On First Principles 3.5.1–3.5.8
Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.
On 3, chapter 5
3.5.1PG 11:326a–327a
Post haec iam quoniam quidem unum de ecclesiasticis definitionibus habetur praecipue secundum historiae nostrae fidem, quod mundus hic factus sit et ex certo tempore coeperit et secundum pervulgatam omnibus consummationem saeculi pro sui corruptione solvendus sit, etiam de hoc pauca repetere non videtur absurdum. Et quantum quidem ad Scripturarum fidem pertinet, perfacilis videtur de hoc assertio. Denique haeretici cum in alia multa distracti sint, in hoc tamen Seriptnrae auctoritati cedentes, visi sunt consonare. De conditione ergo mundi quae alia nos Scriptura magis poterit edocere quam ea quae a Moyse de origine ejusdem scripta est? Qum licet majora intra se contineat quam historize narratio videtur ostendere, et spiritalem in quammaximis contineat intellectum, atque in rebus mysticis el profundis velamine quodam littene utatur; tamen nihilominus indicat hoc sermo narrantis, quod ex certo tempore creata sunt omnia quae videntur. De consummatione vero mundi, primo Jacob indicat cum ad filios suos testatur dicens : Convenite ad me, filii Jacob, ut annuntiem vobis quid erit in novissimis diebus , vel, post novissimos dies. Si ergo sunt novissimi dies, vel post novissimos dies, cessare dies necesse est qui creperum. David quoque ita ait : Coeli peribunt, tu autem permanehis, et omnes sicut vestimentum veterascent; et sicut oper; torium mutabis eos, et mutabuntur; tu autem idem ipse es, et anni tui non deficient“. Dominus vero et Salvator noster cum dicit : Qui ereavit ab initio masculum et feminam fecit eos ",3 factum etiam esse mundum ipse testatur; et rursum dicens quia, Caelum et terra transient, verba autem mea non transient“,1 corrupti‘bilem eum [iuieudumque designat. Sed et Apostolus dicens: «Vanitati enim creatura subjecta est non volens, sed propter enni qui subjecit in spe, quia et ipsa creatura liberabitur a servitute corruptionis in libertatem gloria: filiorum Dei τ;1 manifeste tinem mundi declarat; et cum rursum dicit ς, 1 Transiet habitus huius mundi . Verum in eo ipso quod dixit quia vanitati creatura subjecta est, etiam initium ejus ostendit; si enim vanitati creatura subjecta est propter (l5) spem aliquam, ex causa utique subjecta e31; et quod ex causa est, necesse est nt coeperit ; non enim poterat sine ullo initio vanitati creatura esse subjecta, et sperare liberari a servitute corruptionis quae servire non coeperat. Sed et quamplurima alia Scripturis divinis hujuscemodi dicta reperiet si quis requirat ex otio, quibus et initium habere mundus, et linem Sperare dicitur.
Next, since it is one of the church's definitions, held especially according to the faith of our history, that this world was made and began at a definite time, and that at the consummation of the age, known to all, it is to be dissolved because of its corruption, it does not seem absurd to repeat a few things about this too. As far as the faith of the Scriptures is concerned, the assertion on this point seems very easy. Indeed, the heretics, though they are divided on many other matters, nevertheless seem to agree on this, yielding to the authority of Scripture. About the creation of the world, then, what other Scripture can teach us better than what was written by Moses about its origin? Although it contains within it greater things than the narrative of the history seems to show, and contains a spiritual sense in very many places, and uses the letter as a kind of veil over mystical and deep matters, nonetheless the narrator's account indicates that all things that are seen were created from a definite time. About the consummation of the world, Jacob indicates it first, when he testifies to his sons, saying: "Gather to me, sons of Jacob, that I may tell you what will be in the last days," or, "after the last days." If, then, there are last days, or a time after the last days, the days that began must necessarily cease. David also says thus: "The heavens shall perish, but you will remain; and they will all grow old like a garment, and like a covering you will change them, and they will be changed; but you are the same, and your years will not fail." Our Lord and Saviour, when he says, "He who created them from the beginning made them male and female," himself testifies that the world was made; and again, when he says, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away," he indicates that it is corruptible and will come to an end. And the apostle, when he says, "For the creation was subjected to vanity, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be set free from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God," plainly declares the end of the world; and again when he says, "The form of this world is passing away." But in the very words that the creation was subjected to vanity he also shows its beginning; for if the creation was subjected to vanity because of some hope, it was certainly subjected for a cause; and what exists from a cause must necessarily have begun; for the creation could not, without any beginning, have been subjected to vanity, and hope to be set free from a bondage of corruption which it had not begun to serve. Whoever searches at leisure will find very many other sayings of this kind in the divine Scriptures, by which the world is said both to have a beginning and to hope for an end.
Gen 49:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 102:26–27 (101:27-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:20–21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:31 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture (Moses, Jacob, the Psalms, Christ and Paul) teaches that the world had a beginning in time and will come to an end.
- Sources: Gen 49:1; Ps 102:26–27 (101:27–28 LXX); Matt 19:4; Matt 24:35; Rom 8:20–21; 1 Cor 7:31. 'After the last days' is an alternative reading or rendering of Gen 49:1 that Origen notes.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Topics: Eschatology, Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.1 (PG 11:326a–327a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.2PG 11:327a
Si quis ergo est qui adversetur in bac parte vel auctoritati Scriptura: ιιοδινειξ, vel fidei, iuqniremus ab eo utrum dicat Deum comprehch dere posse omnia, annon posse? Et dicere quidem non posse, manifeste impium est. Si vero, quod necesse est, dixerit quia omnia comprehendit, superest ut eo ipso quo comprehendi possunt, et initium habere intelligantur et finem. Nam quod penitus sine initio ullo est, comprehendi omnino non potest. lu quantumcunque enim se iutelhictus estenderit, in tantum comprehendeudi facultas sine line subducitur et differtur, ubi initium non habetur.
If, then, there is anyone who in this matter opposes either the authority of our Scripture or the faith, we would ask him whether he says that God can comprehend all things or cannot. To say that he cannot is plainly impious. But if, as he must, he says that God comprehends all things, it remains that, by the very fact that they can be comprehended, they are understood to have both a beginning and an end. For what is wholly without any beginning cannot be comprehended at all. For however far the understanding extends itself, so far the power of comprehending is withdrawn and put off without end, where no beginning is held.
Notes and citation
Summary: Since God comprehends all things, and what has no beginning cannot be comprehended, the world must have a beginning and an end.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.2 (PG 11:327a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.3GCS 22:272
Sed solent nobis obicere dicentes: Si coepit mundus ex tempore, quid ante faciebat deus quam mundus inciperet? Otiosam enim et immobilem dicere naturam dei impium est simul et absurdum, vel putare quod bonitas aliquando bene non fecerit et omnipotentia aliquando non egerit potentatum. Haec nobis obicere solent dicentibus mundum hunc ex certo tempore coepisse et secundum scripturae fidem annos quoque aetatis ipsius numerantibus. Ad quas propositiones non arbitror aliquem haereticorum secundum rationem dogmatis sui posse facile respondere. Nos vero consequenter respondebimus observantes regulam pietatis et dicentes quoniam non tunc primum, cum visibilem istum mundum fecit deus, coepit operari, sed sicut post corruptionem huius erit alius mundus, ita et antequam hic esset, fuisse alios credimus. Quod utrumque divinae scripturae auctoritate firmabitur. Nam quod erit post hunc alius mundus, Esaias docet dicens: »Erit caelum novum et terra nova, quae ego faciam permanere in conspectu meo, dicit dominus«. Quod autem ante hunc mundum fuerint etiam Ecclesiastes ostendit dicens: »Quid est quod factum est? ipsum quod futurum est. Et quid est quod creatum est? hoc ipsum quod creandum est; et nihil est omnino recens sub sole. Si qui loquetur et dicet: Ecce hoc novum est, iam fuit id in saeculis, quae fuerunt ante nos«. Quibus testimoniis utrumque simul probatur, quod et ante fuerint saecula et futura sint postmodum. Non tamen putandum est plures simul mundos esse, sed post hunc iterum alium futurum; de quibus nunc non est necessarium per singula repetere, cum id iam in superioribus fecerimus.
But they are accustomed to object to us, saying: If the world began in time, what was God doing before the world began? For to call the nature of God idle and unmoving is both impious and absurd, as is to think that goodness at some time did no good and omnipotence at some time exercised no power. This they usually object to us when we say that this world began at a definite time, and when, following the faith of Scripture, we even count the years of its age. I do not think any of the heretics can easily answer these propositions in keeping with the principle of his own doctrine. But we shall answer consistently, keeping the rule of piety, by saying that God did not then first begin to work when he made this visible world; but as after the corruption of this world there will be another, so also before this one existed we believe there were others. Both points will be confirmed by the authority of divine Scripture. For that after this world there will be another, Isaiah teaches, saying: “There will be a new heaven and a new earth, which I will make to remain in my sight, says the Lord.” And that before this world there were others too, Ecclesiastes shows, saying: “What is it that has been made? The very thing that will be. And what is it that has been created? The very thing that is to be created; and there is nothing at all new under the sun. If anyone speaks and says, Behold, this is new, it has already been in the ages that were before us.” By these testimonies both points are proved at once, that there were ages before and that there will be ages afterwards. Yet we must not think that there are several worlds at the same time, but that after this one another will come in its turn; about these it is not necessary now to repeat each point, since we have already done so above.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Isa 66:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 1:9–10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: To the question what God did before the world, Origen answers that there were other worlds before this one and will be others after it, though not several at once.
- Sources: Isa 66:22; Eccl 1:9–10. The earlier discussion referred to is Book 2, chapters 1–3.
- Migne prints beside Rufinus Jerome's more literal version of this passage (Letter 124.9), which adds that Ecclesiastes testifies “that worlds not only have been but will be … one after another”. It is not Rufinus's text and is not reproduced.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Extrabiblical texts: Jerome, Ep. 124.9 (Letters; echo)
Topics: Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.3 (GCS 22:272; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.4GCS 22:272
Illud sane otiose praetereundum esse non arbitror, quod scripturae sanctae conditionem mundi novo quodam et proprio nomine nuncuparunt, dicentes καταβολήν mundi (quod latine satis inproprie translatum constitutionem mundi dixerunt; καταβολή vero in graeco magis deicere significat, id est deorsum iacere, quod latine inproprie, ut diximus, constitutionem mundi interpraetati sunt), sicut in evangelio secundum Iohannem, cum dicit salvator: »Et erit tribulatio in illis diebus, qualis non fuit a constitutione mundi« (hic constitutio καταβολή dicta est, quod ita intellegendum est, sicut superius exposuimus). Sed et apostolus in epistola ad Ephesios eodem sermone usus est, cum ait: »Qui elegit nos ante constitutionem mundi« (et hic constitutionem mundi καταβολήν dixit, eodem sensu quo superius interpraetati sumus intellegendam). Dignum igitur videtur inquirere, quid est quod hoc novo nomine indicetur. Et arbitror, quoniam quidem finis et consummatio sanctorum erit in his, »quae non videntur et aeterna sunt«, ex ipsius finis contemplatione, sicut in superioribus frequenter ostendimus, simile etiam initium rationabiles creaturas habuisse censendum est. Et si tale initium habuerunt, qualem finem sperant, fuerunt sine dubio iam ab initio in his, »quae non videntur et aeterna sunt«. Quod si est, de superioribus ad inferiora descensum est non solum ab his animabus, quae id motuum suorum varietate meruerunt, verum et ab his, qui ad totius mundi ministerium ex illis superioribus et invisibilibus ad haec inferiora et visibilia deducti sunt, licet non volentes. »Vanitati quippe creatura subiecta est non volens, sed propter eum, qui subiecit in spe«, quo vel sol vel luna vel stellae vel angeli dei explerent obsequium mundo; et his animabus, quae ob nimios defectus mentis suae crassioribus istis et solidioribus indiguere corporibus, et propter eos, quibus hoc erat necessarium, mundus iste visibilis institutus est. Ex hoc ergo communiter omnium per hanc significantiam, id est per καταβολήν, a superioribus ad inferiora videtur indicari deductio. Spem sane libertatis universa »creatura« gerit, ut »a servitutis corruptione liberetur«, cum »filii dei«, qui vel prolapsi vel dispersi sunt, in unum fuerint congregati, vel cum cetera officia expleverint in hoc mundo, quae solus cognoscit omnium artifex deus. Talem vero ac tantum factum esse putandum est mundum, qui vel omnes eas animas, quae in hoc mundo statutae sunt exerceri, caperet, vel omnes eas virtutes, quae adesse eis et dispensare eas ac iuvare paratae sunt. Unius namque naturae esse omnes rationabiles creaturas, ex multis adsertionibus conprobatur; per quod solum dei iustitia in omnibus earum dispensationibus defendi potest, dum unaquaeque in semet ipsa habet causas, quod in illo vel in illo vitae ordine posita est.
I think one thing must certainly not be passed over idly: that the holy Scriptures have called the creation of the world by a new and peculiar name, speaking of the καταβολή of the world (which has been rather improperly translated into Latin as “the foundation of the world”; but καταβολή in Greek rather means “casting down,” that is, throwing downward, which, as we said, they have improperly rendered in Latin as “the foundation of the world”); as in the Gospel according to John, when the Saviour says, “And there will be tribulation in those days such as has not been since the foundation of the world” (here “foundation” is καταβολή, which must be understood as we have explained above). The apostle too used the same word in the Epistle to the Ephesians, when he says, “Who chose us before the foundation of the world” (here too he called the foundation of the world καταβολή, to be understood in the same sense as we interpreted above). It seems worth inquiring, then, what is indicated by this new name. And I think that, since the end and consummation of the saints will be in those things “which are not seen and are eternal,” we must judge from the contemplation of that very end, as we have often shown above, that rational creatures had a similar beginning. And if they had a beginning such as the end they hope for, they were without doubt from the beginning in those things “which are not seen and are eternal.” If this is so, there has been a descent from higher to lower, not only on the part of those souls that deserved it by the variety of their motions, but also on the part of those that were brought down from those higher and invisible places to these lower and visible ones for the service of the whole world, even though unwilling. “For the creation was subjected to vanity, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it in hope,” so that sun or moon or stars or angels of God might render service to the world; and for those souls which, because of their excessive defects of mind, needed these coarser and more solid bodies, and because of those for whom this was necessary, this visible world was established. From this, then, by this meaning of the word, that is, by καταβολή, a bringing down of all in common from higher to lower seems to be indicated. The whole “creation,” indeed, holds the hope of liberty, that it “may be set free from the bondage of corruption,” when “the sons of God” who fell away or were scattered have been gathered into one, or when they have fulfilled the other duties in this world which God alone, the maker of all, knows. Such and so great a world must be thought to have been made as could hold all the souls that were appointed to be exercised in this world, and all the powers that are ready to be present with them, to order them and to help them. For that all rational creatures are of one nature is proved by many assertions; by this alone can the justice of God be defended in all his dealings with them, since each one has in itself the causes why it has been placed in this or that rank of life.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 24:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 1:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:20–21 (quotation, high confidence) · John 11:52 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture's word καταβολή for the founding of the world suggests a “casting down” of rational beings from the invisible to the visible, some by merit and some, like the stars, for service.
- Sources: Matt 24:21 (Rufinus says “the Gospel according to John”, a slip, since the saying is in Matthew); Eph 1:4; 2 Cor 4:18; Rom 8:20–21; John 11:52 (“gather into one the scattered children of God”).
- The interpretation of καταβολή as a “casting down” of souls belongs to Origen's teaching on the pre-existence and fall of rational beings; it is translated as Rufinus gives it.
- Migne prints beside Rufinus Jerome's more literal version (Letter 124.9), which describes the heavenly “dwelling and true rest” from which rational beings fell to earth and needed gross bodies, says that “because of varied motions varied worlds are created”, and that a world “much unlike” ours will follow. Koetschau notes that Rufinus rearranged and altered this part. Jerome's version is not reproduced.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Extrabiblical texts: Jerome, Ep. 124.9 (Letters; echo)
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.4 (GCS 22:272; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.5GCS 22:276
Hanc ergo dispositionem dei, quam postea ordinavit, iam tum ab origine mundi rationibus causisque prospectis vel eorum, qui pro defectu mentis venire in corpora merebantur, vel eorum, qui visibilium cupiditate raptabantur, sed et illorum, qui vel volentes vel inviti praestare officia quaedam his, qui in hunc statum deciderant, conpellebantur ab eo, qui »in spe« subiciebat, non intellegentes quidam nec advertentes quod ex praecedentibus liberi arbitrii causis instituta fuisset a deo dispositionis ista varietas, arbitrati sunt vel fortuitis motibus vel fatali necessitate agi omnia, quae in hoc mundo sunt, nec esse aliquid in nostro arbitrio. Unde nec dei providentiam inculpabilem adsignare potuerunt.
This ordering of God, then, which he afterwards arranged, having already from the origin of the world foreseen the reasons and causes, both of those who for some defect of mind deserved to come into bodies, and of those who were carried away by desire for visible things, and also of those who, willingly or unwillingly, were compelled by him who subjected them “in hope” to render certain services to those who had fallen into this state: some, not understanding or noticing that this variety in the ordering had been instituted by God from preceding causes of free choice, have thought that all things in this world are driven either by chance motions or by fatal necessity, and that nothing is in our choice. Hence they could not show the providence of God to be blameless.
Rom 8:20 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God foresaw from the beginning the causes of each being's state; those who do not see that the world's variety arises from free choice blame chance or fate and cannot clear God's providence.
- Rom 8:20 lies behind “him who subjected them in hope”. In Migne the opening line mixes in the last words of Jerome's parallel version (God “begins to visit others and gradually, as if giving them a hand, draws them back to their former state”), which are not part of Rufinus and are not translated.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.5 (GCS 22:276; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.6PG 11:330b–331b
Sicut autem diximus, quia multis, vel ministris, vel rectoribus, vel auxiliatoribus eguerunt animae omnes quae in lioc mundo versatae sunt : ita in novissimis temporibus cum jam linis mundo proximus immineret, et in ultimam perditionem omne humanum vergeret genus, infirmatis non so. lumbis qui regebantur, verum etiam illis quibus regendi fuerat sollicitudo commissa, non jam tali auxilio, nec similibus suis indiguit defensoribus, sed auctoris ipsius et creatoris sui opem depoposcit, qui et his obediendi, et illis regendi corruptam profanamque restitueret disciplinam. Unde unigenitus Filius Dei qui erat Verbum et sapientia Patris, cum esset iu ea gloria apud Patrem quam habuit antequam mundus esset, exinanivit semetipsum, et formam servi accipiens ellicitur ohedieus usque ad mortem, ut obedientiam doceret eos qui non aliter nisi per obedientiam salutent consequi poterant; regendi quoque regnandiquc corruptas restituit leges, dum omnes inimicos subiecit pedibus suis, ut per hor. quod necesse est eum regnare donec ponat inimicos suos sub pedibus et novissimum inimicum destruat mortem, rectores ipsos regendi doceat moderamina. Quia ergo non solum regendi, vel regnandi, verum etiam obediendi, ut diximus, venerat reparare disciplinam, in semetipso prius complens quod ab aliis volebat impleri, idcirco non solum usque ad mortem crucis Patri obediens factus est, verum etiam iu consummatione sreculi in semetipso complectens omnes quos subiicit Patri, et qui per eum veniunt ad salutem, cum ipsis et in ipsis ipse quoque subiectus dicitur Patri : dum omnia in ipso constant, et ipse est caput omnium, et in ipso est salus et salutem consequentimn plenitudo. Hoc ergo est quod de eo dicit Apostolus : Cum autem ei subiecta fuerint omnia, tunc et ipse Filius subiectus erit ei qui sibi subdidit omnia, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus “.
As we said, all the souls that have lived in this world needed many ministers, or rulers, or helpers; so in the last times, when the end of the world was already near and close at hand, and the whole human race was sinking toward final perdition, not only those who were ruled but also those to whom the care of ruling had been entrusted having grown weak, it no longer needed such help, nor defenders like itself, but asked for the aid of its author and creator himself, who would restore the corrupted and profaned discipline both of obeying for the one and of ruling for the other. Hence the only-begotten Son of God, who was the Word and Wisdom of the Father, though he was in that glory with the Father which he had before the world was, emptied himself and, taking the form of a servant, became obedient unto death, so that he might teach obedience to those who could obtain salvation in no other way than through obedience. He also restored the corrupted laws of ruling and reigning, when he subjected all his enemies under his feet, so that by this, that he must reign until he puts his enemies under his feet and destroys the last enemy, death, he might teach the rulers themselves the right measures of ruling. Since, then, he had come to restore not only the discipline of ruling or reigning, but also, as we said, of obeying, fulfilling first in himself what he wished others to fulfil, he therefore not only became obedient to the Father unto the death of the cross, but also, at the consummation of the age, embracing in himself all whom he subjects to the Father and who come to salvation through him, he himself too, together with them and in them, is said to be subject to the Father; for all things hold together in him, and he is the head of all, and in him is the salvation and fullness of those who obtain salvation. This, then, is what the apostle says of him: "When all things have been subjected to him, then the Son himself also will be subjected to him who subjected all things to him, that God may be all in all."
John 17:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 2:6–8 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25–26 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:17–18 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In the last times the Son himself came, emptying himself to teach obedience and to restore true rule; his final subjection to the Father includes all the saved in him.
- Sources: John 17:5; Phil 2:6–8; 1 Cor 15:25–26; Col 1:17–18; 1 Cor 15:28.
- The Son's 'subjection' at the end is explained of his embracing the saved, not as an inferiority of nature; the next section defends this against those who took offence at the word. Migne's footnotes printed inside the text are removed by a logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnotes on manuscript readings printed inside the text): deest s ergo. ρ Sic mss. Editi vero, urgentes.» Infra mss., quae in hoc mrime fiunt. Εᾱὶιίη quae in hoc mundo suun} Paulo post mss.,_.« sicut autem die ximus. Editi, sicut autem audivimus. → .
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.6 (PG 11:330b–331b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.7PG 11:331b–332b
Verum nescio quo pacto haeretici non intelligentes Apostoli sensum qui his verbis continetur, subiectionis in Filio nomen infamant; cuius appellationis si preprietas requiritur, ex contrariis facile poterit inveniri. Nam si subiectum esse non est bonum, restat ut illud quod contrarium est, bonum sit, id est non esse subiectum. Sermo namque Apostoli secundum quod isti volunt, hoc videtur ostendere, dum dicit: Cum autem ei subiecta fuerint omnia, tunc. et ipse Filius subiectus erit ei qui sibi subdidit omnia , ιιι quasi is qui nunc Patri subiectus non sit, subiectus iuturus sit tunc cum prius Pater ei universa subiecerit. Sed miror quomodo hoc intelligi possit, ut is qui nondum sibi subiectis omnibus non est ipse subiectus, tunc cum “ subiecta fuerint sibi omnia, cum rex omnium luerit, π et potestatem tenuerit universorum, tunc eum Sub- η iiciendum putent, eum subjectus ante non fuerit ; non ‘ intelligentes quod subiectio Christi ad Patrem beatitudinem nostra: perfectionis ostendit, et suscepti ab eo operis palmam declara’, cum non solum regendi ac regnandi summam quam in universam emendaverit creaturam, vermn etiam obedientia: et sub iectionis correcta reparataque humani generis Patri olierat instituta. Si ergo bona et salutaris accipitur ista subiectio qua subjectus essedicitur Filius Patri , valde consequenset cohaerens est ιιι ει inimicorum quae dicitur Filio Dei esse subjectio, salutaris quaedam intelligatur et utilis;ut sicut cum dicitur Filius Patri subjectus, perlecta universae creatura: restitutio declaratur, ita cum Filio Dei inimici dicuntur esse subiectum), subiec- η torum salus in eo intelligatur et reparatio perdi- ’ torum.
But I do not know how the heretics, not understanding the apostle's meaning contained in these words, bring disgrace on the word 'subjection' in the Son. If the proper meaning of this term is sought, it can easily be found from its opposites. For if to be subject is not good, it remains that its opposite is good, that is, not to be subject. For the apostle's words, as they would have it, seem to show this when he says, "When all things have been subjected to him, then the Son himself also will be subjected to him who subjected all things to him," as if he who is not now subject to the Father will be subject then, when the Father has first subjected all things to him. But I wonder how this can be understood: that he who, while all things are not yet subject to him, is not himself subject, should be thought to be subjected then, when all things have been subjected to him, when he has become king of all and holds power over the universe, though he was not subject before. They do not understand that the subjection of Christ to the Father shows the blessedness of our perfection and declares the crowning of the work he undertook, since he offers to the Father not only the sum of ruling and reigning, which he has amended throughout the whole creation, but also the ordinances of obedience and subjection of the human race, corrected and restored. If, then, this subjection by which the Son is said to be subject to the Father is taken as good and saving, it is very consistent and coherent that the subjection of enemies, which is said to be made to the Son of God, should also be understood as saving and beneficial; so that, as when the Son is said to be subject to the Father the perfect restoration of the whole creation is declared, so when enemies are said to be subjected to the Son of God, the salvation of those subjected and the restoration of the lost are understood in it.
1 Cor 15:28 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Son's subjection to the Father is good, the crowning of his work; so the subjection of his enemies to him means their salvation and the restoration of the lost.
- Source: 1 Cor 15:28. The inference that the subjection of Christ's enemies means 'the salvation of those subjected and the restoration of the lost' is Origen's teaching on the restoration, translated as Rufinus gives it. Migne's reference note printed inside the text is removed by a logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's reference note printed inside the text): Cor. xv, 28. Ibid. → .
Topics: Christology, Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.7 (PG 11:331b–332b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.5.8PG 11:332b–333a
Verum certis quibusque et modis. et disciplinis, et temporibus subiectio ista complebilur; non necessitate aliqua ad subiectionem cogente, ne per vim sabditns iiat omnis mundus Deo, sed verbo, ratione, doctrina, provocatione meliorum,iustitutionibus optimis, comminationibus quoque dignis et competentibus, quae iuste immineant his qui salutis et utilitatis sua: curam sanitatemque contemnunt. Denique et nos homines cum vel servos, vel filios erudimus, dum adhuc per aetatem rationis incapaces sunt, minis eos et metu coercemus; cum vero boni, utilis et honesti intellegentiam ceperint, tunc iam cessante verberum metu, verbo ac ratione suasi ad omnia quae bona sunt adquiescunt. Quomodo autem servata omnibus rationabilibus creaturis arbitrii libertate unusquisque debeat dispensari, id est quos velut iam paratos et capaces sermo dei et inveniat et instruat, quos autem interim differat, a quibus vero penitus occultetur et longe eorum a se fieri dispenset auditum, quosque rursum contemnentes indicatum sibi et praedicatum verbum dei correptionibus quibusdam et castigationibus inlatis perurgeat ad salutem conversionemque eorum quodammodo exigat et extorqueat, quibus vero etiam occasiones quasdam praestet salutis, ita ut interdum etiam ex responsione sola fide prolata indubitatam quis ceperit salutem; quibus haec ex esusis vel quibus occasiOuibus fiant; quidve in his intro inspiciens divina sapientia, vel quos motus propositi eorum videns lucc universa dispenset, soli Deo cognitum est et Unigenito ejus, per quem creata ac reparata sunt universa, et Spiritui sancto per quem cuncta sanctilicantur. qui ab ipso Patre pro. cedit, cui est gloria in :eterna sarcula. Amen.
But this subjection will be accomplished in certain ways, by certain disciplines and at certain times; not by any necessity compelling to subjection, so that the whole world is made subject to God by force, but by word, by reason, by teaching, by the calling forth of better things, by the best instructions, and also by deserved and fitting threats, which justly hang over those who despise the care and health of their own salvation and benefit. Indeed, we human beings too, when we train servants or sons while they are still, because of their age, incapable of reason, restrain them by threats and fear; but when they have grasped an understanding of what is good, useful and honourable, then, the fear of blows having ceased, persuaded by word and reason, they consent to all that is good. But how each one ought to be dealt with, the freedom of choice being preserved to all rational creatures (that is, whom the word of God finds and instructs as already prepared and capable, whom it puts off for a time, from whom it is wholly hidden and arranges that their hearing be far from it; whom, again, when they despise the word of God shown and preached to them, it presses toward salvation by inflicting certain corrections and chastisements, and in a manner exacts and extorts their conversion; and to whom it even offers certain occasions of salvation, so that sometimes someone obtains a salvation beyond doubt even from a single answer uttered in faith); for what causes or on what occasions these things come about, or what divine wisdom, looking within, or seeing what motions of their purpose, orders all these things, is known only to God and to his Only-begotten, through whom all things were created and restored, and to the Holy Spirit, through whom all things are sanctified, who proceeds from the Father himself; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
John 15:26 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The subjection of all to God will come about not by force but by teaching, persuasion and fitting threats, in ways known only to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
- The insistence that the final subjection comes 'not by necessity … but by word, reason, teaching' keeps the free choice argued for in chapter 1.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Koetschau's edition.
Topics: Eschatology, Trinity
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.5.8 (PG 11:332b–333a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-5-1/#p-3-5-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-5-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).