Homilies on Leviticus 5.12
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 5
5.12PG 12:463b–466a
Post haec “ : t Et loeutus est Dominus ad Moysen ,dicens :Filiis Israel loquere dicens : Qui ofl‘ert sacrificium salutaris sui Domino, ull'eret utuntts suum Domino in sacrificio salutaris sui. Manus cj'ts offerent Itostiam Domino, adipem qui super pectusculum est, et pinnam jecoris : ofi'cret ea ita, nt ponatur donum contra Dominum. Et imponet sacerdos adipem, qui est Super pectusculum, super altare, et erit peetusculum Aaron et filiis ejus, et ε brachium dextrum dabitis separationem sacerdoti a sacrificiis salutaribus vestris. Qui offert sanguinem salutaris, et adipem ex filiis Aaron, ipsi erit brachium dextrum in parte; pectusculum enim itupositionis, et brachium detnptionis accepi a filiis Israel a sacrificiis salutaribus vestris, et dedi ea Aaron sacerdoti, et filiis ejus, legitimum :eternum filiis Israel. Hoc est sacrificium quod dicitur salutare. Quod sacrificium nemo oflert Domino, nisi qui sanus est, et salutis suae conscius, gratias Domino refert. Nemo ergo qui aeger est animo, et Ianguidus in operibus, offerre potest sacrificium sa- Iulare. Vis videre quia nemo aeger et languidus potest illud offerre sacrificium? chrosus ille, quem in Evangelio Dominus curasse describitur °’, non poterat ofi‘erre hostiam, donec lepra: wgritudine tenebatur. Cum autem accessit ad Jesum, et mundatus est, tuncjubetur eia Domino ofi‘erre munera ad altare, σ quod praecepit, inquit “, Moyses in iestimoniutn illis. Audisti quis sit, qui offerre debet hostiam salutaris, audi nunc quomodo debeatofferre. Manus, inquit, ejus ofi‘erent hostiam Domino. Nunquid non evidenter clamat legislator, quia nou homo estqui otfert hostiam, sed. manus ejus, id est opera ejus? Opera namque sunt, quae connttendant hostiam Deo. Si enim attracta sit rnantts tua ad dandum, et expansa ad accipiendum, intra te est adhuc lepra tua, et offerre non potes hostiam salutaris. Manus ergo ejus offerent sacrificium salutaris, et manus ejus offerent ea, qure Domino offerenda sunt, id cst adipem qui super pectusculum est, et pinnam jecoris. lu hoc Ioco ubi nos habemus, t manus ejus ofi‘ereut hostiam Domino, ο in Graecis ltaheturpro hostia quod intelligitur omnem fructtnn : per quod ostendit non posse Domino offerre onmem fructum cum qui infructuosus est, qui non afI'crt fructum justitize, fructum misericordias, vel etiam fruetus Spiritus, quos enumerat Apostolus “, charitatem, gandium, pacem, patientiam, unanimitatem, et caetera his similia. Unde et iu alio loco Propheta dicit “ : ‹ Et holocaustum tuttm pingue fiat. 0ffert ergo adipes, qui super pectusculum sunt, et pinnam jecoris, qua! superponantur altari. De adipibus saepe jam diximus. Quod autem dicit, adipes qtti super pectuSculumsunt,pectusculum tuum iutcllige esse cor tuum, de quo tibi auferendae sunt omnes mala: cogitationes; inde enim procedunt, et altaris igni tradendae sunt, ut possit cor luunt mundum effectum Deum videre. Sed et pinnam jecoris praecepit offerendam. Diximus et ante, laceris pinnam, loca iracundia:, vel cupiditatis expotti; oll‘ert enim pinnam jecoris, qui ex se omne ritium ira: et furoris excidit. Adipes ergo qui sunt pectusculum,imponuntur altari, ipsum vero peetusculttm, Aaron et filiis ejus. Sed et brachium dextrum separari praecepit, et esse eis muneris loco ex sacrificio salutari. Vide quibus muneribus honoratur sacerdos. Pectusculum accipit, et brachium, sed brachium dextrum. Putantus non esse aliquid rationis, quod ex omnibus membris animalium, qua: iugulantur in sacrificiis, haec potissimum membra delecta sint? Ego puto quod si quis dicit se esse sacerdotem Dei, nisi habeat pectus ex omnibus membris electum, non est sacerdos; ct‘nisi habeat brachium dextrum, non potest ascendere ad altare Domini, nec sacerdos nominari. Quod ergo est sacerdotis pectus, aut quale? Tale ego puto esse, quod plenum sit sapientia, plenum scientia, pleno omni divina intelligentia; et quid dico plenum intelligentia? imo quod plenum sit Deo, quale estet brachium sacerdotis quod ei offerunt filii Israel pro salute sua qua salvantur. Forma: sunt singula ista qua- scribuntur in lege, eorum quae itt Ecclesia geri debeant. Alioquin nec fuisset necessarium legi haec in Ecclesia, nisi ex his aedificatio aliqua audientibus prmberetur. Si ergo sacerdos Ecclesia per verba, et doctrinam, et multam sollicitudinem suam, et laborem vigiliarum, convertere potuerit peccatorern, et docere eum, ut meliorem viam sequatur, ut ad timorem Dei redeat, cogitet spem futuram, a malis actibus desinat, et convertatur ad honos; si, inquam, tale opus fecerit, consequens est,eum, qui ipsius labore salvatur, Deo gratias agere, et olferre hostiam salutaris, pro eo quod salutem consecutus sit. In qua hostia pars efilcitur sacerdotis, pectusculurn et brachium dexrrum : ut sit indicium quod pectus ejus et cor quod ante mala cogitabat, sacerdotis labore conversum, recepit cogitationes bonas, et ita mundatum est, ut etiam Deum possit videre. Similiter et in brachio illo indicium est, quod mala ejus opera et sinistra, quae sunt‘utiquc prava, et non bona, convertit in dextra, ut essent secundum Deum; et hoc est dextrum brachium, in quo pars esse dicitur sacerdotis. Sed et vos deprecamur, qui haec auditis, detis peetuscula, offeratis pectora vestra sacerdOtibus Dei, ut auferant ex his omne quod crassum est, ut sacerdotalem eam faciant portionem. Date nobis etiam brachia, sed dextra a vobis poscimus brachia : sinistrum nihil volumus, dextra a vobis opera requirimus. Sed et hoc quod addit peetusculum dici appositionis et brachium dernptionis, non mihi sine causa dictum videtur. Et ideo velim requirere quid est quod apponendum est ad pectusculum, ut fiat pectusculurn appositionis. Posteaquam ablatum fuerit acorde tuo omne quod crassum est, et emundatnm fuerit ab omni operimento, vel inquinamento, quod igni tradendum est, restat ut apponatur ei gratia Spiritus sancti, et tunc fiet pectusculum appositionis, sedet brachium separationis, sive demptionis. Quomodo erit et brachium separationis? Si scias, et intelligas discernere quae sint opera lucis, et quae sint opera tenebrarum, et separes actus tuos de tenebris, ut sint Opera tua in lumine, brachium tuum elficitur brachium separationis; vel cum separaveris te ab onmi fratre inquiete ambulante; vel certe cum secundum prophetam separant se, et exeunt de medio peccatorum, qui portant vasa Domini. Denique vernacula quadam consuetudine Scripturae, commune esse dicitur quod immundum est. Sicut et ad Petrum vox de dicit“; Quod Deus mundavit, tu commune ne dixeris. Consequenter ergo si idquod immundum est, corumuue appellatur, quod sancturu est, nominabitur separatum. Sed et illud addimus. Si quis Dei solius servus est, communis non potest dici. Si quis autem communis est. dubium non estquod multorum sit, et ideo communis dicatur. Grande estin hoc sermone mysterium, quod Israel secunduru carnem in usu/sensum quidem habet, sed intellectum non habet. Communem dicunt et illi hominem innnunduru, sed cur communis dicatur, ignorant. Discant ergo ab Ecclesia, quia qui sanctus est, solius Dei est, et cum nullo ei communio cst. Qui autem pec- ’ cator est etimnruudus, multorum est. Multi enim daimoues possident eum, et ideo communis appellatur. Denique et ille qui in Evangeliis a Domino curatus est, cum interrogatus esset, Quod tibi nomen est? dixit : Legio, multi enim sumus . llaec licet in excessu quodam, necessario tamen addita videntur, ut mysterium pcetusculi appositionis, et brachii separatiouis, quare scriptum sit dissereremus, quae est acterna portio sacerdotibus data, in qua dignos nos facere dignetur, ut per cordis puritatem, et operum probitatem, in divino sacrificio habere participium mereamur, per aeternum pontificem Dominum et Salvator-em nostrum Jesum Christum, per quem est Deo Patri cum Spll'lltl sancto gloria ct imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
After this: “And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Speak to the children of Israel, saying: He who offers the sacrifice of his peace offering to the Lord shall bring his gift to the Lord from the sacrifice of his peace offering. His hands shall offer the victim to the Lord: the fat which is on the breast, and the lobe of the liver; he shall offer them so that the gift is placed before the Lord. And the priest shall lay the fat which is on the breast on the altar, and the breast shall be Aaron's and his sons'; and the right shoulder you shall give as a portion set apart for the priest from your peace offerings. He among the sons of Aaron who offers the blood of the peace offering and the fat, to him shall belong the right shoulder as a portion; for the breast of the laying-on and the shoulder of the taking-away I have taken from the children of Israel from your peace offerings, and have given them to Aaron the priest and to his sons, a perpetual ordinance for the children of Israel.” This is the sacrifice which is called the peace offering. This sacrifice no one offers to the Lord except one who is healthy and, conscious of his salvation, gives thanks to the Lord. No one, then, who is sick in soul and feeble in works can offer the peace offering. Do you wish to see that no one sick and feeble can offer that sacrifice? The leper whom the Lord is described in the Gospel as having cured could not offer a victim while he was held by the sickness of leprosy. But when he approached Jesus and was cleansed, then he is commanded by the Lord to offer gifts at the altar, “which Moses commanded,” he says, “as a testimony to them.” You have heard who it is that ought to offer the peace offering; hear now how he ought to offer it. “His hands,” it says, “shall offer the victim to the Lord.” Does not the lawgiver clearly cry out that it is not the man who offers the victim, but his hands, that is, his works? For it is works that commend the victim to God. For if your hand is drawn back from giving and stretched out to receive, your leprosy is still within you, and you cannot offer the peace offering. His hands, then, shall offer the peace offering, and his hands shall offer what is to be offered to the Lord, that is, the fat which is on the breast, and the lobe of the liver. In this place, where we have “his hands shall offer the victim to the Lord,” in the Greek there is, instead of “victim”, a word which is understood as “the whole fruit”: by which he shows that one who is fruitless cannot offer the whole fruit to the Lord, one who does not bring the fruit of righteousness, the fruit of mercy, or also the fruits of the Spirit which the Apostle enumerates: love, joy, peace, patience, unanimity, and the rest like these. Hence in another place too the prophet says: “And may your burnt offering be fat.” He offers, then, the fat which is on the breast, and the lobe of the liver, to be laid on the altar. Of fat we have often spoken already. And as to his saying “the fat which is on the breast”, understand your breast to be your heart, from which all evil thoughts must be removed from you; for from there they proceed; and they must be given to the fire of the altar, so that your heart, made clean, may see God. And he commanded the lobe of the liver also to be offered. We explained before too that the lobe of the liver is the seat of anger or of desire; for he offers the lobe of the liver who cuts out of himself every vice of anger and fury. The fat, then, which is on the breast is laid on the altar, but the breast itself is Aaron's and his sons'. And he commanded the right shoulder too to be set apart, and to be for them in place of a gift from the peace offering. See with what gifts the priest is honoured. He receives the breast and the shoulder, but the right shoulder. Do we think there is no reason why, out of all the members of the animals that are slaughtered in sacrifices, these members especially were chosen? I think that if anyone says he is a priest of God, unless he has a breast chosen out of all the members, he is not a priest; and unless he has a right shoulder, he cannot go up to the altar of the Lord nor be called a priest. What, then, is the priest's breast, or of what kind? I think it is such that it is full of wisdom, full of knowledge, full of all divine understanding; and why do I say full of understanding? Rather, that it is full of God. Such too is the shoulder of the priest which the children of Israel offer him for their salvation, by which they are saved. Each of these things that are written in the law are forms of what ought to be done in the church. Otherwise it would not have been necessary for these things to be read in the church, unless some edification were offered from them to the hearers. If, then, the priest of the church, by words and teaching and his great solicitude and the labour of vigils, has been able to convert a sinner and teach him to follow a better way, to return to the fear of God, to think of the hope to come, to cease from evil deeds and turn to good ones; if, I say, he has done such a work, it follows that the one who is saved by his labour should give thanks to God and offer the peace offering, because he has obtained salvation. In this victim the priest's portion becomes the breast and the right shoulder: so that it may be a sign that his breast and heart, which before thought evil things, converted by the priest's labour, has received good thoughts and has been so cleansed that it can even see God. Likewise in that shoulder there is a sign that he has turned his evil and left-handed works, which were certainly depraved and not good, into right-handed ones, so that they might be according to God; and this is the right shoulder, in which the priest's portion is said to be. And we beseech you too who hear these things: give your breasts, offer your hearts to the priests of God, so that they may remove from them all that is gross and make them the priestly portion. Give us also your shoulders, but it is right shoulders we ask of you: we want nothing left-handed; we require right-handed works of you. And what he adds, that it is called the breast of the laying-on and the shoulder of the taking-away, does not seem to me said without reason. And so I should like to ask what it is that must be laid on the breast, so that it becomes the breast of the laying-on. After all that is gross has been removed from your heart, and it has been cleansed from every covering or defilement which is to be given to the fire, it remains that the grace of the Holy Spirit be laid on it, and then it will become the breast of the laying-on; and also the shoulder of separation, or of taking-away. How will it also be the shoulder of separation? If you know and understand how to discern what are the works of light and what the works of darkness, and separate your actions from darkness, so that your works are in the light, your shoulder becomes the shoulder of separation; or when you separate yourself from every brother who walks disorderly; or certainly when, according to the prophet, those who carry the vessels of the Lord separate themselves and go out from the midst of sinners. Indeed, by a certain native usage of Scripture, what is unclean is called “common”. As the voice too says to Peter: “What God has cleansed, do not call common.” Consequently, then, if what is unclean is called common, what is holy will be named separated. And we add this too. If anyone is the servant of God alone, he cannot be called common. But if anyone is common, there is no doubt that he belongs to many, and is therefore called common. There is a great mystery in this word, which Israel according to the flesh has in use and in feeling, but does not have in understanding. They too call an unclean man common, but why he is called common they do not know. Let them learn, then, from the church that he who is holy belongs to God alone, and has communion with no one. But he who is a sinner and unclean belongs to many. For many demons possess him, and therefore he is called common. Indeed, that man too who was cured by the Lord in the Gospels, when he was asked, “What is your name?” said: “Legion, for we are many.” These things, though in something of a digression, nevertheless seemed necessary to add, so that we might discuss the mystery of the breast of the laying-on and the shoulder of separation, why it was written; which is the eternal portion given to the priests, in which may he deign to make us worthy, so that through purity of heart and uprightness of works we may deserve to have a share in the divine sacrifice, through the eternal high priest, our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, through whom to God the Father with the Holy Spirit is glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Lev 7:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 20:3 (19:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 15:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 5:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Thess 3:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 52:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 10:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 5:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:18 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Only the healed may offer the peace offering, by the 'hands' of good works; the priest's portion, the breast and right shoulder, signifies the converted heart and right-handed works of sinners brought back by the priest's labour.
- Sources: Lev 7:28–34; Matt 8:2–4; Sir 4:31 (the hand stretched out to receive and drawn back from giving); Gal 5:22; Ps 20:3 (LXX 19:4); Matt 15:19; Matt 5:8; Eph 5:8–11 and Rom 13:12; 2 Thess 3:6; Isa 52:11; Acts 10:15; Mark 5:9; 1 Cor 10:18 (Israel according to the flesh).
- “The whole fruit”: the Septuagint has τὸ κάρπωμα at Lev 7:30 (LXX 7:20).
- “Unanimity” (unanimitas) stands in Rufinus's list where Gal 5:22 has “kindness”; translated as written.
- On “Israel according to the flesh”, Origen's wording is kept exactly.
- A Migne footnote (Scripture references) leaked into the text and is removed by logged correction, with a page number, a footnote marker, and stray letters.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; OCR slip; Migne's footnote marker; OCR slips; stray letter; footnote references leaked into the text; page number leaked into the text): sollicitudinem “chit. vtt, et seqq. Matth. vni. ibid., 4. suam → sollicitudinem suam; portio sacerdotibus 215 data → portio sacerdotibus data; ad pectusculth (6'2) → ad pectusculum; Quod ergo est εειcerdotis pectus → Quod ergo est sacerdotis pectus; omne quod crassum εει → omne quod crassum est; Si quis lsa. tem communis est → Si quis autem communis est; in seecula λ surculorum → in saecula saeculorum.
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 4:31 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 5.12 (PG 12:463b–466a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/5-12/#p-5-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-5-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.