On First Principles 2.11.1–3.1.5

Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.

Show

On 2, chapter 11

2.11.1PG 11:241a–241b

Videamus nunc breviter quid etiam de repromissionibus sentiendum sit. Certum est quia nullum animal omni modo otiosum atque immobile esse potest, sed omni genere moveri et agere semper et velle aliquid gestit; et hanc inesse naturam omnibus animantibus, manifestum puto. Multo magis ergo rationabile animal, id est, hominis naturam necesse est semper aliquid movere vel agere. Et si quidem immemor sui sit, et quid se deceat ignoret, circa usus corporales omnis sua movetur intentio, et per omnes motus suos erga voluptates suas ac libidines corporis occupatur; si vero talis sit qui in commune aliquid curare vel providere studeat, aut reipublicae consulens, aut magistratibus parens, aut quidquid illud est quod in commune certe prodesse videatur, exercet. Jam vero si quis talis sit ut aliquid melius quam haec quae corporea videntur, intelligat, et sapientiae et scientiae operam habeat, sine dubio erga hujuscemodi studia omnem declinabit industriam, quo possit inquisita veritate rerum causas rationemque cognoscere. Sicut ergo in hac vita alius quidem summum bonum corporis iudicat voluptatem alius vero in commune consulere, alius studiis et intelligentiae operam dare; ita requiramus in illa vita quae vera est, quae abscondita esse dicitur cum Christo in Deo“, id est in illa aeterna vita, si aliquis talis erit nobis vivendi ordo vel status.

Let us now see briefly what is to be thought also about the promises. It is certain that no living being can be wholly idle and motionless, but it longs in every way to be moved and to act and always to will something; and that this nature is present in all living beings I think is plain. Much more, then, must a rational living being, that is, the nature of man, always be moving or doing something. And if he is forgetful of himself and does not know what befits him, his whole effort is moved about bodily uses, and in all his movements he is occupied with his pleasures and the lusts of the body; but if he is such as to be eager to care or provide for something for the common good, he exercises himself either in counselling the state, or obeying magistrates, or whatever else certainly seems to be of common benefit. But if someone is such as to understand something better than these things that seem bodily, and to give his effort to wisdom and knowledge, he will undoubtedly turn all his industry to studies of this kind, so that, having investigated the truth, he may come to know the causes and reason of things. Just as, then, in this life one judges bodily pleasure the highest good, another counselling for the common good, another giving effort to studies and understanding, so let us inquire whether in that life which is true, which is said to be hidden with Christ in God, that is, in that eternal life, there will be some such order or state of living for us.

Col 3:3 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Every living being, and still more a rational one, is always active; as people in this life seek pleasure, the common good or wisdom, Origen asks what the life of the world to come will be.

  • Allusion: Col 3:3.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; joined and split words; line-break hyphen; OCR slip; stray mark; OCR slips): omni- . busauimantibus → omnibus animantibus; onmis → omnis; iu commune → in commune; quam [nec quae corporea → quam haec quae corporea; sapientia: et scientiae → sapientiae et scientiae; Sicut. ergo in bac vita alios quidem → Sicut ergo in hac vita alius quidem; intelligentia: operam → intelligentiae operam; eritnobis vivendi ordo vel sta tus. → erit nobis vivendi ordo vel status..

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.1 (PG 11:241a–241b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

2.11.2PG 11:241b–242b

Quidam ergo laborem quodammodo intelligentiae recusantes, et superficiem quamdam legis litterae consectantes, et magis delectationi suae quodammodo ac libidini indulgentes, solius litterae discipuli, arbitrantur repromissiones futuras, in voluptate et luxuria corporis exspectandas; et propterea praecipue carnes iterum desiderant post resurrectionem tales quibus manducandi, et bibendi et omnia quae carnis et sanguinis sunt, agendi nunquam desit facultas, apostoli Pauli de resurrectione spiritalis corporis sententiam non sequentes“. Quibus consequenter addunt et nuptiarum conventiones, et filiorum procreationes etiam post resurrectionem laturas, fingentes sibimetipsis Jerusalem terrenam urbem reaedificandam lapidibus pretiosis in fundamenta ejus jaciendis, et de lapide iaspide muros eius erigendos, et propugnacula ejus ex lapide crystallo; peribolum quoque habituram ex lapidibus electis et variis, id est jaspide et sapphiro, et chalcedonio, et smaragdo, et sardio, et onychino, et chrysolitho, et chrysopraso, et hyacintho, et amethysto. Quin etiam ministros deliciarum suarum dandos sibi alienigenas putant, quos vel aratores habeant, vel structores parietum, a quibus diruta ipsorum et collapsa civitas exstruatur; et arbitrantur quod facultates gentium accipiant ad edendum, et in divitiis eorum dominentur, ut etiam cameli Madian et Cedar veniant, et afferant eis aurum, et thus, et lapides pretiosos. Et haec conantur auctoritate prophetica confirmare ex his quae de Jerusalem repromissionibus scripta sunt; ubi etiam dicitur quia qui serviunt Domino, manducabunt et bibent, peccatores autem esurient et sitient et quod laetitiam agent justi, impios vero maeror possidebit. Et de Novo quoque Testamento vocem proferunt Salvatoris, qua discipulis promittit de vini laetitia dicens : Quia non bibam ex hoc jam usquequo bibam illud vobiscum novum in regno Patris mei .› Addunt quoque et illud, quod Salvator beatos dicit eos qui nunc esuriunt et sitiunt, pollicens eis quia saturabuntur; et multa alia ex Scripturis exempla proferunt, quorum vim figuraliter intelligi debere non sentiunt. Tum vero secundum formam quae in hac vita est, et secundum mundi hujus dispositiones dignitatum, vel ordinum, vel eminentias potestatum, reges se fore et principes arbitrantur, sicut, sunt isti terreni, propter illud videlicet quod in Evangelio dictum est: Eris potestatem habens super quinque civitates. Et ut breviter dicam, secundum vitae hujus conversationem per omnia similia volunt esse omnia quae de repromissionibus exspectantur, id est ut iterum sit hoc quod est. Hoc ita sentiunt qui Christo quidem credentes, Iudaico autém quodam sensu Scripturas divinas intelligentes, nihil ex his dignum divinis pollicitationibus praesumpserunt.

Some, then, refusing in a way the labour of understanding, and following a certain surface of the letter of the law, and indulging rather their own delight and desire, disciples of the letter alone, think that the promises to come are to be expected in bodily pleasure and luxury; and therefore they especially desire to have again after the resurrection such flesh as never lacks the ability to eat and drink and do all that belongs to flesh and blood, not following the apostle Paul's statement about the resurrection of a spiritual body. To these things they consequently add marriage contracts and the begetting of children even after the resurrection, imagining for themselves an earthly city of Jerusalem to be rebuilt, with precious stones laid in its foundations, its walls raised of jasper stone and its battlements of crystal; and that it will have an enclosing wall of choice and varied stones, that is, jasper and sapphire and chalcedony and emerald and sardius and onyx and chrysolite and chrysoprase and jacinth and amethyst. Moreover, they think that foreigners will be given them as servants of their pleasures, whom they will have as ploughmen or builders of walls, by whom their ruined and fallen city may be rebuilt; and they think that they will receive the wealth of the nations to eat and will rule over their riches, so that even the camels of Midian and Kedar will come and bring them gold and incense and precious stones. And they try to confirm these things by prophetic authority, from what is written about the promises to Jerusalem, where it is also said that those who serve the Lord will eat and drink, but sinners will hunger and thirst, and that the righteous will rejoice, but sorrow will possess the impious. From the New Testament too they bring forward the Saviour's saying in which he promises his disciples the gladness of wine, saying, “For I will not drink of this henceforth until I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.” They add also that the Saviour calls blessed those who now hunger and thirst, promising them that they will be filled; and they bring forward many other examples from the Scriptures, whose force they do not perceive must be understood figuratively. Then, according to the form that exists in this life, and according to the arrangements of this world's dignities or orders or eminences of powers, they think they will be kings and princes, as these earthly ones are, because, namely, of what is said in the Gospel: “You shall have authority over five cities.” And, to put it briefly, they wish all that is expected from the promises to be in every way like the conduct of this life, that is, that what is should be again. So think those who believe in Christ indeed, but, understanding the divine Scriptures in a kind of Jewish sense, have presumed nothing from them worthy of the divine promises.

1 Cor 15:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 54:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 54:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 21:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 21:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 21:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 61:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 61:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 60:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 65:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 65:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 26:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 19:17 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Some Christians, reading the letter only, expect after the resurrection bodily pleasures, marriage, a rebuilt earthly Jerusalem and earthly rule, misreading prophecies meant figuratively.

  • Origen describes Christian millenarians, without naming them; “a kind of Jewish sense” is his term for a merely literal reading, given as written. Migne's footnotes in the middle are removed. Allusions and quotations: 1 Cor 15:44; Isa 54:11–12; Rev 21:18–20; Isa 61:5–6; Isa 60:6; Isa 65:13–14; Matt 26:29; Matt 5:6; Luke 19:17.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne footnotes removed; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; note marker; OCR slip; split word; OCR slips; joined words; line-break hyphen; line-break hyphen; OCR slip; note marker; split word; OCR slip): Iittera: → litterae; repromissioues → repromissiones; etluxuria → et luxuria; prazcipue ca rnes → praecipue carnes; resurre‘ ctioneui → resurrectionem; uunq'uant → nunquam; conventioues → conventiones; illorum procreationes → filiorum procreationes; tingentes → fingentes; id estjaspide → id est jaspide; etchrysolitho, et cbrysopaso → et chrysolitho, et chrysopraso; gentium (7'5) → gentium; utetiam → ut etiam; afl‘erant eis aurum,et thus → afferant eis aurum, et thus; Etglizcc → Et haec; repromissionihus → repromissionibus; ubi ctiam → ubi etiam; lzrtitiam → laetitiam; mceror → maeror; Salvatoris,qua → Salvatoris, qua; csuriuut → esuriunt; saturabunlur”; → saturabuntur;; proferupt → proferunt; iulelligi → intelligi; secuu- . dum → secundum; arhitrantur → arbitrantur; Eris ('74) → Eris; civitates”. Ει. → civitates. Et; iutelligentes → intelligentes; prazsumpse- , runt. → praesumpserunt.; aratores Ἰ Coloss- tu. 5. ί ’ξ I Cor. “,1”. Matth. “ Prov. ix, 1, ‘2, 5, 4, 5. (69.) Rationem/lue. Deest in libb. antea editis, sed reperitur in mss. Sic. mss. Alias, «γ futuras voluptates et luxuriaseorporis exspectandas. lia mss. Libb. editi, naedificandam lapidibus pretiosis, eos in {ntidamentajacentes. _ (iit Et sardio. Deest in antea editis, sed habetur habeant → aratores habeant.

Topics: Eschatology, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.2 (PG 11:241b–242b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

2.11.3PG 11:242b–243a

Hi vero qui secundum apostolorum sensum theoriam Scripturarum recipiunt, sperant manducaturos quidem esse sanctos, sed panem vitae qui veritatis et sapientiae cibis nutriat animam, et illuminet mentem, et potet eam divinae sapientiae poculis, sicut dicit Scriptura divina : Quia sapientia praeparavit mensam suam, iugulavit victimas suas, miscuit in cratere vinum suum, et summa voce clamat : Divertite ad me, manducate panes quos paravi vobis, et bibite vinum quod miscui vobis”. Quibus sapientiae escis nutrita mens ad integrum et perfectum, sicut ex initio factus est homo, ad imaginem et similitudinem Dei reparetur; ut etiamsi quis ex hac vita minus eruditus abierit, probabilia tamen opera detulerit, instrui poterit in illa Jerusalem sanctorum civitate, id est edoceri et informari, et effici lapis vivus, lapis pretiosus et electus, pro eo quod fortiter et constanter pertulerit agones vitae, et certamina pietatis; ibique hoc quod jam hic praedictum est, verius manifestiusque cognoscet, quod non in pane solo vivit homo, sed in omni verbo quod procedit de ore Dei. " Sed et principes et rectores intelligendi sunt hi qui inferiores et regunt, et erudiunt, et edocent atque instituunt ad divina.

But those who receive the contemplation of the Scriptures according to the sense of the apostles hope that the saints will indeed eat, but the bread of life, which nourishes the soul with the food of truth and wisdom, and enlightens the mind, and gives it to drink from the cups of divine wisdom, as divine Scripture says: “Wisdom has prepared her table, slain her victims, mixed her wine in the bowl, and cries with a loud voice: Turn aside to me; eat the bread which I have prepared for you, and drink the wine which I have mixed for you.” Nourished by these foods of wisdom, the mind is restored to wholeness and perfection, as man was made in the beginning, to the image and likeness of God; so that even if someone has departed from this life less instructed, but has brought commendable works, he can be instructed in that Jerusalem, the city of the saints, that is, taught and formed and made a living stone, a precious and chosen stone, because he has endured bravely and steadfastly the contests of life and the struggles of piety; and there he will know more truly and clearly what has already been said beforehand here, that man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. And the princes and rulers are to be understood as those who rule those below them, and instruct and teach them and train them for divine things.

John 6:35 (echo, medium confidence) · Prov 9:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 9:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 9:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 9:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 28:16 (allusion, medium confidence) · Deut 8:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:4 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The saints will feed on the bread of wisdom, be restored to God's image, and continue to be taught in the heavenly Jerusalem; its “rulers” are those who instruct others.

  • Quotations and allusions: John 6:35; Prov 9:1–5 (Greek form); Gen 1:26; 1 Pet 2:4–5; Isa 28:16; Deut 8:3 (Matt 4:4). A Migne footnote in the middle is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne footnote removed; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; line-break hyphen; stray mark): Ηί vero → Hi vero; sensiuu → sensum; qni veritatis → qui veritatis; divina: sapientite → divinae sapientiae; vinum sumu, → vinum suum,; sapientire cscis nutrita mens nd integrum → sapientiae escis nutrita mens ad integrum; rep-aretur → reparetur; minus “ Matth. v, 6. Luc. XIX, l7. xm, 29. eruditus → minus eruditus; detu- Ierit → detulerit; ellici → effici; cerlamina → certamina; quodjam → quod jam; manifestiusqne → manifestiusque; pro- , cedit → procedit; bi qui inferiores → hi qui inferiores.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.3 (PG 11:242b–243a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

2.11.4PG 11:243a–244a

Verum si minus videntur haec sperantibus ea dignum mentibus incutere desiderium, paululum repetentes, quanquam naturalis sit et insita animae rei ipsius cupiditas, inquiramus, ut ita demum velut species ipsas panis vitae et qualitatem vini ejus ac proprietatem principatuum, per theoriae consequentiam describamus. Igitur sicut in artibus his quae manu adimpleri solent, ratio quidem quid, vel qualiter, vel ad quos usus fiat, versatur in sensu, efficacia vero operis manuum ministerio explicatur; ita in operibus Dei quae ab ipso facta sunt, sentiendum est, quod eorum quae videmus ab eo facta, ratio et intelligentia manet in occulto. Et sicut ea quae ab artifice facta sunt, cum oculos noster viderit, si quid praecipue fabrefactum prospexerit, continuo qualiter, vel quomodo, vel ad quos usus factum sit, ardet animus sciscitari; multo amplius et super omnem comparationem, eorum quae a Deo facta pervidemus, ineffabili desiderio ardet animus agnoscere rationem. Quod desiderium, quem amorem sine dubio a Deo nobis insitum credimus; et sicut oculus naturaliter lucem requirit et visum, et corpus nostrum escas et potum desiderat per naturam; ita mens nostra sciendae veritatis Dei et rerum causas noscendi proprium ac naturale desiderium gerit. Accepimus autem a Deo istud desiderium, non ad hoc ut nec debeat unquam, nec possit expleri; alioquin a conditore Deo menti nostrae frustra videbitur amor veritatis insertus, si nunquam desiderii compos efficitur. Unde et in hac vita qui summo labore piis studiis ac religiosis operam dederint, quanquam parva quaedam ex multis et immensis divinae scientiae capiant thesauris, tamen hoc ipsum quod animos suos mentemque erga haec occupant, atque in hac semetipsos cupiditate preveniunt, multum utilitatis accipiunt ex hoc ipso quod animos suos ad inquirendae veritatis studium amoremque convertunt, et paratiores eos faciunt ad eruditionis futurae capacitatem; sicut cum aliquis velit imaginem pingere, si ante futurae formae lineamenta tenuis styli adumbratio designet, et superponendis vultibus capaces praeparet notas, sine dubio per adumbrationem imposita praeformatio ad suscipiendos veros illos colores jam paratior invenitur; si modo adumbratio ipsa ac deformatio stilo Domini nostri Jesu Christi in cordis nostri tabulis perscribatur. Et idcirco fortasse dicitur, quia omni habenti dabitur et adjicietur. Unde constat habentibus deformationem quamdam in hac vita veritatis et scientiae, addendam etiam esse pulchritudinem perfectae imaginis in futuro.

But if these things seem to stir too little desire in the minds of those who hope for them, let us go back a little and inquire, since the desire for the thing itself is natural and implanted in the soul, so that we may at last describe, by the sequence of contemplation, as it were the very forms of the bread of life and the quality of its wine and the property of the principalities. Just as, then, in the arts which are carried out by hand, the reason of what is made, or how, or for what uses, resides in the mind, while the effecting of the work is unfolded by the service of the hands, so in the works of God which were made by him we must hold that the reason and understanding of the things we see made by him remain hidden. And just as, when our eye sees things made by a craftsman, if it beholds something especially skilfully made, the mind at once burns to inquire how, or in what way, or for what uses it was made, much more, and beyond all comparison, does the mind burn with ineffable desire to know the reason of the things we perceive to be made by God. This desire, this love, we believe was undoubtedly implanted in us by God; and just as the eye naturally seeks light and sight, and our body by nature desires food and drink, so our mind bears a proper and natural desire to know the truth of God and to learn the causes of things. And we have received this desire from God not so that it should never be, nor could ever be, fulfilled; otherwise the love of truth would seem to have been implanted in our mind by God the Creator in vain, if it is never made master of its desire. Hence, even in this life, those who with the greatest labour have given themselves to pious and religious studies, although they grasp only small things out of the many and immense treasures of divine knowledge, yet by the very fact that they occupy their souls and minds with these things and press forward in this desire, they receive great benefit, from the very fact that they turn their souls to the zeal and love of seeking the truth, and make them better prepared for the capacity of future instruction (just as when someone wishes to paint a picture, if a sketch by a fine stylus first marks out the lines of the future form and prepares marks capable of receiving the features to be laid on, undoubtedly the preliminary form laid down by the sketch is found better prepared for receiving those true colours), provided only that this sketch and outline is written on the tablets of our heart by the stylus of our Lord Jesus Christ. And perhaps for this reason it is said that “to everyone who has it will be given and added.” From this it is established that to those who have in this life a kind of outline of truth and knowledge, the beauty of the perfect image will also be added in the future.

2 Cor 3:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 19:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:29 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God has implanted in the mind a natural desire to know the reasons of his works, which must be fulfilled; study in this life is like an artist's preliminary sketch, to be completed with true colours hereafter.

  • The comparison with the painter's sketch is a parenthesis, as Koetschau punctuates it. A Migne footnote is removed. Allusions: 2 Cor 3:3; Luke 19:26 (Matt 25:29).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne footnote removed; OCR slip; OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; "si modo" as in Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913); note marker; split word; stray mark; stray marks): inquiramtts, ttt ita → inquiramus, ut ita; principatunm → principatuum; lheorize → theoriae; aditnpler-i → adimpleri; ellicaeia → efficacia; explicatur' → explicatur; in operibus Dci → in operibus Dei; sen'ieadntn → sentiendum; qum videmus → quae videmus; Et sic. ut → Et sicut; faetutn → factum; ει Deo → a Deo; scienda veritatis → sciendae veritatis; nt nec debeat → ut nec debeat; menti nostra: → menti nostrae; cllicilur → efficitur; Itac vita → hac vita; qutedam → quaedam; divinae scientia: → divinae scientiae; mentemque ι) erga → mentemque erga; inquirenda: veritatis → inquirendae veritatis; pra:paret → praeparet; siue dubio → sine dubio; prmformatio → praeformatio; sic modo adumbratio ipsa ac deformatio ston Domini nostri .Iesu Christi → si modo adumbratio ipsa ac deformatio stilo Domini nostri Jesu Christi; babenti → habenti; adjicietur“. → adjicietur.; perfecta: imaginis → perfectae imaginis; ct paratiores eos ” Deut. vm,3. Luc. xtx, 26. ιν Philipp. I, faciunt → et paratiores eos faciunt.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.4 (PG 11:243a–244a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

2.11.5PG 11:244a–245a

Tale, Opinor, indicabat desiderium suum ille qui dicebat: Coarctor autem ex duobus, desiderium habens dissolvi et cum Christo esse, multo enim melius '9; sciens quod tunc cum regressus esset ad Christum, omnium quae geruntur in terris manifestius agnosceret rationes, vel de homine vel de anima hominis, vel de mente, vel ex quibuscunque illis homo constat, qui sit spiritus principalis, qui sit spiritus qui inoperetur, qui sit quoque vitalis spiritus, vel quae sit gratia quae datur fidelibus Spiritus sancti. Tunc quoque intelliget qui sibi videatur Israel, vel quae diversitas gentium, quid etiam sibi velint Israel duodecim tribus, et quid singuli populi per singulas tribus. Tunc intelliget etiam de sacerdotibus et levitis, et de diversis sacerdotalibus ordinibus rationem , et cujus forma erat in Moyse, et nihilominus quae sit veritas apud Deum jubilaeorum, et septimanas annorum; sed et festorum dierum et feriarum rationes videbit; et omnium sacrificiorum et purificationum intuebitur causas; quae sit quoque ratio leprae purgationis, et quae leprae diversae, et quae purgatio sit eorum qui seminis profluvium patiuntur, advertet; et agnoscet quoque quae et quantae qualesque virtutes sint bonae, quaeque nihilominus contrariae, et qui vel illis affectus sit hominibus, vel istis contentiosa aemulatio. Intuebitur quoque quae sit ratio animarum, quaeve diversitas animalium, vel eorum quae in aquis vivunt, vel avium, vel ferarum, quidve sit quod in tam multas species singula genera deducuntur, qui Creatoris prospectus, vel quis per haec singula sapientiae ejus tegitur sensus. Sed et agnoscet qua ratione radicibus quibusdam vel herbis adsociantur quaedam virtutes, et aliis e contrario herbis vel radicibus depelluntur; quae ratio apostatarum angelorum, quaeve causa, quod his, qui eos non tota fide contempserint, vel adulari in aliquibus possunt, vel erroris causa ac deceptionis exsistere. Sed et de singulis divinae providentiae judicium discet, de his quae accidunt hominibus, quod non fortuito vel casu accidunt, sed ratione quadam tam examinata, tam ardua, ut eam non solum sanctorum, sed, fortassis omnium hominum, ne numerus quidem praetereat capillorum, cujus providentiae ratio perducatur usque ad duos passeres qui denario distrahuntur, sive spiritaliter, sive etiam secundum litteram passeribus intellectis. Hic enim adhuc interim quaeritur, tunc autem ibi jam manifeste videbitur.

Such, I think, was the desire indicated by him who said, “I am hard pressed between the two, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, for it is far better”; knowing that when he had returned to Christ he would know more clearly the reasons of all things that are done on earth: about man, or the soul of man, or the mind, or whatever those things are of which man consists: what the ruling spirit is, what the spirit that works, what too is the vital spirit, and what is the grace of the Holy Spirit that is given to the faithful. Then too he will understand what Israel is perceived to be, or what the diversity of the nations, what the twelve tribes of Israel mean, and what the individual peoples in each tribe. Then he will understand also the reason concerning the priests and Levites and the different priestly orders, and whose figure was in Moses, and also what the truth is with God of the jubilees and the weeks of years; he will see also the reasons of the feast days and holidays, and he will behold the causes of all the sacrifices and purifications; he will notice too what is the reason of the cleansing of leprosy, and what are the different leprosies, and what is the purification of those who suffer a flux of seed; and he will know also what and how great and of what kind are the good powers, and also the contrary ones, and what is the affection of the former toward human beings, and the contentious rivalry of the latter. He will behold also what is the reason of souls, and what the diversity of living things, whether of those that live in the waters, or of birds, or of beasts; and why each genus is divided into so many species; what is the Creator's foresight, or what sense of his wisdom is hidden in each of these. He will learn for what reason certain powers are associated with some roots or herbs, and on the contrary are driven off by other herbs or roots; what is the account of the apostate angels, and what is the cause that with those who do not despise them with full faith they can ingratiate themselves in some things, or become the cause of error and deception. He will also learn the judgment of divine providence about each of the things that happen to human beings: that they do not happen by chance or accident, but by a reason so carefully weighed and so lofty that not even the number of the hairs, not only of the saints but perhaps of all human beings, escapes it; a providence whose reason extends even to the two sparrows sold for a penny, whether the sparrows are understood spiritually or according to the letter. For here it is still being sought meanwhile, but there it will then be plainly seen.

Phil 1:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 25:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Lev 13:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Lev 15:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 10:30 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 12:6 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Paul desired to depart and be with Christ, knowing that he would then understand the reasons of all things on earth: the soul, Israel, the law, the powers and providence.

  • Quotations and allusions: Phil 1:23; Lev 25:8–10; Lev 13–15; Matt 10:30; Matt 10:29 (Luke 12:6).
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; OCR slips): qua: datur → quae datur; qua diversitas → quae diversitas; Tnucintelligct → Tunc intelliget; jubiheorum → jubilaeorum; lepra: purgationis, et qure → leprae purgationis, et quae; quanta: qualesque virtutes sint boum, quaeque nihilominus contrarim,et → quantae qualesque virtutes sint bonae, quaeque nihilominus contrariae, et; istis’contentiosa annulatio → istis contentiosa aemulatio; sapientia; ejus → sapientiae ejus; divina: providentia: → divinae providentiae; sanctormn → sanctorum; prmtereat → praetereat; providentia: ratio → providentiae ratio; intellec1is. b'ttuc enim adhuc interim qumritur → intellectis. Hic enim adhuc interim quaeritur.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.5 (PG 11:244a–245a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

2.11.6PG 11:245a–246a

Ex quibus omnibus putandum est, quod interim non parum temporis transeat usquequo eorum tantummodo quae super terram sunt ratio post vitae abscessum dignis et bene meritis ostendatur, ut per eorum omnium agnitionem et plenae scientiae gratiam, laetitia inenarrabili perfruantur. Tum deinde si aer iste qui inter caelum et terram est, non est vacuus ab animantibus, et animantibus rationabilibus. sicut et Apostolus dixit : In quibus aliquando ambulastis secundum saeculum mundi hujus, secundum principem potestatis aeris hujus spiritus qui nunc operatur in filiis diffidentiae; et iterum ait: Rapiemur in nubibus obviam Christo in aera. et ita semper cum Domino erimus“. Putandum est igitur quod tandiu sancti ibi permaneant, usquequo utriusque modi rationem dispensationis eorum quae in aere geruntur, agnoscant. Quod autem dixi utriusque modi, hoc est: verbi gratia, cum in terris essemus, vidimus vel animalia, vel arbores, et differentias eorum prospeximus, sed et diversitatem quamplurimam inter homines; verum videntes haec, rationem eorum non intelleximus, sed hoc nobis tantum ex ipsa quam vidimus diversitate suggestum est, ut inquiramus et perscrutemur qua ratione ista omnia vel diversa fuerint creata, vel varie dispensentur, et concepto in terris hujuscemodi agnitionis vel studio, vel amore, dabitur nobis post exitum etiam cognitio ejus et intelligentia; si tamen res procedat ex voto. Cum ergo comprehenderimus integre ejus rationem, tunc utroque modo comprehendemus ea quae vidimus super terram. Tale ergo aliquid etiam de aerea sede dicendum est. Puto enim quod sancti quique discedentes de hac vita permanebunt in loco aliquo in terra posito, quem paradisum dicit Scriptura divina, velut in quodam eruditionis loco, et, ut ita dixerim, auditorio vel schola animarum in quo de omnibus his quae in terris viderant, doceantur, indicia quoque quaedam accipiant etiam de consequentibus et futuris. sicut in hac quoque vita positi indicia quaedam futurorum, licet per speculum et aenigmata, tamen ex aliqua parte conceperant, quae manifestius et lucidius sanctis in suis et locis et temporibus revelantur. Si quis sane mundus corde, et purior mente , et exercitatior sensu fuerit, velocius proficiens, cito ad aeris locum ascendet, et ad caelorum regna perveniet per locorum singulorum, ut ita dixerim, mansiones; quas Graeci quidem sphaeras, id est globos appellaverunt, Scriptura vero divina caelos nominat; in quibus singulis primo quidem perspiciet ea quae ibi geruntur, secundo vero etiam rationem quare gerantur agnoscet; et ita per ordinem digredietur singula, sequens eum qui transgressus est caelos Iesum Filium Dei dicentem: Volo ut ubi sum ego, et isti sint mecum ". ο Sed et de his locorum diversitatibus indicat cum dicit : Multae mansiones sunt apud Patrem meum ’. Ipse tamen ubique est, et Universa percurrit. Nec ultra intelligamus eum in ea exiguitate in qua nobis propter nos effectus est; id est, non illa circumscriptione quam in nostro corpore in terris positus inter homines habuit, quo velut in uno aliquo circumseptus loco putetur.

From all this it must be thought that no little time passes meanwhile until the reason of only those things that are upon the earth is shown, after their departure from life, to the worthy and well-deserving, so that through the knowledge of all these things and the grace of full knowledge they may enjoy unspeakable gladness. Then, if this air which is between heaven and earth is not empty of living beings, and of rational living beings, as the Apostle also said, “in which you once walked according to the age of this world, according to the prince of the power of this air, the spirit that now works in the sons of disobedience”; and again he says, “We shall be caught up in the clouds to meet Christ in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord,” we must think, then, that the saints remain there until they come to know the reason of the dispensation of the things done in the air in both ways. By “both ways” I mean this: for example, when we were on earth, we saw animals or trees and observed their differences, and also very great diversity among human beings; but seeing these things we did not understand their reason, but this alone was suggested to us by the very diversity we saw, that we should inquire and search out by what reason all these things were created different or are dispensed variously; and if we have conceived on earth a zeal or love for knowledge of this kind, the knowledge and understanding of it will be given us after our departure, if only things go as we wish. When, then, we have fully comprehended its reason, then we shall comprehend in both ways what we saw on earth. Something of the same kind must also be said about the seat in the air. For I think that all the saints departing from this life will remain in some place situated on the earth, which divine Scripture calls paradise, as in a kind of place of instruction and, so to speak, a lecture hall or school of souls, in which they may be taught about all the things they had seen on earth, and may also receive certain indications of what follows and is to come; just as, placed in this life too, they had conceived certain indications of things to come, though through a mirror and in enigmas, yet in some part, which are revealed more clearly and brightly to the saints in their own places and times. If anyone indeed is pure in heart and purer in mind and more practised in perception, advancing more swiftly he will quickly ascend to the place of the air and come to the kingdoms of the heavens through the mansions, so to speak, of the individual places, which the Greeks called spheres, that is, globes, but divine Scripture calls heavens. In each of these he will first see what is done there, and secondly will also know the reason why it is done; and so he will pass through each in order, following him who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, who says, “I will that where I am, these too may be with me.” He indicates these diversities of places also when he says, “In my Father's house there are many mansions.” He himself, however, is everywhere and passes through all things. Nor are we any longer to understand him in that smallness in which he became for our sake, that is, not in that circumscription which he had in our body when he was placed on earth among human beings, so as to be thought enclosed as it were in some one place.

Eph 2:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 4:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Heb 4:14 (allusion, high confidence) · John 17:24 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:2 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The departed saints are first taught in paradise, a school of souls, and the pure in heart then ascend through the spheres of heaven, learning what is done there and why, following Christ.

  • Quotations: Eph 2:2; 1 Thess 4:17.
  • Paradise as a “school of souls” and the ascent through the heavenly spheres are given as Origen's speculation. Quotations and allusions: Matt 5:8; 1 Cor 13:12; Heb 4:14; John 17:24; John 14:2.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR misread; OCR slip; OCR slip; broken word completed and garbled characters removed; OCR slip; stray mark; OCR slips; line-break hyphen; note marker; note marker; stray mark; split word): vita: abscessum dignis et beuemeritis → vitae abscessum dignis et bene meritis; inenar- .rabili → inenarrabili; aniulantibus → animantibus; 1η quibus → In quibus; Steculutn → saeculum; cperatur → operatur; diffidentiae”; et iterum ait: tRapiemur → diffidentiae; et iterum ait: Rapiemur; (90') Putandum → Putandum; qua} in aere geruntur, agno- —~.----—------- anu-mu. τεν-ν sunt. → quae in aere geruntur, agnoscant.; hoc ρει : → hoc est:; verunt videntes → verum videntes; inquirantus et 'perscrutemur → inquiramus et perscrutemur; corttpreltenderitnus → comprehenderimus; catttprehendemus ea qute → comprehendemus ea quae; Puto enim (9:2) → Puto enim; ttt ita dixerim → ut ita dixerim; qutedam accipiant → quaedam accipiant; ex alio qua parte → ex aliqua parte; proliciens → proficiens; locormn → locorum; Multa: mansiones → Multae mansiones; itt ea exiguitate → in ea exiguitate; prepter → propter.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.6 (PG 11:245a–246a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

2.11.7PG 11:246a–247a

Cum ergo, verbi gratia, ad caelestia loca pervenerint sancti, tunc jam rationem astrorum per singula pervidebunt, et sive animantia sunt, sive quidquid illud est, comprehendent. Sed et alias rationes operum Dei quas eis ipse revelabit, intelligent. Jam enim tanquam filiis rerum causas et virtutem suae conditionis ostendet, edocens eos, quare illa stella in illo loco posita caeli est, et quare ab alia tanto dirimente spatio separatur: verbi gratia, si propinquior fuisset, quid ex hoc esset futurum, si vero longius, quid accideret; aut si maior fuisset illa stella quam illa, quomodo sibi similis non servaretur universitas, sed in aliam quandam formam cuncta mutarentur. Sic ergo decursis omnibus, quae in astrorum ratione et in his conversationibus, quae in caelo sunt, continentur, venient etiam ad quae non videntur, vel ad ea quorum sola nomina nunc audivimus, et ad invisibilia, quae quidem esse Paulus apostolus docuit, quae sint, vel quam habeant differentiam, ne quidem aliquo intellectu conjicere possumus. Et ita crescens per singula rationabilis natura, non sicut in carne vel corpore et anima in hac vita crescebat, sed mente ac sensu aucta, ad perfectam scientiam mens jam perfecta perducitur, nequaquam jam ultra istis carnalibus sensibus impedita, sed intellectualibus incrementis aucta, semper ad purum, et, ut ita dixerim, ad faciem rerum causas inspiciens, potiturque perfectione, primo illa, qua in id ascendit, secundo qua permanet, cibos quibus vescatur habens theoremata et intellectus rerum rationesque causarum. Sicut enim in hac vita nostra corporea primo in hoc ipsum, quod sumus, corporaliter crescimus, in prima aetate ciborum sufficientia nobis incrementa praestante, postea vero quam crescendi ad mensuram sui fuerit expleta proceritas, utimur cibis iam non ut crescamus, sed ut vivamus et conservemur in vita per escas: ita arbitror et mentem etiam cum iam venerit ad perfectum, vesci tamen et uti propriis et competentibus cibis cum ea mensura, cui neque deesse aliquid debeat neque abundare. In omnibus autem cibus hic intellegendus est theoria et intellectus dei, habens mensuras proprias et competentes huic naturae, quae facta est et creata; quas mensuras singulos quosque incipientium »videre deum«, id est intellegere per »puritatem cordis«, competit observare.

When, then, for example, the saints have come to the heavenly places, then they will see through the reason of the stars one by one, and will comprehend whether they are living beings or whatever else they are. And they will understand other reasons of the works of God, which he himself will reveal to them. For already, as to sons, he will show them the causes of things and the power of his creation, teaching them why that star is placed in that place of the sky, and why it is separated from another by so great an intervening space; for example, what would have followed if it had been nearer, and what would happen if it were farther off; or, if that star had been greater than this one, how the universe would not remain the same but all things would be changed into some other form. And so, when they have gone through everything contained in the reckoning of the stars and in those courses that are in heaven, they will come also to the things that are not seen, or to those whose names alone we have now heard, and to the invisible things, which the apostle Paul taught exist, but what they are or what difference they have we cannot even guess by any understanding. And so the rational nature, growing through each stage, not as it grew in this life in flesh or body and soul, but increased in mind and perception, is led on as a mind already perfect to perfect knowledge, no longer hindered at all by these fleshly senses, but increased by intellectual growth, always looking purely and, so to speak, face to face at the causes of things, it attains perfection: first that by which it ascends to it, and secondly that by which it remains in it, having as the food on which it feeds the contemplations and understandings of things and the reasons of causes. For just as in this bodily life of ours we first grow bodily into what we are, the sufficiency of food in our early years supplying growth, but after our height has been completed to its measure we use food no longer in order to grow but in order to live and be preserved in life by nourishment, so I think the mind too, even when it has come to perfection, still feeds on and uses its own fitting food, in such measure that nothing ought to be lacking and nothing in excess. In all things, moreover, this food is to be understood as the contemplation and understanding of God, having measures proper and fitting to this nature which was made and created; and these measures it befits each of those who are beginning “to see God,” that is, to understand through “purity of heart,” to observe.

Col 1:16 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In the heavens the saints will learn the nature of the stars and of invisible things, and the rational nature, growing in mind, will come to perfect knowledge, seeing the causes of things face to face.

  • The last part is interleaved in the scan with Migne's parallel column, his Latin version of Jerome's report (Letter to Avitus) that Origen said “we shall no longer be flesh and bodies, nor even souls, but mind” beholding rational beings face to face; it is not Rufinus's text and has been removed, and Rufinus's words restored to their order, by logged correction. Allusions: Rom 1:20; Col 1:16; 1 Cor 13:12; Matt 5:8.
  • Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word; stray mark): cmlestia loca → caelestia loca; alias ras tiones Operum → alias rationes operum; invisibilia: quae → invisibilia, quae; docuit,‘ quae sint → docuit, quae sint.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 2.11.7 (PG 11:246a–247a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-2-11-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-2-11-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

On 3, chapter 0

3.0.1GCS 22:192

Superiores duos Περὶ ἀρχῶν libellos te non solum insistente, verum etiam cogente, diebus quadragesimae interpretatus sum. Sed quoniam illis diebus etiam tu, frater religiose Macari, et vicinus manebas et amplius vacabas, etiam ego amplius operabar; hos vero posteriores duos tardius explicuimus, dum tu ad nos ab extrema et ultima urbis parte rarior exactor accedis. Verum si meministi quod in praefatiuncula priore commonui, quia indignaturi essent quidam, si nos audissent non aliquid de Origene male loqui, continuo id, ut arbitror, prosecutum probasti. Quodsi in illo opere ita inflammati sunt hi, qui hominum linguas ad male loquendum excitant daemones, in quo nondum ad plenum eorum secreta nudaverat: quid in hoc futurum putas, in quo omnes eorum caecas et occultas vias, quibus humanis cordibus inrepunt et animas infirmas ac fragiles decipiunt, revelavit? Videbis illico perturbari omnia, seditiones moveri, clamores tota urbe diffundi, ad damnationem vocari eum, qui evangelicae lucernae lumine diabolicas ignorantiae tenebras fugare conatus est. Verum haec parvi pendat qui cupit salva fidei catholicae regula in divinis eruditionibus exerceri. Illud autem necessario commoneo, quod sicut in prioribus libris fecimus, etiam in istis observavimus, ne ea, quae reliquis eius sententiis et nostrae fidei contraria videbantur, interpretarer, sed velut inserta ea ab aliis et adulterata praeterirem. De creaturis vero rationabilibus si quid novi dixisse visus est, quia non in hoc est summa fidei, scientiae gratia et exercitii, cum forte nobis adversum nonnullas haereses tali ordine necessario respondendum est, neque in his libellis neque in superioribus praetermisi, nisi si qua forte iam in superioribus dicta repetere etiam in his posterioribus voluit, et brevitatis gratia aliqua ex his resecare commodum duxi. Si qui tamen proficiendi et non obtrectandi studio haec leget, rectius faciet, si exponi sibi haec a peritioribus velit. Absurdum namque est poetarum ficta carmina et comoediarum ridiculas fabulas a grammaticis exponi, et ea, quae vel de deo vel de caelestibus virtutibus ac de omni universitate dicuntur, in quibus omnis vel paganorum philosophorum vel haereticorum pravus error arguitur, sine magistro et explanatore putare aliquem posse se discere; et ita fit ut res difficiles et obscuras malint homines per temeritatem et inscientiam condemnare, quam per studium et diligentiam discere.

The two former books On First Principles I translated not only at your urging but under your pressure, during the days of Lent. But since in those days you, my devout brother Macarius, both lived near me and had more leisure, I too worked harder; these two later books I have unfolded more slowly, because you come to us more rarely, as a taskmaster, from the farthest edge of the city. Now if you remember what I warned of in my former little preface, that certain people would be indignant if they did not hear us speak some evil of Origen, you have, I think, at once found it so. But if the demons who stir up men's tongues to speak evil were so inflamed by that work, in which he had not yet fully laid bare their secrets, what do you think will happen in this one, in which he has revealed all their blind and hidden ways, by which they creep into human hearts and deceive weak and frail souls? You will see at once everything thrown into disorder, factions stirred up, outcries spread through the whole city, and the man summoned to condemnation who tried to drive away the devil's darkness of ignorance by the light of the Gospel lamp. But let him think little of these things who desires to be trained in divine learning while keeping the rule of the catholic faith. This, however, I must remind you of: as in the former books, so in these I have observed the rule not to translate what seemed contrary to his other opinions and to our faith, but to pass it over as inserted and corrupted by others. If he seems to have said anything new about rational beings, since the substance of the faith does not lie in this, for the sake of knowledge and exercise, when perhaps we had to answer certain heresies in this order, I have not passed it over either in these books or in the former ones, except where in these later books he wished to repeat what had already been said in the earlier ones; there I thought it useful, for brevity's sake, to cut some of it away. If anyone reads these things from a desire to make progress and not to disparage, he will do better to have them explained to him by more skilled men. For it is absurd that the invented songs of the poets and the laughable stories of comedies should be explained by grammarians, and that anyone should think he can learn without a master and interpreter the things that are said about God, or the heavenly powers, or the whole universe, in which some perverse error either of pagan philosophers or of heretics is refuted; and so it happens that people prefer to condemn difficult and obscure things rashly and ignorantly rather than to learn them by diligence and study.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: Rufinus tells Macarius that he has finished Books 3 and 4, expects attacks for translating Origen, and repeats that he has passed over what he judged contrary to the faith.

  • Rufinus's preface to his translation of Books 3–4, addressed to Macarius. Some manuscripts head it “Reader, remember me in your holy prayers” (printed by Migne as part of the text); Koetschau gives this only in his apparatus.
  • Rufinus states openly that he omitted or adjusted passages he judged contrary to Origen's other teaching and to the faith; readers should bear this in mind throughout the Latin version.
  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.0.1 (GCS 22:192; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-3-0-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-0-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

On 3, chapter 1

3.1.1GCS 22:194

Talia quaedam de repromissionibus divinis credimus sentienda, cum intellegentiam nostram ad contemplationem aeterni illius et nullo fine claudendi saeculi iaculamur atque ineffabilem eius laetitiam ac beatitudinem contemplamur. Verum quoniam in ecclesiastica praedicatione inest etiam de futuro dei ⟨iusto⟩ iudicio fides, quae iudicii credulitas provocat homines et suadet ad bene beateque vivendum et omni genere refugere peccatum, et per hoc sine dubio indicatur quod in nostra sit positum potestate vel laudabili nos vitae vel culpabili dedere: propterea necessarium reor pauca etiam de arbitrii nostri libertate disserere, eo quod non ignobiliter haec quoque quaestio a quam plurimis agitetur. Ut autem facilius quid sit libertas arbitrii cognoscamus, quid sibi velit natura ipsius arbitrii voluntatisque requiramus.

Such, we believe, are the things to be thought about the divine promises, when we direct our understanding to the contemplation of that eternal age which no end will close, and contemplate its unspeakable joy and blessedness. But since the church's preaching also contains faith in the future just judgment of God, and this belief in judgment calls and persuades people to live well and happily and to flee sin in every way, and since it is without doubt implied by this that it is placed in our power to give ourselves to a praiseworthy or to a blameworthy life, I think it necessary to discuss a few things about the freedom of our choice as well, since this question too is discussed by very many, and not in a mean way. That we may more easily know what freedom of choice is, let us inquire what the very nature of choice and will means.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: Since the church's preaching includes God's just judgment, which implies that our life is in our power, Origen turns to the question of free choice.

  • Koetschau adds iusto (“just”) in angle brackets from the Greek of the Philocalia (κρίσεως δικαίας θεοῦ). The Philocalia's Greek (Philoc. 21) has Origen call the question “most necessary”; Rufinus says it is discussed by many “not in a mean way”.
  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Extrabiblical texts: Origen, Philoc. 21.1 (Philocalia; echo)

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.1 (GCS 22:194; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-3-1-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.1.2GCS 22:196

Omnium quae moventur alia in semet ipsis causas motuum suorum gerunt, alia extrinsecus accipiunt: ut puta extrinsecus tantummodo moventur omnia, quae sine vita sunt, ut lapides vel ligna et quaecumque huiusmodi sunt, quae solo habitu materiae suae vel corporum constant. Omittenda sane nunc est illa quaestio, quae etiam illum motum putat esse, cum per corruptelam corpora dissolvuntur; nihil enim nunc haec ad propositum conducunt. Alia vero in semet ipsis habent movendi causam, ut animalia vel arbores et omnia, quae vel per naturalem vitam vel per animam constant; inter quae etiam metallorum venas deputari aliquibus visum est, sed et ignis sui motus esse putandus est, fortassis autem etiam fontes aquarum. Haec autem, quae in semet ipsis causam suorum motuum habent, quaedam dicunt ex se, quaedam a se moveri; et ita dividunt quod ex se moveantur ea, quae vivunt quidem non tamen animantia sunt, a se autem moveantur animantia, cum eis fantasia, id est voluntas quaedam vel incitamentum, adfuerit, quae ea moveri ad aliquid vel incitari provocaverit. Denique etiam in quibusdam animalibus inest talis fantasia, id est voluntas vel sensus, qui ea naturali quodam instinctu provocet et concitet ad ordinatos et conpositos motus; sicut videmus araneas facere, quae fantasia, id est voluntate quadam vel studio textrinae, ad opus texendi ordinatissime concitantur, sine dubio naturali quodam motu intentionem huiuscemodi operis provocante, nec tamen ultra alium aliquem sensum quam texendi naturale studium habere ipsum animal invenitur, sicut et apis fingendi favos ac mella, ut aiunt, aeria congregandi.

Of all things that move, some carry the causes of their motion within themselves, while others receive them from outside. Those things are moved only from outside that are without life, such as stones or wood and whatever things of this kind consist only of the state of their matter or of their bodies. That question must certainly be set aside here which also calls it motion when bodies are dissolved by decay, for it does not bear on our present purpose. Others have the cause of motion in themselves, such as animals or trees and all things that exist by natural life or by a soul; among these some have thought that veins of metal should also be counted; and fire too must be thought to have its own motion, and perhaps springs of water also. Of the things that have the cause of their motion within themselves, some are said to be moved out of themselves, others by themselves; and they divide them thus: those are moved out of themselves which live but are not animals; those are moved by themselves which are animals, when a phantasia, that is, a kind of will or incitement, is present in them, which stirs them to be moved or incited toward something. Indeed, in certain animals there is such a phantasia, that is, a will or sense, which by a kind of natural instinct provokes and stirs them to ordered and regular motions: as we see spiders do, which are stirred most regularly to the work of weaving by a phantasia, that is, by a certain will and desire for weaving, a natural motion without doubt prompting the effort for such a work; and yet the animal itself is found to have no other sense than the natural desire for weaving; just as the bee too has the desire for shaping honeycombs and, as they say, for gathering the honey of the air.

Notes and citation

Summary: Some things are moved from outside, others from within; living beings are moved by themselves through a phantasia, an impression that stirs them, as with spiders and bees.

  • Phantasia: the Greek term (impression, image) is kept by Rufinus and glossed “will” or “incitement”. “The honey of the air” recalls Virgil, Georgics 4.1.
  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.2 (GCS 22:196; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-3-1-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.1.3GCS 22:197

Rationabile vero animal cum habeat in se et hos naturales motus, habet tamen amplius ceteris animalibus etiam rationis vim, qua iudicare et discernere de motibus naturalibus possit et alios quidem reprobare et abicere alios vero probare atque suscipere, cuius rationis iudicio dirigi et gubernari hominis motus ad vitam probabilem possint. Unde consequens est ut, quoniam natura rationis huius, quae est in homine, habet in se vim dinoscendi boni vel mali, idque cum discreverit, inest ei facultas etiam eligendi quod probaverit, in eligendo quidem quod bonum est laudabilis, in sequendo vero quod turpe vel malum est iure culpabilis iudicetur. Illud sane nequaquam latere nos debet, quod in nonnullis mutis animalibus ordinatior quidam motus a ceteris animalibus invenitur, ut in sagacibus canibus vel bellatoribus equis, ita ut videantur aliquibus velut rationabili quodam sensu moveri; sed id non tam ratione quam incentivo quodam et naturali motu, pro huiuscemodi usibus largius indulto, fieri credendum est. Verum ut dicere coeperamus, cum ita se habeat rationabile animal, nobis hominibus incidere quidem extrinsecus possunt aliqua et occurrere sive ad visum sive ad auditum vel ad alios sensus, quae nos concitent ac provocent ad bonos vel contrarios motus; quae utique quia extrinsecus incidunt, non est in nostra positum potestate ne incidant vel occurrant: iudicare vero et probare, qualiter uti debeamus his, quae incidunt, nullius alterius res est vel opus nisi rationis eius, quae est in nobis, id est nostri iudicii; cuius rationis iudicio incidentibus extrinsecus concitamentis abutimur ad id, quodcumque ipsa ratio probaverit, naturalibus motibus nostris nutu eius vel ad bona vel ad contraria gubernatis.

A rational animal, although it has these natural motions in itself, yet has beyond the other animals the power of reason as well, by which it can judge and discern among the natural motions, rejecting and casting away some and approving and accepting others, so that by the judgment of this reason the motions of a human being may be directed and governed toward a praiseworthy life. It follows that, since the nature of this reason which is in a human being has in itself the power of discerning good and evil, and, when it has discerned, the faculty also of choosing what it has approved, it is rightly judged praiseworthy in choosing what is good and blameworthy in following what is shameful or evil. We must certainly not overlook that in some dumb animals a more ordered motion is found than in the other animals, as in hunting dogs or war horses, so that to some they seem to be moved by a kind of rational sense. But this must be believed to come about not so much from reason as from a kind of incentive and natural motion granted more abundantly for such uses. But, as we had begun to say, since this is how a rational animal is, things may indeed befall us human beings from outside, or meet us whether through sight or hearing or the other senses, which stir and provoke us to good or contrary motions; and because they befall us from outside, it is not placed in our power that they should not befall or meet us. But to judge and approve how we ought to use the things that befall us is the business and work of nothing else than the reason that is in us, that is, of our judgment; and by the judgment of this reason we use the incitements that befall us from outside for whatever purpose reason itself has approved, governing our natural motions at its nod either toward good things or toward the contrary.

Notes and citation

Summary: A rational being can judge its impressions: what befalls us from outside is not in our power, but how we use it is, by the judgment of reason.

  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.3 (GCS 22:197; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-3-1-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.1.4GCS 22:198

Si vero quis dicat ea, quae extrinsecus incidunt motus nostros provocantia, talia esse, ut possibile non sit adversari eis, sive ad bonum nos sive ad malum concitantibus: in semet ipsum paulisper qui haec aestimat convertat animum et proprios diligentius introspiciat motus, nisi invenerit, cum alicuius desiderii pulsat inlecebra, nihil prius geri quam animi accommodetur assensus et suggestioni pravae nutus mentis indulgeat; ita ut etiam verisimilibus quibusdam causis intra cordis nostri tribunalia velut iudici residenti ex utraque parte adhiberi videatur assertio, ut causis prius expositis gerundi sententia de rationis iudicio proferatur. Non enim, ut verbi gratia dixerim, huic, qui statuit continenter et caste vivere atque ab omni se muliebri contagio continere, si forte apparuerit mulier provocans eum et inliciens aliquid contra propositum gerere, causa ei ⟨perfecta et absoluta⟩ vel necessitas praevaricandi mulier extitit, cum possit utique statuti sui memor libidinis incitamenta refrenare et inritantis inlecebrae delectamenta austerioribus virtutis increpationibus cohercere, ut omni luxuriae sensu fugato propositi firmitas et constantia perseveret. Denique si eruditioribus quibusque viris et in divinis institutionibus roboratis huiuscemodi inritamenta provenerint, memores continuo sui, ea quae dudum meditati sunt et in quibus eruditi sunt in memoriam revocantes et sanctioris se doctrinae adminiculis munientes, respuunt ac refellunt omnem incitamenti inlecebram atque adversas concupiscentias insitae sibi rationis obiectione depellunt.

If someone says that the things which befall us from outside and provoke our motions are such that it is not possible to resist them, whether they stir us to good or to evil, let him who thinks this turn his mind for a little to himself and examine his own motions more carefully, and see whether he does not find that, when the enticement of some desire strikes, nothing is done before the mind's assent is given and the mind's will yields to the evil suggestion; so that, as before a judge sitting within the tribunal of our heart, the case seems to be pleaded from both sides with plausible reasons, and, the causes having first been set out, sentence for action is passed by the judgment of reason. To give an example: if a woman should appear to a man who has resolved to live continently and chastely and to keep himself from all contact with women, provoking him and enticing him to do something contrary to his resolve, the woman is not the perfect and absolute cause or necessity of his transgressing, since he can, remembering his resolve, rein in the incitements of lust and check the delights of the provoking enticement with the sterner rebukes of virtue, so that, with every sense of lust put to flight, the firmness and constancy of his resolve may persevere. Indeed, if such incitements come to more learned men, strengthened by divine instruction, at once remembering who they are, recalling to memory what they have long meditated and been taught, and fortifying themselves with the support of holier teaching, they reject and refute every enticement of incitement and drive away contrary desires by the opposition of the reason implanted in them.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: Outside incitements cannot compel us: nothing is done without the mind's assent, as a man resolved on chastity can resist a woman's enticement.

  • Koetschau adds perfecta et absoluta (“perfect and absolute”) in angle brackets from the Greek of the Philocalia.
  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.4 (GCS 22:198; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-3-1-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).

3.1.5GCS 22:199

Cum ergo haec ita esse naturalibus quodammodo testimoniis conprobetur, quomodo non superfluum est gestorum nostrorum causas ad ea, quae extrinsecus incidunt, retorqueri et a nobis culpam, in quibus omnis causa est, removeri, hoc est dicere similes nos esse lignis vel lapidibus, quae intra se quidem nullum habent motum, causas autem motus sui extrinsecus patiuntur? Quod utique nec vere dicitur nec decenter, sed ad hoc solum fingitur, ut libertas arbitrii denegetur; nisi si putemus ita demum constare posse arbitrii libertatem, si nihil sit quod nos extrinsecus incidens ad bona provocet aut ad mala. Si vero quis ad naturalem corporis intemperiem culparum referat causas, contra rationem id esse totius eruditionis ostenditur. Quomodo enim videmus in quam plurimis, qui cum incontinenter prius intemperateque vixissent ac luxuriae fuissent libidinisque captivi, si forte verbo doctrinae atque eruditionis in melius provocati sunt, tantam extitisse commutationem, ut ex luxuriosis ac turpibus sobrii et castissimi, ex ferocibus et inmanibus mitissimi ac mansuetissimi redderentur: ita rursum videmus in aliis quietis et honestis, cum se inquietis forte hominibus ac turpibus sociarint, »corrumpi mores bonos conloquiis malis« et effici eos tales, quales sunt illi, quibus nihil ad turpitudinem deest; et hoc interdum evenit matura iam aetate viris, ita ut continentiores in iuventute vixerint, quam cum provectior aetas facultatem vitae liberioris indulsit. Consequentia igitur rationis ostendit quod ea quidem, quae extrinsecus incidunt, in nostra potestate non sunt; bene vero vel male uti his, quae incidunt, ea ratione, quae intra nos est, discernente ac diiudicante quomodo his uti oporteat, nostrae est potestatis.

Since, then, these things are proved to be so by natural evidence, as it were, how is it not superfluous to turn back the causes of our deeds onto the things that befall us from outside, and to remove the blame from ourselves, in whom the whole cause lies; that is, to say that we are like pieces of wood or stones, which have no motion within themselves but receive the causes of their motion from outside? This is neither truly nor fittingly said, but is invented only so that freedom of choice may be denied; unless perhaps we think that freedom of choice can exist only if nothing befalls us from outside that provokes us to good or to evil. If someone refers the causes of sins to a natural bad temperament of the body, this is shown to be contrary to the reason of all instruction. For just as we see in very many who before had lived without restraint or self-control and had been captives of luxury and lust, if they were perhaps called to better things by the word of teaching and instruction, that so great a change came about that from being luxurious and base they were made sober and most chaste, from fierce and savage most gentle and mild; so again we see in others, quiet and honourable people, that when they have perhaps joined themselves to restless and base people, “good morals are corrupted by evil conversation,” and they become such as those who lack nothing for baseness; and this sometimes happens to men already of mature age, so that they lived more continently in youth than when a more advanced age granted them the means of a freer life. The consequence of reason therefore shows that the things which befall us from outside are not in our power; but to use well or ill the things that befall us, by that reason within us which discerns and judges how they ought to be used, is in our power.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

1 Cor 15:33 (quotation, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: To blame outside causes or bodily temperament for our sins makes us like stones; conversions and corruptions show that the use of what befalls us is in our power.

  • “Good morals are corrupted by evil conversation” is 1 Cor 15:33, itself a line of Menander's Thais. Koetschau deletes qui before cum se inquietis (square brackets in his edition); it is left out here.
  • Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.

Extrabiblical texts: Menander (Menander (fragments); echo)

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.5 (GCS 22:199; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/2-11-1/#p-3-1-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).