Commentary on Romans 3.2–3.5

Latin text: Migne, PG 14 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 14 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 3

3.2PG 14:928b–933b

Quid ergo tenemus amplius Causati en tn sumus Iudaeos et Graecos omnes sub peccato esse. sicut scriptum est : Quia non est justus quisquam, non est intelligens, non est requirens Deum. 0mnes declinaverunt, simul inutiles facti sunt, non est qui faciat bonitatem, non est usque ad unum. Sepulcrum patens est guttur eorum, linguis suis dolose agebant, venenum aspidum sub labiis eorum. Quorum os maledictione et amaritudine plenum est : veloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem. Contritio et infelicitas in viis eorum, et viam pacis non cognoverunt : non est timor Dei ante oculos eorum . Praediximus jam quod in hac Epistola Paulus, velut arbiter quidam inter eos qui ex circumcisione crediderunt, et eos qui ex gentibus, temperet sermonem semper et libret, ut nunc hos, nunc illos in quibusdam videatur arguere, et rursum singulas partes certa spe promissionis animare. Quia ergo visus fuerat in superioribus dicere, quoniam si praeputium justitias legis custodiat, judicabit eum qui in circumcisione praevaricator est legis ε rursum ut eos quos humiliaveral allevaret, addidit. Quid ergo amplius est Iudaeo? aut quae utilitas circumcisionis? Multum per omnem modum. Primo quidem, quia credita sunt illis eloquia Dei ". Pnst haec, cum his consequenter quasi quaedam fuisset prosecutus, addit nunc, et dicit ε Quid ergo tenemus amplius ἲ Causati enim sumus Iudaeos et Graacos omnes sub peccato esse”. Quod si omnes sub peccato sunt, ergo non eritelationis causa uni adversum alium, cum uterque non ex sua justitia, sed ex Dei misericordia veniat ad salutem. Probavit ergo Graecos quidem, id est gen. tiles, esse sub peccato, cum ait “z Dicentes enim se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt : et mutaverunt gloriam incorruptibilis Dei in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis, et volucrum, et quadrupedum, et serpentium : propter quod tradidit eos Deus in reprobum sensum, et reliqua : Jutizcos vero, cum dicit: Si autem tu Iuda-us cognominaris, et requiescis in lege ", et reliqua. Quibus addidit “z ‹ Qui ergo doces alium, teipsum non doces: qui praedicas non furandum, furaris, etc. Post hac ergo dicit, quia causati sumus Judazos et Graecos omnes sub peccato esse . Post haec vero, ut ei moris est, de Scripturis sanctis vult aflirmare quod dixerat; simul et doctoribus Ecclesiae przebet exemplum, ut ea quae loquuntur ad populum, non propriis praesumpta sententiis, sed divinis munita testimoniis proferant. Si enim ipse tantus ac talis Apostolus auctoritatem dictorum suorum sufficere posse non credit, nisi doceat in Lege et Prophetis scripta esse quae dicit, quanto magis nos minimi hoc observare debemus, utnon nostras cum docemus, sed sancti Spiritus sententias proferamus? lllud etiam necessario ducimus admonendum, quod in nonnullis Latinorum ea quae subsequuntur testimonia in tertio decimo psalmo consequenter ex integro posita inveniuntur; in Grarcis autem pene omnibus non amplius in decimo tertio psalmo, quantusque ad illum versiculum, ubi scriptum εει : Non est qui faciat bonum, non est usque ad unum. Sed et quod dixit Apostolus : Sicut scriptum est : Quia non est justus quisquam : non estintelligens, non est requirens Deum, ιιοιι eisdem sermonibus invenitur in psalmo, sed alii permutantur, alii assumuntur, alii relinquuntur. Quod ab studiosis quibusque si observetur diligentius, puto dari in hoc apostolicam auctoritatem, ut cum Scriptura: testimoniis utendum fuerit, sensum magis ex ea, quant verba capiamus. Hoc enim et in Evangeliis factum frequenter invenies. In tertio decimo igitur psalmo ita scriptum est: Dominus de coelo respexit super tilios hominum, ut videret si est intelligens , aut requirens Deum. Sed in quinquagesimo setuudo psalmo ita dicit : ( Deus de coelo respexit soper filios hominum, ut videret si est intelligens, aut requirens Deum. Et videtur idem servari sensus etiam in eo quod Apostolus posuit: Non.est intelligens, non est requirens Deum .» Ει quod dixit: Non estjustus quisquam , puto quod ex labiis eorum , quod et ipsum ex quodam psalmo assumptum, immutatis, ut supra diximus, sermonibus, puto. Quod autem sequitur: Quorum os maledictione, et amaritudine plenum est , ex nono psalmo videtur acceptum. Tum deinde: Veloces pedes eorum ad efl'undendum sanguinem, vel in Isaia invenies, vel in Proverbiis . Sed et, Cons tritio et infelicitas in viis eorum, et viam pacis non cognoverunt , non quidem ad integrum recordor ubi scriptum sit : suspicor tamen in uno prophetarum inveniri posse. In Psalmis autem scriptum est ‘°: Νοη est timor Dei ante oculos eorum. Hzec autem omnia testimonia videtur congregare voluisse ob hoc, ut ostenderet, quia quod causatur Judznos et Graecos omnes sub peccato esse “, ο non tam suam, quam sancta: Scriptura: sententiam pronuntiat. Sed requiramus quid est hoc ipsum sub peccato esse : sine exceptione enim sermo ejus omnes, sive Judaei sint, sive gentiles, videtur involvere. Sed occurrit nobis alia ipsius sententia, qua dicit: Ubi autem non est lex, nec praevaricatio “. › Apud Judazos quidem legem Moysi esse manifestum est: apud gentiles vero legem natura: esse conlirmat, quae testimonio conscientiae arguat delinquentem. Ubi ergo qumrimus hominem in quo non sit lex, et qui per hoc non videatur esse in praevaricatione peccati, quia et ipse Paulus de semetipso dicit: Ego autem vivebam sine lege aliquando“?i Quando Paulus sine lege vixit, qui rursum de semetipso dicit: α Circumcisus octava die Hebraeus ex Hebraeis “7 ο Quomodo ergo verum erit eum aliquando sine lege vixisse, qui octava die nativitatis sua: signum circutncisionis ex lege suscepit? Unde constat tunc fieri hominem sub lege, quando ad id artatis venerit, ut eligere possit, et discernere quid sit lex : nec prius legis illius extrinsecus jugum suscipere, quam internae, et naturalis legis habere incipiat (l7) firmitatem. Denique in eo loco ubi dixit: Ego autem vivebam sine lege aliquando, addidit: Sed ubi venit mandatum, peccatum revixit “. In quo hoc quidem ostendit, quia in pueritia prius quam discretionem quis habeat boni et mali, sine lege esse dicitur; cum etiam si peccat, quia lex in eo non est, peccatum ei non imputatur “. Cum vero discretionem boni malique acceperit, venisse ei dicitur lex, et dedisse mandata. Ubi autem inest vis mandati, hoc est, conscientia redargueus, peccatum, quod prius in eo mortuum erat, dicitur revixisse. Ex hoc ergo jam tempore si quis subdat se legi Moysi, ut eam secundum litteram observet, efficitur … eam sequatur, elficitur in occulto Judteus. lltec pro eo quod dictum est: Causati enim sumus Iudaeos et Grzrcos omnes sub peccato esse . Scilicet om- . nes intelligatur de illis dictum, quos vel naturali vel scripta lege ne peccent constat edoceri. Nam et de gentibus sub peccato lactis eodem modo intelligimus quo supra diximus: eum coeperint naturaliter qua- legis sunt facere , et ipsi sibi esse lex, tum redarguuntur a conscientia in his quae contra legem facere videntur. Propter quod et consequenter mihi videntur vere sensisse hi, qui legem naturae legem Dei dicunt, legem autem Moysi legem scriptam appellant. Si ergo Paulus de lege scripta, hoc est de lege Moysi, diceret: t Peccatum autem non imputatur, cum lex non est”, videbitur nec Cain reputatum esse peccatum (l9), nec illis qui diluvio perierunt, nec illis quos in Sodomis ignis absumpsit. Sed quoniam videmus illis non solum reputata esse peccata, sed et ultionem in eos datam, ostenditur ex his de naturali lege Paulum dicere, quze, excepta prima aetate pueritiae, in omnibus ltominibus inest: et per boc rectissime dicit : α Cattsati enim sumus Juda-os et Grtecos omnes sub peceato esse. Unde non mihi videtur quidam ex sapientibus contra rationem definisse, quod in omni mortalium genere, eum ad id aetatis ventum l'uerit ubi discretionem recti pravique ingressu naturalis legis quis excipiat, primo omnium malitiam suscitari, post hmc iam eruditionibus, institutis, monitis paulatim eam depelli, et ad virtutem Ο transiri. Consona namque his etiam Paulus mihi sensisse videtur in eo quod dicit: t Sed ubi venit mandatum, peccatum revixit. Sed et Salvatorcum dicit in Evangeliis: ‹ Nisi venissem, et locutus eis fuissem, peccatum non haberent: nunc autem excusationem non habent de peccato suo , videbitur secundum hanc dixisse rationem, quod virtute ea qua replere (9.1) dicitur mundum, ad unumquemque hominem veniat, et loquatur in corde ejus, ac boni malique judicium doceat. ideo ergo Paulus scriptum esse dicit: ε Quia non estiustus quisquam; non est intelligens, non est requirens Deum: omnes declinaverunt, simul inutiles facti sunt“; sicut et aiibi Propheta dicit : Quia non iustifieabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens .» Quod fortassis eoulrarium videatur aliis Scripturis, quae nonnullis testimonium perhibent quasi iustis; in tantum ut etiam ad Jerusalem de Sodomis dicatur, quia iustificata est Sodoma ex te “. Sed intuere diligentius cautelam Scriptura: divinae, quomodo non dixit: t Justificata est Sodoma; sed ait (2‘3) : Quo… agis, ut omnes supergrediaris in magnitudine peccatorum, ad comparationem scelerum tuorum iam Sodoma iustificata est. Et hic ergo quod dixit: Non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis νίκης.» non hoc sentiri voluit quod non instificabitur omnis vivens, sed in conSpectu tuo, hoc est Dei, non iustiticabitur. Quantumvis enim quis iustus, quantumvis sanctus sit, non solum inter homines, sed et in supernis atque eminentioribus creaturis, ad comparationem Dei certum est eum iustificari non posse. Denique et in Apocalypsi Joannis ", ubi lio ber signatus ull‘ertur in conspectu vetusti dierum, et qmeritttr ex omni tribu, lingua, et populis, qui eum possit aperire, nullus inventus est nisi solus Agnus de tribu Juda, qui iustificatus est in conspectu Dei : et ipse solus librum meruit aperire, qui solus ipse est α qui aperit, et nemo claudit; claudit et nemo aperit ". Solus ergo Salvator noster Dominus Jesus Christus iustificatur in conspectu Patris, quia quaecunque facit Pater, haec et Filius facit similiter .» Omnis autem creatura ex comparatione inferiorum iustiticatur. Ut si, verbi causa, dicamus : ad comparationem reliqui populi iusta fuit Maria soror Moysi: et rursum ad comparationem lilaria: iustus erat Aaron: et iterum ad comparationem Aaron, iustus erat Moyses. Beatus tamen est qui ex comparatione meliorum iustus appellatur, et non ex comparatione pessimorum, sicut Sodoma, qum ex comparatione Jerusalem iustificata memoratur. Unde et ego vereor ne ex nobis qui videmur esse in Ecclesia Dei et legi eius ope. ram dare, ac praceptis evangelicis deservire. inveniantur aliqui infidelium iustificandi. Ut verbi causa dicam, si nos libidini et impudicitia: serviamus, et gentilis qui alienus est a fide Christi, custodial castitatem, ille gentilis iustificatur ex nobis. Similiter et si nos avaritia, rapacitate, superbia, et caeteris lmiusmodi malis involvamur, abstineat autem ab bis omnibus gentilis, et bi qui legem Dei nesciunt, illi iustificabuntur ex nobis, et nus ex illorum comparatione damnabimur. Quin potius oprram demus, ut sicut fide praecedimus gentes, ita actibus et operibus praecellamus, ne mala nostra fiant aliena bona, et illorum temperantia nostram redarguat intemperantiam. Potest adhuc et alio modo explanari quod dixit: t Non estiustus quisquam “; vel quod ait: ί Νοιι iustilicabitur in conspectu tuo omnis vivens 5’; quia {donec quis Ne beatificaveris hominem ante mortem, quia nescis quae erunt ejus novissima °°; et iterum dicit Ecclesiastes “z c‘ Et laudavi homines defunctos qnijam mortui sunt, magis quam vivos qui adhuc vivunt: sed melior super utrosque qui nondum natus est. Habes adhuc et aliam Scriptura: sententiam quae dicit, quia quicunque minimus est in regno Dei, major sit eo qui in corpore est, etiamsi Joannes ille sit, quo maior inter natos mulierum non fuit ". Non est ergo justus quisquam. Ει addidit: Νοιι est intelligens .’ Et revera cum Apostolus ipse ex parte se dicat agnoscere, et ex parte intelligere “, quis erit qui dicatur intelligens ἲ Quantumcunque enim quis intellexerit, in speculo et in :rnigmate videbitur intelligere “:quia post depositionem terreni corporis refertur facie ad faciem intelligere: nunc vero, ut ait Scriptura “ : Corruptibile corpus aggravat animam, et demergit terrena habitatio sensum multa cogitautem.» Unde fit ut non sit intelligens quis, nec ‹ requirens Deum . Dum enim corporis sollicitudinibus occupamur, et qum hominum sunt quaerimus , Deum quaerere, vel quae Dei sunt cogitare non possumus.

"What then do we hold more? For we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin, as it is written: There is no one righteous, there is no one who understands, there is no one who seeks God. All have turned aside, together they have become useless; there is no one who does goodness, there is not even one. Their throat is an open grave, with their tongues they have dealt deceitfully, the poison of asps is under their lips. Their mouth is full of cursing and bitterness; their feet are swift to shed blood. Ruin and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace they have not known; there is no fear of God before their eyes."

We have already said that in this Epistle Paul, as a kind of arbiter between those who have believed from the circumcision and those from the Gentiles, always tempers and balances his word, so that he seems now to rebuke these, now those, in some things, and again to encourage each side with sure hope of promise. Since, then, he had seemed to say above that if the uncircumcision keeps the righteous requirements of the law it will judge the one who in circumcision is a transgressor of the law, he added, in order to lift up again those whom he had humbled: "What advantage then has the Jew? Or what is the value of circumcision? Much in every way. First, because the oracles of God were entrusted to them." After this, having pursued certain things in sequence with these, he now adds and says: "What then do we hold more? For we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin." And if all are under sin, there will be no cause for boasting of one against another, since each comes to salvation not by his own righteousness but by the mercy of God. He proved, then, that the Greeks, that is, the Gentiles, are under sin when he said: "For claiming to be wise they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed beasts and serpents; therefore God gave them up to a reprobate mind," and the rest; and the Jews, when he says: "But if you are called a Jew and rest in the law," and the rest; to which he added: "You then who teach another, do you not teach yourself? You who preach that one must not steal, do you steal?" and so on. After these things, then, he says that "we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin."

After this, as is his custom, he wishes to confirm from the holy Scriptures what he had said; and at the same time he gives an example to the teachers of the Church, so that what they say to the people they may bring forward not taken from their own opinions but fortified by divine testimonies. For if so great and such an Apostle does not believe that the authority of his own words can suffice unless he shows that what he says is written in the Law and the Prophets, how much more ought we, the least, to observe this, so that when we teach we bring forward not our own opinions but those of the Holy Spirit? We think it necessary also to point out this: that in some Latin copies the testimonies that follow are found set down entire, in sequence, in the thirteenth Psalm; but in almost all the Greek copies no further in the thirteenth Psalm than the verse where it is written, "There is no one who does good, there is not even one." And what the Apostle said, "As it is written: There is no one righteous, there is no one who understands, there is no one who seeks God," is not found in the same words in the psalm, but some are changed, some added, some left out. If this is observed more carefully by the studious, I think apostolic authority is given in this, that when we have to use the testimonies of Scripture we should take the sense from it rather than the words. For you will find this done frequently in the Gospels too. In the thirteenth Psalm, then, it is written thus: "The Lord looked down from heaven upon the sons of men, to see if there is anyone who understands or seeks God." And in the fifty-second Psalm it says thus: "God looked down from heaven upon the sons of men, to see if there is anyone who understands or seeks God." And the same sense seems to be kept also in what the Apostle set down: "There is no one who understands, there is no one who seeks God." And as for his saying, "There is no one righteous," I think … "under their lips," which itself too is taken from a psalm, with the words changed, as we said above. What follows, "Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness," seems to be taken from the ninth Psalm. Then: "Their feet are swift to shed blood" you will find either in Isaiah or in Proverbs. But as for "Ruin and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace they have not known," I do not fully remember where it is written; yet I suspect it can be found in one of the prophets. And in the Psalms it is written: "There is no fear of God before their eyes." He seems to have wished to gather all these testimonies in order to show that in charging that Jews and Greeks are all under sin he is pronouncing not so much his own sentence as that of holy Scripture.

But let us ask what it is to be under sin; for his word seems to embrace all without exception, whether Jews or Gentiles. But another sentence of his meets us, where he says: "But where there is no law, there is no transgression." Among the Jews, clearly, there is the law of Moses; but among the Gentiles he affirms that there is the law of nature, which convicts the offender by the testimony of conscience. Where, then, shall we look for a man in whom there is no law, and who for that reason does not seem to be in the transgression of sin, since Paul himself says of himself, "But I was once living without law"? When did Paul live without law, who again says of himself, "Circumcised on the eighth day, a Hebrew of Hebrews"? How then will it be true that he once lived without law, who on the eighth day of his birth received the sign of circumcision from the law? Hence it is clear that a man comes to be under the law when he has reached the age at which he can choose and discern what the law is; and that he does not take up the outward yoke of that law before he begins to have the firmness of the inner and natural law. Indeed, in the place where he said, "But I was once living without law," he added: "But when the commandment came, sin revived." In this he shows that in childhood, before someone has the discernment of good and evil, he is said to be without law; since even if he sins, because the law is not in him, sin is not imputed to him. But when he has received the discernment of good and evil, the law is said to have come to him and to have given commandments. And where the force of the commandment is present, that is, the conscience that convicts, sin, which was previously dead in him, is said to have revived. From this time, then, if someone submits himself to the law of Moses so as to observe it according to the letter, he becomes … [if he] follows it [according to the spirit], he becomes a Jew in secret.

These things on what is said, "For we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin": that is, "all" is to be understood as said of those who are clearly taught by the natural or the written law not to sin. For we also understand that the Gentiles are made under sin in the same way as we said above: when they have begun by nature to do the things of the law and to be a law to themselves, they are then convicted by conscience in the things they seem to do against the law. That is why those seem to me to have judged truly and consistently who call the law of nature the law of God, but call the law of Moses the written law. If, then, Paul were saying of the written law, that is, of the law of Moses, "But sin is not imputed when there is no law," sin will seem not to have been imputed to Cain, nor to those who perished in the flood, nor to those whom fire consumed in Sodom. But since we see that not only were sins imputed to them, but vengeance was also given against them, it is shown from these that Paul speaks of the natural law, which, except in the first age of childhood, is present in all men; and through this he says most rightly: "For we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin." Hence one of the wise does not seem to me to have defined against reason that in the whole race of mortals, when one has come to the age at which one receives the discernment of right and wrong by the entrance of the natural law, first of all wickedness is roused, and after this it is gradually driven out by teachings, training, and admonitions, and one passes over to virtue. For Paul seems to me to have thought in agreement with this when he says: "But when the commandment came, sin revived." And when the Savior says in the Gospels, "If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin," he will seem to have spoken according to this principle: that by that power by which he is said to fill the world he comes to each man and speaks in his heart and teaches the judgment of good and evil.

That is why Paul says it is written: "There is no one righteous, there is no one who understands, there is no one who seeks God; all have turned aside, together they have become useless"; as the prophet also says elsewhere: "For no one living will be justified in your sight." This may seem contrary to other Scriptures, which bear witness to some as righteous, so far that it is even said to Jerusalem about Sodom that "Sodom has been justified by you." But look more carefully at the caution of divine Scripture, how it did not say, "Sodom has been justified," but said: … "you act so that you surpass all in the greatness of your sins; in comparison with your crimes Sodom has now been justified." And here too, then, in saying, "No one living will be justified in your sight," he did not wish it to be understood that no one living will be justified, but that in your sight, that is, God's, he will not be justified. For however righteous, however holy someone may be, not only among men but also among the heavenly and more eminent creatures, it is certain that in comparison with God he cannot be justified. Indeed, in the Apocalypse of John too, where the sealed book is brought before the Ancient of Days, and it is asked out of every tribe, tongue, and people who can open it, no one was found except the Lamb alone of the tribe of Judah, who was justified in the sight of God; and he alone was worthy to open the book, who alone is the one "who opens and no one shuts, who shuts and no one opens." Our Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, alone, then, is justified in the sight of the Father, because "whatever the Father does, the Son also does likewise." But every creature is justified by comparison with inferiors. As if, for example, we should say: in comparison with the rest of the people, Miriam the sister of Moses was righteous; and again, in comparison with Miriam, Aaron was righteous; and again, in comparison with Aaron, Moses was righteous. Yet blessed is he who is called righteous by comparison with the better, and not by comparison with the worst, like Sodom, which is recorded as justified by comparison with Jerusalem.

Hence I too fear lest some unbelievers be found to be justified by comparison with us who seem to be in the Church of God and to give attention to his law and to serve the precepts of the Gospel. For example, if we serve lust and impurity, and a Gentile who is a stranger to the faith of Christ keeps chastity, that Gentile is justified by us. Likewise, if we are entangled in avarice, rapacity, pride, and other evils of this kind, while a Gentile abstains from all these, and those who do not know the law of God, they will be justified by us, and we will be condemned by comparison with them. Rather let us take pains that, as we go before the Gentiles in faith, so we may excel them in acts and works, lest our evils become others' goods and their temperance convict our intemperance.

What he said, "There is no one righteous," or what he says, "No one living will be justified in your sight," can also be explained in another way: that as long as someone … "Call no man blessed before death, for you do not know what his last things will be"; and again Ecclesiastes says: "And I praised the dead, who have already died, more than the living who are still alive; but better than both is he who has not yet been born." You have also another sentence of Scripture, which says that whoever is least in the kingdom of God is greater than one who is in the body, even if it is that John than whom there was no greater among those born of women. "There is no one righteous," then. And he added: "There is no one who understands." And indeed, since the Apostle himself says that he knows in part and understands in part, who will there be who may be called one who understands? For however much someone has understood, he will be seen to understand in a mirror and in a riddle; because after the laying aside of the earthly body it is reported that he understands face to face; but now, as Scripture says, "The corruptible body weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling presses down the mind that thinks many things." Hence it comes about that no one understands, nor "seeks God." For while we are occupied with the cares of the body and seek the things of men, we cannot seek God or think on the things of God.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Rom 3:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 14:1 (13:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 14:2 (13:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 14:3 (13:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 53:2 (52:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 140:3 (139:4 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 10:7 (9:28 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 59:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Prov 1:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 59:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 36:1 (35:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 4:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 2:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 4:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 7:21 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 19:24 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 15:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 143:2 (142:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 16:52 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 16:51 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 5:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 5:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 5:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Dan 7:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rev 3:7 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 4:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 4:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:11 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:9 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Paul confirms from Scripture that Jews and Gentiles are all under sin, which Origen explains through the natural law that comes with the age of discernment; no one is righteous in God's sight except Christ, and Christians should fear being shamed by virtuous Gentiles.

  • Rom 3:9–18. The thirteenth and fifty-second Psalms are Ps 14 and 53 in English numbering; the longer form of Ps 13 (14) found in some Latin copies includes Rom 3:13–18. Origen says he does not remember where "Ruin and misery are in their ways" is written (it is Isa 59:7–8). Text is lost in the scan in three places (marked …): in the discussion of the sources of Rom 3:10–13 (probably naming Ps 5:9 and Ps 140:3); after "he becomes" in the sentence on the law of Moses (the bracketed words give the sense); and after "as long as someone" (probably "is in this life"). The "one of the wise" who taught that vice is roused first and is driven out by training is unidentified (perhaps a Stoic). "Call no man blessed before death" is Sir 11:28. "The corruptible body weighs down the soul" is Wis 9:15.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote references removed; the scan lost words here, marked by an ellipsis): etlicitur ibid. l9. ” Psal. xm, 2. Rem. Rom. ιιι, l5; Isai. Lux, 17. ibi'd. 9. " Boni. τ. ut, M; Pnsalz‘tx, 7.“ 'f_Rom..£t.n; ‘sal. xxxv. 2; Rom. "1,17. ibi'd. eam sequatur → efficitur … eam sequatur; Quo- ‘7 Rom. tt, 28. βξ cunni. Ezech. xw Psal. xm, 1 οἳ). Boni. ιιι, 10. δν Psal. chtt, 2. agis → Quo… agis.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 11:28 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Origen, Comm. Rom. 3.2 (PG 14:928b–933b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-commentarius-romanos/3-2/#p-3-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-commentarius-romanos-3-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 14, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; lines lost in the scan are marked and noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

3.3PG 14:933b–935a

Otnncs declinaverunt,simul inutiles facti sunt". 507 Mihi videtur quod non dicitur declinasse, nisi is qui aliquando in via recta stetit. Unde apparet primum illud natura: rationabilis opus, quod a Deo fluctum est. fuisse rectum, et in via recta Creatoris ipsius munere collocatum. Sed quia ab hac ad laevam (2.1) peccati iter detorsit, merito nunc dicitur declinasse, sicut exemplo est primus homo Adam. qui de paradisi via recta malesuadi fraude serpentis ad pravas et tortuosas mortalis vita: semitas declinavit. Consequeuter ergo omnes qui ex ipsius successione ιιι hunc mundum veniunt, declinaverunt, et simul cum ipso inutiles facti sunt. Propter hoc puto et Dominum in Evangeliis dare mandatum, ut cum omnia praecepta fecerimus, meminerimus tamen quid simus, et dicamus: a Servi inutiles sumus: quod debuimus facere, fecimus".n Donec enim quis hoc facit tantum quod debet, id est, ea quae praecepta sunt, inutilis servus est. Si autem addas aliquid prteceptis, tunc non jam inutilis servus eris, sed dicetur ad te : Euge, serve bone, et fidelis . Quid autem sit quod addatur ιιι-ωιεεριὶε. et supra debitum fiat, Paulus apostolus uicit : De virginibus autem praeceptum Domini non habeo: consilium autem do, tanquam misericordiam consecutus a Domino". Hoc opus super praeceptum est. Qui ergo completis prreceptis addiderit etiam hoc, ut virginitatem custodiat, non jam inutilis servus, sed servus bonus et fidelis vocabitur. Et iterum praeceptum est, ut hi qui Evangelium annuntiant, de Evangelio vivant 7'. Paulus tamen dicit, quia nullo horum usus sum; et ideo non inutilis erat servus, sed fidelis et prudens. Omnes ergo (declinaverunt, simul inutiles l'acti sunt.» Quibus addidit : Non estqui faciat bonitatem, non estusque ad unum". Gravis sententia, et qua: dilficile astrui possit. Quomodo enim videtur fieri posse, nullum omnino, nullum usque ad unum, vel in Iudaeis, vel in Graecis inveniri potuisse qui faceret bonitatem? Siccine credimus quod nullus fuerit qui vel hospitem aliquando receperit,vel esurienti panem dederit, vel nudum texerit, vel innocentem de manibus potentis eripuerit, vel tale aliquid boni Operis egerit? Non mihi videtur tam incredibilem sermonem voluisse asserere Paulus apostolus : sed hoc modo intelligendum puto; quod neget quemquam fecisse bonitatem. Verbi gratia, velut si quis fundamenta jaciat domus,et unum aut duos parietes exstruat, aliquid etiam materiae convehat, nunquid dicetur fecisse domum, quamvis operatus videatur in domo? Sed ille dicetur domum fecisse, qui totius azdilicii ad perfectum singula quaeque membra perduxerit. lta arbitror et hic Apostolutn dicere neminem fecisse bonitatem, hoc est, a nullo eam ad perfectum et ad integrum consummatam. Si autem requiramus quis sit vero bonus, et qui perfectam fecerit bonitatem, illunt inveniemus solum qui dicit : Ego sum pastor bonus; et iterum: Pastor bonus animam suam ponit pro ovibus suis . Post haec de quinto, ut supra diximus, psalmo sumens, dicit: Sepulcrum patens est guttur eorum. Diversa in his, ut mihi videtur, immani generis peccata describit. Omne sepulcrum immunditiam defuncti eadaveris contegit; unde et Dominus dicebat in Evangelio de Scribis et Pharisa'is, quod essent sepulcra dealbata, quae foris quidem speciosa videntur hominibus, intus autem plena sunt omni immunditia "‘. › Videtur autem Paulus hoc in loco majus aliquid in istis, de quibus sermo est, ostendere criminis, cum eos sepulcrum non tectum , neque roopertum, sed ( patens) appellat. Clausa enim scι) pulcra dicuntur, quos aliquantulum pudor cohibet palam delinquere, et proferre ad publicum erimina sua. Patens vero sepulcrum dicuntur hi qui innnun-v ditias suas et impuritates in pr0patnlo habent: quibus assiduitas et usus scelerum, quod est in nialis ultimum, etiam commissorum verecundiam sustulit : ut jam non aperiant os suum, et proferant verbum Dei, verbum vivum ; sed aperiant guttur suum, et proferant 'verbum‘mortuum, verbum . diaboli, non de corde, sed de sepulcro. Si quando ergo videris hominem lascivo ore impudica verba jactantem, aut tumido et furibundo contumelias et maledicta proferentem, non dubites de hoc dicere, quia sepulcrum patetis est guttur ejus. De abundantia enim cordis os loquitur". Ad haec additur : Linguis suis dolose agebant. Dolus est, cum aliud quis lingua loquitur, et aliud volutat in corde. Quod crimen nescio si vel justos quosque et electos relinquat immunes; sed puto quod alius plus, alius autem minus, nemo tamen sit ab hoc ad perfectum purus, nisi ille solus de quo scriptum est: Qui peccatum non fecit, nec dolus inventus est in ore ejus . Nam et si inveniatur quis diligens et cautus, potest fortassis in gravioribus se observare : quem autem invenias, qui in hac vel prae verecundia, vel pra: negligentia non incurrat? Interdum et per oblivionem omittuntur quae curanda fuerant, et ne appareat culpa, excusantur aliter quam (‘29) gesta sunt. Unde et Petrus, sciens istas esse diversitates doli, in Epistola sua scribit dicens : Deponentes ergo onmem dolum, et simulationem, et invidiam, et obtrectationem, quasi modo geniti infantes, rationabiles, et sine dolo, lac concupiscite, ut in eo crescetis in salutem ". ο

"All have turned aside, together they have become useless." It seems to me that no one is said to have turned aside except one who once stood on the right way. Hence it appears that that first work of rational nature, which was made by God, was right and was placed on the right way by the gift of the Creator himself. But since it turned its course from this to the left, to sin, it is now rightly said to have turned aside, as the first man Adam is an example, who turned aside from the right way of paradise, by the evil-counseling fraud of the serpent, to the crooked and twisted paths of mortal life. Consequently, then, all who come into this world from his succession have turned aside and together with him have become useless. For this reason, I think, the Lord too gives a command in the Gospels that, when we have done all the precepts, we should nevertheless remember what we are and say: "We are useless servants; we have done what we ought to have done." For as long as someone does only what he owes, that is, what has been commanded, he is a useless servant. But if you add something to the precepts, then you will no longer be a useless servant, but it will be said to you: "Well done, good and faithful servant." What it is that is added to the precepts and done beyond what is owed, the apostle Paul says: "Concerning virgins I have no command of the Lord, but I give counsel, as one who has obtained mercy from the Lord." This work is above the precept. One, then, who after fulfilling the precepts adds this too, that he keeps virginity, will be called no longer a useless servant but a good and faithful servant. And again it is a precept that those who proclaim the Gospel should live by the Gospel; yet Paul says, "I have made use of none of these"; and therefore he was not a useless servant but faithful and prudent. "All," then, "have turned aside, together they have become useless."

To these he added: "There is no one who does goodness, there is not even one." A heavy sentence, and one difficult to establish. For how does it seem possible that no one at all, not even one, could have been found among the Jews or among the Greeks who did goodness? Are we really to believe that there was no one who ever received a guest, or gave bread to the hungry, or clothed the naked, or rescued the innocent from the hands of the powerful, or did some such good work? The apostle Paul does not seem to me to have wished to assert so incredible a statement; but I think it should be understood in this way: that he denies that anyone has made goodness complete. For example, if someone lays the foundations of a house and builds one or two walls and also brings together some material, will he be said to have made the house, although he seems to have worked on the house? But he will be said to have made the house who has brought every single part of the whole building to completion. So I think the Apostle says here too that no one has made goodness, that is, no one has brought it to completion and wholeness. But if we ask who is truly good and has made goodness perfect, we will find him alone who says, "I am the good shepherd"; and again, "The good shepherd lays down his life for his sheep."

After this, taking from the fifth Psalm, as we said above, he says: "Their throat is an open grave." In these, as it seems to me, he describes sins of different kinds. Every grave covers the uncleanness of a dead corpse; hence the Lord too said in the Gospel of the scribes and Pharisees that they were whitewashed tombs, which outwardly seem beautiful to men, but inwardly are full of all uncleanness. But Paul seems in this place to show something more criminal in those of whom he speaks, when he calls them a grave not covered nor closed but "open." For those are called closed graves whom shame somewhat restrains from sinning openly and bringing their crimes out in public. But those are called an open grave who have their uncleannesses and impurities in the open, in whom the habit and practice of crimes, which is the last stage in evil, has taken away even shame for what they have committed: so that they no longer open their mouth and bring forth the word of God, the living word; but open their throat and bring forth a dead word, the word of the devil, not from the heart but from the grave. If, then, you ever see a man throwing out shameless words with a lewd mouth, or uttering insults and curses with a swollen and furious one, do not hesitate to say of him that his throat is an open grave. For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.

To this is added: "With their tongues they have dealt deceitfully." Deceit is when someone says one thing with the tongue and turns over another in the heart. I do not know whether this charge leaves even all the righteous and elect immune; but I think that one more, another less, yet no one is perfectly pure of it, except him alone of whom it is written: "Who did no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth." For even if someone is found careful and cautious, he can perhaps guard himself in graver matters; but whom will you find who does not fall into this, either from embarrassment or from negligence? Sometimes too through forgetfulness things that should have been attended to are omitted, and, lest the fault appear, they are excused otherwise than they were done. Hence Peter too, knowing that these are the varieties of deceit, writes in his epistle, saying: "Putting away, then, all deceit and pretense and envy and slander, like newborn infants, rational and without deceit, long for milk, so that by it you may grow to salvation."

Rom 3:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 17:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:25 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 9:14 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 9:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:45 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 25:35 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 10:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 5:9 (5:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 23:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:34 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:22 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:2 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: To 'turn aside' implies that rational nature was created upright; doing only what is commanded leaves one a 'useless servant,' so works beyond the precept such as virginity make one good and faithful; no one but Christ has brought goodness to completion; and Origen explains the 'open grave' and 'deceit.'

  • Rom 3:12–13. "The fifth Psalm" is Ps 5:9 ("as we said above" refers to a passage lost in 3.2). Origen's distinction between the precept and the counsel of virginity (works "beyond what is owed") is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote references removed; word rejoined): non jam inu- “ Eccli. xl, 50. liccle. IV, 2, ὅ. Matth. XI l Cor. vn, 5‘2, “ ut. l-l. xxv, 21. Cor. vn, '25. Cor. ιχ, 14, 15. tilis → non jam inutilis; aperiant gul- llom. ιιι, 10,“11. l Cor. xm, 9. ibid. l2. llout. χλιιι, 27. tur suum → aperiant guttur suum.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Comm. Rom. 3.3 (PG 14:933b–935a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-commentarius-romanos/3-2/#p-3-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-commentarius-romanos-3-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 14, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; lines lost in the scan are marked and noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

3.4PG 14:935a–936a

Venenum aspidum sub labiis eorum . Iorsus serpentis veneno corpus interimit: morsus verbi venenati fraude animam necat. Potest α accidi hoc et de his qui calumniarum commentis circumveniunt homines : potest et de his, qui per hrereticam doctrinam veneno diaboli infectam, animas decipiunt simplicium. Quorum os maledic ctione, et amaritudine plenum est“. De veneno quidem aspidum non dixit plena esse labia. ln illo enim vitio plures fortassis inveniantur, non tamen plures qui plene, et ad integrum veneni illius virus exerant. Maledictione autem et amaritudine repleri os, valde multorum est. Quis enim ita emendati oris est ('52), quem non maledicendi consuetudo sollicitet, non dicam adversum eos qui maledictione digni sunt, sed adversum eos quos Dominus non maledixit, id est, justus et innocentes viros? Promptum hoc et proclive vitium est fragilita- ι) tis humanae erga subjectos prmcipue et inferiores: ita utjam appellationem hanc non maledictionem putent. Et ideo plenum esse os eorum, et tanquam de pleno oris vasculo indesinenter dicitur fluere maledictio. Huic tamen ct amaritudo conjungitur, quia ex iracundia: felle depromitur. Per iracundiam enim ac furorem ad maledicendum lingua compel- 'itnr. Et ideo dicit idem Apostolus : Benedicite, et nolite maledicere; et alibi : Ne qua radix amaritudinis sursum germinans impediat. Additur in consequentibus “ : Veloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem. Quod tamen crimen non fortassis pluribus aptari posse videbitur eorum de quibus dixit: Causati enim sumus Judaos et Graecos omnes sub peccato esse ; nisi forte ita intelligamus, quia non corporaliter tantum sanguis effunditur eorum quorum corpora trucidantur, sed et hi qui quolibet seandalo animam a Deo separant, viri sanguinum nominantur. Sicut enim homicida dicitur ille qui corpus ab anima separat, per quan vivificatur: ita multo etiam verius ille homicida dicendus εει, qui animam a vera vita separat, qua: est Deus. Pedes autem hocin loco illos intelθ fige de quibus dicit Propheta : Mei autem pene moti sunt pedes ; hoc est, consilium quo agimus iter vitae.

"The poison of asps is under their lips." The bite of a serpent kills the body with poison; the bite of a poisoned word kills the soul by deceit. This can happen through those who ensnare men with fabricated slanders; it can happen also through those who deceive the souls of the simple by heretical doctrine infected with the devil's poison. "Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness." Of the poison of asps he did not say that their lips are full. For in that vice perhaps many may be found, yet not many who put forth the venom of that poison fully and completely. But to have the mouth filled with cursing and bitterness belongs to very many. For who has a mouth so corrected that the habit of cursing does not tempt him, I will not say against those who are worthy of cursing, but against those whom the Lord has not cursed, that is, righteous and innocent men? This vice of human frailty is ready and easy, especially toward subordinates and inferiors, so that they no longer think this kind of name-calling to be cursing. And therefore their mouth is said to be full, and cursing to flow incessantly as from the full vessel of the mouth. To this, however, bitterness too is joined, because it is drawn from the gall of anger. For the tongue is driven to curse through anger and rage. And therefore the same Apostle says: "Bless, and do not curse"; and elsewhere: "Lest any root of bitterness springing up should hinder."

It is added next: "Their feet are swift to shed blood." Yet this crime will perhaps not seem applicable to many of those of whom he said, "For we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin"; unless perhaps we understand it thus: that blood is shed not only bodily, of those whose bodies are slaughtered, but also those who separate a soul from God by any scandal whatever are called men of blood. For just as he is called a murderer who separates the body from the soul by which it is given life, so much more truly is he to be called a murderer who separates the soul from the true life, which is God. And understand the feet in this place as those of which the prophet says: "But my feet were almost moved"; that is, the counsel by which we travel the road of life.

Rom 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 23:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 12:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 73:2 (72:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The 'poison of asps' is slander and heretical teaching; cursing and bitterness are common faults of the angry tongue; and those who separate souls from God by scandal are murderers with 'feet swift to shed blood.'

  • Rom 3:13–15.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote references removed; word rejoined): Benedi- -_ ξ] Matth. xu, 34. ί ’ l Petr. tt, ἓξ. ibid. l, ] Hebr. χιιηιό. ff" Rom. In, 15. ’ ibid. 9. Ρ gerem. ιι. 9.9: 15, Si. "' xm, 5. cite → Benedicite.

Topics: Heresy, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Comm. Rom. 3.4 (PG 14:935a–936a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-commentarius-romanos/3-2/#p-3-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-commentarius-romanos-3-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 14, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; lines lost in the scan are marked and noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.

3.5PG 14:936a–937a

Contritio, et infelicitas in viis eorum : et via pacis non cognoverunt". Contritionem hic dicit, non illam qua spiritus peccatis contribulatur pro paenitentia, unde dicitur in Psalmis“8 : Cor contritum et humiliatum Deus non spernit: sed illam dicit contritionem qua peccatores dicuntur conterere jugum Domini et projicere a cervicibus suis θ’. Similiter et infelicitas, vel, sicut alibi legitur, miseria accipienda est, qua miser effectus est homo et infelix, qui cum in honore esset. non intellexit, › sed comparatus est iumentis insipientibus, et similis factus est eis ”. Et viam pacis non cognoverunt “. Pax nostra Christus est. Via ergo pacis, via Christi est. Sed et si accipiamus quod peccatores dum vitiorum bellis semper urgentur, viam pacis ignorant, recte intelligimus. Dicit enim propheta ad Dominum : Pax multa diliges. tibus nomen tuum, et non est illis scandalum θ’. Sed et ille populus qui de Egypto eductus est, per viam pacis incessit, ut ad terram repromissionis veniret, et habitaret in Jerusalem, quae interpretatur uisio pacis, sicut et Propheta dicit ε Factus est in pace locus ejus, et habitatio ejus in Sion ”. Plenius autem viam pacis agnoscit qui ad caelestis Jerusalem habitaculum tendit, ut ad sanctam civitatem Dei viventis ascendat. Post haec additur: Non est timor Dei ante oculos eorum “. Si quis sit qui semper de timore Dei cogitet, quid ei placeat requirat, quidve displiceat,huic timor Dei esse ante oculos dicitur. Sed peritus debet esse, et ex lege Domini diligenter eruditus , ne forte illic timeat timore, ubi necessarius non erit timor. Ponendus est ergo semper timor Dei ante oculos: non istos oculos carnis (neque enim visibile aliquid, aut oorporeum qumritur), sed ante oculos mentis; quibus timoris Dei et intellectus et doctrina perspicitur, per quam, sicut superius diximus, intelligatur quid timendum sit, aut quid non sit timendum.Qui Deum timet, potestates saeculi non timet. Et quid dico de potestatibus saeculi? Nec illos principatus, et potestates, et mundi hujus rectores, neque spiritalia nequitia: in caelestibus timet ". Et. ut ipsius hoc Pauli auctoritate firmemus, audi quomodo dicit de humanis potestatibus: Vis, inquit. non timere potestatem ‘.' Fac quod bonum est, et habebis laudem ex ea "’. Et Propheta dicit : ε Dominus mibi adjutor est, non timebo quid faciat mihi homo“. De adversis vero potestatibus spirituum idem Propheta sensisse mihi videtur, ubi dicit: ‹ Multi qui debellant me de excelso, per diem timebunt ”; et iterum : Si consistant adversum me castra,non timebit cor meum ί.» Opus ergo grande est etmagniflcum semper habere ante oculos cordis ξω timorem Dei: illum timorem, qui replevit virgam quae surrexit de radice Jesse, et florem qui de radice ejus surrexit : de quo dixerat : ‹ Et raplehit eum spiritus timoris Domini ’. ln tanttun autem perfectum reddit hominem Dei timor, ut. nihil ei desit, ut Propheta dicit, quia nihil deest timentibus eum . Htec, prout potuimus, singulis quibusque quae a Paulo assumpta fuerant aptavimus, quomodo convenire viderentur his de quibus dicit: Causatl enim sumus Iudaeos et Gnaeos otnnes sub peccato esse . Quae tamen ita Putedebere- intelligi, non ut in singulis hominibus ο omnia haec fuisse arguantur, sed aliud in alio, etaliudin alio, ita tamen ut in omnibus lmpleretur universitas ista vitiorum.

"Ruin and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace they have not known." By ruin (contritio) he means here not that by which the spirit is crushed for its sins in repentance, of which it is said in the Psalms, "A contrite and humbled heart God does not despise," but that crushing by which sinners are said to break the yoke of the Lord and throw it off their necks. Likewise misery, or, as it is read elsewhere, wretchedness, is to be taken as that by which man was made wretched and unhappy, who, "when he was in honor, did not understand," but "was compared to senseless beasts and became like them." "And the way of peace they have not known." Christ is our peace. The way of peace, then, is the way of Christ. But if we also take it that sinners, while they are always pressed by the wars of the vices, do not know the way of peace, we understand rightly. For the prophet says to the Lord: "Great peace have those who love your name, and there is no scandal for them." And that people too which was led out of Egypt went by the way of peace, so as to come to the land of promise and dwell in Jerusalem, which is interpreted "vision of peace," as the prophet also says: "His place has been made in peace, and his dwelling in Zion." But he knows the way of peace more fully who is making for the dwelling of the heavenly Jerusalem, so as to ascend to the holy city of the living God.

After this it is added: "There is no fear of God before their eyes." If there is someone who always thinks of the fear of God, and seeks what pleases him and what displeases him, of him it is said that the fear of God is before his eyes. But he must be skilled and carefully instructed in the law of the Lord, lest perhaps he fear with fear where there will be no need of fear. The fear of God, then, is always to be set before the eyes: not these eyes of the flesh (for nothing visible or bodily is sought), but before the eyes of the mind, by which the understanding and teaching of the fear of God is perceived, through which, as we said above, it may be understood what is to be feared and what is not to be feared. One who fears God does not fear the powers of the world. And what do I say of the powers of the world? He does not fear even those principalities and powers and rulers of this world, nor the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. And that we may confirm this by the authority of Paul himself, hear how he speaks of human powers: "Do you wish," he says, "not to fear the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from it." And the prophet says: "The Lord is my helper; I will not fear what man may do to me." And the same prophet seems to me to have had in mind the adverse powers of the spirits when he says: "Many who fight against me from on high will fear by day"; and again: "Though camps stand against me, my heart will not fear." It is, then, a great and magnificent work always to have the fear of God before the eyes of the heart: that fear which filled the rod that rose from the root of Jesse and the flower that rose from its root, of whom he had said: "And the spirit of the fear of the Lord will fill him." And the fear of God makes a man so perfect that nothing is lacking to him, as the prophet says, that "there is no want to those who fear him."

These things we have fitted, as we could, to each of the testimonies taken up by Paul, showing how they seemed to suit those of whom he says, "For we have charged that Jews and Greeks are all under sin." Yet I think they should be understood not as though all these things are charged as having been in each single man, but one thing in one and another in another, yet so that in all of them together this whole sum of vices was fulfilled.

Rom 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 5:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 2:3 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 49:12 (48:13 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 2:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:165 (118:165 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 76:2 (75:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 3:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 36:1 (35:2 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 14:5 (13:5 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 118:6 (117:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 56:2 (55:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 27:3 (26:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 11:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 34:9 (33:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The 'ruin' of sinners is their breaking of the Lord's yoke, the 'way of peace' is Christ, and the fear of God rightly set before the mind's eyes frees one from fearing any earthly or spiritual power; the vices listed are spread among all, not all in each person.

  • Rom 3:16–18. "Jerusalem, which is interpreted vision of peace" follows the traditional etymology. "Many who fight against me from on high will fear by day" follows the Septuagint of Ps 56:2–3 (55:3–4).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote references removed; word rejoined): mentis; qui- Rom. ιιι, 15. ibid. l4. Rom. xu, ll. 2. xxu, 2. Rom. ιιι, l6, 17. Psal. ι.. l9. "’ Rom. ιιι, 17. Psal. cxvm, 165. ’ Psal. uxr, 5bus timoris → mentis; quibus timoris.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Comm. Rom. 3.5 (PG 14:936a–937a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-commentarius-romanos/3-2/#p-3-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-commentarius-romanos-3-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 14, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; lines lost in the scan are marked and noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.