On First Principles 1.3.1–1.4.5

Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.

Show

On 1, chapter 3

1.3.1PG 11:145a–147a

Consequens igitur est nunc, ut de Spiritu sancto quam possumus breviter requiramus. Et omnes quidem qui quoquomodo providentiam esse sentiunt, Deum esse ingenitum qui universa creavit atque disposuit, confitentur, eumque parentem universitatis agnoscunt. Huic tamen esse Filium non nos soli pronuntiamus, quamvis satis hoc et mirum et incredulum videatur iis qui apud Graecos et barbaros philosophari videntur; tamen a nonnullis etiam ipsorum habita ejus videtur opinio, cum verbo Dei, vel ratione creata esse omnia confitentur. Nos vero secundum fidem doctrinae ejus, quam divinitus aspiratam pro certo habemus, eminentiorem divinioremqne rationem de Filio Dei, nullius alterius possibilitatis esse credimus exponere, atque in hominum cognitionem proferre, nisi ejus solius Scripturae quae a Spiritu sancto inspirata est, id est, evangelicae atque apostolicis, nec non legis ac prophetarum, sicut ipse Christus asseruit. De subsistentia vero Spiritus sancti ne suspicionem quidem ullam habere quis potuit, praeter eos qui in lege et prophetis versati sunt, vel eos qui se Christo credere confitentur. Nam de Deo quidem Patre quamvis quiitem proloqui nemo valeat, tamen possibile est intellectum aliquem capi ex occasione visibilium creaturarum et ex his quae humana mens naturaliter sentit; insuper etiam de Scripturis sanctis confirmari possibile est. Sed et de Filio Dei, quamvis nemo noverit Filium nisi Pater, tamen ex divinis Scripturis etiam de ipso qualiter sentiri debeat, mens humana formatur, et non solum ex Novo, sed etiam ex Veteri Testamento, per ea quae a sanctis gesta ad Christum figuraliter referuntur, ex quibus adverti vel divina ejus natura, vel humana quae ab eo assumpta est, potest.

It follows now that we should inquire, as briefly as we can, about the Holy Spirit. All who in any way perceive that there is a providence confess that God is unbegotten, who created and arranged all things, and they acknowledge him as the parent of the universe. That he has a Son, however, we are not the only ones to declare, although this seems quite astonishing and incredible to those who are regarded as philosophers among Greeks and barbarians; yet some even of them seem to have held this opinion, when they confess that all things were created by the Word or reason of God. We, however, according to the faith of his teaching, which we hold for certain to be divinely inspired, believe that it is possible to set out and bring to human knowledge the higher and more divine account of the Son of God by no other means than by that Scripture alone which was inspired by the Holy Spirit, that is, the Gospels and the apostolic writings, and also the law and the prophets, as Christ himself asserted. But concerning the subsistence of the Holy Spirit no one could have had even a suspicion except those who were versed in the law and the prophets, or those who profess to believe in Christ. For about God the Father, although no one is able to speak [worthily], it is possible to gain some understanding from the visible creatures and from what the human mind perceives by nature; and it is possible, moreover, for this to be confirmed from the holy Scriptures. And about the Son of God, although no one knows the Son except the Father, yet from the divine Scriptures the human mind is taught how it ought to think of him too, and not only from the New but also from the Old Testament, through the deeds of the saints which are referred figuratively to Christ, from which both his divine nature and the human nature taken up by him can be discerned.

Matt 11:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 24:44 (echo, low confidence) · Rom 1:20 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Philosophers know of God and even of his Word, but the Holy Spirit is known only from Scripture; the Father is known from creation, the Son from both Testaments.

  • Migne's long footnote on Plato's Second Letter and Eusebius's comments on it, which the scan mixes into the text, has been removed by logged correction. Allusions: Matt 11:27; Luke 24:44 (the law and the prophets); Rom 1:20.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote (on Plato's Second Letter and Eusebius) interleaved with Rufinus's text removed; OCR slips; OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; words of Migne's footnote interleaved; line-break hyphen; note marker): lluic tamen → Huic tamen; incredulnm → incredulum; iidem doctrinae → fidem doctrinae; printer eos → praeter eos; ver- Sati sunt, vel eos qui se Christo credere confitenquod autem comlitmu cst, tertius. Qua: tria totitur (6'5). → versati sunt, vel eos qui se Christo credere confitentur.; itttrllectttm → intellectum; Scriptnris → Scripturis; Sedet de Filio Dei, quantvis → Sed et de Filio Dei, quamvis; quma sanetis → quae a sanctis; eiusnatura → ejus natura; iis qui apud (.60) §ic ωδε.. male Cencbrarilns, potentem.) (till Tamen α npumtllis etiam ipsorum habita ejus videtur Opinio. Plato ejusque discipuli speciem quamdam Trinitatisinformarunt, duosque ac tres distinxere universe deos. e quibus primus est parens umerorum; secundusartil‘ex et principium omnium rerum; tertius ra Platone obscure signilio catus, a plerisque mundi esse anima dicitur. In epistola secunda ad Dionysium sic habet εΦραστέον τῆς sittant; Elei. tisiτὰ τρίτα. « Dicendunr estigitur tibi nunc per (Βηῖgntaia quaedam, ut si quid huic tabellie vel mari vel terra contingat, qui_eam legerit intelligere non possit. Est autem ita. Circa omnium regem cuncta sunt; ipsius gratia omnia; ipse pulchrorum omnium causa; vcirca secundumsecumla; tertia circa ο tertium. His verbis tres _divinita_tis personas significari putavit Eusebius lib. ιιι] Prrepar.erangcl.: tllmc Platonis, inquit. verba qui explicandam philosophi mentem suscepere, ad primum Deum, secundumque principium referunt, nec non ad tertium, quam mundi animamimumque tertium ipsi quoque appellare solent. Idem Plato cpistola scita ad llermiam et Erastum et Doriscum, duos deos, Patrem et Filium, disertius significat, cum epistolatn suam legere illos jubet, ad quos eam scribit, te «Etiam Graecos et barbaros phil050phari videntur; tamena nonnullis etiam ipsarum → iis qui apud Graecos et barbaros philosophari videntur; tamen a nonnullis etiam ipsorum.

Topics: Trinity, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.1 (PG 11:145a–147a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.2PG 11:147a

De Spiritu vero sancto quod sit, multae nos Scripturae docuerunt, sicut David in L psalmo dicit : «Et Spiritum sanctum tuum ne auferas a me. Et in Daniele dicitur: Spiritus sanctus qui est in te‘°.» In Novo vero Testamento abundantibus testimoniis edocemur, cum Spiritus sanctus super Christum descendisse describitur, et cum ipse Dominus insufflavit in apostolos post resurrectionem, dicens: Accipite Spiritum sanctum. Et ad Mariam ab angelo dicitur : Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te. Paulus vero dicit, «quia nemo potest dicere Dominum Jesum nisi in Spiritu sancto . Et in Actibus apostolorum per impositionem manuum apostolicarum Spiritus sanctus dabatur in baptismo“. Ex quibus Omnibus didicimus tantae esse auctoritatis et dignitatis substantiam Spiritus sancti, ut salutaris baptismus non aliter nisi excellentissimae omnium Trinitatis auctoritate, id est, Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti cognominatione compleatur, et ingenito Deo Patri, et unigenito ejus Filio nomen quoque Spiritus sancti copuletur. Quis ergo non Obstupescat quanta majestas sit Spiritus sancti, cum eum qui dixerit verbum in Filium hominis, 'audiat sperare veniam posse, eum vero qui in Spiritum sanctum blasphemaverit, veniam non habere neque in praesenti Saeculo, neque in futuro?

As to what the Holy Spirit is, many passages of Scripture have taught us, as David says in the fiftieth Psalm, “And do not take your Holy Spirit from me”; and in Daniel it is said, “the Holy Spirit who is in you.” In the New Testament we are taught by abundant testimonies, when the Holy Spirit is described as descending upon Christ, and when the Lord himself breathed on the apostles after the resurrection, saying, “Receive the Holy Spirit.” And the angel says to Mary, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you.” And Paul says that “no one can say ‘Lord Jesus’ except in the Holy Spirit.” And in the Acts of the Apostles the Holy Spirit was given in baptism through the laying on of the apostles' hands. From all these we have learned that the substance of the Holy Spirit is of such authority and dignity that saving baptism is not completed except by the authority of the most excellent Trinity of all, that is, by naming the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, and that the name of the Holy Spirit is joined to the unbegotten God the Father and his only-begotten Son. Who, then, is not amazed at how great is the majesty of the Holy Spirit, when he hears that one who has spoken a word against the Son of Man may hope for forgiveness, but that one who has blasphemed against the Holy Spirit has no forgiveness either in the present age or in the age to come?

Ps 51:11 (50:13 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Dan 4:9 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · John 20:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 8:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 28:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 12:32 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Scripture teaches the Spirit's existence and dignity: he is named with the Father and the Son in baptism, and blasphemy against him is unforgivable.

  • Quotations and allusions: Ps 51:11 (Ps 50:13 LXX, “the fiftieth Psalm”); Dan 4:9 (Greek); Matt 3:16; John 20:22; Luke 1:35; 1 Cor 12:3; Acts 8:17–18; Matt 28:19; Matt 12:32.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne note marker; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; stray mark; OCR slips; OCR slips; stray marks; stray marks; OCR slip): multa: nos Scripturm docuertmt → multae nos Scripturae docuerunt; neauferas a tne .» → ne auferas a me.; lu Novo → In Novo; abundantibus (Gi) testimoniis → abundantibus testimoniis; insulIlavit → insufflavit; (licens: α Accipite → dicens: Accipite; sanctum εί. Ει ad → sanctum. Et ad; α Spiritus sanetus superveniet in te δ’. → Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te.; Dominunt → Dominum; sancto . Ει in Actibus → sancto . Et in Actibus; apostoliearum → apostolicarum; tanta: esse → tantae esse; ιιι salutaris baptismtts → ut salutaris baptismus; excellentissime (ἶ onutinrn Trinitatis → excellentissimae omnium Trinitatis; cognominationc → cognominatione; majesias sit Spiritus saucti, cum eum qni → majestas sit Spiritus sancti, cum eum qui; Itabere → habere.

Topics: Trinity, Baptism

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.2 (PG 11:147a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.3PG 11:147a–148a

Quod autem a Deo universa creata sint, nec sit ulla creatura quae non ab eo hoc ipsum ut esset acceperit, ex multis Scriptura: assertionibus comprobatur, repudiatis atque depulsis his quae a quibusdam falso perhibentur, vel de materia Deo coaeterna, vel de ingenitis animabus, quibus non tam subsistendi naturam, quam aequalitatem atque ordinem a Deo insitum volunt. Nam et in eo libello qui Pastoris dicitur angeli paenitentiae, quem Hermas conscripsit, ita refertur: Primo omnium crede, quia unus est Deus qui omnia creavit atque composuit; qui, cum nihil esset prius, esse fecit omnia; qui est omnia capiens, ipse vero a nemine capitur. Sed et in Enoch libro his similia describuntur. Verumtamen usque ad praesens nullum sermonem in scriptis sanctis invenire potuimus per quem Spiritus sanctus factura esse vel creatura diceretur, ne eo quidem modo quo de sapientia referre Salomonem supra edocuimus, vel quae de Vita, vel Verbo, aliisque appellationibus Filii Dei intelligenda esse tractavimus. Spiritus igitur Dei qui super aquas ferebatur “, sicut scriptum est in principio facturae mundi, puto quod non sit alius quam Spiritus sanctus, secundum quod ego intelligere possum, sicut et cum ipsa loca exponeremus, ostendimus, non tamen secundum historiam, sed secundum intelligentiam spiritalem.

That all things were created by God, and that there is no creature which has not received from him its very existence, is proved by many statements of Scripture, which reject and refute what is falsely alleged by some, whether about matter coeternal with God or about unbegotten souls, in whom they would have it that God implanted not so much the nature of subsisting as equality and order. For in the little book called the Shepherd, the book of the angel of repentance, which Hermas wrote, it is said: “First of all believe that there is one God, who created and arranged all things; who, when nothing existed before, made all things to be; who contains all things, but is himself contained by none.” Similar things are also written in the book of Enoch. Yet up to the present we have been able to find no statement in the holy writings by which the Holy Spirit is said to be a thing made or a creature, not even in the way in which we showed above that Solomon speaks of Wisdom, or in which we discussed how the names of Life or Word and the other titles of the Son of God are to be understood. The Spirit of God, therefore, who was borne upon the waters, as is written at the beginning of the making of the world, I think is none other than the Holy Spirit, as far as I am able to understand, as we also showed when we were expounding those very passages, not according to the history, however, but according to the spiritual understanding.

Gen 1:2 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: All things were created by God, as Hermas also says; but no Scripture calls the Holy Spirit a creature, and the Spirit over the waters is the Holy Spirit.

  • Quotation: Hermas, Mandate 1.1. Origen cites the Shepherd and the book of Enoch beside Scripture; this is given as written. “The Spirit of God was borne upon the waters”: Gen 1:2. Origen's exposition of Genesis referred to here is lost.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): tant subsistendi naturam, quam mqualitatem → tam subsistendi naturam, quam aequalitatem; paenitentitc, quem llermas → paenitentiae, quem Hermas; Euoch → Enoch; sanctus_ factura → sanctus factura; factura: mutuli → facturae mundi; intelligere. possunt, sicutet cum ipsa loca exponeretuus, ostendimus, nou tamen secundant → intelligere possum, sicut et cum ipsa loca exponeremus, ostendimus, non tamen secundum.

Extrabiblical texts: Herm. Mand. 1.1 (Shepherd of Hermas: Mandates; quotation); 1 En. (1 Enoch [in the ETH canon]; allusion)

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.3 (PG 11:147a–148a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.4PG 11:148a–150a

Quidam sane ex prxecessoribus nostris in Novo Testamento observarunt, quod sicubi Spiritus nominatur sine adjectione quae assignet qualis sit Spiritus, de sancto Spiritu debet intelligi, ut puta : Fructus autem Spiritus est caritas, gaudium et pax °“, etc. Item et ibi: Cum coeperitis Spiritu, nunc carne perficimini . Nos vero etiam in veteri testamento putamus distinctionem istam posse servari, sicut cum dicit: »Qui dat spiritum populo, qui est super terram, et spiritum his, qui calcant eam«. Sine dubio enim omnis »qui calcat terram«, id est terrena et corporalia, particeps est spiritus sancti, a deo eum accipiens. Dicebat autem et Hebraeus magister quod duo illa Seraphin, quae in Esaia senis alis describuntur clamantia ad invicem et dicentia: »Sanctus sanctus sanctus dominus Sabaoth«, de unigenito filio dei et de spiritu sancto essent intellegenda. Nos vero putamus etiam illud, quod in cantico Ambacum dictum est: »In medio duorum animalium« (vel »duarum vitarum«) »cognosceris«, de Christo et de Spiritu sancto sentiri debere. Omnis enim scientia de Patre revelante Filio in Spiritu sancto cognoscitur, ut ambo haec qua: secundum prophetam vel animantia, vel vitae dicuntur, causa Scientia: Dei Patris exsistant. Sicut enim de Filio dicitur, quia nemo novit Patrem nisi Filius, et cui voluerit Filius revelare"; haec eadem etiam de Spiritu sancto dicit Apostolus, cum ait: Nobis autem revelavit Deus per Spiritum suum; Spiritus enim omnia scrutatur etiam alta Dei. Sed et rursus in Evangelio de divinis ac profundioribus doctrinis commemorans Salvator quas nondum capere poterant discipuli sui, ita ait ad apostolos : Adhuc multa habeo quae vobis dicam, sed non potestis illa modo capere; cum autem venerit consolator Spiritus sanctus, qui ex patre procedit, ille vos docebit omnia, et commonebit omnia quae dixi vobis. Et ita sentiendum est quod sicut Filius qui solus cognoscit Patrem, revelat cui vult; ita Spiritus sanctus qui solus scrutatur etiam alta Dei, revelat Deum cui vult. Spiritus enim ubi vult spirat". Neque enim putandum est quod etiam Spiritus Filio revelante cognoscit. Si enim revelante Filio cognoscit Patrem Spiritus sanctus, ergo ex ignorantia ad scientiam venit; quod utique et impium pariter et stultum est, Spiritum sanctum confiteri, et ignorantiam ei ascribere. Non enim cum aliud aliquid esset antequam Spiritus sanctus, per profectum venit in hoc ut esset Spiritus sanctus; ut quis audeat dicere, quia tunc quidem cum nondum esset Spiritus sanctus, ignorabat Patrem, postea vero quam recepit scientiam, Spiritus sanctus effectus est; quod si esset. nunquam utique in unitate Trinitatis, id est Dei Patris inconvertibilis et Filii ejus, etiam ipse Spiritus sanctus haberetur, nisi quia et ipse semper erat Spiritus sanctus. Hoc sane quod dicimus, vel semper, vel erat, vel si quod aliud tale temporalis significationis nomen adsciscimus, simpliciter et cum venia accipiendum est; quoniam nominum quidem horum significationes temporales sunt, ea autem de quibus loquimur, tractatu quidem sermonis temporaliter nominantur, natura autem sui omnem intelligentiam sensus temporalis excedunt.

Some of our predecessors have indeed observed that in the New Testament, wherever the Spirit is named without an addition indicating what kind of spirit it is, it should be understood of the Holy Spirit; for example, “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy and peace,” and so on; and likewise, “Having begun in the Spirit, are you now made perfect in the flesh?” We, however, think that this distinction can be kept also in the Old Testament, as when it says: “He who gives spirit to the people that is upon the earth, and spirit to those who tread on it.” For without doubt everyone who “treads on the earth,” that is, on earthly and bodily things, is a partaker of the Holy Spirit, receiving him from God. My Hebrew teacher also used to say that the two seraphim in Isaiah, who are described with six wings each, calling to one another and saying, “Holy, holy, holy, Lord of hosts,” were to be understood of the only-begotten Son of God and of the Holy Spirit. And we think that what is said in the song of Habakkuk, “In the midst of the two living creatures” (or “of the two lives”) “you will be known,” is also to be understood of Christ and of the Holy Spirit. For all knowledge of the Father is gained through the Son's revelation in the Holy Spirit, so that both of these, which according to the prophet are called either living creatures or lives, are the cause of the knowledge of God the Father. For just as it is said of the Son that “no one knows the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wishes to reveal him,” the Apostle says the same of the Holy Spirit when he says, “But God has revealed it to us through his Spirit; for the Spirit searches all things, even the depths of God.” And again in the Gospel the Saviour, mentioning the divine and deeper teachings which his disciples could not yet grasp, says to the apostles: “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now; but when the Comforter, the Holy Spirit, who proceeds from the Father, comes, he will teach you all things and remind you of all that I have said to you.” And so we must think that just as the Son, who alone knows the Father, reveals him to whom he wills, so the Holy Spirit, who alone searches even the depths of God, reveals God to whom he wills. “For the Spirit breathes where he wills.” Nor are we to think that the Spirit, too, knows through the Son's revealing. For if the Holy Spirit knows the Father through the Son's revealing, he has then come from ignorance to knowledge; and it is surely as impious as it is foolish to confess the Holy Spirit and to ascribe ignorance to him. For it is not that he was something else before he was the Holy Spirit, and came by advancement to be the Holy Spirit, so that one might dare to say that when he was not yet the Holy Spirit he did not know the Father, but after he received knowledge he was made the Holy Spirit. If that were so, the Holy Spirit himself would never be reckoned in the unity of the Trinity, that is, with the unchangeable God the Father and his Son, unless he too had always been the Holy Spirit. Of course, when we say “always” or “was,” or adopt any other such term of temporal meaning, it must be taken simply and with allowance; for the meanings of these terms are temporal, but the things of which we speak, though they are named in temporal terms in the course of discussion, by their nature surpass every understanding of temporal sense.

Gal 5:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Hab 3:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:12 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:13 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:26 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 42:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 6:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Hab 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:26 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Like the Son, the Holy Spirit reveals the Father; he did not come from ignorance to knowledge, but was always the Holy Spirit within the unity of the Trinity.

  • Quotations: Gal 5:22; Gal 3:3; Isa 42:5; Isa 6:2–3; Hab 3:2 LXX (“in the midst of two living creatures you will be known”); Matt 11:27; 1 Cor 2:10; John 16:12–13; John 15:26; John 14:26; John 3:8. The “Hebrew teacher” is a Jewish Christian, or a Jew, from whom Origen learned; he mentions him elsewhere.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne footnote removed; Migne note marker; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; column number removed; joined words; stray mark; stray mark; OCR slip; stray marks): ttominatur → nominatur; caque: assignet → quae assignet; ut puta : α Fructus → ut puta : Fructus; citat-itas → caritas; ltem et ibi: Cum emperitis Spiritu. nunc carne perlicimini → Item et ibi: Cum coeperitis Spiritu, nunc carne perficimini; suum (7'3); → suum;; Dei “.i Sed → Dei. Sed; prolumlioribus → profundioribus; nomium → nondum; dieam, sed non potestisilla → dicam, sed non potestis illa; coxisolator → consolator; etcotnmunebit → et commonebit; Μυκη-.» → vobis.; sentiendum estquod → sentiendum est quod; ‹ Spiritus enim tibi vult → Spiritus enim ubi vult; putandum 6?, est → putandum est; stultmn → stultum; conliteri,et → confiteri, et; ιιι quis audeat → ut quis audeat; t-flectus → effectus; uuitate → unitate; lloc τ’ llabac. Ill, 5. ’ί Luc. ιι, 9.2. lCor. ιι, 10. sane → Hoc sane; etcum venia → et cum venia; signiticationes → significationes.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.4 (PG 11:148a–150a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.5PG 11:150a–151b

Rectum tamen videtur inquirere quid causa: sit. quod qui regeneratnr per Deum in salutem, opus habet et Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto, non percepturus salutem nisi sit integra Trinitas : nec possibile sit participem fieri Patris vel Filii sine Spiritu sancto. De quibus discutientes sine dubio necessarium erit ut operationem specialem Spiritus sancti, et specialem Patris ac Filii describamus. Arbitror ergo operationem quidem esse Patris et Filii tam in sanctis quam in peccatoribus, in hominibus rationalibus et in mutis animalibus ; sed et in his quae sine anima sunt, et in omnibus omnino quae sunt; operationem vero Spiritus sancti nequaquam prorsus incidere vel in ea quae sine anima sunt, vel in ea quae animantia quidem, sed muta sunt; sed ne in illis quidem inveniri qui rationabiles quidem sunt, sed in malitia positi, nec omnino ad meliora conversi. In illis autem solis esse arbitror opus Spiritus sancti qui jam se ad meliora convertunt, et per vias Christi Jesu incedunt, id est, qui sunt in bonis actibus, et in Deo permanent.

It seems right, however, to inquire what the reason is why one who is regenerated by God unto salvation has need of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, and will not receive salvation unless the Trinity is complete; and why it is not possible to become a partaker of the Father or of the Son without the Holy Spirit. In discussing these things it will undoubtedly be necessary to describe the special working of the Holy Spirit, and the special working of the Father and the Son. I think, then, that the working of the Father and the Son is both in saints and in sinners, in rational human beings and in dumb animals, and also in things without soul, and in absolutely all things that exist; but that the working of the Holy Spirit by no means extends to things without soul, nor to those that are living but dumb; nor is it found even in those who are rational but are set in wickedness and not at all converted to better things. But I think that the work of the Holy Spirit is in those alone who are already turning to better things and walking in the ways of Christ Jesus, that is, who are engaged in good actions and abide in God.

Notes and citation

Summary: Salvation requires the whole Trinity: the Father and the Son work in all things, but the Holy Spirit only in those who turn to the good and walk in Christ's ways.

  • In the scan, the second half of this passage is interleaved with Migne's parallel column, his Latin version of a Greek fragment preserved by Justinian, which says that the Father reaches all beings, the Son, “less than the Father”, only rational beings, and the Spirit, “still less”, only the saints, so that the Father's power is greater than the Son's and the Spirit's. It is not part of Rufinus's text and has been removed by logged correction, with Migne's footnotes. Rufinus's text, given here, does not contain that ranking; whether he left it out is a known question.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's bracket and line-break hyphen removed; OCR slips; line-break hyphen; OCR slips; line-break hyphens; split word): Spirio tus sancti → Spiritus sancti; describamus. [ Arbitror ergo operatio- nem → describamus. Arbitror ergo operationem; sed et iu his quae sine anima sunt, et in omni— bus omnino (λικε sunt; → sed et in his quae sine anima sunt, et in omnibus omnino quae sunt;; Spiri- tus saucti nequaquam prorsus incidere vel inea qum sine anima sunt, vel in ea quae animantia qui- dem, sed muta sunt;sed ne in illis quidem inve- niri qui rationabiles quidem-sunt, sed in tua; lilia → Spiritus sancti nequaquam prorsus incidere vel in ea quae sine anima sunt, vel in ea quae animantia quidem, sed muta sunt; sed ne in illis quidem inveniri qui rationabiles quidem sunt, sed in malitia.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.5 (PG 11:150a–151b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.6PG 11:151b–152b

Quia autem operatio Patris et Filii et in sanctis et in peccatoribus sit, manifestatur ex eo quod omnes qui rationabiles sunt, Verbi, id est rationis participes sunt, et per hoc velut quaedam semina insita sibi gerunt sapientiae et justitiae, quod est Christus. Ex eo autem qui vere est, qui dixit per Moysem: Ego sum qui sum , omnia quaecunque sunt participant : quae participatio Dei Patris pervenit in omnes tam justos quam peccatores, et rationabiles atque irrationabiles, et in omnia omnino quae sunt. Ostendit sane et Apostolus quod omnes habeant participium Christi , dicens: Ne dixeris in corde tuo : Quis ascendet in caelum? id est Christum deducere; aut quis descendet in abyssum? id est Christum a mortuis revocare. Sed quid dicit Scriptura? Prope est verbum in ore tuo, δ et in corde tuo". ί Ex quo in corde omnium significat eSse Christum secundum id quod Verbum vel ratio est, cujus participatione rationabiles sunt. Sed et illud quod in Evangelio dictum est : Nisi venissem et locutus fuissem eis, peccatum non haberent, nunc autem excusationem non habent pro peccato suo"; his qui rationem norunt, usque ad quod tempus peccatum homo non habeat, et ex qua aetate obnoxius peccato sit, manifestum est et patet quomodo ex participatione verbi vel rationis homines peccatum habere dicuntur; videlicet ex quo intellectus atque scientia: capaces effecti, cum jam eis boni vel mali discretionem ratio intrinsecus inserta suggesserit; et cum scire jam coeperint quid sit malum, si faciunt illud, peccato efficiuntur obnoxii : et hoc estquod dicit, quia excusationem non habent homines pro peccato suo, ex quo eis divinus sermo vel ratio ostendere coeperit in corde discretionem boni et mali, ut per hanc debeant refugere et cavere quod malum est; quia scienti bonum et non facienti, peccatum est illi". item quod omnes homines non sunt extra communionem Dei, hoc modo Evangelium docet, dicente Salvatore: Regnum Dei cum observatione non venit; neque dicent, ecce hic, aut ibi; sed regnum Dei intra vos est”. Sed et illud videndum est ne forte idem significet quod in Genesi scriptum est, cum ait : Et insufflavit in faciem ejus inspirationem vitae, et factus est homo in animam vivam“. Quod si generaliter in omnes homines datum esse intelligitur,omnes homines habent participium Dei. Si vero hoc de Spiritu Dei dictum intelligendum est, quoniam ει Adam prophetasse de nonnullis invenitur, ergo jam non generaliter, sed sanctis quibusque datum accipi potest.

That the working of the Father and the Son is both in saints and in sinners is shown by the fact that all who are rational are partakers of the Word, that is, of reason, and by this they bear implanted in themselves certain seeds, as it were, of wisdom and righteousness, which is Christ. And all things that exist share in him who truly is, who said through Moses, “I am who I am”; and this participation in God the Father reaches all, both righteous and sinners, rational and irrational, and absolutely all things that exist. The Apostle too shows that all have a share in Christ, saying: “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’ (that is, to bring Christ down), or ‘Who will descend into the abyss?’ (that is, to call Christ back from the dead). But what does Scripture say? ‘The word is near, in your mouth and in your heart.’” By this he signifies that Christ is in the heart of all, in so far as he is the Word or reason, by sharing in whom they are rational. And the saying in the Gospel, “If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin,” makes clear to those who understand reason up to what time a person does not have sin and from what age he is liable to sin, and it is plain and evident how people are said to have sin from their participation in the Word or reason: that is, from the time they have been made capable of understanding and knowledge, when the reason implanted within has suggested to them the distinction between good and evil; and when they have begun to know what evil is, if they do it, they become liable to sin. And this is what he means by saying that people have no excuse for their sin, from the time when the divine word or reason has begun to show them in their heart the distinction between good and evil, so that by it they ought to flee and beware of what is evil; for “to one who knows the good and does not do it, it is sin.” Again, that all human beings are not outside communion with God, the Gospel teaches in this way, when the Saviour says: “The kingdom of God does not come with observation; nor will they say, ‘Look, here,’ or ‘there’; but the kingdom of God is within you.” But we must also see whether perhaps the same thing is meant by what is written in Genesis, where it says: “And he breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul.” If this is understood to have been given generally to all human beings, then all human beings have a share in God. But if this is to be understood as said of the Spirit of God, since Adam too is found to have prophesied about some things, then it can be taken as given not generally but to the saints.

Exod 3:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 10:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 10:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 10:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 30:14 (echo, medium confidence) · John 15:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 4:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 17:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:30 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: All beings share in God the Father's existence and all rational beings in Christ the Word, who makes them answerable for sin once reason distinguishes good from evil.

  • Quotations: Exod 3:14; Rom 10:6–8 (from Deut 30:12–14); John 15:22; Jas 4:17; Luke 17:20–21; Gen 2:7. “Wisdom and righteousness, which is Christ”: 1 Cor 1:30. The words in square brackets are supplied from the sense.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips): itt sanetis → in sanctis; nntvnes → omnes; Verhi, id cst rationis participes suut., → Verbi, id est rationis participes sunt,; justitim → justitiae; in cmltnu (ειη id est → in caelum? id est; abyssum Ἰ id est → abyssum? id est; signilicat → significat; in Evangelio dictum cst → in Evangelio dictum est; boni vel ntali → boni vel mali; illttd, ρειαί-ιιιο elliciuntur → illud, peccato efficiuntur; carperit → coeperit; refugere ct cavere → refugere et cavere; Regnum Dei eum observatione → Regnum Dei cum observatione; Sed ει illud → Sed et illud; scriptum cst, cum ait : ‹ Ει insulllavit in iaciem ejus inspi rationem vine, et faetus → scriptum est, cum ait : Et insufflavit in faciem ejus inspirationem vitae, et factus.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.6 (PG 11:151b–152b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.7PG 11:152b–154b

Denique etiam diluvii tempore cum omnis caro corrupisset viam Dei. tanquam de indignis et peccatoribus scriptum est dixisse Deum : Non permanebit Spiritus meus in hominibus istis in aeternum, propter quod caro sunt«. In quo manifeste ostenditur quod ab indignis quibusque aufertur spiritus dei. In psalmis quoque scribitur: »Auferes spiritum eorum, et deficient et in terram suam revertentur. Emittes spiritum tuum, et creabuntur, et renovabis faciem terrae«, quod manifeste de sancto spiritu designatur, qui ablatis atque extinctis peccatoribus et indignis ipse sibi novum populum »creet« et »renovet faciem terrae«, cum per gratiam spiritus deponentes veterem hominem cum actibus suis, in novitate vita: coeperint ambulare. Et ideo de eo competenter dicitur, quia non in omnibus, neque in his qui caro sunt, sed in his quorum terra renovata fuerit, Spiritus sanctus habitabit. Denique idcirco per impositionem manuum apostolorum post baptismum gratia et revelatio sancti Spiritus tradebatur. Sed et Salvator noster post resurrectionem, cum vetera jam transissent, et facta fuissent omnia nova, novus ipse homo et primogenitus ex mortuis renovatis quoque per fidem suae resurrectionis apostolis ait : «Accipite Spiritum sanctum“. Hoc est nimirum quod et ipse Salvator Dominus in Evangelio designabat“, cum vinum eorum in utres mitti posse veteres denegabat, sed iubebat utres fieri novos, id est homines in novitate vita: ambulare, ut vinum novum, id est Spiritus sancti gratiae susciperent novitatem. lloc ergo pacto operatio virtutis Dei Patris et Filii indiscrete super omnem protenditur creaturam : Spiritus sancti vero participationem a sanctis tantummodo haberi invenimus. Propter quod dicitur : Nemo potest dicere Dominum Jesum nisi in Spiritu sancto. Et vix aliquando ipsi apostoli digni habentur audire : Accipietis virtutem supervenientis Spiritus sancti in vos .» Propter quod et consequens puto, quia qui peccaverit quidem in Filium hominis venia dignus est; pro eo quod is qui Verbi Dei vel rationis est particeps, si desinat rationabiliter vivere, videtur in ignorantiam vel stultitiam decidisse, et propter hoc veniam promereri; qui autem dignus jam habitus est sancti Spiritus participatione, et retro fuerit conversus, hic reipsa et opere blasphemasse dicitur in Spiritum sanctum. Ne quis sane existimet nos ex eo quod diximus Spiritum sanctum solis sanctis praestari, Patris vero et Filii beneficia vel inoperationes pervenire ad bonos et malos, justos et injustos, praetulisse per hoc Patri et Filio Spiritum sanctum, vel majorem ejus per hoc asserere dignitatem : quod utique valde inconsequens est. Proprietatem namque gratiae ejus operisque descripsimus. Porro autem nihil in Trinitate majus minusve dicendum est, cum unius divinitatis fons verbo ac ratione sua teneat universa, spiritu vero oris sui quae digna sunt sanctificatione, sanctificet, sicut in psalmo scriptum est: Verbo Domini caeli firmati sunt, et spiritu oris eius omnis virtus eorum .) Est etiam quaedam inoperatio Dei Patris praecipua praeter illam qua carnibus ut essent naturaliter praestitit. Est et Domini Jesu Christi praecipuum quoddam ministerium in eos quibus naturaliter ut rationabiles sint, confert, per quod ad haec quae sunt praestatur eis ut bene sint. Est et alia quoque etiam Spiritus sancti gratia quae dignis praestatur, ministrata quidem per Christum, inoperata autem a Patre secundum meritum eorum qui capaces ejus efficiuntur. Quod manifestissime indicat apostolus Paulus, unam eamdemque virtutem Trinitatis exponens in eo dum dicit : Divisiones sunt donorum, idem autem Spiritus; et divisiones sunt ministeriorum, idem autem Dominus; et divisiones operationum sunt, idem autem Deus qui operatur omnia in omnibus. Unicuique autem datur manifestatio Spiritus secundum id quod expedit”. Ex quo manifestissime designatur quod nulla est in Trinitate discretio, sed hoc quod donum Spiritus dicitur, manifestatur per Filium, et inoperatur per Deum Patrem. Omnia autem Operatur unus atque idem Spiritus, dividens unicuique prout vult.

Indeed, at the time of the flood, when all flesh had corrupted the way of God, it is written that God said, as of the unworthy and sinners, “My Spirit shall not remain in these men for ever, because they are flesh.” By this it is clearly shown that the Spirit of God is taken away from all who are unworthy. In the Psalms also it is written: “You will take away their spirit, and they will fail and return to their earth. You will send forth your Spirit, and they will be created, and you will renew the face of the earth.” This is clearly said of the Holy Spirit, who, when sinners and the unworthy have been taken away and destroyed, himself “creates” a new people for himself and “renews the face of the earth,” when through the grace of the Spirit they put off the old man with his deeds and begin to walk in newness of life. And therefore it is fittingly said of him that the Holy Spirit will dwell not in all, nor in those who are flesh, but in those whose earth has been renewed. For this reason, indeed, the grace and revelation of the Holy Spirit was given after baptism through the laying on of the apostles' hands. And our Saviour, too, after the resurrection, when the old things had passed away and all things had been made new, himself the new man and the firstborn from the dead, said to the apostles, who had also been renewed through faith in his resurrection, “Receive the Holy Spirit.” This, no doubt, is what the Saviour and Lord himself indicated in the Gospel when he denied that new wine could be put into old wineskins and commanded that new wineskins be made, that is, that people should walk in newness of life, so that they might receive the new wine, that is, the newness of the grace of the Holy Spirit. In this way, then, the working of the power of God the Father and of the Son extends without distinction over every creature, but we find that participation in the Holy Spirit is held by the saints alone. Therefore it is said, “No one can say ‘Lord Jesus’ except in the Holy Spirit.” And even the apostles themselves are scarcely at last thought worthy to hear, “You shall receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you.” For this reason I think it also follows that one who has sinned against the Son of Man is worthy of forgiveness, because one who is a partaker of the Word or reason of God, if he ceases to live according to reason, seems to have fallen into ignorance or folly and on this account to deserve forgiveness; but one who has already been counted worthy of participation in the Holy Spirit and has turned back is said, by this very fact and deed, to have blasphemed against the Holy Spirit. Let no one think, indeed, that because we have said that the Holy Spirit is granted to the saints alone, while the benefits or workings of the Father and the Son reach the good and the bad, the just and the unjust, we have by this preferred the Holy Spirit to the Father and the Son, or are asserting a greater dignity for him; that would certainly be quite inconsistent. For we have described the particular character of his grace and work. Further, nothing in the Trinity is to be called greater or less, since the fountain of the one Godhead holds all things together by his Word and reason, and sanctifies by the spirit of his mouth those things that are worthy of sanctification, as is written in the Psalm: “By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and all their power by the spirit of his mouth.” There is also a special working of God the Father, besides that by which he naturally granted existence to all things. There is also a special ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ toward those on whom he naturally confers rationality, by which it is granted to them, in addition to their being, to be well. There is also another grace, that of the Holy Spirit, which is granted to the worthy, ministered through Christ but worked by the Father, according to the merit of those who become capable of it. This the apostle Paul most clearly indicates when, setting forth the one and the same power of the Trinity, he says: “There are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of ministries, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of workings, but the same God who works all in all. But to each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for what is profitable.” From this it is most clearly indicated that there is no separation in the Trinity, but that what is called the gift of the Spirit is manifested through the Son and worked by God the Father. “But all these are worked by one and the same Spirit, dividing to each as he wills.”

Gen 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 6:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 6:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 8:17 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:18 (allusion, high confidence) · John 20:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 9:17 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:32 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:45 (echo, medium confidence) · Ps 33:6 (32:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 104:29 (103:29 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 104:30 (103:30 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Holy Spirit is given to the saints alone, yet this does not make him greater than the Father and the Son; the one power of the Trinity works in the different gifts.

  • “Besides that by which he naturally granted existence to all things”: the scan reads carnibus (“to fleshly beings”), probably a misreading; translated by sense. The sentence “nothing in the Trinity is to be called greater or less” is Rufinus's text. Quotations and allusions: Gen 6:12; Gen 6:3; Ps 104:29–30 (Ps 103:29–30 LXX); Col 3:9; Rom 6:4; Acts 8:17; 2 Cor 5:17; Col 1:18; John 20:22; Matt 9:17; 1 Cor 12:3; Acts 1:8; Matt 12:32; Matt 5:45; Ps 33:6 (Ps 32:6 LXX); 1 Cor 12:4–7, 11.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne note marker; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; line-break hyphen; note marker; stray mark): tauquam de indignis ct → tanquam de indignis et; cmperint → coeperint; impositiouem → impositionem; munia nova → omnia nova; resurreetionis → resurrectionis; Dominus iu Evangelio → Dominus in Evangelio; protenditur (9|) creaturam → protenditur creaturam; Dominum' Jesum nisi in Spiritu sanιειοθε.» Ει vix → Dominum Jesum nisi in Spiritu sancto. Et vix; est‘particeps → est particeps; qui Ο autem → qui autem; przestari → praestari; injustas, prartulisse → injustos, praetulisse; majorem elus → majorem ejus; gralite → gratiae; sauctifteatione,sanctificet → sanctificatione, sanctificet; scriptum estuVerbo Domini οωΙί firmati → scriptum est: Verbo Domini caeli firmati; qumdatu inoperatio → quaedam inoperatio; prwter → praeter; ad ltazc quae → ad haec quae; przestatur → praestatur; uuam eamdemque → unam eamdemque; dicit : I Divisiones → dicit : Divisiones; manil'estatio → manifestatio; Triuitate → Trinitate; manife- Statur → manifestatur; unus atque idern → unus atque idem; vult θ’. → vult..

Topics: Trinity, Baptism

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.7 (PG 11:152b–154b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.3.8PG 11:154b–155b

His igitur de unitate Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti protestatis, redeamus nunc ad eum ordinem quem disserere coeperamus. Deus Pater omnibus praestat ut sint; participatio vero Christi, secundum id quod Verbum vel ratio est,facit ea esse rationabilia. Ex quo consequens est ea vel laude digna esse, vel culpa, quia virtutis et malitiae sunt capacia. Propter hoc consequenter adest etiam gratia Spiritus sancti, ut ea quae substantialiter sancta non sunt, participatione ipsius sancta efficiantur. Cum ergo primo ut sint, habeant ex Deo Patre; secundo ut rationabilia sint, habeant ex Verbo; tertio ut sint sancta, habeant ex Spiritu sancto, rursum Christi secundum hoc quod justitia Dei est, capacia efficiuntur ea quae jam sanctificata ante fuerint per Spiritum sanctum; et qui in hunc gradum proficere meruerint per sanctificationem Spiritus sancti, consequentur nihilominus donum sapientiae secundum virtutem et inoperationem Spiritus Dei. Et hoc puto Paulum dicere, cum ait quibusdam dari sermonem sapientiae, aliis sermonem scientiae secundum eumdem Spiritum. Et designans unamquamque discretionem donorum, refert omnia ad universitatis fontem, et dicit: »Divisiones sunt inoperationum, sed unus deus, qui operatur omnia in omnibus«. Unde et inoperatio patris, quae esse praestat omnibus, clarior ac magnificentior invenitur, cum unusquisque per participationem Christi secundum id, quod »sapientia« est, et secundum id, quod scientia est et »sanctificatio« est, proficit et in altiores profectuum gradus venit; et per hoc quod participatione sancti Spiritus factus est quis purior atque sincerior, effectus dignus recipit sapientia: ac scientiae gratiam, ut depulsis omnibus expurgatisque pollutionis atque ignorantiae maculis, tantum profectum sinceritatis ac puritatis accipiat, ut hoc quod accepit a Deo ut esset, tale sit quale Deo dignum est, eo qui ut esset pure utique praestitit ac perfecte; ut tam dignum sit id quod est. quam est ille qui id esse fecit. Ita namque et virtutem semper esse atque in aeternum manere percipiet a Deo is qui talis est. qualem eum esse voluit ille qui fecit. Quod ut accidat, et ut indesinenter atque inseparabiliter adsint ei qui est ea quae ab ipso facta sunt, sapientiae id opus est instruere atque erudire ea, et ad perfectionem perducere ex Spiritus sancti confirmatione atque indesinenti sanctificatione per quam solum Deum capere possunt. Ita ergo indesinenti erga nos opere Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti per singulos quosque profectuum gradus instaurato, vix si forte aliquando intueri possumus sanctam ac beatam vitam : in qua cum post agones multos in eam perveniri potuerit, ita perdurare debemus ut nulla unquam nos boni illius satietas capiat; sed quanto magis de illa beatitudine percipimus, tanto magis in nobis vel dilatetur ejus desiderium, vel augeatur, dum semper ardentius et capacius Patrem, et Filium, ac Spiritum sanctum vel capimus, vel tenemus. Si autem aliquando satietas capit aliquem ex his qui in summo perfectoque constiterint gradu, non arbitror quod ad subitum quis evacuetur, ac decidat: sed paulatim et per partes defluere eum necesse est: ita ut fieri possit interdum, ut si brevis aliquis lapsus acciderit, et cito resipiscat atque in se revertatur, non penitus ruere, sed revocare pedem et redire ad statum suum, et rursum statuere possit id quod per negligentiam fuerat lapsum.

Having thus declared these things about the unity of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, let us now return to the order we had begun to discuss. God the Father grants to all that they exist; participation in Christ, in so far as he is the Word or reason, makes them rational. From this it follows that they are worthy either of praise or of blame, because they are capable of virtue and wickedness. Consequently, therefore, the grace of the Holy Spirit is also present, so that those beings which are not holy in substance may be made holy by participation in him. Since, then, they have first their existence from God the Father, secondly their rationality from the Word, and thirdly their holiness from the Holy Spirit, those which have previously been sanctified through the Holy Spirit are again made capable of Christ, in so far as he is the righteousness of God; and those who have merited to advance to this degree through the sanctification of the Holy Spirit will nonetheless obtain the gift of wisdom according to the power and working of the Spirit of God. And this I think Paul means when he says that to some is given the word of wisdom, to others the word of knowledge, according to the same Spirit. And indicating each distinction of gifts, he refers them all to the fountain of the universe, and says: “There are varieties of workings, but one God, who works all things in all.” Hence the working of the Father, which grants existence to all, is found the more glorious and magnificent when each one, through participation in Christ as wisdom, as knowledge and as sanctification, advances and comes to higher degrees of progress; and through being made purer and more sincere by participation in the Holy Spirit, he is made worthy and receives the grace of wisdom and knowledge, so that, all the stains of pollution and ignorance being driven out and cleansed, he may receive so great an advance in sincerity and purity that what he received from God, his existence, may be such as is worthy of God, who granted him existence purely and perfectly, so that what exists may be as worthy as he who made it exist. For in this way the one who is such as he who made him wished him to be will receive from God the power to exist always and to remain for ever. And so that this may happen, and that the things made by him may be present unceasingly and inseparably to him who is, it is the work of Wisdom to instruct and train them and bring them to perfection by the strengthening and unceasing sanctification of the Holy Spirit, through which alone they can receive God. Thus, by the unceasing work of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit towards us, renewed at every stage of progress, we may perhaps at last, with difficulty, behold the holy and blessed life; and when after many struggles we have been able to reach it, we ought so to continue in it that no satiety of that good ever takes hold of us; but the more we perceive of that blessedness, the more our desire for it is enlarged and increased, as we ever more ardently and more capaciously receive and hold the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. But if satiety ever takes hold of any of those who have stood on the highest and perfect step, I do not think that he is suddenly emptied and falls away; rather he must slip down gradually and by degrees; so that it may sometimes happen that, if a brief lapse occurs and he quickly comes to his senses and returns to himself, he does not fall utterly but can draw back his foot and return to his position, and again make firm what had slipped through negligence.

1 Cor 1:30 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 12:8 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:6 (quotation, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Rational beings receive existence from the Father, reason from the Word and holiness from the Spirit, and so advance toward the blessed life; but even the perfect may, through satiety, gradually slip.

  • The idea that satiety may lead even the perfect to fall away is a characteristic teaching of Origen, given here as Rufinus has it. Allusions: 1 Cor 1:30; 1 Cor 12:8; 1 Cor 12:6.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; note marker): llis igitur → His igitur; ad cum ordinem → ad eum ordinem; prtestat → praestat; facit ca esse → facit ea esse; eiiiciautur → efficiantur; primo ttt sint → primo ut sint; sanctificatiouem → sanctificationem; scieutiaa secundum eumdent → scientiae secundum eumdem; vcuit → venit; efi‘ectus → effectus; ut boc quod accepit a Deo ιιι esset → ut hoc quod accepit a Deo ut esset; ιιι tam dignum sit itl quod → ut tam dignum sit id quod; :rternum → aeternum; a ilco → a Deo; Quod nt accidat → Quod ut accidat; profectnum gratius instaurate → profectuum gradus instaurato; tmquam → unquam; tle illa → de illa; Patrem“), → Patrem,; ex bis qui → ex his qui; aliqu?s → aliquis; lapsmn → lapsum.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.3.8 (PG 11:154b–155b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-3-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-3-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

On 1, chapter 4

1.4.1PG 11:155b–156b

Ut autem istam diminutionem vel lapsum eorum qui se negligentius egerint ostendamus, etiam similitudine alicujus exempli uti non videtur absurdum. Igitur si sit aliquis qui peritia vel arte, verbi gratia geometria: vel medicinae, paulatim fuerit imbutus usquequo venerit ad perfectum, multo scilicet tempore institutionibus atque exercitiis semetipsum informans ut ad integrum supradictae artis assumeret disciplinam : huic nunquam profecto accidere poterit, ut cum peritus dormierit, evigilet imperitus. Non enim ea quae per laesionem aliquam vel debilitatem accidunt, in medium adducere aut commemorare nunc convenit; neque enim similitudini propositae exemploque conveniunt. Secundum ergo id quod proposuimus, geometres ille vel medicus, donec exercet se in meditationibus artis suae et rationabilibus institutis, permanet apud eum etiam scientia disciplinae. Si vero dissimulet ab exercitiis, et negligat ab industria. paulatim primo per negligentiam pauca excidunt, tum deinde etiam plura, et ita per multum tempus abeunt omnia in oblivionem, atque universa ex memoria penitus abolentur. Potest sane fieri, ut cum decidere ab initio coeperit et parva adhuc corrumpi negligentia, si resuscitetur et citius in semetipsum revertatur, reparet ea quae adhuc nuper amissa sunt, et recolat ea quae ab eo fuerant tenui adhuc abolitione sublata. Transferamus nunc haec ad eos qui se Dei scientiae ac sapientia: dediderunt, cujus eruditio atque industria incomparabilibus omnes reliquas disciplinas supereminet modis, et secundum propositae similitudinis formam vel quae sit assumptio scientiae, vel quae sit ejus abolitio contemplemur; maxime cum audiamus ab Apostolo quod de perfectis dicitur, quod facie ad faciem gloriam Domini ex mysteriorum revelationibus speculabuntur.

To show this diminution or falling away of those who have acted rather carelessly, it does not seem absurd to use the comparison of an example. Suppose, then, there is someone who has been gradually trained in some skill or art, for instance geometry or medicine, until he has come to perfection, having shaped himself over a long time by instruction and exercises so as to take on the discipline of that art completely: to such a one it can certainly never happen that he falls asleep skilled and wakes up unskilled. For it is not fitting now to bring forward or mention what happens through some injury or weakness, since these do not suit the comparison and example proposed. According to what we have proposed, then, so long as that geometer or physician exercises himself in the study of his art and in its rational principles, the knowledge of the discipline remains with him. But if he neglects the exercises and abandons his diligence, at first, through negligence, a few things gradually slip away, then more, and so over a long time everything passes into oblivion and is entirely erased from memory. It can indeed happen that, when he has only begun to fall away and is still being corrupted by a small negligence, if he is roused and quickly returns to himself, he may restore what has only recently been lost and recover what had been taken from him by an erasure still slight. Let us now transfer this to those who have devoted themselves to the knowledge and wisdom of God, whose learning and diligence surpass all other disciplines in incomparable ways, and let us consider, according to the form of the comparison proposed, what the acquisition of knowledge is and what its erasure; especially since we hear from the Apostle what is said of the perfect, that face to face they behold the glory of the Lord through the revelation of mysteries.

1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:18 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Origen illustrates the gradual falling away of rational beings by the example of a man skilled in an art who neglects it and slowly forgets it.

  • Allusions: 1 Cor 13:12; 2 Cor 3:18. Koetschau notes that Rufinus seems to have left out here Origen's fuller account of how knowledge is acquired and lost (Jerome, Letter to Avitus 3, reports that Origen taught that rational beings who grow negligent sink by degrees into ever grosser bodies); Jerome's report is not part of Rufinus's text and is not reproduced.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne footnote removed; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; note marker; joined words): Ut autent → Ut autem; quise Itcgligettlius → qui se negligentius; etiam θ’ ll Cor. ιιι, l8. similitudine → etiam similitudine; medicintr → medicinae; itubutus → imbutus; informaus → informans; utcum → ut cum; ea qua! per liesionem → ea quae per laesionem; proposita: exemploque → propositae exemploque; ergo iii quod → ergo id quod; iu meditationibus artis sua: → in meditationibus artis suae; apml → apud; multtnn tetnpus('2) → multum tempus; creperit → coeperit; resnscitetur → resuscitetur; tnaxime → maxime.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.4.1 (PG 11:155b–156b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-4-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-4-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.4.2PG 11:156b–157a

Verum nos volentes divina in nos beneficia demonstrare, quae nobis per patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum praebentur, quae trinitas totius est sanctitatis fons, excessu quodam usi haec diximus et sermonem de anima quia inciderat, strictim licet, contingendum putavimus, vicinum utpote locum de natura rationabili disserentes. Opportunius tamen in loco proprio de omni rationabili natura quae in tria genera speciesque distinguitur, deo nobis per Jesum Christum et sanctum Spiritum concedente, disputabimus.

But in our wish to show the divine benefits bestowed on us through the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, which Trinity is the fountain of all holiness, we have said these things by way of a digression, and we thought we should touch, if only briefly, on the subject of the soul, since it had come up, as we were discussing the neighbouring subject of rational nature. More fittingly, however, we shall discuss in its proper place, God granting it to us through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, the whole of rational nature, which is distinguished into three kinds and species.

Notes and citation

Summary: Origen closes his digression on the soul and defers to its proper place the discussion of rational nature in its three kinds.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.4.2 (PG 11:156b–157a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-4-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-4-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.4.3GCS 22:65

Hanc ergo beatam et ἀρχικήν, id est principatum omnium gerentem ⟨δύναμιν⟩, dicimus trinitatem. Hic est bonus deus et benignus omnium pater, simul et εὐεργετικὴ δύναμις et δημιουργική, id est bene faciendi virtus et creandi ac providendi. Quas virtutes dei absurdum simul et impium est putare vel ad momentum aliquod aliquando fuisse otiosas. Inlicitum namque est vel leviter suspicari has virtutes, quibus principaliter sicut dignum est intellegitur deus, cessasse aliquando ab operibus sibi dignis et fuisse immobiles. Neque enim extrinsecus inpeditas eas esse putandum est, quae in deo sunt, immo quae deus sunt, neque rursum, cum nihil obsisteret, vel piguisse eas agere et operari quae se digna erant vel dissimulasse credendum est. Et ideo nullum prorsus momentum sentiri potest, quo non virtus illa benefica bene fecerit. Unde consequens est fuisse semper quibus bene faceret, conditionibus videlicet vel creaturis suis, et bene faciens ordine et merito in his sua beneficia virtute providentiae dispensaret. Et per hoc consequens videtur quod neque conditor neque beneficus neque providens deus aliquando non fuerit.

This blessed and ruling (ἀρχική) power, then, that is, the power that holds rule over all things, we call the Trinity. This is the good God and kindly Father of all, at once the beneficent power (εὐεργετικὴ δύναμις) and the creative (δημιουργική), that is, the power of doing good, of creating and of providing. It is both absurd and impious to suppose that these powers of God were ever idle, even for a moment. For it is unlawful even to suspect lightly that these powers, through which God is chiefly understood, as is fitting, ever ceased from works worthy of them and were inactive. For we must not think that they were hindered from outside, since they are in God, or rather are God; nor again must we believe that, when nothing stood in their way, they were reluctant to act and to do what was worthy of them, or neglected to do it. And therefore no moment at all can be conceived in which that beneficent power did not do good. Hence it follows that there always existed those to whom it did good, namely its works or creatures, and that, doing good, it dispensed its benefits among them in due order and according to merit by the power of its providence. And through this it seems to follow that there was never a time when God was not creator, benefactor and provider.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Trinity, the good and creative power, was never idle, so it seems there were always creatures on whom God bestowed his benefits.

  • This passage (Koetschau's “On creatures”) is missing from the earlier printed editions, including Migne's; it survives in part of the manuscript tradition and is given from Koetschau's edition, who adds δύναμιν in angle brackets. Rufinus keeps the Greek terms ἀρχική, εὐεργετικὴ δύναμις and δημιουργική.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.4.3 (GCS 22:65; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-4-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-4-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.4.4GCS 22:66

Sed rursum in hoc humana intellegentia hebetatur atque constringitur, quomodo possit intellegi semper ex quo deus est fuisse etiam creaturas et sine initio, ut ita dixerim, substitisse eas, quae utique sine dubio creatae esse atque a deo factae credendae sunt. Cum ergo haec inter se humanarum cogitationum atque intellectuum pugna sit, rationibus utrubique validissimis occurrentibus ac repugnantibus et contemplantis sensum in partem suam quamque torquentibus, nobis pro exiguo ac brevissimo sensus nostri captu illud occurrit, quod sine omni pietatis periculo confitendum est: deum quidem patrem semper fuisse, semper habentem unigenitum filium, qui simul et sapientia secundum ea, quae supra exposuimus, appellatur. Haec ergo ipsa est sapientia, cui semper »adgaudebat« deus »orbe perfecto«, ut per hoc etiam semper laetari intellegatur deus. In hac igitur sapientia, quae semper erat cum patre, descripta semper inerat ac formata conditio, et numquam erat quando eorum, quae futura erant, praefiguratio apud sapientiam non erat.

But here again human understanding is dulled and hemmed in: how can it be understood that, for as long as God has existed, creatures too have always existed and have subsisted, so to speak, without beginning, when they must without doubt be believed to have been created and made by God? Since, then, there is this conflict of human thoughts and understandings with one another, very strong arguments meeting and resisting on both sides and each pulling the mind of the one who considers them over to its side, this occurs to us, within the slight and very narrow grasp of our mind, as something that can be confessed without any danger to piety: that God the Father always existed, always having his only-begotten Son, who, according to what we set out above, is also called Wisdom. This, then, is the Wisdom in whom God always “rejoiced when the world was completed,” so that by this God may be understood always to rejoice. In this Wisdom, then, who was always with the Father, the creation was always present, outlined and formed, and there was never a time when the prefiguration of the things that were to be was not with Wisdom.

Prov 8:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 8:31 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Since creatures cannot be coeternal with God, Origen proposes that the creation was always present, as a prefiguration, in God's Wisdom, the eternal Son.

  • Quotation: Prov 8:30–31 in its Greek form (“when the world was completed”).

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.4.4 (GCS 22:66; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-4-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-4-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

1.4.5GCS 22:67

Et hoc modo fortassis pro nostra infirmitate pium aliquid de deo sentire videbimur, ut neque ingenitas et coaeternas deo creaturas dicamus, neque rursum cum nihil boni prius egerit deus, in id ut ageret esse conversum; cum verus sit ille sermo, qui scriptus est quia »omnia in sapientia fecisti«. Et si utique »in sapientia omnia« facta sunt, cum sapientia semper fuerit, secundum praefigurationem et praeformationem semper erant »in sapientia« ea, quae protinus etiam substantialiter facta sunt. Et hoc opinor Salomonem sentientem vel intellegentem dicere in Ecclesiaste: »Quid est quod factum est? Hoc ipsum quod futurum est; et quid est quod creatum est? Hoc ipsum quod creandum est. Et nihil recens sub sole. Si quis quid loquetur et dicet: Ecce novum est hoc, iam fuit id in saeculis, quae fuerunt ante nos«. Si ergo singula, quae »sub sole« sunt, fuerunt iam in illis »saeculis, quae fuerunt ante nos«, cum »nihil recens sit sub sole«, sine dubio omnia vel genera vel species fuerunt semper, et fortassis etiam per singula. Verum tamen omnimodo hoc est, quod ostenditur, quod non deus conditor aliquando esse coeperit, cum ante non fuerit.

In this way, perhaps, we shall seem, within our weakness, to think something reverent about God: neither calling creatures unbegotten and coeternal with God, nor, on the other hand, saying that God, having done nothing good before, turned to doing it; since that word is true which is written, “In wisdom you have made all things.” And if “all things” were made “in wisdom,” then, since Wisdom always existed, the things which were afterwards also made in substance were always “in Wisdom” by way of prefiguration and preformation. And I think that Solomon, perceiving or understanding this, says in Ecclesiastes: “What is it that has been made? The very thing that is to be. And what is it that has been created? The very thing that is to be created. And there is nothing new under the sun. If anyone speaks and says, ‘See, this is new,’ it has already been in the ages that were before us.” If, then, the individual things that are “under the sun” already existed in those “ages that were before us,” since “there is nothing new under the sun,” then without doubt all things, whether genera or species, always existed, and perhaps even individually. In any case, what is shown is this: that God did not begin to be creator at some point, not having been so before.

Ps 104:24 (103:24 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: So creatures are neither coeternal with God, nor did God begin to create after doing nothing: all things existed always in Wisdom by prefiguration, as Ecclesiastes suggests.

  • Quotations: Ps 104:24 (Ps 103:24 LXX); Eccl 1:9–10 (Greek form). Koetschau prints the last two sentences in brackets, beside a Greek fragment of Origen expressing the same thought (that all genera and species always existed).

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.4.5 (GCS 22:67; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-3-1/#p-1-4-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-4-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).