Homilies on Joshua 21.1–22.6
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 21
21.1PG 12:928a–929a
Filii Juda volebant disperdere vel interimercie buszcos de Jerusalem et non potuerunt, propter quod habitarunt Jebusrei cum filiis Juda in Jerssalem usque itt hodiernum diem ”. Volumus littera incipientes inquirere ab iis qui [nutant hac secundum litteram stare posse, quid est quod dicitur ‹ usque in hodiernum diem : quod rerbum semper Scriptura pro eo ponit , ut sterni. tatem saeculi per hoc significet, sicut et dicit : Solite recedere a Domino in hodierno die, id est,donec sacculum stat. Ostendat ergo mihi quatnndo Jehusretts donec saeculum stat, habitat cum filiis Jud: itt Jerusalem, quippe cum ne°ipsi quidem lilii lui: habitent in Jerusalem. Ideo ergo nec istud veritum esse poterit, quod Jebusaai cum Judaais habitent in Jerusalem, quandoquidem ne ipsi quidem habitant in ea. Sed nos intelligamus haac spiritualiter, assumentes Evangelii parabolam quae dicit de zizanii": ‹ Sinite utraque crescere, ne forte cum vultis eradicare zizania, eradicetis simul cum ipsis etiam triticum. Sicut ergo in Evangelia permittanter zizania simul cum tritico crescere : eodem modo etiam hic in Jerusalem, id est itt Ecclesia sunt quidam Jehttswi, isti qui ignobilem et degenere vitam ducunt, qui et fide, et actibus, et omni ranversatione sua perversi stitit. Neque enim possibile est ad liquidum purgari Ecelesiam dum ir; terris est, ita ut neque impius in ea quisquam , neque peccator residere Videntur, sed sint in ea omnes Sancti et beati, et in quibus nulla prorsus peccati marsi: deprehendatur. Sed sicut dicitur de zizaniis : ‹ Si: forte cradicantcs zizania simul cum illis eradicent et triticum; ita etiam super iis dici potest, in quibus vel dubia vel occulta peccata sunt. Neque enim dicimus de iis qui manifeste et evidenter criminosi suut,ut non de Ecclesia exliellantur. Audi ergo Scripturam dicentem , quia non potuerunt filii Jnda disperdere Jebuszeos, sed habitaverunt cum ipsis in Jerusalem usque in hodiernum diem. Unde deprecor vos qui fideles estis, ut ita vitam vestram et conversationem servetis, ne in aliquo vel ipsi scan- «istum patiamini, vel aliis scandalum faciatis : sed sit vobis summi studii, summaeque cautelae ne quis in hanc sanctam congregationem vestram pollutus iutmeat, ne quis Jebuszeus habitet Vobiscum. Vides ergo quia dicit Scriptura , quod non potuerunt ejicere lilii Juda Jebuszeos de Jerusalem. Jehusaeus autem interpretatur conculcatio. Ergo quia non possumus ejicere istos qui nos conculcaut :ecs saltem ejiciamus quos possumus, quorum peccata manifesta sunt. Ubi enim peccatum non est evidens, ejicere de Ecclesia neminem possumus, ne forte eradicantes zizania, eradicemus simul cum ipsis etiam triticum.
The sons of Judah wanted to destroy or kill the Jebusites of Jerusalem and could not; therefore the Jebusites have lived with the sons of Judah in Jerusalem until this day. Beginning with the letter, we want to ask those who think these things can stand according to the letter what is meant by “until this day,” a phrase that Scripture always uses to signify the perpetuity of the age, as when it says, “Do not turn away from the Lord this day,” that is, as long as the age stands. Let him show me, then, how the Jebusite lives with the sons of Judah in Jerusalem as long as the age stands, when not even the sons of Judah themselves live in Jerusalem. Therefore this cannot be true either, that the Jebusites live with the Jews in Jerusalem, since not even the Jews live there. But let us understand these things spiritually, taking up the parable of the Gospel which says of the tares: “Let both grow, lest perhaps, when you want to root up the tares, you root up the wheat along with them.” As, then, in the Gospel the tares are allowed to grow together with the wheat, so too here in Jerusalem, that is, in the church, there are certain Jebusites, those who lead an ignoble and degenerate life and are perverse in faith, in acts, and in all their conduct. For it is not possible for the church to be cleansed completely while it is on earth, so that no ungodly person or sinner seems to remain in it, but all in it are holy and blessed, and no stain of sin at all is found in them. But as it is said of the tares, “lest perhaps, rooting up the tares, they root up the wheat with them,” so too it can be said of those in whom there are sins that are either doubtful or hidden. For we do not say of those who are manifestly and evidently criminal that they should not be expelled from the church. Hear, then, Scripture saying that the sons of Judah could not destroy the Jebusites, but lived with them in Jerusalem until this day. Hence I beseech you who are faithful so to keep your life and conduct that you neither suffer scandal in anything yourselves nor give scandal to others; but let it be your greatest zeal and your greatest care that no polluted person enter this holy assembly of yours, that no Jebusite live with you. You see, then, that Scripture says that the sons of Judah could not drive the Jebusites out of Jerusalem. And Jebusite is interpreted “trampling.” Since, then, we cannot drive out those who trample on us, let us at least drive out those we can, whose sins are manifest. For where sin is not evident, we can drive no one out of the church, lest perhaps, in rooting up the tares, we root up the wheat along with them.
Josh 15:63 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 22:16 (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 13:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:30 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:32 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Jebusites who remained in Jerusalem are the sinners who remain in the church, which cannot be wholly purified on earth; those whose sins are manifest are to be expelled, but no one whose sin is hidden, lest the wheat be uprooted with the tares.
- A passage on church discipline (Matt 13:29–30), translated as written. Part of a sentence is lost in the Migne scan. Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 21.1 (PG 12:928a–929a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-21-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-21-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
21.2PG 12:929b–930d
Movet me tamen quod dixit, quia non potuerunt ejicereJebuszeos, id est eos qui interpretantur couculcatio. Et ideo videamus qui sunt in Ecclesia conculcantes. llli sine dubio de quibus dicit Dominus in Evangeliis " : Nolite mittere sanctum neque margaritas vestras ante porcos, ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis, et conversi clidant vos. Iste est ergo Jebusazus, conculcatio, qui indigni audiunt verbum Dei, et cum audierint ο nepte ut infideles discedunt, neque permanent nt fideles, sed percepta mysteriorum notitia, fidei nostra: secretioribus scrutatis, conversi postmodum impugnant nos, et contradictionibus suis corda nostra dirumpunt, conculcanles verbi Dominici margaritas, et ornamenta fidei maculantes. De iStis ergo dicitur, quia non potuerunt filii Jud:e ejicere Jebusaium de Jerusalem usque in hodiernum diem. Simile autem aliquid scriptum est et de Ephrem; ait enim Scriptura 9‘: Et non disperdidit Ephrem Chananaznin qni habitabat iu Gazer, et habitavit Chananqu in Ephrem usque iu hodiernum diem. Ephrem autem interpretatur fructi/iratio. Qui ergo fructificat et crescit in tide,non potest exterminare Chananacum semen pessimmn , Ῑ) semen maledictum, semen semper mobile, semen incertum. Hoc enim interpretatur Chananteus. Et certum est, quia cum eo qui fructificat et crescit, semper habitat Chananzeus. Nunquam enim tentatiomnu motus cessant ab eo. Sed tu si vere lzuctiticas in Deo, et vides talem aliquem inquico tum, turbidum, mobilem, scito quia Chanamens tst. Si non potes eum ejicere de Ecclesia, quia non potuerunt filii Effrem disperdere Chananaeos, illud observa quod Apostolus commendat dicens : Subtrahite vos ab omni fratreinquieteamlmlanteM8. Sed quoniam Salomon suadet lucc quae legimus describi in corde tripliciter 9", etiam praeter illa qua: diximus , quod cordi meo occurrit, ad aures vestras proferam :ct vos facile quod scriptum est θ’, nt uno dicente omnes exatninent. Me ergo dicente quod sentio, vos discernite et examinate si quid rectum est ant minus rectum. De Jerusalem frequenter diximus quod visio pacis interpretatur. Si ergo in corde nostro Jerusalem astiiticata , hoc est, si visio pacis in corde nostro fundata est, et Christum semper quiest pax nostra, intuemur et servamus in corde : siquidem ita fixi et stabiles in hac visione pacis, ut tuinquam prorsus ulla cogitatio mala, vel alicujus peccati consilium ascendat in cor nostrum; si hoc ita fieri possit, poterimus dicere, quia in Jerusalem sumus, et nullus alius habitat nobiscum , nisi soli qui sancti sunt. Nunc vero cum etiam ad grandem profectum veniamus , et summis nosmetipsos studiis excolamus , tamen non puto cuiquam tantum in corde puritatis evenire, ut nunquam adversa: cogitationis contagione maculeturzcertum est etiam Jebusazos habitare cum filiis Juda in Jerusalem. Non tamen ideo inec diximus, quod negligamus quantum lieri potest ejicere eos, sed sati! agendum nobis est, et tentandum quotidie eos ejicere de Jerusalem : sed , sicut scriptum est, non possumus simul omnes ejicere. Hoc idem autent etiam in iis qui fructificant sentiendum est, qui Ephrem filii nominantur, qui et ipsi Cliananaros, id est vagas et lubricas cogitationes semper debent ejicere de animabus suis. Potens est autem Deus, qui et Jebuszeos ct Chananzeos subjiciat nobis, sicut scriptum est ‘:cSubjecit autem Chanameos liliis Ephremalpsum ergo Dominum deprecemur, ut ejiciens a nobis malas cogitationes. bonas inferat (8'2), dignas Jerusalem civitate coelesti, in quibus nihil pollutum inveniatur et sordidum , quod nos in die judicii ex conscientia: cogitationibus arguat, sed inveniatur in nobis puritas cordis in Christo Jesu Domino nostro, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula smculorum.
Yet I am moved by his saying that they could not drive out the Jebusites, that is, those whose name is interpreted “trampling.” And so let us see who the tramplers in the church are. Undoubtedly those of whom the Lord says in the Gospels: “Do not give what is holy, nor cast your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you.” This, then, is the Jebusite, the trampler: those who hear the word of God unworthily, and when they have heard it, neither depart as unbelievers nor remain as believers, but, having gained knowledge of the mysteries and searched out the more secret things of our faith, afterwards turn and attack us, and by their contradictions burst our hearts, trampling on the pearls of the Lord’s word and staining the ornaments of the faith. It is of these, then, that it is said that the sons of Judah could not drive the Jebusite out of Jerusalem until this day. Something similar is written of Ephraim too; for Scripture says: “And Ephraim did not destroy the Canaanite who lived in Gezer, and the Canaanite has lived in Ephraim until this day.” Ephraim is interpreted “fruitfulness.” He, then, who bears fruit and grows in faith cannot exterminate the Canaanite, the most wicked seed, the cursed seed, the ever-shifting seed, the unstable seed; for this is what Canaanite is interpreted. And it is certain that the Canaanite always lives with one who bears fruit and grows, for the motions of temptation never leave him. But if you truly bear fruit in God and see someone of this kind, restless, turbulent, unstable, know that he is a Canaanite. If you cannot drive him out of the church, because “the sons of Ephraim could not destroy the Canaanites,” observe what the Apostle commends, saying: “Withdraw from every brother who walks in idleness.” But since Solomon urges that what we read be written in the heart threefold, besides what we have said I will bring to your ears what occurs to my heart; and you, do what is written, that when one speaks, all examine. So when I say what I think, you discern and examine whether anything is right or less right. Of Jerusalem we have often said that it is interpreted “vision of peace.” If, then, Jerusalem is built in our heart, that is, if the vision of peace is founded in our heart, and we always behold and keep in our heart Christ, who is our peace; if we are so fixed and stable in this vision of peace that no evil thought or plan for any sin ever rises into our heart — if this can be so, we shall be able to say that we are in Jerusalem and that no one else lives with us except those who are holy. But now, even when we come to great progress and cultivate ourselves with the greatest zeal, I still do not think that such purity of heart comes to anyone that he is never stained by the contagion of a hostile thought: it is certain that the Jebusites too live with the sons of Judah in Jerusalem. Yet we have not said this so that we may neglect to drive them out as far as possible; rather we must take pains and try daily to drive them out of Jerusalem; but, as it is written, we cannot drive them all out at once. The same must be thought of those who bear fruit, who are called sons of Ephraim; they too must always drive the Canaanites, that is, wandering and slippery thoughts, out of their souls. And God is able to subject both Jebusites and Canaanites to us, as it is written: “And he subjected the Canaanites to the sons of Ephraim.” Let us, then, pray to the Lord himself that he may drive evil thoughts out of us and bring in good ones, worthy of Jerusalem, the heavenly city, in which nothing polluted and filthy may be found that might convict us on the day of judgment by the thoughts of our conscience, but that purity of heart may be found in us in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom is glory and dominion for ages of ages.
Josh 15:63 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 7:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 16:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Thess 3:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 22:20 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 14:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 2:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 7:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 2:15 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Jebusites, “tramplers,” are those who learn the church’s mysteries and then turn against it; the Canaanites left in Ephraim are the unstable who trouble the fruitful; inwardly, both are evil and wandering thoughts that must be driven out of the heart daily.
- The Migne scan loses words after “because.” Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition. Prov 22:20 in the Greek Bible (“write them threefold”) was Origen’s basis for a threefold sense of Scripture.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s marginal Scripture reference printed into the line): xvt , l0. → .
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 21.2 (PG 12:929b–930d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-21-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-21-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
Chapter 22
22.1PG 12:930d–931b
Chananrei tertio dicti sunt in filiis esse Ephrem ε sed observemus qui sit in singulis ordo dictorum , id est, quid continet primus sermo qui dicit Chanauazos esse cum filiis Ephrem, et quid secundus et tertius. Si enim diligentius observemus quomodo tertio dicantur esse Chananmi cum filiis Ephrem, et, Domino prasstante, poterimus investigare ordiquid in tertio factum refertur : puto quod non erimus increduli, quia vere hare non ut sola nobis rerum gestarum narratio traderetur, scripta sunt, sed sacramentis divinis Dcoque dignis repleta. Primo ergo dictum est , t quia non perdidit Ephrem Chauaua‘um qui habitatin Gazer, sed habitat Chananeus itt Ephrem usque in hodiernum diem, et factus est suh tributo servus usquequo ascendit Pharao rex Egypti et accepit civitatem, et incendit eam igni, et (Iliauauzeos, et Pherczzros, etqui habitabant in Gazer trucidavit, et dedit eam Pharao in dotem filiae suae. Secundo: ς Et factum est, iuquit', quoniam iuvaluerunt lilii Israel, et fecerunt Chananzeos subjectos, exterminatione autem non exterruinaveruut eos. Tertio , quando contradixerunt viri de tribu Ephrem Jesu, volentes secundum nurnerositatetu suam , quia plures erant et validi, majorem accipere etiam litereditatis sortem; et jubentnr ascendere in saltum , ct sibi ipsis ampliorem locum capere; et ut possint latiora spatia occupare,juhentur exterminare Cliauanzeum
The Canaanites are said three times to be among the sons of Ephraim; but let us observe what the order of the statements is in each case, that is, what the first statement contains, which says that the Canaanites are with the sons of Ephraim, and what the second and third contain. For if we observe more carefully how the Canaanites are said three times to be with the sons of Ephraim, and if, by the Lord’s gift, we can investigate the order and what is related as done the third time, I think we shall not be unbelieving that these things were truly written not merely so that a narrative of events might be handed down to us, but that they are filled with divine sacraments worthy of God. First, then, it was said that “Ephraim did not destroy the Canaanite who lived in Gezer, but the Canaanite lives in Ephraim until this day, and became a slave under tribute, until Pharaoh king of Egypt went up and took the city and burned it with fire, and slaughtered the Canaanites and the Perizzites and those who lived in Gezer, and Pharaoh gave it as a dowry to his daughter.” Second: “And it came to pass,” it says, “when the sons of Israel grew strong, that they made the Canaanites subject, but they did not utterly exterminate them.” Third, when the men of the tribe of Ephraim spoke against Jesus, wanting to receive a larger lot of inheritance in proportion to their numbers, because they were many and strong; and they are told to go up into the forest and take a larger place for themselves; and, so that they may occupy wider spaces, they are told to exterminate the Canaanite.
Josh 16:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 9:16 (allusion, medium confidence) · Josh 17:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 17:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 17:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 17:18 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The three statements about the Canaanites living among the sons of Ephraim follow an order that holds a divine meaning.
- The account of Pharaoh’s taking of Gezer is in Origen’s Greek Bible at Josh 16:10 (compare 1 Kgs 9:16).
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 22.1 (PG 12:930d–931b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-22-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-22-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
22.2PG 12:931b
Videamus ergo nunc quid sibi velit(8:£) lizec de Chanantcis tripartita narratio. Primo Clianatueus nobiscum est quidem, et sub tributo est, non cst tamen obediens nobis, neque servus. Secundo etiam servus cilicitur et obediens. Chanauzeum hic carnem nostram accipiamus, vel ea quae carnis sunt. Haec primo nobiscum est, hoc est anima: juncta est, sed non obediens, nisi tantum quod tributa dependet : id est ministerium quidem agendi aliquid exhibet, vel movendi; concupiscit tamen adversus spiritum et non est obediens animae, sed suis desideriis cedit. Si vero jam aliquantum profecerimus, elIicitnr nobis caro servus, et obediens ac parens anima: voluntati. Et iste est. secundus anima: profectus, cum sibi carnem et servire fecerit et obedire. Tertium vero est, quod perfectum est. Si enim jam veniamus ad perfectum, etiam exterminandus nobis dicitur Chananazus, et morti tradendus. Quomodo autem hoc iu nostra carne completur, audi apostolum Paulum dicentem δε Mortificate membra vestra quae sunt super terram, furnicationem, imtnui‘tditiam, et caetera qum se- quae an Et ite- rum dieit: qui autem sunt Christi, carnem suam crucifixerunt eum vitiis et eoncupiscentise. Sie ergo tertio, hoc est cum ad perfectio- nem venimus et membra nostra mortificamus ac mortem Christi in corpore nostro eircumferimus , exterminari a nobis dieitur Chana- naeus“. -
Let us see now, then, what this threefold account of the Canaanites means. At first the Canaanite is indeed with us and under tribute, yet he is not obedient to us, nor a slave. Second, he is also made a slave and obedient. Let us take the Canaanite here to be our flesh, or the things that belong to the flesh. At first it is with us, that is, joined to the soul, but not obedient, except only that it pays tribute: that is, it provides the service of doing or moving something; yet it lusts against the spirit and does not obey the soul, but gives way to its own desires. But if we have now made some progress, the flesh becomes our slave, obedient and submissive to the will of the soul. And this is the second advance of the soul, when it has made the flesh both serve and obey it. But the third is what is perfect. For if we now come to perfection, the Canaanite is said to be exterminated by us as well and handed over to death. And how this is fulfilled in our flesh, hear the apostle Paul saying: “Put to death your members that are on the earth: sexual immorality, uncleanness,” and the rest that follow. And again he says: “And those who belong to Christ have crucified their flesh with its vices and desires.” So, then, the third time, that is, when we come to perfection, put our members to death, and carry about the death of Christ in our body, the Canaanite is said to be exterminated by us.
Gal 5:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 3:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:10 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Canaanite is the flesh, which first only pays tribute, then becomes obedient, and finally, in the perfect, is put to death with its vices.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 22.2 (PG 12:931b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-22-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-22-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
22.3PG 12:932a–932b
5._Scd et illud non otiose praetereundum est, quod dicitur Pharao venisse et accepisse civitatem Gazer, in qua Chananmus habitabat cum Ephrem, ct dedisse eam in dotem filia: sua. Gazer autem interpretatur constructio. Si erga corpus et anima in una atque eadem construction: habitent, id est conjuncta: sibi invicem et socia, ita ut corpus carnaliter vivat, et non festinet animi velocius sibi obedientem et subditam facere carnem, verendnm est ne veniat Pharao ex AZgyptc, et captivam ducat infelicem animam, ita ut in da. tem eam tradat filiae suae. Si enim consideres illul quod dixit Apostolus , exsurgere aliam legem in membris nostris, et captivos nos ducere iu tege peccati, invenies quomodo ille Pharao, qui cstasctor et rex peccati, filiae sua}, quae est lex peccati, animam quae carnaliter vixerit, in dotem coacti. bit.
But this too must not be passed over idly, that Pharaoh is said to have come and taken the city of Gezer, in which the Canaanite lived with Ephraim, and to have given it as a dowry to his daughter. Gezer is interpreted “building.” If, then, the body and the soul live in one and the same building, that is, joined and allied with each other, so that the body lives carnally and the soul does not hasten more quickly to make the flesh obedient and subject to itself, it is to be feared that Pharaoh may come from Egypt and lead the unhappy soul captive, so as to hand it over as a dowry to his daughter. For if you consider what the Apostle said, that another law rises up in our members and leads us captive in the law of sin, you will find how that Pharaoh, who is the author and king of sin, will force the soul that has lived carnally to be given as a dowry to his daughter, who is the law of sin.
Josh 16:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 7:23 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Pharaoh’s taking of Gezer, “building,” and giving it to his daughter warns that a soul which lets the body live carnally will be led captive to the law of sin.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 22.3 (PG 12:932a–932b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-22-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-22-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
22.4PG 12:932b–933a
Post lucc etiam hoc videndum est, quod Joseph quzestionem movent de litereditate, magorem sortem requirunt,dicentes ad Jesum : ‹ Qum nobis dedisti haereditatis sortem unam, et pcdaturam unam? Ego autem p0pulus inultus su. Dominus benedixit me. Si ergo et nos simus multus, et benedicat nos Dominus, auditmus ab Jesu : Populus multus es, ascende ὴ saltum, et munda tibi ipsi, ct para locum interra. Expurga l’herczmos et Raphaim. Necessecst ergo nos ejiCcre l‘herezmos. Invenimus autem Piltrezaeos interpretari [ructificationem. Sed, sicut sznpe jam diximus de aliis nominibus, in lac duplex est interpretatio. Est etenim fructibus: bona et fructificatio mala, sicut in Evangeliis tiesignatur ὀ, quia t arbor bona bonos fructus facs. et arbor mala malos fructus facit. nos expellere omne quidquid non bene fructificzt. et abscindere fructum pecccati, et expurgare frvctus injustitite. Sed et Raphaim, inquit, expetit, Vpotius expurga de te. ltaphaim invenimus interpretatum resoluta mater. Est in anima nostra virtus quietiam, quze parit sensus, et velut nam cst eorum sensuum vel intellectuum, qui procedat: e nobis, secundum quod dicitur in sacramento .83" ο de anima quasi de muliere “ :t Salva autemeritpé.‘ filiorum generationem, si permanserit in fide et terilate. istae ergo matres, hoc est ista virtus aratnrc, illis in quibus fortis est et valida ac robusta. generat sensus validos et potentes, et qui supra-a contradicente non possint. ln aliis quidem virtus ista resoluta est et remissa, quod indicatur ex sensibus cum languidi quidam proferuntur et inepti, et nihil in se fortitudinis continentes. lloe ergo significatur sub nomine Raphaim ut hujuscemodi de nobis matres remissas, quae sensus ineruditos et inutiles pariunt, expurgemus. Et bene servavit spiritalis intelligentia: proprietatem. Non enim dixit interminandos Raphaim, sed expurgandus. Non enim ipsos naturales anima: motus evertere atque exterminare praecipitur, sed eitpurgare, id est sordes et immunditias, qum eis ex nostra negligentia advenerunt, purgare atque depellere, ttt naturalis ejus vigor propriae atque ingenitae virtutis eflulgeat.
After this we must also note that the sons of Joseph raise a question about the inheritance and seek a larger lot, saying to Jesus: “Why have you given us one lot of inheritance and one portion? But I am a great people; the Lord has blessed me.” If, then, we too are a great people and the Lord blesses us, we shall hear from Jesus: “You are a great people; go up into the forest and clear it for yourself, and prepare a place in the land. Clear out the Perizzites and the Rephaim.” We must, then, drive out the Perizzites. And we find that Perizzites is interpreted “fruitfulness.” But, as we have often said of other names, there is a double interpretation in this one. For there is a good fruitfulness and an evil fruitfulness, as is indicated in the Gospels, that “a good tree bears good fruit, and an evil tree bears evil fruit.” We must, then, drive out from ourselves everything that does not bear fruit well, cut off the fruit of sin, and clear out the fruits of injustice. “And the Rephaim,” it says, “clear out,” or rather, clear them out from yourself. We find Rephaim interpreted “a mother loosened.” There is in our soul a power that also gives birth to thoughts, and is, as it were, the mother of the thoughts or understandings that proceed from us, according to what is said in a mystery of the soul as of a woman: “But she will be saved through childbearing, if she remains in faith and chastity.” These mothers, then, that is, this generative power, in those in whom it is strong, vigorous, and robust, generates strong and powerful thoughts that cannot be overcome by an opponent. But in others this power is loosened and slack, as is shown by their thoughts, when some weak and inept thoughts are brought forth that have no strength in them. This, then, is signified under the name of Rephaim: that we should clear out from ourselves such slack mothers, which give birth to untrained and useless thoughts. And the spiritual understanding has kept the exact sense well. For it did not say that the Rephaim were to be exterminated, but cleared out. For we are not commanded to overturn and exterminate the natural movements of the soul themselves, but to clear them out, that is, to purge and drive away the filth and uncleanness that have come upon them through our negligence, so that the natural vigor of their own inborn power may shine forth.
Josh 17:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 17:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:15 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Joseph’s sons are told to clear the Perizzites, evil “fruitfulness,” and the Rephaim, the “loosened mother,” the soul’s slack power that bears feeble thoughts, which must be purified, not destroyed.
- The interpretations of the names are Origen’s. 1 Tim 2:15 is applied to the soul as the “mother” of thoughts. Migne’s marginal references printed into the line have been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s marginal Scripture references printed into the line): :17 Rom. vit, 2‘5. Coloss. → .
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 22.4 (PG 12:932b–933a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-22-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-22-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
22.5PG 12:933b
Post haec addunt adhuc filii Ephrem, ei dicunt " : Non sullicit nobis mons, et equus electus, et ferrum Chanaan est qui habitat in me. Nunquam invenies qui equum habeat lsraelitam, sed Chananzeus habet illum equum, qui falsus est ad salutem. Habet et ferrum bellicum Chananaeus. Sed quid respondit illis Jesus? ‹ Si populus multus es tu, et virtutem habens, non erit tibi sors una, quia saltus est tibi, et emundahis eum . Vides quid ad nos per spiritalem intelligentiamdicitur, ut emundemus silvam quae itt nobis est, et excidentes inutiles et infructuosas ex nobismetipsis arbores, faciamus ibi novalia quae semper innovemus, et ex quibus fructum capiamus tricesimum et sexagesimum et centesimum? Annon eadem nobis Evangelii sermo denuntiat, dicens ιδ : ί Eecejam securis posita est ad radicem arboris ? Omnis ergo arbor quae non all‘ert fructum, excidetur, etin ignem mittetur. Haec prioribus nostris Nave filius praecepit Jesus de infructuosis arboribus excidendis, haec nobis Dominus Jesus in Evangeliis mandata describit : et quornudo non verum est quod umbra praecessit et veritas secuta est?
After this the sons of Ephraim say to him further: “The mountain is not enough for us, and the Canaanite who lives in me has chosen horses and iron.” You will never find an Israelite who has a horse; but the Canaanite has that horse which is a vain hope for safety. The Canaanite also has the iron of war. But what did Jesus answer them? “If you are a great people and have strength, you shall not have one lot, because the forest is yours, and you shall clear it.” You see what is said to us through the spiritual understanding: that we should clear the forest that is within us, and, cutting down the useless and fruitless trees from ourselves, make there a newly broken field that we may always renew, and from which we may gather fruit thirtyfold, sixtyfold, and a hundredfold? Does not the word of the Gospel announce the same thing to us, saying: “Behold, the axe is already laid to the root of the tree; every tree, then, that does not bear fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire”? This is what Jesus the son of Nun commanded our forefathers about cutting down fruitless trees; this is what the Lord Jesus sets down for us as commands in the Gospels: and how is it not true that the shadow went before and the truth followed?
Josh 17:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 33:17 (32:17 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 17:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 17:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 4:3 (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 13:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 10:1 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Joseph’s sons are told to clear the forest, which signifies cutting down fruitless trees in the soul so that it may bear fruit, as the Gospel’s axe at the root also teaches.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 22.5 (PG 12:933b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-22-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-22-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
22.6PG 12:933b–934b
~Quid autem est quod addidit Jesus : Si emundaveris, inquit , silvam, erit tibi cum exterminaveris Chananzeum? Diximus jam superius quomodo nobiscum. positus Chananaeus, primo tantum tributa dependet, secundo obediens cilicitur et subjectus, tertio vero itt membrorum noatrorum tuortilicatione etiant exterminari dicitur. Qure si recte intelligimus, et donavit nobis Dominus per gratiam suam ita haec intelligere, sit aliquid opera: pretii haec de secretis et absconditis in publicum produxisse, et venisse ad agnitionem nostram, quae servabantur obtecta; et conemur sccundum haec quae diximus, Chananaeum qui nobiscum est, citius subjicere nobis, et obedientem facere, post hazc etiam exterminare; quia, si dimittimus eum et negligimus, veniet Pharao ex Egypto, et incipiet locum nostrum in dotem dare filiae suae, et captivos nos tradere legi peccati. Sed absit hoc ab Israelitica nobilitate, ut serviat filiae Pharaonis Israelita, quem jam Deus eduxit de terra IEgypti, iterum serviat illi, qui in mari Rubro submersus est, Pharaoni l Observemus ergo sicut et hic dicit Jesus, ut prrevaleamus nos contra Chananaeos : ne si forte illi invaluerint super nos et obtinuerint nos, de lsraeliticis Chananaeos nos faciant, sicut et ille effectus est, quem superaverat carnis illecebra, cui dicitur a pmphela ” : Semen Chanaan, etnon .luda, species seduxit te. Non eveniat ergo nobis audire semen Chanaan, quia ‹ maledictus Chanaan puer servus erit fratribus suis . Nobis autem praestet Dominus, ut filii simus Abraham, et Isaac, et Jacob, secundum promissionem haeredes, et ub hoe ex lapidibus suscitati, ut simus filii Abraham a Christo Jesu Dominu nostro, cui est gloria et imperium in sarcula Saeculorum. Arnen.
And what is it that Jesus added: “If you clear the forest,” he says, “it will be yours, when you have exterminated the Canaanite”? We have already said above how the Canaanite who lives with us first only pays tribute, second becomes obedient and subject, and third, in the putting to death of our members, is even said to be exterminated. If we understand these things rightly, and the Lord has granted us by his grace to understand them in this way, it may be something worthwhile to have brought these things out of their secret and hidden places into public view, and that what was kept covered has come to our knowledge. And let us try, according to what we have said, quickly to subject to ourselves the Canaanite who is with us and make him obedient, and after this also to exterminate him; because if we let him be and neglect him, Pharaoh will come from Egypt and begin to give our place as a dowry to his daughter and to hand us over captive to the law of sin. But far be it from the nobility of Israel that an Israelite should serve the daughter of Pharaoh — that one whom God has already brought out of the land of Egypt should serve again that Pharaoh who was drowned in the Red Sea! Let us take care, then, as Jesus says here too, that we prevail against the Canaanites; lest, if perhaps they prevail over us and overcome us, they make us Canaanites instead of Israelites, as happened to that man whom the allurement of the flesh had overcome, to whom the prophet says: “Seed of Canaan and not of Judah, beauty has seduced you.” Let it not befall us, then, to hear “seed of Canaan,” because “cursed be Canaan; a servant shall he be to his brothers.” But may the Lord grant us to be sons of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, heirs according to the promise, and for this raised up from stones, so that we may be sons of Abraham through Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom is glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Josh 17:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 15:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 9:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 3:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:9 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Canaanite flesh must be subdued and finally exterminated, lest the soul fall captive to Pharaoh, the law of sin, and become a “seed of Canaan” instead of a child of Abraham.
- The words “Seed of Canaan and not of Judah, beauty has seduced you” are from Susanna 56 (Daniel’s rebuke of one of the elders). Migne’s marginal references and apparatus printed into the text have been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s marginal references and apparatus notes printed into the word): nobis- xvn. l6. Levit. xvr, 8, ll). Omnes mss. ‹ naturales. › Libb. editi : nam igi'iOCiidex Sangerm. cum uno Ebroic. in me. cum est → nobiscum est.
Extrabiblical texts: Sus 56 (Susanna [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 22.6 (PG 12:933b–934b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/21-1/#p-22-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-22-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.