On First Principles 1.5.1–1.6.4
Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.
On 1, chapter 5
1.5.1PG 11:157a
Post eam dissertationem 'quam de Patre, et Filio, et Spiritu sancto , quantum valuimus, breviter digessimus, consequens est etiam de naturis rationabilibus , ac de speciebus earum et ordinibus, vel officiis tam sanctarum quam etiam malignorum virtutum, sed et de his qui inter has bonas et malas medii quidam sunt et adhuc in agone atque in certamine positi, pauca disserere. Quamplurima namque in sanctis Scripturis invenimus ordinum quorumdam atque officiorum tam sanctorum quam etiam contrariorum nomina , quae prius praeponentes, tum deinde quid sibi velit horum significatio, pro viribus nostris discutere pertentabimus. Sunt quidam sancti angeli Dei, quos Paulus ministeriales spiritus appellat ad ministerium destinatos, propter eos qui hereditatem capiunt in salutem ”. Apud ipsum quoque sanctum Paulum invenimus, nescio unde sementem, cognominantem tamen quasdam sedes, et dominationes, et principatus, et potestates, et post enumerationem horum, velut alia adhuc quaedam rationabilia officia atque ordines esse sentiens praeter eos quos supra dixerat, ait de Salvatore : Qui est super omnem principatum, et potestatem, et virtutem, et dominationem, et omne nomen quod nominatur non solum in hoc saeculo, sed etiam in futuro “. Ex quo videlicet ostendit esse quaedam praeter haec quae commemoravit, quae nominentur quidem in hoc saeculo, non tamen ab ipso enumerata nunc fuerint, forte nec ab alio aliquo intellecta: esse vero alia quae in hoc saeculo quidem non nominentur, in futuro tamen
After the discussion of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, which we have briefly set out as far as we were able, it follows that we should also say a little about rational natures, their species and orders, and the offices both of the holy and of the evil powers, and also about those who are in some way intermediate between these good and evil ones and are still placed in the contest and struggle. For we find in the holy Scriptures a great many names of certain orders and offices, both of holy beings and of their opposites; we shall first set these out, and then try, as far as we can, to discuss what they mean. There are certain holy angels of God, whom Paul calls ministering spirits, appointed for service for the sake of those who inherit salvation. In the same holy Paul we find, drawn I know not from where, the naming of certain thrones, dominions, principalities and powers; and after listing these, as though perceiving that there are still other rational offices and orders besides those he had mentioned, he says of the Saviour: “who is above every principality and power and virtue and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the age to come.” By this he plainly shows that there are certain others besides those he mentioned, which are named in this age, though they were not enumerated by him now and perhaps not understood by anyone else; and that there are others which are not named in this age, but will be named in the age to come.
Heb 1:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 1:21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Origen begins his account of rational natures by listing the orders named in Scripture: angels, thrones, dominions, principalities, powers, and names to be named in the age to come.
- Quotations and allusions: Heb 1:14; Col 1:16; Eph 1:21.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; line-break hyphen; OCR slips; note marker; note marker; joined words; section number removed): Ι. Post eam → Post eam; Valuinius → valuimus; earnm et ortiinibus, vel olliciis → earum et ordinibus, vel officiis; adhuc (l0) in agone atquein certamine → adhuc in agone atque in certamine; iit sanctis- Scripluris → in sanctis Scripturis; ofliciorum tam sanctorunt → officiorum tam sanctorum; qua! (ll) prius preponeutes, ιιιιιι deinde → quae prius praeponentes, tum deinde; sancli angeli → sancti angeli; cognominautem → cognominantem; quiedam rationabdia ollicia → quaedam rationabilia officia; Super omnem principatum, et potesta- ρ tetu → super omnem principatum, et potestatem; in hoc sazculo, sed → in hoc saeculo, sed; quzedam praeter inec → quaedam praeter haec; hoc smculo, non tamen ab ipso eumnerata → hoc saeculo, non tamen ab ipso enumerata; ab aiio aliquo → ab alio aliquo.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.5.1 (PG 11:157a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-5-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-5-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.5.2PG 11:157a–158a
nominabuntur. Tum deinde sciendum est quia omne quod rationabile est et rationis terminos statutaque declinat, sine dubio per praevaricationem recti iustique efficitur in peccato. Est ergo omnis creatura rationabilis laudis et culpae capax; laudis, si secundum rationem, quam in se habet, ad meliora proficiat, culpae, si rationem recti tenoremque declinet; propter quod recte etiam poenis et suppliciis subjacet. Quod etiam de ipso diabolo et his qui cum ipso sunt et dicuntur ejus angeli, sentiendum est. Exponendae tamen sunt etiam appellationes eorum, ut sciamus quae sint ista de quibus sermo uobis movendus est. Diaboli igitur nomen. et Satanas, et maligni in multis Scriptura: locis designatur, qui et inimicus Dei esse describitur. Necnon et quidam angeli diaboli nominantur, sed et princeps mundi hujus, qui utrum ipse sit diabolus an alius quis, nondum manifeste declaratum est. Principes quoque hujus mundi quidam dicuntur Sapientiam quamdam habentes quae destruetur; sed utrum ipsi sint isti principes, qui et illi sunt principatus adversus quos nobis est colluctatio, an alii sint, non facile mihi ab aliquo pronuntiandum videtur. Post principatus autem, etiam potestates quantum nominantur adversus quas colluctatio nobis est, et agon geritur, sed et adversus principes mundi hujus, et rectores tenebrarum harum ; qui etiam spiritalia malitiae in caelestibus ab ipso Paulo nominantur. Quid autem dicendum est etiam de spiritalibus malignis et daemonibus immundis qui in Evangeliis nominantur? Tum deinde appellantur etiam quaedam simili nomine caelestia, sed qua: dicuntur genu flectere, vel esse flexura in nomine Jesu, sed et terrestria et inferna quae per ordinem Paulus enumerat. In eo sane loco in quo de rationalibus naturis disserimus, reticere non convenit, nec de nobis quidem hominibus qui utique rationabile animal esse dicimur; sed ne illud quidem otiose praetereundum est, quod etiam de nobis ipsis hominibus diversi quidam ordines nominantur, cum dicitur: Pars Domini populus ejus Iacob, funiculus haereditatis eius Israel. Pars autem angelorum dicuntur caetera: nationes, quoniam quidem cum divideret Excelsus gentes et diSpergeret filios Adam, statuit fines gentium secundum numerum angelorum Dei .) Et idcirco cum caeteris rationalibus naturis etiam humanae animae ratio pervidenda est.
Next, it must be known that every rational being which departs from the limits and ordinances of reason is without doubt in sin, through transgression of what is right and just. Every rational creature, then, is capable of praise and blame: of praise if, in accordance with the reason it has in itself, it advances to better things; of blame if it departs from the reason and course of what is right; for which reason it is also rightly subject to pains and punishments. And this is to be thought also of the devil himself and of those who are with him and are called his angels. Their titles, however, must also be explained, so that we may know what these beings are of whom we must speak. The name of devil, then, and Satan, and the evil one is indicated in many passages of Scripture, and he is described as the enemy of God. Certain angels of the devil are also named, and also the prince of this world, who, whether he is the devil himself or someone else, has not yet been clearly declared. Certain princes of this world are also said to have a kind of wisdom that will be destroyed; but whether these princes are the same as those principalities against whom we wrestle, or others, does not seem to me easy for anyone to pronounce. After the principalities, powers also are named, against whom we wrestle and the struggle is waged, and also against the princes of this world and the rulers of this darkness; and certain spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places are named by Paul himself. And what are we to say of the evil spirits and unclean demons who are named in the Gospels? Then certain heavenly beings, too, are called by a similar name, but they are said to bow the knee, or to be about to bow it, at the name of Jesus; and also things on earth and under the earth, which Paul enumerates in order. In a place where we are discussing rational natures, it is not fitting to be silent even about ourselves, human beings, who are called a rational animal; nor should we idly pass over the fact that among us human beings too certain different orders are named, when it is said: “The portion of the Lord is his people Jacob, Israel the line of his inheritance.” The other nations are called the portion of the angels, since “when the Most High divided the nations and scattered the sons of Adam, he set the boundaries of the nations according to the number of the angels of God.” And therefore, together with the other rational natures, the account of the human soul too must be examined.
Matt 25:41 (echo, low confidence) · John 12:31 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 2:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 32:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 32:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Every rational creature is capable of praise and blame; Scripture names the devil and the hostile powers, and distinguishes orders among human beings as well.
- Deut 32:8 is quoted in the Greek form (“according to the number of the angels of God”). Quotations and allusions: Matt 25:41; John 12:31; 1 Cor 2:6; Eph 6:12; Phil 2:10; Deut 32:9; Deut 32:8.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; stray mark; OCR slips; OCR slips; joined words; OCR slips; note marker; joined words; note marker): subjacet.Quod etiam de ipso diaboloet his qui cum ipso Sttttl → subjacet. Quod etiam de ipso diabolo et his qui cum ipso sunt; sentiendum est (l5). Expoueudzn tamen sunt etiam appellationes eorum, ut. St‘ialtttts qua? sint → sentiendum est. Exponendae tamen sunt etiam appellationes eorum, ut sciamus quae sint; etinimicus → et inimicus; mumli liujus, qui tttrum → mundi hujus, qui utrum; siut isti principes, qtti → sint isti principes, qui; au alii → an alii; pronuntiatulum → pronuntiandum; nominum tur → nominantur; quietiam etiam spiritalia malitia: iii cmlestbus ah ipso → qui etiam spiritalia malitiae in caelestibus ab ipso; malignis (l5) et → malignis et; quiedatu simili nomine cmlestia → quaedam simili nomine caelestia; enumerat (ιϐ). → enumerat.; loco inquo → loco in quo; reticere non convent → reticere non convenit; titique → utique; praetereumlutn → praetereundum; cutn dicitur: ‹ Pars → cum dicitur: Pars; liaareditatis → haereditatis; quoniani → quoniam; lilios Adam, statuit lines gentium secundum numerum angi-lorum → filios Adam, statuit fines gentium secundum numerum angelorum.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.5.2 (PG 11:157a–158a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-5-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-5-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.5.3PG 11:158a–160a
Igitur tot et tantis ordinum officiorumque nominibus cognominatis, quibus certum est subesse substantias, requirendum est, utrum conditor et creator omnium deus quosdam quidem ex his ita sanctos fecerit ac beatos, ut nihil possint recipere omnino contrarium; et quosdam ita fecerit ut possint tam virtutis quam malitiae effici capaces; aut si putandum est quod alios ita fecerit, ut omnino incapaces sint ad virtutem, et alios malitiam quidem nequaquam posse recipere, solummodo autem posse in beatitudine permanere; alios vero tales qui possint utraque recipere. Ut autem etiam ex ipsis nominibus prima nobis inquisitio moveatur, consideremus si sancti angeli ex quo sunt, semper sancti fuerunt, et sancti sunt, sanctique erunt, et neque receperunt unquam, neque recipere potuerunt peccati locum. Tum deinde etiam hi qui sancti principatus appellantur, consideremus si statim ut creati a Deo sunt, principatum exercere coeperunt in aliquos qui eis essent subjecti, et illos tales creatos, et ad hoc factos ut essent subditi et subjecti. Similiter autem et quae appellantur potestates, utrum tales et in hoc ipsum creatae sunt, ut exercerent potestatem ; an meritum aliquod istud est et praemium virtutis, per quod ad potestatem istam dignitatemque venerunt. Necnon et hi qui throni dicuntur, vel sedes, an istam beatitudinis sedem stabilitatemque simul cum substantiae suae prolatione meruerint, ut ex voluntate sola hoc possideant Creatoris; vel qua: appellantur dominationes, hoc quod dominantur, non per profectus sui meritum eis fuerit additum, sed conditionis praerogativa donatum sit et ideo sit ab eis inseparabile quodammodo ac naturale. Quod utique si ita recipiamus, ut putentur sancti angeli, et sanctae potestates, et beatae sedes, gloriosaeque virtutes, et magnificae dominationes substantialiter potestates istas ac dignitates gloriasque possidere, consequens sine dubio videbitur etiam ea quae in contrariis officiis nominata sunt ad hunc modum intelligi debere: ita ut principatus illi adversus quos nobis est colluctatio, illud ipsum obluctans ac resistens omni bono propositum non postmodum recepisse declinantes a bono per arbitrii libertatem putentur, sed cum ipsis simul substantialiter exstitisse; similiter etiam potestates, et virtutes, nec esse in eis juniorem substantia sua posterioremque malitiam. Illi quoque quos mundi tenebrarum rectores et principes appellavit, hoc quod principantur et obtinent tenebras, non ex perversitate propositi, sed ex conditionis necessitate dicuntur descendere. Eadem quoque de spiritalibus nequitiae, et de spiritalibus malignis, et daemonibus immundis consequentia: ipsius ratio coget intelligi. Quod si haec ita de malignis contrariisque virtutibus intelligi videtur absurdum, sicut certe absurdum est, ut causa malitiae ipsarum remota ab arbitrii sui proposito, conditori earum necessario ascribatur, quomodo non etiam de bonis sanctisque virtutibus cogimur similia confiteri, id est, quia non substantiale sit in ipsis bonum, quod utique in solo Christo et in Spiritu sancto evidenter esse ostendimus, sine dubio utique et in Patre. Non enim Trinitatis natura habere aliquid compositionis ostensa est, ut haec ei consequenter videantur accidere. Unde superest ut in omni creatura sui operis suorumque motuum fuerit quod virtutes istae quae vel principatum agere in aliis, vel potestatem exercere, vel dominationem videntur, ex merito, et non per conditionis praerogativam praelatae sint et superpositae his quibus praeesse, vel in quos potestatem exercere dicuntur.
Since, then, so many and such great names of orders and offices have been mentioned, under which it is certain that there are substances, we must ask whether God, the founder and creator of all things, made some of them so holy and blessed that they can receive nothing at all of the contrary; and whether he made some such that they could become capable of both virtue and wickedness; or whether we are to think that he made some so that they are wholly incapable of virtue, and others wholly unable to receive wickedness but able only to remain in blessedness, and others such as can receive either. And so that our first inquiry may arise from the names themselves, let us consider whether the holy angels, from the time they have existed, were always holy, are holy and will be holy, and have never received nor been able to receive any occasion of sin. Then let us also consider whether those who are called holy principalities began, as soon as they were created by God, to exercise rule over some who were subject to them, and whether those were created such and made for this, to be subordinate and subject. Likewise also those which are called powers: whether they were created such and for this very purpose, to exercise power, or whether this is a merit and reward of virtue by which they came to that power and dignity. And also those who are called thrones or seats: whether they merited that seat and stability of blessedness at the same time as their substance was brought forth, so that they possess it by the Creator's will alone; or whether in those called dominions their dominion was not added to them for the merit of their progress but given as a privilege of their creation, and is therefore in a certain way inseparable from them and natural. If we accept this, so that the holy angels and holy powers and blessed seats and glorious virtues and magnificent dominions are thought to possess those powers and dignities and glories substantially, it will undoubtedly seem to follow that those named in the contrary offices must be understood in the same way: so that those principalities against whom we wrestle are thought not to have later taken on that purpose of struggling against and resisting all good by turning away from the good through freedom of choice, but to have had it substantially from the moment they existed; and likewise the powers and virtues, and that wickedness in them is not younger and later than their substance. Those also whom he called rulers of the world of darkness and princes are said to derive their ruling and holding of darkness not from perversity of purpose but from the necessity of their creation. The very logic of consequence will compel us to understand the same about the spiritual forces of wickedness, the evil spirits and the unclean demons. But if it seems absurd to understand this so of the evil and opposing powers, as it certainly is absurd, that the cause of their wickedness should be removed from the purpose of their own choice and necessarily ascribed to their creator, how are we not compelled to confess similar things about the good and holy powers also, namely, that the good is not substantial in them, which we have shown to be clearly so only in Christ and in the Holy Spirit, and certainly also in the Father? For the nature of the Trinity has been shown to have nothing composite, such that these things should seem to happen to it as consequences. It remains, therefore, that in every creature it was a result of its own work and its own movements that those powers which appear to hold rule over others, or to exercise power or dominion, were preferred and set over those whom they are said to rule or over whom they exercise power by merit, and not by the privilege of their creation.
Col 1:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Origen asks whether the holy and the hostile powers hold their rank by nature or by merit, and concludes that in every creature rank follows its own movements, not the privilege of its creation.
- Allusions: Col 1:16; Eph 6:12.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slips; stray mark): eliici capaces (i9); → effici capaces;; fecerit, nt omnino → fecerit, ut omnino; saneti fuerunt → sancti fuerunt; cmperunt → coeperunt; prmntium → praemium; sedent stabilitatemqne → sedem stabilitatemque; substantia: suae → substantiae suae; sanctte potestates → sanctae potestates; gloriosa2que → gloriosaeque; magnifica: dominationes → magnificae dominationes; eum ipsis simul → cum ipsis simul; potesmtes → potestates; unnuli tenebrarum → mundi tenebrarum; ~Eadem → Eadem; nequitia}, et. → nequitiae, et; daamonibus → daemonibus; hrec ita → haec ita; absurdttm → absurdum; maliti:e ipsarum → malitiae ipsarum; cenipositionis → compositionis; agerc → agere; prergativam przelatte sint et superpositm his quitms przeesse, vel in quos potestatein exercere di- Cllnllll‘. → praerogativam praelatae sint et superpositae his quibus praeesse, vel in quos potestatem exercere dicuntur..
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.5.3 (PG 11:158a–160a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-5-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-5-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.5.4PG 11:160a–163a
Sed ne de tantis ac tam difficilibus rebus consequentia: solius ratione invitati videamur asserere, atque ex conjecturis tantummodo in assensum cogere auditores, videamus si quid etiam de Scripturis sanctis possumus assertionis assumere, quarum auctoritate haec credibilius astruantur. Et primum quidem de malis virtutibus quid sancta Scriptura contineat, proferemus; tum deinde etiam de caeteris investigabimus , secundum quod Dominus nos fuerit illuminare dignatus, ut in rebus tam difficilibus quid magis veritati sit proximum , vel quid secundum pietatis regulam opinandum sit, consequantur. Invenimus namque in Ezechiele propheta duas quasdam prophetias scriptas esse ad principem Tyri , quarum prima fortasse videbitur alicui antequam audiat et secundam , dici de homine aliquo qui princeps fuerit Tyriorum. Et ideo nos interim nihil de prima illa sumemus; secunda vero quoniam evidentissime talis est, ut nihil prorsus de homine, sed de virtute aliqua superiori intelligi debeat quae delapsa fuerit a superioribus et in inferiora ac deteriora dejecta , ex ipsa deferemus exemplum , ex quo manifestissime demonstretur contrarias istas malignasque virtutes non natura tales esse conditas, vel creatas, sed de melioribus venisse in pejus, atque in deterius esse conversas; beatas quoque illas virtutes non esse talis natura: quae contrarium recipere non possit si velit, ac negligat, et status sui beatitudinem non omni cautela custodiat. Si enim is qui dicitur princeps Tyri , refertur quia inter sanctos erat et immaculatus erat, et in paradiso Dei constitutus, corona quoque decoris et pulchritudinis exornatus, is qui talis erat quomodo aliquo sanctorum inferior fuisse putandus est? Corona enim decoris et pulchritudinis ipse fuisse, et in paradiso Dei ambulasse immaculatus describitur; et quomodo ab aliquo putari potest quod iste talis non unus fuerit de illis sanctis beatisque virtutibus, quas utique in beatitudine positas, non alio quam tali honore praeditas esse credendum est? Sed videamus tandem quid etiam ipsa prophetia: verba nos doceant. Et factus est, inquit, sermo Domini ad me, dicens : Fili hominis, accipe lamentum super principem Tyri, et dic ei : Haec dicit Dominus Deus : Tu signaculum similitudinis , et corona decoris in deliciis paradisi fuisti; omni lapide vel gemma bona exornatus es, et indutus sardio, et topazio, et smaragdo, et carbunculo, et sapphiro , et iaspide, argento et auro insertis, et achate , amethysto, et chrysolitho, et beryllo, et onychino; auro quoque replesti thesauros tuos et promptuaria tua in temet ipso. Ex qua die creatus es (tu) cum Cherubin, posui te in monte sancto dei. Fuisti in medio lapidum igneorum, fuisti inmaculatus tu in diebus tuis, ex qua die creatus es tu, donec cum inventae sunt iniquitates in te; ex multitudine negotiationis tuae replesti promptuaria tua iniquitate et peccasti et vulneratus es a monte dei. Et ejecit te cherub de medio lapidum Dei. ignitorum; et. elatum est cor tuum in decore tuo, corrupta est disciplina tua cum pulchritudine tua; propter multitudinem peccatorum tuorum in terram projeci te coram regibus; dedi te in ostentationem atque in illusionem propter multitudinem peccatorum tuorum, et iniquitatum tuarum, ex negotiatione tua polluisti sancta tua. Et educam ignem de medio tui, et comedet te, et dabo te in cinerem ac favillam super terram in conspectu omnium videntium te, et omnes qui sciebant in gentibus, maerebunt super te. Perditio effectus es, et non subsistes ultra in aeternum tempus 98. Haec cum ita dicta sint, quis est qui audiens : Signaculum similitudinis, et corona decoris in deliciis paradisi fuisti, vel audiens quod ex quo creatus es tu cum cherubim, posui te in monte sancto Dei, ultra sensum suum poterit relaxare, ut de aliquo hominum, vel sanctorum, non dicam Tyri principe, haec dicta esse suspicetur? Aut quos lapides igneos putabit, in quorum medio homo aliquis conversari poterit? Aut quis immaculatus ab ipsa die qua creatus est intelligi poterit , in quo postea aliquando iniustitiae in ipso inventae sint, et tunc in terram projectus esse dicatur? Quod utique significat, quia de eo dicitur, quicum non esset in terra, in terram proiectus est; cujus etiam sancta polluta esse dicuntur. Haec quidem de principe Tyri ex propheta Ezechiele quae in adversariam virtutem referuntur ostendimus, per quae manifestissime demonstratur quod sancta ante virtus haec fuerit et beata, de qua beatitudine, ex quo in ea inventa est iniquitas, ruerit, in terramque demersa sit, et non per naturam conditionemque talis exstiterit. Arbitrantur ergo dici haec de angelo quodam, qui Tyriorum gentis dispensandae sit sortitus officium , cui etiam animae eorum procurandae videntur esse commissae. Quam sane Tyrum , vel quas Tyriorum animas sentire debeamus, utrum hanc quae in Phoenices provincia: regionibus sita est, an aliam aliquam cujus haec quam in terris novimus, forma est; et animas Tyriorum utrum horum , an eorum qui domestici sunt illius Tyri quae spiritaliter intelligitur, in hoc loco non videtur requirendum ; ne forte velut in transitu de tantis et tam absconditis rebus videamur inquirere, quod utique proprium vel Opus exigit, vel laborem.
But so that we may not seem to assert such great and difficult matters prompted only by the logic of consequence, and to compel our hearers' assent merely by conjectures, let us see whether we can also take some support from the holy Scriptures, by whose authority these things may be established more credibly. First we shall set out what holy Scripture contains about the evil powers; then we shall investigate the others too, as far as the Lord deigns to enlighten us, so that in matters so difficult [readers] may attain what is nearer the truth, or what ought to be held according to the rule of piety. We find, then, in the prophet Ezekiel two prophecies written to the prince of Tyre, the first of which might perhaps seem to someone, before he hears the second as well, to be said of some man who was prince of the Tyrians. So for the present we shall take nothing from that first one; but since the second is most evidently such that it must be understood not at all of a man but of some higher power which fell from higher places and was cast down to lower and worse ones, we shall take our example from it. By it may be most clearly shown that these opposing and evil powers were not founded or created such by nature, but came from better to worse and were turned to the worse; and that those blessed powers, too, are not of such a nature that they cannot receive the contrary if they so will and become negligent and do not guard the blessedness of their state with all care. For if he who is called the prince of Tyre is related to have been among the saints, and to have been spotless, and placed in the paradise of God, and adorned also with a crown of comeliness and beauty, how is one who was such to be thought inferior to any of the saints? For he is described as having himself been a crown of comeliness and beauty and as having walked spotless in the paradise of God; and how can anyone think that such a one was not one of those holy and blessed powers which, being placed in blessedness, must be believed to be endowed with no other honour than this? But let us see at last what the words of the prophecy themselves teach us. “And the word of the Lord came to me,” it says, “saying: Son of man, take up a lament over the prince of Tyre, and say to him: Thus says the Lord God: You were the seal of likeness and a crown of comeliness in the delights of paradise; you were adorned with every good stone or gem, and clothed with sardius and topaz and emerald and carbuncle and sapphire and jasper, set in silver and gold, and agate and amethyst and chrysolite and beryl and onyx; and you filled your treasuries and your storehouses within yourself with gold. From the day you were created with the cherubim, I placed you on the holy mountain of God. You were in the midst of the fiery stones, you were spotless in your days, from the day you were created, until iniquities were found in you; by the multitude of your trading you filled your storehouses with iniquity, and you sinned and were wounded from the mountain of God. And the cherub cast you out from the midst of the fiery stones; and your heart was lifted up in your comeliness; your discipline was corrupted with your beauty. Because of the multitude of your sins I cast you to the earth before kings; I gave you up to be a spectacle and a mockery, because of the multitude of your sins and your iniquities; by your trading you polluted your holy things. And I will bring fire from the midst of you, and it shall devour you, and I will make you ashes and cinders upon the earth in the sight of all who see you; and all who knew you among the nations shall mourn over you. You have become destruction, and you shall not exist any more for ever.” Since these things are said so, who, hearing “You were the seal of likeness and a crown of comeliness in the delights of paradise,” or hearing that “from the time you were created with the cherubim I placed you on the holy mountain of God,” could weaken their meaning so far as to suspect that they were said of some human being or saint, not to speak of the prince of Tyre? Or what fiery stones will he think there are, in the midst of which a human being could live? Or who could be understood to have been spotless from the very day he was created, in whom afterwards at some time iniquities were found, and who is then said to have been cast down to the earth? This certainly signifies that it is said of one who, not being on the earth, was cast down to the earth; and his holy things too are said to have been polluted. These things about the prince of Tyre from the prophet Ezekiel, which refer to an opposing power, we have set out; by them it is most clearly demonstrated that this power was formerly holy and blessed, and fell from that blessedness from the time iniquity was found in it, and was sunk to the earth, and was not such by nature and creation. They think, then, that these things are said of a certain angel who was allotted the office of governing the Tyrian nation, to whom the care of their souls also seems to have been entrusted. But what Tyre, or what souls of Tyrians, we ought to understand, whether this city situated in the regions of the province of Phoenicia or some other of which this one we know on earth is a figure, and whether the souls of the Tyrians are those of this city or of those who belong to that Tyre which is understood spiritually, does not seem to be a question for this place, lest we seem to inquire in passing into matters so great and so hidden, which certainly require a work and labour of their own.
Ezek 28:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 28:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 28:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 28:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 28:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 28:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 28:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 28:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Ezekiel's lament over the prince of Tyre describes a once holy and spotless power that fell by its own fault, showing that evil powers were not created evil.
- Quotation: Ezek 28:11–19 in the Greek form. The view that the passage concerns a fallen angelic power, perhaps the angel set over Tyre, is given as Origen's.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slips; OCR slips; column number removed; OCR slips; note marker; joined words; note marker; split word): diflicilibus → difficilibus; coniecturis tantummodo iit → conjecturis tantummodo in; assertiouis → assertionis; cmteris 67 investigabitnus → caeteris investigabimus; iu rebus tam diffic cilibus → in rebus tam difficilibus; conscquantur → consequantur; qute delapsa → quae delapsa; eratet → erat et; constitutus,cor(-na quoque decoris et pulehritndinis(‘28) → constitutus, corona quoque decoris et pulchritudinis; aliquo sanetorum → aliquo sanctorum; pulchritudinisipse → pulchritudinis ipse; potest (:29) quod → potest quod; credendmn → credendum; «ΕΙ. factus → Et factus; die ei : llmc dicit Deminus Deus : Τιι signaculum → dic ei : Haec dicit Dominus Deus : Tu signaculum; paradisi luisti; omni → paradisi fuisti; omni; sappl.iro → sapphiro; conspcetu → conspectu; sciebant iu gentibus → sciebant in gentibus; etlectus → effectus; ιιωο eum ita → Haec cum ita; cei-oua decoris in deliciis paradisi luistip vel amliens quod ex quo creatus es ιιι cum cherubim, posui te iu monte → corona decoris in deliciis paradisi fuisti, vel audiens quod ex quo creatus es tu cum cherubim, posui te in monte; relaxare, at de → relaxare, ut de; 'l'yri → Tyri; pro jectus → projectus; llaec quidem → Haec quidem; qnod sancta → quod sancta; hzec de angelo → haec de angelo; Tyriorqu → Tyriorum; ollieium (.59) → officium; videnlur → videntur; aliam aliquant → aliam aliquam; utrnnt → utrum; qni domestici → qui domestici; Spit-italiter → spiritaliter; loco nott → loco non; tant absconditis → tam absconditis; tttique → utique.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.5.4 (PG 11:160a–163a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-5-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-5-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.5.5PG 11:163a–165a
Rursum tamen etiam de alia virtute contraria ab Isaia propheta talia quaedam docemur. Ait enim : Quomodo cecidit de caelo Lucifer, qui mane oriebatur? Confractus est et collisus in terram qui immittebat ad omnes gentes. Tu vero dixisti in sensu tuo : Ascendam in caelum, super stellas caeli ponam meum thronum, sedebo in monte excelso super montes excelsos qui sunt ad Aquilonem, ascendam super nubes, ero similis Altissimo. Nunc autem in infernum demergeris, et in fundamenta terrae. Qui te viderint , admirabuntur super te, et dicent: Hic est homo qui exacerbabat totam terram, qui movebat reges, qui fecit universum orbem desertum, qui urbes destruxit, nec eos qui in vinculis sunt, resolvit. Omnes reges gentium dormierunt in honore, unusquisque in domo sua : tu vero projicieris in montibus sicut mortuus exsecrabilis cum multis mortuis qui transfossi sunt gladiis, et descenderunt in infernum. Sicut vestimentum sanguine concretum et infectum non erit mundum, ita nec tu quidem eris mundus pro eo quod terram meam perdidisti, et populum meum occidisti , non manebis in aeternum tempus, semen pessimum. Praepara filios tuos ad interfectionem pro peccatis patris tui, ne resurgant et terram haereditate possideant, et repleant terram bellis , et insurgam in eos, dicit Dominus Sabaoth, et deperire faciam nomen ipsorum, et reliquias, et semen eorum. Manifestissime per haec ostenditur cecidisse de caelis utique qui prius erat Lucifer, et qui mane oriebatur. Si enim, ut putant aliqui, natura tenebrarum erat, quomodo ante fuisse Lucifer dicitur? Vel quomodo poterat oriri mane qui nihil in se habebat ex luce? Sed et Salvator docet nos de diabolo dicens: Ecce video Satanam cecidisse de coelo sicut fulgur. Lux enim erat aliquando. Sed et Dominus noster qui veritas est, gloriosi adventus sui potentiam nihilominus fulguri comparavit dicens: Sicut enim fulgur a summo caelo fulget usque ad summum ejus, ita erit adventus Filii hominis. Et nihilominus hunc fulguri comparat, et dicit eum cecidisse de caelo; ut ostenderet per hoc fuisse et ipsum aliquando in caelo, et habuisse locum inter sanctos, et participasse de hac luce, de qua omnes sancti participant, ex qua angeli lucis efficiuntur, et apostoli lux mundi dicuntur a Domino. Hoc ergo modo erat etiam iste lux aliquando antequam praevaricaretur et caderet in hunc locum, et gloria ejus converteretur in pulverem, quod est proprie impiorum, sicut et propheta dicit, ex quo et princeps hujus mundi, id est terrenae habitationis, appellatus est; principatum namque egit in eos qui ejus malitiae obsecuti sunt, quoniam quidem totus hic mundus (mundum autem nunc terrenum istum appello locum) in maligno positus est , et in hoc apostata. Quod autem apostata sit iste, id est refuga, etiam Dominus in Job ita dicit : Adduces autem draconem in hamo apostatam‘, id est refugam. Certum est autem quia draco ipse diabolus intelligitur. Si ergo'contrariae virtutes nominantur et immaculata: fuisse aliquando dicuntur, immaculatum autem esse praeter Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum nulli substantialiter inest, sed sanctitas in omni creatura accidens res est, quod autem accidit, et decidere potest, et ista: virtutes contrariae immaculata: aliquando fuerunt, et inter illas utique fuerunt quae adhuc immaculata: permanent, per hoc ostenditur neque substantialiter, vel naturaliter esse aliquem immaculatum, neque substantialiter esse pollutum Et per hoc consequens est in nobis esse atque in nostris motibus, ut vel beati et sancti simus, vel per desidiam et neglegentiam ex beatitudine in malitiam perditionemque vergamus in tantum ut nimius profectus, ut ita dixerim, malitiae, si quis in tantum sui neglexerit, usque ad eum statum deveniat, ut ea quae dicitur contraria virtus efficiatur.
Again, from the prophet Isaiah we are taught similar things about another opposing power. For he says: “How has Lucifer fallen from heaven, who rose in the morning! He who sent forth to all the nations has been broken and dashed to the ground. But you said in your mind: I will ascend into heaven; above the stars of heaven I will set my throne; I will sit on a lofty mountain above the lofty mountains that are toward the north; I will ascend above the clouds; I will be like the Most High. But now you shall be sunk into the underworld and into the foundations of the earth. Those who see you shall wonder at you and say: This is the man who provoked the whole earth, who shook kings, who made the whole world a desert, who destroyed cities, and did not release those who were in chains. All the kings of the nations have slept in honour, each in his own house; but you shall be cast out on the mountains like a loathsome corpse, with the many dead who were pierced with swords and went down into the underworld. As a garment clotted and stained with blood will not be clean, so neither shall you be clean, because you have ruined my land and killed my people; you shall not remain for ever, most evil seed. Prepare your sons for slaughter for the sins of your father, lest they rise and possess the earth as an inheritance and fill the earth with wars; and I will rise up against them, says the Lord of hosts, and I will cause their name to perish, and their remnant and their seed.” By these words it is most clearly shown that he fell from heaven who was formerly Lucifer and who rose in the morning. For if, as some think, he was of the nature of darkness, how is he said to have formerly been Lucifer? Or how could he rise in the morning who had nothing of light in himself? The Saviour, too, teaches us about the devil, saying: “Behold, I saw Satan fallen from heaven like lightning.” For he was once light. And our Lord, who is the truth, also compared the power of his own glorious coming to lightning, saying: “For as the lightning shines from the height of heaven to its height, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.” And yet he compares this one too to lightning and says that he fell from heaven, to show by this that he too was once in heaven, and had a place among the saints, and shared in this light in which all the saints share, by which angels become angels of light and the apostles are called by the Lord the light of the world. In this way, then, this one too was once light, before he transgressed and fell to this place, and his glory was turned into dust, which is properly the lot of the impious, as the prophet also says; from this he was also called the prince of this world, that is, of the earthly dwelling. For he exercised rule over those who followed his wickedness, since “this whole world” (and by world I now mean this earthly place) “lies in the evil one,” and in this apostate. That he is an apostate, that is, a runaway, the Lord also says in Job: “You will draw out with a hook the dragon, the apostate,” that is, the runaway. It is certain that the dragon is understood to be the devil himself. If, then, the opposing powers are named and said once to have been spotless, and to be spotless belongs substantially to none except the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, but holiness in every creature is an accidental thing, and what is accidental can also fall away; and if these opposing powers were once spotless and were among those which still remain spotless: by this it is shown that no one is either substantially or naturally spotless, nor substantially polluted. And from this it follows that it lies with us and with our own movements whether we are blessed and holy, or through sloth and negligence turn from blessedness to wickedness and perdition, to such a degree that an excessive progress, so to speak, in wickedness, if someone neglects himself so far, may bring him to the state of becoming what is called an opposing power.
Isa 14:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:27 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 11:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 5:14 (allusion, high confidence) · John 12:31 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 41:1 (40:25 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Isaiah's fallen Lucifer and Christ's saying about Satan falling like lightning show that the devil was once light; holiness in creatures is accidental, so none is spotless or polluted by nature.
- Quotations: Isa 14:12–22 (Greek form); Luke 10:18; Matt 24:27; 1 John 5:19; Job 41:1 (Job 40:25 LXX, “the dragon, the apostate”). Allusions: 2 Cor 11:14 (angels of light); Matt 5:14; John 12:31. Near the end the scan interleaves Rufinus's lines with Migne's parallel column, his Latin version of a Greek fragment preserved by Justinian (that certain beings, lacking holiness, fell into such negligence that they were turned into opposing powers); it has been removed by logged correction.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slips; OCR slips; note marker; note marker; stray mark): Aiteuitn → Ait enim; Cecidit(tI) de cmlo Lucifer, qni → cecidit de caelo Lucifer, qui; Coufracttts → Confractus; immittehat → immittebat; Ttt vero dixiSti in sensu (4‘2) tuo : Ascendam in ccelum, super stellas οωΙὶ ponam nteutu thronum, sedebo itt monte → Tu vero dixisti in sensu tuo : Ascendam in caelum, super stellas caeli ponam meum thronum, sedebo in monte; Altissittto → Altissimo; cmn multis → cum multis; tnuudum → mundum; terram meant → terram meam; mternum → aeternum; Pracpara → Praepara; luereditate po:sideaut → haereditate possideant; eorum θ’.» → eorum.; per hate → per haec; aquui, natura (Η) → aliqui, natura; quoruon → quomodo; cx luce → ex luce; l'ulgur‘. → fulgur.; qtti veritas → qui veritas; t Sicut enim fulgur a summo (ωΙο fulget usquead stunmum → Sicut enim fulgur a summo caelo fulget usque ad summum; hominis”. › Ει nihilominus → hominis. Et nihilominus; cec.tlisse de cado; ttt ostenderet → cecidisse de caelo; ut ostenderet; aliquando itt cmlo, et habuisse lacum → aliquando in caelo, et habuisse locum; angeli lueis → angeli lucis; lux (to) mundi → lux mundi; Iloc ergo → Hoc ergo; convertere‘ur → converteretur; prapheta → propheta; terrena: habitationis → terrenae habitationis; principatunt namque egit itt eos → principatum namque egit in eos; ε totus hic mundus → totus hic mundus; ntmc → nunc; apestata → apostata; aposmta → apostata; in Joh ita → in Job ita; Adduces (t8) autem → Adduces autem; Corium est → Certum est; contrarize → contrariae; fuerttnt → fuerunt.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.5.5 (PG 11:163a–165a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-5-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-5-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
On 1, chapter 6
1.6.1PG 11:165a–166a
Finis vel consummatio, rerum perfectarum consummatarumque esse videtur indicium. Quae res etiam nos in hoc loco commonet, quod ad haec tam ardua et difficilia intelligenda, si quis ille qui legendi horum et talia cognoscendi desiderium ceperit, perfectum et eruditum sensum debet adhibere : ne forte si aut nullum usum in hujuscemodi quaestionibus habuit, vana quaedam haec illi et superflua videantur; aut si jam praeiudicatum et praeventum in aliis animum gerit, haeretica haec et contra fidem ecclesiasticam putet, non tam ratione convincens quam animi sui praejudicio definiens. Quae quidem a nobis etiam cum magno metu et cautela dicuntur, discutientibus magis et pertractantibus quam pro certo ac definito statuentibus. Iudicaturo namque a nobis in superioribus est quae sint de quibus manifesto dogmate terminandum sit. quod et pro viribus nos fecisse puto, cum de Trinitate loqueremur. Nunc autem disputandi specie magis quam definiendi, prout possumus, exercemur. Finis ergo mundi et consummatio dabitur, cum unusquisque pro merito peccatorum etiam poenis subjicietur; quod tempus Deus solus agnoscit, quando unusquisque quod meretur expendet. In unum sane finem putamus quod bonitas Dei per Christum suum universam revocet creaturam, subactis et subditis etiam inimicis. Sic enim dicit sancta Scriptura : Dixit Dominus Domino meo, Sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum . Quod si minus nobis manifestum est quid in hoc iudicet propheticus sermo, Paulo apostolo discamus apertius dicente, quod oportet (Christum) regnare, donec ponat omnes inimicos sub pedibus suis . Quod si ne ista quidem Apostoli tam aperta sententia satis nos edocuit, quid sit inimicos poni sub pedibus, audi adhuc eum in consequentibus : Oportet enim ei omnia esse subjecta . Quae ergo est subiectio qua Christo debent esse omnia subjecta? Ego arbitror quia haec ipsa qua nos quoque optamus ei esse subiecti. qua subjecti ei sunt et apostoli et omnes sancti,qui secuti sunt Christum. Subjectionis enim nomen qua Christo subjicimur, salutem quae a Christo est, indicat subjectorum; sicut et David dicebat : Nonne Deo subjecta erit anima mea? ab ipso enim Salutare meum .
An end or consummation seems to be the mark of things perfected and completed. This reminds us at this point that anyone who has conceived the desire to read and understand such matters must bring a mature and trained mind to understanding things so arduous and difficult; lest, if he has had no practice in questions of this kind, they seem to him vain and superfluous; or, if he bears a mind already prejudiced and preoccupied with other views, he think them heretical and contrary to the church's faith, not so much convinced by reason as deciding by the prejudice of his own mind. These things are indeed said by us with great fear and caution, as discussing and examining rather than laying down as certain and defined. For we have indicated above which matters must be settled by clear doctrine, which I think we have done as far as we could when we spoke of the Trinity. But now we are exercising ourselves, as best we can, in the manner of discussion rather than of definition. The end and consummation of the world, then, will come when each one is subjected to punishments according to the merit of his sins, a time which God alone knows, when each will pay what he deserves. We think, indeed, that the goodness of God through his Christ will call back the whole creation to one end, even his enemies being subdued and subjected. For so holy Scripture says: “The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet.” And if what the prophetic word means by this is not clear enough to us, let us learn from the apostle Paul, who says more openly that Christ must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. And if not even this so clear statement of the Apostle has sufficiently taught us what it is for the enemies to be put under his feet, hear him further in what follows: “For all things must be subjected to him.” What, then, is the subjection by which all things must be subjected to Christ? I think it is that very subjection by which we too desire to be subject to him, by which the apostles and all the saints who have followed Christ are subject to him. For the term subjection, by which we are subjected to Christ, indicates the salvation, which is from Christ, of those who are subjected; as David also said: “Shall not my soul be subject to God? For from him is my salvation.”
Ps 110:1 (109:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 62:1 (61:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 13:32 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Origen offers his view of the end as discussion, not definition: God's goodness through Christ will bring the whole creation, even his enemies, to one end, and their subjection to Christ means their salvation.
- Origen marks this chapter as inquiry, not settled doctrine. The restoration of all things to one end, including the subjection of enemies understood as salvation, is given exactly as Rufinus has it. Quotations: Ps 110:1 (Ps 109:1 LXX); 1 Cor 15:25; 1 Cor 15:27; Ps 62:1 (Ps 61:2 LXX). “A time which God alone knows”: compare Mark 13:32.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne footnote removed; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; note marker; OCR slip; section number removed; OCR slips; split word; stray marks): Ι. Finis vel consvunuatio, rerum perfectarum consumtuatarumque → Finis vel consummatio, rerum perfectarum consummatarumque; ad hac tam ardua et difiicilia → ad haec tam ardua et difficilia; ille ιιρι qui → ille qui; perfectum ct eruditum → perfectum et eruditum; hate illi → haec illi; lueretica hac → haeretica haec; pnrjudicio → praejudicio; discutieutibus → discutientibus; statuentihus → statuentibus; doginate → dogmate; iecisse → fecisse; Nune autem → Nunc autem; ρωιιὶε subjicietur → poenis subjicietur; Sltllttt → suum; scabellqu → scabellum; tuauifestum → manifestum; apertiusdiceute → apertius dicente; Omnes l‘sal. ' Psal. cx, Ι. l Cor. xv, 25. ibid. 26. inimicos → omnes inimicos; qui: dem → quidem; Satis nos edo. cuit → satis nos edocuit; suh pedibus. andi → sub pedibus, audi; debeut → debent; arbitror (ϐυ) quia lucc ipsa → arbitror quia haec ipsa; ei csse → ei esse; soculi → secuti; Suhjectiouis euiut nomen qua Christo Snbjicimnr, salutem quae a Christo est, indicat suhjectorum → Subjectionis enim nomen qua Christo subjicimur, salutem quae a Christo est, indicat subjectorum.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.6.1 (PG 11:165a–166a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-6-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-6-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.6.2PG 11:166a–168b
Talem igitur finem videntes, cum omnes inimici subjecti erunt Christo, et cum novissimus inimicus destruetur mors, et cum tradetur a Christo cui omnia subjecta sunt, regnum Deo Patri. ab isto, inquam, tali fine rerum contemplemur initia. Semper enim similis est finis initiis; et ideo sicut unus omnium finis, ita unum omnium intelligi debet initium; et sicut multorum unus finis, ita ab uno initio multae differentiae ac varietates, quae rursum per bonitatem Dei et subjectionem Christi, atque unitatem Spiritus sancti in unum finem qui sit initio similis revocantur : omnes scilicet illi qui in nomine Jesu genu flectentes, per hoc ipsum subjectionis suae insignia declararunt; qui sunt caelestium, terrestrium et infernorum ; in quibus tribus significationibus omnis universitas indicatur, hi videlicet qui ab illo uno initio pro suis unusquisque motibus et varietatibus per diversos ordines pro merito dispensati sunt; non enim in his bonitas substantialiter inerat, sicut in Deo et Christo ejus, et in Spiritu sancto. In hac enim sola Trinitate, quae est auctor omnium, bonitas substantialiter inest; caeteri vero accidentem eam ac decidentem habent, et tunc sunt in beatitudine, cum de sanctitate ac sapientia et de ipsa divinitate participant. Si vero ab hujusmodi participatione negligant atque dissimulent , tunc vitio propriae desidiae alius citius alius tardius, plus alius alius minus, ipse sibi causa sui lapsus vel casus edicitur. Et quoniam, ut diximus, casus iste vel lapsus, quo de statu suo quisque declinat, quamplurimum in se habet diversitatem pro mentis ac propositi motibus, quod alius levius, alius gravius ad inferiora declinat, in hoc jam justum judicium Dei providentiae, ut unicuique secundum diversitatem motuum pro merito sui decessus et commotionis occurrat. Ex his sane qui in illo initio permanserunt, quod futuro fini simile esse descripsimus, quidam ex ipsis in ordinatione ac dispensatione mundi ordinem angelicum sortiuntur, alii virtutum, alii principatuum, alii potestatum, ut videlicet exerceant potestatem in eos qui habere super caput indigent potestatem; alii thronorum ordinem, id est, judicandi vel regendi eos qui hoc indigent, habentes officium; alii dominationem, quam sine dubio super servos; quae omnia eis pro merito et profectibus suis quibus in Dei participationem imitationemque profecerant, aequo iustoque iudicio divina contulit providentia. Illi vero qui de statu primae beatitudinis moti quidem sunt, non tamen irremediabiliter moti, illis quos supra descripsimus, sanctis beatisque ordinibus dispensandi subjecti sunt ac regendi; quorum adjutorio usi, et institutionibus ac disciplinis salutaribus reformati, redire ac restitui ad statum suae beatitudinis possint. Ex quibus existimo, prout ego sentire possum, hunc ordinem humani generis institutum, qui utique in futuro saeculo, vel supervenientibus saeculis, cum coelum novum et terra nova secundum Isaiam erit, restituetur in illam unitatem quam promittit Dominus Jesus dicens ad ‘Deum Patrem de suis discipulis : Non pro istis rogo solum, sed et pro omnibus qui credituri sunt per verbum eorum in me, ut omnes unum sint, sicut ego in te, Pater, et tu in me, ita et isti in nobis unum sint . Et iterum ubi ait : Ut sint unum, sicut et nos unum sumus, ego in ipsis, et tu in me, ut sint et ipsi consummati in uno. Et sicut confirmat nihilominus etiam Paulus apostolus dicens: Donec occurramus omnes in unitatem fidei in virum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi. Et sicut idem Apostolus jam nos etiam in praesenti vita in Ecclesia positos, in qua utique futuri regni est forma, ad hanc eamdem unitatis similitudinem cohortatur dicens: Ut eadem dicatis omnes, et non sint in vobis schismata, sitis autem perfecti in uno eodemque sensu, atque in una eademque sententia.
Looking, then, to such an end, when all enemies will be subjected to Christ, and when the last enemy, death, will be destroyed, and when the kingdom will be handed over to God the Father by Christ, to whom all things are subjected, let us, I say, from such an end of things contemplate their beginnings. For the end is always like the beginning; and therefore, as there is one end of all things, so one beginning of all things must be understood; and as there is one end of many things, so from one beginning come many differences and varieties, which in turn, through the goodness of God, the subjection of Christ and the unity of the Holy Spirit, are called back to one end, which is like the beginning: namely all those who, bending the knee at the name of Jesus, have by this very act declared the signs of their subjection, those of things in heaven, on earth and under the earth, in which three terms the whole universe is indicated; those, that is, who from that one beginning were arranged, each according to his own movements and varieties, in different orders according to merit. For goodness was not present in them substantially, as in God and his Christ and in the Holy Spirit. In this Trinity alone, which is the author of all things, goodness is present substantially; the others have it as accidental and liable to fall away, and they are in blessedness only when they share in holiness and wisdom and in the Godhead itself. But if they neglect and disregard such participation, then, by the fault of their own sloth, one more quickly and another more slowly, one more and another less, each becomes himself the cause of his own slip or fall. And since, as we have said, this slip or fall, by which each one declines from his state, contains very great diversity according to the movements of mind and purpose, so that one declines more lightly, another more gravely, to lower things, herein lies the just judgment of God's providence, that to each one there comes, according to the diversity of his movements, what is deserved by his departure and disturbance. Of those, indeed, who remained in that beginning which we have described as like the end to come, some in the ordering and arrangement of the world are allotted the angelic order, others that of virtues, others of principalities, others of powers, so that they may exercise power over those who need to have a power over their head; others the order of thrones, having the office of judging or ruling those who need this; others dominion, no doubt over servants; all of which divine providence conferred on them according to their merit and the progress by which they had advanced in the participation and imitation of God, by a fair and just judgment. Those, however, who have been moved from their state of first blessedness, yet not moved beyond remedy, have been made subject to be arranged and ruled by the holy and blessed orders we described above; and by their help, reformed by salutary instructions and disciplines, they may return and be restored to the state of their blessedness. From these, I think, as far as I am able to perceive, this order of the human race was established, which in the age to come, or in the ages that follow, when there will be a new heaven and a new earth according to Isaiah, will certainly be restored to that unity which the Lord Jesus promises when he says to God the Father about his disciples: “I do not pray for these only, but also for all who will believe in me through their word, that they all may be one, as I am in you, Father, and you in me, so also they may be one in us”; and again where he says: “that they may be one, as we also are one, I in them and you in me, that they too may be perfected in one.” As the apostle Paul also confirms, saying: “Until we all attain to the unity of the faith, to the perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ.” And as the same Apostle exhorts us, placed even in the present life in the Church, in which there is certainly a figure of the kingdom to come, to this same likeness of unity, saying: “That you all say the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfected in one and the same mind and in one and the same judgment.”
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:26 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 2:10 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:10 (echo, low confidence) · Isa 66:22 (allusion, high confidence) · John 17:20 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The end will be like the beginning: from one beginning rational beings were ranked by their own merits, the human race arising from those who fell but not beyond remedy, and all will be restored to the unity Christ prayed for.
- In the scan the middle of this passage is interleaved line by line with Migne's parallel column (his Latin version of a Greek fragment preserved by Justinian, on the ranks that beings will hold in the future arrangement of the world) and with long footnotes, including Jerome's report (Letter to Avitus) that Origen taught that the devil and demons may become human beings. These have been removed and Rufinus's words restored to their order by logged correction. Rufinus's text says that the human race was formed from those moved from their first blessedness; this teaching on the pre-existence of souls is given as written. Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 15:24–28; Phil 2:10; 1 Cor 11:10; Isa 66:22; John 17:20–21; John 17:22–23; Eph 4:13; 1 Cor 1:10.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slips; joined words; note marker; stray mark; stray mark; OCR slip): Talem igitur linem → Talem igitur finem; ab isto,iuquam,tali line → ab isto, inquam, tali fine; similis est linis initiis (b2) → similis est finis initiis; unus ontttittut linis → unus omnium finis; multorum unus linis, ita ab uno .iuitio multm dill‘ereutia: → multorum unus finis, ita ab uno initio multae differentiae; oumcs scilicet Ill qui → omnes scilicet illi qui; cmlestium, terrestrium et inleruorum → caelestium, terrestrium et infernorum; perdiversos → per diversos; non euint in his bonitas substentialiter → non enim in his bonitas substantialiter; lu hac enim sola Triuitate → In hac enim sola Trinitate; partiripatioue → participatione; lli vero qui de statu prima: beatitudinis meti quidem sunt, non tamen irremediabilitertnoti → Illi vero qui de statu primae beatitudinis moti quidem sunt, non tamen irremediabiliter moti; ct institutionibus → et institutionibus; statum sua: beatitudinis → statum suae beatitudinis; utique itt futuro → utique in futuro; Isaiam erit {72), → Isaiam erit,; « Non pro istis rage → Non pro istis rogo; ιιι omnes unum sint, sicut ego itt te → ut omnes unum sint, sicut ego in te; unum sint . Ει iterum → unum sint . Et iterum; smmis, ego in ipsis, et ιιι ἰιι me → sumus, ego in ipsis, et tu in me; in uno η. Et sicut coolirmat → in uno. Et sicut confirmat; :etatis → aetatis; Christi η. Ει sicut idem Apostolusjam nos etiatn → Christi. Et sicut idem Apostolus jam nos etiam; Uteadem dicatis ouines, et non sint itt → Ut eadem dicatis omnes, et non sint in; sententia . t → sententia..
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.6.2 (PG 11:166a–168b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-6-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-6-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.6.3PG 11:168b–169c
Sciendum tamen est quosdam qui ex uno principio, quod supra diximus, delapsi sunt. in tantam indignitatem ac malitiam se dedisse ut indigni habiti sint institutione hac, vel eruditione qua per carnem humanum genus adiutorio virtutum coelestium instituitur atque eruditur, sed e contrario etiam adversarii atque repugnantes his qui erudiuntur atque imbuuntur, exsistant. Unde et agones quosdam atque certamina omnis haec habet vita mortalium, reluctantibus scilicet et repugnantibus adversum nos his qui sine ullo respectu de statu meliori delapsi sunt, qui appellantur diabolus et angeli ejus, caeterique ordines malitiae, quos Apostolus de virtutibus contrariis nominavit. Jam vero si aliqui ex his ordinibus qui sub principatu diaboli agunt, ac malitiae ejus obtemperant , poterunt aliquando in futuris saeculis converti ad bonitatem, pro eo quod est in ipsis liberi facultas arbitrii; an vero permanens et inveterata malitia velut in naturam quamdam ex consuetudine convertatur, etiam tu qui legis probato, si omnino neque in his quae videntur temporalibus saeculis, neque in his quae non videntur et aeterna sunt, penitus pars ista ab illa etiam finali unitate atque convenientia discrepabit. Interim tamen tam in his quae videntur et temporalibus saeculis quam in illis quae non videntur et aeterna sunt, omnes isti pro ordine, pro ratione, pro modo et meritorum dignitatibus dispensantur; ut alii in primis, alii in secundis, nonnulli etiam in ultimis temporibus, et per majora ac graviora supplicia, necnon et diuturna ac multis, ut ita dicam, saeculis tolerata asperioribus emendationibus reparati et restituti eruditionibus primo angelicis, tum deinde etiam superiorum graduum virtutibus, et sic per singula ad superiora provecti usque ad ea quae sunt invisibilia et aeterna perveniant, singulis videlicet quibusque caelestium virtutum officiis quadam eruditionum specie peragratis. Ex quo, ut opinor, hoc consequentia ipsa videtur ostendere, unamquamque rationabilem naturam posse ab uno in alterum ordinem transeuntem per singulos in omnes, et ab omnibus in singulos pervenire, dum accessus profectuum defectuumve varios pro motibus vel conatibus propriis unusquisque pro liberi arbitrii facultate perpetitur.
It must be known, however, that some who fell from that one beginning of which we spoke above have given themselves up to such unworthiness and wickedness that they have been judged unworthy of this instruction or training by which the human race in the flesh is instructed and trained with the help of the heavenly powers; on the contrary, they are even the adversaries and opponents of those who are being trained and instructed. Hence all this life of mortals has its contests and struggles, since those who have fallen without any regard from a better state, who are called the devil and his angels, and the other orders of wickedness which the Apostle named among the opposing powers, struggle and fight against us. Now whether any of these orders that act under the rule of the devil and obey his wickedness will at some time in the ages to come be able to be converted to goodness, because there is in them the faculty of free choice, or whether a persistent and inveterate wickedness is turned by habit into a kind of nature, you yourself who read must judge: whether this part will be utterly at odds with that final unity and harmony, both in these temporal ages which are seen and in those which are not seen and are eternal. Meanwhile, however, both in these temporal ages which are seen and in those which are not seen and are eternal, all these beings are arranged according to order, reason, measure and the worth of their merits: so that some in the first, others in the second, and some even in the last times, through greater and heavier punishments, long ones endured, so to speak, for many ages, are renewed and restored by harsher corrections, first by the instructions of angels, then also by the powers of higher ranks; and so, advanced step by step to higher things, they reach those things that are invisible and eternal, having passed through, in a kind of course of instruction, each of the offices of the heavenly powers. From this, I think, the logic of the matter itself seems to show that each rational nature can, passing from one order to another, go through each to all and from all to each, while each one undergoes various movements of progress or decline according to its own movements and efforts, by the faculty of free choice.
Matt 25:41 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:18 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Some fallen beings became the devil and his angels, opponents of humanity; whether they can ever be converted Origen leaves to the reader, while others are restored through long corrections, every rational being able to rise or fall by free choice.
- The scan inserts here Migne's footnotes and his parallel column (a Latin version of Jerome's report, Letter to Avitus, that Origen taught that all rational creatures may become human beings, that we may become demons if negligent, and demons reach the dignity of angels); these are not Rufinus's text and have been removed by logged correction. Rufinus's text leaves to the reader whether the devil's orders can be converted, and speaks of restoration through punishments lasting many ages; this is given exactly as written. Allusions: Matt 25:41; Eph 6:12; 2 Cor 4:18.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnotes and his parallel column (a Latin version of Jerome's report in the Letter to Avitus) removed; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; note marker; split word): tautam → tantam; econ ο trario → e contrario; haac habet → haec habet; exterique ordines → caeterique ordines; iam ‘vero si aliqui ex liis → Jam vero si aliqui ex his; malitia: ejus → malitiae ejus; tuturis smculis → futuris saeculis; mae litia → malitia; omnintode neque in his’ quae → omnino neque in his quae; pars ista ιιι, ina etiam ιίηειη unitate → pars ista ab illa etiam finali unitate; Interim tamin itis qua: videntur ει temporalibus sarculis quant in illis → Interim tamen tam in his quae videntur et temporalibus saeculis quam in illis; et atterna sunt, omnes → et aeterna sunt, omnes; ει meritorum → et meritorum; alii iu primis → alii in primis; cmendationibus → emendationibus; cruditionibus → eruditionibus; cmlestinm virtutum olliciis quadam eruditionunt → caelestium virtutum officiis quadam eruditionum; opinor (89.), → opinor,; ab uno iu alterum → ab uno in alterum; pervenire,dum → pervenire, dum; “ Ephes. tv,13. [Con ι, lO. 22, 2'5. sic ad antiquum redire principium ; itagduntaxat ut per supplicia atque toriuenta, quae vel multo vel brevi tempore sustinuerint, in hominumeruditi corporibus, rursum veniant ad angelorum fastigia. Exque consequenti ratione, monstrari, omnes ra-_tionabil’es creaiuras ex hominibus fieri, non sernel et subito, sed frequentius; nosque et angelos futuros daemones, si egerimus negligentius; et rursum daemones si volberiut capere virtutes, perveniread angelicam dignitatem. __ ,, .. Ita inss. Libli. editi, ordinibussubjecti sunt ad regendum. Paulo post iidem libb. editi, restitui ad statum beatitudinis possunt. At tuas. → .
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.6.3 (PG 11:168b–169c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-6-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-6-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
1.6.4PG 11:169c–170c
Quoniam sane visibilia quaedam dicit esse Paulus et temporalia, alia vero praeter haec invisibilia et aeterna, quaerimus quomodo haec, quae videntur, temporalia sint; utrumne pro eo quod nihil omnino post haec erunt in omnibus illis futuri saeculi spatiis , quibus dispersio illa unius principii atque divisio ad unum et eumdem finem ac similitudinem reparetur : an pro eo quod habitus quidem eorum quae videntur, transeat, non tamen eorum substantia omnimode corrumpatur. Et Paulus quidem videtur id, quod posterius diximus, confirmare, cum dicit : Transit enim habitus huius mundi. Sed et David cum dicit: Caeli peribunt, tu autem permanebis, et omnes sicut vestimentum veterascent, et velut amictum mutabis eos, sicut vestimentum mutabuntur, eadem videtur ostendere. Si enim mutabuntur coeli, utique non perit quod mutatur; et si habitus mundi transit, non omnimode exterminatio vel perditio substantiae materialis ostenditur, sed immutatio quaedam iit qualitatis, atque habitus transformatio. Isaias quoque cum per prophetiam dicit , quia erit caelum novum, et terra nova, similem sine dubio suggerit intellectum. Innovatio namque caeli et terrae et transmutatio habitus hujus mundi, et immutatio caelorum, his sine dubio praeparabitur, qui per illam viam , quam supra OStendimus, iter agentes, ad illum finem beatitudinis tendunt, cui etiam ipsi inimici subiiciendi dicuntur, in quo fine omnia et in omnibus dicitur esse Deus. In hoc fine si quis materialem naturam, id est corpoream, penitus interituram putet, nullo omnino genere intellectui meo occurrere potest , quomodo tot et tantae substantiae vitam agere et subsistere sine corporibus possunt, cum solius Dei, id est Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti naturae id proprium sit, ut sine materiali substantia et absque ulla corporeae adjectionis societate intelligatur subsistere. Alius fortasse dicet, quoniam in illo fine omnis substantia corporalis ita pura erit atque purgata, ut aetheris in modum et caelestis cujusdam puritatis atque sinceritatis possit intelligi. Certius tamen qualiter se habitura sit res, scit solus Deus , et si qui ejus per Christum et Spiritum sanctum amici sunt.
Since Paul says that some things are visible and temporal, and others besides these invisible and eternal, we ask how these things that are seen are temporal: whether because there will be nothing at all after these in all those periods of the age to come in which that dispersion and division of the one beginning is restored to one and the same end and likeness; or because the outward form of the things seen passes away, though their substance is not wholly destroyed. And Paul seems to confirm what we said second, when he says, “For the form of this world is passing away.” David too seems to show the same when he says: “The heavens will perish, but you will remain; and they will all grow old like a garment, and like a cloak you will change them, and like a garment they will be changed.” For if the heavens will be changed, what is changed certainly does not perish; and if the form of the world passes away, it is not a total extermination or destruction of the material substance that is indicated, but a certain change of quality and transformation of form. Isaiah too, when he says in prophecy that there will be a new heaven and a new earth, undoubtedly suggests a similar understanding. For the renewal of heaven and earth, the transformation of the form of this world, and the change of the heavens will undoubtedly be prepared for those who, walking by that way which we showed above, are making for that end of blessedness to which even the enemies themselves are said to be subjected, the end in which God is said to be all in all. If anyone thinks that at this end material, that is, bodily, nature will perish entirely, I can in no way conceive how so many and so great substances could live and subsist without bodies, since it is proper to the nature of God alone, that is, of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, to be understood to subsist without material substance and without any association of bodily addition. Another will perhaps say that at that end all bodily substance will be so pure and cleansed that it can be thought of as like the ether and of a kind of heavenly purity and clearness. But how the matter will be, God alone knows for certain, and any who are his friends through Christ and the Holy Spirit.
2 Cor 4:18 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 102:26 (101:27 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 66:22 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · John 15:15 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: At the end the visible world will not be annihilated but transformed; Origen cannot conceive created beings without bodies, though bodies may become pure as ether, and leaves the certainty to God.
- Quotations and allusions: 2 Cor 4:18; 1 Cor 7:31; Ps 102:26 (Ps 101:27 LXX); Isa 66:22; 1 Cor 15:25, 28; John 15:15.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne footnote and line-break hyphen removed; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; note marker; note marker; stray marks; OCR slips): praeter hate invi‘sibitia et :eterna, quaerimus quomodo brec, qum videntur → praeter haec invisibilia et aeterna, quaerimus quomodo haec, quae videntur; futuri sae- lsa. LXVI, 22. “ lCor. vn, 5!. Psal. cn, 27. culi → futuri saeculi; tinem ac similitudinem reparetur : au proco quod → finem ac similitudinem reparetur : an pro eo quod; cum dicit : ‹ Transit enim habitus huius ntundi ιδ. Sed ει David → cum dicit : Transit enim habitus huius mundi. Sed et David; ϐωιί peribunt, tu autem permanebis, etonmes → Caeli peribunt, tu autem permanebis, et omnes; mutabuntur ‘5,» → mutabuntur,; lsaias quoque → Isaias quoque; quia erilemlum novum, et terra nova ιθ, similent → quia erit caelum novum, et terra nova, similem; lnnovatio namque mali et terra) et → Innovatio namque caeli et terrae et; σει immutatio caalorum → et immutatio caelorum; illum linem beatitudinis tendunt, cui ctiam → illum finem beatitudinis tendunt, cui etiam; in quo line omnia → in quo fine omnia; ln hoc line si quis matcrialem → In hoc fine si quis materialem; tot ct tanta: substantiae → tot et tantae substantiae; natura: id proprium → naturae id proprium; corporea: adiectionis → corporeae adjectionis; in illo line omnis → in illo fine omnis.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 1.6.4 (PG 11:169c–170c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/1-5-1/#p-1-6-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-1-6-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).