Homilies 2.5–2.38

Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, presenting itself as his account of Peter's travels and disputes with Simon Magus. It is not a work of Clement; it draws on an earlier source (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift' or 'Kerygmata Petrou', probably 3rd-century Syria) reworked in its present form by the 4th century. Its companion recension, the Latin Recognitions, survives only in Rufinus's translation and is not staged here.

Greek text: Schwegler (Greek text: Albert Schwegler, Clementis Romani quae feruntur Homiliae XX (Stuttgart, 1847), digitized by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (Open Greek and Latin), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).

Show

Chapter 2

2.5Schwegler

Ὁ δὲ Πέτρος ἐπὶ τούτῳ μεγάλως ἡσθεὶς ἀπεκρίνατο· ἤδη μὲν ἡ πρὸς σὲ διόρθωσις τέλος εἴληφεν, ἐπεγνωκότα τῆς ἀπταίστου προφητείας τὸ μέγεθος, ἧς ἄνευ λαβεῖν τινὶ τὸ ἐν ὑπεροχῇ συμφέρον ἀδύνατον. πολλῶν γὰρ καὶ διαφόρων ἀγαθῶν ὄντων ἐν τοῖς οὖσιν ἢ ἔσεσθαι δυναμένοις, τὸ πάντων μακαριώτατον, εἴτε ἀΐδιός ἐστιν ζωή, ἢ παράμονος ὑγεία, ἢ τέλειος νοῦς, ἢ φῶς, ἢ χαρά, ἢ ἀφθαρσία, ἢ καὶ ἄλλο τι ὅ ἐν τῇ τῶν ὄντων φύσει ὑπερέχον ὑπάρχει καλὸν ἢ ὑπάρξαι δύναται τοῦτο — ἐκ ἄλλως ἔστιν αὐτὸ κτήσασθαι, μὴ πρότερον γνόντα τὰ ὄντα ὡς ἔστιν· τῆς δὲ γνώσεως οὐκ ἄλλως τυχεῖν ἔστιν, ἐὰν μὴ πρότερόν τις τὸν τῆς ἀληθείας προφήτην ἐπιγνῶ.

Ho de Petros epi toutǭ megalōs hēstheis apekrinato; ēdē men hē pros se diorthōsis telos eilēphen, epegnōkota tēs aptaistou prophēteias to megethos, hēs aneu labein tini to en hyperochę̄ sympheron adynaton. pollōn gar kai diaphorōn agathōn ontōn en tois ousin ē esesthai dynamenois, to pantōn makariōtaton, eite aïdios estin zōē, ē paramonos hygeia, ē teleios nous, ē phōs, ē chara, ē aphtharsia, ē kai allo ti ho en tę̄ tōn ontōn physei hyperechon hyparchei kalon ē hyparxai dynatai touto — ek allōs estin auto ktēsasthai, mē proteron gnonta ta onta hōs estin; tēs de gnōseōs ouk allōs tychein estin, ean mē proteron tis ton tēs alētheias prophētēn epignō.

And Peter, greatly pleased at this, answered: “Already the correction of you has reached its end, since you have recognized the greatness of the unerring prophecy, without which no one can obtain the supreme good. For though there are many and various good things among those that are or can come to be, the most blessed of all, whether it is eternal life, or lasting health, or perfect understanding, or light, or joy, or incorruption, or anything else that is or can be an excellent good in the nature of things, cannot be obtained otherwise than by first knowing things as they are; and one cannot attain that knowledge otherwise than by first recognizing the Prophet of the truth.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that the highest goods can be gained only through knowledge that comes from the Prophet of the truth.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.5 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.6Schwegler

Προφήτης δὲ ἀληθείας ἐστὶν ὁ πάντοτε πάντα εἰδώς, τὰ μὲν γεγονότα ὡς ἐγένετο, τὰ δὲ γινόμενα ὡς γίνεται, τὰ δὲ ἐσόμενα ὡς ἔσται, ἀναμάρτητος, ἐλεήμων, μόνος τὴν ἀλήθειαν ὑφηγεῖσθαι πεπιστευμένος. ἀναγίνωσκε, καὶ εὑρήσεις τοὺς ἀφʼ ἑαυτῶν τὴν ἀλήθειαν εὑρεῖν νομίσαντας. τοῦτο γὰρ προφήτου ἴδιον, τὸ τὴν ἀλήθειαν μηνύειν, ὥσπερ ἡλίου ἴδιον τὸ τὴν ἡμέραν φέρειν. διὰ τοῦτο ὅσοι ποτὲ ἀλήθειαν γνῶναι ἐπεθύμησαν, παρὰ δὲ τούτου μαθεῖν αὐτὴν οὐκ εὐτύχησαν, μὴ εὑρόντες, ζητοῦντες ἐτελεύτησαν. ὁ γὰρ τὴν ἀλήθειαν ζητῶν παρὰ τῆς ἑαυτοῦ ἀγνοίας λαβεῖν πῶς ἄν δύναιτο; κᾄν γὰρ εὕροι, οὐκ εἰδὼς αὐτὴν ὡς οὐκ οὖσαν παρέρχεται. οὔτʼ αὖ παρʼ ἑτέρου, τοῦ ὁμοίως ὡς ἐξ ἀγνωσίας ἔχειν ἐπαγγελλομένου, ἀληθείας κρατεῖν δυνατὸς ἔσται· πλὴν πολιτείας μόνης, καὶ ταῦτα ἐκείνης τῆς διὰ τὸ εὔλογον γνωρισθῆναι δυναμένης, ἥτις ἑκάστῳ ἐκ τοῦ μὴ θέλειν ἀδικεῖσθαι, τοῦ μὴ δεῖν ἄλλον ἀδικεῖν τὴν γνῶσιν παρίστησιν.

Prophētēs de alētheias estin ho pantote panta eidōs, ta men gegonota hōs egeneto, ta de ginomena hōs ginetai, ta de esomena hōs estai, anamartētos, eleēmōn, monos tēn alētheian hyphēgeisthai pepisteumenos. anaginōske, kai heurēseis tous aphʼ heautōn tēn alētheian heurein nomisantas. touto gar prophētou idion, to tēn alētheian mēnyein, hōsper hēliou idion to tēn hēmeran pherein. dia touto hosoi pote alētheian gnōnai epethymēsan, para de toutou mathein autēn ouk eutychēsan, mē heurontes, zētountes eteleutēsan. ho gar tēn alētheian zētōn para tēs heautou agnoias labein pōs an dynaito? kąn gar heuroi, ouk eidōs autēn hōs ouk ousan parerchetai. outʼ au parʼ heterou, tou homoiōs hōs ex agnōsias echein epangellomenou, alētheias kratein dynatos estai; plēn politeias monēs, kai tauta ekeinēs tēs dia to eulogon gnōristhēnai dynamenēs, hētis hekastǭ ek tou mē thelein adikeisthai, tou mē dein allon adikein tēn gnōsin paristēsin.

“Now the Prophet of the truth is he who always knows all things: things past as they happened, things present as they are happening, things to come as they will be; sinless, merciful, alone entrusted with guiding men to the truth. Read, and you will find that those who thought they had found the truth by themselves did not. For this is the proper work of a prophet, to reveal the truth, as it is the sun's proper work to bring the day. Therefore all who ever desired to know the truth but did not have the good fortune to learn it from him died still seeking it without finding it. For how could one who seeks the truth receive it from his own ignorance? Even if he found it, not recognizing it, he would pass it by as though it were not. Nor again will he be able to lay hold of the truth from another who professes to have it, but likewise out of ignorance, except only in matters of conduct, and then only such conduct as can be known by reasonableness, which gives each one, from his not wishing to be wronged, the knowledge that he ought not to wrong another.”

Matt 7:12 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter defines the true Prophet as all-knowing and sinless, and says that apart from him people can know only the basic rule of not wronging others.

  • The final clause resembles the negative form of the Golden Rule (compare Tob 4:15; Matt 7:12).

Extrabiblical texts: Tob 4:15 (Tobit [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; echo)

Topics: Christology, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.6 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.7Schwegler

Πάντες μὲν οὖν ὅσοι ποτὲ ἐζήτησαν τὸ ἀληθές, τὸ δύνασθαι εὑρεῖν ἑαυτοῖς πιστεύσαντες, ἐνηδρεύθησαν. τοῦτο ὅπερ πεπόνθασιν καὶ οἱ τῶν Ἐλλήνων φιλόσοφοι, καὶ βαρβάρων οἱ σπουδαιότεροι. ἐκ στοχασμῶν γὰρ ἐπιβάλλοντες τοῖς ὁρατοῖς περὶ τῶν ἀδήλων ἀπεφήναντο, τὸ ὅπως ποτὲ παραστὰν αὐτοῖς, τοῦτο ἀληθὲς εἶναι νομίσαντες. ὡς γὰρ εἰδότες ἀλήθειαν, οἱ ἀλήθειαν ἔτι ζητοῦντες, τῶν παρισταμένων αὐτοῖς ὑπολήψεων ἃ μὲν ἀποδοκιμάζουσιν, ἅ δὲ κρατύνουσιν, ὥσπερ εἰδότες, μὴ εἰδότες ποῖα μέν ἐστιν ἀληθῆ, ποῖα δὲ ψευδῆ. καὶ δογματίζουσιν περὶ ἀληθείας, οἱ ἀλήθειαν ἐπιζητοῦντες, οὐκ εἰδότες ὅτι ὁ ἀλήθειαν ζητῶν παρὰ τῆς αὑτοῦ πλάνης μαθεῖν αὐτὴν οὐ δύναται. οὔτε γὰρ, ὡς ἔφην, παρεστηκυῖαν αὐτὴν ἐπιγνῶναι δύναται, ἤν ἀγνοεῖ.

Pantes men oun hosoi pote ezētēsan to alēthes, to dynasthai heurein heautois pisteusantes, enēdreuthēsan. touto hoper peponthasin kai hoi tōn Ellēnōn philosophoi, kai barbarōn hoi spoudaioteroi. ek stochasmōn gar epiballontes tois horatois peri tōn adēlōn apephēnanto, to hopōs pote parastan autois, touto alēthes einai nomisantes. hōs gar eidotes alētheian, hoi alētheian eti zētountes, tōn paristamenōn autois hypolēpseōn ha men apodokimazousin, ha de kratynousin, hōsper eidotes, mē eidotes poia men estin alēthē, poia de pseudē. kai dogmatizousin peri alētheias, hoi alētheian epizētountes, ouk eidotes hoti ho alētheian zētōn para tēs hautou planēs mathein autēn ou dynatai. oute gar, hōs ephēn, parestēkuian autēn epignōnai dynatai, ēn agnoei.

“All, then, who have ever sought the truth, trusting that they could find it by themselves, have been ensnared. This is what happened both to the philosophers of the Greeks and to the more learned of the barbarians. For, applying themselves by conjecture to visible things, they made pronouncements about things unseen, thinking that whatever occurred to them was true. As though they knew the truth, those who are still seeking the truth reject some of the notions that occur to them and confirm others, as though they knew, while not knowing which are true and which false. And those who are still seeking the truth lay down doctrines about the truth, not knowing that he who seeks the truth cannot learn it from his own error. For, as I said, he cannot recognize it even when it is present, since he does not know it.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter argues that philosophers who sought truth by their own conjectures were deceived.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.7 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.8Schwegler

Πείθει δὲ ἕκαστον ἀφʼ ἑαυτοῦ ζητοῦντα μαθεῖν οὐ πάντως τὸ ἀληθές, ἀλλὰ τὸ τέρπον. ἐπεὶ οὖν ἄλλον ἄλλο τέρπει, ἄλλου ἄλλο κρατεῖ ὡς ἀληθές. τὸ δὲ ἀληθές ἐστιν τὸ δοκοῦν τῷ προφήτη, οὐ τὸ ἑκάστῳ ἡδύ. πολλὰ γὰρ ἄν ἦν τὸ ἕν, εἰ τὸ τέρπον ἀληθὲς ἦν, ὅπερ ἐστὶν ἀδύνατον. διὰ τοῦτο καὶ οἱ τῶν Ἑλλήνων φιλόλογοι, οὐ φιλόσοφοι, διὰ στοχασμῶν τοῖς πράγμασιν ἐπιβάντες, πολλὰ καὶ διάφορα ἐδογμάτισαν, τὴν οἰκείαν τῶν ὑποθέσεων ἀκολουθίαν ἀλήθειαν εἶναι νομίσαντες, οὐκ εἰδότες ὅτι αὐτῶν ψευδεῖς ἀρχὰς ἑαυτοῖς ὁρισαμένων, τῇ μὲν ἀρχῇ αὐτῶν τὸ τέλος συμφωνίαν εἴληφεν.

Peithei de hekaston aphʼ heautou zētounta mathein ou pantōs to alēthes, alla to terpon. epei oun allon allo terpei, allou allo kratei hōs alēthes. to de alēthes estin to dokoun tǭ prophētē, ou to hekastǭ hēdy. polla gar an ēn to hen, ei to terpon alēthes ēn, hoper estin adynaton. dia touto kai hoi tōn Hellēnōn philologoi, ou philosophoi, dia stochasmōn tois pragmasin epibantes, polla kai diaphora edogmatisan, tēn oikeian tōn hypotheseōn akolouthian alētheian einai nomisantes, ouk eidotes hoti autōn pseudeis archas heautois horisamenōn, tę̄ men archę̄ autōn to telos symphōnian eilēphen.

“What persuades each one who seeks to learn by himself is not at all the truth, but what pleases him. Since, then, one thing pleases one and another another, one man holds one thing as true and another another. But the truth is what seems good to the Prophet, not what is pleasant to each. For the one would be many, if what pleases were true, which is impossible. For this reason also the lovers of words among the Greeks, not lovers of wisdom, approaching things by conjecture, laid down many and various doctrines, thinking that the internal consistency of their premises was the truth, not knowing that, since they had set down false first principles for themselves, their conclusions agreed only with their principles.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter says that people left to themselves take what pleases them for truth, as the Greek philosophers did with their consistent but false systems.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.8 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.9Schwegler

Ὅθεν δεῖ πάντα παρελόμενον μόνῳ τῆς ἀληθείας πιστεύειν ἑαυτὸν προφήτῃ, ὅν πάντες κρῖναι δυνάμεθα, εἰ προφήτης ἐστίν, κἄν πάνυ ἀμαθεῖς ὦμεν, καὶ σοφισμῶν ἰδιῶται, καὶ γεωμετρίας ἄπειροι, καὶ μουσικῆς ἀμύητοι. εὐκολωτέραν γὰρ τὴν περὶ αὐτοῦ εὕρεσιν ὁ Θεὸς τέθεικεν πᾶσιν, ὡς πάντων κηδεμών· ἵνα μήτε βάρβαροι ἐξασθενῶσιν αὐτὸν, μήτε Ἕλληνες ἀδυνατῶσιν εὑρεῖν. ῥᾳδία μὲν οὖν περὶ αὐτοῦ εὕρεσις ὑπάρχει· ἔστιν δὲ ἥδε.

Hothen dei panta parelomenon monǭ tēs alētheias pisteuein heauton prophētę̄, hon pantes krinai dynametha, ei prophētēs estin, kan pany amatheis ōmen, kai sophismōn idiōtai, kai geōmetrias apeiroi, kai mousikēs amyētoi. eukolōteran gar tēn peri autou heuresin ho Theos tetheiken pasin, hōs pantōn kēdemōn; hina mēte barbaroi exasthenōsin auton, mēte Hellēnes adynatōsin heurein. rhądia men oun peri autou heuresis hyparchei; estin de hēde.

“Therefore one must set everything aside and entrust oneself to the Prophet of the truth alone, whom we can all judge, whether he is a prophet, even if we are altogether unlearned, unskilled in sophistries, inexperienced in geometry, and uninitiated in music. For God, as the guardian of all, has made the finding of him easy for all, so that neither barbarians should be too weak to find him nor Greeks unable. The way of finding him is easy indeed; and it is this.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter says God has made the true Prophet easy for anyone, learned or not, to recognize.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.9 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.10Schwegler

Εἰ προφήτης ἐστὶν, καὶ δύναται εἰδέναι ὡς ἐγένετο ὁ κόσμος, καὶ τὰ ἐν αὐτῷ γινόμενα, καὶ τὰ εἰς τέλος ἐσόμενα· ἐὰν ἡμῖν ᾖ τι προειρηκὼς, ὃ εἰς τέλος ἐγνώκαμεν γεγενημένον, καλῶς αὐτῷ ἐκ τῶν ἤδη γεγενημένων καὶ τὰ ἐσόμενα ἔσεσθαι πιστεύομεν, οὐ μόνον ὡς γινώσκοντι, ἀλλὰ καὶ προγινώσκοντι. τίνι οὖν, κᾂν βραχὺν νοῦν ἔχοντι, οὐ φαίνεται, ὡς χρὴ τούτῳ παρὰ πάντας πιστεύειν τὰ τῷ Θεῷ δόξαντα, ὃς μόνος παρὰ πάντας ἀνθρώπους καὶ μὴ μαθὼν ἐπίσταται; διό, ἂν τῷ τοιούτῳ, λέγω δὲ τῷ πρόγνωσιν ἔχοντι διὰ τὴν ἐν αὐτῷ τοῦ πνεύματος θειότητα, τὸ ἀληθὲς εἰδέναι μὴ διδόναι τις θέλοι, τινὶ ἑτέρῳ δοὺς εἰδέναι, ἐκ ἐνδεὴς ὑπάρχει φρενῶν, ἀποδεδωκὼς τῷ μὴ προφήτῃ, ἃ προφήτῃ εἰδέναι δοῦναι οὐκ ἐβουλήθη;

Ei prophētēs estin, kai dynatai eidenai hōs egeneto ho kosmos, kai ta en autǭ ginomena, kai ta eis telos esomena; ean hēmin ę̄ ti proeirēkōs, ho eis telos egnōkamen gegenēmenon, kalōs autǭ ek tōn ēdē gegenēmenōn kai ta esomena esesthai pisteuomen, ou monon hōs ginōskonti, alla kai proginōskonti. tini oun, kąn brachyn noun echonti, ou phainetai, hōs chrē toutǭ para pantas pisteuein ta tǭ Theǭ doxanta, hos monos para pantas anthrōpous kai mē mathōn epistatai? dio, an tǭ toioutǭ, legō de tǭ prognōsin echonti dia tēn en autǭ tou pneumatos theiotēta, to alēthes eidenai mē didonai tis theloi, tini heterǭ dous eidenai, ek endeēs hyparchei phrenōn, apodedōkōs tǭ mē prophētę̄, ha prophētę̄ eidenai dounai ouk eboulēthē?

“If he is a prophet, he is able to know how the world came to be, and what happens in it, and what will be at the end. If he has foretold something to us which we have known to have come to pass at last, we rightly believe him, from what has already happened, that what is to come will also come to pass, as one who not only knows but foreknows. To whom, then, having even a little understanding, is it not plain that one must believe him above all others concerning what God has decided, him who alone of all men knows without having learned? Therefore, if anyone will not grant to such a one, I mean one who has foreknowledge through the divinity of the Spirit in him, that he knows the truth, but grants knowledge to someone else, is he not lacking in sense, having granted to one who is not a prophet what he would not grant a prophet to know?”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter argues that fulfilled predictions prove the Prophet's foreknowledge, so he must be believed above all.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.10 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.11Schwegler

Ὅθεν πρὸ πάντων πάσῃ κρίσει διὰ τῆς προφητικῆς ἐπαγγελίας τὸν προφήτην ζητεῖν δεῖ, καὶ γνόντα, τοῖς λοιποῖς τῆς διδασκαλίας αὐτοῦ λόγοις ἀνενδοιάστως ἕπεσθαι, καὶ θαῤῥοῦντα περὶ τῶν ἐλπιζομένων, πολιτεύεσθαι τῇ πρώτῃ κρίσει, γνόντα ὅτι ὁ ταῦτα εἰπὼν πρὸς τὸ ψεύσασθαι φύσιν οὐκ ἔχει. διὸ ἐάν τι τοῦ λοιποῦ τῶν ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ ῥηθέντων δοκῇ ἡμῖν οὐ καλῶς εἰρῆσθαι, εἰδέναι χρὴ ὅτι οὐκ αὐτὸ εἵρηται κακῶς, ἀλλʼ αὐτὸ ἡμεῖς καλῶς ἔχον οὐκ ἐνοήσαμεν. ἄγνοια γὰρ γνῶσιν οὐκ ὀρθῶς κρίνει, ἅτε δὴ οὔτε γνῶσις πρόγνωσιν ἀληθῶς κρίνειν πέφυκεν. ἀλλʼ ἡ πρόγνωσις τοῖς ἀγνοοῦσιν παρέχει τὴν γνῶσιν.

Hothen pro pantōn pasę̄ krisei dia tēs prophētikēs epangelias ton prophētēn zētein dei, kai gnonta, tois loipois tēs didaskalias autou logois anendoiastōs hepesthai, kai tharrhounta peri tōn elpizomenōn, politeuesthai tę̄ prōtę̄ krisei, gnonta hoti ho tauta eipōn pros to pseusasthai physin ouk echei. dio ean ti tou loipou tōn hypʼ autou rhēthentōn dokę̄ hēmin ou kalōs eirēsthai, eidenai chrē hoti ouk auto heirētai kakōs, allʼ auto hēmeis kalōs echon ouk enoēsamen. agnoia gar gnōsin ouk orthōs krinei, hate dē oute gnōsis prognōsin alēthōs krinein pephyken. allʼ hē prognōsis tois agnoousin parechei tēn gnōsin.

“Therefore before all things one must seek the Prophet with all judgment by means of the prophetic promise; and having known him, follow without hesitation the other words of his teaching; and, confident about what is hoped for, live by that first judgment, knowing that he who said these things has not the nature to lie. Therefore, if afterwards anything he has said seems to us not well said, we must know that it was not said badly, but that we have not understood what is well. For ignorance does not rightly judge knowledge, just as knowledge by nature cannot truly judge foreknowledge; but foreknowledge gives knowledge to the ignorant.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that once the Prophet is recognized, his teaching must be followed without doubt, and apparent difficulties are our failure to understand.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.11 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.12Schwegler

Ὅθεν, ὦ φίλε Κλήμης, εἴγε τὰ τῷ Θεῷ διαφέροντα γνῶναι θέλῃς, παρὰ τούτου μόνου μαθεῖν ἔχεις, ὅτι μόνος οἶδεν τὴν ἀλήθειαν. τῶν γὰρ ἄλλων εἴ τις ἐπίσταταί τι, παρὰ τούτου ἢ τῶν τούτου μαθητῶν λαβὼν ἔχει. ἔστι δὲ αὐτοῦ τό τε βούλημα καὶ ἀληθὲς κήρυγμα, ὅτι εἶς Θεὸς, οὗ κόσμος ἔργον, ὃς δίκαιος ὢν πάντως ἑκάστῳ πρὸς τὰς πράξεις ἀποδώσει ποτέ.

Hothen, ō phile Klēmēs, eige ta tǭ Theǭ diapheronta gnōnai thelę̄s, para toutou monou mathein echeis, hoti monos oiden tēn alētheian. tōn gar allōn ei tis epistatai ti, para toutou ē tōn toutou mathētōn labōn echei. esti de autou to te boulēma kai alēthes kērygma, hoti eis Theos, hou kosmos ergon, hos dikaios ōn pantōs hekastǭ pros tas praxeis apodōsei pote.

“Therefore, my dear Clement, if you wish to know the things that concern God, you may learn them from him alone, because he alone knows the truth. For if any of the others knows anything, he has received it from him or from his disciples. And this is his will and true proclamation: that there is one God, whose work the world is, who, being righteous, will surely one day render to each according to his deeds.”

Rom 2:6 (echo, medium confidence) · Matt 16:27 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter states that the Prophet alone knows the truth, which is that the one Creator God will judge each person by his deeds.

  • “Render to each according to his deeds” echoes Rom 2:6 and Matt 16:27.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.12 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.13Schwegler

Ἀνάγκη γὰρ πᾶσα, φύσει δίκαιον εἶναι λέγοντα τὸν Θεὸν καὶ τὰς ἀνθρώπων ψυχὰς ἀθανάτους εἶναι πιστεύειν. ἐπεὶ ποῦ τὸ δίκαιον αὐτοῦ, ὅπου τινὲς εὐσεβῶς βιώσαντες κακουχηθέντες ἐνίοτε βιαίως ἀνῃρέθησαν, ἔνιοι δὲ ἀσεβεῖς πάνυ γεγενημένοι, ἐν πολυτελείᾳ βίου τρυφήσαντες, τὸν κοινὸν ἀνθρώπων θάνατον ἐτελεύτησαν. ἐπεὶ οὖν χωρὶς πάσης ἀντιλογίας ὁ Θεὸς ἀγαθὸς ὢν καὶ δίκαιός ἐστιν, οὐκ ἄλλως δὲ δίκαιος εἶναι γνωσθήσεται, ἐὰν μὴ ἡ ψυχὴ μετὰ τὸν χωρισμὸν τοῦ σώματος ἀθάνατος ᾖ, ἵνα μὲν ὁ κακὸς ἐν ᾅδῃ γενόμενος, ὡς ἐνταῦθα τὰ ἀγαθὰ ἀπολαβών, ἐκεῖ περὶ ὧν ἥμαρτεν κολασθῇ, ὁ δὲ ἀγαθὸς ἐνταῦθα περὶ ὧν ἥμαρτεν κολασθεὶς, ἐκεῖ ὡς ἐν κόλποις δικαίων, ἀγαθῶν κληρονόμος καταστῇ· ὅτι τοίνυν ὁ Θεὸς δίκαιος, πρόδηλον ἡμῖν ἐστιν ὅτι καὶ κρίσις γίνεται καὶ ψυχαὶ ἀθάνατοι τυγχάνουσιν.

Anankē gar pasa, physei dikaion einai legonta ton Theon kai tas anthrōpōn psychas athanatous einai pisteuein. epei pou to dikaion autou, hopou tines eusebōs biōsantes kakouchēthentes eniote biaiōs anę̄rethēsan, enioi de asebeis pany gegenēmenoi, en polyteleią biou tryphēsantes, ton koinon anthrōpōn thanaton eteleutēsan. epei oun chōris pasēs antilogias ho Theos agathos ōn kai dikaios estin, ouk allōs de dikaios einai gnōsthēsetai, ean mē hē psychē meta ton chōrismon tou sōmatos athanatos ę̄, hina men ho kakos en hądę̄ genomenos, hōs entautha ta agatha apolabōn, ekei peri hōn hēmarten kolasthę̄, ho de agathos entautha peri hōn hēmarten kolastheis, ekei hōs en kolpois dikaiōn, agathōn klēronomos katastę̄; hoti toinyn ho Theos dikaios, prodēlon hēmin estin hoti kai krisis ginetai kai psychai athanatoi tynchanousin.

“For it is altogether necessary that one who says that God is righteous by nature should also believe that the souls of men are immortal. Otherwise, where is his righteousness, when some who have lived piously have been ill-treated and sometimes violently killed, while some who have been utterly impious, having lived in luxury and costly living, died the common death of men? Since, then, God, beyond all contradiction, being good, is also righteous, and he will not be known to be righteous otherwise than if the soul is immortal after its separation from the body, so that the wicked man, having come into Hades, as one who received his good things here, may be punished there for his sins, while the good man, punished here for his sins, may there, as in the bosom of the righteous, be made heir of good things: since, then, God is righteous, it is plain to us both that there is a judgment and that souls are immortal.”

Luke 16:25 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter argues that God's justice requires the immortality of the soul and a judgment after death.

  • The contrast of good things here and punishment there, and “the bosom of the righteous,” recall the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:22–25).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (word split in the digital text): δι καίων → δικαίων.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.13 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.14Schwegler

Εἰ δέ τις, ὡς τῷ Σαμαρεῖ Σίμωνι δοκεῖ, τὸ δικαίῳ εἶναι Θεῷ μὴ θέλοι δοῦναι, τίνι ἔτι τοῦτό τις δοῦναι δύναται, ἢ καὶ τὸ γενέσθαι δύνασθαι; τῆς γὰρ ῥίζης τῶν ὅλων τοῦτο οὐκ ἐχούσης, ἀνάγκη πᾶσα νοεῖν, ὅτι τῇ τῶν ἀνθρώπων φύσει ὡς ἐν καρποῖς εὑρεῖν ἀδύνατον. ἔστιν εὑρεῖν ἐν ἀνθρώποις, πόσῳ μᾶλλον ἐν Θεῷ; εἰ δὲ οὐδαμοῦ, οὔτε παρὰ Θεῷ, οὔτε παρʼ ἀνθρώποις ἔστιν εὑρεῖν τὸ δίκαιον, πάντως οὐδὲ τὸ ἄδικον. ἀλλʼ ἔστιν τὸ δίκαιον. δικαιοσύνης γὰρ οὔσης τὸ ἄδικον λέγεται· ὥσπερ παραβαλλομένης τῆς δικαιοσύνης αὐτῇ καὶ ἐναντίως ἔχειν εὑρισκομένης ἀδικία λέγεται.

Ei de tis, hōs tǭ Samarei Simōni dokei, to dikaiǭ einai Theǭ mē theloi dounai, tini eti touto tis dounai dynatai, ē kai to genesthai dynasthai? tēs gar rhizēs tōn holōn touto ouk echousēs, anankē pasa noein, hoti tę̄ tōn anthrōpōn physei hōs en karpois heurein adynaton. estin heurein en anthrōpois, posǭ mallon en Theǭ? ei de oudamou, oute para Theǭ, oute parʼ anthrōpois estin heurein to dikaion, pantōs oude to adikon. allʼ estin to dikaion. dikaiosynēs gar ousēs to adikon legetai; hōsper paraballomenēs tēs dikaiosynēs autę̄ kai enantiōs echein heuriskomenēs adikia legetai.

“But if anyone, as Simon the Samaritan thinks, will not grant to God that he is righteous, to whom can one still grant it, or even that it can come to be? For if the root of all things does not have it, one must necessarily conclude that it cannot be found in human nature, as in the fruits. If it is found in men, how much more in God! But if righteousness is found nowhere, neither with God nor with men, then neither is unrighteousness at all. But righteousness exists; for it is because righteousness exists that anything is called unrighteous; just as, when something is compared with righteousness and found to be contrary to it, it is called unrighteousness.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Against Simon, Peter argues that God must be righteous, since righteousness exists and is the standard for calling anything unrighteous.

  • Simon's denial that the supreme God is the just God resembles the Marcionite distinction between a good God and a just Creator; many scholars see Marcion reflected in the Simon of the Homilies. The sentence “If it is found in men…” appears to lack a condition in the Greek (“if it can be found”); translated by sense.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.14 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.15Schwegler

Ἔνθεν γοῦν ὁ Θεὸς διδασκαλῶν τοὺς ἀνθρώπους πρὸς τὴν τῶν ὄντων ἀλήθειαν, εἷς ὢν αὐτὸς διχῶς καὶ ἐναντίως διεῖλεν πάντα τὰ τῶν ἄκρων, ἀπαρχῆς αὐτὸς εἷς ὢν καὶ μόνος Θεός, ποιήσας οὐρανὸν καὶ γῆν, ἡμέραν καὶ νύκτα, φῶς καὶ πῦρ, ἥλιον εἷς καὶ σελήνην, ζωὴν καὶ θάνατον. μόνον δὲ ἐν τούτοις αὐτεξούσιον τὸν ἄνθρωπον ἐποίησεν, ἐπιτηδειότητα ἔχοντα δίκαιον ἢ ἄδικον γενέσθαι. ᾧ καὶ τὰς τῶν συζυγιῶν ἐνήλλαξεν εἰκόνας, μικρὰ τὰ πρῶτα παραθέμενος αὐτῷ, μεγάλα δὲ τὰ δεύτερα, οἷον κόσμον, αἰῶνα. ἀλλʼ ὁ μὲν παρὼν κόσμος πρόσκαιρος, ὁ δὲ ἐσόμενος ἀΐδιος. πρώτη ἄγνοια, δευτέρα γνῶσις. οὕτως καὶ τοὺς τῆς προφητείας ἡγέμονας διέταξεν. ἐπεὶ γὰρ ὁ παρὼν κόσμος θῆλύς ἐστιν, ὡς μήτηρ τέκνων τίκτων ψυχάς, ὁ ἐσόμενος αἰὼν ἄῤῥην ἐστίν, ὡς πατὴρ ἀποδεχόμενος τὰ αὑτοῦ τέκνα· διὰ τοῦτο ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ τούτῳ προφῆται ἑπομένως, ὡς τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος ὄντες υἱοί, ἀνθρώπων τὴν γνῶσιν ἔχοντες, ἐπέρχονται. τοῦτο δὲ τὸ μυστήριον εἰ ἠπίσταντο οἱ ἐν θεοσεβείᾳ ἄνθρωποι, οὐκ ἄν ποτε ἐπλανήθησαν, ἀλλὰ καὶ νῦν ἂν ἐγνώκεισαν ὅτι Σίμων, ὁ νῦν πάντας θρυλλῶν, πλάνης καὶ ἀπάτης ἐστὶν συνεργός. ὁ δὲ λόγος τοῦ προφητικοῦ κανόνος οὕτως ἔχει.

Enthen goun ho Theos didaskalōn tous anthrōpous pros tēn tōn ontōn alētheian, heis ōn autos dichōs kai enantiōs dieilen panta ta tōn akrōn, aparchēs autos heis ōn kai monos Theos, poiēsas ouranon kai gēn, hēmeran kai nykta, phōs kai pyr, hēlion heis kai selēnēn, zōēn kai thanaton. monon de en toutois autexousion ton anthrōpon epoiēsen, epitēdeiotēta echonta dikaion ē adikon genesthai. hǭ kai tas tōn syzygiōn enēllaxen eikonas, mikra ta prōta parathemenos autǭ, megala de ta deutera, hoion kosmon, aiōna. allʼ ho men parōn kosmos proskairos, ho de esomenos aïdios. prōtē agnoia, deutera gnōsis. houtōs kai tous tēs prophēteias hēgemonas dietaxen. epei gar ho parōn kosmos thēlys estin, hōs mētēr teknōn tiktōn psychas, ho esomenos aiōn arrhēn estin, hōs patēr apodechomenos ta hautou tekna; dia touto en tǭ kosmǭ toutǭ prophētai hepomenōs, hōs tou mellontos aiōnos ontes huioi, anthrōpōn tēn gnōsin echontes, eperchontai. touto de to mystērion ei ēpistanto hoi en theosebeią anthrōpoi, ouk an pote eplanēthēsan, alla kai nyn an egnōkeisan hoti Simōn, ho nyn pantas thryllōn, planēs kai apatēs estin synergos. ho de logos tou prophētikou kanonos houtōs echei.

“Hence, then, God, teaching men the truth of the things that are, being himself one, divided all extremes in pairs and as opposites. From the beginning, being himself the one and only God, he made heaven and earth, day and night, light and fire, sun and moon, life and death. Among these he made man alone free in his own choice, with the capacity to become righteous or unrighteous. For him also he reversed the order of the pairs, setting before him first the small things and afterwards the great, such as world and age. The present world is temporary, but the one to come is everlasting; first comes ignorance, then knowledge. So too he ordered the leaders of prophecy. For since the present world is female, bringing forth souls as a mother bears children, while the age to come is male, receiving his own children as a father, therefore in this world the prophets come after, as sons of the age to come, having the knowledge of men. If men of piety had understood this mystery, they would never have gone astray; and even now they would have known that Simon, who is now making a stir among everyone, is a fellow-worker of error and deceit. The account of the prophetic rule is as follows.”

Gen 1:1 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter introduces the doctrine of pairs (syzygies): God made the world in opposites, but for mankind the worse comes first and the better second.

  • The “pairs” (syzygies) are a distinctive teaching of the Pseudo-Clementines. “Sun and moon” renders ἥλιον εἷς καὶ σελήνην, where εἷς (“one”) appears to be a stray word.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.15 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.16Schwegler

Ὡς ἐν ἀρχῇ ὁ Θεὸς εἷς ὤν, ὥσπερ δεξιὰ καὶ ἀριστερά, πρῶτον ἐποίησεν τὸν οὐρανὸν, εἶτα τὴν γῆν, καὶ οὕτως κατὰ τὸ ἑξῆς πάσας τὰς συζυγίας συνεστήσατο ἐπὶ μέντοι ἀνθρώπων οὐκ ἔτι οὕτως, ἀλλὰ πάσας ἐναλλάσσει τὰς συζυγίας. ὡς γὰρ ἀπʼ αὐτοῦ τὰ πρῶτα κρείττονα, τὰ δεύτερα ἥττονα, ἐπʼ ἀνθρώπων τὸ ἐναντίον εὑρίσκομεν, τὰ πρῶτα χείρονα, τὰ δεύτερα κρείττονα. αὐτίκα γοῦν ἀπὸ Ἀδὰμ τοῦ κατʼ εἰκόνα Θεοῦ γενομένου ἐγένετό τις πρῶτος ἄδικος Καΐν, δεύτερος δίκαιος Ἀβέλ. πάλιν δὲ ἀπὸ τοῦ καθʼ ὑμᾶς λεγομένου Δευκαλίωνος πνευμάτων εἰκόνες δύο ἀπεστάλησαν, ἀκαθάρτου λέγω καὶ καθαροῦ, ὅ τε κόραξ ὁ μέλας, καὶ ἡ λευκὴ περιστερὰ δευτέρα. καὶ ἀπὸ μὲν τοῦ ἀρχηγέτου τοῦ ἔθνους ἡμῶν Ἀβραὰμ δύο πρῶτοι γεγόνασιν, πρῶτος Ἰσμαήλ, εἶτα Ἰσαὰκ ὁ ὑπὸ τοῦ Θεοῦ εὐλογημένος. ἀπὸ δὲ αὐτοῦ Ἰσαὰκ ὁμοίως πάλιν δύο, Ἠσαῦ ὁ ἀσεβής, καὶ Ἰακὼβ ὁ εὐσεβής. οὕτως τῇ τέξει πρῶτος, ὡς προτότοκος τῷ κόσμῳ, ὁ ἀρχιερεὺς, εἶτα ὁ νομοθέτης.

Hōs en archę̄ ho Theos heis ōn, hōsper dexia kai aristera, prōton epoiēsen ton ouranon, eita tēn gēn, kai houtōs kata to hexēs pasas tas syzygias synestēsato epi mentoi anthrōpōn ouk eti houtōs, alla pasas enallassei tas syzygias. hōs gar apʼ autou ta prōta kreittona, ta deutera hēttona, epʼ anthrōpōn to enantion heuriskomen, ta prōta cheirona, ta deutera kreittona. autika goun apo Adam tou katʼ eikona Theou genomenou egeneto tis prōtos adikos Kaïn, deuteros dikaios Abel. palin de apo tou kathʼ hymas legomenou Deukaliōnos pneumatōn eikones dyo apestalēsan, akathartou legō kai katharou, ho te korax ho melas, kai hē leukē peristera deutera. kai apo men tou archēgetou tou ethnous hēmōn Abraam dyo prōtoi gegonasin, prōtos Ismaēl, eita Isaak ho hypo tou Theou eulogēmenos. apo de autou Isaak homoiōs palin dyo, Ēsau ho asebēs, kai Iakōb ho eusebēs. houtōs tę̄ texei prōtos, hōs prototokos tǭ kosmǭ, ho archiereus, eita ho nomothetēs.

“As in the beginning God, being one, like a right hand and a left, made first the heaven and then the earth, and so in order established all the pairs; but with men he no longer does so, but reverses all the pairs. For whereas with him the first things are the better and the second the lesser, with men we find the opposite: the first worse, the second better. Straightway, then, from Adam, who was made in the image of God, there came first the unrighteous Cain, and second the righteous Abel. Again, from the man whom you Greeks call Deucalion, two images of spirits were sent out, I mean of the unclean and of the clean: the black raven, and second the white dove. And from Abraham, the founder of our nation, two first sons were born: first Ishmael, then Isaac, who was blessed by God. And from Isaac himself likewise again two: Esau the impious and Jacob the pious. So in order came first, as firstborn to the world, the high priest, and then the lawgiver.”

Gen 1:27 (allusion, low confidence) · Gen 4:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 8:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 16:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 25:25 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 7:7 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter illustrates the rule that the worse comes first with Cain and Abel, the raven and the dove, Ishmael and Isaac, Esau and Jacob, and Aaron and Moses.

  • Deucalion, the Greek flood hero, stands here for Noah (Gen 8:7–8). The “high priest” and “lawgiver” are Aaron, the elder brother, and Moses (Exod 7:7). “Order” renders τέξει, probably for τάξει, as also in 2.17.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.16 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.17Schwegler

Ὁμοίως ἡ γὰρ πρὸς τὸν Ἡλίαν συζυγία ὀφείλουσα ἐλθεῖν ἑκοῦσα ἀπελείφθη εἰς ἕτερον καιρόν, ἄλλοτε εὐκαίρως αὐτὴν ἀπολαύειν βουλευσαμένη. διὸ καὶ ἐν γεννητοῖς γυναικῶν πρῶτος ἦλθεν, εἶτα ὁ ἐν υἱοῖς ἀνθρώπων δεύτερος ἐπῆλθεν. ταύτῃ τῇ τέξει ἀκολουθοῦντα δυνατὸν ᾖ νοεῖν τίνος ἐστὶν Σίμων, ὁ πρὸ ἐμοῦ εἰς τὰ ἔθνη πρῶτος ἐλθών, καὶ τίνος ὢν τυγχάνω, ὁ μετʼ ἐκεῖνον ἐληλυθώς, καὶ ἐπελθὼν ὡς σκότῳ φῶς, ὡς ἀγνοίᾳ γνῶσις, ὡς νόσῳ ἴασις. οὕτως δή, ὡς ἀληθὴς ἡμῖν προφήτης εἴρηκεν, πρῶτον ψευδὲς δεῖ ἐλθεῖν εὐαγγέλιον ὑπὸ πλάνου τινός, καὶ εἶθʼ οὕτως μετὰ καθαίρεσιν τοῦ ἁγίου τόπου εὐαγγέλιον ἀληθὲς κρύφα διαπεμφθῆναι εἰς ἐπανόρθωσιν τῶν ἐσομένων αἱρέσεων καὶ μετὰ ταῦτα πρὸς τῷ τελει πάλιν πρῶτον Ἀντίχριστον ἐλθεῖν δεῖ, καὶ τότε τὸν ὄντως Χριστὸν ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦν ἀναφανῆναι, καὶ μετὰ τοῦτο αἰωνίου φωτὸς ἀνατείλαντος πάντα τὰ τοῦ σκότους ἀφανῆ γενέσθαι.

Homoiōs hē gar pros ton Hēlian syzygia opheilousa elthein hekousa apeleiphthē eis heteron kairon, allote eukairōs autēn apolauein bouleusamenē. dio kai en gennētois gynaikōn prōtos ēlthen, eita ho en huiois anthrōpōn deuteros epēlthen. tautę̄ tę̄ texei akolouthounta dynaton ę̄ noein tinos estin Simōn, ho pro emou eis ta ethnē prōtos elthōn, kai tinos ōn tynchanō, ho metʼ ekeinon elēlythōs, kai epelthōn hōs skotǭ phōs, hōs agnoią gnōsis, hōs nosǭ iasis. houtōs dē, hōs alēthēs hēmin prophētēs eirēken, prōton pseudes dei elthein euangelion hypo planou tinos, kai eithʼ houtōs meta kathairesin tou hagiou topou euangelion alēthes krypha diapemphthēnai eis epanorthōsin tōn esomenōn haireseōn kai meta tauta pros tǭ telei palin prōton Antichriston elthein dei, kai tote ton ontōs Christon hēmōn Iēsoun anaphanēnai, kai meta touto aiōniou phōtos anateilantos panta ta tou skotous aphanē genesthai.

“Likewise the pair that ought to have come with Elijah was willingly left over for another time, having resolved to enjoy it at another, fitting time. Therefore he who was among those born of women came first, and then he who was among the sons of men came second. Following this order, one can understand to whom Simon belongs, who came before me first to the Gentiles, and to whom I belong, who came after him and followed him as light follows darkness, knowledge ignorance, and healing disease. So, as the true Prophet has told us, a false gospel must first come by some deceiver, and then, after the destruction of the holy place, a true gospel must be secretly sent abroad for the correction of the heresies that are to come. And after this, at the end, Antichrist must again come first, and then our true Christ, Jesus, appear; and after this, when the eternal light has risen, all the things of darkness will vanish.”

Matt 11:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 24:24 (allusion, low confidence) · 2 Thess 2:3 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter applies the rule of pairs: John before Jesus, Simon before Peter among the Gentiles, a false gospel before the true, and Antichrist before Christ.

  • “Among those born of women” (John the Baptist) and “among the sons of men” (Jesus as Son of Man) echo Matt 11:11. The first sentence is obscure in the Greek; it seems to mean that the pair Elijah-and-another was deferred, so that John (as Elijah) came before Jesus. Many scholars read Simon, who “came first to the Gentiles,” as a veiled reference to Paul. The saying about a false gospel and a true one sent out after the Temple's destruction is not in the canonical Gospels; compare Matt 24:2, 24:14, 24:24.

Extrabiblical texts: Agraphon Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.17 (Sayings of Jesus outside the Gospels (agrapha); allusion)

Topics: Heresy, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.17 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.18Schwegler

Ἐπεὶ οὖν, ὡς ἔφην, τὸν κανόνα τῆς συζυγίας ἀγνοοῦσί τινες, ἔνθεν οὐκ ἐπίστανται τίς τυγχάνει ὁ ἐμοῦ προοδεύσας Σίμων. εἰ γὰρ ἐγινώσκετο, οὐκ ἂν ἐπιστεύετο. νῦν δὲ ᾀγνοούμενος οὐκ ὀρθῶς πεπίστευται. καὶ ὁ τὰ μισούντων ποιῶν ἠγάπηται, καὶ ὁ ἐχθρὸς ὡς φίλος ἀποδέδεκται, καὶ θάνατος ὥν ὡς σώζων πεπόθηται, καὶ πῦρ ὤν φῶς νενόμισται, καὶ πλάνος ὤν ὡς ἀληθεύων ἀκούεται· ταῦτα ἀκούσας ἐγὼ Κλήμης· τίς ἄρα τυγχάνει, ἔφην, οὗτος ὁ τοσοῦτος ὤν ἀπατεών, μαθεῖν ἤθελον. καὶ ὁ Πέτρος ἔφη· εἰ θέλεις μαθεῖν, πάρεστίν σοι τὸ γνῶναι, παρʼ ὧν κᾀγὼ τὰ κατʼ αὐτὸν πάντα ἠκρίβωκα.

Epei oun, hōs ephēn, ton kanona tēs syzygias agnoousi tines, enthen ouk epistantai tis tynchanei ho emou proodeusas Simōn. ei gar eginōsketo, ouk an episteueto. nyn de ągnooumenos ouk orthōs pepisteutai. kai ho ta misountōn poiōn ēgapētai, kai ho echthros hōs philos apodedektai, kai thanatos hōn hōs sōzōn pepothētai, kai pyr ōn phōs nenomistai, kai planos ōn hōs alētheuōn akouetai; tauta akousas egō Klēmēs; tis ara tynchanei, ephēn, houtos ho tosoutos ōn apateōn, mathein ēthelon. kai ho Petros ephē; ei theleis mathein, parestin soi to gnōnai, parʼ hōn kągō ta katʼ auton panta ēkribōka.

“Since, then, as I said, some do not know the rule of the pairs, they do not understand who Simon is, who went before me. For if he were known, he would not be believed; but now, being unknown, he has been wrongly believed. He who does the deeds of those who hate has been loved; the enemy has been received as a friend; though he is death, he has been longed for as a saviour; though he is fire, he has been thought to be light; though he is a deceiver, he is listened to as one who speaks the truth.” When I, Clement, heard this, I said: “I should like to learn who this man is who is so great a deceiver.” And Peter said: “If you wish to learn, you can know it from those from whom I too have learned everything about him accurately.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter says that Simon is believed only because the rule of pairs is not understood, and offers to have Clement learn about him from informants.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.18 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.19Schwegler

Ἰούστα τις ἐν ἡμῖν ἐστιν Συροφοινικίσσα, τὸ γένος Χανανῖτις, ἧς τὸ θυγάτριον ὑπὸ χαλεπῆς νόσου συνείχετο, ἥ καὶ τῷ κυρίῳ ἡμῶν προσῆλθεν βοῶσα καὶ ἱκετεύουσα, ὅπως αὐτῆς τὸ θυγάτριον θεραπεύσῃ. ὁ δὲ καὶ ὑφʼ ἡμῶν ἀξιωθεὶς εἶπεν· οὐκ ἔξεστιν ἰᾶσθαι τὰ ἔθνη, ἐοικότα κυσίν, διὰ τὸ διαφόροις χρῆσθαι τροφαῖς καὶ πράξεσιν, ἀποδεδομένης τῆς κατὰ τὴν βασιλείαν τραπέζης τοῖς υἱοῖς Ἰσραήλ. ἡ δὲ τοῦτο ἀκούσασα, καὶ τῆς αὐτῆς τραπέζης, ὡς κύων, ψιχίων ἀποπιπτόντων συμμεταλαμβάνειν, μεταθεμένη ὅπερ ἦν, τῷ ὁμοίως διαιτᾶσθαι τοῖς τῆς βασιλείας υἱοῖς τῆς εἰς τὴν θυγατέρα, ὡς ἠξίωσεν, ἔτυχεν ἰάσεως. οὐ γὰρ ἄν ἐθνικὴν οὖσαν καὶ ἐπὶ τῇ αὐτῇ πολιτείᾳ μένουσαν, ὁ τὴν ἀρχὴν διὰ τὸ μὴ ἐξεῖναι θεραπεύειν ὡς ἐθνικήν, ἐθνικὴν μείνασαν ἐθεράπευεν.

Iousta tis en hēmin estin Syrophoinikissa, to genos Chananitis, hēs to thygatrion hypo chalepēs nosou syneicheto, hē kai tǭ kyriǭ hēmōn prosēlthen boōsa kai hiketeuousa, hopōs autēs to thygatrion therapeusę̄. ho de kai hyphʼ hēmōn axiōtheis eipen; ouk exestin iasthai ta ethnē, eoikota kysin, dia to diaphorois chrēsthai trophais kai praxesin, apodedomenēs tēs kata tēn basileian trapezēs tois huiois Israēl. hē de touto akousasa, kai tēs autēs trapezēs, hōs kyōn, psichiōn apopiptontōn symmetalambanein, metathemenē hoper ēn, tǭ homoiōs diaitasthai tois tēs basileias huiois tēs eis tēn thygatera, hōs ēxiōsen, etychen iaseōs. ou gar an ethnikēn ousan kai epi tę̄ autę̄ politeią menousan, ho tēn archēn dia to mē exeinai therapeuein hōs ethnikēn, ethnikēn meinasan etherapeuen.

“There is among us a certain Justa, a Syrophoenician, a Canaanite by race, whose little daughter was gripped by a grievous disease. She came to our Lord crying out and begging him to heal her little daughter. But he, though entreated by us as well, said: ‘It is not lawful to heal the Gentiles, who are like dogs, because they use various foods and practices, since the table of the kingdom has been given to the sons of Israel.’ Hearing this, and asking to share, like a dog, in the crumbs that fall from that same table, she changed what she was, living in the same way as the sons of the kingdom, and obtained healing for her daughter, as she had asked. For he who at first would not heal her as a Gentile, because it was not lawful, would not have healed her had she remained a Gentile and continued in the same way of life.”

Matt 15:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 7:27 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter tells of Justa, the Syrophoenician woman, whose daughter Jesus healed only after she adopted the way of life of Israel.

  • The story is that of Matt 15:21–28 and Mark 7:24–30, retold in a form not found in the Gospels: the woman is named Justa, and Jesus' saying about foods and practices and her conversion are additions that reflect the Homilies' own emphasis on observance of the Law.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.19 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.20Schwegler

Ἀὐτὴ οὖν τὴν νόμιμον ἀναδεξαμένη πολιτείαν ὑπὸ τοῦ ἰδίου ἀνδρὸς ἐναντία φρονοῦντος ἡμῖν μετὰ τῆς ἰαθείσης θυγατρὸς ἰδίων οἴκων ἐκβέβληται. ἡ δὲ εὐγνωμονοῦσα πρὸς τὰς συνθήκας, καὶ ἐν περιουσίᾳ βίου ὑπάρχουσα, αὐτὴ μὲν χήρα ἔμεινεν, τὸ δὲ θυγάτριον αὑτῆς ἀνδρί τινι εὐγνωμονοῦντι πρὸς τὴν ἀληθῆ πίστιν καὶ πένητι ὄντι συνηρμόσατο· ἡ δὲ καὶ τῆς θυγατρὸς προφάσει γάμου στερηθεῖσα, δύο παῖδας ὠνησαμένη καὶ παιδεύσασα, εἰς υἱῶν ἔσχεν τόπον. ἅτινα τῷ μάγῳ Σίμωνι ἐκ παίδων συμπαιδευθέντα, πάντα τὰ κατʼ αὐτὸν ἐκμεμαθήκασιν. τοσαύτη γὰρ αὐτῶν ἦν φιλία, ὡς καὶ συσπεῦσαι αὐτῷ ἐν πᾶσιν οἷς βούλοιτο αὐτοῖς ἑνοῦν.

Autē oun tēn nomimon anadexamenē politeian hypo tou idiou andros enantia phronountos hēmin meta tēs iatheisēs thygatros idiōn oikōn ekbeblētai. hē de eugnōmonousa pros tas synthēkas, kai en periousią biou hyparchousa, autē men chēra emeinen, to de thygatrion hautēs andri tini eugnōmonounti pros tēn alēthē pistin kai penēti onti synērmosato; hē de kai tēs thygatros prophasei gamou sterētheisa, dyo paidas ōnēsamenē kai paideusasa, eis huiōn eschen topon. hatina tǭ magǭ Simōni ek paidōn sympaideuthenta, panta ta katʼ auton ekmemathēkasin. tosautē gar autōn ēn philia, hōs kai syspeusai autǭ en pasin hois bouloito autois henoun.

“She, then, having taken up the lawful way of life, was cast out of her own house, together with the daughter who had been healed, by her husband, who thought otherwise than we do. But she, keeping faith with her covenants, and being well off, herself remained a widow, and gave her daughter in marriage to a man who was well disposed to the true faith, and poor. And being bereft of her daughter also by reason of the marriage, she bought two boys and educated them, and had them in the place of sons. These, having been educated together with Simon the magician from boyhood, have learned all about him. For so great was their friendship that they were eager to join with him in everything he wished.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Justa, expelled by her husband for her faith, stays a widow, marries off her daughter, and adopts two boys who grew up with Simon.

  • Justa's husband drives her out because of her new faith; she does not remarry. “Keeping faith with her covenants” renders εὐγνωμονοῦσα πρὸς τὰς συνθήκας; whether the covenants are those of her marriage or of her new faith is not clear.
  • “Bereft of her daughter also by reason of the marriage” renders τῆς θυγατρὸς προφάσει γάμου στερηθεῖσα; it can also mean “deprived of marriage for her daughter's sake” (so ANF).

Topics: Divorce, Divorce and remarriage

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.20 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-20) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.21Schwegler

Οὗτοι τῷ ἐνταῦθα ἐπιδημήσαντι Ζακχαίῳ συντυχόντες, καὶ τοῦ τῆς ἀληθείας διʼ αὐτοῦ μεταλαβόντες λόγου, ἐπὶ τοῖς πρώτοις νεωτερισμοῖς μεταμεληθέντες, ταχέως τοῦ Σίμωνος καταγνόντες, πάντα αὐτῷ συνειδότες, ἅμα τῷ ἐπιδημῆσαί με ἐνταῦθα, μετὰ τῆς ἀναθρεψαμένης αὐτοὺς προσελθόντες μοι, ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ συσταθέντες μοι, καὶ ἔκτοτε πάντοτε σύνεισίν μοι, τῶν τῆς ἀληθείας ἀπολαύοντες μαθημάτων. ταῦτα εἰπὼν ὁ Πέτρος, μεταπεμψάμενος, ἐκέλευσεν αὐτοῖς πάντα μοι κατὰ τὸν Σίμωνα ἀκριβῶς ἐκτίθεσθαι. οἱ δὲ τὸν Θεὸν μαρτυράμενοι μηδὲν ψεύσασθαι, ἐξετίθεντο.

Houtoi tǭ entautha epidēmēsanti Zakchaiǭ syntychontes, kai tou tēs alētheias diʼ autou metalabontes logou, epi tois prōtois neōterismois metamelēthentes, tacheōs tou Simōnos katagnontes, panta autǭ syneidotes, hama tǭ epidēmēsai me entautha, meta tēs anathrepsamenēs autous proselthontes moi, hypʼ autou systathentes moi, kai ektote pantote syneisin moi, tōn tēs alētheias apolauontes mathēmatōn. tauta eipōn ho Petros, metapempsamenos, ekeleusen autois panta moi kata ton Simōna akribōs ektithesthai. hoi de ton Theon martyramenoi mēden pseusasthai, exetithento.

“They met Zacchaeus, who had come to stay here, and received from him the word of the truth; repenting of their former innovations, they quickly condemned Simon, whose every secret they knew. As soon as I arrived here, they came to me with the woman who had brought them up and were commended to me by him; and from then on they have always been with me, enjoying the teachings of the truth.” Having said this, Peter sent for them and bade them set out for me accurately everything about Simon. And they, calling God to witness that they would tell no lie, set it out.

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila and Nicetes, converted by Zacchaeus, join Peter and are asked to tell Clement all about Simon.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.21 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-21) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.22Schwegler

Ὡς πρῶτος ὁ Ἀκύλας ἤρξατο λέγειν οὕτως. ἄκουσον, ὦ φίλτατε ἡμῖν ἀδελφέ, ὅπως ἀκριβῶς πάντα τὰ κατὰ τὸν ἄνδρα εἰδῇς, τίνος τε ὢν καὶ τίς καὶ πόθεν, τίνα τέ ἐστιν ἃ πράττει, καὶ πῶς καὶ διὰ τί. Σίμων οὗτος πατρὸς μέν ἐστιν Ἀντωνίου, μητρὸς δὲ Ῥαχήλ, Σαμαρεὺς τὸ γένος, ἀπὸ Γετθῶν κώμης, τῆς πόλεως ἀπεχούσης σχοίνους ἕξ. οὗτος ἐν Ἀλεξανδρείᾳ πάνυ ἐξασκήσας ἑαυτὸν καὶ μαγείᾳ πολὺ δυνηθεὶς καὶ φρενωθεὶς θέλει νομίζεσθαι ἀνωτάτη τις εἶναι δύναμις καὶ αὐτοῦ τοῦ τὸν κόσμον κτίσαντος Θεοῦ· ἐνίοτε δὲ καὶ Χριστὸν ἑαυτὸν αἰνισσόμενος, ἑστῶτα προσαγορεύει. ταύτῃ δὲ τῇ προσηγορίᾳ κέχρηται, ὡς δὴ στησόμενος ἀεί, καὶ αἰτίαν φθορᾶς, ὥστε τὸ σῶμα πεσεῖν, οὐκ ἔχων. καὶ οὔτε Θεόν, τὸν κτίσαντα τὸν κόσμον, ἀνώτατον εἶναι λέγει, οὔτε νεκροὺς ἐγηγέρθαι πιστεύει. τὴν Ἱερουσαλὴμ ἀρνεῖται, τὸ Γαριζεὶν ὄρος ἀντεισφέρει. ἀντὶ τοῦ ὄντως Χριστοῦ ἡμῶν ἑαυτὸν ἀναγορεύει. τὰ δὲ τοῦ νόμου ἰδίᾳ προλήψει ἀλληγορεῖ. καὶ κρίσιν ἔσεσθαι μὲν λέγει, οὐ προσδοκᾷ δέ. οὐ γὰρ ἂν ὑπὸ Θεοῦ κριθήσεσθαι πεπεισμένος, μέχρι αὐτοῦ τοῦ Θεοῦ ἀσεβεῖν ἐτόλμα. ὅθεν ἔνιοι μὴ εἰδότες, ὅτι προκαλύμματι τῇ θεοσεβείᾳ κεχρημένος ὑποσυλᾷ τὰ τῆς ἀληθείας, καὶ τὴν ὁπώσποτε ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ ἐλπίδα καὶ κρίσιν λεγομένην ἔσεσθαι, ὡς πιστῶς πιστεύοντες ἀπόλλυνται.

Hōs prōtos ho Akylas ērxato legein houtōs. akouson, ō philtate hēmin adelphe, hopōs akribōs panta ta kata ton andra eidę̄s, tinos te ōn kai tis kai pothen, tina te estin ha prattei, kai pōs kai dia ti. Simōn houtos patros men estin Antōniou, mētros de Rhachēl, Samareus to genos, apo Getthōn kōmēs, tēs poleōs apechousēs schoinous hex. houtos en Alexandreią pany exaskēsas heauton kai mageią poly dynētheis kai phrenōtheis thelei nomizesthai anōtatē tis einai dynamis kai autou tou ton kosmon ktisantos Theou; eniote de kai Christon heauton ainissomenos, hestōta prosagoreuei. tautę̄ de tę̄ prosēgorią kechrētai, hōs dē stēsomenos aei, kai aitian phthoras, hōste to sōma pesein, ouk echōn. kai oute Theon, ton ktisanta ton kosmon, anōtaton einai legei, oute nekrous egēgerthai pisteuei. tēn Hierousalēm arneitai, to Garizein oros anteispherei. anti tou ontōs Christou hēmōn heauton anagoreuei. ta de tou nomou idią prolēpsei allēgorei. kai krisin esesthai men legei, ou prosdoką de. ou gar an hypo Theou krithēsesthai pepeismenos, mechri autou tou Theou asebein etolma. hothen enioi mē eidotes, hoti prokalymmati tę̄ theosebeią kechrēmenos hyposylą ta tēs alētheias, kai tēn hopōspote hypʼ autou elpida kai krisin legomenēn esesthai, hōs pistōs pisteuontes apollyntai.

Aquila began to speak first, as follows: “Listen, our dearest brother, so that you may know accurately everything about the man: whose son he is, who he is, and from where; what it is that he does, and how, and why. This Simon is the son of Antonius and Rachel, a Samaritan by race, from the village of Gitthae, six schoeni from the city. Having trained himself thoroughly in Alexandria, and become very powerful in magic, and being puffed up, he wishes to be thought a supreme power, above even the God who created the world. And sometimes, hinting that he himself is the Christ, he calls himself the Standing One. He uses this title as one who will stand for ever, and has no cause of corruption so that his body should fall. And he says neither that God, who created the world, is the Most High, nor does he believe that the dead will be raised. He rejects Jerusalem and puts forward Mount Gerizim instead. He proclaims himself in place of our true Christ. The things of the Law he allegorizes according to his own presuppositions. And he says there will be a judgment, but does not expect one; for if he were persuaded that he would be judged by God, he would not dare to be impious even toward God himself. Hence some, not knowing that he uses piety as a veil to steal away the things of the truth, and faithfully believing the hope and judgment of which he speaks in some fashion, are perishing.”

John 4:20 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila describes Simon's origins in Samaria, his magic, his claim to be the Standing One above the Creator, and his denial of the resurrection and of Jerusalem.

  • A schoenus was an Egyptian and Near Eastern measure of distance (about 5–6 km); “the city” is not named. The preference for Gerizim over Jerusalem is the Samaritan position (compare John 4:20). The title “Standing One” (ὁ ἑστώς) for Simon also appears in Hippolytus and the Recognitions.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.22 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-22) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.23Schwegler

Τὸ δὲ παρεισελθεῖν αὐτὸν τὸν τῆς θεοσεβείας λόγον, γέγονεν οὕτως· Ἰωάννης τις ἐγένετο ἡμεροβαπτιστής, ὃς καὶ τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ κατὰ τὸν τῆς συζυγίας λόγον ἐγένετο πρόοδος· καὶ ὥσπερ τῷ κυρίῳ γεγόνασιν δώδεκα ἀπόστολοι, τῶν τοῦ ἡλίου δώδεκα μηνῶν φέροντες τὸν ἀριθμόν, ὡσαύτως καὶ αὐτῷ ἔξαρχοι ἄνδρες γεγόνασιν τριάκοντα, τὸν μηνιαῖον τῆς σελήνης ἀποπληροῦντες λόγον. ἐν ᾧ ἀριθμῷ μία τις ἦν γυνὴ λεγομένη Ἑλένη, ἵνα μηδὲ τοῦτο ἀνοικονόμητον ᾖ. ἥμισυ γὰρ ἀνδρὸς οὖσα γυνὴ ἀτελῆ τὸν τῆς τριακοντάδος τέθεικεν ἀριθμὸν, ὥσπερ καὶ τῆς σελήνης, ἧς ἡ πορεία τοῦ μηνὸς οὐ τέλειον ποιεῖται τὸν δρόμον. τούτων δὲ τῶν τριάκοντα τῷ Ἰωάννῃ πρῶτος καὶ δοκιμώτατος ἦν ὁ Σίμων, ὃς καὶ τοῦ μὴ ἆρξαι αὐτὸν μετὰ τὴν τελευτὴν τοῦ Ἰωάννου αἰτίαν ἔσχεν ταύτην.

To de pareiselthein auton ton tēs theosebeias logon, gegonen houtōs; Iōannēs tis egeneto hēmerobaptistēs, hos kai tou kyriou hēmōn Iēsou kata ton tēs syzygias logon egeneto proodos; kai hōsper tǭ kyriǭ gegonasin dōdeka apostoloi, tōn tou hēliou dōdeka mēnōn pherontes ton arithmon, hōsautōs kai autǭ exarchoi andres gegonasin triakonta, ton mēniaion tēs selēnēs apoplērountes logon. en hǭ arithmǭ mia tis ēn gynē legomenē Helenē, hina mēde touto anoikonomēton ę̄. hēmisy gar andros ousa gynē atelē ton tēs triakontados tetheiken arithmon, hōsper kai tēs selēnēs, hēs hē poreia tou mēnos ou teleion poieitai ton dromon. toutōn de tōn triakonta tǭ Iōannę̄ prōtos kai dokimōtatos ēn ho Simōn, hos kai tou mē arxai auton meta tēn teleutēn tou Iōannou aitian eschen tautēn.

“And his entry into the teaching of religion came about in this way. There was a certain John, a day-baptist, who was also the forerunner of our Lord Jesus, according to the rule of the pairs. And as the Lord had twelve apostles, bearing the number of the twelve months of the sun, so also he had thirty chief men, filling out the monthly reckoning of the moon. In that number there was one woman, called Helen, so that not even this might be without design. For a woman, being half a man, left the number thirty incomplete, as with the moon, whose course in the month does not make a complete circuit. Of these thirty the first and most esteemed with John was Simon; and the reason he did not become head after John's death was this.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila explains that Simon was the chief of John the Baptist's thirty disciples, a group that included a woman called Helen.

  • “Day-baptist” (ἡμεροβαπτιστής) was the name of a Jewish sect that bathed daily; the Homilies apply it to John. This account of John's thirty disciples, Simon, and Dositheus is peculiar to the Pseudo-Clementines. A lunar month is about 29½ days, hence the “incomplete” thirty.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.23 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-23) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.24Schwegler

Ἀποδημοῦντος γὰρ αὐτοῦ εἰς Αἴγυπτον ἐπὶ τὴν τῆς μαγείας ἐπάσκησιν, τοῦ Ἰωάννου ἀναιρεθέντος, Δωσίθεός τε τῆς ἀρχῆς ὀρεγόμενος, θάνατον αὐτοῦ ψευδῆ καταγγείλας, διαδέχεται τὴν αἵρεσιν. ὁ δὲ Σίμων μετʼ οὐ πολὺ ἐπελθὼν καὶ τοῦ τόπου ὡς ἰδίου μεγάλως ἀντεχόμενος, τῷ Δωσιθέῳ συντυχὼν τὸν μὲν τόπον οὐκ ἀπῄτει, εἰδὼς ὅτι ὁ φθάσας τῆς ἀρχῆς παρὰ προαίρεσιν οὐ καθαιρεῖται. διὸ μετὰ προσποιητοῦ φιλίας ἐπʼ ὀλίγον μὲν εἰς τὸν δεύτερον τοῦ Δωσιθέου τόπον δίδωσιν ἑαυτόν. ταγεὶς δὲ μετʼ οὐ πολλὰς ἡμέρας τοῖς τριάκοντα συμμαθηταῖς, ὑποδιαβάλλειν ἤρξατο τὸν Δωσίθεον, ὡς μὴ παραδιδόντα γνησίως τὰ μαθήματα. καὶ τοῦτο ποιεῖν ἔλεγεν αὐτὸν οὐχ ὡς φθονοῦντα, ἀλλʼ ἀγνοοῦντα. καί ποτε ὁ Δωσίθεος, ὑπαισθόμενος τὴν τοῦ Σίμωνος ἔντεχνον διαβολὴν, λύουσαν αὐτοῦ τὴν πρὸς τοὺς πολλοὺς ὑπόνοιαν, τοῦ μὴ αὐτὸν εἶναι νομίζειν τὸν ἑστῶτα, θυμῷ ἐπὶ τὴν συνήθη παραγενόμενος διατριβὴν ῥάβδῳ παίει εὑρὼν τὸν Σίμωνα, ἡ δὲ ὥσπερ καπνοῦ τοῦ Σίμωνος διελθεῖν ἔδοξε σῶμα. ἐπὶ τούτῳ καταπλαγεὶς ὁ Δωσίθεος λέγει αὐτῷ, εἰ σὺ εἶ ὁ ἑστώς, καὶ προσκυνῶ σε. τοῦ Σίμωνος εἰπόντος, ἐγὼ εἰμί, ὁ Δωσίθεος ἑαυτὸν γνοὺς οὐκ ὄντα τὸν ἑστῶτα, πεσὼν προσεκύνησεν, καὶ τοῖς εἰκοσιεννέα ἐξάρχοις συγκαταβαλὼν ἑαυτὸν εἰς τὸν ἑαυτοῦ τῆς ὑπονοίας τόπον ἔστησε τὸν Σίμωνα, καὶ οὕτως μετʼ οὐ πολλὰς ἡμέρας ὁ Δωσίθεος, ἐκείνου στάντος, αὐτὸς πεσὼν ἐτελεύτησεν.

Apodēmountos gar autou eis Aigypton epi tēn tēs mageias epaskēsin, tou Iōannou anairethentos, Dōsitheos te tēs archēs oregomenos, thanaton autou pseudē katangeilas, diadechetai tēn hairesin. ho de Simōn metʼ ou poly epelthōn kai tou topou hōs idiou megalōs antechomenos, tǭ Dōsitheǭ syntychōn ton men topon ouk apę̄tei, eidōs hoti ho phthasas tēs archēs para proairesin ou kathaireitai. dio meta prospoiētou philias epʼ oligon men eis ton deuteron tou Dōsitheou topon didōsin heauton. tageis de metʼ ou pollas hēmeras tois triakonta symmathētais, hypodiaballein ērxato ton Dōsitheon, hōs mē paradidonta gnēsiōs ta mathēmata. kai touto poiein elegen auton ouch hōs phthonounta, allʼ agnoounta. kai pote ho Dōsitheos, hypaisthomenos tēn tou Simōnos entechnon diabolēn, lyousan autou tēn pros tous pollous hyponoian, tou mē auton einai nomizein ton hestōta, thymǭ epi tēn synēthē paragenomenos diatribēn rhabdǭ paiei heurōn ton Simōna, hē de hōsper kapnou tou Simōnos dielthein edoxe sōma. epi toutǭ kataplageis ho Dōsitheos legei autǭ, ei sy ei ho hestōs, kai proskynō se. tou Simōnos eipontos, egō eimi, ho Dōsitheos heauton gnous ouk onta ton hestōta, pesōn prosekynēsen, kai tois eikosiennea exarchois synkatabalōn heauton eis ton heautou tēs hyponoias topon estēse ton Simōna, kai houtōs metʼ ou pollas hēmeras ho Dōsitheos, ekeinou stantos, autos pesōn eteleutēsen.

“He had gone away to Egypt to practise magic when John was killed; and Dositheus, desiring the leadership, spread a false report of Simon's death and succeeded to the head of the sect. Not long afterwards Simon returned and, laying strong claim to the position as his own, met Dositheus; yet he did not demand the position, knowing that one who has already obtained leadership is not removed against his will. Therefore, with pretended friendship, he gave himself for a while to the second place under Dositheus. But after a few days, being ranked among the thirty fellow-disciples, he began to slander Dositheus secretly as not handing on the teachings faithfully; and he said that he did this not out of envy but out of ignorance. And once Dositheus, perceiving that Simon's artful slander was undermining the opinion the many had of him, so that they no longer thought him to be the Standing One, came in anger to the usual meeting-place, found Simon, and struck him with a rod; but the rod seemed to pass through Simon's body as though through smoke. Astonished at this, Dositheus said to him: ‘If you are the Standing One, I too worship you.’ When Simon said, ‘I am,’ Dositheus, knowing that he himself was not the Standing One, fell down and worshipped; and, ranking himself with the twenty-nine chief men, he set Simon in his own place of repute. And so, not many days later, while Simon stood, Dositheus himself fell and died.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila tells how Simon displaced Dositheus as head of John's sect by slander and a magical show.

  • The closing words play on the title “Standing One”: Simon “stood” while Dositheus “fell.”

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.24 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-24) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.25Schwegler

Ὁ δὲ Σίμων τὴν Ἑλένην παραλαβὼν περιέρχεται, καὶ μέχρι τοῦ δεῦρο, ὡς ὁρᾷς, ἀναστατεῖ τοὺς ὄχλους. αὐτὴν δὲ τὴν Ἑλένην ἀπὸ τῶν ἀνωτάτων οὐρανῶν κατενηνοχέναι λέγει τῷ κόσμῳ, κυρίαν οὖσαν, ὡς παμμήτορα οὐσίαν καὶ σοφίαν, ἧς ἕνεκεν, φησίν, Ἑλληνές τε καὶ βάρβαροι ἐμαχέσαντο, εἰκόνα φαντασθέντες ἀληθείας, ἡ γὰρ ὄντως οὖσα τότε παρὰ τῷ πρωτίστῳ ὑπῆρχεν Θεῷ. πλὴν τοιαῦτά τινα ἑλληνικοῖς μύθοις συμπεπλασμένα πιθανῶς ἀλληγορῶν ἀπατᾷ πολλούς, ἐξαιρέτως πολλὰ τερατώδη θαυμάσια ποιῶν, ὡς εἰ μὴ ᾔδειμεν ὅτι μαγείᾳ ταῦτα ποιεῖ, ἠπατήθημεν ἂν καὶ αὐτοί. ἀλλʼ ἐπειδὴ συνεργοὶ αὐτοῦ ἦμεν τὸ καταρχὰς, ὅτε τὰ τοιαῦτα ποιῶν τὸ τῆς θεοσεβείας οὐκ ἠδίκει μέρος, νῦν ὅτε πολυμανὴς τοὺς ἐν θεοσεβείᾳ ἀπατῶν ἐπιχειρεῖν ἤρξατο, ἀπέστημεν αὐτοῦ.

Ho de Simōn tēn Helenēn paralabōn perierchetai, kai mechri tou deuro, hōs horąs, anastatei tous ochlous. autēn de tēn Helenēn apo tōn anōtatōn ouranōn katenēnochenai legei tǭ kosmǭ, kyrian ousan, hōs pammētora ousian kai sophian, hēs heneken, phēsin, Hellēnes te kai barbaroi emachesanto, eikona phantasthentes alētheias, hē gar ontōs ousa tote para tǭ prōtistǭ hypērchen Theǭ. plēn toiauta tina hellēnikois mythois sympeplasmena pithanōs allēgorōn apatą pollous, exairetōs polla teratōdē thaumasia poiōn, hōs ei mē ę̄deimen hoti mageią tauta poiei, ēpatēthēmen an kai autoi. allʼ epeidē synergoi autou ēmen to katarchas, hote ta toiauta poiōn to tēs theosebeias ouk ēdikei meros, nyn hote polymanēs tous en theosebeią apatōn epicheirein ērxato, apestēmen autou.

“Simon, taking Helen with him, goes about and, as you see, stirs up the crowds even to this day. He says that he has brought this Helen down from the highest heavens to the world, as being the mistress, the all-mother being and Wisdom, for whose sake, he says, Greeks and barbarians fought, having imagined an image of the truth; for she who truly is was then with the first God. Allegorizing plausibly such things, fashioned together with Greek myths, he deceives many, especially by doing many marvellous wonders, so that if we had not known that he does them by magic, we too would have been deceived. But since we were his fellow-workers at first, while in doing such things he did no injury to the cause of religion, now that in his great madness he has begun to try to deceive those who are pious, we have withdrawn from him.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila says that Simon presents his companion Helen as the heavenly Wisdom for whom the Trojan War was fought, and deceives many by magic.

  • The war fought by Greeks and barbarians is the Trojan War over Helen (Homer's Iliad). The same claim about Simon's Helen is reported by Irenaeus (Haer. 1.23.2) and Justin (1 Apol. 26).

Extrabiblical texts: Homer, Il. (Homer, Iliad; allusion); Irenaeus, Irenaeus, Haer. 1.23.2 (Irenaeus, Against Heresies; echo)

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.25 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-25). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-25) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.26Schwegler

Καὶ γὰρ μιαιφονεῖν ἤρξατο, ὡς αὐτὸς ἔτι ὡς φίλος φίλοις ἐξέφηνεν, ὅτι παιδίου ψυχὴν τοῦ ἰδίου σώματος χωρίσας ἀποῤῥήτοις ὅρκοις, συνεργὸν πρὸς τὴν τῶν αὐτῷ δοκούντων φαντασίαν, τὸν δὲ παῖδα διαγράψας ἐπʼ εἰκόνος, ἐνδοτέρῳ οἴκῳ ὅπου αὐτὸς ὑπνοῖ ἀνατεθειμένην ἔχει, φάσκων, ποτὲ τοῦτον ἐξ ἀέρος πλάσας θείαις τροπαῖς καὶ τὸ εἶδος ἀναγράψας ἀποδεδωκέναι λέγει πάλιν τῷ ἀέρι. τὴν δὲ πρᾶξιν ἐρμηνεύει οὕτως πεποιηκέναι. πρῶτον τοῦ ἀνθρώπου πνεῦμα λέγει τραπὲν εἰς θερμοῦ φύσιν τὸν περικείμενον αὐτῷ σικύας δίκην ἐπισπασάμενον συμπιεῖν ἀέρα, εἶτα ἔνδοθεν τῆς τοῦ πνεύματος εἰδέας γενόμενον αὐτὸν τρέψαι εἰς ὕδωρ. ὑπὸ δὲ συνεχείας τοῦ πνεύματος χυθῆναι μὴ δυνάμενον, εἰς αἵματος φύσιν μετατρέπειν ἔφασκεν τὸν ἐν αὐτῷ ἀέρα, τὸ δὲ αἶμα πῆξαν τὰς σάρκας ποιῆσαι· εἶθʼ οὕτως τῆς σαρκὸς παγείσης ἄνθρωπον οὐκ ἀπὸ γῆς, ἀλλʼ ἐξ ἀέρος ἀναδεῖξαι. καὶ οὕτως ἑαυτὸν πείσας καινὸν ἄνθρωπον δύνασθαι ποιῆσαι, τὰς τροπὰς ἀναλύων πάλιν ἀποδεδωκέναι ἔλεγεν τῷ ἀέρι. καὶ ταῦτα μὲν ἄλλοις λέγων ἐπιστεύετο, ὑφʼ ἡμῶν δὲ τῶν ἐπὶ τελετῇ συμπαρόντων εὐσεβῶς ἠπιστεῖτο. διὸ ἀσεβείας καταγνόντες ἀπέστημεν ἀπʼ αὐτοῦ.

Kai gar miaiphonein ērxato, hōs autos eti hōs philos philois exephēnen, hoti paidiou psychēn tou idiou sōmatos chōrisas aporrhētois horkois, synergon pros tēn tōn autǭ dokountōn phantasian, ton de paida diagrapsas epʼ eikonos, endoterǭ oikǭ hopou autos hypnoi anatetheimenēn echei, phaskōn, pote touton ex aeros plasas theiais tropais kai to eidos anagrapsas apodedōkenai legei palin tǭ aeri. tēn de praxin ermēneuei houtōs pepoiēkenai. prōton tou anthrōpou pneuma legei trapen eis thermou physin ton perikeimenon autǭ sikyas dikēn epispasamenon sympiein aera, eita endothen tēs tou pneumatos eideas genomenon auton trepsai eis hydōr. hypo de synecheias tou pneumatos chythēnai mē dynamenon, eis haimatos physin metatrepein ephasken ton en autǭ aera, to de aima pēxan tas sarkas poiēsai; eithʼ houtōs tēs sarkos pageisēs anthrōpon ouk apo gēs, allʼ ex aeros anadeixai. kai houtōs heauton peisas kainon anthrōpon dynasthai poiēsai, tas tropas analyōn palin apodedōkenai elegen tǭ aeri. kai tauta men allois legōn episteueto, hyphʼ hēmōn de tōn epi teletę̄ symparontōn eusebōs ēpisteito. dio asebeias katagnontes apestēmen apʼ autou.

“For he even began to commit murder, as he himself disclosed to us, as a friend to friends: that he separated the soul of a child from its own body by secret oaths, to be his helper in producing the apparitions he wished; and he painted the boy's likeness on an image, which he keeps set up in the inner room where he sleeps. He says that he once formed this boy out of air by divine transformations, and, having drawn his form, gave him back again to the air. And he explains how he did it, thus. First, he says, the spirit of the man, turned into the nature of heat, drew in and absorbed the surrounding air like a cupping-glass; then, when it had come within the form of the spirit, he turned it into water; and since it could not be poured out, because of the cohesion of the spirit, he said he changed the air in it into the nature of blood; and the blood, congealing, made flesh; and then, when the flesh had solidified, he produced a man not from earth but from air. And so, having persuaded himself that he could make a new man, he said that he reversed the transformations and gave him back again to the air. In telling this to others he was believed; but by us, who were present at the rite, he was piously disbelieved. Therefore, condemning him for impiety, we withdrew from him.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila reports that Simon claimed to have used the soul of a murdered boy for his magic and to have made a man out of air.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.26 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-26). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-26) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.27Schwegler

Ταῦτα τοῦ Ἀκύλα εἰπόντος ὁ ἀδελφὸς αὐτοῦ Νικήτης ἔφη· Ἀναγκαῖόν ἐστιν, ἀδελφὲ ἡμῶν Κλήμης, τὰ παραλειφθέντα τῷ Ἀκύλᾳ ἐμὲ ὑπομνῆσαι. πρῶτον μὲν γὰρ μάρτυς ὁ Θεὸς ὡς οὐδὲν αὐτῷ ἡμεῖς συνειργασάμεθα ἀσεβές, ἀλλʼ ὅτι αὐτοῦ πράσσοντος ἱστορήκαμεν· καὶ μέχρις ὅτε ἀβλαβῆ ποιῶν ἐπεδείκνυτο, καὶ ἐτερπόμεθα, ὅτε δὲ τὰ μαγείᾳ γινόμενα θεότητι ποιεῖν πρὸς ἀπάτην θεοσεβῶν ἔλεγεν, οὐκ ἔτι αὐτοῦ ἠνεσχόμεθα καίτοι πολλὰ ἐπαγγελλομένου ἡμῖν, πρῶτον μὲν ναῶν ἀνδριάντας ἡμῶν καταξιωθῆναι καὶ θεοὺς νομισθῆναι καὶ ὑπὸ ὄχλων προσκυνηθῆναι καὶ ὑπὸ βασιλέων δοξασθῆναι καὶ δημοσίων τιμῶν καταξιωθῆναι καὶ χρήμασιν ἀπεριορίστοις πλουτῆσαι.

Tauta tou Akyla eipontos ho adelphos autou Nikētēs ephē; Anankaion estin, adelphe hēmōn Klēmēs, ta paraleiphthenta tǭ Akylą eme hypomnēsai. prōton men gar martys ho Theos hōs ouden autǭ hēmeis syneirgasametha asebes, allʼ hoti autou prassontos historēkamen; kai mechris hote ablabē poiōn epedeiknyto, kai eterpometha, hote de ta mageią ginomena theotēti poiein pros apatēn theosebōn elegen, ouk eti autou ēneschometha kaitoi polla epangellomenou hēmin, prōton men naōn andriantas hēmōn kataxiōthēnai kai theous nomisthēnai kai hypo ochlōn proskynēthēnai kai hypo basileōn doxasthēnai kai dēmosiōn timōn kataxiōthēnai kai chrēmasin aperioristois ploutēsai.

When Aquila had said this, his brother Nicetes said: “It is necessary, Clement our brother, that I should recall what Aquila has left out. First, God is witness that we did nothing impious together with him, but only watched as he did it. As long as he displayed harmless tricks, we even enjoyed them; but when he said that he did by divinity what was done by magic, to deceive the pious, we no longer put up with him, although he promised us much: first, that statues of us would be thought worthy of temples, that we would be regarded as gods and worshipped by the crowds, glorified by kings, thought worthy of public honours, and enriched with boundless wealth.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Nicetes adds that he and Aquila took no part in Simon's impiety and refused his promises of divine honours and wealth.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.27 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-27). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-27) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.28Schwegler

Ταῦτά τε καὶ τὰ τούτοις μείζονα νομιζόμενα ἡμῖν ὑπέσχετο, μόνον ἵνα συνόντες αὐτῷ τὸ τῆς ἐγχειρήσεως κακὸν σιωπῶμεν, ἵνα αὐτῷ τὰ τῆς ἀπάτης προκόπτῃ, καὶ ὅμως οὐ συνεθέμεθα, ἀλλὰ καὶ αὐτὸν τῆς τοιαύτης ἀπονοίας παύσασθαι συνεβουλεύσαμεν, λέγοντες αὐτῷ· ἡμεῖς, Σίμων, τῆς ἐκ παίδων φιλίας πρός σε μεμνημένοι στέργοντές τε τὰ συμφέροντα συμβουλεύομεν· παῦσαι τῆς τοιαύτης τόλμης· θεὸς εἶναι οὐ δύνασαι· φοβήθητι τὸν ὄντως Θεόν, γνῶθι ὅτι ἄνθρωπος εἶ καὶ ὅτι σου μικρός ἐστιν ὁ τῆς ζωῆς χρόνος. κἄν μέγα πλουτῇς ἢ καὶ βασιλεύσῃς, τῷ τῆς ζωῆς σου μικρῷ χρόνῳ ὀλίγα τυγχάνει πρὸς ἀπόλαυσιν, καὶ ἀσεβῶς πορισθέντα, εὐθέως φεύγοντα, αἰωνίαν κόλασιν περιποιεῖται τῷ τετολμηκότι. διὸ φοβεῖσθαί σοι τὸν Θεὸν συμβουλεύομεν, ὑφʼ οὗ κριθῆναι ἔχει ἡ ἑκάστου ψυχὴ περὶ ὧν ἕπραξεν ἐνταῦθα.

Tauta te kai ta toutois meizona nomizomena hēmin hypescheto, monon hina synontes autǭ to tēs encheirēseōs kakon siōpōmen, hina autǭ ta tēs apatēs prokoptę̄, kai homōs ou synethemetha, alla kai auton tēs toiautēs aponoias pausasthai synebouleusamen, legontes autǭ; hēmeis, Simōn, tēs ek paidōn philias pros se memnēmenoi stergontes te ta sympheronta symbouleuomen; pausai tēs toiautēs tolmēs; theos einai ou dynasai; phobēthēti ton ontōs Theon, gnōthi hoti anthrōpos ei kai hoti sou mikros estin ho tēs zōēs chronos. kan mega ploutę̄s ē kai basileusę̄s, tǭ tēs zōēs sou mikrǭ chronǭ oliga tynchanei pros apolausin, kai asebōs poristhenta, eutheōs pheugonta, aiōnian kolasin peripoieitai tǭ tetolmēkoti. dio phobeisthai soi ton Theon symbouleuomen, hyphʼ hou krithēnai echei hē hekastou psychē peri hōn hepraxen entautha.

“These things, and others thought greater than these, he promised us, if only, remaining with him, we would keep silent about the evil of his undertaking, so that his deceit might prosper. Yet we did not agree; rather, we advised him to cease from such madness, saying to him: ‘Simon, we remember our friendship with you from boyhood and, out of affection, advise you what is to your advantage. Cease from such daring. You cannot be a god. Fear the God who truly is; know that you are a man and that the time of your life is short. Even if you become very rich or even become king, in the short time of your life little comes to be enjoyed; and what is gained impiously quickly flees and secures eternal punishment for the one who dared it. Therefore we advise you to fear God, by whom the soul of each is to be judged for what it has done here.’”

Notes and citation

Summary: Nicetes recalls how he and Aquila urged Simon to stop claiming divinity and to fear God's judgment.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.28 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-28). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-28) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.29Schwegler

Ὁ δὲ ταῦτα ἀκούσας ἐγέλασεν. ἡμῶν δὲ εἰπόντων, τί ἡμῶν τά σοι συμφέροντα συμβουλευόντων καταγελᾶς; ἔφη, γελῶ ὑμῶν τὴν μωρὰν ὑπόληψιν, ὅτι πιστεύετε ἀθάνατον εἶναι τὴν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ψυχήν. κᾀγὼ ἔφην, οὐ θαυμάζομεν, ὦ Σίμων, εἰ ἀπατᾶν ἡμᾶς ἐπιχειρεῖς, ἀλλʼ ἐκπεπλήγμεθα τίνι λόγῳ καὶ ἑαυτὸν ἀπατᾷς· λέγε μοι ὦ Σίμων, εἰ καὶ τῶν ἄλλων οὐδεὶς πεπληροφόρηται ἀθάνατον εἶναι τὴν ψυχήν, ἀλλʼ οὖν γε σὺ καὶ ἡμεῖς, σὺ μὲν ὡς ἀνθρωπείου σώματος χωρίσας αὐτὴν καὶ προσομιλήσας καὶ ἐπιτάξας, ἡμεῖς δὲ ὡς συμπαρόντες καὶ τὴν ἐπιταγήν ἀκούσαντες καὶ τὸ κελευσθὲν ἐναργῶς ἱστορήσαντες. Σίμων ἔφη, ἐγὼ μὲν οἶδα τί λέγετε, ὑμεῖς δὲ οὐκ οἴδατε περὶ τίνων διαλέγεσθε. καὶ ὁ Νικήτης ἔφη, ἐπεὶ οἶδας, λέγε, εἰ δὲ μὴ οἶδας, μὴ δόκει ἡμᾶς τῷ λέγειν σὲ μὲν εἰδέναι, ἡμᾶς δὲ μή, ἀπατᾶσθαι δύνασθαι. οὐ γάρ ἐσμεν οὕτως νήπιοι, ἵνα πανοῦργον ἐνσπείρῃς ἐν ἡμῖν ὑποψίαν τοῦ νομίζειν σού τι τῶν ἀποῤῥήτων εἰδέναι, καὶ οὕτως ἐπιθυμίᾳ κολαζομένους ἡμᾶς ὑποχειρίους λαβὼν ἔχῃς.

Ho de tauta akousas egelasen. hēmōn de eipontōn, ti hēmōn ta soi sympheronta symbouleuontōn katagelas? ephē, gelō hymōn tēn mōran hypolēpsin, hoti pisteuete athanaton einai tēn tou anthrōpou psychēn. kągō ephēn, ou thaumazomen, ō Simōn, ei apatan hēmas epicheireis, allʼ ekpeplēgmetha tini logǭ kai heauton apatąs; lege moi ō Simōn, ei kai tōn allōn oudeis peplērophorētai athanaton einai tēn psychēn, allʼ oun ge sy kai hēmeis, sy men hōs anthrōpeiou sōmatos chōrisas autēn kai prosomilēsas kai epitaxas, hēmeis de hōs symparontes kai tēn epitagēn akousantes kai to keleusthen enargōs historēsantes. Simōn ephē, egō men oida ti legete, hymeis de ouk oidate peri tinōn dialegesthe. kai ho Nikētēs ephē, epei oidas, lege, ei de mē oidas, mē dokei hēmas tǭ legein se men eidenai, hēmas de mē, apatasthai dynasthai. ou gar esmen houtōs nēpioi, hina panourgon enspeirę̄s en hēmin hypopsian tou nomizein sou ti tōn aporrhētōn eidenai, kai houtōs epithymią kolazomenous hēmas hypocheirious labōn echę̄s.

“On hearing this he laughed. And when we said, ‘Why do you laugh at us when we advise you for your good?’ he said: ‘I laugh at your foolish supposition that you believe the soul of man is immortal.’ And I said: ‘We do not wonder, Simon, that you try to deceive us, but we are astonished by what reasoning you deceive even yourself. Tell me, Simon: even if no one else has been fully assured that the soul is immortal, surely you and we have: you, as having separated one from a human body, conversed with it, and commanded it; and we, as having been present, heard the command, and clearly seen what was ordered.’ Simon said: ‘I know what you are saying; but you do not know what you are talking about.’ And Nicetes said: ‘Since you know, say it; but if you do not know, do not think that by saying that you know and we do not, you can deceive us. For we are not such children that you can sow in us a crafty suspicion that you know some secret, and so, tormented with desire, take us and keep us in your power.’”

Notes and citation

Summary: Simon mocks belief in the soul's immortality, and Nicetes retorts that Simon's own necromancy proves it.

  • Nicetes speaks in the first person and then is named in the third person; the narration shifts as printed.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.29 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-29). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-29) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.30Schwegler

Καὶ ὁ Σίμων ἔφη· ὅτι μὲν ἐχώρισα ψυχὴν ἀνθρωπείου σώματος, οἶδα ὑμᾶς εἰδότας, ὅτι δὲ οὐχ ἡ τοῦ τεθνεῶτος ψυχὴ ὑπουργεῖ, ἐπεὶ μὴ ὑπάρχει, ἀλλὰ δαίμων τις ὑποκρινόμενος αὐτὸς εἶναι ψυχὴ ἐνεργεῖ, οἶδα ὑμᾶς ἀγνοοῦντας. καὶ ὁ Νικήτης ἔφη, πολλὰ ἐν τῷ βίῳ ἠκούσαμεν ἄπιστα, τούτου δὲ τοῦ λόγου ἀνοητότερον οὐ προσεδοκήσαμεν ἀκοῦσαι. εἰ γὰρ δαίμων ὑποκρίνεται εἶναι τοῦ τεθνεῶτος ἡ ψυχή, τίς τῆς ψυχῆς χρεία γίνεται, ἵνα χωρισθῇ τοῦ σώματος; οὐκ αὐτοὶ δὲ παρόντες ἠκούσαμέν σου, τοῦ σκήνους τὴν ψυχὴν ὁρκίζοντος; πῶς δὲ καὶ ἄλλου ὁρκιζομένου ἕτερος μὴ ὁρκισθεὶς ὡς φοβηθεὶς ὑπακούει; οὐκ ἐξετασθεὶς δὲ καὶ σὺ ὑφʼ ἡμῶν ποτε, διὰ τί ἐνίοτε καὶ παύονται αἱ παρεδρίαι, ἔφης ὅτι ψυχὴ πληρώσασα τὸν ὑπὲρ γῆς χρόνον, ὅν ἤμελλεν ἐν σώματι διατελεῖν, εἰς ᾅδην πορεύεται προσετίθης δὲ λέγων, ὅτι τῶν ἰδίῳ θανάτῳ τελευτησάντων αἱ ψυχαί, ἐπειδὴ αὐτόθι εἰς ᾅδην χωρήσασαι φρουροῦνται, οὐκ εὐκόπως ἐλθεῖν ἀφίενται;

Kai ho Simōn ephē; hoti men echōrisa psychēn anthrōpeiou sōmatos, oida hymas eidotas, hoti de ouch hē tou tethneōtos psychē hypourgei, epei mē hyparchei, alla daimōn tis hypokrinomenos autos einai psychē energei, oida hymas agnoountas. kai ho Nikētēs ephē, polla en tǭ biǭ ēkousamen apista, toutou de tou logou anoētoteron ou prosedokēsamen akousai. ei gar daimōn hypokrinetai einai tou tethneōtos hē psychē, tis tēs psychēs chreia ginetai, hina chōristhę̄ tou sōmatos? ouk autoi de parontes ēkousamen sou, tou skēnous tēn psychēn horkizontos? pōs de kai allou horkizomenou heteros mē horkistheis hōs phobētheis hypakouei? ouk exetastheis de kai sy hyphʼ hēmōn pote, dia ti eniote kai pauontai hai paredriai, ephēs hoti psychē plērōsasa ton hyper gēs chronon, hon ēmellen en sōmati diatelein, eis hądēn poreuetai prosetithēs de legōn, hoti tōn idiǭ thanatǭ teleutēsantōn hai psychai, epeidē autothi eis hądēn chōrēsasai phrourountai, ouk eukopōs elthein aphientai?

“And Simon said: ‘That I separated a soul from a human body, I know that you know; but that it is not the soul of the dead man that serves me, since it does not exist, but some demon who pretends to be the soul is at work, this I know you do not know.’ And Nicetes said: ‘We have heard many incredible things in our life, but we did not expect to hear anything more senseless than this. For if a demon pretends to be the soul of the dead, what need is there for the soul to be separated from the body? Did we not ourselves, being present, hear you adjuring the soul of the body? And how, when one is adjured, does another, who was not adjured, obey as though in fear? And when you were once questioned by us why the attendances sometimes cease, did you not say that a soul, having completed the time above the earth which it was to spend in the body, goes to Hades? And did you not add that the souls of those who died their own natural death, since they go straight to Hades and are kept under guard there, are not easily allowed to come?’”

Notes and citation

Summary: Simon claims a demon, not the soul, serves him; Nicetes points out that this contradicts Simon's own earlier explanations.

  • “Their own natural death” renders ἰδίῳ θανάτῳ; ANF understands suicide. The argument implies that only souls of those who died before their appointed time (by violence) can be summoned.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.30 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-30). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-30) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.31Schwegler

Ταῦτα του Νικήτου εἰπόντος, Ἀκύλας αὐτὸς πάλιν ἔφη· ἐβουλόμην παρά σου τοῦτο μόνον μαθεῖν, Σίμων, εἴτε ψυχὴ, εἴτε δαίμων ἐστὶν τὸ ὁρκιζόμενον, τί φοβούμενον οὐ παραπέμπεται τοὺς ὅρκους; καὶ ὁ Σίμων ἔφη· κόλασιν γὰρ παρακούσασα οἶδεν μέλλειν παθεῖν. καὶ ὁ Ἀκύλας ἔφη· οὐκοῦν εἰ ὁρκιζομένη ψυχὴ ἔρχεται, καὶ κρίσις γίνεται. εἰ οὖν αἱ ψυχαὶ ἀθάνατοι γίνονται, καὶ κρίσις πάντως γίνεται. ὡς ἄν καὶ τοὺς ἐπὶ κακῇ πράξει ὁρκισθέντας καταδικασθῆναι παρακούσαντας φῇς, πῶς οὐ πεφόβησαι σὺ ἀναγκάζειν, τῶν ἀναγκαζομένων ἐπὶ παρακοῇ κολαζομένων; τὸ γὰρ ἤδη σε μὴ παθεῖν ἐφʼ οἶς ἔδρασας, ἐπεὶ μήπω κρίσις ἐστίν, ἵνα σὺ μὲν δίκην δῷς περὶ ὧν ἠνάγκασας, τὸ δὲ ἀναγκασθὲν ὑπὸ συγγνώμην γένηται, ὡς τῆς κακῆς πράξεως τὸν ὅρκον προτιμῆσαν. ὁ δὲ τούτων ἀκούσας ὠργίσθη, θάνατον ἡμῖν ἀπειλήσας, εἰ μὴ τὰ ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ πραττόμενα σιωπῶμεν.

Tauta tou Nikētou eipontos, Akylas autos palin ephē; eboulomēn para sou touto monon mathein, Simōn, eite psychē, eite daimōn estin to horkizomenon, ti phoboumenon ou parapempetai tous horkous? kai ho Simōn ephē; kolasin gar parakousasa oiden mellein pathein. kai ho Akylas ephē; oukoun ei horkizomenē psychē erchetai, kai krisis ginetai. ei oun hai psychai athanatoi ginontai, kai krisis pantōs ginetai. hōs an kai tous epi kakę̄ praxei horkisthentas katadikasthēnai parakousantas phę̄s, pōs ou pephobēsai sy anankazein, tōn anankazomenōn epi parakoę̄ kolazomenōn? to gar ēdē se mē pathein ephʼ ois edrasas, epei mēpō krisis estin, hina sy men dikēn dǭs peri hōn ēnankasas, to de anankasthen hypo syngnōmēn genētai, hōs tēs kakēs praxeōs ton horkon protimēsan. ho de toutōn akousas ōrgisthē, thanaton hēmin apeilēsas, ei mē ta hypʼ autou prattomena siōpōmen.

“When Nicetes had said this, Aquila himself said again: ‘I should like to learn from you this one thing, Simon: whether it is a soul or a demon that is adjured, what does it fear, that it does not disregard the oaths?’ And Simon said: ‘Because it knows that it will suffer punishment if it disobeys.’ And Aquila said: ‘Then if the soul comes when adjured, there is also a judgment. If, then, souls are immortal, there is certainly also a judgment. And if you say that those adjured for an evil deed are condemned when they disobey, how are you not afraid to compel them, since those compelled are punished for disobedience? For that you have not yet suffered for what you have done is because there is not yet a judgment, when you will pay the penalty for what you compelled, while what was compelled will be pardoned, as having honoured the oath above the evil deed.’ Hearing this, he was enraged, and threatened us with death unless we kept silent about what he was doing.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila argues from Simon's own practice that souls are immortal and that a judgment is coming; Simon threatens them with death.

  • The last argument is elliptical in the Greek; translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (two words joined in the digital text): εἰοῦν → εἰ οὖν.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.31 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-31). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-31) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.32Schwegler

Ταῦτα τοῦ Ἀκύλα εἰπόντος, ἐγὼ Κλήμης ἐπυθόμην, τίνα ἄρα ἐστὶν ἅ ποιεῖ θαυμάσια. οἱ δὲ ἔλεγόν μοι, ὅτι ἀνδριάντας ποιεῖ περιπατεῖν, καὶ ἐπὶ πῦρ κυλιόμενος οὐ καίεται· ἐνίοτε δὲ καὶ πέταται· καὶ ἐκ λίθων ἄρτους ποιεῖ· ὄφις γίνεται, εἰς αἶγα μεταμορφοῦται, διπρόσωπος γίνεται, εἰς χρυσὸν μεταβάλλεται· θύρας κεκλεισμένας ἀνοίγει, σίδηρον λύει, ἐν δείπνοις εἴδωλα παντοδαπῶν εἰδεῶν παρίστησιν· τὰ ἐν οἰκίᾳ σκεύη ὡς αὐτόματα φερόμενα πρὸς ὑπηρεσίαν βλέπεσθαι ποιεῖ, τῶν φερόντων οὐ βλεπομένων. ταῦτα αὐτῶν λεγόντων ἀκούων ἐθαύμαζον. ἐμαρτύρουν δὲ πολλοὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα αὐτοὶ παρόντες ἱστορηκέναι.

Tauta tou Akyla eipontos, egō Klēmēs epythomēn, tina ara estin ha poiei thaumasia. hoi de elegon moi, hoti andriantas poiei peripatein, kai epi pyr kyliomenos ou kaietai; eniote de kai petatai; kai ek lithōn artous poiei; ophis ginetai, eis aiga metamorphoutai, diprosōpos ginetai, eis chryson metaballetai; thyras kekleismenas anoigei, sidēron lyei, en deipnois eidōla pantodapōn eideōn paristēsin; ta en oikią skeuē hōs automata pheromena pros hypēresian blepesthai poiei, tōn pherontōn ou blepomenōn. tauta autōn legontōn akouōn ethaumazon. emartyroun de polloi ta toiauta autoi parontes historēkenai.

When Aquila had said this, I, Clement, asked what, then, were the wonders that he does. And they told me that he makes statues walk; he rolls on fire and is not burned; sometimes he even flies; he makes loaves out of stones; he becomes a serpent, is transformed into a goat, becomes two-faced, changes himself into gold; he opens locked doors, melts iron, and at dinners presents images of every kind of form; he makes the vessels in his house be seen moving as if of themselves to serve him, those who carry them not being seen. I was amazed as I heard them say this; and many bore witness that they had themselves been present and seen such things.

Matt 4:3 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Aquila and Nicetes list Simon's magical wonders.

  • “Loaves out of stones” recalls the temptation of Jesus (Matt 4:3).

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.32 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-32). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-32) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.33Schwegler

Τούτων οὕτως ῥηθέντων ὁ καλὸς Πέτρος καὶ αὐτὸς τοῦ λέγειν ἤρξατο· συνορᾶν ὑμᾶς δεῖ, ἀδελφοί, τοῦ τῆς συζυγίας κανόνος τὴν ἀλήθειαν, οὑ μὴ ἀφιστάμενός τις οὐκ ἔχει πλανηθῆναι. ἐπεὶ γάρ, ὡς ἔφαμεν, δυϊκῶς καὶ ἐναντίως πάντα ἔχοντα ὁρῶμεν, καὶ ὡς πρώτη νύξ, εἶτα ἡμέρα, καὶ πρῶτον ἄγνοια, εἶτα γνῶσις, πρῶτον νόσος, εἶτα ἴασις, οὕτως πρῶτα τὰ τῆς πλάνης τῷ βίῳ ἔρχεται, εἶθʼ οὕτως τὸ ἀληθὲς ἐπέρχεται, ὡς τῇ νόσῳ ὁ ἰατρός. αὐτίκα γοῦν τοῦ θεοφιλοῦς ἡμῶν ἔθνους ἀπὸ τῆς τῶν Αἰγυπτίων κακουχίας μέλλοντος λυτροῦσθαι, πρῶτον διὰ τῆς ὀφιωθείσης ῥάβδου, ἥτις τῷ Ἀαρὼν ἐδόθη, αἱ νόσοι ἐγίνοντο, καὶ εἶθʼ οὕτως εὐχαῖς Μωυσέως αἱ ἰάσεις ἐπεφέροντο. καὶ νῦν δὲ τῶν ἐθνῶν μελλόντων ἀπὸ τῆς μετὰ τὰ εἴδωλα λυτροῦσθαι θρησκείας, ἡ κακία πάλιν, ὡς αὐτὴ βασιλεύουσα, προλαβοῦσα πρῶτον τὸν ἑαυτῆς ὥσπερ ὄφιν ἔπεμψε σύμμαχον, ὅν ὁρᾶτου Σίμωνα, ποιοῦντα θαυμάσια πρὸς κατάπληξιν καὶ ἀπάτην, οὐ σημεῖα ἰατικὰ πρὸς ἐπιστροφὴν καὶ σωτηρίαν. διὸ καὶ ὑμᾶς ἀπὸ τῶν γινομένων τεράτων τοὺς ποιοῦντας νοεῖν δεῖ, τίς τίνος ἐστὶν ἐργάτης. ἐὰν ἀνωφελῆ ποιῇ τέρατα, κακίας ἐστὶν ὑπουργός· ἐὰν δὲ ἐπωφελῆ πράττῃ, τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ ἐστιν ἡγεμών.

Toutōn houtōs rhēthentōn ho kalos Petros kai autos tou legein ērxato; synoran hymas dei, adelphoi, tou tēs syzygias kanonos tēn alētheian, hou mē aphistamenos tis ouk echei planēthēnai. epei gar, hōs ephamen, dyïkōs kai enantiōs panta echonta horōmen, kai hōs prōtē nyx, eita hēmera, kai prōton agnoia, eita gnōsis, prōton nosos, eita iasis, houtōs prōta ta tēs planēs tǭ biǭ erchetai, eithʼ houtōs to alēthes eperchetai, hōs tę̄ nosǭ ho iatros. autika goun tou theophilous hēmōn ethnous apo tēs tōn Aigyptiōn kakouchias mellontos lytrousthai, prōton dia tēs ophiōtheisēs rhabdou, hētis tǭ Aarōn edothē, hai nosoi eginonto, kai eithʼ houtōs euchais Mōyseōs hai iaseis epepheronto. kai nyn de tōn ethnōn mellontōn apo tēs meta ta eidōla lytrousthai thrēskeias, hē kakia palin, hōs autē basileuousa, prolabousa prōton ton heautēs hōsper ophin epempse symmachon, hon horatou Simōna, poiounta thaumasia pros kataplēxin kai apatēn, ou sēmeia iatika pros epistrophēn kai sōtērian. dio kai hymas apo tōn ginomenōn teratōn tous poiountas noein dei, tis tinos estin ergatēs. ean anōphelē poię̄ terata, kakias estin hypourgos; ean de epōphelē prattę̄, tou agathou estin hēgemōn.

When this had been said, the good Peter himself also began to speak: “You must perceive, brothers, the truth of the rule of the pairs, from which whoever does not depart cannot be led astray. For since, as we have said, we see all things existing in pairs and as opposites, and as first comes night, then day; first ignorance, then knowledge; first disease, then healing: so the things of error come first into life, and then the truth comes after, as the physician after the disease. For instance, when our God-loving nation was about to be redeemed from the ill-treatment of the Egyptians, first, through the rod that was turned into a serpent, which was given to Aaron, the plagues came; and then the healings were brought by the prayers of Moses. And now, when the Gentiles are about to be redeemed from the worship of idols, wickedness again, as though it were reigning, has anticipated and first sent its own ally, like a serpent, this Simon whom you see, doing wonders to astonish and deceive, not healing signs for conversion and salvation. Therefore you too must understand from the wonders that are done who is the worker of whom. If he does useless wonders, he is a servant of wickedness; but if he does beneficial ones, he is a leader of the good.”

Exod 7:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 8:12 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter applies the rule of pairs to wonders: Simon's useless marvels come first, from evil, as the plagues of Egypt came before Moses' healings.

  • Aaron's rod turned into a serpent: Exod 7:10–12; Moses' prayers remove the plagues: Exod 8:12–13, 8:30–31. “Whom you see” renders ὅν ὁρᾶτου, evidently for ὅν ὁρᾶτε τοῦτον.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.33 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-33). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-33) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.34Schwegler

Τὰ μὲν οὖν ἀνωφελῆ ἐστιν σημεῖα, ὅσα αὐτοὶ Σίμωνα εἰρήκατε πεποιηκέναι. λέγω δὲ τὸ ἀνδριάντας αὐτὸν ποιεῖν περιπατεῖν, καὶ τὸ ἐπʼ ἀνθράκων αὐτὸν πεπυρωμένων κυλίεσθαι, καὶ δράκοντα γίνεσθαι, εἰς αἶγα μεταμορφωθῆναι, εἰς ἀέρα πτῆναι, καὶ ὅσα τοιαῦτά τινα, εἰς ἴασιν ἀνθρώπων μὴ γινόμενα, πρὸς ἀπατᾶν φύσιν ἔχει πολλούς. τὰ δὲ τῆς οἰκτίρμονος ἀληθείας σημεῖά ἐστιν φιλάνθρωπα, ἅ τινα ἠκούσατε τὸν κύριον πεποιηκότα, κᾀμὲ μετʼ ἐκεῖνον εὐχαῖς κατορθοῦντα· ὧν οἱ πλεῖστοι παρεστήκατε, οἱ μὲν νόσων παντοίων ἀπαλλαγέντες, οἱ δὲ δαιμόνων, οἱ δὲ ὀρθωθέντες χεῖρας, οἱ δὲ πόδας, οἱ δὲ τοὺς ὀφθαλμοὺς ἀπολαβόντες, οἱ δὲ τὰς ἀκοὰς καὶ ἄλλα ὅσα ἄνθρωπος ποιεῖν δύναται, φιλανθρώπου πνεύματος γενόμενος.

Ta men oun anōphelē estin sēmeia, hosa autoi Simōna eirēkate pepoiēkenai. legō de to andriantas auton poiein peripatein, kai to epʼ anthrakōn auton pepyrōmenōn kyliesthai, kai drakonta ginesthai, eis aiga metamorphōthēnai, eis aera ptēnai, kai hosa toiauta tina, eis iasin anthrōpōn mē ginomena, pros apatan physin echei pollous. ta de tēs oiktirmonos alētheias sēmeia estin philanthrōpa, ha tina ēkousate ton kyrion pepoiēkota, kąme metʼ ekeinon euchais katorthounta; hōn hoi pleistoi parestēkate, hoi men nosōn pantoiōn apallagentes, hoi de daimonōn, hoi de orthōthentes cheiras, hoi de podas, hoi de tous ophthalmous apolabontes, hoi de tas akoas kai alla hosa anthrōpos poiein dynatai, philanthrōpou pneumatos genomenos.

“Useless, then, are the signs that you yourselves have said Simon did: I mean making statues walk, rolling on burning coals, becoming a dragon, being transformed into a goat, flying in the air, and all such things, which, not being done for the healing of men, are by nature apt to deceive many. But the signs of compassionate truth are kind to men, such as you have heard that the Lord did, and that I after him accomplish by prayers. Most of you stand here as witnesses: some freed from all kinds of disease, others from demons; some restored in their hands, others in their feet; some who have recovered their eyes, others their hearing; and all else that a man can do who has become possessed of a spirit that loves mankind.”

Matt 11:5 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter contrasts Simon's useless marvels with the healings done by the Lord and by himself.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.34 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-34). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-34) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.35Schwegler

Ταῦτα τοῦ Πέτρου εἰπόντος, ὑπὸ τὸν ὄρθρον ἐπεισιὼν ἡμῖν Ζακχαῖος προσαγορεύσας ἔφη Πέτρῳ· ἀνατίθεται Σίμων τὴν ζήτησιν εἰς τὴν αὔριον ἡμέραν ἡ γὰρ σήμερον τὸ διʼ ἕνδεκα ἡμερῶν αὐτοῦ τυγχάνει σάββατον. καὶ πρὸς τοῦτον ὁ Πέτρος ἀπεκρίνατο· λέγε Σίμωνι· ἐπεὶ τελείως θέλεις, μετὰ τοῦ γινώσκειν, ὅτι σοι ἡμεῖς, ὅτε βούλει, θεοφιλεῖ προνοίᾳ ἀπαντᾶν ἑτοίμως ἔχομεν. καὶ ὁ μὲν Ζακχαῖος ταῦτα ἀκούσας ἀντιβάλλειν ἐξῄει τὴν ἀπόκρισιν.

Tauta tou Petrou eipontos, hypo ton orthron epeisiōn hēmin Zakchaios prosagoreusas ephē Petrǭ; anatithetai Simōn tēn zētēsin eis tēn aurion hēmeran hē gar sēmeron to diʼ hendeka hēmerōn autou tynchanei sabbaton. kai pros touton ho Petros apekrinato; lege Simōni; epei teleiōs theleis, meta tou ginōskein, hoti soi hēmeis, hote boulei, theophilei pronoią apantan hetoimōs echomen. kai ho men Zakchaios tauta akousas antiballein exę̄ei tēn apokrisin.

When Peter had said this, toward dawn Zacchaeus came in to us, greeted us, and said to Peter: “Simon postpones the discussion to tomorrow, for today happens to be his sabbath, which comes every eleven days.” And Peter answered him: “Tell Simon: let it be as you wish; and know that we are ready to meet you, by God-loving providence, whenever you wish.” And Zacchaeus, having heard this, went out to deliver the answer.

Notes and citation

Summary: Zacchaeus reports that Simon has postponed the debate because of his eleven-day sabbath.

  • “Let it be as you wish” renders ἐπεὶ τελείως θέλεις, which is awkward as printed; translated by sense.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.35 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-35). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-35) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.36Schwegler

Ὁ δὲ ἰδών με ἀθυμοῦντα καὶ τὴν αἰτίαν πυθόμενος καὶ μαθὼν παρʼ ἐμοῦ οὐκ ἄλλοθέν ποθεν οὖσαν, ἢ ἀπὸ τῆς κατὰ τὴν ζήτησιν ἀναβολῆς, ἔφη· ἀγαθῇ Θεοῦ προνοίᾳ προειληφὼς διοικεῖσθαι τὸν κόσμον, ὦ φίλε Κλήμης, αὐτὸς οὐκ ἄχθεται ἐπὶ τοῖς ὁπώσποτε ἀπαντῶσι πράγμασιν, ἀποδεδωκὼς ὅτι ὑπὸ τῆς τοῦ κρείττονος οἰκονομίας συμφερόντως τὰ πράγματα τὴν ἔκβασιν λαμβάνει· ὅθεν δίκαιον αὐτὸν εἶναι γνοὺς καὶ εὐσυνειδήτως βιούς, τὸ προςπίπτον λυπηρὸν οἶδεν ὀρθῷ τῷ λογισμῷ ἀποσείεσθαι τῆς ψυχῆς, ὅτι πρὸς ἀγαθοῦ τινος ἀγνώστου συντελούμενον ἐλθεῖν ἔχει. καὶ νῦν δὲ τοῦ μάγου Σίμωνος ἡ τῆς ζητήσεως ὑπέρθεσις μή σε λυπείτω· ἴσως γὰρ ἐκ τῆς τοῦ Θεοῦ προνοίας εἰς τὴν σὴν γέγονεν ὠφέλειαν. διὸ ὡς ἰδίῳ σοι ὄντι οὐκ ὀκνήσω λέγειν.

Ho de idōn me athymounta kai tēn aitian pythomenos kai mathōn parʼ emou ouk allothen pothen ousan, ē apo tēs kata tēn zētēsin anabolēs, ephē; agathę̄ Theou pronoią proeilēphōs dioikeisthai ton kosmon, ō phile Klēmēs, autos ouk achthetai epi tois hopōspote apantōsi pragmasin, apodedōkōs hoti hypo tēs tou kreittonos oikonomias sympherontōs ta pragmata tēn ekbasin lambanei; hothen dikaion auton einai gnous kai eusyneidētōs bious, to prospipton lypēron oiden orthǭ tǭ logismǭ aposeiesthai tēs psychēs, hoti pros agathou tinos agnōstou synteloumenon elthein echei. kai nyn de tou magou Simōnos hē tēs zētēseōs hyperthesis mē se lypeitō; isōs gar ek tēs tou Theou pronoias eis tēn sēn gegonen ōpheleian. dio hōs idiǭ soi onti ouk oknēsō legein.

But he, seeing me despondent, asked the reason and learned from me that it came from nothing else than the postponement of the discussion. He said: “He who has come to believe, my dear Clement, that the world is governed by the good providence of God is not vexed at whatever things befall, since he has granted that under the ordering of the Higher things come to an outcome that is for the best. Hence, knowing that God is righteous, and living with a good conscience, he knows how by right reason to shake off from his soul whatever grief befalls, because it must come to fulfil some unknown good. And now, do not let the postponement of the discussion by Simon the magician grieve you; for perhaps by the providence of God it has come about for your benefit. Therefore, since you are one of our own, I will not hesitate to tell you.”

Rom 8:28 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter comforts Clement over the delay, saying that God's providence turns events to good.

  • Compare Rom 8:28 for the thought that all things work together for good.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.36 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-36). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-36) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.37Schwegler

Τῶν ἡμετέρων τινὲς ἑταῖροι τῷ Σίμωνι προσποιητῶς σύνεισιν, ὡς πεισθέντες τῇ ἀθεωτάτῃ αὐτοῦ πλάνῃ, ὅπως μανθάνοντες αὐτοῦ τὰς βουλὰς ἐκφαίνωσιν ἡμῖν, πρὸς τὸ δύνασθαι δεινῷ ἀνδρὶ οἰκείως συναρμόσασθαι. καὶ νῦν παρʼ αὐτῶν ἔμαθον, ἧς μέλλει ζητήσεως ποιεῖσθαι τοὺς λόγους· καὶ γνοὺς ἐπὶ τούτῳ τῷ μὲν Θεῷ ἠυχαρίστησα, σὲ δὲ ἐμακάρισα ἐπὶ τῇ τῆς ζητήσεως ὑπερθέσει· τῶν γὰρ μελλόντων λόγων ὑπʼ αὐτοῦ πρὸς διάκρισιν τῶν ἀγνοούντων λέγεσθαι σὺ πρὸ τῆς ζητήσεως ἐφοδιασθεὶς ὑπʼ ἐμοῦ ἄπτωτος ἀκροατὴς γενέσθαι δυνήσῃ.

Tōn hēmeterōn tines hetairoi tǭ Simōni prospoiētōs syneisin, hōs peisthentes tę̄ atheōtatę̄ autou planę̄, hopōs manthanontes autou tas boulas ekphainōsin hēmin, pros to dynasthai deinǭ andri oikeiōs synarmosasthai. kai nyn parʼ autōn emathon, hēs mellei zētēseōs poieisthai tous logous; kai gnous epi toutǭ tǭ men Theǭ ēucharistēsa, se de emakarisa epi tę̄ tēs zētēseōs hyperthesei; tōn gar mellontōn logōn hypʼ autou pros diakrisin tōn agnoountōn legesthai sy pro tēs zētēseōs ephodiastheis hypʼ emou aptōtos akroatēs genesthai dynēsę̄.

“Some of our companions are with Simon by pretence, as though persuaded by his most godless error, so that, learning his plans, they may reveal them to us, in order that we may be able to deal suitably with a clever man. And now I have learned from them what arguments he intends to use in the discussion. Knowing this, I gave thanks to God, and I called you blessed because of the postponement of the discussion. For, being equipped by me before the discussion concerning the arguments he is to bring forward to unsettle the ignorant, you will be able to be a hearer who does not stumble.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter reveals that he has informants in Simon's circle and will prepare Clement for Simon's arguments.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.37 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-37). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-37) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.

2.38Schwegler

Πολλὰ γὰρ ψευδῆ κατὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ προσέλαβον αἱ γραφαὶ λόγῳ τούτῳ. τοῦ προφήτου Μωυσέως γνώμῃ τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐκλεκτοῖς τισιν ἑβδομήκοντα τὸν νόμον σὺν ταῖς ἐπιλύσεσιν παραδεδωκότος, πρὸς τὸ καὶ αὐτοὺς ἐφοδιάζειν τοῦ λαοῦ τοὺς βουλομένους, μετʼ οὐ πολὺ γραφεὶς ὁ νόμος προσέλαβέν τινα καὶ ψευδῆ κατὰ τοῦ νόμου Θεοῦ τοῦ τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν καὶ πάντα τὰ ἐν αὐτοῖς δημιουργήσαντος, τοῦτο τοῦ πονηροῦ δικαίῳ τινὶ λόγῳ ἐνεργῆσαι τετολμηκότος. καὶ τοῦτο γέγονεν λόγῳ καὶ κρίσει, ὅπως ἐλεγχθῶσι, τίνες τολμῶσιν τὰ κατὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ γραφέντα φιληκόως ἔχειν, τίνες τε στοργῇ τῇ πρὸς αὐτὸν τὰ κατʼ αὐτοῦ λεγόμενα μὴ μόνον ἀπιστεῖν, ἀλλὰ μηδὲ τὴν ἀρχὴν ἀκούειν ἀνέχεσθαι, κἄν ἀληθῆ τυγχάνῃ, πολλῷ κρίναντες ἀσφαλέστερον περὶ εὐφήμου πίστεως κινδυνεύειν, ἢ ἐπὶ βλασφήμοις λόγοις δυσσυνειδήτως βιοῦν.

Polla gar pseudē kata tou Theou proselabon hai graphai logǭ toutǭ. tou prophētou Mōyseōs gnōmę̄ tou Theou eklektois tisin hebdomēkonta ton nomon syn tais epilysesin paradedōkotos, pros to kai autous ephodiazein tou laou tous boulomenous, metʼ ou poly grapheis ho nomos proselaben tina kai pseudē kata tou nomou Theou tou ton ouranon kai tēn gēn kai panta ta en autois dēmiourgēsantos, touto tou ponērou dikaiǭ tini logǭ energēsai tetolmēkotos. kai touto gegonen logǭ kai krisei, hopōs elenchthōsi, tines tolmōsin ta kata tou Theou graphenta philēkoōs echein, tines te storgę̄ tę̄ pros auton ta katʼ autou legomena mē monon apistein, alla mēde tēn archēn akouein anechesthai, kan alēthē tynchanę̄, pollǭ krinantes asphalesteron peri euphēmou pisteōs kindyneuein, ē epi blasphēmois logois dyssyneidētōs bioun.

“For the Scriptures have taken in many falsehoods against God, for this reason. When the prophet Moses, by the will of God, had handed on the Law, together with its explanations, to certain chosen men, seventy in number, so that they too might instruct those of the people who wished, not long afterwards the Law, when it was written down, took in certain falsehoods also, against the Law of God who made heaven and earth and all things in them; the Evil One having dared to work this for some just reason. And this happened by design and judgment, so that it might be shown who dare to listen gladly to what is written against God, and who, out of love for him, not only disbelieve what is said against him but will not even bear to hear it at all, even if it should be true, judging it far safer to run a risk for a faith that speaks well of God than to live with an evil conscience by blasphemous words.”

Num 11:16 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that the written Scriptures acquired false passages against God after Moses had handed the Law orally to the seventy elders, as a test of believers' love for God.

  • The doctrine of “false pericopes” inserted into the written Law is characteristic of the Homilies (compare 3.47–51). The seventy elders are those of Num 11:16–25.

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.38 (Schwegler; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-homilies/2-5/#p-2-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-homilies-2-38) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Schwegler; made independently of existing English translations and compared afterwards with ANF where it has the work.