quomodo → Ecce quomodo; loqucris, et le parvulum → loqueris, et te parvulum; Qui tc jam → Qui te jam; pre me → pro me; animan tuæ → animæ tuæ; enun vita cst → enim vita est; mors cst negare → mors est negare.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 66.1 (PL 35:1809; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-66-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-66-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.
66.2PL 35:1809–1811
An apostolus Petrus, sicut eum quidam favore perverso excusare nituntur, Christum non negavit, quia interrogatus ab ancilla hominem se nescire respondit, sicut alii evangelistae contestantur expressius? Quasi vero qui hominem Christum negat, non Christum negat; et hoc in eo negat quod factus est propter nos, ne periret quod fecerat nos. Ergo qui ita confitetur Christum Deum ut hominem neget, non pro illo mortuus est Christus; quia secundum hominem mortuus est Christus. Qui negat hominem Christum, non reconciliatur per me diatorem Deo. Unus enim Deus, et unus mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus. Qui negat hominem Christum, non justificatur; quia sicut per inobedientiam unius hominis, peccatores constituti sunt multi; ita et per obedientiam unius hominis, justi constituentur multi. Qui negat hominem Christum, non resurget in resurre ctionem vitæ; quia per hominem mors, et per homi nem resurrectio mortuorum: sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, ita et in Christo omnes vivificabun tnr. Per quid autem caput est Ecclesiæ, nisi per hominem, quod Verbum caro fa ctum cst f id est, Dei Patris Unigenitus Deus homo factus est, Quomodo est igitur in corpore Christi, qui negat hominem Christum? Qui enim caput negat, quomodo est membrum? Sed quid multis im morer, cum ipse Dominus abstulerit omnes humanæ argumentationis ambages? Non enim ait, Non canta bit gallus donec hominem neges; aut, sicut loqui fa miliariore cum hominibus dignatione consuevit, Non cantabit gallus donec Filium hominis ter neges; sed ait, donec me ter neges. Quid est, me, nisi quod erat? et quid nisi Christus erat? Quidquid ergo ejus nega vit, ipsum negavit, Christum negavit, Dominum Deum suum negavit. Quia et ille condiscipulus ejus Thomas, quando exclamavit, Dominus meus et Deus meus, non Verbum, sed carnem tetigit; non incorpoream Dei naturam, sed hominis corpus curiosis manibus con trectavit. Hominem itaque tetigit, et tamen Deum cognovit. Si ergo quod iste tetigit, hoc Petrus negavit; quod iste exclamavit, hoc Petrus offendit. Non cantabit gallus, donec ter me neges. hi cas licet, Nescio hominem; dicas licet, Homo, nescio quid dicis; dicas licet, Non sum ex discipulis ejus: me negabis. Si, quod dubitare nefas est, Christus hoc dixit, verumque praedixit, procul dubio Petrus Chri stum negavit. Non accusemus Christum cum defen dimus Petrum. Peccatum agnoscat infirmitas; nam mendacium non habet veritas. Agnovit quippe pecca tum suum infirmitas Petri, prorsus agnovit; et quan tum mali Christum negando commiserit, plorando monstravit. Ipse suos redarguit defensores, et unde eos convincat, producit lacrymas testes. Neque nos cum ista dicimus, primum Apostolorum accusare de lectal: sed hunc intuendo admoneri nos oportet, ne homo quisquam de humanis viribus fidat. Nam quid aliud pertinuit ad doctorem Salvatoremque nostrum, nisi ut nobis nequaquam de se quemquam præsumere debere, in ipso primo Apostolorum demonstraret exemplo? In anima itaque Petri contigit quod offere bat in corpore. Non tamen pro Domino, ut temere præsumebat, præcessit, sed aliter quam putabat. Namque ante mortem et resurrectionem Domini, et mortuus est negando, et revixit plorando: sed mor tuus est, quia superbe ipse præsumpsit; revixit au tem, quia benigne ille respexit.
Or did the apostle Peter not deny Christ, as some try to excuse him with misplaced goodwill, because when questioned by the maidservant he answered that he did not know the man, as the other evangelists attest more explicitly? As if one who denies Christ the man does not deny Christ, and denies him in that which he was made for our sake, so that what he had made might not perish! So whoever confesses Christ as God in such a way as to deny him as man, Christ did not die for him, because Christ died as man. Whoever denies Christ the man is not reconciled to God through the mediator. "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." Whoever denies Christ the man is not justified, because "as by the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so also by the obedience of one man many will be made righteous." Whoever denies Christ the man will not rise to the resurrection of life, because "by a man came death, and by a man the resurrection of the dead; for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive." And through what is he head of the church, if not through the man, in that "the Word became flesh," that is, the only-begotten God of God the Father became man? How then is he in the body of Christ who denies Christ the man? For whoever denies the head, how is he a member? But why should I linger over many points, when the Lord himself has removed all the windings of human argument? For he did not say, "The cock will not crow until you deny the man," or, as he was accustomed to speak in his more familiar condescension with men, "The cock will not crow until you deny the Son of Man three times"; but he said, "until you deny me three times." What is "me" but what he was? And what was he but Christ? Whatever of him, then, Peter denied, he denied him, he denied Christ, he denied the Lord his God. For his fellow disciple Thomas too, when he cried out, "My Lord and my God," touched not the Word but the flesh; he handled with curious hands not the incorporeal nature of God but the body of a man. So he touched a man, and yet recognized God. If, then, Peter denied what Thomas touched, Peter offended against what Thomas cried out. "The cock will not crow until you deny me three times." You may say, "I do not know the man"; you may say, "Man, I do not know what you are saying"; you may say, "I am not one of his disciples": you will be denying me. If, as it would be wicked to doubt, Christ said this and foretold the truth, then beyond doubt Peter denied Christ. Let us not accuse Christ when we defend Peter. Let weakness acknowledge its sin; for truth has no lie. Peter's weakness did acknowledge its sin, acknowledged it fully; and by weeping it showed how much evil it had committed in denying Christ. He himself refutes his defenders, and to convict them he brings forward his tears as witnesses. Nor do we take pleasure, in saying these things, in accusing the first of the apostles; but in looking at him we ought to be warned, so that no human being may trust in human strength. For what else was our teacher and Savior concerned to do than to show us, by the example of the very first of the apostles, that no one ought in any way to presume upon himself? So what Peter was offering in his body happened in his soul. Yet he did not go before, for the Lord, as he rashly presumed, but in a way other than he thought. For before the death and resurrection of the Lord he both died by denying and came back to life by weeping; but he died because he himself presumed proudly, and he came back to life because the Lord looked on him kindly.
Matt 26:72 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:29 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:38 (quotation, high confidence) · John 20:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 22:60 (quotation, high confidence) · John 18:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 22:61 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 22:62 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter truly denied Christ, for to deny Christ the man is to deny Christ himself; his tears refute those who would excuse him.
- Augustine answers those who excused Peter on the ground that he denied only "the man"; the edition's margin refers here to Ambrose on Luke 22 (Expositio in Lucam). 1 Tim 2:5, Rom 5:19, 1 Cor 15:21–22, John 1:14, John 13:38, John 20:28, and Peter's denials (Matt 26:72; Luke 22:60; John 18:17) are quoted; John 5:29 and Luke 22:61–62 are in view. The Christological argument is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal reference (leaked into the text); OCR slip; OCR slip and stray mark): (Ambros. in Luc. XXII) → ; anciJla → ancilla; Christum ncgat; → Christum negat;; qui ila confitetur Christum Dcum # → qui ita confitetur Christum Deum; sccundum → secundum; Dco. Unus cnim → Deo. Unus enim; constitueutur → constituentur; ncgat hoininem → negat hominem; Pcr quid autem caput est Ecclesire, nisi pEr → Per quid autem caput est Ecclesiæ, nisi per; bominem Christum? Qui cnim → hominem Christum? Qui enim; Non cnim ait, Nou → Non enim ait, Non; doneE → donec; donee Filium → donec Filium; neges:sed → neges; sed; ct quid nisi → et quid nisi; Deus meas → Deus meus; Non canlabit → Non cantabit; inlirmitas → infirmitas; adlnoncri → admoneri; doclorem → doctorem; prasumebat → præsumebat; mortuus cst negando → mortuus est negando.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 66.2 (PL 35:1809–1811; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/63-1/#p-66-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-66-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.