Recognitions 0.1–1.19

Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, who tells how he found Christ, followed Peter, and was reunited with his lost family (the 'recognitions'). It is not a work of Clement. It survives complete only in Rufinus of Aquileia's Latin translation; the Greek original is lost (fragments in Eusebius and Origen's Philocalia, and a Syriac version of parts). It shares a source with the Greek Clementine Homilies (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift', probably 3rd-century Syria), and the Recognitions are usually dated to the 4th century in their Greek form. Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius is reference 0.1.

Latin text: Migne, PG 1 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 1 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).

Show

Recognitions 0.1

0.1PG 1:1205b–1207b

Tibi quidem, Gaudenti, nostrorum decus insigne doctorum, tantus ingenii vigor, imo tanta spiritus gratia est, ut si quid a te etiam quotidiani eloquii more dicitur, si quid in ecclesia declamatur, id in libris haberi et ad instructionem tradi posteris debeat. Nos tamen, quos et ingenii tenuitas minus promptos, et senecta jam tardos reddit ac segnes, Opus quod olim veneranda memoria virgo Silvia injunxerat, ut Clementem nostra lingua redderemus, et tu deinceps jure haereditario poscebas, licet multas post moras, tamen aliquando restituimus, praedamque, ut opinor, non parvam, Graecorum bibliothecis ereptam, nostrorum usibus et utilitatibus convectamus, ut quos propriis non possumus, peregrinis nutriamus alimoniis. Nam et solent suaviora videri peregrina, interdum vero et utiliora. Denique peregrinum est pene omne quod medelam corporibus confert, quod morbis occurrit, quod venena depellit. Judaea balsami lacrymam, Creta comam dictamni mittit, Arabia aromatum flores, et spicarum nardi India segetem metit, qua apud nos, etiamsi aliquantulo quam proprius ager attulit, fractiora perveniunt, odoris tamen gratiam vimque medendi integram servant. Suscipe igitur, anime mi, redeuntem ad te Clementem nostrum, suscipe jam Romanum. Nec mireris, si forte tibi in eo minus solito floridus eloquentiae vultus appareat. Nihil interest, dummodo sensus idem sapiat. Peregrinas ergo merces multo in patriam sudore transvehimus. Et nescio quam gratus me civium vultus accipit, magna sibi Graeciae spolia deferentem, et occultos sapientia thesauros nostra lingua clave reserantem. Sed votis tuis faveat Deus, ut nullus nobis sinister oculus, nec cujusquam lividus occurrat aspectus, ne extremo prodigii genere, cum nihil invideant illi quibus aufertur, livescant tamen isti quibus confertur. Aequum est sane, tibi qui haec etiam Graece legeris (ne forte in aliquibus minus a nobis servatum translationis ordinem putes), interpretationis nostra indicare consilium. Puto quod non te lateat, Clementis hujus in Graco ejusdem operis Ἀναγνὼσεων, hoc est Recognitionum, duas editiones haberi, et duo corpora esse librorum, in aliaquantis quidem diversa, in multis tamen ejusdem narrationis. Denique pars ultima hujus operis, in qua de transformatione Simonis refertur, in uno corpore habetur, in alio penitus non habetur. Sunt autem et quaedam in utroque corpore de ingenito Deo genitoque disserta, et de aliis nonnullis, quae, ut nihil amplius dicam, excesserunt intelligentiam nostram. Haec ergo ego, tanquam quae supra vires meas essent, aliis reservare malui, quam minus plena proferre. In caeteris autem,quantum potuimus, operam dedimus, non solum a sententiis, sed ne a sermonibus quidem satis elocutionibusque discedere. Quae res quamvis minus ornatum, magis tamen fidele narrationis reddit eloquium. Epistolam sane, in qua idem Clemens ad Jacobum fratrem Domini scribens de obitu nuntiat Petri, et quod se reliquerit successorem cathedra et doctrinae suae, in qua etiam de omni ordine ecclesiastico continetur, ideo nunc huic Operi non praemisi, quia et tempore posterior est, et olim a me interpretata et edita. Sed quod in ea nonnullis fortasse videbitur inconsequens, si hic explanetur, non puto absurdum videri. Quidam enim requirunt, quomodo cum Linus et Cletus in urbe Roma ante Clementem hunc fuerint episcopi, ipse Clemens ad Iacobum scribens, sibi dicat a Petro docendi cathedram traditam. Cujus rei hanc accepimus esse rationem, quod Linus et Cletus fuerunt quidem ante Clementem episcopi in urbe Roma, sed superstite Petro, videlicet ut illi episcopatus curam gererent, ipse vero apostolatus impleret officium, sicut invenitur etiam apud Caesaream fecisse, ubi cum ipse esset praesens, Zacchaeum tamen a se ordinatum habebat episcopum. Et hoc modo utrumque verum videbitur, ut et illi ante Clementem numerentur episcopi, et Clemens tamen post obitum Petri docendi susceperit sedem. Sed jam videamus, scribens Iacobo fratri Domini, operis sui Clemens ipse quod sumat narrationis initium.

To you, Gaudentius, distinguished ornament of our teachers, belongs such vigor of intellect, or rather such grace of the Spirit, that whatever you say even in the manner of everyday speech, whatever you deliver in church, ought to be kept in books and handed down to posterity for instruction. We, however, whom slenderness of talent makes less ready and old age now makes slow and sluggish, have at last, though after many delays, rendered the work which the virgin Silvia of venerable memory once enjoined on us, that we should put Clement into our language, and which you afterwards claimed by right of inheritance. And we are bringing in for the use and benefit of our people a booty, I think, not small, snatched from the libraries of the Greeks, so that we may nourish with foreign food those whom we cannot nourish with our own. For foreign things usually seem sweeter, and sometimes also more useful. Indeed, almost everything that brings healing to bodies, that counters diseases, that drives off poisons, is foreign. Judaea sends the tear of balsam, Crete the leafy head of dittany, Arabia the flowers of spices, and India reaps the harvest of spikenard; and though these reach us somewhat more broken than what our own field has produced, they keep entire the charm of their fragrance and their power to heal. Receive, then, my soul, our Clement returning to you; receive him now a Roman. And do not wonder if perhaps the face of eloquence appears less florid in him than usual. It makes no difference, provided the sense savors the same. So we carry foreign wares into our homeland with much sweat. And I do not know how gratefully the faces of my fellow citizens will receive me as I bring them great spoils from Greece and unlock the hidden treasures of wisdom with the key of our language. But may God favor your prayers, that no ill-omened eye and no envious look of anyone may meet us, lest by the last kind of portent, while those from whom he is taken feel no envy, those on whom he is conferred should yet turn livid with it.

It is only fair to explain the plan of our translation to you, who have read these things also in Greek, lest you think that in some places the order of the translation has been insufficiently kept by us. I suppose you are aware that in Greek there are two editions of this work of Clement, the Anagnōseis, that is, the Recognitions, and two bodies of books, differing in some points but in many containing the same narrative. Indeed, the last part of this work, which tells of the transformation of Simon, is found in one body and is entirely absent from the other. There are also in both bodies certain discussions about the unbegotten and the begotten God, and about some other matters, which, to say no more, went beyond our understanding. These, therefore, as being beyond my powers, I preferred to reserve for others rather than to present them imperfectly. In the rest, however, we have taken pains, as far as we could, to depart not only not from the sense but not even from the words and expressions. This makes the style of the narrative less ornate, but more faithful. The letter, indeed, in which this same Clement, writing to James the brother of the Lord, reports the death of Peter, and that Peter left him as successor of his chair and his teaching, and in which the whole order of the church is also set out, I have not now prefixed to this work, both because it is later in time and because I translated and published it some time ago. But since something in it may perhaps seem inconsistent to some, I think it not absurd to explain it here. For some ask how, since Linus and Cletus were bishops in the city of Rome before this Clement, Clement himself, writing to James, says that the chair of teaching was handed over to him by Peter. We have received this as the explanation: Linus and Cletus were indeed bishops in the city of Rome before Clement, but while Peter was still living, namely so that they bore the care of the episcopate while he himself fulfilled the office of apostleship; just as he is found to have done at Caesarea also, where, though he himself was present, he nevertheless had Zacchaeus, ordained by himself, as bishop. In this way both will be seen to be true: that those men are counted as bishops before Clement, and that Clement nevertheless received the seat of teaching after Peter's death. But now let us see how Clement himself, writing to James the brother of the Lord, begins his narrative.

Notes and citation

Summary: Rufinus dedicates his Latin translation of the Recognitions to Gaudentius, explains his method and omissions, and reconciles Clement's succession with the Roman bishops Linus and Cletus.

  • Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius of Brescia. The letter of Clement to James that he mentions is the Epistle of Clement to James prefixed to the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies; Rufinus's explanation of Linus and Cletus as bishops during Peter's lifetime is his own harmonization. Where the scan reads 'dicata Petro', the sense requires 'dicat a Petro' ('says … by Peter'), corrected below.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips and leaked footnote marker; OCR: Ae ligature misread; OCR: ae read as a; OCR: ae read as a:; OCR: digit for letter; OCR: word division; OCR: words joined; leaked footnote marker; stray mark): senectajam → senecta jam; bareditario → haereditario; pradamque → praedamque; Gracorum → Graecorum; Judaa balsami → Judaea balsami; eloquentia vultus → eloquentiae vultus; Gracia spolia defetentem → Graeciae spolia deferentem; confertur..IEquum → confertur. Aequum; hac etiam (l) Graec legeris → haec etiam Graece legeris; Recogm'tionum → Recognitionum; Denique‘ → Denique; etquadam → et quaedam; genitoque('5) → genitoque; qua,ut nihil → quae, ut nihil; Hac ergo ego, tanquam qua supra → Haec ergo ego, tanquam quae supra; lu cateris → In caeteris; elocutionibusquo → elocutionibusque; doctrina: suae → doctrinae suae; dicata Petro → dicat a Petro; episc0patus → episcopatus; prmsens → praesens.

Extrabiblical texts: Ps.-Clem. Hom. (Homilies; allusion)

Topics: Church office

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 0.1 (PG 1:1205b–1207b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-0-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-0-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

Chapter 1

1.1PG 1:1207a–1207b

Ego Clemens in urbe Roma natus. ex prima aetate pudicitiae studium gessi, dum me animi intentio velut vinculis quibusdam sollicitudinis et moeroris a puero innexum teneret. inerat enim mihi cogitatio (incertum sane unde initium sumpserit), crebro ad memoriam meam conditionem mortalitatis adducens, simulque discutiens: utrumne sit mihi aliqua vita post mortem, an nihil omnino postea sim futurus, si non fuerim antequam nascerer, vel si nulla prorsus vitae hujus erit post obitum recordatio, et ita immensitas temporis cuncta oblivioni ac silentio dabit, ut non solum non simus, sed neque quod fuerimus, habeatur in memoria. Sed et illud versabatur in pectore, quando factus sit mundus, vel antequam fieret, quid erat, aut vero semper fuerit. Nam certum videbatur, quod si esset factus, esset et profecto solvendus, et si solvatur, quid iterum erit? Nisi forte oblivio cuncta et silentium teget, aut forte aliquid erit, quod nunc sentire mortalium non potest mens.

I, Clement, born in the city of Rome, pursued chastity from my earliest age, while from boyhood an intentness of mind held me bound as if by chains of anxiety and grief. For there was in me a train of thought (whence it took its beginning I do not know) that kept bringing to my mind the condition of mortality, and at the same time debated: whether there is any life for me after death, or whether I shall be nothing at all afterwards; whether I did not exist before I was born; or whether there will be no remembrance at all of this life after death, and so the immensity of time will consign all things to oblivion and silence, so that not only shall we not exist, but it will not even be remembered that we existed. And this too turned over in my breast: when the world was made, or what there was before it was made, or whether it has always existed. For it seemed certain that if it had been made, it would surely also be dissolved; and if it is dissolved, what will there be afterwards? Unless perhaps oblivion and silence will cover all things, or perhaps there will be something which the mind of mortals cannot now perceive.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement describes how from boyhood he was tormented by questions about death, the afterlife, and the origin and end of the world.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; leaked footnote marker; stray mark): gessi (θ), dum → gessi, dum; mceroris → moeroris; soivatur → solvatur; pote'st → potest.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.1 (PG 1:1207a–1207b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.2PG 1:1207b–1208a

Haec et his similia, nescio unde, indesinenter animo revolvens, nimietate moeroris incredibiliter tabescebam, et quod est gravius, si quando respuere a me hujuscemodi curas velut minus utiles cogitabam, validiores in me fluctus sollicitudinum consurgebant. Inerat enim mihi comes optima, quae me quiescere non sineret. immortalitatis cupido. Ut enim post rerum exitus docuit, et gratia Dei omnipotentis ostendit, haec me animi intentio ad inquisitionem veritatis, et agnitionem verae lucis adduxit. Ex quo factum est, ut lugerem postmodum eos, quos prius ignorans beatos credebam. _

Turning these and similar things over in my mind unceasingly, I know not whence, I wasted away incredibly from excess of grief; and, what is worse, whenever I thought of rejecting such cares as useless, stronger waves of anxiety rose up within me. For I had within me an excellent companion who would not let me rest: the desire of immortality. For as the outcome of things afterwards taught, and the grace of almighty God showed, this intentness of mind led me to the search for truth and the knowledge of the true light. From this it came about that I afterwards mourned for those whom earlier, in my ignorance, I had believed blessed.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement's restless desire for immortality, he says, was what later led him to the truth.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: ae read as a:; OCR: broken word): mmroris → moeroris; respue. re → respuere; vera: lucis → verae lucis.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.2 (PG 1:1207b–1208a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.3PG 1:1208a–1208b

igitur cum a prima aetate in hujuscemodi animorum intentione versarer, cupiens aliquid discere, philosophorum frequentabam scholas, ubi nihil aliud, quam dogmatum assertiones et impugnationes videbam agi sine fine, certamina, artes syllogismorum conclusionumque agitari versutias. Et si quando quidem obtinebat hic sermo, quod immortalis esset anima, gratulabar; si quando vero arguebatur quasi mortalis, cum tristitia discedebant. Neutrum tamen in corde meo firmitudinem veritatis tenebat,sed hoc tantum intelligebam, quod sententiae ac definitiones rerum, non pro natura sui ac veritate causarum, sed pro ingeniis defendentium, falsae imaginarentur, aut verae, eoque magis in profundo pectoris cruciabar, quod neque aliquid ex his, quae dicebantur, tanquam firmum tenere poteram, neque abjicere desiderium requirendi; sed quanto magis negligere conabar ac spernere, tanto ardentius, ut supra dixi, velut cum quadam voluptate latenter irrepens hujuscemodi cogitatio,mentem atque animum possidebat.

So, while from my earliest age I was occupied with such intentness of mind, wishing to learn something, I frequented the schools of the philosophers, where I saw nothing else going on but the assertion and refutation of doctrines without end, contests, and the arts and subtleties of syllogisms and conclusions being plied. And whenever the argument prevailed that the soul was immortal, I rejoiced; whenever it was argued to be mortal, I went away sad. Yet neither view held the firmness of truth in my heart; I understood only this, that opinions and definitions of things were thought true or false, not according to their own nature and the truth of the matters, but according to the talents of those who defended them. And I was tormented all the more deeply in my breast because I could neither hold anything of what was said as firm nor cast away the desire of inquiring; but the more I tried to neglect and spurn it, the more ardently, as I said above, this kind of thought, creeping in secretly as if with a certain pleasure, possessed my mind and soul.

Notes and citation

Summary: The endless disputes of the philosophical schools left Clement without any certainty about the soul.

  • The scan reads 'discedebant' ('they went away'); the sense of the sentence requires Clement himself, and it is translated 'I went away'.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): doginatum → dogmatum; falsa: imaginarentur, aut verte → falsae imaginarentur, aut verae; tanta ardentius → tanto ardentius; volaptate → voluptate.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.3 (PG 1:1208a–1208b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.4PG 1:1208b–1209a

Coangustatus igitur inventione rerum, aiebam apud memetipsum: Quid inaniter laboramus, cum manifestus sit terminus rerum? Si enim post mortem non ero, nunc superfluo crucior; si vero erit mihi vita post obitum, servemus illi vitae sui temporis motus, ne forte his, quae nunc patior. aliqua me ibi tristiora excipiant, nisi pie ac sobrie vixero, et secundum nonnullorum sententias philosophorum, Pyriphlegethonti fluvio vel Tartaro, ut Sisyphus et Tityus, et ut Ixion ac Tantalus aeternis in inferno suppliciis tradar. Et rursus mihi ipsi respondebam: Sed haec fabulae sunt, aut si ita est, in rebus dubiis praestat pie vivere. Sed iterum reputabam mecum, quomodo possem sub incerto justitiae praemio, a peccati me libidine continere? Maxime cum etiam, quae sit ipsa justitia, quae Deo placeat, apud me habeatur incertum, et neque si immortalis sit anima, ac sit, quae aliquid sperare possit, agnoscam, neque quid certi futurum sit noverim. Nec tamen quiescere ab hujuscemodi cogitationibus possum.

Being thus hemmed in in the discovery of things, I said to myself: Why do we labor in vain, since the end of things is plain? For if after death I shall not exist, I am tormented needlessly now; but if there will be life for me after death, let us keep for that life the impulses that belong to its time, lest perhaps sadder things than those I now suffer await me there, unless I have lived piously and soberly, and, according to the opinions of some philosophers, I be handed over to the river Pyriphlegethon or to Tartarus, like Sisyphus and Tityus, and like Ixion and Tantalus, to eternal punishments in the underworld. And again I answered myself: But these things are fables; or, if it is so, in doubtful matters it is better to live piously. But again I reckoned with myself: How could I restrain myself from the lust of sin while the reward of righteousness is uncertain? Especially since even what righteousness itself is, the righteousness that pleases God, is uncertain to me; and I neither know whether the soul is immortal and is such as can hope for anything, nor do I know what will certainly come. And yet I cannot rest from such thoughts.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement weighs whether to live piously in case there are punishments after death, but cannot be certain of anything.

  • Pyriphlegethon, Tartarus, Sisyphus, Tityus, Ixion, and Tantalus are the river and the punished figures of the Greek underworld (Homer, Odyssey 11; Plato, Phaedo 113–114).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): Coangustatns → Coangustatus; illi vitm sui → illi vitae sui; philosephorum → philosophorum; ut lxion → ut Ixion; fabula: sunt,aut → fabulae sunt, aut; reputaham → reputabam; justitiaa → justitiae; Deo.placeat → Deo placeat.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.4 (PG 1:1208b–1209a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.5PG 1:1209a–1209c

Quid igitur faciam? Egyptum petam, atque ibi hierophantis vel prophetis qui adytis praesunt, amicus efficiar, et pecunia ab eis invitatum magum precabor, ut educat mihi animam de infernis, per eam quam necromantiam vocant, tanquam de aliquo negotio consulere cupienti. Mihi vero haec erit consultatio: si immortalis est anima. Probatio autem animae, quod immortalis sit, non ex eo quod loquitur, erit mihi certa, vel ex eo quod audio, sed ex eo quod video; ut oculis meis cernens eam, certissimam de reliquo immortalitatis ejus sententiam teneam. Neque enim ultra poterit veritatem visus, verborum fallacia et auditio incerta turbare. Verumtamen hanc ipsam deliberationem meam retuli ad quemdam familiarem meum philosophum, qui mihi consilium dedit, ne hoc facere auderem. Sive enim, inquit, evocanti mago non obediat anima, tu post haec tanquam nihil esse putans post mortem. desperabilius vives, quippe qui et illicita tentaveris. Si vero et aliquid ibi videre tibi visus fueris, quae tibi religio, aut quae pietas ex illicitis tradetur et impiis? Exosum namque Divinitati hujuscemodi negotium ferunt, et adversari Deum his qui animas post absolutionem corporum vexant. Ego vero, his auditis, pigrior quidem sum redditus ad hoc quod parabam, nec tamen usquequaque aut desiderium ponere poteram, aut molestiam cogitationis abjicere.

What then shall I do? I will go to Egypt, and there become friendly with the hierophants or prophets who preside over the shrines; and I will entreat a magician, hired from among them with money, to bring up a soul for me from the underworld by what they call necromancy, as though I wished to consult it about some business. But my consultation will be this: whether the soul is immortal. And the proof that the soul is immortal will be certain to me not from its speaking, or from what I hear, but from what I see; so that, beholding it with my own eyes, I may hold for the future the most certain conviction of its immortality. For then neither the deceitfulness of words nor uncertain hearing will be able to disturb the truth of sight. However, I referred this very plan of mine to a certain philosopher who was my friend, and he advised me not to dare to do it. “For if,” he said, “the soul does not obey the magician who summons it, you will afterwards live more hopelessly, thinking there is nothing after death, since you will also have attempted unlawful things. But if you seem to yourself to see something there, what religion or what piety will be handed on to you from unlawful and impious things? For they say that such business is hateful to the Deity, and that God sets himself against those who trouble souls after their release from bodies.” When I heard this I became slower about what I was preparing; yet I could by no means either lay aside my desire or cast off the trouble of my thought.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement plans to test the soul's immortality by necromancy in Egypt, but a philosopher friend dissuades him.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: broken word): przesunt → praesunt; elliciar → efficiar; evero hazc → vero haec; peterit → poterit; post hazc tanquam → post haec tanquam; pictas → pietas; Divinilati → Divinitati; abj icere → abjicere.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.5 (PG 1:1209a–1209c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.6PG 1:1209c–1210b

Et ne longa utar narratione, cum his ego cogitationis meae aestibus agitarer, fama quaedam sensim in imperio Tiberii Caesaris, initio ex Orientis partibus sumpto, pervenit ad nos, et per singula convalescens, velut a Deo bonus quidam nuntius missus, universum replebat orbem, nec patiebatur divinam voluntatem silentio tegi. Diffundebatur ergo per singula loca, annuntians, quod esset quidam in Judaea, qui sumpto a tempore veris exordio, regnum Dei evangelizaret Iudaeis, idque percepturos diceret eos, qui mandatorum suorum et doctrinae instituta servassent. Ut autem sermo ejus fide dignus, ac divinitatis plenus esse crederetur, virtutes multas, et signa ac prodigia mira efficere jussione sola dicebatur, ita ut, tanquam a Deo potestatem habens, surdos faceret audire et caecos videre, claudos erigeret, atque omnem infirmitatem cunctosque daemones ex hominibus effugaret, sed et oblatos sibi mortuos suscitaret, leprosos quoque eminus videns curaret, et nihil omnino esset, quod ei impossibile videretur. Haec et horum similia processu temporis, crebris jam non rumoribus, sed manifestis quodammodo adventantium ex illis partibus nuntiis firmabantur, et ipsa jam per dies singulos rei veritas patescebat.

To be brief: while I was being tossed by these surges of thought, a certain report, which began in the regions of the East in the reign of Tiberius Caesar, gradually reached us, and, gaining strength from place to place like a good messenger sent from God, it was filling the whole world and would not allow the divine will to be hidden in silence. It spread, then, through every place, announcing that there was someone in Judaea who, beginning in the springtime, was preaching the kingdom of God to the Jews, and said that those would receive it who kept the ordinances of his commandments and teaching. And so that his word might be believed worthy of credit and full of divinity, he was said to perform many mighty works, and wonderful signs and portents, by his command alone, so that, as one having power from God, he made the deaf hear and the blind see, raised up the lame, drove away every infirmity and all demons from people, even raised the dead who were brought to him, and healed lepers, looking on them from a distance; and there was nothing at all that seemed impossible to him. These and similar things were confirmed in the course of time, no longer by frequent rumors but by the plain reports, so to speak, of people coming from those parts, and the truth of the matter became clearer day by day.

Matt 11:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 4:23 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Reports reach Rome of a man in Judaea preaching the kingdom of God and working miracles.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: ae read as a:; OCR: broken word): eum his ego cogitationis mea: aestibus → cum his ego cogitationis meae aestibus; Ctesaris → Caesaris; convalesccns → convalescens; Diffundcbatur → Diffundebatur; Judaaa → Judaea; doctrina: instituta → doctrinae instituta; eflicere → efficere; vi-_dere → videre; Hac et horum → Haec et horum; scd manifestis → sed manifestis; ct ipsa → et ipsa.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.6 (PG 1:1209c–1210b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.7PG 1:1210b–1211a

Denique in urbe per loca conventus fieri et de hoc sermone tractari, atque in admiratione res haberi coepit, quisnam is esset, qui apparuerit, vel quid nuntii a Deo hominibus detulisset; donec sub eodem anno vir quidam astans in urbis loco celeberrimo, proclamaret ad populum, dicens: Audite me, o cives Romani; Filius Dei adest in partibus Iudaeae, promittens omnibus volentibus audire se, vitam aeternam, si quis tamen secundum voluntatem ejus, a quo missus est Dei Patris, actus suos direxerit. Propter quod convertimini a malis ad bona, a temporalibus ad aeterna. Agnoscite unum esse Deum coeli terraeque rectorem, in cujus justis aspectibus vos injusti mundum ejus habitatis. Sed si convertimini et secundum voluntatem ejus agitis, ad futurum saeculum venientes et aeterni effecti, ineffabilibus ejus bonis ac praemiis perfruamini. Erat autem vir iste, qui haec loquebatur ad populum, ex Orientis partibus, natione Hebraeus, nomine Barnabas, qui se etiam unum ex ejus discipulis esse dicebat, missumque ob hoc, ut haec volentibus indicaret. Quibus ego auditis. cum reliqua multitudine sequi eum coepi et audire, quae diceret. Intelligebam sane quod nihil dialecticae artis esset in homine, sed simpliciter et absque ullo dicendi fuco, quae audisset a Filio Dei vel vidisset, exponeret. Assertiones enim suas non argumentorum virtute muniebat, sed verborum et mirabilium, quae annuntiabat, testes multos, ex ipso etiam circumstante populo, producebat.

At last gatherings began to be held in various places in the city, this report to be discussed, and the question to be pondered with wonder: who this might be who had appeared, and what message from God he had brought to men. Then in the same year a certain man, standing in the most crowded place of the city, proclaimed to the people: “Hear me, citizens of Rome. The Son of God is now in the regions of Judaea, promising eternal life to all who are willing to hear him, provided they direct their actions according to the will of God the Father, by whom he was sent. Therefore turn from evil things to good, from temporal things to eternal. Acknowledge that there is one God, ruler of heaven and earth, in whose righteous sight you, being unrighteous, inhabit his world. But if you turn and act according to his will, you will come to the world to come, be made eternal, and enjoy his unspeakable good things and rewards.” Now this man who was saying these things to the people was from the regions of the East, by nation a Hebrew, by name Barnabas, who said that he was himself one of his disciples and had been sent for this purpose, to declare these things to those who were willing. When I heard this, I began with the rest of the crowd to follow him and hear what he said. I perceived, indeed, that there was nothing of the dialectical art in the man, but that he set forth simply, without any coloring of speech, what he had heard or seen from the Son of God. For he did not fortify his assertions by force of argument, but produced from the very people standing around many witnesses of the words and wonders he announced.

Notes and citation

Summary: Barnabas preaches in Rome that the Son of God has appeared in Judaea, and Clement begins to follow him.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips and leaked footnote marker; OCR: digit for letter; leaked footnote marker; leaked running head (NOTAE); stray mark): volun.tatem → voluntatem; cceli → coeli; saaculum → saeculum; etl'ecti → effecti; praamiis → praemiis; hmc loquebatur → haec loquebatur; llehrwus (i0), noznine → Hebraeus, nomine; discipulis (l l) → discipulis; volentibus ΝΟΤίΕ. indicaret → volentibus indicaret; dialecticas → dialecticae; mtmicbat → muniebat; p0pulo → populo.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.7 (PG 1:1210b–1211a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.8PG 1:1211a

Verum quoniam ad ea, quae sincere dicebantur, libenter annuere populus et amplecti sermonem simplicem coepit, hi qui sibi eruditi videbantur vel philosophi, ridere hominem ac spernere cepere, et syllogismorum in eum tendiculas velut validissima arma proferre.At ille interritus et velut deliramenta argutias eorum ducens, ne responsione quidem dignos judicabat, sed ea quae proposuerat, exsequebatur intrepidus. Denique cum loquenti ei quidam proposuisset, cur ita factus esset culex, ut cum sit animal exiguum, et sex habeat pedes, insuper additae sint ei et alae, elephantus vero cum sit immane animal neque alas habeat, quatuor tantum pedes habeat: ad haec ille ne respiciens quidem, sermonem suum, quem importuna propositio interruperat, continuata intentione peragebat, hac sola admonitione per singulas quasque interruptiones addita: Nos ejus qui misit nos verba factaque mirabilia annuntiare vobis in mandatis habemus, fidemque eorum quae dicimus, non ex argumentis arte quaesitis, sed ex vobis ipsis productis testibus confirmare. Agnosco enim plurimos astare in medio vestrum ex his, quos una nobiscum memini audisse quae audivimus, et vidisse quae vidimus. Sit autem in vestra potestate, vel recipere quae annuntiamus, vel spernere. Nos enim quod expedire vobis novimus, tacere non possumus, quia nobis, si taceamus, damnum est, vobis vero, quae dicimus, si non recipiatis, pernicies. Sed et stultis propositionibus vestris respondere perfacile possim, si veritatis discendae causa quaereretis, de culicis dico atque elephantis differentia; sed nunc de creaturis dicere vobis aliquid absurdum est, cum a vobis ipse Omnium Creator et Conditor ignoretur.

But since the people began to assent gladly to what was said sincerely and to embrace the simple speech, those who seemed to themselves learned, or philosophers, began to laugh at the man and despise him, and to bring out against him the snares of syllogisms as though they were the strongest weapons. But he, undaunted, regarding their subtleties as ravings, did not even judge them worthy of an answer, but went on fearlessly with what he had set out to say. At length, when someone put to him, as he was speaking, the question why the gnat was so made that, though it is a tiny animal and has six feet, wings were added to it besides, whereas the elephant, though it is a huge animal and has no wings, has only four feet, he, without even looking at the question, went on with unbroken attention with the discourse that the untimely question had interrupted, adding at each interruption only this admonition: “We have it in charge to announce to you the words and wonderful deeds of him who sent us, and to confirm the truth of what we say, not by arguments sought out by art, but by witnesses produced from among yourselves. For I recognize many standing in your midst who, I remember, heard with us what we heard and saw what we saw. But let it be in your power either to receive or to reject what we announce. For we cannot keep silent about what we know to be for your good, because for us, if we keep silent, there is loss; but for you, if you do not receive what we say, destruction. I could indeed very easily answer your foolish questions—I mean about the difference between the gnat and the elephant—if you asked them for the sake of learning the truth; but now it is absurd to say anything to you about creatures, when the very Creator and Founder of all is unknown to you.”

1 John 1:1 (echo, low confidence) · Acts 4:20 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Mocked by philosophers with a question about gnats and elephants, Barnabas refuses to argue and appeals to eyewitnesses.

  • The words 'heard … saw' echo 1 John 1:1–3; 'we cannot keep silent' echoes Acts 4:20.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: ae read as a:; leaked footnote marker): dieebantur → dicebantur; sermunem simplicem carpit → sermonem simplicem coepit; pr0posucrat → proposuerat; culex (l2) → culex; addita: sint ei et alte → additae sint ei et alae; verha → verba; qumsitis → quaesitis; annuutiamus → annuntiamus; qua: dicimus → quae dicimus; prepositiouibus → propositionibus; quzereretis → quaereretis.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.8 (PG 1:1211a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.9PG 1:1211a–1212a

Haec autem cum dixisset, velut ex uno consensu, indisciplinato ore omnes simul risum dedere, incutere ei verecundiam ac silentium imponere cupientes, barbarumque et minus sanae mentis eum acclamantes. Ego vero cum haec ita fieri cernerem, zelo quodam nescio unde repletus, ac religioso furore succensus, silere non potui, sed cum omni libertate proclamans: Rectissime Deus, inquam, omnipotens abscondit a vobis voluntatem suam, quos agnitione sui praevidit indignos, sicut ex his quae nunc agitis, sanum sapientibus palam est. Nam cum videatis praedicatores voluntatis Dei advenisse, quia nullam sermo eorum grammaticae artis scientiam profitetur, sed simplicibus et impolitis sermonibus perferunt ad vos divina mandata, ita ut omnes qui audiunt, sequi possint et intelligere quae dicuntur; ridetis salutis vestrae ministros et nuntios, ignorantes quia vestra, qui vobis periti et eloquentes videmini, condemnatio est, quod apud agrestes et barbaros habetur veritatis agnitio. Quae cum ad vos advenerit, nec quasi hospita suscipitur, quae nisi intemperantia vestra et libido obsisteret, civis esse et vernacula debuisset; ut ex his arguamini, quod non veritatis amici et philosophi, sed jactantiae sectatores, et vaniloqui estis, qui veritatem non in simplicibus verbis, sed in versutis et callidis creditis habitare, et innumerabilia verborum profertis, unius verbi nequaquam pretio pensitanda. Quid ergo putatis futurum de vobis, vos o omnis turba Graecorum, si erit judicium Dei, sicut iste dicit? Sed nunc, omittentes ridere in perniciem vestri virum hunc, respondeat mihi qui vult ex vobis, quoniam quidem solo latratu vestro obturbatis etiam eorum aures, qui salvi esse volunt, et mentes quae ad fidem paratae sunt, ad infidelitatis lapsum vestris obturbationibus declinatis: quae vobis erit unquam venia, qui Divinitatis nuntium, promittentem vobis agnitionem Dei, ridetis et injuriis adicitis? quem utique etiamsi nihil veritatis afferret, pro ipso tamen benignitatis erga vos proposito, gratum acceptumque habere deberetis.

When he had said this, all, as if with one accord, burst out laughing together with undisciplined mouths, wishing to put him to shame and impose silence on him, and crying out that he was a barbarian and not of sound mind. But when I saw these things being done, filled with a certain zeal (I know not whence) and kindled with religious fervor, I could not keep silent, but cried out with all boldness: “Most rightly,” I said, “has almighty God hidden his will from you, whom he foresaw to be unworthy of the knowledge of himself, as is plain to the right-minded from what you are now doing. For when you see that preachers of the will of God have come, you laugh at the ministers and messengers of your salvation because their speech professes no knowledge of the grammatical art, and they bring the divine commandments to you in simple and unpolished words, so that all who hear can follow and understand what is said. You do not know that it is your condemnation—you who seem to yourselves skilled and eloquent—that the knowledge of the truth is found among rustics and barbarians. When it comes to you, it is not received even as a guest, though, had your intemperance and lust not stood in the way, it ought to have been a citizen and a native. So you are convicted of being not friends of truth and philosophers, but followers of boastfulness and vain talkers, who believe that truth dwells not in simple words but in crafty and cunning ones, and who pour out countless words not worth the price of a single word. What then do you think will become of you, all you crowd of Greeks, if there is to be a judgment of God, as this man says? But now leave off laughing at this man to your own ruin, and let any of you who wishes answer me; for by your mere barking you disturb even the ears of those who wish to be saved, and by your disturbances you turn aside to the fall of unbelief minds that are prepared for faith. What pardon will there ever be for you, who laugh at and insult the messenger of the Deity who promises you the knowledge of God? Even if he brought nothing of truth, yet for his very purpose of kindness toward you, you ought to hold him welcome and acceptable.”

1 Cor 1:27 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement rebukes the crowd for mocking Barnabas's plain message and warns them of God's judgment.

  • The scan's 'Caecorum' is read as 'Graecorum' ('Greeks'), as the sense requires.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips and stray marks; OCR: ae read as a:; OCR: broken word): sinml → simul; telo quodam → zelo quodam; inquam 9 omnipotens abscondita vobis voluntatem suam,quo| agnitione → inquam, omnipotens abscondit a vobis voluntatem suam, quos agnitione; ex bis quae → ex his quae; prmdicatores → praedicatores; grammatica: artis → grammaticae artis; agnitio.Quze → agnitio. Quae; jactantiaa → jactantiae; sime plicibus → simplicibus; turba Caecorum → turba Graecorum; parata: sunt. → paratae sunt,; obturbao tionibus → obturbationibus; aflerret → afferret; be. nignitatis → benignitatis.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.9 (PG 1:1211a–1212a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.10PG 1:1212a

Haec et his similia cum prosequerer, plurimus astantis populi fremitus concitabatur,dum alii velut erga hospitem miseratione moverentur, meumque sermonem ut consequenter habitum probarent, alii petulantes et stolidi, in me quoque pariter, ut in Barnabam, effrenati animi iracundiam concitarent. Sed cum ad vesperam jam declinaret dies, apprehensa Barnabae dextera, obluctantem licet eum, ad meam tamen adduxi domum, atque ibi manere feci, ne quis forte ex indocili vulgo injiceret ei manus. Aliquantulis igitur diebus una positi, disserente eo [paucis], sermonem veritatis libenter audiebam; urgebat tamen profectionem, dicens se diem festum religionis suae, qui immineret, omnimodis apud Iudaeam celebraturum, ibique de reliquo cum suis civibus ac fratribus permansurum. evidenter indicans injuriae se horrore perculsum.

While I was pursuing these and similar things, a great uproar arose among the people standing by, some being moved with pity, as toward a stranger, and approving my speech as consistent with that, while others, petulant and stupid, roused the anger of their unbridled minds against me too, as against Barnabas. But as the day was now declining toward evening, I took Barnabas by the right hand and, though he resisted, brought him to my house and made him stay there, lest anyone of the unruly mob should lay hands on him. So, being together for some days, I gladly heard him discourse the word of truth; yet he pressed for his departure, saying that he must by all means celebrate in Judaea a festival of his religion that was approaching, and remain there thereafter with his fellow citizens and brethren, plainly showing that he was struck with horror at the injury done him.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement takes Barnabas into his house for safety and hears him for some days before Barnabas leaves for a festival in Judaea.

  • The edition prints 'paucis' ('briefly', 'in a few words') in square brackets after 'disserente eo'; it is left untranslated.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): habiturn → habitum; ell‘renati → effrenati; Barnabm → Barnabae; ruanus → manus; religionis suas → religionis suae.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.10 (PG 1:1212a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.11PG 1:1212a–1213b

Denique cum ego dicerem: Tu mihi tantum ejus viri, quem apparuisse dicis, expone doctrinam, et ego meis sermonibus tua dicta componens, omnipotentis Dei regnum iustitiamque praedicabo, et post haec si volueris, etiam navigabo tecum, valde enim videre cupio Iudaeam, vobiscum fortassis perpetuo permansurus. Ad haec ille: Tu, inquit, si quidem videre vis patriam nostram, et discere quae desideras, jam nunc mecum pariter naviga; si vero te aliquid tenet, signa tibi habitationis nostrae derelinquam, ut cum venire volueris, invenire nos facile possis; ego enim crastino iter aggrediar. Quem ubi immobilem vidi, descendi cum ipso usque ad portum, ac diligenter ab eo signa, quae dixerat, habitationis accepi, dicens ei: quia nisi aliquantulum pecuniae necessario mihi esset a debitoribus reposcendum, nihil omnino differrem, velociter tamen insequar iter tuum. Cum haec dixissem, commendato eo attentius his, qui navi praeerant, regressus sum tristis. Habebat enim me recordatio consuetudinis boni hospitis et optimi amici.

Then I said: “Only set out for me the teaching of that man who you say has appeared, and I, putting your sayings into my own words, will preach the kingdom and righteousness of almighty God; and after that, if you wish, I will even sail with you, for I very much desire to see Judaea, and perhaps to remain with you permanently.” To this he answered: “If indeed you wish to see our country and learn what you desire, sail with me right now; but if something keeps you, I will leave you directions to our dwelling, so that when you wish to come you may easily find us; for tomorrow I set out on my journey.” When I saw that he was immovable, I went down with him to the harbor, carefully received from him the directions to the dwelling he had spoken of, and told him that, were it not that I had to recover some money from debtors, I would not delay at all, but would quickly follow him. Having said this, and having commended him very earnestly to those in charge of the ship, I returned sad; for the memory of my association with a good guest and the best of friends held me.

Notes and citation

Summary: Barnabas sails for Judaea, leaving Clement directions to find him.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: ae read as a:; stray mark): qua: desideras → quae desideras; nostra: derelinquam → nostrae derelinquam; possis;η ego → possis; ego; pecunia: necessario → pecuniae necessario; dillerrem → differrem; Cum inec → Cum haec.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.11 (PG 1:1212a–1213b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.12PG 1:1213b

Diebus autem paucis remoratus, et his quae debebantur ex parte aliqua profligatis (plurima enim festinandi studio neglexi, ne a proposito impedirer), enavigavi continuo in Judaeam, et post dies quindecim Caesaream Stratonis, quae est Palaestina urbs maxima, appulsus sum. Cumque navi egressus, hospitium quaererem, rumore populi comperi quod Petrus quidam, illius qui in Judaea apparuit, et signa multa ac prodigia divinitus gesta inter homines ostendit, discipulus probatissimus, crastino cum Simone quodam Samaritana ex castello Getbonum, habiturus esset verborum quaestionumque certamen. Quibus ego auditis, rogabam demonstrari mihi ejus hospitium; quod cum reperissem, atque ante fores constitissem, ingerebam janitori, quisnam essem atque unde adventarem; et ecce Barnabas procedens, statim ut me vidit, in complexus meos cucurrit, gaudio lacrymans, atque apprehensum me manu introducebat ad Petrum. Quem cum mihi eminus ostendisset: Hic est, inquit, Petrus, quem tibi maximum esse in Dei sapientia dicebam, cuique de te rursus sine cessatione locutus sum. ingredere igitur tanquam bene ei cognitus. Omnia enim quae in te sunt bona, verissime comperit, et religiosum propositum tuum diligenter agnovit, ex quo et summo desiderio agitur videndi te. Unde magnum ei hodie munus meis te manibus offero; simulque oblato me. ait: Hic est Clemens, Petre.

After remaining a few days and settling part of what was owed to me (for in my eagerness to hasten I neglected much, so as not to be hindered from my purpose), I sailed straight for Judaea, and after fifteen days landed at Caesarea Stratonis, the largest city of Palestine. When I had left the ship and was looking for lodging, I learned from common talk that a certain Peter, a most approved disciple of him who appeared in Judaea and showed many signs and wonders divinely performed among men, was to hold a debate of words and questions the next day with a certain Simon, a Samaritan from the village of Gitthae. When I heard this, I asked to be shown his lodging; and when I had found it and stood before the door, I told the doorkeeper who I was and whence I came. And behold, Barnabas came out, and as soon as he saw me he ran into my embrace, weeping for joy, and taking me by the hand led me in to Peter. Pointing him out to me from a distance, he said: “This is Peter, whom I told you was greatest in the wisdom of God, and to whom I in turn have spoken of you without ceasing. Go in, then, as one well known to him. For he has learned most truly all the good that is in you, and has carefully understood your religious purpose; hence he is moved with the greatest desire to see you. So today I present you to him from my hands as a great gift.” And at the same time, presenting me, he said: “This is Clement, Peter.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement lands at Caesarea, learns that Peter is to debate Simon the Samaritan, and is brought by Barnabas to Peter.

  • The village name is garbled in the scan ('Getbonum'); it is Simon's home village, called Gitthae (Gitta) in other sources (Justin, 1 Apol. 26).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: broken word; leaked footnote marker): cnavigavi → enavigavi; Judzeam → Judaeam; pepuli → populi; Judaia → Judaea; Getbonum (l3) → Getbonum; llic est → Hic est; veris- ’ sime → verissime; ollero → offero.

Extrabiblical texts: Justin, 1 Apol. 26 (First Apology; echo)

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.12 (PG 1:1213b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.13PG 1:1214a–1214b

At benignissimus Petrus, audito nomine, accurrens protinus inhaesit osculis meis, et post haec cum sedere me fecisset, ait: Bene fecisti praedicatorem veritatis hospitio recipere Barnabam, nihil veritus populi insanientis furorem; beatus eris. Sicut enim tu legatum veritatis omni honore dignum duxisti, ita te quoque peregrinantem et hospitem veritas ipsa suscipiet, et civem propriae urbis ascribet, et tunc tibi erit gaudium magnum, quod exiguam nunc impartiens gratiam, aeternorum bonorum haeres scriberis. Nunc ergo ne labores exponere mihi animum tuum; cuncta enim de te et de moribus tuis Barnabas fideli sermone edocuit, quotidie pene et indesinenter bonorum tuorum memoriam repetens. Et ut tibi breviter, tanquam unanimi jam amico. quod in νϐ εει definiam. si nihil est quod te impediat, iter age nobiscum, et audi sermonem veritatis, quem habituri sumus per loca singula, usquequo ad ipsam nobis perveniendum sit urbem Romam; et nunc tu si quid desideras. dicito.

But the most kind Peter, hearing my name, ran to me at once and kissed me, and after making me sit down, he said: “You did well to receive Barnabas, a preacher of the truth, as your guest, in no way fearing the fury of the frenzied people; you will be blessed. For as you have counted the ambassador of the truth worthy of every honor, so the truth itself will receive you as a stranger and guest and enroll you as a citizen of its own city; and then you will have great joy, because by bestowing a small kindness now you are being written down as heir of eternal goods. Now, then, do not trouble to explain your mind to me; for Barnabas has told me everything about you and your character in a faithful account, recalling the memory of your good qualities almost daily and without ceasing. And, to tell you briefly, as to a friend already of one mind with us, what I would advise: if nothing hinders you, journey with us and hear the word of truth which we shall speak in each place until we reach the very city of Rome; and now, if you wish anything, say it.”

Matt 10:41 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter welcomes Clement warmly and invites him to travel with him and hear the word of truth.

  • The words 'quod in νϐ εει definiam' are garbled in the scan (Latin read as Greek letters); translated by sense, 'what I would advise'.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Latin read as Greek letters; OCR: digit for letter; leaked chapter numeral): Χιιί. At → At; p0puli → populi; εί nihil εει ψιοά te → si nihil est quod te.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.13 (PG 1:1214a–1214b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.14PG 1:1214b

Cumque ei exposuissem, quid ab initio propositi gesserim, et quomodo per inanes ell‘usus sim quaestiones [et illa omnia, quae tibi, domine mi Jacobe, in principiis indicavi, uti ne eadem repetam], libenter promisi, cum ipso me iter acturum; hoc est enim, aio, quod cupidissime exspectabam. Verumtamen prius mihi cupio rationem veritatis exponi, ut sciam, si mortalis, an immortalis sit anima, et si immortalis, utrum pro his quae hic agit, ducatur ad judicium. Sed et quae sit justitia, quae Deo placeat, scire desidero.Tum praeterea, si factus est mundus, vel quare factus, aut si solvendus est, an in melius renovandus, aut si omnino post haec non erit mundus, et ne per singula progrediar, haec atque horum similia ut se habeant, discere me velle respondi. Ad haec Petrus: Breviter, inquit, tibi, o Clemens, rerum scientiam tradam, et ausculta jam nunc.

When I had explained to him what purpose I had formed from the beginning, and how I had been worn out by empty questions (and all those things which I told you, my lord James, at the beginning, so that I need not repeat them), I gladly promised that I would travel with him; “for this,” I said, “is what I was most eagerly waiting for. But first I want the account of the truth explained to me, so that I may know whether the soul is mortal or immortal, and, if immortal, whether it will be brought to judgment for what it does here. I also want to know what righteousness is, the righteousness that pleases God. Then besides, whether the world was made, and why it was made, or whether it is to be dissolved, or renewed for the better, or whether after this there will be no world at all; and, not to go through every point, I want to learn how these and similar things stand.” To this Peter said: “Briefly, Clement, I will impart to you the knowledge of these things; listen now.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement agrees to travel with Peter and asks to be taught about the soul, righteousness, and the world.

  • The words in parentheses, addressed to James, are printed in square brackets in the edition; they are Clement's aside and are translated.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: words joined; stray mark): abinitio → ab initio; omnia,quee → omnia, quae; repetam “] → repetam]; sitjustitia → sit justitia; post hare → post haec; borum similia → horum similia; Ad hazc → Ad haec; 'o Clemens → o Clemens; DUIIC → nunc.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.14 (PG 1:1214b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.15PG 1:1214b–1215a

Voluntas Dei et consilium latuit homines multis ex causis. Primo quidem pro institutione mala, pro sodalitatibus pessimis, pro consuetudine nequam, pro colloquiis non bonis, pro praesumptionibus minus rectis, pro his, inquam, omnibus, primum error, deinde contemptus, tum infidelitas et malitia, avaritia quoque et vana jactantia, aliaque his similia mala, velut fumus quidam immensus, universam domum hujus mundi replevit, et habitantibus intrinsecus intuendi Conditorem suum, aspectum liberum non dedit, neque quae ei essent placita pervidendi. Quid igitur his qui sunt intrinsecus convenit, nisi ut ex intimis praecordiis clamore prolato, auxilium invocent ejus, quem solum domus fumo repleta non claudit, ut accedens aperiat januam domus, quo possit fumus quidem qui intrinsecus habetur, excludi, lux vero solis quae extrinsecus resplendet, induci.

“The will and counsel of God have been hidden from men for many reasons. First, indeed, because of bad upbringing, very evil companionships, wicked habits, conversations that are not good, and presumptions that are not right. Because of all these, I say, first error, then contempt, then unbelief and malice, avarice too and vain boasting, and other evils like these, have filled the whole house of this world like a vast smoke, and have not allowed those who dwell inside a free view to behold their Founder, nor to perceive what is pleasing to him. What then befits those who are inside, except to raise a cry from their inmost hearts and call for the help of him whom alone the smoke-filled house does not shut in, that he may come and open the door of the house, so that the smoke that is inside may be let out, and the light of the sun that shines outside may be let in?”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that sin fills the world like smoke in a house, hiding God, so that people must call on the one outside to open the door.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and leaked footnote marker; OCR slips; stray mark; stray marks): rectis“, pro → rectis, pro; inlidelitas et malitia (M) → infidelitas et malitia; bis similia → his similia; intuendipConditorem → intuendi Conditorem; qua: ei essent placita pervidendi.Quid → quae ei essent placita pervidendi. Quid; convenit ἵ ξ nisi → convenit, nisi; pnecordiis → praecordiis.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.15 (PG 1:1214b–1215a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.16PG 1:1215a–1215b

Hunc ergo qui ad auxilium domus, caligine ignorantiae et vitiorum fumo repletae, perquiritur, illum esse dicimus, qui appellatur verus propheta, qui solus illuminare animas hominum potest, ita ut oculis suis viam salutis evidenter inspiciant. Aliter enim impossibile est, de rebus divinis aeternisque cognoscere, nisi qui ab isto vero propheta didicerit; quia sicut ipse paulo ante memorabas, fides rerum causarumque sententiae, pro ingeniis magis defendentium ponderantur. Unde et eadem causa nunc justa, nunc putatur injusta, et quod modo verum videbatur, alterius assertione falsum videtur. Ista de causa religionis ac pietatis fides veri prophetae praesentiam postulavit, ut ipse nobis diceret de singulis, prout se ipsa veritas habet, et doceret quomodo oporteat de singulis credi. Et ideo ante omnia fidem prophetae, omni cum examinatione oportet probari; quem cum cognoveris vere esse prophetam, de reliquo cuncta ei credas oportet, nec ultra discutere eum per singula quae docuerit, sed habere firma et sancta quae dicit, quaeque quamvis fide suscipi videantur. antehabita tamen probatione creduntur. Cum enim semel ex initio prophetae veritas examinata constiterit, reliqua demum fide audienda sunt et tenenda, qua eum doctorem veritatis esse jam constat. Et sicut certum est, cuncta secundum veritatis regulam teneri oportere, quae ad divinam scientiam spectant, ita indubitatum est, a nullo alio nisi ab ipso solo sciri posse, quod verum est.

“He, then, whose help is sought for the house filled with the darkness of ignorance and the smoke of vices is, we say, the one who is called the true Prophet, who alone can enlighten the souls of men, so that they see the way of salvation plainly with their own eyes. For otherwise it is impossible to gain knowledge of divine and eternal things, unless one has learned from that true Prophet; because, as you yourself mentioned a little while ago, belief about things and opinions about causes are weighed rather according to the talents of those who defend them. Hence the same cause is thought now just, now unjust, and what seemed true a moment ago seems false on the assertion of another. For this reason faith in religion and piety required the presence of the true Prophet, that he himself might tell us about each thing as the truth itself stands, and teach how one ought to believe about each. And therefore before everything the credibility of the prophet must be tested with all examination; and once you have recognized that he is truly a prophet, you must believe him in everything thereafter, and no longer discuss point by point what he teaches, but hold what he says as firm and sacred; and these things, though they seem to be received by faith, are nevertheless believed on the strength of the proof already made. For once the truth of the prophet has been established by examination at the start, the rest is to be heard and held by the faith by which it is already established that he is a teacher of truth. And as it is certain that all things that pertain to divine knowledge must be held according to the rule of truth, so it is beyond doubt that what is true can be known from no one else but from him alone.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter teaches that divine truth can be known only from the true Prophet, whose credentials must first be tested and who must then be believed in everything.

  • 'The true Prophet' (verus propheta) is the Pseudo-Clementine title for Christ.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: ae read as a:; leaked footnote marker; stray mark): ignorantia; et vitiorum fumo repletze. perquiritur → ignorantiae et vitiorum fumo repletae, perquiritur; propheta (I5) → propheta; ah isto → ab isto; didicerit; “quia → didicerit; quia; sententia}, pro → sententiae, pro; propheta: przesentiam → prophetae praesentiam; pmphetze → prophetae; cuneta → cuncta; propheta: veritas → prophetae veritas.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.16 (PG 1:1215a–1215b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.17PG 1:1215b–1216b

Et his dictis, tam mihi aperte et tam dilucide, quis iste esset propheta, et quomodo inveniretur, exposuit, ut ego mihi ante oculos habere, et manu contrectare viderer probationes, quas de prophetica veritate protulerat, ingentique stupore defigerer, quomodo ea quae omnes quaerunt, ante oculos posita nullus videt. Unde jubente eo, ea quae ad me locutus est, in ordinem redigens, librum de vero propheta conscripsi, eumque de Caesarea, ad te, ipso iubente, transmisi. Dicebat enim mandatum se accepisse abs te, ut per singulos annos, si qua essent a se dicta gestaque, ad te descripta transmitteret. Interea initio sermonis sui, quem prima die habuit ad me de vero propheta et de aliis plurimis, cum me instruxisset plenissime, addidit etiam haec: Vide, inquit, de reliquo, et interesto tractatibus meis; quos, si quando necessitas attulerit, habebo cum his qui contradicunt; adversus quos disputans, etiam si forte inferior visus fuero, non verebor, ne forte tu de his, quae tibi a me sunt tradita, in dubium venias, quia etiamsi ego visus fuero superari, non tamen idcirco et ea, quae nobis verus propheta tradidit, infirma videbuntur. Spero tamen quod nec in disputationibus superemur, si modo rationabiles sint auditores et amici veritatis, qui discernere valeant vim speciemque verborum, et agnoscere qui sermo ex arte sophistica veniat, non veritatem continens, sed imaginem veritatis, et qui sit qui simpliciter ac sine fuco prolatus, omnem vim non in specie et ornatu, sed in veritate et ratione possideat.

Having said this, he explained to me so openly and so clearly who that Prophet was and how he might be found, that I seemed to have before my eyes and to handle with my hand the proofs he had produced concerning the prophetic truth; and I was fixed in great astonishment that no one sees what all are seeking, though it is placed before their eyes. Then, at his command, arranging in order what he had said to me, I wrote a book about the true Prophet and, at his command, sent it to you from Caesarea. For he said that he had received an instruction from you to send you each year, written out, whatever he had said and done. Meanwhile, at the beginning of the discourse that he held with me on the first day about the true Prophet and very many other things, when he had instructed me most fully, he added this also: “See to it,” he said, “from now on, that you are present at my discussions, which I shall hold, whenever necessity requires, with those who oppose us. In disputing against them, even if I should perhaps seem to be worsted, I shall not fear that you will come to doubt what I have handed on to you; because even if I seem to be beaten, the things the true Prophet has handed on to us will not on that account seem weak. Yet I hope that we shall not be beaten in disputations either, provided the hearers are reasonable and friends of truth, able to discern the force and appearance of words, and to recognize which speech comes from the sophistic art, containing not truth but an image of truth, and which, uttered simply and without coloring, has all its force not in appearance and ornament but in truth and reason.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement writes a book on the true Prophet for James, and Peter tells him to attend his debates without fear for his faith.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip): eXposuit → exposuit; juhente → jubente; addidit etiam htec → addidit etiam haec; veritatis. et qui sit → veritatis, et qui sit.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.17 (PG 1:1215b–1216b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.18PG 1:1216b–1217a

Ad haec ego: Omnipotenti, inquam, Deo gratias ago, quia ut desideravi, instructus sum. Verumtamen de me in tantum esse debes securus, quod de his quae didici abs te, in dubium venire non possim, ut si tu ipse velis aliquando fidem meam a vero propheta transferre, omnino non possis; ita pleno Spiritu hausi, quae tradidisti. Et ne putes magnum tibi me aliquid polliceri, quod ab hac fide negem me posse transferri, certum est apud me, quia quicunque hominum hanc de vero propheta acceperit rationem, dubitare ultra de veritate nullatenus poterit. Et ideo confido de hoc divino dogmate coalitus delinito, in quo omnis ars malitiae superatur. Adversus prophetiam etenim neque ars ulla stare sufficiet, neque sophismatum syllogismorumque versutiae. Sed omnis qui audierit de vero propheta, necesse est ut statim desiderium capiat ipsius veritatis, nec ultra sub occasione veri quaerendi, diversos patietur errores. Propter quod, domine mi, o Petre, nolo sis ultra sollicitus, tanquam de eo qui nesciat quid acceperit, et quantum sibi commissum sit muneris; certus esto, quod scienti et intelligenti gratiam contulisti, nec facile possum decipi, pro eo quod, quae diu desiderabam, cito videor adeptus. Potest enim fieri ut alius desiderans cito adipiscatur, alius nec tarde ad desiderata perveniat.

To this I said: “I give thanks to almighty God that I have been instructed as I desired. Yet you may be so far assured about me that I cannot come to doubt what I have learned from you, so that even if you yourself should at some time wish to transfer my faith from the true Prophet, you could not do it at all; with so full a spirit have I drunk in what you have handed on. And lest you think I am promising you something great in saying that I cannot be moved from this faith: it is certain to me that whoever among men has received this account of the true Prophet can never again doubt the truth in any way. And therefore I am confident, having grown together with this divine teaching, in which every art of malice is overcome. For against prophecy no art will be able to stand, nor the cunning of sophisms and syllogisms. Everyone who has heard of the true Prophet must at once conceive a desire for the truth itself, and will no longer, on the pretext of seeking the truth, endure various errors. Therefore, my lord Peter, I do not want you to be anxious any more, as about one who does not know what he has received and how great a gift has been entrusted to him. Be sure that you have bestowed a favor on one who knows and understands, and I cannot easily be deceived because I seem to have quickly obtained what I long desired. For it can happen that one man who desires obtains quickly, while another does not reach his desires even slowly.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement assures Peter that his faith in the true Prophet cannot be shaken.

  • The words 'coalitus delinito' are uncertain in the scan; translated by sense, 'having grown together with'.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: broken word; stray mark): Ad lucc ego → Ad haec ego; transferre. omnino → transferre, omnino; ita Ο pleno → ita pleno; putes“ magnum → putes magnum; nulla. tenus → nullatenus; dOgmate → dogmate; suIIicict → sufficiet; versutize → versutiae; qumrendi → quaerendi; domine ini, ο Petre → domine mi, o Petre; et‘ quantum → et quantum; cornmissum → commissum.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.18 (PG 1:1216b–1217a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

1.19PG 1:1217a

Et Petrus, his a me auditis: Gratias ago, inquit, Deo meo, et pro salute tua, et pro requie mea; valde enim delector, quia intellexisse te video, quanta sit virtutis propheticae magnitudo, et quia, ut ais, nec si ego ipse cupiam, quod absit! potero te transvertere in aliam fidem. Ex hoc jam incipe esse nobiscum, et crastina die interesto disputationibus nostris; erit enim mihi certamen cum Simone Mago. Cumque haec dixisset, secessit, ut cibum caperet cum suis, me autem seorsum vesci jussit. Et post cibum cum laudem dedisset Deo et gratias egisset, etiam hujus ipsius facti mihi reddidit rationem, et addidit, dicens: Det tibi Dominus exaequari nobis in omnibus, ut percepto baptismate possis ad eamdem nobiscum convenire mensam. Et his dictis, quiescere me jussit; jam enim ad somnum et natura corporis, et ratio temporis invitabat.

And Peter, hearing this from me, said: “I give thanks to my God both for your salvation and for my own peace; for I am greatly delighted because I see that you have understood how great is the power of prophecy, and because, as you say, not even I myself, if I wished (which God forbid!), could turn you to another faith. From now on begin to be with us, and tomorrow be present at our disputations; for I am to have a contest with Simon Magus.” When he had said this, he withdrew to take food with his own people, but told me to eat apart. And after the meal, when he had given praise and thanks to God, he also gave me the reason for this very practice, and added: “May the Lord grant you to be made like us in all things, so that, having received baptism, you may come to the same table with us.” Having said this, he told me to rest; for by now both the nature of the body and the hour invited to sleep.

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter welcomes Clement into his company but has him eat apart until he is baptized.

  • Peter's practice of not sharing the table with the unbaptized reflects the purity concerns of the Pseudo-Clementine writings (compare Homilies 1.22 and 13.4).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): pr0pheticaa → propheticae; transverlere → transvertere; Et bis dictis → Et his dictis.

Extrabiblical texts: Ps.-Clem. Hom. 1.22 (Homilies; allusion)

Topics: Baptism

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.19 (PG 1:1217a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/0-1/#p-1-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).