Homilies on Numbers 21.1–22.4

Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 21

21.1PG 12:736a–738a

Numeri sunt quos legimus, et in priore quidem lectione tempore exclusi sumus, ne aliquid etiam de secunda dinumerationc diceremus, sed conveniens est omissa vel exclusa nunc reddere. Igitur per praeceptum Domini primo numeratus est populus, sed quoniam illi, qui primo fuerant asciti, ceciderunt propter perseverantiam delictorum, secundus nunc populus, qui in lapsorum locum rediviva generatione successit, vocatur ad numerum, et quod de illis prioribus dictum non fuerat, de iis dicitur. Postea enim quam per tribus et plebes, d‘omosque, ac familias collectus est numerus. Dominus ad Moysen “‘z lis distribuetur terra ir sortem, ex numero nominum. Pluribus plura ἀει· buntur in sortem, et exiguis exiguam dabis hmreditatem. Si de prioribus dictum fuisset, quia iis distribuetur terra in sortem,falsum utique fuisset, quia ceciderunt illi in deserto propter delicta sua. Quod ergo primis non est dictum, postremis dicitur, quibus et cuncta quae promittuntur, impleta sunt. Haec autem nolo putes solius historiae textu concludi. Mysteria sunt quae per legis imaginem conscribuntur. Reprobatur enim prior populus, qui estin circumcisione : et introducitur secundus, qui congregatur ex gentibus, et ipse est qui luereditatem consequitur paternam. Et a quo consequitur? Non ab Moyse, sed ab Jesu. Nam Moyses Si di“ "liq'fib‘fs l'mf’diuile'?’ "0" δθξ im” Jordanem, nec transit omnino Iordanem, sed extra Jordanem dat terram, non fluentem lacte et melle, sed pecoribus aptam, et muta animalia, atque irrationales pecudes melius quam rationales homines nutrientem. Jesus vero meus secundo populo terram quam dat, terra est lacte et melle fluens, imo favus mellis est prae omni terra. Et Moyses haereditatem non dat in clero, nec sorte distribuit, nec potest per plebes, et domos, ac familias, et nomina, et merita singulorum divina sorte pensare: hoc solus facit Jesus, cui omne judicium Pater tradidit “ : ipse scit quomodo populum suum non solum per tribus, et familias, et domos, verum et per nomina unumquemque digna et competenti mansione dispenset. Sunt tamen aliqui in istis qui conditione sortis supereminent, et omnino uec adduntur ad sortem. Omnes Levitae, id est omnes qui intente et indesinenter permanent in ministerio Dei, et pervigiles in servitio ejus excubias gerunt, sortem inter caeteros non accipiunt : sed nec omnino in terra est sors eorum, sed ipse Dominus sors eis et luereditas esse memoratur. Per hos illi mihi videntur indicari, qui nullis corporeae naturae obstaculis hebetati, sed omnium visibilium gloriam supergressi, in sola sibi sapientia Dei et verbo ejus vivendi usum exercitiumque pomerunt, qui corporeum nihil requirunt, nihil rationis ahenum. Con» cupierunt enim sapientiam, concupierunt secretorum Dei agnitionem : et ubi est cur eorum, ibi e5t et thesaurus eorum . lsti ergo hereditatem non habent in terris, sed supergrediunlur summa coeli fastigia, et ibi semper in Domino, semper in verbo ejus, semper in sapientia et in voluptate scientiae ejus deliciabuntur. llic eis cibus, hoc erit poculum, ista: divitire, hoc erit regnum. Tales ergo erunt, et in iis erunt illi, quibus ltzereditas ipse Dominus erit. Qui autem inferiores sunt, nec in istum profectuum verticem pervenerunt, hmreditatem teme “cel SublimiOriS alicujus et potentioris. Terra enim viventium repromittitur, quae utique ideirco terra viventium dicitur, quod nesciat mortem. Et isti quidem magni, et isti beati; sed beatiores illi qni jam non per speculum et in mnigmate, neque in substantiis corporalibus, sed facie ad faciem Deum videbunt, sapientiae illuminatione radiali, ei divinitatis capaces per puritatem cordis effecti : portionemque suam non in creatura, sed in creatore habentes, qui est super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula.

What we have read are numberings; and in the earlier reading we were shut out by time from saying anything about the second numbering too; but it is fitting now to render what was omitted or shut out. By the Lord’s command, then, the people was first numbered; but since those who had first been enrolled fell because of their persistence in sins, a second people, which succeeded in the place of the fallen by a generation come back to life, is now called to be numbered, and what had not been said of those earlier ones is said of these. For after the number had been gathered by tribes and clans and houses and families, the Lord said to Moses: “To these the land will be distributed by lot, according to the number of names. To the many more will be given by lot, and to the few you shall give a small inheritance.” If it had been said of the earlier ones that the land would be distributed to them by lot, it would certainly have been false, because they fell in the desert because of their sins. What was not said to the first, then, is said to the last, for whom too all that is promised has been fulfilled. But I would not have you think that these things are confined to the text of the literal account alone. They are mysteries that are written down through the image of the law. For the former people, which is in circumcision, is rejected, and the second is brought in, which is gathered from the Gentiles, and it is this that obtains the father’s inheritance. And from whom does it obtain it? Not from Moses, but from Jesus. For Moses, if he divides an inheritance, does not give it across the Jordan, nor does he cross the Jordan at all, but gives land outside the Jordan, not flowing with milk and honey, but suited to cattle, nourishing dumb animals and irrational beasts better than rational men. But the land which my Jesus gives to the second people is a land flowing with milk and honey, indeed a honeycomb above every land. And Moses does not give the inheritance by allotment, nor distribute it by lot, nor can he weigh out by divine lot according to clans and houses and families and names and the merits of each: this Jesus alone does, to whom the Father has handed over all judgment. He knows how to dispense his people, not only by tribes and families and houses, but even by names, each to a worthy and fitting dwelling. There are, however, some among these who rise above the condition of the lot and are not added to the lot at all. All the Levites, that is, all who remain intently and unceasingly in the ministry of God and keep watchful vigil in his service, do not receive a lot among the others: their lot is not in the land at all, but the Lord himself is recorded to be their lot and inheritance. By these seem to me to be indicated those who, dulled by no obstacles of bodily nature, but having passed beyond the glory of all visible things, have placed the practice and exercise of their living in the wisdom of God alone and in his Word; who seek nothing bodily, nothing foreign to reason. For they have desired wisdom, they have desired the knowledge of God’s secrets: and where their heart is, there also is their treasure. These, then, do not have an inheritance on earth, but pass beyond the highest summits of heaven, and there they will always delight in the Lord, always in his Word, always in wisdom and in the pleasure of his knowledge. This is their food, this will be their drink, these their riches, this will be their kingdom. Such, then, they will be, and among these will be those for whom the Lord himself will be the inheritance. But those who are lower and have not come to this summit of advances will receive the inheritance of a land, but of some more sublime and more powerful land. For the land of the living is promised, which is surely called the land of the living for this reason, that it does not know death. And these indeed are great, and these are blessed; but more blessed are those who will see God no longer through a mirror and in a riddle, nor in bodily substances, but face to face, radiant with the illumination of wisdom, and made capable of the divinity through purity of heart, having their portion not in the creature but in the Creator, who is God over all, blessed for ever.

Num 26:53–54 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 26:64–65 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 32:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 3:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 20:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 5:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 18:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 10:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 6:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 27:13 (26:13 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 9:5 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The second census, made for the generation that would inherit, signifies the Gentile people who receive the inheritance from Jesus, not Moses; the Levites, whose inheritance is the Lord, signify those devoted wholly to God’s wisdom, while others receive the higher “land of the living.”

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 26:53–54; Num 26:64–65; Num 32:1–5, 33 (Moses’ grant east of the Jordan); Exod 3:8; Ezek 20:6; John 5:22; Num 18:20 and Deut 10:9; Matt 6:21; Ps 27:13 (LXX 26:13); 1 Cor 13:12; Matt 5:8; Rom 9:5. “Jesus” here is both Joshua and Jesus (the same name in Greek and Latin), as Origen intends.
  • The scan begins with a leaked reference (“Num. xxv, ll.”) and has lost the first words of the homily, which are supplied from Baehrens's edition. Two garbled passages (“Nam Moyses Si di“ "liq'fib‘fs l'mf’diuile'?’ "0" δθξ im” Jordanem” and “hmreditatem teme “cel SublimiOriS alicujus”) are translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; stray column number): corporeae naturaaobslaculis → corporeae naturae obstaculis; Deus benedictus in saecula. 353 2ο → Deus benedictus in saecula..

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 21.1 (PG 12:736a–738a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-21-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-21-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

21.2PG 12:738a–740a

Ait ergo “ : Ex numero nominum pluribus plura dabuntur in sortem, et exiguis exiguam dabis hiereditatem, unicuique sicut recensitus est, dabitur luereditas ejus. llistoria hoc est quod docet, ut si qua tribus numerosior habetur in populis, majora terrae spatia sortiatur: si qua autem minore hominum numero censetur, breviore possessione contenla sit. Sed quoniam terra: hujus divisionem hmreditatumque terrenam, speciem dicimus tenere et imaginem futurorum bonorum, ac formam caelestis illius, quae a fidelibus et saucris speratur, haereditatis ostendere: requiro in illa hmreditate quae speranda est, qui sint plures, et qui sint pauci, et invenio ibi beatiores paucos haberi quam plures. Nam qui per viam latam et spatiosam, quae ducit ad perditionem, egerint iter, multi dicuntur ”. Qui vero per arctam et angustam viam perrexeriut, quae ducit ad vitam, pauci appellantur. Et iterum in aliis dicitur ὀδε Quam pauci sunt, qui salvantur. Et iterum in aliis Mr: Ubi multiplicatur iniquitas, refrigescet charitas multonum, non paucorum. Sed et in arca, quae a Noe constructa est , ubi mensura: coalitus dantur, in inferioribus trecentorum cubitorum ponitur longitudo, et quinquaginta cubitorum latitudo. Ubi vero textus ejus ad altiora consurgit, in angustum cogitur, et paucorum cubitorum conclusione colligitur, ita ut summitas ejus in unius cubiti spatium consummetur: proptereaque in inferioribus quidem, ubi lata et spatiosa habebantur loca, vel bestiae, vel pecudes erant collocata, in superioribus vero aves : in summis autem, quae augustiora et altiora erant, ibi homo rationalis collocatur. Ipse vero vertex in unum cubitum colligitur. Omnia enim ad monadem rediguntur. Quae tamen Trinitatis sacramentum in numero trecentorum cubitorum designat, et huic sacramento proximus ponitur homo utpote rationalis et Dei capax. Sed unde quae sit dillerentia inter paucos et multos, colligamus indicia? Pone omnem humani generis numerum, ex universis gentibus elige fideles, sine dubio pauciores erunt, quam sunt universi. Tunc deinde ex fidelium numero, elige meliores. Certum est quod multo inferior numerus remanebit. Et iterum ex ipsis quos elegeris, elige rursum perfectiores. pauciores profecto reperies. Et quanto amplius eligendo processeris, tanto magis exiguos et pauciores invenies usquequo ultimo venias ad unum aliquem, qui conlidenter dicat δ’, quia ‹ amplius quam omnes illi laboravi. › Hi ergo qui hoc modo plures sunt, plus terrae et plus corporea: haereditatis accipiunt: pauci autem exiguum aliquid de terra consequuntur, qui plus iu Domino habent: alii autem nihil omnino (ti) terrente litereditalis ε accipiunt, si qui digni fuerint sacerdotes esse et ministri Dei, horum enim ex integro ipse Dominus ltazreditas erit. Et quis ita beatus est, ut vel inter paucos exiguum terrae accipiat, vel inter electos sacerdotes et ministros solum Deum capere haereditatis sorte mereatur? Licet etiam ipsi propterjumenta sua accipiant aliquid terrae, sed illius terrae quae urbibus contigua estet adhaeret civitatibus. Potest tamen adhuc et alio modo intelligi sermo iste, qui dicit ut pluribus multiplicetur luereditas. Unus enim justus secundum hoc quod acceptus est Deo, pro pluribus‘habetur. Denique et scriptum est '°: Per unum sapientem inhabilabitur civitas,~tribus autem iniquorum desolabitur. Et unus justus pro toto mundo reputatur, iniqui autem, etiamsi multi sint, exigui et pro nihilo ducuntur apud Deum. Est ergo et multitudo laudabilis, sicut videmus etiam ad Abraham dictum, cum eduxit eum Deus foras, et dixit ad eum : Respice ad emtum, si potes dinumerare stellas, ita erit semen tuum. » In quo et hoc intuere, quomodo justus intus est, et in interioribus semper consistit: quia intus in abscondito orat Patrem, et omnis gloria lilia: regis, id est, animae regalis, intrinsecus est; sed tamen Deus educit eum foras, eum res postulat, et rerum visibilium ratio deposcit. Potest ergo et hoc modo multis istis, qui sunt sicut stellae coeli in multitudine, multiplicari haereditas, et exiguis illis videlicet qui etiamsi numero multi sunt, vita: tamen sua indignitate et vilitate exigui habentur, exigua haereditas poni.

It says, then: “According to the number of names, to the many more will be given by lot, and to the few you shall give a small inheritance; to each, as he was enrolled, his inheritance will be given.” This is what the literal account teaches: that if some tribe is more numerous among the peoples, it should receive larger areas of land by lot; but if one is counted with a smaller number of men, it should be content with a smaller possession. But since we say that the division of this land and the earthly inheritances hold the figure and image of the good things to come, and show the form of that heavenly inheritance which is hoped for by the faithful and holy, I ask, in that inheritance which is to be hoped for, who are the many and who the few; and I find that there the few are held more blessed than the many. For those who travel by the broad and spacious way that leads to destruction are said to be many; but those who have gone by the narrow and strait way that leads to life are called few. And again elsewhere it is said: “How few there are who are saved!” And again elsewhere: “Where iniquity is multiplied, the love of many will grow cold,” not of few. And in the ark which was built by Noah, where the measures of its frame are given, in the lower parts a length of three hundred cubits and a breadth of fifty cubits is set down. But where its structure rises to higher parts, it is drawn into a narrow space and gathered into a compass of few cubits, so that its top is completed in the space of one cubit; and for this reason in the lower parts, where the spaces were broad and spacious, wild beasts or cattle were placed, in the upper parts birds; but in the highest, which were narrower and higher, there rational man is placed. And the very summit is gathered into one cubit. For all things are brought back to unity. And the number of three hundred cubits signifies the sacrament of the Trinity, and next to this sacrament man is placed, as being rational and capable of God. But from what shall we gather indications of what the difference is between the few and the many? Take the whole number of the human race; from all the nations choose the faithful; without doubt they will be fewer than all. Then from the number of the faithful choose the better. It is certain that a much smaller number will remain. And again from those you have chosen, choose again the more perfect: you will surely find fewer. And the further you proceed in choosing, the smaller and fewer you will find them, until at last you come to some one who can say with confidence: “I have laboured more than all of them.” Those, then, who are many in this way receive more land and more of the bodily inheritance; but the few, who have more in the Lord, obtain some small portion of the land; and others receive nothing at all of the earthly inheritance, those who are worthy to be priests and ministers of God, for the Lord himself will be wholly their inheritance. And who is so blessed as either to receive a little land among the few, or to merit, among the chosen priests and ministers, to take God alone as the lot of his inheritance? Although even they receive some land for their beasts, but of that land which is adjacent to cities and adjoins towns. This saying, however, which says that the inheritance is to be increased for the many, can still be understood in another way too. For one righteous man, according as he is accepted by God, is reckoned as many. Indeed it is written: “By one wise man a city will be inhabited, but the tribe of the wicked will be made desolate.” And one righteous man is reckoned for the whole world; but the wicked, even if they are many, are counted few and as nothing before God. There is, then, also a praiseworthy multitude, as we see said to Abraham too, when God brought him outside and said to him: “Look at the sky, if you can number the stars; so shall your seed be.” In this observe also how the righteous man is inside and always remains in the inner places, because he prays to the Father inside, in secret, and all the glory of the king’s daughter, that is, of the royal soul, is within; but yet God brings him outside when the matter requires it and the order of visible things demands it. In this way too, then, the inheritance can be multiplied for these many, who are like the stars of heaven in multitude, and a small inheritance be assigned to those few, namely those who, even if they are many in number, are nevertheless held few because of the unworthiness and baseness of their life.

Num 26:54 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 10:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:13–14 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 13:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 6:15–16 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 35:2–5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 15:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 45:13 (44:14 LXX) (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In the heavenly inheritance the “few” are the more blessed, as the narrowing ark shows; the priests receive God alone as their inheritance; alternatively, one righteous man counts as many and the wicked, however numerous, as few.

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 26:54; Heb 10:1; Matt 7:13–14; Luke 13:23; Matt 24:12; Gen 6:15–16 (Origen describes the ark narrowing to one cubit at the top, following the Greek of 6:16); 1 Cor 15:10; Num 35:2–5 (the Levites’ pasture lands); Sir 16:4; Gen 15:5; Matt 6:6; Ps 45:13 (LXX 44:14).
  • The symbolism of the 300 cubits for the Trinity is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): lucreditatis ssrte → haereditatis sorte.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 16:4 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 21.2 (PG 12:738a–740a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-21-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-21-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

21.3PG 12:740a

Per sortem, inquit “, erit hereditatis distributio. υ Hoc quidem praecipitur, sed cum venio ad Scripturas, video ipsum Moysen. cui ista mandastur, sorte non uti in divisione luereditatis Balleia, et Gad, et dimidiae tribus Mauasse. Sed et Jesus Nave, extra sortem dat hzereditatem tribui Juda, et Caleb, et extra sortem dat et tribui Ephrem, et dimidia: tribui Manasse : in caeteris sors mittitur, et prima sors Beniamin procedit, et inde jam tribuum reliquarum. Unde puto quod et in illa regni ecclorum beata hmreditate erunt aliqui, qui non veniant ad sortem, neque eum caeteris, quamvis sint sancti. numerabuntur : sed erit egregia quautam et eximia eorum hairedilas, sicut fuit Caleb ex tribu Juda, et .lesu ipsius lilii Nave. Sicut enim, verbi'causa . eum post praelium victoribus provinciae partiuntur spolia, egregii quique et eximii bellatores non cum caeteris militibus in divisione spoliorum ducuntur ad sortem, sed optima quaeque et prmcipua eis virtstum merito decernuntur, caeteri vero utuntur sorte solo jure victoria: : ita mihi videtur et Dominus 355. meus Jesus Christus facturus : quosdam eniquos scit abundantius quam caeteros quorum gesta magniliea sublimesque virtutes ipse cognoscit, illis praecipuos quosque et eximios, atque. ut ita audeam dicere, similes sibi honores decernit et glorias. Annon tibi videtur simile aliquid sn: beatitudinis clarissimis suis conferre discipulis, asse dicit ’δε ς Pater, volo ut ubi ego sum et isti sint meeum? Et cum iterum dicit , quia et vos super duodecim thronos judicantes duodecim tribus Israel? Et iterum “z Sicut tu in me. Pater, et ego in te, ita et isti in nobis unum sint? ο llaec omnia non sorte decernuntur, sed electionis praerogativa donantur ab eo qui corda et mestes hominum videt solus, qui nos quoque etiami non inter eximios et electos, atque illos qui supra sortem sunt, in sortem tamen sanctorum dignetur adducere : eui est gloria et imperium in scruta swculorum.

“By lot,” it says, “will the distribution of the inheritance be.” This indeed is commanded; but when I come to the Scriptures, I see that Moses himself, to whom these things were commanded, does not use the lot in the division of the inheritance of Reuben and Gad and the half-tribe of Manasseh. And Joshua son of Nun too gives an inheritance outside the lot to the tribe of Judah and to Caleb, and outside the lot he also gives to the tribe of Ephraim and to the half-tribe of Manasseh; for the rest the lot is cast, and the first lot comes out for Benjamin, and then for the remaining tribes. Hence I think that in that blessed inheritance of the kingdom of heaven too there will be some who do not come to the lot and will not be numbered with the others, though they are saints; but theirs will be a certain outstanding and exceptional inheritance, as was that of Caleb of the tribe of Judah and of Joshua son of Nun himself. For just as, for example, when after a battle the spoils of a province are divided among the victors, the outstanding and exceptional warriors are not brought to the lot with the other soldiers in the division of the spoils, but all the best and choicest things are assigned to them by merit of their valour, while the others use the lot by the mere right of victory; so it seems to me that my Lord Jesus Christ too will do: for some whom he knows to have laboured more abundantly than the others, whose magnificent deeds and sublime virtues he himself knows, he will assign special and exceptional honours and glories, and, if I may dare to say it, like his own. Does he not seem to you to confer something like his own blessedness on his most illustrious disciples when he says: “Father, I wish that where I am, these too may be with me”? And when again he says: “You too will sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel”? And again: “As you, Father, are in me and I in you, so may these too be one in us”? All these things are not decided by lot but are granted by the prerogative of election by him who alone sees the hearts and minds of men; and may he deign to bring us too, even if not among the exceptional and chosen and those who are above the lot, at least into the lot of the saints: to whom is the glory and the dominion for ages of ages.

Num 26:55–56 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 32:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 14:6–14 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 19:49–50 (allusion, medium confidence) · Josh 18:11 (allusion, high confidence) · John 17:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:12 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Since some received their inheritance outside the lot, Origen infers that in the kingdom of heaven Christ will give outstanding saints a special share beyond the common lot, as he promised his disciples.

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 26:55–56; Num 32:33; Josh 14:6–14 and 15:13 (Caleb); Josh 19:49–50 (Joshua’s own inheritance); Josh 15–17; Josh 18:11; John 17:24; Matt 19:28; John 17:21; Col 1:12 (“the lot of the saints”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR (Latin name read as Greek letters)): ἕως Nave → Jesus Nave.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 21.3 (PG 12:740a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-21-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-21-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 22

22.1PG 12:741d–742b

Quinque lilia: fuerunt, quarum etiam nomina in Scriptura comprehensa sunt, de Salphaat quodam lsraelita progenita}, qui mortuus est in deserto. nulla virili sobole derelicta. Ista: ergo tiliae Salphsat interpellant Moysen, et sortem paterna: hereditatis exposcunt ducentes, ne deleatur nomen patris earum de medio plebis suae, quia non cst ei vir filius natus. Refert pro hoc Moyses consul'atiom-m ad Deum. Omnipotentis autem Dei clementia non spernit, nec despicit consultationem quae offertur a puellis, et non solum responsa dare dignatur, sed intantum probat, et amplectitur verba earum, ut ex ipsis (eterna hominibus jura constituat et Saeculis omnibus observanda. Ait enim : Loquens erat Dominus ad Moysen; Recte locuta: sunt filia: Salphaat. Dahis eis possessionem in medio fratrum [κισ tris sui, et dabis sortem patris ipsarum ipsis, et filiis Israel loqueris dicens: Homo si mortuus fuerit, et filius non fuerit ei, dabitis hmreditatem ejus filia: ejus. Quod si non fuerit ei filia (A9), dabitis literedilatcm fratri ejus. Quod si non fuerint ei fratres, dabitis hmreditatem fratri patris ejus. Quod si non fuerint ei fratres patris ejus, dabitis Increditatem domestico, qui fuerit propiuquior illi ex tribu sua, et capiet haereditatem ejus, et erit hoc filiis Israel justificatio judicii, sicut constituit Dominus Moysi. Haec secundum historiam quid vigoris habeant, omnibus palam est qui sciunt lcgcs istas non solum apud filios Israel custodiri, sed apud omnes η homines, qui tamen legibus vivunt. Unde apparet quod libertas filiarum Salphaat non solum ipsis hereditatem contulerit, sed et perpetua vivendi jura sacculo dederit. Vides quanta sit etiam historia: ipsius utilitas in lege Dei. Quis potest leges istas aliquando dissolvere, quibus universus utitur ο mundus? Sed tamen nos quaeramus quomodo etiam spiritaliter aedificentur. Potest enim fieri ut neque filia: mihi sint secundum carnem, neque aliquid ruris, cujus capi possit haereditas. Quid ergo? nihil apud eum qui hujusmodi est, ista lex Operabitur, et erit alicui otiosum quod divina voce sancitum est? Requiramus ergo etiam apud spiritalem legem quae sint ista: filiae quinque, quarum etiamsi pater mortuus fuerit pro aliquo peccato, ipsa: tamen haereditatcm ex verbo Dei capiant. In superioribus, cum de spiritalibus filiis tractaremus, virtutes animi et sensus mentis filios diei docuimus. Consequens sine dubio et conveniens videtur etiam filias opera quae corporis ministerio explentur, accipere. ldeo denique et quinarius eis numerus ascribitur. Quinque enim corporei sensus sunt, quibus omne opus expletur in corpore. Ista: ergo quinque filiae, id est operum perfectio, etiamsi patre orbentur et rema- .teant orplianw, non tamen ejiciuntur ab Incrediλειω, neque excluduntur a regno, sed in medio plebis Dei portionem hmreditatis accipiunt. Interim videamus quis est iste pater earum, qui mortuus esse dicitur. Salphaat, inquit, Salphaat autem terpretatur umbra in ore ejus (ll); pater operum intellectus est. Saepe ergo accidit, et non pauci inter fratres nostros sunt, in quibus intellectus altior et profundior nullus, sed est in eis sensus emortuus, sieut de quodam scriptum est : ‹ Et emortuum est cor ejus in ipso. Iste ergo etiamsi ad intelligentiam spiritalem nihil sapit, sed est emortuus, tamen si genuerit filias, id est opera ministerii, opera obsequiorum, opera mandatorum Dei, luereditatem terrm cum plebe Domini consequitur. Non poterit quidem inter eos numerari, quorum portio Dominus est, quorum hmreditas Deus est, non poterit in ministrorum et sacerdotum numero suscipi, in plebeio tamen ordine haereditatem terra: repromissionis accipiet: Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci autem electi. Ostenditur tamen el causa εκ ipsius nominis interpretatione, quia iste Salphaat non potuerit filios generare, sed filias. Interpre' tatur enim, ut diximus, umbra in ore ejus. Vides ergo quoniam si quis umbram legis habet in ore, et non ipsam imaginem rerum, hic quia nihil 355 spiritale, nihil profundi intellectus sentire poteSI, sed sola umbra legis in ore ejus est, sensus vivos et spiritales non potest generare, generare tamen potest opera et actus, quae sunt simplicioris vita: ministeria. Et ideo ostendit in his clementia Dei, quod innocentiores quique, etiamsi sensu deficiant, habent tamen opera bona, non excluduntur ab haereditate sanetorum. Recte ergo lo κ cutze sunt filize Salpbaat.

There were five daughters, whose names too are contained in Scripture, born of a certain Israelite Zelophehad, who died in the desert leaving no male offspring. These daughters of Zelophehad, then, approach Moses and ask for the lot of their father’s inheritance, saying: Let not the name of our father be blotted out from the midst of his clan, because no male son was born to him. On this matter Moses brings the inquiry to God. And the clemency of almighty God does not spurn or despise the inquiry which is offered by girls, and he not only deigns to give an answer, but so approves and embraces their words that from them he establishes eternal laws for men, to be observed in all ages. For it says: “The Lord spoke to Moses: The daughters of Zelophehad have spoken rightly. You shall give them a possession in the midst of their father’s brothers, and you shall give them their father’s lot; and you shall speak to the sons of Israel, saying: If a man dies and has no son, you shall give his inheritance to his daughter. And if he has no daughter, you shall give his inheritance to his brother. And if he has no brothers, you shall give his inheritance to his father’s brother. And if his father has no brothers, you shall give his inheritance to the member of his household who is nearest to him of his tribe, and he shall take his inheritance; and this shall be for the sons of Israel a statute of judgment, as the Lord commanded Moses.” What force these things have according to the literal account is plain to all who know that these laws are kept not only among the sons of Israel but among all men who live by laws. Hence it appears that the boldness of the daughters of Zelophehad not only brought an inheritance to themselves but also gave the world perpetual rights of living. You see how great is the usefulness even of the literal account itself in the law of God. Who can ever dissolve these laws, which the whole world uses? But let us nevertheless inquire how they may also edify spiritually. For it can happen that I have neither daughters according to the flesh nor any land whose inheritance can be taken. What then? Will this law work nothing in one who is of this kind, and will what was sanctioned by the divine voice be idle for anyone? Let us inquire, then, in the spiritual law too, who these five daughters are, who, even if their father has died for some sin, nevertheless take an inheritance by the word of God. Earlier, when we were treating of spiritual sons, we taught that the virtues of the soul and the thoughts of the mind are called sons. It seems without doubt consistent and fitting to take as daughters the works which are accomplished through the service of the body. That, in short, is why the number five is ascribed to them. For there are five bodily senses, by which every work is accomplished in the body. These five daughters, then, that is, the completion of works, even if they are bereft of their father and remain orphans, are nevertheless not cast out of the inheritance, nor shut out from the kingdom, but receive a portion of the inheritance in the midst of the people of God. Meanwhile let us see who this father of theirs is, who is said to have died. Zelophehad, it says. Zelophehad is interpreted “shadow in his mouth”; the father of works is understanding. It often happens, then, and there are not a few among our brothers, in whom there is no higher or deeper understanding, but their sense is as dead, as it is written of someone: “And his heart died within him.” Such a one, then, even if he has no taste for spiritual understanding but is as dead, yet if he has begotten daughters, that is, works of ministry, works of service, works of God’s commandments, obtains the inheritance of the land with the people of the Lord. He will not indeed be able to be numbered among those whose portion is the Lord, whose inheritance is God; he will not be able to be received into the number of ministers and priests; yet in the common order he will receive the inheritance of the land of promise. “For many are called, but few are chosen.” The reason too is shown from the interpretation of the name itself, why this Zelophehad could not beget sons, but daughters. For it is interpreted, as we said, “shadow in his mouth.” You see, then, that if someone has in his mouth the shadow of the law, and not the very image of the realities, he, because he can perceive nothing spiritual, nothing of deep understanding, but only the shadow of the law is in his mouth, cannot beget living and spiritual thoughts; yet he can beget works and acts, which are the services of a simpler life. And therefore the clemency of God shows in these things that the more innocent, even if they are lacking in understanding, yet have good works, are not shut out from the inheritance of the saints. Rightly, then, did the daughters of Zelophehad speak.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Num 27:1–4 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 27:6–11 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 27:3 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Sam 25:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 10:1 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God’s answer to the daughters of Zelophehad gave lasting laws of inheritance; spiritually, the five daughters are good works done through the five senses, by which even simple believers without deep understanding (“shadow in his mouth”) inherit with the people of God.

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 27:1–11 (27:3, “died in the desert … for his own sin”); 1 Sam 25:37; Matt 22:14; Heb 10:1 (shadow and image). The etymology of Zelophehad (“shadow in his mouth”) is Origen’s.
  • A leaked marginal reference (“".Nutn. xxvn, 55. Jos. xlv. “Joau. xui, υ.”) is removed, and the word “electi” lost in the scan before “Ostenditur” is supplied.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; a word lost at a line break; leaked marginal references): hereditatis ".Nutn. xxvn, 55. Jos. xlv. “Joau. xui, υ. exposcunt → hereditatis exposcunt; pauci autem - OSIendilur → pauci autem electi. Ostenditur.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 22.1 (PG 12:741d–742b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-22-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-22-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

22.2PG 12:742b–743a

Post haec ponitur lex Dei de successione, ut primo filius, filia secundo in loco succedat, tertio frater, quarto patris frater. Quintus vero gradus certum aliquem non designat, sed quisquis illi propinquior ex omni familia fuerit, ut ipse succedat. ln his tam integer et perfectus est historia: sensus, ut nihil requirere videatur extrinsecus (l2). Tamen si quis bene in spiritalibus legibus eruditus est, et pleniore scientiae lumine radiatus, ille potest intelligere diversos istos successionum gradus, et quomodo primus sit consequentia: ctelestis hmreditatis gradus, doctrina: et scientiae merito, qui est masculus filius. Secundus operum prmrogativa, quae filia est. Tertius compassionis alicujus et imitationis, propter quod et frater nominatur. Sunt enim nonnulli, qui sponte quidem sua, et proprio intellectu nihil agunt, positi tamen inter fratres, ex imitatione caeterorum eadem videntur agere quae et illi agunt, qui intellectu proprio moventur. Datur etiam istis tertius htereditatis sub titulo fratrum nominis gradus. Quartus vero, quem fratrem patris nominat, potest fortassis intelligi ille ordo hominum, qui audita a patribus, ct veterum narratione suscepta conantur imp’lere, et non tam propriis sensibus moti, nec praeseutis doctrinae commonitionibus excitati, quam veterum vel traditione, vel consuetudine sola instituti, boni tamen aliquid gerunt. Ultimus ver gradus scribitur ille, qui quolibet pacto huic proximus fuerit: quasi si diceret, Sive occasione sive veritate doctrinae si quis aliquid boni fecerit, non peribit boui Operis merces, sed largiente Domino locum haereditatis accipiet. llaec quidem a nobis audacter fortassis prmsnmpta, et in medium prolata videantur, non tamen erit absurdum si spiritalibus spiritalia proponentes, secretioris eos intelligentiae aemulatores, cupidosque reddamus.

After this the law of God concerning succession is set down: that first the son should succeed, the daughter in second place, third the brother, fourth the father’s brother. The fifth degree does not designate any particular person, but whoever is nearer to him from the whole family should succeed. In these things the sense of the literal account is so complete and perfect that it seems to require nothing from outside. Yet if anyone is well instructed in the spiritual laws and illuminated by the fuller light of knowledge, he can understand these different degrees of succession: how the first degree of attaining the heavenly inheritance is by merit of doctrine and knowledge, which is the male son; the second by the prerogative of works, which is the daughter; the third by a certain fellow-feeling and imitation, which is why he is also named brother. For there are some who do nothing of their own accord and by their own understanding, yet, placed among the brothers, by imitation of the others seem to do the same things which those do who are moved by their own understanding. To these too the third degree of inheritance is given under the title of the name of brothers. The fourth, whom he names the father’s brother, can perhaps be understood as that order of men who try to fulfil what they have heard from the fathers and received from the account of the ancients, and who, moved not so much by their own understanding, nor roused by the admonitions of present teaching, as instructed solely by the tradition or custom of the ancients, nevertheless do something good. The last degree is written as that which is in any way next to him: as if he said, Whether by occasion or by truth of doctrine, if anyone has done something good, the reward of the good work will not perish, but by the Lord’s bounty he will receive a place of inheritance. These things may perhaps seem boldly presumed and brought forward by us; yet it will not be absurd if, setting spiritual things before spiritual people, we make them emulous and eager for a more secret understanding.

Num 27:8–11 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 1:18 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The five degrees of succession are read spiritually as five ways of attaining the heavenly inheritance: through knowledge, through works, through imitation of others, through the tradition of the ancients, and through any good done at all.

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 27:8–11; 1 Cor 2:13; Phil 1:18 (“whether by occasion or by truth”).
  • A leaked footnote (on the etymology of Zelophehad and readings of a manuscript of Saint Theuderic, “a Matth. HJ EJUS.A Sy … iis proxumus.”) splitting “audita a patribus” is removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked footnote): audita a Matth. HJ EJUS.A Sy, ‹ umbra, et τις), ‹ os, oris. ,(ιὲ) Codex Sancti Theudorici Remensis, in- rmsecus. {Taifalis} σ huic proximus. Lihb. editi, iis proxumus. patribus → audita a patribus.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 22.2 (PG 12:742b–743a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-22-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-22-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

22.3PG 12:743a–744b

Post haec historia refertur, et narratione ntirabilis, et intellectu magnifica. Ponitur enim quomodo Deus dixerit ad Moysen, ut ascenderet in montem, et inde cum prospexisset, et intuitus fuisset omnem terram repromissionis, ibi defungeretur. Sed ille qui pepuli curam magis quant sui gereret, orat ad Deum ut provideat hominem qui regat populum lsrael: t Ne llat, inquit ο, synagoga haec sicut oves quibus non est pastor.» Vide ergo primo omnium quomodo qui perfectus et beatus est, non itt valle, nec in aliqua terrae planitie, aut in colle aliquo, sed tn monte, id est in alto et in arduo defungitur loco. Viue namque ejus consummatio et perfectio habebatur in excelso. Sed et oculis suis contueri iubetur omnem terram repromissionis, et diligenter ex eminenti statione cuncta perspicere. Oportebat enim summam perfectionis consecutura nihil incognitum remanere, sed cunctorum quae videntur et audiuntur habere notitiam: ob hoc caedo, ut omnium quae in carne positus, corporali coepit aSpectu, in spiritu effectus, et nuda mente ac auditoria et discipulatum sapientia: properans, velociter eorum rationes assequatur et causas. Nam qttid videbitur utilitatis ut decessuro dc saeculo, et finem vitae huius protinus accepturo ostenderentur terra; et loca quorum nec laborem perpessurus esset (l4), nec gratiam suscepturus? Perterret me sane sermo qui sequitur, et ad dicendum reddit timidum ac trepidum , quo de magno illo Moyse l‘amulo et amico Dei, cui facie ad faciem locutus est Deus, per quem signa et virtutes mirifica} perpetratae sunt, tam gravia, tam periculosa referuntur. Quid enim ei dicit Deus? Et apponeris, inquit υ, ad populum tuum et tu, sicut appositus est Aaron frater tuus in monte 0r. Et quasi causam mortis cit-ponit dicens : Propter quod transgressi estis vcrbum meum in deserto Sin, cum reStitit synagoga ne ipsetransgressioniscrimen incurrit,etiamipsefactu; me sanctificaret. Non me sanctificastis in aqua coram lise. Ergone in culpa est etiam Moyses? Etiam ipse trans- gressionis crimen Incurrit, etiam ipse factus est sub peccato. Idcirco, credo,cum confidentia dicebatApostolus ’, quia ε regnavit mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen. Accessit enim ad Moysen, et nec ipt' pepercit. Et ideo, opinor, dicebat“, quia ‹ peccatur introivit iu hunc mundum, et per peccatum mors clusit Deus omnes sub peccato, ut omnibus raise reatur. Sed gratias Domino Jesu Christo, qui aut liberavit de corpore mortis huius, ut ubi abundari, peccatum, superabundaret gratia . Nam Moyses quomodo aliquem liberare potuisset a peccatis, cum etiam ipsi dicatur, quia transgressi estis verbum meum in deserto Sin , et non me sanctificastis in aqua coram filiis lsrael? ut manifestum sit omnibus quod ille debeat solus requiri, qui soluspeccatum non fecit, nec inventus est dolus in ore q'us.

After this an account is related, wonderful in its narrative and magnificent in its meaning. For it is set down how God told Moses to go up the mountain, and to die there when he had looked out from it and seen the whole land of promise. But he, who took more care for the people than for himself, prays to God to provide a man to rule the people of Israel: “Let not this congregation,” he says, “be like sheep that have no shepherd.” See, then, first of all how he who is perfect and blessed dies not in a valley, nor on some plain of the earth, nor on some hill, but on a mountain, that is, in a high and lofty place. For the completion and perfection of his life was held on the height. And he is also ordered to behold with his eyes the whole land of promise, and from his eminent station to look carefully at everything. For it was fitting that for one who was to attain the summit of perfection nothing should remain unknown, but that he should have knowledge of all that is seen and heard: for this reason, I believe, so that, having become spirit, with a naked mind, and hastening to the school and discipleship of wisdom, he might swiftly grasp the reasons and causes of all that he had begun to see with bodily sight while placed in the flesh. For what usefulness would there seem to be in showing lands and places, whose labour he was not to endure nor whose grace he was to receive, to one about to depart from the world and soon to receive the end of this life? But the saying that follows terrifies me and makes me timid and trembling to speak, in which such grave and perilous things are related of that great Moses, the servant and friend of God, with whom God spoke face to face, through whom wonderful signs and powers were performed. For what does God say to him? “And you too will be added,” it says, “to your people, as Aaron your brother was added on Mount Hor.” And as if setting out the cause of death he says: “Because you transgressed my word in the desert of Zin, when the congregation resisted, so as to sanctify me. You did not sanctify me at the water before them.” Is Moses too, then, at fault? He too incurred the charge of transgression; he too was made subject to sin. For this reason, I believe, the Apostle said with confidence that “death reigned from Adam to Moses.” For it came even to Moses and did not spare him either. And therefore, I think, he said that “sin entered into this world, and through sin death,” and “God has shut up all under sin, that he may have mercy on all.” But thanks be to the Lord Jesus Christ, who has set us free from the body of this death, so that where sin abounded, grace might abound still more. For how could Moses have freed anyone from sins, when it is said even to him, “Because you transgressed my word in the desert of Zin, and did not sanctify me at the water before the sons of Israel”? So that it may be plain to all that he alone ought to be sought who alone did no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth.

Num 27:12–17 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 33:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 27:13–14 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 20:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 5:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:24–25 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 5:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 2:22 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses, told to view the promised land from the mountain before dying, is a figure of perfection; yet his death for his transgression at Zin shows that even he was under sin, and that Christ alone, who did no sin, sets us free.

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 27:12–17; Exod 33:11; Num 27:13–14 (cf. Num 20:12, 24); Rom 5:14; Rom 5:12; Rom 11:32 (cf. Gal 3:22); Rom 7:24–25; Rom 5:20; 1 Pet 2:22.
  • The scan displaces a line in the quotation of Num 27:14 (“cum reStitit synagoga ne ipsetransgressioniscrimen incurrit,etiamipsefactu; me sanctificaret”) and loses words in the Pauline quotations (“mors clusit Deus omnes … raise reatur”, “qui aut liberavit”); these are translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): proSpexisset → prospexisset.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 22.3 (PG 12:743a–744b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-22-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-22-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

22.4PG 12:744b–746a

Sed interim videamus Moysis magnificentiam. Rccessurus de saeculo orat Deum, ut provideat ducem populo. Quid agis, ο Moyses? Nunquid lilii tibi non sunt, Gersum et Eliezer? Antsi aliquid de ipsis dubitas, non sunt filii fratris magni et egregii viri? Quomodo non oras Deum pro ipsis, ut eos constituat populo duces? Sed discant, Eccitsiarum principes successores sibi non eos. qui eoa sanguinitate generis juncti sunt, nec qui carnis propinquitate sociantur, testamento signare, neque ltzereditarium tradere Ecclesia: principatum, sed referre ad judicium Dei, et non eligere illum, quon humanus commendat allectus, sed Dei judicio totum de successoris electione permittere. Nunquid non poterat Moyses eligere principem populo, rt vero judicio eligere, et recta iustaque sententia, ad quem dixerat Deus “t Elige presbyteros populo quos tu ipse scis presbyteros esse, et elegit tales in quibus continuo Dei spiritus requiesceret,et propltetarent omnes? Quis ergo ita potuit eligere principent populi, ut Moyses poterat? Sed hoeuon facit, non eligit, non audet. Cur non audet? Ne posteris prazsumptionis relinquat esetnplum. Sed ausculta quid dicit: t Provideat, inquit", Dominus Deus spirituum et omnis carnis, hominem super synagogam hanc, qui egrediatur ante faciem eo. rum, et qui ingrediatur, et qui producat eos, et qui reducm. Si ergo tantus ille ac talis Moyses non permittitiudicio suo de eligendo principe populi. de constituendo successore, quis erit qui aud-cat, vel ex plebe quae saepe clamoribus ad gratiam, aut pretio fortassis excitata (l6) moveri solet, vel fl ipsis etiam sacerdotibus quis erit qui se idoneum ad hoc iudicet, nisi si cui oranti, et petenti a Domino reveletur? Sicut et Deus dicit ad Moysen "z Assutne ad temetipsum Jesum filium Nave, hominem qui habet Spiritum Dei in semetipso, et impones manus tuas super enim, et statues eum coram Eleazaro sacerdme. et prtecepta dato ei in conSpectu totius synagogas, et praecipe de ipso coram eis, et dabis claritatem tuam super illum, ut audiant illum lilii Israel. Audis evidenter ordinationem principis populi tam manifeste descriptam, ut pene expositione non egeat. Nulla hic populi acclamatio, nulla consanguinitatis ratio, nulla propinquitatis habita contemplatio est. Pr0pinquis agrorum et praediorum relinquatur haereditas : gubernatio populi illi tradatur, quem Deus elegerit : homini scilicet tali, qtti habet, sicut scriptum audistis, in semetipso Spiritqu Dei et prazcepta Dei in conSpcctu ejus sunt, et qui Moysi valde notus et lamiliaris sit, id est, in quo sit claritas legis et scientia, ut possint eum audire lilii Israel. Verum quoniam mysteriis cuncta referta sunt, non possumus quae pretiosiora sunt omittere, etiamsi haec quae secundum litteram mandantur, necessaria videantur et utilia. Consideremus ergo quae sit Moysis mors, finis sine dubio legis : sed legis illius quze secundum litteram dicitur. Quis autem ejus linis est? Sacrificiornm scilicet interruptio, et cmterorum quae simili. observantia mandantur in lege. llzec ergo ubi linem accipiunt. Jesus suscipit principatum : Finis enim legis Christus ad justitiam omni credenti . t- Et sicut de prioribus dictum est, quia omnes in Moyse baptizati sunt in nube et in mari 7°; ita et de Jesu quia onmes in Jesu baptizati sunt in Spiritu sancto et aqua. Jesus namque est,qui transit aquas Iordanis, et in ipsis quodammodojam tum populum baptizat : et ipse cst qui terram ba2reditatis, terram sanctam partitur universis. non priori populo, sed secundo. Prior enim pupulus propter prtevaricationem suam cecidit in deserto. De Jesu autem temporibus dicitur, quia terra quievit a bellis“; quod Moysi tempore dici non potuit. Sed de Jesu hac dicitur meo Domino, non illo Nave. Atque utinam mea terra cesset a bellis. Et cessare posset si ego Iesu principi meo fideliter militarem. Si etum paream meo Domino Jesu, nnnrpiam caro mea insurget adversus spiritum meum, nec impugnabitnr terra mea ab adverSariis gentibus, diversis scilicet concupiscentiis stimulata. Oremus ergo, ut Jesus regnet super nos, et cesset terra nostra a bellis, cesset ab impugnationibus carnalium desideriorum : et cum ista cessaverint,tunc unusquisque requiescet sub vite sua, et sub ficu sua, et sub oliva sua τ’. Sub velamento enim Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus saneli requiescet anima, quae pacem in se recuperaverit carnis ac spiritus. Ipsi aeterno Deo gloria in saecula szeculorum. Amen.

But meanwhile let us look at the greatness of Moses. About to depart from the world, he prays God to provide a leader for the people. What are you doing, O Moses? Do you not have sons, Gershom and Eliezer? Or if you have some doubt about them, are there not sons of your brother, a great and excellent man? Why do you not pray God for them, that he may appoint them leaders of the people? But let the leaders of the churches learn not to seal by testament as their successors those who are joined to them by blood relationship, nor those who are allied by kinship of the flesh, nor to hand down the leadership of the church as an inheritance, but to refer it to the judgment of God, and not to choose the one whom human affection commends, but to leave the whole choice of the successor to the judgment of God. Could not Moses choose a leader for the people, and choose with true judgment and with a right and just decision, he to whom God had said, “Choose presbyters for the people whom you yourself know to be presbyters,” and he chose such men that the Spirit of God at once rested on them and they all prophesied? Who, then, could choose a leader of the people as Moses could? But he does not do this; he does not choose; he does not dare. Why does he not dare? So as not to leave his successors an example of presumption. But listen to what he says: “Let the Lord, the God of the spirits and of all flesh, provide a man over this congregation, who will go out before their face and who will come in, and who will lead them out and who will bring them back.” If, then, so great and such a Moses does not trust his own judgment about choosing a leader of the people and appointing a successor, who will there be who dares, whether from the people, which is often moved by shouts in favour of someone, or perhaps stirred up by money, or even from the priests themselves, who will there be who judges himself fit for this, unless it is revealed to someone praying and asking it of the Lord? Just as God too says to Moses: “Take to yourself Joshua son of Nun, a man who has the Spirit of God in himself, and lay your hands on him, and set him before Eleazar the priest, and give him commands in the sight of the whole congregation, and give charge concerning him before them, and you shall put your glory on him, so that the sons of Israel may hear him.” You hear plainly the ordination of the leader of the people described so clearly that it hardly needs explanation. Here there is no acclamation of the people, no account taken of blood relationship, no regard had to kinship. Let the inheritance of fields and estates be left to kinsmen; let the governance of the people be handed to him whom God has chosen: to such a man, namely, who has, as you have heard written, the Spirit of God in himself, and the commands of God are in his sight, and who is very well known and familiar to Moses, that is, in whom there is the glory and knowledge of the law, so that the sons of Israel may hear him. But since all things are full of mysteries, we cannot omit the more precious things, even if these which are commanded according to the letter seem necessary and useful. Let us consider, then, what the death of Moses is: without doubt the end of the law, but of that law which is called according to the letter. And what is its end? The cessation, namely, of the sacrifices and of the other things that are commanded with like observance in the law. When these things, then, receive their end, Jesus takes up the leadership: “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” And just as it was said of the earlier people that all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, so too of Jesus, that all are baptized into Jesus in the Holy Spirit and water. For it is Jesus who crosses the waters of the Jordan, and in them in a certain way already then baptizes the people; and it is he who divides the land of inheritance, the holy land, to all, not to the former people, but to the second. For the former people fell in the desert because of its transgression. But of the times of Joshua it is said that the land rested from wars, which could not be said in the time of Moses. But this is said of Jesus my Lord, not of that son of Nun. And would that my land might cease from wars! And it could cease if I served faithfully as a soldier under Jesus my leader. If I obey my Lord Jesus, my flesh will never rise up against my spirit, nor will my land be attacked by hostile nations, that is, by the various desires that goad it. Let us pray, then, that Jesus may reign over us, and our land may cease from wars, cease from the attacks of carnal desires; and when these have ceased, then each one will rest under his vine and under his fig tree and under his olive. For under the covering of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit the soul will rest which has recovered within itself peace of flesh and spirit. To the eternal God himself be glory for ages of ages. Amen.

Num 27:15–17 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 18:3–4 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 11:16–17 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 11:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 27:18–20 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 10:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 3:14–17 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 11:23 (quotation, medium confidence) · Gal 5:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Mic 4:4 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses, not daring to choose his own successor, teaches church leaders never to hand on office by kinship or popular favour but to leave the choice to God; spiritually, Moses’ death is the end of the letter of the law, and Jesus leads the second people into the inheritance and gives the soul rest from inner warfare.

  • Quotations and allusions: Num 27:15–23; Exod 2:22 and 18:3–4 (Gershom and Eliezer); Num 11:16–17, 25; Rom 10:4; 1 Cor 10:2; Josh 3:14–17; Josh 11:23 (14:15); Gal 5:17; Mic 4:4 (1 Kgs 4:25). Origen plays on the name Jesus/Joshua: the leadership passes to “Jesus,” and he says explicitly that the land’s rest refers to “Jesus my Lord, not that son of Nun.”
  • On the choice of church leaders Origen excludes hereditary succession and popular acclamation; translated as written.
  • Leaked marginal references after the final “Amen” and inside the quotation of Num 27:18 are removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked marginal references; leaked marginal references and footnotes): hominem °' ibid. l2. “ llom. qui habet → hominem qui habet; Amen. " Rom. κ, 4. ICor. ι, 2. τί Jus. xxvnt, l, 2, 3. (17.) Ili. s., dicitur.» Libb. editi, dicatur. η Parnm. Gn. XII. 1101111.ῐὰ XXIII. → Amen..

Topics: Church office, Baptism

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 22.4 (PG 12:744b–746a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/21-1/#p-22-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-22-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.