Homilies 1.1–2.4

Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, presenting itself as his account of Peter's travels and disputes with Simon Magus. It is not a work of Clement; it draws on an earlier source (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift' or 'Kerygmata Petrou', probably 3rd-century Syria) reworked in its present form by the 4th century. Its companion recension, the Latin Recognitions, survives only in Rufinus's translation and is not staged here.

Greek text: Schwegler (Greek text: Albert Schwegler, Clementis Romani quae feruntur Homiliae XX (Stuttgart, 1847), digitized by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (Open Greek and Latin), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).

Show

Chapter 1

1.1Schwegler

Ἐγὼ Κλήμης, Ρωμαίων πολίτης ὥν, καὶ τὴν πρώτην ἡλικίαν σωφρόνως ζῆσαι δεδύνημαι, τῆς ἐννοίας μου οὐκ παιδὸς ἀποσχολούσης τὴν ἐν ἐμοὶ ἐπιθυμίαν εἴς τε ἀθυμίας καὶ πόνους. συνῆν γάρ μοι λογισμὸς οὐκ οἶδα πόθεν τὴν ἀρχὴν λαβών, περὶ θανάτου πυκνὰς ποιούμενος ὑπομνήσεις, ὅτι ἄρα θανὼν ἐκ εἰμὶ καὶ οὐδὲ μνήμην τις ποιήσει μού ποτε, τοῦ ἀπείρου χρόνου πάντων τὰ πάντα εἰς λήθην φέροντος, ἔσομαι δὲ ἐκ ὤν, ἐκ ὄντας εἰδώς, οὐ γνώσκων, οὐ γινωσκόμενος, οὐ γεγονώς, οὐ γινόμενος καὶ ἆρά ποτε γέγονεν ὁ κόσμος, καὶ πρὸ τοῦ γενέσθαι τί ἄρα ἦν; εἰ γὰρ ἦν ἀεὶ, καὶ ἔσται· εἰ δὲ γέγονε, καὶ λυθήσεται· καὶ μετὰ λύσιν τί ἄρα ἔσται πάλιν, εἰ μὴ τάχα σιγὴ καὶ λήθη; καὶ τάχα ἔσται τι, ὅ νῦν νοῆσαι οὐ δυνατόν.

Egō Klēmēs, Rōmaiōn politēs hōn, kai tēn prōtēn hēlikian sōphronōs zēsai dedynēmai, tēs ennoias mou ouk paidos aposcholousēs tēn en emoi epithymian eis te athymias kai ponous. synēn gar moi logismos ouk oida pothen tēn archēn labōn, peri thanatou pyknas poioumenos hypomnēseis, hoti ara thanōn ek eimi kai oude mnēmēn tis poiēsei mou pote, tou apeirou chronou pantōn ta panta eis lēthēn pherontos, esomai de ek ōn, ek ontas eidōs, ou gnōskōn, ou ginōskomenos, ou gegonōs, ou ginomenos kai ara pote gegonen ho kosmos, kai pro tou genesthai ti ara ēn? ei gar ēn aei, kai estai; ei de gegone, kai lythēsetai; kai meta lysin ti ara estai palin, ei mē tacha sigē kai lēthē? kai tacha estai ti, ho nyn noēsai ou dynaton.

I, Clement, a citizen of Rome, was able to live chastely even in my early youth, because from boyhood my mind turned the desire within me aside into despondency and labours. For a train of thought was with me, which had its beginning I know not whence, and kept reminding me frequently of death: that when I died I should not exist, and no one would ever make any mention of me, since boundless time carries all things of all men into oblivion; that I should be as one who does not exist, not knowing those who do not exist, neither knowing nor known, neither having come to be nor coming to be. And I asked: was the world ever made? And before it was made, what then was there? For if it always was, it will also always be; but if it came into being, it will also be dissolved. And after its dissolution, what will there be again, unless perhaps silence and oblivion? Or perhaps there will be something which it is not now possible to conceive.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement introduces himself as a Roman who from boyhood was haunted by thoughts of death and of the world's beginning and end.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.1 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.2Schwegler

Ταῦτά τε καὶ τὰ τούτοις ὅμοια ἐκ οἶδα πόθεν ἀπαύστως ἐνθυμούμενος ὀδυνηρὰν εἰχον λύπην τοσοῦτον, ὡς ὠχριακότα με τήκεσθαι· καὶ τὸ δεινότατον, εἴ ποτε ἀπώσασθαι τὴν φροντίδα ὡς ἀνωφελῆ ἐβουλευσάμην, ἀκμαιότερόν μοι μᾶλλον τὸ πάθος ἐγίνετο. καὶ ἠχθόμην ἐπὶ τούτῳ, ἐκ εἰδὼς σύνοικον καλὴν ἔχων ἔννοιαν, ἀθανασίας ἀγαθῆς αἰτίαν μοι γενομένην, ὡς ὕστερον τῇ πείρᾳ ἐπέγνων καὶ Θεῷ πάντων δεσπότῃ ἠυχαρίστησα. ὑπὸ γὰρ τῆς κατʼ ἀρχὰς θλιβούσης με ἐννοίας εἰς τὴν τῶν πραγμάτων ζήτησιν καὶ εὕρεσιν ἠναγκάσθην ἐλθεῖν· καὶ τότε ἐταλάνιζον οὕς τὴν ἀρχὴν διʼ ἄγνοιαν μακαρίζειν ἐκινδύνευον.

Tauta te kai ta toutois homoia ek oida pothen apaustōs enthymoumenos odynēran eichon lypēn tosouton, hōs ōchriakota me tēkesthai; kai to deinotaton, ei pote apōsasthai tēn phrontida hōs anōphelē ebouleusamēn, akmaioteron moi mallon to pathos egineto. kai ēchthomēn epi toutǭ, ek eidōs synoikon kalēn echōn ennoian, athanasias agathēs aitian moi genomenēn, hōs hysteron tę̄ peirą epegnōn kai Theǭ pantōn despotę̄ ēucharistēsa. hypo gar tēs katʼ archas thlibousēs me ennoias eis tēn tōn pragmatōn zētēsin kai heuresin ēnankasthēn elthein; kai tote etalanizon hous tēn archēn diʼ agnoian makarizein ekindyneuon.

Turning over these and similar thoughts unceasingly, I know not from what source, I was so painfully grieved that I grew pale and wasted away. And what was most dreadful: whenever I resolved to thrust the care away as useless, the suffering grew all the sharper. I was vexed at this, not knowing that I had in my thought a good companion, which became for me the cause of a blessed immortality, as I afterwards learned by experience and gave thanks to God, the Lord of all. For by the thought that at first afflicted me I was compelled to come to the inquiry into things and to the finding of them; and then I pitied those whom at the beginning, through ignorance, I had been inclined to call blessed.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement's anxious thoughts, though painful, later proved to be the cause of his finding the truth.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.2 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.3Schwegler

Ἐκ παιδὸς οὖν ἡλικίας ὤν ἐν τοιούτοις λογισμοῖς, χάριν τοῦ μαθεῖν τι βέβαιον, εἰς τὰς τῶν φιλοσόφων ἐφοίτων διατριβάς καὶ οὐθὲν ἕτερον ἑώρων, ἢ δογμάτων ἀνασκευὰς καὶ κατασκευὰς καὶ ἔρεις καὶ φιλονεικίας καὶ συλλογισμῶν τέχνας καὶ λημμάτων ἐπινοίας. καὶ ὁτὲ μὲν ἐπεκράτει, φέρε λέγειν, ὅτι ἀθάνατος ἡ ψυχή, ὁτὲ δὲ ὅτι θνητή. εἴ ποτε οὖν ἐπεκράτει λόγος ὅτι ἀθάνατος, ἔχαιρον· ὁπότε δὲ [ὅτι θνητή, ἠνιώμην· πλέον δὲ πάλιν ἠθύμεν, ] ὅτι ἔδʼ ὁπότερον εἰς τὸν ἐμὸν βεβαιῶσαι νοῦν ἠδυνάμην. πλὴν συνενόεν ὅτι αἱ δόξαι τῶν ὑποθέσεων παρὰ τοὺς ἐκδικοῦντας ψευδεῖς ἢ ἀληθεῖς ὑπολαμβάνονται, καὶ οὐχ ὡς ἔχουσιν ἀληθείας φαίνονται. ἐπιστήσας οὖν ἤδη ποτὲ ὅτι οὐ παρὰ τὰς ἐκδικουμένας ὑποθέσεις ἡ κατάληψις γίνεται, ἀλλὰ παρὰ τοὺς ἐκδικοῦντας αἱ δόξαι ἀποφέρονται, ἔτι μᾶλλον ἰλιγγίων ἐν τοῖς πράγμασιν. διὸ ἐκ τοῦ τῆς ψυχῆς βάθους ἐστέναζον· οὔτε γάρ τι βεβαιῶσαι οἷός τε ἤμην, οὔτε τὴν τῶν τοιούτων φροντίδα ἀποσείσασθαι ἐδυνάμην, καί περ βουλόμενος, ὡς φθάσας εἶπον· ὅτι ἐμαυτῷ πυκνότερον ἡσυχάζειν ἐπιτάσσοντος, οὐκ οἶδά πως λανθανόντως μεθʼ ἡδονῆς ὁ τῶν τοιούτων μοι εἰσήρχετο λογισμός.

Ek paidos oun hēlikias ōn en toioutois logismois, charin tou mathein ti bebaion, eis tas tōn philosophōn ephoitōn diatribas kai outhen heteron heōrōn, ē dogmatōn anaskeuas kai kataskeuas kai ereis kai philoneikias kai syllogismōn technas kai lēmmatōn epinoias. kai hote men epekratei, phere legein, hoti athanatos hē psychē, hote de hoti thnētē. ei pote oun epekratei logos hoti athanatos, echairon; hopote de [hoti thnētē, ēniōmēn; pleon de palin ēthymen, ] hoti edʼ hopoteron eis ton emon bebaiōsai noun ēdynamēn. plēn synenoen hoti hai doxai tōn hypotheseōn para tous ekdikountas pseudeis ē alētheis hypolambanontai, kai ouch hōs echousin alētheias phainontai. epistēsas oun ēdē pote hoti ou para tas ekdikoumenas hypotheseis hē katalēpsis ginetai, alla para tous ekdikountas hai doxai apopherontai, eti mallon ilingiōn en tois pragmasin. dio ek tou tēs psychēs bathous estenazon; oute gar ti bebaiōsai hoios te ēmēn, oute tēn tōn toioutōn phrontida aposeisasthai edynamēn, kai per boulomenos, hōs phthasas eipon; hoti emautǭ pyknoteron hēsychazein epitassontos, ouk oida pōs lanthanontōs methʼ hēdonēs ho tōn toioutōn moi eisērcheto logismos.

Being, then, from boyhood in such reasonings, I frequented the schools of the philosophers for the sake of learning something certain. And I saw nothing else there than the overturning and establishing of doctrines, strife and contentiousness, the arts of syllogisms and the contrivance of premises. At one time the argument prevailed, let us say, that the soul is immortal; at another, that it is mortal. Whenever, then, the argument prevailed that it is immortal, I rejoiced; but whenever that it is mortal, I was grieved; and again I was yet more despondent because I could not settle either view firmly in my mind. Yet I perceived that opinions on these questions are taken as false or true according to those who defend them, and do not appear as they are in truth. Having at last come to see that conviction is formed not according to the questions defended but that opinions are carried off according to their defenders, I was still more dizzied in the matter. Therefore I groaned from the depth of my soul; for I was neither able to establish anything, nor could I shake off the care of such matters, though I wished to, as I have already said. For even when I often ordered myself to be quiet, somehow, I know not how, the reasoning about such things stole in upon me again with pleasure.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement studies with the philosophers but finds only debate, not certainty about the soul's immortality.

  • The words “but whenever that it is mortal, I was grieved; and again I was yet more despondent” are bracketed in the edition (evidently supplied); they are needed for the sense and are translated.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (letters scrambled in the digital text (μαθεῖν τι)): τοῦ ματι θεῖν βέβαιον → τοῦ μαθεῖν τι βέβαιον.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.3 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.4Schwegler

Καὶ πάλιν ἀπορούμενος ἔλεγον ἐμαυτῷ· τί ματαιοπονῶ σαφοῦς ὄντος τοῦ πράγματος ὅτι εἰ μὲν θανὼν ἐκ εἰμί, νῦν ὄντα με λυπεῖσθαι οὐ προσῆκεν. διὸ τηρήσω τὸ λυπεῖσθαι εἰς τὴν τότε, ὅτε ἐκ ὤν οὐ λυπηθήσομαι. εἰ δʼ ἄρα εἰμί, τί νῦν ἐκ περισσοῦ μοι πρόςεστιν τὸ λυπεῖσθαι; καὶ εὐθέως μετὰ τοῦτο ἕτερός με εἰσῄει λογισμός. ἔλεγον γάρ, εἰ μή τί γε τοῦ νῦν με λυποῦντος ἐκεῖ χεῖρον παθεῖν ἔχω, μὴ βεβιωκὼς εὐσεβῶς, καὶ παραδοθήσομαι κατʼ ἐνίων φιλοσόφων λόγους Πυριφλεγέθοντι καὶ Ταρτάρῳ ὡς Σίσυφος ἢ Τίτυος ἢ Ἰξίων ἢ Τάνταλος, καὶ ἔσομαι ἐν ᾅδου τὸν αἰῶνα κολαζόμενος. πάλιν τε ἀνθυπέφερον λέγων, ἀλλʼ οὐκ ἔστι ταῦτα. καὶ πάλιν ἔλεγον, εἰ δὲ ἔστιν; οὐ δήλου οὖν ὄντος τοῦ πράγματος, ἔλεγον, ἀκινδυνότερόν ἐστιν μᾶλλον εὐσεβῶς βιῶσαί με. καὶ πῶς δυνήσομαι τοῦ δικαίου χάριν, εἰς ἄδηλον ἐλπίδα ἀφορῶν, τῶν τοῦ σώματος κρατεῖν ἡδονῶν; ἀλλʼ οὐδὲ τί ποτέ ἐστι δίκαιον καὶ ἀρέσκον Θεῷ πεπληροφόρημαι, οὔτε εἰ ἡ ψυχὴ ἀθάνατος ἢ θνητὴ γινώσκω· οὔτε τις λόγος βέβαιος εὑρίσκεται, οὔτε τῶν τοιούτων λογισμῶν ἡσυχάζειν δύναμαι.

Kai palin aporoumenos elegon emautǭ; ti mataioponō saphous ontos tou pragmatos hoti ei men thanōn ek eimi, nyn onta me lypeisthai ou prosēken. dio tērēsō to lypeisthai eis tēn tote, hote ek ōn ou lypēthēsomai. ei dʼ ara eimi, ti nyn ek perissou moi prosestin to lypeisthai? kai eutheōs meta touto heteros me eisę̄ei logismos. elegon gar, ei mē ti ge tou nyn me lypountos ekei cheiron pathein echō, mē bebiōkōs eusebōs, kai paradothēsomai katʼ eniōn philosophōn logous Pyriphlegethonti kai Tartarǭ hōs Sisyphos ē Tityos ē Ixiōn ē Tantalos, kai esomai en hądou ton aiōna kolazomenos. palin te anthypepheron legōn, allʼ ouk esti tauta. kai palin elegon, ei de estin? ou dēlou oun ontos tou pragmatos, elegon, akindynoteron estin mallon eusebōs biōsai me. kai pōs dynēsomai tou dikaiou charin, eis adēlon elpida aphorōn, tōn tou sōmatos kratein hēdonōn? allʼ oude ti pote esti dikaion kai areskon Theǭ peplērophorēmai, oute ei hē psychē athanatos ē thnētē ginōskō; oute tis logos bebaios heurisketai, oute tōn toioutōn logismōn hēsychazein dynamai.

And again, being at a loss, I said to myself: “Why do I labour in vain, since the matter is plain? If after death I shall not exist, it is not fitting that I should grieve now while I exist. Let me keep the grieving, then, for that time when, not existing, I shall not grieve. But if I shall exist, what does grieving now gain me?” And immediately after this another thought came to me. I said: “Unless perhaps I am to suffer there something worse than what grieves me now, if I have not lived piously, and I shall be handed over, as some philosophers say, to Pyriphlegethon and Tartarus, like Sisyphus or Tityus or Ixion or Tantalus, and shall be punished in Hades for ever.” And again I answered myself, saying: “But these things are not so.” And again I said: “But what if they are? Since the matter is not clear,” I said, “it is safer for me rather to live piously. Yet how shall I be able, for the sake of righteousness and looking to an uncertain hope, to master the pleasures of the body? Nor have I been fully assured what is righteous and pleasing to God, nor do I know whether the soul is immortal or mortal; no sure argument is found, and I cannot rest from such reasonings.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement weighs whether to fear punishment after death and resolves that it is safer to live piously, though he lacks certainty.

  • Pyriphlegethon, Tartarus, and the punished figures Sisyphus, Tityus, Ixion, and Tantalus are the underworld of Greek poetry (Homer, Od. 11.576–600) and of philosophers such as Plato (Phaed. 113–114).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (two words joined in the digital text): περισσοῦμοι → περισσοῦ μοι.

Extrabiblical texts: Homer, Od. 11.576–600 (Homer, Odyssey; allusion); Plato, Phaed. 113a–114b (Plato (works); allusion)

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.4 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.5Schwegler

Τιʼ οὖν χρὴ ποιεῖν; ἢ τοῦτο, εἰς Αἴγυπτον πορεύσομαι, καὶ τοῖς τῶν ἀδύτων ἱεροφάνταις καὶ προφήταις φιλιωθήσομαι, καὶ μάγον ζητήσας καὶ εὑρὼν χρήμασι πολλοῖς πείσω, ὅπως ψυχῆς ἀναπομπήν, τὴν λεγομένην νεκρομαντείαν ποιήση, ἐμοῦ ὡς περὶ πράγματός τινος πυνθανομένου· ἡ δὲ πεῦσις ἔσται περὶ τοῦ μαθεῖν εἰ ἀθάνατος ἡ ψυχή. ἡ δὲ τῆς ψυχῆς ἀπόκρισις, ὅτι ἀθάνατός ἐστιν, οὐκ ἐκ τοῦ λαλῆσαι ἢ καὶ ἀκοῦσαι ἔσται μοι γνῶναι, ἀλλʼ ἐκ τοῦ ὀφθῆναι μόνον, ἵνα αὐτοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς ἰδὼν αὐτὴν αὐτάρκη καὶ ἱκανὴν ἀπόφασιν ἔχω, ἐκ τοῦ μόνον φανῆναι, ὅτι ἔστιν· καὶ ἐκ ἔτι δυνήσεται τὰ τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν ἴδία τὰ τῆς ἀκοῆς ἀνατρέψαι ἄδηλα ῥήματα. ὅμως καὶ αὐτὴν ταύτην τὴν σκέψιν ἀντέβαλλόν τινι συνήθει φιλοσόφῳ, ὅς συνεβέλευέν μοι, τῦτο μὴ τολμᾶν, κατὰ πολλοὺς τρόπους. εἴτε γὰρ ἐκ εἰσακούσεται, φησὶν, ἡ ψυχὴ τῷ μάγῳ, σὺ τοῖς ταῦτα ποιεῖν ἀπαγορεύουσι νόμοις ὡς ἀντιπράξας δυσσυνειδήτως βιώσεις εἰ δὲ ἐπακούσεται, μετὰ τοῦ δυσσυνειδήτως σε βιοῦν, οἶμαι τὰ τῆς εὐσεβείας σοι μηκέτι προχωρεῖν, οὗ εἵνεκεν καὶ ἐτόλμησας. ἐχθραίνειν γὰρ τὸ θεῖον λέγουσιν ἐπὶ τοῖς τῇ λύσει θανόντων σωμάτων σκύλλεσιν τὰς ψυχάς. ἐγὼ δὲ ταῦτα ἀκούσας ὀκνηρότερος μὲν πρὸς τὸ τοιοῦτον ἐγχειρῆσαι ἐγενόμην, τῆς δὲ ἀπαρχῆς μου ἐκ ἐπαυσάμην βουλῆς, ἀλλʼ ὡς ἐμποδισθεὶς τὴν ὁρμὴν ἠθύμουν.

Tiʼ oun chrē poiein? ē touto, eis Aigypton poreusomai, kai tois tōn adytōn hierophantais kai prophētais philiōthēsomai, kai magon zētēsas kai heurōn chrēmasi pollois peisō, hopōs psychēs anapompēn, tēn legomenēn nekromanteian poiēsē, emou hōs peri pragmatos tinos pynthanomenou; hē de peusis estai peri tou mathein ei athanatos hē psychē. hē de tēs psychēs apokrisis, hoti athanatos estin, ouk ek tou lalēsai ē kai akousai estai moi gnōnai, allʼ ek tou ophthēnai monon, hina autois ophthalmois idōn autēn autarkē kai hikanēn apophasin echō, ek tou monon phanēnai, hoti estin; kai ek eti dynēsetai ta tōn ophthalmōn idia ta tēs akoēs anatrepsai adēla rhēmata. homōs kai autēn tautēn tēn skepsin anteballon tini synēthei philosophǭ, hos synebeleuen moi, tyto mē tolman, kata pollous tropous. eite gar ek eisakousetai, phēsin, hē psychē tǭ magǭ, sy tois tauta poiein apagoreuousi nomois hōs antipraxas dyssyneidētōs biōseis ei de epakousetai, meta tou dyssyneidētōs se bioun, oimai ta tēs eusebeias soi mēketi prochōrein, hou heineken kai etolmēsas. echthrainein gar to theion legousin epi tois tę̄ lysei thanontōn sōmatōn skyllesin tas psychas. egō de tauta akousas oknēroteros men pros to toiouton encheirēsai egenomēn, tēs de aparchēs mou ek epausamēn boulēs, allʼ hōs empodistheis tēn hormēn ēthymoun.

What, then, must I do? This: I will go to Egypt and make friends with the hierophants and prophets of the shrines; and I will seek out a magician, and when I have found him I will persuade him with much money to perform a calling-up of a soul, what is called necromancy, as though I were inquiring about some business. But the inquiry will be to learn whether the soul is immortal. And the soul's answer that it is immortal will not come to me from its speaking or my hearing, but only from its being seen, so that, seeing it with my own eyes, I may have a sufficient and adequate proof, from its mere appearing, that it exists; and no longer will the uncertain words of hearing be able to overturn what the eyes have themselves seen. Nevertheless I laid this very plan before a philosopher of my acquaintance, who advised me in many ways not to dare it. “For if the soul does not obey the magician,” he said, “you will live with an evil conscience, as one who has acted against the laws that forbid these practices; and if it does obey, then besides living with an evil conscience, I think the cause of piety, for whose sake you ventured it, will no longer prosper for you. For they say that the divine is hostile to those who trouble souls after their release from the body in death.” When I heard this I became more hesitant to attempt such a thing; yet I did not give up my first purpose, but was despondent, as one hindered in his impulse.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement plans to seek proof of immortality through necromancy in Egypt but is dissuaded by a philosopher.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.5 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.6Schwegler

Καὶ ἵνα μή σοι τὰ τοιαῦτα μακρῷ διηγήσομαι λόγῳ, ἐν τοσούτοις λογισμοῖς καὶ πράγμασιν ὄντος μου φήμη τις ἠρέμα, ἐπὶ τῆς Τιβερίς Καίσαρος βασιλείας, ἐξ ἐαρινῆς τροπῆς τὴν ἀρχὴν λαμβάνουσα ἤυξανεν ἑκάστοτε καὶ ὡς ἀληθῶς ἀγαθὴ Θεοῦ ἄγγελος διήρχετο τὸν κόσμον, τὸ τοῦ Θεοῦ βούλημα σιγᾶν καὶ στέγειν μὴ δυναμένη. ἑκάστοτε τῶν πλείων καὶ μείζων ἐγένετο, λέγουσα, ὧς τίς ποτε ἐν Ιουδαίᾳ, ἐξ ἐαρινῆς τροπῆς λαβὼν τὴν ἀρχήν, Ἰουδαίος τὴν τοῦ ἀϊδίου Θεοῦ εὐαγγελίζεται βασιλείαν, ἧς ἀπολαύειν λέγει ἐάν τις αὐτῶν προσκατορθώσει τὴν πολιτείαν· τοῦ δὲ πιστεύεσθαι αὐτὸν χάριν, ὅτι θειότητος γέμων ταῦτα πνέει, πολλὰ θαυμάσια σημεῖά τε καὶ τέρατα διαπράττεται κελεύσει μόνη, ὡς παρὰ Θεοῦ εἰληφὼς τὴν ἐξουσίαν· κωφοὺς γὰρ ποιεῖ ἀκούειν, τυφλοὺς ἀναβλέπειν, κυλλοὺς ποιεῖ περιπατεῖν, χωλοὺς ἀνορθοῖ, πᾶσαν νόσον ἀπελαύνει, πάντα δαίμονα φυγαδεύει ἀλλὰ καὶ λεπροὶ ψωροὶ ἐκ διαστήματος μόνον ἐνορῶντες αὐτῷ ἰώμενοι ἀπαλλάσσονται, νεκροὶ δὲ προσφερόμενοι ἐγείρονται, καὶ οὐδέν ἐστιν ὅ ἀδυνατεῖ ποιεῖν· καὶ ὅσφ γε μᾶλλον ὁ χρόνος προέκοπτεν, πολὺ μείζων διὰ πλειόνων τῶν ἐπιδημέντων καὶ βεβαιοτέρα ἐγίνετο, ἐκ ἔτι φήμη λέγω, ἀλλὰ τοῦ πράγματος ἡ ἀλήθεια. ἤδη γάρ ποτε καὶ συστήματα κατὰ τόπους ἐγίνετο βουλῆς καὶ σκέψεως, τὸ τίς ἄν εἴη ὁ φανεὶς καὶ τί βούλεται λέγειν.

Kai hina mē soi ta toiauta makrǭ diēgēsomai logǭ, en tosoutois logismois kai pragmasin ontos mou phēmē tis ērema, epi tēs Tiberis Kaisaros basileias, ex earinēs tropēs tēn archēn lambanousa ēuxanen hekastote kai hōs alēthōs agathē Theou angelos diērcheto ton kosmon, to tou Theou boulēma sigan kai stegein mē dynamenē. hekastote tōn pleiōn kai meizōn egeneto, legousa, hōs tis pote en Ioudaią, ex earinēs tropēs labōn tēn archēn, Ioudaios tēn tou aïdiou Theou euangelizetai basileian, hēs apolauein legei ean tis autōn proskatorthōsei tēn politeian; tou de pisteuesthai auton charin, hoti theiotētos gemōn tauta pneei, polla thaumasia sēmeia te kai terata diaprattetai keleusei monē, hōs para Theou eilēphōs tēn exousian; kōphous gar poiei akouein, typhlous anablepein, kyllous poiei peripatein, chōlous anorthoi, pasan noson apelaunei, panta daimona phygadeuei alla kai leproi psōroi ek diastēmatos monon enorōntes autǭ iōmenoi apallassontai, nekroi de prospheromenoi egeirontai, kai ouden estin ho adynatei poiein; kai hosph ge mallon ho chronos proekopten, poly meizōn dia pleionōn tōn epidēmentōn kai bebaiotera egineto, ek eti phēmē legō, alla tou pragmatos hē alētheia. ēdē gar pote kai systēmata kata topous egineto boulēs kai skepseōs, to tis an eiē ho phaneis kai ti bouletai legein.

And not to recount such things to you at length: while I was in the midst of such reasonings and affairs, a report, beginning quietly in the reign of Tiberius Caesar, from the spring season, grew greater all the time and passed through the world like a truly good messenger of God, unable to keep silent and conceal the will of God. It grew greater and stronger on every occasion, saying that someone in Judea, beginning in the spring season, was proclaiming to the Jews the kingdom of the eternal God, which he said they would enjoy if they amended their way of life; and that, so that he might be believed to speak these things full of divinity, he was doing many wonderful signs and wonders by his command alone, as having received authority from God. For he makes the deaf hear and the blind see, makes the crippled walk, raises up the lame, drives away every disease, and puts every demon to flight; even scabby lepers, merely looking at him from a distance, go away healed; and the dead, when brought to him, are raised; and there is nothing he cannot do. And as time went on, through the greater number of those who arrived it grew much greater and firmer, no longer, I say, a report, but the truth of the matter. For now at last meetings were being held in various places for counsel and inquiry as to who he might be who had appeared, and what he meant to say.

Matt 11:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 7:22 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: A report reaches Rome under Tiberius of a Jew in Judea preaching God's kingdom and working miracles.

  • The list of miracles echoes Jesus' answer to John the Baptist (Matt 11:5; Luke 7:22).
  • The digital text reads Ἰουδαίος (“a Jew”); the following “of them” shows that Ἰουδαίοις (“to the Jews”) is meant.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.6 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.7Schwegler

Καὶ δήποτέ τις πρὸς αὐτῷ τῷ ἔτει φθινοπωρινῇ τροπῇ δημοσίᾳ στὰς ἐβόα λέγων· ἄνδρες Ῥωμαῖοι, ἀκούσατε· ὁ τοῦ Θεοῦ υἱὸς ἐν Ἰουδαίᾳ πάρεστιν, ἐπαγγελλόμενος πᾶσι τοῖς βουλομένοις ζωὴν αἰώνιον ἐὰν τὰ κατὰ γνώμην τοῦ πέμψαντος αὐτὸν πατρὸς βιώσωσιν. διὸ μεταβάλλεσθε τὸν τρόπον, ἀπὸ τῶν χειρόνων ἐπὶ τὰ κρείττονα, ἀπὸ τῶν προσκαίρων ἐπὶ τὰ αἰώνια γνῶτε ἕνα Θεὸν εἶναι τὸν ἐπουράνιον, οὗ τὸν κόσμον ἀδίκως οἰκεῖτε ἐμπροσθὲν τῶν αὐτοῦ δικαίων ὀφθαλμῶν· ἀλλʼ ἐὰν μεταβάλλησθε καὶ κατὰ τὴν αὐτοῦ βούλησιν βιώσητε, εἰς ἕτερον αἰῶνα ἐνεχθέντες καὶ ἀΐδιοι γινόμενοι τῶν ἀποῤῥήτων αὐτοῦ ἀγαθῶν ἀπολαύσετε· ἐὰν δὲ ἀπειθήσητε, αἱ ψυχαὶ ὑμῶν κατὰ τὴν τοῦ σώματος λύσιν εἰς τὸν τόπον τοῦ πυρὸς βληθήσονται, ὅπου ἀϊδίως κολαζόμεναι ἀνωφέλητα μετανοήσουσιν. ὁ γὰρ τῆς μετανοίας καιρὸς ἡ νῦν ἑκάστου ζωὴ τυγχάνει. ἐγὼ μὲν οὖν ταῦτα ἀκούων ἠχθόμην, ὅτι οὐδεὶς ἐκ τοσούτων ὄχλων τηλικαύτην ἀγγελίαν ἀκούσας εἴρηκεν, εἰς Ιουδαίαν πορεύσομαι, ἵνα ἴδω εἰ ταῦθʼ οὗτος λέγων ἀληθεύει, ὡς ὅτι υἱὸς Θεοῦ ἐπιδεδήμηκεν τῇ Ιουδαίᾳ, ἀγαθῆς καὶ αἰωνίας ἐλπίδος χάριν, τὴν τοῦ ἀποστείλαντος πατρὸς βούλησιν ἐκφαίνων· καὶ ὅπερ λέγουσιν αὐτὸν κηρύσσειν, ἐκ ἔστιν μικρόν ὧν μὲν γὰρ τὰς ψυχὰς διαβεβαιοῦται αἰωνίους οὔσας αἰωνίων ἀπολαύσειν ἀγαθῶν, ὧν δὲ ἐν πυρὶ ἀσβέστῳ ῥιφθείσας τὸν αἰῶνα κολασθήσεσθαι.

Kai dēpote tis pros autǭ tǭ etei phthinopōrinę̄ tropę̄ dēmosią stas eboa legōn; andres Rhōmaioi, akousate; ho tou Theou huios en Ioudaią parestin, epangellomenos pasi tois boulomenois zōēn aiōnion ean ta kata gnōmēn tou pempsantos auton patros biōsōsin. dio metaballesthe ton tropon, apo tōn cheironōn epi ta kreittona, apo tōn proskairōn epi ta aiōnia gnōte hena Theon einai ton epouranion, hou ton kosmon adikōs oikeite emprosthen tōn autou dikaiōn ophthalmōn; allʼ ean metaballēsthe kai kata tēn autou boulēsin biōsēte, eis heteron aiōna enechthentes kai aïdioi ginomenoi tōn aporrhētōn autou agathōn apolausete; ean de apeithēsēte, hai psychai hymōn kata tēn tou sōmatos lysin eis ton topon tou pyros blēthēsontai, hopou aïdiōs kolazomenai anōphelēta metanoēsousin. ho gar tēs metanoias kairos hē nyn hekastou zōē tynchanei. egō men oun tauta akouōn ēchthomēn, hoti oudeis ek tosoutōn ochlōn tēlikautēn angelian akousas eirēken, eis Ioudaian poreusomai, hina idō ei tauthʼ houtos legōn alētheuei, hōs hoti huios Theou epidedēmēken tę̄ Ioudaią, agathēs kai aiōnias elpidos charin, tēn tou aposteilantos patros boulēsin ekphainōn; kai hoper legousin auton kēryssein, ek estin mikron hōn men gar tas psychas diabebaioutai aiōnious ousas aiōniōn apolausein agathōn, hōn de en pyri asbestǭ rhiphtheisas ton aiōna kolasthēsesthai.

And in that same year, at the autumn season, a certain man stood in a public place and cried out, saying: “Men of Rome, listen! The Son of God is now in Judea, promising eternal life to all who are willing, if they live according to the will of the Father who sent him. Therefore change your ways from the worse to the better, from things temporal to things eternal. Know that there is one God, the heavenly one, whose world you inhabit unrighteously before his righteous eyes. But if you change and live according to his will, you will be brought into another age and, becoming everlasting, will enjoy his unspeakable good things. But if you disobey, your souls after the dissolution of the body will be cast into the place of fire, where, punished everlastingly, they will repent to no profit. For the time for repentance is each one's present life.” When I heard this, I was grieved that no one out of such great crowds, having heard so great a message, said: “I will go to Judea to see whether this man speaks the truth in saying that the Son of God has come to dwell in Judea for the sake of a good and eternal hope, revealing the will of the Father who sent him.” For what they say he preaches is no small thing: for some, he affirms, their souls, being eternal, will enjoy eternal good things; for others, cast into unquenchable fire, they will be punished for ever.

Mark 9:43 (echo, low confidence) · Matt 3:12 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: A preacher in Rome announces the Son of God in Judea and calls for repentance before judgment.

  • In the Homilies this unnamed preacher is identified as Barnabas (compare 1.9); “unquenchable fire” echoes Mark 9:43 and Matt 3:12.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.7 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.8Schwegler

Ταῦτα ἐγὼ λέγων περὶ ἄλλων καὶ ἐμαυτῷ ὡμίλησα λέγων· τί ἄλλους μέμφομαι, ἐν τῷ αὐτῷ τῆς ἀμελείας ὑπάρχων ἐγκλήματι; ἀλλʼ εἰς Ἰουδαίαν ὁρμήσω, πρότερον τὸν ἐμὸν διαθεὶς βίον. καὶ δὴ οὕτως βουλευσαμένε μου πολὺς ὁ τῆς παρολκῆς ἐγενήθη χρόνος, τῶν βιωτικῶν πραγμάτων δυσεκλύτων ὄντων. πέρας γοῦν συννοήσας ὧδέ ποτε τὴν τοῦ βίου φύσιν, ὅτι ἐλπίδι ἐκπλέκων τοὺς σπεύδοντας ἐνεδρεύει, οὐ μὴν ἀλλὰ καὶ ὅν ποτε εἰσεκλάπην χρόνον ἐλπίσιν δονούμενος, καὶ ὅτι οὕτως ἀσχολούμενοι οἱ ἄνθρωποι ἀποθνήσκομεν, τὰ πάντα μου ὡς ἔτυχεν ἀφεὶς εἰς πόντον ὥρμησα, καὶ εἰς τὸν λιμένα ἐλθών τε καὶ ἀναχθεὶς ἀνέμων ἔχθραις ἀντὶ τοῦ εἰς Ἰουδαίαν εἰς Ἀλεξάνδρειαν ἠνέχθην· καὶ ἀνέμων ἀπορίᾳ ἐπισχεθεὶς ἐκεῖ συνεφοίτων τοῖς φιλοσόφοις, καὶ τὰ τῆς φήμης καὶ τοῦ ἐν Ῥώμῃ φανέντος ἔλεγον τοὺς λόγους. οἱ δὲ ἀπεκρίναντο, ὅτι μὲν ἐν Ῥώμῃ φανέντα οὐκ ἴσμεν, περὶ δὲ τοῦ ἐν Ἰουδαίᾳ γενομένου καὶ υἱοῦ Θεοῦ ὑπὸ τῆς φήμης λεγομένου, καὶ παρὰ πολλῶν τῶν κᾀκεῖθεν ἐληλυθότων ἠκούσαμεν, καὶ περὶ πάντων ὧν λαλῶν ἐποίει θαυμασίων ἐμάθομεν.

Tauta egō legōn peri allōn kai emautǭ hōmilēsa legōn; ti allous memphomai, en tǭ autǭ tēs ameleias hyparchōn enklēmati? allʼ eis Ioudaian hormēsō, proteron ton emon diatheis bion. kai dē houtōs bouleusamene mou polys ho tēs parolkēs egenēthē chronos, tōn biōtikōn pragmatōn dyseklytōn ontōn. peras goun synnoēsas hōde pote tēn tou biou physin, hoti elpidi ekplekōn tous speudontas enedreuei, ou mēn alla kai hon pote eiseklapēn chronon elpisin donoumenos, kai hoti houtōs ascholoumenoi hoi anthrōpoi apothnēskomen, ta panta mou hōs etychen apheis eis ponton hōrmēsa, kai eis ton limena elthōn te kai anachtheis anemōn echthrais anti tou eis Ioudaian eis Alexandreian ēnechthēn; kai anemōn aporią epischetheis ekei synephoitōn tois philosophois, kai ta tēs phēmēs kai tou en Rhōmę̄ phanentos elegon tous logous. hoi de apekrinanto, hoti men en Rhōmę̄ phanenta ouk ismen, peri de tou en Ioudaią genomenou kai huiou Theou hypo tēs phēmēs legomenou, kai para pollōn tōn kąkeithen elēlythotōn ēkousamen, kai peri pantōn hōn lalōn epoiei thaumasiōn emathomen.

Saying this about others, I also addressed myself, saying: “Why do I blame others, when I am guilty of the same negligence? But I will set out for Judea, after first settling my affairs.” And indeed, when I had so resolved, a long time of delay followed, since the affairs of life are hard to disentangle. At last, however, considering the nature of life, how it lies in wait for those who are in haste, entangling them in hope, and also how much time I had already had stolen from me while tossed about by hopes, and that we men die while thus kept busy, I left all my affairs as they were and set out for the sea. Having come to the harbour and put to sea, I was carried by contrary winds to Alexandria instead of Judea; and being detained there for lack of winds, I associated with the philosophers and told them of the report and the words of the one who had appeared in Rome. They answered: “Of one who appeared in Rome we know nothing; but about the one who has arisen in Judea, who is called by report the Son of God, we have heard from many who have come from there, and have learned of all the wonders he did as he spoke.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement leaves his affairs and sails for Judea, but winds carry him to Alexandria, where he hears of Jesus.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.8 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.9Schwegler

Ἐμοῦ δὲ εἰπόντος, ἤθελόν τινι συντυχεῖν τῶν ἑωρακότων αὐτόν, εὐθὺς ἦγόν με λέγοντες, ἔστι τις ἐνταῦθα, οὐ μόνον ἱστορήσας αὐτὸν ἀλλὰ καὶ τῆς ἐκεῖθεν γῆς ὑπάρχων, ἀνὴρ Ἑβραῖος, ὀνόματι Βαρνάβας, ὃς καὶ ἕνα τῶν αὐτοῦ μαθητῶν ἑαυτὸν εἶναι λέγει, καὶ ἐνταῦθά που καθεζόμενος τῆς ἐκείνου ὑποσχέσεως τοὺς λόγους τοῖς βουλομένοις ἑτοίμως λέγει. καὶ δὴ συνῆλθον αὐτοῖς. καὶ ἐλθὼν, σὺν τῷ παρεστῶτι ὄχλῳ ἔστην ἐπακούων τῶν λόγων, καὶ συνενόεν τἀληθῆ οὐ διαλεκτικῇ τέχνῃ λέγοντα, ἀλλʼ ἀκάκως καὶ ἀπαρασκευάστως ἐκτιθέμενον ἅ τε ἤκουσεν καὶ ἑώρακεν τὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ φανούντα υἱὸν πεποιηκέναι τε καὶ εἰρηκέναι· πολλοὺς δὲ μάρτυρας τῶν ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ λεγομένων θαυμασίων τε καὶ λόγων, καὶ ἐξ αὐτοῦ τοῦ παρεστῶτος ὄχλου, παρεῖχεν.

Emou de eipontos, ēthelon tini syntychein tōn heōrakotōn auton, euthys ēgon me legontes, esti tis entautha, ou monon historēsas auton alla kai tēs ekeithen gēs hyparchōn, anēr Hebraios, onomati Barnabas, hos kai hena tōn autou mathētōn heauton einai legei, kai entautha pou kathezomenos tēs ekeinou hyposcheseōs tous logous tois boulomenois hetoimōs legei. kai dē synēlthon autois. kai elthōn, syn tǭ parestōti ochlǭ estēn epakouōn tōn logōn, kai synenoen talēthē ou dialektikę̄ technę̄ legonta, allʼ akakōs kai aparaskeuastōs ektithemenon ha te ēkousen kai heōraken ton tou Theou phanounta huion pepoiēkenai te kai eirēkenai; pollous de martyras tōn hypʼ autou legomenōn thaumasiōn te kai logōn, kai ex autou tou parestōtos ochlou, pareichen.

When I said that I wished to meet one of those who had seen him, they immediately led me off, saying: “There is a man here who has not only seen him but is from that country, a Hebrew named Barnabas, who says that he himself is one of his disciples; he lodges somewhere here and readily tells the words of his promise to those who wish to hear.” So I went with them. And having come, I stood with the crowd that was present, listening to his words; and I perceived that he spoke the truth, not with dialectical art, but setting forth simply and without preparation the things he had heard and seen the Son of God, who had appeared, do and say. And he produced many witnesses of the wonders and words spoken of by him, even from the crowd that was standing there.

Notes and citation

Summary: In Alexandria Clement hears Barnabas, a Hebrew disciple, tell plainly what the Son of God did and said.

  • In the parallel Recognitions (1.7) Clement meets Barnabas in Rome; the Homilies place the meeting in Alexandria.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.9 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.10Schwegler

Ἐπειδὴ δὲ πρὸς τὰ ἀπανέργως λεγόμενα ἡδέως οἱ ὄχλοι διετίθεντο, οἱ ἐκ παιδείας κοσμικῆς ὁρμώμενοι φιλόσοφοι γελᾶν αὐτὸν καὶ χλευάζειν ἐπεβάλλοντο, σκώπτοντες καὶ διασύροντες θράσει ἀμέτρῳ, ὡς μεγάλοις ὅπλοις κεχρημένοι τοῖς συλλογισμοῖς. ὁ δὲ ἀπωθούμενος αὐτῶν τὸν λῆρον οὐ συνέτρεχεν αὐτῶν τῇ πανούργῳ πεύσει, ἀλλʼ ἀκαταπλήκτως ὧν ἔλεγεν οὐκ ἀφίστατο. καὶ ποτέ τις αὐτοῦ ἐπύθετο, διὰ τί κώνωψ ἐγένετο, καὶ βραχύτατον ὄν, ἕξ πόδας ἔχον, ἔχει καὶ πτερά, ἐλέφας δέ, τὸ μέγιστον τῶν ζώων, ἄπτερος ὤν τέσσαρας μόνους ἔχει πόδας. ὁ δὲ μετὰ τὴν πεῦσιν τὸν ἐμποδισθέντα ἀναλαβὼν λόγον, ὡς πρὸς τὴν πεῦσιν ἀποκρινάμενος, τὸν αὑτῷ ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς προκείμενον ἀνελάμβανεν λόγον τούτῳ μόνῳ προοιμίῳ χρώμενος καθʼ ἑκάστην ἐγκοπήν ἡμεῖς τοῦ πέμψαντος ἡμᾶς τοὺς λόγους καὶ τὰς θαυμασίες πράξεις εἰπεῖν ὑμῖν μόνον ἔχομεν ἐντολήν, καὶ ἀντὶ τῆς λογικῆς ἀποδείξεως μάρτυρας παρέχομεν ὑμῖν τῶν ἐξ ὑμῶν παρεστώτων πολλοὺς, ὧν ἐγὼ εἴδη μέμνημαι, ὡς ἐμψύχους εἰκόνας ἱκανὰς μαρτυρίας. λοιπὸν ὑμετέρας ἐστὶν ἐξουσίας, ὑπείκειν ἢ ἀπειθεῖν. τοῦ δὲ λέγειν ὑμῖν τὸ συμφέρον οὐ παύσομαι, ὅτι ἐμοὶ μὲν ζημία τὸ σιωπᾶν, ὑμῖν δὲ τὸ ἀπειθεῖν βλάβη. ἀλλὰ καὶ τῶν εἰκαίων ὑμῶν προβλημάτων τὰς ἀποδείξεις ἀποδοῦναι ἐδυνάμην, εἰ φιλαληθῶς ἐπυνθάνεσθε. κώνωπος δὲ καὶ ἐλέφαντος τὴν αἰτίαν τῆς διαφόρου δημιουργίας νῦν ὑμῖν εἰπεῖν ἐκ ἔστιν εὔκαιρον τοῖς τῶν ὅλων ἀγνοοῦσι Θεόν.

Epeidē de pros ta apanergōs legomena hēdeōs hoi ochloi dietithento, hoi ek paideias kosmikēs hormōmenoi philosophoi gelan auton kai chleuazein epeballonto, skōptontes kai diasyrontes thrasei ametrǭ, hōs megalois hoplois kechrēmenoi tois syllogismois. ho de apōthoumenos autōn ton lēron ou synetrechen autōn tę̄ panourgǭ peusei, allʼ akataplēktōs hōn elegen ouk aphistato. kai pote tis autou epytheto, dia ti kōnōps egeneto, kai brachytaton on, hex podas echon, echei kai ptera, elephas de, to megiston tōn zōōn, apteros ōn tessaras monous echei podas. ho de meta tēn peusin ton empodisthenta analabōn logon, hōs pros tēn peusin apokrinamenos, ton hautǭ apʼ archēs prokeimenon anelambanen logon toutǭ monǭ prooimiǭ chrōmenos kathʼ hekastēn enkopēn hēmeis tou pempsantos hēmas tous logous kai tas thaumasies praxeis eipein hymin monon echomen entolēn, kai anti tēs logikēs apodeixeōs martyras parechomen hymin tōn ex hymōn parestōtōn pollous, hōn egō eidē memnēmai, hōs empsychous eikonas hikanas martyrias. loipon hymeteras estin exousias, hypeikein ē apeithein. tou de legein hymin to sympheron ou pausomai, hoti emoi men zēmia to siōpan, hymin de to apeithein blabē. alla kai tōn eikaiōn hymōn problēmatōn tas apodeixeis apodounai edynamēn, ei philalēthōs epynthanesthe. kōnōpos de kai elephantos tēn aitian tēs diaphorou dēmiourgias nyn hymin eipein ek estin eukairon tois tōn holōn agnoousi Theon.

Since the crowds were well disposed toward what was said without artifice, the philosophers, who set out from worldly learning, began to laugh at him and mock him, jeering and disparaging him with boundless insolence, using their syllogisms as though they were great weapons. But he, thrusting aside their nonsense, did not enter into their crafty questioning, but went on undaunted with what he was saying. At one point someone asked him why the gnat was made so that, though it is very small and has six feet, it also has wings, while the elephant, the largest of animals, is wingless and has only four feet. But he, after the question, took up again the speech that had been interrupted, as though answering the question, resuming the discourse he had set before himself from the start, using at each interruption only this preface: “We have a command only to tell you the words and wonderful deeds of him who sent us; and instead of logical demonstration we offer you as witnesses many of those standing here among you, whose faces I remember, as living images, sufficient testimony. For the rest, it is in your power to yield or to disobey. But I will not cease telling you what is to your advantage, for to be silent is loss to me, but to disobey is harm to you. I could indeed give you the answers to your idle problems, if you asked out of love of the truth. But to tell you now the cause of the different making of the gnat and the elephant is not timely, when you do not know the God of all things.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Philosophers mock Barnabas with a question about the gnat and the elephant, but he keeps to his message and offers eyewitnesses instead of syllogisms.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.10 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.11Schwegler

Ταῦτα αὐτοῦ λέγοντος, ὡς ἐκ συμφωνίας ἄτακτον ἠφίεσαν γέλωτα, κατασιωπᾶν καὶ ἀπορεῖν αὐτὸν πειρώμενοι ὡς βάρβαρόν τινα δαιμονῶντα. ἐγὼ δὲ ταῦτα ὁρῶν, ζήλῳ οὐκ οἶδʼ ὅπως ληφθείς, εὐσεβεῖ θυμῷ τοῦ λοιποῦ σιγᾶν οὐκ ἐκαρτέρουν, ἀλλὰ μετὰ παῤῥησίας ἐβόων λέγων· εὐλόγως ὁ Θεὸς ὑμῖν ἀκατάληπτον τὴν αὐτοῦ βούλησιν ἔθετο, ἀναξίους προιδών, ὡς ἐκ τῶν νῦν τοὺς κριτικὸν νοῦν ἔχοντας πληροφορῶν φαίνεται. ἐπεὶ γὰρ νῦν τῆς αὐτοῦ βουλήσεως κήρυκες ἐξαπεστάλησαν, οὐ γραμματικὴν ἐπαγγελλόμενοι τέχνην, ἀλλʼ ἁπλοῖς καὶ ἀπανούργοις τὴν αὐτοῦ βούλησιν ἐκφαίνοντες, ὡς πάντα ὁντιναοῦν τὸν ἀκούσαντα νοεῖν τὰ λεγόμενα, καὶ οὐ μετὰ ἕξεως τινος φθονερᾶς, παρέχειν πᾶσιν ἑαυτὴν μὴ βουλομένης πάρεστε ὑμεῖς, πρὸς τῷ μὴ νοεῖν τὸ ὑμῖν συμφέρον, ἐπὶ τῇ ὑμετέρᾳ βλάβῃ γελᾶν τὴν εἰς τὴν ὑμετέραν καταδίκην ἐν βαρβάροις πολιτευσαμένην ἀλήθειαν, ἣν καὶ ὑμῖν ἐπιδημήσασαν ξενίσαι οὐ βούλεσθε, διὰ τὰς ἀσελγείας ὑμῶν, καὶ τὸ λιτὸν τῶν λόγων αὐτῆς, ἵνα μὴ ἐλεγχθῆτε, ὅτι εἰ καὶ φιλόλογοί ἐστε, καὶ οὐ φιλαλήθεῖς φιλόσοφοι μέχρι μὲν οὖν πότε λαλεῖν μανθάνετε, οἱ τὸ λαλεῖν οὐκ ἔχοντες; πολλὰ γὰρ ὑμῶν ῥήματα ἑνὸς οὐκ ἄξια λόγου. τί ἄρα ἐρεῖ ὑμῶν τὸ ἑλληνικὸν πλῆθος μία ψυχὴ γενόμενον, εἴπερ ἔσται κρίσις, ὡς οὗτος λέγει; διὰ τί, ὦ θεέ, τὴν σὴν βούλησιν οὐκ ἐκήρυξας ἡμῖν; οὐ πάντως ἀκούσεσθε, εἴπερ ἀποκρίσεως καταξιωθήσεσθε, τάδε· ἐγὼ πάσας τὰς ἐσομένας πρὸ καταβολῆς κόσμου εἰδὼς προαιρέσεις, ἰδίως ἑκάστῳ πρὸς τὸ αὐτοῦ ἄξιον λανθανόντως προαπήντησα· τοῦτο δὲ αὐτὸ ὅτι οὕτως ἔχει, βουληθεὶς τοὺς προσπεφευγότας μοι πληροφορῆσαι, διὰ τί ἀπαρχῆς ἐκ προτέρων γενεῶν τὴν ἐμὴν βούλησιν δημοσίᾳ ἐκ εἴασα κηρυχθῆναι, νῦν πρὸς τῷ τέλει τοῦ βίου κήρυκας ἐμῆς βουλῆς ἀπέστειλα, οἱ καὶ ὑβριζόμενοι χλευάζονται ὑπὸ τῶν μηδὲν ὠφελεῖσθαι θελόντων καὶ ἐπιτεταμένως τὴν ἐμὴν φιλίαν παραιτησαμένων. ὢ μεγάλης ἀδικίας, μέχρι φθόνου κινδυνεύουσιν κήρυκες, καὶ ταῦτα ὑπὸ τῶν εἰς σωτηρίαν καλουμένων ἀνδρῶν.

Tauta autou legontos, hōs ek symphōnias atakton ēphiesan gelōta, katasiōpan kai aporein auton peirōmenoi hōs barbaron tina daimonōnta. egō de tauta horōn, zēlǭ ouk oidʼ hopōs lēphtheis, eusebei thymǭ tou loipou sigan ouk ekarteroun, alla meta parrhēsias eboōn legōn; eulogōs ho Theos hymin akatalēpton tēn autou boulēsin etheto, anaxious proidōn, hōs ek tōn nyn tous kritikon noun echontas plērophorōn phainetai. epei gar nyn tēs autou boulēseōs kērykes exapestalēsan, ou grammatikēn epangellomenoi technēn, allʼ haplois kai apanourgois tēn autou boulēsin ekphainontes, hōs panta hontinaoun ton akousanta noein ta legomena, kai ou meta hexeōs tinos phthoneras, parechein pasin heautēn mē boulomenēs pareste hymeis, pros tǭ mē noein to hymin sympheron, epi tę̄ hymeterą blabę̄ gelan tēn eis tēn hymeteran katadikēn en barbarois politeusamenēn alētheian, hēn kai hymin epidēmēsasan xenisai ou boulesthe, dia tas aselgeias hymōn, kai to liton tōn logōn autēs, hina mē elenchthēte, hoti ei kai philologoi este, kai ou philalētheis philosophoi mechri men oun pote lalein manthanete, hoi to lalein ouk echontes? polla gar hymōn rhēmata henos ouk axia logou. ti ara erei hymōn to hellēnikon plēthos mia psychē genomenon, eiper estai krisis, hōs houtos legei? dia ti, ō thee, tēn sēn boulēsin ouk ekēryxas hēmin? ou pantōs akousesthe, eiper apokriseōs kataxiōthēsesthe, tade; egō pasas tas esomenas pro katabolēs kosmou eidōs proaireseis, idiōs hekastǭ pros to autou axion lanthanontōs proapēntēsa; touto de auto hoti houtōs echei, boulētheis tous prospepheugotas moi plērophorēsai, dia ti aparchēs ek proterōn geneōn tēn emēn boulēsin dēmosią ek eiasa kērychthēnai, nyn pros tǭ telei tou biou kērykas emēs boulēs apesteila, hoi kai hybrizomenoi chleuazontai hypo tōn mēden ōpheleisthai thelontōn kai epitetamenōs tēn emēn philian paraitēsamenōn. ō megalēs adikias, mechri phthonou kindyneuousin kērykes, kai tauta hypo tōn eis sōtērian kaloumenōn andrōn.

When he said this, they broke out as though by agreement into disorderly laughter, trying to silence him and put him at a loss, as a barbarian possessed by a demon. But I, seeing this, and seized, I know not how, with zeal, could no longer bear to keep silent in my pious anger, but cried out boldly, saying: “With good reason has God made his will incomprehensible to you, foreseeing that you would be unworthy, as is evident now to those who have discerning minds. For now that heralds of his will have been sent out, not professing the art of the grammarians but setting forth his will in simple and guileless words, so that anyone at all who hears may understand what is said, as of a will that does not wish, from some jealous disposition, to withhold itself from anyone, here you are, besides not understanding what is to your advantage, laughing, to your own harm, at the truth, which has lived among barbarians to your condemnation; and now that it has come to dwell among you, you will not receive it as a guest, because of your licentiousness and the plainness of its words, lest you be proved to be lovers of words but not truth-loving philosophers. How long will you be learning to speak, you who do not know how to speak? For many of your words are not worth one word. What then will your whole Greek multitude say, become as one soul, if there is to be a judgment, as this man says? ‘Why, O God, did you not proclaim your will to us?’ Will you not surely hear, if you are counted worthy of an answer, this: ‘I, knowing before the foundation of the world all the choices that would be made, met each one secretly beforehand according to what he deserved. And wishing to assure of this very thing those who have taken refuge with me, namely why I did not allow my will to be proclaimed publicly from the beginning in former generations, I have now, at the end of the age, sent out heralds of my will; and they are insulted and mocked by those who wish to gain nothing and who have earnestly refused my friendship.’ O great injustice! The heralds are in danger even of malice, and that from the very men who are called to salvation.

Eph 1:4 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement rebukes the laughing philosophers, arguing that God foresaw their unworthiness and now sends simple heralds of his will.

  • “Before the foundation of the world” echoes Eph 1:4 and similar New Testament phrasing.
  • “In danger even of malice” renders φθόνου as printed; ANF's “loss of life” presupposes φόνου (“murder”).

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.11 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.12Schwegler

Τοῦτο δὲ τὸ ἀδίκως γινόμενον κατὰ τῶν ἐμῶν κηρύκων ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς ἄν εἰς πάντας ἐγίνετο, εἴπερ ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς εἰς σωτηρίαν ἐκαλοῦντο οἱ ἀνάξιοι. τὸ γὰρ νῦν γινόμενον ὑπʼ αὐτῶν ἀδίκως εἰς ἀπολογίαν τῆς ἐμῆς δικαίας γίνεται προνοίας, ὅτι καλῶς τὸν τιμῆς ἄξιον λόγον ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς δημοσίᾳ εἰς ὕβριν θεῖναι οὐκ ἐβηλήθην ἀνωφελῶς, ἀλλὰ σιγᾶσθαι αὐτὸν ὡς τίμιον ἐβουλευσάμην, οὐκ ἀπὸ τῶν ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς ἀξίων, οἷς καὶ μετέδωκα, ἀλλʼ ἀπὸ τούτων καὶ τῶν τοιούτων, ὡς ὁρᾶτε, ἀναξίων, τῶν ἐμὲ μισούντων καὶ ἑαυτοὺς φιλεῖν μὴ βουλομένων. καὶ νῦν γε παρέντες γελᾷν τὸν ἄνδρα τοῦτον ἐμοῦ πρὸς τὸ τούτου ἐπάγγελμα πυνθάνεσθε, ἢ πυνθανομένων ὁ βουλόμενος ἀποκρινάσθω. καὶ ὡς ἀσελγεῖς κύνες ὑλάκτετε, ψόφῳ ἀτάκτῳ μύοντες τῶν σώζεσθαι θελόντων τὰς ἀκοάς, ἄδικοι καὶ θεοστυγεῖς, καὶ τὸν σώζοντα λογισμὸν εἰς ἀπιστίαν ἀποσχολοῦντες. πῶς συγγνώμης τυχεῖν δυνήσεσθε, τὸν τὴν θεότητα τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐπαγγελλόμενον ὑμῖν εἰπεῖν ὑβρίζοντες, καὶ ταῦτα ἄνθρωπον ὅν ἐχρῆν, εἰ καὶ μηδὲν ἀληθεύοντα, διὰ τὴν ἀγαθὴν αὐτοῦ πρὸς ὑμᾶς ἀποδέξασθαι προαίρεσιν;

Touto de to adikōs ginomenon kata tōn emōn kērykōn apʼ archēs an eis pantas egineto, eiper apʼ archēs eis sōtērian ekalounto hoi anaxioi. to gar nyn ginomenon hypʼ autōn adikōs eis apologian tēs emēs dikaias ginetai pronoias, hoti kalōs ton timēs axion logon apʼ archēs dēmosią eis hybrin theinai ouk ebēlēthēn anōphelōs, alla sigasthai auton hōs timion ebouleusamēn, ouk apo tōn apʼ archēs axiōn, hois kai metedōka, allʼ apo toutōn kai tōn toioutōn, hōs horate, anaxiōn, tōn eme misountōn kai heautous philein mē boulomenōn. kai nyn ge parentes geląn ton andra touton emou pros to toutou epangelma pynthanesthe, ē pynthanomenōn ho boulomenos apokrinasthō. kai hōs aselgeis kynes hylaktete, psophǭ ataktǭ myontes tōn sōzesthai thelontōn tas akoas, adikoi kai theostygeis, kai ton sōzonta logismon eis apistian aposcholountes. pōs syngnōmēs tychein dynēsesthe, ton tēn theotēta tou Theou epangellomenon hymin eipein hybrizontes, kai tauta anthrōpon hon echrēn, ei kai mēden alētheuonta, dia tēn agathēn autou pros hymas apodexasthai proairesin?

“For this wrong now done to my heralds would have been done from the beginning to all of them, if the unworthy had been called to salvation from the beginning. For what is now unjustly done by them serves as a defence of my just providence: that I rightly did not wish, from the beginning, to expose to insult publicly and to no profit the word worthy of honour, but chose that it be kept in silence as precious, not from those who were worthy from the beginning, to whom I also imparted it, but from these and such as these, who, as you see, are unworthy, who hate me and do not wish to love themselves.’ And now, stop laughing at this man; ask me about what he proclaims, or, if you ask, let whoever wishes answer. But like shameless dogs you bark, closing with disorderly noise the ears of those who wish to be saved, unrighteous and hateful to God, and diverting to unbelief the reasoning that saves. How will you be able to obtain pardon, when you insult the man who promises to tell you of the divinity of God, whom you ought, even if he spoke no truth at all, to have received for his good will toward you?”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement continues God's imagined reply and rebukes the philosophers for barking down a messenger who meant them good.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.12 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.13Schwegler

Ταῦτά μου λέγοντος καὶ τὰ τούτοις ἀκόλουθα, πολὺς τῶν ὄχλων ἐγίνετο θρύλλος. καὶ οἱ μὲν ὡς τὸν Βαρνάβαν ἐλεοῦντες συνήραντό μοι οἱ δὲ ἠλίθιοι ὄντες δεινῶς κατʼ ἐμοῦ ἔβρυχον τοὺς ὀδόντας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἤδη ποτὲ ἑσπέρα κατειλήφει, τῆς χειρὸς λαβὼν τὸν Βαρνάβαν, μὴ θέλοντα, βίᾳ εἰς τὴν ἐμὴν ἦγον οἰκίαν, ἔνθα καὶ μένειν αὐτὸν ἐποίησα, ἵνα μή τις αὐτῷ χεῖρας ἐπιβάλῃ. καὶ ἡμερῶν ὀλίγων διατρίψας, καὶ τοῦ ἀληθοῦς λόγου βραχέα κατηχήσας με ὀλίγον, ὡς ἐν ὀλίγαις ἡμέραις σπεύδειν ἔλεγεν εἰς Ἰουδαίαν τῆς κατὰ τὴν θρησκείαν ἑορτῆς χάριν, καὶ τοῦ λοιποῦ τοῖς ἑαυτοῦ ὁμοεθνέσιν συνεῖναι θέλων.

Tauta mou legontos kai ta toutois akoloutha, polys tōn ochlōn egineto thryllos. kai hoi men hōs ton Barnaban eleountes synēranto moi hoi de ēlithioi ontes deinōs katʼ emou ebrychon tous odontas. epei de ēdē pote hespera kateilēphei, tēs cheiros labōn ton Barnaban, mē thelonta, bią eis tēn emēn ēgon oikian, entha kai menein auton epoiēsa, hina mē tis autǭ cheiras epibalę̄. kai hēmerōn oligōn diatripsas, kai tou alēthous logou brachea katēchēsas me oligon, hōs en oligais hēmerais speudein elegen eis Ioudaian tēs kata tēn thrēskeian heortēs charin, kai tou loipou tois heautou homoethnesin syneinai thelōn.

As I was saying these things and more to the same effect, there arose a great commotion among the crowds. Some, as pitying Barnabas, took my side; but others, being foolish, gnashed their teeth at me fiercely. And since evening had now come on, I took Barnabas by the hand and led him, against his will, by force to my house, and there I made him stay, so that no one might lay hands on him. And after staying a few days and briefly instructing me a little in the true doctrine, as far as one could in a few days, he said that he was hastening to Judea for the sake of the festival of his religion, and because he wished for the future to be with his own countrymen.

Notes and citation

Summary: After the uproar Clement takes Barnabas to his house, is briefly instructed, and learns that Barnabas must return to Judea for a festival.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.13 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.14Schwegler

Φανερὸς δʼ ἦν μοι ἀποναρκήσας. ἐμοῦ γὰρ εἰπόντος· σύ μοι μόνον τοὺς τοῦ φανέντος ἀνδρὸς οὕς ἥκουσας ἐκτίθου λόγους, κἀγὼ τῷ ἐμῷ κοσμήσας λόγῳ τοῦ Θεοῦ κηρύξω τὴν βούλησιν, καὶ εἶθʼ οὕτως ἐντὸς ὀλίγων ἡμερῶν συμπλεύσω σοι· λίαν γὰρ ποθῶ ἐπὶ τὸν τῆς Ἰουδαίας γενέσθαι τόπον· τάχα δὲ καὶ συνοικήσω ὑμῖν τὸν πάντα μου τῆς ζωῆς βίον· ὁ δὲ ταῦτα ἀκούσας ἀπεκρίνατο· σὺ εἰ μὲν ἱστορῆσαι τὰ ἡμέτερα καὶ μαθεῖν τὸ συμφέρον θέλεις, ἐξ αὐτῆς μοι σύμπλευσον· ἐπεί γε τὰ σημεῖα τῆς οἰκήσεώς μου καὶ ὧν θέλεις ἐγώ σοι σήμερον ἐρῶ, ἵνα ὅτε βούλει ἐλθὼν ἐπιστῇς ἡμῖν· ἐγὼ γὰρ αὔριον πορεύσομαι ἐπὶ τὰ ἐμαυτοῦ. καὶ δὴ ἀδυσώπητον ἰδὼν συνῆλθον αὐτῷ μέχρι τοῦ λιμένος· καὶ μαθὼν παρʼ αὐτοῦ ἅπερ ἔλεγε σημεῖα τῶν οἰκήσεων, ἔφην αὐτῷ· εἰ μὴ ὅτι αὔριόν τι ἀπαιτῶ ὀφειλόμενόν μοι, ἐξ αὐτῆς ἄν σοι συνέπλεον· πλὴν τάχιόν σε καταλήψομαι. καὶ ταῦτα εἰπών, παραθέμενος αὐτὸν τοῖς τοῦ πλοίου ἡγουμένοις ὑπέστρεφον λυπούμενος, μεμνημένος τοῦ καλοῦ καὶ συνήθους φίλου.

Phaneros dʼ ēn moi aponarkēsas. emou gar eipontos; sy moi monon tous tou phanentos andros hous hēkousas ektithou logous, kagō tǭ emǭ kosmēsas logǭ tou Theou kēryxō tēn boulēsin, kai eithʼ houtōs entos oligōn hēmerōn sympleusō soi; lian gar pothō epi ton tēs Ioudaias genesthai topon; tacha de kai synoikēsō hymin ton panta mou tēs zōēs bion; ho de tauta akousas apekrinato; sy ei men historēsai ta hēmetera kai mathein to sympheron theleis, ex autēs moi sympleuson; epei ge ta sēmeia tēs oikēseōs mou kai hōn theleis egō soi sēmeron erō, hina hote boulei elthōn epistę̄s hēmin; egō gar aurion poreusomai epi ta emautou. kai dē adysōpēton idōn synēlthon autǭ mechri tou limenos; kai mathōn parʼ autou haper elege sēmeia tōn oikēseōn, ephēn autǭ; ei mē hoti aurion ti apaitō opheilomenon moi, ex autēs an soi synepleon; plēn tachion se katalēpsomai. kai tauta eipōn, parathemenos auton tois tou ploiou hēgoumenois hypestrephon lypoumenos, memnēmenos tou kalou kai synēthous philou.

It was clear to me that he had grown weary of staying. For when I said, “Only set out for me the words of the man who appeared, which you heard, and I, adorning them with my own speech, will proclaim the will of God; and then within a few days I will sail with you, for I greatly long to be in the land of Judea, and perhaps I will even live with you all the rest of my life,” he answered on hearing this: “If you wish to see our affairs and learn what is to your advantage, sail with me at once; or else I will tell you today the signs of my dwelling-place and of the persons you wish to find, so that you may come and visit us whenever you wish. For tomorrow I am going home.” Seeing him unmoved, I went with him to the harbour; and having learned from him the signs of the dwellings of which he spoke, I said to him: “If it were not that tomorrow I am to collect something owed me, I would sail with you at once; but I shall overtake you soon.” And having said this and commended him to the masters of the ship, I returned in sorrow, remembering my good and dear friend.

Notes and citation

Summary: Barnabas refuses to delay; Clement escorts him to the harbour and promises to follow soon.

  • “It was clear to me that he had grown weary of staying” renders ἀποναρκήσας loosely; the sense of the word here is uncertain.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.14 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.15Schwegler

Ἡμερῶν δὲ διατρίψας, καὶ τὸ χρέος οὐχ ὅλον λαβεῖν δυνηθείς, τάχους ἕνεκα ἀμελήσας τοῦ περιλειφθέντος, ὡς ἐμποδίου ὄντος, καὶ αὐτὸς εἰς Ἰουδαίαν ἀπέπλευσα, καὶ δεκαπέντε ἡμερῶν εἰς Καισάρειαν κατήντησα τὴν Στράτωνος. ἐπίβαντος δέ μου τῆς γῆς καὶ ξενίαν θηρωμένου, ἔμαθον ὅτι Πέτρος τις λεγόμενος, τοῦ ἐν Ἰουδαίᾳ εἰσφανέντος ἀνδρὸς τοῦ σημεῖα καὶ τέρατα πεποιηκότος ὁ δοκιμώτατος ὑπάρχων μαθητής, αὔριον Σίμωνι τῷ ἀπὸ Γιτθῶν Σαμαρεῖ ζήτησιν ποιεῖται λόγων. ἐγὼ δὲ ταῦτα ἀκούσας ἐδεήθην τὴν τούτου μοι μηνυθῆναι μονήν καὶ ὁμῶς ἔμαθον καὶ τῷ πυλῶνι ἐπέστην. οἱ δʼ ἀντέβαλλον τίς τε ὥν καὶ πόθεν ἥκω. καὶ ἰδοὺ Βαρνάβας ἐκβὰς ἄμα τῷ ἰδεῖν περιεπλάκη μοι, πολὺ χαίρων καὶ δακρύων· καὶ λαβόμενός μου τῆς χειρὸς εἰσέφερεν ἔνθα ἦν ὁ Πέτρος, λέγων μοι, οὗτός ἐστιν Πέτρος, ὅν μέγιστον ἐπὶ τῇ τοῦ Θεοῦ σοφίᾳ ἐπηγγελλόμην σοι, ᾧ ἀπαύστως σε ἀντέβαλλον. ὡς εἴσιθι ἐκ ταυτομάτου, ὅτι τὰ κατά σε καλὰ ὄντα ἀψευδῶς ἀντέβαλλον, ἅμα καὶ τὴν προαίρεσιν ἐξέφηνα, ὡς αὐτὸν γλίχεσθαι καὶ ἰδεῖν σε. μέγα οὖν αὐτῷ δῶρόν σε διὰ τῶν ἐμῶν προσφέρω χειρῶν. καὶ τοῦτο εἰπών, προσενέγκας ἔφη, οὗτός ἐστι Κλήμης, Πέτρε.

Hēmerōn de diatripsas, kai to chreos ouch holon labein dynētheis, tachous heneka amelēsas tou perileiphthentos, hōs empodiou ontos, kai autos eis Ioudaian apepleusa, kai dekapente hēmerōn eis Kaisareian katēntēsa tēn Stratōnos. epibantos de mou tēs gēs kai xenian thērōmenou, emathon hoti Petros tis legomenos, tou en Ioudaią eisphanentos andros tou sēmeia kai terata pepoiēkotos ho dokimōtatos hyparchōn mathētēs, aurion Simōni tǭ apo Gitthōn Samarei zētēsin poieitai logōn. egō de tauta akousas edeēthēn tēn toutou moi mēnythēnai monēn kai homōs emathon kai tǭ pylōni epestēn. hoi dʼ anteballon tis te hōn kai pothen hēkō. kai idou Barnabas ekbas ama tǭ idein perieplakē moi, poly chairōn kai dakryōn; kai labomenos mou tēs cheiros eisepheren entha ēn ho Petros, legōn moi, houtos estin Petros, hon megiston epi tę̄ tou Theou sophią epēngellomēn soi, hǭ apaustōs se anteballon. hōs eisithi ek tautomatou, hoti ta kata se kala onta apseudōs anteballon, hama kai tēn proairesin exephēna, hōs auton glichesthai kai idein se. mega oun autǭ dōron se dia tōn emōn prospherō cheirōn. kai touto eipōn, prosenenkas ephē, houtos esti Klēmēs, Petre.

After staying some days, and not being able to recover the whole debt, I neglected the remainder for the sake of speed, since it was a hindrance, and I too sailed for Judea, and in fifteen days arrived at Caesarea Stratonis. When I had landed and was looking for lodging, I learned that a certain man called Peter, the most esteemed disciple of the man who had appeared in Judea and done signs and wonders, was to hold a discussion the next day with Simon, the Samaritan from Gitta. On hearing this I asked to be shown his lodging; and when I had learned it I stood at the gate. The people there asked who I was and where I came from. And behold, Barnabas came out, and as soon as he saw me he embraced me, rejoicing greatly and weeping. And taking me by the hand he led me in to where Peter was, saying to me: “This is Peter, whom I told you of as the greatest in the wisdom of God, and to whom I have spoken of you unceasingly. Go in as one expected, for I have told him truly of your good qualities and have also revealed your purpose, so that he too longs to see you. I therefore bring you to him with my own hands as a great gift.” And having said this he presented me, saying: “This is Clement, Peter.”

Acts 8:9 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement lands at Caesarea, learns that Peter is to debate Simon of Gitta, and is introduced to Peter by Barnabas.

  • Simon of Gitta is Simon Magus (Acts 8:9–24), whose home town Justin also names (1 Apol. 26).

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.15 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.16Schwegler

Ὁ δὲ ἀγαθὸς προσπηδήσας ἅμα τῷ ἀκοῦσαι τὸ ὄνομα κατεφίλησεν, καὶ καθισθῆναί με ποιήσας ἐξ αὐτῆς ἔφη· καλῶς ἐποίησας τὸν τῆς ἀληθείας κήρυκα ξενίσας Βαρνάβαν, εἰς τιμὴν τοῦ ὄντος Θεοῦ, μεγαλοφρόνως, ἐκ αἰδεσθείς, οὐ φοβηθεὶς τὸν τῶν ἀπαιδεύτων ὄχλων θυμόν. μακάριος ἔσῃ. ὡς γὰρ σὺ τὸν τῆς ἀληθείας πρεσβευτὴν οὕτω ἐξένισας πάσῃ τιμῇ, καὶ αὐτή σε ἡ ἀλήθεια ξένον ὄντα τῆς ἰδίας πόλεως καταστήσει πολίτην· καὶ τότε χαρήσῃ μεγάλως, ὅτι βραχεῖαν νῦν δανείσας χάριν, προαίρεσιν λόγων καλῶν λέγων, ἀϊδίων καὶ ἀναφαιρέτων ἀγαθῶν ἔσῃ κληρονόμος. καὶ μὴ κάμνε ἀντιβάλλειν μοι τὸ σὸν ἦθος· πάντα γὰρ τὰ κατά σε ὁ ἀψευδὴς ἡμῖν ἀντέβαλεν Βαρνάβας, σχεδὸν καθʼ ἡμέραν τὴν ἀγαθὴν ποιούμενος μνήμην. καὶ ἵνα σοι ἐν ἐπιτομῇ ὡς γνησίῳ τὸ προκείμενον ἐρῶ, εἰ μὴ σοί τι ἐμποδίζει, συνόδευσον ἡμῖν, μεταλαμβάνων τὸν τῆς ἀληθείας λόγον, ὅν κατὰ πόλιν ποιεῖσθαι μέλλω, μέχρι Ῥώμης αὐτῆς. καὶ σὺ δὲ εἴ τι βούλει λέγε.

Ho de agathos prospēdēsas hama tǭ akousai to onoma katephilēsen, kai kathisthēnai me poiēsas ex autēs ephē; kalōs epoiēsas ton tēs alētheias kēryka xenisas Barnaban, eis timēn tou ontos Theou, megalophronōs, ek aidestheis, ou phobētheis ton tōn apaideutōn ochlōn thymon. makarios esę̄. hōs gar sy ton tēs alētheias presbeutēn houtō exenisas pasę̄ timę̄, kai autē se hē alētheia xenon onta tēs idias poleōs katastēsei politēn; kai tote charēsę̄ megalōs, hoti bracheian nyn daneisas charin, proairesin logōn kalōn legōn, aïdiōn kai anaphairetōn agathōn esę̄ klēronomos. kai mē kamne antiballein moi to son ēthos; panta gar ta kata se ho apseudēs hēmin antebalen Barnabas, schedon kathʼ hēmeran tēn agathēn poioumenos mnēmēn. kai hina soi en epitomę̄ hōs gnēsiǭ to prokeimenon erō, ei mē soi ti empodizei, synodeuson hēmin, metalambanōn ton tēs alētheias logon, hon kata polin poieisthai mellō, mechri Rhōmēs autēs. kai sy de ei ti boulei lege.

And the good Peter, as soon as he heard the name, ran to me and kissed me, and having made me sit down, said at once: “You did well to receive as your guest Barnabas, the herald of the truth, in honour of the God who is, nobly, not ashamed and not fearing the rage of the uneducated crowds. You will be blessed. For as you received the ambassador of the truth with all honour, so the truth itself will make you, who are a stranger, a citizen of its own city. And then you will rejoice greatly, because, having now lent a small favour, the goodwill of kind words, you will be heir of everlasting good things that cannot be taken away. And do not trouble to tell me of your character, for the truthful Barnabas has told us everything about you, mentioning you kindly almost every day. And to tell you briefly, as to a true friend, what lies before us: if nothing hinders you, travel with us, sharing in the word of truth, which I intend to preach from city to city as far as Rome itself. And you too, say whatever you wish.”

Matt 10:41 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter welcomes Clement, praises his hospitality to Barnabas, and invites him to travel with him as far as Rome.

  • The motif of receiving a messenger and being rewarded echoes Matt 10:40–41.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.16 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.17Schwegler

Ἐγὼ ἐξεθέμην τὴν ἐξ ἀρχῆς μου προαίρεσιν, καὶ ὡς εἰς ζητήσεις ἀπόρους ἐκενώθην, καὶ πάντα ὅσα σοι τὴν ἀρχὴν προεδήλωσα, ὡς ἵνα μὴ τὰ αὐτὰ πάλιν γράφω. ἔλεγον δέ· σοὶ μὲν ἑτοίμως ἔχω συνοδεύειν· τοῦτο γὰρ οὐκ οἶδʼ ὅπως χαίρων θέλω· πλὴν περὶ ἀληθείας πρῶτον πληροφορηθῆναι θέλω, ἵνα γνῶ, εἰ ψυχὴ θνητὴ τυγχάνει, εἰ ἀθάνατός ἐστιν, καὶ ἀΐδιος οὐσα περὶ ὧν ἔπραξεν ἐνταῦθα ἔχει κριθῆναι· καὶ εἰ, τί ποτέ ἐστι δίκαιον ἢ ἀρέσκον Θεῷ· καὶ εἰ γέγονε κόσμος, καὶ διὰ τί γέγονε· καὶ εἰ οὐ λυθήσεται, καὶ εἰ λυθήσεται· καὶ εἰ κρείττων ἔσται, ἢ οὐδὲ ἔσται· καὶ ἵνα μὴ τὸ κατʼ εἶδος λέγω, ταῦτα καὶ τὰ τούτοις οὑπόμενα μαθεῖν εἶπον θέλειν. ὁ δὲ πρὸς ταῦτα ἀπεκρίνατο συντόμως σοι, ὦ Κλήμης, τὴν τῶν ὄντων γνῶσιν παρέξομαι· καὶ τὰ νῦν ἐξ αὐτῆς ἄκουσον.

Egō exethemēn tēn ex archēs mou proairesin, kai hōs eis zētēseis aporous ekenōthēn, kai panta hosa soi tēn archēn proedēlōsa, hōs hina mē ta auta palin graphō. elegon de; soi men hetoimōs echō synodeuein; touto gar ouk oidʼ hopōs chairōn thelō; plēn peri alētheias prōton plērophorēthēnai thelō, hina gnō, ei psychē thnētē tynchanei, ei athanatos estin, kai aïdios ousa peri hōn epraxen entautha echei krithēnai; kai ei, ti pote esti dikaion ē areskon Theǭ; kai ei gegone kosmos, kai dia ti gegone; kai ei ou lythēsetai, kai ei lythēsetai; kai ei kreittōn estai, ē oude estai; kai hina mē to katʼ eidos legō, tauta kai ta toutois houpomena mathein eipon thelein. ho de pros tauta apekrinato syntomōs soi, ō Klēmēs, tēn tōn ontōn gnōsin parexomai; kai ta nyn ex autēs akouson.

I set out my purpose from the beginning, and how I had been exhausted by insoluble inquiries, and everything that I made known to you at the beginning, so that I need not write the same things again. And I said: “I am ready to travel with you, for this, I know not how, I wish with joy. But first I wish to be fully assured about the truth, so that I may know whether the soul is mortal, or whether it is immortal and, being everlasting, is to be judged for what it has done here; and, if so, what it is that is righteous and pleasing to God; and whether the world came into being, and why it came into being; and whether it will not be dissolved, or whether it will be dissolved; and whether it will be better, or will not exist at all.” And, not to speak in detail, I said that I wished to learn these things and what follows from them. And he answered: “I will give you, Clement, the knowledge of the things that are, in brief; and hear it now at once.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement asks Peter his questions about the soul, judgment, righteousness, and the world, and Peter agrees to answer.

  • The “you” addressed by Clement is James, to whom the Homilies are framed as a letter (see the prefatory Epistle of Clement to James).

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.17 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.18Schwegler

Ἡ τοῦ Θεοῦ βουλὴ ἐν ἀδήλῳ γέγονε κατὰ πολλοὺς τρόπους. τὰ μὲν πρῶτα εἰσαγωγὴ κακὴ, συντροφία πονηρὰ, συνήθεια δεινὴ, ὁμιλία οὐ καλὴ, πρόληψις οὐκ ὀρθὴ, διὰ ταῦτα πλάνη· εἶτα ἀφοβία, ἀπιστία, πορνεία, φιλαργυρία, κενοδοξία, καὶ ἄλλα τοιαῦτα μυρία κακὰ, ὥσπερ καπνοῦ πλῆθος, ὡς ἕνα οἶκον οἰκοῦντα τὸν κόσμον, τῶν ἔνδοθεν οἰκούντων ἀνδρῶν ἐπεθόλωσαν τὰς ὁράσεις, καὶ οὐκ εἴασαν ἀναβλέψαντας ἐκ τῆς διαγραφῆς τὸν δημιουργὸν συγκατανοῆσαι Θεὸν, καὶ τὸ τούτῳ δοκοῦν γνωρίσαι. διὸ τοὺς φιλαλήθεις ἔσωθεν χρὴ ἐκ στέρνων βοήσαντας ἐπικουρίαν προσκαλέσασθαι, φιλαληθεῖ λογισμῷ, ἵνα τις ἐντὸς ὢν τοῦ οἴκου τοῦ πεπλησμένου καπνοῦ, προσιὼν ἀνοίξῃ θύραν, ὅπως δυνηθῇ τὸ μὲν ἐκτὸς τοῦ ἡλίου φῶς εἰσκριθῆναι τῷ οἴκῳ, ὁ δὲ ἐντὸς τοῦ πυρὸς ὣν ἐκβληθῆναι καπνός.

Hē tou Theou boulē en adēlǭ gegone kata pollous tropous. ta men prōta eisagōgē kakē, syntrophia ponēra, synētheia deinē, homilia ou kalē, prolēpsis ouk orthē, dia tauta planē; eita aphobia, apistia, porneia, philargyria, kenodoxia, kai alla toiauta myria kaka, hōsper kapnou plēthos, hōs hena oikon oikounta ton kosmon, tōn endothen oikountōn andrōn epetholōsan tas horaseis, kai ouk eiasan anablepsantas ek tēs diagraphēs ton dēmiourgon synkatanoēsai Theon, kai to toutǭ dokoun gnōrisai. dio tous philalētheis esōthen chrē ek sternōn boēsantas epikourian proskalesasthai, philalēthei logismǭ, hina tis entos ōn tou oikou tou peplēsmenou kapnou, prosiōn anoixę̄ thyran, hopōs dynēthę̄ to men ektos tou hēliou phōs eiskrithēnai tǭ oikǭ, ho de entos tou pyros hōn ekblēthēnai kapnos.

“The will of God has become obscure in many ways. First there is bad upbringing, evil companionship, dreadful habit, unworthy conversation, wrong prejudgment, and through these, error; then fearlessness, unbelief, sexual immorality, love of money, vainglory, and countless other evils of the kind. Like a great mass of smoke filling the world, which is like one house, these have darkened the sight of the men who dwell within, and have not allowed them to look up and perceive God the Creator from his handiwork and to learn what pleases him. Therefore those within who love the truth must cry out from their breasts and call for help, with truth-loving reason, so that someone who is inside the house full of smoke may come near and open the door, so that the light of the sun outside may be let into the house, and the smoke of the fire within may be driven out.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter compares the world to a smoke-filled house whose inhabitants cannot see God until someone opens the door from outside.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (chapter number of the next section leaked into the text): καπνός. XIX. → καπνός..

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.18 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.19Schwegler

Τὸν μὲν οὖν βοηθὸν ἄνδρα τὸν ἀληθῆ προφήτην λέγω, ὅς μόνος φωτίσαι ψυχὰς ἀνθρώπων δύναται, ὥτʼ ἄν αὐτοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς δυνηθῆναι ἡμᾶς ἐνιδεῖν τῆς αἰωνίου σωτηρίας τὴν ὁδόν. ἄλλως δὲ ἀδύνατον, ὡς οἶσθα καὶ σὺ μικρῷ τάχιον εἰπών, ὡς πᾶσα ὑπόθεσις ἀνασκευάζεται καὶ κατασκευάζεται, καὶ πρὸς τὴν τοῦ ἐκδικοῦντος δύναμιν ἡ αὐτὴ ἀληθὴς καὶ ψευδὴς νομίζεται· ὡς μηκέτι τὰς ὑποθέσεις φαίνεσθαι ὅ εἰσιν, ἀλλὰ παρὰ τοὺς ἐκδικοῦντας φαντασίαν λαμβάνειν τοῦ εἶναι ἢ μὴ εἶναι ἀληθεῖς ἢ ψευδεῖς. τούτου εἵνεκεν προφήτου ἀληθοῦς ὅλον τὸ τῆς εὐσεβείας ἐδεήθη πρᾶγμα, ἵνα ἡμῖν ἐρῇ τὰ ὄντα ὥς ἐςιν, καὶ ὡς δεῖ περὶ πάντων πιςεύειν. ὥστε πρῶτον χρὴ τὸν προφήτην πάσῃ τῇ προφητικῇ ἐξετάσει δοκιμάσαντα καὶ ἐπιγνόντα ἀληθῆ, τοῦ λοιποῦ τὰ πάντα αὐτῷ πιστεύειν, καὶ μηκέτι τὸ καθʼ ἓν ἕκαστον τῶν ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ λεγομένων ἀνακρίνειν, ἀλλὰ λαμβάνειν αὐτὰ βέβαια ὄντα, δοκούσῃ μὲν πίστει, ληφθέντα δὲ ἀσφαλεῖ κρίσει· ἀποδείξει γὰρ μιᾷ τῇ ἀπαρχῆς καὶ ἀκριβεῖ ἐξετάσει τῇ πανταχόθεν τὰ ὅλα ὀρθῷ εἴληπται λογισμῷ. διὸ πρὸ πάντων τὸν ἀληθῆ προφήτην ζητεῖν δεῖ, ὅτι ἄνευ τούτου βέβαιόν τι προσεἶναι ἀνθρώποις ἀδύνατον.

Ton men oun boēthon andra ton alēthē prophētēn legō, hos monos phōtisai psychas anthrōpōn dynatai, hōtʼ an autois ophthalmois dynēthēnai hēmas enidein tēs aiōniou sōtērias tēn hodon. allōs de adynaton, hōs oistha kai sy mikrǭ tachion eipōn, hōs pasa hypothesis anaskeuazetai kai kataskeuazetai, kai pros tēn tou ekdikountos dynamin hē autē alēthēs kai pseudēs nomizetai; hōs mēketi tas hypotheseis phainesthai ho eisin, alla para tous ekdikountas phantasian lambanein tou einai ē mē einai alētheis ē pseudeis. toutou heineken prophētou alēthous holon to tēs eusebeias edeēthē pragma, hina hēmin erę̄ ta onta hōs esin, kai hōs dei peri pantōn piseuein. hōste prōton chrē ton prophētēn pasę̄ tę̄ prophētikę̄ exetasei dokimasanta kai epignonta alēthē, tou loipou ta panta autǭ pisteuein, kai mēketi to kathʼ hen hekaston tōn hypʼ autou legomenōn anakrinein, alla lambanein auta bebaia onta, dokousę̄ men pistei, lēphthenta de asphalei krisei; apodeixei gar mią tę̄ aparchēs kai akribei exetasei tę̄ pantachothen ta hola orthǭ eilēptai logismǭ. dio pro pantōn ton alēthē prophētēn zētein dei, hoti aneu toutou bebaion ti proseinai anthrōpois adynaton.

“The helper, then, I call the true Prophet, who alone is able to enlighten the souls of men, so that we may be able to see with our own eyes the way of eternal salvation. Otherwise it is impossible, as you yourself know, having said a little earlier that every thesis is overturned and established, and the same thesis is held true or false according to the ability of its defender, so that theses no longer appear as they are, but take from their defenders the appearance of being or not being true or false. For this reason the whole matter of piety needed a true prophet, to tell us things as they are, and how we must believe about all things. So one must first test the prophet by every prophetic examination and, having recognized him as true, thereafter believe him in everything, and no longer examine each thing he says one by one, but accept his words as certain, received seemingly by faith but in fact by a sure judgment. For by one proof at the beginning and a precise examination on every side, the whole has been received by right reasoning. Therefore before all things one must seek the true Prophet, because without him it is impossible for men to have anything certain.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that only the true Prophet can give certainty, and that once tested he must be believed in everything.

  • The “true Prophet” is the central Christological title of the Pseudo-Clementines; it refers to Christ.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.19 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.20Schwegler

Καὶ ὁμῶς ἀνέπαυσέν με, ἐκθέμενός μοι τίς ἐστιν καὶ πῶς εὑρίσκεται, καὶ ἀληθῶς εὑρετόν μοι παρασχὼν αὐτόν, τῶν παρὰ ὀφθαλμοῖς ὁρωμένων ἐμφανεστέραν τῇ τοῦ προφήτου ὁμιλίᾳ τοῖς ὠσὶν δείξας τὴν ἀλήθειαν, ὡς ἐκπλαγέντα με θαυμάζειν, πῶς τῶν πᾶσι ζητουμένων ἔμπροσθεν κειμένων οὐδεὶς ἐνορᾷ. πλὴν γράψας τὸν περὶ προφήτου λόγον, αὐτοῦ κελεύσαντος, ἀπὸ τῆς Καισαρείας Στράτωνος διαπεμφθῆναί σοι ἐποίησεν τὸν τόμον, παρά σου ἐντολὴν ἔχειν εἰπὼν, τὰς καθʼ ἕκαστον ἐνιαυτὸν ὁμιλίας τε καὶ πράξεις γράφοντα διαπέμπειν σοι. ὅμως ἐν μιᾷ τῇ πρώτῃ ἡμέρᾳ ἀρχὴν ἤδη μόνον ποιούμενος περὶ τοῦ τῆς ἀληθείας προφήτου, περὶ πάντων με ἐπληροφόρησεν. καὶ εἶθʼ οὕτως ἔφη ἐνόρα τοῦ λοιποῦ τὰς ἐξ ἐμοῦ πρὸς τοὺς ἐξ ἐναντίας γινομένας ζητήσεις καὶ εἰ τὸ ἧττον ἀπενέγκωμαι, οὐ δέδια μή πως σὺ περὶ τῆς παραδοθείσης σοι ἀληθείας διακριθῇς, εὖ εἰδὼς ὅτι ἐγὼ ἡττᾶσθαι ἔδοξα, οὐχὶ ἡ ὑπόθεσις ἡ διὰ τοῦ προφήτου παραδοθεῖσα ἡμῖν. πλὴν ἐλπίζω μηδὲ ἐν τῷ ἐξεταστικῷ λόγῳ τὸ ἧττον ἀπενέγκασθαι πρὸς τοὺς νοῦν ἔχοντας, φιλαληθεῖς λέγω, οἵτινες δύνανται γνωρίζειν τῶν λόγων τίνες εἰσὶ πιθανοί, ἔντεχνοί τε καὶ ἐπιτερπεῖς, τίνες τε λιτοὶ καὶ ἁπλοῖ, μόνῃ τῇ διʼ αὐτῶν ἀληθείᾳ πεποιθότες.

Kai homōs anepausen me, ekthemenos moi tis estin kai pōs heurisketai, kai alēthōs heureton moi paraschōn auton, tōn para ophthalmois horōmenōn emphanesteran tę̄ tou prophētou homilią tois ōsin deixas tēn alētheian, hōs ekplagenta me thaumazein, pōs tōn pasi zētoumenōn emprosthen keimenōn oudeis enorą. plēn grapsas ton peri prophētou logon, autou keleusantos, apo tēs Kaisareias Stratōnos diapemphthēnai soi epoiēsen ton tomon, para sou entolēn echein eipōn, tas kathʼ hekaston eniauton homilias te kai praxeis graphonta diapempein soi. homōs en mią tę̄ prōtę̄ hēmerą archēn ēdē monon poioumenos peri tou tēs alētheias prophētou, peri pantōn me eplērophorēsen. kai eithʼ houtōs ephē enora tou loipou tas ex emou pros tous ex enantias ginomenas zētēseis kai ei to hētton apenenkōmai, ou dedia mē pōs sy peri tēs paradotheisēs soi alētheias diakrithę̄s, eu eidōs hoti egō hēttasthai edoxa, ouchi hē hypothesis hē dia tou prophētou paradotheisa hēmin. plēn elpizō mēde en tǭ exetastikǭ logǭ to hētton apenenkasthai pros tous noun echontas, philalētheis legō, hoitines dynantai gnōrizein tōn logōn tines eisi pithanoi, entechnoi te kai epiterpeis, tines te litoi kai haploi, monę̄ tę̄ diʼ autōn alētheią pepoithotes.

And so he gave me rest, setting out for me who he is and how he is found; and he truly made him discoverable to me, showing to my ears, by his discourse on the Prophet, the truth more plainly than things seen with the eyes, so that I was astonished and wondered how no one perceives what all men seek though it lies before them. However, having written down the discourse about the Prophet at his command, he had the volume sent to you from Caesarea Stratonis, saying that he had instructions from you to write and send you year by year his discourses and acts. Still, on that one first day, while only making a beginning about the Prophet of the truth, he gave me full assurance about everything. And then he said: “Observe from now on the discussions I hold with those who oppose us; and even if I should come off worse, I am not afraid that you will waver about the truth handed on to you, knowing well that it is I who seemed to be worsted, not the doctrine handed on to us through the Prophet. But I hope not to come off worse even in the argument of examination, before those who have understanding, I mean lovers of truth, who can discern which words are persuasive, artful, and delightful, and which are plain and simple, trusting only in the truth that comes through them.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter's teaching on the Prophet assures Clement, and Peter invites him to watch his coming debates with opponents.

  • The volume is sent to James, the addressee of the Homilies; who wrote it down (Clement or Peter) is ambiguous in the Greek.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.20 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-20) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.21Schwegler

Ταῦτα αὐτοῦ εἰπόντος, ἀπεκρινάμην· ἥδη εὐχαριστῶ τῷ Θεῷ· ὡς γὰρ ἐβουλόμην πληροφορηθῆναι, οὕτως μοι καὶ παρέσχεν. πλὴν τὰ περὶ ἐμοῦ τοσοῦτον ἀμέριμνος ἴσθι, ὅτι οὐ πώποτε ἐνδοιάσω, τοσοῦτον, ὅσον εἰ καὶ αὐτὸς σὺ βουληθείης ποτὲ τῆς προφητικῆς ὑποθέσεως ἐκστῆσαί με, ἀδύνατον ἠδυνήσῃ, τοσοῦτον οἶδα ὅ παρείληφα. καὶ μή τοι νόμιζέ μέ σοι μέγα ἐπαγγέλλεσθαι, τοῦτο αὐτὸ τὸ μὴ ἐνδοιάσαι ποτέ· ἀλλʼ οὔτʼ αὐτὸς ἐγὼ, οὔτε τις ἀνθρώπων τὸν περὶ προφήτου λόγον ἐπακούσας ἐνδοιάσαι ποτὲ δυνήσεται περὶ τῆς ἀληθοῦς ὑποθέσεως, πρότερον ἐπακούσας καὶ νοήσας, τίς ἐστιν προφητικῆς ἐπαγγελίας ἀλήθεια. διὸ θάῤῥει τῷ θεοβουλήτῳ δόγματι πᾶσα γὰρ τέχνη κακίας νενίκηται. πρὸς γὰρ προφητείαν οὐδὲν δύνανται οὔτε τέχναι λόγων, οὔτε σοφισμάτων ἐπίνοιαι, οὐ συλλογισμοί, οὐκ ἄλλη τις μηχανή· ἐάν γε ὁ ἐπακούσας προφήτου ἀληθοῦς ἀληθείας ὄντως ὀρέγεται, καὶ οὐ προφάσει ἀληθείας ἕτερόν τι περιβλέπεται. ὥστε, κύριέ μου Πέτρε, μὴ ἀθύμει, ὡς ἀναισθήτῳ τὸ μέγιστον δωρησάμενος ἀγαθόν. αἰσθομένῳ γὰρ χάριτος ἐδώρησας, καὶ μὴ δυναμένῳ ἀπατηθῆναι ἀπὸ τοῦ δοθέντος ἀληθοῦς. οἶδα γὰρ ὅτι ἕν ἐστιν ὧν βούλεταί τις καὶ ταχέως λαβεῖν καὶ βραδέως μὴ τυχεῖν· οἶδα οὖν μὴ καταφρονεῖν τοῦ δοθέντος μοι, διὰ τὸ τάχος, ἀσυγκρίτου καὶ μόνου ἀσφαλοῦς.

Tauta autou eipontos, apekrinamēn; hēdē eucharistō tǭ Theǭ; hōs gar eboulomēn plērophorēthēnai, houtōs moi kai pareschen. plēn ta peri emou tosouton amerimnos isthi, hoti ou pōpote endoiasō, tosouton, hoson ei kai autos sy boulētheiēs pote tēs prophētikēs hypotheseōs ekstēsai me, adynaton ēdynēsę̄, tosouton oida ho pareilēpha. kai mē toi nomize me soi mega epangellesthai, touto auto to mē endoiasai pote; allʼ outʼ autos egō, oute tis anthrōpōn ton peri prophētou logon epakousas endoiasai pote dynēsetai peri tēs alēthous hypotheseōs, proteron epakousas kai noēsas, tis estin prophētikēs epangelias alētheia. dio tharrhei tǭ theoboulētǭ dogmati pasa gar technē kakias nenikētai. pros gar prophēteian ouden dynantai oute technai logōn, oute sophismatōn epinoiai, ou syllogismoi, ouk allē tis mēchanē; ean ge ho epakousas prophētou alēthous alētheias ontōs oregetai, kai ou prophasei alētheias heteron ti periblepetai. hōste, kyrie mou Petre, mē athymei, hōs anaisthētǭ to megiston dōrēsamenos agathon. aisthomenǭ gar charitos edōrēsas, kai mē dynamenǭ apatēthēnai apo tou dothentos alēthous. oida gar hoti hen estin hōn bouletai tis kai tacheōs labein kai bradeōs mē tychein; oida oun mē kataphronein tou dothentos moi, dia to tachos, asynkritou kai monou asphalous.

When he had said this, I answered: “Already I give thanks to God; for as I wished to be fully assured, so he has granted me. But be so free from care about me that I will never waver; so much so that even if you yourself should ever wish to move me from the prophetic doctrine, you would not be able, so well do I know what I have received. And do not think that I promise you something great in this very thing, that I will never waver. For neither I nor any man who has heard the discourse about the Prophet will ever be able to waver concerning the true doctrine, once he has heard and understood what the truth of the prophetic promise is. Take courage, then, in the doctrine willed by God, for every art of wickedness has been conquered. Against prophecy neither the arts of words nor the devices of sophisms can do anything, nor syllogisms, nor any other contrivance, if indeed he who has heard the true Prophet truly longs for the truth and does not, under pretext of truth, look to something else. So, my lord Peter, do not be despondent, as though you had given the greatest good to one without perception. You have given it to one who perceives the grace, and who cannot be led astray from the truth that has been given. For I know that it is one of the things a man desires, both to receive quickly and not to obtain slowly. I know, then, not to despise, because of its speed, what has been given me, which is incomparable and alone secure.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement assures Peter that he will never waver from the doctrine of the true Prophet.

  • The sentence “I know that it is one of the things…” is obscure in the Greek; the translation follows the words as printed.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.21 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-21) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

1.22Schwegler

Ταῦτά μου εἰπόντος ὁ Πέτρος ἔφη χάριν ὁμολογῶ τῷ Θεῷ καὶ περὶ τῆς σῆς σωτηρίας καὶ περὶ τῆς ἐμῆς ἀπολαύσεως. ἀληθῶς γὰρ ἥδομαι εἰδὼς ὅτι ἐπέγνως τί ποτʼ ἔστιν προφητείας μέγεθος. ἐπεὶ οὖν, ὡς ἔφης, οὐδʼ ἄν αὐτὸς ἐγὼ θελήσω ποτέ, ὅπερ ἀπείη, εἰς ἕτερόν σε μεταστῆσαι δόγμα, οὐχ ἱκανὸς ἔσομαι πεῖσαί σε, ἄρξαι τοῦ λοιποῦ ἀπὸ τῆς αὔριον παρεῖναί μοι ἐν ταῖς τῶν ἀντικειμένων ζητήσεσιν. ἔστι δέ μοι ἡ αὔριον πρὸς Σίμωνα μάγον. καὶ ταῦτα εἰπὼν καὶ τροφῆς αὐτὸς μεταλαβὼν ἰδίᾳ κᾀμὲ μεταλαβεῖν ἐκέλευσεν. εὐλογήσας δὲ ἐπὶ τῆς τροφῆς καὶ εὐχαριστήσας, μετὰ τὸ κορεσθῆναι καὶ αὐτοῦ τούτου τὸν λόγον μοι ἀποδοὺς ἐπήγαγεν λέγων· δῴη σοι ὁ Θεὸς κατὰ πάντα ἐξομοιωθῆναί μοι, καὶ βαπτισθέντα τῆς αὐτῆς μοι μεταλαβεῖν τραπέζης. ταῦτα εἰπὼν ἡσυχάζειν μοι προσέταξεν. ἤδη γάρ που καὶ τὸν ὕπνον ἀπῄτει ἡ τοῦ σώματος φύσις.

Tauta mou eipontos ho Petros ephē charin homologō tǭ Theǭ kai peri tēs sēs sōtērias kai peri tēs emēs apolauseōs. alēthōs gar hēdomai eidōs hoti epegnōs ti potʼ estin prophēteias megethos. epei oun, hōs ephēs, oudʼ an autos egō thelēsō pote, hoper apeiē, eis heteron se metastēsai dogma, ouch hikanos esomai peisai se, arxai tou loipou apo tēs aurion pareinai moi en tais tōn antikeimenōn zētēsesin. esti de moi hē aurion pros Simōna magon. kai tauta eipōn kai trophēs autos metalabōn idią kąme metalabein ekeleusen. eulogēsas de epi tēs trophēs kai eucharistēsas, meta to koresthēnai kai autou toutou ton logon moi apodous epēgagen legōn; dǭē soi ho Theos kata panta exomoiōthēnai moi, kai baptisthenta tēs autēs moi metalabein trapezēs. tauta eipōn hēsychazein moi prosetaxen. ēdē gar pou kai ton hypnon apę̄tei hē tou sōmatos physis.

When I had said this, Peter said: “I give thanks to God both for your salvation and for my own enjoyment. For I truly rejoice, knowing that you have recognized how great prophecy is. Since, then, as you said, even if I myself should ever wish (which God forbid) to move you to another doctrine, I should not be able to persuade you, begin from tomorrow on to be present with me in the discussions with our opponents. And tomorrow I am to meet Simon the magician.” Having said this, he took food by himself, and told me also to take food. And after blessing the food and giving thanks, when he had eaten his fill, he explained to me the reason for this very thing, and added: “May God grant you to become like me in all things, and, when you have been baptized, to share the same table with me.” Having said this he bade me rest; for the nature of the body was now demanding sleep.

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter invites Clement to the next day's debate with Simon and eats apart from him, praying that Clement will be baptized and share his table.

  • Peter's refusal to eat with the unbaptized reflects the purity rules of the Pseudo-Clementines (compare Hom. 13.4).

Topics: Baptism

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.22 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-1-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-1-22) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

Chapter 2

2.1Schwegler

Τῇ μὲν οὖν ἐπιούσῃ ἡμέρᾳ ἐγὼ Κλήμης, ἔτι τῆς νυκτὸς οὔσης διυπνισθεὶς, καὶ μαθὼν τὸν Πέτρον ἐγρηγορότα καὶ τοῖς συνοῦσι περὶ θεοσεβείας διαλεγόμενον· οἵ ἦσαν δέκα ἕξ, ὧν καὶ τὰ ὀνόματα, ὡς ἕκαστον ἑξῆς χρόνου μαθὼν, ἐκθεῖναι ἐβουλευσάμην, ὅπως ἐπιγνῶς καὶ τίνες ἦσαν· ὧν πρῶτος Ζακχαῖος ὅ ποτε τελώνης, καὶ Σοφωνίας ὁ ἀδελφὸς αὐτοῦ, Ἰώσηφός τε καὶ ὁ τούτου σύντροφος Μιχαίας, προσέτι δὲ Θωμᾶς καὶ Ἐλιέζερος οἱ δίδυμοι, ἀλλὰ καὶ Ἀινείας καὶ Λάζαρος οἱ ἱερεῖς, προσέτι μήν τε καὶ Ἐλισσαῖος, Βενιαμίν τε καὶ ὁ τοῦ Σαφρᾶ, ὁμοίως γε Ρούβιλος καὶ Ζαχαρίας οἱ οἰκοδόμοι, Ἀνανίας τε καὶ Ἀγγαῖος οἱ Ἰαμμηνοὶ, ἔτι τε Νικήτης καὶ Ἀκύλας οἱ ἑταῖροι· πλὴν ἐπεισιὼν καὶ προσαγορεύσας ἐκαθέσθην, αὐτοῦ κελεύσαντος.

Tę̄ men oun epiousę̄ hēmerą egō Klēmēs, eti tēs nyktos ousēs diypnistheis, kai mathōn ton Petron egrēgorota kai tois synousi peri theosebeias dialegomenon; hoi ēsan deka hex, hōn kai ta onomata, hōs hekaston hexēs chronou mathōn, ektheinai ebouleusamēn, hopōs epignōs kai tines ēsan; hōn prōtos Zakchaios ho pote telōnēs, kai Sophōnias ho adelphos autou, Iōsēphos te kai ho toutou syntrophos Michaias, proseti de Thōmas kai Eliezeros hoi didymoi, alla kai Aineias kai Lazaros hoi hiereis, proseti mēn te kai Elissaios, Beniamin te kai ho tou Saphra, homoiōs ge Roubilos kai Zacharias hoi oikodomoi, Ananias te kai Angaios hoi Iammēnoi, eti te Nikētēs kai Akylas hoi hetairoi; plēn epeisiōn kai prosagoreusas ekathesthēn, autou keleusantos.

On the following day, then, I, Clement, woke while it was still night, and learned that Peter was awake and conversing about the worship of God with those who were with him. They were sixteen, and I have decided to set down their names too, as I learned each of them in the course of time, so that you may know who they were. First of them was Zacchaeus, formerly a tax collector, and Sophonias his brother; Joseph and his foster-brother Michaeas; also Thomas and Eliezer, the twins; and Aeneas and Lazarus, the priests; and further Elisha, and Benjamin the son of Saphra; likewise Rubelus and Zacharias, the builders; Ananias and Haggai of Jamnia; and also Nicetes and Aquila, the companions. However, I went in, greeted them, and sat down, as he bade me.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement lists the sixteen companions of Peter whom he found with him before dawn.

  • “Of Jamnia” renders Ἰαμμηνοί; the sense is uncertain. The sixteen are counted with Benjamin the son of Saphra as one person.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.1 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-2-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.2Schwegler

Ὁ δὲ τὸν προκείμενον ἐκκόψας λόγον, ὥσπερ ἀπολογούμενος ἐπληροφόρει τίνος ἕνεκεν οὐκ ἐξύπνισέν με, ὅπως τῶν λόγων ἐπακούσω, αἰτίαν τιθέμενος τὸν ἐκ τοῦ πλοῦ σκυλμόν· ἐκεῖνον πεφθῆναί μοι θέλων ἡσυχάζειν εἴασεν. ὁπότʼ ἂν ἡ ψυχὴ περὶ τὸ λεῖπον τῷ σώματι ἀσχολεῖται, τὰ προσφερόμενα μαθήματα οὐ κατʼ ἀξίαν προσίεται. τούτου ἕνεκα διαλέγεσθαι οὐ βούλομαι, οὔτε πάνυ διά τινα συμφορὰν λυπουμένοις, ἢ ἀμέτρως ὀργιζομένοις, ἢ πρὸς λύσσαν ἔρωτος ἐκτετραμμένοις, ἢ ὑπὸ βιωτικῶν φροντίδων περιωθουμένοις, ἢ ἄλλοις τισὶ πάθεσιν ὀχλουμένοις, οἷς ἡ ψυχή, ὡς ἔφην, ὑποπίπτουσα, καὶ τῷ σώματι πάσχοντι συναλγοῦσα, καὶ τὴν αὑτῆς φρόνησιν ἀσχολεῖ.

Ho de ton prokeimenon ekkopsas logon, hōsper apologoumenos eplērophorei tinos heneken ouk exypnisen me, hopōs tōn logōn epakousō, aitian tithemenos ton ek tou plou skylmon; ekeinon pephthēnai moi thelōn hēsychazein eiasen. hopotʼ an hē psychē peri to leipon tǭ sōmati ascholeitai, ta prospheromena mathēmata ou katʼ axian prosietai. toutou heneka dialegesthai ou boulomai, oute pany dia tina symphoran lypoumenois, ē ametrōs orgizomenois, ē pros lyssan erōtos ektetrammenois, ē hypo biōtikōn phrontidōn periōthoumenois, ē allois tisi pathesin ochloumenois, hois hē psychē, hōs ephēn, hypopiptousa, kai tǭ sōmati paschonti synalgousa, kai tēn hautēs phronēsin ascholei.

He broke off the discourse in hand and, as though excusing himself, assured me why he had not woken me to hear the discussion: he gave as the reason the upset from the voyage, and wishing that to pass off, he had let me rest. “For whenever the soul is taken up with what the body lacks, it does not receive as it deserves the teaching offered to it. For this reason I do not wish to converse with those who are deeply grieved by some misfortune, or immoderately angry, or turned to the madness of love, or pushed about by the cares of life, or troubled by any other passions; for the soul, falling under these, as I said, and suffering with the suffering body, has its own understanding taken up as well.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter explains that he let Clement sleep, since a soul taken up with the body's troubles cannot receive teaching well.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.2 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-2-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.3Schwegler

Καὶ μὴ λεγέτω τις· οὐ χρὴ οὖν παραμυθίας καὶ νουθεσίας προσφέρειν τοῖς φαῦλόν τι πράττουσιν. φημί, εἰ μὲν ἀνύει τις, προσφερέτω· εἰ δὲ μή, τῷ καιρῷ εἰξάτω. ἐγὼ γὰρ οἶδα ὅτι πάντα καιρὸν ἴδιον ἔχει. διὸ χρὴ τοῖς ἀνθρώποις τοὺς τὴν ψυχὴν ῥωννύντας λόγους πρὸ τῆς κακώσεως ἐπιδιδόναι, ἵνα εἴ ποτε ἐπέλθοι τι φαῦλον, ὁ νοῦς προωπλισμένος ὀρθῷ τῷ λογισμῷ τὸ ἐπενεχθὲν ὑποστῆναι δυνηθῇ. τότε γὰρ καὶ τῷ διὰ γνώμης ἀγαθῆς βοηθήσαντι παρὰ τὴν ἀκμὴν τοῦ πολέμου οἶδεν ὁ νοῦς συντρέχειν.

Kai mē legetō tis; ou chrē oun paramythias kai nouthesias prospherein tois phaulon ti prattousin. phēmi, ei men anyei tis, prospheretō; ei de mē, tǭ kairǭ eixatō. egō gar oida hoti panta kairon idion echei. dio chrē tois anthrōpois tous tēn psychēn rhōnnyntas logous pro tēs kakōseōs epididonai, hina ei pote epelthoi ti phaulon, ho nous proōplismenos orthǭ tǭ logismǭ to epenechthen hypostēnai dynēthę̄. tote gar kai tǭ dia gnōmēs agathēs boēthēsanti para tēn akmēn tou polemou oiden ho nous syntrechein.

“And let no one say, ‘Then we must not offer consolation and admonition to those who do wrong.’ I say: if one can accomplish something, let him offer it; if not, let him yield to the occasion. For I know that everything has its own time. Therefore we must give people the words that strengthen the soul before the affliction comes, so that if anything evil should come upon them, the mind, armed beforehand with right reason, may be able to endure what is brought upon it. For then the mind knows how to join with him who has helped it by good counsel, even at the height of the battle.”

Eccl 3:1 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that the soul should be strengthened by instruction before trouble comes.

  • “Everything has its own time” echoes Eccl 3:1.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.3 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-2-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.4Schwegler

Πλὴν ἔμαθον, ὦ Κλήμης, ὡς ἐν τῇ Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ ὁ Βαρνάβας τὸν περὶ προφητείας λόγον τελείως σοι ἐξέθετο· ἢ γὰρ οὔ; κᾀγὼ ἀπεκρινάμην· ναί, καὶ πάνυ καλῶς. καὶ ὁ Πέτρος· οὐκοῦν ἐκ ἀναγκαῖον, τὸν νῦν χρόνον δυνάμενον ἡμῖν ὑπηρετεῖν εἰς ἑτέρους λόγους οὕς οὐκ ἐπίστασαι, εἰς οὕς ἐπίστασαι ποιεῖσθαι τὴν ἀσχολίαν. ἐγὼ ἔφην· ὀρθῶς ἔφης Πέτρε. ἐμοὶ δὲ τοῦτο χαρίζου πάντοτέ σοι συνεῖναι κρίναντι, τὸν περὶ προφήτου λόγον ἡδέως ἀκούοντι συνεχῶς ὑφηγεῖσθαι· ἄνευ γὰρ αὐτοῦ, ὡς ἔμαθον παρὰ Βαρνάβα, τὴν ἀλήθειαν μαθεῖν ἀδύνατον.

Plēn emathon, ō Klēmēs, hōs en tę̄ Alexandreią ho Barnabas ton peri prophēteias logon teleiōs soi exetheto; ē gar ou? kągō apekrinamēn; nai, kai pany kalōs. kai ho Petros; oukoun ek anankaion, ton nyn chronon dynamenon hēmin hypēretein eis heterous logous hous ouk epistasai, eis hous epistasai poieisthai tēn ascholian. egō ephēn; orthōs ephēs Petre. emoi de touto charizou pantote soi syneinai krinanti, ton peri prophētou logon hēdeōs akouonti synechōs hyphēgeisthai; aneu gar autou, hōs emathon para Barnaba, tēn alētheian mathein adynaton.

“However, Clement, I have learned that in Alexandria Barnabas set out for you fully the discourse about prophecy; is it not so?” And I answered: “Yes, and very well.” And Peter said: “Then is it not necessary that the present time, which could serve us for other discourses that you do not know, should not be spent on those that you know?” I said: “You speak rightly, Peter. But grant me this, since I have decided to be with you always: to explain continually the discourse about the Prophet, to one who hears it gladly; for without it, as I learned from Barnabas, it is impossible to learn the truth.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter proposes new teaching, but Clement asks him to keep expounding the doctrine of the Prophet.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.4 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/1-1/#p-2-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.