Homilies on Leviticus 6.1–6.6
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 6
6.1PG 12:466a
Causam qua haec quae nobis recitantur, aut intelligi possint, aut non intelligi , breviter ostendit Apostolus, dicens ab ejus oculis posse Veteris Testamenti velamen auferri, qui conversus ad Deum fuerit; ex quo sciri voluit, quod quanto minus haec nobis plana sunt, tanto minor est ad Deum nostra conversio. Et ideo omni virtute nitendum est, ut ab occupationibus saeculi, et a mundanis actibus liberi, et ipsas etiam, si Iieri potest , superfluas sodalium fabulas relinquentes , verbo Dei operam demus, et in lege ejus meditemur die ac nocte, ut toto corde conversi, revelatam et apertam Moysi faciem possimus aspicere, et maxime in his, quae nunc recitata sunt, vel de sacerdotalibus indumentis, vel de consecratione poutiticis, in quibus talia quantum dicuntur, ut etiam illum ipsum carnalem Israel ab historica intelligentia peuitus excludant; et ideo ad haec explananda, non humani ingenii viribus nitendum est, sed orationibus et precibus ad Deum fusis. lu quo etiam vestri adiutorio indigemus, ut Deus Pater Verbi det nobis verbum in apertionem oris nostri, ut possimus considerare mirabilia de lege ejus.
The reason why these things that are read to us can be understood or not, the Apostle shows briefly, saying that the veil of the Old Testament can be removed from the eyes of one who has turned to God; from which he wished it to be known that the less plain these things are to us, the less is our turning to God. And therefore we must strive with all our strength, freed from the occupations of the world and from worldly affairs, and leaving behind, if it can be done, even the superfluous chatter of companions, to devote ourselves to the word of God and meditate on his law day and night, so that, turned with our whole heart, we may be able to look on the unveiled and open face of Moses; and especially in what has now been read, whether about the priestly garments or about the consecration of the high priest, in which such things are said as wholly to shut out even that fleshly Israel from a historical understanding. And therefore, to explain these things, we must strive not with the powers of human talent but with prayers and supplications poured out to God. In this we also need your help, so that God, the Father of the Word, may give us a word in the opening of our mouth, so that we may be able to consider the wonders of his law.
2 Cor 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 1:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 119:18 (118:18 LXX) (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Only those who turn wholly to God, freed from worldly cares and devoted to prayer and Scripture, can see past the veil of the law on the priestly garments.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
- Sources: 2 Cor 3:14–16; Ps 1:2; Eph 6:19; Ps 119:18 (LXX 118:18).
- “That fleshly Israel”: Origen's wording, kept exactly.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; Migne's footnote marker; stray marks): Apostolus τί , dicens → Apostolus, dicens; ad hzec explananda (6'1), non → ad haec explananda, non; mirabilia de lege ejs. → mirabilia de lege ejus..
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 6.1 (PG 12:466a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/6-1/#p-6-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-6-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
6.2PG 12:466d–469a
Est ergo initium eorum quae hodie recitata sunt, in his verbis : llaec unctio Aaron, et uuctio liliorum ejus ab hostiis Domini, qua die applicuit eos sacrificare Domino, sicut praecepit Dominus dare illis, qua die unxit illos a filiis lsrael, legitimum mteruum in progenies eorum. llaec lex est ltoloeaustorum, et pro peccato, et pro delicto, et consumn'tationis, et sacrilicii salutaris, sicut tuatidavit Dominus Moysi in monte Sina, qua die praecepit filiis Israel offerre munera sua coram Domino iu deserto Sina. Cum proposuerit dicere legislator, hate unctio filiorum ejus, non sebjuuxit quae esset unctio, nec qualiter uuxissct exposuit, sed hoc quidem in sequentibus facit, nunc vero posteaquam dixit : haec unctio Aaron et filiorum ejus, nihil de unctione subjunxit. Profecto ut ostenderet, quia haec quae supra dixerat, id est pectuscuium impositionis .. et brachium separatiouis, ipsa essent unctio Aaron et filiorttm ejus, ne putaremus illa pro carnibus dicta, sed ut doceret etiam ipsa sub sacramento unctionis inserta. Denique in consequentibus repetit ea, quae superius exposuerat, et dicit : Haec lex holocaustorum, et sacrificii. et pro peccato. llaec , id est quae supra exposita est, et videtur esse , id est recapitulatio sacramentorum, quae in superioribus latius fuerant enarrata. Post haec vero subjungit : ε Et locutus est Dominus, inquit , ad Moysen, dicens : Sume Aaron , et filios ejus, et stolas et oleum unctionis, et vitulum qui est pro peccato, et duos arietes, et canistrum azymorum , et omnem sy‘ua- α gogam convoca adjannam tabernaculi testimonii. lit fecit Moyses sicut praecepit ei Dominus, et couvocavit synagogam ad januam tabernaculi testimonii. Et dixit Moyses ad synagogam : lloc est verbum quod mandavit Dominus facere. Et applicuit Moyses Aaron fratrem suum, et filios ejus, et lavit cos aqua : et vestivit eum tunica , et praecinxit eum zona, et vestivit eum tunica interiore , et imposuit ei humerale et cinxit eum secundum facturam ltumeralis, et constrinxit eum in ipso, et imposuit super eum logiutn et imposuit super logium manifestatiouem et veritatem, et imposuit mitram super caput ejus, et posuit super mitram ante faciem ejus laminam auream sanctificatam sanctam, sicut prteceperat Dominus Moysi. › lntentis auribus et vigilanti corde consecrationem pontificis vel sacerdotis audite, quia et vos secundum promissa Dei, sacerdotes Dei estis, ‹ gens enim sancta, et sacerdotium sanctum estis 7‘. › Accepit, inquit, Moyses secundum prazceptum Domini Aaron et filios ejus, et primo quidem lavat, postea vero in. η duit eos. Considerate diligentius ordinem dictorum, primo lavat, postea induit. Non enim potes indui, nisi ante lotus fueris. Lavamini ergo , et muniti estote, et auferte nequitias ah animis vestris τ’. Nisi enim hoc modo lotus fueris, non poteris induere Dominum Jesum Christum, secundum quod dicit Apostolus : ‹ induite Dominum Jesnm Cluistum, et carnis curam ne feceritis itt concupiscentiis. Lavet te igitur Moyses, ipse te lavet, et ipse te induat. Quomodo te lavare potest Moyses, frequenter audisti. Saepe enim diximus quod Moyses in Seriptnris suis pro lege ponatur, sicut in Etangelio dictum est" : ε Habent Moysen et prophetas, audiant illos. Lex ergo Dei est quae te lavat, ipsa sordes tuas diluit, ipsa, si audias eam, peccatorum tuorum maculas abstergit : ipse est Moyses, hoc est lex quae sacerdotes consecrat, nec potest sacerdos esse, quem non lex constituerit sacerdotem. Multi enim sunt sacerdotes, sed quos non lavit lex , neque puros reddidit verbum Dei, neque abluit a peccatorum sordibus sermo divinus. Sed et vos, qui sacrum baptisma desideratis accipere, et gratiam spiritus promereri , prius debetis ex lege purgari, prius debetis, audito verbo Dei,vitiorum germina resecare, et mores barbaros ferosque componere, ut mansuetudine et humilitate suscepta, possitis etiam gratiam sancti Spiritus capere. Sic enim dicit Dominus per prophetam ηε ‹ Super quem requiescam, nisi super humilem, et quietum, et trementem sermones meos? Si humilis non fueris et quietus, non potest inhabitare in te gratia Spiritus sancti , si non cum tremore suscipis verba divina. Superbam namque et coutumacem animam, et fictam refugit Spiritus sanctus. Debes ergo prius meditari legem Dei , utsi forte actus tui intemperati sunt, ct mores inconditi, lex Dei te emendet et corrigat. Vis videre quia Moyses semper cum Jesu est, hoc est lex cum Evangeliis? Doceat te Evangelium '9, quia cum transformatus esset in gloriam Jesus, etiam Moyses et Elias simul cum ipso apparuerunt in ‘gloria, ut scias quia lex et prophetae, et Evangelium in unum semper conveniunt, et in una gloria permanent. Deuique ct Petrus cum vellet eis tria facere tabernacula, imperitiae notatur , tanquam qui uesciret quid diceret. Legi enim, et prophetis, et Evangelio non tria, sed unum est tabernaculum, quae est Ecclesia Dei. Lavat ergo primo Moyses sacerdotem Domini, et cum cum laverit, et purgatum reddiderit a sordibus vitiorum, post lucc induit eum. Sed consideremus quae sint ista indumenta, quibus induit Moyses Aaron fratrem suum pontificem primum, si forte possibile sit etiam te iudui eisdem indumentis , et esse pontificem. Est quidem unus pontifex magnus Dominus noster Jesus Christus, sed ille non solum sacerdos , sed et sacerdotum sacerdos est, et non solum pontifex, sed pontificum pontifex, nec sacerdotum princeps, sed princeps principum sacerdotum. Sicut et rex non dicitur plebis, sed regum rex, et Dominus non servorum, sed Dominus dominorum. Potest ergo fieri. si et tu lotus fueris per Moysen, et fueris ita nmndus, quasi quem Moyses laverit tantus ille ac talis, ut possis etiam pervenire ad haccindumenta quae profert Moyses, et stolas istas, quibus induit Aaron fratrem suum , et filios ejus. Sed non solum indumentis opus est ad sacerdotales infulas, verum et cingulis. Sed priusquam de specie ipsa indumentorum dicere incipiamus, velim conferre illa infelicia indumenta, quibus primus homo cum peccasset, indutus est, cum bis sanetis ct fidelibus indumentis. Et quidem illa dicitur Dens fecisse : Fecit enim, inquit 3°, Dens tunicas pelliceas, et induit Adam et mulierem ejus. Illa: ergo tunicae de pellibus erant ex animalibus sumptze. Talibus enim oportebat indui peccatorem, pelliceis, inquam, tunicis, quae essent mortalitatis, quam pro peccato acceperat, et fragilitatis ejus quae ex carnis corruptione veniebat, indicium. Si vero jam lotus ab his fueris , et purificatus per legent Dei, induet te Moyses indumento incorruptionis; ita ut nusquam appareat turpitudo tua, et ut absorbeatur mortale hoc a vita.
The beginning, then, of what was read today is in these words: “This is the anointing of Aaron and the anointing of his sons from the victims of the Lord, on the day on which he brought them near to sacrifice to the Lord, as the Lord commanded to give them, on the day on which he anointed them, from the children of Israel, a perpetual ordinance for their generations. This is the law of the burnt offerings, and of the sin offering, and of the offence offering, and of the consecration, and of the peace offering, as the Lord commanded Moses on Mount Sinai, on the day when he commanded the children of Israel to offer their gifts before the Lord in the desert of Sinai.” When the lawgiver had set out to say, “This is the anointing of his sons,” he did not add what the anointing was, nor explain how he anointed; he does this indeed in what follows, but now, after saying “This is the anointing of Aaron and of his sons,” he added nothing about the anointing. Surely this was to show that the things he had said above, that is, the breast of the laying-on and the shoulder of separation, were themselves the anointing of Aaron and his sons, so that we should not think those things were said about flesh, but so that he might teach that they too were included under the sacrament of the anointing. Indeed, in what follows he repeats what he had set out above, and says: “This is the law of the burnt offerings, and of the sacrifice, and of the sin offering.” “This”, that is, the one set out above; and it seems to be a recapitulation of the sacraments which had been related more fully above. After this he adds: “And the Lord spoke,” he says, “to Moses, saying: Take Aaron and his sons, and the robes, and the oil of anointing, and the calf for sin, and the two rams, and the basket of unleavened bread, and call the whole synagogue together at the door of the tabernacle of witness. And Moses did as the Lord commanded him, and called the synagogue together at the door of the tabernacle of witness. And Moses said to the synagogue: This is the word which the Lord commanded to do. And Moses brought Aaron his brother and his sons near, and washed them with water; and he clothed him with the tunic, and girded him with the girdle, and clothed him with the inner tunic, and put the ephod on him, and girded him according to the making of the ephod, and bound him with it; and he put the oracle on him, and on the oracle he put the manifestation and the truth; and he put the mitre on his head, and on the mitre, in front of his face, he put the golden plate, sanctified, holy, as the Lord had commanded Moses.” Hear with attentive ears and a watchful heart the consecration of the high priest or priest, because you too, according to God's promises, are priests of God: “for you are a holy nation and a holy priesthood.” Moses, it says, according to the Lord's command, took Aaron and his sons, and first he washes them, and afterwards he clothes them. Consider more carefully the order of the words: first he washes, afterwards he clothes. For you cannot be clothed unless you have first been washed. “Wash, then, and be clean, and take away wickedness from your souls.” For unless you have been washed in this way, you will not be able to put on the Lord Jesus Christ, according to what the Apostle says: “Put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh in its desires.” Let Moses, then, wash you; let him wash you himself, and let him clothe you himself. How Moses can wash you you have often heard. For we have often said that in his Scriptures Moses is put for the law, as was said in the Gospel: “They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.” It is the law of God, then, that washes you; it rinses away your filth; it, if you listen to it, wipes away the stains of your sins. This is Moses, that is, the law which consecrates priests; and no one can be a priest whom the law has not established as priest. For there are many priests, but whom the law has not washed, nor the word of God made pure, nor the divine discourse cleansed from the filth of sins. But you too who desire to receive holy baptism and to merit the grace of the Spirit ought first to be purged by the law; you ought first, having heard the word of God, to cut back the shoots of vices and to set in order barbarous and savage habits, so that, having taken on gentleness and humility, you may be able also to receive the grace of the Holy Spirit. For so the Lord says through the prophet: “On whom shall I rest, but on the humble and quiet, and one who trembles at my words?” If you are not humble and quiet, the grace of the Holy Spirit cannot dwell in you, if you do not receive the divine words with trembling. For the Holy Spirit flees a proud and stubborn and deceitful soul. You ought, then, first to meditate on the law of God, so that if perhaps your actions are intemperate and your habits disordered, the law of God may amend and correct you. Do you wish to see that Moses is always with Jesus, that is, the law with the Gospels? Let the Gospel teach you that when Jesus was transfigured into glory, Moses and Elijah too appeared together with him in glory, so that you may know that the law and the prophets and the Gospel always agree in one and remain in one glory. Indeed, Peter too, when he wished to make three tabernacles for them, is censured for lack of understanding, as one who did not know what he was saying. For the law and the prophets and the Gospel have not three but one tabernacle, which is the church of God. Moses, then, first washes the priest of the Lord, and when he has washed him and rendered him clean from the filth of vices, after this he clothes him. But let us consider what these garments are with which Moses first clothed his brother Aaron, the high priest, in case it is possible for you too to be clothed with the same garments and to be a high priest. There is indeed one great high priest, our Lord Jesus Christ; but he is not only a priest but the priest of priests, and not only a high priest but the high priest of high priests, not a chief of priests but the chief of the chief priests. Just as he is called king not of a people but King of kings, and Lord not of servants but Lord of lords. It may be, then, if you too have been washed by Moses, and have become so clean, as one whom so great and so excellent a Moses has washed, that you may be able to attain even to these garments which Moses brings out, and these robes with which he clothed Aaron his brother and his sons. But for the priestly insignia there is need not only of garments but also of girdles. But before we begin to speak of the kind of garments itself, I should like to compare those unhappy garments with which the first man was clothed when he had sinned with these holy and faithful garments. And indeed God is said to have made those: “For God made,” it says, “tunics of skin, and clothed Adam and his wife.” Those tunics, then, were of skins taken from animals. For with such the sinner had to be clothed, with tunics of skin, I say, which were a sign of the mortality which he had received because of sin, and of the frailty which came from the corruption of the flesh. But if you have now been washed from these and purified through the law of God, Moses will clothe you with the garment of incorruption, so that your shame may nowhere appear, and that this mortal may be swallowed up by life.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Lev 7:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 7:38 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:9 (quotation, medium confidence) · Isa 1:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 13:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 16:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 66:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 17:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 17:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 9:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 4:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rev 19:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:4 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Moses, that is, the law, first washes and then clothes the priest; so those seeking baptism must first be purified by the law, and the priestly garments of incorruption replace Adam's tunics of skin.
- Sources: Lev 7:35–38; Lev 8:1–9; 1 Pet 2:9 and Exod 19:6; Isa 1:16; Rom 13:14; Luke 16:29; Isa 66:2; Matt 17:1–4 and Mark 9:5–6; Heb 4:14; Rev 19:16; Gen 3:21; 2 Cor 5:4.
- “The manifestation and the truth” render the Septuagint's δήλωσις καὶ ἀλήθεια (the Urim and Thummim); “oracle” renders logium (λογεῖον, the breastpiece).
- A parallel from Origen's Commentary on Romans (“in glory, speaking with Jesus on the mountain; in which it is shown that the law and the prophets agree with the Gospels …”), quoted in Baehrens's apparatus, had been inserted into the staged text as if it were a line lost in the scan, in the middle of “with which Moses first clothed his brother Aaron, the high priest”; it is removed by logged correction.
- Migne's footnotes (Scripture references and manuscript readings) leaked into the text and are removed by logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote leaked into the text; OCR slip; OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; a parallel from Origen's Commentary on Romans, quoted in Baehrens's apparatus, wrongly inserted as a lost line; removed; OCR slip; footnote references leaked into the text; OCR slip): Non enim notes indui, Levit. VIII, et seqq. Levit. vn. et seqq. Luc. xvt, 29. lsa. vat, 2. Matth. xvn. Mss., ε essent. › Libb._e_diti, «esset. Mss. , humerale. Libh. editi, humemtilitiin mss. Gemcticensi et Cadomensi deest, → Non enim potes indui, ; fratrem gloria colloquentes cum Iesı in monte. In quo ostenditur legem et prophetas cum evangeliis consonare et in eadem gloria spiritalis aspectus atque intellege- tiae refulgere suum pontificem pritutnn → fratrem suum pontificem primum; Dominus neSIer Je- 7" Pet. tt, 9. lsa. sus Christus → Dominus noster Jesus Christus; et ιιι absorbeatur → et ut absorbeatur; Same enim diximus → Saepe enim diximus; praecinxit eum tona → praecinxit eum zona.
Topics: Church office, Baptism
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 6.2 (PG 12:466d–469a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/6-1/#p-6-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-6-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
6.3PG 12:469a–470a
Videamus ergo quali ordine pontifex constituatur. Convocavit, inquit, Moyses synagogam, et dicit ad eos : Hoc est verbum quod praecepit Dominus. Licet ergo Dominus de constituendo pontifice praecepisset, et Dominus elegisset, tamen convocatur et synagoga. Requiritur cnim in ordinando Sacerdote et prrcsentia populi, ut sciant omnes, et certi sint, quia qui prmstantior estex omni populo, qui doctior, qui sanctior, qui in omni virtute eminentior, ille eligitur ad sacerdotium, et hoc astante pepulo, ne qua postmodum retractatio cuiquam , ne quis scrupulus resideret. Hoc est autem quod et Apostolus pimcepit in ordinatione sacerdotis, dicens 3’: Oportet autem illum et testimonium habere bonum ab his qui foris sunt. Ego tamen et amplius aliquid video in eo quod dicit, quia convocavit Moyses omnem synagogam, et puto quod convocare synagogam, hoc sit colligere omnes animi et in unum congregare virtutes, ut cum sermo de sacerdotalibus sacramentis habetur, vigilent omnes animi virtutes, et intentre sint. nihil in eis sapientiae, nihil scientiae , nihil desit industriae , sed adsit omnis multitudo sensuum, adsit omnis congregatio Sanctarum cogitationum, ut quid sit pontifex, quid unctio, quae indumenta ejus, conferens intra sacrarium cordis sui possit advertere. Lavit ergo eum, et induit. Quali indumento? Tunica, inquit, et prazcinxit eum zona, et iterum vestivit eum tunicam talarem, vel, ut alibi legimus, interiorem. Duabus, ut video, tunicis per Moysen induitur pontifex. Sed quid faciemus qnod Jesus sacerdotes suos apostolos non stros prohibuit uti duabus tunicis? Dixeramus quod Moyses et Jesus , id est lex et Evangelia sibi invicem consonarent. Posset fortasse dicere aliquis quia quod praecepit Jesns duas tunicas non habendas, non est contrarium legi , sed perfectius lege, sicut et cum lex homicidium vetat, Jesns autem etiam iracundiam resecat , et cum lex prohibet adulterium , Jesus etiam concupiscentiam cordis abscindit. Sic ergo videbitur et duabus ibi ltrnicis pontificem, et hic una apostolos induisse. Sit quidem etiam iste sensus, probabilis si videtur, ego tamen non intra ltujus intelligentia: angustiam pontificalia sacramenta concludo. Amplius mihi aliquid ex ista forma videtur ostendi; pontifex est, qui scientiam legis tenet, et uniuscujusque mysterii intelligit rationes, et ut breviter eXpIicem, qui legem etsecundum spiritum, ct secundum litteram novit.Sciebat ergo pontifex ille, quem tunc ordinabat Moyses, quia esset circumcisio spiritalis, servabat tamen et circumcisionem carnis, quia incircumcisus pontifex essenon poterat. Habebatergo istc duas tunicas. Unam ministerii carnalis, et aliam intelligentim spiritalis. Sciebat quia et sacrificia spiritalia offerri debent Deo, olferebat tamen nihilominus et carnalia.'Non enim poterat esse pontifex eorum qui tunc erant, nisi hostias immolaret. Ita ergo convenienter ille pontifex duabus indutus tunicis dicitur. Apostoli vero qui dicturi erant", quia si circumcidamini, Christus vobis nihil proderit, et qui dicturi erant“, nemo vos judicet in cibo, aut in potu, aut in parte diei festi, aut ncomenia, aut Sabbato, quae sunt umbra futurorum, isti ergo ut liujusntodi secundnm litteram legis observantias penitus repudia. rent, rrec occuparent discipulos Judaicis fabulis, et imponerent bis jngnm, quod neque ipsi, neque patres corum portare potuerunt , merito duas tunicas bahere prohibentur, sed suflicit eis una, ethazc interior. Nam istam quae foris est, et quae desuper apparet, legis tunicam nolunt. Unam namque eis Jesus, et ipsam interiorem habere permittit. Imponit tamen Moyses pontifici et humeralem, qui est humerorum quidam ex circumductione vestis ornatus. Humeri autem Operum figuram tonent, ac laboris indicia. Vult ergo pontificem esse etiam in Operibus ornatum, nec sufficit sola scientia, quia qni fecerit et docuerit, hic magnus vocabitur in regno caalorum
Let us see, then, in what order the high priest is appointed. “Moses,” it says, “called the synagogue together, and says to them: This is the word which the Lord commanded.” Although, then, the Lord had given commands about appointing the high priest, and the Lord had chosen him, yet the synagogue too is called together. For in ordaining a priest the presence of the people also is required, so that all may know and be certain that the one who is more excellent than all the people, more learned, holier, more eminent in every virtue, is the one chosen for the priesthood; and this with the people standing by, so that afterwards no one might have any reconsideration, and no scruple might remain. This is what the Apostle too commanded in the ordination of a priest, saying: “But he must also have a good testimony from those outside.” I, however, see something more in his saying that Moses called the whole synagogue together; and I think that to call the synagogue together is to collect all the powers of the soul and gather them into one, so that, when discourse is held about the priestly sacraments, all the powers of the soul may be awake and attentive, no wisdom, no knowledge, no diligence lacking in them, but the whole multitude of the senses present, the whole assembly of holy thoughts present, so that, comparing within the sanctuary of his heart, one may perceive what the high priest is, what the anointing, what his garments. He washed him, then, and clothed him. With what garment? “With a tunic,” it says, “and he girded him with a girdle, and again clothed him with the tunic reaching to the ankles,” or, as we read elsewhere, “the inner one”. With two tunics, as I see, the high priest is clothed by Moses. But what shall we do about Jesus forbidding his priests, the apostles, to use two tunics? We had said that Moses and Jesus, that is, the law and the Gospels, agree with one another. Someone might perhaps say that Jesus' command not to have two tunics is not contrary to the law but more perfect than the law; as also when the law forbids murder, Jesus cuts off even anger, and when the law forbids adultery, Jesus cuts off even the desire of the heart. So it will seem that he clothed the high priest there with two tunics and the apostles here with one. Let this sense too stand, if it seems probable; I, however, do not confine the high-priestly sacraments within the narrowness of this understanding. Something more seems to me to be shown by this pattern: the high priest is one who holds the knowledge of the law and understands the reasons of each mystery, and, to explain it briefly, who knows the law both according to the spirit and according to the letter. That high priest whom Moses was then ordaining knew, then, that there was a spiritual circumcision, yet he also kept the circumcision of the flesh, because an uncircumcised man could not be high priest. He had, then, two tunics: one of the fleshly ministry, and another of spiritual understanding. He knew that spiritual sacrifices too ought to be offered to God, yet he nonetheless offered fleshly ones as well. For he could not be the high priest of those who then lived unless he sacrificed victims. So, fittingly, that high priest is said to be clothed with two tunics. But the apostles, who were to say, “If you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing,” and who were to say, “Let no one judge you in food or in drink or in respect of a feast day or a new moon or a sabbath, which are a shadow of things to come”: these, then, so that they might utterly repudiate such observances of the law according to the letter, and not occupy the disciples with Jewish fables, and lay on them a yoke which neither they nor their fathers were able to bear, are rightly forbidden to have two tunics; one suffices them, and that the inner one. For that tunic which is outside and which appears on top, the tunic of the law, they do not want. For Jesus permits them to have one, and that the inner one. Moses, however, also puts on the high priest the ephod, which is a kind of ornament of the shoulders formed by wrapping a garment around them. And the shoulders bear the figure of works and are signs of labour. He wishes, then, the high priest to be adorned also with works; knowledge alone does not suffice, because “whoever does and teaches, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
Lev 8:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 8:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 3:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 5:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Titus 1:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 15:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The people's presence at the high priest's consecration shows that the most worthy must be chosen openly; his two tunics signify knowing the law in letter and spirit, while the apostles keep only the inner, spiritual one; the ephod signifies works.
- Sources: Lev 8:4–7; 1 Tim 3:7; Exod 28:4; Matt 10:10; Matt 5:21–22, 27–28; Gal 5:2; Col 2:16–17; Titus 1:14; Acts 15:10; Matt 5:19.
- The presence of the people at the ordination of a priest is stated by Origen as a rule of the church; translated as written.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
- OCR slips, stray marks, and a page number are corrected by logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote marker; OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; garbled OCR; page number leaked; OCR slip; stray letter; stray marks; stray marks; OCR slip): pontifex constiluam.- ε inquit et, Moyses synagogam, ο et dicit → pontifex constituatur. Convocavit, inquit, Moyses synagogam, et dicit; omnem synago- Ι) gain → omnem synagogam; virtutes, ttt cum sermo → virtutes, ut cum sermo; Duabus, ιιι video, tunicis → Duabus, ut video, tunicis; duabus tunicis “‘I Dixeramus → duabus tunicis? Dixeramus; Posset fortasse τ dicere → Posset fortasse dicere; Jcsns etiam 217 concupiscentiam → Jesus etiam concupiscentiam; lmponit (7 tamen → Imponit tamen.
Topics: Church office, Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 6.3 (PG 12:469a–470a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/6-1/#p-6-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-6-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
6.4PG 12:470a–472b
Jam et superius dixerat quia cinxit eum zonam super tunicam, et modo iterum cingitur secundum facturam humeralis. Quod est istud duplex cingulum, quo constriCtum vult esse ex omni parte pontificem? Constrictus sit in verbo, constrictus in opere, expeditus ad omnia, nihil remissum, nihil habeat dissolutum. Accinctus sit animi virtutibus, constrictus sit a corporalibus vitiis, nullum animae lapsum, nullum corporis timeat, utroque cingulo semper utatur ut sit sanctus corpore et spiritu. Bene autem et secundum facturam humeralis cingitur. Secundum facta enim sua et secundum opera sua cingulo virtutis utitur. Et post hmc, inquit”, «imposuit super eum legium, quod est rationale, ‹ et imposuit super logium manifestationem, et veritatem, et imposuit mitram super caput ejus. Sed videamus quid logium, quod est rationale, signiticet. Posteaquam nuditas tecta est, et indumentis turpitttdo velata, posteaquam munitus operibus et cingulo utroque tirmatus est, logium ei, id est rationale, tunc traditur. Logium sapientia: indicium est,quia sapientia in ratione consistit. Sed quae sit sapientia: hujus ct rationis virtus ostendit. lmponit enim super rationalem, manifestationem et veritatem. Non enim sullicit pontifici habere sapientiam, et scire omnium rationem, nisi possit etiam populo manifestare qute novit. Ideo ergo imponitur rationali manifestatio, ut possit respondere omni poscenti se rationem de (ide et veritate. Ponitur autem super illud et veritas, ut non illa astruat, quae proprio excogitare potest ingenio, sed quae veritas habet, nec unquam a veritate discedat, ut iu omni sermone ejus semper veritas maneat. Hoc est ergo superposuisse rationali manifestatiouem et veritatem. Infelices illi, qui lucc legentes omnem intelligentiam suam erga sensum vestimenti corporalis ell'unduntt Dicant nobis quale est vestimentum manifestatiouis, aut indumentum quale est veritatis. Si quis unquam vidit, si quis audivit manifestationem et veritatem vestimenta nominari, dicant uobis qua sint mulieres quae ista texerint, in quo haec unquam sint confecta textrino. Sed si verum vultis audire, sapientia est quae hujusmodi confecit indumenta. Illa occultorum manifestationem, illa texit rerum omnium veritatem. Hauc ergo oremus a Domino ut accipere mereamur, et ipsa nos talibus circumdabit indumentis. Sed et ipse ordo rerum quam sanctus sit, et quam mirabilis, intuere. Non antelogium, et postea humerale,quia non ante sapientia quam opera, sed prius opera haberi debent, et postea quaerenda sapientia est. Tum deinde non ante manifestatio quam rationale, quia non ante alios docere quam nos instructi et rationabiles esse debemus. Super hare autem additur veritas, quia veritas est summa sapientia. Denique propheta hunc eumdem ordinem servat cum dicit“ : Seminate vobis ad justitiam, et metite fructum vitaz, illuminate vobis lumen scientiae. Vides quomodo non dicit primo illuminate vobis lumen scientia, sed primo ‹ seminate vobis ad justitiam, et non sufficit seminare, sed metite, inquit, fructum vitae, ut post haec possitis implere quod sequitur, illuminate. vobis lumen scientiae.» Sic ergo etiam hic imponitur humeralis ornatus, et non sufficit solus ornatus, sed et zona constringitur. Sed ne hoc quidem satis est, secundo adhuc cingitur, ut ita demum rationale possit imponi, et posthaec manifestatio subsequatur et veritas. His indumentis pontifex utatur. Tali ornatu debet indui, qui sacerdotium gerit.
He had already said above that he girded him with a girdle over the tunic, and now again he is girded according to the making of the ephod. What is this double girdle with which he wishes the high priest to be bound on every side? Let him be bound in word, bound in deed, ready for everything, having nothing slack, nothing loose. Let him be girded with the virtues of the soul, bound against bodily vices; let him fear no fall of the soul, none of the body; let him always use both girdles, so as to be holy in body and spirit. And it is well that he is girded according to the making of the ephod. For according to his deeds and according to his works he uses the girdle of virtue. “And after this,” it says, “he put on him the oracle,” which is the rational, “and on the oracle he put the manifestation and the truth, and he put the mitre on his head.” But let us see what the oracle, which is the rational, signifies. After the nakedness has been covered and the shame veiled by garments, after he has been protected by works and strengthened by both girdles, then the oracle, that is, the rational, is handed to him. The oracle is a sign of wisdom, because wisdom consists in reason. But the power of this wisdom and reason shows what kind it is. For he puts on the rational the manifestation and the truth. For it is not enough for the high priest to have wisdom and to know the reason of all things unless he can also make manifest to the people what he knows. Therefore, then, manifestation is put on the rational, so that he may be able to answer everyone who asks him for a reason concerning faith and truth. And truth is put on it as well, so that he may not assert what he can devise by his own talent, but what the truth holds, and never depart from the truth, so that in all his speech truth may always remain. This, then, is to have put on the rational the manifestation and the truth. Unhappy are those who, reading these things, pour out all their understanding on the sense of a bodily garment! Let them tell us what kind of garment manifestation is, or what kind of clothing truth is. If anyone has ever seen, if anyone has heard manifestation and truth named as garments, let them tell us who the women are who wove these things, in what weaving shop these were ever made. But if you wish to hear the truth, it is wisdom that made garments of this kind. She wove the manifestation of hidden things, she wove the truth of all things. Let us pray, then, to the Lord that we may deserve to receive her, and she herself will surround us with such garments. But look also at how holy and how wonderful the very order of things is. Not first the oracle and afterwards the ephod, because not wisdom before works; but works ought to be had first, and afterwards wisdom is to be sought. Then next, not manifestation before the rational, because we ought not to teach others before we ourselves are instructed and rational. And truth is added over these, because truth is the highest wisdom. Indeed the prophet keeps this same order when he says: “Sow for yourselves unto righteousness, reap the fruit of life, light for yourselves the light of knowledge.” You see how he does not say first, “light for yourselves the light of knowledge,” but first, “sow for yourselves unto righteousness”; and it is not enough to sow, but “reap,” he says, “the fruit of life,” so that after this you may be able to fulfil what follows, “light for yourselves the light of knowledge.” So too here the ornament of the ephod is put on, and the ornament alone is not enough, but he is also bound with the girdle. But not even this is enough: he is girded a second time, so that only then the rational may be put on, and after this the manifestation and the truth may follow. Let the high priest use these garments. With such adornment ought he to be clothed who bears the priesthood.
Lev 8:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 7:1 (allusion, low confidence) · 1 Pet 3:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Hos 10:12 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The double girdle binds the priest in word and deed; the rational with 'manifestation and truth' signifies wisdom that can be explained to the people and never departs from truth; works must precede wisdom.
- Sources: Lev 8:7–9; 2 Cor 7:1; 1 Pet 3:15; Hos 10:12 (LXX).
- “Rational” (rationale) is the Latin name of the breastpiece, here linked with reason (ratio).
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
- OCR slips and stray marks are corrected by logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; OCR read Latin as Greek letters; stray marks; OCR slip; stray letter): corporalibus vitiis, λ nullum → corporalibus vitiis, nullum; sapientia εει quae hujusmodi confe- ι) cit → sapientia est quae hujusmodi confecit; vitm, ιιι post haec → vitae, ut post haec; scire omsuium rationem → scire omnium rationem; llouique pr0pheta → Denique propheta; ex 0mm parte → ex omni parte.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 6.4 (PG 12:470a–472b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/6-1/#p-6-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-6-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
6.5PG 12:472b–472d
Sed nondum finivit, et alius adhuc ornatus addendus est, necesse est ut accipiat etiam coronam. Pr0pterea accipit primo cidarim, quod est vel operimentum quoddam capitis, vel ornamentum. Et post haec superimponitur ei mitra. Ante faciem, id est, a fronte pontificis, lamina aurea sanctificata, in qua sculptum dicitur vocabulum Dei. Verum iste capitis ornatus, ubi nomen Dei impositum dicitur, post illa omnia quibus inferiora rorporis membra fuerant exornata, superponitur. In quo mihi indicari videtur, quod super omnia, qua de mundo vel de caeteris creaturis sentiri, aut intelligi possunt, eminentior tauquam auctoris omnium scientia Dei sit. Et quia ipse caput est omnium, ideo et ornatus iste super omnia capiti superponitur. Nihil enim post tunc adjicitur pontificis capiti. Et ideo miseri sunt illi de quibus dicit Apostolus“, quia non tenent caput, ex quo omnis jouctura connexa et compaginata crescit in incrementum Dei in spiritu. Sed nos si bene intelleximus quis sit sacerdotis ornatus, quive super omnia hoc nor capitis ejus, mysteriorum divinorum profunda rimantes, non scire tantum hmc et audire, sed et implere desideremus et facere, quia non auditores legis justiticabuntur apud Deum, sed factores. Potes enim et tu, ut stepe jam diximus, si studiis et vigiliis tuis hujuscemodi tibi praeparaveris indamenta, si te ablucrit, et mundum fecerit sermo lcgis, et unctio chrismatis, et gratia in te baptismi incontatninata duraverit, si indutus fueris indu‘ mentis duplicibus littera! ac spiritus, si etiam duo pliciter accingaris, ut carne et animo castus sis, si humerali operum, et sapientia: rationali emeris, si etiam mitratibi et lamina aurea, plenitudo scientia: Dei caput coronet, scito te etiamsi apud humines lateas et ignoreris, apud Deum tamen agere pontificatum intra animae tuae templum. Vos enim estis templum Dei vivi, si spiritus Dei habitat in vobis ". Post haec quae de consecratione ejus dicuntur et de unctione, sparsim a nobis et saepe disserta sunt.
But he has not yet finished, and still another adornment must be added: he must receive also a crown. Therefore he receives first the cidaris, which is either a kind of covering of the head or an ornament. And after this the mitre is put on over it. Before his face, that is, on the forehead of the high priest, a golden plate, sanctified, on which the name of God is said to be engraved. This adornment of the head, where the name of God is said to be placed, is put on over all those things with which the lower members of the body had been adorned. In this it seems to me to be indicated that the knowledge of God, as of the author of all things, is more eminent than everything that can be thought or understood about the world or the other creatures. And because he is the head of all things, therefore this adornment too is put on the head above all things. For nothing is added after this to the high priest's head. And therefore wretched are those of whom the Apostle says that they do not hold fast to the head, from which the whole body, joined and knit together, grows with the growth of God in the Spirit. But we, if we have well understood what the priest's adornment is, and what the honour of his head is above all things, searching the depths of the divine mysteries, should desire not only to know and hear these things but also to fulfil and do them, because not the hearers of the law will be justified before God, but the doers. For you too can, as we have often said already, if by your studies and vigils you prepare for yourself such garments, if the word of the law has washed you and made you clean, and the anointing of the chrism, and the grace of baptism in you has lasted undefiled; if you are clothed with the double garments of the letter and the spirit; if you are also doubly girded, so as to be chaste in flesh and mind; if you shine with the ephod of works and the rational of wisdom; if also the mitre and the golden plate, the fullness of the knowledge of God, crowns your head: know that, even if you are hidden and unknown among men, yet before God you exercise the high priesthood within the temple of your soul. For you are the temple of the living God, if the Spirit of God dwells in you. After this, the things that are said about his consecration and anointing have been discussed by us here and there and often.
Lev 8:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 28:36 (allusion, medium confidence) · Col 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:16 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The mitre and golden plate bearing God's name signify that the knowledge of God crowns all knowledge; whoever is washed, anointed, kept in baptismal grace, chaste, and adorned with works and wisdom is a high priest before God.
- Sources: Lev 8:9; Exod 28:36–38; Col 2:19; Rom 2:13; 2 Cor 6:16 and 1 Cor 3:16.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
- The anointing of the chrism and the grace of baptism are named by Origen as conditions of the believer's priesthood; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; footnote reference leaked into the text; stray letter; split word): enim Col. ιι, l9. estis templum → enim estis templum; accipiat etiam comnam → accipiat etiam coronam; Sed nondum tiuivit → Sed nondum finivit; dio cuntur → dicuntur.
Topics: Church office, Baptism
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 6.5 (PG 12:472b–472d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/6-1/#p-6-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-6-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
6.6PG 12:473a–475a
Quod autem dicit“: Et applicuit Moyses filios Aaron, et induit eos tunicas, et praecinxit eos zonas, et imposuit eis cidares, sicut praecepit Dominus Moysi,» attendendum est quae sit differentia horum sacerdotum, ad majora sacerdotia. istis neque bina indumenta traduntur, neque httmeralis neque rationalis, neque capitis ornatus, nisi tantum cidaris et zonae, quae tunicam stringant. Et i5ti ergo accipiunt sacerdotii gratiam, et isti funguntur oflicio, sed non ut illi qui et humerali et rationali ornatus est, qui manifestatione et veritate resplendet, qui aureae laminae ornamento decoratur. Unde arbitror aliud esse in sacerdOtibus officio fungi, aliud instructum esse in omnibus et ornatum. Quivis enim potest solemni ministerio fungi ad populum, pauci autem sunt qui ornati moribus, instructi doctrina, sapientia eruditi, ad manifestandam veritatem rerum peridonei, et qui scientiam fidei non sine ornamento sensuum et assertionum fulgore depromant‘, quod aureae lamina: capiti impositus designat ornatus. Unum igitur est sacerdotii nomen, sed non una, vel pro vitae merito, vel pro animi virtutibus dignitas. Et ideo in his quae lex divina describit, veluti in speculo ittspicere se debet unusquisque sacerdotqu :et gra- ο dus meriti sui inde colligere, si se videat in bis omnibus, quae supra exposuimus, positum, pontificalibus ornatum ornamentis; si conscius sibi sit quod vel in scientia, vel in actibus, vel in doctrina tantus ac talis sit, sciat se summum sacerdotium non solum nomine, sed et meritis obtinere. Alioquin inferiorem sibi gradum positum noverit etiamsi primi nomen acceperit. Nos sane non debet praeterire etiam hoc, quod potest a SludiOSO lectore proferri, in quo et ego saepe mecum ipse haesitavi. lu Exodo enim legens, ubi de sacerdotalibus mandatur indumentis invenio octo esse species, quae pontifici praeparantur. Hic vero septem tantummodo numerantur. Requiro ergo quid sit, quod omissum est. Octava species ibi ponitur campestre, sive, ut alibi legimus, fcmoralia linea, de quo hic inter caetera siluit indumenta. Quid ergo dicemus? oblivionem dabimus in verbis Spiritus sancti, ut cum caetera omnia secundo cuarraverit, una eum species superius dicta latuerit? Non audeo haec de sacris sentire sermonibus. Sed videamus ne forte, quoniam in superioribus diximus hoc genus indumenti indicium castitatis videri, quo vel femora operiri, vel constringi renes videntur ac lumbi, ne forte, inquam, non semper in illis qui tunc erant sacerdotes, has partes dicat esse constrictas. Aliquando enim et de posteritate generis, et de successu sobolis indulgetur. Sed ego in sacerdotibus Ecclesiae huiusmodi intelligentiam non introduxerim. Aliam namque rem video occurrere sacramento. Possunt enim et in Ecclesia sacerdotes et doctores filios generare, sicut et ille qui dicebat: Filioli mei, quos iterum parturio, donec formetur Christus in vobis. Et iterum alibi dicit 9°: ς Tametsi multa millia paedagogorum habeatis in Christo, scd non multos patres. Nam in Christo Jesu per Evangelium ego vos genui. Isti ergo doctures Ecclesiae in lmjusmodi generationibus procreandis aliquando constrictis femoralibus utuntur, et abstinent a generando, cum taies invenerint auditores, in quibus sciant se fructum habere non posse. Denique et in Actibus apostolorum refertur de quibusdam, quod non potuerunt, inquit ", ‹ in Asia verbum Dei loqui, hoc est imposita habuisse fiemoralia, et continuisse se ne filios generarent, quia scilicet tales erant auditores, iu quibus et semen periret, et non posset haberi successio. Sic ergo Ecclesia: sacerdotes, cum incapaces aures viderint, aut cum simulatos inspexerint et hypocritas auditores, imponant campestre, utantur femoralibus, ne pereat semen verbi ‘ Dei, quia et Dominus eadem mandat et dicit ’δε Nolite mittere sanctum canibus, neque margaritas vestras ante porcos, ne forte conculcent eas pedibus, et conversi dirumpaut vos. › Propterea ergo si quis vult pontifex non tam vocabulo esse, quam merito, imitetur Moysen, imitetur Aaron. Quid enim dicitur de eis? quia non discedunt de tabernaculo Domini. Erat ergo Moyses indesinenter in tabernaculo Domini. Quod autem opus ejus erat? ut aut a Deo aliquid disceret, aut ipse populum doceret. llaec duo sunt pontificis opera, ut aut a Deo discat legendo Scripturas divinas, et sacpius meditando, aut populum doceat. Sed illa doceat, qua; ipse a Deo didicerit, non ex proprio corde, vel ex lmmano sensu, sed quae Spiritus sanctus docet. Est et illud opus quod facit Moyses; ad bella vadit, non pugnat contra inimicos. Sed quid facit? Orat: et donec ille orat, vincit populus ejus. Si relaxaveritctdimiserit manus, populus ejus vincitur ct fugatur. Oret ergo et sacerdos Ecclesiae indesineuter, ut vincat populus qui sub ipso et hostes invisibiles Amalecitas, qui sunt daemones, impugnantes eos qui volunt pie vivere iu Christo. Et ideo nos meditantes in bis, et haec die a-c nocte ad meme riam revocantes, et orationi instantes ac vigilantes in ea, deprecemur Dominum ut nobis ipse borum quze legimus scientiam revelare dignetur, et ostendere quomodo spiritalem legem non solum in intelligentia, sed et in actibus observemus, ut spiritalem gratiam consequi mereamur illuminati per legem Spiritus sancti, in CbristoJesu Domino nostro, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
As to what he says, “And Moses brought the sons of Aaron near, and clothed them with tunics, and girded them with girdles, and put caps on them, as the Lord commanded Moses,” we must attend to what difference there is between these priests and the higher priesthoods. To these neither double garments are given, nor the ephod, nor the rational, nor the adornment of the head, but only the cap and the girdles which bind the tunic. These too, then, receive the grace of the priesthood, and these too perform the office, but not like him who is adorned with the ephod and the rational, who shines with manifestation and truth, who is decorated with the ornament of the golden plate. Hence I think it is one thing among priests to perform the office, another to be equipped and adorned in all things. For anyone can perform the solemn ministry to the people, but few are those who are adorned in conduct, equipped in teaching, trained in wisdom, thoroughly fit to make manifest the truth of things, and who bring out the knowledge of the faith not without the adornment of thoughts and the brilliance of assertions; which the adornment placed on the head, the golden plate, designates. One, then, is the name of priesthood, but not one the dignity, whether by the merit of life or by the virtues of the soul. And therefore in what the divine law describes, as in a mirror, each of the priests ought to look at himself and gather from it the degree of his merit: if he sees himself placed in all these things which we have expounded above, adorned with the high-priestly ornaments; if he is conscious that he is so great and of such a kind in knowledge, in actions, in teaching, let him know that he holds the highest priesthood not only in name but also in merits. Otherwise let him know that a lower rank is set for him, even if he has received the name of the first. Indeed this too ought not to escape us, which can be brought forward by a studious reader, and about which I myself have often hesitated within myself. For reading in Exodus, where commands are given about the priestly garments, I find that there are eight kinds which are prepared for the high priest. But here only seven are counted. I ask, then, what it is that has been omitted. The eighth kind is set down there as the drawers, or, as we read elsewhere, linen breeches, about which he has been silent here among the other garments. What, then, shall we say? Shall we attribute forgetfulness to the words of the Holy Spirit, so that, when he has related all the others a second time, one kind mentioned above should have escaped him? I do not dare think such things of the sacred words. But let us see, since we said above that this kind of garment seems to be a sign of chastity, by which either the thighs are covered or the kidneys and loins are bound, whether perhaps, I say, he means that these parts were not always bound in those who were priests then. For sometimes indulgence is given concerning the posterity of the family and the succession of offspring. But I would not introduce an understanding of this kind among the priests of the church. For I see another matter that meets the sacrament. For in the church too priests and teachers can beget sons, like him who said: “My little children, with whom I am again in labour until Christ is formed in you.” And again elsewhere he says: “For though you have many thousands of tutors in Christ, yet not many fathers. For in Christ Jesus through the Gospel I begot you.” These teachers of the church, then, in procreating such offspring, sometimes use bound breeches and abstain from begetting, when they find hearers in whom they know they cannot have fruit. Indeed in the Acts of the Apostles too it is related of certain ones that they could not “speak the word of God in Asia”: that is, that they had put on the breeches and restrained themselves from begetting sons, because, namely, the hearers were such that in them the seed would perish and there could be no succession. So, then, let the priests of the church, when they see incapable ears, or when they discern pretending and hypocritical hearers, put on the drawers, use the breeches, so that the seed of the word of God may not perish; because the Lord too commands the same and says: “Do not give what is holy to dogs, nor cast your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet and turn and tear you.” Therefore, then, if anyone wishes to be a high priest not so much in name as in merit, let him imitate Moses, let him imitate Aaron. For what is said of them? That they do not depart from the tabernacle of the Lord. Moses, then, was unceasingly in the tabernacle of the Lord. And what was his work? Either to learn something from God, or himself to teach the people. These are the two works of the high priest: either to learn from God by reading the divine Scriptures and meditating on them often, or to teach the people. But let him teach what he himself has learned from God, not from his own heart or from human sense, but what the Holy Spirit teaches. There is also that work which Moses does: he goes to wars, he does not fight against the enemies. But what does he do? He prays; and while he prays, his people conquer. If he relaxes and lets down his hands, his people are conquered and put to flight. Let the priest of the church too, then, pray unceasingly, so that the people under him may conquer the invisible enemies, the Amalekites, who are the demons attacking those who wish to live godly in Christ. And therefore let us, meditating on these things and calling them to memory day and night, and persevering in prayer and keeping watch in it, beseech the Lord that he himself may deign to reveal to us the knowledge of what we read, and to show us how we may observe the spiritual law not only in understanding but also in actions, so that we may deserve to obtain spiritual grace, enlightened through the law of the Holy Spirit, in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom be glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Lev 8:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 28:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 28:42 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 4:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 16:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 8:35 (allusion, low confidence) · Exod 33:11 (allusion, low confidence) · Exod 17:11 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The lesser priests' simpler garments show that the name of priest does not guarantee the merit of the high priesthood; the omitted linen breeches signify teachers' restraint before unworthy hearers, and the high priest's work is to learn from God, teach, and pray.
- Sources: Lev 8:13; Exod 28:4, 28:42; Gal 4:19; 1 Cor 4:15; Acts 16:6; Matt 7:6; Exod 33:11 and Lev 8:33–35 (not departing from the tabernacle); Exod 17:11; 2 Tim 3:12; Eph 6:12.
- Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
- Origen's remark that the Old Testament priests' continence was not constant, and his refusal to apply this to the priests of the church, are translated exactly as written.
- A Migne footnote (Scripture references and manuscript readings) stood in the scan where words are lost after “hoc genus”; footnote markers and a stray reference are removed by logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnote marker; OCR read Latin as Greek letters; OCR slip; footnote references leaked into the text; stray letter; split word): pontificalibus ornatum (8|) ornamentis → pontificalibus ornatum ornamentis; video occurrere (8‘2)sacramento → video occurrere sacramento; Et ideo nos 15. "Cal. xvr, 6. meditantes → Et ideo nos meditantes; pontificis opera, ιιι aut a Deo → pontificis opera, ut aut a Deo; Quiris enim potest → Quivis enim potest; ut aut et Deo aliquid disceret → ut aut a Deo aliquid disceret; species ibi ponitur cam- θ pestre → species ibi ponitur campestre; dicebat θα : Filioli → dicebat: Filioli.
Topics: Church office, Prayer
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Lev. 6.6 (PG 12:473a–475a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-leviticum/6-1/#p-6-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-leviticum-6-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.