On First Principles 2.10.1–2.10.8
Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.
On 2, chapter 10
2.10.1PG 11:233a–234a
De resurrectione et judicio, de igne inferni et poenis. Sed quoniam nos sermo commonuit de judicio futuro, et de retributione. ac suppliciis peccatorum, secundum quod comminantur sanctae Scripturae, et ecclesiastica praedicatio continet, eo quod judicii tempore ignis aeternus et tenebrae exteriores et carcer et caminus, et alia his similia peccatoribus praeparata sint; videamus quid etiam de his sentire oporteat. Sed ut ad haec competenti ordine veniatur, prius mihi videtur de resurrectione sermo movendus, ut sciamus quid est illud quod vel ad supplicium, vel ad requiem, vel ad beatitudinem veniet; de quo in aliis quidem libris quos de resurrectione scripsimus, plenius disputavimus, et quid nobis de hoc videretur, ostendimus. Sed et nunc propter consequentiam tractatus pauca inde repetere non videtur absurdum : maxime propter hoc quod offenduntur quidam in ecclesiastica fide, quasi velut stulte et penitus insipienter de resurrectione credamus; praecipue haeretici, quibus hoc modo arbitror respondendum. Si confitentur etiam ipsi quia resurrectio sit mortuorum, respondeant nobis quid est _ quod mortuum est. Nonne corpus? Corporis ergo resurrectio flet. Tum deinde dicant si utendum nobis putant esse corporibus an non? Arbitror apostolo Paulo dicente quia seminatur corpus animale, resurget corpus spiritale, istos negare non posse quod corpus resurgat, vel quia in resurrectione corporibus utamur. Quid ergo? Si certum est quod corporibus nobis utendum sit, et corpora quae ceciderunt, resurgere praedicantur (non enim proprie resurgere dicitur, nisi id quod ante ceciderit), nulli dubium est idcirco ea resurgere, ut his iterum ex resurrectione induamur. Alterum ergo haeret ex altero. Nam et si resurgunt corpora, sine dubio ad indumentum nostri resurgunt; et si necesse est nos esse in corporibus, sicut certe necesse est, non in aliis quam in nostris corporibus esse debemus. Quae si verum est quod resurgunt et spiritalia resurgunt, dubium non est quin abjecta corruptione, et deposita mortalitate resurgere dicantur a mortuis; alioquin vanum videbitur et superfluum resurgere quemquam a mortuis, ut iterum moriatur. Quod ita demum intelligi evidentius potest, si quis diligenter advertat, quae sit animalis corporis qualitas, quae in terram seminata Spiritalis corporis reparet qualitatem. Ex animali namque corpore ipsa virtus resurrectionis et gratia spiritale corpus educit, cum id ab indignitate transmutat ad gloriam.
On the resurrection and the judgment, on the fire of hell and punishments. But since our discussion has reminded us of the judgment to come and of the retribution and punishments of sinners, according to what the holy Scriptures threaten and the church's preaching contains, namely that at the time of judgment eternal fire and outer darkness and a prison and a furnace and other things like these are prepared for sinners, let us see what we ought to think about these too. But so that we may come to these in proper order, it seems to me that we must first speak about the resurrection, so that we may know what it is that will come either to punishment or to rest or to blessedness. On this we have discussed more fully in other books which we wrote on the resurrection, and have shown what we thought about it. But now too, because of the sequence of the treatise, it does not seem absurd to repeat a few things from there, especially because some are offended at the church's faith, as though we believed foolishly and altogether senselessly about the resurrection; especially the heretics, to whom I think we should reply in this way. If they too confess that there is a resurrection of the dead, let them answer us: what is it that died? Was it not the body? It is of the body, then, that the resurrection will take place. Then let them say whether they think we shall use bodies or not. I think that, since the apostle Paul says that a soulish body is sown and a spiritual body will rise, they cannot deny that a body rises, or that we use bodies in the resurrection. What then? If it is certain that we shall use bodies, and the bodies that fell are preached as rising (for nothing is properly said to rise except what fell before), no one doubts that they rise for this reason, that we may be clothed with them again after the resurrection. The one thing, then, hangs on the other. For if bodies rise, undoubtedly they rise to clothe us; and if it is necessary for us to be in bodies, as it certainly is necessary, we must be in no other bodies than our own. And if it is true that they rise, and rise spiritual, there is no doubt that they are said to rise from the dead with corruption cast off and mortality laid aside; otherwise it will seem vain and superfluous for anyone to rise from the dead only to die again. This can be understood more evidently at last if one considers carefully what is the quality of the soulish body which, sown in the earth, restores the quality of a spiritual body. For out of the soulish body the very power and grace of the resurrection brings forth a spiritual body, when it changes it from dishonour to glory.
Matt 25:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 8:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 13:42 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:44 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:43 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Before discussing punishment, Origen argues against heretics that the body rises, our own body, but changed from a soulish into a spiritual and incorruptible body.
- The passage opens with the chapter's own heading. Origen's books On the Resurrection are lost. Migne's footnotes, mixed into the text by the scan, are removed. Allusions and quotations: Matt 25:41; Matt 8:12; Matt 13:42; 1 Cor 15:44; 1 Cor 15:43.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne footnotes and running head removed; line-break hyphen; OCR slip; OCR slip; section number removed; OCR slips; OCR slips; note marker; joined words; note marker; stray mark; OCR slip): panis. l. Sed → poenis. Sed; etde retributione → et de retributione; Scripturaz → Scripturae; videamusquid → videamus quid; ad lucc → ad haec; tnihi → mihi; pmpter hoc quod olTeitdunlur qnidam in ecclesiastica lide → propter hoc quod offenduntur quidam in ecclesiastica fide; hmipue → praecipue; animule → animale; Spiritale θ’, → spiritale,; certttm → certum; induamnr → induamur; Alterum ergo lueret ex ullcrt). Nam et si resurgunt (Υ) corpora → Alterum ergo haeret ex altero. Nam et si resurgunt corpora; sient certe → sicut certe; cerporibns → corporibus; Quae si verum cst → Quae si verum est; quin ‘ abjeeta → quin abjecta; advertat ($8), → advertat,; quia resur- "ll Tim. lt, '20. 2i. ” lCor. xv, 44. (mlta mss. Alias, naturam. Sic mss. Alias, t numerum. [ide Origeniun., lib. tt, _q. Ξ. n. Mf... (flifleritoruz'n. Deest in prioribus editionibus, licet in erunibus reperiatur mss. Ωιιαεὶ velut stulte et penitus insipienter de resurrectione credamus. Quid de resurrectione docuerit Origenes, fuse disputatur Origenianorum librati, quaestione noua. Dicant, si utendum nobis putant. Ita recte mss. ln prioribus editionibus deest dicunt, et iter potant legitur ς putatur. (9.7) Sic mss. A'lias. etiamsi resurgant. Paulo PATROL. Gn. ΧΙ. rectio → quia resurrectio.
Topics: Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.1 (PG 11:233a–234a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.2PG 11:234a–235b
Quoniam ergo haeretici eruditissimi sibi videntur et sapientissimi, interrogabimus eos, si omne corpus schema aliquod habet, id est habitu aliquo deformetur. Et si quidem dixerint esse corpus quod non aliquo habitu deformetur, imperitissimi omnium atque insipientissimi videbuntur. Nullus enim hoc negabit, nisi sit ab omni eruditione penitus alienus. Si vero secundum id quod consequens est dixerint, quia omne corpus certo aliquo habitu deformatur, requiremus ab eis si possunt nobis spiritalis corporis habitum demonstrare atque describere; quod utique nullo modo facere poterunt. Sed et differentias eorum qui resurgunt inquiremus ab eis. Quomodo ostendent verum esse illud quod dictum est quia alia caro volucrum, alia piscium, et corpora cmlestia et corpora terrestria, sed alia quidem caelestium gloria, alia vero terrestrium, alia gloria solis, alia lunae, alia stellarum; stella a stella differt in gloria, ita et resurrectio mortuorum ”? Secundum istam ergo consequentiam caelestium corporum ostendant nobis differentias gloriae eorum qui resurgunt, et si ullo genere conati fuerint secundum caelestium corporum differentias aliquam excogitare rationem, quaeremus ab eis ut etiam secundum terrenorum corporum comparationem differentias resurrectionis assignent. Nos vero ita intelligimus, quod volens Apostolus describere quanta esset differentia eorum qui resurgent in gloria, id est sanctorum, comparationem caelestium corporum sumpsit dicens: Alia gloria solis, alia gloria lunae, alia gloria stellarum. Et iterum volens differentias eorum docere, qui in hac vita non expurgati ad resurrectionem venient, id est peccatores, de terrenis sumit exemplum, dicens : Alia corpora volucrum, alia piscium ". Digne etenim sanctis caelestia, terrena peccatoribus comparantur. Haec quidem dicta sint adversus eos qui resurrectionem mortuorum, id est resurrectionem corporum negant.
Since, then, the heretics seem to themselves most learned and most wise, we shall ask them whether every body has some schema, that is, is shaped by some form. And if they say there is a body which is not shaped by some form, they will appear the most ignorant and foolish of all; for no one will deny this unless he is wholly a stranger to all learning. But if, as is consistent, they say that every body is shaped by some definite form, we shall demand of them whether they can show and describe to us the form of a spiritual body; which they will certainly be in no way able to do. We shall also inquire of them about the differences among those who rise. How will they show that this saying is true, that “one is the flesh of birds, another of fish; and there are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies, but the glory of the heavenly is one and that of the earthly another; one is the glory of the sun, another of the moon, another of the stars; star differs from star in glory; so also is the resurrection of the dead”? According to this sequence, then, let them show us the differences of glory among those who rise, corresponding to the heavenly bodies; and if they attempt in any way to devise some account according to the differences of the heavenly bodies, we shall ask them to assign differences of the resurrection also according to the comparison with earthly bodies. We, however, understand it thus: that the Apostle, wishing to describe how great the difference would be among those who will rise in glory, that is, the saints, took the comparison of the heavenly bodies, saying, “One is the glory of the sun, another the glory of the moon, another the glory of the stars.” And again, wishing to teach the differences among those who come to the resurrection not purified in this life, that is, sinners, he takes an example from earthly things, saying, “One is the body of birds, another of fish.” For fittingly are heavenly things compared to the saints, earthly to sinners. Let these things be said against those who deny the resurrection of the dead, that is, the resurrection of bodies.
1 Cor 15:39 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:40 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:41 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:42 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against heretics who deny bodily resurrection, Origen reads Paul's comparison of heavenly and earthly bodies as describing the differing glory of the saints and the condition of unpurified sinners.
- Quotations: 1 Cor 15:39–42.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slips; OCR slips; note marker; note marker; split word; stray mark; stray marks; OCR slips): imperi. tissimi → imperitissimi; aliquo (5|) habitu → aliquo habitu; caalestium gloria, alia vero terrestrium, alia gloria solis, alia lnnze → caelestium gloria, alia vero terrestrium, alia gloria solis, alia lunae; difl‘ert in gloria → differt in gloria; censequcntiam → consequentiam; difl'ercntias gloria: (5‘2) → differentias gloriae; ct si ullo → et si ullo; rcsurrectiouis assignent ('55). → resurrectionis assignent.; diil‘crcntia → differentia; corrorum → corporum; A'lia gloria → Alia gloria; stellarum ’. › Ει iterum volens dficrcntias → stellarum. Et iterum volens differentias; ltac vita → hac vita; dicens : t Alia corpora → dicens : Alia corpora; cwlestia → caelestia; “mequidem → Haec quidem.
Topics: Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.2 (PG 11:234a–235b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.3PG 11:235b–236b
Nunc vero sermonem convertimus ad nonnullos nostrorum, qui vel pro intellectus exiguitate, vel explanationis inopia, valde vilem et abiectum sensum de resurrectione corporis introducunt. Quos interrogamus, quomodo intelligant animale corpus gratia resurrectionis immutandum , et spiritale futurum; et quomodo quod in infirmitate seminatur, resurrecturum sentiant in virtute; quod in ignobilitate, quomodo resurgat in gloria; et quod in corruptione, quomodo ad »incorruptionem« transferatur. Quod utique si credunt apostolo quia corpus »in gloria et in virtute et in incorruptibilitate« resurgens »spiritale« iam effectum sit, absurdum videtur et contra apostoli sensum dicere, id rursum »carnis et sanguinis« passionibus implicari, cum manifeste dicat apostolus: »Quoniam caro et sanguis regnum dei non possidebunt, neque corruptio incorruptionem possidebit«. Sed et illud quomodo accipiunt, quod dicit apostolus quia »omnes autem immutabimur«? Quae utique immutatio secundum illum ordinem, quem superius diximus, expectanda est, in qua sine dubio dignum aliquid divina gratia sperare nos convenit; quod futurum credimus hoc ordine quo nudum granum frumenti aut alicujus caeterorum in terra seminatum describit apostolus, cui »deus dat corpus prout voluit«, cum primum granum ipsum frumenti mortuum fuerit. Ita namque etiam nostra corpora velut granum cadere in terram putanda sunt; quibus insita ratio ea quae substantiam continet corporalem, quamvis emortua fuerint corpora et corrupta atque dispersa, verbo tamen Dei ratio illa ipsa quae semper in substantia corporis salva est, erigat ea de terra. et restituat ac reparet, sicut ea virtus quae est in grano frumenti, post corruptionem ejus et mortem reparat ac restituit granum in culmi corpus et spicae. Et ita his quidem qui regni caelorum haereditatem consequi merebuntur, ratio illa reparandi corporis quam supra diximus, Dei jussu ex terreno et animali corpore corpus reparat spiritale, quod habitare possit in caelis ; his vero qui inferioris meriti fuerint, vel abjectioris, vel etiam ultimi et abstrusi, pro uniuscujusque vitae atque animae dignitate, etiam gloria corporis et dignitas datur; ita tamen ut etiam eorum qui ad ignem aeternum, vel ad supplicia destinandi sunt, per ipsam resurrectionis permutationem ita corpus incorruptum sit quod resurgit, ut ne suppliciis quidem corrumpi valeat et dissolvi.
Now we turn our discussion to some of our own people who, whether from smallness of understanding or poverty of explanation, introduce a very low and abject idea of the resurrection of the body. We ask them how they understand that the soulish body is to be changed by the grace of the resurrection and will be spiritual; how they think that what is sown in weakness will rise in power; how what is sown in dishonour rises in glory; and how what is sown in corruption is changed into incorruption. If they believe the Apostle that the body, rising in glory and in power and in incorruption, has now become spiritual, it seems absurd and contrary to the Apostle's meaning to say that it is again entangled in the passions of flesh and blood, since the Apostle clearly says: “Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God, nor will corruption possess incorruption.” And how do they take what the Apostle says, “But we shall all be changed”? This change is certainly to be expected according to the order which we have described above, in which we must undoubtedly hope for something worthy of divine grace. We believe that this will come about in the order in which the Apostle describes a bare grain of wheat or of some other kind sown in the earth, to which “God gives a body as he willed,” when the grain of wheat itself has first died. So our bodies too must be thought to fall into the earth like a grain; and the principle implanted in them, which contains the bodily substance, although the bodies have died and been corrupted and scattered, yet by the word of God that very principle, which is always preserved in the substance of the body, raises them from the earth and restores and repairs them, just as the power that is in the grain of wheat, after its corruption and death, repairs and restores the grain into the body of a stalk and ear. And so, for those who will merit to obtain the inheritance of the kingdom of heaven, that principle of repairing the body which we mentioned above, by God's command, repairs out of the earthly and soulish body a spiritual body which can dwell in the heavens; while to those who are of lower merit, or more abject, or even the lowest and most thrust down, glory and dignity of body is given according to the dignity of each one's life and soul; in such a way, however, that even for those who are to be destined for eternal fire or punishments, through the very change of the resurrection, the body which rises is so incorruptible that it cannot be corrupted and dissolved even by punishments.
1 Cor 15:42 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:43 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:44 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:37 (allusion, high confidence) · John 12:24 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:50 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:51 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against a low idea of the resurrection, Origen explains that the body rises spiritual and incorruptible from a principle preserved in it, as a grain grows into an ear.
- Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 15:42–44; 1 Cor 15:50–51; 1 Cor 15:36–38; John 12:24.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; stray mark; OCR slips; column number removed; note marker): itumutandum → immutandum; itt ignobilitate → in ignobilitate; czetcrorum › → caeterorum; l'a namque → Ita namque; itt terram → in terram; ratio ('58) ea → ratio ea; Dci ratio → Dei ratio; corruptionent → corruptionem; itt culmi → in culmi; spica: → spicae; Itis quidem → his quidem; cmlorum lia-reditatem → caelorum haereditatem; ctelis → caelis; bis vero → his vero; pra uniuscujusque → pro uniuscujusque; anima: dignitate → animae dignitate; ut 102 etiam → ut etiam; resurgit (Ml), → resurgit,; valeal el dissolvi → valeat et dissolvi.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.3 (PG 11:235b–236b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.4PG 11:236b–237b
Si ergo ita se habet qualitas ejus corporis quod resurget a mortuis, videamus nunc quid sibi velit ignis aeterni comminatio. Invenimus namque in Isaia propheta designari uniuscujusque proprium esse ignem quo punitur; ait enim : Ambulate in lumine ignis vestri, et in flamma quam accendistis θ’. Per quos sermones hoc videtur indicari, quod unusquisque peccatorum flammam sibi ipse proprii ignis accendat, et non in aliquem ignem, qui antea jam fuerit accensus ab alio, vel ante ipsum substiterit, demergatur. Cujus ignis materia atque esca nostra sunt peccata, quae ab apostolo Paulo ligna et fenum et stipula nominantur . Et arbitror quod sicut in corpore escarum abundantia et qualitas et quantitas cibi contraria febres generant, et febres diversi modi vel temporis secundum eam mensuram qua intemperies collecta materiam suggesserit ac fomitem febrium; quae materiae qualitas ex diversa intemperie congregata, causa vel acerbioris morbi, vel prolixioris exsistit; ita anima cum multitudinem malorum operum et abundantiam in se congregaverit peccatorum, competenti tempore omnis illa malorum congregatio effervescit ad supplicium, atque inflammatur ad poenas; cum mens ipsa, vel conscientia per divinam virtutem omnia in memoriam recipiens, quorum in semetipsa signa quaedam et formas, cum peccaret, expresserat, et singulorum quae vel foede ac turpiter gesserat, vel etiam impie commiserat, historiam quamdam scelerum suorum ante oculos suos videbit expositam; tunc et ipsa conscientia propriis stimulis agitatur atque compungitur, et sui ipsa efficitur accusatrix et testis. Quod ita sensisse puto etiam Paulum apostolum cum dicit : inter se invicem cogitationibus accusantibus, aut etiam defendentibus in die qua iudicabit Deus occulta hominum, secundum Evangelium meum per Jesum Christum. Ex quo intelligitur quod circa ipsam animae substantiam tormenta quaedam ex ipsis peccatorum noxiis affectibus generantur.
If, then, such is the quality of the body that will rise from the dead, let us now see what the threat of eternal fire means. For we find in the prophet Isaiah that the fire by which each is punished is indicated to be his own; for he says: “Walk in the light of your fire and in the flame which you have kindled.” By these words it seems to be indicated that each sinner kindles for himself the flame of his own fire, and is not plunged into some fire which had already been kindled by another or existed before him. The material and food of this fire are our sins, which the apostle Paul calls wood and hay and stubble. And I think that, just as in the body an abundance of food and a contrary quality and quantity of nourishment generate fevers, and fevers of different kinds or durations according to the measure in which the accumulated intemperance has supplied the material and fuel of the fevers (and this quality of material, gathered from different intemperance, becomes the cause of a sharper or a more prolonged disease), so the soul, when it has gathered within itself a multitude of evil works and an abundance of sins, at the proper time all that gathering of evils boils up to punishment and is set aflame to penalties; when the mind itself, or conscience, receiving by divine power all things into memory, of which it had impressed certain signs and forms on itself when it sinned, will see set out before its eyes a kind of history of its crimes, of each of the things it had done foully and shamefully or even committed impiously; then the conscience itself is driven and pricked by its own goads, and becomes its own accuser and witness. This I think the apostle Paul also felt when he says: “Their thoughts among themselves accusing or even excusing them, on the day when God will judge the secrets of men, according to my Gospel, through Jesus Christ.” From this it is understood that around the very substance of the soul certain torments are generated from the harmful affections of the sins themselves.
Matt 25:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 50:11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 2:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:16 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Each sinner kindles his own fire, fed by his sins as fever by bad food; the punishment is conscience recalling all its crimes and becoming its own accuser.
- Allusion: Matt 25:41.
- Quotations and allusions: Isa 50:11; 1 Cor 3:12; Rom 2:15–16.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne footnote removed; OCR slip; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; note marker; stray mark; stray marks): retenti c‘omminatio → aeterni comminatio; ait enim (£5) : → ait enim :; accendat. et non → accendat, et non; nominautur → nominantur; Ει arbitror → Et arbitror; esca 59. lbid., 50. lbid., 5L lbid., 37, ‘58. abundantia → escarum abundantia; contraria (ιθ) febres → contraria febres; materia! qualitas → materiae qualitas; pmnas → poenas; ftede → foede; ‹ inter se → inter se; Christum'. ο Ex quo → Christum. Ex quo; animm substantiam → animae substantiam.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.4 (PG 11:236b–237b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.5PG 11:237b–238a
Et ne satis tibi hujus rei intellectus difficilis appareat, considerari possibile est ex his passionum vitiis: quae animabus accidere solent, id est, cum vel flammis amoris exuritur anima, vel zeli, vel livoris ignibus maceratur; aut cum ira agitatur, vel cum insaniae, vel tristitiae immensitate consumitur, quomodo horum malorum nimietates aliquanti intolerabiliter ferentes, mortem subire, quam hujuscemodi cruciatus perpeti, tolerabilius habuere. Requires sane si his qui vitiorum malis istis quae supra diximus, irretiti sunt, nec emendationis aliquid in hac vita adhuc positi comparare sibimet potuerunt, et ita ex hoc mundo abscesserunt, sufficiat illis ad poenam quod illis ipsis perdurantibus in se noxiis affectibus cruciantur, id est, vel irae, vel furoris, vel insaniae, vel maeroris, quorum utique mortiferum virus nullo in hac vita emendationis medicamento mitigatum est; an his affectibus immutatis generalis poenae stimulis vexabuntur. Sed et aliam suppliciorum speciem intelligi arbitror posse, quia sicut quidem sentimus soluta corporis membra atque a suis invicem divulsa compagibus immensi doloris generare cruciatum, ita cum anima extra ordinem atque compagem, vel eam harmoniam qua ad bene agendum et utiliter sentiendum a Deo creata est, fuerit inventa, nec sibimetipsi rationabilium motuum compagine consonare, poenam cruciatumque putanda sit suimetipsius ferre dissidii, et inconstantiae suae, atque inordinationis sentire supplicium. Quae animae dissolutio atque divulsio cum adhibiti ignis ratione fuerit explorata, sine dubio ad firmiorem sui compaginem instaurationemque solidatur.
And lest the understanding of this matter seem too difficult to you, it can be considered from those faults of the passions which commonly befall souls: that is, when the soul is burned by the flames of love, or wasted by the fires of jealousy or envy, or when it is driven by anger, or consumed by the immensity of madness or sorrow; how some, finding the excesses of these evils intolerable, have held it more tolerable to undergo death than to endure such torments. You will ask, indeed, whether for those who have been entangled in these evils of vice which we mentioned above, and could procure no amendment for themselves while still placed in this life, and so departed from this world, it suffices for punishment that they are tormented by those very harmful affections remaining in them, of anger, of fury, of madness or of grief, whose deadly poison has been softened by no medicine of amendment in this life; or whether, these affections being changed, they will be vexed by the goads of a general punishment. I think, indeed, that another kind of punishment can also be understood: just as we feel that when the members of the body are loosened and torn from their joints they produce the torment of immense pain, so when the soul is found outside the order and structure, or that harmony in which it was created by God for acting well and feeling usefully, and does not accord with itself in the structure of rational movements, it must be thought to bear the punishment and torment of its own dissension, and to feel the penalty of its own inconstancy and disorder. And when this dissolution and tearing apart of the soul has been tested by the application of fire, it is undoubtedly made firm into a more solid structure and restoration of itself.
Notes and citation
Summary: The punishment of sinners may consist in the torment of their own passions, or in the soul's being torn from its proper harmony, which the fire then restores.
- The view that the fire tests and restores the soul is Origen's, given as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; note marker; stray mark; stray marks): Ει ne satis → Et ne satis; passionam → passionum; id est. ρ cum → id est, cum; amoris ;exuritur → amoris exuritur; tristitia: immensitate → tristitiae immensitate; nimieta'tes → nimietates; babuere → habuere; pcenam → poenam; mmroris → maeroris; generalis pinnae → generalis poenae; aliam (5|) suppliciorum → aliam suppliciorum; eaeata → creata; compagiue → compagine; inconstantia: suae → inconstantiae suae; Qua: animae → Quae animae.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.5 (PG 11:237b–238a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.6PG 11:238a–239a
Multa sunt etiam alia quae nos latent, quae illi soli cognita sunt, qui est medicus animarum nostrarum. Si enim ad corporis sanitatem pro his vitiis quae per escam potumque collegimus, necessariam habemus interdum austerioris ac mordacioris medicamenti curam; nonnunquam vero, si id vitii qualitas depoposcerit, rigore ferri et sectionis asperitate indigemus; quod si etiam haec supergressus fuerit morbi modus, ad ultimum conceptum vitium etiam ignis exurit; quanto magis intelligendum est et hunc medicum nostrum Deum volentem diluere vitia animarum nostrarum, quae ex peccatorum et scelerum diversitate collegerant, uti hujuscemodi poenalibus curis, insuper etiam ignis inferre supplicium his qui sanitatem animae perdiderunt? Cujus rei imagines etiam in Scripturis sanctis referuntur. Denique in Deuteronomio sermo divinus peccatoribus comminatur, quod febribus et frigoribus et aurigine punientur, et oculorum vacillationibus, et mentis alienatione, et paraplexia, et caecitate ac debilitate renum cruciandi sint. Si quis igitur ex otio de omni Scriptura congreget omnes languorum commemorationes, quae in comminatione peccatoribus velut corporearum aegritudinum appellationibus memorantur, inveniet quod animarum vel vitia, vel supplicia per hoc figuraliter indicentur. Ut autem intelligamus quia ea ratione qua medici adjutoria languentibus adhibent, ut per curas reparent sanitatem, etiam Deus agit circa eos qui lapsi sunt, et deciderunt in peccata, indicio est et illud, quod per Jeremiam prophetam jubetur calix furoris Dei propinari omnibus gentibus ut bibant, et insaniant, et evomant. In quo comminatur dicens, quia si quis noluerit bibere, non mundabitur. Ex quo utique intelligitur quod furor vindictae Dei ad purgationem proficit animarum. Quoniam autem et ea poena quae per ignem inferri dicitur, pro adjutorio intelligitur adhiberi, Isaias docet, qui de Israel quidem sic dicit : Abluet Dominus sordes filiorum, vel filiarum Sion, et sanguinem expurgabit e medio ipsorum spiritu judicii et spiritu ustionis. De Chaldaeis autem sic dicit: Habes carbones ignis, sede super eos, hi erunt tibi in adjutorio. Et in aliis dicit: Sanctificabit Dominus in igne ardenti. Et in Malachia prOpheta dicit : Sedens Dominus conflabit, sicut aurum et argentum populum suum, conflabit et purgabit, et fundet purgatos filios Juda.
There are also many other things hidden from us, known to him alone who is the physician of our souls. For if, for the health of the body, because of the faults we have gathered through food and drink, we sometimes need the treatment of a harsher and more biting medicine, and sometimes, if the quality of the fault demands it, we need the rigour of iron and the harshness of cutting; and if the measure of the disease has gone beyond even these, at last fire burns out the fault that has taken hold; how much more must it be understood that this physician of ours, God, wishing to wash away the faults of our souls which they had gathered from the diversity of sins and crimes, uses penal remedies of this kind, and even applies the punishment of fire to those who have lost the health of the soul? Images of this are also given in the holy Scriptures. Indeed in Deuteronomy the divine word threatens sinners that they will be punished with fevers and chills and jaundice, and are to be tormented with failing of the eyes and alienation of mind and paralysis and blindness and weakness of the kidneys. If anyone, then, at leisure gathers from all Scripture all the mentions of diseases that are recorded in threats to sinners under the names of bodily illnesses, he will find that either the faults or the punishments of souls are indicated by them figuratively. And that we may understand that God acts toward those who have lapsed and fallen into sins in the same way as physicians apply aids to the sick in order to restore health by their treatment, this too is an indication: that through the prophet Jeremiah the cup of God's fury is commanded to be given to all nations to drink, that they may drink and be mad and vomit; in which he threatens, saying that if anyone will not drink, he will not be cleansed. From this it is certainly understood that the fury of God's vengeance serves for the purification of souls. And that even the punishment which is said to be inflicted through fire is understood to be applied as a help, Isaiah teaches, who says of Israel: “The Lord will wash away the filth of the sons or daughters of Zion, and purge the blood from their midst by the spirit of judgment and the spirit of burning.” And of the Chaldeans he says: “You have coals of fire; sit upon them; they will be a help to you.” And in other places he says: “The Lord will sanctify in burning fire.” And in the prophet Malachi he says: “The Lord, sitting, will smelt his people like gold and silver; he will smelt and purify and pour out the purified sons of Judah.”
Deut 28:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 28:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 25:15 (32:15 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 25:16 (32:16 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 25:28 (32:28 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 4:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 47:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 10:17 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mal 3:3 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God, the physician of souls, uses painful remedies, even fire, to purify them, as images in Scripture show.
- The view that God's punishments, including fire, are remedial and purifying is Origen's, given as written. Quotations and allusions: Deut 28:22, 28–29; Jer 25:15–16, 28 (Jer 32:15–16, 28 LXX); Isa 4:4; Isa 47:14–15 (Greek); Isa 10:17 (66:16); Mal 3:3.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slips; joined words; note marker; stray mark): pro bis vitiis → pro his vitiis; mordacioris (5‘2) medicamenti → mordacioris medicamenti; colleseram → collegerant; bis qui sanitatem → his qui sanitatem; comminatur‘, → comminatur,; crecitate. ac → caecitate ac; vitia,vel → vitia, vel; iudicentur → indicentur; qtti lapsi sunt. et deciderunt → qui lapsi sunt, et deciderunt; per .Ieremiam prophetam jubctur calix luroris Dei propitiari omnibus gentibus ιιι bibant → per Jeremiam prophetam jubetur calix furoris Dei propinari omnibus gentibus ut bibant; evomant‘. Itt quo → evomant. In quo; dicens“, → dicens,; vindicta: Dei → vindictae Dei; atttem et ea posita → autem et ea poena; γ Isaias → Isaias; «Abluet → Abluet; sauguinem cxpttrgabit → sanguinem expurgabit; jndicii et spiritu ustiouisfl De Cbaldaais → judicii et spiritu ustionis. De Chaldaeis; t Ilabes → Habes; itt adjutorio7. → in adjutorio.; ,Ιιιάει . → Juda..
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.6 (PG 11:238a–239a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.7PG 11:239a–240a
Sed et illud quod de dispensatoribus non bonis in Evangelio dictum est, qui dividendi dicuntur, et pars eorum cum infidelibus poni, tanquam ea pars quae ipsorum propria non sit, aliorsum sit ιmittenda , sine dubio genus aliquod indicat poenae eorum, quorum, ut mihi videtur, separandus ab anima spiritus indicatur. Qui spiritus si quidem divinae naturae, id est Spiritus sanctus intelligendus est, sentiemus hoc dictum de dono Spiritus sancti; quod, sive per baptismum, sive per gratiam Spiritus cum alicui sermo sapientiae, vel sermo scientiae, vel alterius cujusque datus est doni, et non recte administratus, id est aut »in terram« defossus est aut »in sudario« conligatus, auferetur profecto ab anima donum spiritus, et »pars« reliqua quae superest, id est animae substantia, »cum infidelibus ponetur«, divisa ac separata ab eo spiritu, cum quo »adiungens se domino unus spiritus esse« debuerat. Si vero hoc non de dei spiritu, sed de natura ipsius animae intellegendum est, pars eius melior dicetur, quae »ad imaginem« dei »et similitudinem« facta est, alia autem »pars« ea, quae postmodum per liberi arbitrii lapsum contra naturam primae conditionis puritatis assumpta est, quae utique pars utpote amica et chara materiae cum infidelium sorte mulctatur. Potest autem et tertio sensu illud intelligi de divisione ista, ut quoniam unicuique fidelium etiamsi minimus sit in Ecclesia, adesse angelus dicitur qui etiam semper videre faciem Dei Patris a Salvatore perhibetur , et hic utique unum erat cum eo qui praeerat, si is per inobedientiam efficiatur indignus, auferri ab eo Dei angelus dicatur, et tunc pars ejus, id est humanae naturae pars avolsa a Dei parte cum infidelibus deputetur, quoniam commonitiones appositi sibi a Deo angeli non fideliter custodivit.
And that too which is said in the Gospel about the stewards who are not good, who are said to be cut in two and their portion placed with the unbelievers, as though that part which is not their own were to be sent elsewhere, undoubtedly indicates some kind of punishment of those in whom, as it seems to me, the spirit is indicated as to be separated from the soul. If this spirit is to be understood as of divine nature, that is, the Holy Spirit, we shall take this as said of the gift of the Holy Spirit: that when, whether through baptism or through the grace of the Spirit, the word of wisdom or the word of knowledge or any other gift has been given to someone, and it has not been rightly administered (that is, has either been buried “in the earth” or tied up “in a napkin”), the gift of the Spirit will surely be taken away from the soul, and the remaining “part,” that is, the substance of the soul, “will be placed with the unbelievers,” divided and separated from that Spirit with whom, “by joining itself to the Lord,” it ought to have been “one spirit.” But if this is to be understood not of the Spirit of God but of the nature of the soul itself, its better part will be said to be that which was made “in the image and likeness” of God, and the other “part” that which was afterwards, through the fall of free choice, taken on against the nature of its first condition of purity; and this part, as being friendly and dear to bodily matter, is condemned with the lot of the unbelievers. This division can also be understood in a third sense: since an angel is said to be present to each of the faithful, even the least in the Church, who is also declared by the Saviour always to behold the face of God the Father, and this angel was certainly one with him over whom he was set, if that person becomes unworthy through disobedience, the angel of God may be said to be taken away from him, and then his portion, that is, the portion of human nature torn away from God's portion, is reckoned with the unbelievers, since he did not faithfully keep the admonitions of the angel appointed to him by God.
Matt 24:51 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 12:46 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 18:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 19:20 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The unfaithful steward “cut in two” may mean the withdrawal of the Spirit's gift, the separation of the better part of the soul, or the withdrawal of one's guardian angel.
- Allusions: Matt 24:51 and Luke 12:46; 1 Cor 12:8; Matt 25:18, 25 and Luke 19:20; 1 Cor 6:17; Gen 1:26; Matt 18:10.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; line-break hyphen; note marker): tiiSllCllSHltll‘lbllS → dispensatoribus; dictum est”, → dictum est,; ιιίιtenda → mittenda; preme eorum → poenae eorum; ιιι mihi videtur,separandus → ut mihi videtur, separandus; divinze → divinae; sapietttim,vel sermo scientia}, → sapientiae, vel sermo scientiae,; amics et chara → amica et chara; divi-' sione → divisione; prmerat → praeerat; cfiiciatur iudiguns → efficiatur indignus; humana: natura: → humanae naturae; lideliter custotlivit → fideliter custodivit.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.7 (PG 11:239a–240a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
2.10.8PG 11:240a
Sed et exteriores tenebras, ut ego opinor, non tam aerem aliquem obscurum et sine ullo lumine intelligendum puto, quam de his qui profundae ignorantiae tenebris immersi extra omne rationis et intelligentiae lumen effecti sunt. Videndum quoque est, ne forte etiam illud iste sermo significet, quod sicut sancti corpora sua, in quibus sancte et pure in hujus vitae habitationibus vixerunt, lucida et gloriosa ex resurrectione suscipient, ita et impii quique qui in hac vita errorum tenebras et noctem ignorantiae dilexerunt, obscuris et atris post resurrectionem corporibus induantur, ut ea ipsa caligo ignorantiae quae in hoc mundo interiores eorum mentes obsederat, in futuro per exterius corporis appareat indumentum. Similiter quoque et de carcere sentiendum est. Sed sufficiant ista in praesenti loco, quae interim nunc ut dicendi ordo servaretur, quam paucissimis dicta sunt.
And the outer darkness, as I think, is to be understood not so much as some dark air without any light, but of those who, plunged in the darkness of deep ignorance, have been placed outside all light of reason and understanding. We must also see whether perhaps this expression signifies this too: that just as the saints will receive from the resurrection, bright and glorious, the bodies in which they lived holily and purely in the dwellings of this life, so too all the impious, who in this life loved the darkness of errors and the night of ignorance, will be clothed after the resurrection with dark and black bodies, so that the very darkness of ignorance which in this world had besieged their inner minds may in the future appear through the outer clothing of the body. The prison too is to be understood likewise. But let these things suffice for the present place, which have been said meanwhile, in as few words as possible, so that the order of discussion might be kept.
Matt 8:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:25 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The “outer darkness” is deep ignorance, perhaps shown outwardly in the dark bodies of the impious after the resurrection.
- At the end the scan interleaves Migne's parallel column, his Latin version of Jerome's report (Letter to Avitus) that Origen called “this fat and earthly body” darkness, through which, when this world ends, one passes into another world and begins to be born again; it is not Rufinus's text and has been removed, and Rufinus's words restored to their order, by logged correction. Allusions: Matt 8:12; Matt 5:25.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's parallel column (his Latin version of Jerome's report) interleaved line by line with Rufinus's text; removed, and Rufinus's words restored to their order; OCR slip; OCR slips): quant de bis qui profunda: ignorantia: → quam de his qui profundae ignorantiae; vita: habitationibus → vitae habitationibus; suscipieut → suscipient; ιιι ea ipsa caligo Ilienoxrut rsnsro. Nisi ignorantia: quae in hoc forte corpus Ιιοε piu- mundo interiores earum gue atque terrenum caligo mentes obsederat, et teneone nominanda: in l’uturo per exterius ο sum, per quod consum- corporis appareat indumqu hoc mundo cum ne— mentum. Similiter quocesse fuerit in alium lrans- que et de carcere senire mundum, rursum tiendum est. Sed sufnascendi sumet exordia. ficiant ista in pra:seuti loco, quae interim nune ut dicendi ordo servaretur, quam paucissimis dicta sunt. i → ut ea ipsa caligo ignorantiae quae in hoc mundo interiores eorum mentes obsederat, in futuro per exterius corporis appareat indumentum. Similiter quoque et de carcere sentiendum est. Sed sufficiant ista in praesenti loco, quae interim nunc ut dicendi ordo servaretur, quam paucissimis dicta sunt..
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.10.8 (PG 11:240a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-10-1/#p-2-10-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-10-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).