Recognitions
The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.
Recognitions 0.1
0.1PG 1:1205b–1207b
Tibi quidem, Gaudenti, nostrorum decus insigne doctorum, tantus ingenii vigor, imo tanta spiritus gratia est, ut si quid a te etiam quotidiani eloquii more dicitur, si quid in ecclesia declamatur, id in libris haberi et ad instructionem tradi posteris debeat. Nos tamen, quos et ingenii tenuitas minus promptos, et senecta jam tardos reddit ac segnes, Opus quod olim veneranda memoria virgo Silvia injunxerat, ut Clementem nostra lingua redderemus, et tu deinceps jure haereditario poscebas, licet multas post moras, tamen aliquando restituimus, praedamque, ut opinor, non parvam, Graecorum bibliothecis ereptam, nostrorum usibus et utilitatibus convectamus, ut quos propriis non possumus, peregrinis nutriamus alimoniis. Nam et solent suaviora videri peregrina, interdum vero et utiliora. Denique peregrinum est pene omne quod medelam corporibus confert, quod morbis occurrit, quod venena depellit. Judaea balsami lacrymam, Creta comam dictamni mittit, Arabia aromatum flores, et spicarum nardi India segetem metit, qua apud nos, etiamsi aliquantulo quam proprius ager attulit, fractiora perveniunt, odoris tamen gratiam vimque medendi integram servant. Suscipe igitur, anime mi, redeuntem ad te Clementem nostrum, suscipe jam Romanum. Nec mireris, si forte tibi in eo minus solito floridus eloquentiae vultus appareat. Nihil interest, dummodo sensus idem sapiat. Peregrinas ergo merces multo in patriam sudore transvehimus. Et nescio quam gratus me civium vultus accipit, magna sibi Graeciae spolia deferentem, et occultos sapientia thesauros nostra lingua clave reserantem. Sed votis tuis faveat Deus, ut nullus nobis sinister oculus, nec cujusquam lividus occurrat aspectus, ne extremo prodigii genere, cum nihil invideant illi quibus aufertur, livescant tamen isti quibus confertur. Aequum est sane, tibi qui haec etiam Graece legeris (ne forte in aliquibus minus a nobis servatum translationis ordinem putes), interpretationis nostra indicare consilium. Puto quod non te lateat, Clementis hujus in Graco ejusdem operis Ἀναγνὼσεων, hoc est Recognitionum, duas editiones haberi, et duo corpora esse librorum, in aliaquantis quidem diversa, in multis tamen ejusdem narrationis. Denique pars ultima hujus operis, in qua de transformatione Simonis refertur, in uno corpore habetur, in alio penitus non habetur. Sunt autem et quaedam in utroque corpore de ingenito Deo genitoque disserta, et de aliis nonnullis, quae, ut nihil amplius dicam, excesserunt intelligentiam nostram. Haec ergo ego, tanquam quae supra vires meas essent, aliis reservare malui, quam minus plena proferre. In caeteris autem,quantum potuimus, operam dedimus, non solum a sententiis, sed ne a sermonibus quidem satis elocutionibusque discedere. Quae res quamvis minus ornatum, magis tamen fidele narrationis reddit eloquium. Epistolam sane, in qua idem Clemens ad Jacobum fratrem Domini scribens de obitu nuntiat Petri, et quod se reliquerit successorem cathedra et doctrinae suae, in qua etiam de omni ordine ecclesiastico continetur, ideo nunc huic Operi non praemisi, quia et tempore posterior est, et olim a me interpretata et edita. Sed quod in ea nonnullis fortasse videbitur inconsequens, si hic explanetur, non puto absurdum videri. Quidam enim requirunt, quomodo cum Linus et Cletus in urbe Roma ante Clementem hunc fuerint episcopi, ipse Clemens ad Iacobum scribens, sibi dicat a Petro docendi cathedram traditam. Cujus rei hanc accepimus esse rationem, quod Linus et Cletus fuerunt quidem ante Clementem episcopi in urbe Roma, sed superstite Petro, videlicet ut illi episcopatus curam gererent, ipse vero apostolatus impleret officium, sicut invenitur etiam apud Caesaream fecisse, ubi cum ipse esset praesens, Zacchaeum tamen a se ordinatum habebat episcopum. Et hoc modo utrumque verum videbitur, ut et illi ante Clementem numerentur episcopi, et Clemens tamen post obitum Petri docendi susceperit sedem. Sed jam videamus, scribens Iacobo fratri Domini, operis sui Clemens ipse quod sumat narrationis initium.
To you, Gaudentius, distinguished ornament of our teachers, belongs such vigor of intellect, or rather such grace of the Spirit, that whatever you say even in the manner of everyday speech, whatever you deliver in church, ought to be kept in books and handed down to posterity for instruction. We, however, whom slenderness of talent makes less ready and old age now makes slow and sluggish, have at last, though after many delays, rendered the work which the virgin Silvia of venerable memory once enjoined on us, that we should put Clement into our language, and which you afterwards claimed by right of inheritance. And we are bringing in for the use and benefit of our people a booty, I think, not small, snatched from the libraries of the Greeks, so that we may nourish with foreign food those whom we cannot nourish with our own. For foreign things usually seem sweeter, and sometimes also more useful. Indeed, almost everything that brings healing to bodies, that counters diseases, that drives off poisons, is foreign. Judaea sends the tear of balsam, Crete the leafy head of dittany, Arabia the flowers of spices, and India reaps the harvest of spikenard; and though these reach us somewhat more broken than what our own field has produced, they keep entire the charm of their fragrance and their power to heal. Receive, then, my soul, our Clement returning to you; receive him now a Roman. And do not wonder if perhaps the face of eloquence appears less florid in him than usual. It makes no difference, provided the sense savors the same. So we carry foreign wares into our homeland with much sweat. And I do not know how gratefully the faces of my fellow citizens will receive me as I bring them great spoils from Greece and unlock the hidden treasures of wisdom with the key of our language. But may God favor your prayers, that no ill-omened eye and no envious look of anyone may meet us, lest by the last kind of portent, while those from whom he is taken feel no envy, those on whom he is conferred should yet turn livid with it.
It is only fair to explain the plan of our translation to you, who have read these things also in Greek, lest you think that in some places the order of the translation has been insufficiently kept by us. I suppose you are aware that in Greek there are two editions of this work of Clement, the Anagnōseis, that is, the Recognitions, and two bodies of books, differing in some points but in many containing the same narrative. Indeed, the last part of this work, which tells of the transformation of Simon, is found in one body and is entirely absent from the other. There are also in both bodies certain discussions about the unbegotten and the begotten God, and about some other matters, which, to say no more, went beyond our understanding. These, therefore, as being beyond my powers, I preferred to reserve for others rather than to present them imperfectly. In the rest, however, we have taken pains, as far as we could, to depart not only not from the sense but not even from the words and expressions. This makes the style of the narrative less ornate, but more faithful. The letter, indeed, in which this same Clement, writing to James the brother of the Lord, reports the death of Peter, and that Peter left him as successor of his chair and his teaching, and in which the whole order of the church is also set out, I have not now prefixed to this work, both because it is later in time and because I translated and published it some time ago. But since something in it may perhaps seem inconsistent to some, I think it not absurd to explain it here. For some ask how, since Linus and Cletus were bishops in the city of Rome before this Clement, Clement himself, writing to James, says that the chair of teaching was handed over to him by Peter. We have received this as the explanation: Linus and Cletus were indeed bishops in the city of Rome before Clement, but while Peter was still living, namely so that they bore the care of the episcopate while he himself fulfilled the office of apostleship; just as he is found to have done at Caesarea also, where, though he himself was present, he nevertheless had Zacchaeus, ordained by himself, as bishop. In this way both will be seen to be true: that those men are counted as bishops before Clement, and that Clement nevertheless received the seat of teaching after Peter's death. But now let us see how Clement himself, writing to James the brother of the Lord, begins his narrative.
Chapter 1
1.1PG 1:1207a–1207b
Ego Clemens in urbe Roma natus. ex prima aetate pudicitiae studium gessi, dum me animi intentio velut vinculis quibusdam sollicitudinis et moeroris a puero innexum teneret. inerat enim mihi cogitatio (incertum sane unde initium sumpserit), crebro ad memoriam meam conditionem mortalitatis adducens, simulque discutiens: utrumne sit mihi aliqua vita post mortem, an nihil omnino postea sim futurus, si non fuerim antequam nascerer, vel si nulla prorsus vitae hujus erit post obitum recordatio, et ita immensitas temporis cuncta oblivioni ac silentio dabit, ut non solum non simus, sed neque quod fuerimus, habeatur in memoria. Sed et illud versabatur in pectore, quando factus sit mundus, vel antequam fieret, quid erat, aut vero semper fuerit. Nam certum videbatur, quod si esset factus, esset et profecto solvendus, et si solvatur, quid iterum erit? Nisi forte oblivio cuncta et silentium teget, aut forte aliquid erit, quod nunc sentire mortalium non potest mens.
I, Clement, born in the city of Rome, pursued chastity from my earliest age, while from boyhood an intentness of mind held me bound as if by chains of anxiety and grief. For there was in me a train of thought (whence it took its beginning I do not know) that kept bringing to my mind the condition of mortality, and at the same time debated: whether there is any life for me after death, or whether I shall be nothing at all afterwards; whether I did not exist before I was born; or whether there will be no remembrance at all of this life after death, and so the immensity of time will consign all things to oblivion and silence, so that not only shall we not exist, but it will not even be remembered that we existed. And this too turned over in my breast: when the world was made, or what there was before it was made, or whether it has always existed. For it seemed certain that if it had been made, it would surely also be dissolved; and if it is dissolved, what will there be afterwards? Unless perhaps oblivion and silence will cover all things, or perhaps there will be something which the mind of mortals cannot now perceive.
1.2PG 1:1207b–1208a
Haec et his similia, nescio unde, indesinenter animo revolvens, nimietate moeroris incredibiliter tabescebam, et quod est gravius, si quando respuere a me hujuscemodi curas velut minus utiles cogitabam, validiores in me fluctus sollicitudinum consurgebant. Inerat enim mihi comes optima, quae me quiescere non sineret. immortalitatis cupido. Ut enim post rerum exitus docuit, et gratia Dei omnipotentis ostendit, haec me animi intentio ad inquisitionem veritatis, et agnitionem verae lucis adduxit. Ex quo factum est, ut lugerem postmodum eos, quos prius ignorans beatos credebam. _
Turning these and similar things over in my mind unceasingly, I know not whence, I wasted away incredibly from excess of grief; and, what is worse, whenever I thought of rejecting such cares as useless, stronger waves of anxiety rose up within me. For I had within me an excellent companion who would not let me rest: the desire of immortality. For as the outcome of things afterwards taught, and the grace of almighty God showed, this intentness of mind led me to the search for truth and the knowledge of the true light. From this it came about that I afterwards mourned for those whom earlier, in my ignorance, I had believed blessed.
1.3PG 1:1208a–1208b
igitur cum a prima aetate in hujuscemodi animorum intentione versarer, cupiens aliquid discere, philosophorum frequentabam scholas, ubi nihil aliud, quam dogmatum assertiones et impugnationes videbam agi sine fine, certamina, artes syllogismorum conclusionumque agitari versutias. Et si quando quidem obtinebat hic sermo, quod immortalis esset anima, gratulabar; si quando vero arguebatur quasi mortalis, cum tristitia discedebant. Neutrum tamen in corde meo firmitudinem veritatis tenebat,sed hoc tantum intelligebam, quod sententiae ac definitiones rerum, non pro natura sui ac veritate causarum, sed pro ingeniis defendentium, falsae imaginarentur, aut verae, eoque magis in profundo pectoris cruciabar, quod neque aliquid ex his, quae dicebantur, tanquam firmum tenere poteram, neque abjicere desiderium requirendi; sed quanto magis negligere conabar ac spernere, tanto ardentius, ut supra dixi, velut cum quadam voluptate latenter irrepens hujuscemodi cogitatio,mentem atque animum possidebat.
So, while from my earliest age I was occupied with such intentness of mind, wishing to learn something, I frequented the schools of the philosophers, where I saw nothing else going on but the assertion and refutation of doctrines without end, contests, and the arts and subtleties of syllogisms and conclusions being plied. And whenever the argument prevailed that the soul was immortal, I rejoiced; whenever it was argued to be mortal, I went away sad. Yet neither view held the firmness of truth in my heart; I understood only this, that opinions and definitions of things were thought true or false, not according to their own nature and the truth of the matters, but according to the talents of those who defended them. And I was tormented all the more deeply in my breast because I could neither hold anything of what was said as firm nor cast away the desire of inquiring; but the more I tried to neglect and spurn it, the more ardently, as I said above, this kind of thought, creeping in secretly as if with a certain pleasure, possessed my mind and soul.
1.4PG 1:1208b–1209a
Coangustatus igitur inventione rerum, aiebam apud memetipsum: Quid inaniter laboramus, cum manifestus sit terminus rerum? Si enim post mortem non ero, nunc superfluo crucior; si vero erit mihi vita post obitum, servemus illi vitae sui temporis motus, ne forte his, quae nunc patior. aliqua me ibi tristiora excipiant, nisi pie ac sobrie vixero, et secundum nonnullorum sententias philosophorum, Pyriphlegethonti fluvio vel Tartaro, ut Sisyphus et Tityus, et ut Ixion ac Tantalus aeternis in inferno suppliciis tradar. Et rursus mihi ipsi respondebam: Sed haec fabulae sunt, aut si ita est, in rebus dubiis praestat pie vivere. Sed iterum reputabam mecum, quomodo possem sub incerto justitiae praemio, a peccati me libidine continere? Maxime cum etiam, quae sit ipsa justitia, quae Deo placeat, apud me habeatur incertum, et neque si immortalis sit anima, ac sit, quae aliquid sperare possit, agnoscam, neque quid certi futurum sit noverim. Nec tamen quiescere ab hujuscemodi cogitationibus possum.
Being thus hemmed in in the discovery of things, I said to myself: Why do we labor in vain, since the end of things is plain? For if after death I shall not exist, I am tormented needlessly now; but if there will be life for me after death, let us keep for that life the impulses that belong to its time, lest perhaps sadder things than those I now suffer await me there, unless I have lived piously and soberly, and, according to the opinions of some philosophers, I be handed over to the river Pyriphlegethon or to Tartarus, like Sisyphus and Tityus, and like Ixion and Tantalus, to eternal punishments in the underworld. And again I answered myself: But these things are fables; or, if it is so, in doubtful matters it is better to live piously. But again I reckoned with myself: How could I restrain myself from the lust of sin while the reward of righteousness is uncertain? Especially since even what righteousness itself is, the righteousness that pleases God, is uncertain to me; and I neither know whether the soul is immortal and is such as can hope for anything, nor do I know what will certainly come. And yet I cannot rest from such thoughts.
1.5PG 1:1209a–1209c
Quid igitur faciam? Egyptum petam, atque ibi hierophantis vel prophetis qui adytis praesunt, amicus efficiar, et pecunia ab eis invitatum magum precabor, ut educat mihi animam de infernis, per eam quam necromantiam vocant, tanquam de aliquo negotio consulere cupienti. Mihi vero haec erit consultatio: si immortalis est anima. Probatio autem animae, quod immortalis sit, non ex eo quod loquitur, erit mihi certa, vel ex eo quod audio, sed ex eo quod video; ut oculis meis cernens eam, certissimam de reliquo immortalitatis ejus sententiam teneam. Neque enim ultra poterit veritatem visus, verborum fallacia et auditio incerta turbare. Verumtamen hanc ipsam deliberationem meam retuli ad quemdam familiarem meum philosophum, qui mihi consilium dedit, ne hoc facere auderem. Sive enim, inquit, evocanti mago non obediat anima, tu post haec tanquam nihil esse putans post mortem. desperabilius vives, quippe qui et illicita tentaveris. Si vero et aliquid ibi videre tibi visus fueris, quae tibi religio, aut quae pietas ex illicitis tradetur et impiis? Exosum namque Divinitati hujuscemodi negotium ferunt, et adversari Deum his qui animas post absolutionem corporum vexant. Ego vero, his auditis, pigrior quidem sum redditus ad hoc quod parabam, nec tamen usquequaque aut desiderium ponere poteram, aut molestiam cogitationis abjicere.
What then shall I do? I will go to Egypt, and there become friendly with the hierophants or prophets who preside over the shrines; and I will entreat a magician, hired from among them with money, to bring up a soul for me from the underworld by what they call necromancy, as though I wished to consult it about some business. But my consultation will be this: whether the soul is immortal. And the proof that the soul is immortal will be certain to me not from its speaking, or from what I hear, but from what I see; so that, beholding it with my own eyes, I may hold for the future the most certain conviction of its immortality. For then neither the deceitfulness of words nor uncertain hearing will be able to disturb the truth of sight. However, I referred this very plan of mine to a certain philosopher who was my friend, and he advised me not to dare to do it. “For if,” he said, “the soul does not obey the magician who summons it, you will afterwards live more hopelessly, thinking there is nothing after death, since you will also have attempted unlawful things. But if you seem to yourself to see something there, what religion or what piety will be handed on to you from unlawful and impious things? For they say that such business is hateful to the Deity, and that God sets himself against those who trouble souls after their release from bodies.” When I heard this I became slower about what I was preparing; yet I could by no means either lay aside my desire or cast off the trouble of my thought.
1.6PG 1:1209c–1210b
Et ne longa utar narratione, cum his ego cogitationis meae aestibus agitarer, fama quaedam sensim in imperio Tiberii Caesaris, initio ex Orientis partibus sumpto, pervenit ad nos, et per singula convalescens, velut a Deo bonus quidam nuntius missus, universum replebat orbem, nec patiebatur divinam voluntatem silentio tegi. Diffundebatur ergo per singula loca, annuntians, quod esset quidam in Judaea, qui sumpto a tempore veris exordio, regnum Dei evangelizaret Iudaeis, idque percepturos diceret eos, qui mandatorum suorum et doctrinae instituta servassent. Ut autem sermo ejus fide dignus, ac divinitatis plenus esse crederetur, virtutes multas, et signa ac prodigia mira efficere jussione sola dicebatur, ita ut, tanquam a Deo potestatem habens, surdos faceret audire et caecos videre, claudos erigeret, atque omnem infirmitatem cunctosque daemones ex hominibus effugaret, sed et oblatos sibi mortuos suscitaret, leprosos quoque eminus videns curaret, et nihil omnino esset, quod ei impossibile videretur. Haec et horum similia processu temporis, crebris jam non rumoribus, sed manifestis quodammodo adventantium ex illis partibus nuntiis firmabantur, et ipsa jam per dies singulos rei veritas patescebat.
To be brief: while I was being tossed by these surges of thought, a certain report, which began in the regions of the East in the reign of Tiberius Caesar, gradually reached us, and, gaining strength from place to place like a good messenger sent from God, it was filling the whole world and would not allow the divine will to be hidden in silence. It spread, then, through every place, announcing that there was someone in Judaea who, beginning in the springtime, was preaching the kingdom of God to the Jews, and said that those would receive it who kept the ordinances of his commandments and teaching. And so that his word might be believed worthy of credit and full of divinity, he was said to perform many mighty works, and wonderful signs and portents, by his command alone, so that, as one having power from God, he made the deaf hear and the blind see, raised up the lame, drove away every infirmity and all demons from people, even raised the dead who were brought to him, and healed lepers, looking on them from a distance; and there was nothing at all that seemed impossible to him. These and similar things were confirmed in the course of time, no longer by frequent rumors but by the plain reports, so to speak, of people coming from those parts, and the truth of the matter became clearer day by day.
1.7PG 1:1210b–1211a
Denique in urbe per loca conventus fieri et de hoc sermone tractari, atque in admiratione res haberi coepit, quisnam is esset, qui apparuerit, vel quid nuntii a Deo hominibus detulisset; donec sub eodem anno vir quidam astans in urbis loco celeberrimo, proclamaret ad populum, dicens: Audite me, o cives Romani; Filius Dei adest in partibus Iudaeae, promittens omnibus volentibus audire se, vitam aeternam, si quis tamen secundum voluntatem ejus, a quo missus est Dei Patris, actus suos direxerit. Propter quod convertimini a malis ad bona, a temporalibus ad aeterna. Agnoscite unum esse Deum coeli terraeque rectorem, in cujus justis aspectibus vos injusti mundum ejus habitatis. Sed si convertimini et secundum voluntatem ejus agitis, ad futurum saeculum venientes et aeterni effecti, ineffabilibus ejus bonis ac praemiis perfruamini. Erat autem vir iste, qui haec loquebatur ad populum, ex Orientis partibus, natione Hebraeus, nomine Barnabas, qui se etiam unum ex ejus discipulis esse dicebat, missumque ob hoc, ut haec volentibus indicaret. Quibus ego auditis. cum reliqua multitudine sequi eum coepi et audire, quae diceret. Intelligebam sane quod nihil dialecticae artis esset in homine, sed simpliciter et absque ullo dicendi fuco, quae audisset a Filio Dei vel vidisset, exponeret. Assertiones enim suas non argumentorum virtute muniebat, sed verborum et mirabilium, quae annuntiabat, testes multos, ex ipso etiam circumstante populo, producebat.
At last gatherings began to be held in various places in the city, this report to be discussed, and the question to be pondered with wonder: who this might be who had appeared, and what message from God he had brought to men. Then in the same year a certain man, standing in the most crowded place of the city, proclaimed to the people: “Hear me, citizens of Rome. The Son of God is now in the regions of Judaea, promising eternal life to all who are willing to hear him, provided they direct their actions according to the will of God the Father, by whom he was sent. Therefore turn from evil things to good, from temporal things to eternal. Acknowledge that there is one God, ruler of heaven and earth, in whose righteous sight you, being unrighteous, inhabit his world. But if you turn and act according to his will, you will come to the world to come, be made eternal, and enjoy his unspeakable good things and rewards.” Now this man who was saying these things to the people was from the regions of the East, by nation a Hebrew, by name Barnabas, who said that he was himself one of his disciples and had been sent for this purpose, to declare these things to those who were willing. When I heard this, I began with the rest of the crowd to follow him and hear what he said. I perceived, indeed, that there was nothing of the dialectical art in the man, but that he set forth simply, without any coloring of speech, what he had heard or seen from the Son of God. For he did not fortify his assertions by force of argument, but produced from the very people standing around many witnesses of the words and wonders he announced.
1.8PG 1:1211a
Verum quoniam ad ea, quae sincere dicebantur, libenter annuere populus et amplecti sermonem simplicem coepit, hi qui sibi eruditi videbantur vel philosophi, ridere hominem ac spernere cepere, et syllogismorum in eum tendiculas velut validissima arma proferre.At ille interritus et velut deliramenta argutias eorum ducens, ne responsione quidem dignos judicabat, sed ea quae proposuerat, exsequebatur intrepidus. Denique cum loquenti ei quidam proposuisset, cur ita factus esset culex, ut cum sit animal exiguum, et sex habeat pedes, insuper additae sint ei et alae, elephantus vero cum sit immane animal neque alas habeat, quatuor tantum pedes habeat: ad haec ille ne respiciens quidem, sermonem suum, quem importuna propositio interruperat, continuata intentione peragebat, hac sola admonitione per singulas quasque interruptiones addita: Nos ejus qui misit nos verba factaque mirabilia annuntiare vobis in mandatis habemus, fidemque eorum quae dicimus, non ex argumentis arte quaesitis, sed ex vobis ipsis productis testibus confirmare. Agnosco enim plurimos astare in medio vestrum ex his, quos una nobiscum memini audisse quae audivimus, et vidisse quae vidimus. Sit autem in vestra potestate, vel recipere quae annuntiamus, vel spernere. Nos enim quod expedire vobis novimus, tacere non possumus, quia nobis, si taceamus, damnum est, vobis vero, quae dicimus, si non recipiatis, pernicies. Sed et stultis propositionibus vestris respondere perfacile possim, si veritatis discendae causa quaereretis, de culicis dico atque elephantis differentia; sed nunc de creaturis dicere vobis aliquid absurdum est, cum a vobis ipse Omnium Creator et Conditor ignoretur.
But since the people began to assent gladly to what was said sincerely and to embrace the simple speech, those who seemed to themselves learned, or philosophers, began to laugh at the man and despise him, and to bring out against him the snares of syllogisms as though they were the strongest weapons. But he, undaunted, regarding their subtleties as ravings, did not even judge them worthy of an answer, but went on fearlessly with what he had set out to say. At length, when someone put to him, as he was speaking, the question why the gnat was so made that, though it is a tiny animal and has six feet, wings were added to it besides, whereas the elephant, though it is a huge animal and has no wings, has only four feet, he, without even looking at the question, went on with unbroken attention with the discourse that the untimely question had interrupted, adding at each interruption only this admonition: “We have it in charge to announce to you the words and wonderful deeds of him who sent us, and to confirm the truth of what we say, not by arguments sought out by art, but by witnesses produced from among yourselves. For I recognize many standing in your midst who, I remember, heard with us what we heard and saw what we saw. But let it be in your power either to receive or to reject what we announce. For we cannot keep silent about what we know to be for your good, because for us, if we keep silent, there is loss; but for you, if you do not receive what we say, destruction. I could indeed very easily answer your foolish questions—I mean about the difference between the gnat and the elephant—if you asked them for the sake of learning the truth; but now it is absurd to say anything to you about creatures, when the very Creator and Founder of all is unknown to you.”
1.9PG 1:1211a–1212a
Haec autem cum dixisset, velut ex uno consensu, indisciplinato ore omnes simul risum dedere, incutere ei verecundiam ac silentium imponere cupientes, barbarumque et minus sanae mentis eum acclamantes. Ego vero cum haec ita fieri cernerem, zelo quodam nescio unde repletus, ac religioso furore succensus, silere non potui, sed cum omni libertate proclamans: Rectissime Deus, inquam, omnipotens abscondit a vobis voluntatem suam, quos agnitione sui praevidit indignos, sicut ex his quae nunc agitis, sanum sapientibus palam est. Nam cum videatis praedicatores voluntatis Dei advenisse, quia nullam sermo eorum grammaticae artis scientiam profitetur, sed simplicibus et impolitis sermonibus perferunt ad vos divina mandata, ita ut omnes qui audiunt, sequi possint et intelligere quae dicuntur; ridetis salutis vestrae ministros et nuntios, ignorantes quia vestra, qui vobis periti et eloquentes videmini, condemnatio est, quod apud agrestes et barbaros habetur veritatis agnitio. Quae cum ad vos advenerit, nec quasi hospita suscipitur, quae nisi intemperantia vestra et libido obsisteret, civis esse et vernacula debuisset; ut ex his arguamini, quod non veritatis amici et philosophi, sed jactantiae sectatores, et vaniloqui estis, qui veritatem non in simplicibus verbis, sed in versutis et callidis creditis habitare, et innumerabilia verborum profertis, unius verbi nequaquam pretio pensitanda. Quid ergo putatis futurum de vobis, vos o omnis turba Graecorum, si erit judicium Dei, sicut iste dicit? Sed nunc, omittentes ridere in perniciem vestri virum hunc, respondeat mihi qui vult ex vobis, quoniam quidem solo latratu vestro obturbatis etiam eorum aures, qui salvi esse volunt, et mentes quae ad fidem paratae sunt, ad infidelitatis lapsum vestris obturbationibus declinatis: quae vobis erit unquam venia, qui Divinitatis nuntium, promittentem vobis agnitionem Dei, ridetis et injuriis adicitis? quem utique etiamsi nihil veritatis afferret, pro ipso tamen benignitatis erga vos proposito, gratum acceptumque habere deberetis.
When he had said this, all, as if with one accord, burst out laughing together with undisciplined mouths, wishing to put him to shame and impose silence on him, and crying out that he was a barbarian and not of sound mind. But when I saw these things being done, filled with a certain zeal (I know not whence) and kindled with religious fervor, I could not keep silent, but cried out with all boldness: “Most rightly,” I said, “has almighty God hidden his will from you, whom he foresaw to be unworthy of the knowledge of himself, as is plain to the right-minded from what you are now doing. For when you see that preachers of the will of God have come, you laugh at the ministers and messengers of your salvation because their speech professes no knowledge of the grammatical art, and they bring the divine commandments to you in simple and unpolished words, so that all who hear can follow and understand what is said. You do not know that it is your condemnation—you who seem to yourselves skilled and eloquent—that the knowledge of the truth is found among rustics and barbarians. When it comes to you, it is not received even as a guest, though, had your intemperance and lust not stood in the way, it ought to have been a citizen and a native. So you are convicted of being not friends of truth and philosophers, but followers of boastfulness and vain talkers, who believe that truth dwells not in simple words but in crafty and cunning ones, and who pour out countless words not worth the price of a single word. What then do you think will become of you, all you crowd of Greeks, if there is to be a judgment of God, as this man says? But now leave off laughing at this man to your own ruin, and let any of you who wishes answer me; for by your mere barking you disturb even the ears of those who wish to be saved, and by your disturbances you turn aside to the fall of unbelief minds that are prepared for faith. What pardon will there ever be for you, who laugh at and insult the messenger of the Deity who promises you the knowledge of God? Even if he brought nothing of truth, yet for his very purpose of kindness toward you, you ought to hold him welcome and acceptable.”
1.10PG 1:1212a
Haec et his similia cum prosequerer, plurimus astantis populi fremitus concitabatur,dum alii velut erga hospitem miseratione moverentur, meumque sermonem ut consequenter habitum probarent, alii petulantes et stolidi, in me quoque pariter, ut in Barnabam, effrenati animi iracundiam concitarent. Sed cum ad vesperam jam declinaret dies, apprehensa Barnabae dextera, obluctantem licet eum, ad meam tamen adduxi domum, atque ibi manere feci, ne quis forte ex indocili vulgo injiceret ei manus. Aliquantulis igitur diebus una positi, disserente eo [paucis], sermonem veritatis libenter audiebam; urgebat tamen profectionem, dicens se diem festum religionis suae, qui immineret, omnimodis apud Iudaeam celebraturum, ibique de reliquo cum suis civibus ac fratribus permansurum. evidenter indicans injuriae se horrore perculsum.
While I was pursuing these and similar things, a great uproar arose among the people standing by, some being moved with pity, as toward a stranger, and approving my speech as consistent with that, while others, petulant and stupid, roused the anger of their unbridled minds against me too, as against Barnabas. But as the day was now declining toward evening, I took Barnabas by the right hand and, though he resisted, brought him to my house and made him stay there, lest anyone of the unruly mob should lay hands on him. So, being together for some days, I gladly heard him discourse the word of truth; yet he pressed for his departure, saying that he must by all means celebrate in Judaea a festival of his religion that was approaching, and remain there thereafter with his fellow citizens and brethren, plainly showing that he was struck with horror at the injury done him.
1.11PG 1:1212a–1213b
Denique cum ego dicerem: Tu mihi tantum ejus viri, quem apparuisse dicis, expone doctrinam, et ego meis sermonibus tua dicta componens, omnipotentis Dei regnum iustitiamque praedicabo, et post haec si volueris, etiam navigabo tecum, valde enim videre cupio Iudaeam, vobiscum fortassis perpetuo permansurus. Ad haec ille: Tu, inquit, si quidem videre vis patriam nostram, et discere quae desideras, jam nunc mecum pariter naviga; si vero te aliquid tenet, signa tibi habitationis nostrae derelinquam, ut cum venire volueris, invenire nos facile possis; ego enim crastino iter aggrediar. Quem ubi immobilem vidi, descendi cum ipso usque ad portum, ac diligenter ab eo signa, quae dixerat, habitationis accepi, dicens ei: quia nisi aliquantulum pecuniae necessario mihi esset a debitoribus reposcendum, nihil omnino differrem, velociter tamen insequar iter tuum. Cum haec dixissem, commendato eo attentius his, qui navi praeerant, regressus sum tristis. Habebat enim me recordatio consuetudinis boni hospitis et optimi amici.
Then I said: “Only set out for me the teaching of that man who you say has appeared, and I, putting your sayings into my own words, will preach the kingdom and righteousness of almighty God; and after that, if you wish, I will even sail with you, for I very much desire to see Judaea, and perhaps to remain with you permanently.” To this he answered: “If indeed you wish to see our country and learn what you desire, sail with me right now; but if something keeps you, I will leave you directions to our dwelling, so that when you wish to come you may easily find us; for tomorrow I set out on my journey.” When I saw that he was immovable, I went down with him to the harbor, carefully received from him the directions to the dwelling he had spoken of, and told him that, were it not that I had to recover some money from debtors, I would not delay at all, but would quickly follow him. Having said this, and having commended him very earnestly to those in charge of the ship, I returned sad; for the memory of my association with a good guest and the best of friends held me.
1.12PG 1:1213b
Diebus autem paucis remoratus, et his quae debebantur ex parte aliqua profligatis (plurima enim festinandi studio neglexi, ne a proposito impedirer), enavigavi continuo in Judaeam, et post dies quindecim Caesaream Stratonis, quae est Palaestina urbs maxima, appulsus sum. Cumque navi egressus, hospitium quaererem, rumore populi comperi quod Petrus quidam, illius qui in Judaea apparuit, et signa multa ac prodigia divinitus gesta inter homines ostendit, discipulus probatissimus, crastino cum Simone quodam Samaritana ex castello Getbonum, habiturus esset verborum quaestionumque certamen. Quibus ego auditis, rogabam demonstrari mihi ejus hospitium; quod cum reperissem, atque ante fores constitissem, ingerebam janitori, quisnam essem atque unde adventarem; et ecce Barnabas procedens, statim ut me vidit, in complexus meos cucurrit, gaudio lacrymans, atque apprehensum me manu introducebat ad Petrum. Quem cum mihi eminus ostendisset: Hic est, inquit, Petrus, quem tibi maximum esse in Dei sapientia dicebam, cuique de te rursus sine cessatione locutus sum. ingredere igitur tanquam bene ei cognitus. Omnia enim quae in te sunt bona, verissime comperit, et religiosum propositum tuum diligenter agnovit, ex quo et summo desiderio agitur videndi te. Unde magnum ei hodie munus meis te manibus offero; simulque oblato me. ait: Hic est Clemens, Petre.
After remaining a few days and settling part of what was owed to me (for in my eagerness to hasten I neglected much, so as not to be hindered from my purpose), I sailed straight for Judaea, and after fifteen days landed at Caesarea Stratonis, the largest city of Palestine. When I had left the ship and was looking for lodging, I learned from common talk that a certain Peter, a most approved disciple of him who appeared in Judaea and showed many signs and wonders divinely performed among men, was to hold a debate of words and questions the next day with a certain Simon, a Samaritan from the village of Gitthae. When I heard this, I asked to be shown his lodging; and when I had found it and stood before the door, I told the doorkeeper who I was and whence I came. And behold, Barnabas came out, and as soon as he saw me he ran into my embrace, weeping for joy, and taking me by the hand led me in to Peter. Pointing him out to me from a distance, he said: “This is Peter, whom I told you was greatest in the wisdom of God, and to whom I in turn have spoken of you without ceasing. Go in, then, as one well known to him. For he has learned most truly all the good that is in you, and has carefully understood your religious purpose; hence he is moved with the greatest desire to see you. So today I present you to him from my hands as a great gift.” And at the same time, presenting me, he said: “This is Clement, Peter.”
1.13PG 1:1214a–1214b
At benignissimus Petrus, audito nomine, accurrens protinus inhaesit osculis meis, et post haec cum sedere me fecisset, ait: Bene fecisti praedicatorem veritatis hospitio recipere Barnabam, nihil veritus populi insanientis furorem; beatus eris. Sicut enim tu legatum veritatis omni honore dignum duxisti, ita te quoque peregrinantem et hospitem veritas ipsa suscipiet, et civem propriae urbis ascribet, et tunc tibi erit gaudium magnum, quod exiguam nunc impartiens gratiam, aeternorum bonorum haeres scriberis. Nunc ergo ne labores exponere mihi animum tuum; cuncta enim de te et de moribus tuis Barnabas fideli sermone edocuit, quotidie pene et indesinenter bonorum tuorum memoriam repetens. Et ut tibi breviter, tanquam unanimi jam amico. quod in νϐ εει definiam. si nihil est quod te impediat, iter age nobiscum, et audi sermonem veritatis, quem habituri sumus per loca singula, usquequo ad ipsam nobis perveniendum sit urbem Romam; et nunc tu si quid desideras. dicito.
But the most kind Peter, hearing my name, ran to me at once and kissed me, and after making me sit down, he said: “You did well to receive Barnabas, a preacher of the truth, as your guest, in no way fearing the fury of the frenzied people; you will be blessed. For as you have counted the ambassador of the truth worthy of every honor, so the truth itself will receive you as a stranger and guest and enroll you as a citizen of its own city; and then you will have great joy, because by bestowing a small kindness now you are being written down as heir of eternal goods. Now, then, do not trouble to explain your mind to me; for Barnabas has told me everything about you and your character in a faithful account, recalling the memory of your good qualities almost daily and without ceasing. And, to tell you briefly, as to a friend already of one mind with us, what I would advise: if nothing hinders you, journey with us and hear the word of truth which we shall speak in each place until we reach the very city of Rome; and now, if you wish anything, say it.”
1.14PG 1:1214b
Cumque ei exposuissem, quid ab initio propositi gesserim, et quomodo per inanes ell‘usus sim quaestiones [et illa omnia, quae tibi, domine mi Jacobe, in principiis indicavi, uti ne eadem repetam], libenter promisi, cum ipso me iter acturum; hoc est enim, aio, quod cupidissime exspectabam. Verumtamen prius mihi cupio rationem veritatis exponi, ut sciam, si mortalis, an immortalis sit anima, et si immortalis, utrum pro his quae hic agit, ducatur ad judicium. Sed et quae sit justitia, quae Deo placeat, scire desidero.Tum praeterea, si factus est mundus, vel quare factus, aut si solvendus est, an in melius renovandus, aut si omnino post haec non erit mundus, et ne per singula progrediar, haec atque horum similia ut se habeant, discere me velle respondi. Ad haec Petrus: Breviter, inquit, tibi, o Clemens, rerum scientiam tradam, et ausculta jam nunc.
When I had explained to him what purpose I had formed from the beginning, and how I had been worn out by empty questions (and all those things which I told you, my lord James, at the beginning, so that I need not repeat them), I gladly promised that I would travel with him; “for this,” I said, “is what I was most eagerly waiting for. But first I want the account of the truth explained to me, so that I may know whether the soul is mortal or immortal, and, if immortal, whether it will be brought to judgment for what it does here. I also want to know what righteousness is, the righteousness that pleases God. Then besides, whether the world was made, and why it was made, or whether it is to be dissolved, or renewed for the better, or whether after this there will be no world at all; and, not to go through every point, I want to learn how these and similar things stand.” To this Peter said: “Briefly, Clement, I will impart to you the knowledge of these things; listen now.”
1.15PG 1:1214b–1215a
Voluntas Dei et consilium latuit homines multis ex causis. Primo quidem pro institutione mala, pro sodalitatibus pessimis, pro consuetudine nequam, pro colloquiis non bonis, pro praesumptionibus minus rectis, pro his, inquam, omnibus, primum error, deinde contemptus, tum infidelitas et malitia, avaritia quoque et vana jactantia, aliaque his similia mala, velut fumus quidam immensus, universam domum hujus mundi replevit, et habitantibus intrinsecus intuendi Conditorem suum, aspectum liberum non dedit, neque quae ei essent placita pervidendi. Quid igitur his qui sunt intrinsecus convenit, nisi ut ex intimis praecordiis clamore prolato, auxilium invocent ejus, quem solum domus fumo repleta non claudit, ut accedens aperiat januam domus, quo possit fumus quidem qui intrinsecus habetur, excludi, lux vero solis quae extrinsecus resplendet, induci.
“The will and counsel of God have been hidden from men for many reasons. First, indeed, because of bad upbringing, very evil companionships, wicked habits, conversations that are not good, and presumptions that are not right. Because of all these, I say, first error, then contempt, then unbelief and malice, avarice too and vain boasting, and other evils like these, have filled the whole house of this world like a vast smoke, and have not allowed those who dwell inside a free view to behold their Founder, nor to perceive what is pleasing to him. What then befits those who are inside, except to raise a cry from their inmost hearts and call for the help of him whom alone the smoke-filled house does not shut in, that he may come and open the door of the house, so that the smoke that is inside may be let out, and the light of the sun that shines outside may be let in?”
1.16PG 1:1215a–1215b
Hunc ergo qui ad auxilium domus, caligine ignorantiae et vitiorum fumo repletae, perquiritur, illum esse dicimus, qui appellatur verus propheta, qui solus illuminare animas hominum potest, ita ut oculis suis viam salutis evidenter inspiciant. Aliter enim impossibile est, de rebus divinis aeternisque cognoscere, nisi qui ab isto vero propheta didicerit; quia sicut ipse paulo ante memorabas, fides rerum causarumque sententiae, pro ingeniis magis defendentium ponderantur. Unde et eadem causa nunc justa, nunc putatur injusta, et quod modo verum videbatur, alterius assertione falsum videtur. Ista de causa religionis ac pietatis fides veri prophetae praesentiam postulavit, ut ipse nobis diceret de singulis, prout se ipsa veritas habet, et doceret quomodo oporteat de singulis credi. Et ideo ante omnia fidem prophetae, omni cum examinatione oportet probari; quem cum cognoveris vere esse prophetam, de reliquo cuncta ei credas oportet, nec ultra discutere eum per singula quae docuerit, sed habere firma et sancta quae dicit, quaeque quamvis fide suscipi videantur. antehabita tamen probatione creduntur. Cum enim semel ex initio prophetae veritas examinata constiterit, reliqua demum fide audienda sunt et tenenda, qua eum doctorem veritatis esse jam constat. Et sicut certum est, cuncta secundum veritatis regulam teneri oportere, quae ad divinam scientiam spectant, ita indubitatum est, a nullo alio nisi ab ipso solo sciri posse, quod verum est.
“He, then, whose help is sought for the house filled with the darkness of ignorance and the smoke of vices is, we say, the one who is called the true Prophet, who alone can enlighten the souls of men, so that they see the way of salvation plainly with their own eyes. For otherwise it is impossible to gain knowledge of divine and eternal things, unless one has learned from that true Prophet; because, as you yourself mentioned a little while ago, belief about things and opinions about causes are weighed rather according to the talents of those who defend them. Hence the same cause is thought now just, now unjust, and what seemed true a moment ago seems false on the assertion of another. For this reason faith in religion and piety required the presence of the true Prophet, that he himself might tell us about each thing as the truth itself stands, and teach how one ought to believe about each. And therefore before everything the credibility of the prophet must be tested with all examination; and once you have recognized that he is truly a prophet, you must believe him in everything thereafter, and no longer discuss point by point what he teaches, but hold what he says as firm and sacred; and these things, though they seem to be received by faith, are nevertheless believed on the strength of the proof already made. For once the truth of the prophet has been established by examination at the start, the rest is to be heard and held by the faith by which it is already established that he is a teacher of truth. And as it is certain that all things that pertain to divine knowledge must be held according to the rule of truth, so it is beyond doubt that what is true can be known from no one else but from him alone.”
1.17PG 1:1215b–1216b
Et his dictis, tam mihi aperte et tam dilucide, quis iste esset propheta, et quomodo inveniretur, exposuit, ut ego mihi ante oculos habere, et manu contrectare viderer probationes, quas de prophetica veritate protulerat, ingentique stupore defigerer, quomodo ea quae omnes quaerunt, ante oculos posita nullus videt. Unde jubente eo, ea quae ad me locutus est, in ordinem redigens, librum de vero propheta conscripsi, eumque de Caesarea, ad te, ipso iubente, transmisi. Dicebat enim mandatum se accepisse abs te, ut per singulos annos, si qua essent a se dicta gestaque, ad te descripta transmitteret. Interea initio sermonis sui, quem prima die habuit ad me de vero propheta et de aliis plurimis, cum me instruxisset plenissime, addidit etiam haec: Vide, inquit, de reliquo, et interesto tractatibus meis; quos, si quando necessitas attulerit, habebo cum his qui contradicunt; adversus quos disputans, etiam si forte inferior visus fuero, non verebor, ne forte tu de his, quae tibi a me sunt tradita, in dubium venias, quia etiamsi ego visus fuero superari, non tamen idcirco et ea, quae nobis verus propheta tradidit, infirma videbuntur. Spero tamen quod nec in disputationibus superemur, si modo rationabiles sint auditores et amici veritatis, qui discernere valeant vim speciemque verborum, et agnoscere qui sermo ex arte sophistica veniat, non veritatem continens, sed imaginem veritatis, et qui sit qui simpliciter ac sine fuco prolatus, omnem vim non in specie et ornatu, sed in veritate et ratione possideat.
Having said this, he explained to me so openly and so clearly who that Prophet was and how he might be found, that I seemed to have before my eyes and to handle with my hand the proofs he had produced concerning the prophetic truth; and I was fixed in great astonishment that no one sees what all are seeking, though it is placed before their eyes. Then, at his command, arranging in order what he had said to me, I wrote a book about the true Prophet and, at his command, sent it to you from Caesarea. For he said that he had received an instruction from you to send you each year, written out, whatever he had said and done. Meanwhile, at the beginning of the discourse that he held with me on the first day about the true Prophet and very many other things, when he had instructed me most fully, he added this also: “See to it,” he said, “from now on, that you are present at my discussions, which I shall hold, whenever necessity requires, with those who oppose us. In disputing against them, even if I should perhaps seem to be worsted, I shall not fear that you will come to doubt what I have handed on to you; because even if I seem to be beaten, the things the true Prophet has handed on to us will not on that account seem weak. Yet I hope that we shall not be beaten in disputations either, provided the hearers are reasonable and friends of truth, able to discern the force and appearance of words, and to recognize which speech comes from the sophistic art, containing not truth but an image of truth, and which, uttered simply and without coloring, has all its force not in appearance and ornament but in truth and reason.”
1.18PG 1:1216b–1217a
Ad haec ego: Omnipotenti, inquam, Deo gratias ago, quia ut desideravi, instructus sum. Verumtamen de me in tantum esse debes securus, quod de his quae didici abs te, in dubium venire non possim, ut si tu ipse velis aliquando fidem meam a vero propheta transferre, omnino non possis; ita pleno Spiritu hausi, quae tradidisti. Et ne putes magnum tibi me aliquid polliceri, quod ab hac fide negem me posse transferri, certum est apud me, quia quicunque hominum hanc de vero propheta acceperit rationem, dubitare ultra de veritate nullatenus poterit. Et ideo confido de hoc divino dogmate coalitus delinito, in quo omnis ars malitiae superatur. Adversus prophetiam etenim neque ars ulla stare sufficiet, neque sophismatum syllogismorumque versutiae. Sed omnis qui audierit de vero propheta, necesse est ut statim desiderium capiat ipsius veritatis, nec ultra sub occasione veri quaerendi, diversos patietur errores. Propter quod, domine mi, o Petre, nolo sis ultra sollicitus, tanquam de eo qui nesciat quid acceperit, et quantum sibi commissum sit muneris; certus esto, quod scienti et intelligenti gratiam contulisti, nec facile possum decipi, pro eo quod, quae diu desiderabam, cito videor adeptus. Potest enim fieri ut alius desiderans cito adipiscatur, alius nec tarde ad desiderata perveniat.
To this I said: “I give thanks to almighty God that I have been instructed as I desired. Yet you may be so far assured about me that I cannot come to doubt what I have learned from you, so that even if you yourself should at some time wish to transfer my faith from the true Prophet, you could not do it at all; with so full a spirit have I drunk in what you have handed on. And lest you think I am promising you something great in saying that I cannot be moved from this faith: it is certain to me that whoever among men has received this account of the true Prophet can never again doubt the truth in any way. And therefore I am confident, having grown together with this divine teaching, in which every art of malice is overcome. For against prophecy no art will be able to stand, nor the cunning of sophisms and syllogisms. Everyone who has heard of the true Prophet must at once conceive a desire for the truth itself, and will no longer, on the pretext of seeking the truth, endure various errors. Therefore, my lord Peter, I do not want you to be anxious any more, as about one who does not know what he has received and how great a gift has been entrusted to him. Be sure that you have bestowed a favor on one who knows and understands, and I cannot easily be deceived because I seem to have quickly obtained what I long desired. For it can happen that one man who desires obtains quickly, while another does not reach his desires even slowly.”
1.19PG 1:1217a
Et Petrus, his a me auditis: Gratias ago, inquit, Deo meo, et pro salute tua, et pro requie mea; valde enim delector, quia intellexisse te video, quanta sit virtutis propheticae magnitudo, et quia, ut ais, nec si ego ipse cupiam, quod absit! potero te transvertere in aliam fidem. Ex hoc jam incipe esse nobiscum, et crastina die interesto disputationibus nostris; erit enim mihi certamen cum Simone Mago. Cumque haec dixisset, secessit, ut cibum caperet cum suis, me autem seorsum vesci jussit. Et post cibum cum laudem dedisset Deo et gratias egisset, etiam hujus ipsius facti mihi reddidit rationem, et addidit, dicens: Det tibi Dominus exaequari nobis in omnibus, ut percepto baptismate possis ad eamdem nobiscum convenire mensam. Et his dictis, quiescere me jussit; jam enim ad somnum et natura corporis, et ratio temporis invitabat.
And Peter, hearing this from me, said: “I give thanks to my God both for your salvation and for my own peace; for I am greatly delighted because I see that you have understood how great is the power of prophecy, and because, as you say, not even I myself, if I wished (which God forbid!), could turn you to another faith. From now on begin to be with us, and tomorrow be present at our disputations; for I am to have a contest with Simon Magus.” When he had said this, he withdrew to take food with his own people, but told me to eat apart. And after the meal, when he had given praise and thanks to God, he also gave me the reason for this very practice, and added: “May the Lord grant you to be made like us in all things, so that, having received baptism, you may come to the same table with us.” Having said this, he told me to rest; for by now both the nature of the body and the hour invited to sleep.
1.20PG 1:1217a–1218a
Postera vero die matutinus ad nos ingrediebatur Zacchaeus, et cum salutasset, ait ad Petrum: Differt Simon certaminis diem in undecimam mensis praesentis, quae est post septem dies. Tunc enim magis vacuum sibi disceptandi tempus affirmat. Sed et mihi videtur comperendinatio eius etiam nobis esse necessaria, ut plures conveniant, qui disputationis nostrae vel auditores vel judices fiant. Verumtamen si probabile tibi videtur, inter moras ea, quae in controversiam venire posse opinamur, inter nosmetipsos prius discutiamus,et unusquisque nostrum, cum quae proponenda sint et quae respondenda, cognoverit, apud semetipsum pertractet, si recte se habeant, aut si invenire poterit aliquid adversarius quod objiciat, aut quo objecta frustretur. Si vero ex omni latere, quae a nobis dicenda sunt, claruerit esse munita, ita demum confidenter quaestionis ineatur exordium. Et quidem mea haec est sententia, quod ante omnia requiri oporteat, quid sit omnium primum, quidve immediatum, quod etiam causam esse omnium quae sunt, docendum est; deinde cuncta quae sunt, si facta sunt, et a quo, et per quem vel propter quem; utrum ab uno, an a duobus, an a multis accepere substantiam; et utrum ex nullis substantibus, an ex aliquibus sumpta sint, et adornata; tum si aliqua virtus est in altissimis, aut in infernis; si est aliquid melius omnibus, aut cunctis inferius; si sunt aliqui motus, aut nulli; si haec quae videntur, erant semper, et erunt; si exstitere nullo operante, et nullo solvente dilabentur. Si, inquam, ex his initium acceperit disputatio, puto quod ea quae quaerentur, diligenti examinatione discussa facile clarescant. Cum autem haec claruerint, eorum quae sequuntur, in promptu reperietur agnitio. Ego quid senserim protuli; quid etiam tibi videatur, indicare ne pigeat.
Early next day Zacchaeus came in to us and, after greeting us, said to Peter: “Simon postpones the day of the contest to the eleventh of the present month, which is seven days from now; for he says he will then have more free time for disputing. And to me his adjournment seems necessary for us too, so that more may gather to be either hearers or judges of our disputation. However, if it seems good to you, let us in the meantime discuss among ourselves first the things we think may come into controversy, so that each of us, knowing what is to be proposed and what answered, may consider with himself whether they are sound, or whether the adversary can find anything to object or by which to frustrate our objections. And if it becomes clear that what we are to say is fortified on every side, then at last let the inquiry be begun with confidence. My opinion is this: that before everything we should ask what is first of all, or what is immediate, which must also be shown to be the cause of all things that are; then, concerning all things that are, whether they were made, and by whom, and through whom or for whom; whether they received their substance from one, or from two, or from many; and whether they were taken and fashioned from nothing existing, or from some things; then whether there is any power in the highest things or in the lowest; whether there is something better than all, or inferior to all; whether there are any motions, or none; whether these things that are seen always were and always will be; whether they came into being with no one at work, and will pass away with no one dissolving them. If, I say, the disputation begins from these, I think that the questions inquired into, discussed with careful examination, will easily become clear. And when these have become clear, the knowledge of what follows will be readily found. I have put forward what I think; do not hesitate to say what seems right to you as well.”
1.21PG 1:1218a–1219a
Ad haec Petrus: Dic, inquit, interim Simoni, faciat ut libet, certus quod, divina Providentia largiente, semper nos inveniet paratos. Et Zacchaeus quidem quae audierat, egressus est Simoni nuntiare. Petrus vero respiciens ad nos, et intelligens contristatum me esse pro dilatione certaminis, ait: Qui credit summi Dei providentia dispensari mundum, non debet, o amice Clemens, de singulis quae quoque modo accidunt, aspernanter accipere, certus quod justitia Dei, etiam ea, quae superflua videntur aut contraria, in unoquoque negotio opportuno exitu competentique dispensat, praecipue tamen erga eos qui eum familiarius colunt; et ideo qui de his, ut dixi, certus est, si quid eveniat contra sententiam, novit pro eo moerorem de animis expellere, meliori sententia manifestum habens, quod dispensatione boni Dei, etiam quod contrarium putatur, vertatur in melius. Propter quod, ο Clemens, etiamnunc non te contristet Magi Simonis ista dilatio. Credo enim quod per Dei providentiam gestum sit ad utilitatem tuam, ut possim tibi rationem fidei nostrae, in hac septem dierum comperendinatione, absque aliquo strepitu per ordinem consequenter exponere secundum traditionem veri prophetae, qui solus scit, quae facta sunt, ut facta sint, et quae fiunt, ut fiant, quaeque erunt, ut erunt; quae tamen manifeste quidem dicta, non tamen manifeste scripta sunt, in tantum, ut cum leguntur, intelligi sine expositore non possint propter peccatum quod coadolevit hominibus, sicut superius diximus. Idcirco igitur explanabuntur tibi per me omnia, ut in his quae scripta sunt, dilucide quae sit sententia legislatoris agnoscas.
To this Peter said: “Tell Simon meanwhile to do as he pleases, sure that, by the gift of divine Providence, he will always find us ready.” And Zacchaeus went out to report to Simon what he had heard. But Peter, looking at us and perceiving that I was saddened by the postponement of the contest, said: “One who believes that the world is governed by the providence of the supreme God ought not, my friend Clement, to take amiss any particular thing that happens in whatever way, being sure that the justice of God directs to a timely and fitting outcome even what seems superfluous or contrary in any affair, especially toward those who worship him more intimately. And therefore one who is sure of these things, as I said, if anything happens contrary to his expectation, knows how to drive grief from his mind on that account, holding it plain by his better judgment that by the governance of the good God even what is thought contrary is turned to the better. Therefore, Clement, do not let even this postponement by Simon Magus sadden you. For I believe it has been brought about by the providence of God for your benefit, so that in this seven days' adjournment I may set out to you without any disturbance, in order and consecutively, the account of our faith according to the tradition of the true Prophet, who alone knows the things that have happened as they happened, the things that are happening as they happen, and the things that will be as they will be. These things were indeed spoken plainly but not written plainly, so much so that when they are read they cannot be understood without an interpreter, because of the sin that has grown up with men, as we said above. For this reason, then, everything will be explained to you by me, so that in what has been written you may clearly recognize what is the mind of the lawgiver.”
1.22PG 1:1219a–1219b
Cumque haec dixisset, exponere mihi singula de his, quae in quaestione esse videbantur legis capitulis coepit, ab initio creaturae usque ad id temporis, quo ad eum Caesaream devolutus sum. Haec mihi dicens, dilatio Simonis contulit, ut per ordinem cuncta cognoscerem. Alias, inquit, secundum ea quae opportunitas sermonis attulerit, de singulis quibusque, quae nunc compendiosius diximus, latius disseremus, ut secundum ea quae pollicitus sum tibi, plenius de omnibus perfectiusque cognoscas. Quia ergo hodierna adhuc nobis superest dies, ex his quae dilata sunt, volo tibi rursus ea quae dicta sunt breviter iterare, ut magis tibi ad memoriam revocentur. Et exin coepit hoc modo mentibus meis innovare quae dixerat: Meministi, o amice Clemens, quae mihi fuerit de aeterno saeculo, ac finem nesciente narratio? Tum ego: Nihil, inquam, o Petre, aliquando retinebo, si hoc omittere aut oblivisci potuero.
When he had said this, he began to explain to me one by one the chapters of the law that seemed to be in question, from the beginning of creation up to the time when I came to him at Caesarea, telling me that Simon's postponement had made it possible for me to learn everything in order. “At other times,” he said, “as the occasion of the discourse brings them up, we shall discuss more broadly each of the things we have now spoken of more briefly, so that, as I promised you, you may learn about everything more fully and perfectly. Since, then, today still remains to us of the days granted by the delay, I wish to go over briefly again what has been said, so that it may be better recalled to your memory.” And thereupon he began in this way to renew in my mind what he had said: “Do you remember, my friend Clement, the account I gave you of the eternal age that knows no end?” Then I said: “I shall never retain anything, Peter, if I can omit or forget that.”
1.23PG 1:1219b–1220b
Et Petrus libenter hac mea responsione suscepta: Gratulor tibi, inquit, quod ita responderis, et non quod hinc ipsa facile dicas, sed te meminisse protuleris; quae enim summa sunt, silentio honorari volunt. Ad fidem tamen eorum, quae de ineffabilibus meministi, dic quae retines ex his, quae In loco secundo a nobis dicta sunt, quae proferri facile queunt, ut pervidens tenacitatem memoriae tuae, de quibus volo, prompte tibi iudicem, et libenter aperiam. Tum ego, ubi adverti eum auditorum memoria gaudere, Non solum, inquam, definitionis tuae memor sum, sed et praefationis illius, quae ante definitionem posita est, et omnium pene quae exposuisti, sensum integrum servo, etiamsi verba non omnia, quia tanquam vernacula animae meae et ingenita effecta sunt, quae dixisti. Nimium enim sitienti mihi dulcissimum poculum porrexisti. Et ne putes, quod rerum immemor, verbis te occupem, jam nunc quae dicta sunt in memoriam revocabo; in quo me plurimum juvat ordo disputationis tuae. Etenim quia consequenter directa sunt et librate ordinata, quae dicis, idcirco et facile ad memoriam ordinis sui lineis revocantur. Multum namque ad recordandum prodest ordo dictorum; cum enim recolere singula per consequentiam coeperis, ubi aliquid deest, statim sensus inquirit, et cum invenerit, servat, aut certe, si investigare nequierit, a magistro requirere non pigebit. Sed ne moram faciam in reddendo ea quae poscis a me, retexam breviter quae de veritatis definitione tradidisti.
And Peter, gladly receiving this answer of mine, said: “I congratulate you on answering so, and on declaring, not that you can easily speak of those things themselves, but that you remember them; for the highest things wish to be honored with silence. Yet, to give proof of what you remember about the ineffable things, tell what you retain of what we said in the second place, which can easily be uttered, so that, seeing the tenacity of your memory, I may readily point out to you the things I wish, and gladly open them.” Then I, when I noticed that he rejoiced in the memory of his hearers, said: “I remember not only your definition, but also that preface which was placed before the definition; and of nearly everything you expounded I keep the sense entire, even if not all the words, because what you said has become as it were native and inborn to my soul. For you held out a most sweet cup to me when I was exceedingly thirsty. And lest you think that I am occupying you with words while forgetful of the matter, I will now recall what was said; in this the order of your disputation helps me greatly. For because what you say proceeds consecutively and is arranged in balance, it is easily recalled to memory along the lines of its order. The order of what is said helps much toward remembering; for when you begin to recall each thing in sequence, wherever something is missing, the mind at once searches for it, and when it finds it keeps it, or at least, if it cannot track it down, it will not be reluctant to ask the teacher. But so as not to delay in giving back what you ask of me, I will briefly go over again what you taught about the definition of truth.”
1.24PG 1:1220b–1221a
Erat semper, et est, et erit illud a quo prima voluntas genita sempiternitate constat, et ex prima voluntate iterum voluntas. Post haec mundus, ex mundo tempus, ex hoc hominum multitudo, ex multitudine electio amicorum, ex quorum unanimitate pacificum construitur Dei regnum. Reliqua vero, quae hanc consequi deberent, alias te mihi dicturum esse promiseras. Post haec, cum de creatura mundi exposuisses, definitionem Dei, quam in conspectu omnium primorum angelorum de sua voluntate promisit, quamque aeternam legem cunctis statuit, intimasti, et quod duo regna posuit, praesentis dico temporis et futuri, et tempora utrique constituit, statuitque exspectari judicii diem, quam ipse definivit, in qua habenda sit rerum, animarumque discretio, ut impii quidem pro peccatis suis igni tradantur aeterno, hi vero qui secundum voluntatem conditoris Dei vixerint, pro bonis operibus benedictione suscepta, clarissima luce fulgentes, introducti ad aeternam sedem, et in incorruptione durantes, ineffabilium bonorum munera aeterna percipiant.
“There always was, and is, and will be that from which the first will, begotten from everlasting, subsists; and from the first will, again a will. After this, the world; from the world, time; from this, the multitude of men; from the multitude, the choice of friends, from whose unanimity the peaceful kingdom of God is built up. The rest, which ought to follow this, you promised to tell me another time. After this, when you had explained the creation of the world, you made known the decree of God which he declared of his own will in the presence of all the first angels, and which he established as an eternal law for all; and that he set up two kingdoms, I mean that of the present time and that of the future, and appointed times for both, and determined that a day of judgment, which he himself has fixed, should be awaited, on which a separation of things and of souls is to be made, so that the wicked will be handed over to eternal fire for their sins, but those who have lived according to the will of God the Creator, having received a blessing for their good works, shining with brightest light, brought into the eternal abode, and continuing in incorruption, will receive the eternal gifts of ineffable good things.”
1.25PG 1:1221a
Haec me prosequente, gaudio perfusus Petrus et tanquam super filio tripudians, ne forte in reliquorum memoria titubans, erubescerem propter eos qui aderant: Sufficit, inquit, Clemens; evidentius enim haec quam a me ipso exposita fuerant, edidisti. Et ego aio: Narrandi ordinem, et lucidius ea quae res expetit proferendi, eruditio nobis contulit liberalis, qua si utamur in antiquitatis erroribus, in perniciem vitae verborum decore ac suavitate decidimus; si vero ad asserendam veritatem eruditionem sermonis et gratiam conferamus, puto ex hoc non parum utilitatis acquiri. Verumtamen, mi domine Petre, quanta me arbitraris gratulatione sublatum, cum in caeteris omnibus, tum praecipue in illius doctrinae sententia, qua ais: Unus est Deus, cujus opus mundus est, quique, quia justus est omnimodis, unicuique pro actibus suis reddet. Et posthaec addidisti, dicens: Pro cujus dogmatis assertione innumera verborum millia meo _ vehuntur; sed in his, quibus veri prophetae concessa est scientia, omnis ista verborum silva succisa est. Et propter hoc cum mihi tradideris de vero propheta sermonem, omni me assertionum firmitate roborasti. Inde denique ego cum advertissem in hoc summam totius religionis pietatisque consistere, illico respondi: Optime prosecutus es, Petre, propter quod de reliquo jam tanquam scienti, quae sint fundamenta fidei et pietatis, veri prophetae traditiones incunctanter expone, cui soli credendum esse evidenter probatum est. Illam vero expositionem, quae assertionibus et argumentis indigeat, infidelibus serva, quibus nondum committere propheticae gratiae indubitabilem judicaveris fidem. Et cum haec dixissem, tu utrumque, inquam, pollicitus es, et hanc te mihi simplicem expositionem ac totius erroris expertem, et illam quae per singulas quasque quaestiones explicatur, quae movebuntur, in tempore traditurum. Et post haec exposuisti per ordinem, a principio mundi usque ad praesens tempus consequentiam rerum; et si placet, possum memoriter universa retexere.
As I was going through these things, Peter, filled with joy and exulting as if over a son, and lest I should perhaps falter in remembering the rest and be put to shame before those who were present, said: “Enough, Clement; for you have set these things out more clearly than I myself had expounded them.” And I said: “A liberal education has given me the ability to narrate in order and to set out more lucidly what the matter requires. If we use it in the errors of antiquity, we fall into the ruin of life through the beauty and sweetness of words; but if we bring the learning and grace of speech to the assertion of truth, I think that no little benefit is gained from it. But, my lord Peter, how great a joy, do you think, lifted me up, both in everything else and especially at the statement of that teaching in which you say: There is one God, whose work the world is, and who, because he is righteous in every way, will repay each according to his deeds. And after this you added: For the assertion of this doctrine countless thousands of words are brought forward; but in those to whom the knowledge of the true Prophet has been granted, that whole forest of words has been cut down. And for this reason, by handing on to me the discourse about the true Prophet, you strengthened me with all firmness of assertion.” Then at last, when I had noticed that the sum of all religion and piety consists in this, I at once answered: “You have set it out excellently, Peter; therefore from now on, as to one who knows what the foundations of faith and piety are, expound without hesitation the traditions of the true Prophet, who alone, it has been plainly proved, must be believed. But keep that exposition which needs assertions and arguments for unbelievers, to whom you have not yet judged it right to entrust the undoubting faith of prophetic grace.” And when I had said this, I said: “You promised both: to hand on to me in due time both this simple exposition, free of all error, and that which is unfolded through each of the questions that will be raised. And after this you set out in order the sequence of events from the beginning of the world to the present time; and if you please, I can go over it all again from memory.”
1.26PG 1:1221a–1222a
Ad haec Petrus: Magnifice, inquit, delector, o Clemens, quod tam tuto cordi verba committam; memorem namque esse eorum quae dicuntur, indicium est in promptu habere operum fidem: cui vero malus daemon salutis verba furatur et de memoria rapit, etiam si velit salvari non poterit; perdit enim viam, qua pervenitur ad vitam. Propter quod eo magis repetamus quae dicta sunt, et confirmemus ea in corde tuo; id est, quomodo vel a quo factus sit mundus, ut tendamus ad amicitiam Conditoris. Amicitia autem efficitur bene vivendo et voluntati ejus obediendo, quae voluntas omnium viventium lex est. Breviter ergo tibi haec eadem firmioris causa memoriae retexemus.
To this Peter said: “I am greatly delighted, Clement, that I entrust words to so safe a heart; for to remember what is said is a sign of having the faith of works at hand. But the one from whom the evil demon steals the words of salvation and snatches them from memory cannot be saved even if he wishes; for he loses the way by which one comes to life. Therefore let us all the more repeat what has been said and confirm it in your heart: that is, how and by whom the world was made, so that we may strive for the friendship of the Creator. And friendship is gained by living well and obeying his will, and that will is the law of all living beings. So let us briefly go over these same things again for the sake of firmer memory.”
1.27PG 1:1222a
In principio cum fecisset Deus coelum et terram, tanquam domum unam, ipsa quae ex corporibus mundi reddita est umbra, his quae intrinsecus clausa fuerant, tenebras ex se dedit. Sed cum voluntas Dei introduxisset lucem, tenebrae illae quae ex umbra corporum factae fuerant, continuo devoratae sunt; tunc deinde lux in diem, tenebrae deputantur in noctem. Jam vero aqua, quae erat intra mundum, in medio primi illius coeli terraeque spatio, quasi gelu concreta et crystallo solidata distenditur, et hujusmodi firmamento velut intercluduntur media caeli ac terrae spatia; idque firmamentum coelum Conditor appellavit, antiquioris illius vocabulo nuncupatum. Et ita totius mundi machinam, cum una domus esset, in duas dividit regiones. Divisionis autem haec fuit causa, ut superna regio angelis habitaculum, inferior vero praeberet hominibus. Post haec quod reliquum fuit in inferioribus aquarum, jussu voluntatis aeternae, locus maris et chaos effectum recepit, eisque ad demersa et concava defluentibus, arida quidem apparuit terra. Congregationes autem aquarum, effecta sunt maria. Et post haec terra, quae apparuerat, herbarum et virgultorum diversa genera produxit, fontes quoque et fluvios non solum in planis, sed et in montibus protulit; et sic cuncta praeparata sunt, ut hominibus qui habitarent in ea, esset facultas his omnibus pro arbitrio uti, id est sive ad bona velint, sive etiam ad mala.
“In the beginning, when God had made heaven and earth as one house, the shadow cast by the bodies of the world gave darkness from itself to the things that had been shut inside. But when the will of God had brought in light, that darkness which had been made from the shadow of the bodies was at once swallowed up; then the light is assigned to the day, the darkness to the night. Now the water which was within the world, in the middle of the space of that first heaven and earth, is spread out as if congealed by frost and made solid as crystal; and by such a firmament the middle spaces of heaven and earth are, as it were, shut off; and the Creator called this firmament heaven, naming it with the word for that older one. And thus he divides the whole fabric of the world, though it was one house, into two regions. The reason for the division was this: that the upper region should provide a dwelling for angels, and the lower for men. After this, at the command of the eternal will, the place of the sea and the chaos that had been made received what remained of the waters below; and as they flowed down into the deep and hollow places, the dry land appeared, and the gatherings of the waters became seas. And after this the earth that had appeared brought forth various kinds of plants and shrubs; it also produced springs and rivers, not only on the plains but on the mountains too; and so all things were prepared, so that the men who would dwell on it might be able to use all these things at their discretion, that is, whether they wish to use them for good or for evil.”
1.28PG 1:1222a–1223a
Post haec stellis adornat coelum istud visibile. Solem quoque et lunam ponit in eo, ut alterius lumine dies, et nox uteretur alterius, simulque ut essent indicio rerum praeteritarum, praesentium et futurarum. Pro signis enim temporum facta sunt ac dierum, quae videntur quidem ab omnibus, intelliguntur autem ab eruditis et intelligentibus solis. Cumque post haec de terra et aquis produci jussisset animantia, paradisum fecit, quem et deliciarum locum nominavit. Post haec autem ministerio ejus concessa, et habitationis ejus usibus lata.
“After this he adorns this visible heaven with stars. He also places in it the sun and the moon, so that the day might enjoy the light of the one and the night that of the other, and at the same time that they might be signs of things past, present, and future. For they were made for signs of seasons and of days; they are seen indeed by all, but understood only by the learned and intelligent. And when after this he had commanded living creatures to be brought forth from the earth and the waters, he made paradise, which he also named a place of delights. After this … granted for his service and given over to the uses of his dwelling.”
1.29PG 1:1223a–1224a
Igitur consummatis omnibus quae in coelo et in terris sunt, atque in aquis, multiplicato etiam hominum genere, octava generatione homines justi qui angelorum vixerant vitam, illecti pulchritudine mulierum, ad promiscuos et illicitos concubitus declinaverunt, et inde jam indiscrete et contra ordinem cuncta agentes, statum rerum humanarum et divinitus traditum vitae ordinem permutarunt, ita ut omnes homines, vel persuasione, vel vi peccare in Creatorem suum cogerent Deum. Exin nona generatione nascuntur gigantes, illi qui Graecorum fabulae ferunt, sed immensis corporibus editi, quorum adhuc ad indicium in nonnullis locis ossa immensae magnitudinis ostenduntur. Sed adversum hos justa Dei providentia diluvium mundo introduxit, ut orbis quidem terrarum ab eorum contagione dilueretur, omnis vero locus ab impiorum nece verteretur in pelagus. Unus tamen tunc inventus est justus, nomine Noe, qui in arca cum tribus filiis eorumque uxoribus liberatus, post aquarum et seminibus, mundi habitator effectus est.
“So, when all things in heaven and on earth and in the waters had been completed, and the human race too had multiplied, in the eighth generation righteous men who had lived the life of angels, enticed by the beauty of women, turned aside to promiscuous and unlawful intercourse; and from then on, doing everything indiscriminately and against order, they changed the state of human affairs and the order of life handed down by God, so that they compelled all men, by persuasion or by force, to sin against God their Creator. Then in the ninth generation the giants are born, those whom the fables of the Greeks tell of … but produced with immense bodies, whose bones of immense size are still shown in some places as evidence. But against them the just providence of God brought a flood upon the world, so that the earth might be washed clean of their contagion, and every place turned into sea by the destruction of the wicked. Yet one righteous man was found then, by name Noah, who, delivered in the ark with his three sons and their wives, after the waters … and with the seeds, became the inhabitant of the world.”
1.30PG 1:1224a–1225a
Duodecima generatione, cum Deus benedixisset homines et multiplicari coepissent, acceperunt praeceptum,ne sanguinem degustarent; propter hoc enim etiam diluvium factum est. Tertia decima generatione cum ex tribus filiis Noe, unus qui erat medius, patri fecisset injuriam, posteritati suae ex maledicto conditionem servitutis induxit. Cujus interim senior frater habitationis sortem eam, quae est in medio terrae, suscepit, in qua est regio Judaeae; junior vero orientis plagam sortitus est, ipse autem occidentis accepit. Quarta decima vero generatione ex maledicta progenie quidam propter artem magicam, primus aram statuit daemonibus, honorem sanguinis litans. Quinta decima generatione, primo omnium homines idolum statuentes adoraverunt, et usque ad illud tempus divinitus humano generi data Hebraeorum lingua tenuit monarchiam. Sexta decima generatione moverunt se ab oriente filii hominum, et venientes ad terras patrum suorum, unusquisque sortis suae locum, proprii vocabuli appellatione signavit. Septima decima generatione apud Babyloniam Nemrod primus regnavit, urbemque construxit, et inde migravit ad Persas, eosque ignem colere docuit.
“In the twelfth generation, when God had blessed men and they had begun to multiply, they received a commandment not to taste blood; for it was on account of this too that the flood had come. In the thirteenth generation, when the middle one of Noah's three sons had done his father an injury, he brought upon his posterity, through the curse, the condition of slavery. Meanwhile his elder brother received as his lot the dwelling in the middle of the earth, in which is the region of Judaea; the younger obtained the eastern quarter, and he himself received the western. In the fourteenth generation someone of the cursed progeny first set up an altar to demons for the sake of the magic art, offering the honor of blood. In the fifteenth generation men for the first time set up an idol and worshiped it; and until that time the Hebrew language, given to the human race by God, held sole sway. In the sixteenth generation the sons of men moved from the east, and, coming to the lands of their fathers, each marked the place of his lot with his own name. In the seventeenth generation Nimrod first reigned in Babylonia and built a city, and from there migrated to the Persians and taught them to worship fire.”
1.31PG 1:1225a–1225b
Octava decima generatione muratae urbes factae sunt, et exercitus instituti armaque, et judices legesque sancitae, templa constructa, et principes gentium tanquam dii adorati sunt. Nona decima generatione posteri illius, qui post diluvium maledictus est, proprios terminos excedentes, quos in occidentalibus partibus sorte susceperant, eos qui medium terrae fuerant sortiti locum, in terras orientales expellunt et usque ad Persidem fugant, ipsique in expulsorum locis iniqua sorte succedunt. Vicesima generatione ob incesti crimen, primus morte propria filius ante patrem defunctus est.
“In the eighteenth generation walled cities were made, armies organized and armed, judges and laws established, temples built, and the princes of nations were worshiped as gods. In the nineteenth generation the descendants of the one who was cursed after the flood, going beyond their own borders, which they had received by lot in the western parts, drove those who had been allotted the middle of the earth into the eastern lands, chased them as far as Persia, and themselves wrongfully took over the places of those expelled. In the twentieth generation, on account of the crime of incest, a son for the first time died before his father.”
1.32PG 1:1226a–1227a
Vicesima prima generatione exstitit vir quidam sapiens, ex genere eorum qui fuerunt expulsi, ex semine primogeniti filiorum Noe, nomine Abraham, a quo nostrum Hebraeorum ducitur genus. Hic cum universus iterum mundus diversis erroribus esset oppressus, et pro immanitate scelerum maturum ei pararetur excidium non jam per aquam, sed per ignem, cumque jam plaga initio a Sodomis sumpto immineret et universo orbi terrarum; pro amicitiis, quibus erat ei familiaritas cum Deo cui bene placuerat, universum mundum ne pariter periret eripuit. Ab initio tamen caeteris omnibus errantibus, ipse cum arte esset astrologus, ex ratione et ordine stellarum agnoscere potuit Conditorem, ejusque providentia intellexit cuncta moderari. Unde et angelus assistens ei per visionem, plenius eum de his quae sentire coepit, edocuit. Sed et quid generi ejus ac posteritati deberetur, ostendit, et non tam eis danda haec loca, quam reddenda promisit.
“In the twenty-first generation there arose a certain wise man, of the race of those who had been expelled, of the seed of the firstborn of Noah's sons, by name Abraham, from whom our Hebrew race is descended. When the whole world was again oppressed by various errors, and on account of the enormity of its crimes a speedy destruction was being prepared for it, no longer by water but by fire, and the stroke, beginning from Sodom, was already threatening the whole earth, he, because of the friendship by which he was intimate with God, whom he had pleased well, rescued the whole world from perishing likewise. From the beginning, however, while all others were in error, he, being an astrologer by art, was able from the reckoning and order of the stars to recognize the Creator, and understood that all things are governed by his providence. Hence also an angel, standing by him in a vision, taught him more fully about the things he was beginning to perceive. He also showed him what was due to his race and posterity, and promised that these lands were not so much to be given to them as restored.”
1.33PG 1:1227a–1227b
Igitur Abraham cum rerum causas desideraret agnoscere, idque secum intenta mente pervolveret, apparuit ei verus Propheta, qui solus hominum corda et propositum novit, et omnia ei quae desiderabat aperuit, Divinitatis scientiam docuit, mundi originem finemque pariter indicavit, animae immortalitatem ac vivendi instituta quibus Deo placeretur, ostendit, resurrecturos quoque mortuos, ac judicium futurum, bonorum remunerationem, malorum poenas, justo cuncta moderando judicio declaravit, omnibusque rite ac sufficienter edoctis ad sedes rursus invisibiles secessit. Verum cum adhuc Abraham in ignorantia versaretur, sicut tibi et antea jam diximus, nati sunt ei filii duo, quorum unus Ismael, alius Heliesdros appellati sunt. Ex alio barbarae gentes, ex alio Persarum populi descendunt. E quibus nonnulli Brachmanorum vitam et vicina instituta sectati sunt, alii apud Arabiam consederunt, ex quorum posteris nonnulli etiam in Egyptum dispersi sunt. Inde denique et Indorum quidam et Egyptiorum circumcidi didicere ac purioris observantiae esse quam caeteri, licet processu temporis quamplurimi eorum ad impietatem verterent argumentum et indicium castitatis.
“So when Abraham desired to know the causes of things and was pondering this intently in his mind, the true Prophet appeared to him, who alone knows the hearts and purposes of men, and opened to him all that he desired. He taught him the knowledge of the Godhead, made known the origin and likewise the end of the world, showed him the immortality of the soul and the rules of life by which God is pleased, and declared that the dead will rise, that there will be a judgment to come, the reward of the good and the punishment of the wicked, all governed by just judgment; and when he had taught him all things duly and sufficiently, he withdrew again to the invisible abodes. But while Abraham was still in ignorance, as we told you before, two sons were born to him, of whom one was called Ishmael, the other Eliezer. From the one descend the barbarous nations, from the other the peoples of the Persians. Some of these followed the way of life and the institutions of their neighbors the Brahmans; others settled in Arabia, and of their descendants some were dispersed even into Egypt. From these, indeed, some of the Indians and of the Egyptians learned to be circumcised and to keep a purer observance than the rest, though in the course of time very many of them turned what was the proof and sign of chastity into impiety.”
1.34PG 1:1227b–1228b
Verumtamen cum hos duos filios tempore, quo adhuc in ignorantia rerum vixerat, suscepisset, Dei agnitione percepta petit ab eo, quia erat justus, ut ex Sara quae ei erat conjux legitima, cum esset sterilis, habere progeniem mereretur; et accepit, quem et Isaac nominavit, ex quo natus est Jacob, de Jacob autem duodecim patriarchae, et ex ipsis duodecim septuaginta duo. Hi fame exorta in Egyptum veniunt cum omni domo sua, et intra annos quadringentos benedictione et promissione Dei multiplicati, affligebantur ab Egyptiis. Cumque affligerentur, apparuit verus Propheta Moysi, et Egyptios quidem resistentes, ne Hebraeorum populus exiret ab eis et rediret ad patriam terram, decem plagis coelestibus affecit, populum vero Dei eduxit ex Egypto. Sed qui superfuerant ex Egyptiis, conspirati cum animositate regis sui, insecuti sunt Hebraeos; quos cum reperissent super littus maris, et interimere omnes ac delere cogitarent, Moyses oratione ad Deum fusa mare in duas partes divisit, ita ut aqua dextra laevaque quasi gelu concreta teneretur, et populus quidem Dei transiret velut iter aridum, insequentes vero eos Egyptii temere ingressi necarentur. Ubi enim ultimus ex Hebraeorum populo ascendit, Egyptiorum quoque ultimus descendit in mare, et continuo aquae maris quae ut gelu constrictae tenebantur, praecepto ejus qui constrinxerat relaxatae, poenas de impiorum populo recepta naturae suae libertate sumpserunt.
“Yet, since he had received these two sons at the time when he was still living in ignorance of things, after he had gained the knowledge of God he asked of him, because he was righteous, that he might be found worthy to have offspring from Sarah, who was his lawful wife, though she was barren; and he received a son, whom he named Isaac, from whom was born Jacob, and from Jacob the twelve patriarchs, and from these twelve, seventy-two. When famine arose, these came into Egypt with all their household, and within four hundred years, multiplied by the blessing and promise of God, they were afflicted by the Egyptians. And when they were afflicted, the true Prophet appeared to Moses, and struck the Egyptians, who resisted the departure of the Hebrew people and their return to their native land, with ten plagues from heaven; and he led the people of God out of Egypt. But those of the Egyptians who survived, conspiring with the animosity of their king, pursued the Hebrews; and when they had overtaken them on the seashore and were planning to kill and destroy them all, Moses poured out prayer to God and divided the sea into two parts, so that the water was held on the right and on the left as if congealed by frost, and the people of God passed through as on a dry road, while the Egyptians who rashly entered in pursuit of them were killed. For when the last of the Hebrew people came up, the last of the Egyptians went down into the sea; and at once the waters of the sea, which had been held bound as if by frost, released by the command of him who had bound them, regained the freedom of their nature and took vengeance on the wicked people.”
1.35PG 1:1228b–1229a
Post haec Moyses, Dei omnia providentis praecepto Hebraeorum populum eduxit in desertum, et iter brevissimum, quod fert de Egypto ad Judaeam, relinquens, per longos eremi plebem duxit anfractus, ut quadraginta annorum exercitiis mala quae eis ex Egyptiorum moribus usu longi temporis inoleverant, innovatione mutatae consuetudinis aboleret. Interea venitur ad montem Sina, et inde lex eis, vocibus et visionibus coelestibus traditur decem conscripta praeceptis; quorum primum et maximum fuit, ut ipsum solum colerent Deum, nec ullam sibi aliam speciem vel formam statuerent ad colendum. Sed cum Moyses ascendisset ad montem, ibique diebus quadraginta moraretur, populus qui decem plagis percussam viderat Egyptum, et disruptum mare ac pedibus digressum, manna quoque sibi pro pane coelitus datum et ex sequenti petra poculum ministratum (quae species cibi per virtutem Dei, in quem quisque desiderasset, verteretur saporem), cumque sub plaga coeli ardentiore positi essent, ne aestibus coquerentur, nube obumbrabantur in die, nocte vero columna ignis illuminabantur, ne ad eremi vastitatem horror quoque accederet tenebrarum: cum, inquam, moraretur Moyses, ipsi secundum speciem Apidis, quem coli in Egypto viderant, aureum caput vituli facientes adoraverunt, et post tot ac tanta quae viderant mirabilia, veteris consuetudinis sordes elimare a se atque abstergere nequiverunt. Et ob hoc brevis spatii iter quod ex Egypto ducit ad Iudaeam relinquens, immenso eremi ambitu egit eos Moyses, si forte possit, ut superius memoravimus, vetustae consuetudinis mala novellae institutionis permutatione discutere.
“After this Moses, at the command of God who foresees all things, led the Hebrew people into the desert; and leaving the shortest road, which leads from Egypt to Judaea, he led the people through long windings of the wilderness, so that by the discipline of forty years he might abolish, through the novelty of a changed way of life, the evils that had grown into them by long custom from the habits of the Egyptians. Meanwhile they come to Mount Sinai, and there the law is given to them with heavenly voices and visions, written in ten commandments, of which the first and greatest was that they should worship God himself alone, and set up for themselves no other likeness or form to worship. But when Moses had gone up the mountain and was staying there forty days, the people—though they had seen Egypt struck with ten plagues, the sea split and crossed on foot, manna given them from heaven for bread, and drink supplied from the rock that followed them (and that kind of food was turned by the power of God into whatever flavor each desired), and though, being placed under the hotter quarter of the sky, they were shaded by a cloud by day lest they be scorched by the heat, and by night were lit by a pillar of fire, lest the horror of darkness be added to the vastness of the wilderness—while Moses, I say, was delaying, they made a golden calf's head after the likeness of Apis, whom they had seen worshiped in Egypt, and worshiped it; and after so many and such great wonders as they had seen, they could not file away and wipe off from themselves the filth of old custom. And for this reason Moses, leaving the short road that leads from Egypt to Judaea, drove them about through the immense circuit of the wilderness, to see whether he could, as we mentioned above, shake off the evils of old custom by the change of a new way of life.”
1.36PG 1:1229a
Cum interim fidelis et prudens dispensator Moyses pervidens, populo ex Egyptiorum consortio altius inolevisse vitium idolis immolandi, nec posse de eis radicem mali hujus excidi, immolare quidem eis concessit, sed Deo soli hoc fieri permisit, ut mediam quodammodo partem vitii altius inoliti resecaret; aliam vero mediam, per alium et ad aliud tempus reservaret emendandam, per illum scilicet, de quo ipse dixit: Prophetam vobis suscitabit Dominus Deus vester sicut me, ipsum audite secundum omnia quae dixerit vobis. Quicunque enim non audierit prophetam illum, exterminabitur anima ejus de populo suo.
“Meanwhile Moses, that faithful and wise steward, seeing that the vice of sacrificing to idols had grown deeply into the people from their association with the Egyptians, and that the root of this evil could not be cut out of them, allowed them indeed to sacrifice, but permitted this to be done to God alone, so that he might cut away, as it were, one half of the deeply ingrained vice, and reserve the other half to be corrected by another and at another time—namely by him of whom he himself said: ‘The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me; hear him in all things that he says to you. Whoever does not hear that prophet, his soul shall be destroyed from among his people.’”
1.37PG 1:1229a–1230a
Ad haec autem etiam locum statuit, in quo solo liceret eis immolare Deo. Hoc autem totum eo prospectu gerebatur, ut cum tempus opportunum venisset et didicissent per prophetam, quia Deus misericordiam vult et non sacrificium, viderent eum qui eos doceret locum Dei electum esse sapientiam ejus, in quo conveniret offerri hostias Deo, hunc autem locum, qui ad tempus videbatur electus, incursionibus hostium et excidiis saepe vexatum, et ad ultimum quoque audirent penitus excidendum. In cujus rei fidem etiam ante adventum veri prophetae, qui esset hostias cum loco pariter repudiaturus, saepe ab hostibus populatus est et igne incensus; atque in captivitatem populus abductus in exteras nationes, et exinde cum ad misericordiam Dei confugeret revocatus est, ut per haec doceretur, quia sacrificia offerens expellitur et in manus hostium traditur, misericordiam vero faciens et justitiam, sine sacrificiis de captivitate liberatur et in terram patriam restituitur. Sed hoc intelligere paucos admodum accidit. Plures enim etiamsi sentire haec et advertere poterant, vulgi tamen irrationali opinione tenebantur. Paucorum namque est recta cum libertate sententia.
“Besides this he also appointed a place in which alone it was lawful for them to sacrifice to God. All this was done with this in view: that when the fit time had come and they had learned through the Prophet that God desires mercy and not sacrifice, they might see him who would teach them that the place chosen by God, in which it is fitting that victims be offered to God, is his Wisdom; and might hear that this place, which seemed chosen for a time, often troubled by enemy incursions and destructions, was at last to be utterly destroyed. And in proof of this, even before the coming of the true Prophet, who was to reject the sacrifices together with the place, it was often plundered by enemies and burned with fire, and the people were carried into captivity among foreign nations and then, when they took refuge in the mercy of God, were brought back, so that they might be taught by this that a people offering sacrifices is driven out and delivered into the hands of enemies, but one doing mercy and righteousness is freed from captivity without sacrifices and restored to its native land. But very few happened to understand this. For most, even if they could perceive and notice these things, were nevertheless held by the irrational opinion of the crowd. For right judgment with freedom belongs to few.”
1.38PG 1:1230a
Igitur Moyses, his administratis, Ansen quemdam nomine praeponens populo, qui eos revocaret ad patriam terram, ipse ad montem quemdam praecepto Dei viventis ascendens, illic defunctus est; cujus tamen talis fuit mors, ut usque in hodiernum diem sepulturam ejus nullus invenerit. Ut ergo populus patrium contigit solum, per providentiam Dei primo statim ingressu iniquarum gentium habitatores fugantur, et ipsi haereditatem paternam judice sorte suscipiunt. Tum deinde per aliquantum temporis judicibus, non regibus gubernati, statu tranquilliore durarunt. Ubi vero tyrannos sibi magis quaesivere quam reges, tunc etiam in loco, qui eis orationis causa fuerat praedestinatus, templum pro ambitione regia construxere, et sic per ordinem regibus impiis sibi invicem succedentibus, ad majores impietates etiam populus declinavit.
“So Moses, having arranged these things and having set a certain man named Auses over the people to bring them back to their native land, himself went up a certain mountain at the command of the living God and died there; yet his death was such that to this day no one has found his burial place. When, then, the people reached their native soil, by the providence of God the inhabitants of the wicked nations were put to flight at their very first entrance, and they received their ancestral inheritance with the lot as judge. Then for some time, governed by judges, not kings, they continued in a quieter state. But when they sought for themselves tyrants rather than kings, then also, in the place which had been destined for them for prayer, they built a temple out of royal ambition; and so, as wicked kings succeeded one another in turn, the people too sank into greater impieties.”
1.39PG 1:1230a
Ut autem tempus adesse coepit, quo id quod deesse Moysis institutis diximus impleretur, et propheta quem praecinuerat appareret, qui eos primo per misericordiam Dei moneret cessare a sacrificiis, et ne forte putarent cessantibus hostiis remissionem sibi non fieri peccatorum, baptisma eis per aquam statuit, in quo ab omnibus peccatis invocato ejus nomine solverentur, et de reliquo perfectam vitam sequentes in immortalitate durarent, non pecudum sanguine sed sapientiae Dei purificatione purgati. Denique etiam hoc ponitur evidens magni mysterii hujus indicium, ut omnis qui credens prophetae huic, qui a Moyse praedictus est, baptizatur in nomine ipsius, ab excidio belli quod incredulae genti imminet ac loco ipsi, servetur illaesus, non credentes vero extorres loco et regno fiant, ut vel inviti intelligant et obediant voluntati Dei.
“But when the time began to be at hand for what we said was lacking in the institutions of Moses to be fulfilled, and for the Prophet whom he had foretold to appear, who would first warn them, through the mercy of God, to cease from sacrifices, then, lest they should perhaps think that with the cessation of victims there was no remission of sins for them, he instituted for them baptism by water, in which, at the invocation of his name, they would be set free from all sins, and, following a perfect life thereafter, would continue in immortality, purified not by the blood of cattle but by the cleansing of the Wisdom of God. Finally, this too is set forth as a clear sign of this great mystery: that everyone who, believing in this Prophet foretold by Moses, is baptized in his name will be kept unharmed from the destruction of the war that threatens the unbelieving nation and the place itself, while those who do not believe will be made exiles from their place and kingdom, so that even against their will they may understand and obey the will of God.”
1.40PG 1:1230a–1231a
His igitur ita praeordinatis, adest qui exspectabatur, indicia sui quibus fieret manifestus, signa et prodigia deferens. Sed ne sic quidem populus credidit, qui ad haec credenda tot saeculis eruditus est; et non solum non credidit, sed addidit infidelitati blasphemiam, voracem hominem et ventri servientem, ac daemone agi eum, qui ob salutem suam venerat, dicens. In tantum nequitia malorum ministeriis valet, quod nisi Sapientia Dei adfuisset his qui diligunt veritatem, universos pene simul impius error involveret. Nos ergo primos elegit duodecim sibi credentes, quos apostolos nominavit, postmodum alios septuaginta duos probatissimos discipulos, ut vel hoc modo recognita imagine Moysis crederet multitudo, quia hic est, quem praedixit Moyses venturum prophetam.
“These things being thus foreordained, he who was expected is present, bringing signs and wonders as marks by which he would be made manifest. But not even so did the people believe, though they had been trained for so many ages to believe these things; and not only did they not believe, but they added blasphemy to unbelief, saying that he who had come for their salvation was a glutton and a slave to his belly, and was driven by a demon. So strong is wickedness through the ministry of the evil ones that, had the Wisdom of God not been present to those who love the truth, impious error would have enveloped almost all at once. So he first chose us twelve, who believed in him, whom he named apostles, and afterwards seventy-two other most approved disciples, so that, at least in this way, recognizing the image of Moses, the multitude might believe that this is he whom Moses foretold as the prophet to come.”
1.41PG 1:1231a–1231b
Sed fortassis dicat aliquis, quia imitari numerum cuicunque possibile est; et quid de signis et virtutibus dicet, quae iste faciebat? Etenim Moyses virtutes et sanitates fecerat in Egypto. Is quoque, quem ipse praedixit sicut se ipsum surrecturum prophetam, cum omnem languorem et omnem infirmitatem curaret in plebe, virtutes faceret innumeras, vitam evangelizaret aeternam, ab impiis actus est in crucem; quod tamen factum virtute ejus conversum est in bonum. Denique cum pateretur, omnis ei compassus est mundus; nam et sol obscuratus est, montesque disrupti, et sepulcra patefacta sunt, velum templi scissum est, velut lamentans excidium loco imminens. Et tamen cum omnis mundus commotus sit, ipsi etiamnunc ad inquisitionem tantarum rerum nullatenus commoventur.
“But perhaps someone may say that anyone can imitate a number; and what will he say of the signs and miracles which this one did? For Moses had done miracles and cures in Egypt. He too, whom Moses foretold would rise up as a prophet like himself, though he healed every disease and every infirmity among the people, worked innumerable miracles, and preached eternal life, was driven to the cross by the wicked; yet this deed was turned to good by his power. Indeed, when he suffered, the whole world suffered with him; for the sun was darkened, the mountains were split, the graves were opened, and the veil of the temple was torn, as if lamenting the destruction threatening the place. And yet, though the whole world was moved, they themselves are even now in no way moved to inquire into such great things.”
1.42PG 1:1231b–1232a
Verum quoniam necessarium erat ut in locum eorum qui increduli permanebant, vocarentur gentes, ut repleretur ille numerus qui demonstratus fuerat Abrahae, mittitur in universum mundum salutaris regni Dei praedicatio. Perturbantur ob hoc mundani spiritus, qui libertatem quaerentibus semper obsistunt, et ad destruendam Dei aedificationem errorum machinas quaerunt, quibus hi, qui ad salutis et libertatis gloriam tendunt, obsistentes et agones adversum eos non minimos desudantes, fortiores effecti, ad salutis coronam veniant non sine palma victoriae. Interim cum passus esset, et ab hora sexta usque ad nonam mundum tenebrae pressissent, sole reddito ac rebus in ordinem restitutis, etiam homines nequam ad se atque ad mores suos metu cessante regressi sunt. Nam quidam eorum cum omni custodia servantes locum, quem non potuere resurgentem mnam, magum dicebant; alii finxerunt furatum.
“But since it was necessary that the Gentiles should be called in place of those who remained unbelieving, so that the number which had been shown to Abraham might be filled up, the saving preaching of the kingdom of God is sent into the whole world. On this account the worldly spirits are disturbed, who always oppose those who seek freedom, and who look for engines of error to destroy God's building; so that those who strive toward the glory of salvation and freedom, resisting them and sweating out no small contests against them, are made stronger and come to the crown of salvation not without the palm of victory. Meanwhile, when he had suffered, and darkness had pressed upon the world from the sixth hour to the ninth, as soon as the sun was restored and things were set back in order, even the wicked, their fear ceasing, returned to themselves and to their own ways. For some of them, who had guarded the place with every precaution, called him a magician, since they could not prevent him from rising again; others pretended that he had been stolen.”
1.43PG 1:1232a–1232b
Verumtamen veritas ubique vincebat. Ad indicium enim, quod haec divina virtute agerentur, nos qui fueramus paucissimi, processu dierum, astipulante Deo, multo plures quam illi efficiebamur, ita ut aliquando pertimescerent sacerdotes, ne forte per Dei providentiam ad confusionem ipsorum, in fidem nostram universus populus conveniret; frequenter mittentes ad nos rogabant, ut eis de Jesu dissereremus, si ipse esset propheta quem Moyses praedixit, qui est Christus aeternus. De hoc enim solo nobis qui credidimus in Jesum, adversum non credentes Iudaeos videtur esse differentia. Verum cum frequenter super hoc rogarent, nos autem opportunum tempus requireremus, septimana jam una ex passione Domini complebatur annorum, ecclesia Domini in Hierusalem constituta copiosissime multiplicata crescebat per Jacobum, qui a Domino ordinatus est in ea episcopus, rectissimis dispensationibus gubernata.
“Nevertheless the truth prevailed everywhere. For as a sign that these things were being done by divine power, we who had been very few became in the course of days, with God's help, far more numerous than they, so that the priests at one time were afraid lest perhaps, by the providence of God and to their confusion, the whole people should come over to our faith. They frequently sent to us and asked us to discourse to them about Jesus, whether he was the Prophet whom Moses foretold, who is the eternal Christ. For on this point alone does there seem to be a difference between us who have believed in Jesus and the unbelieving Jews. But while they frequently asked about this, and we were looking for a fitting time, a week of years from the passion of the Lord was being completed; and the church of the Lord established in Jerusalem was growing, multiplied most abundantly, governed with most upright administration by James, who was ordained bishop in it by the Lord.”
1.44PG 1:1232b–1233a
Cum autem nos duodecim apostoli ad diem Paschae cum ingenti multitudine convenissemus, ingressi ecclesiam fratrum unusquisque nostrum, Iacobo interrogante quae a nobis per loca singula gesta sint, audiente populo breviter exponimus. In quibus Caiphas pontifex, missis ad nos sacerdotibus, rogat venire ad se, ut aut ratione doceamus eum, quia Jesus aeternus est Christus, aut ipse nos doceat, quia non est, quo in utramlibet fidem universus populus conveniret; et hoc facere nos frequenter exorat. Nos vero saepe distulimus, tempus semper opportunius requirentes. Et ego Clemens respondi ad hoc: Puto quod et hoc ipsum quod quaeritur, utrum ipse sit Christus, multum prosit ad fidei rationem, alioqui nunquam pontifex pro hoc tam frequenter rogaret, ut de Christo vel disceret vel doceret. Et Petrus: Recte respondisti, o Clemens. Sicut enim sine oculis cernere nemo potest, nec sine auribus capere auditum, vel absque naribus odoratum, neque sine lingua gustum sumere, aut absque manibus aliquid contrectare: ita impossibile est, absque vero Propheta quae Deo placeant noscere. Et ego respondi: Quod ipse sit verus propheta Christus, te docente, jam didici; sed quid sit hoc ipsum, Christus, aut cur ita appelletur, velim discere, uti ne vaga mihi sit et incerta rei tantae notitia.
“When we twelve apostles had come together on the day of the Passover with a vast multitude and had entered the church of the brethren, each of us, at James's request, briefly set out in the hearing of the people what had been done by us in each place. Meanwhile Caiaphas the high priest sent priests to us and asked us to come to him, so that either we might teach him by reasoning that Jesus is the eternal Christ, or he might teach us that he is not, and so the whole people might agree on one faith or the other; and he frequently entreated us to do this. But we often put it off, always looking for a more fitting time.” And I, Clement, answered to this: “I think that this very question, whether he is the Christ, contributes much to the grounding of faith; otherwise the high priest would never ask so often to learn or to teach about Christ.” And Peter said: “You answered rightly, Clement. For as no one can see without eyes, nor receive hearing without ears, or smell without nostrils, nor take taste without a tongue, or handle anything without hands, so it is impossible without the true Prophet to know what pleases God.” And I answered: “That the true Prophet is himself the Christ I have already learned from your teaching; but what this very word 'Christ' means, or why he is so called, I should like to learn, so that my knowledge of so great a matter may not be vague and uncertain.”
1.45PG 1:1233a–1234a
Tunc Petrus docere me hoc modo coepit: Deus cum fecisset mundum, tanquam universitatis Dominus singulis quibusque creaturis principes statuit, ipsis quoque arboribus, montibusque ac fontibus, et fluminibus, et universis, ut diximus, quae fecerat. Multum enim est ire per singula. Statuit ergo angelis angelum principem, et spiritibus spiritum, sideribus sidus, daemonibus daemonem, avibus avem, bestiis bestiam, serpentem serpentibus, piscem piscibus, hominibus hominem, qui est Christus Jesus. Christus autem dicitur eximio quodam religionis ritu; nam sicut regum sunt quaedam communia nomina, ita ut apud Persas Arsaces, apud Romanos Caesar, apud Egyptios Pharao, ita apud Iudaeos Christus communi nomine rex appellatur. Causa autem hujus appellationis haec est: quoniam quidem cum esset Filius Dei et initium omnium, homo factus est, hunc primum Pater oleo perunxit, quod ex ligno vitae fuerat sumptum. Ex illo ergo unguento Christus appellatur. Inde denique etiam ipse secundum praedestinationem Patris, pios quosque, cum ad regnum ejus pervenerint, velut qui asperam superaverint viam, pro laborum refectione simili oleo perunget, ut et ipsorum lux luceat, et Spiritu sancto repleti immortalitate donentur. Virgulti vero hujus, ex quo sumptum est istud unguentum, universam naturam tibi sufficienter exposuisse me memini.
Then Peter began to teach me in this way: “When God had made the world, as Lord of the universe he appointed rulers over each of the creatures, even over the trees, the mountains and springs, the rivers, and all the things, as we said, that he had made; for it would be long to go through them one by one. So he appointed an angel as ruler over the angels, a spirit over the spirits, a star over the stars, a demon over the demons, a bird over the birds, a beast over the beasts, a serpent over the serpents, a fish over the fishes, and over men a man, who is Christ Jesus. He is called Christ by a certain special rite of religion; for as there are certain names common to kings, as Arsaces among the Persians, Caesar among the Romans, Pharaoh among the Egyptians, so among the Jews a king is called by the common name Christ. The reason for this title is this: although he was the Son of God and the beginning of all things, he became man; him first the Father anointed with oil that had been taken from the tree of life. From that ointment, then, he is called Christ. Hence, finally, he himself also, according to the Father's predestination, will anoint with similar oil all the godly when they come to his kingdom, as those who have overcome a rough road, for refreshment from their labors, so that their light too may shine, and that, filled with the Holy Spirit, they may be endowed with immortality. I remember that I have sufficiently explained to you the whole nature of the plant from which this ointment was taken.”
1.46PG 1:1234a–1234b
Sed et nunc per brevissimam speciem de omnibus te in memoriam revocabo. In praesenti vita primus pontifex Aaron chrismatis compositione perunctus, quod ad imaginem illius de quo supra diximus spiritalis unguenti factum est, princeps populi fuit, et tanquam rex primitias et tributum per capita accepit a populo, et judicandi plebem sorte suscepta de mundis immundisque judicabat. Sed et si quis alius ex ipso unguento perunctus est, tanquam virtute inde concepta, jam ipse rex, aut propheta fiebat, aut pontifex. Quod si temporalis haec gratia ab hominibus composita tantum potuit, intellige jam tu, quantum sit illud unguentum, quod a Deo de virgulto vitae prolatum est, cum hoc quod ab hominibus factum est, tam eximias inter homines conferat dignitates. Quid enim in praesenti saeculo propheta gloriosius, pontifice clarius, rege sublimius?
“But now too I will recall all this to your memory by a very brief outline. In the present life Aaron, the first high priest, anointed with a compound of chrism which was made after the pattern of that spiritual ointment of which we spoke above, was prince of the people, and as a king received first fruits and a poll tribute from the people; and having received by lot the judging of the people, he judged concerning clean and unclean. And if anyone else was anointed with the same ointment, as if receiving power from it, he became a king, or a prophet, or a high priest. If, then, this temporal grace compounded by men could do so much, understand now how great is that ointment which was brought forth by God from the plant of life, when this which was made by men confers such excellent dignities among men. For what in the present age is more glorious than a prophet, more illustrious than a high priest, more exalted than a king?”
1.47PG 1:1234b–1235a
Et ego ad haec respondi: Memini, Petre, dixisse te de primo homine, quia propheta fuit; quod autem unctus fuerit, non dixisti. Si ergo sine unguento propheta nullus est, quo modo primus homo, cum non esset unctus, fuit propheta? Tum subridens Petrus: Si primus, inquit, homo prophetavit, certum est quod et unctus sit. Licet enim unctionem illius siluerit ille, qui legem in paginis condidit, nobis tamen intelligenda haec evidenter reliquit. Sicut enim, si unctum eum dixisset, non dubitaretur et prophetam eum fuisse, etiamsi scriptum non esset in lege: ita cum certum sit eum prophetam fuisse, similiter certum est et quod unctus sit, quia sine unguento prophetare non poterat. Verum hoc magis dicere te oportuit, si chrisma arte myropolica compositum est ab Aaron, quomodo primus homo perungi potuit unguento, ante compositionis artibus nondum repertis? Et ego respondi: Non me traducas, Petre; non enim de unguento composito et temporali oleo loquor, sed de illo simplici et aeterno, quod a Deo factum esse docuisti, ad cujus similitudinem istud compositum esse ab hominibus dicis.
And I answered to this: “I remember, Peter, that you said of the first man that he was a prophet; but that he was anointed you did not say. If, then, there is no prophet without ointment, how was the first man a prophet when he was not anointed?” Then Peter, smiling, said: “If the first man prophesied, it is certain that he was also anointed. For although he who set down the law in writing was silent about his anointing, he plainly left these things for us to understand. For as, if he had said that he was anointed, it would not be doubted that he was also a prophet, even if that were not written in the law, so, since it is certain that he was a prophet, it is likewise certain that he was anointed, because he could not prophesy without the ointment. But you ought rather to have said this: if the chrism was compounded by Aaron with the perfumer's art, how could the first man be anointed with ointment before the arts of compounding had been discovered?” And I answered: “Do not misrepresent me, Peter; I am not speaking of the compounded ointment and temporal oil, but of that simple and eternal one which you taught was made by God, and after whose likeness, you say, this one was compounded by men.”
1.48PG 1:1235a–1235b
Et Petrus ad haec, ut videbatur, indignans: Quid putas, Clemens, quia omnes omnia ante tempus scire possumus! Sed nunc uti ne a proposito sermone recedamus, alias tibi cum profectus tuus manifestus fuerit, de his apertius exponemus. Tunc autem unguento composito perunctus pontifex vel propheta, Dei altare succendens in omni mundo clarus habebatur. Sed post Aaron qui pontifex fuit, alius ex aquis assumitur, non Moysen dico, sed Illum qui in aquis baptismi Filius a Deo appellatus est. Jesus namque est, qui ignem illum quem accendebat pontifex pro peccatis, restinxit per baptismi gratiam; ex quo enim hic apparuit, cessavit chrisma, per quod pontificatus praebebatur, vel prophetia, vel regnum.
And Peter, seemingly indignant at this, said: “What, Clement? Do you think that we can all know everything before the time? But now, so as not to depart from the subject of our discourse, we will explain these things to you more openly another time, when your progress has become manifest. At that time, then, the high priest or prophet anointed with the compounded ointment, kindling the altar of God, was held illustrious in all the world. But after Aaron, who was high priest, another is taken from the waters—I do not mean Moses, but him who in the waters of baptism was called Son by God. For it is Jesus who by the grace of baptism put out that fire which the high priest kindled for sins; for from the time that he appeared, the chrism ceased by which the priesthood, or prophecy, or kingship was conferred.”
1.49PG 1:1235c
Hunc igitur adfuturum praedixit Moyses, qui legem Dei hominibus tradidit; sed et alius ante ipsum, sicut tibi et ante jam tradidi. Ipse ergo indicavit eum venturum primo quidem adventu humilem, secundo vero gloriosum. Et primus quidem jam impletus est, cum venit et docuit, et judex omnium judicatus est ac peremptus. Secundo vero adventu judicaturus adveniet, et impios quidem condemnabit, pios vero in consortium regni societatemque suscipiet. Fides vero secundi adventus constat ex primo. Prophetae enim de primo locuti sunt, et praecipue Jacob et Moyses, nonnulli tamen etiam de secundo. Sed magnificentia prophetiae in hoc maxime comprobatur, quod nihil secundum consequentiam rerum de futuris dixerunt; alioqui aestimasse potius sapientes viri, quod rerum consequentia dictaverat, viderentur.
“This one, then, Moses foretold would come, he who handed down the law of God to men; and another before him did so too, as I have already told you. He indicated, then, that he would come humble in his first coming, but glorious in his second. And the first has already been fulfilled, when he came and taught, and he, the judge of all, was judged and put to death. But at his second coming he will come to judge, and he will condemn the wicked, but receive the godly into the fellowship and society of the kingdom. Faith in the second coming rests on the first. For the prophets spoke of the first, especially Jacob and Moses, though some spoke also of the second. But the greatness of prophecy is proved most of all in this, that they said nothing about the future according to the natural sequence of things; otherwise they would seem rather to be wise men who had guessed what the sequence of things dictated.”
1.50PG 1:1235c–1236a
Quod autem dico, tale est: Christum suscipi a Iudaeis ad quos venerat, et credi ei, qui exspectabatur ad salutem populi secundum traditiones patrum, consequens erat, gentes vero alienas ab eo fore, quibus neque promissum quidquam de eo neque annuntiatum fuerat, imo quibus ne nomine quidem ipso aliquando innotuerat. Et tamen prophetae, contra ordinem et consequentiam rerum dixere eum exspectationem gentium, et non Judaeorum futurum. Ita denique et gestum est. Cum enim venisset, ab his qui eum exspectare videbantur ex traditione majorum, omnino agnitus non est; hi vero qui nihil de ipso penitus audierant, et venisse credunt, et venturum sperant. Et ita in omnibus prophetia fidelis apparuit, quae dixit ipsum esse exspectationem gentium. Erraverunt ergo Judaei de primo Domini adventu; et inter nos atque ipsos de hoc est solo dissidium. Nam quod venturus sit Christus, norunt etiam ipsi et exspectant; quod autem jam venerit in humilitate hic qui dicitur Iesus, ignorant. Et in hoc maxime ejus confirmatur adventus, quod ei non omnes credunt.
“What I mean is this: it was to be expected that Christ would be received by the Jews, to whom he had come, and that he who was expected for the salvation of the people according to the traditions of the fathers would be believed; but that the foreign nations would be estranged from him, since nothing had been promised or announced to them about him, and indeed he had never been known to them even by name. And yet the prophets, against the order and sequence of things, said that he would be the expectation of the nations, and not of the Jews. And so indeed it came about. For when he came, he was not at all recognized by those who seemed to expect him from the tradition of their ancestors; but those who had heard nothing at all of him both believe that he has come and hope that he will come. And thus in everything the prophecy proved faithful which said that he is the expectation of the nations. The Jews, then, erred about the first coming of the Lord; and between us and them there is disagreement on this point alone. For they too know and expect that Christ will come; but that he has already come in humility, this one who is called Jesus, they do not know. And his coming is confirmed most of all by this, that not all believe in him.”
1.51PG 1:1236a–1236b
Hunc ergo Deus destinavit in fine mundi, quia impossibile erat mortalium mala purgari per alium, integra duntaxat permanente humani generis creatura, hoc est salva arbitrii libertate. Hoc igitur statu incolumi reservato, invitare venit ad regnum justos quosque et eos qui placere studuerunt ei, quibus bona ineffabilia praeparavit et Hierusalem civitatem caelestem, quae super splendorem solis fulgebit in habitatione sanctorum. Injustos vero et impios, et qui pro nihilo habuerunt Deum, commissamque sibi vitam diversa ad flagitia contulerunt, ac tempus operis justi, exercitium fecere malitiae, competentibus ipsisque dignis ultionibus tradet. Caetera vero quae ibi gerentur proferri et eloqui, neque angelis neque hominibus fas est; sed hoc tantum scire nos sufficit, quod bonis aeternam bonorum possessionem conferet Deus.
“God, then, appointed him at the end of the world, because it was impossible for the evils of mortals to be purged by anyone else, so long as the nature of the human race remained intact, that is, with freedom of choice preserved. Keeping this condition unimpaired, then, he came to invite to the kingdom all the righteous and those who have striven to please him, for whom he has prepared ineffable good things and the heavenly city Jerusalem, which will shine above the brightness of the sun as the dwelling of the saints. But the unrighteous and wicked, those who have held God as nothing, have spent the life entrusted to them on various crimes, and have made the time for righteous work an exercise of malice, he will hand over to fitting punishments that they deserve. The rest of what will be done there it is not lawful for angels or men to utter or declare; but it is enough for us to know this, that God will confer on the good an eternal possession of good things.”
1.52PG 1:1236b–1236c
His ab eo dictis ego respondi: Si Christi regno fruentur hi, quos justos invenerit ejus adventus, ergo qui ante adventum ejus defuncti sunt, regno penitus carebunt? Tum Petrus: Cogis me, inquit, o Clemens, aliqua de ineffabilibus publicare. Verumtamen quoadusque proferri licet, facere non pigebit. Christus, qui ab initio et semper erat, per singulas quasque generationes piis, latenter licet, semper tamen aderat, his praecipue, a quibus exspectabatur, quibusque frequenter apparuit. Sed non erat tempus, ut tunc resolutis corporibus fieret resurrectio; sed haec magis remuneratio videbatur a Deo, ut qui inveniretur justus, diutius permaneret in corpore, aut certe, sicut de quodam justo evidenter refertur in litteris legis, quod transtulerit eum Deus. Simili exemplo etiam cum caeteris gestum est qui ejus voluntati placuerunt, ut ad paradisum translati serventur ad regnum; eorum vero qui non ad integrum potuere explere normam justitiae, sed aliquas in sua carne malitiae reliquias habuere, corpora quidem resolverentur, animae vero servarentur in bonis laetisque regionibus, ut in resurrectione mortuorum, cum sua receperint, ipsa jam resolutione purgati, pro his quae bene gesserant, aeterna haereditate potiantur. Et ideo beati sunt omnes qui regnum Christi fuerint adepti, quia non solum inferni poenas effugient, sed et incorruptibiles permanebunt, et primi Deum Patrem videbunt, atque inter primos apud Deum honoris ordinem consequentur.
When he had said this, I answered: “If those whom his coming finds righteous will enjoy the kingdom of Christ, will those who died before his coming, then, be wholly deprived of the kingdom?” Then Peter said: “You compel me, Clement, to make known some things about matters that are ineffable. Yet, as far as it is lawful to declare them, I will not be reluctant. Christ, who was from the beginning and always, was always present to the godly in every generation, though secretly, and especially to those by whom he was expected, and to whom he frequently appeared. But it was not then the time for the resurrection to take place for bodies that had been dissolved; rather this seemed to be a reward from God, that whoever was found righteous should remain longer in the body, or indeed, as is plainly related of a certain righteous man in the writings of the law, that God translated him. In a similar way it has been done with others who pleased his will, so that, translated to paradise, they are kept for the kingdom. But as for those who could not fulfill the rule of righteousness completely, but had some remains of wickedness in their flesh, their bodies were indeed dissolved, but their souls are kept in good and happy regions, so that at the resurrection of the dead, when they have received back their own, purified by the very dissolution, they may obtain an eternal inheritance for the good they did. And therefore blessed are all who attain the kingdom of Christ, because not only will they escape the punishments of hell, but they will also remain incorruptible, will be the first to see God the Father, and will obtain a rank of honor among the first with God.”
1.53PG 1:1236c–1237b
Propter quod non minima de Christo quaestio habetur, et infideles quique ex Judaeis immensa adversum nos insania commoventur, verentes ne forte ipse sit, in quem peccaverunt; et eo magis metus increscit, quod sciunt, statim ut eum cruci affixere, universum ei compassum esse mundum, corpusque ejus diligenti se custodia conservatum nusquam comparuisse, atque ad fidem nominis ejus innumeras multitudines convenire. Unde et compulsi sunt una cum pontifice Caipha, saepius mittere ad nos, ut de nominis ejus veritate quaereretur. Cumque crebro deposcerent ut de Jesu aut discerent aut docerent, si ipse esset Christus, visum nobis est ascendere ad templum, et coram omni populo protestari de eo, simul et arguere Judaeos de multis, quae ab eis absurde gerebantur. in multas etenim jam partes populus scindebatur, initio sumpto a Joanne Baptista.
“For this reason no small question is raised about Christ, and all the unbelievers among the Jews are stirred against us with immense madness, fearing lest perhaps he is the one against whom they sinned; and their fear grows all the more because they know that as soon as they fastened him to the cross the whole world suffered with him, that his body, though kept under careful guard, was nowhere to be found, and that countless multitudes are coming to faith in his name. Hence they, together with the high priest Caiaphas, were compelled to send to us more often, so that the truth of his name might be inquired into. And when they repeatedly demanded either to learn or to teach about Jesus, whether he was the Christ, it seemed good to us to go up to the temple and bear witness concerning him before all the people, and at the same time to reprove the Jews for many things that were being done by them absurdly. For the people was already being split into many parties, beginning from John the Baptist.”
1.54PG 1:1237b–1238a
Cum enim jam immineret ortus Christi ad sacrificia quidem reprimenda, baptismi vero gratiam largiendam, inimicus ex his quae praedicta erant adesse tempus intelligens, diversa schismata operabatur in populo, ut si forte prius peccatum potuisset aboleri, secunda corrigi culpa non posset. Erat ergo primum schisma eorum qui dicebantur Sadducaei, initio Joannis jam pene temporibus sumpto. Hique ut caeteris justiores, segregare se coepere a populi coetu, et mortuorum resurrectionem negare, idque argumento infidelitatis asserere, dicentes non esset dignum ut quasi sub mercede proposita colatur Deus. Auctor vero sententiae hujus primus Dositheus, secundus Simon fuit. Aliud Samaraaum schisma est; ipsi enim resurrectionem mortuorum negantes asserunt, non in Hierosolymis, sed in monte Garizin adorandum esse Deum. Qui tamen unum verum prophetam ex Moysis vaticinationibus recte exspectantes, pravitate Dosithei impediti sunt, ne hunc quem exspectabant, crederent esse Jesum. Scribae quoque et Pharisaei in aliud schisma deducuntur. Sed hi baptizati a Joanne, et velut clavem regni coelorum verbum veritatis tenentes ex Moysis traditione susceptum, occultarunt auribus populi. Sed et ex discipulis Joannis, qui videbantur esse magni, segregarunt se a populo et magistrum suum veluti Christum praedicarunt. Haec autem omnia praeparata sunt schismata, ut et fides Christi per haec impediretur, et baptisma.
“For when the rising of Christ was already at hand, to restrain sacrifices and to bestow the grace of baptism, the enemy, understanding from what had been foretold that the time was at hand, worked various schisms among the people, so that, if perhaps the former sin could be abolished, the second fault might not be corrected. The first schism, then, was that of those called Sadducees, which began almost in the time of John. These, as being more righteous than the rest, began to separate themselves from the assembly of the people and to deny the resurrection of the dead, asserting this by an argument of unbelief: they said it was not fitting that God should be worshiped as if for a reward set before them. The first author of this opinion was Dositheus, the second Simon. Another schism is that of the Samaritans; for they deny the resurrection of the dead and assert that God is to be worshiped not in Jerusalem but on Mount Gerizim. Yet, though they rightly expect the one true Prophet from the prophecies of Moses, they were prevented by the depravity of Dositheus from believing that the one they expected is Jesus. The scribes and Pharisees, too, are drawn off into another schism. But these, baptized by John and holding as the key of the kingdom of heaven the word of truth received from the tradition of Moses, hid it from the ears of the people. And some of the disciples of John, who seemed to be great, separated themselves from the people and proclaimed their master as if he were the Christ. All these schisms were prepared so that by them both faith in Christ and baptism might be hindered.”
1.55PG 1:1238a–1238b
Verumtamen, ut dicere coeperamus, cum frequenter nos pontifex per sacerdotes rogasset, ut de Jesu sermo nobis haberetur ad alterutrum, ubi opportunum visum est et omni Ecclesiae placuit, ascendimus ad templum, et stantes in gradibus una cum fidelibus fratribus nostris, facto populi summo silentio, prior pontifex coepit adhortari populum, ut patienter et cum quiete audiant, simulque eorum quae dicenda sunt testes et judices fiant. Tum deinde multis laudibus efferens sacrificiorum ritum, qui ad remissionem peccatorum humano generi divinitus esset indultus, causabatur Jesu nostri baptisma velut contra haec nuper inductum. Sed propositionibus ejus occurrens Matthaeus, evidenter ostendit quod si quis Jesu baptisma non fuerit consecutus, is non solum coelorum regno fraudabitur, verum et in resurrectione mortuorum non absque periculo erit, etiamsi bonae vitae et rectae mentis praerogativa muniatur. Haec et his similia prosecutus siluit Matthaeus.
“Nevertheless, as we had begun to say, when the high priest had frequently asked us through the priests that a discussion about Jesus be held between us, when it seemed opportune and the whole church agreed, we went up to the temple; and standing on the steps together with our faithful brethren, when the people had fallen completely silent, the high priest first began to exhort the people to listen patiently and quietly, and at the same time to become witnesses and judges of what was to be said. Then, extolling with many praises the rite of sacrifices, which had been granted by God to the human race for the remission of sins, he complained of the baptism of our Jesus as recently introduced in opposition to them. But Matthew, meeting his propositions, showed clearly that if anyone did not obtain the baptism of Jesus, he will not only be deprived of the kingdom of heaven, but will not be without danger at the resurrection of the dead, even if he is fortified by the advantage of a good life and an upright mind. Having gone through these and similar things, Matthew fell silent.”
1.56PG 1:1238b
Sed Sadducaeorum pars, quae negat esse resurrectionem mortuorum, indignata est, ita ut quidam ex ipsis de medio populi exclamaret, dicens multum errare eos qui putent mortuos aliquando resurgere. Contra hunc Andreas meus frater respondens, docuit errorem non esse, sed certissimam fidem, quod mortui resurgant, secundum ea quae docuit is, quem Moyses praedixit venturum prophetam; aut si non videretur eis ipse esse quem praedixit Moyses, de hoc, inquit, primo requiratur, ut cum evidenter ipse fuerit probatus, nihil reliquo super his quae docuit ambigatur. Haec autem et his similia plura protestatus siluit Andreas.
“But the party of the Sadducees, who deny that there is a resurrection of the dead, were indignant, so that one of them cried out from the midst of the people that those greatly err who think that the dead will ever rise. Against him my brother Andrew replied, and taught that it is not an error but a most certain faith that the dead rise, according to what was taught by him whom Moses foretold as the prophet to come; ‘or if he does not seem to you to be the one whom Moses foretold,’ he said, ‘let this first be inquired into, so that, once he has been clearly proved to be so, there may be no further doubt about what he taught.’ Having testified these and many similar things, Andrew fell silent.”
1.57PG 1:1238b–1239b
Samaraeus vero quidam, contraria populo et Deo loquens, et neque mortuos asserens resurrecturos, neque eum qui est in Hierusalem cultum Dei tenendum, sed montem Garizin venerandum addidit contra nos etiam haec, quod Jesus noster non esset ipse, quem Moyses prophetam venturum esse praedixerit. Adversum hunc et alium qui cum ipso haec eadem prosequebatur Zebedaei filii Jacobus et Joannes vehementer obnisi sunt, et quamvis haberent mandatum, ne ingrederentur civitates eorum neque verbum eis praedicationis inferrent, tamen ne sermo eorum, si confutatus non esset, aliorum laederet fidem, ita prudenter et fortiter responderunt, ut perpetuum eis silentium darent. Nam Jacobus de resurrectione mortuorum cum totius populi favore peroravit, Joannes vero ostendit, quia si cessarent ab errore montis Garizin, consequenter agnoscerent ipsum esse Jesum, qui secundum prophetiam Moysis exspectabatur esse venturus, quoniam quidem signa et prodigia, ut fecit Moyses, ita fecit etiam Jesus, et dubium non est quin similitudo signorum ipsum esse testetur, quem sicut se dixit esse venturum. Haec et alia plura his similia protestati siluere.
“But a certain Samaritan, speaking against the people and against God, and asserting neither that the dead will rise nor that the worship of God in Jerusalem should be kept, but that Mount Gerizim should be revered, added this too against us, that our Jesus was not the one whom Moses foretold as the prophet to come. Against him and another who was pursuing the same things with him James and John, the sons of Zebedee, strove vigorously; and although they had a command not to enter their cities nor bring the word of preaching to them, yet, lest their talk, if not refuted, should harm the faith of others, they answered so prudently and boldly that they reduced them to perpetual silence. For James spoke on the resurrection of the dead with the approval of the whole people, while John showed that if they ceased from the error of Mount Gerizim, they would consequently recognize that Jesus is the one who, according to the prophecy of Moses, was expected to come; since, as Moses did signs and wonders, so did Jesus also, and there is no doubt that the likeness of the signs testifies that he is the one who Moses said would come like himself. Having testified these and many other similar things, they fell silent.”
1.58PG 1:1239b
Et ecce quidam de Scribis de medio populi exclamans ait: Jesus vester signa et prodigia quae fecit, ut magus non ut propheta fecit. Huic Philippus vehementer occurrit ostendens, quia hac ratione accusaret etiam Moysen. Cum enim Moyses signa et prodigia fecerit in Egypto, similiter autem et Jesus in Judaea, dubitari non possit, quin quod de Jesu diceretur, hoc etiam de Moyse dici videretur. Haec et his similia plura protestatus siluit Philippus.
“And behold, one of the scribes cried out from the midst of the people: ‘The signs and wonders your Jesus did, he did as a magician, not as a prophet.’ Philip met him vigorously, showing that on this reasoning he would accuse Moses too. For since Moses did signs and wonders in Egypt, and likewise Jesus in Judaea, there could be no doubt that what was said of Jesus would seem to be said of Moses also. Having testified these and many similar things, Philip fell silent.”
1.59PG 1:1239b–1240b
Pharisaeus autem quidam audiens haec, insimulabat Philippum, quod Moysen aequalem diceret Jesu. Cui Bartholomaeus respondens, constanter edocuit, quia non dicimus Jesum solum aequalem Moysi, sed majorem; quia Moyses quidem propheta fuit, quod fuit et Jesus, quod autem fuit Jesus, Moyses non fuit, hoc est Christus, et ideo major ille sine dubio, qui et propheta et Christus est, quam ille qui solum propheta est. Haec et his similia plura prosecutus siluit. Post hunc Jacobus Alphaei sermonem fecit ad populum, quo ostenderet, non ideo credendum esse Jesu, quia de eo prophetae praedixerint, sed ideo magis credendum esse prophetis, quod vere prophetae sint, quia eis testimonium Christus reddat. Nam praesentia et adventus Christi illos vere prophetas fuisse designat. Dicebat enim non ab inferioribus majori, sed a majore inferioribus fidei testimonium dari. Haec et multa his similia prosecutus, etiam Jacobus siluit. Post hunc Lebbaeus populum coepit vehementer arguere, quod non crederent Jesu, qui eis tantum profuerit, docendo quae Dei sunt, solando afflictos, medendo infirmis, pauperes consolando, sed pro his omnibus bonis odia mortemque reddiderint. Haec et his similia plura cum esset populo protestatus, siluit.
“But a certain Pharisee, hearing this, charged Philip with making Moses equal to Jesus. Bartholomew answered him and steadfastly taught that we do not say that Jesus is only equal to Moses, but greater; because Moses was indeed a prophet, as Jesus also was, but what Jesus was, Moses was not, that is, the Christ; and therefore he who is both prophet and Christ is without doubt greater than he who is only a prophet. Having gone through these and many similar things, he fell silent. After him James the son of Alphaeus addressed the people, to show that we should not believe in Jesus because the prophets foretold him, but rather believe the prophets to be truly prophets because Christ bears witness to them. For the presence and coming of Christ shows that they were truly prophets. For he said that the testimony of faith is given not by inferiors to the greater, but by the greater to inferiors. Having gone through these and many similar things, James too fell silent. After him Lebbaeus began vehemently to reproach the people for not believing in Jesus, who had done them so much good, teaching the things of God, comforting the afflicted, healing the sick, consoling the poor, and for all these good things they had returned hatred and death. When he had testified these and many similar things to the people, he fell silent.”
1.60PG 1:1240b–1241a
Et ecce unus ex discipulis Joannis affirmabat, Christum Joannem fuisse, et non Jesum; in tantum, inquit, ut et ipse Jesus omnibus hominibus et prophetis majorem esse pronuntiaverit Joannem. Si ergo, inquit, major est omnibus, sine dubio et Moyse et ipso Jesu major habendus est. Quod si omnium major est, ipse est Christus. Ad haec Cananaeus Simon respondens, asseruit Joannem majorem quidem fuisse omnibus prophetis, et omnibus qui sunt filii mulierum, non tamen majorem esse Filio hominis. Et ideo Jesus quidem et Christus est, Joannes vero solum propheta, et tantum interest inter ipsum et Jesum, quantum inter praecursorem et eum cui praecurritur, et quantum inter eum qui legem dat et eum qui legem servat. Haec et his similia prosecutus siluit etiam Cananaeus. Post quem Barnabas qui et Matthias, qui in locum Judae subrogatus est apostolus, monere populum coepit, ne odio haberent Jesum neque blasphemarent eum. Multo enim esse rectius, etiam ignoranti vel dubitanti de Jesu, amare eum quam odisse. Charitati enim Deus praemium posuit, odiis poenam. Hoc ipsum enim, inquit, quod Judaicum corpus assumpsit et inter Judaeos natus est, quo modo non omnibus vobis incentiva sui amoris incussit? Haec et his similia cum perorasset, dicendi finem fecit.
“And behold, one of John's disciples asserted that John had been the Christ, and not Jesus; ‘so much so,’ he said, ‘that Jesus himself declared John to be greater than all men and prophets. If, then,’ he said, ‘he is greater than all, he must without doubt be held greater than Moses and than Jesus himself. And if he is the greatest of all, he is the Christ.’ To this Simon the Canaanite replied, asserting that John was indeed greater than all the prophets and all who are sons of women, yet not greater than the Son of Man. And therefore Jesus is also the Christ, whereas John is only a prophet; and there is as much difference between him and Jesus as between the forerunner and him before whom he runs, and as between him who gives the law and him who keeps the law. Having gone through these and similar things, the Canaanite too fell silent. After him Barnabas, who is also Matthias, who was substituted as an apostle in place of Judas, began to admonish the people not to hate Jesus nor blaspheme him. For it is much more right, even for one who is ignorant of Jesus or in doubt about him, to love him than to hate him. For God has set a reward for love, and punishment for hatred. ‘For this very fact,’ he said, ‘that he took a Jewish body and was born among the Jews—how has it not kindled in all of you the incentives of love for him?’ When he had spoken these and similar things, he made an end of speaking.”
1.61PG 1:1241a–1241b
Tunc Caiphas doctrinam Jesu culpare tentabat, dicens eum res vanas locutum: beatos enim pauperes dixit, et terrenas fore remunerationes promisit, ac summam muneris in terrena haereditate constituit, cibisque ac potu eos qui justitiam servarint, promisit esse saturandos; et his similia multa docuisse deprehenditur. Cui Thomas respondens arguit eum frustra causantem, ostendens, quia prophetae magis, quibus etiam ipse credit, ita docuerint, nec tamen quomodo erunt haec aut quomodo percipientur, ostenderint, Jesus vero qualiter accipi haec debeant, demonstraverit. Et cum haec atque his similia plura dixisset, siluit etiam Thomas.
“Then Caiaphas tried to find fault with the teaching of Jesus, saying that he had spoken vain things: for he called the poor blessed, promised earthly rewards, placed the chief reward in an earthly inheritance, and promised that those who kept righteousness would be filled with food and drink; and he is found to have taught many things like these. Thomas, answering him, showed that he was finding fault in vain, pointing out that it was rather the prophets, whom he himself believes, who taught so, and yet did not show how these things will be or how they are to be received, whereas Jesus showed in what way they ought to be understood. And when he had said these and many similar things, Thomas too fell silent.”
1.62PG 1:1241b
Post haec rursum Caiphas me intuens, et nunc ut monens, nunc vero ut culpans, dicebat, cessare me debere de reliquo a praedicatione Christi Jesu, ne in perniciem mei hoc agerem, neve ipse errore deceptus alios quoque meo errore deciperem. Tum praeterea arguebat me temeritatis, quod cum essem ipse imperitus, piscator et rusticus, officium subire doctoris auderem. Haec et alia plura his similia dicenti, ego quoque in haec verba respondi: Mihi quidem minus esse periculi, si, ut ipse ait, iste non sit Christus, quia doctorem legis receperim; ipsi vero ingens esse discrimen, si hic ipse sit Christus, sicut et certe est. Ego enim credo huic qui apparuit; ipse autem cui alii fidem servare se credit, qui nullus apparuit? Si vero et idiota, ut ais, et imperitus ac piscator et rusticus, super presbyteros sapientes intelligam, hoc tibi, inquam, magis metum debet incutere. Nam si ex eruditione aliqua disputans obtinerem vos sapientes et eruditos, videretur utique doctrina hoc mihi longi temporis et non divinae virtutis gratia contulisse, nunc autem cum, ut dixi, nos imperiti vos sapientes convincimus et superamus, cui sensum habenti non palam est, quia hoc non humanae argutiae opus est, sed divinae voluntatis et muneris?
“After this Caiaphas, looking at me again, now as if warning, now as if blaming, said that I ought henceforth to cease from preaching Christ Jesus, lest I do this to my own ruin, and lest, being deceived by error myself, I should also deceive others by my error. Then besides he charged me with rashness, because, though I was myself unlearned, a fisherman and a rustic, I dared to take up the office of teacher. When he said these and many similar things, I too answered in these words: that there was less danger for me if, as he said, this man is not the Christ, because I had received a teacher of the law; but for him the risk was enormous if this man is the Christ, as he certainly is. ‘For I believe in him who has appeared; but for what other, who has never appeared, does he think he is keeping his faith? But if I, an unlettered man, as you say, unskilled, a fisherman and a rustic, have more understanding than wise elders, this,’ I said, ‘ought to strike you with more fear. For if by disputing from some learning I prevailed over you, wise and learned men, it would surely seem that long study, and not the grace of divine power, had given me this; but now, when, as I said, we unskilled men convince and overcome you wise men, to whom that has sense is it not plain that this is not the work of human cleverness, but of the divine will and gift?’”
1.63PG 1:1241b–1242b
Haec igitur et alia hujusmodi prosequentes, consequenter protestati sumus ac docuimus nos imperiti et piscatores, sacerdotes quidem de uno solo Deo coeli, Sadducaeos de resurrectione mortuorum. Samaritas de consecratione Hierusalem, non tamen ingressi civitatem ipsorum, sed publice disputantes, Scribas vero et Pharisaeos de regno caelorum, discipulos Joannis, ne scandalum paterentur in Joanne, omnem vero populum, quia Iesus est Christus aeternus. Ad ultimum autem monui eos, ut priusquam progrederemur ad gentes praedicare eis agnitionem Dei Patris, ipsi reconciliarentur Deo suscipientes Filium ejus. Aliter enim nullo modo eos ostendi posse salvari, nisi per sancti Spiritus gratiam trinae invocationis dilui baptismate properarent, et Eucharistiam Christi Domini sumerent, cui soli, de his quae docuit credere deberent, ut sic aeternam salutem consequi mererentur, aliter vero impossibile prorsus esse reconciliari eos Deo, etiam si mille ei aras et altaria mille succendunt.
“Going through these and other such things, then, we unskilled men and fishermen testified and taught in turn: the priests concerning the one only God of heaven; the Sadducees concerning the resurrection of the dead; the Samaritans concerning the sanctity of Jerusalem (not entering their city, however, but disputing in public); the scribes and Pharisees concerning the kingdom of heaven; the disciples of John, that they should not stumble over John; and all the people, that Jesus is the eternal Christ. Last of all I admonished them that, before we went out to the Gentiles to preach to them the knowledge of God the Father, they themselves should be reconciled to God by receiving his Son. For I showed that they could in no other way be saved than by hastening, through the grace of the Holy Spirit, to be washed in baptism with the threefold invocation, and by receiving the Eucharist of Christ the Lord, whom alone they ought to believe concerning what he taught, so that thus they might be found worthy to attain eternal salvation; but that otherwise it is altogether impossible for them to be reconciled to God, even if they kindle a thousand altars and a thousand high altars to him.”
1.64PG 1:1242b
Nos enim, inquam, pro certo comperimus, quod super sacrificiis quae offertis, multo magis exasperatur Deus, sacrificiorum tempore duntaxat expleto. Et quia vos non vultis agnoscere, emensum esse jam tempus hostias offerendi, ob hoc destruetur et templum, et abominatio desolationis statuetur in loco sancto, et tunc gentibus Evangelium praedicabitur ad testimonium vestri, ut ex illorum fide vestra infidelitas judicetur. Omnis etenim mundus diversis temporibus diversas malitiae aegritudines patitur, vel per omnes generaliter, vel per singulos quosque specialiter, et ideo indiget medico, qui eum visitet ad salutem. Nos ergo protestamur vobis, et quod unumquemque vestrum latuit nuntiamus. Vestrum est deliberare, quid expediat vobis.
“‘For we have learned for certain,’ I said, ‘that God is much more provoked by the sacrifices you offer, now that the time of sacrifices has been completed. And because you do not wish to acknowledge that the time for offering victims has already run out, for this reason the temple too will be destroyed, and the abomination of desolation will be set up in the holy place; and then the gospel will be preached to the Gentiles as a testimony against you, so that your unbelief may be judged by their faith. For the whole world at different times suffers different diseases of wickedness, either in all generally or in individuals specially, and therefore needs a physician to visit it for its healing. So we testify to you and announce what has been hidden from each of you. It is for you to deliberate what is profitable for you.’”
1.65PG 1:1242b–1243a
His a me dictis, ingemuit omnis multitudo sacerdotum, quod eis de templi subversione praedixerim. Quod cum vidisset Gamaliel princeps populi qui latenter frater noster erat in fide, sed consilio nostro inter eos erat, quia valde fremerent et ingenti adversum nos furore moverentur, assurgens ait: Quiescite paulisper, o viri Israelitae, non enim advertitis tentationem quae imminet vobis, propter quod desinite ab hominibus istis, et si quidem humani consilii est quod agunt, cito cessabit, si autem a Deo est, cur sine causa peccatis nec proficitis quidquam? Dei enim voluntatem quis potest superare? Nunc ergo, quoniam quidem in vesperam vergitur dies, crastino hoc ipso in loco audientibus vobis, ego ipse cum istis disputabo, ut omnem errorem palam arguam, dilucideque confutem. Et his dictis repressus est eorum aliquatenus furor, ea praecipue spe, quod die crastina erroris nos publice arguendos sperarent. Et sic cum pace populum dimisit.
“When I had said this, the whole multitude of priests groaned because I had foretold to them the overthrow of the temple. When Gamaliel, a ruler of the people, who was secretly our brother in the faith but by our counsel remained among them, saw that they were raging greatly and were moved with enormous fury against us, he rose and said: ‘Be quiet for a little, men of Israel; for you do not perceive the trial that hangs over you. Therefore refrain from these men; and if what they are doing is of human counsel, it will soon cease; but if it is from God, why do you sin without cause and gain nothing? For who can overcome the will of God? Now, then, since the day is declining toward evening, tomorrow, in this very place and in your hearing, I myself will dispute with them, so as to refute all error openly and confute it clearly.’ By these words their fury was somewhat checked, especially by the hope that on the next day we would be publicly convicted of error. And so he dismissed the people in peace.”
1.66PG 1:1243a–1243b
Nos vero cum venissemus ad Iacobum nostrum, omnia quae dicta gestaque fuerant exponentes, apud eum cibo sumpto mansimus, omnipotenti Deo per totam noctem supplicantes, ut futurae disputationis sermo indubitatam fidei nostrae ostenderet veritatem. Igitur postera die Iacobus episcopus nobiscum simul et cum omni ecclesia ascendit ad templum, ubi ingentem reperimus multitudinem, a medio noctis exspectantem nos. Stetimus ergo in locis, quibus et prius, ut eminentius stantes ab universo populo cerneremur. Cumque esset summum silentium factum, Gamaliel, qui, ut supra diximus, nostrae fidei erat, dispensatione vero manebat inter ipsos, ut si quando iniquum aliquid adversum nos aut impium molirentur, vel ipsos consilio reprimeret prudenter aptato, vel nos commoneret ut aut curare aut declinare possemus; is ergo tanquam adversum nos agens, prior omnium episcopum Iacobum intuens hoc modo allocutus est:
“We, then, when we had come to our James and set out all that had been said and done, took food with him and stayed there, praying to almighty God through the whole night that the discourse of the coming disputation might show the undoubted truth of our faith. So on the following day James the bishop went up to the temple with us and with the whole church, where we found a vast multitude that had been waiting for us since midnight. We stood, then, in the same places as before, so that, standing higher, we might be seen by all the people. And when there was complete silence, Gamaliel—who, as we said above, was of our faith, but by arrangement remained among them, so that if ever they plotted anything unjust or impious against us, he might either restrain them by counsel prudently adapted or warn us, so that we could either guard against it or avoid it—he, then, as if acting against us, looking first of all at James the bishop, addressed him in this way:”
1.67PG 1:1243b–1244a
Si ego Gamaliel neque eruditionis meae, neque senectutis opprobrium duco, discere aliquid a parvulis et ab imperitis, si quid forte est utilitatis aut salutis acquirere (qui enim rationabiliter vivit, scit quia nihil est anima pretiosius), quomodo non omnibus amabile est, cunctisque exoptatum, ut quae ignorat discat, quae didicerit doceat? Certissimum namque est, quod neque amicitia, neque propinquitas generis, neque regni sublimitas homini debet esse pretiosior veritate. Et vos ergo fratres, si quid amplius nostis, populo Dei qui adest, itemque fratribus vestris proferre non pigeat, omni populo libenter et tota conquiete quae dicitis audiente. Quomodo enim non hoc faciat populus, cum meipsum videat secum pariter velle a vobis discere, si quid forte amplius vobis revelavit Deus? Si vero vos in aliquo indigetis, similiter etiam vos a nobis non pigeat doceri, ut erga utramque partem, si quid deest, adimpleat Deus. Quod si aliquis forte vos nunc sollicitat metus, propter nonnullos nostrorum qui praejudicatis adversum vos animis utuntur, et insidias eorum verentes, non audetis dicere quod sentitis apertius, ego ut vos etiam hujus occasione timoris absolvam, juro vobis per omnipotentem Deum et viventem in secula, quia nullum permittam injicere vobis manus. Habentes ergo hujus juramenti mei omnem hunc populum testem, et idoneum pignus sacramenti nostri foedus tenentes, absque ulla cunctatione unusquisque vestrum quod didicit proferat, et nos fratres intente et cum silentio audiamus.
“‘If I, Gamaliel, consider it no disgrace either to my learning or to my old age to learn something from little ones and the unlearned, if perhaps there is something of profit or salvation to be gained (for one who lives reasonably knows that nothing is more precious than the soul), how should it not be lovable to all and desired by all to learn what they do not know and to teach what they have learned? For it is most certain that neither friendship, nor kinship, nor the height of royal power ought to be more precious to a man than the truth. You too, then, brethren, if you know anything more, do not hesitate to set it before the people of God who are present, and likewise before your brethren, while the whole people hears what you say gladly and in all quiet. For how should the people not do this, when they see me myself wishing, together with them, to learn from you, if perhaps God has revealed something more to you? But if you are lacking in anything, likewise do not hesitate to be taught by us, so that God may fill up whatever is lacking on either side. And if perhaps some fear troubles you now because of some of our people who bear prejudiced minds against you, and, fearing their plots, you do not dare to say more openly what you think, then, to free you from this occasion of fear also, I swear to you by almighty God, who lives forever, that I will allow no one to lay hands on you. Having, then, all this people as witness of this oath of mine, and holding the covenant of our oath as a fit pledge, let each one of you without any hesitation set forth what he has learned, and let us, brethren, listen attentively and in silence.’”
1.68PG 1:1244a–1244b
Haec dicens Gamaliel non valde placebat Caiphae, et, ut videbatur, suspectum habens eum, ipse magis inserere se subtiliter disputationibus coepit: subridens enim ad ea quae Gamaliel dixerat, Iacobum episcoporum principem sacerdotum princeps orabat, ut de Christo non aliunde sermo quam de scripturis fieret, ut sciamus, inquit, utrum Iesus ipse sit Christus, an non. Tum Iacobus, primo, inquit, requiramus, ex quibus scripturis potissimum disputationem haberi oporteat. At ille vix aliquando ratione ipsa superatus respondit, ex lege habendam, et post hoc etiam prophetarum addidit mentionem.
“As Gamaliel said this, he did not greatly please Caiaphas; and, holding him suspect, as it seemed, Caiaphas began to insert himself more subtly into the disputations. For, smiling at what Gamaliel had said, the chief of the priests asked James, the chief of the bishops, that the discussion about Christ should be drawn from no other source than the Scriptures, ‘so that we may know,’ he said, ‘whether Jesus is the Christ or not.’ Then James said: ‘First let us inquire from which Scriptures especially the disputation ought to be held.’ And he, scarcely at last overcome by reason itself, answered that it must be held from the law, and after this added mention of the prophets too.”
1.69PG 1:1244b–1245a
Cui Iacobus noster coepit ostendere, quia et prophetae quae dicunt, ex lege sumpserint et legi consona sint locuti. Sed et de libris Regnorum disseruit aliqua, quomodo, et quando, et a quo scripti sint, et quomodo eis uti oporteat. Cumque et de lege plenissime disputasset, ac singula quae de Christo sunt, purissima expositione protulisset in lucem, ostendit abundantissimis probationibus, quia Iesus est Christus, et in ipso universa quae de humili ejus adventu fuerant praedicta, complentur. Duos enim ejus praedictos esse docuit adventus, unum humilitatis quem adimplevit, alium gloriae qui speratur implendus, cum veniet dare regnum credentibus in se et servantibus omnia quae praecepit. Cumque de his evidenter populum docuisset, addebat etiam hoc; quia nisi quis baptizatus fuisset in aqua sub appellatione trinae beatitudinis, sicut docuit verus propheta, neque remissionem acciperet peccatorum, neque introiret in regna caelorum: et hanc esse Dei [ingeniti] praefinitionem confirmavit. Quibus etiam haec addidit: Nolite putare nos duos ingenitos dicere deos, aut unum divisum esse in duos, vel sicut impii dicunt, eumdem masculum et feminam sui effectum; sed Filium Dei unigenitum dicimus, non ex alio initio, sed ex ipso ineffabiliter natum. Similiter etiam de Paracleto dicimus. Sed et de baptismate cum aliquanta dixisset, per septem continuos dies persuasit omni populo et pontifici, ut confestim ad percipiendum baptismum festinarent.
“Our James began to show him that the prophets too took what they say from the law and spoke in harmony with the law. He also discussed something of the books of the Kingdoms: how, when, and by whom they were written, and how they ought to be used. And when he had discussed the law most fully, and by the clearest exposition had brought to light everything in it concerning Christ, he showed by the most abundant proofs that Jesus is the Christ, and that in him all that had been foretold of his humble coming is fulfilled. For he taught that two comings of his had been foretold: one of humility, which he has fulfilled; the other of glory, which is hoped to be fulfilled when he comes to give the kingdom to those who believe in him and keep all that he has commanded. And when he had clearly taught the people about these things, he added this too: that unless someone has been baptized in water under the name of the threefold blessedness, as the true Prophet taught, he will neither receive remission of sins nor enter the kingdom of heaven; and he affirmed that this is the decree of the unbegotten God. To this he also added: ‘Do not think that we speak of two unbegotten gods, or that one is divided into two, or, as the impious say, that the same became male and female of himself; but we say that the only-begotten Son of God was born ineffably, not from another beginning, but from him himself. And we say likewise concerning the Paraclete.’ And when he had said some things also about baptism, through seven continuous days he persuaded all the people and the high priest to hasten at once to receive baptism.”
1.70PG 1:1245a–1246a
Cumque in eo jam res esset, ut venirent et baptizarentur, homo quidam inimicus, tunc cum paucis admodum ingrediens templum, clamare coepit et dicere: Quid facitis, o viri Israelitae? cur vobis tam facile subripitur? cur praecipites ducimini ab hominibus infelicissimis, et a [Simone] Mago deceptis? Cumque haec diceret et ad haec adderet ac superaretur ab episcopo Jacobo, conturbare populum et seditiones suscitare coepit, uti ne ea quae dicebantur plebs posset audire. Igitur exagitare cuncta clamoribus, et quae fuerant multa labore ordinata convellere, simulque incusare sacerdotes, et opprobriis atque increpationibus coepit accendere, et velut furibundus singulos quosque ad caedem concitare, dicens: Quid agitis? quid cessatis? O segnes et desides, cur non manibus nostris invadimus et discerpimus omnes hos? Et cum haec dixisset, primus rapto ex ara torre robusto caedis fecit exordium. Tum deinde et caeteri videntes eum, simili efferebantur insania; fit omnium clamor, caedentium pariter et caesorum, sanguis plurimus funditur, fuga permista habetur, cum interim ille inimicus homo Iacobum aggressus, de summis gradibus praecipitem dedit, quem cum mortuum credidisset, ultra mulctare neglexit.
“And when matters had come to this point, that they should come and be baptized, a certain hostile man, entering the temple at that time with very few others, began to shout and say: ‘What are you doing, men of Israel? Why are you so easily carried away? Why are you led headlong by most wretched men, deceived by Simon, a magician?’ And when he was saying this and adding more, and was being overcome by James the bishop, he began to stir up the people and raise riots, so that the people could not hear what was being said. So he began to throw everything into confusion with shouts, to overturn what had been arranged with much labor, and at the same time to accuse the priests and inflame them with reproaches and rebukes, and like a madman to rouse each one to slaughter, saying: ‘What are you doing? Why do you hesitate? You sluggish and idle men, why do we not lay hands on all these and tear them to pieces?’ When he had said this, he was the first to snatch a strong brand from the altar and to begin the slaughter. Then the rest too, seeing him, were carried away with like madness; a shout goes up from all, from those striking and those struck alike; much blood is shed; there is confused flight; and meanwhile that hostile man attacked James and threw him headlong from the top of the steps, and, believing him dead, took no care to beat him further.”
1.71PG 1:1246a–1246b
Nostri vero sublatum eum collegerunt; erant enim et numero plures quam illi et virtute majores, Sed propter reverentiam Dei ipsi magis interimi se a paucioribus, quam interimere alios patiebantur. Cum autem vespera adfuisset, templum quidem sacerdotes claudunt; nos vero ad domum Jacobi regressi et pernoctantes ibi in oratione, ante lucem descendimus Hiericho ad quinque millia viri. Post triduum autem venit ad eos ex fratribus quidam a Gamaliele, de quo supra diximus, occultos nobis nuntios deferens, quod inimicus ille homo legationem suscepisset a Caipha pontifice, ut omnes qui crederent in Jesum persequeretur et Damascum pergeret cum epistolis ejus, ut etiam inibi auxilio usus infidelium fidelibus inferret exitium; idcirco autem praecipue Damascum festinaret, quod illuc confugisse crederet Petrum. Et post dies fere triginta digressus est per Hiericho Damascum tendens, cum per idem temporis progressi essemus nos ad sepulcra duorum fratrum quorumdam, quae sponte sua per annos singulos dealbabantur; quo miraculo multorum adversum nos repressus est furor, videntium haberi nostros in memoria apud Deum.
“But our people took him up and carried him off; for they were both more numerous and stronger than the others, but out of reverence for God they preferred to let themselves be killed by fewer men rather than to kill others. When evening came, the priests shut the temple; and we, returning to the house of James and spending the night there in prayer, went down before dawn to Jericho, about five thousand men. After three days one of the brethren came to us from Gamaliel, whom we mentioned above, bringing us secret news that that hostile man had received a commission from Caiaphas the high priest to persecute all who believed in Jesus, and to go to Damascus with his letters, so that there too, using the help of the unbelievers, he might bring destruction on the faithful; and that he was hastening to Damascus especially because he believed Peter had fled there. And after about thirty days he passed through Jericho on his way to Damascus, at the time when we had gone out to the tombs of two of the brethren, which were whitened of their own accord every year; by this miracle the fury of many against us was checked, as they saw that our brethren were held in remembrance before God.”
1.72PG 1:1246b–1247b
Positis itaque nobis in Hiericho, ibique orationibus et jejuniis operam dantibus, Jacobus episcopus accersitum me inde huc Caesaream mittit, dicens: quia Zacchaeus de Caesarea scripserit sibi, Simonem quemdam Samaraeum magum plurimos nostrorum subvertere, asserentem se esse quemdam Stantem, hoc est alio nomine, Christum, et virtutem summam excelsi Dei, qui sit supra conditorem mundi, simulque mirabilia plurima ostendens alios dubitare, alios declinare fecerit ad se; cunctaque diligenter comperta ab his, qui prius vel socii ejus, vel discipuli fuerant, et post hoc ad Zacchaeum conversi sunt, indicavit. Multi sunt ergo, inquit Iacobus, o Petre, quorum salutis causa proficisci te oportet, et arguere magum, ac sermonem veritatis docere; sed nihil moreris, neque te contristet quod solus proficisceris, sciens comitem tibi et adjutorem Deum per Iesum, et cito per ejus gratiam multos tibi socios et unanimes fore. Dato sane operam, ut per singulos annos praecipua quaeque ex dictis gestisque tuis scripta mittas ad me, et maxime per septimanos annorum. Et his dictis dimissus ab eo, sex diebus perveni Caesaream.
“While we were staying at Jericho, devoting ourselves to prayers and fasts, James the bishop sent for me and sent me from there here to Caesarea, saying that Zacchaeus had written to him from Caesarea that a certain Simon, a Samaritan magician, was subverting very many of our people, asserting that he was a certain ‘Standing One’, that is, by another name, the Christ, and the supreme power of the high God, who is above the creator of the world; and that by showing many marvels he had made some doubt and others turn aside to him. He reported everything, carefully learned from those who had earlier been his companions or disciples and had afterwards been converted to Zacchaeus. ‘There are many, then,’ said James, ‘Peter, for whose salvation you must set out, refute the magician, and teach the word of truth. Do not delay, and do not be saddened that you set out alone, knowing that God is your companion and helper through Jesus, and that soon, by his grace, you will have many companions of one mind with you. Take care, however, to send me in writing each year the chief of your sayings and doings, and especially every seven years.’ Dismissed by him with these words, I arrived at Caesarea in six days.”
1.73PG 1:1247b–1248a
Ingredienti autem mihi occurrit Zacchaeus dilectissimus frater noster, et inhaerens amplexibus meis perduxit ad hoc in quo ipse commanebat hospitium, requirens a me de singulis quibusque fratribus, praecipue tamen de honorabili fratre nostro Iacobo. Cumque audisset a me, quod una adhuc claudicaret pede, percontanti continuo causam, omnia haec quae nunc tibi exposuimus, ei enarravi; quomodo evocati essemus a sacerdotibus et pontifice Caipha ad templum, et Iacobus archiepiscopus stans in summis gradibus, per septem continuos dies universo populo de Scripturis Dominicis assignaverit, quod Iesus esset Christus, quove modo omnibus jam acquiescentibus, ut ab eo baptizarentur in nomine Iesu, inimicus homo effecerit illa omnia, quae supra diximus, ut ne eadem iterum dicamus.
“As I was entering, Zacchaeus, our dearly beloved brother, met me and, embracing me, brought me to this lodging in which he was staying, asking me about each of the brethren, but especially about our honored brother James. And when he heard from me that he was still lame in one foot, he at once asked the reason, and I related to him all these things that we have now set out to you: how we had been summoned by the priests and the high priest Caiaphas to the temple, and how James the archbishop, standing on the top steps, for seven continuous days demonstrated to all the people from the Lord's Scriptures that Jesus is the Christ, and how, when all were now consenting to be baptized by him in the name of Jesus, the hostile man brought about all those things that we mentioned above, so that we need not say them again.”
1.74PG 1:1248a–1248b
Quibus cognitis Zacchaeus rursus mihi quae a Simone agerentur exponit; et inter haec, nescio unde cognito adventu meo, ipse mandat ad me Simon: Audiente, inquit, populo die crastina disputemus. Cui ego: Fiat, inquam, ut libet. Et haec pollicitatio mea universae innotuit civitati, ita ut etiam tu qui ipsa die adveneras, disceres me die postera cum Simone habiturum esse certamen, et requisita mansione nostra secundum indicia quae a Barnaba acceperas, venires ad nos. Ego vero ingressu tuo ita gratulatus sum, ut nescio unde motus, festinaverit animus meus exponere tibi cuncta velociter, praecipue tamen quod est in fide maximum de vero propheta, quod unum ac totius doctrinae fundamentum sufficere posse non ambigo; tum etiam scriptae legis per singula quaeque capitula quorum ratio poscebat, secretiorem tibi intelligentiam patefeci, non occultans a te nec traditionum bona. Quae vero supersunt incipiens a die crastina, ex his quae in quaestionibus cum Simone movebuntur, per dies singulos audies, usquequo Deo favente perveniatur ad ipsam quo iter nostrum dirigendum credimus urbem Romam. Cumque ad haec ab eo dicta, omnem gratiam me ei debere profiterer, facturumque omnia me quae praeciperet promptissime pollicerer, cibo sumpto quiescere nos jussit sibique ipse quietem dedit.
“When he had learned this, Zacchaeus in turn told me what Simon was doing; and meanwhile Simon himself, having somehow learned of my arrival, sends word to me: ‘Let us dispute tomorrow in the hearing of the people.’ To him I said: ‘Let it be as you please.’ And this promise of mine became known to the whole city, so that you too, who had arrived that very day, learned that I was to hold a contest with Simon the next day, and, having asked for our lodging according to the directions you had received from Barnabas, came to us. I rejoiced so much at your coming that, moved I know not how, my mind hastened to set out everything to you quickly, but especially what is greatest in the faith, concerning the true Prophet, which alone, I do not doubt, can suffice as the foundation of the whole teaching; and then I also disclosed to you the more secret meaning of the written law, chapter by chapter as the reasoning required, not hiding from you the good things of the traditions either. What remains you will hear day by day, beginning tomorrow, from what will be raised in the questions with Simon, until, God favoring, we arrive at the very city to which we believe our journey must be directed, Rome.” And when, in reply to what he had said, I professed that I owed him all thanks and promised that I would most readily do all that he commanded, after taking food he told us to rest, and himself took rest.
Chapter 2
2.1PG 1:1247d–1249a
Cum autem dies, quae ad disceptandum cum Simone statuta fuerat, illucesceret, Petrus primis gallorum cantibus surgens excitavit etiam nos; eramus enim in eodem conclavi cubitantes simul omnes tredecim, in quibus primus post Petrum Zacchaeus, deinde Sophonias, Iosephus, et Michaeas, Eliesdros et Phinees, Lazarus et Eliseus; post hos ego Clemens et Nicodemus, deinde Niceta et Aquila, qui fuerant prius discipuli Simonis, et docente Zacchaeo conversi sunt ad fidem Christi. Mulierum sane nulla prorsus aderat. Cumque adhuc vespertinum lumen duraret, omnes resedimus, et Petrus videns vigilare nos ac sibi intendere, salutatis nobis continuo dat sermonis exordium. Mirari me equidem fateor, fratres, humanae naturae vim, quam ad omnia aptam habilemque esse video. Hoc autem dicere in memoriam venit ex his quae rebus ipsis expertus sum. Ut enim transierit medium noctis, ego sponte jam suscitor et ultra somnus nequaquam venit ad me; quod mihi accidit ex eo, quia in consuetudine habui verba Domini mei, quae ab ipso audieram, revocare ad memoriam, et pro ipsorum desiderio suscitari animis meis et cogitationibus imperavi, ut evigilans ad ea et singula quaque recolens ac retexens possim memoriter retinere. Ex hoc ergo, dum omni cum dulcedine sermones Domini versare in meo corde desidero, consuetudo obtinuit vigilandi, etiam si nihil sit quod cogitare velim. Ita ergo ineffabili quadam ratione, introducta alia consuetudine, vetus consuetudo mutatur, et id revera si non supra modum cogas, sed quantum recipit mensura naturae. Neque enim penitus somno carere possibile est, alioqui nec facta nox fuisset ad quietem.
When the day appointed for the debate with Simon was dawning, Peter, rising at the first cockcrow, woke us too; for we were all sleeping in the same room, thirteen in all: first after Peter was Zacchaeus, then Sophonias, Joseph and Michaeas, Eliesdros and Phinees, Lazarus and Eliseus; after these I, Clement, and Nicodemus; then Niceta and Aquila, who had formerly been disciples of Simon and had been converted to the faith of Christ by the teaching of Zacchaeus. Of women there was none at all present. While the evening lamp was still burning, we all sat up; and Peter, seeing that we were awake and attentive to him, greeted us and at once began to speak: “I confess, brethren, that I wonder at the power of human nature, which I see to be fitted and adapted to everything. It comes to my mind to say this from what I have experienced in fact. For as soon as midnight has passed, I wake of my own accord, and sleep no longer comes to me at all. This happens to me because I made it my habit to recall to memory the words of my Lord which I had heard from him, and out of longing for them I commanded my mind and thoughts to be roused, so that, waking to them and recalling and going over each one, I might keep them in memory. From this, then, since I desire to turn over the Lord's sayings in my heart with all sweetness, the habit of waking has taken hold, even if there is nothing I want to think about. So in an inexpressible way, when another habit is introduced, the old habit is changed—provided you do not force it beyond measure, but only as far as the measure of nature allows. For it is not possible to go wholly without sleep; otherwise night would not have been made for rest.”
2.2PG 1:1249a
Et ego cum audissem: Optime, inquam, dixisti, Petre, quia consuetudo consuetudine commutatur. Nam et ego cum navigarem primo turbabar et intra me mihi omnia vertebantur, ita ut suggillari viderer nec ferre possem brumam et molestiam maris, post paucos autem dies ubi consuetudo facta est, tolerabiliter ferre coepi, ita ut mane statim una cum nautis cibum sumere delectarer, cum prius ante horam septimam capiendi cibi consuetudo non esset. Nunc ergo ex ista sola consuetudine, circa illud tempus quo comedere cum nautis solebam, esuries admonet me, quod tamen rursus depellendum spero, cum alia fuerit consuetudo suscepta. Credo ergo etiam tibi vigiliarum consuetudinem, ut perhibes, institutam; et opportune hoc exponere voluisti, ut et nos aliquantulum somni a nobis abjicere atque effugare non pigeat, ut possimus doctrinae viventis instituta suscipere. Ubi enim decocti fuerint cibi et mens acceperit nocturna silentia, opportunissime quae docentur insident.
When I heard this, I said: “You have spoken excellently, Peter, in saying that one habit is changed by another. For I too, when I first went to sea, was upset, and everything within me was turned over, so that I seemed to be bruised and could not bear the roaring and discomfort of the sea; but after a few days, when I had grown used to it, I began to bear it tolerably, so that I was glad to take food with the sailors early in the morning, whereas before I had not been accustomed to take food before the seventh hour. Now, then, from that habit alone, around the time I used to eat with the sailors, hunger reminds me; yet I hope to drive it away again when another habit has been taken up. I believe, then, that your habit of waking was also formed as you say; and you were right to want to explain this, so that we too may not be reluctant to cast off and drive away a little of our sleep, in order to receive the instructions of the living teaching. For when food has been digested and the mind has received the silence of night, what is taught settles in most fittingly.”
2.3PG 1:1249a–1250a
Et Petrus libenter accipiens, quod intellexerim praefationis ejus causam ad utilitatem nostram prolatam, collaudans me adhortandi et incitandi sine dubio gratia, consequentem coepit expedire sermonem: Opportunum mihi nunc et necessarium videtur, de his quae imminent aliqua discutere, id est de Simone. Scire enim velim, quibus sit moribus et quibus actibus, quod mihi, si quis scit, indicare non cesset; refert enim ista praenoscere. Nam si in mandatis habemus, ut venientes ad civitatem discamus prius, quis in ea dignus sit ut apud eum cibum sumamus; quanto magis convenit noscere, quis, qualisve sit is cui immortalitatis verba credenda sunt? Solliciti enim et valde solliciti esse debemus, ne margaritas nostras mittamus ante porcos.
And Peter, glad that I had understood the reason for his preface as offered for our benefit, praised me—no doubt to encourage and spur me on—and began to set out the next part of his discourse: “It seems to me fitting and necessary now to discuss some things about what lies ahead, that is, about Simon. For I should like to know his character and conduct; if anyone knows, let him not hesitate to tell me, for it matters to know these things beforehand. For if we have it among our commands that when we come to a city we should first learn who in it is worthy for us to take food with him, how much more is it fitting to know who and what sort of man he is to whom the words of immortality are to be entrusted? For we must be careful, very careful, not to cast our pearls before swine.”
2.4PG 1:1250a
Sed et alias ob causas utile est, viri hujus habere me notitiam. Si enim sciam, quia in his, de quibus non potest dubitari quod bona sint, emendatus est et inculpabilis, hoc est, si sobrius, si misericors, si justus, si mitis et humanus est, quae utique bona esse nullus ambigit, tunc consequens videbitur, ut ei qui obtinet bona virtutum, etiam quod deest fidei et scientiae conferatur, et in quibus maculari videtur ejus vita, quae est in reliquis probabilis, emendetur. Si vero in his quae palam sunt, peccatis involutus permanet et inquinatus, non me oportet ei aliquid de secretioribus et remotis divinae scientiae proloqui, sed magis protestari et convenire eum, ut peccare desinat et actus suos a vitiis emendet. Quod si ingesserit se et provocaverit nos dicere, quae eum minus recte agentem non oportet audire, prudenter eum debemus eludere; nam nihil omnino respondere auditorum causa utile non videtur, ne forte existiment nos responsionis penuria declinare certamen, et fides eorum laedatur, non intelligentium propositum nostrum.
“But it is useful for me to know about this man for other reasons too. For if I know that in those things which cannot be doubted to be good he is reformed and blameless—that is, if he is sober, merciful, just, gentle, and humane, which no one doubts are good—then it will seem to follow that one who possesses the goods of the virtues should also be given what is lacking of faith and knowledge, and that his life, praiseworthy in other respects, should be corrected where it seems to be stained. But if he remains entangled and defiled in sins that are manifest, I ought not to tell him anything of the more secret and hidden things of divine knowledge, but rather testify to him and confront him, that he may cease from sinning and correct his conduct from vices. And if he thrusts himself forward and provokes us to say what a man who acts wrongly ought not to hear, we must parry him prudently; for to answer nothing at all does not seem useful, for the hearers' sake, lest they think we are avoiding the contest for lack of an answer, and their faith be harmed because they do not understand our purpose.”
2.5PG 1:1250a
Cumque haec Petrus dixisset ad nos, Niceta rogat permitti sibi dicere aliquid, atque indulgente Petro cum venia inquit: Obsecro te, domine mi Petre, audias me valde sollicitum tui et verentem, ne forte in certamine quod tibi est cum Simone, superari videaris. Solet enim frequenter accidere, ut qui veritatem defendit, non semper obtineat, dum aut in aliquo praeventi sunt auditores, aut non grandem curam melioris sententiae gerunt. Super haec autem omnia et ipse Simon vehementissimus est orator, in arte dialectica et syllogismorum tendiculis enutritus, quod autem est omnibus gravius, et in arte magica valde exercitatus; et ideo metuo, ne forte tam valide ex omni parte munitus, apud eos qui ignorant eum, falsa allegans putetur vera defendere. Neque enim vel nos ipsi eum potuissemus effugere et converti ad Dominum, nisi dum adjutores ejus et errorum socii fuimus, agnovissemus quod deceptor esset ac magus.
When Peter had said this to us, Niceta asked permission to say something, and when Peter granted it, he said respectfully: “I beg you, my lord Peter, hear me, for I am very anxious for you and afraid that in your contest with Simon you may seem to be overcome. For it often happens that one who defends the truth does not always prevail, when either the hearers are prejudiced in some respect, or they take no great care for the better opinion. Above all this, Simon himself is a most forceful speaker, trained in the dialectical art and the snares of syllogisms, and, what is most serious of all, very practiced in the magic art too; and therefore I fear that, so strongly fortified on every side, he may be thought by those who do not know him to be defending the truth while he alleges falsehoods. For not even we ourselves could have escaped him and been converted to the Lord, had we not recognized, while we were his helpers and companions in error, that he was a deceiver and a magician.”
2.6PG 1:1250a–1251b
Cum haec Nieeta dixisset, Aquila quoque rogans sibi dicendi facultatem dari, hoc modo etiam ipse prosecutus est: Suscipe, quaeso, et mei erga te amoris curam, optime Petre; et ego enim valde sollicitus sum pro te. Nec reprehendas nos in hoc, quia curam gerere alicujus ex affectu venit, negligere autem non minus est quam odisse. Testem vero invoco Deum, quia non ut segniorem te in certamine sciens metuo pro te, quippe qui nec unquam tibi praesto fuerim disputanti, sed qui illius impietates bene noverim, existimationem tuam cogito simul et animos auditorum, et ipsius ante omnia veritatis statum. Vehemens etenim est hic magus ad omnia quaecunque voluerit et supra modum scelestus; in omnibus enim eum diligenter agnovimus, utpote qui a puero malorum ejus auditores fuerimus et ministri, et nisi nos Dei amor abrupisset ab eo, in eisdem cum ipso etiam nunc versaremur malis; sed ingenitus quidam nobis erga Deum affectus, scelera quidem ejus exosa, cultum vero Dei amabilem fecit. Unde et arbitror opus fuisse divinae providentiae, ut nos primo familiares ejus effecti notitiam caperemus quomodo, vel quali arte prodigia, quae facere videtur efficiat. Quis enim est, qui non obstupescat super his, quae facit, mirabilibus, ut putet eum de coelis Deum ad salutem hominum descendisse? Ego de meipso fateor, nisi interius eum scissem, et interfuissem actibus ejus, subripi mihi facile potuisset; unde non fuit magnum nos ab ejus consortio separari, scientes eum magicis artibus et commentis scelerum niti. Quod si vis etiam ipse de eo cuncta cognoscere, quis ipse sit, qualisve, et unde, vel qualiter patrentur quae gerit, ausculta.
When Niceta had said this, Aquila too asked to be given leave to speak, and went on in this way: “Accept, I pray, the care that comes of my love for you also, excellent Peter; for I too am very anxious for you. And do not blame us for this, for caring for someone comes from affection, while neglecting him is no less than hating him. I call God to witness that I do not fear for you as knowing you to be weaker in debate—indeed I have never been present when you disputed—but because I know his impieties well, I am thinking at once of your reputation, of the minds of the hearers, and above all of the state of the truth itself. For this magician is forceful in whatever he wishes, and wicked beyond measure; we have come to know him thoroughly in everything, since from boyhood we have been hearers and ministers of his evils, and had not the love of God torn us away from him, we would still be engaged with him in the same evils. But a certain inborn affection toward God made his crimes hateful to us and the worship of God lovable. Hence I think it was the work of divine providence that we, having first become his intimates, should learn how, or by what art, he performs the wonders he seems to do. For who is there who is not amazed at the marvels he does, so as to think that he is God come down from heaven for the salvation of men? I confess of myself that, had I not known him inwardly and been present at his doings, I could easily have been carried away; hence it was no great thing for us to separate from his company, knowing that he relies on magic arts and criminal devices. And if you too wish to learn everything about him—who he is, what sort of man, where he comes from, and how what he does is accomplished—listen.”
2.7PG 1:1251b
Simon hic, patre Antonio, matre Rachel natus est, gente Samaraeus ex vico Gethonum, arte magus, Graecis tamen litteris liberalibus apprime eruditus, gloriae ac jactantiae supra omne genus hominum cupidus, ita ut excelsam virtutem quae supra creatorem Deum sit, credi se velit, et Christum putari, atque Stantem nominari. Hac autem appellatione utitur quasi qui neget posse se aliquando dissolvi, asserens carnem suam ita divinitatis suae virtute compactam, ut possit in aeternum durare. Hinc ergo Stans appellatur, tanquam qui non possit ulla corruptione decidere.
“This Simon was born of a father Antonius and a mother Rachel, a Samaritan by race from the village of Gitthae, a magician by art, yet highly educated in Greek liberal letters, and desirous of glory and boasting above all humankind, so that he wishes to be believed to be the exalted power which is above God the creator, to be thought the Christ, and to be called the Standing One. He uses this title as one who denies that he can ever be dissolved, asserting that his flesh is so compacted by the power of his divinity that it can endure forever. Hence, then, he is called the Standing One, as one who cannot fall through any corruption.”
2.8PG 1:1251b–1252a
Interfecto etenim, sicut scis et ipse, Baptista Joanne, cum Dositheus haereseos suae iniisset exordium, cum aliis triginta principalibus discipulis et una muliere quae Luna vocitata est (unde et illi triginta quasi secundum lunae cursum in numero dierum positi videbantur), Simon hic malae, ut diximus, gloriae cupidus accedit ad Dositheum et simulatis amicitiis exorat, ut si quando aliquis ex illis triginta obisset, in locum defuncti se continuo subrogaret; quia neque statutum numerum excedere apud eos fas erat, neque ignotum aliquem inserere aut nondum probatum; unde et caeteri studentes digni loco ac numero fieri, secundum sectae suae instituta placere per omnia gestiunt, quo possit unusquisque ex his qui illum numerum sequuntur, cum forte aliquis, ut diximus, decesserit, dignus videri, qui in locum defuncti substitui debeat. Igitur Dositheus plurimis ab hoc exoratus, ubi locus intra numerum factus est, introduxit Simonem.
“For after John the Baptist had been killed, as you yourself know, when Dositheus had begun his heresy with thirty other chief disciples and one woman who was called Luna (so that those thirty seemed to be set in number according to the days of the moon's course), this Simon, eager, as we said, for evil glory, approaches Dositheus and with feigned friendship begs that whenever any of those thirty died, he might at once be substituted in the dead man's place. For it was not lawful among them to exceed the fixed number, nor to admit anyone unknown or not yet proved; hence the others too, striving to become worthy of the place and number, are eager to please in everything according to the rules of their sect, so that each of those who aspire to that number may seem worthy, when someone, as we said, has died, to be substituted in the dead man's place. So Dositheus, much entreated by him, brought Simon in when a place in the number fell vacant.”
2.9PG 1:1252b–1253a
Sed hic non multo post incidit in amorem mulieris illius quam Lunam vocant, nobisque utpote familiaribus suis omnia concredebat, quod magus esset, et quod amaret Lunam, quodque gloriae cupidus nollet ea inglorius frui, sed exspectare patienter donec honeste ea uti liceret, si tamen etiam nos conspiraremus ei ad omnia quae velit. Sed et mercedem ministerii hujus daturum se nobis pollicebatur, summis ut honoribus allici, et dii esse ab hominibus crederemur, tantum ut mihi, inquit, Simoni deferatis primatus, qui possunt magica arte multa signa et prodigia ostendere, per quae possit vel gloriae vel sectae nostrae ratio constare. Possum enim facere ut volentibus me comprehendere non appaream, et rursus volens videri palam sim, si fugere velim montes perforem et saxa quasi lutum pertranseam, si me de monte excelso praecipitem, tanquam subvectus ad terras illaesus deferar. Vinctus memetipsum solvam, eos vero qui vincula injecerint vinctos reddam, in carcere colligatus claustra sponte patefieri faciam, statuas animatas reddam, ita ut putentur ab his qui vident homines esse; novas arbores subito oriri faciam, et repentina virgulta producam, in ignem memetipsum injiciens non ardeam. Vultum meum commuto, ut non agnoscar, sed et duas facies habere me, possum hominibus ostendere. Ovis aut capra efficiar, pueris parvis barbam producam, in aerem volando invehar, aurum plurimum ostendam, reges faciam eosque dejiciam. Adorabor ut Deus, publice divinis donabor honoribus, ita ut simulacrum mihi statuentes tanquam Deum colant et adorent. Et quid opus est multa dicere? quidquid voluero facere, potero. Multa etenim jam mihi experimenti causa consummata sunt. Denique aliquando, inquit, cum mater mea Rachel juberet me exire ad agrum, ut meterem, ego falcem videns positam praecepi ei ut iret et meteret, et messuit decuplo amplius caeteris. Multa jam nova virgulta produxi de terra et convalescere ea feci, sub momento temporis apparere feci et montem proximum, ego secundo perforavi.
“But not long after he fell in love with that woman whom they call Luna, and he confided everything to us as his intimates: that he was a magician, that he loved Luna, and that, being desirous of glory, he did not want to enjoy her ingloriously, but to wait patiently until he could have her honorably—provided we too conspired with him in all he wished. And he promised to give us as the reward for this service that we would be raised to the highest honors and believed by men to be gods, ‘only provided,’ he said, ‘that you grant the first place to me, Simon, who can show many signs and wonders by magic art, through which both my glory and our sect may be established. For I can make myself invisible to those who wish to seize me, and again, when I wish to be seen, be in plain view; if I wish to flee, I bore through mountains and pass through rocks as if through clay; if I throw myself headlong from a high mountain, I shall be carried down to earth unharmed as if borne up; when bound, I shall loose myself and bind those who put the bonds on me; shut up in prison, I shall make the bars open of their own accord; I shall make statues alive, so that those who see them think they are men; I shall make new trees spring up suddenly and produce sudden shoots; I shall throw myself into fire and not burn. I change my face so as not to be recognized, and I can even show men that I have two faces. I shall become a sheep or a goat; I shall make a beard grow on little boys; I shall fly up into the air; I shall show much gold; I shall make kings and depose them. I shall be worshiped as God and publicly endowed with divine honors, so that men will set up an image of me and worship and adore me as God. And what need to say much? Whatever I wish to do, I shall be able to do. For many things have already been accomplished by me by way of experiment. Once, indeed,’ he said, ‘when my mother Rachel told me to go out to the field to reap, I saw a sickle lying there and commanded it to go and reap, and it reaped ten times more than the others. I have already produced many new shoots from the earth and made them grow strong and appear in a moment of time, and I bored through the nearest mountain.’”
2.10PG 1:1253a–1253b
Sed haec cum diceret de virgultis productis et monte perforato, stupescebam pro eo, quod etiam nos circumvenire velit, quibus se commendare et concredere videbatur; sciebamus enim quod a proavis haec fuissent, quae a se nuper facta perhibebat. Haec ergo nos ab eo flagitia audientes, et horum deteriora, sequebamur tamen et ipsi ejus scelera, et alios ab eo decipi patiebamur, multa etiam mentientes pro eo, et hoc priusquam aliquid faceret eorum quae promiserat, ita ut nullis adhuc gestis, a nonnullis tamen putaretur Deus.
“But when he said this about producing shoots and boring through the mountain, I was dumbfounded that he wished to deceive even us, to whom he seemed to commend and entrust himself; for we knew that the things he claimed to have done recently had been there since our ancestors' time. Hearing these crimes from him, and worse, we nevertheless followed his wickedness ourselves and allowed others to be deceived by him, even telling many lies on his behalf, and this before he did any of the things he had promised, so that, though nothing had yet been done, he was already thought by some to be God.”
2.11PG 1:1253b–1254a
Interim in initio cum adhuc inter triginta Dosithei discipulos haberetur, coepit ipsi Dositheo derogare, tanquam qui non integre nec perfecte doceret, idque eum non invidia facere sed inscientia. Verum Dositheus ubi sibi derogari sensit a Simone, verens ne opinio sua obscuraretur apud homines, qui eum putabant ipsum esse Stantem, furore commotus, cum ad scholam solito convenissent, virga correpta verberare Simonem coepit, et repente per corpus ejus quasi per fumum, visa est virga transire; super quo obstupefactus Dositheus, ait ad eum: Dic mihi, si tu es Stans, ut adorem te. Cumque Simon respondisset, ego sum, Dositheus videns se non esse Stantem, cecidit et adoravit eum, et Simoni quidem cedit principatum suum, ipsique obedire omnem triginta virorum ordinem jubet, semetipsum vero in locum Simonis statuit et non multo post defunctus est.
“Meanwhile, at the beginning, while he was still counted among the thirty disciples of Dositheus, he began to disparage Dositheus himself as one who did not teach soundly or perfectly, saying that he did so not from envy but from ignorance. But when Dositheus perceived that Simon was disparaging him, fearing that his reputation might be obscured among men who thought he himself was the Standing One, he was moved with fury; and when they had met at the school as usual, he seized a rod and began to beat Simon; and suddenly the rod was seen to pass through his body as if through smoke. Astonished at this, Dositheus said to him: ‘Tell me if you are the Standing One, that I may worship you.’ And when Simon answered, ‘I am,’ Dositheus, seeing that he himself was not the Standing One, fell down and worshiped him, yielded his leadership to Simon, and ordered the whole rank of thirty men to obey him; he put himself in Simon's place, and not long after he died.”
2.12PG 1:1254a–1254b
Igitur post obitum Dosithei Simon accepit Lunam, cum qua usque ad praesens circuit, ut videtis decipiens turbas et asserens, semetipsum quidem virtutem esse quamdam, quae sit supra conditorem Deum, Lunam vero quae secum est, esse de superioribus caelis deductam, eamdemque cunctorum genitricem asserit esse sapientiam, pro qua, inquit, Graeci et barbari confligentes, imaginem quidem ejus aliqua ex parte videre potuerunt, ipsam vero ut est, penitus ignorarunt, quippe quae apud illum primum omnium et solum habitaret Deum. Et haec atque alia his similia cum verborum pompa proferens, decepit multos. Sed et hoc indicare debeo, quod ipse ego vidisse me memini, cum esset aliquando Luna illa ejus in turri quadam, multitudo ingens ad eam convenerat pervidendam et undique circa turrim stabat; at illa per omnes fenestras turris illius omni populo procumbere ac prospicere videbatur. Et multa alia mirabilia fecit et facit, ita ut stupentes pro his homines putent eum ipsum esse summum Deum.
“So after the death of Dositheus Simon took Luna, with whom he goes about to the present day, as you see, deceiving the crowds and asserting that he himself is a certain power which is above God the creator, and that Luna, who is with him, has been brought down from the higher heavens; and he asserts that she is Wisdom, the mother of all, for whom, he says, the Greeks and barbarians fought, and were able to see her image in some part, but were wholly ignorant of her as she is, since she dwelt with that first and only God of all. Uttering these and other similar things with pomp of words, he has deceived many. But I must also point out this, which I remember seeing myself: once, when that Luna of his was in a certain tower, a vast crowd had gathered to see her and stood all around the tower; and she was seen by all the people to lean out and look out through every window of that tower. And he has done and does many other marvels, so that men, amazed by them, think that he himself is the supreme God.”
2.13PG 1:1254b–1255b
Nam mihi aliquando et Niceta: rogantibus, ut exponeret quomodo haec possint arte magica effici, et quae esset hujus rei natura, Simon tanquam familiaribus suis explanare ita coepit: Pueri, inquit, incorrupti et violenter necati, animam adjuramentis ineffabilibus evocatam assistere mihi feci, et per ipsam fit omne quod jubeo. Et ego: Estne, inquam, possibile animae haec facere? Ille respondit: Hoc vos scire volo, quia secundum locum post Deum obtinet anima hominis, cum exuta fuerit a corporis sui tenebris. Statim denique et praescientiam habet, propter quod evocatur ad necromantiam. Et ego respondi: Cur ergo interfectorum animae non ulciscuntur interfectores suos? At ille: Non meministi, inquit, quod dixi, quia cum exierit de corpore, etiam praescientiam habet? Memini, inquam. Ob hoc ergo, inquit, cum excedit e corpore, statim praenoscit futurum esse judicium, et unumquemque pro his quae hic egerit malis poenas daturum, et ideo nolunt ulcisci interfectores suos, quia et ipsae pro suis malis quae hic commiserant, perferunt cruciatus, et illis sciunt in judicio graviora manere supplicia. Super haec autem omnia nec permittitur eis exire, aut facere quidquam ab angelis qui eis praesunt. Et ego respondi: Si non permittitur eis ab angelis huc venire aut facere quod volunt, quomodo mago evocanti obtemperant animae? ipsis, inquit, animabus venire volentibus non indulgent, cum vero hi qui praesunt angeli adjurati fuerint per majorem suum, excusationem habent nostrae, qui eos adjuramus, violentia, ut permittant exire animas quas evocamus; non enim illi peccant qui vim patiuntur, sed nos qui inferimus necessitatem. Ad haec Niceta, ultra non ferens praepropere respondit, quod et ego quidem facturus eram, sed prius eum expiscari de singulis cupiebam; sed, ut dixi, Niceta praeveniens: Et tu, inquit, non times diem judicii, qui vim angelis facis, et animas evocas, et homines decipis, et honorem tibi divinum ab hominibus mercaris? et quomodo nobis persuades quod neque judicium erit, ut nonnulli Judaeorum fatentur, neque animae immortales sint, quod videtur pluribus, cum ipsis oculis tuis videas eas, et commotionem divini judicii capias ex ipsis?
“For once, when Niceta and I asked him to explain how these things could be done by magic art and what the nature of the matter was, Simon began to explain it thus, as to his intimates: ‘I have made the soul of a boy, undefiled and violently slain, summoned by ineffable adjurations, stand by me, and through it everything I command is done.’ And I said: ‘Is it possible for a soul to do these things?’ He answered: ‘I want you to know this, that the soul of a man holds the second place after God once it has been stripped of the darkness of its body. Indeed, it at once has foreknowledge too, which is why it is summoned for necromancy.’ And I answered: ‘Why, then, do the souls of the slain not take vengeance on their slayers?’ And he said: ‘Do you not remember that I said that when it has left the body it also has foreknowledge?’ ‘I remember,’ I said. ‘For this reason, then,’ he said, ‘when it leaves the body it at once foreknows that there will be a judgment, and that each will pay penalties for the evils he did here; and therefore they do not wish to take vengeance on their slayers, because they themselves too suffer torments for the evils they committed here, and they know that heavier punishments await the others in the judgment. Above all this, they are not permitted by the angels who are set over them to go out or do anything.’ And I answered: ‘If they are not permitted by the angels to come here or to do what they wish, how do the souls obey a magician who summons them?’ ‘When the souls themselves wish to come,’ he said, ‘the angels do not permit it; but when the angels set over them have been adjured by their superior, they have the excuse of our violence, we who adjure them, to let out the souls we summon; for those who suffer force do not sin, but we who impose the necessity.’ At this Niceta, no longer able to bear it, answered too hastily—as I too was going to do, but I wished first to draw him out on each point; but, as I said, Niceta, forestalling me, said: ‘And do you not fear the day of judgment, you who do violence to angels, summon souls, deceive men, and buy divine honor for yourself from men? And how do you persuade us that there will be no judgment, as some of the Jews profess, and that souls are not immortal, as many think, when you see them with your own eyes and receive from them the proof of the divine judgment?’”
2.14PG 1:1255b–1256b
llis ab eo dictis impalluit Simon, et tamen post paululum recolligens se, ita respondit: Ne putetis, inquit, quod generis vestri homo sim; ego neque magus sum, neque amator Lunae, neque Antonii filius. Ante enim quam mater mea Rachel conveniret cum eo, adhuc virgo concepit me, cum esset in potestate mea, vel parvum esse, vel magnum, et hominem inter homines apparere. Tentandi ergo gratia vos primos assumpsi amicos, ut in coelestibus et ineffabilibus locis meis primos vos collocem, cum probavero. Humana ergo de meipso mentitus sum, ut vos manifestius comprobarem, si integrum erga me servatis affectum. Ego vero haec audiens, ipsum quidem miserum judicans, impudentiam tamen ejus admirans, et pro eo ipse erubescens, simul et veritus ne quid in nos moliretur mali, innuo Nicetae paulisper una mecum simulare, et aio ad eum: Non nobis indigneris hominibus corruptibilibus, incorruptibilis Deus; sed suscipe magis affectum nostrum, et animum volentem scire qui sit Deus; nondum enim sciebamus quis esses, et nec advertebamus quia tu es quem quaerebamus.
“When he had said this, Simon turned pale; yet after a little, recollecting himself, he answered thus: ‘Do not think that I am a man of your race. I am neither a magician, nor a lover of Luna, nor the son of Antonius. For before my mother Rachel came together with him, she conceived me while still a virgin, since it was in my power to be either small or great and to appear as a man among men. For the sake of testing you, then, I took you first as friends, so that, when I have proved you, I may place you first in my heavenly and ineffable places. So I told lies about myself as a man, in order to prove more clearly whether you keep your affection toward me intact.’ But I, hearing this, judged him wretched indeed, yet wondered at his impudence and blushed for him; and at the same time, fearing that he might contrive some evil against us, I signaled to Niceta to pretend with me for a little, and said to him: ‘Do not be angry with us corruptible men, you incorruptible God; rather accept our affection and our mind that wishes to know who God is; for we did not yet know who you were, nor did we perceive that you are the one we were seeking.’”
2.15PG 1:1256b
Haec et his similia vultu pro re aptato prosequentibus nobis, vanissimus credidit nos deceptos, et eo magis elatus addidit etiam haec: Propitius vobis jam sum, pro affectu quem erga me Deum geritis, me enim diligentes nesciebatis, et me quaerentes ignorabatis. Sed nolo dubitetis, quia hoc est vere Deum esse, cum potest quis parvus effici, vel magnus, si voluerit, nam quoquo modo apparere hominibus poteram. Nunc ergo incipiam vobis aperire quod verum est. Ego virtute mea quodam tempore aerem vertens in aquam, et aquam rursus in sanguinem, carnemque solidans, novum hominem puerum formavi, et opus conditore Deo multo nobilius protuli. ille enim creavit hominem e terra, ego autem, quod est difficilius, ex aere, quemque rursus resolvens aeri reddidi, speciem tamen ejus imaginemque depictam in interiore cubiculo collocavi, ut esset indicium ac memoria operis mei. Haec autem intelligebamus eum dicere pro puero illo, cujus vi necati anima, ad ea quae volebat ministeria, utebatur.
“As we went through these and similar things with faces suited to the occasion, that vainest of men believed we had been deceived, and, all the more elated, added this too: ‘I am now gracious to you, for the affection you bear toward me as God; for you loved me without knowing me, and sought me without recognizing me. But I do not want you to doubt that this is truly to be God: to be able to become small or great as one wishes; for I could appear to men in any way. Now, then, I will begin to open to you what is true. Once by my power I turned air into water, and water again into blood, and solidifying it into flesh I formed a new human being, a boy, and produced a work far nobler than God the creator. For he created man from earth, but I, what is more difficult, from air; and dissolving him again I returned him to the air, but I placed his likeness and painted image in an inner chamber as a proof and memorial of my work.’ We understood him to be speaking of that boy whose soul, after he had been slain by violence, he was using for the services he wished.”
2.16PG 1:1256b–1257a
Petrus vero haec audiens cum lacrymis ait: Miror admodum immensam Dei patientiam, et e contrario in nonnullis humanae temeritatis audaciam. Quae enim ratio inveniri ultra poterit, quae Simoni suadeat, quod Deus judicet iniquos; cum ipse sibi persuadet, quod animarum obedientia ad scelerum suorum utatur ministerium? re autem vera a daemonibus illuditur; tamen cum per haec ipsa certus sit, quod immortales sunt animae et iudicantur pro his quae gesserint, et qui se putet re ipsa videre ea quae nos fide credimus. quamvis, ut dixi, illudatur a daemonibus, tamen arbitratur se ipsam animae videre substantiam. Quando hic, inquam, fatebitur vel male se agere in tanto malo positus, vel judicandum se pro his quae egerit, qui sciens Dei judicium contemnit et inimicum se exhibet Deo, et audet tam nefanda committere? Unde certum est, fratres mei, nonnullos veritati ac religioni Dei non ideo adversari, quod eis fidei ratio nequaquam constare videatur, sed quia aut nimietate peccatorum involuti, aut malis suis praeventi et tumore cordis elati sunt, ita ut nec ea quidem credant, quae oculis suis se videre arbitrantur.
Peter, hearing this, said with tears: “I greatly wonder at the immense patience of God, and on the other hand at the audacity of human rashness in some people. For what reason can any longer be found to persuade Simon that God judges the wicked, when he persuades himself that he uses the obedience of souls for the service of his crimes? In reality he is mocked by demons. Yet, since he is certain from these very things that souls are immortal and are judged for what they have done, and since he thinks he sees in fact what we believe by faith—though, as I said, he is mocked by demons, he yet thinks he sees the very substance of the soul—when, I say, will this man confess either that he acts wickedly, placed in so great an evil, or that he is to be judged for what he has done, he who, knowing God's judgment, despises it, shows himself God's enemy, and dares to commit such abominable things? Hence it is certain, my brethren, that some oppose the truth and the religion of God not because the reasoning of faith seems to them in no way established, but because they are either entangled in an excess of sins, or prejudiced by their evils and puffed up with pride of heart, so that they do not believe even what they think they see with their own eyes.”
2.17PG 1:1257b
Verum quoniam ingenita erga Deum conditorem sufficere ad salutem videbatur affectio his, qui diligerent eum, studet inimicus hanc affectionem in hominibus pervertere, et inimicos eos efficere atque ingratos Conditori suo. Testor autem coelum ac terram, quod si quantum cupit inimicus desaevire, permitteretur etiam a Deo, olim omnes homines deperissent; sed misericordiae causa non sinit Deus. Quod si affectum suum homines converterent ad Deum, omnes sine dubio salvarentur, etiam si pro aliquibus delictis ob justitiam corripi viderentur. Sed nunc plurimi hominum inimici effecti sunt Dei, quorum malignus corda penetravit, et affectum quem eis conditor Deus inseruerat, ut erga se haberent, in semetipsum deflexit. Aliorum vero, qui aliquantulum vigilare videbantur, in phantasia gloriae et splendoris apparens, et magna quaedam atque ingentia repromittens, evagari nihilominus a Deo vero mentem atque animum fecit; quae tamen perpetrare ei justa quadam permittitur ratione.
“But since the inborn affection toward God the creator seemed sufficient for salvation to those who loved him, the enemy strives to pervert this affection in men and to make them enemies of their Creator and ungrateful to him. I call heaven and earth to witness that if the enemy were permitted by God to rage as much as he desires, all men would long ago have perished; but for mercy's sake God does not allow it. And if men turned their affection to God, all would without doubt be saved, even if they seemed to be chastised for some offenses for justice's sake. But now very many men have become enemies of God; the evil one has entered their hearts and turned toward himself the affection which God the creator had implanted in them to have toward him. Others, who seemed to be somewhat watchful, he has nonetheless made to wander in mind and soul from the true God, appearing to them in a fantasy of glory and splendor and promising great and immense things; yet he is permitted to do these things for a certain just reason.”
2.18PG 1:1257b–1258b
Ad haec Aquila respondit: Quid ergo delinquunt homines, si malignus transformans se in splendorem lucis majora repromittit hominibus, quam ipse conditor Deus? Et Petrus: Puto, inquit, hoc injustius nihil esse, et quatenus injustum sit audi. Si filius tuus, qui a te omni diligentia eruditus est et nutritus, atque ad virilem perductus aetatem, ingratus tibi sit, et relinquens te ad alium, quem forte ditiorem viderit, eat, et honorem quem tibi debebat illi exhibeat, ac spe majoris lucri naturam neget et jura paterna defugiat, rectum tibi videtur, an impium? Aquila respondit: Omnibus palam est, quod impium sit. Et Petrus: Si ergo in hominibus hoc impium dicis, quanto magis in Deo, qui supra omnes homines honore ab hominibus dignus est? cujus non solum beneficiis fruimur, verum et ope ac virtute esse coepimus cum non essemus, cuique si placeamus merebimur ab eo, ut etiam aeterni in bonis simus. Ut ergo infideles a fidelibus et pii discernantur ab impiis, permissum est maligno uti his artibus, quibus singulorum erga verum parentem probentur affectus. Quod si vere esset aliquis deus alienus, tamen ab eo, qui nos creaverat quique nobis pater et conditor fuerat, rectumne erat, relicto proprio transire ad alienum? Et Aquila: Absit! inquit. Tum Petrus: Quomodo ergo dicemus malignum esse causam peccati nostri, cum hoc permissu Dei fiat, ut per ipsum probentur et in die judicii arguantur hi qui majoribus pollicitationibus invitati, veri patris et conditoris sui reliquerint pietatem, hi vero qui fidem et charitatem proprii patris, etiam cum paupertate, si acciderit, et cum tribulatione servaverint, donis caelestibus in regno ejus et immortalibus muneribus perfruantur? Sed haec alias diligentius exponemus. Quid autem Simon egerit post haec, scire cupio.
To this Aquila answered: “What fault, then, do men commit, if the evil one, transforming himself into the brightness of light, promises men greater things than God the creator himself?” And Peter said: “I think nothing is more unjust than this; and hear how unjust it is. If your son, whom you have carefully educated and brought up and led to manhood, were ungrateful to you, and, leaving you, went to another whom he perhaps saw to be richer, showed him the honor he owed you, and in hope of greater gain denied nature and fled from his father's rights, does it seem right to you, or impious?” Aquila answered: “It is plain to all that it is impious.” And Peter: “If, then, you call this impious among men, how much more toward God, who deserves honor from men above all men? Not only do we enjoy his benefits, but by his help and power we began to be when we were not; and if we please him, we shall deserve from him to be eternal in good things. So, in order that the unfaithful may be distinguished from the faithful and the godly from the ungodly, the evil one is permitted to use these arts, by which each one's affection toward the true parent may be proved. And even if there really were some other god, would it be right to leave the one who had created us and had been our father and creator, and go over to another?” And Aquila said: “Far from it!” Then Peter: “How, then, shall we say that the evil one is the cause of our sin, when this happens by God's permission, so that through him those may be proved, and convicted in the day of judgment, who, enticed by greater promises, have abandoned devotion to their true father and creator, while those who have kept faith and love toward their own father, even in poverty, if it befalls, and in tribulation, may enjoy heavenly gifts and immortal rewards in his kingdom? But we will explain these things more carefully another time. Now I wish to know what Simon did after this.”
2.19PG 1:1258b
Et Niceta respondit: Ubi intellexisse eum sensimus, quod deprehensus esset a nobis, collocuti inter nos de sceleribus ejus reliquimus eum et ad Zacchaeum venimus, haec ipsa ei, quae et tibi nunc protulimus, indicantes. At ille benignissime nos suscipiens, et de fide Domini nostri Iesu Christi edocens, fidelium numero sociavit. Cumque haec Niceta dixisset, Zacchaeus qui paulo ante egressus fuerat, ingrediebatur dicens: Tempus est, ut procedas ad disputandum, Petre; turba enim multa in atrio domus congregata te opperitur, quorum in medio multis fultus asseclis consistit Simon. Tum Petrus ut haec audivit, orationis gratia secedere me jubens (nondum enim eram dilutus a peccatis, quae in ignorantia commiseram), ait ad reliquos: Oremus fratres, ut Deus per Christum suum pro ineffabili misericordia sua adjuvet me exeuntem pro salute hominum, qui ab ipso creati sunt. Et haec cum dixisset, oratione facta processit ad atrium domus, in quo erat multitudo populi plurima congregata; quos ubi omnes summo silentio ad se intentos vidit, et magum Simonem in medio eorum velut signiferum stantem, hoc modo coepit:
And Niceta answered: “When we perceived that he understood that we had found him out, we talked among ourselves about his crimes, left him, and came to Zacchaeus, telling him these very things which we have now told you. And he received us most kindly, instructed us in the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, and added us to the number of the faithful.” When Niceta had said this, Zacchaeus, who had gone out a little earlier, came in, saying: “It is time for you to go out to the debate, Peter; for a great crowd gathered in the court of the house is waiting for you, and in their midst stands Simon, supported by many followers.” Then Peter, hearing this, told me to withdraw for the sake of prayer (for I had not yet been washed from the sins I had committed in ignorance), and said to the rest: “Let us pray, brethren, that God through his Christ, of his ineffable mercy, may help me as I go out for the salvation of men, who were created by him.” When he had said this and had prayed, he went out to the court of the house, in which a very great multitude of people had gathered; and when he saw them all attentive to him in deepest silence, and Simon the magician standing in their midst like a standard-bearer, he began thus:
2.20PG 1:1258b–1259a
Pax vobis sit omnibus, qui parati estis dexteras dare veritati; quicunque enim obediunt ei, videntur quidem sibi aliquid gratia: conferre Deo, porro autem ipsi ab eo donum summi muneris consequuntur justitiae ejus semitis incedentes. Propter quod primum est omnium, justitiam Dei regnumque ejus inquirere; justitiam quidem ut recte agere doceamur, regnum vero, ut quae sit merces posita laboris et patientiae noverimus, in quo est bonis quidem aeternorum bonorum remuneratio, his autem, qui contra voluntatem Dei egerint, pro uniuscujusque gestis poenarum digna restitutio. Hic ergo, hoc est in praesenti vita positos oportet vos agnoscere voluntatem Dei, ubi et agendi locus est. Nam si quis velit antequam actus suos emendet, de his requirere quae non potest invenire, stulta et inefficax erit hujuscemodi inquisitio. Tempus enim breve est, et judicium Dei gestorum causa agetur, non quaestionum. Ideoque ante omnia hoc quaeramus, quid nos, aut qualiter agere oporteat, ut aeternam vitam consequi mereamur.
“Peace be to you all who are ready to give your right hands to the truth; for all who obey it seem to themselves to confer some favor on God, but in fact they themselves obtain from him the gift of the highest reward, walking in the paths of his righteousness. Therefore the first of all things is to seek the righteousness of God and his kingdom: his righteousness, that we may be taught to act rightly; his kingdom, that we may know what reward is set for labor and patience, in which there is for the good a recompense of eternal goods, but for those who have acted against the will of God a fitting requital of punishments according to each one's deeds. Here, then, that is, while you are placed in the present life, you must recognize the will of God, where there is also room for action. For if anyone wishes, before correcting his actions, to inquire into things he cannot find, such an inquiry will be foolish and ineffective. For the time is short, and the judgment of God will be held on account of deeds, not questions. And therefore before everything let us seek this: what we ought to do, and how, so that we may be found worthy to attain eternal life.”
2.21PG 1:1259a–1259b
Nam si exiguum hoc vitae tempus per inanes occupemus et inutiles quaestiones, inanes sine dubio et vacui ab operibus bonis pergemus ad Deum, ubi judicium, ut dixi, operum nostrorum fiet. Unaquaeque etenim res suum tempus habet et locum. Operum hic locus, hoc tempus est saeculum futurum. Ne ergo impediamur ordinem locorum ac temporum permutantes, primo quae sit Dei justitia requiramus, ut tanquam iter acturi, abundanti viatico bonis operibus repleamur, quo possimus ad regnum Dei, tanquam ad urbem maximam pervenire. Deus enim his, qui recte sentiunt, per ipsa opera mundi, quae fecit manifestus est, ipsius creaturae suae utens testimonio, et ideo cum de Deo dubitatio esse non debeat, de sola nunc ejus justitia requiramus et regno. Quod si aliquid nobis de secretis et reconditis inquirendum suggerit mens nostra, antequam de operibus justitiae requiramus, rationem reddere nobismetipsis debemus; quia si bene agentes salutem consequi meruerimus, tanquam casti et mundi euntes ad Deum Spiritu sancto replebimur, et omnia quae sunt secreta et occulta, sine ulla quaestionum cavillatione noscemus, quae nunc, etiam si totum quis vitae suae tempus in inquirendo consumat, non solum non poterit invenire, sed et majoribus se erroribus inseret, quia non per viam prius justitiae incedens, ad portum vitae pervenire contendit.
“For if we spend this short time of life on empty and useless questions, we shall without doubt go to God empty and void of good works, where, as I said, the judgment of our works will take place. For each thing has its own time and place. This is the place of works, and this the time; the world to come is the time of reward. So that we may not be hindered by confusing the order of places and times, let us first inquire what the righteousness of God is, so that, like those about to make a journey, we may be filled with good works as with abundant provisions, by which we may arrive at the kingdom of God as at a very great city. For God is manifest to those who think rightly through the very works of the world that he made, using the testimony of his own creation; and therefore, since there ought to be no doubt about God, let us now inquire only about his righteousness and his kingdom. And if our mind suggests that we inquire into something secret and hidden before we inquire about the works of righteousness, we ought to give ourselves this account: that if by acting well we are found worthy to attain salvation, then, going to God chaste and pure, we shall be filled with the Holy Spirit and shall know all that is secret and hidden without any quibbling of questions; whereas now, even if someone spends the whole time of his life inquiring, he not only will not be able to find them, but will entangle himself in greater errors, because he strives to reach the harbor of life without first walking the way of righteousness.”
2.22PG 1:1259b–1260b
Et propterea suadeo primo justitiam ejus requirendam, ut per hanc iter agentes, et in via positi veritatis, verum prophetam invenire possimus, non velocitate pedum, sed operum bonitate currentes; ut ipso duce usi, nullum viae hujus patiamur errorem. Si enim ipsum sequentes ingredi meruerimus illam, quo pervenire cupimus, civitatem, omnia jam de quibus quaeritur, oculis videbimus, tanquam haeredes omnium facti. Intelligite itaque viam esse hunc vitae nostrae cursum, viatores eos, qui bona opera gerunt, portam verum prophetam, de quo dicimus, urbem regnum esse, in quo residet omnipotens pater, quem soli videre possunt hi qui mundo sunt corde. Non ergo nobis difficilis videatur hujus itineris labor, quia in fine ejus requies erit; nam et ipse verus propheta ab initio mundi per saeculum currens festinat ad requiem. Adest enim nobis omnibus diebus, et si quando necesse est apparet et corrigit nos, ut obtemperantes sibi ad vitam perducat aeternam. Mea ergo ista sententia est, sicut et vero prophetae visum est, ut primo de justitia requiratur, ab his maxime qui Deum se nosse profitentur. Si ergo habet aliquis quod esse rectius putet, dicat et cum dixerit audiat, sed cum patientia et quiete. Propter hoc enim ab initio, salutationis specie pacem cunctis precatus sum.
“And therefore I advise that his righteousness be sought first, so that, journeying by it and placed on the way of truth, we may be able to find the true Prophet, running not with speed of feet but with goodness of works, so that, with him as our guide, we may not go astray on this way. For if, following him, we are found worthy to enter that city to which we desire to come, we shall then see with our eyes all the things now inquired into, having become heirs of all things. Understand, then, that the way is this course of our life; the travelers are those who do good works; the gate is the true Prophet of whom we speak; the city is the kingdom, in which the almighty Father dwells, whom only the pure in heart can see. So let not the labor of this journey seem hard to us, because at its end there will be rest; for the true Prophet himself also, running through the ages from the beginning of the world, hastens to rest. For he is present with us every day, and whenever it is necessary he appears and corrects us, so that he may lead those who obey him to eternal life. This, then, is my judgment, as it also seemed good to the true Prophet: that inquiry should first be made about righteousness, especially by those who profess to know God. If, then, anyone has something he thinks more correct, let him say it, and when he has said it, let him listen, but with patience and quiet. For this reason I prayed for peace for all at the beginning, in the form of a greeting.”
2.23PG 1:1260b–1261a
Ad haec Simon respondit: Nos pace tua opus non habemus, si enim pax sit et concordia, ad inveniendam veritatem nihil proficere poterimus; habent enim inter se pacem et latrones, et scortatores, et omnis nequitia cum semetipsa concordat. Et nos ergo si ob hoc convenimus, ut pacis causa omnibus quae dicuntur praebeamus assensum, nihil auditoribus conferemus, sed e contrario illusis eis, nos amici discedemus. Propter quod noli invocare pacem, sed magis pugnam matrem ejus, et si potes expugna errores. Nec requiras amicitiam injustis assentationibus partam; hoc enim ante omnia scire te volo, quia duobus inter se dimicantibus tunc erit pax, cum alter ceciderit superatus; et ideo pugna ut potes, nec requiras pacem sine bello, quod impossibile est, aut si potest fieri, ostende.
To this Simon answered: “We have no need of your peace; for if there is peace and concord, we shall achieve nothing toward finding the truth. Robbers and fornicators, too, have peace among themselves, and every wickedness agrees with itself. And so if we have met for this, that for peace's sake we should assent to everything that is said, we shall confer nothing on the hearers; on the contrary, having deceived them, we shall depart as friends. Therefore do not invoke peace, but rather battle, its mother, and, if you can, overcome errors. And do not seek friendship gained by unjust flatteries; for I want you to know this above all, that when two fight each other, there will be peace when one has fallen, overcome. And therefore fight as best you can, and do not seek peace without war, which is impossible; or, if it can be done, show how.”
2.24PG 1:1261a–1261b
Ad haec Petrus: Attentius audite, ο viri, quae dicimus. Ponamus mundum hunc campum esse aliquem magnum, et ex duabus civitatibus, quarum reges sibi invicem sint contrarii, missos esse singulos ad dimicandum duces, et illum quidem boni regis ducem consilium dare, ut uterque exercitus absque sanguinis profusione, melioris in regis jura concedat, quo sine periculo omnes salvi fiant, illum vero contrarium dicere: Non, sed pugnetur, ut non qui dignus est, sed qui fortior ipse cum his qui evaserint regnet. Quaeso vos, quid magis eligeretis? Non dubito quin, ut cum incolumitate omnium, regi meliori manus darentur. Et ego nunc non, ut Simon ait, pacis causa assensum volo commodari his quae male dicuntur, sed ut cum quiete et ordine veritas requiratur.
To this Peter said: “Listen more attentively, men, to what we say. Let us suppose that this world is some great plain, and that from two cities whose kings are opposed to each other a general has been sent from each to fight; and that the general of the good king advises that both armies, without shedding blood, should come under the rule of the better king, so that all may be saved without danger, while the other says: ‘No, let there be a battle, so that not he who is worthy, but he who is stronger, may reign with those who survive.’ I ask you, which would you choose? I do not doubt that you would give yourselves up to the better king, with the safety of all. And I now wish, not, as Simon says, that assent be given for peace's sake to what is wrongly said, but that the truth be sought with quiet and order.”
2.25PG 1:1261b
Nonnulli enim in disputationum certamine ubi errorem suum senserint confutari, causa perfugii conturbare continuo incipiunt, et movere lites, ne palam fiat omnibus quod superantur; et propterea ego frequenter exoro, ut cum omni patientia et quiete indago disputationis habeatur, ut et si forte aliquid minus recte dictum videatur, repetere id et apertius liceat explanare. Solet enim interdum aliter dici quid et aliter audiri, dum aut minus lucide profertur, aut minus vigilanter advertitur, et ob hoc patienter cupio haberi sermonem, ut neque subripiat alter alteri, neque sermonem dicentis intempestivus sermo contradicentis interrumpat, neque reprehendendi studium geramus, sed liceat ut dixi, minus plane dicta repetere, ut examinatione justissima clarescat veritatis agnitio. Scire enim debemus, quia si quis a veritate vincatur, non ipse vincitur, sed ignorantia quae in ipso est, quae est daemon pessimus, quam qui potuerit effugare, salutis accipit palmam. Propositum namque nobis est prodesse auditoribus, non ut male vincamus, sed ut pro agnitione veritatis bene vincamur. Si enim veritatis inquirendae studio sermo moveatur, etiamsi quid minus plene pro humana fragilitate dicemus, Deus pro ineffabili sua bonitate, ea quae desunt latenter auditorum sensibus adimplebit. Justus est enim, et secundum uniuscujusque propositum, aliis quidem in promptu facit esse quod quaeritur, aliis vero obscurum reddit, etiam quod palam positum est. Quia ergo via Dei, via pacis est, cum pace quae Dei sunt requiramus. Ad haec si quis habet quod prosequatur, locus est; si vero nullus est qui respondere velit, ego dicere incipiam, et quae mihi ab alio possunt obiici, ipse in medium prolata dissolvam.
“For some, in the contest of disputations, when they perceive that their error is being refuted, at once begin to make confusion as a refuge and to stir up quarrels, so that it may not become plain to all that they are overcome; and therefore I frequently entreat that the inquiry be held with all patience and quiet, so that if something perhaps seems to have been said less correctly, it may be permitted to repeat it and explain it more openly. For sometimes a thing is said one way and heard another, when it is either uttered less lucidly or attended to less carefully; and for this reason I wish the discourse to be held patiently, so that neither may one take advantage of the other, nor the untimely speech of the opponent interrupt the speech of the speaker, nor we indulge a zeal for finding fault; but, as I said, it may be permitted to repeat what was said less plainly, so that by the most just examination the knowledge of truth may shine forth. For we ought to know that if anyone is overcome by the truth, it is not he who is overcome, but the ignorance that is in him, which is the worst demon; and whoever can drive it away receives the palm of salvation. For our purpose is to benefit the hearers, not to conquer wrongly, but to be well conquered for the sake of knowing the truth. For if the discourse is moved by zeal for seeking the truth, even if we say something less fully because of human frailty, God in his ineffable goodness will secretly fill up what is lacking in the minds of the hearers. For he is just, and according to each one's purpose he makes what is sought ready to hand for some, but for others makes obscure even what is set in plain view. Since, then, the way of God is the way of peace, let us seek the things of God with peace. If anyone has anything to set out on this, there is room; but if no one wishes to answer, I will begin to speak, and the objections that can be made to me by another I will myself bring forward and resolve.”
2.26PG 1:1261b–1262b
Cum ergo Petrus coepisset continuare sermonem, Simon interrupta oratione ejus: Cur, inquit, festinas ipse tibi dicere, quae tibi videntur? Intelligo versutias tuas; vis enim tibi ea ipse proponere, quorum absolutio bene tibi meditata est, ut ignorantibus turbis videaris recte aliquid dicere; sed apud me non tibi erit horum locus. Nunc ergo, quoniam ut vir fortis polliceris, te omni volenti proponere responsurum, mihi interim primo respondeto. Et Petrus: Paratus, inquit, sum, tantum ut cum pace sit sermo. Tum Simon: Non vides, inquit, imperitissime, quod contraria agis magistro tuo, pacem deposcens, quod utique non convenit ei, qui expugnaturum se promittit ignorantiam? Aut si tu recte pacem ab auditoribus poscis, non recte magister tuus dixit: Quia non veni pacem mittere in terram, sed gladium. Aut enim tu bene dicis, et ille non bene, aut si magister tuus bene, tu pessime, qui non intellexisti contraria te proferre ei, cujus te discipulum profiteris.
When, then, Peter had begun to continue his discourse, Simon interrupted him: “Why,” he said, “do you hasten to say for yourself what seems right to you? I understand your tricks; for you want to put to yourself those questions whose solution you have well rehearsed, so that to the ignorant crowds you may seem to say something right; but with me there will be no room for this. Now, then, since like a brave man you promise to answer anyone who wishes to propose anything, answer me first.” And Peter said: “I am ready, provided the discussion is in peace.” Then Simon said: “Do you not see, most ignorant man, that you act contrary to your master in demanding peace, which certainly does not befit one who promises to overcome ignorance? Or, if you are right to ask peace of the hearers, your master was not right to say: ‘I came not to send peace on earth, but a sword.’ For either you speak well and he not well, or, if your master spoke well, you speak very badly, not understanding that you put forward things contrary to him whose disciple you profess to be.”
2.27PG 1:1262b
Ad haec Petrus: Neque qui misit me male fecit gladium mittere in terram, neque ego contraria ei ago, auditorum pacem requirens. Sed tu et imperite et temere reprehendis ea quae non intelligis; etenim quia pacem non venit mittere in terram magister, audisti, quod autem dixerit: Beati pacifici, quoniam ipsi filii Dei vocabuntur, non audisti. Propter quod non ego magistro diversa sentio, pacem persuadens, quam ille servantibus beatitudinem posuit. Et Simon ait: Pro magistro respondere cupiens, o Petre, multo eum gravius accusasti, si cum ipse non venerit pacem facere, hanc aliis servare praeceperit. Et quomodo alius ille ejus sermo constabit quem dixit? Quia sufficit discipulo, ut sit sicut magister ejus.
To this Peter said: “Neither did he who sent me do wrong to send a sword on earth, nor do I act contrary to him in seeking the peace of the hearers. But you ignorantly and rashly find fault with what you do not understand; for you have heard that the master did not come to send peace on earth, but you have not heard that he said: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.’ Therefore I do not think differently from the master in urging peace, to which he assigned blessedness for those who keep it.” And Simon said: “In wishing to answer for your master, Peter, you have accused him much more gravely, if, though he himself did not come to make peace, he commanded others to keep it. And how will that other saying of his stand: ‘It is enough for the disciple to be as his master’?”
2.28PG 1:1262b
Petrus ad haec: Magister, inquit, noster, qui erat verus propheta et sui in omnibus memor, neque sibi contraria locutus est, neque nobis ab his quae ipse gerebat diversa mandavit. Quod enim ait: Non veni pacem mittere in terram, sed gladium, et ex hoc videbitis separari patrem a filio, filium a patre, virum ab uxore, et uxorem a viro, et matrem a filia, filiam a matre, fratrem a fratre, socrum a nuru, amicum ab amico, haec omnia continent doctrinam pacis, et quomodo, audi. Initio praedicationis suae, utpote qui velit omnes invitare et adducere ad salutem, ac patientiam laborum tentationumque habendam suaderet, pauperes beatificabat, eosque pro penuriae tolerantia adepturos esse pollicebatur regna caelorum, ut sub tanta spe aequanimiter paupertatis pondus, spreta cupiditate portarent. Est enim unum et maximum ex perniciosissimis peccatis, cupiditas. Sed et esurientes et sitientes aeternis bonis justitiae saturandos esse promisit, ut egestatem tolerabiliter ferentes, nihil pro hac injusti operis molirentur. Mundos quoque corde similiter beatos dicebat, et per hoc Deum visuros, ut unusquisque adipisci tantum cupiens bonum, semetipsum a pessimis et pollutis cogitationibus contineret.
To this Peter said: “Our master, who was the true Prophet and consistent with himself in all things, neither spoke against himself nor commanded us anything different from what he himself did. For his saying, ‘I came not to send peace on earth, but a sword; and from this you will see father separated from son, son from father, husband from wife and wife from husband, mother from daughter, daughter from mother, brother from brother, mother-in-law from daughter-in-law, friend from friend’—all this contains the teaching of peace; and hear how. At the beginning of his preaching, as one who wished to invite and lead all to salvation and to persuade them to bear labors and temptations patiently, he called the poor blessed and promised that for their endurance of want they would obtain the kingdom of heaven, so that with so great a hope they might bear the weight of poverty with equanimity, despising covetousness. For covetousness is one, and the greatest, of the most destructive sins. He also promised that the hungry and thirsty would be filled with the eternal goods of righteousness, so that, bearing want tolerably, they might attempt no unjust deed on its account. Likewise he called the pure in heart blessed, saying that through this they would see God, so that each one, desiring to obtain so great a good, might keep himself from evil and polluted thoughts.”
2.29PG 1:1262b–1263b
Sic ergo magister noster discipulos ad patientiam invitans, bonum pacis etiam cum labore patientiae suadebat esse servandum. E contrario vero eos qui in divitiis ac luxuria versabantur, lugebat, qui nihil pauperibus largiebantur, arguens eos rationem reddituros, quia proximos suos quos diligere sicut seipsos debuerant, ne in egestate quidem positos miserati sunt. Haec autem dicens alios quidem obedire fecit, alios vero reddidit inimicos, credentibus ergo et obedientibus pacem habere inter se invicem jubet, et ipsis dicit: Beati pacifici, quia ipsi filii Dei vocabuntur. His autem, qui non solum non credidere, verum et adversarii doctrinae ejus facti sunt, bellum verbi et confutationis indicit et ait: Quia ea: hoc videbitis separari filium a patre, et uirum ab uxore, et filiam a matre, et fratrem a fratre, et nurum a socru, et inimici hominis domestici ejus. In unaquaque enim domo, cum inter credentem et non credentem coeperit esse diversitas, necessario pugna fit, incredulis quidem contra fidem dimicantibus, fidelibus vero in illis errorem veterem, et peccatorum vitia confutantibus.
“So our master, inviting his disciples to patience, urged that the good of peace be kept even with the labor of patience. On the other hand, he mourned over those who lived in riches and luxury and gave nothing to the poor, declaring that they would render an account, because they had not pitied even in want their neighbors, whom they ought to have loved as themselves. By saying these things he made some obey and others become enemies. To those who believe and obey, then, he commands to have peace with one another, and to them he says: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.’ But to those who not only did not believe but also became adversaries of his teaching, he declares a war of word and refutation, and says: ‘From this you will see son separated from father, husband from wife, daughter from mother, brother from brother, daughter-in-law from mother-in-law, and a man's enemies will be those of his own household.’ For in each house, when a difference begins between believer and unbeliever, a fight necessarily arises, the unbelievers fighting against the faith, the faithful refuting in them their old error and the vices of their sins.”
2.30PG 1:1263b
Similiter quoque etiam erga scribas, et Pharisaeos ultimo doctrinae suae tempore bellum gerit, arguens eos super actibus non bonis et non recta doctrina, et quod clavem scientiae quam a Moyse traditam susceperunt, occultarent, per quam possit janua regni caelestis aperiri. Sed et nos ad praedicandum mittens Dominus noster praecepit nobis, ut in quamcunque civitatem vel domum introierimus, dicamus: Pax huic domui; et si quidem, inquit, fuerit ibi filius pacis, veniet super eum pax vestra; si vero non fuerit, pax vestra ad vos revertetur; exeuntes autem de domo vel de civitate illa, ut etiam pulverem, qui adhaeserit pedibus nostris, excutiamus super eos. Tolerabilius autem erit terrae Sodomorum et Gomorrhaeorum in die judicii, quam illi civitati uel domui. Quod utique ita demum praecepit fieri, si prius in civitate vel domo veritatis sermo praedicetur, ex quo vel recipientes veritatis fidem filii pacis et filii Dei fiant, vel non recipientes arguantur quasi inimici pacis et Dei.
“Likewise also toward the scribes and Pharisees, in the last period of his teaching, he wages war, reproving them for deeds that were not good and teaching that was not right, and because they hid the key of knowledge which they had received as handed down from Moses, by which the gate of the heavenly kingdom could be opened. And our Lord, sending us out to preach, commanded us that into whatever city or house we enter, we should say: ‘Peace to this house’; ‘and if,’ he said, ‘a son of peace is there, your peace will come upon him; but if not, your peace will return to you’; and that when we go out of that house or city, we should shake off upon them even the dust that clings to our feet. ‘And it will be more tolerable for the land of the Sodomites and Gomorrhaeans in the day of judgment than for that city or house.’ This he commanded to be done only if the word of truth has first been preached in the city or house, so that either those receiving the faith of the truth may become sons of peace and sons of God, or those not receiving it may be convicted as enemies of peace and of God.”
2.31PG 1:1263b–1264a
Ita ergo et nos magistri instituta servantes, pacem primo proponimus auditoribus, ut absque ulla perturbatione possit via salutis agnosci. Quod si quis pacis verba non suscipit neque acquiescit veritati, scimus adversum eum pugnam verbi movere, et arguere acrius confutando ignorantiam et redarguendo peccata. Necessario igitur pacem proponimus, ut si quis est filius pacis, pax nostra veniat super eum; ab eo autem qui se alienum pacis effecerit, regredietur ad nos pax nostra. Non ergo, ut ais, consensu malorum pacem proponimus; nam utique continuo tibi dexteram dedissemus, sed ut per quietem et patientiam disserentibus nobis, qui sit sermo verus, facilius ab auditoribus dignoscatur. Si autem dissideas et discordes a temetipso, quomodo stabis? Necesse est ut cadat, qui in semetipso dividitur. Omne enim regnum in semetipsum divisum, non stabit. Ad haec si videtur, dicito.
“So we too, keeping our master's instructions, first offer peace to the hearers, so that the way of salvation may be recognized without any disturbance. But if anyone does not receive the words of peace nor yield to the truth, we know how to stir up the battle of the word against him and to reprove him more sharply, refuting his ignorance and convicting his sins. Necessarily, then, we offer peace, so that if anyone is a son of peace, our peace may come upon him; but from him who has made himself a stranger to peace, our peace will return to us. So we do not offer peace, as you say, by consenting to evils; for then we would certainly have given you our right hand at once; but so that, as we discuss with quiet and patience, the hearers may more easily discern which is the true word. But if you disagree and are at variance with yourself, how will you stand? He who is divided against himself must fall. For every kingdom divided against itself will not stand. If it seems good to you, speak to this.”
2.32PG 1:1264a–1264b
Et Simon: Stultitiam tuam demiror. Sic nobis magistri tui verba proponis, quasi certum de eo habeatur quod propheta sit, quem ego perfacile demonstrare possum, multa sibi contraria locutum. Denique ex his, quae ipse protulisti, arguam te. Ais enim dixisse eum, omne regnum vel omnis civitas divisa in semetipsa non stabit. Et alibi iterum ais eum dixisse, quia ipse miserit gladium, ut separaret eos qui in domo sunt, ita ut dividatur filius a patre, et filia a matre, et frater a fratre, ut si fuerint in una domo quinque, dividantur tres adversum duos, et duo adversum tres. Si ergo omne quod dividitur, cadit, iste qui divisiones facit cadendi praestitit causas, et si talis est, utique malus est. Ad haec responde si potes.
And Simon said: “I wonder at your folly. You set before us your master's words as though it were certain that he is a prophet, whereas I can very easily show that he said many things contrary to himself. Indeed, I will convict you from what you yourself have brought forward. For you say that he said that every kingdom or every city divided against itself will not stand. And elsewhere again you say that he said that he himself sent a sword to separate those who are in a house, so that son is divided from father, daughter from mother, brother from brother, so that if there are five in one house, three are divided against two and two against three. If, then, everything that is divided falls, he who makes divisions has furnished the causes of falling; and if he is such, he is certainly evil. Answer this if you can.”
2.33PG 1:1264b–1264d
Et Petrus: Non temere deroges, o Simon, his quae non intelligis. Primo ergo respondeam pro eo quod ais, me magistri mei verba proponere, atque ex ipsis ea, de quibus dubitatur, absolvere. Dominus noster mittens nos apostolos ad praedicandum, praecepit nobis, ut doceamus omnes gentes de his quae mandata sunt nobis. Neque ergo dicere ea, ut ab ipso dicta sunt, possumus. Non enim dicere, sed docere ea in mandatis habemus, et ex ipsis ostendere, quomodo unumquodque eorum veritate subnixum sit. Neque rursus proprium nobis aliquid dicere permissum est, Sumus enim missi, et necessario qui missus est, illud quod jussus est nuntiat, et voluntatem mittentis exponit. Nam si aliud dicam, quam praecepit mihi ille qui me misit, falsus ero apostolus, qui non illud dico quod jussus sum dicere, sed quod mihi videtur. Quod qui facit, utique se meliorem ostendere vult quam est ille a quo missus est, et est sine dubio praevaricator. Si vero ea quae jussus est prosequatur, eorumque assertiones manifestissimas proferat, apostoli opus exsequi videbitur, quod ego nunc implere contendens non tibi placeo. Non ergo reprehendas, quod ejus qui me misit proferam verba; sed si est in illis aliquid, quod non sit integre dictum, inde me arguas licet; quod tamen nullo modo fieri potest. (Propheta enim est, et sibi esse contrarius non potest.) Aut si non putas eum prophetam esse, hoc primo requiratur.
And Peter said: “Do not rashly disparage, Simon, what you do not understand. First, then, let me answer your saying that I put forward my master's words and resolve from them the points in doubt. Our Lord, sending us apostles to preach, commanded us to teach all nations the things that have been commanded us. So we cannot simply say them as they were said by him. For we have it in our commands not merely to say them but to teach them, and to show from them how each of them rests on truth. Nor again is it permitted to us to say anything of our own. For we are sent, and one who is sent necessarily announces what he has been ordered and sets out the will of the sender. For if I say anything other than what he who sent me commanded me, I shall be a false apostle, since I do not say what I was ordered to say, but what seems good to me. One who does this certainly wishes to show himself better than him by whom he was sent, and is without doubt a transgressor. But if he goes through what he has been ordered and brings forward the clearest proofs of them, he will be seen to perform the work of an apostle; and because I strive to fulfill this now, I do not please you. So do not blame me for bringing forward the words of him who sent me; but if there is anything in them that is not soundly said, you may convict me on that point—which, however, can in no way happen. (For he is a prophet, and cannot be contrary to himself.) Or, if you do not think he is a prophet, let this first be inquired into.”
2.34PG 1:1264d–1265a
Et Simon: Non opus habeo hoc dicere abs te, sed quomodo sibi ista conveniant; si enim inconsonans ostendetur, simul etiam propheta non esse docebitur. Tum Petrus: Sed si prius, inquit, ostendero eum prophetam, hoc quod videtur esse inconsonans, non erit. Neque enim ex consonantia quis propheta esse probatur, quia hoc multis possibile est facere; quod si consonantia prophetam non facit, multo magis nec inconsonantia. Quia ergo multa sunt, quae videntur quidem inconsona esse nonnullis, habent tamen profundiori ratione in semetipsis consonantiam, sicut et alia quae videntur habere consonantiam, discussa diligentius inveniuntur inconsona, hac de causa aliam non puto rectiorem esse viam ad horum discrimen, nisi ut prius cognoscamus, si is qui locutus est ea quae videntur inconsona, propheta sit. Si enim invenitur propheta esse, omnia illa quae videntur sibi esse contraria, constat habere consonantiam, sed non intelligi. De his ergo probamenta rectius requirentur. Nos enim apostoli illius qui nos misit, verba exponere missi sumus et affirmare sententias, proprium vero dicere aliquid non habemus in mandatis, sed verborum illius, ut dixi, aperire veritatem.
And Simon said: “I have no need to say this at your bidding; but I want to know how these sayings agree with each other; for if they are shown to be inconsistent, at the same time he will be shown not to be a prophet.” Then Peter said: “But if I first show that he is a prophet, what seems inconsistent will not be so. For no one is proved to be a prophet by consistency, since many can achieve that; and if consistency does not make a prophet, much less does inconsistency. Since, then, there are many things which seem inconsistent to some, yet by a deeper reason have consistency within themselves, just as other things that seem consistent are found, when examined more carefully, to be inconsistent, for this reason I do not think there is a more correct way of judging these things than first to learn whether he who said the things that seem inconsistent is a prophet. For if he is found to be a prophet, it is established that all the things that seem contrary to each other are consistent, but are not understood. Proofs, then, will more rightly be sought on this point. For we apostles were sent to expound the words of him who sent us and to affirm his teachings; we have no commandment to say anything of our own, but, as I said, to open the truth of his words.”
2.35PG 1:1265a–1265c
Et Simon ait: Doce ergo nos, quomodo conveniat, ut is qui divisiones facit, quae divisiones cadere faciant eos qui dividuntur, vel bonus videatur, vel ad hominum salutem venisse. Et Petrus: Audi, quomodo magister noster omne regnum, et omnem domum divisam adversum semetipsam, dixit stare non posse. Hoc autem cum ipse fecit, vide quomodo ad salutem cedat. In errore positum mundi regnum, vel unamquamque in eo domum verbo veritatis dividit, procul dubio ut cadat error et veritas regnet. Quod si alicui accidat domui, ut error introductus per aliquem dividat veritatem, cum error obtinuerit, certum est veritatem stare non posse. Et Simon: Sed incertum est, utrum magister vester errorem dividat an veritatem. Et Petrus: Istud alterius quaestionis est. Sed si constat apud te, quia omne quod divisum fuerit cadit, superest ut ostendam, si tantum cum pace audire vis, quod Jesus noster errorem diviserit ac resolverit, docendo veritatem.
And Simon said: “Teach us, then, how it can be fitting that he who makes divisions—divisions that make those who are divided fall—should either seem good or have come for the salvation of men.” And Peter: “Hear how our master said that every kingdom and every house divided against itself cannot stand. And when he himself did this, see how it turns to salvation. By the word of truth he divides the kingdom of the world, set in error, or each house in it, no doubt so that error may fall and truth reign. But if it happens to any house that error, brought in by someone, divides the truth, then, when error has prevailed, it is certain that truth cannot stand.” And Simon: “But it is uncertain whether your master divides error or truth.” And Peter: “That belongs to another question. But if you agree that everything that has been divided falls, it remains for me to show, if only you will listen in peace, that our Jesus divided and dissolved error by teaching the truth.”
2.36PG 1:1265c
Tum Simon: Omitte, inquit, sermonem pacis frequenter iterare, quid vero sit quod sentis aut credis, breviter expone. Et Petrus ait: Quid times crebro audire de pace? aut ignoras quia perfectio legis pax est? ex peccatis enim bella nascuntur et certamina, ubi autem peccatum non fit, pax est animae; ubi vero pax est, in disputationibus veritas, in operibus justitia invenitur. Et Simon: Videris mihi non posse profiteri quod sentis. Et Petrus: Dicam, ex arbitrio tamen, non tuis versutiis coactus. Cupio enim quod salutare et utile est omnibus adduci in notitiam, et ideo proferre quam brevissime non morabor. Unus est Deus, idemque conditor mundi, justus judex, et unicuique pro actibus suis quandoque restituens. Jam vero pro assertione horum, scio innumera posse verborum millia commoveri.
Then Simon said: “Stop repeating so often your talk of peace, and set out briefly what you think or believe.” And Peter said: “Why are you afraid to hear often of peace? Or do you not know that peace is the perfection of the law? For wars and contests are born from sins; but where no sin is committed, there is peace of soul; and where there is peace, truth is found in disputations and righteousness in works.” And Simon: “You seem to me unable to profess what you think.” And Peter: “I will say it, but of my own will, not forced by your tricks. For I desire that what is saving and useful be brought to the knowledge of all, and therefore I will not delay to set it out as briefly as possible. There is one God, and he is the creator of the world, a just judge, who will one day render to each according to his deeds. For the assertion of these things, I know, countless thousands of words can be stirred up.”
2.37PG 1:1265c–1266a
Et Simon ait: Miror quidem velocitatem ingenii tui, non tamen amplector errorem fidei tuae; prudenter enim praevidisti, quod tibi contradici possit, et urbane id etiam ipse professus es, quod pro assertione horum innumera verborum millia movebuntur; nulli enim concordat professio fidei tuae. Denique quod unus sit Deus, cujus sit opus mundus, hoc primum quis recipiat? puto quia neque paganorum quisquam, quamvis ille sit idiota, philosophorum autem omnino nullus, sed nec Judaeorum quidem imperitissimus quisquam et miserrimus, neque ego ipse qui eorum legem bene novi. Et Petrus: Omitte, inquit, opiniones absentium, tibi quid videtur, praesens praesenti dicito. Tum Simon: Possum, inquit, exponere quod vere sentio, sed pigriorem me facit illa consideratio, quia si dixero, quod neque tibi sit consonum neque vulgo huic imperito rectum videtur, tu quidem quasi obstupefactus, aures continuo obcludens velut ne blasphemia polluantur, verteris in fugam, quia quod respondeas non invenies, populus autem irrationabilis assentatus tibi, te quidem amplectetur, quasi ea docentem quae in usu eis sunt, me vero exsecrabuntur, veluti nova quaedam atque inaudita profitentem, meumque errorem alienis mentibus inferentem.
And Simon said: “I wonder indeed at the quickness of your wit, yet I do not embrace the error of your faith. For you prudently foresaw what could be said against you, and elegantly professed it yourself: that countless thousands of words will be stirred up for the assertion of these things. For your profession of faith agrees with no one. Indeed, that there is one God, whose work the world is—who will accept this first point? I think none of the pagans, however uneducated; none at all of the philosophers; not even the most ignorant and wretched of the Jews; nor I myself, who know their law well.” And Peter said: “Leave aside the opinions of the absent; say face to face what seems right to you.” Then Simon said: “I can set out what I truly think, but this consideration makes me slower: if I say what neither agrees with you nor seems right to this ignorant crowd, you, as if struck dumb, will at once stop your ears, as though to keep them from being polluted by blasphemy, and will turn to flight, because you will find nothing to answer; and the irrational people, agreeing with you, will embrace you as one who teaches what they are used to, but will curse me as one who professes new and unheard-of things and brings his error into the minds of others.”
2.38PG 1:1266a
Tum Petrus: Nunquid non tu, in quo nos accusabas, ipse ambagibus uteris, nihil habens quod afferas veritatis? aut si habes, incipe absque circuitionibus, si tantum confidis: et si quidem non placuerint alicui auditorum quae dicis, abscedet, qui vero permanserint, cogentur assertionibus tuis probare quod verum est. Incipe igitur quod tibi rectum videtur, exponere.
Then Peter said: “Are you not yourself using the evasions you accused us of, having nothing of truth to bring forward? Or, if you have, begin without circumlocutions, if only you are confident; and if what you say does not please any of the hearers, he will leave, but those who remain will be compelled by your assertions to approve what is true. Begin, then, to set out what seems right to you.”
2.39PG 1:1266a–1267b
Et Simon ait: Ego dico multos esse deos, unum tamen esse incomprehensibilem atque omnibus incognitum, horumque omnium deorum Deum. Tum Petrus: Hunc, inquit, quem dicis esse incomprehensibilem et incognitum omnibus Deum, ex Scripturis Judaeorum quae in auctoritate habentur, probare potes, an ex aliis aliquibus, quas omnes ignoramus, an ex Graecis auctoribus, an ex tuis scripturis propriis? Certe ex quibuscunque vis, dicito, ita tamen ut ostendas eas prius esse propheticas; ita enim fiet, ut earum indubitata habeatur auctoritas. Et Simon ait: Ex lege Iudaeorum sola assertiones adhibebo. Omnibus enim qui religionis curam gerunt, manifestum est totius esse auctoritatis hanc legem, unumquemque tamen secundum proprium sensum intelligentiam legis hujus accipere. Ita enim ab eo qui mundum condidit, scripta est, ut in ipsa rerum fides habeatur. Unde sive quis vera, sive etiam falsa proferre velit, absque hac lege nulla recipietur assertio. Quia igitur scientia mea plenissime cum lege concordat, recte multos esse pronuntiavi deos, quorum unus est eminentior et incomprehensibilis, ipse qui est Deus deorum. Quod autem multi sint dii, ipsa me edocuit lex. Primo quidem ubi ex persona serpentis dicitur ad Evam, primam mulierem: Quacunque die manducaveritis de ligno sciendi bonum et malum eritis sicut dii, hoc est, sicut hi qui hominem fecere. Postea enim quam gustavere de ligno, ipse Deus testatur dicens ad reliquos deos: Ecce Adam factus est sicut unus ex nobis. Sic ergo constat multos esse deos qui hominem fecerint, quia et initio ita dicit Deus ad caeteros deos: Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. Sed et quod ait: Ejiciamus eum. Et iterum: Venite descendentes confundamus linguas eorum. Omnia haec multos esse indicant deos. Sed et illud scriptum est: Deos non maledices, et principem populi tui non maledices. Et rursum quod scriptum est: Dominus solus ducebat eos, et non erat cum illis Deus alienus, multos esse ostendit deos. Sunt et alia plurima quae proferri possunt ex lege testimonia, non solum obscuriora, sed et manifesta, quibus multi esse doceantur dii. Ex quibus unus, ut Judaeorum populo Deus esset, sorte electus est. Ego autem non hunc assero, sed illum qui etiam hujus Deus est, quem nec ipsi quidem Judaei norunt. Neque enim ipsorum est Deus, sed eorum qui agnoverint eum.
And Simon said: “I say that there are many gods, but that one is incomprehensible and unknown to all, and is the God of all these gods.” Then Peter said: “This God whom you say is incomprehensible and unknown to all—can you prove him from the Scriptures of the Jews, which are held in authority, or from some others which none of us know, or from Greek authors, or from your own scriptures? Say from whichever you wish, provided you first show that they are prophetic; for so their authority will be held beyond doubt.” And Simon said: “I will use proofs from the law of the Jews alone. For it is plain to all who care for religion that this law is of complete authority, yet that each one takes the meaning of this law according to his own sense. For it was so written by him who founded the world that belief in things should rest on it. Hence, whether one wishes to bring forward true things or false, no assertion will be received apart from this law. Since, then, my knowledge agrees most fully with the law, I rightly declared that there are many gods, of whom one is more eminent and incomprehensible, he who is the God of gods. That there are many gods the law itself has taught me. First, where it is said in the person of the serpent to Eve, the first woman: ‘On whatever day you eat of the tree of knowing good and evil, you will be as gods,’ that is, as those who made man. For after they had tasted of the tree, God himself testifies, saying to the other gods: ‘Behold, Adam has become as one of us.’ So it is established that there are many gods who made man, because at the beginning too God speaks thus to the other gods: ‘Let us make man in our image and likeness.’ And also his saying: ‘Let us cast him out.’ And again: ‘Come, let us go down and confound their tongues.’ All these indicate that there are many gods. And this too is written: ‘You shall not curse the gods, and you shall not curse the ruler of your people.’ And again what is written: ‘The Lord alone led them, and there was no foreign god with them,’ shows that there are many gods. There are also very many other testimonies that can be brought from the law, not only obscure but also plain, by which it is taught that there are many gods. Of these, one was chosen by lot to be God of the Jewish people. But I do not assert this one, but him who is the God of this one too, whom not even the Jews themselves know. For he is not their God, but the God of those who have come to know him.”
2.40PG 1:1267b
His auditis Petrus: Nihil, inquit, verearis Simon; ecce enim neque aures clausimus; neque fugimus, sed ad ea quae falso prosecutus es, veritatis sermonibus respondemus, illud primo asserentes, quia unus est Deus, hic ipse Iudaeorum, qui est solus Deus, coeli creator ac terrae, qui et omnium etiam quos dicis deorum Deus est. Si ergo ostendero nullum esse hoc superiorem, sed ipsum esse super omnia, fateberis errorem tuum esse super omnia. Et Simon: Quid enim, inquit, etiamsi ego nolim fateri, qui assistunt auditores, nonne arguent me nolentem quae vera sunt profiteri?
Hearing this, Peter said: “Fear nothing, Simon; for see, we have neither stopped our ears nor fled, but we answer with words of truth what you have falsely set out, asserting this first: that there is one God, this same God of the Jews, who alone is God, creator of heaven and earth, and who is also the God of all those whom you call gods. If, then, I show that there is none higher than he, but that he himself is above all, you will confess that your error is above all.” And Simon said: “Why, even if I were unwilling to confess it, would not the hearers who stand by convict me of being unwilling to profess what is true?”
2.41PG 1:1267b–1268b
Ausculta ergo, ait Petrus, ut scias primo, quod etiam si multi sunt dii, ut dicis, Iudaeorum Deo subditi sunt, cui neque aequalis quisquam, neque major esse potest; scriptum est enim, quod ita dicat ad Judaeos Moyses propheta: Dominus Deus vester hic est Deus deorum, et Dominus dominorum, Deus magnus. Ita etiamsi multi sunt qui dicuntur dii, unus est tamen omnium Iudaeorum Deus, qui et deorum Deus dictus est. Neque enim quicunque dictus fuerit Deus, continuo Deus est. Denique et Moyses deus dicitur Pharaonis, et certum est eum hominem fuisse. Et judices dii appellati sunt, et constat eos fuisse mortales. Simulacra quoque gentium dii appellantur, et omnes scimus, quia non sunt, sed impiis quasi pro poena hoc datum est, ut quia verum Deum cognoscere noluerunt, quaecunque eis forma et imago occurrisset, haberetur ab eis Deus. Quoniam unius, ut dixi, qui est omnium Deus, agnitionem suscipere recusarunt, ideo ergo conceditur eis illos habere deos, qui praestare supplicantibus nihil possunt. Quid enim aut exanima simulacra conferre hominibus queant aut animantia, cum potestas omnium apud illum sit?
“Listen, then,” said Peter, “that you may know first that even if there are many gods, as you say, they are subject to the God of the Jews, to whom no one can be equal or greater. For it is written that Moses the prophet speaks thus to the Jews: ‘The Lord your God, he is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God.’ So even if there are many who are called gods, the God of the Jews is nevertheless the one God of all, and he is called the God of gods. For not everyone who has been called god is therefore God. Indeed Moses too is called the god of Pharaoh, and it is certain that he was a man. And judges have been called gods, and it is agreed that they were mortal. The idols of the nations, too, are called gods, and we all know that they are not; but this was given to the impious as a kind of punishment: that because they would not know the true God, whatever form and image presented itself to them should be held by them as god. Since, as I said, they refused to receive the knowledge of the one who is God of all, it is therefore granted to them to have as gods those who can furnish nothing to those who pray to them. For what can lifeless images or living creatures confer on men, when power over all things belongs to him?”
2.42PG 1:1268b–1269a
Tribus igitur modis Deus quis dicitur, vel quia vere est, vel quia ei qui vere est, ministrat, et ob honorem mittentis, ut plena sit ejus auctoritas, hoc dicitur iste qui missus est, quod est ille qui misit, ut saepe factum est de angelis, qui tamen cum apparuerint homini, si sit prudens et eruditus vir, interrogat ejus qui apparuit nomen, ut simul et honorem missi et auctoritatem mittentis agnoscat. Est enim uniuscujusque gentis angelus, cui credita est gentis ipsius dispensatio a Deo, qui tamen cum apparuerit, quamvis putetur et dicatur ab his quibus praeest, deus, tamen interrogatus non sibi dabit ipse tale testimonium. Deus enim excelsus, qui solus potestatem omnium tenet, in septuaginta et duas partes divisit totius terrae nationes, eisque principes angelos statuit. Uni vero qui in archangelis erat maximus, sorte data est dispensatio eorum, qui prae caeteris omnibus excelsi Dei cultum atque scientiam receperunt. Sed et sancti homines, ut diximus, impiorum efficiuntur dii, tanquam qui potestatem acceperint in eos vitae ac necis, ut de Moyse et judicibus supra memoravimus. Propter quod scriptum est de eis: Deos non maledices, et principem populi tui non maledices. Principes ergo singularum gentium dii appellantur. Principum autem Deus Christus est, qui est omnium judex. Vere ergo neque angeli, neque homines, neque ulla creatura dii esse possunt, quippe qui sub potestate sunt positi, tanquam creati et mobiles; angeli quidem, ut qui non fuere et sint, homines autem ut mortales, omnis vero creatura, ut quae solvi possit, sed revera si solverit ille qui fecit. Et ideo ille solus verus est Deus qui non solum ipse vivit, sed et aliis vitam praestat, quam et auferre potest cum vult.
“In three ways, then, someone is called god: either because he truly is; or because he ministers to him who truly is—and, for the honor of the sender and that his authority may be full, the one sent is called what the sender is, as has often happened with angels; yet when they appear to a man, if he is prudent and learned, he asks the name of the one who appeared, so that he may recognize at once the honor of the one sent and the authority of the sender. For each nation has an angel, to whom the government of that nation has been entrusted by God; and when he appears, though he is thought and called god by those over whom he is set, yet when questioned he will not give himself such a testimony. For the most high God, who alone holds power over all, divided the nations of the whole earth into seventy-two parts and appointed angels as princes over them. But to one who was the greatest among the archangels was given by lot the government of those who, above all others, received the worship and knowledge of the most high God. And holy men too, as we said, are made gods of the impious, as having received power of life and death over them, as we mentioned above concerning Moses and the judges. For this reason it is written of them: ‘You shall not curse the gods, and you shall not curse the ruler of your people.’ The princes of the individual nations, then, are called gods. But the God of the princes is Christ, who is the judge of all. So in truth neither angels, nor men, nor any creature can be gods, since they are placed under power, as created and changeable: angels as those who once were not and now are, men as mortal, and every creature as that which can be dissolved—but only if he who made it dissolves it. And therefore he alone is the true God who not only lives himself, but also gives life to others, which he can also take away when he wills.”
2.43PG 1:1269a–1270a
Propterea ergo clamat Scriptura ex persona Dei Iudaeorum, et dicit: Videte, videte, quoniam ego sum Deus, et non est alius praeter me. Ego occidam, et vivere faciam; percutiam, et ego sanabo, et non est qui eripiat de manibus meis. Videas ergo quomodo ineffabili quadam virtute Scriptura occurrens futuris erroribus eorum qui alium Deum, praeter eum qui est Judaeorum, vel in coelis esse, vel in terris affirmarent, pronuntiat dicens: Dominus Deus tuus Deus unus est, in coelo sursum, et in terra deorsum, et praeter ipsum alius non est. Quomodo ergo ausus es dicere alium esse Deum, praeter eum qui Iudaeorum est Deus? Et iterum dicit Scriptura: Ecce Domini Dei tui caelum, et coelum caeli, terra et omnia quae in eis sunt. Verumtamen patres tuos elegi, ut diligerem eos, et vos post ipsos. Ita ex omni parte ab Scriptura munitur ista sententia, quia ipse qui mundum creavit, verus et solus est Deus.
“For this reason, then, Scripture cries out in the person of the God of the Jews: ‘See, see, that I am God, and there is no other besides me. I will kill, and I will make alive; I will strike, and I will heal; and there is none who can deliver from my hands.’ You see, then, how by a certain ineffable power Scripture, forestalling the future errors of those who would affirm another God, either in heaven or on earth, besides him who is the God of the Jews, declares: ‘The Lord your God is one God, in heaven above and on earth below, and besides him there is no other.’ How, then, have you dared to say that there is another God besides him who is the God of the Jews? And again Scripture says: ‘Behold, the heaven of the Lord your God, and the heaven of heaven, the earth and all that is in them. Yet I chose your fathers to love them, and you after them.’ So on every side this judgment is fortified by Scripture: that he who created the world is the true and only God.”
2.44PG 1:1270a
Quod et si sint alii, ut diximus, qui dicuntur dii, sub potestate sunt Judaeorum Dei, quia ita dixit Scriptura Iudaeis: Dominus Deus noster, hic est Deus deorum, et Dominus dominorum. Hunc etiam solum colendum monet Scriptura, dicens: Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli servies. Et: Audi Israel, Dominus Deus tuus Deus unus est. Denique et sancti Spiritu Dei repleti, et guttis misericordiae ejus irrorati exclamabant, dicentes: Qui similis tibi in diis, Domine, quis similis tibi? Et iterum: Quis Deus praeter Dominum, et quis Deus praeter Dominum nostrum? Itaque Moyses ubi proficere populum vidit, paulatim eos ad intelligentiam monarchiae, et fidem Dei unius initiavit, ut in consequentibus dicit: Nomina deorum aliorum non commemorabis, recordatus sine dubio, quali poena damnatus sit serpens, qui primus nominaverat deos. Terram denique comedere condemnatur, et tali cibo dignus judicatur ob id, quod primum omnium appellationum deorum introduxit in mundum. Quod si et tu multos deos vis introducere, vide ne exitum serpentis similem sortiaris.
“And even if there are others, as we said, who are called gods, they are under the power of the God of the Jews, for Scripture spoke thus to the Jews: ‘The Lord our God, he is God of gods and Lord of lords.’ Scripture also warns that he alone is to be worshiped, saying: ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve.’ And: ‘Hear, Israel, the Lord your God is one God.’ Indeed the saints too, filled with the Spirit of God and sprinkled with the drops of his mercy, cried out: ‘Who is like you among the gods, Lord, who is like you?’ And again: ‘Who is God besides the Lord, and who is God besides our Lord?’ So Moses, when he saw the people making progress, gradually initiated them into the understanding of the monarchy and faith in one God, as he says in what follows: ‘You shall not mention the names of other gods,’ remembering, no doubt, the punishment with which the serpent was condemned, who first named gods. He was condemned to eat earth, and judged worthy of such food because he first of all brought the name of gods into the world. And if you too wish to introduce many gods, see that you do not meet an end like the serpent's.”
2.45PG 1:1270a–1271d
Certus autem esto, quod nos hujus ausi socios non habebis, nec decipi nos patiemur abs te. Neque enim proderit nobis ad excusationem in judicio, si dicamus quod tu deceperis nos, quia nec primam mulierem excusare potuit male credidisse serpenti, sed morte quia male crediderit, condemnata est. Hac ergo de causa et Moyses unius Dei fidem populo commendans, ait: Observa tibi ipsi ne seducaris a Domino Deo tuo. Vide quia eodem verbo utitur, quo et prima mulier in excusatione utebatur, seductam se dicens, sed nihil profuit. Super omnia autem etiamsi verus aliquis surgeret propheta, qui signa et prodigia faceret, suadere autem velit, ut coleremus deos alios praeter Judaeorum Deum, nunquam ei credere possemus. Sic enim nos docuit lex divina, secretum sermonem purius ex traditione commendans. Ait ergo: Si surrexerit in te propheta, aut somnians somnium, et dederit signa vel prodigia, et evenerint signa illa vel prodigia, et dixerit ad te, eamus et colamus deos alienos quos nescitis, non audietis verba prophetae illius, neque somnium somniatoris illius, quia tentans tentavit vos, ut videat si diligitis Dominum Deum vestrum.
“Be sure, then, that you will not have us as partners in this audacity, nor shall we let ourselves be deceived by you. For it will not help us as an excuse in the judgment if we say that you deceived us, since it could not excuse the first woman either that she wrongly believed the serpent; but because she wrongly believed, she was condemned to death. For this reason Moses too, commending to the people faith in one God, says: ‘Take heed to yourself, lest you be seduced from the Lord your God.’ See that he uses the same word which the first woman used in her excuse, saying that she was seduced; but it profited her nothing. Above all, even if some true prophet were to arise who did signs and wonders, but wished to persuade us to worship other gods besides the God of the Jews, we could never believe him. For so the divine law has taught us, commending a secret saying more purely by tradition. It says: ‘If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of a dream, and he gives signs or wonders, and those signs or wonders come to pass, and he says to you, Let us go and worship other gods whom you do not know, you shall not hear the words of that prophet nor the dream of that dreamer, because he is testing you, to see whether you love the Lord your God.’”
2.46PG 1:1271d
Propterea ergo et Dominus noster signa et prodigia faciens, Deum praedicabat Judaeorum, et ideo recte praedicationi ejus creditur. Tu autem etiam si vere propheta esses, et signa faceres ac prodigia, sicut promittis, et alios annuntiares deos praeter eum qui verus est, manifestum esset te ad tentationem populo Dei suscitatum, et ideo credi tibi omnino non potest. Unus est enim verus, qui est Iudaeorum Deus, et ob hoc Dominus noster Jesus Christus docebat quaerendum esse non Deum quem bene noverant, sed regnum et justitiam ejus, quam Scribae et Pharisaei, suscepta scientiae clave, non concluserant, sed excluserunt. Nam si ignorassent verum Deum, nunquam utique hujus rei scientiam relinquens, quae erat omnium caput, culparet eos de parvis et minimis, id est quod dilatarent fimbrias suas, et primos accubitus in conviviis vindicarent, et quod in quadriviis stantes orarent, et alia his similia, quae utique ex comparatione magni hujus capitis, ignorantiae Dei, exigua videntur et parva.
“For this reason, then, our Lord too, while doing signs and wonders, preached the God of the Jews, and therefore his preaching is rightly believed. But you, even if you were truly a prophet and did signs and wonders, as you promise, and proclaimed other gods besides him who is the true God, it would be plain that you had been raised up as a test for the people of God, and therefore you cannot be believed at all. For there is one true God, who is the God of the Jews; and for this reason our Lord Jesus Christ taught that what must be sought is not God, whom they knew well, but his kingdom and righteousness, which the scribes and Pharisees, having received the key of knowledge, had not shut in but shut out. For if they had been ignorant of the true God, he would surely never have passed over the knowledge of this matter, which was the head of all, to blame them for small and least things—that they enlarged their fringes, claimed the first places at banquets, prayed standing at the crossroads, and other such things—which certainly, compared with this great charge, ignorance of God, seem slight and small.”
2.47PG 1:1271d
Et Simon ad haec ait: Ex verbis magistri tui convincam te, quia etiam ipse ignoratum quemdam omnibus introducit Deum. Cum enim et Adam creatorem suum scierit Deum, mundique conditorem, et Enoch, quippe qui ab eo translatus est, et Noe, utpote ab eo jussus arcam construere, cum quo et Abraham, et Isaac, et Iacob, et Moyses, et omnes, omnisque populus atque omnes gentes noverint conditorem mundi, et fateantur Deum, Jesus vester, qui longe posterior Patribus apparuit, dicit: Nemo novit Filium, nisi Pater, neque Patrem quis, nisi Filius, et cui voluerit Filius revelare. Ita ergo et Jesus vester alium esse Deum incomprehensibilem omnibus et incognitum fatetur.
And Simon said to this: “From your master's words I will convince you that he too introduces a certain God unknown to all. For though Adam knew God, his creator and the founder of the world, and Enoch, as one translated by him, and Noah, as one commanded by him to build the ark, and with them Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and all, every people and all nations, knew the founder of the world and confess him as God, your Jesus, who appeared long after the fathers, says: ‘No one knows the Son except the Father, nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and he to whom the Son wishes to reveal him.’ So your Jesus too confesses that there is another God, incomprehensible and unknown to all.”
2.48PG 1:1271d
Tum Petrus: Contraria, inquit, tibimet ipsi te proferre non sentis. Si enim et Jesus noster scit istum, quem dicis incognitum Deum, ergo jam non a te solo est cognitus. Imo si Jesus noster eum novit, Moyses quoque, qui et Iesum venturum esse prophetavit sine dubio nec ipse ignoravit eum; propheta enim erat, et qui de Filio prophetavit, sine dubio cognoverat Patrem. Si enim in voluntate est Filii revelare Patrem cui voluerit, Filius, qui ab initio et semper cum Patre fuit per singulas quasque generationes, sicut revelavit Moysi Patrem, ita et aliis prophetis; quod si est, nulli Patrem fuisse incognitum constat. Tibi vero qui Filium non credis, quomodo potuit revelari Pater, qui nulli notus est, nisi cui voluerit Filius revelare? Revelat autem Filius Patrem his qui ita honorificant Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem.
Then Peter said: “You do not perceive that you are putting forward things contrary to yourself. For if our Jesus too knows this God whom you call unknown, then he is no longer known by you alone. Indeed, if our Jesus knew him, then Moses too, who prophesied that Jesus would come, was without doubt not ignorant of him either; for he was a prophet, and one who prophesied of the Son had without doubt known the Father. For if it is in the will of the Son to reveal the Father to whom he wishes, then the Son, who from the beginning and always was with the Father through every generation, revealed the Father to Moses, and likewise to the other prophets; and if this is so, it is established that the Father was unknown to no one. But to you, who do not believe the Son, how could the Father be revealed, who is known to no one except the one to whom the Son wishes to reveal him? The Son reveals the Father to those who honor the Son as they honor the Father.”
2.49PG 1:1271d–1272d
Tum Simon: Memento, inquit, quia filium dixisti habere Deum, quod est injuriae; quomodo enim habere filium potest, nisi similia hominibus aut animalibus patiatur? Sed de his non est nunc tempus arguere profundam stultitiam tuam, festino enim de immensitate summae lucis exponere, et jam nunc audi. Puto esse aliquam virtutem immensae et ineffabilis lucis, cujus magnitudo incomprehensibilis habeatur, quam virtutem etiam mundi conditor ignoret, et legislator Moyses, et magister vester Iesus.
Then Simon said: “Remember that you said God has a son, which is an insult; for how can he have a son unless he undergoes things like men or animals? But now is not the time to refute your profound folly on these matters; for I am hastening to speak of the immensity of the highest light; listen now. I think there is a certain power of immense and ineffable light, whose greatness is held to be incomprehensible, a power of which even the creator of the world is ignorant, and Moses the lawgiver, and your master Jesus.”
2.50PG 1:1272d
Tum Petrus: Non tibi videtur amentiae res esse, asserere velle quempiam, quod sit alius Deus quam Deus omnium, et dicere, puto esse virtutem quamdam, et priusquam ipsi certum sit quod loquitur, hoc velle aliis confirmare? Estne aliquis ita praeceps, qui verbis tuis credat, in quibus te ipsum videat dubitantem; et admittat esse aliquam virtutem incognitam creatori Deo, et Moysi, et prophetis, et legi, et Jesu etiam magistro nostro, quae virtus ita bona sit, ut nulli velit innotescere, nisi uni tantum, et hoc tibi tali? Tum deinde si nova est ista virtus, quomodo nobis non dat novum aliquem sensum praeter hos quos gerimus quinque, ut ex ipso ab ea nobis largito novo sensu, ipsam quae nova est capere et intelligere possimus? aut si non potest largiri, quomodo tibi largita est? aut si tibi revelavit, cur non et nobis? Si vero a temetipso intellexisti, quae ne prophetae quidem sentire aut intelligere potuerunt, dic age nobis nunc quid unusquisque nostrum cogitat: Si enim tantus est in te spiritus, ut ea quae super caelos sunt, incognita omnibus et omnibus incomprehensibilia cognoscas, multo facilius cogitationes humanas quae in terris habentur agnoscis. Quod si cogitationes nostras qui hic stamus non potes scire, quomodo ea quae nullis esse cognita affirmas, scire te dicis?
Then Peter said: “Does it not seem to you a mark of madness that anyone should wish to assert that there is another God than the God of all, and say, ‘I think there is a certain power,’ and before he himself is certain of what he says, should want to confirm it to others? Is anyone so headlong as to believe your words, in which he sees you yourself doubting, and to admit that there is some power unknown to God the creator, to Moses, to the prophets, to the law, and even to Jesus our master—a power so good that it wishes to be known to no one but one only, and that one such as you? Then, if this power is new, why does it not give us some new sense besides these five that we have, so that by the new sense granted us by it we might grasp and understand that which is new? Or, if it cannot grant this, how did it grant it to you? Or, if it revealed itself to you, why not to us too? But if you understood by yourself what not even the prophets could perceive or understand, come, tell us now what each of us is thinking. For if there is so great a spirit in you that you know the things above the heavens, unknown to all and incomprehensible to all, much more easily do you know human thoughts, which are on earth. But if you cannot know the thoughts of us who stand here, how do you say you know things which you affirm are known to no one?”
2.51PG 1:1272d–1273a
Crede autem mihi, quia nunquam scires quid est lux, nisi ab ipsa luce accepisses et visum et intellectum videndi; sic et in caeteris. Hinc accepta intelligentia, majus aliquid et sublimius somnii instar excogitas, occasione tamen ex istis quinque sensibus sumpta, quorum largitori ingratus es. Certus autem esto, quod donec non invenis novum aliquem sensum, qui extra hos quinque sit quibus omnes utimur, novum asserere non poteris Deum. Et Simon: Cum quinque sensibus constent omnia quae sunt, nihil novum addere virtus illa cunctis eminentior potest. Et Petrus ait: Falsum est. Est enim et alius sextus sensus, id est praenoscendi; isti enim quinque sensus scientiae capaces sunt, sextus autem praescientiae est, quem habuere prophetae. Tu ergo quomodo potes Deum omnibus incognitum nosse, qui nec propheticum sensum, qui est praescientiae, cognovisti? Tum Simon coepit dicere: Hanc quam dico virtutem incomprehensibilem et eminentiorem cunctis, etiam ipso qui mundum condidit Deo, neque angelorum quisquam neque daemonum novit neque Judaeorum, neque ulla omnino quae a conditore Deo substitit creatura. Quomodo enim poterat, quam Creator ipse non noverat, lex me ipsius Creatoris edocere, cum nec ipsa sciret quod doceret?
“But believe me that you would never know what light is, had you not received from light itself both sight and the understanding of seeing; and so too with the rest. Having received understanding from this source, you devise something greater and more sublime, like a dream, yet taking the occasion from these five senses, to whose giver you are ungrateful. Be sure, however, that until you find some new sense beyond these five which we all use, you will not be able to assert a new God.” And Simon said: “Since all things that exist are grasped by the five senses, that power more eminent than all can add nothing new.” And Peter said: “That is false. For there is another, sixth sense, that of foreknowing; these five senses are capable of knowledge, but the sixth is of foreknowledge, which the prophets had. How, then, can you know a God unknown to all, you who have not known even the prophetic sense, which is that of foreknowledge?” Then Simon began to say: “This power which I call incomprehensible and more eminent than all, even than the God who founded the world, none of the angels knows, nor of the demons, nor of the Jews, nor any creature at all that has come into being from God the creator. For how could the law of the Creator himself teach me what the Creator himself did not know, since the law itself did not know what it should teach?”
2.52PG 1:1273a
Et Petrus: Miror, inquit, quomodo tu ex lege plus potueris discere, quam docere vel scire lex poterat? et quomodo horum quae asserere vis probationes dicas te ex lege proferre, cum neque legem asseras nosse ea quae dicis, neque eum qui legem dedit, id est mundi Creatorem? Sed et hoc miror, quomodo tu qui solus haec nosti, hic modo cum omnibus stes brevis atrii hujus ambitu circumdatus. Et Simon videns cum omni populo ridentem Petrum: Rides, inquit, Petre, cum sermo de tantis rebus et tam eminentibus habeatur? Tum Petrus: Noli, inquit, indignari Simon, nihil enim praeter promissionem nostram gerimus, neque aures nostras claudimus, ut dicebas, neque statim ut audivimus a te ineffabilia proferri in fugam versi sumus, sed ne loco quidem moti. Neque enim verisimilia saltem aliqua proferuntur abs te, quae nos possint aliquatenus deterrere, aut certe aperi nobis intelligentiam dicti hujus, quomodo tu ex lege didiceris Deum, quem lex ipsa nescit, et quem ipse qui legem posuit ignoret. Et Simon: Si, inquit, ridendo cessasti, evidentibus assertionibus comprobabo. Et Petrus ait: Quin desinam, ut possim discere a te, quomodo tu a lege didiceris, quae lex nescit et quae ipse Deus legis ignoret.
And Peter said: “I wonder how you could learn more from the law than the law could teach or know, and how you say you bring from the law proofs of what you wish to assert, when you assert that neither the law knows the things you speak of, nor he who gave the law, that is, the creator of the world. And I wonder at this too: how you, who alone know these things, are standing here now with everyone, enclosed within the narrow bounds of this court.” And Simon, seeing Peter laughing with all the people, said: “Do you laugh, Peter, when the discussion concerns such great and eminent matters?” Then Peter said: “Do not be angry, Simon; for we are doing nothing beyond our promise: we have not stopped our ears, as you said, nor turned to flight as soon as we heard you bring forward ineffable things; we have not even moved from our place. For you bring forward nothing even plausible that could frighten us at all. Or at least open to us the meaning of this saying: how you learned from the law of a God whom the law itself does not know, and of whom he who gave the law is ignorant.” And Simon said: “If you have stopped laughing, I will prove it by clear assertions.” And Peter said: “Why, I will stop, so that I may learn from you how you learned from the law what the law does not know and what the God of the law himself is ignorant of.”
2.53PG 1:1273a–1274a
Et Simon: Audi, inquit, manifestum est omnibus et ineffabili quadam ratione compertum, unum esse Deum, qui sit omnium melior, a quo omne quod est, sumpsit exordium, unde et necessario subjecta sunt ei omnia quae post ipsum sunt, velut principi omnium et eminentiori. Ego ergo cum cognovissem Deum hunc qui creaverat mundum, secundum quod lex docet, in multis esse infirmum, longe autem abhorret infirmitas a perfecto Deo, et hunc viderem non esse perfectum, necessario alium esse intellexi qui esset perfectus. Hic enim, ut dixi, secundum quod Scriptura legis docet, in multis infirmus esse deprehenditur. Primo quod homo quem plasmavit, non potuit permanere talis qualem ipse voluerat, et quia nec bonus est, qui primo homini posuit legem, ut ab omnibus quidem lignis paradisi ederet, de ligno autem scientiae non contingeret, sed si gustasset moreretur. Cur enim vetaret eum vesci et scire quid esset bonum vel quid malum, ut sciens mala quidem vitaret, bona vero eligeret? Sed neque ipse hoc concessit, et quia ille praeter mandatum gustavit et agnovit quid esset bonum, ac didicit honoris gratia verenda contegere (indecorum enim sensit revelatis pudendis stare ante Creatorem suum), ille eum qui honorem Deo deferre didicerat, morte condemnat et serpenti qui haec ostenderat, maledicit. Sed utique si laedendus ex hoc erat homo, cur omnino laedendi causam in paradiso posuit? Si vero bonum erat quod in paradiso posuit, non est boni prohibere a bono.
And Simon said: “Listen. It is plain to all, and discovered by a certain ineffable reasoning, that there is one God who is better than all, from whom everything that is took its beginning; hence also all things that are after him are necessarily subject to him, as to the chief and most eminent of all. So when I had learned that this God who had created the world is, according to what the law teaches, weak in many respects—and weakness is far removed from the perfect God—and saw that he is not perfect, I necessarily understood that there is another who is perfect. For this one, as I said, according to what the Scripture of the law teaches, is found to be weak in many respects. First, because the man whom he formed could not remain such as he himself had wished; and because he is not good either, he who gave the first man a law that he should eat of all the trees of paradise but not touch the tree of knowledge, and that if he tasted it he would die. For why should he forbid him to eat and to know what is good and what evil, so that, knowing, he might avoid evil and choose good? But he did not grant this; and because the man tasted contrary to the command and learned what is good, and learned for honor's sake to cover his private parts (for he felt it unseemly to stand before his Creator with them uncovered), he condemns to death the one who had learned to show honor to God, and curses the serpent who had shown him these things. But surely, if man was to be harmed by this, why did he place the cause of harm in paradise at all? And if what he placed in paradise was good, it is not the part of a good being to forbid another from good.”
2.54PG 1:1274a
Sic ergo cum is qui hominem fecit et mundum, secundum ea quae lex refert imperfectus sit, alium sine dubio dat intelligi qui perfectus sit. Necesse est enim esse aliquem omnium praestantiorem, propter quem et omnis creatura ordinem suum servat. Unde et ego sciens, quia omnimodo necesse est esse aliquem benigniorem et potentiorem eo, qui legem dedit, imperfecto deo, ex comparatione imperfecti perfectum quid sit intelligens, ex ipsa Scriptura Deum illum de quo scriptum non erat, intellexi. Et hoc modo potui, o Petre, ex lege discere quod nesciebat lex. Quod et si lex non dedisset indicia, quibus colligeretur imperfectus esse Deus qui condidit mundum, mihi possibile erat, etiam ex his quae in hoc mundo geruntur malis nec emendantur, colligere, vel quia impossibilis est creator ejus, qui male gesta non corrigit, si non potest, vel si non vult auferre mala, ipse malus sit, si vero neque potest neque vult, nec potens nec bonus sit. Et ex his necesse est colligi, quod alius sit Deus omnium praestantior et potentior. Ad haec si quid habes dicere, non moreris.
“So, since he who made man and the world is, according to what the law relates, imperfect, he without doubt gives us to understand another who is perfect. For there must be someone more excellent than all, on whose account every creature keeps its order. Hence I too, knowing that there must by all means be someone kinder and more powerful than him who gave the law, an imperfect god, and understanding from comparison with the imperfect what the perfect is, understood from the Scripture itself that God of whom nothing had been written. And in this way, Peter, I was able to learn from the law what the law did not know. And even if the law had not given indications from which it could be gathered that the God who founded the world is imperfect, it was possible for me to gather it even from the evils that are done in this world and are not corrected: either that its creator is powerless, since he does not correct what is done wrongly, if he cannot; or, if he does not wish to take away evils, that he himself is evil; and if he neither can nor will, that he is neither powerful nor good. And from these it must be gathered that there is another God more excellent and more powerful than all. If you have anything to say to this, do not delay.”
2.55PG 1:1274a
Petrus respondit: Solent ista, o Simon, absurda adversus Deum meditari hi qui legem non magistris tradentibus legunt, sed semetipsos doctores habent et putant se intelligere posse legem, quam sibi non exposuit ille qui a magistro didicerit. Verumtamen nunc, ut et nos secundum tuum sensum Scripturam legis sequi videamur, quia et impossibilem et non bonum dicis ostendi Conditorem mundi, quomodo non vidisti quod iisdem ipsis reprehensionibus succumbit et subjacet etiam ista virtus tua, quam dicis esse eminentiorem omnium? Eodem namque modo de ipsa dici potest, quia omnia quae hic male geruntur, aut impossibilis est quae non corrigit, aut si potest et non vult, mala est. Si vero neque potest neque vult, et impossibilis et imperfecta est. Unde non solum simili culpae virtus ista tua nova, sed et deteriori invenitur obnoxia, si super haec omnia etiam cum non sit, esse credatur. Nam is qui mundum creavit, hoc ipsum quod subsistit ex opere ejus quo mundum condidit, palam est, sicut etiam ipse confiteris. Ista vero virtus quam te solum scire dicis, nullum de se indicium praebet, per quod hoc ipsum saltem quod est et subsistit, possimus advertere.
Peter answered: “Such absurdities against God, Simon, are usually devised by those who read the law without teachers handing it on, but have themselves as teachers and think they can understand the law, though it has not been expounded to them by one who learned it from a teacher. Nevertheless now, so that we too may seem to follow the Scripture of the law according to your sense: since you say that the creator of the world is shown to be both powerless and not good, how did you not see that this power of yours too, which you say is more eminent than all, falls under and is liable to the very same reproaches? For it can be said of it in the same way, concerning all the things that are done wrongly here, that either it is powerless, since it does not correct them, or, if it can and will not, it is evil; and if it neither can nor will, it is both powerless and imperfect. Hence this new power of yours is found liable not only to the same fault but to a worse one, if, on top of all this, it is believed to exist when it does not. For as to him who created the world, the very fact that he exists is plain from the work by which he founded the world, as you yourself also confess. But this power, which you say you alone know, offers no indication of itself through which we could perceive even this, that it is and subsists.”
2.56PG 1:1274a–1275b
Quale est ergo, ut derelinquamus Deum, in cujus mundo vivimus et omnibus ad vitam necessariis fruimur, et sequamur nescio quem, cujus non solum nihil consequimur boni, sed ne hoc ipsum quidem, quod sit, scire possumus, scilicet quia nec est; sive enim eum lucem appelles et luce ista quam cernimus clariorem, nomen ipsum a mundi Conditore mutuaris; sive substantiam dixeris super omnia, intelligentiam hinc profers cum sermonis augmento; sive mentem, sive bonitatem, sive vitam, sive aliud quid memoraveris, hinc vocabula mutuaris. Cum ergo nihil novi de illa virtute quam dicis, non solum ad intelligendum, verum ne ad nominandum quidem habeas, quomodo introducis novum Deum, cujus nec appellationem quidem invenis novam? Virtus enim non solum Creator mundi dicitur, sed et ministri gloriae ejus omnisque militia coelestis. Non tibi ergo melius videtur esse, ut sequamur factorem nostrum Deum, tanquam patrem erudientem nos et imbuentem sicut ipse novit? Quod et si sit aliquis, ut tu dicis benignior omnium Deus, certum est quia non irascitur nobis, si vero irascitur malus est. Noster autem Deus si irascitur et vindicet, non est malus sed justus, proprios enim filios corripit et emendat. Ille vero qui nihil nobiscum habet negotii, si vindicare velit in nos, quomodo bonus erit? supplicia sumens de nobis, quod non derelicto patre nostro ipsum secuti sumus inanibus suspicionibus tracti, quomodo ergo iste talis bonus a te asseritur, qui nec justus intelligi potest.
“What sort of thing would it be, then, that we should forsake God, in whose world we live and enjoy everything necessary for life, and follow I know not whom, from whom we not only obtain nothing good, but cannot even know whether he exists—since in fact he does not exist? For whether you call him light, and brighter than this light that we see, you borrow the very name from the creator of the world; or if you call him a substance above all, you take the idea from here with an enlargement of speech; or if you speak of mind, or goodness, or life, or anything else, you borrow the words from here. Since, then, you have nothing new about that power you speak of, not only for understanding it but not even for naming it, how do you introduce a new God, for whom you cannot find even a new name? For not only is the creator of the world called ‘power’, but also the ministers of his glory and the whole heavenly host. Does it not then seem better to you that we follow God our maker, as a father who trains and instructs us as he himself knows? And even if there is, as you say, some God kinder than all, it is certain that he is not angry with us; and if he is angry, he is evil. But our God, if he is angry and punishes, is not evil but just; for he chastises and corrects his own sons. But he who has nothing to do with us—if he should wish to punish us, how will he be good, taking vengeance on us because we did not forsake our father to follow him, drawn by empty suspicions? How, then, can such a one be asserted by you to be good, when he cannot even be understood to be just?”
2.57PG 1:1275b
Tum Simon: Tantumne erras, Petre, ut nescias, quia animae nostrae a bono Deo sunt illo omnium praestantiore, sed captivae deductae sunt in hunc mundum? Et Petrus: Ergo non est omnibus incognitus, sicut paulo ante dicebas; et tamen quomodo indulsit bonus Deus captivitatem fieri animarum suarum, si erat super omnes potentior virtus? Et Simon: Ipse misit creatorem Deum, ut conderet mundum, sed ille, mundo condito, semetipsum pronuntiavit Deum. Et Petrus: Ergo non ignoratur ab eo qui condidit mundum, ut superius dixeras, sed neque animae ignorant eum, siquidem ab ipso abductae sunt. Cui ergo jam erit incognitus, si et mundi Creator novit eum, ut ab ipso missus, secundum ea quae tu dicis, et omnes animae tanquam ab ipso huc violenter abstractae? Tum deinde dicas velim, qui mittebat conditorem mundi, non sciebat eum qui mittebatur, fidem non servaturum? si nesciebat praescius non erat, si vero praesciit et passus est, facti hujus ipse reus est, qui non vetuit; quod si non potuit, omnipotens non est. Si vero quasi bonum id sciens non prohibuit, invenitur ille esse melior qui praesumpsit facere id, quod ille qui mittebat ignoravit bonum.
Then Simon said: “Are you so far astray, Peter, as not to know that our souls are from that good God, more excellent than all, but have been led captive into this world?” And Peter: “Then he is not unknown to all, as you said a little earlier. And yet how did the good God allow the captivity of his souls to take place, if he was a power more powerful than all?” And Simon: “He himself sent the creator God to found the world; but he, when the world had been founded, proclaimed himself God.” And Peter: “Then he is not unknown to him who founded the world, as you said above; nor are the souls ignorant of him, since they were led away from him. To whom, then, will he now be unknown, if both the creator of the world knows him, as one sent by him, according to what you say, and all souls know him, as violently dragged here from him? Then I would like you to tell me: did he who sent the founder of the world not know that the one he sent would not keep faith? If he did not know, he was not foreknowing; but if he foreknew and allowed it, he himself is guilty of this deed, since he did not prevent it; and if he could not, he is not almighty. But if he did not forbid it, knowing it to be good, then the one who presumed to do what the sender did not know to be good is found to be better.”
2.58PG 1:1275b–1276b
Et Simon: Volentes, inquit, ad se venire suscipit et ipsis benefacit. Et Petrus: Nec hoc novum est, hoc enim facit et hic quem mundi creatorem fateris. Et Simon: Sed bonus Deus tantum si agnoscatur salutem praestat, mundi autem conditor exigit etiam legem impleri. Et Petrus: Ergo et adulteros et homicidas salvat, si cognoverint eum, bonos autem et sobrios vel misericordes, si nullum de eo indicium capientes ignoraverint eum, non salvat. Magnum et bonum praedicas, qui non tam malos salvet, quam qui bonis nullam misericordiam praestet. Et Simon: Magnus sane labor est agnoscere eum homini in carne posito. Omnibus enim tenebris tetrius, et omni luto gravius corpus hoc, quo circumdatur anima. Et Petrus: Ergo bonus iste Deus quae difficilia sunt, quaerit. Qui autem vere Deus est, faciliora expetit. Dimittat itaque nos quasi bonus apud Patrem et Creatorem nostrum, et quando discesserimus e corpore, et istas quas dicis tenebras reliquerimus, tunc eum facilius agnoscemus, et tunc magis anima conditorem suum esse intelliget Deum, et apud ipsum permanebit, nec ultra diversis cogitationibus fatigabitur, neque volet ad aliam confugere virtutem, quae nulli cognita est nisi Simoni soli; quae tantae bonitatis est, ut nisi quis prius impius exstiterit in parentem suum, ad ipsam venire non possit. Nescio quomodo haec virtus vel bona vel justa appellanda sit, cui placere non potest, nisi quis impie se gesserit in eum a quo factus est.
And Simon said: “He receives those who wish to come to him and does good to them.” And Peter: “Nor is this new; for the one whom you confess as creator of the world does this too.” And Simon: “But the good God grants salvation only if he is known, whereas the founder of the world also requires the law to be fulfilled.” And Peter: “Then he saves even adulterers and murderers if they know him, but the good, the sober, or the merciful, if they receive no indication of him and so do not know him, he does not save! A great and good God you preach, who does not so much save the wicked as show no mercy to the good.” And Simon: “It is indeed a great labor for a man placed in the flesh to know him. For this body by which the soul is surrounded is darker than all darkness and heavier than all clay.” And Peter: “Then this good God of yours seeks what is difficult; but he who is truly God asks what is easier. So let him, as a good God, leave us with our Father and Creator; and when we have departed from the body and left behind this darkness you speak of, then we shall know him more easily, and then the soul will better understand that its creator is God, and will remain with him, and will no longer be wearied by diverse thoughts, nor wish to take refuge in another power, which is known to no one but Simon alone, and which is of such goodness that no one can come to it unless he has first been impious toward his own parent. I do not know how this power can be called either good or just, which no one can please unless he has acted impiously toward him by whom he was made.”
2.59PG 1:1276b
Et Simon: Non est impium, utilitatis gratia et lucri majoris confugere ad eum, qui opulentioris est gloriae. Et Petrus: Si, ut tu ais, non est impium confugere ad alienum, multo magis pium est permanere apud proprium patrem, etiamsi pauper sit. Aut si non putas esse impium, ut relicto patre nostro confugiamus ad alium quasi meliorem, neque indignari credis pro hoc creatorem nostrum, multo magis bonus Deus non indignabitur, quod cum essemus ab eo alieni, non confugimus ad eum, sed permansimus apud Creatorem nostrum; et puto quod ex hoc magis collaudabit nos, quia fidem servamus Creatori nostro Deo, considerans quia si sui ipsius fuissemus, nunquam relinquentes ipsum seduci illecebris potuissemus alienis. Nam si quis opulentioribus illectus pollicitationibus, relicto proprio parente confugiat ad alienum, potest fieri, ut iterum relicto eo, ad alium pergat qui majora promiserit, eo magis quod ipsius proprius non erat filius, quippe qui etiam eum, qui ei natura pater erat, relinquere potuit. Et Simon: Quid si ab illo sunt animae, et ignorant eum, et ille est vere pater ipsarum?
And Simon said: “It is not impious, for the sake of profit and greater gain, to take refuge with him who is of richer glory.” And Peter: “If, as you say, it is not impious to take refuge with a stranger, it is much more pious to remain with one's own father, even if he is poor. Or if you do not think it impious that we should leave our father and take refuge with another as better, and believe that our creator is not angry at this, much more will the good God not be angry that, when we were strangers to him, we did not take refuge with him but remained with our creator. And I think he will praise us the more for this, because we keep faith with God our creator, considering that if we had been his own, we could never have left him and been seduced by others' enticements. For if someone, enticed by richer promises, leaves his own parent and takes refuge with a stranger, it may happen that he will leave him in turn and go to another who has promised greater things, all the more because he was not his own son, since he could leave even the one who was his father by nature.” And Simon: “What if souls are from him, and do not know him, and he is truly their father?”
2.60PG 1:1276b–1277a
Et Petrus: Satis, inquit, ostendis eum invalidum. Nam si potentior, ut ais, omnibus est, nunquam potentiori invalidior spolia detraxisse credendus est; aut si potuit vi ab eo animas deducere in hunc mundum creator Deus, quomodo eas corpore emissas et captivitatis vinculis resolutas, bonus Deus vocabit ad poenam, quae per ipsius vel desidiam vel infirmitatem, abstrahi ad hunc locum et involvi corpore quasi tenebris ignorantiae potuerunt? Videris mihi ignorare quid sit Pater et Deus, verum et animae unde sint vel quando et quomodo factae, possem dicere, sed haec nunc tibi aperire fas non est, in tanto errore posito de scientia Dei. Tum Simon: Erit, inquit, tempus quo poenitebit te, quod dicentem me de ineffabili virtute non intellexeris. Et Petrus: Da ergo nobis, ut saepe jam dixi, tanquam novus Deus aut qui ab illo descenderis sensum aliquem novum, per quem novum quem dicis Deum possimus agnoscere; isti enim quinque sensus, quos nobis dedit creator Deus, Creatori suo fidem servant, nec alium quemquam esse sentiunt Deum, hoc eis ipsa sui praestante natura.
And Peter said: “You show clearly enough that he is weak. For if, as you say, he is more powerful than all, the weaker must never be believed to have taken spoils from the more powerful. Or, if the creator God could lead souls by force from him into this world, how will the good God call them to punishment when they have been sent out of the body and freed from the bonds of captivity—souls which, through his own negligence or weakness, could be dragged to this place and wrapped in the body as in the darkness of ignorance? You seem to me not to know what Father and God means. I could also tell you whence souls are, and when and how they were made; but it is not lawful to open these things to you now, placed as you are in so great an error about the knowledge of God.” Then Simon said: “There will be a time when you will repent that you did not understand me when I spoke of the ineffable power.” And Peter: “Give us, then, as I have often said, as a new God or as one who has come down from him, some new sense through which we may know the new God you speak of; for these five senses, which God the creator gave us, keep faith with their Creator and do not perceive any other to be God, their very nature affording them this.”
2.61PG 1:1277a
Ad haec Simon: Adhibe, inquit, animum ad ea quae dicturus sum, et facito eum invisibilibus semitis incedentem, pervenire ad ea quae tibi demonstravero. Ausculta ergo nunc: nunquamne in cogitatione positus extendisti mentem tuam in regiones vel insulas porro positas, et ita in eis fixus animo mansisti, ut ne praesentes quidem videre aut temetipsum scire ubi sederes, prae suavitate eorum quae habebantur in oculis, posses? Et Petrus ait: Verum est, Simon, hoc mihi frequenter accidit. Et Simon: Ita et nunc sensum tuum extende in caelum, et iterum super coelum, et vide quia debet esse aliquis locus qui sit ultra mundum vel extra mundum, in quo neque coelum sit, neque terra, neque umbra horum etiam ibi tenebras operetur, et ob hoc cum nulla corpora aliqua in eo sint, neque ex corporibus tenebrae, necessario sit lumen immensum; et lumen considera cujusmodi esse possit, cui tenebrae nullae succedunt. Nam si universum hunc mundum solis hujus replet lux, quantum aestimas esse illud incorporeum lumen et infinitum? tantum sine dubio, ut istud solis lumen ad illud tenebrae et non lux esse videatur.
To this Simon said: “Turn your mind to what I am about to say, and make it go by invisible paths to reach the things I shall show you. Listen now: have you never, absorbed in thought, stretched your mind into regions or islands placed far off, and remained so fixed there in spirit that you could not even see those present or know where you were sitting, for the delight of the things before your eyes?” And Peter said: “It is true, Simon; this has often happened to me.” And Simon said: “So now stretch your sense into the heaven, and again above the heaven, and see that there must be some place beyond the world or outside the world, in which there is neither heaven nor earth, nor does any shadow of them produce darkness there; and therefore, since there are no bodies in it and no darkness from bodies, there must necessarily be immense light. And consider what kind of light that can be which no darkness succeeds. For if the light of this sun fills this whole world, how great do you reckon that incorporeal and infinite light to be? So great, without doubt, that this light of the sun seems darkness and not light in comparison with it.”
2.62PG 1:1277a–1278a
Haec cum diceret Simon, Petrus respondit: De utroque ergo patienter ausculta, id est et de exemplo extendendi sensus et de immensitate lucis. Scio meipsum, o Simon, aliquando in cogitatione positum extendisse sensum meum in regiones, ut ais, et insulas procul positas, easque mente non minus quam oculis perspexisse. Cum essem apud Capharnaum in captura piscium positus, et sederem supra saxum, hamum setae innexum et decipiendis piscibus aptatum habens in manu, ita ut haerentem ei non senserim piscem, dum mens mea per desiderabilem mihi Jerusalem distenta percurreret, ad quam sane oblationum gratia et orationum vigilans frequenter ascenderam. Verum et Caesaream hanc mirari ab aliis audiens, et desiderare solebam, et eam in qua nondum fueram, videre mihi videbar, et cogitabam de ea quae conveniret de civitate magna cogitari, portas, muros, lavacra, plateas, angiportus, fora et horum consequentia, secundum ea scilicet quae in aliis urbibus videram, et in tantum intentione hujuscemodi intuitus delectabar, ut vere, sicut ipse dixisti, nec praesentem atque astantem viderem, nec ipse ubi sederem, nossem. Et Simon: Modo, inquit, recte dicis.
When Simon said this, Peter answered: “Listen patiently, then, on both points, that is, on the example of stretching out the mind and on the immensity of the light. I know, Simon, that I myself have sometimes, absorbed in thought, stretched my mind into regions, as you say, and islands placed far off, and viewed them with my mind no less than with my eyes. When I was at Capernaum, engaged in fishing, and was sitting on a rock, holding in my hand a hook tied to a line and fitted for deceiving fish, I did not feel the fish that had caught on it, while my mind ran about through Jerusalem, which I longed for, and to which indeed I had often gone up, keeping vigil, for the sake of offerings and prayers. I also used to admire this Caesarea, hearing others speak of it, and to long for it; and I seemed to see it, though I had not yet been in it, and I thought about it what it is fitting to think about a great city—gates, walls, baths, streets, lanes, markets, and the like—according, namely, to what I had seen in other cities; and I so delighted in the intentness of such gazing that truly, as you yourself said, I neither saw the one who was present and standing by, nor knew where I myself was sitting.” And Simon said: “Now you speak rightly.”
2.63PG 1:1278a
Et Petrus: Denique cum piscem maximum qui hamo inhaeserat, mente occupatus habere minime sentirem, et id quidem cum hami lineam de manibus meis violenter arriperet, stupentem me videns frater meus Andreas qui mecum sedebat, ac pene casurum, latus fodiens cubito velut dormientem excitat dicens: Non vides, Petre, quam magnum piscem ceperis? nunquidnam mente excidisti, quod sic attonitus stupes? quid est quod pateris? dic mihi. At ego indignatus ei paululum, quod me a dulcedine eorum quae intuebar abstraxerit, respondi nihil me mali pati, sed animo desiderabilem mihi intueri Jerusalem, simulque Caesaream, et corpore quidem cum ipso esse, mente vero illuc penitus auferri. At ille nescio unde inspiratus, reconditum et secretum veritatis protulit verbum.
And Peter said: “So, occupied in mind, I did not at all feel that I had the very large fish that had caught on the hook, even when it violently snatched the line from my hands; and my brother Andrew, who was sitting with me, seeing me dazed and almost falling, poked my side with his elbow as if waking me from sleep and said: ‘Do you not see, Peter, what a big fish you have caught? Have you gone out of your mind, that you are so dazed and stunned? What is the matter with you? Tell me.’ But I, a little annoyed with him for drawing me away from the sweetness of what I was gazing at, answered that nothing was wrong with me, but that in spirit I was gazing at Jerusalem, which I longed for, and at Caesarea too, and that in body I was with him, but in mind wholly carried away there. But he, inspired I know not whence, uttered a hidden and secret word of truth.”
2.64PG 1:1278a
Desine, inquit, Petre; quid est quod agis? hi enim qui daemone incipiunt repleri vel moveri mente, hujuscemodi initia habent, per phantasias primo ad jucunda quaeque et delectabilia transferuntur; deinde ad ea quae non sunt, vanis et inanibus motibus effunduntur. Hoc autem accidit ex languore quodam animae, quo ea quidem quae sunt non vident, desiderant vero adducere ad conspectus suos ea quae non sunt. Sed et illis ita accidit, qui phrenesin patiuntur et videntur sibi multas imagines videre, pro eo quod nimietate frigoris vel caloris anima ipsorum convulsa et emota locis suis, errorem patitur ministerii naturalis. Sed et hi qui laborant siti, cum in soporem venerint, flumina et fontes videre sibi videntur ac bibere; hoc autem patiuntur ariditate intemperati corporis laborantes. Propter quod certum est, haec vitio quodam vel animae vel corporis fieri;
“‘Stop, Peter,’ he said; ‘what are you doing? For those who begin to be filled with a demon or moved in mind have beginnings of this kind: first they are carried by fantasies to whatever is pleasant and delightful; then they are poured out in vain and empty movements toward things that do not exist. This happens from a certain sickness of the soul, by which they do not see the things that are, but desire to bring before their sight the things that are not. So too it happens to those who suffer from frenzy and seem to themselves to see many images, because their soul, convulsed and moved from its places by excess of cold or heat, suffers a disorder of its natural function. And those who suffer from thirst, when they fall asleep, seem to themselves to see rivers and springs and to drink; this they suffer because they labor under the dryness of an ill-tempered body. Hence it is certain that these things come about from some fault either of soul or of body.’”
2.65PG 1:1278a–1279a
Denique ut accipias rei fidem de Jerusalem quam saepe videram, dicebam fratri meo, quae loca quosve conventus visus mihi fuissem videre. Sed et de Caesarea quam nunquam videram, nihilominus contendebam, quod esset talis, qualem mente et cogitatione conceperam. Cum autem venissem huc, nihil omnino simile respiciens eorum quae per phantasias videram, reprehendi memetipsum et notavi valde, quia ex aliis quae videram, portas ei et muros aliasque aedes, revera similitudinem ex aliis capiens dederam. Neque enim quis potest novum aliquid, et cujus forma nulla unquam exstiterit, cogitare. Nam et si velit aliquis tauros cum quinis capitibus ex sua cogitatione formare, ex istis quos vidit cum singulis capitibus, illos quinis capitibus fingit. Et tu ergo nunc, si vere aliquid tibi videris tua cogitatione perspicere, et supra coelos intueri, non dubium quin ex his ea consideres quae in terris positus vides. Aut si putas facilem menti tuae accessum esse super coelos, et considerare te posse quae illic sunt, atque immensae illius lucis scientiam capere, puto ei qui illa potest comprehendere, facilius esse ut sensum suum qui illuc novit ascendere, in alicujus nostrum qui assistimus, cor et pectus injiciat et dicat, quas in eo cogitationes gerat. Si ergo potes alicujus nostrum, qui tamen non sit erga favorem tuum occupatus, enuntiare cogitationes cordis, poterimus tibi fortasse credere, quod et ea quae super coelos sunt, scire potueris, licet illa multo sint celsiora.
“Finally, that you may believe the matter: about Jerusalem, which I had often seen, I told my brother what places and gatherings I had seemed to myself to see. And about Caesarea, which I had never seen, I nonetheless maintained that it was such as I had conceived it in mind and thought. But when I came here and saw nothing at all like the things I had seen in fantasy, I reproached and blamed myself greatly, because I had given it gates and walls and other buildings from others I had seen, really taking the likeness from them. For no one can think of anything new, whose form has never existed. Even if someone wishes to form in his thought bulls with five heads each, he fashions those with five heads from the ones he has seen with one head each. And you too now, if you think you truly see something in your thought and gaze above the heavens, there is no doubt that you consider those things from the ones you see placed on earth. Or if you think your mind has easy access above the heavens, and that you can consider what is there and grasp the knowledge of that immense light, I think it is easier for one who can comprehend those things to cast his mind, which knows how to ascend there, into the heart and breast of one of us standing by, and say what thoughts he has in him. If, then, you can declare the thoughts of the heart of any of us—provided he is not inclined in your favor—we may perhaps believe you that you could also know the things above the heavens, though they are far loftier.”
2.66PG 1:1279a
Ad haec Simon: Qui vero, inquit, multas naenias texuisti, audi jam nunc. Impossibile est omne quod ad cogitationem hominis venerit, non etiam re ipsa ac veritate subsistere; quae enim non subsistunt, nec speciem habent, quae autem speciem non habent, nec cogitationi possunt occurrere. Et Petrus: Si omne, inquit, quod ad cogitationem venire potest, subsistit, istum quem dicis extra mundum esse immensitatis locum, si eum quis in corde suo lumen esse cogitet, alius vero tenebras, quomodo poterit unus atque idem locus secundum eos, qui diversa de eo cogitarunt, et lumen esse et tenebrae? Et Simon: Omitte nunc ista quae ego dixi, tu quid esse putes super coelos dicito.
To this Simon said: “You who have woven many trifles, listen now. It is impossible that anything which has come into a man's thought should not also subsist in fact and truth; for things that do not subsist have no form either, and things that have no form cannot occur to thought.” And Peter said: “If everything that can come into thought subsists, then as to that place of immensity which you say is outside the world: if one man thinks in his heart that it is light, and another that it is darkness, how can one and the same place be both light and darkness, according to those who thought differently about it?” And Simon said: “Leave aside now these things I have said; tell me what you think is above the heavens.”
2.67PG 1:1279a–1279d
Et Petrus: Si de vero, inquit, fonte luminis crederes, possem te docere, quid et quo modo esset quod immensum est, et non phantasiam vanam, sed consequentem et necessariam rationem redderem veritatis, nec assertionibus sophisticis, sed legis et naturae testimoniis uterer, ut scires quia immensitatis fidem praecipue continet lex. Quod si immensitatis ratio non latet legem, nihil profecto aliud eam latere potest, et ideo falsum est, quod putasti esse aliquid quod ignoret lex. Multo autem amplius nihil latebit eum, qui legem dedit. Nec tamen possum tibi aliquid de immensitate et his quae sine fine sunt loqui, nisi prius de his, qui certo fine terminantur caelis, rationem vel receperis nostram, vel ipse protuleris tuam. Quod si de his quae certis finibus concluduntur intelligere non potes, multo magis de his quae sine fine sunt, neque scire aliquid poteris neque discere.
And Peter said: “If you believed concerning the true source of light, I could teach you what that which is immense is and in what way it is, and I would give not a vain fantasy but a consistent and necessary account of the truth, using not sophistical assertions but the testimonies of the law and of nature, so that you would know that the law especially contains the belief concerning immensity. And if the account of immensity is not hidden from the law, nothing else at all can be hidden from it; and therefore your supposition that there is something the law does not know is false. Much more will nothing be hidden from him who gave the law. Yet I cannot speak to you about immensity and the things that are without end unless you have first either received our account of the heavens, which are bounded by a fixed end, or brought forward your own. But if you cannot understand the things enclosed by fixed bounds, much less will you be able to know or learn anything about the things that are without end.”
2.68PG 1:1279d–1280a
Ad haec Simon: Melius, ait, mihi videtur simpliciter credere, quia Deus est, et quia solum istud quod videmus, sit caelum in universo mundo. Et Petrus: Non ita, inquit, sed unum quidem confiteri convenit Deum qui vere est; coelos autem esse qui ab eo facti sunt, sicut et lex dicit, quorum unum caelum sit superius, quo continetur etiam visibile firmamentum, illud esse perpetuum et aeternum cum his qui habitant ibi; istud autem visibile in consummatione saeculi resolvendum esse et transire, ut illud caelum quod est antiquius et excelsius post judicium sanctis et dignis appareat. Ad haec Simon respondit: Haec ita esse, ut tu dicis, credentibus possint videri, ei autem qui horum exspectat rationes, impossibile est ex lege proferri et praecipue de immensitate lucis.
To this Simon said: “It seems better to me simply to believe that God exists, and that this heaven which we see is the only heaven in the whole universe.” And Peter said: “Not so; but it is fitting to confess one God who truly is, and that there are heavens made by him, as the law also says, of which one heaven is higher, by which the visible firmament also is contained; that that one is perpetual and eternal, with those who dwell there; but that this visible one is to be dissolved and to pass away at the consummation of the age, so that that heaven which is older and higher may appear after the judgment to the saints and the worthy.” To this Simon answered: “That these things are as you say may seem so to believers; but for one who looks for the reasons of these things, it is impossible to bring them forward from the law, and especially concerning the immensity of light.”
2.69PG 1:1280a
Et Petrus: Noli, inquit, putare nos quod haec fide sola recipienda esse dicamus, sed et ratione asserenda. Neque enim tutum est nudae haec fidei absque ratione committere, cum utique veritas ratione non careat. Et ideo qui haec ratione munita susceperit, perdere ea nunquam potest; qui vero absque assertionibus ea suscipit simplicis sermonis assensu, neque servare ea tuto potest, neque si vera sint certus est, quia qui facile credit facile et recedit; qui autem rationem quaesivit eorum quae credidit, et accepit, quasi vinculis quibusdam rationis ipsius colligatus, nunquam ab his quae credidit, divelli aut separari potest. Et ideo quanto quis propensior fuerit in expetenda ratione, tanto erit firmior in conservanda fide.
And Peter said: “Do not think that we say these things are to be received by faith alone; they are also to be asserted by reason. For it is not safe to commit these things to bare faith without reason, since the truth certainly does not lack reason. And therefore he who has received these things fortified by reason can never lose them; but he who receives them without proofs, by assent to a simple statement, can neither keep them safely nor be certain whether they are true; for he who believes easily also departs easily. But he who has sought and received the reason for the things he has believed, bound as it were by the chains of reason itself, can never be torn away or separated from what he has believed. And therefore the more eager one is in seeking reason, the firmer he will be in keeping the faith.”
2.70PG 1:1280a–1280d
Ad haec Simon: Magnum est, inquit, quod repromittis ut immensae lucis aeternitas ex lege possit ostendi. Cumque Petrus dixisset: Quando volucris, Simon ait: Quoniam hora jam multa est, crastino astanti mihi et renitenti, si probare potueris factum esse hunc mundum et animas esse immortales, habebis me adjutorem praedicationis tuae. Et cum haec dixisset, egressus est, secuta autem est eum ex omni populo qui cum ipso venerat pars tertia, qui erant quasi mille viri; caeteri vero flexis genibus prosternebant se Petro, super quos ille invocato Dei nomine, alios daemonia habentes curavit, alios etiam languentes sanavit, et ita laetantem populum dimisit, mandans eis, ut in crastinum diem maturius convenirent. Petrus vero cum recessissent turbae, sterni jussit humi sub aere atrii nudo ubi fuerat disputatum, et recubuit una cum illis undecim, ego vero cum aliis quibusdam, qui et ipsi initia audiendi verbi Dei acceperant et erant charissimi, recumbens sumebam cibum.
To this Simon said: “It is a great thing that you promise, that the eternity of the immense light can be shown from the law.” And when Peter had said, “Whenever you wish,” Simon said: “Since the hour is now late, tomorrow, with me present and resisting, if you can prove that this world was made and that souls are immortal, you will have me as a helper in your preaching.” When he had said this, he went out; and of all the people who had come with him, a third part followed him, about a thousand men; but the rest, bending their knees, prostrated themselves before Peter. And he, invoking the name of God over them, cured some who had demons and healed others who were sick, and so dismissed the people rejoicing, charging them to gather earlier the next day. But Peter, when the crowds had withdrawn, had places spread on the ground in the open air of the court where the disputation had taken place, and reclined with those eleven; but I took food reclining with certain others who had also received the beginnings of hearing the word of God and were very dear.
2.71PG 1:1280d–1281a
Sed benignissimus Petrus considerans, ne forte tristitiam mihi inferret ista sequestratio, ait ad me: Non pro superbia, o Clemens, convivium non ago cum his qui nondum purificati sunt. Sed vereor ne forte mihi quidem noceam, ipsis autem nihil prosim. Hoc enim pro certo scire te volo, quia omnis qui idola coluit aliquando, et eos quos pagani nominant deos, adoravit vel de immolatis eorum degustavit, spiritu immundo non caret; conviva enim factus est daemonum, et participium sumpsit ejus daemonis cujus in mente sua speciem, vel timore vel amore formavit. Et per haec mundus non est a spiritu immundo, et ideo purificatione indiget baptismi, ut exeat ab eo spiritus immundus, qui interiores animae ipsius insedit affectus, et quod est deterius, nec quod intrinsecus lateat indicatur, ut ne publicatus fugetur.
But the most kind Peter, considering that this separation might perhaps cause me sadness, said to me: “It is not from pride, Clement, that I do not share a meal with those who have not yet been purified. But I fear that I might harm myself and do them no good. For I want you to know this for certain: everyone who has at some time worshiped idols and adored those whom the pagans call gods, or has tasted of what was sacrificed to them, is not free of an unclean spirit; for he has become a table companion of demons, and has taken a share with that demon whose likeness he formed in his mind, either by fear or by love. And because of these things he is not clean of the unclean spirit, and therefore needs the purification of baptism, so that the unclean spirit may go out of him, which has settled in the inner affections of his soul; and, what is worse, it does not reveal that it lies hidden within, lest, being exposed, it be put to flight.”
2.72PG 1:1281a–1282b
Amant enim isti spiritus immundi inhaerere corporibus hominum, ut ipsorum ministerio cupiditates suas expleant, et ad ea quae ipsi desiderant inclinantes animae motus, suis eos parere libidinibus cogant, ut efficiantur ex integro vasa daemonum. Ex quibus unus est Simon hic, qui tali quodam morbo comprehensus nec sanari jam potest, quia voluntate et proposito aegrotat. Nec contra voluntatem ejus habitat in eo daemon, et ideo si eum quis fugare velit et expellere ab eo, cum sit inseparabilis, et, ut ita dicam, anima jam ejus effectus, videbitur magis necare eum et homicidii crimen incurrere. Nemo ergo vestrum contristetur a convivio nostro separatus, tempore enim aliquo observare debet unusquisque sane quanto ipse voluerit. Parvo enim tempore sequestratur qui cito voluerit baptizari, multo autem qui tardius. Unusquisque ergo in sua habet potestate, breve aut longum poenitentiae suae tempus exigere, et ideo in vobis est, quando velitis ad nostram convenire mensam, et non in nobis, quibus permissum non est sumere cum aliquo cibum, nisi fuerit baptizatus. Vos ergo magis nos prohibetis a vestro convivio, si ad purificandum moras habeatis et tardius baptizemini. His dictis cum benedixisset, cibum sumpsit. Et post haec cum gratias egisset Deo, ingressus quievit, similiter autem et nos omnes, erat enim jam nox.
“For these unclean spirits love to cling to the bodies of men, so that through their ministry they may fulfil their own desires, and, inclining the movements of the soul toward what they themselves desire, may compel them to obey their lusts, so that they become wholly vessels of demons. One of these is this Simon, who, seized by such a disease, can no longer be healed, because he is sick by will and purpose. Nor does the demon dwell in him against his will; and therefore, if anyone wished to put it to flight and expel it from him, since it is inseparable and, so to speak, has now become his soul, he would seem rather to kill him and incur the crime of murder. Let none of you, then, be saddened at being separated from our table; for each one must observe this for a time, as long as he himself chooses. He who wishes to be baptized quickly is separated for a short time, but he who wishes it later, for a long time. Each one, then, has it in his own power to make the time of his repentance short or long; and therefore it lies with you, when you wish, to come to our table, and not with us, to whom it is not permitted to take food with anyone unless he has been baptized. It is you, then, who rather keep us from your table, if you delay purification and are baptized later.” Having said this, he blessed and took food. And after this, when he had given thanks to God, he went in and rested, and likewise all of us; for it was now night.
Chapter 3
3.1PG 1:1281b–1282b
Interea Petrus gallorum cantibus surgens et excitare nos volens invenit vigilantes, vespertino adhuc lumine perdurante, cumque ex more salutavisset et resedissemus omnes, ita exorsus est: Nihil est difficilius, fratres mei, quam de veritate apud permisti populi multitudinem disputare. Quod enim est, omnibus ut est dici non licet, propter eos qui maligne et insidiose audiunt; fallere vero non expedit propter eos qui sincere audire desiderant veritatem. Quid ergo faciet cui ad indiscretum populum sermo est; occultet quod verum est? Et quomodo instruet eos qui digni sunt? Sed si meram proferat veritatem his qui salutem consequi non desiderant, illi a quo missus est injuriam facit, a quo et mandatum accepit, ne mittat verborum ejus margaritas ante porcos et canes, qui adversum eas argumentis ac sophismatibus reluctantes, ipsas quidem caeno intelligentiae carnalis involvant, latratibus autem suis et responsionibus sordidis rumpant et fatigent praedicatores verbi Dei. Propter quod et ego in plurimis circuitu quodam verbi utens tentare nitebar, ne principalem de summa Divinitate intelligentiam minus dignis auribus publicarem. Et post haec incipiens de Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto, breviter nobis et evidenter exposuit, ut omnes audientes miraremur quomodo homines, derelicta veritate, conversi sunt ad vanitatem.
Meanwhile Peter, rising at cockcrow and wishing to wake us, found us awake, with the evening lamp still burning; and when he had greeted us as usual and we had all sat down, he began thus: “Nothing is more difficult, my brethren, than to dispute about the truth before a mixed multitude of people. For what is may not be told to all as it is, because of those who listen maliciously and treacherously; yet it is not right to deceive, because of those who sincerely desire to hear the truth. What, then, shall one do who addresses an undiscriminating crowd? Conceal what is true? And how will he instruct those who are worthy? But if he sets forth the pure truth to those who do not desire to obtain salvation, he wrongs him by whom he was sent and from whom he received the command not to cast the pearls of his words before swine and dogs, who, struggling against them with arguments and sophisms, roll them in the mud of carnal understanding, and with their barking and filthy answers break and weary the preachers of the word of God. For this reason I too, in most matters, using a certain circumlocution, strove not to publish the principal understanding concerning the supreme Divinity to less worthy ears.” And after this, beginning with the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, he set it out to us briefly and clearly, so that all of us who heard wondered how men, forsaking the truth, have turned to vanity.
3.2PG 1:1282b
[Haec Petro dicente Aquila ait: Recte dixisti, propterea nobis dicito quae veritatis sunt propria. Et Petrus: De quibus vultis interrogate me. Et Aquila ait: De principio et principiis verbum disputa, et de eo quod reprehendit Simon quasi inconveniens, Filium Dei dici Christum, ne similia plantationibus et caeteris inanimatis pati
As Peter was saying this, Aquila said: “You have spoken rightly; tell us, then, the things that belong to the truth.” And Peter said: “Ask me about whatever you wish.” And Aquila said: “Discuss the principle and the principles, and that which Simon censured as unfitting: that Christ is called the Son of God, lest God be thought to suffer things like plants and other inanimate things …”
3.3PG 1:1282b–1283b
Petrus autem videns omnes hoc ipsum volentes audire, omnem rationem ita exposuit: Principii nomen in multis et diversis nuncupatur rebus, sensibilibus scilicet et intelligibilibus. Sed ne ante experimentum sensibilium ad intelligibilia declinare videamur, decet primo a visibilibus incipere, ut de proximo sumentes exemplum iterum ad intelligibilium veniamus comprehensionem. Quomodo sol verbi gratia in principium vel principatum diei constitutus est, luna vero e contrario noctis; haec autem ut principatum gerant constituta sunt, a quo etiam ut essent in principio acceperunt. Qui autem haec composuit, caelum et terram prius condidit, praeter haec autem terrestria et inaquosa et volatilia animalia composuit, arbores quoque et herbas et post haec hominem, non ut essent haec tantum principium sumens, sed etiam ut viverent secundum mandatum Dei. Ita ergo multa quidem possunt esse principia, ei autem qui est, principia non sunt. Unum est enim principium et unum sine principio principium, quae autem post haec sunt, abusive dicuntur (si quidem dicuntur) principia. Praeveniens autem exposui causam hujus exempli, a sensibilibus scilicet ad intelligibilia, ut hac via usi firmam et certam de intelligibilium traditione possideamus tuitionem. Sine principio ergo dicimus Deum ineffabili providentia demonstrante, qui non a se ipso factus est nec a se ipso genitus; est enim sine principio et ingenitus. Ingeniti autem appellatio non quid sit, nobis intelligere dat, sed quod non est factus; αὑτοπάτορα vero et αὐτογένητον, hoc est ipsum sibi Patrem ipsumque sibi Filium qui vocaverunt illud quod ingenitum, contumeliam facere conati sunt dubiis deservientes rationibus. Indigere enim nativitate illud quod erat priusquam nasceretur, parvulorum more intelligentes putarunt, et illud quod fuerat, pro eo quod fuerit ponentes, quasi per se ipsum factum dicere insania insanierunt, et plantationibus comparare illud quod est ingenitum, ut daemoniosi ausi sunt. Haec autem omnia in impietate constituta consequentem habent ignorantiam. Non enim intellexerunt hoc ipsum dicentes et fuisse et non fuisse. Quatenus enim genuit, fuit, quatenus vero natum est, non fuit. Non fuisse ergo eum constat quatenus natum est, fuisse autem eum constat quatenus genuit. Haec autem utraque dicere simul eumdem sustinuisse, non permittit pietatis professio.
Peter, seeing that all wished to hear this very thing, set out the whole account thus: “The name ‘principle’ is applied to many and diverse things, namely sensible and intelligible. But lest we seem to turn to intelligible things before experience of sensible ones, it is fitting to begin first from visible things, so that, taking an example from what is near, we may then come to the comprehension of intelligible things. Thus the sun, for example, was established as the principle or rule of the day, and the moon, on the other hand, of the night; these were established to hold rule, and received from him that they should be at the beginning. And he who composed these first founded heaven and earth, and besides these composed the land, water, and winged animals, trees too and plants, and after these man—not only giving them a beginning so that they might exist, but also that they might live according to the command of God. So there can indeed be many principles, but for him who is there are no principles. For there is one principle, and one principle without principle; the things after these are improperly called principles, if they are called so at all. I set out beforehand the reason for this example, from sensible to intelligible things, so that, using this way, we may possess a firm and certain safeguard in the teaching about intelligible things. We say, then, that God is without beginning, as ineffable providence shows, who was neither made by himself nor begotten by himself; for he is without beginning and unbegotten. The name ‘unbegotten’ does not give us to understand what he is, but that he was not made. But those who called that which is unbegotten ‘self-father’ and ‘self-begotten’, that is, father of himself and son of himself, tried to do it insult, serving doubtful reasonings. For, understanding like little children, they thought that what was before it was born needed birth; and, taking ‘that which was’ for ‘that it came to be’, they raved with madness in saying that it was made as if by itself, and dared, like men possessed, to compare what is unbegotten to plants. All these things, being set in impiety, have ignorance as their consequence. For they did not understand that in saying this very thing they say that he both was and was not. For inasmuch as he begot, he was; but inasmuch as he was born, he was not. It is established, then, that he was not insofar as he was born, and that he was insofar as he begot. But the profession of piety does not allow us to say that the same underwent both at once.”
3.4PG 1:1283b–1284b
Deinde etiam communes cogitationes sollicite a se repellunt tantam blasphemiam, dignum honorem ingenito deferentes. Quidnam igitur quis interrogatus dicat eorum qui impie appellaverunt? nisi quia fuit priusquam esset, ipse sibi Pater, qui esse habuit antequam sibi ut esset praestitisset. Αὐτο- ipse sibi Pater et ipse sibi Filius, qua ratione dicatur, et cum quidem non fuisset quod esset, ante exstans intelligentiae signum? Audes autem factum dicere a semetipso illud quod ineffectum est? Putaverunt autem hujus modi cum disciplina se hoc dicere, sicut ebrii, qui umbras pro foveis existimant. Propter quod ante omnia oportet nos immortalium scrutationem facientes incipere a Dominicis traditionibus, ubi mortalium conditionem ab immortalibus separans, docuit nos pericula et tentationes usque ad ipsam mortem sustinere propter spem bonorum regni, dicens: Nolite timere eos qui occidunt corpus, animas autem non possunt occidere, timete autem eum qui potest corpus et animam perdere in gehennam. Et vere si non commoritur corpori anima, non utique dividitur nec aliud aliquid patitur de his quae patitur corpus, verbi gratia influxionem vel defluxionem, tenuitatem aut crassitudinem, sanitatem vel infirmitatem, abscisionem aut conjunctionem. Sed et in ipsa hominum procreatione nihil committit anima secundum defluxionem, sed in omni quidem motu stat videlicet substantia immutabilis, diverso autem motu ad aliud et aliud corpus incitat pati. Fluit ergo et patitur substantialiter corpus, sicuti experimento cognoscitur, post illam natorum coagulationem exinanitione uteri facta, propter crementum infantis impellentis et impulsi velut in luctamine, verbo Conditoris: Quod enim coagulatum est festinat egredi; quod autem coagulavit cupit exponere. Causa vero haec transfert ipsas passiones ad successionem ejusdem rei, facta autem passione commune periculum saepius quam speciale contingit.
“Then also our common notions carefully repel so great a blasphemy, paying due honor to the unbegotten. What, then, would any of those who used the impious names say if questioned? Only that he was before he was, father to himself, having being before he had furnished himself with being. By what reasoning could he be called ‘self-’, father of himself and son of himself, when what he would be did not yet exist—a sign of an understanding existing before? Do you dare to say that what is unmade was made by itself? They thought they said this with learning, like drunkards who take shadows for pits. Therefore, before all things, we who make inquiry into immortal things must begin from the traditions of the Lord, where, separating the condition of mortal things from immortal, he taught us to endure dangers and temptations even to death itself for the hope of the good things of the kingdom, saying: ‘Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill souls; but fear him who can destroy body and soul in Gehenna.’ And truly, if the soul does not die with the body, it is certainly not divided, nor does it suffer anything else of what the body suffers, for example influx or efflux, thinness or thickness, health or sickness, severing or joining. And even in the very procreation of men the soul contributes nothing by way of efflux; in every movement its substance stands unchangeable, but by its diverse movement it stirs one body and another to be affected. The body, then, flows and is affected in its substance, as is known by experience, when after the forming of those born the womb is emptied, through the growth of the infant, pushing and pushed as if in a struggle, by the word of the Creator: for what has been formed hastens to come out, and what formed it desires to put it forth. This cause carries the passions themselves over to the succession of the same thing; and when the passion has occurred, a common danger occurs more often than a particular one.”
3.5PG 1:1284b–1285a
Sed et omne quod servit muliebribus desideriis, promovetur et praemeditatur naturaliter secundum uniuscujusque aetatem, verbi causa aliter puer, aliter vero adolescens, aliter autem vir. Nam infans quidem in virtute habet horum operationem, nondum autem in virtute habet etiam animae motus; adolescens vero paratus quidem ad destinatum, nondum vero digestionis habet usum; vir autem conspirans possidet perfectionis propositum. Et non ex illis solis dicendum est, animam immortalem, corpus vero fluens, sed etiam ex his, quae ad eam constant in communem personam mandatis, quae ait Dominus: Dictum est antiquis: Non moechaberis; ego autem dico: Nec in aspectum desideria servies, nimis caute loquens. Si enim corpus naturaliter obligatum est femineis commistionibus, magis autem servire coactum his quae accepit, ut esset et in schemate haberet, quod et principale est carnalis procreationis, quo modo quis suspicetur corpori esse dictum: Non moechaberis, ego autem dico nec desiderio servies, et non potius ei, quae libera est substantia, talium passionum potestatem habens laxare vel refrenare secundum operationem corpus, hic melioris rei mandatum insinuatur? Sic enim et futura sperantes non irascimur, et furorem cohibemus et mulieres despicimus spe futurorum sensum sublevantes, ut dixi, non omne quod sumus servile habentes femineis operationibus, sed aliud quidem serviens natura quod est corpus, sicut ostendimus, aliud vero liberum, mentem, quod est motus animae immortalis.
“And everything that serves the desires for women is advanced and prepared naturally according to each one's age—for example, in one way in the boy, in another in the youth, in another in the man. For the infant has the working of these in potency, but does not yet have in potency the movements of the soul as well; the youth is ready for the appointed end, but does not yet have the use of discernment; the man, consenting, possesses the purpose of completion. And it must be said that the soul is immortal and the body flowing not only from these things, but also from the commandments which apply to it as the common person, which the Lord speaks: ‘It was said to those of old, You shall not commit adultery; but I say, Do not serve desire even in looking’—speaking very carefully. For if the body is naturally bound to intercourse with women, and is rather compelled to serve what it has received, so that it might exist and have it in its form—which is also the chief part of carnal procreation—how could anyone suppose that it was said to the body, ‘You shall not commit adultery; but I say, Do not serve desire,’ and not rather that the commandment of the better thing is intimated here to the soul, which is a free substance, having power to loosen or rein in such passions as the body works? So too, hoping for the things to come, we are not angry, we restrain wrath, and we disdain women, raising our minds by the hope of things to come; not, as I said, having all that we are servile to female operations, but one part serving by nature, which is the body, as we showed, and another free, the mind, which is the movement of the immortal soul.”
3.6PG 1:1285a–1285b
His igitur ita se habentibus, vestigium optimum ad intelligibilium comprehensionem invenimus cum Deo dicente. Incedamus ergo per eum sine periculo, utentes anima immortali gubernaculo, ultra non sinentes irruere passionem carnalem illi immortali et intelligibili substantiae, honorem tantum unicuique intelligibilium sequestrantes, quantum ei is quem esse vel praesse constat Deo permittit. Est enim primum, quod est ingenitum, cui et propheta testimonium perhibent: Ego Deus primus, et ego post haec, et praeter me Deus non est; hoc vero subauditur esse sine initio et ingenitum.
“These things being so, we have found the best track toward the comprehension of intelligible things, with God speaking. Let us go by it, then, without danger, using the immortal soul as our helm, no longer allowing carnal passion to rush upon that immortal and intelligible substance, and assigning to each of the intelligible beings only so much honor as God, who is established to be and to rule, permits it. For there is a first, which is unbegotten, to which the prophet also bears witness: ‘I God am first, and I after these, and besides me there is no God’; and by this is understood that he is without beginning and unbegotten.”
3.7PG 1:1285b
Clemens vero et caeteri interrogaverunt, quid est hoc Ingenitum, audire volentes. Et Petrus animadvertens ait: Non modicum periculum est de eo, quod sine principio est loqui vel audire, vos vero pro desiderio eorum quae dicta sunt, immensitatem irruere periclitamini; et me hoc pati ut video captatis, qui putatis posse mihi de illo quod ineffabile est subripere. Moneo autem vos fratres et conservi, non quid sit quaerere, sed quia est tantummodo audire desiderare. Et de hoc plus aliquid dicere non oportet. Est Ingenitum non sola appellatione honorandum, est enim et sine initio; hoc autem sine initio et Ingenitum est Deus, quod a sola opinione eorum quae facta sunt annuntiatur, a se ipso autem comprehenditur. Non enim inveniet aliquid sui primo fuisse, et aliquid postea factum conspicere sui, eo quod sine principio eum esse constet; haec autem eorum quae facta sunt visitatio, propter quod illud quod est ineffabile, ad inquisitionem sui, quod fuerit ante praevidere quam fuerit, spatium non habet; non enim secundatur ab eo qui est ipsius essentia curiositas. Novit igitur se ipsum, qui non interrogat se de se ipso. Sed haec quidem etiam plus quam oportet diximus, amat enim illud quod est Ingenitum, silentio honorari tantummodo. Sine principio ergo hanc substantiam, secundum quod sentire potuimus, absque periculo suscepistis.
Clement and the others asked what this ‘Unbegotten’ is, wishing to hear. And Peter, noticing, said: “There is no small danger in speaking or hearing about that which is without beginning; but you, from desire for what has been said, risk rushing upon immensity; and you are trying, as I see, to make me suffer this, thinking you can steal from me something about that which is ineffable. I warn you, brethren and fellow servants, not to seek what he is, but only to desire to hear that he is. And more than this must not be said about it. The Unbegotten is to be honored not by the name alone, for it is also without beginning; and this which is without beginning and unbegotten is God, who is proclaimed only by the opinion of the things that have been made, but is comprehended by himself. For he will not find that something of him was first and see something of him made afterwards, since it is established that he is without beginning; that is the condition of the things that have been made. Therefore that which is ineffable has no interval for inquiring into itself, to foresee what it was before it was; for no curiosity follows upon him who is his own essence. He knows himself, then, who does not question himself about himself. But we have said even more of these things than is fitting; for that which is unbegotten loves to be honored by silence alone. You have received, then, without danger, as far as we could perceive it, that this substance is without beginning.”
3.8PG 1:1285b–1286b
Qui ergo esse non inchoavit praedictus Deus, genuit primogenitum omnis creaturae, sicuti Deum decuit; non se immutans, non se convertens, non se dividens, non defluens, non extendens aliquid. Mementote enim quia haec corporum sunt passiones, quas etiam animae tribuere subterfugimus, timore ne forte immortalitas ei his attributis auferatur. Genuit ergo Deus, quod et facturam vocare didicimus, hoc ipsum ergo vocare et genituram et facturam et reliqua horum vocabulorum, illud quod sine schemate constat genitoris specimen, ponere permittit. Quibus enim est differentia schematum, in ipsis necesse est observanda genitura et factura. Manendo ergo genuit Deus, non passus divisionem aliquam. Non enim honorabilius est Deo et hoc Ingenito illud quod est, eo quod non est velut genitum. Volens enim non tardam habuit virtutem ad quod voluit, nec excessit virtus voluntatem; sed secundum mensuram, qualem voluit, talem et genuit. Si enim manendo, non patiendo, necessitati crassitudinis corpora servientia umbras exstare faciunt, quanto magis ingenitae virtuti subsequentem demus Unigenitum voluntate procedentem. Sicuti autem rursus praeintelliguntur umbris corpora, ita et plus praeintelligitur et ingenita substantia genita, etiam si ex eo quod erat, ut esset accepit. Idcirco igitur vere et genitura et factura et creatura competenter appellatur, quia substantia non est Ingenitum. Memor sum sane Simonem accusasse nos blasphemia, eo quod diceremus Filium Dei Christum, tanquam hominibus et plantationibus Deum aequantes; vos vero ex desiderio discere festinate.
“This God, then, who did not begin to be, begot the firstborn of all creation, as befitted God: not changing himself, not turning himself, not dividing himself, not flowing out, not extending anything. For remember that these are passions of bodies, which we avoid attributing even to the soul, for fear that its immortality be taken away by these attributes. God, then, begot that which we have also learned to call a thing made; and to call it both begotten and made, and the other words of this kind, allows us to posit that which, being without form, is the likeness of the begetter. For in those that differ in form, the begotten and the made must be distinguished. Remaining, then, God begot, suffering no division. For that which is is not more honorable to God and to this Unbegotten than that which is not, as if begotten. For when he willed, he did not have a power slow toward what he willed, nor did his power exceed his will; but such as was the measure he willed, such did he beget. For if bodies, remaining and not suffering, subject to the necessity of their thickness, make shadows exist, how much more shall we grant that the Only-begotten, proceeding by will, follows upon the unbegotten power. And as bodies are understood before shadows, so much more is the unbegotten substance understood before the begotten, even if he received from him who was that he should be. For this reason, then, he is truly and fittingly called begotten and made and created, because he is not the unbegotten substance. I remember indeed that Simon accused us of blasphemy because we said that Christ is the Son of God, as if we made God equal to men and plants; but you, from desire to learn, hasten on.”
3.9PG 1:1286b–1287a
Omnibus autem libenter annuentibus ait Petrus: Manifesta est hujus incredulitatis via, o Aquila et caeteri. Qui enim pro certo nescierit, opinionem autem usque ad auditum susceperit, credere timet, cum facile possit excusationem ipsius incredulitatis a se abjicere prae gaudio ejus quod promittitur, assumptus publicare illam quam habuit de eo quod quaeritur incredulitatem, cupiditate discendi non dubitat. Sed in secundo de hac re sermo, ne quando abstrahens vos incerta fidei spes excipiatur pro fide in inquisitionem. Ubique autem praeferatur nobis Deus et de ipso cogitatus. Ultro inviolabilis exstans Deus ingenitus, operationemque voluntate virginaliter custodivit. Quod autem non est Ingenitum, ultro virgo esse non potest. Factum est enim, tanquam sub tactum genitoris et factoris adductum. Intelligatur autem qualiter Deum decuit Unigenitum generare et primogenitum omnis creaturae, sed non quasi ex aliquo; haec enim animantium et inanimantium est servitus. Sed nec in operationem veniens ipse sui aliquid genuit; non enim maneret inviolabilis et impassibilis, operatus in seipso; impietatis autem plena sunt haec de ingenito suspicari, periclitamur enim filii impiorum pie se putantes intelligere, magnam blasphemiam Ingenito ingerendo, masculofeminam eum existimantes. Memor sum sane ejus qui commonuit nos, fratres.
When all gladly agreed, Peter said: “The way of this unbelief is plain, Aquila and the rest. For one who does not know for certain, but has received an opinion only as far as hearing, is afraid to believe; whereas he could easily cast off the excuse of his unbelief for joy at what is promised, and, carried away by the desire to learn, he does not hesitate to make public the unbelief he had about what is being sought. But discussion of this matter belongs to a second occasion, lest an uncertain hope of faith, drawing you away, be accepted in place of faith in the inquiry. Everywhere let God and the thought of him come first for us. God, being unbegotten, remains of his own nature inviolable, and he kept his operation by will in a virgin manner. But that which is not unbegotten cannot of its own nature be virgin; for it was made, as brought under the touch of its begetter and maker. Let it be understood how it befitted God to beget the Only-begotten and firstborn of all creation, but not as from some material; for that is the servitude of animate and inanimate things. Nor, coming into operation, did he beget something of himself; for he would not remain inviolable and impassible if he worked upon himself. It is full of impiety to suspect these things of the unbegotten; for we, sons of the impious, are in danger, thinking that we understand piously, of bringing a great blasphemy upon the Unbegotten by supposing him male-female. I remember indeed him who warned us, brethren.”
3.10PG 1:1287a–1287b
Manendo ergo genuit Deus voluntate praecedente, sicut praedictum est. Propterea Unigenitus vere appellatur; ex ingenito enim habet quod est et Filius vere appellatur, ab innato enim natus est. Sed tamen voluntate controversiam noxiam mansuete paulatim relaxantes eorum, qui audent dicere infectum a facto appellatione sola distare, et illud quod genite distinctum est, adversus innatum esse substantiam ingenitum affirmare. Quod si ita dicitur, quod quidem dicitur non est, quod autem est non dicitur. Est enim infectum substantia, si autem dicitur factum, detestatur quod non est appellatum; maxime autem ultro rationabili exstante Deo et ultro sine principio, quod modo non est impossibile; magis autem impium est, et id quod ultro est rationabile ultroque ingenitum, non sibi ipsi magis vellet esse conjunctum, quam dualitatis subire ordinem, honorabiliorem existimans nativitatem innatae perseverantiae. Unum enim non est, neque ipsum sibi praecipit dicens: Sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum. Sed neque contendit adversus se ipsum, ut aliquid videlicet ejus permaneret ingenitum, aliquid vero nativitati subjiceretur; scire quoque atque praescire ingenite aliquid sui nasciturum, aliquid vero generaturum; omnino videlicet honorabiliorem se sibimetipsi non ignorans esse futurum, aliquid quidem praecipientem, aliquid vero praeceptum accipientem, illud verbi gratia quod dictum est: Sede a dextris meis, vel etiam illud quod ad missionem pertinet aut quod ipse semetipsum praeferens collaudaverit, dicens: Et vidit Deus, quia bona, postquam ab Unigenito sex diebus effecta sunt quae facta esse constat, immutabilem videns suam voluntatem in consummationibus Unigeniti divinae operationis.
“Remaining, then, God begot, his will going before, as was said before. For this reason he is truly called Only-begotten; for he has what he is from the unbegotten, and he is truly called Son, for he was born of the unborn. Yet we gently and gradually loosen, by will, the harmful controversy of those who dare to say that the unmade differs from the made by name alone, and to affirm that what is distinguished as begotten is, over against the unborn, an unbegotten substance. If it is said so, what is said is not, and what is, is not said. For the unmade is substance; and if it is called made, it rejects what it was not called. Especially since God is of himself rational and of himself without beginning, which is not impossible; but it is more impious that that which is of itself rational and of itself unbegotten should not rather wish to be at one with itself than to submit to the order of duality, thinking birth more honorable than unborn permanence. For it is not one, nor does he command himself, saying: ‘Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.’ Nor does he contend against himself, so that some part of him should remain unbegotten and some part be subjected to birth; nor know and foreknow unbegottenly that some part of himself would be born and some part would beget; not at all unaware that he would be more honorable than himself, one part giving commands and the other receiving them—for example, what was said: ‘Sit at my right hand’; or what pertains to sending; or that he praised himself, preferring himself, saying: ‘And God saw that they were good,’ after the things which are known to have been made had been completed by the Only-begotten in six days, seeing his will unchanged in the completed works of the Only-begotten's divine operation.”
3.11PG 1:1287b–1288b
Si autem ingenitus non est factus Pater aut sui ipsius factor, sicut ostendimus; quomodo utique faceret aut generaret ex se ipso aliquid, quod nativitatem et facturam usque ad appellationem non recepit? Non enim quod est per haec habet; ista autem de Deo dicere impium est. Manifesta enim est his qui vel modicum quidpiam videre possunt, illa ingeniti, impassibilis, innata substantia. Si vero et post nativitatem substantia nunquam ad dissensionem surrexit et hoc numero distans, nec enim est Autopator, hoc est sibi ipsi pater, quomodo non magis innascibili consensu permacra diligeret, quod ingenitum quidem erat substantia, genitura vero in dualitatem dinumerata. Hujus namque inconvenientiae mater quidem est ignorantia de Deo, cooperatrix vero et soror negligentia de Spiritu sancto. Spiritus autem sanctus pignus ad conservationem eorum quae a Domino data sunt nobis (quem non post multos dies assumptionis ejus accepimus), habet quod est ab Unigenito, plenissima declaratio virtutis ejus; sicut unigenitus et omnium primogenitus imago est immutabilis ingenitae virtutis, imago scilicet unica, immaculata manens, visionem ingeniti cum sit visibilis, praestat intelligibilibus et sensibilibus; quo modo si quis solem verbi gratia ostendere volens aut aliud aliquid, his qui non possunt per se ipsos eum videre, sit autem illis necessitas videre solem, temperans obtutibus ipsam necessitatem per speculum quidem solem ostendere festinat, et non solem afferens injicit speculo; ita et Unigenitus ipse quidem ingenitus non est, ingenitum vero totam in se demonstrat virtutem cum sit talis ac tantus deitate; ab his vero qui non diligenter inquisierunt ingenitus suspicabatur, apud quos vero ρι-κοθάίι ipsa inquisitio ιίmorem Dei, non solum dicere aliquid tale recusant, sed etiam cogitare cavent. Cum ergo unus sit ingenitus et unus genitus, Spiritus sanctus Filius dici non potest, nec primogenitus; factus est enim per factum, subconnumeratur autem Patri et Filio, tanquam primum secundi per factum virtutis signaculum. Etenim ipse Patris ferens aequipondera voluntate, innatae perseverantiae in imagine operationem, post ingenitum consequenter bene connumeratus est. Multa autem et alia de Patre, et Filio, et Spiritu sancto breviter nobis et evidenter exposuit, ut omnes audientes miraremur, quomodo homines derelicta veritate conversi sunt ad vanitatem]
“But if the unbegotten Father was not made, nor is the maker of himself, as we have shown, how indeed would he make or beget from himself something that did not admit birth and making even in name? For what is does not have its being through these; and to say these things of God is impious. For to those who can see even a little, that unbegotten, impassible, unborn substance is manifest. And if even after the birth the substance never rose up to dissension, though distinct in number—for he is not Autopator, that is, father to himself—how would he not rather love, in an unborn agreement, that which was unbegotten in substance, but by begetting numbered into a duality? For of this incongruity the mother is ignorance about God, and its fellow worker and sister is negligence about the Holy Spirit. But the Holy Spirit, a pledge for the keeping of the things given us by the Lord (whom we received not many days after his ascension), has what he is from the Only-begotten, the fullest declaration of his power; just as the Only-begotten and firstborn of all is the unchangeable image of the unbegotten power—an image indeed unique, remaining spotless, which, being visible, affords the vision of the unbegotten to intelligible and sensible beings. It is as if someone wishing to show the sun, for example, or something else, to those who cannot see it by themselves, while they need to see the sun, tempering that necessity to their sight, hastens to show the sun by a mirror, and, bringing not the sun itself, casts it on the mirror; so too the Only-begotten himself is not unbegotten, but shows in himself the whole unbegotten power, since he is such and so great in deity. By those who did not inquire carefully he was suspected to be unbegotten; but those among whom the inquiry itself proceeds with the fear of God not only refuse to say any such thing but take care not even to think it. Since, then, there is one unbegotten and one begotten, the Holy Spirit cannot be called Son, nor firstborn; for he was made through the one who was made, and he is numbered beneath the Father and the Son, as the first seal of the power of the second, through the one who was made. For he, bearing by will the Father's equal weight, the working of unborn permanence in an image, is rightly numbered next after the unbegotten.” And he set out to us briefly and clearly many other things about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, so that all of us who heard wondered how men, forsaking the truth, have turned to vanity.
3.12PG 1:1288b–1289a
Sed cum illuxisset dies, ingressus est quidam dicens: Multitudo plurima exspectat in atrio, in quorum medio stat Simon, persuasionibus pessimis praevenire aures populi cupiens. Et Petrus statim egressus stetit in loco quo pridie disputaverat, omnisque ad ipsum populus conversus cum gaudio intendebat in eum. Simon vero ubi sensit gavisum esse populum de conspectu Petri, et erga affectum ejus moveri, obstupefactus ait: Miror hominum stultitiam, qui me magum dicunt et Petrum diligunt, cum utique olim habentes notitiam mei, me magis diligere deberent. Et ideo ex hoc indicio, qui habent sensum possunt intelligere, quia magis Petrus magus videri potest, cum mihi, cui ex consuetudine debitus propemodum est, non defertur affectus, illi autem, cui nullo usu debetur, abundanter expenditur.
But when day had dawned, someone came in saying: “A very great multitude is waiting in the court, and in their midst stands Simon, wishing to preoccupy the ears of the people with very wicked persuasions.” And Peter at once went out and stood in the place where he had disputed the day before, and all the people turned to him and attended to him with joy. But when Simon perceived that the people rejoiced at the sight of Peter and were moved to affection for him, he said in confusion: “I wonder at the folly of men, who call me a magician and love Peter, though, having long known me, they ought rather to love me. And therefore from this sign those who have sense can understand that Peter may rather seem to be the magician, since affection is not paid to me, to whom it is almost due from long acquaintance, but is lavished on him, to whom it is due by no familiarity.”
3.13PG 1:1289a–1289b
Et cum multa hujuscemodi Simon diceret, Petrus salutato ex more populo ita respondit: Sufficit unicuique, o Simon, ad confutandum conscientia sua; quod si hoc miraris, quod noti non solum te non diligunt sed et oderunt tui, causam disce a me. Cum sis seductor, veritatem te praedicare profiteris, ob hoc plures desiderium gerentes discendae veritatis amicos habuisti. Sed hi ubi contraria in te quam profitebaris viderunt, quia amatores erant, ut dixi, veritatis, non solum non diligere te, sed et odisse coeperunt. Non autem statim ab eis desertus es, quia vel pollicebaris adhuc te eis ostendere posse, quod verum est. Donec ergo nondum aderat qui posset ostendere, patiebantur te, ubi vero spes eis doctrinae melioris arrisit, te contemnentes quod melius intelligunt nosse desiderant. Et tu quidem nefariis artibus agens, ab exordio latere te posse credidisti, sed non lates; urgeris enim et contra spem publicaris, quia non solum ignorasti veritatem, sed nec audire voluisti ab his qui eam sciebant. Si enim audire voluisses, innotuisset utique tibi ille sermo ejus qui ait, quia nihil est occultum quod non agnoscatur, neque opertum quod non reveletur.
And when Simon was saying many such things, Peter, having greeted the people as usual, answered thus: “Each one's own conscience is enough, Simon, to refute him; but if you wonder at this, that those who know you not only do not love you but even hate you, learn the reason from me. Though you are a seducer, you profess to preach the truth; for this reason you had many friends who desired to learn the truth. But when they saw in you things contrary to what you professed, since, as I said, they were lovers of truth, they began not only not to love you but to hate you. Yet you were not at once deserted by them, because you still promised that you could show them what is true. So as long as no one was present who could show it, they put up with you; but when the hope of better teaching smiled on them, they despised you and desire to know what they understand to be better. And you, acting by wicked arts, believed at first that you could escape notice; but you do not; for you are pressed and, against your hope, exposed, because you not only did not know the truth but would not even hear it from those who knew it. For if you had been willing to hear, that saying of his would surely have become known to you, who said that nothing is hidden that will not be known, nor covered that will not be revealed.”
3.14PG 1:1289b
Haec et his similia dicente Petro, Simon respondit: Nolo me verbis occupes, Petre, repeto abs te quae hesterno promiseras; dicebas enim ostendere te posse, quia lex doceat de immensitate lucis aeternae, et quod duo tantum sint coeli et ipsi creati, sed superius esse lucis illius sedem, in qua solus in aeternum residet ineffabilis Pater; ad illius vero coeli similitudinem factum esse etiam istud visibile caelum, quod et transiturum confirmabas. Unum ergo dixisti esse Patrem omnium, quia non possunt duo esse immensi, alioqui neuter eorum immensus erit, quia in eo quo alter subsistit, alteri finem subsistendi facit. Si ergo haec non tantum polliceris, sed et ostendere potes ex lege, omittens plura loqui hinc incipe. Et Petrus: Si propter te, inquit, qui ad contradicendum tantummodo venis, rogarer de his dicere, nunquam me unum saltem posses audire sermonem, sed quoniam necesse est agricolam, qui vult bonam terram seminare, nonnulla semina perdere aut in petrosis, aut in his quae ab hominibus conculcanda sunt, vel in dumosis ac repletis sentibus locis, sicut et Magister noster exposuit diversitatem propositi uniuscujusque animae per haec indicans, non morabor.
While Peter was saying these and similar things, Simon answered: “I do not want you to keep me busy with words, Peter; I demand from you what you promised yesterday. For you said you could show that the law teaches about the immensity of the eternal light, and that there are only two heavens, and these created, but that the higher is the seat of that light, in which the ineffable Father alone dwells forever; and that after the likeness of that heaven this visible heaven too was made, which you also affirmed will pass away. You said, then, that the Father of all is one, because there cannot be two immense beings; otherwise neither of them will be immense, because in that in which the one subsists he sets a limit to the subsistence of the other. If, then, you not only promise these things but can also show them from the law, leave off saying more and begin from here.” And Peter said: “If I were asked to speak about these things for your sake, who come only to contradict, you would never hear even one word from me; but since a farmer who wishes to sow good ground must lose some seeds, either on rocky places, or on places to be trodden by men, or in thorny places full of briers—as our Master too explained, indicating by these the different dispositions of each soul—I will not delay.”
3.15PG 1:1289b–1290b
Tum Simon: Videris mihi, inquit, irasci; quod si est, non necesse est inire conflictum. Et Petrus: Video te sentire quod arguendus sis, et vis urbane subterfugere certamen; nam quid vidisti, me iratum fecisse in te hominem tantum populum decipere cupientem, et cum nihil habeas quod dicas, modestiam simulantem? qui et auctoritate tua jubes, ut quomodo ipse vis et non quomodo ordo postulat, controversia moveatur. Et Simon: Imperabo mihi ipsi patientia uti ad imperitiam tuam, ut ostendam te quidem velle populum seducere, me autem docere quae vera sunt. Sed nunc omitto de immensa luce discutere, quod interrogo te, hoc mihi responde: Cum Deus fecerit universa, ut tu dicis, unde est malum? Et Petrus: Hoc modo interrogare non est adversantis, sed discentis. Si ergo vis discere, confitere, et prius te doceam quomodo debeas discere, et cum didiceris audire, tunc jam te incipiam consequenter docere. Si vero non vis discere tanquam sciens omnia, ego prius expono fidem quam praedico, expone et tu quod tibi verum videtur, et cum manifesta fuerit utriusque professio, judicetur ab auditoribus cujus nostrum sermo sit veritate subnixus. Et Simon ad haec respondit: Risus mihi est, ecce qui promittit quod me doceat. Verumtamen patiar te et imperitiam tuam atque arrogantiam feram. Confiteor, discere volo, videamus quomodo me poteris docere.
Then Simon said: “You seem to me to be angry; and if so, there is no need to enter into the contest.” And Peter said: “I see that you perceive that you are going to be refuted, and you wish politely to escape the contest. For what have you seen that should have made me angry with you—a man who wishes to deceive so great a people and, when he has nothing to say, feigns moderation, and who also commands by his own authority that the controversy be conducted as he himself wishes and not as order demands?” And Simon said: “I will command myself to be patient with your ignorance, so as to show that you wish to seduce the people, but that I teach what is true. But now I leave off discussing the immense light; answer me what I ask you: since God made all things, as you say, whence is evil?” And Peter said: “To ask in this way is not the part of an opponent but of a learner. If, then, you wish to learn, confess it, and I will first teach you how you ought to learn; and when you have learned to listen, then I will begin to teach you in order. But if you do not wish to learn, as one who knows everything, I will first set out the faith I preach; you too set out what seems true to you; and when the profession of each of us has been made plain, let the hearers judge whose discourse rests on truth.” And Simon answered to this: “That is a joke: here is one who promises to teach me! Nevertheless I will put up with you and bear your ignorance and arrogance. I confess it: I wish to learn; let us see how you can teach me.”
3.16PG 1:1290b
Et Petrus: Si, inquit, vere vis discere, disce hoc primum, quam imperite interrogaveris; ais enim, cum Deus universa creaverit, unde est malum? Ante enim quam hoc rogares, tres interrogandi species praecedebant. Primo, si est malum; secundo, quid sit malum; tertio, cui sit, et unde. Ad haec Simon: O imperitissime, inquit, et ineruditissime, estne hominum quisquam qui non confiteatur, quia sit in hac vita malum? Unde et ego putans te vel communem omnium habere sensum, interrogavi unde sit malum, non ut discere volens, qui omnia sciam, abs te praecipue qui nihil noveris, sed ut te ostendam ignarum esse omnium. Et ne putes quia iratus sum quod ita tecum austerius loquor, miseratio me habet horum qui adsunt, quos tu decipere conaris. Et Petrus ait: Multum malus es, si tantas injurias non iratus facis; sed impossibile est fumum non consurgere, ubi ignis est. Verumtamen dicam, ne te verbis videar occupare, quominus ad ea quae abs te inconvenienter sunt dicta, respondeam. Ais omnes fateri quia sit malum, quod utique falsum est; nam primo omnium quia subsistat malum, universa Hebraeorum negat gens.
And Peter said: “If you truly wish to learn, learn this first: how ignorantly you have asked. For you say, ‘Since God created all things, whence is evil?’ But before you asked this, three kinds of question should have come first: first, whether evil exists; second, what evil is; third, to whom it belongs, and whence it comes.” To this Simon said: “O most ignorant and most uneducated man, is there anyone who does not confess that there is evil in this life? Hence I, thinking that you had at least the common sense of all men, asked whence evil is—not wishing to learn, I who know everything, least of all from you, who know nothing, but to show you ignorant of everything. And lest you think that I speak to you so harshly because I am angry: I am moved by pity for those present, whom you are trying to deceive.” And Peter said: “You are very wicked if you do such great wrongs without being angry; but it is impossible for smoke not to rise where there is fire. Nevertheless I will speak, lest I seem to keep you busy with words so as to avoid answering what you have said unfittingly. You say that all confess that evil exists, which is certainly false; for, first of all, the whole nation of the Hebrews denies that evil subsists.”
3.17PG 1:1290b–1291a
Et Simon, interrupto ejus sermone: Recte, inquit, faciunt qui dicunt non esse malum. Et Petrus: Non de hoc nunc proposuimus dicere, sed quia non omnes dicunt esse malum. Secundum autem erat interrogare te, quid est malum, substantia, an accidens, an actus? sed et alia multa hujusmodi. Et post haec, erga quid vel quomodo sit, aut cui sit malum, utrum Deo an angelis, an hominibus, piis an impiis, omnibus an aliquibus, an sibi ipsi, an nulli. Et tunc interrogares unde sit, utrumnam a Deo, an ex nihilo, semperne fuerit, an ex tempore coeperit, utile sit an inutile, et alia multa quae hujuscemodi propositio exigit. Ad haec Simon respondit: Ignosce mihi, erravi de prima interrogatione, sed puta me nunc primum interrogare, est malum an non?
And Simon, interrupting him, said: “They do rightly who say that there is no evil.” And Peter said: “We did not now propose to speak of this, but only that not all say there is evil. The second thing was to ask you what evil is: a substance, an accident, or an act? And many other things of this kind. And after this, in respect of what and how it is, or to whom evil belongs: to God or to angels or to men, to the godly or the ungodly, to all or to some, to itself or to none. And then you might ask whence it is: from God or from nothing; whether it always was, or began in time; whether it is useful or useless; and many other things that such a question requires.” To this Simon answered: “Forgive me; I erred in the first question. But suppose that I now ask first: does evil exist or not?”
3.18PG 1:1291a–1291b
Et Petrus ait: Quomodo interrogas, quasi discere volens an docere, an quaestionis movendae gratia? Si quidem quasi discere volens, habeo quod te prius doceam, ut per consequentiam et ordinem doctrinae veniens, ex te ipso intelligas quid sit malum. Si vero ut docens proponis, non indigeo abs te doceri, habeo enim magistrum a quo omnia didici. Quod si quaestionis movendae et disputandi gratia, uterque nostrum prius quod sibi videtur, exponat et ita certamen habeatur. Neque enim verum est ut interroges quasi discere volens, et contradicas ut docens, ut post responsionem meam in tuo judicio sit dicere, si bene an male dixerim. Propter quod non potes in loco contradicentis stans judex esse eorum quae dicimus; et ideo, ut dixi, si certamen habendum est, uterque nostrum quod sentit exponat, et nobis in conflictu positis religiosi auditores hi justi judices erunt.
And Peter said: “How do you ask—as one wishing to learn, or to teach, or for the sake of raising a question? If as one wishing to learn, I have something to teach you first, so that, coming through the sequence and order of teaching, you may understand of yourself what evil is. But if you put it forward as one teaching, I have no need to be taught by you; for I have a master from whom I have learned everything. But if for the sake of raising a question and disputing, let each of us first set out what seems right to him, and so let the contest be held. For it is not right that you should ask as one wishing to learn and contradict as one teaching, so that after my answer it should be up to your judgment to say whether I have spoken well or badly. Therefore you cannot stand in the place of one who contradicts and be judge of what we say; and so, as I said, if there is to be a contest, let each of us set out what he thinks, and while we are engaged in the conflict, these devout hearers will be just judges.”
3.19PG 1:1291b–1291d
Et Simon: Non tibi videtur absurdum ut imperitus populus de nostris dictis habeat judicium? Et Petrus: Non ita est, quod enim uni fortasse minus liquet, investigari a plurimis poterit, nam saepe etiam fama vulgi prophetiae speciem tenet. Super haec autem omnia, praesens hic omnis populus amore Dei constrictus hic astat, verique cognoscendi gratia, et ideo omnes isti quasi unus habendus est, pro uno eodemque erga amorem veritatis affectu, sicut e contrario duo inter se si dissentiant, multi sunt et diversi. Si autem vis indicium capere, quomodo omnis hic populus qui astat quasi unus sit homo, ex silentio ejus ipso et quiete considera, quomodo cum omni patientia ut vides, etiam antequam discant, veritati Dei honorem deferunt. Nerulum enim majorem cultum, que'“ θξ “Ferre spero de clementia Dei, quod religiosum propositum mentis eorum amplectetur erga se, et veritatem praedicanti victoriae palmam dabit, ut manifestum eis faciat veritatis praeconem.
And Simon said: “Does it not seem absurd to you that an ignorant crowd should judge our words?” And Peter said: “It is not so; for what is perhaps less clear to one person can be investigated by many; indeed, even popular rumor often has the appearance of prophecy. Above all this, all this people present stands here bound by the love of God and for the sake of knowing the truth; and therefore all of them are to be regarded as one, because of one and the same affection toward the love of truth, just as, on the contrary, two who disagree with each other are many and diverse. And if you wish to take a sign of how all this people standing here is like one man, consider it from their very silence and quiet—how, with all patience, as you see, they pay honor to the truth of God even before they learn it; for they have not yet learned the greater worship they owe it. I hope, then, from the clemency of God, that he will embrace the devout purpose of their mind toward him, and will give the palm of victory to the one who preaches the truth, so as to make the herald of truth manifest to them.”
3.20PG 1:1291d–1292b
Tum Simon: De quo. inquit, vis haberi certamen? dic, ut et ego definiam quod mihi videtur, et ita quaestio incipiat. Et Petrus respondit: Si quidem ut mihi videtur facere vis, ego secundum magistri mei praeceptum fieri volo, qui primo omnium Hebraeae genti, quam sciebat habere cognitionem Dei et quod ipse esset qui fecerit mundum, praecepit, non ut eum quaereret quem sciebat, sed voluntatem ejus justitiamque perquireret sciens, quia in hominum arbitrio positum est, ut hoc quaerentes inveniant et faciant atque observent ea de quibus judicandi sunt. Et ideo jussit nos quaerere, non unde sit malum, ut tu paulo ante requirebas, sed justitiam boni Dei regnumque ejus, et omnia, inquit, haec adjiciantur vobis. Et Simon: Quoniam, inquit, Hebraeis ista mandantur velut recte scientibus Deum et opinantibus, quod unusquisque in suo arbitrio habeat agere ea, de quibus judicandus est, mihi autem ab illis discrepat sententia, unde vis ut incipiam?
Then Simon said: “On what do you wish the contest to be held? Say, so that I too may define what seems right to me, and so the inquiry may begin.” And Peter answered: “If you wish to do as seems right to me, I wish it to be done according to the precept of my master, who first of all commanded the Hebrew nation—which he knew had knowledge of God and knew that he was the one who made the world—not to seek him whom they knew, but, knowing him, to search out his will and righteousness, because it is placed in men's choice that, seeking these, they may find, and do, and keep the things on which they are to be judged. And therefore he commanded us to seek not whence evil is, as you were asking a little earlier, but the righteousness of the good God and his kingdom; ‘and all these things,’ he said, ‘will be added to you.’” And Simon said: “Since these things are commanded to the Hebrews, as rightly knowing God and thinking that each has it in his own choice to do the things on which he is to be judged, while my opinion differs from theirs, where do you wish me to begin?”
3.21PG 1:1292b
Tum Petrus: Ego, inquit, suadeo primo quaerendum esse, si in potestate nostra est scire unde judicandi simus. Et Simon: Non ita, inquit, sed de Deo, unde et omnes qui praesto sunt audire cupiunt. Et Petrus: Constat ergo apud te, quia est aliquid in arbitrii potestate; fatere hoc tantum si est, et requiramus ut dicis, de Deo. Simon ad haec respondit: Nequaquam. Et Petrus: Si ergo nihil est in nostra potestate, superfluum est nos quaerere aliquid de Deo, cum in potestate non sit quaerentibus invenire. Unde bene dixeram hoc primo quaerendum esse, si est aliquid in arbitrii potestate. Tum Simon: Non possumus, inquit, ne hoc ipsum quidem intelligere quod dicis, si est aliquid in arbitrii potestate. At Petrus videns quod ad partem se contentiosiorem declinat, superari metuens, ut quasi incertum confundat omnia, respondit: Quomodo ergo scis, quia non est in hominis potestate scire aliquid, cum hoc ipsum scias?
Then Peter said: “I advise that we first ask whether it is in our power to know on what we are to be judged.” And Simon said: “Not so, but about God, which is also what all who are present wish to hear.” And Peter said: “You agree, then, that something is in the power of choice; only confess this, if it is so, and let us inquire, as you say, about God.” Simon answered: “By no means.” And Peter said: “If, then, nothing is in our power, it is superfluous for us to inquire anything about God, since it is not in the power of those who seek to find. Hence I rightly said that this should be asked first, whether anything is in the power of choice.” Then Simon said: “We cannot understand even this very thing that you say, whether anything is in the power of choice.” But Peter, seeing that he was turning to the more contentious side, and that, for fear of being overcome, he was confusing everything as uncertain, answered: “How, then, do you know that it is not in man's power to know anything, since you know this very thing?”
3.22PG 1:1292b–1293b
Et Simon: Nescio, inquit, si vel hoc ipsum sciam; unusquisque enim sicut ei fato decernitur, vel agit aliquid vel intelligit vel patitur. Tum Petrus: Videte, inquit, fratres, in quae absurda deciderit Simon, qui ante meum adventum docebat, quod homines in potestate haberent et sapere et facere quae vellent, nunc in angustum redactus necessitate verborum, negat esse in hominis potestate aut sentiendi aliquid aut agendi, et tamen audet se doctorem profiteri. Sed dic, quomodo ergo Deus judicat secundum veritatem unumquemque pro actibus suis, si agere aliquid in potestate non habuit? Hoc si teneatur, convulsa sunt omnia, frustra erit studium sectandi meliora, sed et judices saeculi frustra legibus praesunt et puniunt eos qui male agunt; non enim in sua potestate habuerunt, ut non peccarent. Vana erunt et jura populorum, quae malis actibus poenas statuunt; miseri erunt et hi qui servant cum labore justitiam, beati vero illi qui in deliciis positi, cum luxuria et scelere viventes tyrannidem tenent. Secundum haec ergo nec justitia erit, nec bonitas, nec ulla virtus, et, ut vis, nec Deus. Sed haec, o Simon, cur dixeris scio; volens profecto effugere quaestiones, ne possis manifestius confutari, et ideo ais non esse in potestate hominis sentire aliquid aut invenire. Si enim vere hoc ita sensisses, non utique etiam ante adventum meum apud populum te profitereris doctorem. Ego igitur dico sui esse arbitrii hominem. Et Simon: Quid est sui arbitrii? dic nobis. Petrus ad haec: Si nihil potest disci, cur et audire vis? Et Simon: Nihil habes ad hoc quod respondeas?
And Simon said: “I do not know whether I know even this; for each one, as it is decreed for him by fate, either does or understands or suffers something.” Then Peter said: “See, brethren, into what absurdities Simon has fallen, who before my arrival taught that men had it in their power both to know and to do what they wished, and now, driven into a corner by the necessity of words, denies that it is in man's power either to perceive or to do anything; and yet he dares to profess himself a teacher. But tell me: how, then, does God judge each one according to truth for his deeds, if he did not have it in his power to do anything? If this is held, everything is overturned; the effort to pursue better things will be in vain; the judges of this world, too, preside over the laws in vain and punish those who do evil, for they did not have it in their own power not to sin. The laws of peoples which set penalties for evil deeds will also be vain; wretched will be those who keep righteousness with labor, and blessed those who, set in pleasures, living in luxury and crime, hold tyranny. According to this, then, there will be neither righteousness, nor goodness, nor any virtue, nor, as you would have it, God. But I know why you said this, Simon: surely because you wish to escape the questions, so that you cannot be refuted more plainly; and so you say that it is not in man's power to perceive or discover anything. For if you had truly thought so, you would certainly not have professed yourself a teacher among the people before my arrival. I say, then, that man is of free choice.” And Simon said: “What is free choice? Tell us.” Peter answered: “If nothing can be learned, why do you wish to hear?” And Simon said: “Have you nothing to answer to this?”
3.23PG 1:1293b
Tum Petrus: Dicam, non a te compulsus, sed ab auditoribus rogatus. Arbitrii potestas est sensus animae, habens virtutem, qua possit ad quos velit actus inclinari. Tum Simon collaudans Petrum super his quae dixerat: Vere, inquit, magnifice et incomparabiliter exposuisti, bene enim dicenti tibi debeo testimonium dare: hoc tamen quod te interrogo nunc si exposueris mihi, in caeteris omnibus obtemperabo tibi; quod ergo volo discere hoc est: Si quod Deus vult esse, est; et si quod non vult esse, non est? de hoc responde mihi. Et Petrus: Si ignoras quod absurde et incompetenter interroges, ignoscens tibi ipse exponam; si autem scis quod inconsequenter interrogas, non recte facis. Tum Simon: Juro, inquit, ipsam quaecunque illa est summam Divinitatem, quae habet judicium et vindictam in eos qui peccant, quia ignoro quid incompetenter dixerim et quid in verbis meis habeatur absurdum, in his duntaxat quae proposui.
Then Peter said: “I will speak, not compelled by you, but asked by the hearers. The power of choice is a faculty of the soul, having a power by which it can be inclined toward whatever acts it wishes.” Then Simon, praising Peter for what he had said, said: “Truly you have explained it magnificently and incomparably; for I owe you testimony when you speak well. But if you now explain to me what I ask you, I will obey you in everything else. What I wish to learn is this: if what God wills to be, is, and what he does not will to be, is not? Answer me on this.” And Peter said: “If you do not know how absurd and unfitting your question is, I will forgive you and explain it to you myself; but if you know that you are asking inconsistently, you do not act rightly.” Then Simon said: “I swear by that supreme Divinity, whatever it is, which judges and punishes those who sin, that I do not know what I said unfittingly, or what is absurd in my words, at least in what I have put forward.”
3.24PG 1:1293b–1294d
Ad haec Petrus: Quoniam, inquit, te ignorare confessus es, disce. Interrogatio tua duobus sibi invicem contrariis unam sententiam postulavit. Etenim omnis motus in duas partes dividitur, ut quaedam necessitate, quaedam voluntate moveantur, et ea quidem quae necessitas movet semper in motu sunt, quae vero voluntas non semper. Ut verbi gratia dicam, solis motus necessitate ducitur ut statutum compleat cursum, omnisque status coeli et ministeria necessariis motibus constant. Homo vero actuum suorum motus voluntarios gerit. Et ideo alia sunt, quae ob hoc creata sunt, ut in ministeriis suis necessitate deserviant, nec facere aliud quidpiam possint nisi quod eis statutum est, cum autem expleverint ministerium, Creator omnium qui ita constituit ea prout voluerit, conservat ea. Alia vero sunt, ubi potestas est voluntatis, et in quibus agendi quae velint liberum habetur arbitrium. Haec, ut dixi, non semper in eo ordine quo creata sunt permanent, sed prout voluntas duxerit et animi judicium declinaverit, sive bonis sive malis student; et ideo bene agentibus munera posuit, male agentibus poenas.
To this Peter said: “Since you have confessed that you do not know, learn. Your question demanded one answer for two things contrary to each other. For every motion is divided into two kinds, so that some things are moved by necessity and some by will; and the things which necessity moves are always in motion, but those which will moves are not always. To give an example: the motion of the sun is driven by necessity to complete its appointed course, and every state and service of heaven consists of necessary motions. But man conducts the motions of his acts voluntarily. And therefore there are some things which were created for this purpose, to serve in their ministries by necessity, and they can do nothing other than what has been appointed for them; and when they have fulfilled their ministry, the Creator of all, who so arranged them, preserves them as he wills. But there are other things in which there is power of will and free choice to do what they wish. These, as I said, do not always remain in the order in which they were created, but according as the will leads and the judgment of the mind inclines, they pursue either good or evil; and therefore he has set rewards for those who do well and penalties for those who do evil.”
3.25PG 1:1294d–1294b
Ais ergo tu, si Deus vult aliquid esse et est, et si non vult non est; scilicet ut si responderem quia quod vult et est, quod autem non vult non est, diceres: Ergo ipse vult esse mala quae in hoc mundo geruntur, quia omne quod vult hoc et est, quod autem non vult non est. Si vero respondissem non esse hoc, ut quod vult Deus sit, et quod non vult non sit, tum retorto sermone diceres: Ergo impossibilis est Deus, si quod vult non potest, et existeres petulantior, ut qui nihil rectum dixeris, vicisse te crederes. Et ideo ignoras, o Simon, et valde ignoras, quomodo in singulis quibusque voluntas sit Dei. Quaedam enim voluit, ut diximus, ita esse, ut aliud esse non possent quam id quod ab ipso instituta sunt, et his neque praemia neque supplicia statuit; ea vero quae ita esse voluit, ut in sua potestate habeant agere quod velint, his pro actibus ac voluntatibus suis statuit, ut aut remunerationes mereantur aut poenas. Cum ergo in duas ut edocui partes dividantur cuncta quae moventur, secundum eam quam supra diximus distinctionem, omne quod vult Deus est, quod autem non vult non est.
“You say, then, ‘If God wills something to be, it is; and if he does not will it, it is not’—evidently so that, if I answered that what he wills is and what he does not will is not, you would say: ‘Then he himself wills the evils that are done in this world to be, since everything he wills is, and what he does not will is not.’ But if I had answered that it is not so—that what God wills is, and what he does not will is not—then, turning the argument round, you would say: ‘Then God is powerless, if he cannot do what he wills’; and you would become more insolent, believing you had won, though you had said nothing right. And therefore you do not know, Simon, you greatly do not know, how the will of God works in each thing. For some things, as we said, he willed to be such that they could be nothing other than what they were established by him to be, and for these he set neither rewards nor punishments; but those which he willed to be such that they have it in their power to do what they wish, he appointed, according to their acts and wills, to deserve either rewards or punishments. Since, then, all things that are moved are divided into two kinds, as I have taught, according to the distinction we made above, everything that God wills is, and what he does not will is not.”
3.26PG 1:1294b–1295b
Et Simon ad haec: Nonne poterat nos omnes facere tales ut essemus boni, et aliud esse non possemus? Petrus respondet: Et hoc absurde interrogas. Si enim nos inconvertibilis naturae fecisset et immobiles a bono, non essemus vere boni, quia aliud esse non possemus; et non erat nostri propositi quod eramus boni, nec nostrum erat quod agebamus sed necessitatis naturae. Quomodo ergo hoc bonum dicetur, quod ex proposito non agitur? Ob hoc autem et prolixioribus indiguit mundus iste temporibus, donec animarum quae praedestinatae sunt, ad expletionem ejus numerus impleretur, et tunc istud quidem visibile coelum revolveretur ut liber, illud vero quod est superius appareret, et animae beatorum corporibus suis redditae inducerentur in lucem, impiorum vero animae pro immundis actibus suis spiritu flammeo circumdatae, in profundum ignis inexstinguibilis mergerentur, per saeculum expensurae supplicia. Haec autem ita esse verus nobis propheta testatus est, de quo si vis agnoscere quia propheta sit, innumeris assertionibus edocebo. Ex his enim quae ab eo dicta sunt, et nunc singula quae dixit implentur; etiam ea quae futura dixit, creduntur implenda, fides enim futuris ex his quae jam gesta sunt datur.
And Simon said to this: “Could he not have made us all such that we were good and could be nothing else?” Peter answered: “This too you ask absurdly. For if he had made us of an unchangeable nature, immovable from the good, we would not truly be good, because we could be nothing else; our being good would not come from our purpose, and what we did would not be ours, but of the necessity of nature. How, then, can that be called good which is not done by purpose? For this reason, too, this world needed long periods of time, until the number of souls predestined to fill it should be completed; and then this visible heaven would be rolled up like a scroll and that which is higher would appear; the souls of the blessed, restored to their bodies, would be brought into the light; while the souls of the wicked, surrounded for their unclean deeds by a fiery spirit, would be plunged into the depth of unquenchable fire, to pay its punishments through the age. That these things are so the true Prophet has testified to us; and if you wish to recognize that he is a prophet, I will teach you by innumerable proofs. For of the things he said, each one is even now being fulfilled; and the things he said would come are believed to be going to be fulfilled, since belief in future things is given by those which have already been done.”
3.27PG 1:1295b–1295a
At Simon cui compertum erat, Petrum de prophetia titulo dilucide assignare rationem, ex quo quaestio omnis absolvitur, sermonem de hoc fieri declinavit, et respondens ait: Ad ea quae volo responde mihi et dic, si visibile istud, ut ais, caelum resolvetur, cur ex initio factum est? Respondit Petrus: Propter hominum praesentem hanc factum est vitam, ut esset interjectio quaedam et divisio, ne quis forte indignus habitationem coelestium et Dei ipsius sedem videret, quae his solis qui mundo corde sunt videnda praeparantur. Nunc autem, id est agonis tempore, invisibilia esse placuit ea, quae vincentibus ad praemium destinata sunt. Et Simon ait: Si conditor bonus est et mundus bonus, quomodo bonus bona dissolvet aliquando? Si autem dissolvet quod bonum est, quomodo ipse bonus videbitur? Si autem quasi malum resolvet et destruet, quomodo non videbitur malus qui malum fecit?
But Simon, who knew that Peter was clearly giving an account from the head of prophecy, by which every question is resolved, declined to have the discussion turn to this, and answering said: “Answer me on what I wish, and tell me: if this visible heaven, as you say, will be dissolved, why was it made in the beginning?” Peter answered: “It was made on account of this present life of men, so that there might be a certain partition and division, lest perhaps someone unworthy should see the dwelling of the heavenly ones and the seat of God himself, which are prepared to be seen only by those who are pure in heart. But now, that is, in the time of contest, it has pleased him that the things destined as a prize for the victors should be invisible.” And Simon said: “If the creator is good and the world is good, how will the good one one day dissolve good things? And if he dissolves what is good, how will he himself seem good? But if he dissolves and destroys it as evil, how will he not seem evil, who made what is evil?”
3.28PG 1:1295a
Petrus ad haec: Quoniam, inquit, spopondimus tibi, ne blasphemantem te fugiamus, ipse enim reddes pro his quae loqueris rationem, patienter ferimus. Audi ergo nunc: Caelum istud quod visibile est et pertransit, si quidem propter semetipsum factum esset, haberet fortasse quod dicis aliquid rationis, quia resolvi minime deberet. Si vero propter aliud quid factum est et non propter se, necessario solvetur, ut illud pro quo factum videtur appareat. Sicut verbi gratia dixerim, testa ovorum quamvis pulchre facta et diligenter formata videatur, necesse est tamen eam frangi et resolvi, ut inde pullus procedat et illud, pro quo totius ovi forma expressa videtur, appareat. Ita ergo et hujus mundi necesse est transire statum, ut status ille sublimior regni coelestis effulgeat.
Peter answered: “Since we promised you not to flee from you when you blaspheme—for you yourself will render account for what you say—we bear it patiently. Hear, then, now: if this heaven which is visible and passes away had been made for its own sake, what you say would perhaps have some reason, that it ought not to be dissolved. But if it was made for the sake of something else and not for itself, it must necessarily be dissolved, so that that for which it seems to have been made may appear. As, for example, the shell of an egg, however beautifully made and carefully formed it seems, must nevertheless be broken and opened, so that the chick may come forth from it and that for which the form of the whole egg seems to have been shaped may appear. So also the state of this world must pass away, so that that loftier state of the heavenly kingdom may shine forth.”
3.29PG 1:1295a–1296a
Et Simon: Non mihi videtur quia resolvi possit coelum, quod a Deo factum est. Ab aeterno enim aeterna fiunt, a corruptibili temporalia et caduca. Et Petrus: Non ita est, sed a mortalibus quidem omnimodis corruptibilia fiunt et temporalia; ab aeterno vero non semper corruptibilia neque semper incorruptibilia, sed prout voluerit creator Deus, ita et erunt illa quae creat. Neque enim sub lege est virtus Dei, sed lex creaturis suis voluntas ejus est. Respondit et Simon: Revoco te, inquit, ad primam quaestionem, dixisti Deum nunc quidem nulli esse visibilem, cum vero resolutum fuerit coelum istud et supernus ille status regni caelestis obfulserit, tunc eos qui mundi sunt corde, etiam Deum visuros; quae sententia contraria est legi, ibi enim scriptum est Deum dixisse: Nemo videbit faciem meam et vivet.
And Simon said: “It does not seem to me that the heaven made by God can be dissolved. For eternal things are made by the eternal one, temporal and perishable things by a corruptible one.” And Peter said: “It is not so. By mortal beings, indeed, things wholly corruptible and temporal are made; but by the eternal one, things are made neither always corruptible nor always incorruptible, but as God the creator wills, so will the things he creates be. For the power of God is not under law, but his will is law to his creatures.” Simon answered: “I call you back to the first question. You said that God is now visible to no one, but that when this heaven has been dissolved and that higher state of the heavenly kingdom has shone forth, then those who are pure in heart will see God. This opinion is contrary to the law; for there it is written that God said: ‘No one shall see my face and live.’”
3.30PG 1:1296a
Et Petrus respondit: His qui legem non ex traditione Moysi legunt, contrarius videtur sermo meus, sed audi quomodo non sit contrarius. Deus videtur mente non corpore, spiritu non carne. Unde et angeli qui sunt spiritus, vident Deum, et homines ergo donec homines sunt, Deum videre non possunt. Ex resurrectione autem mortuorum, cum facti fuerint sicut angeli, videre poterunt Deum. Et hoc modo non est sermo meus legi contrarius, neque illud quod magister meus dixit: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt. Futurum enim tempus ostendit, in quo ex hominibus angeli fient, qui in spiritu mentis Deum videbunt. Post haec autem verba multaque alia his similia, cum juramentis pluribus affirmare Simon coepit dicens: De hoc mihi solo rationem redde, si immortalis est anima, et obsequar in omnibus voluntati tuae, sed crastino, inquit, nam hodie jam tardum est. Ubi ergo coepit dicere Petrus, Simon egressus est et cum ipso perpauci ex sodalibus ejus, et hoc prae verecundia. Caeteri vero omnes ad Petrum conversi, genibus positis, prosternebant se ante eum, ex quibus aliquanti diversis languoribus astricti aut daemonibus incursati, oratione Petri sanabantur et discedebant gaudentes, quasi veri Dei doctrinam, simul et misericordiam consecuti. Cum ergo abscessissent turbae, et soli familiares ejus remansissemus cum eo, stratis humi redditis accubuimus solitum unusquisque recognoscens locum, sumptoque cibo cum gratias egissemus Deo, quievimus.
And Peter answered: “To those who read the law not according to the tradition of Moses, my word seems contrary; but hear how it is not contrary. God is seen by the mind, not by the body; by the spirit, not by the flesh. Hence the angels too, who are spirits, see God; and therefore men, as long as they are men, cannot see God. But after the resurrection of the dead, when they have become like the angels, they will be able to see God. And in this way my word is not contrary to the law, nor is what my master said: ‘Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.’ For he points to a future time in which angels will be made out of men, who will see God in the spirit of the mind.” After these words and many others like them, Simon began to affirm with many oaths: “Give me an account of this one thing only, whether the soul is immortal, and I will comply with your will in everything; but tomorrow,” he said, “for today it is already late.” So when Peter began to speak, Simon went out, and with him very few of his companions, and that out of shame. But all the rest turned to Peter and, bending their knees, prostrated themselves before him; and some of them, bound by various sicknesses or assailed by demons, were healed by Peter's prayer and went away rejoicing, as having obtained both the teaching and the mercy of the true God. When the crowds had gone and only we, his intimates, remained with him, the places on the ground having been laid out again, we reclined, each recognizing his usual place; and having taken food and given thanks to God, we rested.
3.31PG 1:1296a–1297a
Sequenti vero die Petrus ex more ante lucem surgens, jam nos invenit vigilantes et paratos ad audiendum, atque ita exorsus est: Deprecor vos, fratres et conservi mei, ut si quis forte vestrum non potest vigilare, non sibi extorqueat erubescens praesentiam meam, quia difficilis est subita permutatio, longo autem tempore si paulatim assuescat, labor non erit quod ex usu venit. Non enim omnes ejusdem institutionis fuimus, licet processu temporis in unam temperari consuetudinem poterimus; aiunt enim, quod secundum naturae locum obtineat consuetudo. Testem autem Deum invoco, quod non indignor, si quis forte non potest vigilare, sed hoc magis, si cum totam quis noctem dormiat, per diem non replet id quod omisit in nocte. Necessarium namque est doctrinae studiis intente et indesinenter operam dare, ut mens nostra Dei solius memoria repleatur, quia mentem quam repleverit memoria Dei, maligno in ea non dabitur locus.
On the following day Peter, rising before dawn as usual, found us already awake and ready to listen, and began thus: “I entreat you, brethren and fellow servants, that if any of you perhaps cannot stay awake, he should not force himself out of embarrassment at my presence; for a sudden change is difficult, but if one grows accustomed gradually over a long time, what comes from habit will not be a labor. We were not all brought up in the same way, though in course of time we shall be able to be shaped into one habit; for they say that habit holds the place of a second nature. I call God to witness that I am not displeased if anyone perhaps cannot stay awake, but rather if someone sleeps the whole night and does not make up by day what he omitted in the night. For we must give attention to the study of doctrine intently and unceasingly, so that our mind may be filled with the remembrance of God alone; because in the mind which the remembrance of God has filled, no room will be given to the evil one.”
3.32PG 1:1297a–1297b
Cum haec diceret ad nos Petrus, unusquisque nostrum sollicite satisfaciebat ei, quod olim brevi somno satiati vigilaremus, sed vereremur excitare eum, quia nec deceret discipulos magistro imperare; quod tamen pene, o Petre, ausi fueramus praesumere, dum cor nostrum nimio verborum tuorum desiderio tripudians, somnum penitus fugaret ab oculis. Sed iterum affectus erga te noster obstitit, et violenter te a nobis non tulit excitari. Tum Petrus: Quoniam igitur audiendi, inquit, desiderio libenter vos asseritis vigilare, volo vobis ea tantum quae hesterno sparsim dicta sunt, repetere diligentius et cum suo ordine explicare. Quod et per singulas quasque disputationes diurnas facere dispono, ut per noctem ubi secretum loci et temporis datur, si quid forte utpote in certamine minus plene dictum est, id integro ordine et linea directa explanationis aperiam. Et post haec coepit nobis ostendere quomodo hesterno haberi debuerit disputatio, et propter contentionem vel imperitiam contradicentis haberi non potuerit, et ideo sola professione usus sit, atque ea quae ab adversario dicebantur, tantum destruxerit, sua vero neque omnia neque manifeste exposuerit; et singula nobis repetens integro ordine et plena ratione disseruit.
As Peter was saying this to us, each of us eagerly assured him that we had long been awake, satisfied with a short sleep, but had been afraid to wake him, because it would not be fitting for disciples to command their master; “and yet, Peter, we had almost dared to presume it, while our heart, leaping with excessive desire for your words, drove sleep entirely from our eyes. But again our affection for you stood in the way and would not let you be roused by us forcibly.” Then Peter said: “Since, then, you declare that you gladly stay awake out of desire to hear, I wish to repeat to you more carefully and to explain in their order the things that were said in a scattered way yesterday. I intend to do this after each day's disputation, so that at night, when privacy of place and time is given, if anything was perhaps said less fully, as happens in a contest, I may open it in complete order and along a straight line of explanation.” And after this he began to show us how yesterday's disputation ought to have been conducted and could not be, because of the contentiousness or ignorance of his opponent; and that therefore he had used only a profession of faith and had merely destroyed what the adversary said, but had set out his own views neither completely nor plainly; and, repeating each point, he discussed them with us in complete order and with full reasoning.
3.33PG 1:1297b
Cum vero jam albesceret dies, egressus ad turbas post orationem solito ad disputandum constitit loco, et videns Simonem in mediis turbis stantem ex more prius salutato populo ait: Dolori mihi esse fateor de nonnullis hominibus, qui cum ita ad nos veniant ut discant aliquid, ubi eos docere coeperimus, ipsi rursus magistros se esse profitentur, et interrogant quidem ut ignorantes, contradicunt autem ut scientes. Sed fortasse dicat aliquis, quia qui interrogat, ob hoc quidem ut discat interrogat, ubi vero id quod audierit non ei recte dictum videtur, necesse est ut respondeat, et haec videtur esse contradictio, quae non est contradictio, sed reinterrogatio.
When day was now dawning, going out to the crowds after prayer, he stood in the usual place for disputing; and seeing Simon standing in the midst of the crowds, having first greeted the people as usual, he said: “I confess that I am grieved about some men who come to us as if to learn something, but when we have begun to teach them, profess in turn that they themselves are teachers, and ask indeed as ignorant men but contradict as men who know. But perhaps someone may say that he who asks does ask in order to learn, but when what he has heard does not seem to him rightly said, he must answer, and this seems to be contradiction, though it is not contradiction but asking again.”
3.34PG 1:1297b–1298a
Audiat ergo haec: Totius doctrinae disciplina certum habet ordinem, et sunt quaedam quae prima tradenda sunt, alia vero quae secundo in loco, et alia tertio, et sic singula quaeque per ordinem, quae utique si per consequentiam tradantur, manifesta fiunt; extra ordinem vero si proferantur, etiam contra rationem dicta videbuntur. Et ideo in primis ordo servandus est, si tamen hoc proposito quaeramus, ut possimus quod quaerimus invenire. Etenim qui rectum initium viae acceperit, etiam secundum locum consequenter advertet, et ex secundo tertium facilius inveniet; et quanto ultra processerit, tanto magis ei via agnitionis apertior fiet, usquequo ad ipsam quo tendit et desiderat urbem perveniat veritatis. Qui vero imperitus est et quaerendi viam nescit, sicut peregrinus viator, ignorans et errans, si cive et indigena nolit uti duce, sine dubio cum aberraverit a via veritatis, extra vitae januas remanebit, et ita noctis atrae tenebris involutus per semitas perditionis incedet. Quia ergo si per ordinem quae quaerenda sunt inquirantur, inveniri facillime possunt, ordinem vero requirendi imperitus ignorat, rectum est ut scienti cedat ignarus et primo quaerendi ordinem discat, ut ita demum interrogandi et respondendi inveniat disciplinam.
“Let him hear this, then: the discipline of all teaching has a fixed order, and there are some things that must be handed on first, others in the second place, others in the third, and so each thing in order; and if they are handed on in sequence, they become plain, but if they are brought forward out of order, they will seem to be said even against reason. And therefore order must be kept above all, if indeed we seek with the purpose of finding what we seek. For he who has received the right beginning of the way will also grasp the second stage in sequence, and from the second will more easily find the third; and the further he proceeds, the more open the way of knowledge will become to him, until he reaches the very city of truth to which he is heading and which he desires. But he who is unskilled and does not know the way of inquiry is like a traveler in a foreign land, ignorant and wandering: if he will not use a citizen and native as guide, he will without doubt stray from the way of truth and remain outside the gates of life, and so, wrapped in the darkness of black night, will walk the paths of perdition. Since, then, the things to be sought can be found most easily if inquired into in order, and the unskilled man does not know the order of inquiry, it is right that the ignorant should yield to the one who knows and first learn the order of inquiry, so that he may then find the discipline of asking and answering.”
3.35PG 1:1298a–1298b
Et Simon ad haec: Non ergo omnium est veritas, sed eorum tantummodo qui artem noverint disputandi, quod utique absurdum est, cum aequaliter sit Deus omnium, non omnes aequaliter posse voluntatem ejus agnoscere. Et Petrus: Aequales, inquit, omnes ab eo facti sunt, et aequaliter cunctis dedit capaces esse veritatis. Verum quod nullus eorum qui nati sunt, eruditus natus sit, sed posterior sit nativitate eruditio, nulli dubium est. Cum igitur nativitas hominum in eo teneat aequitatem, ut omnes similiter percipiendae disciplinae capaces sint, non est in natura, sed in eruditione diversitas. Aut quis nescit, quod ea quae unusquisque didicit, priusquam disceret, ignorabat? Et Simon: Vere, inquit, dicis. Tum Petrus: Si ergo in his artibus quas usus communis habet, primo discitur, deinde docetur, quanto magis Oportet eos qui eruditores se profitentur animarum, primo discere, et ita docere, ne, cum sint ipsi imperiti, ridiculum videatur, si aliis se praestituros scientiam repromittant. Tum Simon: In artibus, inquit, his quae usus communis habet, verum est, quod unusquisque nisi didicerit, nesciat, in verbo vero scientiae statim ut audierit quis, didicit.
And Simon said to this: “Then truth is not for all, but only for those who know the art of disputing; which is certainly absurd—that, while God is equally the God of all, not all should be equally able to know his will.” And Peter said: “All were made equal by him, and he gave to all equally to be capable of truth. But that none of those who are born was born educated, and that education comes after birth, no one doubts. Since, then, the birth of men holds equality in this, that all are alike capable of receiving instruction, the difference is not in nature but in education. Or who does not know that what each has learned he did not know before he learned it?” And Simon said: “You speak truly.” Then Peter said: “If, then, in the arts that are in common use one first learns and then teaches, how much more ought those who profess to be educators of souls first to learn and then to teach, lest, being unskilled themselves, they seem ridiculous in promising to furnish knowledge to others.” Then Simon said: “In the arts that are in common use it is true that no one knows unless he has learned; but in the word of knowledge, as soon as one has heard, he has learned.”
3.36PG 1:1298b–1299a
Et Petrus: Si quidem per ordinem et consequenter audiat, potest scire quod verum est; sed qui emendatioris vitae regulam conversationisque castioris suscipere recusat, quae utique sequela est scientiae veritatis, scire se quod scit, non vult fateri. Sicut etiam nonnullos videmus, qui artibus quas a puero didicerant derelictis, ad alios se actus conferunt, et ut excusatio sit eis desidiae suae, culpare incipiunt artem velut infructuosam. Et Simon: Deberent omnes audientes credere verum esse, quod audiunt? Tum Petrus: Qui audierint per ordinem sermonem veritatis, contradicere omnino non possunt, sed sciunt verum esse quod dicitur, si tamen libenter etiam vitae instituta suscipiant. Hos vero quos audientes ad bona opera conferre se piget, male agendi libido acquiescere his quae recta judicant, non sinit. Unde ostenditur positum esse in auditorum potestate, eligere utrum malint. Quod si omnes qui audiunt, obedirent, naturae magis esset necessitas, quae una omnes ageret via. Sicut enim suaderi quis non potest, ut fiat brevior aut longior, quia non sinit vis naturae; ita et ad veritatem, si omnes verbo converterentur aut omnes non converterentur, naturae esset vis, quae cogebat verbo omnes converti aut nullum omnino converti.
And Peter said: “If indeed one hears in order and in sequence, he can know what is true; but he who refuses to take up the rule of a more amended life and purer conduct, which certainly follows from the knowledge of truth, will not confess that he knows what he knows. So too we see some who, having abandoned the arts they had learned from boyhood, betake themselves to other occupations, and, to excuse their idleness, begin to blame the art as unfruitful.” And Simon said: “Ought all who hear to believe that what they hear is true?” Then Peter said: “Those who have heard the word of truth in order cannot contradict it at all, but know that what is said is true, provided they also willingly take up its rules of life. But those who, when they hear, are reluctant to devote themselves to good works are not allowed by their lust for doing evil to acquiesce in what they judge right. From this it is shown that it is placed in the hearers' power to choose which they prefer. For if all who hear obeyed, it would rather be a necessity of nature, driving all along one way. For as no one can be persuaded to become shorter or taller, because the force of nature does not allow it, so too with regard to the truth: if all were converted by the word, or all were not converted, it would be a force of nature that compelled all to be converted by the word, or none at all to be converted.”
3.37PG 1:1299a–1299b
Et Simon: Doce ergo nos, quid primo oportet discere cum qui veritatem scire desiderat? Et Petrus: Ante omnia, inquit, quaeri oportet, quid sit homini quaerenti invenire possibile. Necesse est enim judicium Dei in hoc stare, si potuit homo bonum facere, et non fecit; et ideo quaerendum est hominibus, si habeant in potestate sua quaerentes invenire quid est bonum, et cum invenerint facere; hoc enim est pro quo judicandi sunt. Amplius autem his solum scire fas est prophetam, et merito; quid enim opus est hominibus scire, quomodo factus sit mundus? Haec enim discenda necessario viderentur, si simile ineundum nobis esset artificium. Nunc autem sufficit nobis ad cultum Dei ut sciamus, quia ipse fecit mundum; quomodo autem fecerit quaerendum non est, quia, ut dixi, non nobis imminet, tanquam simile aliquid facturis, artis ipsius scientiam discere. Sed neque pro hoc judicandi sumus, cur non didicerimus quomodo factus sit mundus, sed pro eo tantum, si ignoremus Conditorem ejus. Sciemus autem conditorem mundi justum et bonum Deum, si eum semitis justitiae requiramus. Nam si hoc tantum sciamus de eo quod bonus est, hujusmodi scientia non sufficit ad salutem. In praesenti enim tempore, bonitate ejus et beneficiis perfruuntur non solum digni, sed etiam indigni. Si vero non tantum bonum, sed etiam justum eum credamus, et secundum hoc quod de Deo credimus, in omni vita nostra justitiam teneamus, etiam bonitate ejus in aeternum fruemur. Denique Hebraeis qui de Deo ita opinabantur, quod solum bonus esset, dicebat Magister noster, ut et justitiam ejus quaererent, hoc est, ut scirent eum praesenti quidem tempore bonum esse, ut omnes in bonitate ejus vivant, justum vero eum futurum in die judicii, ut dignis praemia aeterna restituat, a quibus excludet indignos.
And Simon said: “Teach us, then, what one who desires to know the truth ought to learn first.” And Peter said: “Before everything one must ask what it is possible for a man who seeks to find. For the judgment of God must turn on this: whether a man could do good and did not. And therefore men must ask whether they have it in their power, by seeking, to find what is good, and when they have found it, to do it; for this is that for which they are to be judged. Beyond this it is lawful for the prophet alone to know, and rightly; for what need have men to know how the world was made? This would seem necessary to learn if we had to undertake a similar work of craftsmanship. But as it is, it suffices us for the worship of God to know that he made the world; but how he made it need not be inquired into, because, as I said, it is not incumbent on us to learn the knowledge of that art as if we were going to make something similar. Nor are we to be judged for not having learned how the world was made, but only if we are ignorant of its founder. And we shall know the founder of the world as a just and good God if we seek him in the paths of righteousness. For if we know of him only that he is good, such knowledge does not suffice for salvation; for in the present time not only the worthy but also the unworthy enjoy his goodness and benefits. But if we believe him to be not only good but also just, and, according to what we believe of God, keep righteousness throughout our life, we shall also enjoy his goodness forever. Indeed, to the Hebrews, who thought of God that he was only good, our Master said that they should seek also his righteousness; that is, that they should know that in the present time he is good, so that all may live in his goodness, but that he will be just in the day of judgment, to render eternal rewards to the worthy, from which he will exclude the unworthy.”
3.38PG 1:1299b–1300a
Et Simon: Quomodo potest unum atque idem, et bonum esse et justum? Petrus ait: Quia sine justitia, bonum injustum quodammodo videbitur; boni est enim, solem suum et pluviam ex aequo justis et injustis praebere, sed hoc videretur injustum, si bonos malosque aequali semper sorte censeret, et nisi frugum causa hoc faceret, quibus perfrui aequaliter omnes qui in hoc mundo nati sunt, conveniret. Sed sicut data a Deo pluvia ex aequo et fruges nutrit et lolium, messis autem tempore frumenta quidem congregantur in horreum, paleae vero vel lolium igni consumuntur: ita in die judicii cum justi introducentur in regnum Dei, injusti autem abjicientur foras, tunc etiam justitia Dei ostendetur. Nam si aequalis permaneret perpetuo malis et bonis, jam hoc non solum bonum non esset, sed et injustum atque iniquum videretur, ut justi et injusti uno apud eum haberentur ordine meritorum.
And Simon said: “How can one and the same being be both good and just?” Peter said: “Because without justice the good would in a way seem unjust. For it belongs to the good to give his sun and rain equally to the just and the unjust; but this would seem unjust if he always treated the good and the wicked with an equal lot, and if he did not do it for the sake of the crops, which all who are born in this world should enjoy equally. But as the rain given by God nourishes equally both the crops and the darnel, while at harvest time the grain is gathered into the barn and the chaff or darnel is consumed by fire, so in the day of judgment, when the just are brought into the kingdom of God and the unjust are cast out, then the justice of God too will be shown. For if he remained forever equal toward the wicked and the good, this would not only not be good, but would also seem unjust and inequitable, that the just and the unjust should be held by him in one rank of merit.”
3.39PG 1:1300a–1300b
Et Simon: Unum est de quo mihi velim satisfieri, si immortalis est anima; non enim possum onus subire justitiae, nisi prius de immortalitate animae sciam, quae utique si immortalis non est, nec praedicationis tuae poterit stare professio. Tum Petrus: Quaeramus, inquit, prius, si justus est Deus; quod si claruerit, integer profecto religionis ordo constabit. Et Simon: Videris mihi tu qui te jactas disputandi ordinem nosse, nunc contra ordinem respondisse; me enim rogante ut ostendas, si immortalis est anima, tu ais, primo nos quaerere oportet si justus est Deus. Et Petrus ait: Valde consequenter et recte se habet. Simon: Velim discere.
And Simon said: “There is one thing on which I would like to be satisfied: whether the soul is immortal. For I cannot take up the burden of righteousness unless I first know about the immortality of the soul; and if it is not immortal, the profession of your preaching cannot stand either.” Then Peter said: “Let us first inquire whether God is just; if this becomes clear, the order of religion will certainly stand entire.” And Simon said: “You who boast that you know the order of disputing seem to me now to have answered against order; for when I ask you to show whether the soul is immortal, you say that we must first inquire whether God is just.” And Peter said: “That is quite consistent and right.” Simon said: “I would like to learn how.”
3.40PG 1:1300b
Petrus: Audi, inquit, nonnulli hominum blasphemantes Deum et omnem vitam suam in injustitia et voluptate ducentes, in lectulis suis defuncti sunt, consecuti finem vitae inter suos et honorabilem sepulturam; alii vero Deum colentes et cum omni justitia et sobrietate vitam suam in parcimonia conservantes, pro justitiae observantia in desertis interiere, ita ut ne sepultura quidem haberentur digni. Ubi est ergo justitia Dei, si anima immortalis non est, quae vel si impie egerit poenas in futuro, vel si pie et juste praemia consequatur? Et Simon ait: Hoc utique est quod nos incredulos facit, quia multi bene agentes male pereunt, et rursum multi impie agentes longi temporis vitam cum beatitudine finiunt.
Peter said: “Listen: some men, blaspheming God and spending their whole life in injustice and pleasure, have died in their beds, reaching the end of life among their own and receiving an honorable burial; while others, worshiping God and keeping their life frugal with all righteousness and sobriety, have perished in deserts for their observance of righteousness, so that they were not even thought worthy of burial. Where, then, is the justice of God, if the soul is not immortal, so as to receive punishments in the future if it has acted impiously, or rewards if it has acted piously and justly?” And Simon said: “This is precisely what makes us unbelievers: that many who do well perish miserably, and again many who act impiously end a long life in happiness.”
3.41PG 1:1300b–1301a
Et Petrus: IIoc ipsum, inquit, quod te ad incredulitatem trahit, nobis certam fidem facit, quia judicium erit. Etenim cum certum sit Deum justum esse, necessarium et consequens est aliud esse saeculum, in quo unusquisque pro meritis recipiens justitiam Dei probet. Quod si nunc omnes homines pro meritis suis reciperent, vere nos fallere videbamur dicentes futurum esse judicium, et ideo hoc ipsum quod in praesenti vita non redditur unicuique pro actibus suis, fidem indubitabilem facit scientibus Deum esse justum, quia judicium erit. Et Simon: Cur ergo mihi non persuadetur? Petrus: Quia verum prophetam non audisti dicentem: Quaerite primo justitiam ejus, et haec omnia apponentur vobis. Et Simon: Indulge, inquit, mihi nolenti primo justitiam quaerere, antequam sciam si immortalis sit anima. Et Petrus: Et tu mihi hoc unum indulge, quia non possum facere aliter quam me propheta veritatis edocuit. Tum Simon: Certum est, inquit, non posse te asserere quod immortalis sit anima, et ob hoc cavillaris, sciens quia si mortalis probetur, radicitus convellatur religionis istius quam conaris asserere tota professio; et ideo laudo quidem prudentiam tuam, non tamen probo persuasionem; multis enim persuades suscipere religionem et libidinis subire continentiam, sub spe futurorum bonorum, quibus evenit, ut neque praesentibus perfruantur et decipiantur futuris. Simul enim ut mortui fuerint, etiam anima pariter exstinguetur.
And Peter said: “This very thing that draws you into unbelief gives us certain faith that there will be a judgment. For since it is certain that God is just, it is necessary and consequent that there be another age, in which each one, receiving according to his deserts, will prove the justice of God. For if all men now received according to their deserts, we would truly seem to deceive when we say that there will be a judgment; and therefore this very fact, that in the present life each one is not repaid according to his deeds, gives undoubted faith, to those who know that God is just, that there will be a judgment.” And Simon said: “Why, then, am I not persuaded?” Peter said: “Because you have not heard the true Prophet saying: ‘Seek first his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.’” And Simon said: “Bear with me if I am unwilling to seek righteousness first, before I know whether the soul is immortal.” And Peter said: “And you bear with me in this one thing, that I cannot do otherwise than the Prophet of truth has taught me.” Then Simon said: “It is certain that you cannot assert that the soul is immortal, and therefore you quibble, knowing that if it is proved mortal, the whole profession of this religion which you are trying to assert is torn up by the roots. And so I praise your prudence, but do not approve your persuasion; for you persuade many to take up religion and submit to restraint of their desires in the hope of future goods; and it happens to them that they neither enjoy the present and are deceived about the future. For as soon as they have died, the soul too will be extinguished together with them.”
3.42PG 1:1301a–1301b
Petrus vero haec audiens, dentibus frendens frontemque atterens manu, et profundo dolore suspirans ait: Astutia serpentis antiqui ad hominum decipiendas animas armatus assistis, et ideo ut serpens sapientior caeteris bestiis, ab initio doctorem te esse professus es. Et rursus, ut serpens multos introducere deos volebas, super quo confutatus nullum omnino nunc esse asseris Deum. Nam per occasionem nescio cujus ignoti Dei, conditorem mundi Deum negasti, sed eum vel malum esse, vel multos habere sibi aequales, vel omnino, ut diximus, non esse Deum confirmabas. Post haec cum etiam in hoc superatus fuisses, animam nunc asseveras esse mortalem, uti ne futurorum spe recte justeque vivatur. Nam utique si desperantur futura, quidni si abscidatur misericordia, luxuriae indulgeatur et voluptatibus, ex quibus omnem consurgere injustitiam constat? Et cum tantae impietatis doctrinam miserae huic introducas mortalium vitae, te ipsum pium, me impium vocas, quasi qui homines non sinam sub spe futurorum bonorum arma corripere et impugnare se invicem, diripere ac subvertere universa et moliri omnia quae libido dictaverit. Et quis erit istius vitae status, qui a te introducitur, ut pugnent homines et impugnentur, ut irascantur et perturbentur et semper in metu vivant? Necesse est enim eos qui aliis inferunt mala etiam ipsos sperare similia. Videsne te ducem perturbationis et non pacis, iniquitatis et non aequitatis existere? Verum ego, non quasi qui ostendere non possim immortalem esse animam, simulavi iracundiam, sed misereor animabus hominum, quas tu decipere conaris. Dicam ergo, sed non quasi te cogente; scio enim quomodo dicam, et solus eris qui de hoc non tam persuasione indigeas, quam commonitione; eos autem hoc qui vere ignorant, docebo ut convenit.
Peter, hearing this, gnashing his teeth, rubbing his forehead with his hand, and sighing from deep grief, said: “You stand armed with the cunning of the ancient serpent to deceive the souls of men; and therefore, like the serpent, wiser than the other beasts, from the beginning you have professed yourself a teacher. And again, like the serpent, you wished to introduce many gods; and, refuted on this, you now assert that there is no God at all. For on the pretext of some unknown god you denied that the creator of the world is God, and affirmed that he was either evil, or had many equals, or, as we said, was not God at all. After this, when you had been overcome on this too, you now assert that the soul is mortal, so that men may not live rightly and justly in the hope of things to come. For surely, if the future is despaired of, why should mercy not be cut off and luxury and pleasures be indulged, from which it is agreed that all injustice arises? And while you introduce the teaching of so great an impiety into this wretched life of mortals, you call yourself pious and me impious, as one who does not allow men, under the hope of future goods, to take up arms and attack one another, to plunder and overturn everything, and to attempt all that lust dictates. And what will be the state of this life that you introduce, in which men attack and are attacked, are angry and disturbed, and always live in fear? For those who inflict evils on others must expect the like themselves. Do you see that you are a leader of disturbance and not of peace, of iniquity and not of equity? But I did not feign anger as one who cannot show that the soul is immortal; I pity the souls of men whom you are trying to deceive. I will speak, then, but not as compelled by you; for I know how I shall speak, and you alone will be one who needs on this matter not so much persuasion as admonition; but those who are truly ignorant of it I will teach as is fitting.”
3.43PG 1:1301b
Tum Simon: Si irasceris, inquit, non interrogabo nec audire volo. Et Petrus: Tu siquidem nunc occasionem quaeris subterfugiendi; habes licentiam, et sine occasione cujusquam. Omnes enim audierunt te nihil recte dicentem, nec potuisse aliquid confirmare, sed ob hoc tantum interrogasse ut contradiceres, quod quivis facere potest. Quid enim difficile est post evidentes assertiones respondere, nihil dixisti. Ut autem scias quia possum tibi uno sermone ostendere, quod immortalis est anima, interrogabo te verbum quod omnes norunt, responde mihi, et uno sermone immortalem esse comprobabo. Tum Simon, qui jam occasionem sibi visus fuerat invenisse ex iracundia Petri ut discederet, restitit pro eo quod mirum ei aliquid promittebatur, et ait: Interroga me, ut tibi respondeam quod omnes norunt, et audiam uno ut pollicitus es sermone, quomodo anima immortalis sit.
Then Simon said: “If you are angry, I will neither ask questions nor listen.” And Peter said: “If you are now looking for an excuse to escape, you are free to go, even without anyone's pretext. For all have heard that you have said nothing right and could prove nothing, but asked only in order to contradict, which anyone can do. For what is difficult about answering, after clear proofs, ‘You have said nothing’? But that you may know that I can show you in a single sentence that the soul is immortal, I will ask you something that everyone knows; answer me, and in a single sentence I will prove that it is immortal.” Then Simon, who had thought he had found in Peter's anger an excuse to leave, stayed because something wonderful was being promised him, and said: “Ask me, that I may answer you what all know, and let me hear, as you promised, in a single sentence, how the soul is immortal.”
3.44PG 1:1302a–1302b
Et Petrus: Dicam ita ut prae caeteris omnibus tibi magis probetur. Responde ergo mihi, quid est quod incredulum magis suadere potest, visus an auditus? Et Simon: Visus. Tum Petrus: Quomodo ergo a me vis discere verbo, quod tibi re ipsa probatur et visu? Et Simon: Nescio, inquit, quomodo dicas. Et Petrus: Si nescis, perge nunc in domum tuam, et ingressus interius cubiculum videbis imaginem positam, continentem pueri violenter necati effigiem purpura coopertam, ipsum interroga, et docebit te vel responsione vel visu. Quid enim opus est audire ab eo si immortalis sit anima, cum astare eam videas praesentem? Si enim non esset, nec videri utique poterat. Quod si nescis quam dico imaginem, hinc e vestigio cum aliis decem viris, ex his qui praesentes sunt, eamus ad domum tuam.
And Peter said: “I will speak so that it may be proved to you above all others. Answer me, then: which can better persuade an unbeliever, sight or hearing?” And Simon said: “Sight.” Then Peter said: “Why, then, do you wish to learn from me by words what is proved to you by the fact itself and by sight?” And Simon said: “I do not know what you mean.” And Peter said: “If you do not know, go now to your house, and entering the inner chamber you will see an image set up there, containing the likeness of a boy violently slain, covered with purple; question him, and he will teach you either by answer or by sight. For what need is there to hear from him whether the soul is immortal, when you see it standing present? For if it did not exist, it certainly could not be seen. But if you do not know what image I mean, let us go from here at once to your house, with ten other men of those who are present.”
3.45PG 1:1302b
At Simon haec audiens et conscientia percussus, colore mutato exsanguis effectus est; extimuit enim ne forte si negaret perscrutaretur domus ejus, aut ne indignans Petrus manifestius eum proderet, et omnibus quis esset innotesceret, ita respondit: Obsecro te, Petre, per illum bonum Deum qui in te est, ut vincas malitiam quae in me est, suscipe me ad paenitentiam et habebis me adjutorem praedicationis tuae. Nunc enim vere rebus ipsis didici, quia Dei veri propheta es, et ideo secreta hominum solus atque arcana cognoscis. Et Petrus ait: Videtis, fratres, Simonem paenitentiam quaerentem, paulo post videbitis eum rursus ad infidelitatem suam reverti. Putans enim me prophetam esse, pro eo quod publicavi mala ejus, quae in secretis habebat et in occultis, paenitentiam se acturum promisit; me autem mentiri fas non est, neque ut infidelis hic salvetur aut non salvetur, ego fallere debeo. Testor enim coelum et terram, quia non prophetice dixi, quae dixi vel quae, quantum possibile erat, turbis audientibus indicari, sed a quibusdam qui tunc ei socii fuerant in operibus suis, nunc autem conversi sunt ad fidem nostram, quid ei in secreto gestum sit, didici; cognita ergo non praecognita locutus sum.
But Simon, hearing this and struck in conscience, changed color and turned pale; for he feared that if he denied it his house would be searched, or that Peter, angered, would betray him more plainly and make known to all who he was. So he answered thus: “I beseech you, Peter, by that good God who is in you, overcome the malice that is in me: receive me to repentance, and you will have me as a helper in your preaching. For now I have truly learned by the facts themselves that you are a prophet of the true God, and therefore you alone know the secrets and hidden things of men.” And Peter said: “You see, brethren, Simon seeking repentance; a little later you will see him return again to his unbelief. For, thinking me a prophet because I made public his evil deeds, which he kept secret and hidden, he has promised to repent; but it is not lawful for me to lie, nor ought I to deceive, whether this unbeliever is saved or not. For I call heaven and earth to witness that I did not speak prophetically what I said, or what, as far as was possible, I indicated in the hearing of the crowds; but I learned what he had done in secret from some who were then his associates in his works but have now been converted to our faith. So I spoke things known, not foreknown.”
3.46PG 1:1302b–1303a
Simon vero ut haec audivit maledictis his et conviciis aggreditur Petrum, dicens: O nefandissime omnium et dolosissime, cui victoriam fortuna, non veritas dedit. Verum ego non pro penuria scientiae paenitentiam petii, sed ut tu, putans me per paenitentiam discipulum tuum fore, omnia secreta professionis tuae concrederes mihi, ut ita demum te cunctis agnitis confutarem. Sed ut callidus intellexisti quam ob causam poenitudinem simulassem, et acquievisti tanquam meum non intelligens dolum, ut prius me apud populum exponeres, quasi imperitum, tum deinde praevidens, quod ego ita populo expositus necesse habeo indignari et confiteri me non vere paenitudinem gerere, praevenisti, ut diceres me ad infidelitatem meam post poenitentiam regressurum, ut omni ex parte vicisse videreris, et si permanerem in poenitentia quam professus fueram, et si non permanerem, ut tu sapiens credereris, qui ista praevideris, ego autem deceptus viderer, quia tuum non praevidi dolum; tu vero meum praevidens, calliditate usus circumscripsisti me. Sed, ut dixi, fortunae est, non veritatis ista victoria, scio tamen cur ego ista non praeviderim, quia astans locutus sum tibi per bonitatem meam, et patienter egi tecum. Nunc autem tibi ostendam divinitatis meae potentiam, ut repente procidas et adores me.
But Simon, when he heard this, attacked Peter with curses and abuse, saying: “O most abominable and most deceitful of all men, to whom fortune, not truth, has given the victory! I did not ask for repentance for lack of knowledge, but so that you, thinking that by repentance I would become your disciple, might entrust to me all the secrets of your profession, and so at last, having learned everything, I might refute you. But you, being cunning, understood why I had feigned repentance, and acquiesced as if you did not understand my trick, so as first to expose me before the people as unskilled; then, foreseeing that, once thus exposed to the people, I would have to be indignant and confess that I was not truly repentant, you forestalled me by saying that I would return to my unbelief after repentance, so that you might seem to have won on every side, whether I remained in the repentance I had professed or not; and so that you might be believed wise, as having foreseen these things, while I would seem deceived because I did not foresee your trick; but you, foreseeing mine, used craft and circumvented me. But, as I said, this victory is of fortune, not of truth. Yet I know why I did not foresee these things: because, standing by you, I spoke to you out of my goodness and dealt patiently with you. But now I will show you the power of my divinity, so that you may suddenly fall down and worship me.”
3.47PG 1:1303a–1303b
Ego sum prima virtus, qui semper et sine initio sum. Ingressus autem uterum Rachel, natus sum ut homo ex ea, quo ab hominibus videri possem; ego per aerem volavi, igni commistus unum corpus effectus sum, statuas moveri feci, animavi exanima, lapides panes feci, de monte in montem volavi, transmeavi, manibus angelorum sustentatus ad terras descendi. Haec non solum feci, sed et nunc facere possum, ut rebus ipsis probem omnibus, quia ego sum Filius Dei stans in aeternum, et credentes mihi similiter stare in perpetuum faciam. Tua autem verba vana sunt omnia, nec ullum potes opus ostendere veritatis, sicut et ille qui misit te magus, qui nec se ipsum potuit liberare de crucis poena.
“I am the first power, who am always and without beginning. But having entered the womb of Rachel, I was born of her as a man, so that I might be seen by men. I have flown through the air; mingled with fire, I have become one body with it; I have made statues move; I have given life to lifeless things; I have made stones into bread; I have flown from mountain to mountain and crossed over, and come down to earth upheld by the hands of angels. I have not only done these things, but can do them now too, so as to prove to all by the facts themselves that I am the Son of God, standing forever, and that I will make those who believe in me likewise stand forever. But your words are all vain, and you can show no work of truth, just like that magician who sent you, who could not even free himself from the punishment of the cross.”
3.48PG 1:1303b
His dictis a Simone, Petrus respondit: Ne agas aliena, tu enim quod sis magus ex ipsis quae gessisti, confessus es et manifestatus, noster autem magister qui est Filius Dei et hominis, manifeste bonus est; quod autem vere sit Filius Dei, quibus oportuit, dictum est et dicetur. Tu autem si non vis confiteri quod magus es, cum omni hac turba pergamus ad domum tuam, et tunc apparebit quis sit magus. Haec autem Petro dicente, Simon blasphemiis et maledictis agere coepit, ut seditione facta, perturbatis omnibus argui non posset, et Petrus quasi blasphemiae causa secedens, victus videretur. Sed perstitit et arguere eum vehementius coepit.
When Simon had said this, Peter answered: “Do not meddle with what is not yours; for you have confessed, and been shown, that you are a magician by the very things you have done; but our master, who is the Son of God and of man, is plainly good; and that he is truly the Son of God has been told, and will be told, to those to whom it was fitting. But if you will not confess that you are a magician, let us go with all this crowd to your house, and then it will appear who is the magician.” While Peter was saying this, Simon began to rail with blasphemies and curses, so that, with a riot raised and everyone thrown into confusion, he could not be convicted, and Peter, withdrawing as if because of the blasphemy, would seem to be beaten. But Peter stood firm and began to reprove him more vehemently.
3.49PG 1:1303b–1304b
Tunc populus indignatus Simonem atrio ejectum extra januam domus pepulit, eumque depulsum unus secutus est solus. Facto autem silentio Petrus alloqui populum hoc modo coepit: Patienter, fratres, malos ferre debetis, scientes quia Deus cum possit eos excidere, patitur tamen durare usque ad praestitutam diem, in qua de omnibus judicium fiet; quomodo ergo nos non patiemur, quos patitur Deus? Cur autem non forti animo illatas ab eis toleramus injurias, cum suas ille qui potest omnia non ulciscatur, ut et ipsius bonitas, et malorum noscatur impietas? Verum si non invenisset Simonem malignus ministrum sibi, invenisset alium sine dubio; necesse est enim saeculo huic venire scandala; vae tamen illi per quem veniunt. Et ideo magis deflendus est Simon, quod vas electionis factus est maligno; quod utique non fuisset, nisi potestatem in eum pro peccatis prioribus accepisset. Nam inde quid dicam, quod et Jesu nostro crediderat, et quod immortales esse animas sibi ipse persuasit? Quamvis in eo ludatur a daemonibus, tamen persuasit sibi, quod pueri violenter necati habeat animam ministrantem sibi ad quaecunque voluerit; in quo vere, ut dixi, a daemonibus illuditur. Et ideo ego secundum ea quae ipsi videbantur locutus sum ad eum; nam et a Judaeis didicit, quia sit judicium et ultio proferenda adversum eos, qui contra veram fidem veniunt nec paenitudinem gerunt; sed isti sunt quibus malignus tanquam perfectis in sceleribus apparet, ut decipiat eos, ne aliquando ad poenitentiam convertantur.
Then the people, indignant, drove Simon out of the court and beyond the door of the house, and only one man followed him when he was driven out. When silence had been made, Peter began to address the people thus: “Brethren, you ought to bear the wicked patiently, knowing that God, though he could cut them off, nevertheless suffers them to continue until the appointed day on which judgment will be held concerning all. How, then, shall we not bear those whom God bears? And why do we not endure with strong mind the injuries they inflict, when he who can do all things does not avenge his own, so that both his goodness and the impiety of the wicked may be known? But if the evil one had not found Simon as his minister, he would without doubt have found another; for it is necessary that offenses come into this world, but woe to him through whom they come. And therefore Simon is the more to be lamented, because he has become a chosen vessel of the evil one; which certainly would not have happened unless the evil one had received power over him because of earlier sins. For why should I speak of the fact that he had once believed in our Jesus, and had persuaded himself that souls are immortal? Although he is mocked by demons in this, yet he has persuaded himself that he has the soul of a boy violently slain ministering to him for whatever he wishes; in which, truly, as I said, he is mocked by demons. And therefore I spoke to him according to what seemed true to him; for he also learned from the Jews that there is a judgment and vengeance to be brought against those who oppose the true faith and do not repent. But these are the men to whom the evil one appears as to men perfect in crime, to deceive them, so that they may never turn to repentance.”
3.50PG 1:1304b
Vos ergo qui ad Dominum convertimini per poenitentiam, curvate ei genua. Haec cum dixisset, omnis multitudo genua flexit Deo. Et Petrus respiciens ad coelum, cum lacrymis orabat super eos, ut Deus pro sua bonitate suscipere eos dignaretur confugientes ad se. Et postquam oravit et praecepit ut postera die maturius convenirent, multitudinem missam fecit. Tum deinde secundum consuetudinem, cibo sumpto, quievimus.
“You, then, who are turning to the Lord through repentance, bend your knees to him.” When he had said this, the whole multitude bent their knees to God. And Peter, looking up to heaven, prayed with tears over them, that God of his goodness would deign to receive them as they fled to him. And after he had prayed and charged them to gather earlier the next day, he dismissed the multitude. Then, as usual, having taken food, we rested.
3.51PG 1:1304b
Igitur Petrus solita noctis hora consurgens, invenit nos vigilantes, et cum ex more salutans consedisset, primus Niceta ait: Si permittis, mi domine Petre, habeo quod rogem. Et Petrus: Permitto, inquit, non solum tibi sed et omnibus, et non solum modo sed et semper, ut unusquisque quod eum movet, et partem quam dolet in animo fateatur, ut possit consequi medicinam. Qua: enim silentio conteguntur nec innotescunt nobis, velut multi temporis vitia difficile curantur, et ideo quoniam tacentibus non facile potest medela opportuni et necessarii sermonis adhiberi, proferre debet unusquisque in quo animus per ignorantiam languet; tacenti vero dare remedium solius est Dei; possumus autem et nos, sed circuitu multi temporis. Necesse est enim ut sermo doctrinae ab initio per ordinem currens, et singulis quibusque quaestionibus obvians cuncta aperiat, et cuncta dissolvat et perveniat etiam ad hoc quod unusquisque in animo suo requirit; sed hoc, ut dixi, per multum tempus fieri potest. Nunc autem quod desideras roga.
So Peter, rising at the usual hour of the night, found us awake; and when he had greeted us as usual and sat down, Niceta was the first to speak: “If you permit, my lord Peter, I have something to ask.” And Peter said: “I permit it not only to you but to all, and not only now but always: let each confess what troubles him and the part of his mind that is in pain, so that he may obtain healing. For things that are covered in silence and not made known to us are cured with difficulty, like long-standing diseases; and therefore, since the remedy of timely and necessary discourse cannot easily be applied to those who keep silent, each must bring forward that in which his mind is sick through ignorance. To give a remedy to one who keeps silent belongs to God alone; we too can do it, but only by the long way round. For the discourse of teaching must run in order from the beginning, meet each question, open everything and resolve everything, and come even to what each one is asking in his own mind; but this, as I said, can be done only over a long time. Now, then, ask what you desire.”
3.52PG 1:1304b–1305a
Et Niceta ait: Uberes tibi gratias ago, clementissime Petre, verum hoc est quod discere cupio: Cur Simon qui adversatur Deo, facere tanta haec et talia potuit? Non enim mentitus est aliquid ex his, quae se fecisse professus est. Ad haec beatus Petrus ita respondit: Deus qui unus et verus est, Primogenito suo amicos bonos et fideles instituit praeparare; sciens autem quia boni esse non possunt, nisi habeant in potestate sensum quo fiant boni, ut ex suo proposito hoc sint quod volunt, alioqui non possunt esse vere boni, si non proposito sed necessitate tenerentur in bono, potestatem dedit unicuique arbitrii sui, ut hoc esse possit quod vult. Et rursum praevidens quia ista potestas arbitrii, alios quidem faceret eligere bona, alios vero mala, et per hoc in duos ordines necessario propagandum esset hominum genus, unicuique ordini concessit et locum et regem, quem vellet eligere; bonus enim rex bonis gaudet, et malignus malis. Et quamvis haec tibi, o Clemens, in eo tractatu, quem de praefinitione et fine disserueram, plenius exposuerim, tamen et nunc requirenti Nicetae manifestare me convenit quae sit ratio, quod Simon qui contra Deum sentit, tanta facere mirabilia potuit.
And Niceta said: “I give you abundant thanks, most kind Peter; but this is what I desire to learn: why could Simon, who opposes God, do such great things as these? For he lied in none of the things he professed to have done.” To this the blessed Peter answered thus: “God, who is one and true, resolved to prepare good and faithful friends for his Firstborn. But knowing that they cannot be good unless they have in their power the faculty by which they become good, so that by their own purpose they may be what they wish—otherwise they could not truly be good, if they were held in goodness not by purpose but by necessity—he gave each the power of his own choice, so that he can be what he wishes. And again, foreseeing that this power of choice would make some choose good and others evil, and that through this the human race would necessarily be divided into two orders, he granted to each order both a place and a king, whom it might wish to choose; for a good king rejoices in the good, and the evil one in the evil. And although I have explained these things to you more fully, Clement, in the treatise in which I discussed predestination and the end, yet now too, since Niceta asks, it is fitting for me to make plain the reason why Simon, who thinks against God, could do such great wonders.”
3.53PG 1:1305a
Igitur primo omnium, malus esse judicatur apud Deum is, qui requirere non vult, quod sibi expedit. Quomodo enim talis iste alium diliget, qui semetipsum non diligit? Aut cui non iste inimicus erit, qui sibi ipsi amicus esse non potuit? Ut ergo distinguerentur qui bona et qui eligunt mala, Deus quod utile est occultavit hominibus, id est, possessionem regni caelorum, eamque velut thesaurum secretum reposuit et abscondit, ut ad eam non facile quis possit virtute et scientia pervenire propria, famam tamen ejus, diversis nominibus et opinionibus per generationes singulas ad omnium perduxit auditum, ut si qui forte essent amatores boni, audientes quod sibi esset utile et salutare requirerent et invenirent; requirerent autem non a semetipsis, sed ab eo qui occultavit, darique sibi accedendi aditum et viam scientiae precarentur, quae illis solis panditur qui eam super omnia mundi hujus diligerent bona, nec alio quis pacto vel intelligere eam possit etiamsi prudentissimus videretur; hi vero, qui neglexissent quod sibi utile et salutare esset inquirere, tanquam se ipsos odio habentes et semetipsis inimici fraudarentur ejus bonis, velut qui diligerent mala.
“First of all, then, he is judged evil before God who will not seek what is profitable for himself. For how will such a man love another, who does not love himself? Or to whom will he not be an enemy, who could not be a friend to himself? So, in order that those who choose good and those who choose evil might be distinguished, God hid from men what is profitable, that is, the possession of the kingdom of heaven, and laid it up and concealed it like a secret treasure, so that no one could easily reach it by his own strength and knowledge. Yet he brought its fame, under various names and opinions, through every generation to the hearing of all, so that any who were lovers of good, hearing of what was profitable and saving for them, might seek and find it—seek it not from themselves, but from him who hid it, and pray to be given access and the way of knowledge, which is opened only to those who love it above all the goods of this world; nor can anyone understand it on any other terms, even if he seemed most prudent—while those who neglected to inquire into what was profitable and saving for them, as hating themselves and being their own enemies, would be deprived of its goods, as lovers of evil.”
3.54PG 1:1305d–1306a
Oportet ergo hanc diligere eam super omnia, id est, super divitias, gloriam, requiem, parentes, propinquos, amicos et omne quod in hoc mundo est. Qui vero perfecte diligit possessionem hanc regni caelorum, abjiciet sine dubio omnem malae consuetudinis usum, negligentiam, desidiam, malitiam, iram, cunctaque his similia. Nam si quid horum praetuleris ei, tanquam qui plus dilexeris propriae libidinis vitia quam Deum, ad possessionem regni caelestis pervenire non poteris, quia et vere stultum est, aliquid plus amare quam Deum. Sive enim parentes sunt, moriuntur; sive propinqui, non permanent; sive amici, mutantur. Solus est autem Deus aeternus, et immutabilis permanens. Qui ergo non vult inquirere quod sibi utile est, malus est, in tantum ut malitia sua ipsum impietatis principem superet. Ille enim bonitate Dei abutitur ad propositum malitiae suae, et sibi placet; hic autem salutis suae bona negligit, ut perditione sui malo placeat.
“One must therefore love it above all things, that is, above riches, glory, rest, parents, relatives, friends, and everything that is in this world. And he who perfectly loves this possession of the kingdom of heaven will without doubt cast off every practice of bad habit: negligence, sloth, malice, anger, and all things like these. For if you prefer any of these to it, as one who loves the vices of his own lust more than God, you will not be able to attain the possession of the heavenly kingdom; for it is truly foolish to love anything more than God. For parents die; relatives do not remain; friends change. God alone is eternal and remains unchangeable. He, then, who will not seek what is profitable to himself is evil, so much so that by his malice he surpasses the very prince of impiety. For the latter abuses the goodness of God for the purpose of his own malice, and pleases himself; but this man neglects the goods of his own salvation, so as to please the evil one by his own perdition.”
3.55PG 1:1306a
Propter hos ergo, qui salutis suae neglectu placent malo, et eos qui studio utilitatis suae placere cupiunt bono, paria quaedam ad tentationem praesenti huic saeculo statuta sunt decem, secundum numerum decem plagarum quae illatae sunt Egypto. Cum enim Moyses secundum praeceptum Dei peteret a Pharaone, ut emitteret populum, et ad testimonium coelestis imperii signa ostenderet, projecta in terram virga conversa est in serpentem. Cumque ob haec Pharao non vellet acquiescere, utpote habens arbitrii libertatem, rursum magi similia signa facere visi sunt, permittente Deo, ut propositum regis probaretur ex arbitrii libertate, si magis crederet signis Moysi qui a Deo missus est, quam his quae magi videbantur potius facere, quam faciebant; quos ipsos utique nomine intelligere debuerat non esse operarios veritatis, quod non a Deo missi sed magi appellabantur, sicut et traditio indicat. Denique usque ad aliquem locum visi sunt habere certamen, et post haec confessi de se cessere meliori. Inducitur ergo plaga ultima, interitus primitivorum, et tunc Moyses iubetur populum conspersione sanguinis consecrare, atque ita magna cum prece oblatis etiam muneribus, cum populo rogatur abscedere.
“For the sake of these, then—those who please the evil one by neglecting their salvation, and those who desire to please the good by zeal for their own benefit—certain pairs, ten in number, have been established in this present age as a test, according to the number of the ten plagues that were brought on Egypt. For when Moses, according to the command of God, asked Pharaoh to let the people go, and showed signs as testimony of the heavenly command, his rod, thrown on the ground, was turned into a serpent. And when Pharaoh would not yield on this account, as having freedom of choice, the magicians in turn seemed to do similar signs, by God's permission, so that the king's purpose might be proved through his freedom of choice: whether he would rather believe the signs of Moses, who was sent by God, than those which the magicians seemed to do rather than actually did. He certainly ought to have understood from their very name that they were not workers of truth, since they were called not messengers of God but magicians, as tradition also indicates. Indeed, up to a certain point they seemed to hold a contest, and after this, confessing about themselves, they yielded to the better. The last plague, then, is brought on, the death of the firstborn; and then Moses is ordered to consecrate the people by the sprinkling of blood; and so, with great entreaty, and with gifts offered, he is asked to depart with the people.”
3.56PG 1:1306a–1306d
Simili ergo modo etiam nunc per me video geri. Sicut enim tunc Moyse hortante regem ut crederet Deo, obsistebant magi quasi ostentatione similium signorum, et a salute incredulos prohibebant, ita et nunc cum ego exierim docere omnes gentes ut credant vero Deo, Simon Magus resistit, eadem agens adversum me, quae et illi tunc egerunt adversum Moysen, ut si qui sunt ex gentibus, qui non recto judicio utuntur, appareant, salventur autem qui signorum rectum discrimen habuerint. Haec dicente Petro, Niceta respondit: Obsecro te, ut si quid ad memoriam venit, permittas mihi proferre. Tum Petrus delectatus super studio discipulorum: Dic, inquit, quod vis.
“In a similar way I see the same thing being done now through me. For as then, when Moses was urging the king to believe God, the magicians resisted with a show of similar signs and kept the unbelieving from salvation, so now too, when I have gone out to teach all nations to believe the true God, Simon Magus resists, doing against me the same things that they then did against Moses, so that those of the Gentiles who do not use right judgment may be made manifest, while those who have a right discernment of signs may be saved.” As Peter was saying this, Niceta answered: “I beg you, if anything comes to mind, let me bring it forward.” Then Peter, delighted at the zeal of his disciples, said: “Say what you wish.”
3.57PG 1:1306d–1307a
Et Niceta ait: Quid peccavere Egyptii, si non crediderunt Moysi, cum et magi similia signa fecerint, etiamsi viderentur potius fieri quam veritate fierent? Nam et si ego fuissem tunc, ex eo quod magi similia faciebant, nonne aut Moysen magum credidissem, aut magos quae ostendebant, divinitus facere putassem? quia non mihi verisimile videretur, licet per phantasiam, eadem tamen effici a magis posse, quae ille qui a Deo missus est, perpetrabat. Et nunc ergo quid peccant hi qui Simoni credunt, cum videant eum tanta facere mirabilia? Aut non est mirabile per aerem volare, igni admistum unum corpus effici, facere statuas ingredi, canes aereos latrare, et alia his similia, quae utique discretionem nescientibus satis mira sunt? Sed et de lapidibus visus est panes facere. Quod si peccat qui signa facientibus credit, quomodo non peccasse videbitur et is, qui Domino nostro pro signis et virtutibus credidit?
And Niceta said: “What sin did the Egyptians commit if they did not believe Moses, since the magicians also did similar signs, even if these seemed to be done rather than were truly done? For if I had been there then, would I not, from the fact that the magicians did similar things, either have believed Moses a magician, or thought that the magicians did by divine power what they showed? For it would not have seemed likely to me that magicians could produce, even by illusion, the same things that he who was sent by God was performing. And now too, then, what sin do those commit who believe Simon, when they see him do such great wonders? Or is it not wonderful to fly through the air, to be mingled with fire into one body, to make statues walk, to make bronze dogs bark, and other such things, which are certainly wonderful enough to those who do not know how to discern? He was even seen to make bread from stones. But if one sins who believes those who do signs, how will he not seem to have sinned too who believed in our Lord because of his signs and mighty works?”
3.58PG 1:1307a–1307c
Et Petrus ait: Libenter accipio quod de veritate ad amussim requiris, et impedimenta fidei in anima tua latere non pateris. Unde et medelam consequi facile potes. Meministi quod pejus omnium esse dixi, cum quis negligit quod sibi expedit discere? Et Niceta respondit: Memini. Petrus: Et rursum quod Deus occultavit veritatem suam, ut eam his qui se fideliter sectantur, aperiat? Et Niceta: Ne hoc quidem oblitus sum. Tum Petrus: Quid ergo putas, quia in terram defossam absconderit Deus veritatem et montes ei superposuerit, ut ab his qui in profundum fodere valent, tantummodo inveniri possit? Non ita est, sed sicut montes et terram coeli ambitu circumdedit, ita et veritatem charitatis suae velamine contexit, ut ille ad eam solus pervenire possit, qui prius januam dilectionis divinae pulsaverit.
And Peter said: “I gladly accept that you inquire exactly into the truth and do not allow hindrances to faith to lie hidden in your soul; so you can easily obtain healing too. Do you remember that I said the worst of all is when someone neglects to learn what is profitable for him?” And Niceta answered: “I remember.” Peter said: “And again, that God has hidden his truth so as to open it to those who follow him faithfully?” And Niceta said: “I have not forgotten that either.” Then Peter said: “What, then, do you think—that God has hidden the truth buried in the earth and put mountains over it, so that it can be found only by those who are able to dig deep? It is not so; but as he has surrounded the mountains and the earth with the circuit of heaven, so he has covered the truth with the veil of his love, so that he alone can reach it who has first knocked at the door of divine love.”
3.59PG 1:1307c–1308a
Etenim quod prius dicere coeperam, paria quaedam huic mundo destinasse Deum: ille qui primus ex paribus venit, a malo est, qui secundus, a bono. In quo unicuique hominum justi occasio iudicii datur, sive simplex ille sit, sive prudens. Nam si simplex est et crediderit illi qui primus venit, signis enim et prodigiis motus, necesse est eadem ratione, ut etiam illi qui secundo venerit, credat; signis enim et prodigiis suadebitur et nunc, sicut prius. Cum vero crediderit huic secundo, discet ab eo quod primo illi qui a malo venit, credere non debeat, et ita prioris error secundi emendatione corrigitur. Si vero quia primo credidit, secundum recipere noluerit, merito ut injustus condemnabitur; injustum enim est, ut cum primo propter signa crediderit, secundo eadem aut etiam potiora ferenti signa non credat. Si vero non credidit primo, consequens est, ut vel in secundo moveatur ad credendum. Neque enim in tantum animo stetit, ut ingeminatis mirabilibus non valeat suscitari. Si vero prudens est, discretionem potest capere signorum. Et si quidem primo credidit, augmentis virtutum movebitur ad secundum, et ex comparatione quae sint potiora deprehendet, quamvis manifesta habeantur indicia apud eruditos quosque, sicut per ordinis consequentiam demonstravimus. Si vero tanquam sanus quis et qui medico non indigeat, non est commotus ad primum, rei ipsius perseverantia suscitabitur ad secundum, distinctionemque signorum et mirabilium faciet in hunc modum: Ille qui a malo est, signa quae facit, nulli prosunt; illa vero quae facit bonus, hominibus prosunt.
“For, as I had begun to say before, God has appointed certain pairs for this world: the one who comes first of the pair is from the evil one, the second from the good. And in this way occasion of a just judgment is given to every man, whether he is simple or prudent. For if he is simple and has believed the one who came first, being moved by signs and wonders, he must by the same reasoning believe the one who comes second too; for he will be persuaded by signs and wonders now, as before. And when he has believed this second one, he will learn from him that he ought not to believe the first, who came from the evil one; and so the error about the first is corrected by the amendment of the second. But if, because he believed the first, he will not receive the second, he will rightly be condemned as unjust; for it is unjust that, having believed the first because of signs, he should not believe the second, who brings the same or even greater signs. But if he did not believe the first, it follows that he may at least be moved to believe by the second; for his mind has not been so obstinate that it cannot be roused by redoubled wonders. But if he is prudent, he can grasp the discernment of signs. And if he believed the first, he will be moved to the second by the increase of mighty works, and by comparison will discover which are better—although clear indications are plain to all the learned, as we have shown by the sequence of our order. But if, as one who is sound and needs no physician, he was not moved by the first, he will be roused to the second by the very persistence of the matter, and will make the distinction of signs and wonders in this way: the signs which he who is from the evil one does benefit no one; but those which the good one does benefit men.”
3.60PG 1:1308a–1308c
Nam dic, quaeso, quae utilitas est ostendere statuas ambulantes, latrare aereos aut lapideos canes, salire montes, volare per aerem, et alia his similia, quae dicitis fecisse Simonem? Quae autem a bono sunt, ad hominum salutem deferuntur, ut sunt illa quae fecit Dominus noster, qui fecit caecos videre, fecit surdos audire, debiles et claudos erexit, languores et daemones effugavit, mortuos fecit resurgere, et alia his similia quae etiam per me fieri videtis. Ista ergo signa quae ad salutem hominum prosunt et aliquid boni hominibus conferunt, malignus facere non potest, nisi in fine mundi tantum. Tunc enim admiscere ei concedetur aliqua etiam de dextris signis, id est, ut vel daemones fuget, vel aegritudines sanet, et propter hoc, tanquam qui excesserit terminos suos et in semetipsum divisus sit, ac semetipsum impugnaverit, destruetur. Et propterea Dominus praedixit, in novissimis temporibus tentationem futuram talem in qua decipiantur, si fieri potest, etiam electi; confusis scilicet indiciis signorum perturbari necesse est etiam eos, qui in discernendis spiritibus, ac distinguendis virtutibus videntur eruditi.
“For tell me, I pray, what use is it to show statues walking, bronze or stone dogs barking, mountains leaping, flying through the air, and other such things that you say Simon did? But the signs that are from the good are directed to the salvation of men, like those our Lord did, who made the blind see and the deaf hear, raised up the feeble and the lame, drove away sicknesses and demons, made the dead rise, and did other such things, which you see done through me as well. These signs, then, which serve the salvation of men and confer some good on them, the evil one cannot do, except only at the end of the world. For then he will be permitted to mix in some of the right-hand signs too, that is, to drive out demons or heal sicknesses; and because of this, as one who has exceeded his bounds and is divided against himself and fights against himself, he will be destroyed. And for this reason the Lord foretold that in the last times there would be such a temptation that even the elect would be deceived, if possible; that is, with the marks of the signs confused, even those who seem learned in discerning spirits and distinguishing mighty works must be disturbed.”
3.61PG 1:1308c–1308d
Decem ergo quae diximus paria huic mundo destinata sunt ab initio saeculi. Cain et Abel unum fuit par; secundum vero gigantum et Noe, tertium Pharaonis et Abraham; quartum Philistinorum et Isaac; quintum Esau et Jacob; sextum magorum et legislatoris Moysi; septimum tentatoris et Filii hominis; octavum Simonis et meum, Petri; nonum omnium gentium, et illius qui mittetur seminare verbum inter gentes; decimum Antichristi et Christi, de quibus paribus alias vobis per singula latius exponemus. Cum haec diceret Petrus, Aquila ait: Vere assidua doctrina opus est, ut de singulis possit quis scire rationem.
“So the ten pairs we spoke of were appointed for this world from the beginning of the age. Cain and Abel were one pair; the second, the giants and Noah; the third, Pharaoh and Abraham; the fourth, the Philistines and Isaac; the fifth, Esau and Jacob; the sixth, the magicians and Moses the lawgiver; the seventh, the tempter and the Son of Man; the eighth, Simon and I, Peter; the ninth, all the nations and him who will be sent to sow the word among the nations; the tenth, Antichrist and Christ. We will explain these pairs to you one by one more fully another time.” When Peter said this, Aquila said: “Truly constant teaching is needed for one to know the reason for each thing.”
3.62PG 1:1309a
At Petrus: Quis est, qui assiduus sit erga doctrinam et studiose singula quaeque perquirat, nisi qui animam suam diligit ad salutem et omnibus renuntiat hujus mundi negotiis, ut soli verbo Dei vacet, quem solum prudentem judicat verus propheta, vendentem omnia quae sua sunt, et ementem unam veram margaritam, et intelligentem quae sit differentia a temporalibus ad aeterna, parvis ad magna, hominibus ad Deum? Intelligit enim quae sit aeterna spes apud verum et bonum Deum. Quis autem est qui diligit Deum, nisi qui sapientiam ejus cognovit? quomodo autem quis agnoscere poterit sapientiam Dei, nisi assiduus sit ad audiendum verbum ejus? ex quo accidit ut amorem ejus concipiat et digno eum honore veneretur, hymnis et orationibus ad eum fusis, et in his libentissime requiescens, summumque deputans detrimentum, si quando aliquid aliud vel ad momentum temporis loquatur aut agat, quia revera nec potest anima quae Dei amore repleta est, aliud aliquid intueri nisi quod ad Deum pertinet, nec satiari potest prae amore ejus, ea quae ipsi scit esse placita meditando. Hi vero qui affectum ejus minime concepere, nec illuminatam charitatem ejus gerunt mente, velut in tenebris positi lucem videre non possunt. Et ideo etiam priusquam incipiant acquirere de Deo, quasi labore oppressi statim deficiunt, ac taedio repleti continuo a propria consuetudine rapiuntur ad ea verba quibus delectantur. Nam de Deo audire aliquid talibus taediosum est et molestum, pro eo ut dixi, quia mens eorum nullam dulcedinem divinae charitatis accepit.
But Peter said: “Who is constant in teaching and studiously inquires into each thing, except one who loves his soul unto salvation and renounces all the business of this world, so as to be free for the word of God alone? Him alone the true Prophet judges prudent: one who sells all that he has and buys the one true pearl, and understands the difference between temporal things and eternal, small and great, men and God. For he understands what the eternal hope with the true and good God is. But who loves God, except one who has come to know his wisdom? And how can anyone come to know the wisdom of God unless he is constant in hearing his word? From this it comes about that he conceives love for him and venerates him with due honor, pouring out hymns and prayers to him and resting in these most gladly, and reckoning it the greatest loss if he ever says or does anything else even for a moment; because truly the soul that is filled with the love of God can look at nothing else but what pertains to God, nor, for love of him, can it have enough of meditating on what it knows pleases him. But those who have not conceived affection for him, nor bear his love illumined in their mind, cannot see the light, as if placed in darkness. And therefore, even before they begin to inquire about God, they at once give up as if crushed by labor, and, filled with weariness, are swept off by their habit to the talk in which they delight. For to such people it is wearisome and burdensome to hear anything about God, because, as I said, their mind has received no sweetness of divine love.”
3.63PG 1:1309a–1310a
Haec Petro dicente dies exortus est, et ecce veniens quidam ex discipulis Simonis clamabat dicens: Obsecro te, Petre, suscipe me miserum a Mago Simone deceptum, cui ego velut coelesti Deo intendebam, pro his quae ab eo fieri mirabilibus videbam. Auditis tamen sermonibus tuis coepit jam mihi homo videri, et quidem malus. Verumtamen cum hinc exiret, ego eum subsecutus sum solus, nondum enim ad liquidum impietates ejus agnoveram. Cum autem vidisset me subsequentem, beatum me dicens perduxit ad domum suam, circa medium vero noctis ait ad me: Omnium te hominum faciam meliorem, si volueris usque ad finem perseverare mecum; cui cum promisissem, exegit a me juramentum perseverantiae, eoque accepto imposuit super humeros meos polluta quaedam et exsecrabilia secreta sua ut portarem, et sequi me jussit. Ubi vero ventum est ad mare, navigium quod forte aderat ingressus, id a cervicibus meis quod portare me jusserat, sumpsit. Et paulo post egressus nihil extulit, certum quod in mare id jecerat. Rogabat autem me, ut cum ipso proficiscerer, dicens se Romam petere, ibi enim in tantum placiturum, ut Deus putetur et divinis publice donetur honoribus. Tunc, inquit, te omnibus divitiis repletum, si huc redire placuerit, et pluribus fultum ministeriis mittam. Haec ego audiens, et nihil in eo secundum hanc professionem videns, sed magum et deceptorem esse intelligens, respondi: Quaeso te, ignosce mihi, quia pedes doleo, et propterea exire a Caesarea non valeo; praeterea est mihi uxor, sunt parvuli liberi, quos relinquere omnino non possum. At ille haec audiens et ignaviae me incusans, profectus est contra Doram dicens: Cum audieris quanta mihi gloria erit in urbe Roma, poenitebit te. Et post haec ipse quidem, ut aiebat, Romam petiit, ego autem confestim redii huc, orans ut me suscipias ad poenitentiam, quia ab eo deceptus sum.
As Peter was saying this, day broke; and behold, one of Simon's disciples came crying out: “I beseech you, Peter, receive me, a wretch deceived by Simon Magus, to whom I gave heed as to a heavenly God because of the wonders I saw him do. But when I heard your words, he began to seem to me a man, and a wicked one at that. Nevertheless, when he went out from here, I alone followed him, for I had not yet clearly recognized his impieties. When he saw me following, he called me blessed and took me to his house; and about midnight he said to me: ‘I will make you better than all men if you will persevere with me to the end.’ When I had promised him this, he demanded an oath of perseverance from me; and having received it, he put on my shoulders certain polluted and accursed secret things of his to carry, and ordered me to follow him. When we came to the sea, he went aboard a boat that happened to be there and took from my neck what he had ordered me to carry. A little later he came out bringing nothing; certainly he had thrown it into the sea. And he asked me to set out with him, saying that he was going to Rome, for there he would please so much that he would be thought a god and be publicly endowed with divine honors. ‘Then,’ he said, ‘if you wish to return here, I will send you back filled with all riches and supported by many servants.’ Hearing this, and seeing nothing in him in keeping with this profession, but understanding that he was a magician and a deceiver, I answered: ‘I beg you, forgive me; my feet hurt, and therefore I cannot leave Caesarea; besides, I have a wife and little children whom I cannot leave at all.’ But he, hearing this and charging me with cowardice, set out toward Dora, saying: ‘When you hear how great glory I shall have in the city of Rome, you will regret it.’ And after this he went, as he said, to Rome; but I returned here at once, praying that you will receive me to repentance, because I was deceived by him.”
3.64PG 1:1310a
Cum haec dixisset is qui a Simone regressus est, jussit eum Petrus in atrio residere. Procedens autem ipse et turbas plurimas videns, multo plures quam superioribus diebus, stetit in loco solito et ostendens eum qui venerat, sermonem facere hoc modo coepit: Iste, fratres, quem ostendo vobis, paulo ante venit ad me, de Simonis mihi malis artibus nuntians, quomodo ipsam sceleris sui officinam projecerit in profundum, non quasi poenitentia ductus, sed metuens ne deprehensus publicis legibus subjaceret. Rogabat autem hunc, ut dicit, munera pollicens immensa, secum manere. Quem cum suadere minime potuisset, tanquam ignavum increpans dereliquit, ipse Romam petens. Cumque haec Petrus indicasset turbis, ipse qui regressus a Simone fuerat, publice stans singula quaeque coepit populo exponere de sceleribus Simonis. Et cum graviter ferrent de his, quae audiebant per artes magicas gesta a Simone, ait Petrus:
When the man who had returned from Simon had said this, Peter told him to sit in the court. And going out himself and seeing great crowds, far more than in the previous days, he stood in the usual place and, pointing to the man who had come, began to speak thus: “This man, brethren, whom I show you, came to me a little while ago with news of Simon's evil arts: how he threw the very workshop of his crime into the deep, not led by repentance, but fearing that if he were caught he would fall under the public laws. And he asked this man, as he says, promising immense gifts, to stay with him; and when he could not persuade him, he left him, rebuking him as cowardly, and himself set out for Rome.” And when Peter had told these things to the crowds, the man who had returned from Simon, standing in public, began to set out to the people each of Simon's crimes. And when they were indignant at what they heard Simon had done by magic arts, Peter said:
3.65PG 1:1310a–1311a
Nolite, fratres, graviter ferre de his quae transacta sunt, sed observate de futuris; quae enim transierunt jam finita sunt, quae vero imminent periculosa sunt his qui incurrerint; scandala enim nunquam deerunt huic mundo donec permittitur inimico agere pro voluntate sua, ut prudentes quique et intelligentes astutias ejus suscitatos sibi ab eo superent agones, hi vero qui negligunt discere quae ad salutem pertinent animae suae, justis ab eo deceptionibus capiantur. Quia ergo ut ipsi audistis, Simon egressus est aures gentilium qui ad salutem vocati sunt praevenire, necesse est et me vestigia ejus insequi, ut si quid forte ab illo disputatum fuerit, corrigatur a nobis. Sed quoniam justum est de vobis majorem sollicitudinem geri, qui jam intra muros vitae continemini, quia quod acquisitum est si pereat, damnum infert, quod autem nondum si quidem inveniri potuerit, lucrum est, si minus hoc solum damni est quod lucrum factum non est; ut ergo et vos magis ac magis in veritate firmemini, et gentes quae ad salutem vocantur non usquequaque possint nequitia Simonis praeveniri, cogitavi Zacchaeum vobis ordinare pastorem, ego vero ipse tres vobiscum permanere menses et ita proficisci ad gentes, ne amplius morantibus nobis et sceleribus Simonis usquequaque grassantibus, insanabiles fiant.
“Do not be indignant, brethren, at what has happened, but be watchful about the future; for what has passed is already over, but what threatens is dangerous for those who run into it. For offenses will never be lacking in this world as long as the enemy is permitted to act according to his will, so that all who are prudent and understand his cunning may overcome the contests he raises against them, while those who neglect to learn what pertains to the salvation of their soul may be caught by his deceptions, as they deserve. Since, then, as you yourselves have heard, Simon has gone out to preoccupy the ears of the Gentiles who are called to salvation, I too must follow his tracks, so that whatever he argues may be corrected by us. But it is right that greater care be taken for you, who are already within the walls of life; for if what has been acquired is lost, it brings loss, while what has not yet been acquired is gain if it can be found, and if not, the only loss is that no gain was made. So, in order that you may be more and more strengthened in the truth, and that the Gentiles who are called to salvation may not be wholly preoccupied by Simon's wickedness, I have decided to ordain Zacchaeus as your shepherd, and myself to remain with you three months and then to set out to the Gentiles, lest, if we delay longer while Simon's crimes spread everywhere, they become incurable.”
3.66PG 1:1311a–1311b
Haec illo dicente universus populus flevit, audiens quod profecturus esset. At Petrus compassus eis, etiam ipse lacrymas fudit, et in coelum respiciens ait: Tibi, Deus, qui coelum terramque fecisti et omnia quae in eis sunt, precem supplicem fundimus, ut confugientes ad te in tribulatione sua soleris; propter affectum enim quem habent erga te, diligunt me, qui veritatem tuam annuntiavi eis. Propter quod miserationis tuae dextera custodi eos; non enim Zacchaeus nec alius quisquam hominum custos esse eis idoneus potest. Haec autem et his similia cum dixisset Petrus, manibus superpositis Zacchaeo oravit, ut inculpabiliter episcopatus sui servaret officium. Post haec duodecim presbyteros ordinavit et diacones quatuor, et ait: Zacchaeum hunc vobis ordinavi episcopum, sciens eum timorem Dei habere et eruditum esse in Scripturis, quem quasi Christi locum servantem honorare debetis, obedientes ei ad salutem vestram, et scientes, quod sive honor sive injuria quae ei defertur, ad Christum redundat et a Christo ad Deum. Audite ergo eum attentius et ab ipso suscipite doctrinam fidei, monita autem vitae a presbyteris, a diaconibus vero ordinem disciplinae. Viduarum religiosam curam gerite, pupillos enixius juvate, pauperibus misericordiam facite, juvenes pudicitiam docete, et ut breviter totum dicam, alterutrum vos in quibus res poposcerit sustentate. Deum colite qui creavit caelum et terram, Christo credite, invicem diligite, misericordes estote ad omnes, non verbo solo sed rebus implete charitatem.
As he was saying this, all the people wept, hearing that he was going to depart. And Peter, sympathizing with them, himself also shed tears, and looking up to heaven he said: “To you, O God, who made heaven and earth and all that is in them, we pour out suppliant prayer, that you may comfort those who flee to you in their tribulation; for because of the affection they have toward you, they love me, who announced your truth to them. Therefore guard them with the right hand of your compassion; for neither Zacchaeus nor any other man can be a fit guardian for them.” When Peter had said these and similar things, he laid his hands on Zacchaeus and prayed that he might keep the office of his episcopate blamelessly. After this he ordained twelve presbyters and four deacons, and said: “I have ordained this Zacchaeus as your bishop, knowing that he has the fear of God and is learned in the Scriptures. You ought to honor him as holding the place of Christ, obeying him for your salvation, and knowing that whatever honor or injury is offered to him redounds to Christ, and from Christ to God. Hear him, then, attentively, and receive from him the teaching of the faith; from the presbyters, admonitions for life; and from the deacons, the order of discipline. Take devout care of widows, help orphans earnestly, show mercy to the poor, teach the young chastity, and, to say it all briefly, support one another in whatever the occasion demands. Worship God who created heaven and earth, believe in Christ, love one another, be merciful to all, fulfilling love not in word only but in deed.”
3.67PG 1:1311b–1312a
Et cum hate atque his similia praecepisset, pronuntiavit ad populum dicens: Quoniam tres menses statui facere vobiscum, si quis vestrum desiderat, baptizetur, ut exutus prioribus malis, de reliquo pro bonis actibus haeres bonorum coelestium ex gestis propriis fiat. Accedat ergo qui vult ad Zacchaeum, et ipsi det nomen suum, atque ab eo audiat mysteria regni coelorum. Jejuniis frequentibus operam impendat ac semetipsum in omnibus probet, ut tribus his mensibus consummatis in die festo possit baptizari. Baptizabitur autem unusquisque vestrum in aquis perennibus nomine Trinae Beatitudinis invocato super se, perunctus primo oleo per orationem sanctificato, ut ita demum per haec consecratus possit percipere de sanctis.
And when he had given these and similar instructions, he made an announcement to the people: “Since I have decided to spend three months with you, if any of you desires it, let him be baptized, so that, stripped of his former evils, he may for the rest become by his own deeds an heir of heavenly goods in return for good actions. Let whoever wishes, then, come to Zacchaeus and give him his name, and hear from him the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven. Let him devote himself to frequent fasts and prove himself in all things, so that when these three months are completed he may be baptized on the festival day. Each of you will be baptized in ever-flowing waters, with the name of the threefold blessedness invoked over him, having first been anointed with oil sanctified by prayer, so that, consecrated by these things, he may at last partake of the holy things.”
3.68PG 1:1312a–1312b
— Et cum multa dixisset de ratione baptismi, dimissis turbis ad solitam se recepit mansionem. ibique astantibus sibi duodecim, id est, Zacchaeo et Sophonia, Josepho et Michaea, Eleazaro et Phinees, Lazaro et Eliseo, me Clemente et Nicodemo, Niceta et Aquila, hoc modo prolocutus est: Consideremus fratres, quod justum est; debemus enim auxilium aliquod ferre gentibus, quae ad salutem vocatae sunt. Ipsi audistis quod Simon praecedere volens iter nostrum profectus est, quem oportuerat e vestigio insequi, ut sicubi aliquos subvertere tentaret, continuo confutaretur a nobis. Sed quoniam injustum mihi videtur, ut derelictis his qui jam conversi sunt ad Deum, eorum qui adhuc longe sunt curam proferamus, rectum puto tribus mensibus permanere me cum his qui in hac civitate conversi sunt ad fidem, et firmiores eos efficere, nec tamen illos qui adhuc longe sunt penitus negligere, ne forte, si diu venenis doctrinae imbuantur, difficilius revocentur. Et ideo volo, si tamen etiam vobis justum videtur, ut pro Zacchaeo quem hic ordinavimus episcopum, subjiciatur in numero Benjamin filius Saba, et pro Clemente quem decrevi mecum semper esse, quia ex gentibus veniens audiendi verbi Dei grande desiderium gerit, Ananias filius Safra; pro Niceta vero et Aquila, qui nuper conversi sunt ad fidem Christi, Rubelus Zacchaei frater et Zacharias structor. Istis ergo quatuor pro his quatuor substitutis expleri volo duodecim numerum, ut me in ipsis semper secum esse sentiat Simon.
And when he had said much about the meaning of baptism, he dismissed the crowds and withdrew to his usual lodging; and there, with twelve standing by him—Zacchaeus and Sophonias, Joseph and Michaeas, Eleazar and Phinees, Lazarus and Eliseus, I Clement and Nicodemus, Niceta and Aquila—he spoke thus: “Let us consider, brethren, what is right; for we ought to bring some help to the Gentiles who are called to salvation. You yourselves have heard that Simon has set out, wishing to go ahead of us on our journey; and we ought to follow his tracks at once, so that wherever he tried to subvert any, he might be refuted by us immediately. But since it seems unjust to me to abandon those who have already been converted to God and to care for those who are still far off, I think it right that I remain three months with those in this city who have been converted to the faith and make them firmer; and yet not wholly neglect those who are still far off, lest, if they are long steeped in the poison of his teaching, they be recalled with greater difficulty. And therefore I wish, if it seems right to you too, that in place of Zacchaeus, whom we have ordained bishop here, Benjamin the son of Saba be put into the number; in place of Clement, whom I have decided to have always with me, because, coming from the Gentiles, he has a great desire to hear the word of God, Ananias the son of Safra; and in place of Niceta and Aquila, who have lately been converted to the faith of Christ, Rubelus the brother of Zacchaeus and Zacharias the builder. With these four substituted for those four, I wish the number of twelve to be completed, so that Simon may feel that I am always with him in them.”
3.69PG 1:1312b–1312d
sequestratis igitur me Clemente et Niceta et Aquila, ad illos duodecim ait: Volo vos post diem crastinum proficisci ad gentes et vestigia Simonis insequi, ut omnia quae agit manifesta mihi faciatis. Sed et propositum singulorum diligenter requirite et me adventurum sine mora eis annuntiate, et ne multa vobis dicam, per omnia instruite gentiles exspectare adventum meum. Cumque haec atque his similia dixisset: Etiam vos, inquit, fratres, si quid vobis ad haec videtur, dicite, ne forte non sit rectum quod mihi soli placet. Tum omnes una voce collaudantes eum: Rogamus magis, aiebant, ut pro arbitrio tuo cuncta disponas et quod tibi ipsi videtur jubeas; hoc enim putamus esse opus integrum pietatis, si quae tu jusseris impleamus.
Having set apart, then, me Clement, Niceta, and Aquila, he said to those twelve: “I wish you, the day after tomorrow, to set out to the Gentiles and follow Simon's tracks, so as to make known to me all that he does. Also inquire carefully into the disposition of each person, and announce that I will come to them without delay; and, not to say more, instruct the Gentiles in every way to await my coming.” And when he had said these and similar things, he said: “You too, brethren, if anything seems good to you on this, say it, lest what pleases me alone should not be right.” Then all, praising him with one voice, said: “We rather ask you to arrange everything at your discretion and command what seems good to you; for we think this the whole work of piety, if we fulfil what you command.”
3.70PG 1:1313a
Igitur statuto die cum stetissent ante Petrum, Ne arbitreris, aiunt, Petre, parvum nobis indici maerorem, quod fraudamur non audientes te per menses tres; sed quoniam hoc expedit agere quod tu jubes, obediemus promptissime; semper ergo vultum tuum in nostro corde retinentes sicut jussisti alacres proficiscimur. At ille oratione pro eis ad Dominum fusa emisit eos. Et cum profecti fuissent illi duodecim qui praemissi sunt, Petrus ingressus ex more in loco disputationis stetit. Convenerat autem populi multitudo, copiosior numerus quam solebat, et omnes cum lacrymis intuebantur eum, pro eo quod pridie ab eo audissent, profecturum se Simonis gratia. Sed et ipse lacrymantes eos videns similia patiebatur, licet conaretur occultare et inhibere lacrymas; prodebatur tamen ex tremore vocis et interruptione sermonis, quod simili angeretur affectu.
So on the appointed day, when they stood before Peter, they said: “Do not think, Peter, that it is a small grief laid on us to be deprived of hearing you for three months; but since it is good to do what you command, we will obey most readily. Keeping your face always in our hearts, then, we set out eagerly, as you have commanded.” And he, having poured out prayer to the Lord for them, sent them away. When those twelve who were sent ahead had set out, Peter went in as usual and stood in the place of disputation. A multitude of people had gathered, larger than usual, and all looked at him with tears, because they had heard from him the day before that he would set out on Simon's account. And he himself, seeing them weeping, was affected in the same way, though he tried to hide and hold back his tears; yet the trembling of his voice and the breaking off of his speech betrayed that he was distressed by the same feeling.
3.71PG 1:1313a
Verumtamen manu confricans frontem, Aequo animo, inquit, estote, fratres, et misericordes animas vestras consilii ratione solamini, referentes omnia ad Deum, cujus solius implenda et in omnibus praeferenda voluntas est. Nam si verbi gratia ponamus, quod pro affectu quem erga vos gerimus, contra voluntatem ejus agentes resideamus vobiscum, nunquid non potest missa in me morte, profectionem mihi a vobis indicere longiorem? Et ideo melius est ut hanc breviorem cum voluntate ipsius impleamus, utpote quibus definitum est in omnibus obedire Deo; unde et vos debetis simili obedientia parere ei, quippe qui etiam me non alia ex causa, nisi pro ipsius amore diligatis. Ut ergo amici Dei, voluntati ejus obtemperate; sed et vos ipsi probate quod justum est. Nunquid non impium videretur, si cum vos Simon deciperet, ego non venissem ad vos detentus a fratribus qui erant in Hierusalem, et quidem cum haberetis apud vos Zacchaeum, virum bonum et in sermone expeditum? Ita ergo et nunc impium judicate, si cum exierit Simon ad gentes impugnandas, quibus nullus omnino defensor est, ego non subsequar detentus a vobis. Propter quod observemus, ne forte affectu injusto voluntatem maligni faciamus.
Yet, rubbing his forehead with his hand, he said: “Be of good courage, brethren, and comfort your compassionate souls with reasoned counsel, referring all things to God, whose will alone is to be fulfilled and preferred in all things. For suppose, for example, that out of the affection we have toward you we were to stay with you against his will: could he not, by sending death upon me, impose on me a longer departure from you? And therefore it is better that we carry out this shorter one with his will, as those who are resolved to obey God in all things; and so you too ought to obey him with like obedience, since you love me for no other reason than for love of him. As friends of God, then, comply with his will; but judge for yourselves too what is right. Would it not have seemed impious if, when Simon was deceiving you, I had not come to you, held back by the brethren who were in Jerusalem—and that though you had Zacchaeus with you, a good man and ready in speech? So now too judge it impious if, when Simon has gone out to attack the Gentiles, who have no defender at all, I do not follow him, held back by you. Therefore let us take care lest by an unjust affection we do the will of the evil one.”
3.72PG 1:1313a–1314a
Interim tribus, ut dixi, mensibus permanebo apud vos; estote assidui ad audiendum verbum, et consummatis his, si qui possunt et volunt sequi nos, permittitur eis salva pietate. Quod autem dico salva pietate, hoc est, ne quem discessu suo contristet qui contristari non debet, vel parentes relinquens quos non oportet, vel uxorem fidelem, vel si quae sunt hujusmodi personae, quibus prOpter Deum deferri solatium convenit. Interea per dies singulos disputans et docens, propositum tempus in doctrinae labore complevit. Et cum advenisset dies festus, super decem millia baptizati sunt.
“Meanwhile, as I said, I will stay with you three months. Be constant in hearing the word; and when these are completed, any who can and wish to follow us are permitted to do so, saving piety. What I mean by ‘saving piety’ is this: that no one should, by his departure, grieve one who ought not to be grieved, as by leaving parents whom he ought not to leave, or a faithful wife, or any persons of this kind to whom it is fitting to give comfort for God's sake.” Meanwhile, disputing and teaching day by day, he filled the appointed time with the labor of teaching. And when the festival day had come, more than ten thousand were baptized.
3.73PG 1:1314a
In illis autem diebus epistola mittitur a fratribus qui praecesserant, in qua Simonis scelera continebantur, quomodo per civitates deciperet turbas et Petrum per singula laceraret, ut cum forte advenisset, nullus ei accommodaret auditum. Asserebat enim eum magum esse et sine Deo, injuriosum, callidum, imperitum et impossibilia profitentem. Mortuos enim resurrecturos asserit, quod est, inquit, impossibile. Si qui vero eum confutare velit, occultis ab eo insidiis perimitur per satellites ejus; propter quod, inquit, et ego eum cum superassem et triumphassem, insidias ejus veritus fugi, ne forte maleficiis me perimeret aut mortem meam per insidias elocaret. Indicabant autem maxime eum apud Tripolim demorari.
In those days a letter was sent by the brethren who had gone ahead, describing Simon's crimes: how he was deceiving the crowds from city to city and tearing Peter apart on every point, so that when he arrived no one would lend him an ear. For he asserted that Peter was a magician and godless, insolent, cunning, ignorant, and professing impossible things. “For he asserts,” Simon said, “that the dead will rise, which is impossible. And if anyone wishes to refute him, he is killed by secret plots through his henchmen. That is why I too,” he said, “when I had overcome and triumphed over him, fled for fear of his plots, lest he kill me by sorceries or contrive my death by plots.” They reported that he was staying chiefly at Tripolis.
3.74PG 1:1314a
Igitur Petrus epistolam recitari populo jubet, et post lectionem allocutus eos de omnibus plenissime instruxit, praecipue tamen ut obedirent Zacchaeo, quem ordinavit eis episcopum. Sed et presbyteros et diaconos populo, et ipsis nihilominus populum commendavit. Simulque denuntians quod apud Tripolim hiematurus esset, Commendo vos, inquit, gratiae Dei, crastino cum voluntate Domini profecturus. Per totos autem tres menses quos apud Caesaream doctrinae causa exegimus, quaecunque apud populum disserebat per diem, haec nobis secreto lucubrantibus secum plenius et perfectius explanabat, tanquam fidelioribus ac sibi liquido probatis. Simul et imperat mihi, quia intellexit me studiosius quae audirem memoria commendare, libris singula quaeque quae memoratu digna videbantur comprehendere et mittere ad te, mi domine Jacobe, sicut et feci parens ejus praeceptis.
So Peter had the letter read to the people, and after the reading he addressed them and instructed them most fully about everything, especially that they should obey Zacchaeus, whom he had ordained bishop for them. He also commended the presbyters and deacons to the people, and the people no less to them. And at the same time, announcing that he would spend the winter at Tripolis, he said: “I commend you to the grace of God, as I am to set out tomorrow, by the will of the Lord.” Through all the three months that we spent at Caesarea for the sake of teaching, whatever he discoursed to the people by day he explained more fully and perfectly to us in private as we sat up with him at night, as to men more faithful and clearly proved by him. At the same time he commanded me, because he saw that I committed what I heard to memory with special care, to set down in books whatever seemed worth remembering and to send them to you, my lord James; and I have done so, obeying his commands.
3.75PG 1:1314a–1316a
Primus ergo liber ex his quos prius misi ad te continet de vero propheta et de proprietate intelligentiae legis, secundum id quod Moysi traditio docet. Secundus de principio continet, utrum unum sit principium, an multa, et quod non ignoret Hebraeorum lex, quid sit immensitas. Tertius, de Deo et his quae ab eo instituta sunt. Quartus, quod cum multi dicantur dii, unus sit verus Deus secundum testimonia Scripturarum. Quintus, quod duo sint coeli, quorum unum sit istud visibile firmamentum quod et transibit, aliud vero aeternum et invisibile. Sextus, de bono et malo et quod bono cuncta subjiciuntur a Patre, malum autem quare et quomodo, et unde sit, et quod cooperetur quidem bono, sed non proposito bono; et quae sint signa boni, quae vero mali, et quae sit differentia dualitatis et conjugationis. Septimus, quae sint, quae prosecuti sunt duodecim apostoli apud populum in templo. Octavus, de verbis Domini quae sibi videntur esse contraria, sed non sunt, et quae sit horum absolutio. Nonus, quia lex quae a Deo posita est, justa sit et perfecta, et quae sola possit facere pacem. Decimus, de nativitate hominum carnali et de generatione quae est per baptismum, et quae sit in homine carnalis seminis successio, et quae animae ejus ratio, et quomodo in ipsa est libertas arbitrii; quae quoniam non est ingenita sed facta est, immobilis a bono esse non poterat. De his ergo singulis quae apud Caesaream disserta sunt a Petro, jubente, ut dixi, ipso decem conscripta ad te transmisi volumina. Nos autem die postera, ut statutum fuerat, cum aliquantis qui Petrum sequi decreverant fidelibus viris, a Caesarea proficiscimur.
The first book, then, of those which I sent you earlier contains the account of the true Prophet and of the proper understanding of the law, according to what the tradition of Moses teaches. The second contains the account of the principle: whether there is one principle or many, and that the law of the Hebrews is not ignorant of what immensity is. The third, of God and the things established by him. The fourth, that though many are called gods, there is one true God, according to the testimonies of the Scriptures. The fifth, that there are two heavens, of which one is this visible firmament, which will also pass away, and the other eternal and invisible. The sixth, of good and evil: that all things are made subject to the good by the Father; why, how, and whence evil is; that it works together with the good, but not with a good purpose; what the signs of the good are and what those of the evil; and what the difference is between duality and conjunction. The seventh, what the twelve apostles set out before the people in the temple. The eighth, of the words of the Lord which seem contrary to each other but are not, and what their solution is. The ninth, that the law laid down by God is just and perfect, and that it alone can make peace. The tenth, of the carnal birth of men and of the generation that is through baptism; what the succession of carnal seed in man is; what the nature of his soul is; and how freedom of choice is in it, which, since it is not unbegotten but was made, could not be immovable from the good. Of all these things, then, which Peter discussed at Caesarea, I have, at his command, as I said, written ten volumes and sent them to you. And on the next day, as had been arranged, we set out from Caesarea with some faithful men who had decided to follow Peter.
Chapter 4
4.1PG 1:1315b–1315c
Profecti a Caesarea ut Tripolim pergeremus, apud Doram breve oppidum primam fecimus mansionem, quia nec longe aberat. Et omnes pene qui per sermonem Petri crediderant, divelli ab eo satis aegre habebant, sed pariter incedentes, dum iterum videre, iterum complecti jnvat, iterum conferre sermonem, ad diversorium pervenimus. Sequenti vero die venimus Ptolomaidem, ubi decem dies demorati cum aliquanti verbum Dei recepissent, nonnullis eorum, qui attentiores videbantur et diutius detinere nos doctrina: gratia cupiebant. Tripolim st hoc velint, ut sequerentur indicavimus. Similiter ct apud Tyrum ac Sidonem et Bcrytum fecimus, et his qui plenius desiderabant audire sermonem, apud Tripolim nobis hiemandum denuntiavimus. Igitur cum ex singulis civitatibus studiosi quique comitarentur Petrum, electorum multitudo plurima ingreditur Tripolim. Continuo autem ante portas civitatis fratres qui praemissi fuerant, occurrunt et suscipientes nos adducunt per hospitia, quae praeparaverant. Commotio autem et concursus plurimus fiebat in civitate, desiderantium videre Petrum.
Setting out from Caesarea to go to Tripolis, we made our first halt at Dora, a small town, because it was not far off. Almost all who had believed through Peter's preaching took it very hard to be parted from him; they walked along with us, glad to see him again, to embrace him again, to talk with him again, until we reached the lodging. On the following day we came to Ptolemais, and stayed there ten days. When a good number had received the word of God, we told some of them who seemed more attentive and wanted to keep us longer for the sake of instruction that they might follow us to Tripolis if they wished. We did the same at Tyre, Sidon, and Berytus, and announced to those who wanted to hear the teaching more fully that we were to spend the winter at Tripolis. So, since from each city all the eager ones accompanied Peter, a very great multitude of the elect entered Tripolis. Right before the gates of the city the brothers who had been sent ahead met us, received us, and took us to the lodgings they had prepared. There was a great stir and running together in the city of people wanting to see Peter.
4.2PG 1:1315c–1316b
Et cum venissemus ad domum Maronis, in qua Petro fuerat praeparatum, conversus ad turbas, post diem crastinum sermonem se ad eos promisit facturum. Igitur qui praemissi fuerant fratres, omnibus qui nobiscum venerant hospitia dividunt. Petrus vero Maronis domum ingressus cum rogaretur cibum sumere, nequaquam se facturum respondit, nisi prius scisset, si omnes qui eum fuerant comitati hospitiis requiescerent. Comperit autem a fratribus qui praemissi sunt, quia a civibus pro desiderio quod erga Petrum conceperant, non solum hospitiis sed et omni humanitate suscepti sint, in tantum ut et contristarentur aliquanti, quibus defuere quos susciperent; ita enim omnes paratos fuisse, ut si multo plures venissent, adhuc tanti suscipiendos magis quam suscipientes fuisse defuturos.
When we had come to the house of Maro, where lodging had been prepared for Peter, he turned to the crowds and promised that he would speak to them the day after next. Then the brothers who had been sent ahead assigned lodgings to all who had come with us. Peter went into Maro's house, and when he was asked to take food, he answered that he would by no means do so until he knew whether all who had accompanied him were resting in lodgings. He learned from the brothers who had been sent ahead that, because of the longing the citizens had conceived for Peter, they had been received not only with lodging but with every kindness, so much so that some were even saddened because there was no one left for them to receive. For all were so ready that, if many more had come, there would still have been hosts to spare rather than guests.
4.3PG 1:1316b–1317a
Super bis Petrus valde delectatus, collaudavit et benedixit eos ac secum manere jussit. Ipse vero cum lavisset in mari, cibo sumpto quievit in vespera. Et ex more pullorum cantibus surgens, vespertino adhuc lumine perdurante, cunctos invenit vigilantes; eramus autem omnes cum eo sedecim, Petrus et ego Clemens, Niceta et Aquila, et illi qui praecesserant duodecim. Salutans itaque ut solebat Petrus ait: Hodie quia aliis occupati non sumus, nobis simus. Et ego quidem vobis, quae apud Caesaream post digressum vestrum gesta sunt, enarrabo; vos autem mihi quae hic a Simone perpetrata sunt, indicate. Et cum de his ab alterutro sermo ederetur, illucescente die ingressi quidam de familiaribus nuntiant Petro, quod Simon ubi eum didicisset ingressum, per noctem profectus esset Syriam tendens. Turba: autem diem hanc. inquiunt, quam interposuisti eis. desiderio tui longissimum sibi esse tempus opinantur, denique non ferentes stant ante januam, inter se invicem de his quae audire cupiunt conferentes, et te ante praefinitum tempus omnimodis se visuros sperant, quantoque magis dies clarescit multitudines colliguntur, ct audituros se sermonem tuum, nescio unde praesumentes certissime confidunt. Nunc ergo quod tibi videtur, jube ut dicamus eis; absurdum namque est tantam multitudinem convenisse et discedere cum maestitia, quippe si responsa eis nulla reddantur. Non enim cogitabunt quod ipsi statutum non exspectaverint diem, sed quod a te magis videantur esse contempti.
Peter was greatly delighted at this; he praised and blessed them and told them to stay with him. He himself bathed in the sea, took food, and rested in the evening. Rising as usual at cockcrow, while the evening light still lasted, he found everyone awake. There were sixteen of us in all with him: Peter and I, Clement, Niceta and Aquila, and the twelve who had gone ahead. Greeting us as he used to, Peter said: “Today, since we are not taken up with other business, let us have time for ourselves. I will tell you what was done at Caesarea after you left, and you tell me what has been done here by Simon.” While these things were being told on both sides, at daybreak some of the household came in and told Peter that Simon, on learning that he had arrived, had set out during the night, making for Syria. “But the crowds,” they said, “think this day you have put between yourself and them a very long time, because of their longing for you. In fact they cannot bear it, and are standing before the door, talking among themselves about what they want to hear, and they fully hope to see you before the appointed time. The brighter the day grows, the more the multitudes gather, and they are quite confident—who knows on what ground—that they will hear you speak. So now tell us what you think we should say to them. It would be unfitting for so great a multitude to have come together and to go away in sorrow, if no answer is given them. For they will not think that it was they who did not wait for the appointed day, but rather that they have been slighted by you.”
4.4PG 1:1317a–1317b
Tum Petrus admirans ait: Videtis, fratres, quomodo unusquisque sermo Domini prophetico dictus impletur. Memini enim dixisse eum: Messis quidem multa, operarii autem pauci. Rogate ergo dominum messis, ut ejiciat operarios in messem suam". Ecce ergo nunc quae in mysterio praedicta sunt, adimplentur. Sed et quod dixit: Multi venient ab oriente et occidente. a septentrione et meridie, et recumbent in sinibus Abraham et Isaac et Jacob; etiam hoc pariter, ut videtis, expletur. Propter quod deprecor vos conservos et adjutores meos, ut discatis attentius praedicandi ordinem et absolutionum vias. ut possitis salvare animas hominum, quae occulta Dei virtute quem debeant diligere, prius etiam quam doceantur agnoscunt. Videtis enim eos quasi bonos servos desiderare eum, quem sibi sperant adventum sui Domini nuntiare. ut possint voluntatem ejus cum didicerint implere. Desiderium ergo audiendi verbi Dei et voluntatem ejus quaerendi ex Deo habent, et hoc est initium doni Dei quod gentibus datur, ut possint per hoc doctrinam recipere veritatis.
Then Peter, in wonder, said: “You see, brothers, how each word of the Lord spoken prophetically is fulfilled. For I remember that he said: ‘The harvest is great, but the workers are few; ask therefore the Lord of the harvest to send out workers into his harvest.’ See, then, what was foretold in a mystery is now being fulfilled. And what he said, ‘Many will come from east and west, from north and south, and will recline in the bosom of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob,’ this too, as you see, is likewise being fulfilled. Therefore I beg you, my fellow servants and helpers, to learn more attentively the order of preaching and the ways of release, so that you may be able to save the souls of men, which by the hidden power of God recognize whom they ought to love even before they are taught. For you see them, like good servants, longing for him who they hope will announce to them the coming of their Lord, so that when they have learned his will they may fulfill it. The desire, then, to hear the word of God and to seek his will they have from God; and this is the beginning of the gift of God that is given to the nations, that through it they may be able to receive the teaching of the truth.
4.5PG 1:1317b–1318a
Sic enim et Hebraeorum populo ex initio datum est, ut diligerent Moysen et crederent verbo ejus. [Unde et scriptum est: Credidit populus Deo et Moysi famulo ejus ".] Quod ergo fuit proprii muneris a Deo erga Hebraeorum gentem, hoc nunc videmus dari etiam his qui ex gentibus convocantur ad fidem. Operum vero ratio potestati et arbitrio uniuscujusque permittitur, et hoc ipsorum est proprium, [desiderium vero habere erga doctorem veritatis,] hoc a Patre caelesti donatum est. Sed salus in eo est ut voluntatem ejus, cujus amorem et desiderium Deo largiente conceperis, facias; ne dicatur ad te ille sermo eius quem dixit: Quid autem dicitis mihi: Domine, Domine, et non facitis quae dico? Est ergo proprii muneris a Deo concessi Hebraeis, ut Moysi credant, gentibus autem, ut Jesum diligant. Hoc enim indicabat et Magister, ubi ait: Confitebor tibi, Pater, Domine caeli et terrae, quia occultasti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus, et revelasti ea parvulis ". Per quod utique declaratur, quia Hebraeorum populus qui cx lege eruditus est, ignoravit eum, populus autem gentium agnovit Jesum et veneratur, propter quod et salvabitur, non solum agnoscens eum. sed et voluntatem ejus faciens. Debet autem is qui ex gentibus est, et ex Deo habet, ut diligat Jesum, proprii habere propositi, ut credat et Moysi. Et rursus Hebraeus qui ex Deo habet, ut credat Moysi, habere debet et ex preposito suo, ut credat in Jesum, ut unusquisque eorum habens in se aliud divini muneris, aliud propriae industriae, sit ex utroque perfectus. De tali enim dicebat Dominus noster quasi divite · Qui profert de thesauris suis nova et vetera “‘.
“For so it was given from the beginning to the people of the Hebrews, that they should love Moses and believe his word. (Whence also it is written: ‘The people believed God and Moses his servant.’) What, then, was the special gift from God toward the nation of the Hebrews, this we now see given also to those who are called to the faith from the nations. But the matter of works is left to the power and choice of each person, and this is their own; (but to have a desire toward the teacher of truth) this is given by the heavenly Father. Yet salvation lies in this, that you do the will of him whose love and longing you have conceived by God's gift, so that that saying of his may not be said to you: ‘Why do you say to me, Lord, Lord, and do not do what I say?’ It is, then, a special gift granted by God to the Hebrews that they believe Moses, and to the nations that they love Jesus. This is what the Master indicated when he said: ‘I confess to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to little ones.’ By this it is plainly declared that the people of the Hebrews, who were instructed out of the law, did not know him, but the people of the nations has recognized Jesus and venerates him; for this reason it will also be saved, not only recognizing him but also doing his will. But one who is from the nations and has it from God to love Jesus ought, by his own purpose, also to believe Moses. And again a Hebrew who has it from God to believe Moses ought also, by his own purpose, to believe in Jesus; so that each of them, having in himself one thing from the divine gift and another from his own diligence, may be made perfect from both. For of such a one our Lord spoke, as of a rich man ‘who brings out of his treasures things new and old.’”
4.6PG 1:1318b
Sed de his satis dictum; urget enim tempus et populi religiosa devotio invitat nos, ad ipsos facere sermonem. Et cum haec dixisset, requirebat ubi opportunus esset locus ad disputandum. Et Maro ait: Est mihi aedes amplissima, quae plus quam quingentos recipiat viros, est et hortus intra domum; aut si in publico aliquo placet loco, hoc magis omnes desiderant, nemo enim est, qui non cupiat vel faciem tuam videre tantum. Et Petrus: Ostende mihi, inquit, aedem vel hortum. Et cum vidisset aedem, ingrediebatur ut et hortum perspiceret, et subito omnis multitudo quasi ab aliquo evocata, eum festinatione ingressa est domum, atque inde ad hortum prorupit, ubi jam stabat Petrus, considerans Quis esset aptus ad disputandum locus.
“But enough has been said of these things; for time presses, and the devout zeal of the people invites us to speak to them.” When he had said this, he asked where there was a suitable place for the discourse. Maro said: “I have a very large hall, which holds more than five hundred men, and there is also a garden within the house. Or if a public place is preferred, that is what everyone would rather; for there is no one who does not long just to see your face.” Peter said: “Show me the hall or the garden.” When he had seen the hall, he went in to look over the garden as well; and suddenly the whole multitude, as if summoned by someone, rushed into the house and from there burst into the garden, where Peter was already standing, considering which place was fit for the discourse.
4.7PG 1:1318b–1319a
Ut autem vidit turbas velut ingentis fluvii inundasse lenem meatum, ascendens supra basim quamdam, quae forte juxta horti parietem stabat, primo religionis more populum salutavit. Quidam autem ex bisqui aderant, et multo tempore a daemonibus fuerant fatigati, in terra proruunt obsecrantibus spiritibus immundis, ut vel uno die indulgeretur eis in obsessis corporibus permanere; quos Petrus increpans jussit abscedere, et sine mora discesserunt. Post bos alii longis afflicti languoribus rogabant Petrum, ut reciperent sanitatem, pro quibus se supplicaturum Domino pollicetur, cum prius, sermo doctrinae fuisset expletus. Sed statim ut promisit, languoribus resoluti sunt, etjussit eos seorsim residere cum bis, qui a daemonibus fuerant curati, quasi post laboris fatigationem. interea dum inec aguntur, plurima multitudo convenit, quos non solum desiderium Petri, sed et sanitatum, quae perpetratae fuerant, fama pertraxerat. At Petrus manu quiescere populum docens, et turbas in tranquillitate componens ", hoc modo fecit exordium:
When he saw that the crowds, like a mighty river, had flooded the gentle channel, he climbed onto a pedestal that happened to stand by the garden wall, and first greeted the people in the manner of religion. Some of those present, who had long been tormented by demons, fell to the ground, the unclean spirits begging that they might be allowed to remain in the bodies they possessed for just one day. Peter rebuked them and ordered them to depart, and they left without delay. After these, others afflicted with long illnesses begged Peter that they might recover their health, and he promised to pray to the Lord for them once the discourse of teaching was finished. But as soon as he promised, they were freed from their illnesses; and he told them to sit apart with those who had been cured of demons, as if after the weariness of toil. Meanwhile, while this was going on, a very great multitude gathered, drawn not only by longing for Peter but by the report of the healings that had been done. Peter, motioning with his hand for the people to be quiet and settling the crowds into calm, began in this way:
4.8PG 1:1319a–1319b
lncipienti de vero Dei cultu facere sermonem necessarium mihi videtur, eos qui nondum de hoc aliquid scientia: consecuti sunt, primo omnium docere, per omnia inculpabilem ponendam esse divinam Providentiam, per quam mundus regitur et gubernatur. Hunc autem nobis exordii titulum dedit pra'sentis operis ratio, et eorum quos Dei virtus sanavit occasio, ut ostendamus, quod recta ratione quamplurimi a diversis daemonibus obtinentur, ut per hoc appareat iustitia Dei. Invenietur enim omnium pene malorum mater esse. ignorantia. Sed jam veniamus ad causam.
“As I begin to speak about the true worship of God, it seems necessary to me first of all to teach those who have not yet gained any knowledge of it that divine Providence, by which the world is ruled and governed, must be held blameless in all things. The subject of the present matter, and the occasion of those whom the power of God has healed, has given us this heading for our opening: to show that it is by just reason that very many are held by various demons, so that the justice of God may thereby appear. For ignorance will be found to be the mother of nearly all evils. But now let us come to the matter.
4.9PG 1:1319b
Deus cum fecisset hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem suam, operi suo spiramen quoddam et odorem suae divinitatis inseruit, ut per hoc participes facti mortales Unigeniti ejus, per ipsum etiam amici Dei et filii adoptionis existerent; unde ei qua via id possint adipisci. ipse eos ut propheta verus edocuit, sciens quibus actibus hominum delectaretur Pater. Unus itaque apud homines tunc Dei cultus erat, mens pura et spiritus incorruptus. Et ob hoc omnis creatura humano generi foedus inviolabile conservabat. 0b. reverentiam namque Creatoris “illia πετῖιυάο in θοε ν imum“ νίιίυηι corporis, nulla ciborum dominata corruptio est, ex quo fiebat, ut mille annorum astas in fragilitatem no incideret senectutis.
“When God had made man in his own image and likeness, he implanted in his work a kind of breath and fragrance of his divinity, so that mortals, made partakers of his Only-begotten, might through him also become friends of God and sons of adoption. Hence he himself, the true Prophet, taught them by what way they could attain this, knowing in what actions of men the Father delights. At that time, then, there was among men one worship of God: a pure mind and an uncorrupted spirit. And for this reason the whole creation kept an inviolable covenant with the human race. For out of reverence for the Creator, no disease, no bodily illness, no corruption from food had dominion; and so it came about that an age of a thousand years did not fall into the frailty of old age.
4.10PG 1:1319b
Sed ubi vita laboris expers bonorum perseverantiam non putavit divina largitione, sed rerum forte concessam, et sine ullo sudore divina: amoenitatis deliciis perfrui, naturae debitum et non Dei bonitatis munus accepit. In contrarias per hinc homines ei impias εοῧίιίλιίοηοδ οιίο docente DCI“ veniunt, putantes deorum sibi vitam nullis laboribus nullisque meritis natam. Hinc proficiunt in deterius, ut‘ neque providentia Dei mundum regi crederent, neque virtutibus esse aliquem locum, quandoquidem semetipsos scirent nullis prius bonis operibus assignatis otii ac deliciarum summam tenere, et amicos Dei absque ullis laboribus haberi.
“But when, living a life free of toil, they came to think that the continuance of good things was granted them not by divine bounty but by the chance of things, and to enjoy without any sweat the delights of the divine pleasantness, they took as a debt of nature what was a gift of God's goodness. From this men came, idleness teaching them, into contrary and impious thoughts, supposing that the life of gods had been born to them without any labors or merits. From there they went on to worse, so that they believed neither that the world is ruled by the providence of God nor that there is any place for virtues, since they knew that they themselves held the fullness of ease and delights without any good works first being credited to them, and were counted friends of God without any labors.
4.11PG 1:1319b–1320a
Justissimo itaque Dei judicio in huiusmodi cogitationum vanitate languentibus, labores et afflictiones pro remedio conferuntur. Ubi ergo adfuit labor ac tribulatio, deliciarum et amoenitatis exclusi sunt loco. Terra autem erepit nihil eis sine labore producere; et tunc conversa in hominibus cogitatio, creatoris sui requirere commonentur auxilium, et orationibus ac votis praesidia invitare divina. Et ita factum est, ut cultum Dei quem pro bonis neglexerant, recuperarent pro malis, et cogitationes in Deum quas perverterat indulgentia, emendaret afflictio. Sic ergo divina Providentia hoc esse utilius hominibus videns, vias benignitatis et abundantiae, tanquam quae laederent, subtrahit ab hominibus, et vexationis iter ac tribulationis inducit,
“By a most just judgment of God, therefore, toils and afflictions are applied as a remedy to those languishing in the vanity of such thoughts. When toil and tribulation came, they were shut out of the place of delights and pleasantness. The earth began to produce nothing for them without toil; and then men's thinking was turned, and they were reminded to seek the help of their Creator, and to invite divine protection by prayers and vows. And so it came about that the worship of God which they had neglected in good times they recovered in bad, and affliction corrected the thoughts toward God that indulgence had perverted. So divine Providence, seeing that this was more useful to men, withdrew from men the ways of kindness and abundance, as things that harmed them, and brought in the road of hardship and tribulation.
4.12PG 1:1320a–1320b
Sed ut ostenderet quia haec pro ingratis agerentur, unum quemdam ex illis qui primitus imperant esse mortales, quod eum gratiae datae non immemorem vidit, et quia speravit invocare nomen Domini, ad immortales transtulit, ca:teris qui in tantum ingrati exstitere, ut nec laboribus et tribulationibus emendari et corrigi possint. gravissima morte damnatis. Invenit tamen et inter ipsos unum quemdam cum domo sua justum, quem reservaret, praecepto ei dato ut fabricaret aream, et in ea, cum diluvio cuncta necarentur. ipse cum his quibus praereptum fuerat, posset evadere, quo impiis inundationem aquarum peremptis purificationem mundus acciperet, et is qui ad posteritatem generis fuerat reservatus, per aquam mundus enectus, mundum denuo repararet.
“But to show that these things were done because of the ungrateful, he took one of those who were first created mortal—because he saw that he was not unmindful of the grace given him, and because he hoped to call on the name of the Lord—and translated him among the immortals; while the rest, who proved so ungrateful that they could not be amended and corrected even by toils and tribulations, were condemned to a most grievous death. Yet among them too he found one man, righteous with his household, whom he preserved, giving him the command to build an ark, so that in it, when all things were destroyed by the flood, he with those who had been rescued might escape; so that, the impious being destroyed by the flood of waters, the world might receive purification, and he who had been preserved for the continuance of the race, himself cleansed through the water, might restore the world anew.
4.13PG 1:1320b
Sed his omnibus gestis rursus homines ad impietatem vel-mnium ei propter hoc ει Deo poniιω· [ex qua; vivendi modum doceret; sed processu temporis, Dei quidem cultus et iustitia ab infidelibus ει impiis corrumpitur, sic,“ paulo post aperius ostendemus. Perversa: autem et erratica: religiones introducuntur, quibus se plurima pars honinum per occasionem feriarum et solemnitatem dederunt, ροιυε ξηειευηηιρδ ei convivia, tibias. que ac fistulas et citharas ac diversa genera muείροι-υιη sectantes, et semetipsos per omnia ιθωυ· [entire ac luxuria: propitiantes. Hinc omnis emi" accepit originem, hinc lucos et aras, hinc coronas ει victimas repperere, et post ebrietatem quaSI lymphaticis motibus agi; ex hoc jam potestas dar monii; data ingrediendi hujuscemodi mentes, ut choros ducere insanos et Baccho [urere viderentur; hinc fremere dentibus, et mugire de profundis *δ’ secribus inventum, hinc terribilis vultus et ferus in hominibus aSpectus, ut is quem temulenti: subverterat ac damon instigaverat, numine repletus. τι decepti; et errantibus crederentur.
“But when all these things had been done, men turned again to impiety; and for this reason a law was given by God to teach them the manner of living. But in the course of time the worship of God and justice were corrupted by the unbelieving and impious, as we shall show more clearly a little later. Perverse and wandering religions were brought in, to which the greater part of men gave themselves on the occasion of feasts and festivals, taking up drinking bouts and banquets, pipes and flutes and lyres and various kinds of music, and gratifying themselves in every way with drunkenness and luxury. From this all error took its beginning; from this they invented groves and altars, garlands and victims, and after drunkenness were driven as if by frenzied impulses. From this, power was given to demons to enter minds of this kind, so that they seemed to lead mad dances and to rave like Bacchus. From this came the gnashing of teeth and bellowing from the depths of the bowels; from this the terrible face and savage look in men, so that one whom drunkenness had overthrown and a demon had incited was believed by the deceived and erring to be filled with a deity.
4.14PG 1:1320b–1321a
Unde cum tam multa: in hunc mundani falsae et erratica: religiones essent introductae, missi sumus nos deferentes vobis tanquam boni negotiatores, a patribus traditum et‘ conservatum Vg” Dei cultum, cujus quasi semina quadam robii haec verba respergimus, et in vestro judicio ponimus quod rectum videtur eligere. Si enim recipiatis quae nostra sunt, non solum ipsi incursiones daemonis effugere, sed et ex aliis eas effugare poteritis, simul et aeternorum bonorum praemia consequemini. Qui autem contempserint recipere quae dicuntur a nobis, in praesenti quidem vita diversis damonibus et aegritudinum vitiis subjacebunt. post excessum autem corporis etiam animae eorum cruciabuntur in perpetuum. Deus enim non solum bonus, sed et justus est; nam si semper bonus sit et nunquam justus, ut reddat unicuique pro gestis suis, bonum invenietur injustum. lnjustum namque est, si ita apud eum habeatur impius, sicut et pius.
“Since, then, so many false and wandering religions have been brought into this world, we have been sent, bringing to you like good merchants the worship of God handed down from the fathers and preserved; and we sprinkle these words of it like seeds, and place it before your judgment to choose what seems right. For if you receive what is ours, you will not only escape the attacks of the demon yourselves but also be able to drive them out of others, and at the same time you will obtain the rewards of eternal good things. But those who disdain to receive what we say will in the present life be subject to various demons and to the vices of diseases, and after leaving the body their souls also will be tormented forever. For God is not only good but also just. For if he were always good and never just, so as to render to each according to his deeds, his goodness would be found unjust. For it is unjust if the impious is held by him in the same esteem as the pious.
4.15PG 1:1321a–1321b
Igitur daemones, sicut paulo ante diximus, cum occasionibus acceptis ingerere se potuerunt per malos et turpes actus corporibus hominum, si multo tempore permanent in eis per negligentiam ipsorum, quia animae suae quod est utile non requirunt. necessario cogunt eos habitantium in se daemonum de reliquo facere voluntates. Quod autem est omnium deterius, in consummatione saeculi, cum daemon ille igni tradetur aeterno, necessario et anima quae ei paruit, cum ipso aeternis ignibus cruciabitur, una cum corpore suo quod polluit.
“So the demons, as we said a little before, when they have seized occasions and been able to thrust themselves into human bodies through evil and shameful acts, if they remain in them a long time through the people's own negligence—because they do not seek what is useful for their soul—necessarily compel them thereafter to do the will of the demons dwelling in them. And what is worst of all, at the consummation of the age, when that demon is handed over to eternal fire, the soul that obeyed him will necessarily be tormented with him in eternal fires, together with its body, which it has polluted.
4.16PG 1:1321b
Daemones autem habere desiderium immergendi se corporibus hominum haec causa est. Spiritus sunt habentes propositum conversum ad malitiam; per cibos ergo et potus immoderatos ac libidinem perurgent homines ad peccatum; eos tamen qui peccandi propositum gerunt, qui dum videntur necessaria natura: velle complere, non tenentes modum per nimietatem, ingrediendi in semetipsos daemonibus faciunt locum. Donec au tem natura: mensura servatur et modus legitimus custoditur, Dei clementia ingrediendi in homines non eis tribuit facultatem. Ubi vero aut mens ad impietatem declinaverit, aut corpus immoderatis cibis ac potibus adimplebitur, tanquam voluntate et proposito eorum qui se ita negligunt invitati, quasi adversum eos qui a Deo positam legem solverint, accipiunt facultatem.
“The reason demons desire to plunge themselves into human bodies is this. They are spirits whose purpose is turned to wickedness; so through immoderate food and drink and lust they urge men on to sin—yet only those who have the purpose of sinning, who, while they seem to want only to satisfy the necessities of nature, do not keep measure and by excess make room for the demons to enter them. As long as the measure of nature is kept and lawful moderation observed, God's mercy does not give them the ability to enter into people. But when either the mind has turned aside to impiety or the body is filled with immoderate food and drink, then, as though invited by the will and purpose of those who so neglect themselves, they receive power over those who have broken the law laid down by God.
4.17PG 1:1321b–1322a
Videtis ergo quantum valeat agnitio Dei et divina: religionis observantia, quae non solum defendit credentes ab incursionibus daemonii, verum et imperare eos facit his qui caeteris dominantur. Et ideo necessarium vobis est, qui estis ex gentibus, confugere ad Deum et observare vos ab omni immunditia, ut expulsis daemonibus Dei habitatio fiat in vobis. Simul et orationibus commendate vos Deo, et interpellate eum adversum impudentiam daemonum; credentes enim quaecunque petieritis, accipietis ὀ. Sed et ipsi daemones quanto viderint fidem crescere in homine, tanto ab eo refugiunt in ea solum parte residentes, in qua adhuc aliquid infidelitatis resederit; ab his vero qui plena fide credunt, absque ulla remoratione discedunt. Anima enim cum venerit ad fidem Dei, caelestis aquae virtutem consequitur, per quam daemonem tanquam scintillam ignis exstinguat.
“You see, then, how much the knowledge of God and the observance of divine religion avail: it not only defends believers from the attacks of the demon but also makes them command those who rule over others. And so it is necessary for you who are from the nations to flee to God and keep yourselves from all uncleanness, so that the demons may be driven out and God may make his dwelling in you. At the same time commend yourselves to God by prayers, and appeal to him against the shamelessness of the demons; for ‘whatever you ask, believing, you will receive.’ But the demons themselves flee from a person the more they see faith growing in him, remaining only in that part in which some unbelief still lingers; but from those who believe with full faith they depart without any delay. For when the soul has come to faith in God, it obtains the power of heavenly water, by which it may quench the demon like a spark of fire.
4.18PG 1:1322a–1322b
Est ergo fidei mensura, quae si integra sit, ex integro de anima daemonem fugat; si vero minus aliquid habeat, residet adhuc aliquid de portione daemonis in portione infidelitatis, et est plurimus labor, ut intelligat anima quando aut qualiter, si plene aut minus plene ex se fugatus sit daemon. Si enim in aliqua parte resederit, cum tempus inveniet, cogitationes subjicit cordibus hominum, et illi nescientes unde haec veniant, suggestionibus daemonum quasi animae suae sensibus credunt. Suggerunt ergo aliis occasione corporeae necessitatis delicias sequi, aliorum iracundiam excusant per abundantiam fellis, aliorum insaniam nigri fellis vehementia colorant. sed et stultitiam quorumdam pro multitudine phlegmatis extenuant. Quod etsi ita esset, tamen haec singula molesta corpori esse non possent, nisi ex ciborum potuumque nimietate, qui cum justo amplius sumuntur, abundantia eorum quam decoquere naturalis non sufficit calor, crudescit in venenum quoddam, idque visceribus venisque omnibus sentina: In modum redundans, motus corporis insanos reddit et turpes. Propter quod in omnibus est obtinenda parcimonia, ut neque daemonibus locus detur, neque anima ab eis obsessa una cum ipsis tradatur aeternis ignibus crucianda.
“There is therefore a measure of faith: if it is whole, it drives the demon wholly out of the soul; but if it lacks something, some of the demon's portion still remains in the portion of unbelief, and it is a very great labor for the soul to understand when or how, whether fully or less fully, the demon has been driven from it. For if he remains in any part, when he finds the time he puts thoughts into people's hearts; and they, not knowing where these come from, trust the suggestions of the demons as though they were the perceptions of their own soul. So to some they suggest following pleasures on the pretext of bodily necessity; for others they excuse anger by an abundance of bile; others' madness they color as the violence of black bile; and even the folly of some they excuse as a quantity of phlegm. Even if this were so, still none of these things could harm the body except from excess of food and drink; for when these are taken more than is right, their abundance, which the natural heat is not enough to digest, turns raw into a kind of poison, and overflowing like bilgewater into the bowels and all the veins it makes the body's motions mad and shameful. Therefore moderation must be maintained in all things, so that neither is room given to demons, nor is the soul possessed by them handed over with them to eternal fire to be tormented.
4.19PG 1:1322b–1322d
Est et alius error daemonum, quem subjiciunt sensibus hominum, ut putent se ab his qui dicuntur dii perpeti quae patiuntur, quo per haec, sacrificia offerentes et munera, quasi repropitiantes eos, cultum falsae. religionis affirment, nos vero refugiant qui pro salute eorum satagimus, ut ab errore liberentur; sed hoc, ut dixi, faciunt ignorantes quod daemones ista sibi suggerant, ne salventur. Est ergo in potestate uniuscujusque, quia liberi arbitrii factus est homo, utrum nobis velit audire ad vitam, an daemonibus ad interitum. Aliis etiam daemones in visu per diversas imagines apparentes, interdum minas intendunt, interdum sanitates incommoditatibus pollicentur, ut his quos decipiunt deorum nihilominus de se inserant opinionem, et quod sint daemones ignoretur. Sed nos non latent, scientes mysterium creaturae, et quam ob causam daemonibus haec agere in praesenti sa:culo permittatur, ut vel transformari eis liceat in quas volunt imagines, vel suggerere pravas cogitationes, vel inserere se per cibos et potum sibi consecratum mentibus vel corporibus eorum, qui ex eo sumpserint, vel ad idoli alicujus venerationem somnia vana confingere.
“There is another error of the demons, which they insinuate into people's minds: that they think they suffer what they suffer from those who are called gods, so that by offering sacrifices and gifts to them, as if appeasing them, they establish the worship of false religion and flee from us who are working for their salvation, that they may be freed from error. But, as I said, they do this not knowing that the demons suggest these things to them so that they may not be saved. It is, then, in each one's power—since man was made with free will—whether he wishes to listen to us unto life or to demons unto destruction. To some the demons also appear in visions in various forms, sometimes threatening, sometimes promising cures for ailments, so that they may still plant in those they deceive the belief that they are gods, and it may not be known that they are demons. But they do not escape us, for we know the mystery of creation and why demons are permitted to do these things in the present age: to transform themselves into whatever shapes they wish, or to suggest evil thoughts, or to insinuate themselves, through food and drink consecrated to them, into the minds or bodies of those who partake of it, or to invent empty dreams for the veneration of some idol.
4.20PG 1:1322d–1323a
Et tamen quis ita sine sensu invenitur, cui persuaderi debeat, ut idolum colat, sive illud ex auro sive ex quolibet metallo factum sit? Cui non palam est id esse illud metallum, quod artifex νο· ί luit? Quomodo ergo inesse ibi divinitas putanda est, quod si noluisset artifex, omnino non esset? aut quomodo inde futura sibi annuntiari sperent, ubi nec praesentium aliquis intellectus est? Quamvis etiamsi aliquid divinarent, non continuo dii haberi possent; quia aliud est divinatio, aliud divinitas. Nam et Pythones divinare videntur, et non continuo dii sunt, denique a Christianis hominibus effugantur; et quomodo Deus est, qui fugatur ab homine? Sed dicis fortasse: quid quod sanitates efficiunt, et quomodo quis curetur ostendunt? Hac ratione colendi sunt etiam medici ut dii, multos enim sanant, et quanto quis peritior fuerit, tanto plures sanabit.
“And yet who is found so senseless as to be persuaded to worship an idol, whether it is made of gold or of any other metal? To whom is it not plain that it is the metal the craftsman wished? How then is divinity to be thought present in what would not exist at all if the craftsman had not wished it? Or how do they hope to have the future announced to them from where there is no understanding even of the present? Even if they divined something, they could not at once be held gods, for divination is one thing and divinity another. For the Pythons seem to divine, yet they are not therefore gods; indeed they are put to flight by Christian men. And how is he God who is put to flight by a man? But perhaps you say: ‘What of the fact that they effect cures and show how one may be healed?’ By that reasoning physicians too should be worshiped as gods, for they heal many, and the more skillful one is, the more he will heal.
4.21PG 1:1323b
Unde constat, istos cum sint daemonici spiritus, et multo citius scire aliqua et multo perfectius; non enim ad discendum tarditate corporis degravantur. Et ideo quae medici longe tempore et labore plurimo assequntur, ba2c illi tanquam spiritus, absque mora ulla et absque diflicultate cognoscunt. Non ergo mirum est, si plus aliquid quam homines sciunt; sed hoc intuendum est, quod ea quae sciunt, non ad salutem sed ad deceptionem proferunt animarum, ut per haec eas cultum falsa: religionis edoceant. Sed Deus, ne tanta: deceptionis error lateret et errantibus ipse causa videretur existere, qui tantum eis licere permisit, ut per divinationes, per curationes et per somnia decipere homines possint, clementia: suae ο remedium providit hominibus, et distinctionem falsi verique scire cupientibus in propatulo posuit. Est ergo ista distinctio: Quod a vero Deo dicitur sive per prophetas, sive per visiones diversas, semper verum est: quod autem a daemonibus praedicitur, non semper verum est. Est ergo evidentis indicii, non a vero Deo dici ea, in quibus aliquando mendacium est, in veritate enim nunquam mendacium cst, in his autem qui mentiuntur, potest aliquando et veritatis aliquid admisceri, per quod mendacia condiantur.
“Hence it is clear that these, being demonic spirits, know some things much faster and much more perfectly; for they are not weighed down in learning by the slowness of a body. And so what physicians attain by long time and very great labor, they, as spirits, learn without any delay and without difficulty. It is no wonder, then, if they know something more than men; but this must be observed, that what they know they bring forward not for the salvation but for the deception of souls, so as to teach them by this the worship of false religion. But God, so that the error of such deception might not be hidden and he himself might not seem to be the cause for those who err—since he permitted them so much as to be able to deceive people through divinations, cures, and dreams—in his mercy provided a remedy for men and set out openly the distinction between false and true for those who wish to know it. This, then, is the distinction: what is said by the true God, whether through prophets or through various visions, is always true; but what is foretold by demons is not always true. It is therefore a plain sign that those things are not said by the true God in which there is sometimes a lie; for in the truth there is never a lie, but among those who lie something of the truth may sometimes be mixed in, by which the lies are seasoned.
4.22PG 1:1323b–1324a
Quod si dicat aliquis: Quid enim opus erat hoc ipsum, ut eis permitteretur vel aliquando verum dicere, et per hoc tantum errorem mortalibus introduci, audiat ad haec: Si eis nunquam fuisset indultum veri aliquid dicere, omnino nec praadicerent aliquid; non praedicentes autem, nec quod essent daemones cognoscerentur. Quod si ignorarentur esse daemones in hoc mundo, agonis nostri et certaminis nos causa latuisset, et pateremur palam quse geruntur in occulto: quippe si agendi tantum adversum nos, et nihil loquendi facultas eis concessa videretur. Nunc autem ubi aliquando vera, aliquando falsa dicuntur, debemus agnoscere, ut superius dixi, daemonum et non Dei esse responsa, apud quem mendacium nunquam est.
“But if someone should say, ‘What need was there for this very thing, that they be permitted sometimes to tell the truth, and so to bring such great error upon mortals?’, let him hear in reply: if they had never been allowed to say anything true, they would not foretell anything at all; and if they did not foretell, it would not be known that they are demons. And if it were not known that there are demons in this world, the cause of our struggle and contest would have been hidden from us, and we would suffer openly what is done in secret—that is, if they were seen to have been granted only the power to act against us, and none to speak. But now, since things are said sometimes true and sometimes false, we ought to recognize, as I said above, that the answers are from demons and not from God, with whom there is never a lie.
4.23PG 1:1324a–1324b
Quod si curiosius quis progrediens dicat: Quid enim opus erat hujusmodi mala a Deo fieri, quibus ad subvertendas mentes humanas tanta esset intentio? Haec preponenti respondebimus: requirendum esse primo omnium, si est aliquid in substantia malum. Et quamvis sufficeret dicere ad eum, quia non est conveniens ut creatura iudicet Creatorem, sed illius est judicare opus alienum qui aut similis artificii aut similis potentia: est; tamen ne circuitionibus utamur, absolute dicimus in substantia nihil esse mali. Quod si ita est, substantiarum conditor frustra culpatur?
“But if someone, going further out of curiosity, should say, ‘What need was there for such evil beings to be made by God, with such great determination to overthrow human minds?’, we shall answer one who puts this forward: we must first of all ask whether anything is evil in its substance. And although it would be enough to say to him that it is not fitting for the creature to judge the Creator—rather, it belongs to one who has similar skill or similar power to judge another's work—yet, so as not to use roundabout ways, we say absolutely that nothing is evil in substance. And if this is so, is not the maker of substances blamed in vain?
4.24PG 1:1324b
Sed occurres mihi et dices: Etiamsi ex arbitrii libertate in hoc ventum est, nunquid ignorabat ille qui creabat eos, quod in malum declinaturi essent quos creabat? Oportuit ergo nec creari eos, quos deviaturos ab itinere justitiae praevidebat. Audiant ad hare qui ita preponunt, quod hujuscemodi assertionibus illud voluit ostendere, cur non malitia eorum qui nondum erant, bonitatem vicerit Creatoris. Si enim volens implere numerum et mensuram creationis suae, extimuisset eorum qui futuri erant malitiam, et quasi qui aliam nullam invenire viam remedii ac medicina: potuisset, nisi hoc solum ut retraheret se a proposito creandi. ne sibi ascriberetur malitia eorum qui futuri erant; quid aliud per haec doceretur, nisi indigna passio et indecora fragilitas Conditoris, qui ita pertimuerit eorum actus qui nondum erant, ut a proposita conditione cessaret?
“But you will confront me and say: ‘Even if it came to this through freedom of choice, did not he who created them know that those he was creating would turn aside to evil? Then those whom he foresaw would stray from the path of justice ought not to have been created.’ Let those who argue so hear in reply that by such a course he wished to show why the wickedness of those who did not yet exist should not overcome the goodness of the Creator. For if, wishing to fill up the number and measure of his creation, he had feared the wickedness of those who were to be, and—as one who could find no other way of remedy and cure except this only—had drawn back from his purpose of creating, so that the wickedness of those who were to be might not be ascribed to him, what else would this teach but an unworthy weakness and unseemly frailty of the Maker, who so dreaded the acts of those who did not yet exist that he ceased from the creation he had purposed?
4.25PG 1:1324b–1325a
Sed bis procul amotis illud animo contemplemur, quia Deus universitatis conditor conditionis sua: futuras differentias praevidens, unicuique creaturae secundum proprios motus, quos ex arbitrii libertate proferebat, prospexit et praevidit diversos ordines atque officia differentia, ut cum unius essent substantia: omnes secundum creaturae rationem, esset tamen diversitas in ordinibus et officiis secundum proprios animorum motus, ex arbitrii libertate proferendos. Praevidebat ergo futuras in creaturis culpas, et justitiae ejus ratio poscebat, ut emendationis causa culpas poena sequeretur. Oportuit ergo esse et poenarum ministros, quos tamen libertas arbitrii in hunc ordinem traheret; praeter haec autem ct debuerunt vincerent hin,- qui agones susceperant caelestium praemiorum. Sic ergo nec ea quae putantur mala, vacant ab utilitate, dum victi his quibus vincuntur, licet inviti praemia aeterna conquirunt. Sed de his ista sufficiant, processu'enim temporis etiam secretiora pandentur. ‘
“But putting these things far away, let us consider this in our mind: that God, the maker of the universe, foreseeing the future differences in his creation, provided and foresaw for each creature, according to its own movements, which it would put forth from freedom of choice, different ranks and different offices; so that although all were of one substance according to the nature of creation, there would yet be diversity in ranks and offices according to the souls' own movements, put forth from freedom of choice. He foresaw, then, that there would be faults in his creatures, and the logic of his justice required that punishment should follow faults for the sake of correction. There had, then, to be ministers of punishments, whom freedom of choice would nevertheless draw into this rank; and besides, there had also to be those whom they might conquer who had undertaken the contests for heavenly rewards. So even the things thought evil are not without usefulness, since the conquered, though against their will, gain eternal rewards for those by whom they are conquered. But let these things suffice on this subject; for in the course of time even more secret things will be disclosed.
4.26PG 1:1325a–1326a
Nunc ergo quoniam nondum intelligitis, quanta vos ignorantiae caligo circumstet, interim vobis volo exponere, unde colendi idola exordium mundo huic datum sit. idola autem dico exanima simulacra quae colitis, sive lignea, sive fictilia, sive lapidea, vel terea vel ex quibuscunque aliis sumpta sunt metallis; horum ergo initium tale est. Angeli quidam relicto proprii ordinis cursu, hominum favere vitiis erepere et libidini eorum quodammodo indignum praebere ministerium, quo illorum opera suis magis voluptatibus morem gererent, quique ne sponte inclinati viderentur ad indigna ministeria, docuerunt homines, quod daemones artibus quibusdam obedire mortalibus, id est, magicis invocationibus possent, ac velut ex fornace quadam et officina malitiae totum mundum, subtracto pietatis lumine, impietatis fumo repleverunt.
“Now then, since you do not yet understand how great a darkness of ignorance surrounds you, I wish meanwhile to explain to you how the worship of idols first came into this world. By idols I mean the lifeless images that you worship, whether of wood or clay or stone or bronze, or made from any other metals. Their beginning was this. Certain angels, leaving the course of their proper rank, began to favor the vices of men and in a way to render an unworthy service to their lust, so that by that service the men might the more indulge their own pleasures. And so that they might not seem to have stooped to unworthy services of their own accord, they taught men that demons could be made to obey mortals by certain arts, that is, by magical invocations; and as from a furnace and workshop of wickedness they filled the whole world with the smoke of impiety, the light of piety being withdrawn.
4.27PG 1:1326a–1327a
Pro his et aliis nonnullis causis diluvium mundo introductum est, sicut jam in aliis dictum est et dicemus; et omnes qui erant super terras, deleti sunt, excepta Noe familia, quicum tribus filiis eorumque uxoribus superfuit. Ex quibus unus Cham nomine. cuidam ex filiis suis qui Mesraim appellabatur, a quo Egyptiorum et Babyloniorum et Persarum ducitur genus, male compertam magica: artis tradidit disciplinam; hunc gentes quae tunc erant Zoroastrem appellaverunt, admirantes primum magicae artis auctorem, cujus nomine etiam libri super hoc plurimi habentur. Hic ergo astris multum ac frequenter intentus. et volens apud homines videri Deus, velut scintillas'quasdam ex stellis producere et hominibus ostentare coepit, quo rudes atque ignari in stuporem miraculi traherentur, cupiensque augere de se hujusmodi opinionem, sapius ista moliebatur usquequo ab ipso daemone, quem importunius frequentabat, igni succensus concremaretur.
“For these and some other reasons the flood was brought upon the world, as has already been said elsewhere and as we shall say again; and all who were on the earth were destroyed, except the family of Noah, who survived with his three sons and their wives. One of them, named Ham, handed down the wickedly discovered discipline of the magic art to one of his sons, called Mesraim, from whom the race of the Egyptians, Babylonians, and Persians is descended. The nations of that time called him Zoroaster, admiring him as the first author of the magic art; under his name there are also very many books on this subject. He, then, being much and often intent on the stars, and wishing to be thought a god among men, began to draw out, as it were, sparks from the stars and to show them to men, so that the rude and ignorant might be drawn into amazement at the marvel; and wishing to increase this opinion of himself, he attempted these things more often, until he was set on fire and burned up by the very demon whom he troubled too insistently.
4.28PG 1:1327a–1327b
Sed stulti homines qui tunc erant, cum debuissent utique opinionem, quam de eo conceperant abjicere, quippe quam poenali morte ejus viderant confutatam, in majus eum extollunt. Exstructo enim sepulcro ad honorem ejus, tanquam amicum Dei ac fulminis ad caelum vehiculo sublevatum, adorare ausi sunt et quasi vivens astrum colere. Hinc enim et nomen post, mortem ejus Zoroaster, hoc est vivum sidus, appellatum est ah bis, qui post unam generationem Graecae lingua: loquela fuerant repleti. Hoc denique exemplo etiam nunc multi eos qui fulmine obierint, sepulcris honoratos tanquam amicos Dei colunt. Hic ergo cum quartadecima generatione coepisset, quintadecima defunctus est, in qua turris aedificata est, et linguae hominum multipliciter divisae sunt.
“But the foolish men of that time, when they ought certainly to have thrown away the opinion they had formed of him, since they had seen it refuted by his penal death, exalted him all the more. Building a tomb in his honor, they dared to worship him as a friend of God, carried up to heaven on a chariot of lightning, and to venerate him as a living star. For from this, after his death, he was called by the name Zoroaster, that is, ‘living star,’ by those who, after one generation, had been filled with the speech of the Greek language. By this example, even now many honor with tombs those who have died by lightning and worship them as friends of God. He, then, began in the fourteenth generation and died in the fifteenth, in which the tower was built and the languages of men were divided many ways.
4.29PG 1:1327b–1328a
Inter quos primus magica nihilominus arte quasi corusco ad eum delata, rex appellatur quidam Nemrod, quem et ipsum Graeci Ninum vocaverunt, ex cujus nomine Ninive civitas vocabulum sumpsit. Sic ergo diversae et erraticae superstitiones ab arte magica initium sumpsere. Etenim quoniam difficile erat humanum genus ab amore Dei abstrahi, et ad surda atque exanima simulacra deduci, idcirco excelsioribus usi sunt magi molitionibus, ut astrorum signis ac motibus tanquam caelitus et voluntate Dei delatis, ad suadendos cultus erraticos verterentur. Et ejus quem supra diximus indignatione daemonis, cui nimis molestus fuerat conflagrasse, busti cineres, tanquam fulminei ignis reliquias colligentes hi, qui erant primitus decepti, deferunt ad Persas, ut ab eis tanquam divinus e caelo lapsus ignis, perpetuis conservaretur excubiis, atque ut caelestis Deus coleretur.
“Among these, the first to be called king, the magic art having likewise conferred it on him as by a flash, was one Nimrod, whom the Greeks also called Ninus, and from whose name the city of Nineveh took its name. So, then, the various and wandering superstitions took their beginning from the magic art. For since it was difficult to draw the human race away from the love of God and lead it to deaf and lifeless images, the magi used loftier contrivances, so that, by the signs and movements of the stars, presented as if brought down from heaven and by the will of God, men might be won over to wandering cults. And those who were first deceived collected the ashes of the pyre of the man of whom we spoke above, who had been burned up by the wrath of the demon to whom he had been too troublesome, as relics of the fire of lightning, and carried them to the Persians, so that they might keep them with perpetual watches as divine fire fallen from heaven, and worship it as a heavenly god.
4.30PG 1:1328a–1329a
Simili exemplo etiam per caetera loca reliqui homines his. quos vel in artibus aliquibus vel in virtute fuerant admirati, vel certe in amore plurimo habuerant, templa construere, imagines collocare, mysteria et caeremonias ac sacrificia instituere, et per omnia deorum de his famam posteris tradere gestierunt, eo praecipue quod ut supra diximus, phantasiis aliquibus magicae artis fulti videbantur, ut invocatione daemonum agi ab his aliquid ad deceptionem hominum moverique videretur. His adjiciunt et solemnitates quasdam ac temulenta convivia, quibus et homines libentius indulgerent, et daemones crapulis tanquam vehiculis illati, ipsis eorum visceribus miscerentur, in quibus collocati ad omnem voluntatem suam actus hominum cogitationesque deflecterent. Huiusmodi igitur ex initio erroribus introductis, eisque libidine et temulentia, qua carnales homines maxime delectantur, adjutis, religio Dei quae per continentiam sobrietatemque constabat, rarescere inter homines atque aboleri propemodum coepit.
“By a similar example the rest of men in other places also eagerly built temples, set up images, instituted mysteries, ceremonies, and sacrifices to those whom they had admired either in some arts or in virtue, or at least had held in very great love; and in every way they strove to hand down to posterity the fame of these as gods—chiefly because, as we said above, they seemed to be supported by certain phantasms of the magic art, so that by the invocation of demons something seemed to be done and moved by them for the deception of men. To these they added certain festivals and drunken banquets, in which men would indulge more willingly, and in which demons, carried in on surfeits as on vehicles, might mingle with their very bowels; and settled there, they would bend the acts and thoughts of men to their own will. So when errors of this kind had been introduced from the beginning, and were helped by lust and drunkenness, in which carnal men take the greatest delight, the religion of God, which consisted in self-control and sobriety, began to grow rare among men and almost to be abolished.
4.31PG 1:1329a
Nam cum ex initio homines, utpote justum et omnia contuentem Deum colentes, neque peccare auderent neque injuriam facere proximis suis, certi quod uniuscujusque actus et motus aspiceret Deus: ubi religionis cultus ad simulacra exanima conversus est, tanquam de quibus certi essent, quod neque viderent neque audirent neque moverentur in aliquo. licenter peccare et in omne facinus progredi coepere, quippe qui nihil pati vererentur ab his quos colebant ut deos. Hinc bellorum rabies exarsit, hinc praedas, rapinae, captivitates, et libertas in servitutem redacta, prout quisque potuit libidini et cupiditati sua: satisfecit, quamvis satisfacere cupiditati nulla vis possit. Sicut enim ignis quanto magis ligna acceperit, tanto amplius accenditur et invalescit, ita et cupiditatis rabies, per ea quae adipiscitur, auctior et vehementior efficitur.
“For when from the beginning men worshiped God as just and seeing all things, they dared neither to sin nor to do injury to their neighbors, being sure that God saw the acts and movements of each one. But when the worship of religion was turned to lifeless images—about which they were sure that they neither saw nor heard nor moved at all—they began to sin freely and to go on to every crime, since they feared to suffer nothing from those they worshiped as gods. From this the madness of wars blazed up; from this came plunder, robbery, captivity, and freedom reduced to slavery, as each one could satisfy his lust and greed—although no power can satisfy greed. For as fire, the more wood it receives, the more it is kindled and grows strong, so the madness of greed is made greater and fiercer by what it obtains.
4.32PG 1:1329a
Propter quod incipite jam meliore intellectu vobismetipsis resistere in his quae non recte cupitis, si quo forte modo reparare in vobis ac restituere possitis illam, quae ex initio mortalibus a Deo tradita est, religionis puritatem et innocentiam vitae, ut per eam vobis etiam spes bonorum immortalium reparetur; et agatis gratias largitori omnium patri, per eum quem posuit regem pacis et thesaurum ineffabilium honorum. ut in praesenti quidem tempore diluantur peccata vestra per aquam fontis, aut fluminis, aut etiam maris, invocato super vos trino beatitudinis nomine, ut per hoc non solum fugentur, si intra vos habitant spiritus maligni, verum etiam cum destiteritis a peccatis, et tota fide totaque mentis puritate Deo credideritis, etiam ex aliis vos malignos spiritus et daemones effugetis. atque a passionibus et languoribus alios liberare possitis. Ipsi enim daemones sciunt et agnoscunt eos qui se tradiderint Deo, et interdum sola eorum praesentia propelluntur. sicut paulo ante vidistis, quomodo cum vocem tantum salutationis fecissemus ad vos, continuo daemones propter honorem religionis nostrae exclamare coeperunt, et ne parum quidem temporis potuerunt ferre praesentiam nostram.
“Therefore begin now, with a better understanding, to resist yourselves in the things you wrongly desire, if by any means you may repair and restore in yourselves that purity of religion and innocence of life which was given to mortals by God from the beginning, so that through it the hope of immortal goods may also be restored to you; and give thanks to the Father, the giver of all things, through him whom he appointed King of peace and treasury of unspeakable honors; so that in the present time your sins may be washed away by the water of a spring or a river or even the sea, the threefold name of blessedness being invoked over you; so that by this not only may evil spirits be put to flight, if they dwell within you, but also, when you have ceased from sins and have believed God with full faith and full purity of mind, you may also put evil spirits and demons to flight from others and be able to free others from sufferings and illnesses. For the demons themselves know and recognize those who have given themselves to God, and sometimes they are driven away by their mere presence, as you saw a little earlier: when we had only spoken our greeting to you, at once the demons began to cry out because of the honor of our religion, and could not bear our presence for even a little time.
4.33PG 1:1329a–1330a
Nunquid nos alterius sumus natura; superioris alicujus, et propterea nos daemones timent? Unius ejusdem vobiscum natura: sumus, sed religione differimus. Quod et si vos esse vultis, non invidemus, quin potius et hortamur certosque esse vos volumus, quod cum fuerit in vobis eadem quae in nobis est fides et religio ac vita: innocentia, remunerante Deo fidem vestram, erit par vobis atque eadem etiam contra daemones potestas et virtus. Sicut enim is qui acceperit sub se milites, etiamsi ipse inferior, et illi superiores sint viribus, tamen dicit huic vade, et vadit, at alii veni, et venit, et alii fac hoc, et facit, hoc autem potest non propria virtute, sed Cesaris metu: ita fidelis quisque daemonibus imperat, etiamsi videantur illi multo esse hominibus fortiores, non propter suam virtutem, sed propter Dei qui eos subjecit potestatem. Nam et quod diximus, ut Ctesar apud omnes milites et in omnibus castris atque in omni regno timeatur, cum sit unus et fortassis exiguus viribus, nonnisi potestate Dei agitur, qui timorem dat omnibus ut uni obtemperent.
“Are we of another nature, some higher one, and is that why the demons fear us? We are of one and the same nature with you, but we differ in religion. And if you wish to be so too, we do not begrudge it; rather we urge you, and we want you to be sure, that when there is in you the same faith and religion and innocence of life that is in us, God rewarding your faith, you will have equal and the same power and strength against the demons. For as one who has soldiers under him, even if he is inferior and they superior in strength, nevertheless says to this one, ‘Go,’ and he goes, and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes, and to another, ‘Do this,’ and he does it—and he is able to do this not by his own strength but by fear of Caesar—so each believer commands demons, even if they seem to be far stronger than men, not because of his own strength but because of the power of God who has subjected them. For what we said, that Caesar is feared among all soldiers and in all camps and in every kingdom though he is one man and perhaps of slight strength, is brought about only by the power of God, who gives fear to all so that they obey one.
4.34PG 1:1330a
Hoc sane scire vos volumus quod daemon, nisi quis voluntatibus ejus se sponte subdiderit, potestatem adversum hominem non habet. Unde et ipse qui est princeps malitiae, ad hunc quem diximus a Deo destinatum regem pacis accessit tentans, et polliceri ei coepit omnem gloriam mundi, quod cum aliis obtulisset decipiendi causa, adoratum se noverat. Impius et immemor sui, quod est proprium et speciale malitiae, adorandum se ab eo praesumebat, a quo se noverat destruendum. Dominus ergo noster unius Dei cultum confirmans, respondit ei: Scriptum est: Dominum Deum tuum adorabis et illi soli servies "z qua responsione deterritus, et metuens ne unius et veri Dei repararetur vera religio, festinat continuo emittere in hunc mundum pseudoprophetas et pseudoapostolos falsosque doctores, qui sub nomine quidem Christi loquerentur, daemonis autem facerent voluntatem.
“This we certainly want you to know: that the demon has no power against a man unless he has willingly submitted himself to the demon's wishes. Hence even he who is the prince of wickedness approached that King of peace whom we spoke of, appointed by God, tempting him, and began to promise him all the glory of the world; for he knew that when he had offered this to others to deceive them, he had been worshiped. Impious and forgetful of himself—which is the proper mark of wickedness—he presumed that he would be worshiped by him by whom he knew he was to be destroyed. So our Lord, confirming the worship of the one God, answered him: ‘It is written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve.’ Terrified by this answer, and afraid that the true religion of the one true God might be restored, he immediately hastens to send into this world false prophets and false apostles and false teachers, who would speak indeed in the name of Christ but do the will of the demon.
4.35PG 1:1330a
Propter quod observate cautius, ut nulli doctorum credatis, nisi qui Jacobi fratris Domini ex Hierusalem detulerit testimonium, vel ejus quicunque post ipsum fuerit. Nisi enim quis illuc ascenderit, et ibi fuerit probatus quod sit doctor idoneus et fidelis ad praedicandum Christi verbum; nisi, inquam, inde detulerit testimonium, recipiendus omnino non est; sed neque propheta, neque apostolus in hoc tempore speretur a vobis aliquis alius praeter nos. Unus enim est verus propheta, cujus nos duodecim apostoli verba praedicamus. Ipse enim est annus Dei acceptus, nos apostolos habens duodecim menses ”. Qua autem causa vel mundus ipse factus sit, vel diversitates quae sunt Ῑ) in eo acciderint, et cur ad reparationem ejus veniens Dominus noster, elegerit nos duodecim apostolos et miserit, alias latius explanabitur. Interim nos jussit exire ad praedicandum et invitare vos ad cenam Regis caelestis, quam praparavit Pater in nuptiis Filii sui, et ut demus vobis indumenta nuptialia ’, quod est gratia baptismi, quam qui fuerit consecutus, tanquam vestimentum mundum, cum quo ei ingrediendum est ad cenam regis, observare debet, ne peccato aliqua ex parte maculetur, ct ob hoc tanquam indignus et reprobus abjiciatur. ’
“Therefore take great care to believe no teacher unless he brings from Jerusalem the testimony of James the Lord's brother, or of whoever comes after him. For unless someone has gone up there and been approved there as a fit and faithful teacher for preaching the word of Christ—unless, I say, he brings testimony from there—he is not to be received at all. Nor should any prophet or apostle be expected by you at this time other than us. For there is one true Prophet, whose words we twelve apostles preach. For he is the acceptable year of God, having us apostles as his twelve months. But for what cause the world itself was made, or why the diversities in it have occurred, and why our Lord, coming to restore it, chose and sent us twelve apostles, will be explained more fully elsewhere. Meanwhile he ordered us to go out to preach and to invite you to the supper of the heavenly King, which the Father has prepared for the wedding of his Son, and to give you wedding garments, that is, the grace of baptism. Whoever has obtained it must keep it as a clean garment, with which he is to enter the King's supper, so that it may not be stained in any part by sin and he be cast out on this account as unworthy and reprobate.
4.36PG 1:1330a–1332a
Causa: autem quibus maculetur istud indumentum hae sunt: si quis recedat a patre et conditore omnium Deo, alium recipiens doctorem praeter Christum, qui est solus fidelis ac verus propheta, quique nos duodecim apostolos misit ad praedicandum verbum; et si quis de substantia divinitatis quae cuncta praecellit, aliter quam dignum est sentiat, haec sunt quae usque ad mortem baptismi polluunt indumentum. Quae vero in actibus polluunt, ista sunt: homicidia, adulteria, odia, avaritia, cupiditas mala. Quae autem animam simul et corpus polluunt, ista sunt: participare daemonum mensae, hoc est, immolata degustare, vel sanguinem, vel morticinium quod est suffocatum, et si quid aliud est quod daemonibus oblatum est. Hic ergo vobis sit primus gradus ex tribus, qui gradus triginta ex se gignit mandata ", secundus vero qui sexaginta, tertius qui centum, sicut alias vobis de his plenius exponemus.
“The causes by which this garment is stained are these: if anyone withdraws from God, the Father and maker of all, receiving another teacher besides Christ, who alone is the faithful and true Prophet and who sent us twelve apostles to preach the word; and if anyone thinks otherwise than is worthy about the substance of the Godhead, which surpasses all things—these are the things that stain the garment of baptism even unto death. Those that stain by deeds are these: murders, adulteries, hatreds, avarice, evil desire. And those that stain soul and body at once are these: to share the table of demons, that is, to taste things sacrificed, or blood, or a carcass that has been strangled, and anything else that has been offered to demons. Let this, then, be for you the first step of three, which step produces from itself thirty commandments; the second, sixty; the third, a hundred, as we shall explain to you more fully elsewhere.
4.37PG 1:1332a
Et haec cum dixisset, ac praecepisset at die postera ad eumdem locum maturius convenirent, turbas dimisit; quibus recedere nolentibus, ait Petrus: Donate mihi hanc gratiam propter hesterni itineris labores; et nunc discedentes die Crastina maturius convenite; et ita cum laetitia discessere. At Petrus paululum me secedere praecipiens orationis causa, jubet post haec in loco horti quem umbra contegebat, accubitum sterni, et unusquisque ex more recognoscens proprii ordinis locum, cibum sumpsimus. Tum deinde quia supererat adhuc aliquantulum diei, de mirabilibus Domini collocutus nobiscum, vespere facto ingressus cubiculum quievit.
When he had said this, and had told them to come together early the next day to the same place, he dismissed the crowds. When they did not want to leave, Peter said: “Grant me this favor because of the labors of yesterday's journey; go away now and come together early tomorrow.” And so they went away with joy. Peter, telling me to withdraw a little for prayer, afterwards ordered couches to be spread in a part of the garden covered by shade; and each of us, recognizing the place of his own rank as usual, we took food. Then, since some of the day still remained, he talked with us about the wonders of the Lord, and when evening came he went into his chamber and rested.
Chapter 5
5.1PG 1:1331a
Sequenti autem die, paulo citius quam solebat consurgens Petrus, invenit nos dormientes; quod ubi sensit, quasi ipse adhuc dormire volens, silentium sibi fieri jussit, ut nobis quiescendi facultatem daret. Ubi autem refecti somno exsurreximus, invenimus eum oratione facta intra cubiculum opperientem nos. Et cum jam esset crepusculum, salutans ex more breviter allocutus est, et continuo ad consuetum locum docendi gratia procedit, ubi eum vidisset ad audiendum plurimos convenisse, primo religionis ritu pace eis invocata, dicere hoc modo coepit:
On the following day Peter, rising a little earlier than usual, found us asleep. When he noticed it, he ordered silence to be kept for him, as though he himself wished to sleep longer, so as to give us the chance to rest. When we had got up refreshed by sleep, we found him, his prayer finished, waiting for us in his chamber. As it was already twilight, he greeted us as usual and spoke briefly, and at once went out to the usual place to teach. When he saw that very many had gathered to hear, he first invoked peace on them according to the rite of religion and began to speak in this way:
5.2PG 1:1331a–1332a
“ Deus creator omnium ex initio ad imaginem suam hominem fecit, eique dominationem terrae marisque et aeris ipsius dedit, sicut et verus nobis propheta narravit, et ipsa rerum ratio docet; solus enim est rationabilis, et consequens est ut ratio irrationabilibus dominetur. Hic ergo ab initio cum adhuc justus esset, cunctis vitiis et omni fragilitate superior erat; ubi autem peccavit. sicut hesterno die docuimus, et factus est servus peccati, simul et fragilitati efficitur obnoxius. Quod idcirco scriptum est, ut sciant homines quia sicut ex impietate passibiles facti sunt, ita per pietatem possunt esse impassibiles, et non solum impassibiles, verum et parva in Deum fide aliorum passiones curantes. lta enim verus propheta nobis promisit dicens: Amen dico vobis, quia si habueritis fidem sicut granum sinapis, dicetis monti huic, Transi hinc, et transibit ". Hujus vocis etiam vos ipsi documenta accepistis; hesterno enim die vidistis quomodo astantibus nobis, daemones cum passionibus quas hominibus invexerant, transierunt et fugati sunt.
“God, the creator of all, made man from the beginning in his own image, and gave him dominion over the earth and the sea and the air itself, as the true Prophet has told us and as the very nature of things teaches; for man alone is rational, and it follows that reason should rule over the irrational. So from the beginning, while he was still righteous, he was superior to all vices and all frailty; but when he sinned, as we taught yesterday, and became the slave of sin, he was at the same time made liable to frailty. This was written so that men might know that as they became subject to suffering through impiety, so through piety they can become free from suffering—and not only free from suffering, but able, by even a little faith in God, to heal the sufferings of others. For so the true Prophet promised us, saying: ‘Amen I say to you, if you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, Move from here, and it will move.’ Of this saying you yourselves have received proofs; for yesterday you saw how, while we stood by, the demons, together with the sufferings they had brought on men, moved away and were put to flight.
5.3PG 1:1332a
Quia ergo alii quidem homines patiuntur, alii patientes sanant, causa sine dubio vel patiendi vel curandi noscenda est, quae non alia esse, quam patientibus quidem infidelitatis, curantibus vero fidei demonstratur. infidelitas enim dum non credit futurum judicium Dei, peccandi licentiam praebet, peccatum vero hominem passionibus obnoxium lacit. Fides autem futurum esse Dei judicium credens continet homines a peccato; non peccantes vero non solum liberi sunt a daemonibus et passionibus, verum et aliorum daemones et passiones fugare possunt.
“Since, then, some men suffer and others heal those who suffer, the cause both of suffering and of healing must certainly be understood; and it is shown to be nothing other than unbelief in those who suffer and faith in those who heal. For unbelief, while it does not believe in the coming judgment of God, gives license to sin, and sin makes a man liable to sufferings. But faith, believing that the judgment of God is to come, keeps men from sin; and those who do not sin are not only free from demons and sufferings but can also put to flight the demons and sufferings of others.
5.4PG 1:1333a–1333b
Ex his ergo omnibus colligitur, quod origo totius mali ab ignorantia descendat, et ipsa sit malorum omnium mater, quae incuria quidem et ignavia gignitur, negligentia vero alitur et augetur atque in sensibus hominum radicatur, quam si quis forte doceat effugandam, velut antiquis et haereditariis sedibus moleste et indignanter avellitur. Et ideo paululum laborandum nobis est, ut indagantes ignorantiae praesumptiones scientia: ratione resecemus, in his praecipue qui in aliquibus minus rectis Opinionibus praeventi sunt, per quas quasi sub specie alicujus scientiae, ignorantia in eis vehementius radicata est; nihil enim gravius quam si id quod ignorat quis, scire se credat, et defendat verum esse quod falsum est, quod tale est, quale si quis ebrius sobrium se putet et agat quidem cuncta ut ebrius, sobrium se tamen et ipse putet et dici a caeteris velit. Ita sunt ergo et hi qui ignorantes quod verum est, speciem tamen alicujus scientia: tenent, et mala quasi bona gerunt, atque ad perniciem quasi ad salutem festinant.
“From all this it is gathered that the origin of all evil comes down from ignorance, and that it is the mother of all evils. It is begotten by carelessness and sloth, fed and increased by negligence, and rooted in men's minds; and if anyone teaches that it should be driven out, it is torn away with annoyance and indignation, as if from ancient and hereditary seats. So we must labor a little, tracking down the presumptions of ignorance and cutting them away by the reasoning of knowledge, especially in those who have been preoccupied by some less correct opinions, through which ignorance has rooted itself more strongly in them under the appearance, as it were, of some knowledge. For nothing is worse than when someone believes he knows what he does not know, and defends as true what is false. That is as if a drunk man thought himself sober: he does everything as a drunk man, yet thinks himself sober and wants to be called so by others. So too are those who, not knowing what is true, yet hold the appearance of some knowledge, do evil as if it were good, and hasten to ruin as if to salvation.
5.5PG 1:1333b
Propter quod ante omnia properandum est ad agnitionem veritatis, ut possimus quasi lumine nobis inde succenso, errorum tenebras depellere; grande enim malum est, ut diximus, ignorantia; sed quia substantiam non habet, facile ab his qui studiosi sunt. effugatur. Non enim aliud est quidem ignorantia, nisi non agnovisse quod expedit; ubi autem agnoveris, perit ignorantia. Quaeri ergo magnopere debet veritatis agnitio, quam nemo alius potest assignare, nisi verus propheta. Haec enim porta est vitae volentibus ingredi, et iter operum bonorum pergentibus ad civitatem salutis.
“Therefore above all we must hasten to the knowledge of the truth, so that, a light being kindled for us from it, we may drive away the darkness of errors. For ignorance, as we said, is a great evil; but since it has no substance, it is easily driven away by those who are diligent. For ignorance is nothing other than not having recognized what is profitable; and once you have recognized it, ignorance perishes. The knowledge of the truth, then, must be sought earnestly, and no one else can assign it except the true Prophet. For this is the gate of life for those who wish to enter, and the road of good works for those going to the city of salvation.
5.6PG 1:1333b–1333d
Si quis sane audiens sermonem veri prophetae, velit recipere aut nolit, et amplecti onus ejus, id est mandata vitae, habet in sua potestate; liberi enim sumus arbitrii. Nam si hoc esset, ut audientes eum jam non haberent in potestate aliud facere quam audierant, vis erat quadam naturae, per quam liberum non esset ad aliam migrare sententiam. Aut si rursus ex audientibus nullus omnino reciperet, et hoc natura: vis erat, quae unum aliquid fieri cogeret, et alteri parti non daret Iocum. Nunc autem quia liberum est animo, in quam velit partem declinare judicium suum, et quam probaverit eligere viam, constat evidenter inesse hominibus arbitrii libertatem.
“If anyone hears the word of the true Prophet, it is in his own power whether he wishes to receive it or not, and to embrace his burden, that is, the commandments of life; for we are free in choice. For if it were the case that those who heard him no longer had it in their power to do otherwise than they had heard, there would be a kind of force of nature by which it would not be free to pass over to another view. Or again, if none of the hearers at all received it, this too would be a force of nature, compelling one thing to happen and giving no room to the other side. But now, since the mind is free to incline its judgment to whichever side it wishes and to choose the way it approves, it is plainly established that freedom of choice is present in men.
5.7PG 1:1333d–1334a
Igitur priusquam audiat quis quod ei expedit, certum est quia ignorat, et ignorans vult et desiderat quod non expedit agere, propter quod pro hoc non judicatur. Cum vero audierit causas erroris sui, et rationem veritatis acceperit, tunc si permanserit in his erroribus quibus dudum fuerat praeventus, recte jam vocabitur ad judicium poenas daturus, cur vitae ejus spatium quod ad bene vivendum accepit, in ludibriis consumpsit errorum. Qui vero audiens haec libenter accipit, et gratulatur bonorum sibi doctrinam fuisse delatam, requirit intentius et discere non desinit, usquequo cognoscat, si est vere aliud saeculum, in quo bonis praemia praeparata sunt; et cum certus de hoc fuerit, gratias agens Deo, quod sibi veritatis lumen ostenderit, de caatero dirigit actus suos in omnibus operibus bonis, quorum sibi in futuro mercedem certus est praeparatam, per omnia demirans et stupens caaterorum hominum errores, et quod ante oculos positam veritatem nemo videat. lpse tamen gaudens super divitiis sapientia: quas invenit, insatiabiliter eis perfrui cupit et exercitio bonorum operum delectatur, festinans ad saeculum futurum mundo corde et pura conscientia pervenire, ubi etiam videre Deum regem omnium possit.
“So before anyone hears what is profitable for him, it is certain that he is ignorant, and in ignorance he wishes and desires to do what is not profitable; therefore he is not judged for this. But when he has heard the causes of his error and has received the account of the truth, then, if he remains in the errors by which he had long been possessed, he will rightly be called to judgment to pay the penalty, because he spent in the mockeries of errors the span of life he received for living well. But one who hears these things gladly receives them, rejoices that the teaching of good things has been brought to him, inquires more intently, and does not stop learning until he knows whether there truly is another age in which rewards are prepared for the good. And when he is sure of this, giving thanks to God for having shown him the light of truth, he directs his actions thereafter in all good works, whose reward he is sure is prepared for him in the future; wondering and astonished at the errors of other men in every respect, and that no one sees the truth set before their eyes. Yet he himself, rejoicing over the riches of wisdom he has found, longs to enjoy them insatiably and delights in the practice of good works, hastening to reach the age to come with a clean heart and a pure conscience, where he may also see God, the King of all.
5.8PG 1:1334b
His autem omnibus carere nos et fraudari, sola facit ignorantia. Dum enim ignorant homines quantum boni habeat scientia, ignorantiae malum de se non patiuntur excludi; nesciunt enim quanta sit in horum permutatione diversitas. Propter quod consilium do unicuique discentium, libenter pra?bere aurem verbo Dei, et cum amore veritatis audire quae dicimus. ut mens optimo semine suscepto, per bonos actus laetos afl'erat fructus. Nam si me docente ea quae ad salutem pertinent, recipere quis abnuit, et animo pravis opinionibus occupato obsistere nititur, non ex nobis, sed ex semetipso habebit pereundi causam. Debet enim justo judicio examinare quae dicimus, et intelligere quia verba eloquimur veritatis, ut cognitis his quae sunt ut sunt, et in bonis actibus dirigens vitam suam, regni calorum possit particeps inveniri, subjiciens sibi carnis desideria, et dominus eorum factus, ut ita demum etiam ipse fiat dominatoris omnium jucunda possessio. _ _
“Ignorance alone causes us to lack and be cheated of all these things. For while men do not know how much good knowledge holds, they do not allow the evil of ignorance to be shut out of them; for they do not know how great a difference there is in exchanging the one for the other. Therefore I give this advice to each of the learners: lend your ear gladly to the word of God, and hear what we say with love of the truth, so that the mind, having received the best seed, may bring forth joyful fruits through good actions. For if, while I teach the things that pertain to salvation, anyone refuses to receive them and, with a mind occupied by perverse opinions, strives to resist, he will have the cause of his perishing not from us but from himself. For he ought to examine what we say with a just judgment and understand that we speak words of truth, so that, knowing things as they are and directing his life in good actions, he may be found a partaker of the kingdom of heaven, subjecting the desires of the flesh to himself and becoming their master, so that thus at last he himself may become the pleasing possession of the Ruler of all.
5.9PG 1:1334b–1334d
Nam qui permanet in malo et servus est mali, non potest effici portio boni, donec permanet in malo, quia ab initio, ut ante diximus, duo regna statuit Deus, et potestatem dedit unicuique hominum, ut illius regni fiat portio, cui se ad obedien- lum ipse subjecerit. Et quia definitum est apud Deum, non posse unum hominem utriusque regni esse servum, omni studio date operam, in boni regis foedus ac jura concurrere. Propter hoc denique verus pr0pheta cum esset praesens nobiscum, et quosdam ex divitibus negligentes erga Dei cultum videret. hujus rei ita aperuit veritatem: Nemo potest, inquit, duobus dominis servire, non potestis Deo servire et mammona: '3; mammona patria e0.rum voce divitias vocans.
“For one who remains in evil and is the slave of evil cannot become a portion of the good while he remains in evil; because from the beginning, as we said before, God established two kingdoms, and gave each man the power to become a portion of that kingdom to which he has subjected himself in obedience. And since it is determined with God that one man cannot be the slave of both kingdoms, strive with all zeal to run together into the covenant and laws of the good King. For this reason, indeed, the true Prophet, when he was present with us and saw some of the rich negligent of the worship of God, disclosed the truth of this matter thus: ‘No one,’ he said, ‘can serve two masters; you cannot serve God and mammon’—calling riches ‘mammon’ in their native tongue.
5.10PG 1:1334d–1335a
Hic ergo est verus propheta, qui in Iudaea. nobis apparuit ut audistis; qui stans publice sola jussione faciebat caecos videre, surdos audire, fugabat daemones, aegris sanitatem reddebat et mortuis vitam. Cumque nihil ei esset impossibile, etiam cogitationes hominum pervidebat, quod nulli est possibile nisi soli Deo. Hic annuntiavit regnum Dei, cui nos de omnibus quae dicebat, tanquam vero propheta: credimus, firmitatem fidei nostra: non solum ex verbis ejus, sed et ex operibus assumentes, quia et dicta legis, quae ante multas generationes de praesentia ejus exposuerant, in ipso consignabantur, et imagines gestorum Moysi et ante ipsum patriarchae Jacob, ipsius per omnia typum ferebant. Tempus quoque adventus ejus, hoc est, ipsum in quo venerat, praedictum ab eis constat. et super omnia quod esset a gentibus exspectandus, sacris litteris comprehensum est, qua in eo pariter universa completa sunt.
“This, then, is the true Prophet who appeared to us in Judea, as you have heard; who, standing in public, by his command alone made the blind see and the deaf hear, drove out demons, gave health to the sick and life to the dead. And since nothing was impossible for him, he also saw through the thoughts of men, which is possible for no one but God alone. He proclaimed the kingdom of God; and we believe him in all that he said as the true Prophet, taking the firmness of our faith not only from his words but also from his works. For the sayings of the law, which had set forth his coming many generations before, were sealed in him; and the figures of the deeds of Moses, and before him of the patriarch Jacob, bore his type in every respect. The time of his coming, too—that is, the very time at which he came—is shown to have been foretold by them; and above all, that he was to be awaited by the nations is contained in the sacred writings. All these things have likewise been fulfilled in him.
5.11PG 1:1335a–1335b
Quod autem Iudaeorum propheta praedixit eum a gentibus exspectandum, supra modum in eo fidem veri confirmat. Si enim dixisset a Judaeis exspectandum, non aliquid eximium prophetasse videretur, quod a contribuli populo et a propria gente speraretur is, cujus adventus ad salutem mundi fuerat repromissus; videretur enim magis consequentia: ratio esse, ut hoc fieret, quam magnificentia prophetalis. Nunc autem cum propheta: dicunt, omnem illam spem quae de salute mundi repromittitur, et novitatem regni quae instituenda per Christum est, atque omnia quae de eo indicantur, ad gentes esse transferenda, jam non secundum consequentiam rerum. sed incredibili quodam vaticinationis eventu magnificentia prophetica confirmatur. Judaei namque ex initio adfore aliquando hunc virum per quem cuncta repararentur, verissima traditione susceperant, et quotidie meditantes ac prospicientes, quando ejus fieret adventus, ubi adesse eum viderunt et signa ac prodigia, sicut de eo scriptum fuerat, adimplentem, invidia excaecati agnoscere nequiverunt praesentem, in cujus spe laetabantur absentis; intelleximus tamen pauci nos qui ab eo electi sumus.
“That the prophet of the Jews foretold that he would be awaited by the nations confirms faith in his truth beyond measure. For if he had said that he would be awaited by the Jews, he would not seem to have prophesied anything remarkable—that he whose coming had been promised for the salvation of the world should be hoped for by a kindred people and by his own nation; it would seem rather the logic of consequence that this should happen than prophetic grandeur. But now, since the prophets say that all that hope which is promised concerning the salvation of the world, and the newness of the kingdom which is to be established through Christ, and all that is declared concerning him, are to be transferred to the nations, the grandeur of prophecy is confirmed not according to the sequence of events but by an incredible outcome of the prediction. For the Jews had received by a most true tradition from the beginning that this man would one day come through whom all things would be restored; and meditating daily and looking out for when his coming would take place, when they saw that he had come and was fulfilling signs and wonders as had been written of him, blinded by envy they could not recognize as present the one in the hope of whose coming they had rejoiced while he was absent. Yet we few, who have been chosen by him, understood.
5.12PG 1:1335b–1336a
Hoc autem providentia Dei factum est, ut agnitio boni hujus etiam gentibus traderetur, et hi qui nunquam de eo audierant nec a prophetis didicerant, agnoscerent eum, illi vero qui quotidianis meditationibus agnoverant, ignorarent. Ecce enim per vos nunc qui praesentes estis, et desideratis audire doctrinam fidei ejus et agnoscere quis, et quo modo, et qualis sit ejus adventus, prophetica veritas adimpletur. Hoc est enim quod praedixerunt prophetae, quia a vobis quaerendus esset, qui de eo nunquam audistis“. Et ideo videntes in vobis ipsis prophetica dicta compleri, huic uni recte creditis, hunc recte exspectatis, de hoc recte inquiritis, ut non solum exspectetis eum. sed et haareditatem regni ejus credentes consequamini, secundum quod ipse dixit, quia unusquisque illius est servus cui se ipse subiecerit “.
“This happened by the providence of God, so that the knowledge of this good might be handed on to the nations as well, and those who had never heard of him nor learned from the prophets might recognize him, while those who had known him by daily meditation would not. For see, through you who are now present and desire to hear the teaching of faith in him and to know who he is, and how, and of what kind his coming is, the prophetic truth is being fulfilled. For this is what the prophets foretold: that he would be sought by you who have never heard of him. And so, seeing the prophetic sayings fulfilled in yourselves, you rightly believe this one alone, rightly await him, rightly inquire about him, so that you may not only await him but, believing, may also obtain the inheritance of his kingdom—according to what he himself said, that each one is the servant of him to whom he has subjected himself.
5.13PG 1:1336a–1336b
Propterea ergo evigilate, et Dominum Deumque nostrum vobis ascribite, Dominum qui et caeli ac terra: Dominus est, et ad ipsius vos imaginem ac similitudinem reformate, sicut ipse verus propheta docet, dicens: Estote misericordes sicut et Pater vester caelestis misericors est, qui oriri facit solem suum super bonos et malos, et pluit super justas et injustas. Hunc ergo imitamini et hunc timete, sicut mandatum datur hominibus: Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et ipsi soli servies. Expedit enim vobis huic uni Domino servire, ut per ipsum cognoscentes unum Deum, a multis quos inutiliter timebatis. liberemini. Qui enim creatorem omnium non timet Deum, sed eos timet quos ipse manibus suis fecit, quid nisi vano et inutili semetipsum obnoxium facit timori? vilioremque se et abjectiorem reddit quam sunt illa ipsa, quorum timorem mente concepit. Quin potius per bonitatem ejus qui vos invitat, redite ad priorem nobilitatem vestram, et ex bonis actibus, quod ipsius creatoris vestri imaginem portetis, ostendite, ut ex contemplatione similitudinis ipsius etiam filii ejus esse credamini.
“Therefore wake up, and enroll yourselves under our Lord and God—the Lord who is Lord of heaven and earth—and reshape yourselves to his image and likeness, as the true Prophet himself teaches, saying: ‘Be merciful, as your heavenly Father also is merciful, who makes his sun rise on the good and the evil, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.’ Imitate him, then, and fear him, as the commandment is given to men: ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve.’ For it is profitable for you to serve this one Lord, so that, knowing the one God through him, you may be freed from the many whom you feared to no purpose. For one who does not fear God, the creator of all, but fears those whom he himself made with his own hands, what does he do but subject himself to a vain and useless fear? And he makes himself baser and more abject than the very things whose fear he has conceived in his mind. Rather, through the goodness of him who invites you, return to your former nobility, and show by good actions that you bear the image of your creator himself, so that from the sight of his likeness you may be believed to be his sons as well.
5.14PG 1:1336b
Incipite ergo a sensibus vestris abjicere vanas idolorum species atque inutiles et inanes timores, ut simul etiam conditionem possitis iniqua servitutis effugere. Domini etenim vestri effecti sunt illi, qui ne servi quidem utiles vobis esse potuissent. Quomodo enim simulacra exanima vel ad servitutem vobis viderentur idonea, cum neque audiant, neque videant, neque aliquid sentiant? nisi quod ipsa saltem materia ex qua facta sunt, sive auri, sive argenti, vel etiam teris aut ligni, cum possit vobis ad usus necessarios prodesse, vos ex ea formando deos, otiosam per omnia eam atque inutilem reddidistis. Nos ergo annuntiamus vobis verum Dei cultum, simulque monemus et hortamur cultores, ut per bonos actus imitentur eum quem colunt, et ad imaginem ac similitudinem ejus, ut superius diximus, redire festinent.
“Begin, then, to cast out of your minds the empty images of idols and useless and vain fears, so that at the same time you may also escape the condition of unjust slavery. For those have become your masters who could not even have been useful slaves to you. For how could lifeless images seem fit even for slavery to you, when they neither hear nor see nor perceive anything? Except that at least the material from which they are made—gold or silver, or bronze or wood—could serve you for necessary uses, and you, by forming gods out of it, have made it wholly idle and useless. We, then, proclaim to you the true worship of God, and at the same time we warn and exhort the worshipers to imitate by good actions him whom they worship, and to hasten to return to his image and likeness, as we said above.
5.15PG 1:1336b–1337a
Velim autem dicerent mihi hi qui idola colunt, si optant similes fieri his quos colunt. Vultne aliquis vestrum sic videre quomodo illi vident? et sic audire' quomodo illi audiunt? sic habere sensum quomodo illi habent? Absit hoc ab unoquoque audientium; hoc enim maledictum potius et convicium credendum est homini, qui imaginem Dei in se gerit, etiamsi similitudinem perdidit. Quales ergo dii habendi sunt isti, quos imitari exsecrabile sit cultoribus suis, quorum similitudinem habere contumelia est ‘l Quid ergo? Solvite simulacra inutilia, et facite vasa utilia; solvite otiosam pigramque materiam, et facite humano usui apta ministeria. Sed non sinunt, inquit, leges humanae. Bene, quia humanae leges, et non ipsorum virtus. Quomodo ergo dii sunt qui humanis legibus et non suis viribus defenduntur? sicque et a furibus canum vigiliis et claustrorum munitionibus conservantur, et hoc si fuerint argentea vel aurea vel etiam aerea; nam lapidea et fictilia ipsa sui vilitate muniuntur, nemo enim lapideum aut fictilem deum furatur. Unde miserabiliores videntur hi, quibus pretiosius metallum pericula viciniora conquirit. Qui ergo furari possunt, qui ab hominibus custodiri, qui conflari et appendi et malleis caedi, isti hominibus sensum habentibus dii debent videri?
“I wish those who worship idols would tell me whether they want to become like those they worship. Does any of you want to see as they see, and to hear as they hear, and to have perception as they have? Far be this from each of the hearers; for this should be thought rather a curse and an insult to a man, who bears in himself the image of God even if he has lost the likeness. What kind of gods, then, are these to be held, whom it would be execrable for their worshipers to imitate, and whose likeness it is an insult to have? What then? Melt down the useless images and make useful vessels; melt down the idle and sluggish material and make implements fit for human use. ‘But human laws,’ someone says, ‘do not allow it.’ Good—it is human laws, and not their own power. How then are they gods who are defended by human laws and not by their own strength? So too they are guarded from thieves by watchdogs and the protection of locks—and this if they are of silver or gold or even bronze; for those of stone and clay are protected by their very cheapness, since no one steals a god of stone or clay. Hence those seem more wretched for whom a more precious metal procures nearer dangers. Should those, then, who can be stolen, who are guarded by men, who can be melted and weighed and struck with hammers—should these seem to be gods to men who have perception?
5.16PG 1:1337a
Ο in quantam miseriam mortalium decidit intelligentia! Nam si mortuos timere summa: stultitiae ducitur, quid judicemus de his qui deterius aliquid, quam sunt mortui, timent? ista enim simulacra nec in mortuorum numero habenda sunt, quia nunquam vixerunt. Praeferenda sunt eis etiam sepulcra mortuorum, quoniam, licet nunc mortui sunt, habuerunt tamen aliquando vitam; isti autem quos colitis, nec eam quidem quae est in omnibus teterrima, ranarum ac bubonum vitam aliquando gesserunt. Sed quid opus est de his plura memorare, cum sufficiat dicere ei qui adorat ea: Non vides quia Quem adoras, non videt? audi quia quem adoras, non audit. et intellige quia non intelligit; opus enim mortalis manus est, et necessario sensu caret. Tu ergo adoras insensibilem, cum unusquisque habens sensum, nec ea quidem credat adoranda, quae a Deo facta sunt et habent sensum, id est solem et lunam, vel stellas, omniaque quae in caelo sunt et super terram. Justum enim putant, non ea quae pro mundi ministerio facta sunt, sed ipsorum et mundi totius Creatorem debere venerari; gaudent enim etiam haec, cum ille adoratur et colitur, nec libenter accipiunt, ut honor Creatoris creatura deferatur. Exceptus enim est Dei solius cultus, qui solus increatus est, omnia autem caetera factura ejus sunt. Sicut ergo pr0prium est ejus qui solus non est factus, Deum esse, ita omne quod factum est, Deus vere non est.
“O into what misery the understanding of mortals has fallen! For if fearing the dead is counted the height of folly, what shall we judge of those who fear something worse than the dead? For these images are not even to be counted among the dead, since they never lived. Even the tombs of the dead are to be preferred to them, since, though they are now dead, they once had life; but these whom you worship never even lived that life which is the foulest of all, the life of frogs and owls. But what need is there to say more about them, when it is enough to say to one who adores them: ‘Do you not see that what you adore does not see? Hear that what you adore does not hear, and understand that it does not understand.’ For it is the work of a mortal hand, and necessarily lacks perception. You, then, adore what has no perception, when everyone who has perception does not believe that even the things made by God that have perception are to be adored—that is, the sun and moon or stars, and all that are in heaven and on earth. For they think it right to venerate not the things made for the service of the world, but the Creator of them and of the whole world. For these too rejoice when he is adored and worshiped, and they do not gladly accept that the honor of the Creator should be paid to a creature. For the worship of God alone is set apart, for he alone is uncreated, and all other things are his making. As, then, it is proper to him who alone was not made to be God, so whatever has been made is not truly God.
5.17PG 1:1337a–1338a
Ante omnia ergo intelligere debetis deceptionem serpentis antiqui et callidas ejus suggestiones, qui quasi per prudentiam decipit vos, et velut ratione quadam serpit per sensus vestros, atque ab ipso vertice incipiens per interiores dilabitur medullas. lucrum magnum computans deceptionem vestram. interserit ergo sensibus vestris _ Opiniones quorumcunque deorum, tantum ut vos ab unius Dei revocet fide, sciens peccatum vestrum suum esse solatium. Ille enim pro nequitia sua ab initio terram edere condemnatus est. propter eum quem de terra assumptum, iterum resolvi fecit in terram, usque ad tempus quo anima: vestrae per ignem traductae reparentur, sicut alias de hoc plenius edocebimus. Ex ipso ergo sunt omnes errores et ambiguitates, quibus ab unius Dei fide et credulitate conturbamini.
“Above all, then, you ought to understand the deception of the ancient serpent and his crafty suggestions; he deceives you as if by prudence, and creeps through your minds as if by some reasoning, and beginning from the very crown of the head glides down through the inner marrow, counting your deception a great gain. So he plants in your minds opinions of any gods whatever, so long as he may call you back from faith in the one God, knowing that your sin is his comfort. For because of his wickedness he was condemned from the beginning to eat earth, because of him who was taken from the earth and whom he caused to be dissolved again into earth, until the time when your souls, having been brought through fire, are restored, as we shall teach more fully about this elsewhere. From him, then, come all the errors and doubts by which you are disturbed from faith and belief in the one God.
5.18PG 1:1338a
Et primo omnium subjicit cogitationibus hominum, ut ne audiant verba veritatis, per qua: malorum ignorantiam fugent. Et hoc facit quasi occasione alterius scientiae, asseverans eis illam opinionem qua utuntur plurimi, ut putent se reos futuros non esse si in ignorantia fuerint, nec reddituros esse rationem pro his quae non audierint, et ideo a verbo declinare eos suadet auditum. Sed accipite contra haec: ipsa per semetipsam ignorantia validissimum venenum est, quod sufficiat animam, nulla extrinsecus quaesita adjectione, perimere. Et ideo nemo est qui ignorans, per hoc quod ignorat, evadat, sed certum est quod intereat. Naturaliter enim peccatorum vis interimit peccatorem. Sed quoniam judicium rationabile erit, tam ignorantiae, quam uniuscujusque peccati causa et origo requiretur. Is ergo qui scire noluit quomodo possit venire ad vitam, sed maluit ignorare ne per hoc reus fieri videretur, ex hoc ipse jam, quasi qui scierit et habuerit scientiam, judicatur. Agnovit enim quid esset quod nolebat audire, et nihil e'i conferet ad excusationem serpentis artificis quaesita calliditas; cum eo enim erit ei ratio quem non latet cor. Ut autem scias quia ignorantia per semetipsam generat interitum, anima cum discesserit a corpore. si talis exeat quae ignoret eum a quo creata est, a quo in hoc mundo omnia quae usibus suis erant necessaria consecuta est, tanquam ingrata et infidelis a regni ejus luce projicitur.
“First of all he suggests to men's thoughts that they should not hear the words of truth by which they might put to flight the ignorance of evils. And he does this under the pretext, as it were, of another kind of knowledge, asserting to them the opinion that most people hold: that they think they will not be guilty if they have been in ignorance, nor will they have to give an account for things they have not heard; and so he persuades them to turn their hearing away from the word. But hear against this: ignorance by itself is a most powerful poison, sufficient to destroy the soul without any addition sought from outside. And so there is no one who, being ignorant, escapes because he is ignorant; rather it is certain that he perishes. For the force of sins naturally destroys the sinner. But since the judgment will be rational, the cause and origin both of ignorance and of each sin will be inquired into. He, then, who did not wish to know how he could come to life, but preferred to be ignorant so as not to seem guilty on that account, is by that very fact judged as one who knew and had knowledge. For he recognized what it was that he did not wish to hear, and the craftiness sought from the serpent's artifice will contribute nothing to his excuse; for he will have to give account to him from whom the heart is not hidden. And so that you may know that ignorance by itself produces destruction: when the soul departs from the body, if it goes out such that it does not know him by whom it was created, from whom it received in this world everything necessary for its use, it is cast out from the light of his kingdom as ungrateful and unfaithful.
5.19PG 1:1338a–1339b
Subjicit iterum nequissimus serpens aliam hominibus Opinionem, quam plures vestrum proterre solent: Unum esse et nos dicimus Deum, qui est omnium Dominus; sed et isti, inquiunt, dii sunt. Sicut enim unus est Caesar, et habet sub se multos judices, verbi gratia praefectos, consules, tribunos et caeteras potestates, simili arbitramur modo, cum unus sit major omnium Deus, etiam istos ad similitudinem earum quas diximus, potestatum ordinatos esse in hoc mundo deos, illi quidem majori subjectos, nos tamen et quae in hoc mundo sunt dispensantes. Audite ergo ad haec, quomodo in his ipsis quae ad deceptionem proponitis, veritatis rationibus confutemini. Dicitis quia locum Caesaris teneat Deus, judicum vero ejus et potestatum speciem servent hi qui dicuntur dii; servate ergo, ut proposuistis, exemplum Caesaris, et scitote quia sicut nulli ex judicibus vel administratoribus Caesaris, id est praefectis, vel proconsulibus, vel ducibus, vel tribunis, fas est Caesaris nomen imponi; alioquin et ille qui susceperit et illi qui detulerint, pariter interibunt: ita et de hoc debetis advertere, quod si quis nomen Dei alicui quam praeter ipsum imposuerit, et ille receperit, unum eamdemque sortientur interitum, multo deteriore sorte quam ministri Caesaris. Hic enim qui deliquit in Caesarem, interitum suscipiet temporalem; qui vero in unum qui solus et verus est Deus delinquit, in saeculum luet poenas, et merito, ut qui nomen quod est unicum injuriosa conditione violaverit.
“Again the most wicked serpent suggests to men another opinion, which many of you are accustomed to put forward: ‘We too say that there is one God, who is Lord of all; but these also,’ they say, ‘are gods. For as there is one Caesar, and he has under him many judges—for example, prefects, consuls, tribunes, and the other authorities—in a similar way we think that, while there is one God greater than all, these also have been appointed gods in this world after the likeness of the authorities we mentioned, subject indeed to that greater one, yet administering us and the things in this world.’ Hear, then, in reply, how you are refuted by the reasons of truth in the very things you put forward to deceive. You say that God holds the place of Caesar, and that those called gods keep the appearance of his judges and authorities. Keep, then, the example of Caesar as you proposed it, and know that, just as it is lawful for none of Caesar's judges or administrators—that is, prefects or proconsuls or generals or tribunes—to have the name of Caesar given to him (otherwise both he who accepted it and those who conferred it will perish alike), so you ought to observe concerning this too: if anyone gives the name of God to any other than him, and the other accepts it, they will share one and the same destruction, with a far worse lot than the ministers of Caesar. For one who offends against Caesar will receive a temporal destruction; but one who offends against the one who alone is true God will pay the penalty forever—and rightly, as one who has violated by an injurious condition the name that is unique.
5.20PG 1:1339b
Quamvis hoc ipsum, Deus, non nomen sit Dei, sed hominibus interim vocabulum istud quasi pro nomine ejus concessum est; quod tamen, ut dixi, cum contumeliose tractatur, ad veri ejus nominis refertur injuriam. Denique veteres Egyptiorum, qui de caelesti cursu et astrorum natura rationem sibi visi sunt reperisse, obsidente sensus eorum daemone, omnibus nihilominus contumeliis nomen incommunicabile subjecerunt. Nam alii eorum bovem, qui Apis dicitur, colendum tradidere, alii hircum, alii cattas. nonnulli ibim, quidam serpentem, piscem quoque, et cepas, et cloacas, crepitus ventris, pro numinibus habendos esse docuerunt, et alia innumerabilia quae pudet etiam nominare.
“Yet this very word, God, is not the name of God; rather, this word has meanwhile been granted to men as if in place of his name. Nevertheless, as I said, when it is treated insultingly, it reflects an injury to his true name. Indeed the ancient Egyptians, who thought they had found out the account of the heavenly course and the nature of the stars, with a demon besieging their minds, nonetheless subjected the incommunicable name to every insult. For some of them handed down that the ox called Apis should be worshiped, others the goat, others cats, some the ibis, some a serpent; and they taught that a fish too, and onions, and sewers, and the breaking of wind are to be held as divinities, and countless other things which it is shameful even to name.
5.21PG 1:1339b–1340b
Haec dicente Petro, riserunt omnes qui audiebamus. Et Petrus: Ridetis, inquit, vos aliorum dedecora, quia longa consuetudine propria non videtis. Nam Egyptiorum quidem stultitiam merito ridetis, qui muta animalia, ipsi cum sint rationabiles, colunt. Audite tamen quomodo et illi vos irrideant, aiunt enim: Nos viventia colimus animalia, licet moritura, vos vero quae nunquam omnino vixere, haec colitis et adoratis. Addunt praeterea etiam illud, figuras esse et allegorias virtutum quarumdam, quibus adjutricibus regatur hominum genus; sed pudoris perfugio hare et nonnulla his similia connectentes, errorem suum velare nituntur. Sed non est nunc tempus Egyptiis respondere, et derelicta cura praesentium, absentium medicari languores. Certum namque indicium est vos ab hujusmodi aegritudine haberi alienos, qui eam non doluistis ut propriam, sed risistis ut alienam.
When Peter said this, all of us who were listening laughed. Peter said: “You laugh at the disgraces of others, because through long habit you do not see your own. You rightly laugh at the folly of the Egyptians, who, though rational themselves, worship dumb animals. But hear how they in turn laugh at you; for they say: ‘We worship living animals, even if they are going to die; but you worship and adore things that never lived at all.’ They add besides that these are figures and allegories of certain powers by whose help the human race is ruled. But by stringing together these and similar things as a refuge for their shame, they try to veil their error. But this is not the time to answer the Egyptians and, leaving aside the care of those present, to treat the illnesses of those absent. For it is a sure sign that you are free of this kind of sickness, that you have not grieved over it as your own but laughed at it as someone else's.”
5.22PG 1:1340b–1341a
Sed redeamus ad vos, quibus placet haberi Deum ut Caesarem, deos autem ut ministros et procuratores Cesaris; sequimini me attentius, et modo vobis ostendam latebras serpentis, in argumenti hujus curvis anfractibus collocatas. Certum apud omnes esse debet, et indubitatum, Deo, quia a nullo factus est sed ipse fecit universa, nihil ex facturis suis posse coaequari; neque enim ita quis irrationalis inveniri potest, qui putet quod conferri possit factura factori. Si ergo humana mens non solum ratione sed et naturali quodam motu, recte hanc Opinionem tenet, illud dici Deum, cui conferri aut exaequari nihil potest, sed quod cunctis emineat et cuncta praecellat: quomodo nomen illud quod super omnia esse creditur, recte his creditur dari, quos ad ministerium et procurationem humanae vitae putatis esse dispositos? Sed et illud addemus: mundus hic sine dubio factus est et est corruptibilis, sicut etiam postmodum latius ostendemus; interim et factum eum et corruptibilem constat. Si ergo mundus Deus dici non potest, et recte non potest quia corruptibilis est, quomodo partes mundi Dei nomen accipient? quod enim totus non potest esse mundus, multo magis non erit pars ejus. lgitur si redeamus ad exemplum Caesaris, videte quam longe erretis. Caesari, ejusdem licet natura: hominem cuius ipse est, conferri tamen neminem licet; Deo, qui hoc ipso quod a nullo factus, sed ipse fecit omnia, cuncta supereminet, conferri debere aliquem creditis? Sed Ctesaris quidem nomen nulli alii audetis imponere, quia reum suum ‘statim punit; Dei vero audetis, quia reum suum punire propter pmnitentiam differt?
“But let us return to you who like to hold God as Caesar and the gods as Caesar's ministers and agents. Follow me more attentively, and I will show you the lurking places of the serpent, set in the winding turns of this argument. It must be certain and undoubted for all that nothing among his works can be made equal to God, since he was made by no one but himself made all things; for no one can be found so irrational as to think that a work can be compared with its maker. If, then, the human mind, not only by reason but by a kind of natural impulse, rightly holds this opinion—that God is the name for that to which nothing can be compared or equaled, but which stands above all and surpasses all—how is that name, which is believed to be above all things, rightly believed to be given to those whom you think have been appointed for the service and administration of human life? And we will add this as well: this world was without doubt made and is corruptible, as we shall show more fully later; meanwhile it is agreed that it is both made and corruptible. If, then, the world cannot be called God—and rightly it cannot, because it is corruptible—how shall parts of the world receive the name of God? For what the whole world cannot be, much less will a part of it be. So if we return to the example of Caesar, see how far you err. It is not lawful to compare anyone with Caesar, even though he is a man of the same nature as Caesar; and do you believe that anyone ought to be compared with God, who surpasses all things by the very fact that he was made by no one but himself made all things? You do not dare to give Caesar's name to anyone else, because he punishes the offender at once; but do you dare to give God's, because he puts off punishing the offender for the sake of repentance?
5.23PG 1:1341a
Per alios item serpens ille proferre verba hujuscemodi solet: Nos ad honorem invisibilis Dei imagines visibiles adoramus; quod certissime falsum est. Si enim vere velitis Dei imaginem colere, homini benefacientes veram in eo Dei imaginem coleretis. In omni enim homine est imago Dei, non in omnibus vero similitudo, sed ubi benigna anima est et mens pura. Si ergo vere vultis honorare imaginem Dei, nos vobis quod verum est aperimus, ut homini qui ad imaginem Dei factus est benefaciatis, honorem et reverentiam deferatis, esurienti cibum, sitienti poculum, nudo indumentum, aegro ministerium, peregrino hospitium, et in carcere posito necessaria ministretis, et hoc est quod vere Deo delatum reputabitur. Haec autem in tantum ad honorem Dei imaginis cedunt, ut qui ista non fecerit, contumeliam imagini divinae intulisse credatur. Quis ergo iste honor Dei est. per lapideas et ligneas formas discurrere, et inanes atque exanimes figuras tanquam numina venerari, et hominem in quo vere imago Dei est spernere? imo potius certi estote, quod qui homicidium facit aut adulterium, et quidquid in hominum poenam vel injuriam geritur, in his omnibus Dei imago violatur. Magna enim impietas in Deum est, laedere hominem: omne ergo quod ipse pati non vis, cum facis alii, imaginem Dei iniquis maeroribus foedas. Intelligite ergo, quia latentis intrinsecus serpentis est ista suggestio, quae persuadet pios vos videri posse, cum insensibilia colitis, et non videri impios, cum sensibiles et rationabiles laeditis.
“Through others, again, that serpent is accustomed to put forth words like these: ‘We worship visible images in honor of the invisible God.’ This is most certainly false. For if you truly wished to worship the image of God, you would worship the true image of God in man by doing good to man. For in every man there is the image of God, but the likeness is not in all, only where there is a kindly soul and a pure mind. If, then, you truly wish to honor the image of God, we disclose to you what is true: that you should do good to man, who was made in the image of God, and pay him honor and reverence; give food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty, clothing to the naked, care to the sick, hospitality to the stranger, and minister what is necessary to one in prison; and this is what will be reckoned as truly given to God. These things count so much toward the honor of God's image that one who has not done them is believed to have insulted the divine image. What kind of honor of God is it, then, to run about among forms of stone and wood and venerate empty and lifeless figures as divinities, and to despise man, in whom the image of God truly is? Rather, be sure that whoever commits murder or adultery, or whatever is done to the punishment or injury of men, in all these the image of God is violated. For it is great impiety toward God to harm a man. So whatever you would not wish to suffer yourself, when you do it to another, you defile the image of God with unjust griefs. Understand, then, that this is the suggestion of the serpent lurking within, which persuades you that you can seem pious when you worship senseless things, and not seem impious when you injure beings who have sense and reason.
5.24PG 1:1341a–1342a
Sed ad haec alio nobis serpens ore respondet et dicit: Si nolebat haec esse Deus, utique non erant. Nondum vobis dico, quomodo ad uniuscujusque mentis probationem in hoc mundo permittuntur esse multa contraria; sed illud est quod nunc interim convenit dici, si secundum vos omne quod adorandum erat esse non debuit, nihil pene futurum erat in hoc mundo. Quid enim est quod reliquistis, quod non adorastis? solem, lunam, stellas, aquam, terram, montes, arbores, lapides, homines, nihil horum est quod non adorastis. Oportuit ergo juxta vocem vestram nihil horum fieri a Deo, ne haberetis quod possetis adorare; sed ne homines quidem ipsos esse Oportuit, qui adorarent. Vere hoc est quod desiderat ille qui intra vos latet serpens, nulli vestrum parcit, nullum vult effugere de interitu; sed non ita erit. Audite enim, quia non delinquit illud quod adoratur, sed ille qui adorat. Iustum namque est apud Deum judicium, et aliter injuriam patientem judicat, aliter inferentem.
“But to this the serpent answers us through another mouth and says: ‘If God did not wish these things to exist, they certainly would not exist.’ I do not yet tell you how many contrary things are permitted to exist in this world for the testing of each mind; but this is what it is fitting to say meanwhile: if, according to you, everything that was going to be adored ought not to have existed, almost nothing would have existed in this world. For what have you left that you have not adored? Sun, moon, stars, water, earth, mountains, trees, stones, men—there is none of these that you have not adored. According to your saying, then, none of these ought to have been made by God, so that you would have nothing to adore; indeed, not even men themselves ought to have existed to do the adoring. Truly this is what that serpent lurking within you desires; he spares none of you and wants none to escape destruction. But it will not be so. For hear: it is not what is adored that sins, but he who adores. For the judgment with God is just, and he judges the one who suffers injury differently from the one who inflicts it.
5.25PG 1:1342a
Sed dicis: Oportebat ergo eos qui adorant quod non licet adorari, statim perimi a Deo, ne et alius hoc faceret. Sed nonne es tu prudentior Deo, ut ei consilia suggeras “‘i scit ille quid faciat. Omnibus etenim in ignorantia positis patientiam pra:stat, quia misericors et pius est, et praevidet, quia ex impiis multi efficiuntur pii, et ex ipsis qui impura figmenta et pollutas imagines venerantur, nonnulli conversi ad Deum, et revocantes se a peccatis et agentes bona Opera. perveniunt ad salutem. Sed debuimus, inquit, omnino nec ad cogitationem istam venire, ut haec faceremus. Ignoratis quid est libertas arbitrii, et latet vos quia ille vere bonus est, qui suo proposito bonus est; qui autem necessitate retinetur in bono, bonus non potest dici. quia non est suum quod est. Quia ergo in unoquoque libertas est in electione bonorum vel malorum, ipse sibi vel praemia vel interitum quaerit. Imo, inquit, quidquid cogitamus, Deus nobis adducit ad mentem. Quid agitis, ο homines? blasphematis; si enim omne quod cogitamus, ipse nobis adducit ad mentem, ipse ergo nobis cogitationes adulterii suggerit, et avaritiae, et blasphemiae, omnisque luxuriae? Desinite, quaeso, ab hujusmodi blasphemiis, et qui sit Deo dignus honor intelligite. Nec dicatis, ut solent quidam vestrum, quia Deus mortalium honore non indiget. Ille quidem vere nullius indiget, sed vos debetis agnoscere, quia vobis prodest honor quem Deo defertis. Quid enim tam exsecrabile, quam si gratiam referre nesciat homo proprio conditori?
“But you say: ‘Then those who adore what may not be adored ought to have been destroyed by God at once, so that no one else would do it.’ But are you wiser than God, that you should suggest plans to him? He knows what he is doing. For he shows patience to all who are in ignorance, because he is merciful and kind, and he foresees that many of the impious become pious, and that some even of those who venerate impure figments and polluted images turn to God, call themselves back from sins, do good works, and reach salvation. ‘But,’ he says, ‘we ought not even to have come to the thought of doing these things.’ You do not know what freedom of choice is, and it escapes you that he is truly good who is good by his own purpose; but one who is held in the good by necessity cannot be called good, because what he is is not his own. Since, then, there is freedom in each person in the choice of good or evil, he seeks for himself either rewards or destruction. ‘No,’ he says, ‘whatever we think, God brings to our mind.’ What are you doing, O men? You blaspheme. For if he brings to our mind everything we think, does he then suggest to us thoughts of adultery and avarice and blasphemy and every luxury? Stop, I beg you, from blasphemies of this kind, and understand what honor is worthy of God. And do not say, as some of you are accustomed to, that God does not need the honor of mortals. He truly needs nothing; but you ought to recognize that the honor you pay to God benefits you. For what is so execrable as a man who does not know how to give thanks to his own creator?
5.26PG 1:1342a–1343b
Sed melius, inquit, facimus nos, qui et ipsi et omnibus cum ipso gratias agimus. In hoc subversionem salutis vestra: non intelligitis. Tale est enim hoc, quale si quis aeger ad medelam sui medicum pariter et venenarios invitet, cum illi nocere quidem possint, curare non possint, verus autem medicus venenis illorum recuset sua medicamenta miscere, ne aut pernicies bono aut sanitas nocentibus ascribatur. Dicis: Ergo indignatur aut invidet Deus, si cum ipse benefaciat, aliis gratia: referantur? Etiamsi non indignetur. non vult tamen erroris auctor existere. ut sui operis beneficio inani idolo fides detur. Quid certe tam impium, tam ingratum, quam a Deo beneficium consequi. et reddere lignis ac lapidibus gratiam? Propter quod expergiscimini et intelligite salutem vestram; Deus enim nullius indiget, neque aliquid requirit, neque in aliquo laeditur, sed nos sumus qui aut juvamur aut laedimur in eo quod grati aut ingrati sumus. Nam Deo quid confertur cx laudibus nostris? aut quid aufertur ex blasphemiis? nisi quod Deus animam sibi gratias agentem, proximam sibi et familiarem facit, ingratam vero malus possidet daemon.
“‘But we do better,’ someone says, ‘who give thanks both to him and to all with him.’ In this you do not understand the overthrow of your salvation. For this is as if a sick man should invite to his cure a physician and poisoners alike, though they can harm but cannot heal, while the true physician refuses to mix his medicines with their poisons, so that neither ruin should be ascribed to the good one nor healing to the harmful ones. You say: ‘Is God then indignant or envious if, when he himself does good, thanks are given to others?’ Even if he is not indignant, he does not wish to be the author of error, so that credit for the benefit of his work should be given to an empty idol. What, surely, is so impious, so ungrateful, as to obtain a benefit from God and give thanks to wood and stones? Therefore wake up and understand your salvation. For God needs nothing, requires nothing, and is harmed in nothing; it is we who are either helped or harmed in being grateful or ungrateful. For what is conferred on God by our praises, or what is taken away by blasphemies? Only this: that God makes the soul that gives him thanks near and familiar to himself, while the evil demon possesses the ungrateful one.
5.27PG 1:1343b
Sed et illud scire vos volo, quod adversum hujusmodi animas non ipse Deus per se ultionem profert, sed universa creatura ejus insurgit et poenas de impiis sumit; et quamvis in praesenti sazculo Dei bonitas aequaliter piis et impiis mundi lucem ac terra: ministeria largiatur, tamen non absque dolore sui lucem sol impiis praebet, caeteraque elementa exhibent servitutem. Denique interdum etiam contra bonitatem Conditoris, fatigata sceleribus impiorum vincuntur elementa, et inde est quod aut terra: fructus corrumpitur, aut aeris temperies temeratur, aut supra modum ardor solis incenditur, vel imbrium ac frigorum vis immensa diffunditur. Inde lues, et fames, et mortis facies diversa percurrit. festinat enim creatura in impios movere vindictam. Dei tamen bonitas reprimit eam, et ab indignatione impiorum refrenat, ac suae misericordia: obedire cogit, magis quam peccatis hominum et sceleribus inflammari; exspectat enim patientia Dei, dum in hoc corpore sunt, hominum conversionem.
“But I also want you to know this: against souls of this kind God does not himself bring vengeance by himself, but his whole creation rises up and exacts punishment from the impious. And although in the present age the goodness of God grants the light of the world and the services of the earth equally to the pious and the impious, yet the sun gives its light to the impious not without grief of its own, and the other elements render their service likewise. Indeed, sometimes even against the goodness of the Creator, the elements, wearied by the crimes of the impious, are overcome; and this is why either the fruit of the earth is spoiled, or the mildness of the air is violated, or the heat of the sun is kindled beyond measure, or an immense force of rains and cold is poured out. From this come plague and famine, and the various faces of death run through the world; for the creation hastens to take vengeance on the impious. Yet the goodness of God restrains it, reins it in from its indignation against the impious, and compels it to obey his mercy rather than be inflamed by the sins and crimes of men; for the patience of God awaits the conversion of men while they are in this body.
5.28PG 1:1343b–1344b
Quod si qui ad exitum vita: in impietate perstiterint, tum jam discedens anima quae immortalis est, pro impietatis sua: perseverantia luet poenas. lmmortales namque sunt etiam impiorum animae, quas ipsi fortasse velint pariter cum corporibus suis finiri; sed non ita est, perferunt enim ignis aeterni sine fine supplicia, et ad perniciem sui naturam non habent moriendi. Sed fortasse dicetis mihi; Terres nos, Petre. Et quomodo vobis dicemus quae in re sunt? nunquid tacentes annuntiare possumus veritatem? Quae sunt, aliter quam sunt, proferre nescimus. Quod si taceamus, causam vobis perniciosa: ignorantiae nos dabimus, et satisfaciemus latenti intra vos et obsidenti sensus vestros serpenti, qui haec vobis callide suggerit, ut semper vos inimicos faciat Deo. Sed nos ad hoc missi sumus, ut prodamus vobis latebras ejus, et absolventes inimicitias reconciliemus vos Deo, ut ad ipsum convertamini et placeatis ei in Operibus bonis. Inimicitiae namque sunt homini ad Deum, irrationabilis et impius sensus pravumque propositum, maxime cum videtur sibi scire aliquid et est in ignorantia. Ubi autem abjectis his eadem vobis placere cmperint quae Deo placent, et eadem displicere vobis, atque ea cmperitis velle quae vult Deus. tunc vere amici ejus dicemini.
“But if any persist in impiety to the end of life, then the departing soul, which is immortal, will pay the penalty for its persistence in impiety. For the souls even of the impious are immortal—souls which they themselves would perhaps wish to be ended together with their bodies. But it is not so; for they endure the punishments of eternal fire without end, and to their own ruin they do not have a nature that can die. But perhaps you will say to me: ‘You frighten us, Peter.’ And how shall we tell you what is so in reality? Can we proclaim the truth while keeping silent? We do not know how to present things otherwise than as they are. If we keep silent, we shall give you the cause of a ruinous ignorance, and shall satisfy the serpent who lurks within you and besieges your minds, who cunningly suggests these things to you so as to make you always enemies of God. But we have been sent for this: to expose his lurking places to you, and, dissolving the enmity, to reconcile you to God, so that you may turn to him and please him in good works. For enmity toward God in a man is an irrational and impious mind and a perverse purpose, especially when it seems to itself to know something and is in ignorance. But when, these things cast away, the same things begin to please you that please God, and the same things to displease you, and you begin to will what God wills, then you will truly be called his friends.
5.29PG 1:1344b
Sed fortassis aliqui ex vobis dicent: Nihil cum est Deo de rebus humanis. et cujus ne ad notitiam quidem possumus pervenire, quomodo ad amicitias perveniemus? Quod Deus curam gerat humanarum rerum, ipsius mundi gubernatio testis est, cui sol quotidie deservit, cui imbres ministrant, cui fontes, flumina. ventique et omnia famulantur elementa, quae quanto notiora hominibus videntur, tanto curam Dei esse erga homines indicant. Nisi enim potestate Excelsi, nunquam potiora inferioribus ministrarent; et per hoc non solum curam Deus erga homines, sed grandem quemdam habere docetur affectum, quorum ministerio tam praeclara mancipavit elementa. Quod autem etiam ad amicitias Dei perveniant homines, exemplo nobis sunt hi quorum precibus tantum indulsit, ut clauderet imbribus Celum cum vellent, et rursum cum peterent relaxaret; et multa alia voluntatem suam facientibus priestitit, quae non nisi amicissimis pmstarentur. Sed dices: Quid enim laeditur Deus, si et ista colantur a nobis? Si quis vestrum honorem patri debitum, a quo plurima beneficia consecutus est, alii deferat, et alienum atque extraneum quasi patrem colat, non tibi videtur impius existere in patrem. et exhaeredatione dignissimus?
“But perhaps some of you will say: ‘God has nothing to do with human affairs; and how shall we come to the friendship of one we cannot even come to know?’ That God cares for human affairs, the government of the world itself bears witness: the sun serves it daily, the rains minister to it, springs, rivers, winds, and all the elements serve it; and the better known these seem to men, the more they show God's care for men. For unless by the power of the Most High, the greater would never serve the lesser; and by this God is shown to have not only care for men but a great affection, since he has made such splendid elements subject to their service. And that men also come to the friendship of God, we have as examples those to whose prayers he granted so much that he shut the heaven against rain when they wished, and opened it again when they asked; and he granted many other things to those who did his will, which would be granted only to his closest friends. But you will say: ‘What harm is done to God if we worship these things too?’ If any of you gave the honor due to a father, from whom he had received very many benefits, to another, and honored a stranger and outsider as father, would he not seem to you impious toward his father and most deserving of disinheritance?
5.30PG 1:1344b–1345b
Alii dicunt: Impium est. si non colamus ea quae nobis tradita sunt a patribus nostris, et religionem praevaricamur a majoribus datam. Hac ratione, si cujus pater latro fuit, aut si cujus leno, a patribus sibi traditam consuetudinem mutare non debet, nec ad meliorem viam a paternis erroribus revocari, et impium ducitur. si quis non cum parentibus peccet, aut non cum ipsis impius perseveret. Alii dicunt: Non debemus molesti esse Deo, et ipsum semper aut miseriarum querelis, aut petitionum nostrarum necessitatibus onerare. Quam stulta et absque omni sale responsio! Molestum Deo putas, si ei pro beneficiis suis gratias agas, cui molestum non putas, si pro ipsius muneribus, lignis et lapidibus gratias referas? Et quomodo, cum forte imber longa serenitate suspenditur, omnes ad caelum oculos tendimus, et ab omnipotente Deo pluviarum munera flagitamus, omnesque cum parvulis, ad Deum fusis' precibus, miserationes ipsius exoramus? Sed revera ingrata: animae cum impetraverint, cito obliviscuntur; collectis enim messibus aut vindemiis, continuo ad surda et muta simulacra primitias frugum deferunt, et pro his quae Deus concessit, in templis aut lucis vota persolvunt, et ibi sacrificia daemoniis offerunt, atque accepta gratia permutant gratiae largitorem.
“Others say: ‘It is impious if we do not worship what has been handed down to us by our fathers, and if we transgress the religion given by our ancestors.’ By this reasoning, if someone's father was a robber, or someone's father a pimp, he ought not to change the custom handed down to him by his fathers, nor be called back from his fathers' errors to a better way; and it is counted impious if someone does not sin with his parents or does not persist in impiety with them. Others say: ‘We ought not to be troublesome to God and always burden him either with complaints of our miseries or with the needs of our petitions.’ What a foolish and utterly witless answer! Do you think it troublesome to God if you give him thanks for his benefits, and do you not think it troublesome to him if you give thanks to wood and stones for his gifts? And how is it that when rain is held back by a long drought we all lift our eyes to heaven and beg the gift of rains from the almighty God, and all, with our little ones, pour out prayers to God and implore his mercies? But truly, ungrateful souls quickly forget when they have obtained it; for when the harvests or vintages are gathered, they at once bring the first fruits of the crops to deaf and dumb images, and for what God has granted they pay vows in temples or groves, and offer sacrifices there to demons, and exchange the giver of the grace for the grace received.
5.31PG 1:1345b
Sed quidam dicunt: Haec laetitiae gratia et ad relevandos animos instituta, et ad hoc inventa, ut humana mens aliquantulum curis et maeroribus relaxetur. Videte quomodo ipsi accusatores estis eorum quae geritis. Si haec levandi mmroris et laetitiae capiendae causa reperta sunt, quomodo in lucis et silvis invocationes daemonum fiunt? quomodo insani rotatus hominum, sectionesque membrorum, et abscisiones verendorum? quomodo in his furor rabidus concipitur? quomodo invitatur insania? quomodo mulieres sparsis crinibus furibundae jactantur? unde stridor et fremitus dentium? unde mugitus cordis et viscerum, et omnia illa quae vel simulata, vel etiam ministerio daemonum compaginata, ad terrorem stultorum et ignorantium hominum proferuntur? haec levandi animi gratia fiunt, an potius opprimendi? Nondum sentitis neque intelligitis latentis intra vos serpentis haec esse consilia? qui vos per irrationabiles errorum suggestiones a ratione veritatis abducit, ut vos libidinis et concupiscentia: ac totius dedecoris servos teneat ac ministros.
“But some say: ‘These things were instituted for the sake of gladness and to refresh minds, and were invented so that the human mind might be relieved a little from cares and griefs.’ See how you yourselves are the accusers of what you do. If these things were invented to relieve grief and to gain gladness, how is it that invocations of demons take place in groves and woods? How is it that there are the mad whirlings of men, the gashing of limbs, and the cutting off of private parts? How is it that raging fury is conceived in them? How is madness invited? How are women tossed about in frenzy with disheveled hair? Where does the grinding and gnashing of teeth come from? Where the bellowing from the heart and bowels, and all those things which, whether feigned or put together by the agency of demons, are displayed to terrify foolish and ignorant men? Are these done to relieve the mind, or rather to crush it? Do you not yet perceive and understand that these are the counsels of the serpent lurking within you? He leads you away from the reason of truth by irrational suggestions of errors, so as to keep you slaves and servants of lust and desire and all disgrace.
5.32PG 1:1345b–1345d
Sed ego clara vos omnes praedicationis voce contestor, quod e contrario religio Dei ad sobrietatem vos revocat et pudicitiam, a luxuria ac furore jubet esse continentes, et per patientiam ac mansuetudinem resecare lapsus iracundiae, propriis esse contentos, et virtute parcimoniae, ne egestate quidem compulsos aliena diripere, sed in omnibus servare justitiam, ab idolorum vos immolatione penitus removere; per haec enim invitatis daemones ad vosmetipsos, et introeundi eis aditum sponte praebetis, et ex hoc jam vel furoris causas vel illiciti amoris accipitis.
“But I solemnly testify to you all with the clear voice of preaching that, on the contrary, the religion of God calls you back to sobriety and chastity, commands you to refrain from luxury and frenzy, and to cut off the slips of anger by patience and gentleness; to be content with your own, and by the virtue of frugality not to plunder what belongs to others even when compelled by poverty, but to keep justice in all things; and to remove yourselves entirely from sacrifice to idols. For by these you invite demons into yourselves and willingly give them a way in, and from this you receive the causes either of frenzy or of unlawful love.
5.33PG 1:1345d–1346a
Hinc omnis impietatis origo descendit, hinc homicidia, adulteria, furta, et seminarium malorum omnium flagitiorumque concipitur, dum profanis libaminibus et odoribus indulgetis, ac locum dominandi in vos et jus quodammodo obtinendi malignis spiritibus datis. Ingressi enim sensus vestros, quid nisi quae libidinis, quae injustitiae, quae crudelitatis sunt operentur, et ad omnia vos quibus ipsi delectantur, subigant obedire? permittente revera hoc Deo pati vos ab eis justo quodam judicio, ut ex ipso dedecore actuum sensuumque vestrorum intelligatis, quam indignum sit daemonibus et non Deo esse subjectos. Hinc et ad indecoros et foedos actus per amicitias daemonum pervenitur; hinc usque ad ipsius vita: perniciem vel per flammam libidinis acceditur, vel per iracundia; rabiem aut nimietatem tristitiae pervenitur, ut saepe notum est, etiam manus sibi intulisse nonnullos; quod, ut diximus, justa quadam Dei sententia fieri ab his non prohibetur, ut et quibus se subdiderint, intelligant, et quem deseruerint recognoscant.
“From this descends the origin of all impiety; from this are conceived murders, adulteries, thefts, and the seedbed of all evils and crimes, while you indulge in profane libations and odors and give evil spirits room to rule over you and, in a way, a right to possess you. For once they have entered your minds, what do they work but what belongs to lust, injustice, and cruelty, and compel you to obey in all things in which they themselves delight? God indeed permits you to suffer this from them by a just judgment, so that from the very disgrace of your acts and thoughts you may understand how unworthy it is to be subject to demons and not to God. From this, through friendship with demons, people come to unseemly and foul acts; from this they come even to the destruction of life itself, either through the flame of lust or through the rage of anger or excess of sadness, so that, as is often known, some have even laid hands on themselves. This, as we said, by a just sentence of God is not prevented from being done by them, so that they may understand to whom they have subjected themselves, and recognize whom they have deserted.
5.34PG 1:1346b
Sed dicet aliquis: Passiones istae interdum accidunt etiam his qui Deum colunt. Non est verum; etenim nos illum Dei dicimus esse cultorem, qui voluntatem Dei facit et legis praecepta custodit. Apud Deum enim non ille qui apud homines Iudaeus dicitur, Iudaeus est, neque qui gentilis vocatur, ille gentilis est“, sed qui Deo credens legem impleverit ac voluntatem ejus fecerit, etiamsi non sit circumcisus. Verus Dei cultor est is, qui non solum ipse a passionibus liber est, verum et alios ab eis liberos reddit, etiamsi sint ita graves ut montibus coaequentur; per fidem qua credit Deo, transfert eas, sed et montes vere cum arboribus suis, si necesse sit, per idem transfert". Qui autem videtur quidem colere Deum, sed neque fide plena neque operibus mandatorum munitur, sed est peccator, pro peccatis locum dedit in semetipso passionibus, quae ad poenam peccantium constitutae sunt a Deo, ut ab eis per illata supplicia exigant debita peccatorum, et purgatiores eos ad judicium illud omnium generale perducant, si tamen castigationem eorum non deserat fides. Nam infidelium castigatio in praesenti vita judicium est, quo alieni existere incipiunt a futuris bonis; Deum vero colentium castigatio cum pro peccatis quae acciderint eis infertur, commissi ab eis exigit debitum, ut praevenientes judicium in prmsenti saeculo peccati debitum solvant, et liberentur vel ex parte media ab aeternis, quae illic praeparata: sunt, poenis.
“But someone will say: ‘These sufferings sometimes befall even those who worship God.’ It is not true. For we say that he is a worshiper of God who does the will of God and keeps the precepts of the law. For with God, he who is called a Jew among men is not a Jew, nor is he a Gentile who is called a Gentile, but he who, believing God, has fulfilled the law and done his will, even if he is not circumcised. He is a true worshiper of God who not only is free from sufferings himself but also makes others free from them, even if they are so heavy as to equal mountains; through the faith by which he believes God he removes them—and indeed, if it is necessary, he truly removes mountains with their trees by faith. But one who seems to worship God, yet is fortified neither by full faith nor by works of the commandments, but is a sinner, has because of his sins given room in himself to sufferings, which have been appointed by God for the punishment of sinners, so that by the penalties they inflict they may exact the debts of sins and lead them, more purified, to that general judgment of all—if only faith does not abandon their chastisement. For the chastisement of unbelievers in the present life is a judgment, by which they begin to be strangers to the good things to come; but the chastisement of those who worship God, when it is inflicted on them for sins that have occurred, exacts the debt of what they have committed, so that, anticipating the judgment, they may pay the debt of sin in the present age and be freed, at least by half, from the eternal punishments that are prepared there.
5.35PG 1:1346d–1347a
Sed haec ita esse non recipit, qui non credit futurum esse judicium 'Dei, et ob hoc praesentis saeculi voluptatibus obligatus, ab aeternis excluditur bonis. Et ideo nos non negligimus praedicare vobis, quae saluti vestrae scimus esse necessaria, et qui sit verus Dei cultus ostendere, ut credentes Deo per opera bona possitis una nobiscum futuri saeculi haeredes existere. Quod si nondum apud vos certum est, vera esse quae dicimus, interim pro hoc primo non debetis agre accipere et infesti esse, quia quae putamus bona, haec vobis annuntiamus, et quod nobis salutare esse credimus, hoc ctiam vobis conferre non invidemus, omni, ut dixi, studio laborantes, quo cohaeredes vos bonorum, quae ipsi nobis eventura credimus, habeamus. Utrum autem pro certo vera sint quae annuntiamus vobis, non aliter scire poteritis, nisi ut obedientes his quae mandantur, ipso rerum exitu et beatitudinis certissimo fine doceamini.
“But one who does not believe that the judgment of God is to come does not accept that this is so; and for this reason, bound to the pleasures of the present age, he is shut out from eternal goods. And so we do not neglect to preach to you what we know is necessary for your salvation, and to show what the true worship of God is, so that, believing God, you may through good works become heirs of the age to come together with us. And if it is not yet certain to you that what we say is true, meanwhile you ought not on this account to take it ill and be hostile because we announce to you what we think good, and do not begrudge sharing with you what we believe to be saving for ourselves, laboring, as I said, with every effort to have you as fellow heirs of the goods that we believe will come to us. But whether what we announce to you is certainly true, you can know in no other way than by obeying what is commanded and being taught by the very outcome of things and the most certain end of blessedness.
5.36PG 1:1347a–1348b
Et ideo etiamsi latens intrinsecus serpens sensus vestros mille depravandi artibus occupet, et impedimenta mille subjiciat, quibus a salutari doctrina vestrum declinet auditum, eo magis obsistere ei debetis, et spretis ejus suggestionibus ad audiendum a nobis verbum suscipiendamque doctrinam frequentius convenire, quia nemo potest discere aliquid qui non docetur. Cumque haec dixisset, jussit sibi eos qui languoribus vel daemonibus urgebantur offerri, et imposuit eis manus cum ora- ____________________________________________ ῑῖοιιεο atque ita ίυφεξε dimisit. admonens ut ad audiendum verbum diebus quibus inibi demoraturus esset, frequentarent. Igitur ubi turba abscessere, Petrus aquis quae in horto fluebant corpus diluens una cum caeteris volentibus, humi sterni jussit sub arbore quadam cujus umbra erat plurima, et recumbere nos secundum ordinem apud Ctesaream statutum praecepit. Atque ita cibo sumpto, Hebraeorum ritu gratias agens Deo, quia adhuc aliquantulum diei supererat, jubet nos de quibus velimus percontari. Cumque essemus omnes eum eo viginti. unicuique de quo qmerere voluit explanavit, quo‘ rum singula qumque libellis comprehensa tibi ante jam misi. Vespere autem jam facto ingressi hospitium eum ipso, suis quique locis requievimus.
“And so, even if the serpent lurking within occupies your minds with a thousand arts of corruption and puts a thousand obstacles in the way to turn your hearing aside from saving teaching, you ought all the more to resist him, and, despising his suggestions, to come together more often to hear the word from us and to receive the teaching; for no one can learn anything who is not taught.” When he had said this, he ordered those oppressed by illnesses or demons to be brought to him, laid his hands on them with prayer, and so dismissed the crowds, urging them to come often to hear the word on the days he would be staying there. When the crowd had gone, Peter washed his body in the waters that flowed in the garden, together with the others who wished, and ordered couches to be spread on the ground under a tree that gave much shade, and told us to recline according to the order established at Caesarea. And so, having taken food and given thanks to God after the manner of the Hebrews, since some of the day still remained, he told us to ask about whatever we wished. As there were twenty of us with him in all, he explained to each what he wished to ask about; and each of these things I have already sent to you, set down in books. When evening had come, we went into the lodging with him and rested, each in his own place.
Chapter 6
6.1PG 1:1347b–1347c
Ubi vero rarescentibus tenebris primum dies erepit proferre crepusculum, Petrus orationis gratia hortum ingressus, et inde egrediens atque ingrediens velut excusare nobis videbatur, quod tardius solito evigilans venisset ad nos. Aiebat ergo: Ubi veris tempus longiorem fecerit diem, necesse est ut nox brevior fiat; si quis ergo studiorum causa noctis aliquid occupare desiderat, non in omni tempore easdem horas observare debet ad vigilandum, sed eadem temporis spatia, sive brevior sive longior sit nox, dormiendo consumere, et curare magnopere, ne praesumens ex his spatiis quae habere ad studendum solet, addat somno et vigilandi tempus imminuat. Observandum namque et illud est, ne forte si nondum decoctis cibis interrumpatur somnus, indigestum corpus aggravet mentem, et crudos adhuc exhalans spiritus interiorem sensum confusum reddat ac turbidum. Rectum ergo est ut competenti etiam pars ista quiete foveatur, quo possit sufficienter his quae sibi debentur corpus expletis, justum in reliquis menti exhibere ministerium.
When, as the darkness thinned, the day first began to bring forth the dawn, Peter went into the garden to pray; and coming out and going in, he seemed to be excusing himself to us for having woken later than usual and come to us late. So he said: “When the season of spring has made the day longer, the night must become shorter. If, then, anyone wishes to take some part of the night for study, he ought not to keep the same hours for waking at every season, but should spend the same length of time in sleeping whether the night is shorter or longer, and take great care not to encroach on the hours he usually has for study, adding to his sleep and shortening his time of waking. For this too must be observed: that if sleep is interrupted while the food is not yet digested, the undigested body may weigh down the mind, and, breathing out still-raw vapors, make the inner sense confused and turbid. It is right, then, that this part too be cherished with suitable rest, so that the body, having had sufficiently what is owed to it, may render due service to the mind in everything else.”
6.2PG 1:1347c–1348b
Et cum haec dixisset, plurimis jam consueto in horti loco ad audiendum congregatis, processit Petrus, et salutatis ex more turbis dicere hoc modo erepit: Quoniam quidem, sicut terra a cultore neglecta spinas et tribulos necessario producit, ita sensus vester longi temporis incuria, multas et noxias Opiniones rerum et intelligentias falsae scientia: germinavit; Opus est nunc multa diligentia ad excolendum rus mentis vestrae, ut id sermo veritatis, qui est verus et diligens cordis colonus, assiduis excolat disciplinis. Vestrum ergo est praebere ei obedientiam, et occupationes ac sollicitudines superfluas amputare, ne bonum verbi semen enecet noxium germen. Potest enim fieri, ut multi temporis negligentiam brevis et assidua reparet diligentia; incertum namque est uniuscujusque vita: tempus, et ideo festinandum est ad salutem, ne forte cunctantem mors repentina praeveniat.
When he had said this, since very many had already gathered to hear at the usual place in the garden, Peter went out, greeted the crowds as usual, and began to speak in this way: “As earth neglected by the farmer necessarily produces thorns and thistles, so your mind, through long neglect, has sprouted many harmful opinions about things and notions of false knowledge. There is need now of much diligence to cultivate the field of your mind, so that the word of truth, which is the true and diligent farmer of the heart, may cultivate it with constant discipline. It is your part, then, to give it obedience and to cut off superfluous occupations and anxieties, so that a harmful growth may not choke the good seed of the word. For it can happen that a brief but constant diligence makes up for the neglect of a long time; for the length of each one's life is uncertain, and therefore we must hasten to salvation, lest sudden death overtake one who delays.
6.3PG 1:1348b–1348c
Et ob hoe acrius intendendum est, ut dum est temporis spatium, collecta malae consuetudinis vitia resecentur. Quod non aliter facere poteritis, nisi ut irascamini quodammodo adversum vosmetipsos pro bis quae inutiliter gessistis ac turpiter. Haec enim est justa et necessaria iracundia, qua unusquisque In his quibus erravit et perperam gessit, indignatur et semetipsum incusat, ex qua indignatione accenditur in nobis ignis quidam, qui velut agro sterili immissus, consumptis et excoctis radicibus pessima: voluptatis, bono semini verbi Dei fecundiorem cordis praeparat glebam. Puto autem quod satis dignas habeatis causas iracundiae, ex quibus justissimus ignis iste coalescat, si consideretis in quantos vos errores deduxit ignorantiae malum, quantosque lapsus et quanta praecipitia ad peccandum dedit, a quantis vos bonis abstraxit et in qua praecipitavit mala, et quod est super omnia gravius. quod vos in futuro saeculo aeternis poenis obnoxios fecit. Nonne pro his omnibus, ubi vobis veritatis lumen obfulsit, ignis justissima indignationis accenditur, et iracundiae Deo placita: intra vos consurgit incendium, quo consumatur et radicitus intereat omne germen, si quod forte intra vos malae concupiscentia: pullulavit?
“And for this reason we must strive the more keenly, while there is time, to cut away the vices of evil habit that have accumulated. You will not be able to do this otherwise than by being angry in a way with yourselves for what you have done uselessly and shamefully. For this is a just and necessary anger, by which each one is indignant at the things in which he has erred and done wrong, and accuses himself. From this indignation a kind of fire is kindled in us, which, like fire set into a barren field, burns up and roasts the roots of the worst pleasure and prepares a more fertile soil of the heart for the good seed of the word of God. I think you have causes enough for anger, from which this most just fire may grow, if you consider into what great errors the evil of ignorance has led you, what great lapses and precipices of sin it has given you, from what great goods it has drawn you away and into what evils it has hurled you, and—what is heavier than all—that it has made you liable to eternal punishments in the age to come. When the light of truth has shone on you, is not the fire of most just indignation kindled on account of all these things, and does not a blaze of anger pleasing to God rise up within you, by which every shoot of evil desire that may have sprung up within you is consumed and dies at the root?
6.4PG 1:1348c–1349a
Unde et ipse qui misit nos, cum venisset et omnem mundum vidisset ad malitiam declinasse. non continuo pacem ei in erroribus posito dedit, ne eum confirmaret in malis, sed ignorantiae ejus ruinis scientiam veritatis opposuit, ut, si forte resipiscerent et lumen veritatis aspicerent, deceptos se et in praecipitia erroris abstractos merito dolerent, et iracundiae salutaris ignem adversum deceptricem sui conciperent ignorantiam. 0b hoc itaque dicebat: Ignem veni mittere in terram, et quam volo ut accendatur ”. Est ergo pugna quadam, quae gerenda nobis est in hac vita; sermo enim veritatis et scientia: necessario separat homines ab errore et ignorantia, sicut saepe vidimus putrefactas et emortuas corporis carnes, a connexione viventium membrorum ferro secante separari. Tale ergo aliquid est quod agit veritatis agnitio; necesse est enim ut salutis causa filius, verbi gratia, qui sermonem receperit veritatis, a parentibus separetur incredulis, aut rursum pater separetur a filio, aut filia a matre. Et hoc modo inter propinquos et consanguineos credentes atque incredulos, scientiae et ignorantiae veritatisque et erroris pugna consurgit. Et ob hoc iterum dicebat qui nos misit: Non veni pacem mittere in terram, sed gladium“.
“Hence also he who sent us, when he had come and seen the whole world turned aside to wickedness, did not at once give it peace while it lay in errors, lest he should confirm it in evils, but opposed the knowledge of truth to the ruin of its ignorance, so that, if they should come to their senses and look on the light of truth, they might rightly grieve that they had been deceived and drawn off into the precipices of error, and might conceive the fire of saving anger against the ignorance that had deceived them. For this reason he said: ‘I have come to cast fire on the earth, and how I wish that it were kindled!’ There is, then, a kind of battle that we must wage in this life. For the word of truth and knowledge necessarily separates men from error and ignorance, as we have often seen putrid and dead flesh of the body separated by the cutting knife from its connection with the living members. Something of this kind is what the knowledge of truth does. For it is necessary, for the sake of salvation, that a son, for example, who has received the word of truth be separated from unbelieving parents, or again that a father be separated from his son, or a daughter from her mother. And in this way, among relatives and kin, believers and unbelievers, there arises a battle of knowledge and ignorance, of truth and error. For this reason, again, he who sent us said: ‘I have not come to send peace on the earth, but a sword.’
6.5PG 1:1349b–1350a
Quod si dicit aliquis, et quo modo justum videtur separari a parentibus? audi quo modo. quia, si cum ipsis in errore permaneant, neque illis proderunt, et ipsi cum illis pariter interibunt, Justum igitur et valde justum est. separari eum qui salvari vult, ab eo qui non vult. Sed et illud adverte, quia non ex illis qui rectius intelligunt, venit ista separatio; illi enim volunt esse pariter et prodesse eis ct docere meliora, sed est istud proprium ignorantia: vitium, ut confutantem se veritatis lucem non ferat habere de proximo, et ideo ex illis ista nascitur separatio. Nam qui scientiam veritatis accipiunt, quia bonitatis plena est, tanquam a bono Deo datam cupiunt eam, si fieri potest, cum omnibus habere communem, etiam cum his qui oderunt eos et persequuntur; sciunt enim quia peccati ipsorum causa ignorantia est. Propterea denique ipse Magister, cum ab his qui ignorabant eum duceretur ad crucem, orabat Patrem pro interfectoribus suis et dicebat: Pater, remitte eis peccatum, nesciunt enim quid faciunt“. Imitantes quoque discipuli magistrum, etiam ipsi cum paterentur, similiter pro interfectoribus suis orabant". Quod si disciplina nobis est, orare etiam pro interfectoribus et persecutoribus nostris, quomodo non etiam parentum et propinquorum persecutiones ferre, et pro conversione eorum orare debemus?
“But if anyone says, ‘And how does it seem just to be separated from parents?’, hear how: because if they remain with them in error, they will not help them, and they themselves will perish together with them. It is just, then, and very just, that one who wishes to be saved be separated from one who does not. But notice this too: this separation does not come from those who understand more rightly; for they wish to be with them and to help them and teach them better things. But it is the proper vice of ignorance that it cannot bear to have the light of truth that refutes it close at hand; and so the separation arises from them. For those who receive the knowledge of truth, because it is full of goodness, desire, as a gift from the good God, to have it in common with all if possible, even with those who hate and persecute them; for they know that the cause of their sin is ignorance. For this reason, indeed, the Master himself, when he was being led to the cross by those who did not know him, prayed to the Father for his killers and said: ‘Father, forgive them their sin, for they do not know what they are doing.’ The disciples also, imitating their Master, when they themselves suffered, likewise prayed for their killers. And if it is our discipline to pray even for our killers and persecutors, how ought we not also to bear the persecutions of parents and relatives and pray for their conversion?
6.6PG 1:1350a–1350b
Tum deinde etiam illud diligentius consideremus, quae sit nobis causa parentes diligendi. Pro eo, inquit, quod vitae nostrae videntur auctores. Auctores quidem vitae nostra: parentes non sunt, sed ministri; non enim vitam praebent, sed ingrediendi nobis ad hanc vitam exhibent ministerium. auctor autem vita: unus et solus est Deus. Si ergo auctorem vita: diligere voluerimus, illum nobis sciamus esse diligendum. sed illum, ίηίίηίίν θοὲηρδθθτθ potuimus, istos autem et novimus et in afl'ectu liabemlls- Εεῐο, n0n Ροῐυθΐὶδ cognoscere quid Sil Deus. quid tamen non sit Deus perfacile scire potuisti. Nam quomodo latere potuit hominem quod “suum. aut lapis. θυι 33$. νει alia huiusmmfi materia θυιιδ ῐιοη Sil? ὶυοά εί in his ιυῖλθ mene deprehendfie potuistis, animum ad discutiendum noluistis intendere, certum est quia in agnitione Dei impediti estis non impossibilitatis sed ignaviae vizio, nam si voluissetis, ex his ipsis inutilibus simulacris profecto accepissetis intelligentiae viam.
“Then let us also consider more carefully what reason we have for loving our parents. ‘Because,’ someone says, ‘they seem to be the authors of our life.’ Parents are not the authors of our life but its ministers; for they do not provide life, but render us the service of entering into this life. The author of life is one and only God. If, then, we wish to love the author of life, let us know that it is he whom we must love. ‘But him we have not been able to know, whereas these we know and hold in affection.’ Granted, you could not know what God is; yet you could very easily have known what God is not. For how could it escape a man that wood or stone or bronze or any other material of this kind is not God? And since you could have grasped this in things ready to hand, but would not apply your mind to examine it, it is certain that you were hindered in the knowledge of God not by impossibility but by the vice of sloth. For if you had wished, you would surely have received from these very useless images a way to understanding.
6.7PG 1:1351a–1351b
Certum est enim quia per ferrum facta sunt simulacra, ferrum vero per ignem confectum est, qui ignis aqua exstinguitur, aqua autem per spiritum movetur, spiritus autem a Deo initium habet. Sic enim dicit Moyses propheta: In principio fecit Deus caelum et terram, terra autem erat invisibilis et incomposita, et tenebrae erant super abyssum, et Spiritus Dei erat super aquas “. Qui spiritus jussu Dei, quasi ipsa Conditoris manus lucem separavit a tenebris, et post illud invisibile caelum istud visibile produxit, ut superiora quidem habitaculum faceret angelis, inferiora vero hominibus. Propter te ergo Dei jussu, aqua quae erat super faciem terrae secessit, ut terra tibi produceret fructus, cui etiam humorum venas latenter inseruit, ut tibi ex ea profluerent fontes et flumina. Propter te producere jussa est animantia, et omnia quae tuo usui voluntatique servirent. Aut non propter te venti spirant, ut ex ipsis concipiens fructus tibi terra parturiat? Non propter te imbres profluunt et tempora vicissitudi‘ nes mutant? Non propter te sol oritur et cecidit et mutationes luna perpetitur? Propter te mare exhibet famulatum suum, ut tibi ingrato cuncta subjaceant. Nonne pro his omnibus justa erit ultionis poena, quia horum omnium largitorem. quem ante omnia et agnoscere et venerari debuistis, solum prae caeteris ignorastis?
“For it is certain that images are made by iron, and iron is worked by fire, which fire is quenched by water; and water is moved by spirit, and spirit has its beginning from God. For so says Moses the prophet: ‘In the beginning God made heaven and earth; but the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss, and the Spirit of God was over the waters.’ This Spirit, at God's command, like the very hand of the Maker, separated light from darkness, and after that invisible heaven produced this visible one, so as to make the upper regions a dwelling for angels and the lower ones for men. For your sake, then, at God's command the water that was on the face of the earth withdrew, so that the earth might produce fruits for you; and he secretly put veins of moisture in it, so that springs and rivers might flow from it for you. For your sake it was commanded to bring forth living creatures and everything that would serve your use and will. Or do not the winds blow for your sake, so that the earth, conceiving from them, may bear fruits for you? Do not the rains flow and the seasons change their turns for your sake? Does not the sun rise and set for your sake, and the moon undergo its changes? For your sake the sea offers its service, so that all things may be subject to you, ungrateful as you are. Will there not be a just penalty of vengeance for all these things, because you alone, beyond all others, have not known the giver of all these things, whom you ought to have known and venerated before all things?
6.8PG 1:1351b–1352b
Sed et nunc eisdem vos ad intelligentiam viis duco; videtis etenim quod omnia gignuntur ex aquis, aqua vero per Unigenitum ex initio facta est, Unigeniti vero omnipotens Deus caput est, per quem tali ordine, quo supra diximus, pervenitur ad Patrem; eum autem perveneris ad Patrem, agnosces hanc esse voluntatem ejus, ut per aquas quae primae creata: sunt, denuo renascaris. Qui enim regeneratus fuerit per aquam, bonis operibus adimpletis haeres efficitur ejus a quo in incorruptione regeneratus est. Propter quod paratis animis accedite quasi filii ad patrem, ut peccata vestra diluantur et causa eorum sola ignorantia fuisse probetur apud Deum. Nam si post agnitionem horum permanetis in incredulitate, vobis jam perditionis vestra: causa et non ignorantiae reputabitur. Nec putes quod etiamsi omnem pietatem colas omnemque justitiam, baptismum vero non accipias, spem possis habere apud Deum; imo potius majore poena dignus erit qui bona Opera non bene operatur, confertur enim meritum homini ex bonis gestis, sed si ita gerantur sicut Deus jubet. Deus autem jussit omnem colentem se baptismo consignari, quod si tu reniteris et tute voluntati magis quam Dei obtemperas, contrarius sine dubio et inimicus es voluntati ejus.
“But even now I lead you to understanding by the same ways. For you see that all things are born from the waters; and water was made in the beginning through the Only-begotten; and the almighty God is the head of the Only-begotten, through whom, in the order we described above, one comes to the Father. And when you have come to the Father, you will recognize that this is his will: that you be born anew through the waters that were first created. For one who has been regenerated through water, when he has fulfilled good works, is made heir of him by whom he has been regenerated in incorruption. Therefore come with ready minds, as sons to a father, so that your sins may be washed away and their cause may be proved before God to have been ignorance alone. For if after learning these things you remain in unbelief, the cause of your perdition will be counted to you, and not to ignorance. And do not think that even if you practice all piety and all justice, but do not receive baptism, you can have hope with God. Rather, he will deserve greater punishment who does good works not well. For merit comes to a man from good deeds, but only if they are done as God commands. And God has commanded everyone who worships him to be sealed with baptism. If you resist, and obey your own will rather than God's, you are without doubt contrary and hostile to his will.
6.9PG 1:1352b–1353a
Sed dices fortasse: Quid confert aquae baptismus ad Dei cultum? Primo quidem, quia quod Deo placuit impletur; secundo, quia regenerato ex aquis et Deo renato, fragilitas prioris nativitatis, qua tibi per hominem facta est, amputatur, et ita demum pervenire poteris ad salutem, aliter vero impossibile est. Sic enim nobis cum sacramento verus Propheta testatus est, dicens: Amen dico vobis, nisi quis denuo renatus fuerit ex aqua, non introibit in regna calorum “. Et ideo accelerate, est enim in aquis istis misericordiae vis quaedam, quae ex initio ferebatur super eas, et agnoscit eos qui baptizantur sub appellatione triplicis sacramenti, et eripit eos de suppliciis futuris, quasi donum quoddam offerens Deo animas per baptismum consecratas. Confugite ergo ad aquas istas, sola: sunt enim quae possint vim futuri ignis exstinguere; ad quas qui moratur accedere, constat in eo infidelitatis adhuc idolum permanere, et ab ipso prohiberi ad aquas quae salutem conferunt, properare. Sive enim justus sis sive injustus, baptismus tibi per omnia necessarius est. Justo quidem, ut adimpleatur in eo perfectio et regeneretur Deo; injusto vero, ut peccatorum quae gessit in ignorantia remissio concedatur. Omnibus ergo festinandum est sine mora renasci Deo, quia incertus est uniuscujusque exitus vitae.
“But perhaps you will say: ‘What does the baptism of water contribute to the worship of God?’ First, that what has pleased God is fulfilled; second, that when you have been regenerated from the waters and born again to God, the frailty of your former birth, which came to you through man, is cut off, and so at last you will be able to reach salvation; otherwise it is impossible. For so the true Prophet has testified to us with an oath, saying: ‘Amen I say to you, unless one is born again of water, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven.’ And therefore make haste; for there is in these waters a certain power of mercy, which from the beginning was borne over them, and it recognizes those who are baptized under the invocation of the threefold sacrament, and rescues them from future punishments, offering to God as a kind of gift the souls consecrated through baptism. Flee, then, to these waters; for they alone can quench the force of the fire to come. Whoever delays to come to them, it is clear that the idol of unbelief still remains in him and that he is prevented by it from hastening to the waters that confer salvation. For whether you are just or unjust, baptism is in every way necessary for you: for the just, so that perfection may be fulfilled in him and he may be regenerated to God; for the unjust, so that remission may be granted of the sins he committed in ignorance. All, therefore, must hasten without delay to be born again to God, because the end of each one's life is uncertain.
6.10PG 1:1353a–1353b
Cum autem regeneratus fueris per aquam, ex operibus bonis ostende in te similitudinem ejus, qui te genuit Patris. Agnovisti enim Deum, honora patrem; honor autem ejus est, ut ita vivas sicut ipse vult. Vult autem te ita vivere, ut homicidium, adulterium nescias, odium, avaritiam fugias, iram, superbiam, jactantiam respuas, et exsecreris invidiam, caeteraque his similia penitus a te ducas aliena. Est sane propria quaedam nostra: religionis observantia, quae non tam imponitur hominibus, quam proprie ab unoquoque Deum colente causa puritatis expetitur. Castimoniae dico causa, cujus species multae sunt; sed primo ut observet unusquisque, ne menstruatae mulieri misceatur, hoc enim exsecrabile duxit lex Dei. Quod etsi lex de bis non admonuisset, nos ut canthari libenter volveremur in stercore? Debemus amplius aliquid habere animalibus, utpote rationabiles homines et caelestium sensuum capaces, quibus summi studii esse debet, ab omni inquinamento cordis conscientiam custodire.
“And when you have been regenerated through water, show in yourself by good works the likeness of him who begot you, the Father. For you have come to know God; honor your father. And his honor is that you live as he wishes. He wishes you to live so that you know nothing of murder or adultery, flee hatred and avarice, reject anger, pride, and boasting, abhor envy, and put all things like these far from you. There is indeed a certain observance proper to our religion, which is not so much imposed on men as it is sought out by each one who worships God, for the sake of purity. I mean for the sake of chastity, of which there are many kinds; but first, that each one take care not to have intercourse with a menstruating woman, for the law of God has held this abominable. Even if the law had given no warning about these things, should we, like dung beetles, gladly roll in filth? We ought to have something more than the animals, being rational men and capable of heavenly perceptions, whose highest concern ought to be to guard the conscience from every defilement of heart.
6.11PG 1:1353b–1353d
Bonum est autem et puritati conveniens, etiam corpus aqua diluere. Bonum vero dico, non quasi principale illud in quo mens purificatur, sed quod sequela sit illius boni hoc in quo caro diluitur. Sic enim et Magister noster quosdam Pharisaeorum et Scribarum, qui videbantur esse caeteris meliores et a vulgo separati, increpabat, dicens eos hypocritas, quia ea solum quae hominibus videbantur, purificabant, corda vero quae solus Deus aspicit, inquinata relinquebant et sordida. Ad quosdam ergo ex ipsis, non ad omnes dicebat: Vae vobis, Scribae et Pharisaei hypocritae, quia mundatis calicis et paropsidis quod deforis est, intus autem plena sunt sordibus. Pharisaee caece, emunda prius quod intus est, et quod deforis est erit mundum ‘5. Vere enim si mens mundetur luce scientiae, cum ipsa fuerit munda ac splendida, tunc etiam ejus qui deforis est hominis ipsa necessario curam gerit, id est carnis suae, ut et ipsa purificetur. Ubi autem ista quae deforis est purificatio carnis negligitur, certum est ibi neque de puritate mentis, ac munditia cordis curam geri. Ita ergo fit, ut is quidem qui intrinsecus mundus est, mundetur sine dubio et extrinsecus, non semper autem is qui mundatur extrinsecus, etiam intrinsecus mundus est, videlicet cum agit haec ut omnibus placeat.
“It is good also, and fitting for purity, to wash the body with water. I call it good not as though it were the principal thing, in which the mind is purified, but because the washing of the flesh is a consequence of that good. For so our Master rebuked some of the Pharisees and scribes, who seemed to be better than the rest and separated from the common people, calling them hypocrites because they purified only what was seen by men, but left defiled and filthy their hearts, which God alone sees. So to some of them—not to all—he said: ‘Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of filth. Blind Pharisee, first clean what is inside, and what is outside will be clean.’ For truly, if the mind is cleansed by the light of knowledge, when it has become clean and bright, then it necessarily takes care also of the outer man, that is, of its flesh, so that it too may be purified. But where this outward purification of the flesh is neglected, it is certain that no care is taken there for purity of mind and cleanness of heart. So it comes about that he who is clean inwardly is without doubt cleansed outwardly too; but not always is he who is cleansed outwardly also clean inwardly—namely, when he does these things to please everyone.
6.12PG 1:1353d–1354a
Sed et illa species castimoniae observanda est, ut ne passim et libidinis solius causa feminis coeatur, sed posteritatis reparanda: gratia. Quae observantia cum in nonnullis etiam pecudibus inveniatur, pudoris est si non ab hominibus rationabilibus et Deum colentibus observetur. In tantum autem castimonia verum Dei cultum tenentibus, per has quas supra diximus aliasque horum similes species conservanda est, ut etiam apud eos qui a diabolo adhuc in erroribus detinentur, attentius observetur; est enim apud illos nonnulla observantia castimoniae. Quid ergo, quod errantes custodiebatis, hoc non observabitis emendati 3
“That kind of chastity also must be observed, that intercourse with women be not indiscriminate and for the sake of lust alone, but for the sake of continuing posterity. Since this observance is found even in some animals, it is a shame if it is not observed by men who are rational and worship God. Chastity must be kept by those who hold the true worship of God, through the kinds we have mentioned above and others like them, so much the more because it is observed attentively even among those who are still held in errors by the devil; for there is among them some observance of chastity. What then? What you kept while erring, will you not observe now that you have been corrected?
6.13PG 1:1354a–1354b
Sed fortasse dicet aliquis vestrum: Oportet ergo nos omnia quae fecimus dum coleremus idola, custodire? Non omnia; sed quacunque bene fiebant, haec etiam nunc convenit observare, quia si quid recte fit ab his qui in errore sunt, certum est id a veritate sumptum. Quia et si quid in vera religione non recte fit, non est dubium quin ab errore mutuatum sit: bonum namque etiamsi ab errantibus gestum fuerit, bonum est, et malum etiamsi ab bis qui veritatem sequuntur gestum fuerit, malum est. Aut nunquid ita desipiemus, ut si videamus eum qui idola colit esse sobrium, nos qui Deum colimus, sobrii esse recusemus, ne eadem facere, quas ille qui colit idola, videamur? Non ita est, sed sit nobis studium, ut si illi qui errant, homicidium non faciunt, nos ne irascamur quidem; et si illi adulterium non admittunt, nos ne concupiscamus quidem alienam mulierem; si illi amant proximos suos. nos diligamus etiam inimicos nostros; ‘5; si illi mutuo dant his qui habent unde reddant, nos etiam bis demus a quibus recipere non speramus. Et per omnia nos qui aeterni saeculi haereditatem speramus, debemus praecellere eos qui praisens tantum sacculum norunt, scientes quia, si opera illorum nostris operibus collata, in die judicii similia inveniantur ac paria, confusio nobis erit, quod aequales invenimur in operibus bis qui propter ignorantiam condemnantur, et nullam spem futuri saeculi habuerunt.
“But perhaps one of you will say: ‘Must we then keep everything we did while we worshiped idols?’ Not everything; but whatever was done well, this it is fitting to observe now too. For if anything is done rightly by those who are in error, it is certain that it was taken from the truth; and if anything is done wrongly in the true religion, there is no doubt that it was borrowed from error. For good, even if done by those who err, is good; and evil, even if done by those who follow the truth, is evil. Or shall we be so foolish that, if we see an idol worshiper sober, we who worship God refuse to be sober, so as not to seem to do the same as the idol worshiper? It is not so. Rather let our aim be that, if those who err do not commit murder, we do not even become angry; and if they do not commit adultery, we do not even desire another's wife; if they love their neighbors, we love even our enemies; if they lend to those who have the means to repay, we give even to those from whom we do not hope to receive. And in all things we who hope for the inheritance of the eternal age ought to excel those who know only the present age, knowing that if their works, compared with ours on the day of judgment, are found similar and equal, it will be a shame to us that we are found equal in works to those who are condemned for their ignorance and had no hope of the age to come.
6.14PG 1:1354b–1355a
Et vere digna confusio est, ubi nihil amplius gessimus ab bis quibus amplius intelleximus. Quod si confusio nobis erit aequales eis inveniri in operibus bonis, quid erit nobis, si inferiores nos ac deteriores examinatio futura reperiat? Audite ergo quomodo de his nos ipse verus Propheta docuerit; ad eos enim qui negligunt audire verba sapientiae, ita ait: Regina austri surget in judicio cum generatione hac et condemnabit eam, quia venit a finibus terrae audire sapientiam Salomonis, et ecce plus quam Salomon hic, et non audiunt". Ad eos vero qui de malis actibus gerere paenitentiam detrectabant, ita ait: Viri Ninivita: surgent in judicio cum generatione hac et condemnabam eam, quia paenitentiam egerunt in praedicatione Jonae, et ecce plus quam Jonas hic ‘3-".Vides ergo quomodo eos qui erudiebantur ex lege, adductis ad exemplum illis qui ex gentili ignorantia veniebant, et ostendens eos nec illis azquales esse qui in errore positi videbantur, ex ipsa tantum comparatione condemnat. Ex quibus omnibus sermo quem proposuimus approbatur, ut castimonia, quae aliquatenus etiam ab his qui in errore sunt positi custoditur, multo purius et attentius per singulas quasque, sicut supra ostendimus. species a nobis qui veritatem sequimur teneatur, eo magis quo apud nos observantia: eius praemia a-terna posita sunt.
“And truly it is a fitting shame when we have done nothing more than those than whom we understood more. And if it will be a shame to us to be found equal to them in good works, what will become of us if the coming examination finds us inferior and worse? Hear, then, how the true Prophet himself taught us about these things. To those who neglect to hear the words of wisdom he says: ‘The queen of the south will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold, something greater than Solomon is here, and they do not listen.’ And to those who refused to repent of their evil deeds he says: ‘The men of Nineveh will rise up in the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and behold, something greater than Jonah is here.’ You see, then, how he condemns those who were instructed out of the law simply by comparison, bringing forward as examples those who came from Gentile ignorance and showing that they were not even equal to those who seemed to be in error. From all this the point we proposed is proved: that chastity, which is kept to some extent even by those in error, should be held much more purely and attentively in each of its kinds, as we showed above, by us who follow the truth, all the more because with us eternal rewards are set before its observance.”
6.15PG 1:1355a–1356a
Haec et his similia cum dixisset, turbas dimisit, et ex more cum familiaribus suis cibo sumpto quievit. Hoc autem modo per tres continuos menses eum verbum Dei doceret et plurimos converteret ad fidem, ad ultimum jejunare me jussit, et post jejunium in fontibus qui contigui habentur mari, perennis aqua: mihi baptismum dedit. Cumque pro regenerationis gratia divinitus mihi collata, feriati cum fratribus laeti egissemus, Petrus eos qui ad praecedendum fuerant ordinati, proficisci Antiochiam jubet atque ibi tres alios exspectare menses. Quibus profectis, ipse eos qui fidem Domini plene receperant, deducens ad fontes quos mari contiguos supra diximus baptizavit, et eucharistiam frangens cum eis, Maronem qui eum hospitio receperat perfectum jam in omnibus, constituit eis episcopum, et duodecim cum eo presbyteros, simulque diaconos ordinat. Instituit etiam ordinem viduarum atque omnia Ecclesia; ministeria disponit, universosque admonet Maroni episcopo in omnibus quae praeciperet obedire. Et ita cunctis competenter dispositis, cum trium mensium tempus fuisset expletum, valedicentes his qui erant apud Tripolim, Antiochiam proficiscimur.
When he had said these and similar things, he dismissed the crowds, and, having taken food as usual with his intimates, he rested. In this way, after he had taught the word of God for three continuous months and converted very many to the faith, at last he told me to fast, and after the fast he gave me baptism in the springs of perennial water that lie next to the sea. And when we had kept a joyful holiday with the brothers for the grace of regeneration divinely conferred on me, Peter ordered those who had been appointed to go ahead to set out for Antioch and wait there another three months. When they had gone, he himself led those who had fully received the faith of the Lord to the springs next to the sea that we mentioned above and baptized them; and breaking the Eucharist with them, he appointed Maro, who had received him as guest and was now perfected in all things, as their bishop, and ordained twelve presbyters with him, and deacons at the same time. He also instituted the order of widows and arranged all the ministries of the church, and admonished all to obey Maro the bishop in everything he commanded. And so, when everything had been suitably arranged and the period of three months was completed, we bade farewell to those at Tripolis and set out for Antioch.
Chapter 7
7.1PG 1:1355b
Egressi tandem etiam Tripolim Phoenicis urbem, primam in Ortosiade haud procul a Tripoli fecimus mansionem, ubi sequenti quoque die remorati, quia omnes pene qui Domino crediderant, dum divelli a Petro nequeunt, illo usque secuti sunt; inde Antharadum venimus. Sed quod multi nos comitarentur, ait Petrus ad Nicetam simul atque Aquilam: Quoniam quidem plurimae fratrum turba nobiscum sunt, et ingredientes singulas quasque urbes non parum invidia: contrahimus, videtur mihi providendum, ut neque ipsis ingratum sit si prohibeantur sequi, neque nobis pompa: alicujus excitet malignus invidiam. Censeo itaque te Nicetam atque Aquilam praecedere nos cum ipsis, ita ut etiam vos in duas partes divisam multitudinem ducatis, ut sparsim magis quam sub una congregatione iter agentes, singulas quasque introeamus gentium civitates.
At last we left Tripolis, a city of Phoenicia, and made our first halt at Orthosias, not far from Tripolis. We stayed there the following day as well, because almost all who had believed in the Lord, unable to tear themselves from Peter, had followed him that far. From there we came to Antaradus. But since many were accompanying us, Peter said to Niceta and Aquila together: “Since a very great crowd of brothers is with us, and as we enter each city we draw no little envy, it seems to me we must take care both that it is not unwelcome to them if they are prevented from following, and that the malignant one does not stir up envy against us on account of a kind of pomp. So I think that you, Niceta and Aquila, should go ahead of us with them, and that you should lead the multitude divided into two parts, so that we may enter each of the cities of the Gentiles travelling in scattered groups rather than in one assembly.
7.2PG 1:1355b–1356b
Scio autem quia triste vobis videtur, quod videmini a me duorum saltem dierum spatio separari; credite mihi, quia qua mensura diligitis me, decuplo amplior mihi quoque erga vos affectus est, sed si pro affectu, quem adinvicem gerimus, non faciamus quae convenientia et honesta sunt, irrationabilis hujusmodi amor videbitur. Et ideo nequaquam titulo charitatis imminuto, quae utilia videntur ac necessaria procuremus, maxime cum nullus dies possit intercedere, quo non disputationibus meis interesse possitis. Per singulas enim quasque nobiliores provinciarum civitates proposui, sicut etiam vos scitis, ternis docendi gratia residere mensibus. Nunc ergo Laodiciam, quae est urbs proxima, praecedite me, et ego post biduum aut triduum quantum ad propositum meum spectat, insequar vos. Opperiemini autem me ad proximum portae civitatis stabulum, et inde iterum similiter, cum dies ibi aliquot transegerimus, praecedetis me ad ulteriores civitates; et hoc vos facere per singulas cupio, declinanda: quantum in nobis est invidia: gratia, et ut fratres qui nobiscum sunt, vestri providentia per singulas civitates parata invenientes hospitia, minus vagari videantur.
“I know that it seems sad to you to be separated from me even for the space of two days. Believe me, in whatever measure you love me, my affection toward you is ten times greater. But if, for the sake of the affection we bear one another, we do not do what is fitting and honorable, such love will seem irrational. So, without lessening the claim of love in any way, let us see to what seems useful and necessary—especially since no day can pass on which you cannot be present at my discourses. For I have proposed, as you also know, to stay three months for teaching in each of the more notable cities of the provinces. Now, then, go ahead of me to Laodicea, which is the nearest city, and I will follow you after two or three days, as far as my plan is concerned. Wait for me at the inn nearest the gate of the city; and from there again, likewise, when we have spent some days there, you will go ahead of me to the cities farther on. I want you to do this in each city, so far as we can, for the sake of avoiding envy, and so that the brothers who are with us, finding lodgings prepared in each city by your foresight, may seem less like wanderers.”
7.3PG 1:1356b
Haec dicente Petro, necessario acquiescunt, dicentes: Non valde nos contristat hoc agere quia a te jubemur, qui omnia et bene agere et bene consulere per Christi providentiam electus es, sed et una die aut si multum biduo, quamvis grande sit, in hoc omni spatio non videre dominum nostrum Petrum, tamen tolerabile est. Consideramus enim quid patiantur illi duodecim fratres nostri, qui praecedunt nos, et mensem pene integrum ex tribus mensibus, quibus per unamquamque urbem resides. tanto bono auditus tui visionisque fraudantur. Et ergo jubes, quia recte omnia jubes, agere non morabimur. Et his dictis praecessere, acceptis mandatis, ut extra urbem alloquerentur fratres qui secum iter agebant, ne constipati et quasi cum tumultu, sed sparsim et in binos divisi ingrediantur civitates.
When Peter said this, they acquiesced, as they had to, saying: “It does not grieve us much to do this, since we are ordered by you, who have been chosen by the providence of Christ both to do all things well and to give good counsel. Besides, not to see our lord Peter for one day, or at most two, though it is a great deal, is still bearable in all this time. For we consider what those twelve brothers of ours suffer who go ahead of us, and are deprived of so great a good as hearing and seeing you for almost a whole month out of the three months you stay in each city. So we will not delay to do what you order, since all your orders are right.” With these words they went ahead, having received instructions to speak to the brothers travelling with them outside the city, so that they would enter the cities not crowded together and as if in a tumult, but scattered and divided in pairs.
7.4PG 1:1356b–1357a
Verum ubi illi profecti sunt, ego Clemens valde gavisus sum quod me secum esse fecit, et aio ad eum: Deo gratias ago, quod me non praemisisti cum aliis, nam tristitia interissem. Tum Petrus: Et quid fiet, inquit, si necessitas exegerit mitti te aliquo doctrina: gratia? separatus a me pro utilitate morieris? nec tibimetipsi imperabis ferre patienter quae necessitas imposuerit? aut ignoras, quia amici semper simul sunt, et licet corporibus separentur, memoria tamen junguntur? sicut econtrario nonnulli corporibus una positi, animis dividuntur.
When they had set out, I, Clement, was very glad that he had kept me with him, and I said to him: “I thank God that you did not send me ahead with the others, for I would have died of sadness.” Then Peter said: “And what will happen if necessity requires you to be sent somewhere for the sake of teaching? Separated from me for a useful purpose, will you die? Will you not command yourself to bear patiently what necessity imposes? Or do you not know that friends are always together, and though separated in body, they are joined in memory—just as, on the contrary, some who are placed together in body are divided in soul?”
7.5PG 1:1357a
Et ego respondi: Non putes, mi domine, haec me irrationabiliter pati, sed certa et causa et ratio est hujus erga te affectus mei. Te enim solum pro omnibus meis affectibus habeo, pro patre, pro matre, pro fratribus; super hzec autem omnia est, quod mihi salutis causa et agnoscendae veritatis tu solus existis. Sed et illud non mihi in postremo habetur loco, quod juvenilis aetas quae in me est, concupiscentiarum insidiis subjacet, et vereor esse sine te. cujus sola praesentia omnis luxuria quamvis ratione careat, erubescit; licet confidam de misericordia Dei, quod etiam sensus meus ex his quae per doctrinam tuam concepit, aliud jam aliquid ad cogitationem recipere non possit. Praeterea memini te apud Ca2saream dixisse, ut si quis vult me salva pietate comitari, comitetur. Salva autem pietate dicebas, ut neminem contristaret cui secundum Deum deberet Miserere, verbi gratia, ne uxorem fidelem relinqueret vel parentes vel alias hujuscemodi personas, a quibus ego valde liber sum et ideo aptus ad sequendum te; atque utinam mihi concedas ut tibi etiam servi ministerium exhibeam.
I answered: “Do not think, my lord, that I feel this irrationally; there is a definite cause and reason for this affection of mine toward you. For I have you alone in place of all my affections: for father, for mother, for brothers. And above all this, you alone are to me the cause of salvation and of knowing the truth. Nor do I count it least that the youthful age that is in me lies open to the snares of desires, and I fear to be without you, whose presence alone makes all luxury blush, though it lacks reason—although I trust in the mercy of God that my mind, from what it has conceived through your teaching, can no longer admit anything else into its thoughts. Besides, I remember you said at Caesarea, ‘Whoever wishes to accompany me with piety unimpaired, let him accompany me.’ By ‘with piety unimpaired’ you meant that he should grieve no one to whom he owes consideration according to God—for example, that he should not leave a believing wife, or parents, or other persons of this kind. From these I am entirely free, and therefore fit to follow you. And I wish you would allow me even to render you the service of a slave.”
7.6PG 1:1357a–1358a
Tum Petrus ad haec ridens ait: Et quid putas, Clemens, quod non te ipsa necessitas mihi faciat servum? Nam quis mihi poterit alius sternere sindones et stragula pulchra componere? Quis servare annulos et indumenta quae assidue mutare debeam, praeparabit? Quis etiam cocis imperabit et diversa atque electa pulmenta providebit, quae arte scitissima et varia praeparentur, et omnia illa quae hominibus molliter institutis, imo potius cupiditati eorum velut immanissimas cuidam bestia: injustis quaesita sumptibus convectantur? Sed fortasse quamvis mecum positus videaris, non agnoveris vitam meam; panis mihi solus cum olivis et raro etiam cum oleribus in usu est, indumentum autem hoc est mihi quod vides, tunica cum pallio, et haec habens, aliud nihil requiro. Hoc mihi sufficit, quia mens mea non ad haec praesentia, sed ad illa quae aeterna sunt aspicit, et ideo nihil me rerum praesentium visibiliumque delectat. Unde tuum quidem erga me bonum animum amplector et miror, ac te magis laudo, quomodo cum sis vir ex consuetudine multae abundantiae veniens, tam cito transferre et aptare te potueris ad hanc vitam nostram, quae solis necessariis utitur. Nos enim a puero, id est. ego et frater germanus meus Andreas, non solum orphani, sed et valde pauperes crevimus et necessitate operarii esse consuevimus, unde et nunc facile vexationes itinerum ferimus. Sed potius si mihi acquiesceres et permitteres, ego magis homo operarius, facilius tibi possem servi implere ministerium.
Then Peter laughed at this and said: “And what do you think, Clement—will not necessity itself make you my slave? For who else will be able to spread my linen sheets and arrange beautiful coverlets? Who will keep my rings and get ready the clothes that I must change constantly? Who will command the cooks and provide various choice dishes, prepared with the most skilful and varied art, and all those things that are gathered at unjust expense for men brought up softly—or rather for their greed, as for some most savage beast? But perhaps, though you seem to be with me, you have not come to know my life. Bread alone with olives, and rarely even with vegetables, is what I use; and my clothing is what you see, a tunic with a cloak; and having these, I require nothing else. This is enough for me, because my mind looks not to these present things but to those that are eternal, and therefore nothing of present and visible things delights me. So I embrace and admire your good will toward me, and praise you the more because, though you are a man coming from a habit of great abundance, you have so quickly been able to transfer and adapt yourself to this life of ours, which uses only necessities. For from boyhood—I and my own brother Andrew—we grew up not only orphans but very poor, and were accustomed by necessity to be laborers; so now too we easily bear the hardships of journeys. Rather, if you would agree and allow me, I, being more of a working man, could more easily fulfill the service of a slave for you.”
7.7PG 1:1358a
At ego haec audiens contremui, et lacrymae mihi continuo proruperunt, quod talem mihi sermonem dixerit vir tantus, quo omnis mundus habetur inferior. Tum ille lacrymantem me videns, causam percontatur. Cui ego respondi: Quid tantum in te peccavi ut me tali sermone onerares? et Petrus: Si malum est, inquit, quod dixi ut serviam tibi, tu prior peccasti hoc mihi dicendo. Et ego: Non est, inquam, simile; me enim decet hoc tibi facere, tu autem qui Dei summi praeco ad salvandas animas hominum missus es, grave est ut hoc mihi dicas. Et Petrus: Acquiescerem tibi, inquit, nisi Dominus noster qui ad salutem totius mundi venit, et qui erat omni creatura nobilior, servire passus esset, ut nos suaderet non erubescere fratribus nostris servorum exhibere ministerium. Tum ego: Si puto quod possim te vincere, valde stultus sum; verumtamen age gratias providentia Dei, quod parentum loco habere te merui.
When I heard this I trembled, and tears burst from me at once, that so great a man, to whom the whole world is inferior, should have said such a thing to me. Seeing me weeping, he asked the reason. I answered him: “How have I sinned so much against you that you should burden me with such words?” Peter said: “If what I said, that I should serve you, is wrong, you sinned first by saying it to me.” I said: “It is not the same. It is fitting for me to do this for you; but for you, who have been sent as herald of the most high God to save the souls of men, it is a grievous thing to say this to me.” Peter said: “I would agree with you, if our Lord, who came for the salvation of the whole world and was nobler than all creation, had not submitted to serve, in order to persuade us not to be ashamed to render the service of slaves to our brothers.” Then I said: “If I think I can win against you, I am very foolish. But give thanks to the providence of God that I have been counted worthy to have you in place of parents.”
7.8PG 1:1358a–1359a
Tum Petrus: Nemo enim, inquit, vere ex genere tibi superest? Respondi: Sunt quidem multi potentes viri ex Caesaris prosapia venientes; nam patri utpote propinquo suo et una educato, nobilis adaeque familia: Caesar ipse junxit uxorem, ex qua duos geminos ante me filios suscepit, non valde, ut aiebat pater, sibi invicem similes. ego enim eos non adeo sciebam. Sed ne matris quidem valde memor sum, sed quasi per somnium ita tenuiter vultus ejus speciem recolo. Mater ergo mea Matthidia, pater Faustinianus vocitatus est, fratrum autem meorum alter Faustinus, alter Faustus dicebatur. Interea cum ego quinque vixdum essem annorum, mater, sicut a patre didici, somnium vidit, quo moneretur, nisi cum duobus filiis suis geminis confestim Urbem fuisset egressa et abfuisset annis decem, ipsam pariter cum liberis interitu exitiabili perituram.
Then Peter said: “Is no one of your family really left to you?” I answered: “There are indeed many powerful men descended from the line of Caesar. For Caesar himself joined to my father, as his kinsman and one brought up with him, a wife from an equally noble family, by whom he had twin sons before me, not very much alike, as my father said; for I did not know them well. Nor do I even remember my mother much, but I recall the appearance of her face faintly, as if in a dream. My mother was called Mattidia, my father Faustinianus, and of my brothers one was called Faustinus and the other Faustus. Meanwhile, when I was barely five years old, my mother, as I learned from my father, saw a dream warning that unless she left the city at once with her two twin sons and stayed away for ten years, she would perish together with her children by a terrible death.
7.9PG 1:1359a
Tum pater, qui tenere diligeret filios, adjunctis servis et ancillis ac sumptibus sufficienter praebitis, navi impositos cum matre filios Athenas mittit erudiendos, me sibi solum filium ad solatium retinens et in hoc quidem gratias agens, quia non etiam me imperavit somnium pariter cum matre discedere. Anno autem completo pater misit ad eos Athenas homines et sumptus. scire simul cupiens quid agant, nec tamen redeunt qui missi sunt. Tertio rursus anno maestissimus pater mittit alios cum pecuniis, qui quarto anno regressi nuntiant neque matrem se neque fratres vidisse, sed neque Athenas eos omnino pervenisse, neque usquam alicujus saltem quicum Ipsis fuerant vestigium repertum.
“Then my father, who loved his sons tenderly, gave them male and female slaves and provided sufficient means, put the sons with their mother on a ship, and sent them to Athens to be educated, keeping me, his only son, with him for comfort—and giving thanks for this at least, that the dream had not ordered me too to leave with my mother. When a year had passed, my father sent men and money to them at Athens, wishing at the same time to know how they were doing; but those who were sent did not return. Again in the third year my father, in great sorrow, sent others with money, who came back in the fourth year and reported that they had seen neither my mother nor my brothers, that they had not reached Athens at all, and that no trace had been found anywhere of any of those who had been with them.
7.10PG 1:1359a–1360a
Pater haec audiens et multa tristitia obstupefactus, nesciens quo tenderet aut ubi quaereret, una mecum descendit ad portum, et requirere a nautis coepit, sicubi aliquis eorum vidisset aut audisset aliquando ante quatuor annos corpus mulieris cum duobus parvulis ejectum. Cum multi multa dicerent, nec aliquid nobis rei elucesceret tam immensum pelagus perscrutantibus, pro multo tamen affectu pater quem erga suos gerebat, pascebatur vanis spebus. donec visum est ei, ut me sub procuratoribus ordinatum Romae relinqueret, annorum cum essem duodecim, et ipse pergeret ad requirendum. Flens itaque descendit ad portum, et navem conscendens profectus est. Ex eo usque in hodiernum neque litteras ejus accepi, neque si vivat aut defunctus sit novi. Sed magis suspicor. quia et ipse obierit aut tristitia victus aut naufragio; anni etenim viginti elapsi sunt quibus haec geruntur, et ne nuntius quidem de eo ad me aliquis venit.
“When my father heard this, stunned with great sadness and not knowing where to turn or where to search, he went down with me to the harbor and began to ask the sailors whether any of them had seen or heard of the body of a woman with two little children being cast ashore at any time in the last four years. Though many said many things, and nothing became clear to us as we searched so immense a sea, my father, because of the great affection he bore his family, fed on vain hopes, until he decided to leave me at Rome under guardians, since I was twelve years old, and go himself to search. So he went down to the harbor weeping, boarded a ship, and set out. From then until today I have received no letter from him, nor do I know whether he is alive or dead. But I rather suspect that he too has died, either overcome by sadness or by shipwreck; for twenty years have passed since these things happened, and not even a messenger has come to me about him.”
7.11PG 1:1360a
Petrus haec audiens ex affectu lacrymas fudit, et ad eos qui aderant familiares ait: Haec si quis in Dei cultu positus pertulisset quae hujus pertulit pater, statim homines religioni ascriberent aerumnarum causam; quae cum accidunt miseris gentilibus, malorum causam fato ascribunt. Miseros autem dico eos, quia et hic vexantur erroribus et ab spe futura fraudantur; Dei cultores cum haec patiuntur, ad purgationem peccatorum cedit eis, quod perferunt patienter.
When Peter heard this he shed tears out of compassion, and said to the companions who were present: “If someone engaged in the worship of God had endured what this man's father has endured, men would at once ascribe the cause of his troubles to religion; but when these things happen to wretched Gentiles, they ascribe the cause of their evils to fate. I call them wretched because they are both tormented by errors here and cheated of the hope to come. When worshipers of God suffer these things, what they bear patiently serves for the purging of their sins.”
7.12PG 1:1360a–1361a
Post haec dicta unus ex astantibus Petrum rogare coepit, ut die crastina maturius ad insulam proximam quae sex non amplius stadiis aberat, Aradum nomine, pergeremus, videndi in ea gratia mirum aliquod opus, columnas viteas magnitudinis immensae. Cui Petrus, ut erat clementissimus, acquiescit, sed monuit nos, cum navem descendissemus, non una omnes concurrere ad videndum; nolo enim, inquit, notari vos a turba. Cum ergo die postera navi sub momento horae venissemus ad insulam, continuo ad locum in quo erant columnae. mirabiles, properamus. Erant autem in aede quadam positae, in qua Phidiae opera permagnifica habebantur, quibus intento unusquisque nostrum detinebatur aspectu.
After these words, one of those standing by began to ask Peter that early the next day we should go to the nearby island called Aradus, not more than six stadia away, to see a remarkable work there: columns of vine-wood of immense size. Peter, most kind as he was, agreed, but warned us when we had gone down to the ship not all to rush together to look; “for I do not want you,” he said, “to be noticed by the crowd.” So when on the next day we had come to the island by ship within the space of an hour, we at once hurried to the place where the marvelous columns were. They were placed in a certain temple, in which there were very magnificent works of Phidias, and each of us was held fixed in gazing at them.
7.13PG 1:1361a–1361b
Petrus vero ubi solas columnas miratus est viteas, nequaquam raptus picturae gratia, egressus vidit pro foribus mulierculam quamdam stipem ab introeuntibus deposcentem; quam attentius considerans ait: Dic, mulier, quod tibi membrum corporis deest, quod huic te injuriae subjecisti ut stipem petas, et non potius manibus tuis quas a Deo accepisti operans cibum quaeras? At illa suspirans ait: Utinam mihi quidem essent manus quae moveri possent, nunc autem species tantum servata est manuum, nam ipsae sunt emortum, et meis morsibus debiles et sine sensu redditae. Et Petrus: Quae, inquit, fuit causa, ut hoc tibi tantum mali ipsa conferres? Ignavia, inquit, nec aliud quidquam; si enim fuisset in me aliquid virtutis, potui vel praecipitio uti vel profundo maris injicere memetipsam, et finem dare doloribus meis.
But Peter, having admired only the vine-wood columns and not at all carried away by the charm of the paintings, went out and saw before the doors a poor woman begging alms from those going in. Looking at her more attentively, he said: “Tell me, woman, what limb of your body is missing, that you have subjected yourself to this indignity of begging alms, instead of seeking food by working with the hands you received from God?” She sighed and said: “Would that I had hands that could move! Now only the appearance of hands is kept, for they are dead, made weak and without feeling by my own biting.” Peter said: “What was the reason that you brought so great an evil on yourself?” “Weakness of spirit,” she said, “and nothing else. For if there had been any courage in me, I could have thrown myself from a cliff or into the depth of the sea and put an end to my griefs.”
7.14PG 1:1361b
Tum Petrus: Ecquid putas, ait, mulier, quod qui semetipsos perimunt, a suppliciis liberantur? nisi quia majoribus subjacent poenis animae eorum qui sibi ipsis intulerint manus. At illa: Utinam, inquit, istud mihi certum fieret, quia vivunt animae in inferno, libenter amplecterer etiam poenas ferre mortis illatae, tantum ut dulces mihi natos horam saltem unam viderem. Et Petrus: Quid tantum istud est, quod te tam gravi allicit tristitia, scire velim. Si enim doceres me causam, possem tibi et ego evidenter ostendere, ο mulier, quod in inferno vivant animae, et pro praecipitio vel profundo possem tibi dare medicamentum aliquod, ut sine cruciatu valeas vitam finire.
Then Peter said: “Do you really think, woman, that those who destroy themselves are freed from punishments? Rather, the souls of those who lay hands on themselves are subject to greater penalties.” She said: “If only it were made certain to me that souls live in the underworld, I would gladly embrace even the penalties of a self-inflicted death, if only I might see my sweet children for at least one hour.” Peter said: “I should like to know what it is that afflicts you with so heavy a sadness. For if you would tell me the cause, I too could show you plainly, woman, that souls live in the underworld; and instead of the cliff or the deep, I could give you some remedy so that you might end your life without torment.”
7.15PG 1:1361b–1362a
Tunc mulier promissione hac gratanter accepta coepit dicere: Genus quidem mihi et patria quae sit, nec credi facile, nec dici necessarium puto, sed causam tantum sufficit doloris exponere, cur morsibus meis meas ipsa debiles reddiderim manus. Ego generosis orta parentibus et potentis adaeque viri sortita matrimonium, duos suscepi geminos liberos et post hos unum alium. Sed frater viri mei illicito in me amore vehementer exarsit, mihi autem cum super omnia cura esset pudicitiae, et neque tanto sceleri acquiescere neque viro vellem flagitium fratris aperire, cogitavi quatenus et ego impolluta evaderem, et fratrem inimicum et hostem non facerem fratri, ne genus omne quod erat nobilis familiae in opprobrium darem. Patria ergo et urbe cum duobus meis geminis discedere statui, donec incestus amor conquiesceret, quem forte presentius mea: palparet et inflammaret aspectus: rasa alius sane filius quatenus patri maneret ad solatium, cogitavi.
Then the woman, gladly accepting this promise, began to say: “What my family and country are, I think is neither easily believed nor necessary to say; it is enough to explain the cause of my grief, why I made my own hands weak by biting them. Born of noble parents and married to an equally powerful man, I bore two twin children, and after them one other. But my husband's brother burned violently with unlawful love for me. Since chastity was my care above all, and I was willing neither to consent to so great a crime nor to reveal his brother's wickedness to my husband, I considered how I might escape undefiled and not make the brother an enemy and foe to his brother, so as not to bring the whole race of a noble family into disgrace. So I decided to leave my country and city with my two twins until the incestuous love should subside, which perhaps my presence was fostering and inflaming; the other son, I thought, should remain for his father's comfort.
7.16PG 1:1362a–1362b
Sed ut haec ita fieri possent, somnium finxi, quasi assistente mihi per visum quodam numine et dicente, ut confestim cum geminis meis Urbe discederem et tandiu abessem, donec redire me ipse praeciperet; quod si non facerem, cum liberis omnibus me pariter perituram. Et ita factum est. Statim enim ut somnium viro enarravi, extimuit, et sociatis mihi duobus filiis, servis quoque et ancillis, pecunia etiam abundanti data, navigare Athenas jubet ubi simul et erudire liberos possem, mansura, inquit, ibi usquequo visum fuerit ei qui praecepit exire, ut redeas ad nos. Interea navigans una cum meis natis ventorum violentia ad hos infelix nocturno naufragio depulsa sum locos, et cum omnes interissent, arreptam me crudelem supra saxum quoddam vehementior fluctus ejecit, ubi cum sederem ea sola spe qua meos possem forte natos invenire, in profundum me non praecipitavi, tunc cum adhuc perturbata anima et doloribus ebria facere hoc et audebat et poterat.
“But so that this might be done, I invented a dream, as if some divinity stood by me in a vision and told me to leave the city at once with my twins and stay away until he himself told me to return; and that if I did not do so, I would perish together with all my children. And so it was done. For as soon as I told the dream to my husband, he was alarmed, and, joining to me the two sons, with male and female slaves, and giving abundant money, he ordered me to sail to Athens, where I could also educate the children—‘to stay there,’ he said, ‘until it seems good to him who ordered you to leave that you should return to us.’ Meanwhile, sailing with my children, I was driven, unhappy woman, to these places by the violence of the winds in a shipwreck by night; and when all had perished, a stronger wave seized me, cruelly preserved, and threw me on a rock. Sitting there, only in the hope that I might perhaps find my children, I did not throw myself into the deep—then, when my soul, still distraught and drunk with griefs, both dared and was able to do it.
7.17PG 1:1362b
Verum ubi dies exortus est, et ego cum clamore et ululatu infelicium natorum circumspicerem sicubi vel ejecta possim videre cadavera, miseratione commoti quidam ex his qui me viderant, primo per pelagus, tum etiam circa littora requirunt, si quem forte de meis infantibus invenirent. Sed ubi nusquam ullus inventus est, miserantes me mulieres loci consolari coeperunt, enarrantes singulae suas quaeque miserias, ut ex similitudine calamitatum solatium caperem; quod me magis contristabat, non enim tale mihi erat ingenium, ut aliorum mala mea esse solatia ducerem. Et cum me multae hospitio cuperent recipere, una quaedam paupercula hic habitans extorsit mihi tugurio ejus succedere, dicens, fuisse sibi virum nautam eumque in mari adolescentem defunctum, sibique ex eo die cum multi eam accipere in conjugium cuperent, amore viri viduitatem fuisse chariorem. Erunt ergo, inquit, nobis communia, quaecunque manibus nostris operantes quaerere poterimus.
“But when day had risen, and I, with cries and wailing, was looking around for my unhappy children, to see whether I could at least see their bodies cast ashore, some of those who had seen me were moved by pity and searched first over the sea and then along the shores, in case they might find any of my children. But when none was found anywhere, the women of the place, pitying me, began to comfort me, each telling her own miseries, so that I might take comfort from the likeness of calamities. This saddened me the more, for I was not of such a disposition as to count the evils of others a comfort for my own. And when many wished to receive me as a guest, one poor woman who lives here prevailed on me to come into her hut, saying that she had had a husband, a sailor, who died young at sea, and that from that day, though many wished to take her in marriage, widowhood had been dearer to her out of love for her husband. ‘So,’ she said, ‘whatever we can earn by working with our hands shall be common to us.’
7.18PG 1:1362b
Et ne longa ac minus utili narratione utar, libenter habitavi cum ea propter affectum fidei quam servaverat viro. Sed non multo post mihi infelici, laceratae dudum morsibus, resolutae sunt manus, et illa quae me susceperat, incurrit paralysin et domi in lecto jacet. Illarum autem mulierum quae prius miserabantur, refrixit affectus; nos ambae debiles, ego ut vides sedeo stipem petens. et si quid forte quaesiero fit unus duarum infelicium cibus. Ecce jam quae mea sunt sufficienter audisti, tu nunc quid moraris implere quod promiseras, et dare medicamentum quo possit absque cruciatu, ut ais, utraque nostrum miserabilis vita:
“And not to use a long and unprofitable story, I gladly lived with her because of the faithful affection she had kept for her husband. But not long after, my hands, unhappy as I am, long torn by biting, became powerless; and she who had taken me in fell into paralysis and lies in bed at home. The affection of those women who had pitied me before has grown cold. We are both helpless; I, as you see, sit begging alms, and whatever I happen to get becomes the one meal of two unhappy women. See, you have now heard enough of my affairs; why do you delay to fulfill what you promised, and to give a remedy by which each of us may end her miserable life without torment, as you say?”
7.19PG 1:1363a
tione distractus velut attonitus stabat, et ego Clemens superveniens, Dudum, inquam, per omnia discurrens quaerebam te, et nunc quid facimus? At ille praecepit mihi ut ad naviculam praecederem, ibi me, inquit, opperire, et quia contradici ei non poterat, quod jussit implevi. Ipse vero, ut mihi cuncta posterius enarravit, suspicione quadam pulsatus requirebat a muliere genus et. patriam simul et nomina filiorum, quae si mihi, inquit, dixeris, dabo continuo medicamentum. At illa quasi vim sustinens, quia neque fateri haec volebat et medicamenti cupida erat, finxit alia ex aliis, et ait se quidem esse Ephesiam, virum autem Siculum, sed et filiorum nomina similiter immutavit. Tum Petrus putans eam verum respondisse ait: Heu! mulier, putabam, inquit, grande aliquod gaudium hodierna nobis die oriturum, suSpicabar enim te esse quamdam mulierem, de qua similia quaedam nuper ad fidem didici. At illa adjurabat eum dicens: Rogo te ut indices mihi quae ista sit, ut sciam, si est ulla inter mulieres me infelicior.
While she was saying this, Peter, distracted by much thought, stood as if thunderstruck. And I, Clement, coming up, said: “I have long been running everywhere looking for you; and now what are we to do?” He told me to go ahead to the boat. “Wait for me there,” he said. And because he could not be contradicted, I did what he ordered. But he, as he afterwards told me everything, struck by a certain suspicion, asked the woman her family and country and the names of her sons. “If you tell me these,” he said, “I will give you the remedy at once.” She, as though under compulsion—because she did not want to confess these things and yet desired the remedy—invented one thing after another, and said that she was an Ephesian and her husband a Sicilian, and likewise changed the names of her sons. Then Peter, thinking she had answered truly, said: “Alas, woman! I thought some great joy would arise for us today; for I suspected you were a certain woman about whom I recently learned some similar things on good faith.” But she adjured him, saying: “I beg you to tell me who she is, so that I may know whether there is any woman more unhappy than I.”
7.20PG 1:1363a
Tum Petrus fallere nesciens et miseratione commotus coepit dicere: Est quidam adolescens inter eos qui me sequuntur religionis et sectae gratia, Romanus civis, qui mihi enarravit quod patrem habuerit et duos geminos fratres, ex quibus nullus ei superest. Mater, inquit, mea sicut a patre didici, somnium vidit, ut Romana urbe ad tempus excederet cum duobus geminis natis, ne forte exitiali interitu deperirent; quae cum discessisset nusquam terrarum ultra comparuit. Pater vero suus post haec ad inquisitionem uxoris ac filiorum profectus nec ipse invenitur.
Then Peter, who did not know how to deceive, and moved by pity, began to say: “There is a certain young man among those who follow me for the sake of religion and of the way, a Roman citizen, who told me that he had a father and two twin brothers, of whom none is left to him. ‘My mother,’ he said, ‘as I learned from my father, saw a dream that she should leave the city of Rome for a time with her two twin children, lest they perish by a deadly destruction; and when she had left, she never appeared again anywhere on earth. And my father, after this, set out to search for his wife and sons, and he too is not found.’”
7.21PG 1:1363a
Haec cum dixisset Petrus, mulier stupore percussa corruit. Tum Petrus continere eam et consolari coepit, ac requirere quid esset causae aut quid pateretur. At illa vix aliquando spiritum revocans, ac semetipsam ad gaudii quod sperabat magnitudinem reparans simulque affricans vultum, Ubi, inquit, est quem dicis adolescens? At Petrus ubi rem intellexit, Dic, inquit, mihi tu prior, nam videre eum non poteris. Tum illa ε Ego, inquit, sum adolescentis mater. Et Petrus: Quod ei nomen est? At illa: Clemens, ait. Petrus: ipse est, et ipse erat, qui paulo ante mecum loquebatur et quem jussi ad navem praecedere. Tum illa procidens ad pedes Petri rogare coepit, ut festinaret ad navem. Et Petrus: Si mihi, inquit, servas fidem ut facias quod dico. At illa: Omnia, inquit, facio; tantum mihi ostende unicum meum natum, puto enim me per ipsum et geminos meos videre. Et Petrus: Cum videris, inquit, eum, modo interim dissimula paululum, usquequo egrediantur ab insula. Ita, inquit, faciam.
When Peter had said this, the woman, struck with amazement, collapsed. Peter began to hold her and comfort her, and to ask what was the matter or what she was suffering. Scarcely at last recovering her breath, and gathering herself for the greatness of the joy she hoped for, and at the same time rubbing her face, she said: “Where is this young man you speak of?” When Peter understood the matter, he said: “You tell me first; otherwise you cannot see him.” Then she said: “I am the young man's mother.” Peter said: “What is his name?” She said: “Clement.” Peter said: “It is he, and he it was who was speaking with me a little while ago, and whom I told to go ahead to the ship.” Then she fell at Peter's feet and began to beg him to hurry to the ship. Peter said: “If you will keep faith with me and do what I say.” She said: “I will do everything; only show me my only son, for I think that through him I shall see my twins too.” Peter said: “When you see him, just conceal it a little meanwhile, until we have left the island.” “I will do so,” she said.
7.22PG 1:1364a
Et tenens manum ejus Petrus adducebat eam ad navem. Quem ego videns manum dantem mulieri ridere coepi, accedens tamen honoris eius gratia, pro ipso coepi velle subjicere manum meam et sustentare mulierem; simul autem ut manum ejus contigi, ululatu ingenti reddito in amplexus meos irruit, et maternis me consectari osculis coepit. At ego ignorans omne negotium quasi insanientem mulierem repellebam, simul et, cum verecundia licet, indignabar tamen quodammodo adversum Petrum.
Holding her hand, Peter led her to the ship. When I saw him giving his hand to a woman, I began to laugh; yet, coming up out of respect for him, I wanted to put my hand under hers in his place and support the woman. But as soon as I touched her hand, she gave a great cry, rushed into my arms, and began to cover me with a mother's kisses. I, knowing nothing of the whole affair, pushed her away as a madwoman, and at the same time, though with respect, I was somewhat indignant with Peter.
7.23PG 1:1364a
At ille: Desine, inquit, quid agis, ο fili Clemens? noli repellere tuam matrem. Ego vero ubi haec audivi, continuo lacrymis suffusus concidi supra jacentem matrem et osculari eam coepi. Simul enim ut audivi, paulatim vultum ejus revocabam ad memoriam et notior mihi intuenti tanto magis fiebat. Multitudo interim conveniebat plurima, audiens quod mulier quae ad stipem petendam sedebat, recognita esset a filio suo viro quodam bona. Et cum velimus confestim enavigare ex insula, mater ait ad me: Fili dulcissime, rectum est ut valedicam mulierculae quae me suscepit, est enim egens et paralytica, jacens in lectulo. Quibus auditis Petrus et omnes qui aderant, admirati sunt bonitatem ac prudentiam feminae, et continuo jussit Petrus abire quosdam et deferre mulierem in lectulo ubi jacebat. Cumque fuisset allata et in medio turbae astantis posita, in conspectu omnium Petrus ait: Si veritatis ego sum praeco, ad confirmandam fidem horum omnium qui assistunt, ut sciant et credant quia unus est Deus qui caelum fecit ac terram, in nomine Jesu Christi Filii ejus, surgat haec mulier. Et statim ut haec dixisset, surrexit sana et procidit ad pedes Petri, atque amicam suam ac familiarem osculis petens. percontabatur ab ea quid istud esset negotii. At illa breviter omnem ei ordinem agnitionis exposuit, ita ut etiam turba: astantes mirarentur.
But he said: “Stop! What are you doing, my son Clement? Do not push away your mother.” When I heard this, at once bathed in tears I fell upon my mother lying there and began to kiss her. For as soon as I heard it, I gradually recalled her face to memory, and the more I looked, the more familiar it became to me. Meanwhile a very great crowd gathered, hearing that the woman who used to sit begging alms had been recognized by her son, a good man. And when we wished to sail at once from the island, my mother said to me: “Sweetest son, it is right that I say farewell to the poor woman who took me in; for she is needy and paralyzed, lying in her bed.” When Peter and all who were present heard this, they admired the goodness and prudence of the woman, and Peter at once ordered some to go and bring the woman on the bed where she lay. When she had been brought and placed in the middle of the crowd standing by, Peter said in the sight of all: “If I am a herald of the truth, to confirm the faith of all these who stand by, so that they may know and believe that there is one God who made heaven and earth, in the name of Jesus Christ his Son let this woman rise.” As soon as he had said this, she rose healed and fell at Peter's feet; and, kissing her friend and companion, she asked her what all this meant. She briefly told her the whole course of the recognition, so that the crowds standing by also marveled.
7.24PG 1:1364a–1365a
Tum Petrus de fide Dei ac religionis institutis, quod ad se pertinebat, in quantum tempus patiebatur locutus ad turbas, addit etiam hoc, ut si quis vellet de his diligentius noscere, Antiochiam veniret, ubi tribus, inquit, mensibus statuimus residere et quae ad salutem pertinent edocere. Si enim. inquit, negotiandi causa aut militandi patriam relinquunt homines ac parentes, et longas peregrinationes subire non metuunt, pro vita aeterna tribus saltem mensibus peregrinari, cur onerosum videatur ac difficile? Cumque haec et alia his similia dixisset, ego mulieri quae susceperat matrem et sanitatem receperat per Petrum, mille drachmas donavi, et praesentibus cunctis commendavi cuidam viro bono, primario illius oppidi, qui ei libenter se facturum quod imperabamus Spopondit. Sed et aliis quibusdam aliquantulum pecuniae distribui, et illis mulieribus quae aliquando solatae dicebantur in miseriis matrem meam, quibus et gratias retuli. Et post haec una cum matre enavigavimus Antaradum. ’
Then Peter, having spoken to the crowds about faith in God and the institutions of religion, as far as it concerned him and as much as time allowed, added this as well: if anyone wished to know these things more thoroughly, let him come to Antioch, “where,” he said, “we have decided to stay three months and teach what pertains to salvation. For if men leave their country and parents for the sake of trade or military service, and do not fear to undertake long journeys abroad, why should it seem burdensome and difficult to go abroad for at least three months for eternal life?” When he had said this and other things like it, I gave a thousand drachmas to the woman who had taken in my mother and had received health through Peter, and in the presence of all I commended her to a good man, a leading citizen of that town, who promised that he would gladly do what we asked. I also distributed some money to certain others, and to those women who were said to have once comforted my mother in her miseries, and I thanked them. After this we sailed with my mother to Antaradus.
7.25PG 1:1365a–1365b
Cumque venissemus ad hospitium, mater requirere coepit a me, quonam devenisset pater. Cui ego: Ad te, inquam, requirendam profectus ultra non rediit. At illa audiens suspiravit tantum, grande enim pro me gaudium habens reliquos solabatur maerores. Die autem postera sedens una cum uxore Petri iter agebat nobiscum, et venimus Balaneas, ubi triduo remorati, inde accessimus Patho et post hoc Gabala, et sic Laodiciam pervenimus, ubi ante portas occurrunt nobis Niceta et Aquila et osculantes nos abducunt in hospitium. Petrus autem videns amplam civitatem et splendidam, Dignum est, inquit, remorari nos in hac diebus decem aut etiam amplius. Tum Niceta cum Aquila requirebant a me, quae esset mulier haec ignota. Et ego respondi: Mater mea est quam mihi redonavit Deus per dominum meum Petrum.
When we had come to the lodging, my mother began to ask me what had become of my father. I said to her: “He set out to look for you and never came back.” When she heard this she only sighed; for having great joy on my account, she consoled her other griefs. On the following day she travelled with us, sitting together with Peter's wife, and we came to Balaneae, where we stayed three days; from there we went to Paltus, and after that to Gabala, and so we reached Laodicea. Before the gates Niceta and Aquila met us, kissed us, and took us to the lodging. Peter, seeing the large and splendid city, said: “It is worthwhile for us to stay in it ten days or even more.” Then Niceta and Aquila asked me who this unknown woman was. I answered: “She is my mother, whom God has given back to me through my lord Peter.”
7.26PG 1:1365b–1366a
Haec cum ego dixissem, cuncta eis Petrus per ordinem coepit exponere et ait: Cum venissemus Aradum et ego vos praecedere iussissem, profectis vobis, eadem die Clemens cum incidisset sermonis occasio, genus suum mihi exposuit ac familiam, et quod parentibus esset orbatus duosque habuisset priores se geminos fratres; et sicut mihi, inquit, pater enarravit, somnium vidit aliquando mater, quo jussa est cum geminis suis ex urbe Roma proficisci, ne subito et pariter interirent. Cumque somnium patri indicasset, ille qui tenero filios diligeret affectu, ne quid forte mali paterentur, uxorem pariter ac filios navi cum omnibus necessariis impositos, emittit Athenas erudiendos. Post haec misit semel et iterum qui requirerent, et nusquam illius ne vestigium quidem reperit. Ipse ad ultimum pater ad inquirendum proficiscitur, et usque ad praesens nec ipse quidem usquam est. Haec cum mihi Clemens enarrasset, accessit ad nos quidam rogans, ut ad insulam Aradum quae vicina erat accederemus, videndi gratia columnas viteas mirae magnitudinis; acquievi, ventum est ad locum, caeteri omnes interiora aedis ingressi, mihi animus nescio ob quam causam ingrediendi ultra non fuit.
When I had said this, Peter began to explain everything to them in order, and said: “When we had come to Aradus and I had told you to go ahead, after you left, that same day, when an occasion for conversation arose, Clement told me his family and household: that he had been bereaved of his parents and had had two twin brothers older than himself. ‘And as my father told me,’ he said, ‘my mother once saw a dream in which she was ordered to leave the city of Rome with her twins, lest they suddenly perish together. When she told the dream to my father, he, who loved his sons with tender affection, so that they might not suffer some harm, put his wife and sons on a ship with all necessities and sent them to Athens to be educated. After this he sent once and again to inquire, and found not even a trace of her anywhere. At last my father himself set out to search, and up to the present he too is nowhere.’ When Clement had told me this, someone came to us asking us to go to the nearby island of Aradus to see vine-wood columns of wonderful size. I agreed; we came to the place; all the others went into the inner part of the temple, but I, for some reason I do not know, had no wish to go further in.
7.27PG 1:1366a–1366b
Sed dum illos foris opperior, mulierem hanc considerare coepi qua parte membrorum esset debilis, ut non labore manuum victum quaereret, sed mendicitatis pudorem subiret; requiro ergo ab ea causas. Illa nobili se ortam genere, et nobili nihilominus viro in matrimonio fuisse junctam fatetur, cujus frater, inquit, in me illicito amore inflammatus fraternum torum polluere cupiebat. Quod ego abhorrens, et rursum de tanto scelere viro indicare non audens, ne bellum fratribus et opprobrium generi indicerem, magis ex patria discedere judicavi cum duobus geminis filiis meis, juniore puero ad solatium patri relicto. Et ut haec, inquit, honesta specie fierent, cogitavi somnium fingere et dicere viro, astitisse mihi numen quoddam per visum et dixisse, ut cum duobus geminis meis confestim ex Urbe proficiscerer, usquequo ab ipso audirem, quando redire deberem. Quibus auditis, credidisse aiebat virum, et Athenas se geminis cum liberis emisisse inibi erudiendis, sed tempestate gravi ad hanc insulam fuisse depulsos, ubi, confracta navi, se fluctu excussam supra saxum quoddam, ob hoc solum mortem distulisse, donec, inquit, infelicium natorum meorum saltem emortua membra complecterer, ac sepulturae mandarem. Sed cum dies fuisset exortus et turbae convenissent, miseratione moti projecerunt mihi indumentum. At ego infelix fletibus multis rogabam ut requirerent, sicubi infelicium natorum possint invenire corpuscula. Ego autem omne corpus meum dentibus lanians, planctibus et ululatibus nihil aliud clamabam nisi, Ubi mihi infelici Faustus est, ubi Faustinus?
“But while I waited for them outside, I began to observe this woman, in what part of her limbs she was disabled, that she did not seek a living by the labor of her hands but submitted to the shame of begging. So I asked her the reasons. She confessed that she was born of a noble family and joined in marriage to a husband no less noble, ‘whose brother,’ she said, ‘inflamed with unlawful love for me, wished to defile his brother's bed. I abhorred this, and yet did not dare to reveal so great a crime to my husband, lest I should bring war upon the brothers and disgrace upon the family; so I judged it better to leave my country with my two twin sons, leaving the younger boy to comfort his father. And so that this might be done with an honorable appearance,’ she said, ‘I thought of inventing a dream and telling my husband that some divinity had stood by me in a vision and told me to leave the city at once with my two twins until I should hear from him when I ought to return.’ She said that when her husband heard this he believed it and sent her with the twins to Athens to have them educated there; but they had been driven by a severe storm to this island, where, the ship being broken up, she was cast by a wave onto a rock, and she had put off death only ‘until,’ she said, ‘I might embrace at least the dead limbs of my unhappy children and commit them to burial. But when day had risen and crowds had gathered, moved by pity they threw me a garment. And I, unhappy, with many tears begged them to search, in case they could find the little bodies of my unhappy children anywhere. And tearing my whole body with my teeth, with laments and wailings I cried out nothing else but: Where is my Faustus, unhappy woman that I am? Where is Faustinus?’”
7.28PG 1:1366b–1367a
Et cum haec diceret Petrus, Niceta et Aquila subito assurgunt et stupefacti perturbari coeperunt dicentes: Dominator Domine et Deus omnium, verane haec sunt, an somnium est quod agitur? Tum Petrus: Nisi, inquit, nos insani sumus, haec vera sunt. At illi paululum remorati et confricantes faciem, aiunt: Nos sumus Faustinus et Faustus. Sed et ab initio cum narrare coepisti, statim in suspicionem incidimus, ne forte ad nos pertinerent quae dicebantur; rursus tamen considerantes multa similia accidere in vita hominum, reticuimus, licet cor nostrum spe aliqua pulsaretur. Aspiciebamus ergo ad finem sermonis, ut, si ad integrum de nobis esse constaret, tum fateremur. Et cum haec dixissent, lacrymantes ingrediebantur ad matrem. Quam cum reperissent quiescentem et complecti vellent, prohibuit Petrus dicens: Sinite me prius praeparare animos matris et ita vos offerre ei, ne forte multo et subito gaudio mente excidat et sensus ejus turbetur, maxime quia nunc etiam somno occupata stupet.
While Peter was saying this, Niceta and Aquila suddenly stood up and, astounded, began to be agitated, saying: “Lord and Ruler, God of all, are these things true, or is what is happening a dream?” Then Peter said: “Unless we are mad, these things are true.” After a short pause, rubbing their faces, they said: “We are Faustinus and Faustus. From the beginning, when you began to tell the story, we at once suspected that what was being said might concern us; yet again, considering that many similar things happen in men's lives, we kept silent, though our heart was beating with some hope. So we were waiting for the end of the story, so that if it were clearly established that it was wholly about us, we might then declare it.” When they had said this, they went in weeping to their mother. When they found her asleep and wanted to embrace her, Peter prevented them, saying: “Let me first prepare your mother's mind and so present you to her, lest by great and sudden joy she lose her mind and her senses be disturbed, especially since she is now still dazed with sleep.”
7.29PG 1:1367a–1367b
Igitur ubi mater exsurrexit e somno, alloqui eam Petrus coepit dicens: Scire te volo, mulier, religionis nostra: observantiam. Nos unum colimus Deum qui fecit mundum, hujus et legem servamus, qua mandat in primis ipsum colendum et nomen ejus venerandum, parentes honorandos, pudicitiam justitiamque servandam. Sed et illud observamus, mensam cum gentilibus non habere communem, nisi cum crediderint et recepta veritate baptizati fuerint, ac trina quadam beati nominis invocatione consecrati, et tunc cum eis cibum sumimus. Alioquin etiam si pater aut mater sint, aut uxor aut filii aut fratres, non possumus cum eis mensam habere communem. Quia ergo religionis causa praecipua hoc facimus, non tibi injuriosum videatur, quod non potest filius tuus una tecum sumere cibum, usquequo eadem tibi sit quae illi sententia fidei.
So when the mother rose from sleep, Peter began to speak to her, saying: “I want you to know, woman, the observance of our religion. We worship one God, who made the world, and we keep his law, which commands first of all that he be worshiped and his name venerated, parents honored, and chastity and justice kept. We also observe this: not to share a table with Gentiles unless they have believed and, having received the truth, have been baptized and consecrated by a certain threefold invocation of the blessed name; and then we take food with them. Otherwise, even if they are father or mother, or wife or children or brothers, we cannot share a table with them. Since, then, we do this chiefly for the sake of religion, do not think it an injury that your son cannot take food with you until you hold the same conviction of faith as he.”
7.30PG 1:1367b–1367d
Quibus illa auditis, Et quid, inquit, vetat hodie me baptizari? quae etiam priusquam te viderem, illos quos dicunt deos penitus aversata sum, quod mihi frequenter et pene quotidie sacrificanti sibi praestare potuerunt nihil. Nam de pudicitia quid dicam? cum me neque tunc delicias deceperint, neque nunc egestas peccare compulerit. Satis autem puto innotuisse tibi, quantus mihi exinde fuerit amor pudicitiae, quae ut evaderem illiciti amoris insidias somnium finxi, ut cum duobus meis geminis peregrinarer, et hunc solum filium meum Clementem ad solatium patri reliqui. Si enim mihi duo vix sufficiebant, quanto magis contristasset patrem, si nullum penitus habuisset? Erat enim miser grandi affectu erga filios, ita ut vix ei somnii auctoritas extorqueret, Faustinum et Faustum Clementis hujus fratres mihi concedere, et ipse solo contentus esset Clemente.
When she heard this, she said: “And what prevents me from being baptized today? Even before I saw you, I had wholly turned away from those they call gods, because, though I sacrificed to them often and almost daily, they could do nothing for me. And what shall I say of chastity? Neither did luxuries deceive me then, nor has poverty compelled me to sin now. I think you have been sufficiently informed how great my love of chastity has been from the start, since, to escape the snares of unlawful love, I invented a dream so as to go abroad with my two twins, and left this my only son Clement to comfort his father. For if two were scarcely enough for me, how much more would it have saddened his father if he had had none at all? For the poor man had great affection for his sons, so that the authority of the dream scarcely wrung from him the concession of Faustinus and Faustus, the brothers of this Clement, to me, while he himself was content with Clement alone.”
7.31PG 1:1367d–1368a
Haec illa cum diceret, ultra non ferentes fratres mei irruunt in complexus matris cum multis lacrymis, et osculantur eam. At illa: Quid vult, inquit, hoc esse? Tum Petrus: Nolo turberis, mulier, constans esto; isti sunt Faustinus et Faustus filii tui quos in profundo perisse dicebas; quomodo autem vivant et quomodo in illa horribili nocte de profundo evaserint, et quemadmodum alius ipsorum Niceta et alius Aquila dicatur, ipsi tibi exponere poterunt et una tecum etiam nos audiemus. Ubi haec Petrus dixit, mater nimio gaudio intercepta corruit, et tandem aliquando reparata atque in se metipsam regressa, ait: Obsecro vos, dulcissimi filii, dicite mihi, quae acciderint vobis post illam feralem et crudelissimam noctem.
As she was saying this, my brothers, unable to bear it any longer, rushed into their mother's embrace with many tears and kissed her. She said: “What does this mean?” Then Peter said: “Do not be troubled, woman; be steady. These are Faustinus and Faustus, your sons, whom you said had perished in the deep. How they are alive, and how they escaped from the deep on that dreadful night, and how one of them is called Niceta and the other Aquila, they themselves will be able to tell you, and we too will hear it together with you.” When Peter said this, the mother, overcome by excessive joy, collapsed; and when at last she had recovered and come to herself, she said: “I beg you, my sweetest sons, tell me what happened to you after that deadly and most cruel night.”
7.32PG 1:1368a–1368b
Tum Niceta coepit dicere: In illa nocte, ο mater, cum navis fuisset resoluta et nos innitentes fragmento cuidam tabularum per pelagus jactaremur, viri quidam quibus per profundum latrocinari artificium est, repertos imposuerunt nos naviculae suae, et remis undarum vortices superantes. diversis itineribus Caesaream Stratonis perduxerunt, ibique affligentes nos fame, verberibus, metu, uti ne quod esset in vero proderemus, immutatis etiam nominibus nostris vendiderunt nos cuidam viduae, honesta: admodum feminae. Justa nomine; quae eum emisset, habuit loco filiorum. ita ut etiam Graecis nos litteris et liberalibus attentissime erudiret. Ubi vero adolevimus, etiam philosophorum studiis operam dedimus, quo possemus religionis divina: dogmata philosophicis disputationibus asserentes confutare gentiles.
Then Niceta began to say: “On that night, mother, when the ship had broken up and we, clinging to a piece of the planks, were being tossed about the sea, some men whose trade is robbery on the deep found us and put us in their boat; and overcoming the eddies of the waves with their oars, they brought us by various routes to Caesarea Stratonis. There they afflicted us with hunger, beatings, and fear, so that we would not betray the truth, and changing our names they sold us to a widow, a very honorable woman named Justa. When she had bought us, she held us in the place of sons, so that she even educated us most attentively in Greek letters and the liberal arts. When we grew up we also devoted ourselves to the studies of the philosophers, so that by philosophical disputations we might refute the Gentiles while asserting the doctrines of the divine religion.
7.33PG 1:1368b
Simoni autem cuidam mago qui nobiscum una educatus est, pro amicitiis et puerili consuetudine adhaesimus, ita ut pene ab eo decipi possemus. Fertur enim in religione nostra fama de propheta quodam, cujus ab omnibus qui religioni huic deserviunt speraretur adventus, per quem immortalis et beata vita credentibus danda promittitur. Hunc ergo nos putabamus esse Simonem. Sed haec tibi, mater, opportunius exponentur. Nos interim cum pene jam deciperemur a Simone, quidam collega domini mei Petri, Zacchaeus nomine, monuit ne falleremur a mago, sed obtulit nos advenienti Petro ut ab ipso quae erant sana et perfecta doceremur; quod et tibi Optamus evenire, sicut et nobis concessit Deus, ut possimus etiam cibum et mensam habere communem. Hinc ergo fuit, mater, quod nos a piratis raptos, tu in mari defunctos esse credidisti.
“We attached ourselves to a certain Simon, a magician, who was brought up with us, out of friendship and childhood companionship, so that we were almost deceived by him. For there is a report in our religion about a certain prophet, whose coming was hoped for by all who serve this religion, through whom immortal and blessed life is promised to be given to believers. We thought, then, that this was Simon. But these things will be explained to you, mother, more fittingly later. Meanwhile, when we were almost deceived by Simon, a colleague of my lord Peter, named Zacchaeus, warned us not to be misled by the magician, and presented us to Peter when he arrived, so that we might be taught by him what was sound and perfect. We wish this to happen to you too, as God has granted it to us, so that we may also share food and table. This, then, is why you, mother, believed that we who had been carried off by pirates had died in the sea.”
7.34PG 1:1368b–1368d
Cum haec dixisset Niceta, mater nostra procidit ad pedes Petri, rogans et obsecrans, ut et seipsam et hospitam suam evocaret sine mora ac baptizaret, uti ne una, inquit, die damnum patiar consortii et societatis natorum meorum. Similiter autem et nos filii ejus rogabamus Petrum. At ille: Quid putatis, inquit, quia ego immisericors sum solus, et nolo vos matris convivio sociari? Sed necesse est eam vel una die jejunare prius et ita baptizari, et hoc quia sermonem ab ea quemdam audivi, per quem mihi fides ejus claruit et qui indicium dedit credulitatis ejus, alioqui multis eam diebus oportebat ante instrui et doceri.
When Niceta had said this, our mother fell at Peter's feet, asking and begging him to send for her hostess and herself without delay and baptize them, “so that,” she said, “I may not suffer the loss of the companionship and fellowship of my children even for one day.” Likewise we her sons also asked Peter. But he said: “What do you think—that I alone am unmerciful and do not want you to share a meal with your mother? But she must first fast at least one day and so be baptized. And this is because I heard a certain word from her by which her faith became clear to me and which gave evidence of her belief; otherwise she would have had to be instructed and taught for many days beforehand.”
7.35PG 1:1368d–1369b
Et ego: Quaeso te, inquam, domine mi Petre, dic quis est iste sermo quem dicis dedisse tibi indicium fidei ejus? Et Petrus: Ille sermo est quo rogavit, ut et hospita sua cujus beneficiis vicem reddere desiderat, simul baptizetur cum ipsa Non autem rogaret, ut illi quam diligit praestaretur haec gratia, nisi credidisset quod magnum aliquod in baptismate munus esset. Unde et ego '° reprehendo plurimos qui cum ipsi baptizentur et credant, nihil tamen dignum fide agunt cum his quos diligunt, id est uxoribus vel filiis vel amicis, quos non ad hoc hortantur quod ipsi assecuti sunt, si quidem vere crediderint quod aeterna vita per hoc donatur. Denique si eos aegrotare videant aut periculo alicui carnaliter subjacere, dolent et lugent, quia in hoc certi sunt eis imminere perniciem. Ita ergo, si et de hoc certi essent quod qui Deum non colunt, manet eos poena ignis aeterni, quando cessarent monentes et cohortantes? Aut si obsisterent, quomodo non lugerent eos et plangerent, certi iis eis imminere supplicia? Nunc ergo illam quidem mulierem evocabimus postmodum, et videbimus si amat fidem religionis nostrae, et prout consequens fuerit agemus. Haec autem quoniam fideliter sensit de baptismo, jejunet vel una die ante baptismum.
I said: “I beg you, my lord Peter, tell me what this word is that you say has given you evidence of her faith.” Peter said: “It is the word by which she asked that her hostess too, whose kindnesses she desires to repay, be baptized together with her. She would not ask that this grace be given to one she loves unless she believed that there is some great gift in baptism. Hence I also blame very many who, though they themselves are baptized and believe, yet do nothing worthy of faith toward those they love—that is, wives or children or friends—whom they do not urge to what they themselves have obtained, if indeed they truly believe that eternal life is given through it. For if they see them sick or exposed to some bodily danger, they grieve and mourn, because in this they are sure that ruin threatens them. So, if they were also sure of this, that the punishment of eternal fire awaits those who do not worship God, when would they stop warning and exhorting? Or if they resisted, how would they not mourn and lament them, being sure that punishments threaten them? Now, then, we will send for that woman afterward and see whether she loves the faith of our religion, and we will act as follows from that. But this woman, since she has thought faithfully about baptism, let her fast at least one day before baptism.”
7.36PG 1:1369b
At illa cum juramento satisfaciebat praesente uxore domini mei Petri, quia ex quo recognoverit filium, prae multo gaudio cibum capere omnino nequiverit, nisi hesterna die calicem aqua: solum biberit. Testabatur autem et uxor Petri, dicens ita esse. Et Aquila ait: Quid ergo obstat cur non baptizetur? Tum Petrus subridens: Sed non est, inquit. hoc jejunium baptismi, quod non propter baptismum jejunatum est. Et Niceta: Sed forte, inquit, volens Deus matrem nostram nec una die agnitis nobis separari a consortio mensa: nostrae, praeordinavit hoc ut ante jejunaret. Sicut enim pudicitiam servavit in ignorantia, ut proficeret ei ad baptismi gratiam, ita jejunavit antequam sciret jejunii rationem, ut proficeret ei ad baptismum, et statim ab initio agnitionis nostra: nobiscum pariter mensa: consortio frueretur.
But she gave assurance with an oath, in the presence of the wife of my lord Peter, that from the time she recognized her son she had been wholly unable to take food for great joy, except that yesterday she had drunk only a cup of water. Peter's wife also testified, saying that it was so. Aquila said: “What then prevents her from being baptized?” Then Peter, smiling, said: “But this is not a fast of baptism, since it was not fasted for the sake of baptism.” Niceta said: “But perhaps God, not wishing our mother to be separated from the fellowship of our table even for one day after recognizing us, preordained this, that she should fast beforehand. For as she kept chastity in ignorance so that it might profit her for the grace of baptism, so she fasted before she knew the reason for fasting, so that it might profit her for baptism, and she might enjoy fellowship at table with us from the very beginning of our recognition.”
7.37PG 1:1369b–1370b
Tum Petrus: Non nos, inquit, vincat malignus occasione accepta per affectum matris, sed magis vos et ego vobiscum hodie jejunemus cum ipsa, et crastino baptizabitur; neque enim justum est ad gratiam persona: alicujus et amicitiae, resolvi et extenuari praecepta veritatis. Non ergo pigeat nos magis laborare eum illa, quia omne mandatum praeterire peccatum est. Doceamus autem sensus nostros corporales qui extrinsecus sunt, servire interioribus sensibus, et non interiores sensus, qui quae Dei sunt sapiunt, cogamus sequi exteriores, qui quae carnis sunt sapiunt. Propter hoc“ enim et Dominus mandatum dedit, dicens: Quicunque viderit mulierem ad concupiscendam eam, jam moechatus est eam in corde suo. Et his addidit: Si oculus tuus dexter scandalizat te, erue eum et abjice abs te; expedit enim tibi ut unum membrorum tuorum pereat, quam totum corpus tuum mittatur in gehennam ignis. Non dixit: scandalizavit te, ut posteaquam peccaveris tunc abjicias causam peccati, sed: si scandalizat te, hoc est, ut antequam pecces, causam peccati provocantis te et irritantis abscidas. Nequis autem vestrum putet, fratres, quod membrorum amputationem mandaverit Dominus: propositum in hoc vult resecari, non membra et causas quae ad peccandum illiciunt, quo cogitatio nostra aspectus vehiculo subvecta, ad amorem Dei sensibus corporeis invisa contendat. nec carnalibus oculis, velut lascivientibus equis et extra mandatorum viam currum declinare cupientibus, relaxet frena et habenas indulgeat; sed revocet aspectum corporis ad arbitrium mentis, et oculos nostros quos Deus operis sui inspectores esse voluit et testes, non patiatur fieri lenones mali desiderii. Et ideo cedant legi Dei tam corporei sensus quam interna cogitatio, et illius voluntati ministrent cujus se opera esse intelligunt.
Then Peter said: “Let not the evil one overcome us, seizing the occasion through affection for your mother; rather, let you and I with you fast today along with her, and tomorrow she will be baptized. For it is not right that the precepts of truth be relaxed and weakened for the sake of anyone's person and friendship. So let us not be reluctant to labor more with her, because to pass over any commandment is sin. Let us teach our bodily senses, which are outward, to serve the inward senses, and not compel the inward senses, which savor the things of God, to follow the outward ones, which savor the things of the flesh. For this reason the Lord also gave a commandment, saying: ‘Whoever looks at a woman to desire her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.’ And to this he added: ‘If your right eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is better for you that one of your members perish than that your whole body be thrown into the gehenna of fire.’ He did not say ‘has caused you to stumble,’ as though you should cast away the cause of sin after you have sinned, but ‘if it causes you to stumble,’ that is, so that before you sin you may cut off the cause of the sin that provokes and incites you. But let none of you think, brothers, that the Lord commanded the cutting off of members. He wishes the purpose to be cut off, not the members—and the causes that entice to sin—so that our thought, carried on the vehicle of sight, may strive toward the love of God, unseen by the bodily senses, and may not slacken the reins and give free rein to the carnal eyes, like wanton horses eager to turn the chariot aside from the way of the commandments; but may call back the sight of the body to the judgment of the mind, and not allow our eyes, which God willed to be the observers and witnesses of his work, to become the panders of evil desire. And so let both the bodily senses and the inner thought yield to the law of God, and serve the will of him whose work they understand themselves to be.”
7.38PG 1:1370b–1372a
Igitur ut ordo mysterii poscebat et ratio, die postera baptizatur in mari, et regressa ad hospitium omnibus consequenter mysteriis religionis imbuitur. Aderamus autem et nos filii sui, Niceta et Aquila et ego Clemens. Et post haec simul cum ea prandimus, et simul glorificavimus Deum, referentes gratias studiis et doctrinae Petri, qui nobis ostendit per occasionem matris, quomodo pudicitia: bonum non pereat apud Deum, sicut econtrario impudicitia, inquit, etiamsi non statim, tamen licet tarde non effugit poenam. In tantum autem pudicitia, inquit, Deo placita est, ut etiam his qui in errore sunt positi, nonnihil gratiae in praesenti conferat vita. Nam futura beatitudo illis solum reposita est, qui per gratiam baptismi pudicitiam justitiamque servaverint. Denique exemplo est huic rei etiam hoc, quod erga matrem vestram gestum cst, cui salus haec omnis pro mercede pudicitiae reparata est, ad quam custodiendam et conservandam non sufficit sola continentia, sed ubi senserit quis insidias et deceptionem parari, continuo sicut ab ignis impetu aut incursu canis rabidi refugiat, nec confidat quod hujusmodi insidias possit facile aliquis philosophando aut palpando cohibere; sed, ut dixi, effugiendum est et longe abscedendum, sicut fecit et vestra mater vere et integre bonum diligens pudicitiae. Propter quod et conservata vobis est ac vos illi, insuper autem et aeternae vitae agnitione donata. Cum hazc et multa alia his similia dixisset, vespere facto requievimus.
So, as the order and reason of the mystery required, on the following day she was baptized in the sea, and, returning to the lodging, she was instructed in turn in all the mysteries of religion. We her sons were present, Niceta and Aquila and I, Clement. After this we dined with her and together glorified God, giving thanks for the zeal and teaching of Peter, who showed us, on the occasion of our mother, how the good of chastity does not perish before God; “just as, on the contrary,” he said, “unchastity, even if not at once, nevertheless, though late, does not escape punishment. So pleasing to God,” he said, “is chastity, that it confers some grace in the present life even on those who are in error. For future blessedness is reserved only for those who through the grace of baptism have kept chastity and justice. Indeed what was done for your mother is an example of this: all this salvation has been restored to her as the reward of chastity. To guard and preserve it, continence alone is not enough; but when someone perceives that snares and deception are being prepared, let him flee at once as from the onrush of fire or the attack of a mad dog, and not trust that anyone can easily restrain snares of this kind by philosophizing or by coaxing. Rather, as I said, one must flee and go far away, as your mother did, truly and wholly loving the good of chastity. For this reason she was preserved for you and you for her, and besides she has been given the knowledge of eternal life.” When he had said these and many other similar things, evening came and we rested.
Chapter 8
8.1PG 1:1371a–1371b
Postera autem die Petrus mane assumptis fratribus meis et me, descendit ad portum, ut in mari lavaremus, et post boc ad locum quemdam secretiorem secessimus orationis gratia. Senex autem quidam pauper, et ut apparebat ex habitu operarius. curiose ex occulto observare nos coepit, ut videret quid ageremus in secreto positi. Cumque nos orantes vidisset, exspectavit donec exiremus, et salutans nos ait: Si non aegre accipitis, et quasi curiosum me aut importunum notatis, velim vobiscum conferre sermonem, quia habens miserationem vestri, sub specie veritatis errare vos nollem et habere metum de bis quae non sunt; aut si putatis esse aliquid veri, tradite etiam mihi. Si ergo patienter accipitis, possum vos paucis edocere quae recta sunt; si vero molestum, pergam et meos actus agam. Cui Petrus respondit: Dic age quod tibi videtur bonum, et libenter accipimus sive id verum sive etiam falsum sit; amplectendus enim es, quia quod tibi bonum videtur, tanquam pater pro filiis sollicitus commonere voluisti.
On the next day, early in the morning, Peter took my brothers and me and went down to the harbor so that we might bathe in the sea, and after this we withdrew to a more secluded place to pray. A certain poor old man, a workman as appeared from his dress, began to watch us curiously from hiding, to see what we were doing in that secluded place. When he had seen us praying, he waited until we came out, and greeting us said: “If you do not take it ill and do not mark me as inquisitive or intrusive, I should like to have a word with you. For I pity you, and would not want you to go astray under the appearance of truth and to be afraid of things that do not exist; or if you think there is something true in them, pass it on to me as well. If, then, you will take it patiently, I can teach you in a few words what is right; but if it is troublesome, I will go on and do my own business.” Peter answered him: “Come, say what seems good to you, and we will gladly receive it, whether it is true or false. For you are to be embraced, because, like a father anxious for his sons, you have wished to warn us of what seems good to you.”
8.2PG 1:1371b
Tum senior coepit dicere: In mari vos lavisse vidi, et post hoc ad secretum secessisse locum; observans ergo de occulto quid in secreto ageretis, orantes inspexi; miseratus igitur errorem vestrum, opperiri coepi, usquequo egressos alloquerer et docerem, ne erretis in hujusmodi observantia, quia neque Deus est neque cultus hic aliquis est, neque providentia in mundo, sed fortuitus casus et genesis agunt omnia, sicut ego ex meipso manifestissime comperi in disciplina matheseos pra: caeteris eruditus. Nolite ergo errare; sive enim oretis, sive non oretis, quod genesis vestra continet, hoc erit vobis. Et ego Clemens nescio quid corde pulsabar, multa quasi nota mihi recolens in eo; bene enim ait quidam. quia quod ex aliquo natum est, etiamsi multo tempore abfuerit, nunquam tamen scintilla propinquitatis exstinguitur. Coepi ergo interrogare ab eo, quis et unde esset, vel quomodo ortus. At ille ad haec respondere nolens: Quid, ait, hoc pertinet ad ea quae dixi vobis? Sed primo, si videtur, sermo de his quae proposuimus habeatur, et post haec si ita res poposcerit, nomen et genus ac patriam et caetera quae haec sequuntur, invicem nobis ut amici amicis poterimus aperire. Mirabamur tamen omnes eloquentiam viri, et gravitatem morum tranquillitatemque sermonis.
Then the old man began to say: “I saw you bathing in the sea, and after that withdrawing to a secluded place. So, watching from hiding what you were doing in secret, I saw you praying. Pitying your error, I began to wait until I could speak to you when you came out and teach you not to go astray in an observance of this kind. For there is neither God nor any worship, nor providence in the world, but chance and birth-fate do everything, as I have found out most clearly from my own case, being trained above others in the discipline of astrology. Do not go astray, then; for whether you pray or do not pray, what your birth-fate holds, this will happen to you.” And I, Clement, was somehow stirred in heart, recalling many things in him as if familiar to me. For someone has well said that what is born of another, even if it has been away for a long time, yet the spark of kinship is never extinguished. So I began to ask him who he was and where he came from, or how he was born. But he, unwilling to answer this, said: “What has this to do with what I said to you? But first, if you please, let us have the discussion on what we proposed; and after that, if the matter requires, we can disclose to one another as friends to friends our name and family and country and the rest that follows.” Yet we all admired the man's eloquence, and the gravity of his bearing and the calmness of his speech.
8.3PG 1:1371b–1372b
Petrus autem sensim sermocinando incedens, opportunum ad colloquendum prospicit locum. Et cum pervidisset juxta portum recessum quemdam secretum, residere nos fecit, et ita primus ipse incipit, nec contemptum senis habuit, neque despexit quod vilis ei amictus esset et sordidus. Ait ergo: Quoniam quidem videris mihi vir eruditus esse et misericors ex eo quod adisti nos. et quod tibi bonum videbatur celatum nobis esse noluisti, volumus et nos tibi quae nobis bona et recta creduntur exponere, quae si tibi minus vera videbuntur, etiam tu nostrum erga te bonum propositum libenter suscipe, sicut et nos tuum. Et cum haec diceret Petrus, plurima multitudo convenit. Tum senex: Fortassis, inquit, contristat vos praesentia multitudinis. Et Petrus: Nequaquam, inquit, nisi hoc solum vereor. ne forte disputantibus nobis cum palam facta fuerit veritas tu verecundiam patiaris pro praesentia multitudinis cedere et acquiescere his quae vera dici intellexeris. Ad haec senex ait: Ego non ita stultus consenui, ut intelligens quod verum est, abnuam id ad vulgi gratiam.
Peter, walking slowly as we talked, looked out for a suitable place for conversation. When he had found a secluded recess near the harbor, he had us sit down, and so he himself began first; nor did he treat the old man with contempt or look down on him because his clothing was cheap and dirty. He said: “Since you seem to me to be a learned man and a kind one, in that you came to us and did not want to hide from us what seemed good to you, we too wish to set out for you what we believe good and right. If it seems to you less true, accept our good intention toward you gladly, as we accept yours.” While Peter was saying this, a very great crowd gathered. Then the old man said: “Perhaps the presence of the crowd troubles you.” Peter said: “Not at all, except that I fear this alone: that perhaps, when in our discussion the truth has been made plain, you may feel ashamed, because of the presence of the crowd, to yield and assent to what you have understood to be said truly.” To this the old man said: “I have not grown old so foolish as to refuse what I understand to be true for the sake of popular favor.”
8.4PG 1:1372b
Coepit ergo Petrus dicere: Videntur mihi hi, qui loquuntur verbum veritatis et qui illuminant animas hominum, similes esse radiis solis, qui ut processerint et apparuerint mundo, celari ultra aut occultari nullatenus possunt, dum non tam videntur ab hominibus, quam videre omnibus praestant. Unde et bene a quodam dictum est ad veritatis praecones: Vos estis lux mundi, et non potest civitas abscondi supra montem posita, neque accendunt lucernam et ponunt eam sub modio, sed super candelabrum ut omnibus luceat qui in domo sunt“. Et senex: Bene valde dixit, quisquis ille est. Sed exponat aliquis vestrum, quod sibi sequendum videtur. ut ad certum prospectum emittamus sermones nostros. Non enim sufficit ad inveniendam veritatem destruere ea, quae e diverso dicuntur, sed et ipsum proferre in medium, quod possit qui e diverso est impugnare. Ut ergo partium sit aequa congressio, rectum mihi videtur ut prius, quid uterque nostrum defendat, enuntiet; et si placet, ipse primus incipiam. Ego dico, non secundum Dei providentiam gubernari mundum, quia multa in eo injuste et inordinate geri videmus, sed genesim dico esse, quae omnia agit et continet.
So Peter began to say: “Those who speak the word of truth and enlighten the souls of men seem to me like the rays of the sun, which, once they have gone forth and appeared to the world, can no longer be concealed or hidden in any way, since they are not so much seen by men as they enable all to see. Hence it was well said by someone to the heralds of truth: ‘You are the light of the world, and a city set on a hill cannot be hidden; nor do they light a lamp and put it under a bushel, but on a lampstand, so that it may give light to all who are in the house.’” The old man said: “Whoever he is, he spoke very well. But let one of you set out what he thinks must be followed, so that we may direct our speeches toward a definite goal. For to find the truth it is not enough to destroy what is said on the other side; one must also bring forward oneself something that the opponent can attack. So that the contest of the parties may be equal, it seems right to me that each of us first state what he defends; and, if you please, I will begin first. I say that the world is not governed according to the providence of God, because we see many things done in it unjustly and without order; but I say it is birth-fate that does and holds all things.”
8.5PG 1:1372b–1373b
Ad haec cum Petrus respondere vellet, Niceta praeveniens ait: Indulgeat mihi dominus meus Petrus ad haec respondere, et non videatur protervum quod juvenis cum sene conflictum habeam, sed ut filius cum patre colloquar. Et senex: Non solum tu, inquit, fili, quod tibi videtur ut prosequaris volo, sed et si qui ex sodalibus tuis, si qui etiam de astantibus videtur scire aliquid, incunctanter proferat, libenter accipimus; collatio enim plurimorum facilius ea quae ignorantur inveniet “. Tum ergo Niceta respondit: Non me aestimes, Pater, temere fecisse, quod inserui me sermonibus domini mei Petri. sed magis pro honore ejus hoc mihi facere visus sum. Homo enim Dei est, plenus totius scientiae, quem ne Graeca quidem latet eruditio, quia Spiritu Dei repletus est quem nihil latet. Sed quia ipsi de coelestibus loqui convenit, ego de his quae ad Graecorum loquacitatem pertinent, respondebo. Postea vero quam a nobis Graecorum more fuerit disputatum, atque ad id ventum, ubi exitus nullus appareat, tunc ipse quasi scientia Dei repletus, aperte et dilucide rerum nobis omnium patefaciet veritatem, ut non solum nos, sed et omnes qui praesto sunt auditores, viam veritatis agnoscant. Et ideo nunc ipse quasi arbiter sedeat, ut cum unus aliquis ex nobis cesserit, tunc ipse suscipiens indubitatam sententiam ferat.
When Peter wished to answer this, Niceta forestalled him and said: “Let my lord Peter allow me to answer this, and let it not seem impudent that I, a young man, should have a contest with an old one; rather, let me converse as a son with a father.” The old man said: “Not only do I wish you, my son, to pursue what you think, but also if any of your companions, or any of the bystanders, seems to know something, let him bring it forward without hesitation; we will gladly receive it. For the comparing of many views will more easily find what is not known.” Then Niceta answered: “Do not think, father, that I acted rashly in putting myself into the discourse of my lord Peter; rather I thought I was doing this out of respect for him. For he is a man of God, full of all knowledge, from whom not even Greek learning is hidden, because he is filled with the Spirit of God, from whom nothing is hidden. But since it befits him to speak of heavenly things, I will answer concerning those that belong to the talkativeness of the Greeks. Afterwards, when we have disputed in the manner of the Greeks and have come to the point where no way out appears, then he, as one filled with the knowledge of God, will openly and clearly disclose to us the truth of all things, so that not only we but all the hearers who are present may recognize the way of truth. And so let him now sit as arbiter, so that when one of us gives way, he may then take it up and pronounce an undoubted verdict.”
8.6PG 1:1373b
Haec cum dixisset Niceta, hi qui convenerant inter semetipsos colloquebantur: Hicne est ille quem audiebamus Petrus, illius qui in Iudaea apparuit et signa ac virtutes plurimas fecit, discipulus probatissimus? Et intendentes in eum, cum timore ac veneratione ingenti stabant, tanquam boni servi honorem domino deferentes. Quod ubi Petrus sensit, ait ad eos: Attentius audiamus, rectum tenentes judicium de his quae dicentur ab utroque, et post ipsorum conflictum, quod necessarium visum fuerit, addemus et nos. Et cum haec dixisset Petrus, gavisae sunt turbae. Niceta vero dicere hoc modo aggressus est: Definisti, Pater, quod non per Dei providentiam mundus regatur, sed omnia genesi subjaceant, vel quae ad mores uniuscujusque vel quae ad gesta pertinent. Ad quae statim quidem potui respondere, sed quia justum est servare ordinem, definimus et nos quid teneamus, sicut ipse fieri rogasti. Ego dico providentia Dei gubernari mundum, in his duntaxat quae gubernatione ejus indigent. Unus est enim omnia tenens qui et mundum fecit, justus Deus, unicuique secundum gesta sua quandoque redditurus. Ecce habes et nostram definitionem; nunc quod vis prosequere, vel mea destruens, vel tua asserens, ut ego bis quae a te prosequentur, occurram. Aut si me vis priorem dicere, non morabor.
When Niceta had said this, those who had gathered said among themselves: “Is this the Peter we used to hear of, the most approved disciple of him who appeared in Judea and did very many signs and mighty works?” And gazing at him they stood with fear and great veneration, like good servants paying honor to their master. When Peter perceived this, he said to them: “Let us listen more attentively, keeping a right judgment about what will be said by each; and after their contest, we too will add what seems necessary.” When Peter had said this, the crowds rejoiced. Niceta began to speak in this way: “You have defined, father, that the world is not ruled by the providence of God, but that all things are subject to birth-fate, whether those that pertain to each one's character or those that pertain to his deeds. I could have answered this at once; but since it is right to keep order, let us also define what we hold, as you yourself asked to be done. I say that the world is governed by the providence of God, at least in those things that need his government. For there is one who holds all things, who also made the world, the just God, who will one day render to each according to his deeds. See, you have our definition too. Now pursue what you wish, either destroying mine or asserting yours, so that I may meet what you set forth. Or if you wish me to speak first, I will not delay.”
8.7PG 1:1373b–1374b
Et senex respondit: Sive tibi placet, fili, prius dicere. sive hoc magis placet ut ego dicam, nihil interest, apud eos praecipue, qui bona venia disputant. Dic tamen tu prior, libenter accipio, atque utinam possis etiam qua? a me dicenda sunt prosequi, atque his quae contraria sunt objicere, et ex utrorumque collatione ostendere veritatem. Niceta respondit: Si vis, inquit, possum etiam tuas partes dicere, et ad haec respondere. Et senex: Ostende mihi prius, quomodo potes scire ea quae nondum locutus sum, et ita tibi credam, quod partes meas prosequi possis. Et Niceta: Secta, inquit, tua et sententia quam definisti, manifesta est his qui eruditi sunt in hujusmodi disciplinis, certaque est ejus consequentia. Et quia ego non sum ignarus quae sint definitiones philosophorum, ex his quae proposuisti, quid consequatur agnosco, maxime quia pra: caeteris philosophis Epicuri scholas frequentavi. Frater autem meus Aquila, magis Pyrrhonios secutus est. alius autem frater noster Platonicos et Aristotelicos; itaque cum eruditis tibi auditoribus sermo est. Tum senex: Bene, inquit, et consequenter docuisti, quomodo ex his quae proposita: sunt definitionibus, etiam ea quae consequuntur adverteres. Sed ego amplius aliquid professus sum, quam sentit Epicurus, quia introduxi genesim, eamque causam omnium gestorum hominibus posui.
The old man answered: “Whether you prefer to speak first, my son, or prefer that I should speak, makes no difference, especially among those who dispute with good will. But you speak first; I accept it gladly. And I wish you could also set out what I am to say, and object to it what is contrary, and show the truth from the comparison of both.” Niceta answered: “If you wish, I can also state your side and answer it.” The old man said: “Show me first how you can know what I have not yet said, and then I will believe you that you can set out my side.” Niceta said: “Your school and the view you have defined are plain to those who are trained in disciplines of this kind, and its consequences are certain. And since I am not ignorant of what the definitions of the philosophers are, from what you have proposed I recognize what follows; especially since, more than the other philosophers, I attended the schools of Epicurus. My brother Aquila followed the Pyrrhonists more, and our other brother the Platonists and Aristotelians; so you are speaking with educated hearers.” Then the old man said: “You have shown well and logically how you would notice from the definitions proposed what follows from them. But I have professed something more than Epicurus holds, for I have introduced birth-fate and made it the cause of all men's deeds.”
8.8PG 1:1374b–1375a
Cumque haec senex dixisset, ego Clemens aio ad eum: Audi, Pater, si a te frater meus Niceta obtinuerit, quia non sine Dei providentia mundus agitur, in ista parte quae superest de genesi. ego tibi potero respondere; est enim mihi notitia hujus scientiae. Et cum haec dixissem, frater meus Aquila: Quid necesse est, inquit, ut eum patrem vocemus, cum in mandatis habeamus neminem super terram patrem vocare? Et post haec respiciens ad senem: Non injuriose, inquit, accipias, Pater, quod fratrem meum culpavi, quia te patrem vocaret; habemus enim tale mandatum, ne aliquem nomine isto vocitemus. Cumque haec dixisset Aquila, risit omnium astantium coetus una cum sene et Petro. Aquila autem requirente causam, cur omnes riserint, aio ad eum: Quod tu in quo alios culpas, id ipse facis, qui senem appellaveris patrem. At ille negabat, dicens: Vere nescio si eum patrem vocavi. Interea Petrus movebatur suspicionibus quibusdam, sicut ipse nobis enarravit postmodum, et respiciens ad Nicetam: Expedi, inquit, quod proposuisti.
When the old man had said this, I, Clement, said to him: “Listen, father: if my brother Niceta wins against you that the world is not run without the providence of God, I shall be able to answer you on the part that remains, about birth-fate; for I have knowledge of this science.” When I had said this, my brother Aquila said: “What need is there for us to call him father, when we have it among the commandments to call no one on earth father?” And after this, looking at the old man, he said: “Do not take it as an insult, father, that I blamed my brother for calling you father; for we have such a commandment, not to call anyone by that name.” When Aquila had said this, the whole company of bystanders laughed, together with the old man and Peter. When Aquila asked why everyone had laughed, I said to him: “Because you yourself are doing what you blame others for, since you have called the old man father.” But he denied it, saying: “Truly I do not know whether I called him father.” Meanwhile Peter was stirred by certain suspicions, as he himself told us afterwards; and looking at Niceta he said: “Carry out what you proposed.”
8.9PG 1:1375a–1375b
Tum Niceta hoc modo exorsus est: Omne quod est, aut simplex est aut compositum. Quod simplex est, caret numero, divisione, colore, differentia, asperitate, lenitate, pondere, levitate, qualitate, quantitate. et ob hoc etiam fine. Quod vero compositum est, aut ex duobus aut ex tribus aut etiam ex quatuor compositum est, aut certe ex pluribus, et quae composita sunt, necessario etiam dividi possunt. Et senex audiens haec: Optime, inquit, et doctissime dicis, fili. Et Niceta: Igitur illud quod simplex est et his omnibus caret, quibus solvi quod subsistit, potest, sine dubio incomprehensibile et immensum est, neque initium ullum neque finem sciens, et ideo unum et solum est, et sine auctore subsistens. Quod autem compositum est, et numero ac diversitati divisionique subjacet, necessario auctore aliquo compositum est, atque in unam speciem diversitas congregata. Quod ergo immensum est, bonitate pater est, virtute conditor. Neque ergo condendi virtus in immenso cessare potuit, neque bonitas otiari, sed ad substituenda ea quae sunt, bonitate, ad componenda et firmanda, virtute provocatur. Substituuntur ergo et componuntur quadam, ut diximus, ex duobus vel ex tribus, quaedam vero ex quatuor, alia ex pluribus. Sed quoniam nunc nobis de mundi ratione qua-ritur et de substantia ejus, quam ex quatuor elementis esse compositam constat, cui omnes illa: decem differentiae quas supra comprehendimus accidunt, ab his inferioribus incipientes gradibus, ad superiora veniemus. Via enim nobis ad intellectualia et invisibilia ab bis quae videmus et contrectamus datur, sicut continetur in arithmeticis disciplinis, ubi cum de divinis quaeritur, ab inferioribus ad superiores numeros ascenditur, cum vero de praesentibus et visibilibus ratio exponitur, de superioribus ad inferiores numeros ordo dirigitur. Aut non ita est?
Then Niceta began in this way: “Everything that exists is either simple or composite. What is simple lacks number, division, color, difference, roughness, smoothness, weight, lightness, quality, quantity, and therefore also limit. What is composite is composed of two or three or even four things, or certainly of more; and what is composed can necessarily also be divided.” Hearing this, the old man said: “You speak excellently and most learnedly, my son.” Niceta said: “So that which is simple, and lacks all these things by which what subsists can be dissolved, is without doubt incomprehensible and immeasurable, knowing neither any beginning nor end; and therefore it is one and alone, and subsists without an author. But what is composite, and subject to number and diversity and division, has necessarily been composed by some author, and diversity gathered into one form. That which is immeasurable, then, is father in goodness, founder in power. Neither could the power of founding cease in the immeasurable one, nor his goodness be idle; but he is moved by goodness to bring into being the things that are, and by power to compose and establish them. So some things are brought into being and composed, as we said, of two or of three, some of four, others of more. But since we are now inquiring about the plan of the world and its substance, which is agreed to be composed of four elements, to which all those ten differences we listed above belong, we will begin from these lower steps and come to the higher. For a way to the intellectual and invisible things is given us from those we see and handle, as is contained in the arithmetical disciplines, where, when divine things are inquired into, one ascends from lower to higher numbers, but when the account of present and visible things is set out, the order is directed from higher to lower numbers. Or is it not so?”
8.10PG 1:1375b–1376a
Et senex ait: Valde bene prosequeris. Et Niceta: De mundi nunc ergo ratione prosequendum est, cujus prima quaestio in duas partes dividitur. Quaeritur enim utrum factus sit, an non; et si quidem non est factus, ipse erit illud ingenitum, ex quo omnia. Si vero factus est, de hoc rursus quaestio in duas partes scinditur, utrumnam ex se ipso factus est, an ab alio. Et si quidem a semetipso est, excluditur sine dubio Providentia. Si Providentia non recipitur, frustra animus ad virtutem provocatur, frustra justitia custoditur, quippe si non est qui justo pro meritis aliquando restituat. Sed ne anima quidem ipsa immortalis videbitur, si eam post absolutionem corporis nullius providentia: excipiat dispensatio.
The old man said: “You are proceeding very well.” Niceta said: “Now, then, we must proceed to the plan of the world, the first question about which is divided into two parts. For it is asked whether it was made or not. If it was not made, it will itself be that unbegotten from which all things come. But if it was made, the question about it is again split into two parts: whether it was made of itself or by another. If of itself, Providence is without doubt excluded. If Providence is not accepted, the soul is urged to virtue in vain, justice is kept in vain, since there is no one to repay the just one day according to his merits. Nor will the soul itself seem immortal, if after its release from the body no dispensation of providence receives it.
8.11PG 1:1376a–1376b
Iam si doceatur esse Providentia, et per ipsam factus esse mundus, alia rursus quae discutiantur occurrunt; requiretur enim quo modo sit Providentia, utrum generaliter erga omnia, an specialiter erga partes, an et generaliter erga partes, an et generaliter erga omnia et specialiter erga partes. Generalis autem intelligitur hoc modo, quasi ab initio Deus faciens mundum ordinem dederit rebus et cursum statuerit, et ultra eorum curam quae geruntur, habere cessaverit. Specialis vero erga partes hoc modo est, ut quorumdam quidem vel hominum vel locorum providentiam gerat, quorumdam vero non gerat. Generalis autem omnium et specialis partium simul hoc modo est, quasi et ab initio omnia fecerit Deus, et usque ad finem per singulos quosque providentiam gerat, et unicuique reddat pro actibus suis.
“Now if it is shown that there is Providence, and that the world was made through it, other questions to be discussed arise again. For it will be asked how Providence exists: whether generally over all things, or specially over parts, or generally over parts, or both generally over all and specially over parts. It is understood as general in this way: as if God, making the world in the beginning, gave things their order and fixed their course, and thereafter ceased to care for what happens. It is special over parts in this way: that he exercises providence over some men or places but not over others. And it is at once general over all and special over parts in this way: as if God both made all things in the beginning and exercises providence over each one until the end, and renders to each according to his acts.
8.12PG 1:1376b
Prima ergo illa propositio, quae dicit, quia ab initio Deus fecerit omnia, et cursu atque ordine rebus imposito de reliquo nihil ad se revocet, secundum genesim geri cuncta confirmat. Ad hoc ergo primo respondebimus, et bis praecipue qui deos colunt et genesim defendunt, qui utique cum immolant diis et exorant eos, sine dubio contra genesim se impetraturos aliquid sperant, et per hoc genesim solvunt. Cum vero rident qui ad virtutem provocant et ad continentiam cohortantur, et dicunt, quia nemo potest facere aliquid aut pati, nisi quod ei fato decretum est, omnes profecto cultum Divinitatis abscindunt. Quid enim colas eos, a quibus promereri nihil possis, quod non patiatur ratio decreti? Haec interim adversus illos dicta sunt. Ego vero mundum dico a Deo factum, et ab ipso quandoque esse solvendum, ut ille appareat qui aeternus est et ad hoc factus, ut semper sit et dignos se recipiat judicio Dei. Quod autem sit alius invisibilis mundus, qui hunc visibilem intra semetipsum contineat, posteaquam de visibili mundo discusserimus, tunc et ad illum veniemus.
“That first proposition, then, which says that God made all things in the beginning and, having imposed a course and order on things, calls nothing back to himself thereafter, confirms that all things are done according to birth-fate. We shall answer this first, and especially those who worship the gods and defend birth-fate. When they sacrifice to the gods and entreat them, they certainly hope to obtain something against birth-fate, and by this they undo birth-fate. But when they laugh at those who urge to virtue and exhort to self-control, and say that no one can do or suffer anything except what has been decreed for him by fate, they surely cut away all worship of divinity. For why should you worship those from whom you can obtain nothing that the logic of the decree does not permit? So much meanwhile against them. But I say that the world was made by God and will one day be dissolved by him, so that that world may appear which is eternal and was made for this, that it may exist forever and receive those who are worthy of it by the judgment of God. And that there is another invisible world which contains this visible one within itself, we shall come to that also after we have discussed the visible world.
8.13PG 1:1376b–1377a
Nunc interim, quia factus sit mundus iste visibilis, testantur etiam philosophorum plurimi sapientes viri. Sed ne videamur quasi egentes assertionibus uti voluisse testibus, de principiis ejus, si videtur, quaeramus. Corporeum esse mundum hunc visibilem, eo ipso quod est visibilis, satis constat. Omne autem corpus duas recipit differentias; aut enim connexum est et solidum, aut divisum et separatum. Et si quidem connexum fuit et solidum corpus ex quo mundus factus est, et per diversas species partesque secundum differentias sui corpus illud partitum est et divisum, necesse est intelligi fuisse aliquem qui corpus quod erat connexum et solidum dirimeret, atque in partes multas duceret formasque diversas. Aut si ex diversis dispersisque corporum partibus omnis mundi haec moles composita est et compaginata, necesse est nihilominus intelligi fuisse aliquem qui in unum dispersas colligeret et diversas rebus species indueret.
“Now meanwhile, that this visible world was made, very many wise men among the philosophers also testify. But so that we may not seem, as if lacking proofs, to have wished to use witnesses, let us, if you please, inquire about its first principles. That this visible world is bodily is sufficiently clear from the very fact that it is visible. Every body admits two distinctions: either it is joined and solid, or divided and separated. If the body from which the world was made was joined and solid, and that body was parted and divided into various forms and parts according to its differences, it must be understood that there was someone who separated the body that was joined and solid and drew it out into many parts and various forms. Or if this whole mass of the world was composed and fitted together from various and scattered parts of bodies, it must equally be understood that there was someone who gathered the scattered parts into one and clothed things with various forms.
8.14PG 1:1377a–1378a
Et quidem plures philosophorum hoc magis _ sensisse scio, quod ex uno corpore, quam illi materiam vocant, divisiones ac discretiones conditor fecerit Deus; quod tamen ex quatuor simplicibus, et in unum temperamento quodam divinae Providentiae admistis constaret elementis. Nam illud superfluo a quibusdam dictum puto, quod simplex corpus, id est absque ulla conjunctione sit mundi, cum constet nec corpus posse esse quod simplex est, neque misceri posse aut propagari vel solvi; quae omnia utique mundi corporibus videmus accidere. Quo modo enim solveretur, si esset simplex nec haberet intra se aliud a quo resolvi ac dividi posset? Quod si ex duobus aut tribus, vel etiam ex quatuor constare corpora videntur, cui non etiam exiguum habenti sensum manifestum sit, quod fuerit aliquis qui in unum plura collegerit, et temperamenti moderatione servata, ex diversis partibus solidum corpus effecerit? Hunc igitur nos conditorem mundi dicimus Deum, hunc agnoscimus universitatis auctorem.
“And I know that most of the philosophers held rather this: that God the founder made divisions and distinctions out of one body, which they call matter, which nevertheless consisted of four simple elements mixed into one by a certain tempering of divine Providence. For I think it was said superfluously by some that the body of the world is simple, that is, without any combination, since it is clear that what is simple cannot be a body, nor be mixed or propagated or dissolved—all of which we certainly see happening to the bodies of the world. For how would it be dissolved if it were simple and had nothing within it by which it could be resolved and divided? But if bodies are seen to consist of two or three or even four things, to whom with even a little sense is it not plain that there was someone who gathered many into one and, keeping the moderation of the tempering, made a solid body out of various parts? This one, then, we call God the founder of the world; this one we acknowledge as the author of the universe.
8.15PG 1:1378a–1379a
Nam Graecorum philosophi de principiis mundi quaerentes, alius alia incessit via. Denique Pythagoras elementa principiorum numeros esse dicit, Callistratus qualitates, Alcmaeon contrarietates, Anaximandrus immensitatem, Anaxagoras aequalitates partium, Epicurus atomos. Diodorus amere, hoc est ex his in quibus partes non sunt, Asclepias ὅγκους, quod nos tumores vel elationes possumus dicere, Geometrae lineas, Democritus ideas, Thales aquam, Heraclitus ignem, Diogenes aerem, Parmenides terram, Zenon, Empedocles, Plato ignem, aquam, aerem, terram; Aristoteles etiam quintum introducit elementum, quod ἀκατονόμαστον, id est incompellabile nominavit, sine dubio illum indicans, qui in unum quatuor elementa conjungens mundum fecerit. Sive igitur duo sive tria sive quatuor aut etiam plura sint, vel innumera ex quibus mundus constat, omni ex parte, qui plura in unum collegerit et rursus collecta in diversas species duxerit, ostenditur Deus, et probatur per haec non potuisse machinam mundi sine opifice et provisere constare,
“For the philosophers of the Greeks, inquiring about the first principles of the world, went each his own way. Pythagoras says that numbers are the elements of the first principles; Callistratus, qualities; Alcmaeon, contrarieties; Anaximander, the boundless; Anaxagoras, equality of parts; Epicurus, atoms; Diodorus, partless things, that is, things in which there are no parts; Asclepiades, onkoi, which we may call swellings or masses; the geometers, lines; Democritus, ideas; Thales, water; Heraclitus, fire; Diogenes, air; Parmenides, earth; Zeno, Empedocles, and Plato, fire, water, air, and earth. Aristotle also introduces a fifth element, which he called akatonomaston, that is, ‘unnameable’—without doubt indicating him who made the world by joining the four elements into one. Whether, then, there are two or three or four or even more or innumerable things from which the world consists, in every case God is shown to be the one who gathered many into one and again led what was gathered into various forms; and it is proved by this that the fabric of the world could not have existed without a maker and provider.
8.16PG 1:1379a
Sed et hoc ipso quod in conjunctione elementorum, deficiente altero aut abundante, caetera resolvuntur et concidunt, ostenditur ex nihilo ea accepisse principium. Nam verbi gratia si deficiat in aliquo humor, nec aridum stabit; humore enim pascitur aridum sicut et frigus calido, in quibus, ut diximus, si alterum deficiat, penitus cuncta solvuntur, et in hoc originis sua: qua ex nihilo facta sunt, produntur indicia. Quod si materia ipsa probatur esse facta, quomodo partes ejus et species ex quibus mundus constat, videbuntur infectae? Sed de materia et qualitatibus non est nunc dicendi locus; hoc solum docuisse sufficiat, Deum esse omnium conditorem, quia neque si solidum et connexum fuit corpus ex quo mundus constat, dirimi et discerni sine conditore, neque si ex diversis et discretis partibus in unum collectum est. congregari et misceri sine artifice potuit. Igitur si mundi conditor Deus esse tam evidenter ostenditur, qui erit Epicuro locus introducendi atomos, et asserendi quod ex corpusculis insensibilibus non solum sensibilis corpora, sed et mentes intellectuales ac rationales fiant?
“And by the very fact that, in the combination of the elements, when one is lacking or in excess the rest are dissolved and collapse, it is shown that they received their beginning from nothing. For example, if moisture is lacking in anything, the dry will not stand either; for the dry is nourished by moisture, as cold is by heat; and in these, as we said, if one is lacking, all are wholly dissolved, and in this the signs of their origin, by which they were made from nothing, are betrayed. And if matter itself is proved to have been made, how will its parts and forms, of which the world consists, seem unmade? But this is not the place to speak of matter and qualities; let it suffice to have shown only this, that God is the founder of all things, because neither, if the body from which the world consists was solid and joined, could it have been separated and distinguished without a founder, nor, if it was collected into one from various and distinct parts, could it have been gathered and mixed without a craftsman. If, then, God is shown so plainly to be the founder of the world, what room will there be for Epicurus to introduce atoms, and to assert that from insensible particles not only sensible bodies but intellectual and rational minds come into being?”
8.17PG 1:1379a–1379d
Sed dices, ut Epicuro visum est: Continuationes atomorum indesinenti cursu venientium, per immensa et sine fine tempora miscentium se atque in unum conglobantium, corpora solida efficiuntur. Non venio ad haec, ut rem fabulosam et inepte compositam dicam; videamus magis si qualecunque istud est, potest stare quod dicitur. Aiunt enim corpuscula ipsa quae atomos appellant, diversis esse qualitatibus, et alia quidem humida et ob hoc gravia ac deorsum tendentia, alia vero arida et terrena atque ob hoc nihilominus gravia, alia autem ignea et ob hoc sursum semper nitentia, alia vero frigida et ob hoc pigra et semper media. Quomodo ergo cum alia semper sursum tendant utpote ignea, et alia semper deorsum utpote humida et arida, alia vero media et non aequali cursu incedant, coire simul potuerunt et unum corpus efficere? Si quis enim de superioribus, verbi gratia minutissimas paleas, et ad eamdem magnitudinem minutissimi plumbi particulas deorsum jaciat, nunquid poterunt quamvis aequales sint magnitudine, leves paleas partes plumbi particulas consequi? longe enim velocius ad imum graviora perveniunt. Ita ergo et atomi, etiamsi magnitudine aequales sint, pondere tamen inaequales, nunquam poterunt quae leves sunt consequi graviores; quod si consequi non possunt, sine dubio nec misceri nec corpus efficere.
“But you will say, as Epicurus held: ‘Solid bodies are produced by the joinings of atoms coming in an unceasing stream, mingling through immense and endless ages and gathering into one mass.’ I do not go on to call this a fabulous and foolishly composed thing; let us rather see whether what is said, such as it is, can stand. For they say that these very particles which they call atoms are of different qualities: some moist and therefore heavy and tending downward; others dry and earthy, and therefore also heavy; others fiery and therefore always striving upward; and others cold and therefore sluggish and always in the middle. How then, since some always tend upward, being fiery, and others always downward, being moist and dry, while others are in the middle and do not move with equal course, could they come together and make one body? For if someone threw down from a height, for example, very fine chaff and particles of very fine lead of the same size, could the light chaff overtake the particles of lead, though they are equal in size? The heavier reach the bottom far more swiftly. So too the atoms, even if they are equal in size, yet being unequal in weight, the light ones will never be able to overtake the heavier; and if they cannot overtake them, without doubt they can neither be mixed nor make a body.
8.18PG 1:1379d–1380a
Tum deinde si indesinenter feruntur et semper veniunt, et rebus quarum jam mensura integra constat, adduntur, quomodo stare universitas potest, cum tam immensis ponderibus nova semper pondera cumulentur? Sed et illud requiro, si paulatim coeuntibus corpusculis exstruebatur hic quem videmus ambitus caeli, quomodo non in eo illico cum consurgeret corruit? si quidem hians machina: ipsius summitas, nullis suffulta repagulis stringeretur. Sicut enim qui aedificiorum tholos in circulum instruunt, nisi conclusionem medii verticis strinxerint, universum pariter solvitur; ita et mundi circulus, quem tam decora specie collectum videmus, si non subito et sub uno divina: virtutis rotatu potentia conditoris effectus est, sed paulatim concurrentibus atomis et instruentibus, non ut ratio petebat, sed ut fortuitus incidisset eventus, quomodo non prius quam colligi posset et concludi. dilapsus est et dissolutus? Ad haec etiam illud requiro, quod sit munimen, super quod tam immense molis jacta sint fundamenta? Et rursus illud ipsum quod dixeris munimen, super quid jaceat? Et item illud aliud, super quid? et eousque interrogando progrediar. donec responsio ad nihil et inane perveniat.
“Then again, if they are borne along unceasingly and always keep coming and are added to things whose measure is already complete, how can the universe stand, when new weights are always heaped on such immense weights? And I ask this too: if this circuit of heaven that we see was built up by particles gradually coming together, how did it not collapse at once as it rose, since the top of its gaping structure was held together by no supports? For as those who build the domes of buildings in a circle find that, unless they bind together the closing of the central crown, the whole falls apart at once, so too the circle of the world, which we see gathered in so beautiful a form—if it was not made suddenly and at once by the turning of divine power, by the might of the founder, but by atoms gradually running together and building, not as reason required but as chance fell out—how did it not slip apart and dissolve before it could be gathered and closed? I ask this too: what is the support on which the foundations of so immense a mass have been laid? And again, on what does that very support you name rest? And that other, on what? And I will go on asking until the answer comes to nothing and emptiness.
8.19PG 1:1380a–1380d
Quod si dicat aliquis, quia atomi ignem qualitatis conjunctae sibi corpus unum fecerunt, et quia ignis qualitas non deorsum sed sursum tendit, impositam mundi molem ad superiora semper nitens ignis natura subvectat; ad haec respondebimus: Quomodo potuerunt atomi igneae qualitatis, quae semper ad superiora contendunt, in inferiora descendere, et in profundo ac sub omnia demerso inveniri loco? Cum utique graviores quaeque, id est terrenae vel humidae qualitates praeveniunt, ut diximus, leviores. unde et caelum velut superiorum fabricam igneis atomis, quae et leviores sunt et sursum semper fugiunt, asserunt structam. Neque ergo fundamenta ignis aut alia ulla habere mundus potest, neque atomis gravioribus cum levioribus, id est his qua: deorsum semper praecipitantur et his quae semper sursum fugiunt, societas aut compaginatio ulla conveniat. Igitur quod impossibile sit ex atomorum conjunctione corpora mundi solidari, sufficienter dictum, et quod non potuerint insensibilia corpora. etiamsi ulla ratione coire et connecti potuissent. formas dare corporibus, et mensuras, membra fingere, vel qualitates efficere, vel exprimere quantitates; quae utique omnia modulatione sui, manum testantur artificis et opus rationis ostendunt, quam rationem ego Verbum et Deum appello.
“And if someone should say that atoms of fiery quality joined together made one body, and that, since the quality of fire tends not downward but upward, the nature of fire, always striving upward, bears up the mass of the world placed on it, we will answer this: how could atoms of fiery quality, which always strive upward, descend downward and be found in the depth, in a place sunk beneath all things? For certainly the heavier ones, that is, the earthy or moist qualities, outrun the lighter, as we said. Hence they assert that the heaven too, as the structure of the upper regions, was built of fiery atoms, which are lighter and always flee upward. So the world can have no foundations of fire or of anything else, nor can there be any fellowship or fitting together of heavier atoms with lighter, that is, of those that always plunge downward with those that always flee upward. That it is impossible, then, for the bodies of the world to be made solid from the joining of atoms has been sufficiently said; and also that insensible bodies, even if they could by any means have come together and been joined, could not give forms and measures to bodies, shape limbs, produce qualities, or express quantities—all of which, by their harmony, testify to the hand of a craftsman and show the work of reason; and that reason I call the Word and God.”
8.20PG 1:1380d–1381a
Sed dicet aliquis haec a natura fieri. Jam in hoc de nomine controversia est. Cum enim constet mentis esse et rationis opus, hoc quod tu naturam vocas, ego Deum conditorem voco; constat nec potuisse nec posse vel corporum Species tam necessariis distinctionibus institutas, vel animorum sensus, irrationabili opere et quod sensu careat effici. Quod si idonei tibi testes videntur philosophi, Plato de his testatur in Timaeo, ubi de mundi factura discutiens requirit, utrumnam semper fuerit, an initium sumpserit, et pronuntiat quia factus sit: Visibilis enim, inquit, est et palpabilis atque corporeus, omnia autem quae hujusmodi sunt, facta esse constat; quod autem factum est, aliquem habet sine dubio auctorem, a quo factum est. Hunc ergo, inquit, factorem parentemque omnium, et invenire difficile est et inventum vulgo enarrare impossibile. Haec quidem Plato dicit; sed et si ipse aliique Graecorum philosophi de factura mundi silere voluissent, nonne omnibus intellectum habentibus palam esset? Quis enim est exigui saltem sensus homo, qui cum cernat domum omnia qua: ad usus necessaria sunt habentem, cujus cameram in sphaerae gyrum videat collectam, eamque vario splendore et diversis imaginibus depictam, luminaribus praecipuis et maximis adornatam; quis, inquam, est, qui hujusmodi fabricam videns, non statim pronuntiet a sapientissimo et potentissimo artifice constructam? Et ita quis invenietur insipiens, ut cum caeli opus inspiciat, splendorem solis cernat ac lunae, astrorum cursus et species et vias certis rationibus et temporibus videat definitas, non tam a sapiente haec artifice et rationabili, quam ab ipsa sapientia et ratione clamet effecta?
“But someone will say that these things are done by nature. Then this is a dispute about a name. For since it is agreed that this is the work of mind and reason, what you call nature I call God the founder. It is agreed that neither the forms of bodies, established with such necessary distinctions, nor the senses of souls could have been, or can be, produced by an irrational work that lacks sense. And if the philosophers seem suitable witnesses to you, Plato testifies about these things in the Timaeus, where, discussing the making of the world, he asks whether it always existed or took a beginning, and declares that it was made: ‘For it is visible,’ he says, ‘and tangible and bodily; and all such things are agreed to have been made; and what has been made has without doubt some author by whom it was made. This maker and parent of all things,’ he says, ‘is both hard to find, and, when found, impossible to declare to the many.’ This Plato says. But even if he and the other philosophers of the Greeks had chosen to be silent about the making of the world, would it not be plain to all who have understanding? For who is the man of even slight sense who, seeing a house that has everything necessary for use, whose vault he sees gathered into the round of a sphere, painted with varied splendor and various images, and adorned with special and very great lights—who, I ask, seeing such a building, would not at once declare that it was built by a most wise and powerful craftsman? And who will be found so foolish that, when he looks on the work of heaven and sees the splendor of the sun and moon, and sees the courses and forms and paths of the stars fixed by sure reasons and times, he would not cry out that these were made not so much by a wise and rational craftsman as by wisdom and reason itself?
8.21PG 1:1381a
Quod et si secundum alios Graecorum philosophos audire vis, et mechanicis imbutus es disciplinis, de excelsis quae traduntur, non te sine dubio latent. Ponunt enim sphaeram aequaliter ex omni parte collectam, et ad omnia similiter respicientem, atque a centro terrae aequis spatiis distinctam, ipsaque sui aequalitate ita stabilem, ut eam in nullam partem declinare undique aequalitas collecta permittat; et. ita a nullo fulcimento subvecta sustentatur sphaera. Quod si vere hanc habeat similitudinem mundi machina, evidens est opus in ea divinum Si vero, ut aliis visum est, super aquas posita sphaera vel super ipsas fertur, vel in ipsis volvitur, etiam sic magni in ea artificis opus declaratur.
“And if you wish to hear it according to other philosophers of the Greeks, and are trained in the mechanical disciplines, what is taught about the heavens is surely not unknown to you. For they posit a sphere gathered equally on every side and facing all parts alike, standing at equal distances from the center of the earth, and so stable by its very equality that the equality gathered on all sides allows it to incline in no direction; and so the sphere is sustained, borne up by no prop. If the fabric of the world truly has this form, the divine work in it is evident. But if, as others have held, the sphere is set on waters and either borne on them or revolves in them, even so the work of a great craftsman is declared in it.
8.22PG 1:1382a
Sed ne de his qua! non omnibus palam sunt, incerta videatur assertio, ad ea veniamus quae neminem latent. Quis astrorum cursus tanta ratione disposuit, ortusque eorum et occasus instituit, certisque et demensis temporibus unicuique tenere cmli ambitum dedit? Quis ad occasum aliis semper tendere, aliis etiam redire in ortum permisit? Quis imposuit modum cursibus solis, ut horas et dies et menses et temporum vicissitudines diversis motibus signet, et nunc hiemem, inde ver, aestatem, post et autumnum certa cursus sui dimensione discernat, et semper eisdem vicibus anni orbem inconfusa varietate constringat? Quis, inquam, tanti ordinis moderatricem, non ipsam Dei pronuntiet sapientiam? Et haec quidem secundum illa nobis dicta sint, quae de excelsorum disciplinis traduntur a Graecis.
“But so that the assertion may not seem uncertain because it concerns things not plain to all, let us come to what is hidden from no one. Who arranged the courses of the stars with such reason, established their risings and settings, and gave each to keep its circuit of heaven in fixed and measured times? Who permitted some always to tend toward the west, and others to return to the east as well? Who set a limit to the courses of the sun, so that by its various movements it marks hours and days and months and the changes of the seasons, and now winter, then spring, summer, and afterwards autumn, it distinguishes by the fixed measure of its course, and always binds the circle of the year in the same turns with unconfused variety? Who, I say, would not declare that the governess of so great an order is the very wisdom of God? Let these things be said by us according to what the Greeks teach in the disciplines concerning the heavens.
8.23PG 1:1382a
Quid autem et de his, qua! vel in terris vel in mari videmus? nonne evidenter edocemur, Dei in his non solum opus esse, sed et providentiam? Nam quod in terra montes excelsi certis quibusque habentur in locis, ut ex his velut compressus et coangustatus aer ordinatione Dei cogatur et exprimatur in ventos, ex quibus et fructus germen concipiant, et aestivus ardor temperiem sumat, cum Pleiades ignitae solis ardoribus incanduerint. Sed dices: Cur et ardor solis, ut temperies requiratur? Et quomodo fruges humanis usibus necessariae maturescerent? Sed et illud adverte, quod ad axem meridianum, ubi plus est caloris. non multa datur nubium constipatio, nec abundans copia imbrium traditur, ne morbus habitantibus generetur; humidae enim nubes, si calore rapido coquantur, aerem corruptum et pestiferum reddunt. Sed et terra calidum imbrem suscipiens, non nutrimenta segetibus, sed perniciem praebet; in quo quis dubitat opus esse divinae Providentiae? Denique Egyptus, quia Ethiopicis e vicino flagrat ardoribus, ne insanabiles corruptelas aeris imbrium necessitate susciperet, campi ejus non pluviam nubibus ministratam, sed terrenum quodammodo imbrem Nilo inundante suscipiunt.
“And what of the things we see on land or in the sea? Are we not plainly taught that there is in them not only the work of God but also his providence? For high mountains are placed in certain fixed places on the earth, so that the air, as if compressed and constricted by them, is forced by God's ordering and pressed out into winds, from which the fruits conceive their growth and the summer heat is tempered when the Pleiades glow with the fiery heats of the sun. But you will say: ‘Why the heat of the sun at all, that tempering should be needed?’ And how would the crops necessary for human use ripen? Notice this too: toward the southern pole, where there is more heat, there is no great massing of clouds and no abundant supply of rains, lest disease arise among the inhabitants; for moist clouds, if cooked by fierce heat, make the air corrupt and pestilential. And the earth, receiving a hot rain, gives not nourishment but ruin to the crops. Who doubts that in this there is the work of divine Providence? Indeed Egypt, because it burns with the heats of neighboring Ethiopia, so as not to receive incurable corruptions of the air through the necessity of rains, has fields that receive not rain supplied by clouds but, in a way, an earthly rain from the flooding Nile.
8.24PG 1:1383a–1383b
Quid de fontibus dicemus et fluviis, qui perenni in mare fluunt meatu? Et per divinam Providentiam nec illis abundans deficit cursus, nec mare tantas aquarum recipiens copias ullum sentit augmentum, sed in eadem mensura et ea quae conferunt, et ea quae ibi conferuntur elementa perdurant. Sed dicis mihi: Salsa aqua naturaliter consumit fluentum dulce, quod ei fuerit infusum. Et in hoc ergo manifestum est Providentiae Opus, ut salsum faceret illud elementum, in quod cursus omnium aquarum, quas ad usum hominibus praestiterat, declinavit; uti ne per tanta saeculi spatia, repletus maris alveus inundationem perniciosam terris et hominibus redderet. Nec ita quisquam insipiens erit, ut hanc tantam rationem tantamque providentiam ab irrationabili natura arbitretur esse dispositam.
“What shall we say of the springs and rivers that flow into the sea with perennial course? By divine Providence their abundant stream does not fail, nor does the sea, receiving such great quantities of waters, feel any increase; but both the elements that contribute and those that are brought together there continue in the same measure. But you say to me: ‘Salt water naturally consumes the fresh stream that is poured into it.’ Then in this too the work of Providence is plain, that it made salt that element into which it turned the course of all the waters it had provided for men's use, so that through such long ages the filled bed of the sea might not cause a ruinous flood for lands and men. Nor will anyone be so foolish as to think that so great a reason and so great a providence was arranged by irrational nature.
8.25PG 1:1383b–1384a
Quid autem de virgultis, quid de animalibus dicam? Nonne per providentiam factum est, ut cum senecta temporis resolverentur, virgulta quidem vel plantis vel seminibus quae ipsa dederint. animalia vero per progeniem reparentur? Et mira quadam dispensatione Providentia: nascituro pecori lac praeparatur in uberibus, ac statim ut natum fuerit, nullo docente scit ubi alimoniae suae horrea requirat. Gignuntur autem non solum mares, sed et feminae, ut ex utroque possit rursus constare posteritas. Sed ne ut putant homines, viderentur haec naturae quodam ordine et non dispensatione fieri Conditoris. pauca quaedam ad indicium et documentum providentiae suae, mutato ordine genus servare jussit in terris, verbi gratia ut per os conciperet corvus, et per aurem mustela generaret. ut aves nonnullae sicut gallina, interdum ova vel vento vel pulvere concepta parerent, alia quaedam animalia marem vicibus alternis in feminam verterent et sexum per annos singulos commutarent, ut lepores et hyaenae, quas belluas vocant, alia etiam ex terra orirentur atque inde sumerent carnem, ut talpa:, alia ex cinere, ut vipera:, alia ex putrefactis carnibus, ut vespa: quidem equinis, apes autem bubulis, alia ex fimo boum, ut scarabaei, alia ex herbis, ut de ocimo scorpius, et rursus herba ex animalibus, ut ex cornu cervi vel capra: apii et asparagi.
“And what shall I say of shrubs and of animals? Was it not done by providence that, when they were dissolved by old age, the shrubs should be renewed by the shoots or seeds they themselves produced, and the animals by offspring? And by a wonderful dispensation of Providence, milk is prepared in the udders for the animal about to be born, and as soon as it is born, with no one teaching it, it knows where to seek the storehouses of its nourishment. And not only males but also females are born, so that from both posterity may again exist. But so that these things might not seem, as men suppose, to be done by some order of nature and not by the dispensation of the Founder, he ordered a few kinds to keep their kind on earth with the order changed, as an indication and proof of his providence: for example, that the raven should conceive through its mouth and the weasel give birth through its ear; that some birds, such as the hen, should sometimes lay eggs conceived by wind or dust; that certain other animals should turn male into female by turns and change sex every year, such as hares and hyenas, which they call beasts; that others should spring from the earth and take their flesh from it, such as moles; others from ashes, such as vipers; others from rotting flesh—wasps from horses' and bees from cattle's; others from the dung of oxen, such as beetles; others from herbs, as the scorpion from basil; and again herbs from animals, as celery and asparagus from the horn of a stag or a goat.
8.26PG 1:1384b–1385a
Et quid opus est plura enumerare, in quibus divina Providentia mutato ordine eo qui a natura datus putatur, multimodis differentiis nativitatem animalium constare voluit, ex quibus non irrationabilis rerum cursus, sed ipsius dispensatus ratione doceretur? Aut non et in hoc plenissimum demonstratur opus divina: Providentia, ubi ex terra et aqua ad vitam hominum semina jacta reparantur? quae cum terra: fuerint mandata, voluntate Dei humorem quem susceperit gleba, velut uberibus suis seminibus immulget. Aquis enim inest quaedam vis spiritus a Deo dati ex initio, cujus opere habitus futuri corporis, in ipso statim semine formari incipit et per culmum spicamque restitui; turgefacto etenim ex humore seminum grano, per angustos quosdam venarum meatus vis illa spiritus, quae inesse aquis data est, utpote incorporea transcurrens, ad incrementum semina suscitat et crescentium species format. Ministerio igitur humidi elementi, cui vitalis ille spiritus insitus semper et ingenitus est, efficitur ut non solum reparetur, sed ut per omnia similis species et forma his qua; jacta fuerint seminibus redeat. Quae ratio cui vel brevem sensum habenti, per irrationabilem naturam, et non per divinam sapientiam constare videbitur? Denique etiam haec ad similitudinem humanae nativitatis formata sunt; videtur enim terra vulvae locum tenere, cui semen injectum per aquae et spiritus vim, sicut supra diximus, et formatur et alitur.
“And what need is there to list more cases in which divine Providence, changing the order that is thought to be given by nature, willed the birth of animals to take place in many different ways, so that from them might be taught not an irrational course of things but its own dispensing reason? Or is not the work of divine Providence most fully shown in this too, that seeds cast into the earth and water are renewed for the life of men? When they have been committed to the earth, by the will of God the clod milks into the seeds, as from its breasts, the moisture it has received. For there is in the waters a certain power of spirit given by God from the beginning, by whose working the form of the future body begins to be shaped at once in the seed itself and is restored through stalk and ear. For when the grain of the seed is swollen by moisture, that power of spirit given to be in the waters, being incorporeal, runs through narrow channels of veins, rouses the seeds to growth, and shapes the forms of the growing things. So by the ministry of the moist element, in which that vital spirit is always implanted and inborn, it is brought about that not only is the seed renewed, but a form and shape in every way like the seeds that were cast returns. To whom with even a little sense will this reason seem to exist through irrational nature and not through divine wisdom? Indeed these things too are formed after the likeness of human birth; for the earth seems to hold the place of the womb, in which the seed cast is both formed and nourished through the power of water and spirit, as we said above.
8.27PG 1:1385a
Sed et in hoc admiranda est divina Providentia, quod videre nos quidem et agnoscere facit quis fiunt, quo modo autem et qualiter fiant, in secreto posuit et occulto, ut non indignis ad agnitionem subjaceant, sed dignis et fidelibus cum meruerint, patefiant. Ut autem rebus ipsis et exemplis probemus, nihil omnino ex terrena substantia seminibus dari, sed totum ex elemento aqua: et spiritus qui inest ei virtute constare, pone mihi verbi gratia in cratere aliquo amplissimae magnitudinis injici terrae talenta centum, et seminentur in eo diversae species seminum vel olerum vel etiam virgultorum, his praebeatur ad rigandum aqua sufficiens, et per annos plures habeatur ista diligentia, congregemur autem semina quae collecta fuerint, verbi gratia frumenti vel hordei aliarumque specierum per singulos annos seorsim, donec uniuscujusque seminis acervus ad centum talentorum pondus ascendat, tum etiam arbores avulsae radicitus appendantur, et his omnibus ex cratere sumptis appendatur terra, centum sua nihilominus talenta salva restituet. Unde ergo dicemus omne illud pondus, omnemque quantitatem seminum diversorum atque arborum surrexisse? nonne evidenter apparet, quia ex aquis? Terra enim quod suum est, integrum tenet, aqua vero quae per singula injecta est, nusquam prorsus est, ob potentem divina: conditionis virtutem, quae per unam aquae speciem tantorum seminum virgultorumque et substantias reparat, et species format, et genus fenore multiplicato custodit.
“And in this too divine Providence is to be admired: that it makes us see and recognize what things come into being, but how and in what manner they come into being it has placed in secret and hidden, so that they may not lie open to the knowledge of the unworthy but may be disclosed to the worthy and faithful when they have deserved it. And so that we may prove by facts and examples that nothing at all is given to the seeds from the substance of the earth, but that the whole consists of the element of water and the power of the spirit that is in it: suppose, for example, that a hundred talents of earth are put into some very large vessel, and various kinds of seeds of vegetables or even shrubs are sown in it; let enough water be supplied to irrigate them, and let this care be kept up for many years; and let the seeds that are gathered—of wheat, for example, or barley and other kinds—be collected separately each year until the heap of each seed rises to the weight of a hundred talents; then let the trees too be pulled up by the roots and weighed; and when all these have been taken out of the vessel, let the earth be weighed: it will still give back its hundred talents intact. From where, then, shall we say that all that weight and all that quantity of various seeds and trees arose? Is it not plainly evident that it came from the waters? For the earth keeps what is its own intact, but the water poured in for each is nowhere at all, because of the mighty power of the divine creation, which through the one form of water both renews the substances of so many seeds and shrubs, shapes their forms, and preserves their kind with multiplied increase.
8.28PG 1:1385a–1386a
Ex quibus omnibus satis abundeque patere puto, artifici sensu et non irrationabili natura: opere cuncta effici et universa constare. Sed veniamus adhuc, si videtur, etiam ad nostram, id est ad hominis substantiam, qui est parvus in alio mundus, et consideremus quanta sit ratione compositus; et ex hoc praecipue sapientiam Conditoris intelliges, qui cum ex diversis substantiis constet, id est mortali et immortali, per artificem providentiam Conditoris societatem diversitas non refugit, et quidem longe a se substantiis [alienis et diversis]. Alia namque de terra assumitur et a Conditore formatur, alia vero ex immortalibus substantiis datur, nec tamen ei per hujuscemodi coniunctionem honor immortalitatis infringitur, nec ut quibusdam videtur [ex rationabili et concupiscibili et irascibili subsistit, sed magis inesse ei tales quidam videntur] affectus, quibus ad haec singula moveri possit. Nam corpus quod ex ossibus et carnibus constat, initium sumit ex semine viri, quod e medullis calor eliciens vulvae quasi terra: consignat, cui inhaerens ex fonte sanguinis paulatim rigatum, in carnem et ossa producitur, atque in speciem auctoris jacti seminis reformatur.
“From all this I think it is abundantly clear that all things are effected and the universe exists by a craftsman's intelligence and not by the work of irrational nature. But let us come further, if you please, to our own substance, that is, to man, who is a small world within another, and consider with how great reason he is composed; and from this especially you will understand the wisdom of the Founder. For though man consists of different substances, mortal and immortal, through the craftsmanlike providence of the Founder the diversity does not shun fellowship—and that of substances far removed from each other (foreign and different). For one is taken from the earth and formed by the Founder, the other is given from immortal substances; yet by such a union the honor of immortality is not impaired. Nor, as some think, (does the soul consist of a rational, a desiring, and an irascible part; rather, there seem to be in it certain) affections by which it can be moved to each of these. For the body, which consists of bones and flesh, takes its beginning from the seed of the man, which heat draws out from the marrow and deposits in the womb as in the earth; clinging to it and gradually watered from the fountain of blood, it is brought forth into flesh and bones and reshaped into the likeness of the author of the seed sown.
8.29PG 1:1386a
Et vide in hoc Artificis opus, quomodo ossa velut columnas quasdam, quibus caro sustentetur ac portetur, inseruit. Tum deinde aequalis ex utraque parte, id est dextera et laeva, mensura servetur, ut congruat pes pedi, et manus manui, digiti quoque digitis, ut singuli ad singulos tota aequalitate concordent; sed et oculus oculo, et auris auri, quae non solum consona sibi et concordantia, sed et usibus necessariis apta formantur. Manus quidem ut operi commodae sint, pedes ut gressibus, oculi ut visibus serviant superciliorum excubiis custoditi, aures ad audiendum ita formatae ut cymbalo similes suscepti verbi repercussum sonitum altius reddant, et usque ad sensum cordis emittant, lingua autem ad loquendum illisa dentibus plectri reddat officium, ipsi vero dentes alii ut incidant et dividant cibos et interioribus tradant, interiores vero ut in modum mola conficiant et comminuant, quo Opportunius stomacho traditi coquantur, unde et molares appellati sunt.
“And see in this the Craftsman's work: how he inserted the bones like columns by which the flesh might be supported and carried. Then an equal measure is kept on both sides, right and left, so that foot matches foot and hand hand, finger also finger, so that each corresponds to each in complete equality; and eye to eye and ear to ear, which are formed not only consonant and agreeing with each other but fit for necessary uses. The hands are formed to be convenient for work, the feet for walking, the eyes to serve sight, guarded by the sentinels of the eyebrows; the ears are so formed for hearing that, like a cymbal, they give back the sound of the word received more loudly and send it on to the perception of the heart. The tongue, striking against the teeth, performs the office of a plectrum for speaking. Of the teeth themselves, some cut and divide the food and pass it to the inner ones, and the inner ones grind and crush it like a mill, so that, passed to the stomach, it may be digested more suitably; whence they are also called molars.
8.30PG 1:1386a–1387a
Sed et nares. commeandi flatus et reddendi ac recipiendi gratia factae sunt, ut innovatione spiritus calor naturalis qui in corde est, vel accendi vel refrigerari, cum res poposcerit, queat pulmonis officio, qui pectori inhaerere datus est, ut mollitie sui palpet et foveat cordis vigorem, in quo videtur vita consistere, vita dico, non anima. Nam quid dicam de substantia sanguinis, qui velut fluvius ex fonte procedens, et uno prius alveo invectus tum deinde per innumeras venas, quasi per areas 'derivatus, totam humani corporis terram vitalibus rigat fluentis, jecoris opere ministratus, quod ad efficaciam digestionis ciborum, atque in sanguinem mutandorum in dextro latere jacet. In sinistro vero splenis est locus, qui trahere ad se et purgare quodammodo sordes sanguinis possit.
“The nostrils too were made for the passage of breath, for giving it out and taking it in, so that by renewal of the breath the natural heat in the heart may be either kindled or cooled as the case requires, by the office of the lung, which has been set to cling to the breast, so that by its softness it may caress and cherish the vigor of the heart, in which life seems to reside—life, I say, not the soul. And what shall I say of the substance of the blood, which, like a river proceeding from its source, carried first in one channel and then diverted through innumerable veins as through plots of ground, waters the whole earth of the human body with life-giving streams, supplied by the work of the liver, which lies on the right side to effect the digestion of food and its change into blood? On the left side is the place of the spleen, which can draw to itself and in a way purge the impurities of the blood.
8.31PG 1:1387a
Intestinorum quoque ratio quanta est! quas idcirco longis nexibus in circulorum ordinata sunt modum, ut susceptas digestiones ciborum paulatim egerant, quo neque ad subitum inanes efficiant locos, et his qui superadditi fuerint non impediantur cibis. Membrana: autem in modum idcirco facta sunt, ut ex ipsis ea quat extrinsecus sunt, humorem sensim suscipiant, qui neque subito effusus exinaniret interna, neque densiore cute prohibitus, arida quae extrinsecus habentur efficeret, et totam hominis fabricam sitis necessitate turbaret.
“And how great is the plan of the intestines! They are arranged in long coils in the manner of circles so that they may gradually expel the digested food they have received, so as neither to make their places suddenly empty nor be hindered by the food that is added on top. And the membranes are made in such a way that from them the outer parts may gradually receive moisture, which, if poured out suddenly, would not empty the inner parts, and, if held back by too thick a skin, would not leave the outer parts dry and disturb the whole fabric of man by the necessity of thirst.
8.32PG 1:1387a
Porro vero feminea positio, et vulvas sinus ad recipiendum germen et confovendum vivificandumque commodissimus, quem non ratione et prudentia effecta esse quae facta sunt, suadeat, quod in ea solum parte membrorum a virili specie femina discrepat, qua posteritas sata suscipitur et fovetur, et rursus virilis habitus ea tantummodo membrorum parte immutatur, qua ei vis serendi et generandi hominis inest? Et in hoc magnum quidem testimonium Providentiae datur, ex necessaria diversitate membrorum, sed ibi majus, ubi in habitus similitudine, usus diversitas et officii varietas invenitur. Nam mamillae viris aeque sunt ac feminis, sed feminarum solae sunt quae lactis munere replentur, ut statim ubi genuerint, apta sibi parvulus inveniat nutrimenta. Quod si tanta ratione videmus in homine membra disposita, ut in caeteris omnibus similis habitus videatur, in his tantummodo discrepent, in quibus usus diversitatem requirit, et neque in viro aliquid superfluum aut egens, neque in femina quod desit videamus vel quod abundet, quis ex his omnibus non evidenter agnoscat rationis opus et sapientiam Conditoris?
“Further, the female arrangement and the hollow of the womb, most suited to receiving the seed and cherishing and quickening it—whom will it not persuade that what has been made was effected by reason and prudence, since the woman differs from the male form only in that part of the members by which the posterity sown is received and cherished, and again the male form is changed only in that part of the members in which lies the power of sowing and begetting man? In this a great testimony of Providence is given by the necessary diversity of members; but a greater one where, with likeness of form, there is found a diversity of use and variety of function. For men have breasts just as women do, but only women's are filled with the gift of milk, so that as soon as they have given birth, the little one may find nourishment suited to it. If, then, we see the members in man arranged with such reason that in all the rest there appears a similar form, and they differ only in those in which use requires diversity, and we see nothing superfluous or lacking in the man, nor anything wanting or excessive in the woman, who from all this does not plainly recognize the work of reason and the wisdom of the Founder?”
8.33PG 1:1387a
His astipulatur etiam caeterorum animalium rationabilis diversitas, et suo quodque usui ministerioque conveniens. Haec testatur et arborum varietas herbarumque diversitas, tam specie variata quam succis. Haec asserit et permutatio temporum in quatuor distincta vicissitudines, et certis horis, diebus, mensibus, annum circulus claudens, et ne unam quidem horam statuta: rationis excedens; hinc denique etiam mundi ipsius aetas, certa et stabili ratione, concepto annorum numero venantur.
“This is confirmed also by the rational diversity of the other animals, each suited to its own use and service. This the variety of trees and the diversity of herbs attest, varied as much in form as in juices. This the change of seasons asserts, distinguished into four turns, closing the circle of the year in fixed hours, days, and months, and not exceeding by even one hour the appointed reason. Hence, indeed, even the age of the world itself is reckoned by a sure and stable reason, the number of years being computed.
8.34PG 1:1387a–1388a
Sed dices, Quando mundus factus est, et quare tam tarde? Hoc possis obtendere etiamsi ante factus fuisset; diceres enim, Cur non et ante hoc? et ita immensa saacula transcendens semper possis requirere, cur non et ante hoc? Sed nobis nunc sermo non de eo est [cur non sit ante factus quam factus est], sed si omnino factus est. Si enim factum constat, necessario potentis et summi artificis opus est; quod si constat, quando eum facere voluerit, sapientis artificis arbitrio judicioque relinquendum est. Nisi videatur tibi omnis haec sapientia, quae tam immanem mundi machinam struxit, et singulis quibusque rebus formas et species dedit, quarum habitum non decori solum convenientem, sed et futuris usibus aptissimum et necessarium poneret, hoc eam solum fugerit, quo tam magnifica: conditionis opportunum tempus assumeret. Est apud illum profecto certa ratio, sunt evidentes causa, cur et quando et qualiter fecerit mundum, quas hominibus, quibus haec quae ante oculos posita sunt et de ejus providentia contestantur, inquirere et intelligere pigrum fuit, aperiri utique non oportuit; quae enim in occulto habentur et intra sapientia: sensus, velut intra regios thesauros recondita sunt, nemini patent, nisi his qui ab illo didicerint, apud quem signata sunt haec et reposita. Deus ergo est qui fecit omnia, et ipse a nemine factus est. Qui autem naturam pro Deo nominant, et per naturam facta esse cuncta testantur. latet eos appellationis sua: error. Si enim naturam irrationabilem putant, stultissimum est rationabilem facturam ab irrationabili factore progredi. Si vero ratio est, id est logos, per quam facta constat universa, superfluo nomen immutant, ubi de Conditoris ratione profitentur. Ad haec si quid habes, Pater, prosequere.
“But you will say: ‘When was the world made, and why so late?’ You could put this forward even if it had been made earlier; for you would say, ‘Why not before that?’ And so, passing beyond immense ages, you could always ask, ‘Why not before that?’ But our discussion now is not about (why it was not made before it was made), but whether it was made at all. For if it is agreed that it was made, it is necessarily the work of a powerful and supreme craftsman; and if this is agreed, when he chose to make it must be left to the will and judgment of the wise craftsman. Unless it seems to you that all this wisdom, which built so immense a fabric of the world and gave forms and appearances to each and every thing, whose condition it made not only fitting for beauty but most apt and necessary for future uses, missed only this—when to choose the opportune time for so magnificent a creation. With him there is certainly a sure reason, there are evident causes, why and when and how he made the world; and it was certainly not right for these to be opened to men who were too lazy to inquire into and understand these things set before their eyes, which bear witness to his providence. For what is kept hidden and stored within the mind of wisdom, as in royal treasuries, lies open to no one except those who have learned from him with whom these things are sealed and laid up. It is God, then, who made all things, and he himself was made by no one. But those who name nature in place of God, and testify that all things were made by nature, do not see the error of their naming. For if they think nature irrational, it is most foolish that a rational work should proceed from an irrational maker. But if it is reason, that is, logos, through which all things are agreed to have been made, they change the name superfluously when they are professing the reason of the Founder. If you have anything against this, father, go on.”
8.35PG 1:1388a–1389a
Haec cum Niceta dixisset, senex ita respondit: Tu quidem, fili, prudenter et fortiter prosecutus es, in tantum ut melius dici posse de Providentia non putem. Sed quoniam hora jam multa est, crastino ad haec quae prosecutus es. respondere aliqua volo, de quibus si mihi satisfeceris gratia: me fateor debitorem. Et his a sene dictis, surrexit Petrus. Quidam vero ex astantibus Laodicensium primus rogabat Petrum et nos, ut senis indumenta quae habebat sordida et scissa mutaret; quem Petrus et nos amplexi, et collaudantes pro honesta et optima voluntate sua, dicebamus: Quia nec nos ita insipientes sumus et impii, ut cui tam pretiosa verba concredimus, non multo magis etiam haec quae ad usus corporeos sunt necessaria praebeamus, quae eum et libenter suscepturum credimus, tanquam a filiis patrem, sed et tectum nobis et vitam communem fore credimus. Haec cum nos diceremus, et ille primarius civitatis summa vi et blandimentis plurimis avellere a nobis cuperet senem, nos vero eo vehementius retineremus, omnis populus acclamavit ut illud magis fiat, quod ipsi placet seni; et cum silentium factum fuisset, senex juramento praevenit, dicens: Hodie apud nullum manebo neque ab aliquo quidquam suscipiam, uti ne alterius dilectio alterius tristitia fiat; haec enim postmodum si visum fuerit, fieri possunt.
When Niceta had said this, the old man answered thus: “You, my son, have argued prudently and strongly, so much so that I do not think anything better could be said about Providence. But since the hour is already late, tomorrow I wish to answer some things to what you have argued; and if you satisfy me about them, I confess myself in your debt.” When the old man had said this, Peter rose. One of the bystanders, the leading man of the Laodiceans, asked Peter and us to let him change the old man's clothes, which were dirty and torn. Peter and we embraced him, and, praising him for his honorable and excellent goodwill, said: “We are not so foolish and impious that, having entrusted such precious words to him, we would not much more provide also what is necessary for bodily uses; and we believe he will gladly accept them, as a father from his sons; indeed we believe that we shall share a roof and a common life.” While we were saying this, and that leading man of the city wished with all his might and with many coaxings to take the old man away from us, while we held on to him all the more strongly, the whole people cried out that what pleased the old man should rather be done. When silence had been made, the old man forestalled them with an oath, saying: “Today I will stay with no one and accept nothing from anyone, so that one man's love may not become another's sadness. These things can be done later, if it seems good.”
8.36PG 1:1389a
Et cum haec dixisset senex, Petrus ait ad primarium civitatis: Quoniam nostri praesentia bonam voluntatem tuam ostendisti, tristem te non oportet abscedere, sed accipiemus abs te gratiam pro gratia, domum tuam nobis ostende, et praepara eam ut crastino disputatio quae futura est ibi habeatur, et si qui volunt adesse ad audiendum permittantur. Quae cum audisset primus civitatis valde gavisus est, sed et omnis populus libenter audivit. Cumque discessissent turbae, domum suam ostendit; discedere autem et senex coepit. Ego tamen uni ex pedissequis meis imperavi clam subsequi vestigium senis, et discere ubi maneret. Nos autem cum redissemus ad hospitium, enarravimus omnia fratribus quae nobis cum sene habita sunt, et ita ex more cibo sumpto requievimus.
When the old man had said this, Peter said to the leading man of the city: “Since you have shown your goodwill in our presence, you must not go away sad; we will accept a favor from you in return for a favor. Show us your house and prepare it, so that the discussion that is to take place tomorrow may be held there, and let any who wish to be present to listen be admitted.” When the leading man of the city heard this he was very glad, and the whole people heard it gladly too. When the crowds had dispersed, he showed us his house; and the old man also began to leave. But I ordered one of my attendants to follow the old man's footsteps secretly and learn where he was staying. When we had returned to the lodging, we told the brothers everything we had had with the old man, and so, having taken food as usual, we rested.
8.37PG 1:1389a
Die autem postera Petrus mature surgens suscitavit nos, et perreximus pariter ad locum secretum, in quo et pridie orationis causa fueramus; atque inde post orationem dum veniremus ad constitutam domum, in itinere monebat nos, dicens: Audite me, conservi dilectissimi, bonum est ut unusquisque vestrum secundum quod potest, prosit accedentibus ad fidem religionis nostrae, et ideo non vos pigeat secundum sapientiam, quae vobis per Dei providentiam collata est disserentes, instruere ignaros et docere, ita tamen ut his quae a me audistis et tradita sunt vobis, vestri tantum sermonis eloquentiam societis. Nec aliquid proprium et quod vobis non est traditum proloquamini, etiamsi vobis verisimile videatur, sed ea, ut dixi, quae ipse a vero propheta suscepta vobis tradidi, prosequamini, etiamsi minus plenae assertionis esse videbuntur. Hinc enim saepe contingit declinare quosdam a veritate, dum speciem sibi verioris et validioris veritatis, propriis cogitationibus reperisse se credunt.
On the next day Peter rose early, woke us, and we went together to the secluded place where we had been for prayer the day before. From there, after prayer, as we were coming to the appointed house, he admonished us on the way, saying: “Listen to me, dearest fellow servants. It is good that each of you, as far as he can, should help those who come to the faith of our religion. So do not be reluctant to instruct and teach the ignorant, discoursing according to the wisdom conferred on you by God's providence—but in such a way that you add only the eloquence of your own speech to what you have heard from me and what has been handed down to you. Do not utter anything of your own that has not been handed down to you, even if it seems plausible to you; but, as I said, set forth what I myself received from the true Prophet and handed down to you, even if it seems less fully argued. For it often happens that some turn aside from the truth because they believe that by their own thoughts they have found the appearance of a truer and stronger truth.”
8.38PG 1:1389a–1390a
His a Petro dictis libenter annuimus, dicentes ei, nihil nos acturos, nisi quod ipsi videretur. Tum ille: Ut ergo, inquit, sine periculo exerceamini, me coram disputate singuli, ita ut unus alii succedat ac suas unusquisque explicet quaestiones. Nunc ergo quoniam hesterno die Niceta sufficienter disseruit, hodie sermonem faciat Aquila, et post Aquilam Clemens, inde ego. si tamen etiam me res poposcerit aliquid addere. Interea dum hujuscemodi sermones credimus, ad domum ventum est in qua suscipiens nos paterfamilias, introducit ad locum quemdam in similitudinem theatri collectum et pulchre exaedificatum, in quo turbas plurimas ex tempore noctis opperientes nos reperimus, inter quos et senex qui pridie nobiscum disputaverat. Itaque medium habentes Petrum ingredimur etiam nos, circumspicientes sicubi cerneremus senem; quem prior Petrus videns in medio turbae latitantem evocavit ad se. dicens: Clariorem multis animam possidens, cur in occulto lates et verecundia contegeris? accede huc magis, et quae tibi videntur exsequere.
We gladly agreed to what Peter said, telling him that we would do nothing except what seemed good to him. Then he said: “So that you may be exercised without danger, dispute one by one in my presence, so that one succeeds another and each unfolds his own questions. Now, since Niceta argued sufficiently yesterday, let Aquila make the discourse today, and after Aquila, Clement, and then I, if the matter requires me also to add something.” While we were exchanging such words, we came to the house, where the master of the household received us and brought us into a place built in the form of a theater and beautifully constructed, in which we found very great crowds who had been waiting for us since the night; among them was the old man who had disputed with us the day before. So we went in, with Peter in our midst, looking around to see the old man somewhere. Peter saw him first, hiding in the middle of the crowd, and called him to himself, saying: “Possessing a soul brighter than many, why do you hide in obscurity and cover yourself with modesty? Come here instead and set out what you think.”
8.39PG 1:1390a
Ubi haec dixit Petrus, statim turbae locum dare coeperunt seni. Cumque accessisset, ita coepit: Eorum quae die hesterno prosecutus est juvenis, etiamsi verba non memini, sensum tamen et ordinem teneo, et ideo necessarium puto propter eos qui hesterno non adfuerunt, anacephalaeosin facere eorum quae dicta sunt, et breviter cuncta repetere, ut etiamsi me aliquid effugerit, ab eo qui prosecutus est praesente commonear. Hic ergo fuit hesternae disputationis sensus, quod omnia quae videntur, quoniam certa mensura et arte formaque ac specie constant, sine dubio a sapiente virtute facta esse [credenda sunt; quod si mens et ratio est quae haec condidit, consequens esse] ut rationis ipsius providentia mundus regatur, etiamsi nobis ea quae geruntur in mundo, minus recte geri videantur. Consequitur autem, ut si creator omnium Deus est ac mens, sit etiam justus; quod si justus est, necessario judicat; si judicat, necesse est ut homines de suis actibus judicentur; et si de actibus suis unusquisque judicatur, erit ergo inter justos et peccatores justum quandoque discrimen. Haec fuit, ut opinor, totius verbi continentia.
When Peter said this, at once the crowds began to make room for the old man. When he had come forward, he began thus: “Of what the young man argued yesterday, even if I do not remember the words, I hold the sense and the order; and so I think it necessary, for the sake of those who were not present yesterday, to make a recapitulation of what was said and repeat it all briefly, so that if anything has escaped me I may be reminded by him who argued it, since he is present. This, then, was the sense of yesterday's discussion: that all things that are seen, since they consist in fixed measure and art, form and appearance, (are to be believed) without doubt to have been made by a wise power; (and that if it is mind and reason that founded them, it follows) that the world is ruled by the providence of reason itself, even if the things done in the world seem to us to be done less rightly. And it follows that if God, the creator of all, is also mind, he is also just; and if he is just, he necessarily judges; if he judges, men must be judged for their acts; and if each one is judged for his acts, there will one day be a just distinction between the just and sinners. This, I think, was the content of the whole discourse.
8.40PG 1:1390a–1390d
Si ergo ostendi potest quod mens ac ratio cuncta condiderit, consequens est et ea quae sequuntur ratione et providentia geri. Si vero natura imprudens et caeca gignit universa, perimitur sine dubio judicii ratio, nec discussio peccatorum ac benefactorum remuneratio sperabitur, ubi judex non est. Quia ergo omnia in hoc pendent et huic capiti adhaerent, non indignemini, si forte paulo latius discuti haec et pertractari voluero. In hoc enim mihi ad omnia quae proponuntur, velut prima janua clauditur, et ideo hanc mihi ante omnia aperiri volo. Nunc ergo audite quae doceo, et respondeat mihi si quis vestrum volet; non enim erubescam discere. si audiero quod verum est, et recte dicenti acquiescere. Igitur hesterno a te habitus sermo, qui asserebat quod arte et mensura et ratione cuncta constarent, non valde me suadet, mentem rationemque esse quae fecerit mundum; multa enim habeo, quae ostendam competenti mensura ac forma et specie constare, nec tamen per mentem condita ac rationem. Tum praeterea video multa incondite, inconsequenter, injuste geri in mundo, et sine genesis cursu nihil fieri posse; quod post omnia etiam ex me ipso manifestissime approbabo.
“If, then, it can be shown that mind and reason founded all things, it follows that what comes after is also conducted by reason and providence. But if a nature without foresight and blind begets all things, the reason for judgment is without doubt destroyed, and no examination of sins nor reward of good deeds will be hoped for where there is no judge. Since, then, everything depends on this and hangs on this head, do not be indignant if I wish to discuss and handle these things a little more fully. For in this point, as it were, the first door to everything proposed is closed to me, and so I want this opened to me before everything. Now, then, hear what I put forward, and let any of you who wishes answer me; for I will not be ashamed to learn, if I hear what is true, and to agree with one who speaks rightly. The discourse you gave yesterday, then, which asserted that all things consist by art and measure and reason, does not much persuade me that it was mind and reason that made the world; for I have many things that I can show consist in suitable measure and form and appearance, yet were not founded by mind and reason. Besides, I see many things done in the world confusedly, inconsistently, unjustly, and that nothing can happen without the course of birth-fate; which, after all else, I will prove most clearly from my own case.”
8.41PG 1:1390d–1391a
Haec cum senex diceret, Aquila respondit: Quoniam ipse proposuisti, ut ad ea quae diceres haberet copiam respondendi qui velit, concedit mihi frater meus Niceta hodie facere sermonem. Et senex: Prosequere, ait, fili, ut vis. Et Aquila respondit: Promisisti quod ostenderes multa esse in mundo, quae formam ac speciem aequali ratione collectam gerant, quae tamen constet non effici per conditorem Deum. Nunc ergo quod promisisti, ostende. Et senex: Ecce arcum videmus in caelo circulum tenere omni mensura collectum, et habere speciem veri, quam fortassis nec mens condere nec describere ratio potuisset, nec tamen hic ab aliqua mente fit. Ecce in brevi totum proposui, responde ad haec.
When the old man had said this, Aquila answered: “Since you yourself proposed that whoever wishes should have the opportunity to answer what you say, my brother Niceta grants me to make the discourse today.” The old man said: “Proceed as you wish, my son.” Aquila answered: “You promised that you would show that there are many things in the world which bear a form and appearance gathered with equal reason, which nevertheless are agreed not to be made by God the founder. Now show what you promised.” The old man said: “See, we see a bow in the sky holding a circle gathered with every measure and having the appearance of a true one, which perhaps neither mind could found nor reason describe; yet it is not made by any mind. There—I have put the whole in brief; answer this.”
8.42PG 1:1391a–1391c
Tum Aquila: Non continuo, inquit, si quid ex typo et forma exprimitur, id intelligitur a ratione esse ac sine mente non fieri posse, quoniam typus ipse qui exprimit figuras ac formas. non sine mente factus est. Verbi causa, cera si alligatur sculpta annulo, imaginem quidem et figuram sumit ex annulo, qui sine dubio sensu caret, sed annulus qui exprimit effigiem, manu artificis sculptus est, et mens fuit ac ratio, quae typum annulo dedit. Ita ergo et arcus exprimitur in aere; sol enim nubibus rarescentibus radios suos imprimens, et humori nubilo velut cera molli affigens orbis sui typum, arcus speciem reddit, et efficit hoc ipsa, ut dixi, repercussio splendoris solis in nubibus, atque ex illis fulgorem circuli ejus reddens. Fit autem hoc non semper, sed cum opportunitatem sui humecta nubes rarescendo praestiterint. Unde et rursus cum densantur nubes et coeunt, arcus forma resolvitur et exolescit, denique nunquam sine sole et nubibus arcus apparet, sicut nec sine typo et cera vel alia hujusmodi materia exprimitur imago. Non ergo mirum est, si conditor Deus ex initio fecit typos, ex quibus nunc formae exprimantur ac species. Simile autem hoc et illi, quod ab initio Deus elementa insensibilia creavit, quibus ad reliqua omnia formanda et explicanda uteretur. Sed et qui statuas formant, typum prius luti vel cerae fingunt, et ex ipso redditur statua: effigies; tum deinde et umbra redditur ex statua, quae umbra per omnia formam ac similitudinem statuae gerit. Quid ergo dicemus insensibilem statuam formare umbram, tam diligenti quam ipsa statua est ratione collectam? an illi sine dubio ascribetur umbrae collectio, qui et statuam finxit?
Then Aquila said: “If something is impressed from a mold and form, it is not directly that thing which is understood to be from reason and unable to come about without mind; it is the mold itself, which impresses figures and forms, that was not made without mind. For example, if wax is pressed with an engraved ring, it takes its image and figure from the ring, which certainly lacks sense; but the ring that impresses the likeness was engraved by the hand of a craftsman, and it was mind and reason that gave the ring its mold. So too the bow is impressed on the air. For the sun, impressing its rays on thinning clouds and fixing the mold of its orb on the cloudy moisture as on soft wax, produces the appearance of the bow; and this, as I said, is effected by the reflection of the sun's splendor in the clouds, giving back from them the brightness of its circle. This does not happen always, but when the moist clouds, by thinning, provide the opportunity. Hence, again, when the clouds thicken and come together, the form of the bow dissolves and fades. Indeed the bow never appears without sun and clouds, just as an image is not impressed without a mold and wax or some other such material. It is no wonder, then, if God the founder made molds in the beginning, from which forms and appearances are now impressed. This is like the fact that God created insensible elements in the beginning, to use them for forming and unfolding all the rest. Those who form statues also first fashion a mold of clay or wax, and from it the likeness of the statue is produced; then a shadow too is cast by the statue, which shadow bears in every respect the form and likeness of the statue. What then shall we say—that the insensible statue forms a shadow gathered with as careful a reason as the statue itself? Or will the gathering of the shadow be ascribed without doubt to him who also fashioned the statue?”
8.43PG 1:1391c–1392a
Si ergo tibi videtur hoc ita se habere et sufficit quod de hoc dictum est, ad alia inquirenda veniamus; aut si aliquid adhuc deesse putas, repetamus. Et senex ait: Volo ut repetas de hoc, sunt enim et alia multa quae similiter fieri video; nam et fructus arborum simili modo pulchre formati et in rotundum mire collecti nascuntur, et foliorum species ingenti decore formatur, atque exquisita arte viridis membrana contexitur; tum praeterea pulices, mures, lacertas et his similia, nunquid et haec dicemus a Deo fieri? Unde ex his vilioribus conjectura capitur meliorum, quod nequaquam mentis arte formentur. Bene, inquit Aquila, de foliorum textura et de parvis animalibus colligis, quod ex his fides etiam melioribus deroganda sit; sed non te ista decipiant, ut putes quasi duabus solis manibus operantem Deum non posse universa complere quae fiunt, sed memento quomodo hesterno tibi frater meus Niceta respondit, et mysterium ante tempus aperuit vere quasi cum patre loquens, et cur et quomodo fiant haec quae inutilia videntur, exposuit.
“If, then, it seems to you that this is so and what has been said about it is enough, let us come to other inquiries; or if you think something is still lacking, let us go over it again.” The old man said: “I want you to go over it again; for there are many other things that I see come about in a similar way. For the fruits of trees are produced in a similar manner, beautifully formed and wonderfully gathered into roundness; and the appearance of leaves is formed with great beauty, and the green membrane is woven with exquisite art. And besides, fleas, mice, lizards, and things like these—shall we say that these too are made by God? So from these baser things one may conjecture about the better, that they are by no means formed by the art of a mind.” “You argue well,” said Aquila, “from the texture of leaves and from small animals, that faith should be withdrawn even from the better things on account of them. But do not let these things deceive you into thinking that God, working as it were with two hands only, cannot accomplish all that is made. Remember how my brother Niceta answered you yesterday, and opened a mystery before its time, truly as one speaking with his father, and explained why and how these things that seem useless are made.”
8.44PG 1:1392a–1392c
Et senex: Cur ista inutilia voluntate illius summae mentis fiant, velim a te audire. Si, inquit, liquido apud te constat, quod mentis et rationis opus in ipsis est, tum demum tibi etiam cur facta sunt, dicere non pigebit et quod juste facta sint edocere. Ad haec senex respondit: Non possum. fili, ea quae videntur ex arte formata, dicere per mentem fieri, propter caetera quae injuste et inordinate fieri videmus in mundo. Si te, inquit Aquila, ea quae inordinate fiunt, dicere quod per Providentiam Dei facta sint non sinunt, cur non ea quae ordinate fiunt, dicere te quod a Deo facta sint cogunt. et quia irrationabilis natura opus rationabile proferre non possit? Certum est enim, nec omnino negamus, quia in hoc mundo quaedam ordinate, quaedam inordinate fiant; ea ergo quae rationabiliter fiunt, crede quod per Providentiam fiant, quae vero irrationabiliter et inordinate, quia naturaliter eveniant et fortuito accidant. Miror autem non advertere homines, quia ubi sensus est. possunt res ordinate fieri et inordinate, ubi autem nullus est sensus, neutrum omnino effici; nam ratio ordinem facit, ordinis autem cursus, si contrarium quid acciderit quod ordinem turbet, necessario inordinatum aliquid profert. Et senex: Hoc ipsum mihi a te ostendi volo.
The old man said: “I should like to hear from you why these useless things are made by the will of that supreme mind.” Aquila said: “If it is clearly established for you that the work of mind and reason is in them, then you will not be reluctant to say why they were made, and to teach that they were justly made.” To this the old man answered: “I cannot, my son, say that the things that appear formed by art are made by mind, because of the other things we see done unjustly and without order in the world.” “If,” said Aquila, “the things done without order do not allow you to say that they were made by the providence of God, why do not the things done in order compel you to say that they were made by God, and that irrational nature cannot produce a rational work? For it is certain, and we do not at all deny it, that in this world some things are done in order and some without order. Believe, then, that the things done rationally are done by Providence, but that those done irrationally and without order happen naturally and occur by chance. But I wonder that men do not notice that where there is sense, things can be done both in order and without order, but where there is no sense, neither can be done at all. For reason makes order; but the course of order, if something contrary happens that disturbs the order, necessarily produces something disordered.” The old man said: “This very thing I want you to show me.”
8.45PG 1:1392c–1393a
Non, inquit, morabor Aquila. Duo visibilis signa monstrantur in caelo, unum solis, aliud lunae; haec sequuntur et alia: quinque stellae, diversos et proprios singulae explicantes cursus. Haec ergo Deus posuit in caelo, quibus aeris temperies pro ratione temporum dispensetur, et ordo vicissitudinum permutationumque servetur. Horum autem ipsorum ministerio, et si quando pro peccatis hominum plaga et corruptio terris injicitur, perturbatur aer. lues animantibus. corruptio frugibus, pestilens per omnia mortalibus annus inducitur, et ita fit, ut uno eodemque ministerio et servetur ordo et corrumpatur. Etenim palam est incredulis et imperitis. quod cursus solis utilis et necessarius mundo, per Providentiam datus, semper ordinatus habeatur; lunae vero ad comparationem cursus solis. in augmentis et detrimentis suis apud imperitos inordinati cursus videntur et incompositi. Nam sol certis distinctionibus et ordinatis movetur; ex ipso enim sunt horae, ex ipso dies cum ascenderit, ex ipso etiam nox cum occiderit, ex ipso menses et anni numerantur, ex ipso vicissitudines temporum fiunt, dum ad superiora conscendens ver temperat, ubi autem ad summum caeli venerit, aestivos accendit calores; decidens rursus autumni temperiem reddit, ubi vero ad inferiorem redierit circulum, ex glaciali compage caeli rigorem nobis hiberni frigoris derelinquit.
“I will not delay,” said Aquila. “Two visible signs are shown in the sky, one of the sun, the other of the moon; and five other stars follow these, each unfolding its own different course. These, then, God placed in the sky, so that by them the temperature of the air might be regulated according to the reason of the seasons and the order of turns and changes kept. And by the ministry of these same bodies, whenever for the sins of men a plague and corruption is sent on the earth, the air is disturbed: pestilence on animals, blight on crops, a year pestilent in every way is brought on mortals; and so it comes about that by one and the same ministry order is both kept and corrupted. For even to unbelievers and the unskilled it is plain that the course of the sun, useful and necessary to the world and given by Providence, is always held in order; but the moon's course, compared with the sun's course, in its waxing and waning, seems to the unskilled disordered and irregular. For the sun moves by fixed and ordered distinctions: from it are the hours, from it the day when it rises, from it also night when it sets; by it months and years are numbered; by it the changes of seasons come about, as, climbing to the higher regions, it tempers spring, and when it has come to the height of heaven it kindles the summer heats; descending again it brings back the mildness of autumn; and when it has returned to the lower circle, it leaves us the stiffness of wintry cold from the icy framework of heaven.
8.46PG 1:1393a–1393b
Sed de his alias latius disseremus. Nunc interim, cum sit iste minister bonus, ad vicissitudines temporum moderandas, tamen ubi secundum voluntatem Dei correptio mortalibus datur, incandescit acrius et urit mundum vehementioribus flammis. Similiter et luna: cursus, atque haec quae imperitis videtur inordinata permutatio, incrementis frugum et pecudum omniumque animantium commoda est; augmentis enim ejus detrimentisque mira quadam Providentiae arte omne quod gignitur, alitur et crescit, de quibus latius prosequi possemus et aperire de singulis rationem, nisi nos propositae quaestionis ordo revocaret. His tamen ipsis eisdemque ministeriis quibus gignuntur, aluntur, augentur universa; cum fuerit justa aliqua ex causa ordinis instituti mutata temperies, corruptio oritur et intemperantia, ut in homines, sicut supra diximus, castigatio Dei voluntate procedat.
“But we shall discuss these things more fully elsewhere. Now meanwhile, though the sun is a good minister for regulating the changes of the seasons, yet when, according to the will of God, correction is given to mortals, it glows more fiercely and burns the world with more violent flames. Similarly the course of the moon, and that change which seems disordered to the unskilled, is beneficial to the growth of crops and herds and all living things; for by its waxings and wanings, by a wonderful art of Providence, everything that is begotten is nourished and grows. We could pursue these things more fully and set out the reason of each, if the order of the proposed question did not call us back. Yet by these very same ministries by which all things are begotten, nourished, and increased, when for some just cause the tempering of the established order has been changed, corruption and intemperance arise, so that, as we said above, chastisement proceeds against men by the will of God.
8.47PG 1:1393b–1394a
Sed fortasse dices: Quid, quod in ista communi castigatione similia impii patiuntur et pii? Verum est, etiam nos fatemur; sed piis castigatio ad profectum cedit, ut in praesenti vita afflicti purgatiores veniant ad futuram, in qua perpetua eis requies praeparata est, simul autem ut et impii aliquantulum ex ipsorum castigatione proficiant, aut justa in eos feratur judicii futuri sententia, cum in eisdem castigationibus justi quidem gratias egerint Deo, injusti autem blasphemaverint. Igitur cum in duas partes rerum dividatur opinio, quod alia per ordinem, alia contra ordinem fiant: ex his quidem quae secundum ordinem sunt, oportuit credi esse Providentiam; de his vero qua: contra ordinem geruntur, causas requirere ab his, qui eas per doctrinam propheticam didicere; quibus enim innotescere potuit sermo propheticus, sciunt quando et ob quam causam aerugo, grando, pestilentia, et horum similia per singulas quasque generationes exorta sint, et ex quibus peccatis haec ad vindictam data sint, unde humano generi causa tristitiae, unde gemitus ac dolores acciderint, unde etiam tremoris languor advenerit, et quod haec ab initio fuerit vindicta parricidii.
“But perhaps you will say: ‘What of the fact that in this common chastisement the impious and the pious suffer alike?’ It is true; we too confess it. But for the pious, chastisement turns to their progress, so that, afflicted in the present life, they may come more purified to the future life, in which perpetual rest is prepared for them; and at the same time, so that the impious may profit a little from their chastisement, or else the sentence of the future judgment may be justly passed on them, when in the same chastisements the just have given thanks to God and the unjust have blasphemed. Since, then, opinion about things is divided into two parts—that some things happen in order and others against order—from the things that are according to order one ought to have believed that there is Providence; but of the things done against order one ought to seek the causes from those who have learned them through prophetic teaching. For those to whom the prophetic word has been able to become known know when and for what cause mildew, hail, pestilence, and the like have arisen in each generation, and for what sins these have been given as punishment; whence the cause of sadness came to the human race, whence groans and griefs, whence also the weakness of trembling came, and that this was from the beginning the punishment of fratricide.
8.48PG 1:1394a–1394b
Nam ab origine mundi nihil horum fuit, Sed ex impietate hominum initium mala ista sumpsere, et inde semper crescentibus iniquitatibus et malorum numerus crevit. Sed idcirco divina Providentia judicium erga omnes statuit, quia praesens saeculum non erat tale, in quo unusquisque possit pro meritis dispensari. Non ergo ex his, quae pro peccatis hominum mundo acciderunt malis, illa contemplanda sunt, quae ab initio cum nullae mali causae existerent, bene et ordinate instituta sunt. Denique ad indicium eorum quae ab initio fuere, inveniuntur nonnullae gentes alienae ab hujusmodi malis. Nam Seres quia caste vivunt, expertes habentur horum omnium, quia neque post conceptum adiri ultra apud eos feminam fas est, neque cum purgatur; carnibus ibi immundis nemo vescitur, sacrificia nemo novit, secundum justitiam omnes sibi ipsis judices fiunt. Idcirco igitur neque castigantur istis plagis quas supra diximus, et plurimum temporis in vita durantes, absque aegritudine finiunt vitam. Nos autem miseri, velut cum serpentibus pessimis habitantes, cum hominibus dico iniquis, perferimus necessario cum ipsis afflictionum plagas in hoc mundo, sed spem gerimus ex consolatione futurorum bonorum.
“For from the origin of the world there was nothing of these things; but these evils took their beginning from the impiety of men, and from then on, as iniquities always increased, the number of evils also grew. But divine Providence has appointed a judgment for all because the present age was not such that each could be dealt with according to his merits. So we must not, from the evils that have befallen the world because of men's sins, judge those things which from the beginning, when no cause of evil existed, were well and orderly established. Indeed, as a sign of what was from the beginning, some nations are found free from evils of this kind. For the Seres, because they live chastely, are held to be exempt from all these things; for among them it is not lawful for a woman to be approached after conception, nor while she is being purified. No one there eats unclean flesh, no one knows sacrifices; all become judges of themselves according to justice. Therefore they are not chastised by those plagues we spoke of above, and, living a very long time, they end their life without sickness. But we wretched ones, living as it were with the worst serpents—with wicked men, I mean—necessarily endure with them the plagues of afflictions in this world, but we bear hope from the consolation of the good things to come.
8.49PG 1:1394b
Si propter iniquitates, inquit senex, aliorum cruciantur etiam justi, oportuit Deum tanquam provisorem jubere hominibus, ut non facerent ea, ex quibus necesse esset cum injustis affligi etiam justos, aut si facerent emendationem aliquam, aut purificationem mundo adhiberent. Jussit, inquit Aquila, Deus haec et dedit praecepta per prophetas, quomodo homines vivere deberent; sed et haec contempserunt, imo vero et eos si qui forte observare cupiebant, diversis injuriis afflixerunt, donec etiam ipsos a proposita observatione dejicerent, et ad incredulitatis nihilominus verterent turbam sibique similes efficerent.
“If,” said the old man, “the just too are tormented because of the iniquities of others, God, as a provider, ought to have commanded men not to do the things from which the just must needs be afflicted along with the unjust; or, if they did them, he ought to have applied some correction or purification to the world.” “God did command these things,” said Aquila, “and gave precepts through the prophets about how men ought to live. But they despised these too; indeed, if any wished to keep them, they afflicted them with various injuries, until they cast even them down from the observance they had purposed, and turned them likewise to the crowd of unbelief and made them like themselves.
8.50PG 1:1394b–1395a
Propterea denique ab initio cum fuisset omnis terra maculata peccatis, Deus diluvium mundo induxit, quod vos sub Deucalione factum dicitis, et tunc unum quemdam justum cum filiis suis in arca reservavit, et cum eo omnium seminum omniumque animantium genus. Et tamen etiam qui ex ipsis nati sunt, tempore intercedente, rursus similia prioribus agunt; oblivioni enim quae acciderant data sunt. ita ut posteri ne hoc ipsum quidem crederent. quod diluvium factum est. Unde et statuit Deus in praesenti saeculo ultra non fieri diluvium, alioqui secundum rationem peccaturum necesse erat etiam per singulas generationes hoc fieri infidelitatis gratia; sed magis indulsit per singulas gentes angelos quosdam agere principatum qui malis gaudent, quibus tamen ea conditione potestas adversum unumquemque mortalium data est, si prius se ipse quis peccando eis fecisset obnoxium, donec adveniret ille qui bonis gaudet, et compleretur per ipsum numerus justorum, et per omnem mundum crescente multitudine piorum, aliqua ex parte reprimeretur impietas et innotesceret omnibus, quia omne quod bonum est a Deo fit.
“For this reason, indeed, when in the beginning the whole earth had been stained with sins, God brought a flood on the world—which you say happened under Deucalion—and then preserved one righteous man with his sons in an ark, and with him the kind of all seeds and all living things. Yet even those who were born of them, as time went on, again did the same things as those before; for what had happened was given over to forgetfulness, so that their descendants did not even believe that a flood had happened. Hence God decreed that in the present age there should be no more flood; otherwise, by the logic of those who would sin, it would have had to happen in every generation because of unbelief. Rather, he allowed certain angels who rejoice in evil to exercise rule over each nation; yet power was given them over each mortal only on this condition, that he had first made himself liable to them by sinning; until he should come who rejoices in the good, and the number of the righteous should be completed through him, and as the multitude of the pious grew throughout the world, impiety might be checked in some measure and it might become known to all that everything good is done by God.
8.51PG 1:1395a
Ex arbitrii autem libertate unusquisque hominum dum incredulus est de futuris, per malos actus incurrit in mala. Et haec sunt quae videntur in mundo contra ordinem geri, quibus causas, ut essent, infidelitas dedit. Miranda igitur per omnia est divina Providentia dispensatio. qua his qui initio fuerint, bonam quidem viam vita incedentibus, bonis incorruptibilibus dedit perfrui; ubi vero peccaverunt [mali originem peccato pariente sumpserunt], et unicuique bono quasi quodam conjugii foedere ex parte peccati sociatum est malum, quoniam quidem humano sanguine terra polluta est, et ara damonibus succensa. aerem quoque ipsum incesto sacrificiorum fumo temerarunt, et ita demum corrupta prius elementa hominibus corruptela vitium, velut radices ramis ac fructibus tradiderunt.
“By freedom of choice each man, while he does not believe in what is to come, falls into evils through evil acts. And these are the things that seem to be done in the world against order, whose causes for existing unbelief has given. Wonderful, then, in every way is the dispensation of divine Providence, which gave to those who were in the beginning, as they walked the good way of life, to enjoy incorruptible goods. But when they sinned (evils took their origin, sin giving them birth), and to each good, as by a kind of marriage bond, evil was joined on the side of sin; since the earth was polluted with human blood and altars were kindled for demons, and they defiled the very air with the unholy smoke of sacrifices. And so at last the elements, first corrupted, passed on the vice of corruption to men, as roots to branches and fruits.
8.52PG 1:1395a
Vide ergo in hoc, ut dixi. quam juste vitiatis rebus Providentia divina succurrit, ut quoniam bonis Dei, mala quae ex peccato originem sumpserant sociata sunt, duabus his partibus duos principes poneret. et ei qui bonis gaudet bonorum ordinem, qui ad fidem providentia sua credentes adduceret, statuit, ei vero qui malis gaudet, ea quae contra ordinem et inutiliter geruntur, ex quibus sine dubio etiam providentia fides in dubium veniat; et habita est per hoc a justo Deo justa divisio. Hinc ergo est, quod cum ordinatus astrorum cursus fidem faciat manu artificis conditum mundum, rursum conturbatio aeris, aura pestilens, fulminum vagi ignes, Providentia opus refellant. Habent enim, ut diximus, singula quaque bona. contraria et conjuncta sibi mala, ut fecundis imbribus grando inimica est, ut rori placido rubiginis est sociata corruptio, ut ventis lenibus procellarum turbines juncti sunt, fructuosis arboribus infructuosa, herbis utilibus noxia, animalibus mitibus fera et perniciosa connexa sunt. Haec autem omnia posita sunt a Deo, pro eo quod hominibus voluntas arbitrii a bonorum proposito discessit et declinavit ad mala.
“See, then, in this, as I said, how justly divine Providence came to the aid of things that had been corrupted. Since evils that had taken their origin from sin had been joined to the good things of God, it set two princes over these two parts. To him who rejoices in good things it assigned the order of good things, that he might lead believers to faith in its providence; to him who rejoices in evils, the things done against order and uselessly, by which without doubt faith in providence also comes into doubt. And by this a just division was made by the just God. Hence it is that, while the ordered course of the stars makes one believe that the world was founded by a craftsman's hand, again the disturbance of the air, the pestilent breeze, the wandering fires of lightning, seem to refute the work of Providence. For, as we said, each good thing has evils contrary and joined to it: as hail is the enemy of fertile rains, as the corruption of mildew is joined to the gentle dew, as whirlwinds of storms are joined to gentle winds, unfruitful trees to fruitful, harmful herbs to useful, savage and destructive animals to gentle ones. All these things were set by God because the will of men's free choice departed from the purpose of good things and turned aside to evils.
8.53PG 1:1395a–1396a
Igitur in omnibus mundi rebus habetur ista divisio, et sicut sunt pii, ita et impii, ut sunt propheta, ita et falsi propheta; sed et apud gentiles sunt philosophi, sunt et falsi philosophi; Judaorum quoque circumcisionem Arabica gentes aliaque plurima ad ministerium sua impietatis imitati sunt. Sic et divino cultui est contrarius daemonum cultus, et baptismo baptismus, et legi leges, et apostolis pseudoapostoli, et doctoribus falsi doctores. Et inde est unde apud philosophos alii asserunt providentiam, alii negant, alii unum Deum, alii Plures defendunt. Usque ad hoc res denique accessit, ut cum verbo Dei fugentur daemones, per quod esse Providentia declaratur, invenerit ars magica ad infidelitatem confirmandam, quomodo etiam hoc ex contrariis imitetur. Sic serpentum venena mitigare carminibus inventum, et verbo ac potestati Dei contrarias inducere sanitates. Angelis quoque Dei contraria reperit ars magica ministeria, animarum suscitationes contra hac et figmenta damonum ponens. Et ne multa enumerando sermonem longius traham, nihil omnino est quod fidem Providentia faciat, et non habeat econtrario aliud ad infidelitatem paratum; et ideo qui ignorant istam divisionem rerum, pro his qua a semetipsis discordant in mundo, non putant esse Providentiam. Sed tu, Pater, quasi vir sapiens ex ista divisione elige partem, quae ordinem servat et fidem providentia facit, et non solum sequaris illam partem, qua contra ordinem currit et Providentia derogat fidem
“So in all the things of the world this division holds; and as there are pious, so there are impious; as there are prophets, so also false prophets. Among the Gentiles too there are philosophers, and there are also false philosophers. The Arab nations and very many others have imitated the circumcision of the Jews for the service of their impiety. So too the worship of demons is contrary to divine worship, baptism to baptism, laws to the law, false apostles to apostles, and false teachers to teachers. And this is why among philosophers some assert providence, others deny it; some defend one God, others many. Indeed the matter has come to this, that since demons are put to flight by the word of God, by which it is declared that there is Providence, the magic art, to confirm unbelief, has found how to imitate even this from the contrary side. So it was invented to soothe the venom of serpents by incantations, and to bring in cures contrary to the word and power of God. The magic art has also found ministries contrary to the angels of God, setting against them the raising of souls and the figments of demons. And not to drag out the discourse by listing many things: there is absolutely nothing that produces faith in Providence that does not have, on the contrary side, something else ready for unbelief. And so those who do not know this division of things do not think there is Providence, because of the things in the world that are at odds with themselves. But you, father, as a wise man, choose from this division the part that keeps order and produces faith in providence, and do not follow only that part which runs against order and takes away faith in Providence.”
8.54PG 1:1396a
Ad hac senex respondit: Da mihi viam, fili, qua possim ex duobus istis ordinibus, quorum alter asserit, alter refutat Providentiam, unum aliquem in meis sensibus confirmare. Rectum, inquit Aquila, habenti judicium facile discrimen est: nam et hoc ipsum quod ais, ordo et inordinatio, ab artifice fieri potest, a natura vero insensibili non potest; nam verbi gratia ponamus de excelsa rupe abruptum saxum in praeceps ferri, idque illisum solo in multa fragmenta comminui, nunquid evenire ullo modo potest, ut in illa multitudine fragmentorum inveniatur unum saltem fragmentum, in quo perfecta aliqua species per omnia habeatur ac forma? Et senex respondit: Non potest. Quod si adsit, inquit Aquila, signorum artifex, excisum de monte saxum manu artifici et sensu rationabili formare in quam velit speciem potest. Et senex: Verum, inquit, istud est. Ergo, ait Aquila, ubi sensus non est rationabilis, nulla species ex integro formari potest, ubi autem sensus est artifex, ibi et forma et informitas esse potest: verbi gratia, si excidat e monte saxum artifex cui formam velit imponere, necesse est ut id primo informe cadat et barbarum, tum deinde paulatim excudens et ad libram sua artis exsculpens, exprimat formam quam mente conceperit. Ita ergo ex informitate vel deformitate, artificis manu pervenitur ad formam, et utrumque ab artifice procedit; simili igitur modo et ea qua in mundo geruntur, per artificis providentiam fiunt, etiamsi minus ordinata videantur. Et ideo quia tibi duae istae innotuerunt viae, earumque accepisti divisiones, fuge infidelitatis viam, ne forte perducat te ad illum principem qui malis gaudet, sequere fidei viam, ut pervenire possis ad regem illum qui bonis hominibus gaudet.
To this the old man answered: “Give me a way, my son, by which I can confirm in my mind one of these two orders, of which one asserts and the other refutes Providence.” “For one who has right judgment,” said Aquila, “the distinction is easy. For this very thing you speak of, order and disorder, can be produced by a craftsman, but cannot be produced by insensible nature. For example, let us suppose that a stone broken off from a high rock is carried down headlong and, dashed on the ground, is shattered into many fragments; can it happen in any way that in that multitude of fragments there is found even one fragment in which some perfect shape and form is had in every respect?” The old man answered: “It cannot.” “But if,” said Aquila, “a maker of statues is present, he can form a stone cut from the mountain into whatever shape he wishes by a craftsman's hand and rational intelligence.” The old man said: “That is true.” “So,” said Aquila, “where there is no rational intelligence, no form can be wholly formed; but where there is a craftsman's intelligence, there can be both form and formlessness. For example, if a craftsman cuts from the mountain a stone to which he wishes to give a form, it must first fall shapeless and rough; then, gradually hewing it and carving it to the measure of his art, he expresses the form he has conceived in his mind. So from formlessness or deformity one comes to form by the craftsman's hand, and both proceed from the craftsman. In a similar way, then, the things done in the world are done by the providence of the craftsman, even if they seem less ordered. And therefore, since these two ways have become known to you and you have received their divisions, flee the way of unbelief, lest it lead you to that prince who rejoices in evils; follow the way of faith, so that you may reach that King who rejoices in good men.”
8.55PG 1:1396a–1397b
Ad hac senex respondit: Cur autem et princeps ille qui malis gaudet factus est, et unde factus est aut non est factus? Aquila ait: Alterius temporis est iste tractatus; verum ne expers abeas etiam hujus responsionis, pauca tibi de hoc quoque insinuabo. Praescius omnium Deus ante constitutionem mundi, sciens quia futuri homines, alii quidem ad bona, alii vero ad contraria declinabunt, eos qui bona elegerint, suo principatui et sua cura sociavit atque hareditatem sibi eos propriam nominavit; eos vero qui ad mala declinarint, angelis regendos permisit his qui non per substantiam, sed per oppositum cum Deo permanere noluerunt invidia et superbia vitio corrupti; dignos ergo dignorum principes fecit. Ita tamen eos tradidit, ut non habeant potestatem in eos faciendi quod volunt, nisi statutum sibi ab initio terminum transeant. Hic est autem statutus terminus, ut nisi quis prius fecerit damonum voluntatem, damones in eo non habeant potestatem.
To this the old man answered: “But why was that prince who rejoices in evils made, and from where was he made, or was he not made?” Aquila said: “That treatise belongs to another time; but so that you may not go away without any answer to this, I will suggest a few things to you on it too. God, foreknowing all things before the foundation of the world, knowing that of future men some would turn aside to good and others to the contrary, joined those who would choose good to his own rule and care, and named them his own inheritance; but those who would turn aside to evil he permitted to be ruled by those angels who, not by substance but by choice, refused to remain with God, corrupted by the vice of envy and pride. So he made the worthy rulers of the worthy. Yet he so handed them over that they have no power to do what they wish to them unless they cross the boundary set for them from the beginning. And this is the boundary set: that unless someone has first done the will of the demons, the demons have no power over him.”
8.56PG 1:1397b–1397d
Et senex ait: Magnifice prosecutus es, fili; superest nunc ut dicas unde est substantia mali; si enim a Deo facta est, fructus malus radicem culpabilem docet, videtur enim et ipsa mala natura: si vero coaeterna fuit haec substantia Deo, quomodo potest quod aqualiter ingenitum et coaeternum est, alteri esse subjectum? Non semper fuit, inquit Aquila; sed neque si ex Deo facta est, continuo necesse est etiam conditorem ejus talem videri, quale est illud quod ab eo factum est. Nam substantias quidem Deus fecit omnium, sed si rationabilis mens quae a Deo facta est, nequaquam conditoris sui legibus acquiescit, et modum statuta sibi temperantia excedit, quid hoc ad conditorem spectat? Vel si aliqua est ratio haec superior, ignoramus; neque enim de singulis ad perfectum scire possumus, et de his praecipue pro quibus non sumus judicandi, cur ignoremus. Ea vero pro quibus judicandi sumus, facillima sunt ad intelligendum, et pene uno sermone absolvuntur. Omnis enim propemodum actuum nostrorum in eo colligitur observantia, ut quod ipsi pati nolumus, ne hoc aliis inferamus; sicut enim ipse occidi non vis, caveas oportet ne alium occidas; et sicut tuum non vis violari matrimonium, nec tu alterius macules torum; furtum pati non vis, nec ipse facias; et intra hanc regulam humanorum gestorum singula quaque concurrunt.
The old man said: “You have argued magnificently, my son. It remains now for you to say where the substance of evil comes from. For if it was made by God, the evil fruit shows a culpable root, for the nature itself seems evil; but if this substance was coeternal with God, how can what is equally unbegotten and coeternal be subject to the other?” “It did not always exist,” said Aquila. “But even if it was made from God, it does not at once follow that its founder should seem to be of the same kind as what was made by him. For God made the substances of all things; but if a rational mind made by God does not acquiesce in its founder's laws and exceeds the measure of the temperance set for it, what has this to do with the founder? Or if there is some reason higher than this, we do not know it. For we cannot know everything perfectly, especially about things for which we shall not be judged if we are ignorant of them. But the things for which we shall be judged are very easy to understand and are settled almost in one sentence. For almost the whole observance of our actions is summed up in this: that what we ourselves do not wish to suffer, we should not inflict on others. For as you do not wish to be killed yourself, you must take care not to kill another; and as you do not wish your marriage to be violated, do not you defile another's bed; you do not wish to suffer theft, do not commit it yourself. And within this rule each and every human action falls.”
8.57PG 1:1397d–1398a
Tum senex: Ne aegre, inquit, accipias, fili, quod dicturus sum; sermones tui quamvis validi sint, non possunt tamen flectere me ut credam fieri aliquid posse extra genesim. Scio enim omnia mihi necessitate genesis accidisse, et ideo suaderi mihi non potest, quia vel bene vel male agere in nostra potestate sit; et si actus nostros in potestate non habemus, non potest credi futurum esse judicium, per quod vel malis poena vel bonis praemia tribuantur. Denique quoniam te imbutum video in hujuscemodi disciplinis, pauca tibi ex ipsa arte proferam. Si, inquit Aquila, ex ipsa disciplina astruere aliquid cupis, frater meus Clemens tibi diligentius respondebit, qui plenius scientiam mathesis attigit; ego enim aliis viis asserere possum, quod actus nostri in nostra sint positi potestate, ista autem quae non didici, praesumere non debeo.
Then the old man said: “Do not take it ill, my son, what I am about to say: your words, though they are strong, cannot bend me to believe that anything can happen outside birth-fate. For I know that everything has happened to me by the necessity of birth-fate; and so I cannot be persuaded that it is in our power to act either well or badly. And if we do not have our actions in our power, it cannot be believed that there will be a judgment through which punishment is given to the evil or rewards to the good. Since I see that you are trained in disciplines of this kind, I will bring forward a few things to you from the art itself.” “If,” said Aquila, “you wish to build something from that discipline, my brother Clement will answer you more carefully, since he has gained a fuller knowledge of astrology. I can assert by other ways that our actions are placed in our power; but the things I have not learned I ought not to presume.”
8.58PG 1:1398b
Cum haec Aquila dixisset, ego Clemens: Crastino, inquam, dices, Pater, ut voles. et audiemus libenter, nam et te puto grate habiturum, quod cum his tibi erit sermo, qui expertes non sunt ejus quam protuleris disciplina. Cum ergo placuisset inter me et senem, ut sequenti die disputatio nobis de ratione genesis haberetur, utrum omnia ex ea fierent, an esset aliquid in nobis, quod non genesis sed animi judicium gereret, Petrus surrexit et sermonem facere hoc modo coepit: Mirum mihi admodum est, quod res quae facile inveniri possunt, homines exquisitis cogitationibus ac verbis difficiles faciunt, et hi maxime qui videntur sibi sapientes, quique volentes Dei voluntatem comprehendere, quasi homine utuntur Deo, imo et si quid minus; nam hominis consilium vel sensum scire nemo potest, nisi ipse prodat qui cogitaverit, sed neque artem quis discere potest, nisi multo tempore a magistro fuerit imbutus; quanto magis invisibilis et incomprehensibilis Dei neque sensum neque Opus scire quis potest, nisi ipse mittat prophetam, qui enarret consilium suum et viam conditionis exponat, in quantum discere hominibus fas est. Unde ridiculum puto, cum naturalibus viis de virtute Dei homines judicant, et putant hoc quidem ei esse possibile, illud vero impossibile, aut hoc majus, illud minus, ignari omnium, qui cum sint homines injusti, judicant Deum justum, artificem imperiti, incorruptibilem corrupti, factura factorem.
When Aquila had said this, I, Clement, said: “Tomorrow, father, you shall speak as you wish, and we will listen gladly; for I think you too will be pleased that you will be speaking with those who are not without experience of the discipline you have put forward.” So when it had been agreed between me and the old man that on the following day we would hold a discussion about the theory of birth-fate—whether everything happens by it, or whether there is something in us which not birth-fate but the judgment of the mind directs—Peter rose and began to speak in this way: “It is very surprising to me that men, by elaborate thoughts and words, make difficult things that can easily be found—and especially those who think themselves wise, who, wishing to comprehend the will of God, treat God as if he were a man, or even something less. For no one can know a man's counsel or thought unless he who thought it reveals it; nor can anyone learn an art unless he has been trained for a long time by a master. How much more can no one know either the mind or the work of the invisible and incomprehensible God, unless he himself sends a prophet to tell his counsel and set out the way of creation, as far as it is lawful for men to learn it. Hence I think it ridiculous when men judge the power of God by natural ways, and think this possible for him and that impossible, or this greater and that less—ignorant of everything—who, being unjust men, judge the just God; unskilled, the craftsman; corrupt, the incorruptible; the work, its maker.
8.59PG 1:1398d–1399b
Et nolo putetis, quia hac dicens judicandi de rebus perimo facultatem, sed consilium do ne per devia quis incedens, sine fine incurrat errores. Et ideo non solum sapientibus, sed et omnibus hominibus qui desiderium gerunt agnoscendi quod sibi expedit, suadeo ut requirant verum Prophetam, quia ipse solus est, qui novit omnia, et scit quid et quomodo unusquisque quaerat. Inest enim intra uniuscujusque nostrum mentem, sed in illis quidem, qui desiderium Dei agnitionis et justitia: ejus nullum gerunt, otiatur, in his vero qui quod anima: sua: expedit quaerunt, operatur et scientiae lumen accendit. Propter quod primo omnium hunc requirite, quem si non inveneritis, ab alio vos agnituros aliquid non speretis. Invenitur autem cito ab his qui veritatis amore perquirunt, et quorum anima praeoccupata non tenetur in malitia. Adest enim his qui eum in innocentia spiritus sui desiderant, qui per patientiam sustinent, et suspiria de profundo cordis veritatis amore producunt; fugit autem malevolas mentes, quia ut propheta cognoscit cogitationes uniuscujusque. Et ideo nemo putet eum per prudentiam suam invenire posse, nisi, ut supra diximus, mentem suam omni nequitia vacuam effecerit, atque agnitionis ejus desiderium purum et fidele conceperit. Ubi enim talem se quis praeparaverit, ipse ut propheta, videns praeparatam mentem sponte se adhibet ad agnoscendum.
“And I do not want you to think that in saying this I am destroying the ability to judge about things; rather, I give counsel that no one, walking by byways, should run into errors without end. And therefore I urge not only the wise but all men who have the desire to know what is profitable for them to seek the true Prophet, because he alone knows all things and knows what and how each one seeks. For he is within the mind of each one of us; but in those who have no desire for the knowledge of God and his righteousness he is idle, while in those who seek what is profitable for their soul he works and kindles the light of knowledge. Therefore seek him first of all; and if you do not find him, do not hope to learn anything from another. He is quickly found by those who search for him with love of truth, and whose soul is not preoccupied and held in wickedness. For he is present to those who desire him in the innocence of their spirit, who wait with patience and bring forth sighs from the depth of the heart out of love of truth; but he flees malevolent minds, because as a prophet he knows the thoughts of each. And so let no one think that he can find him by his own prudence, unless, as we said above, he has made his mind empty of all wickedness and has conceived a pure and faithful desire for knowledge of him. For when someone has prepared himself so, he, as a prophet, seeing the mind prepared, offers himself of his own accord to be known.
8.60PG 1:1399b–1400a
Si quis igitur vult omnia discere, non per singula discutiens; neque enim poterit, cum sit mortalis, Dei investigare consilium et ipsam immensitatem perscrutari: sed si discere, ut diximus, omnia desiderat, verum prophetam requirat. Quem cum invenerit, non quaestionibus et disputationibus neque argumentis cum eo agat, sed si quid responderit, si quid pronuntiaverit, hoc certum esse non potest dubitari. Et ideo quaeratur verus propheta ante omnia, et ejus verba teneantur; in quibus illud tantummodo discutiendum unicuique est, ut satisfaciat sibi si vere prophetica ejus verba sunt, id est, si indubitatam fidem continent futurorum, si tempora definita consignant, si rerum ordinem servant, si non quae prima sunt, novissima, et quae in novissimis gesta sunt, prima narrarunt, si nihil versutum, nihil magica arte ad decipiendum compositum continent, aut si non quae aliis revelata sunt, ad se transtulerit admistis mendaciis. Et cum his omnibus recto judicio discussis, verba constiterit esse prophetica, ita demum credi eis de omnibus quibus dixerint et responderint, debet.
“If, then, someone wishes to learn all things, let him not do so by discussing each; for he will not be able, being mortal, to search out the counsel of God and explore his very immensity. But if he desires, as we said, to learn all things, let him seek the true Prophet. When he has found him, let him not deal with him by questions and disputations and arguments; but whatever he answers, whatever he declares, this cannot be doubted to be certain. And therefore let the true Prophet be sought before all things, and his words be held. In them each one need only examine this, so as to satisfy himself whether his words are truly prophetic: that is, whether they contain undoubted faith about things to come, whether they mark out fixed times, whether they keep the order of things, whether they have not narrated as last what is first and as first what was done last, whether they contain nothing crafty, nothing composed by magic art to deceive, or whether he has not transferred to himself, with lies mixed in, what was revealed to others. And when, all these things having been examined with right judgment, the words are established to be prophetic, then at last he ought to be believed in everything he has said and answered.
8.61PG 1:1400a–1400b
Etenim consideremus diligentius opus divina: Providentiae. Nam quod philosophi introduxerunt verba subtilia quaedam et difficilia, ita ut ne ipsa quidem vocabula sermonum nota esse omnibus possent et intelligibilia, Deus eos qui sibi artifices verborum videbantur, per omnia imperitos erga agnitionem veritatis ostendit. Simplex enim est et manifesta ac brevis rerum scientia, quae per verum prophetam traditur, quam isti per devia incedentes et scrupeas verborum difficultates, tota ignoraverunt via. Igitur verecundis et simplicibus mentibus, cum viderint fieri quae pradicta sunt, satis abundeque sufficit, ut de certissima praescientia certissimam scientiam capiant, et de caetero requiescant evidenti agnitione veritatis assumpta; cattera omnia aestimatione tractantur, in quibus firmum nihil esse potest. Quis enim sermo est, qui non recipiat contradictionem? et quae argumentatio est. quae non possit alia argumentatione subverti? Et inde est quod ad nullum finem scientiae et agnitionis per hujusmodi disputationem pervenire homines possunt, priusque finem vitae inveniunt quam qua’stionum.
“For let us consider more carefully the work of divine Providence. Since the philosophers introduced certain subtle and difficult words, so that not even the very terms of their discourses could be known and intelligible to all, God showed those who thought themselves craftsmen of words to be in every way unskilled in the knowledge of the truth. For the knowledge of things which is handed down by the true Prophet is simple, plain, and brief; and they, walking by byways and the rough difficulties of words, have not known it at all. So for modest and simple minds, when they see happen what was foretold, it is enough and more than enough that they should take the most certain knowledge from the most certain foreknowledge, and thereafter rest, having taken up an evident knowledge of the truth. All other things are handled by conjecture, in which nothing can be firm. For what statement is there that does not admit contradiction? And what argument is there that cannot be overturned by another argument? And that is why men can reach no end of knowledge and understanding by disputation of this kind, and they find the end of life sooner than the end of their questions.
8.62PG 1:1400b
Et ideo cum in his omnia habeantur incerta, ad verum prophetam veniendum est, quem Deus Pater volens ab omnibus diligi, haec quae homines induxerunt, in quibus nihil potest apprehendi, voluit penitus exstinguere, ut eo magis iste quaereretur, et quem illi occluserant, hic hominibus viam veritatis aperiret. Propter hunc enim Deus etiam mundum fecit et ab ipso mundus repletur, unde et quaerentibus se adest ubique, etiamsi in ultimis terra: finibus quaeratur. Si vero non puro eum quis nec sancte neque fideliter quaerat, intra ipsum quidem est, quia ubique est et intra sensus omnium invenitur; sed, ut supra diximus, infidelibus dormit et absens habetur his, a quibus esse non creditur. Cumque hac et alia hujusmodi Petrus de vero propheta prosecutus esset, turbas dimisit, senem vero cum rogasset plurimum permanere nobiscum, obtinere non potuit, sed et ipse discessit. alia die sicut placuerat rediturus. Et post haec nos una cum Petro ingressi hospitium, cibo et quiete solito utimur.
“And therefore, since in these things everything is held uncertain, one must come to the true Prophet. God the Father, wishing him to be loved by all, willed wholly to extinguish these things that men have introduced, in which nothing can be grasped, so that he might be sought all the more, and that he might open to men the way of truth which they had shut. For on his account God also made the world, and by him the world is filled; hence he is present everywhere to those who seek him, even if they are at the furthest ends of the earth. But if someone does not seek him purely, holily, and faithfully, he is indeed within him, since he is everywhere and is found within the minds of all; but, as we said above, he sleeps for the unbelieving and is held absent by those by whom he is not believed to exist.” When Peter had set out these and other such things about the true Prophet, he dismissed the crowds. When he had asked the old man earnestly to stay with us, he could not prevail; the old man also left, to return on another day as had been agreed. After this we went into the lodging with Peter and took food and rest as usual.
Chapter 9
9.1PG 1:1399b–1401b
Sequenti die Petrus una nobiscum mature ad locum, in quo pridie habita fuerat disputatio, properavit, atque ibi cum plurimas jam ad audiendum convenisse turbas et senem cum eis videret, ait ad eum: Hesterna die, o senex, cum Clemente placuerat ut hodie sermo fieret, et aut tu ostenderes nihil extra genesim fieri, aut Clemens doceret genesim non esse [sed in nobis et in nostra potestate haberi quae gerimus]. Ad haec senex respondit: quid placuerit memini, et tua verba teneo quae post pactiones locutus es, quibus docuisti impossibile esse homini scire aliquid, nisi a vero Propheta didicerit. Et Petrus: Nescis, inquit, quomodo dixerim, sed nunc te ego commonebo, de voluntate dixi et consilio Dei, quam habuit priusquam mundus esset, et quo consilio fecerit mundum, tempora statuerit, legem dederit, iustis ad bonorum remunerationem futurum saeculum promiserit, iniustis poenas ex iudicii sententia statuerit; hoc ego dixi consilium, et hanc voluntatem Dei ab hominibus inveniri non posse, quia nemo hominum potest sensum Dei coniecturis et aestimatione colligere, nisi propheta ab eo missus enuntiet. Non ergo de quibuscunque disciplinis aut studiis dixi, quia inveniri sine propheta aut sciri non possint; quippe qui sciam et artificia et disciplinas sciri et exerceri ab hominibus, quas non a vero propheta, sed a magistris hominibus didicerint.
On the following day Peter hurried early with us to the place where the discussion had been held the day before; and there, seeing that very great crowds had already gathered to listen and the old man with them, he said to him: “Yesterday, old man, it was agreed with Clement that the discussion should take place today, and that either you should show that nothing happens outside birth-fate, or Clement should teach that there is no birth-fate (but that what we do is in us and in our power).” To this the old man answered: “I remember what was agreed, and I hold the words you spoke after the agreement, in which you taught that it is impossible for a man to know anything unless he has learned it from the true Prophet.” Peter said: “You do not know how I said it; but now I will remind you. I spoke of the will and counsel of God, which he had before the world was, and by what counsel he made the world, appointed times, gave the law, promised the age to come to the just as the reward of good things, and appointed punishments for the unjust by the sentence of judgment. This counsel and this will of God, I said, cannot be found out by men, because no man can gather the mind of God by conjectures and estimation unless a prophet sent by him announces it. I did not say, then, that any disciplines or studies whatever cannot be found or known without a prophet; for I know that arts and disciplines are known and practiced by men, which they have learned not from the true Prophet but from human teachers.”
9.2PG 1:1401b
Quoniam ergo te professus es gnarum esse positionis siderum et stellarum cursus, ex quibus convinceres Clementem quod genesi omnia subiaceant, aut ab ipso disceres quod per Providentiam reguntur universa, et est etiam aliquid in nobis, hoc expedire vos convenit. Ad haec senex respondit: Jam quidem necessarium non erat huiusmodi movere quaestiones. si possibile esset nobis a vero propheta discere et audire definita sententia, quia sit aliquid in nobis et in arbitrii positum libertate; valde enim me sermo tuus movit hesternus, in quo de virtute prophetica disputasti. Unde et ego assentio et confirmo sententiam tuam, quia nihil potest ab homine certum indubitatumque cognosci, cui et exiguum vitae tempus est et breve ac tenue spiramen, quo retineri videtur in vita. Verumtamen quoniam priusquam de prophetica virtute aliquid audirem, pollicitus videor Clementi, ut ostenderem, quia omnia subiecta sunt genesi, aut ab ipso discerem, quia est aliquid et in nobis, praestet mihi ipse in hoc gratiam ut primus incipiat et quae obiici possunt, proponat et absolvat; ego enim, ex quo paucis a te audivi de virtute prophetiae, magnitudinem praescientiae considerans obstupui, fateor, nec omnino recipiendum quidquam censeo, quod coniecturis et aestimatione colligitur.
“Since, then, you have professed to know the position of the constellations and the courses of the stars, by which you might convince Clement that all things are subject to birth-fate, or learn from him that all things are ruled by Providence and that there is something in us, it is fitting that you settle this.” To this the old man answered: “There would be no need now to raise questions of this kind, if it were possible for us to learn and hear from the true Prophet a definite pronouncement that there is something in us and placed in the freedom of choice. For your discourse yesterday, in which you discussed prophetic power, moved me greatly. Hence I agree and confirm your opinion, that nothing certain and undoubted can be known by a man, who has but a short span of life and a brief and slender breath by which he seems to be held in life. Yet since, before I heard anything about prophetic power, I seem to have promised Clement that I would show that all things are subject to birth-fate, or learn from him that there is something in us too, let him do me this favor: let him begin first and propose and resolve the objections that can be raised. For since I heard from you a little about the power of prophecy, considering the greatness of foreknowledge, I confess I have been astounded, and I think nothing at all should be accepted that is gathered by conjecture and estimation.”
9.3PG 1:1401b–1402a
Et cum haec senex dixisset, ego Clemens dicere ita coepi: Deus per Filium suum creavit mundum tanquam duplicem domum, interiectu firmamenti huius quod caelum appellatur distinctam, et in superiori quidem angelicas habitare virtutes, in isto autem visibili mundo nasci hominum multitudinem dedit, ex quibus eligeret amicos Filio suo, cum quibus laetaretur, et qui ei tanquam sponso ut dilecta sponsa pararentur. Verum usque ad nuptiarum tempus, quod est praesentia saeculi venturi, statuit virtutem quamdam, quae ex his quae in hoc mundo nascuntur, eligat et custodiat meliores, ac servet Filio suo sequestratos in loco quodam mundi qui extra peccatum est, in quo jam sunt aliquanti, qui ibi velut sponsa, ut dixi, decora ad sponsi praesentiam praeparantur. Nam mundi huius et praesentis temporis princeps adultero similis est, qui mentes hominum corrumpit ac violat, et a desiderio veri Sponsi seducens, illicit ad aliena desideria.
When the old man had said this, I, Clement, began to speak thus: “God through his Son created the world like a double house, divided by the interposition of this firmament which is called heaven; and he gave the angelic powers to dwell in the upper part, and granted that a multitude of men be born in this visible world, from whom he might choose friends for his Son, with whom he might rejoice, and who might be prepared for him as a beloved bride for the bridegroom. But until the time of the wedding, which is the presence of the age to come, he appointed a certain power to choose and guard the better ones from among those born in this world, and to keep them set apart for his Son in a certain place of the world which is outside sin, in which there are already some who are being prepared there, as a bride adorned, as I said, for the bridegroom's presence. For the prince of this world and of the present time is like an adulterer, who corrupts and violates the minds of men, and, leading them away from desire for the true Bridegroom, entices them to alien desires.
9.4PG 1:1402a–1402b
Sed dicet aliquis: Quid ergo necesse erat istum principem fieri, qui a vero principe mentes hominum declinaret? Quoniam Deus qui, ut dixi, Filio suo amicos voluit praeparare, non eos tales esse voluit, qui necessitate natura: aliud quid esse non possent, sed qui arbitrio suo et voluntate boni esse desiderarent; quia nec laudabile est, quod non est desiderabile, nec bonum iudicatur, quod non proposito expetitur: nihil enim laudis est id esse, a quo te mutari naturae necessitas non sinat. Providentia ergo Dei hominum multitudinem nasci in hoc mundo voluit, ut ex pluribus eligerentur qui iustam diligerent vitam. Et quia praesentem mundum praevidit non aliter posse nisi diversitate et inaequalitate constare, secundum praesentium rerum diversitates unicuique menti libertatem motuum dedit, et hunc principem posuit, quo ea quae contraria videntur agitante, electio meliorum virtutis opere constaret.
“But someone will say: ‘What need was there, then, for this prince to come into being, to turn men's minds aside from the true prince?’ Because God, who, as I said, wished to prepare friends for his Son, did not want them to be such that by necessity of nature they could not be anything else, but such as would desire to be good by their own choice and will. For what is not desirable is not praiseworthy, and what is not sought by purpose is not judged good; for there is no praise in being what the necessity of nature does not allow you to change from. So the providence of God willed a multitude of men to be born in this world, so that from many those might be chosen who would love a just life. And since he foresaw that the present world could exist only by diversity and inequality, he gave each mind freedom of movement according to the diversities of present things, and set this prince, so that, while he stirs up things that seem contrary, the choice of the better might consist in the work of virtue.
9.5PG 1:1402b
Sed ut planius fiat quod dicimus, per singula exponemus. Nunquid omnes, verbi gratia, oportebat esse in hoc mundo reges, aut principes, aut dominos, aut paedagogos, aut legisperitos, aut geometras, aut aurifices, aut pistores, aut fabros, aut grammaticos, aut divites, aut agricolas, aut olitores, aut piscatores aut pauperes? Hoc certum est quia omnes esse non poterant. Omnia tamen haec officia et multo plura praesens vita hominum requirit, et sine his transigi non potest; est ergo necessaria in hoc mundo inaequalitas. Non enim potest esse rex, nisi habeat quos regat et quibus imperet, neque potest esse dominus, nisi habeat cui dominetur, et caetera similiter.
“But so that what we say may become clearer, we will explain it point by point. Should all in this world, for example, be kings, or princes, or masters, or tutors, or lawyers, or geometers, or goldsmiths, or bakers, or smiths, or grammarians, or rich men, or farmers, or gardeners, or fishermen, or poor? It is certain that all could not be these. Yet the present life of men requires all these offices and many more, and cannot be carried on without them. Inequality, then, is necessary in this world. For there cannot be a king unless he has those whom he rules and commands, nor can there be a master unless he has someone to master, and so on.
9.6PG 1:1402b–1403a
Sciens ergo Conditor a nullo sponte veniri ad agonem, dum refugitur labor, hoc est ad exercendas artes istas quas supra diximus, per quas vel iustitia uniuscuiusque vel misericordia manifestari potest, corpus homini fecit, quod famem et sitim et frigus reciperet, ut reficiendi corporis causa compulsi homines, ad omnes quas supra exposuimus artes victus necessitate descenderent. Cibi enim et potus atque indumenti gratia, singulas quasque artes expetere edocemur. Et hic iam uniuscujusque mentis propositum declaratur, utrum necessitatem famis et frigoris per furta et homicidia ac periuria sarciat, perque alia huiusmodi scelera, an iustitiam, misericordiam, continentiamque custodiens, artis studio et manuum labore imminentis necessitatis expleat ministerium. Si enim cum iustitia et pietate ac misericordia necessitatem corporis transigat, velut propositi agonis victor, amicus Filii Dei et electus abscedit; si vero per fraudes, per iniquitates et scelera concupiscentiis deservit corporalibus, principis huius mundi atque omnium daemonum amicus efficitur, a quibus etiam hoc edocetur, ut stellarum cursibus malorum suorum ascribat errores, quos nonnisi proposito ac voluntate delegit. Etenim artes, cogente, ut diximus, cibi ac potus voluptate, discuntur et exercentur; quae voluptas, cum accesserit unicuique veritatis agnitio, infirmior efficitur succedente parcimonia. Quantus enim sumptus est, aqua et pane utentibus et hunc a Deo sperantibus?
“So the Founder, knowing that no one would come willingly to the contest while toil is shunned—that is, to practicing those arts we mentioned above, through which either the justice or the mercy of each can be shown—made for man a body that would feel hunger and thirst and cold, so that men, compelled for the sake of sustaining the body, might come down by the necessity of livelihood to all the arts we set out above. For we are taught to seek each art for the sake of food and drink and clothing. And here now the purpose of each mind is declared: whether it makes up the need of hunger and cold by thefts and murders and perjuries and other crimes of this kind, or, keeping justice, mercy, and self-control, fulfills the service of the pressing need by the study of an art and the labor of the hands. For if one gets through the body's need with justice, piety, and mercy, he departs, as victor in the contest set before him, a friend of the Son of God and chosen; but if through frauds, iniquities, and crimes he serves bodily desires, he becomes a friend of the prince of this world and of all the demons, by whom he is also taught to ascribe to the courses of the stars the errors of his evils, which he chose only by purpose and will. For the arts, as we said, are learned and practiced under the compulsion of the pleasure of food and drink; and this pleasure, when the knowledge of the truth comes to each one, is weakened as frugality takes its place. For how great an expense is there for those who use water and bread and hope for it from God?
9.7PG 1:1403a
Est ergo, ut diximus, necessaria quaedam in dispensatione mundi inaequalitas, dum omnes quidem homines non omnia possunt scire vel implere artificia. usu tamen et ministerio omnium pene omnes indigent, et ob hoc necesse est alium operari, alium operanti praebere mercedem, alium servire, alium dominari, alium regi, alium regere. Sed hanc inaequalitatem quae mortalium vitam necessario subsecuta est, divina Providentia in occasionem justitiae, misericordiae humanitatisque convertit, ut dum haec inter homines aguntur, sit unicuique causa juste agendi cum eo, cui merces operis exsolvenda est, et faciendi misericordiam cum eo, qui debilitate fortassis aut penuria intercedente, debitum solvere non potest, sed et humane agendi cum his qui conditione videntur obnoxii, mansuetudinem quoque conservandi erga subjectos, et omnia prorsus gerendi secundum legem Dei. Dedit enim legem, juvans per hoc humanas mentes, ut facilius erga unumquodque qualiter agi deberet, adverterent, qua via effugerent malum et qua ad futura tenderent bona, et ut in aqua regenerati per opera bona, ignem vetustae nativitatis exstinguerent. Prima enim nostra nativitas per ignem concupiscentia: descendit, et ideo dispensatione divina secunda haec per aquam introducitur, quae restinguat ignis naturam, et caelesti spiritu anima illuminata, metum prima: nativitatis abjiciat, si tamen ita de reliquo vivat, ut nullas omnino mundi hujus voluptates requirat, sed sit tanquam peregrinus et advena, atque alterius civitatis civis.
“There is, then, as we said, a certain necessary inequality in the ordering of the world, since all men cannot know or carry out all crafts, yet almost all need the use and service of all; and for this reason it is necessary that one work and another pay the worker his wage, one serve and another be master, one be ruled and another rule. But this inequality, which has necessarily followed the life of mortals, divine Providence has turned into an occasion of justice, mercy, and kindness; so that while these things are carried on among men, each has cause to act justly with one to whom the wage for work must be paid, and to show mercy to one who, perhaps through weakness or poverty, cannot pay a debt; and also to act humanely with those who seem bound by their condition, to keep gentleness toward subordinates, and to do everything altogether according to the law of God. For he gave the law, helping human minds by it, so that they might more easily notice how they ought to act toward each person, by what way they might escape evil and by what way tend toward future goods, and so that, regenerated in water through good works, they might extinguish the fire of their old birth. For our first birth comes down through the fire of desire; and therefore by divine dispensation this second birth through water is introduced, to quench the nature of fire, so that the soul, enlightened by the heavenly Spirit, may cast off the fear of the first birth—provided that thereafter it so lives as to seek no pleasures of this world at all, but is as a stranger and sojourner and a citizen of another city.
9.8PG 1:1403a–1404a
Sed fortasse dicas, quia in his quidem, in quibus naturalis necessitas exigit artium operumque ministerium, potest unusquisque habere in potestate, servare justitiam et modum vel desideriis vel actibus quem velit imponere; quid de aegritudinibus dicemus et infirmitatibus, quae accidunt hominibus, et quod daemonibus nonnulli urgentur et febribus et frigoribus, nonnulli etiam furore aguntur et mente excidunt; et omnia illa, quae innumeris casibus premunt mortalium genus? Ad haec dicemus, si consideret quis totius mysterii rationem, haec illis quae supra exposuimus, justiora esse pronuntiabit. Deus enim hominibus naturam dedit, per quam et doceri possint de bono et obsistere malo, id est, ut et artes possint discere et obsistere voluptatibus, ac praeferre in omnibus legem Dei, et ob hoc virtutes quasdam contrarias oberrare mundum hunc et obluctari nobiscum permisit, propter causas quae jam superius dictae sunt, ut ex earum certamine oriatur justis palma victoria: et meritum praemiorum.
“But perhaps you may say that in those things in which natural necessity demands the service of arts and works, each one can have it in his power to keep justice and to impose what measure he wishes on his desires and acts; but what shall we say of the sicknesses and infirmities that befall men—that some are oppressed by demons and by fevers and chills, some are even driven by madness and lose their minds—and all those things which press on the race of mortals by countless mishaps? To this we shall say that if anyone considers the reason of the whole mystery, he will declare these things even more just than those we set out above. For God gave men a nature by which they can both be taught the good and resist evil—that is, so that they can both learn arts and resist pleasures and prefer the law of God in everything; and for this reason he permitted certain contrary powers to wander about this world and wrestle with us, for the reasons already stated above, so that from contest with them the palm of victory and the merit of rewards may arise for the just.
9.9PG 1:1404a
Ex istis ergo accidit interdum, ut si qui incontinenter egerint, et non tantum obsistere quam cedere atque in semetipsis dare eis voluerint locum, noxia earum aspiratione generetur intemperata et vitiosa progenies. Dum enim totum libidini indulgetur et observatio nulla coeundi est, illorum sine dubio daemonum, quibus haec perurgentibus fiunt, vitia et fragilitates suscipit importuna generatio. Et ideo pro hujusmodi vitiis natorum obnoxii erunt parentes, qui legem servare concubitus noluerunt, licet sint et alia: causae secretiores. quibus his malis obnoxiae efficiuntur animae, quas nunc proferre temporis non est. Tamen oportet unumquemque agnoscere legem Dei, ut ex ea generandi observantiam sumat et immunditiae causas declinet, ut possit mundum esse quod gignitur. Neque enim fas est, ut in plantandis quidem virgultis vel in seminandis frugibus opportunum tempus quaeratur, terra purgetur atque omnia quae convenit praeparentur, ne forte semen iactum laedatur et pereat, et in solo homine, qui est super haec omnia, serendi observatio nulla habeatur, nulla cautela.
“From these, then, it sometimes happens that if some have acted without self-control, and have chosen not so much to resist as to yield and give them room in themselves, an intemperate and faulty offspring is begotten by their harmful breath. For while everything is given over to lust and no observance of intercourse is kept, the untimely generation without doubt takes on the vices and frailties of those demons at whose urging these things are done. And so the parents will be answerable for such defects in their children, since they would not keep the law of intercourse—though there are also other, more secret causes by which souls are made liable to these evils, which it is not the time to bring forward now. Yet each one ought to know the law of God, so as to take from it the observance of begetting and avoid the causes of uncleanness, so that what is begotten may be clean. For it is not right that in planting shrubs or sowing crops a suitable time should be sought, the earth cleaned, and everything suitable prepared, lest the seed sown be harmed and perish, and that in man alone, who is above all these, there should be no observance of sowing, no caution.
9.10PG 1:1404a–1404d
Sed quid, quod nonnulli, inquit, cum in prima aetate absque vitio fuerint corporali, processu temporis incurrunt haec mala, ita ut aliquanti etiam violenter praecipitentur in mortem? Etiam de his vicina et pene eadem ratio est; illa enim, quas diximus contrarias humano generi potestates, ad uniuscujusque cor per multas et diversas concupiscentias invitantur quodammodo et ingrediendi accipiunt locum, estque haec in illis vis et potestas, quae hortetur et incitet tantum, non quae cogat et perficiat. Si ergo quis acquiescat eis, ut etiam agat ea quae male desiderat, consensus sui et actus mercedem perditionis et pessimae mortis inveniet. Si vero futurum judicium cogitans, metu ipso fuerit repressus et revocaverit se, ne actu impleat quod mala cogitatione concepit, effugiet non solum perniciem praesentem, sed et futura supplicia. Omnis enim causa peccati similis videtur esse stuppae pice oblitae, quae ubi calorem ignis acceperit statim inflammatur: hujus vero ignis incendium opera esse daemonum intelliguntur. Si ergo inveniatur quis peccatis et concupiscentiis tanquam pice oblitus, ignis ei facillime dominatur. Si vero non peccati pice, sed aqua purificationis et regenerationis infusa sit stuppa, ignis in ea daemonum non valebit accendi.
“‘But what of the fact,’ someone says, ‘that some, though they were without bodily defect in their early years, fall into these evils as time goes on, so that some are even hurled violently to death?’ About these too the reason is close and almost the same. For those powers we called hostile to the human race are in a way invited to each one's heart through many and various desires and receive room to enter; and their force and power is such that it only urges and incites, not such as to compel and accomplish. If, then, someone agrees with them so far as to do what he wickedly desires, he will find as the wage of his consent and act perdition and the worst death. But if, thinking of the coming judgment, he is restrained by that very fear and calls himself back so as not to fulfill in act what he conceived in evil thought, he will escape not only present ruin but also future punishments. For every cause of sin seems like tow smeared with pitch, which catches fire at once when it receives the heat of fire; and the blaze of this fire is understood to be the works of demons. If, then, someone is found smeared with sins and desires as with pitch, fire masters him most easily. But if the tow is soaked not with the pitch of sin but with the water of purification and regeneration, the fire of the demons will not be able to kindle in it.
9.11PG 1:1404d–1405b
Sed dicet aliquis: Et quid faciemus jam nos quos contigit peccatis sicut pice oblitos? Respondebo: Nihil aliud nisi ut festinetis ablui, quo expurgetur a vobis ignis materia per invocationem sancti nominis, et de reliquo futuri judicii metu concupiscentias refrenetis, atque adversarias potestates, cum forte ad sensus vestros accesserint, tota obstinatione pellatis. Sed dicis: Si in amorem quis inciderit, quomodo se poterit continere, etiamsi ante oculos suos ipsum ignis fluvium quem Pyriphlegethonta nominant, videat? Haec excusatio est eorum qui converti ad paenitentiam nolunt. Denique nunc nolo Pyriphlegethonta adducas in medium; hominum tibi propone poenas, et vide quantum valeat metus; potestne quisquam, cum pro amoris crimine ad supplicium ducitur et ad stipitem colligatur urendus, in illo tempore ejus quam amavit vel desiderium capere vel speciem ante oculos proponere? Nequaquam, inquies. Vides ergo, quia praesens metus resecat iniqua desideria. Quod si credentes Deo, et futurum judicium poenamque ignis aeterni confitentes non se continent a peccato, certum est quod non plena fide credunt: si enim certa sit fides, certus fit et timor; si vero minus aliquid est in fide, relaxatur et metus, et tunc locum inveniunt introeundi contrariae potestates, quarum persuasionibus cum acquieverint, necesse est ut et potestati earum obnoxii fiant. et ipsis persuadentibus agantur ad praecipitia peccati.
“But someone will say: ‘And what shall we do now, who happen to be smeared with sins as with pitch?’ I will answer: nothing else but hasten to be washed, so that the material of the fire may be purged from you by the invocation of the holy name; and thereafter restrain your desires by fear of the coming judgment, and drive out the adverse powers with all firmness whenever they approach your minds. But you say: ‘If someone has fallen in love, how will he be able to restrain himself, even if he saw before his eyes that very river of fire they call Pyriphlegethon?’ This is the excuse of those who do not wish to turn to repentance. Well then, I do not want you to bring Pyriphlegethon into the middle now; set before yourself the punishments of men, and see how much fear avails. Can anyone, when he is led to punishment for a crime of love and tied to the stake to be burned, at that moment either feel desire for the woman he loved or set her beauty before his eyes? ‘By no means,’ you will say. You see, then, that present fear cuts off wicked desires. And if those who believe God, and confess the coming judgment and the punishment of eternal fire, do not restrain themselves from sin, it is certain that they do not believe with full faith. For if faith is sure, fear also is sure; but if something is lacking in faith, fear too is relaxed, and then the hostile powers find room to enter; and when they have agreed with their persuasions, they must also become subject to their power and be driven by their persuasions to the precipices of sin.
9.12PG 1:1405b
Igitur astrologi, ignorantes hujusmodi mysteria, putant stellarum cursibus ista contingere, unde et his qui accedunt ad eos, ut de futuris aliquid consulant, respondentes falluntur in plurimis; nec mirum, non enim sunt prophetae, sed usu multi temporis, auctores errorum perfugium quoddam in his quibus decipiebantur inveniunt, et climacteras quosdam introducunt, ut de rebus incertis scientiam fingant. Climacteras enim dicunt quasi periculi tempus, in quo interdum perimatur quis, interdum non perimatur; ignorantes quod non stellarum cursus haec, sed daemonum gerit operatio, qui ad astrologiae errorem confirmandum deservientes, calculis mathesis decipiunt homines ad peccandum, ut cum, vel Deo permittente vel legibus exigentibus, peccati dederint poenas, verum dixisse videatur astrologus. Et tamen falluntur etiam in hoc; si enim cito conversi fuerint ad paenitentiam, et futurae poenae recordationem conceperint ac metum, conversis ad Deum per gratiam baptismi resolvitur paena mortis.
“So the astrologers, ignorant of mysteries of this kind, think these things happen by the courses of the stars; and hence, answering those who come to them to consult about the future, they are mistaken in very many things. No wonder, for they are not prophets; but by the practice of a long time, these authors of errors find a kind of refuge in the things in which they were deceived, and introduce certain ‘climacterics,’ so as to feign knowledge about uncertain things. For they call a climacteric a time of danger, as it were, in which someone is sometimes killed and sometimes not; not knowing that it is not the course of the stars that does these things but the working of the demons, who, serving to confirm the error of astrology, deceive men into sinning by the calculations of astrology, so that when, either by God's permission or by the demand of the laws, they have paid the penalty of sin, the astrologer may seem to have told the truth. Yet they are deceived even in this; for if they have quickly turned to repentance and conceived remembrance and fear of the punishment to come, the penalty of death is dissolved for those turned to God through the grace of baptism.
9.13PG 1:1405b–1406b
Sed dicet quis: Multi et homicidium et adulterium et alia scelera commiserunt. et nihil mali passi sunt. Hoc quidem raro accidit hominibus, tamen nescientibus consilium Dei frequenter videtur accidere; Deus autem qui novit universa, scit quomodo et quare peccet qui peccat, et quae unumquemque causa ducat ad peccatum. Hoc tamen generaliter agnoscendum est; quod si qui non ita mente, ut actibus mali sunt, nec proposito incitati ad peccandum devolvuntur, his velocior et magis in praesenti vita redditur poena; ubique enim et semper Deus prout competere judicat, unicuique pro actibus suis reddit. Eorum vero qui proposito exercent malitiam, ita ut interdum etiam in eos saeviant, a quibus bona consecuti sunt, et nullam recordationem capiunt ad paenitentiam, differt poenas in futurum; non enim merentur isti, sicut illi de quibus supra diximus, in praesenti vita scelerum suorum finire vindictam, sed permittitur eis praesens tempus implere ut volunt, quia emendatio eorum non est jam talis, quae temporalibus indigeat castigationibus, sed quae aeterni ignis in inferno exigat poenas, quorum anima: ibi paenitentiam quaerent, ubi invenire non poterunt.
“But someone will say: ‘Many have committed murder and adultery and other crimes and suffered no harm.’ This indeed rarely happens to men, though to those who do not know the counsel of God it seems to happen often. But God, who knows all things, knows how and why the sinner sins, and what cause leads each to sin. This, however, must be recognized generally: if some are not as evil in mind as in acts, and do not fall into sin driven by purpose, to them punishment is rendered more quickly and rather in the present life; for everywhere and always God renders to each according to his acts as he judges fitting. But of those who practice wickedness by purpose, so that sometimes they even rage against those from whom they have received benefits, and take no thought for repentance, he defers the punishments to the future. For these do not deserve, like those of whom we spoke above, to end the vengeance of their crimes in the present life; but they are permitted to fill up the present time as they wish, because their correction is no longer such as needs temporal chastisements, but such as demands the punishments of eternal fire in the underworld, where their souls will seek repentance where they cannot find it.
9.14PG 1:1406b
Quod si in hac vita positi illas quas ibi patientur poenas, ante oculos posuissent, refrenassent utique desideria et nullo pacto decidissent in peccatum. Multum enim potest sensus in anima ad resecandas omnes ejus cupiditates, maxime cum caelestium scientiam ceperit, per quam lumine veritatis accepto, ab omni obscuritate malorum actuum declinabit. Sicut enim sol omnes stellas splendore sui fulgoris obtundit et contegit, ita et mens per scientiae lucem omnes concupiscentias animae inefficaces reddit et otiosas, futuri judicii memoriam super eas tanquam radios suos emittens, ita ut ne apparere quidem ultra in anima queant.
“But if, while placed in this life, they had set before their eyes those punishments they will suffer there, they would surely have restrained their desires and in no way fallen into sin. For understanding in the soul can do much to cut off all its desires, especially when it has received the knowledge of heavenly things, through which, having received the light of truth, it will turn away from all the darkness of evil acts. For as the sun dulls and covers all the stars with the splendor of its brightness, so the mind, through the light of knowledge, makes all the desires of the soul ineffective and idle, sending out over them like its rays the remembrance of the coming judgment, so that they can no longer even appear in the soul.
9.15PG 1:1406b–1407b
Quod autem timor Dei multum valeat ad reprimendas concupiscentias, cape humani timoris exemplum. Quotusquisque est, qui non inter homines concupiscat aliena? et tamen metu poenae quae legibus statuta est, refrenatur et continentius agit. Regi propter metum gentes subjacent et armatus paret exercitus. Servi cum sint validiores dominis suis, propter metum tamen imperia perferunt dominorum. Bestia ipsa: fera: metu mitescunt: tauri validissimi jugo colla submittunt, et immanes elephanti magistris obtemperant per timorem. Sed cur humanis utamur exemplis, cum etiam divina non desint? Nonne terra ipsa sub praecepti metu permanet, quod etiam motu sui et tremore testatur? Mare statutum terminum servat, angeli pacem custodiunt, stellae ordinem tenent et fluvii meatus, daemones quoque certum est timore in fugam verti. Et ne per singula sermonem longius producamus, intuere quomodo unumquodque timor Dei continens cuncta in harmonia propria et ordinis sui compage custodiat. Quanto magis ergo certi esse debetis, quia et daemonum concupiscentia: quae in cordibus vestris oriuntur, admonitione timoris Dei exstingui possunt et penitus aboleri, cum etiam ipsi incentores concupiscentiae metu sibi dominante diffugiant? Haec ita se habere sciens, si quid tibi respondendum videtur, incipe.
“That the fear of God avails much to restrain desires, take the example of human fear. How few are there among men who do not desire what belongs to others? Yet by fear of the punishment established by the laws they are restrained and act with more self-control. Nations are subject to a king through fear, and an armed army obeys. Slaves, though stronger than their masters, yet endure their masters' commands because of fear. Even wild beasts are tamed by fear; the strongest bulls submit their necks to the yoke, and huge elephants obey their trainers through fear. But why use human examples, when divine ones are not lacking? Does not the earth itself remain under fear of the command, which it testifies to even by its movement and trembling? The sea keeps its appointed boundary, the angels keep peace, the stars hold their order and the rivers their courses; and it is certain that demons too are put to flight by fear. And not to extend the discourse further by going through each thing, see how the fear of God, holding each thing, keeps all in its own harmony and the framework of its order. How much more, then, ought you to be sure that the desires of demons which arise in your hearts can be extinguished and wholly abolished by the admonition of the fear of God, since even the instigators of desire themselves flee when fear masters them? Knowing that this is so, if you think anything should be answered, begin.”
9.16PG 1:1407b–1408a
Tum senex: Sapienter, inquit, filius meus Clemens aptavit prosecutionem suam, ita ut nihil nobis ad haec dicendum reliquerit; verum omnis ejus sermo, quem de natura hominis disseruit, hanc habet continentiam, quia cum eo quod inest libertas arbitrii, est extrinsecus et aliqua causa mali, ex qua per diversas concupiscentias incitantur quidem homines, non tamen coguntur ad peccatum; pro eo, inquit, quod multo his validior est timor, qui obsistat et impetus desideriorum refrenet, ut cum naturales motus acciderint, effugatis his qui eos incitant et inflammant daemonibus, peccatum non possit admitti. Sed me haec non adducunt ad fidem: conscius enim mihi sum quorum. llam, ex quibus bene novi, quia compaginatione stellarum homines aut homicida! aut adulteri fiunt, caeteraque perpetrant mala. Similiter autem et honesta: ac pudica: feminae, ut bene agant inde coguntur.
Then the old man said: “My son Clement has fitted his argument together so wisely that he has left us nothing to say to it. But the whole discourse he gave about the nature of man has this content: that besides the freedom of choice that is within, there is also some cause of evil from outside, by which men are incited through various desires, yet not compelled to sin; because, he says, fear is far stronger than these, resisting and restraining the impulses of desires, so that when natural movements occur, the demons who incite and inflame them being put to flight, sin cannot be committed. But these things do not bring me to belief; for I am aware of certain things from which I know well that by the configuration of the stars men become murderers or adulterers and commit other evils. And likewise honorable and chaste women are compelled by it to act well.
9.17PG 1:1408a–1409a
Denique cum Mars centrum tenens. in domo sua ex tetragono respexerit Saturnum cum Mercurio ad centrum, Luna veniente super eum plena, in genesi diurna, efficit homicidas et gladio casuros, sanguinarios, ebriosos, libidinosas. daemoniosos, secretorum perscrutatores, maleficos, sacrilegos, et si qua sunt his similia, praecipue cum bonarum stellarum nulla respexerit. Sed et ipse rursus Mars ad Venerem schema tetragonum habens, ex parte ad centrum, non respiciente aliquo bonorum, adulteros efficit et sorores et filias et matres in conjugium adducit. Venus cum Luna in finibus et domibus Saturni, cum Saturno si fuerit, attestante Marte, efficit mulieres quidem viragines, ad agriculturam, ad structuram, et ad omne opus virile promptas, misceri quibuscunque voluerint et non argui a viris pro adulterio, nulla uti mollitie, non unguentis, non vestibus, non calceamentis muliebribus, sed virorum sorte agentes; viros autem esse ut feminas nec quidquam virile gerere, cacodaemon Venus cum Marte si sit in Ariete'; efficit e contrario mulieres, si sit in Capraecornu aut Aquario.
“For instance, when Mars, holding a cardinal point, in his own house, regards Saturn in square aspect together with Mercury at a cardinal point, with the full Moon coming upon him, in a daytime nativity, he produces murderers and those who will fall by the sword, the bloodthirsty, drunkards, the lustful, the demon-possessed, prying searchers into secrets, sorcerers, the sacrilegious, and whatever else is like these, especially when none of the benign stars regards them. And again Mars himself, having the square figure toward Venus, partly toward a cardinal point, with none of the benign stars regarding, makes adulterers, and leads men to marry sisters and daughters and mothers. Venus with the Moon in the terms and houses of Saturn, if she is with Saturn, with Mars bearing witness, makes women mannish, ready for farming, building, and every man's work, to have intercourse with whomever they wish and not be reproached by their husbands for adultery, to use no softness, no ointments, no women's clothes or shoes, but living after the manner of men; and makes men to be like women and do nothing manly, if the maleficent Venus is with Mars in Aries; and on the contrary she makes women, if she is in Capricorn or Aquarius.”
9.18PG 1:1409a–1409b
Cumque multa de his senex prosecutus esset, et unumquodque schema mathesis, stellarum quoque positiones enumerasset, volens per haec ostendere, quia timor non sufficiat refrenare concupiscentias, ego rursus respondi: Vere, Pater, doctissime et eruditissime prosecutus es, et ipsa me ratio invitat aliquid ad ea quae a te disserta sunt respondere, quoniam quidem scientia mihi mathesis nota est, et libenter cum erudito viro habeo sermonem. Accipe ergo ad ea quae dixisti, ut evidenter agnoscas genesim ex stellis omnino non esse, et quia possibile sit obsisti adversum impugnationem daemonum ab his qui confugiunt ad Deum, ac, sicut praedixi, non solum per timorem Dei naturales cohiberi concupiscentias posse, sed et per timorem hominum, sicut jam nunc edocebimus.
When the old man had set out much about these things, and listed each astrological figure and also the positions of the stars, wishing to show by them that fear is not enough to restrain desires, I answered again: “Truly, father, you have argued most learnedly and expertly, and reason itself invites me to answer something to what you have discussed, since the science of astrology is known to me and I gladly converse with a learned man. Hear, then, in answer to what you have said, so that you may clearly recognize that birth-fate from the stars does not exist at all, and that those who flee to God can resist the attack of demons; and, as I said before, that natural desires can be restrained not only by the fear of God but also by the fear of men, as we shall now teach.
9.19PG 1:1409b–1410a
Leges sunt in unaquaque regione vel regno ab hominibus positae, sive scriptura sive etiam usu durantes, quas nemo facile transgreditur. Denique primi Seres, qui initio orbis terrae habitant, legem habent neque homicidium neque adulterium neque scortum nosse, neque furtum committere, neque idola venerari; et in illa omni regione, quae est maxima, neque templum invenitur, neque simulacrum, neque meretrix, neque adultera, neque fur ad judicium deducitur, sed neque occisus ibi homo fertur aliquando, et tamen nullius libertas arbitrii compulsa est secundum vos a stella Martis ignita, ut ferro uteretur ad hominis necem, nec Venus cum Marte posita alienum matrimonium compulit vitiari, cum utique apud eos per singulos dies Mars medium caeli circulum teneat. Sed est apud Seres legum metus vehementior quam genesis constellatio.
“In every region or kingdom there are laws laid down by men, whether in writing or lasting by custom, which no one easily transgresses. First, the Seres, who dwell at the beginning of the world, have a law not to know murder or adultery or harlotry, not to commit theft, and not to worship idols. And in all that region, which is very large, neither a temple nor an image is found, nor a harlot, nor an adulteress, nor is a thief brought to trial; nor is a man ever reported to have been killed there. Yet no one's freedom of choice was compelled, according to you, by the fiery star of Mars to use the sword for a man's slaying, nor did Venus placed with Mars compel another's marriage to be violated, though certainly among them Mars holds the middle circle of heaven every day. But among the Seres the fear of the laws is stronger than the constellation of birth-fate.
9.20PG 1:1410a–1410b
Sunt similiter et apud Bactros in regionibus Indorum immensae multitudines Bragmanorum, qui et ipsi ex traditione majorum. moribus legibusque concordibus, neque homicidium neque adulterium committunt, neque simulacra colunt neque animantia edere in usu habent, nunquam inebriantur, nunquam malitiose aliquid gerunt, sed Deum semper timent; et quidem haec illi, cum caeteri Indorum et homicidia et adulteria committant, et simulacra colant, et inebrientur, atque alia hujusmodi flagitia exerceant. Sed et in ipsius Indiae nihilominus occiduis partibus regio quaedam est illi, ubi hospites cum inciderint, capti immolantur et comeduntur, et neque bona: stellae vetuerunt eos ab hujusmodi flagitiis et ab exsecrandis cibis, neque maligna: stellae compulerunt Bragmanas, ut aliquid agerent mali. Est rursus mos apud Persas, matres accipere in conjugium et sorores et filias, et sub illo omni axe incesta Persae ineunt matrimonia.
“Likewise among the Bactrians, in the regions of the Indians, there are immense multitudes of Brahmans, who also, from the tradition of their ancestors, with harmonious customs and laws, commit neither murder nor adultery, nor worship images, nor are accustomed to eat living things; they are never drunk, never do anything maliciously, but always fear God. And they do this while the rest of the Indians commit murders and adulteries, worship images, get drunk, and practice other such crimes. And in the western parts of India itself there is a certain region where strangers, when they happen upon it, are seized, sacrificed, and eaten; and neither did the good stars prevent these from such crimes and accursed foods, nor did the evil stars compel the Brahmans to do anything evil. Again, there is a custom among the Persians of taking mothers and sisters and daughters in marriage, and under all that sky the Persians contract incestuous marriages.
9.21PG 1:1410b
Ac ne forte liceat his qui mathesim sequuntur uti illo perfugio quo dicunt, certas quasdam esse plagas caeli, quibus propria quaedam habere conceditur, ex ipsa Persarum gente aliquanti ad peregrina profecti sunt, qui Magusaei appellantur, ex quibus usque in hodiernum sunt alii in Media, alii in Parthia, sed et in Egypto nonnulli, plures autem in Galatia et Phrygia, qui omnes incestae hujus traditionis formam indeclinabilem servant, ac posteris custodiendam transmittunt etiam cum plagam caeli mutaverint, nec tamen eos Venus cum Luna in finibus et domibus Saturni, cum Saturno attestante etiam Marte, compulit habere inter caeteros genesim.
“And lest those who follow astrology be allowed to use the refuge in which they say that there are certain zones of the sky to which it is granted to have certain properties of their own: some of that very nation of the Persians have gone abroad, who are called Magusaeans, of whom to this day some are in Media, some in Parthia, some also in Egypt, but more in Galatia and Phrygia; and all of these keep the unswerving form of this incestuous tradition and hand it down to their descendants to be kept, even when they have changed their zone of the sky. Yet Venus with the Moon in the terms and houses of Saturn, with Saturn, Mars also bearing witness, did not compel them to have a birth-fate among the rest.
9.22PG 1:1410b–1411a
Apud Gelos quoque mos est, ut mulieres agricolentur, aedificent et omne opus virile perficiant, sed et misceri quibus volunt licet, nec incusantur a viris aut adulterae appellantur. passim enim concubitus miscent et praecipue cum hospitibus. unguenta nesciunt, non induuntur veste fucata, non calceis; econtra viri Gelonum ornantur. pectuntur, indumentis mollibus et variis induuntur, auro compositi unguentisque delibuti, et haec non pro dissolutione virium, sunt enim bellicosissimi et venatores acerrimi; nec tamen universae Gelonum mulieres, in Capraecornu aut Aquario cacodaemonem Venerem nascentes habuere, neque viri eorum in Ariete cum Marte Venerem positam, per quod schema effeminatos et dissolutos nasci asserit viros Chaldaica disciplina.
“Among the Geli also there is a custom that the women farm, build, and do every man's work, and they are also allowed to have intercourse with whomever they wish, and are not accused by their husbands or called adulteresses; for they have intercourse indiscriminately, and especially with strangers. They know nothing of ointments, are not dressed in dyed clothing or shoes. On the contrary, the men of the Geli are adorned and combed, dressed in soft and varied garments, decked with gold and smeared with ointments; and this not from any weakness of strength, for they are most warlike and keenest hunters. Yet not all the women of the Geli had, at their birth, the maleficent Venus in Capricorn or Aquarius, nor their men Venus placed with Mars in Aries, by which figure the Chaldean discipline asserts that men are born effeminate and dissolute.
9.23PG 1:1411b–1412a
Porro vero in Susis mulieres unguentis et quidem optimis utuntur, ornamentis comptae ex lapidibus pretiosis, ministeriis quoque ancillarum fultae procedunt multo majore ambitione quam viri, nec tamen pudicitiam colunt, sed indifferens eis cum quibuscunque voluerint usus est et servis et hospitibus, tali licentia a viris permissa; et non solum non culpantur pro hoc, sed et dominantur in viros. Nec tamen omnium genesis mulierum Susidarum in medietate caeli, cum Jove et Marte Venerem in Jovis domibus habent. In ulterioribus Orientis partibus, si puer muliebri se substernat injuriae, cum agnitum fuerit, a fratribus aut parentibus vel quibuslibet proximis interficitur, nec sepultura donatur. Et rursus apud Gallos lex prisca constituit nuptum tradi publice pueros, nec opprobrium ex hoc aliquod duci; et nunquid possibile est, ut omnes qui tam turpiter succumbunt apud Gallos, Luciferum cum Mercurio in domibus Saturni et finibus Martis habuerint?
“Further, in Susa the women use ointments, and the best ones, are adorned with ornaments of precious stones, and go out attended by maidservants with much greater display than the men; yet they do not cultivate chastity, but have indifferent intercourse with whomever they wish, both slaves and strangers, such license being allowed by their husbands; and not only are they not blamed for this, but they even rule over their husbands. Yet the birth-fate of all the women of Susa does not have Venus in the middle of heaven with Jupiter and Mars in the houses of Jupiter. In the farther parts of the East, if a boy submits himself to the womanly outrage, when it is known he is killed by his brothers or parents or any relatives, and is not given burial. And again, among the Gauls an ancient law established that boys are given in marriage publicly, and no reproach is held to come of it. Is it possible that all who so shamefully submit among the Gauls had Lucifer with Mercury in the houses of Saturn and the terms of Mars?
9.24PG 1:1412a–1412b
In Britanniae partibus plures viri unam habent uxorem, in Parthia multa: mulieres unum habent virum, et utraque orbis pars moribus suis atque institutis obsequitur. Amazones omnes non habent viros, sed sicut animalia semel in anno circa vernale aequinoctium proprios egressas terminos, finitione gentis viris miscentur, solemnitatem quamdam per hoc observantes, ex quibus cum conceperint redeunt, et si marem pepererint abjiciunt, feminas nutriunt. Cumque unius temporis sit omnium partus, absurdum est. ut in maribus quidem putetur Mars cum Saturno in tempore aequis esse portionibus, in feminarum vero genesi nunquam. Sed neque Mercurium cum Venere habuisse in domibus propriis positum, ut vel pictores ibi vel sculptores vel trapezitas efficiat, aut in domibus Veneris, ut unguentarios vel vocales vel poetas producat. Apud Saracenos et superiores Libes et Mauros et circa ora maris Oceani habitantes, sed et in extremis Germania: partibus et apud Sarmatas et Scythas atque omnes quae sub axe Septentrionis jacent Pontici littoris gentes, et in Chrysca insula. nunquam invenitur trapezita nec sculptor, aut pictor, aut architectus, aut geometres, aut tragoedus, aut poeta; ergo deficit apud eos Mercurii Venerisque conSlellaliO.
“In parts of Britain several men have one wife; in Parthia many women have one man; and each part of the world follows its own customs and institutions. The Amazons all have no husbands, but like animals, once a year about the spring equinox, going out beyond their own borders, they have intercourse with the men of a neighboring nation, observing a kind of festival by it; and when they have conceived by them they return, and if they bear a male they cast it away, while they rear the females. And since the birth of all of them falls at one time, it is absurd that among the males Mars should be thought to be with Saturn in equal portions at that time, but never in the birth of the females. Nor did they have Mercury placed with Venus in his own houses, so as to produce painters or sculptors or bankers there, or in the houses of Venus, so as to bring forth perfumers or singers or poets. Among the Saracens, the upper Libyans and the Moors, and those who live about the shore of the Ocean, and in the farthest parts of Germany, among the Sarmatians and Scythians and all the nations of the Pontic shore that lie under the northern pole, and in the island of Chryse, there is never found a banker or sculptor or painter or architect or geometer or tragic actor or poet. Therefore the constellation of Mercury and Venus is lacking among them!
9.25PG 1:1412b–1413b
Ex omni orbe terrarum Medi tantummodo summa observantia adhuc spirantes homines canibus devorandos abjiciunt, et non ob hoc Martem cum Luna per diurnam genesim in Cancro positos habent. Indi mortuos suos incendunt, cum quibus et uxores defunctorum sponte se offerentes exuruntur. Sed non ideo omnes quae viva: incenduntur Indorum mulieres, in nocturna genesi sub terra habent Solem cum Marte in partibus Martis. Germanorum plurimi laqueo vitam finiunt, nec idcirco omnes Lunam cum hora, Saturno et Marte circumcinctas habent. Sed non in omni gente, et in omni die per omnem diversitatem genesis nascuntur homines? Ex quibus omnibus apparet, quia metus legum in unaquaque regione dominatur, et arbitrii libertas quae est hominibus insita per spiritum, obtemperat legibus, nec cogere potest genesis aut Seres homicidium committere, aut Bragmanos carnibus vesci, aut Persas incesta vitare, vel Indos non exuri, aut Medos non a canibus devorari, Parthos non habere plures uxores, aut mulieres MeSOpotamia: non servare pudicitiam, Graecos non exerceri palaestris, Gallorum pueros non pati muliebria, vel gentes barbaras Graecorum studiis institui, sed, ut diximus, unaquaeque gens suis legibus utitur pro libertatis arbitrio, et decreta genesis legum severitate depellit.
“Of all the world, the Medes alone, with the greatest care, cast out men while still breathing to be devoured by dogs; and not for that reason do they have Mars with the Moon placed in Cancer in a daytime nativity. The Indians burn their dead, and with them the wives of the dead, offering themselves willingly, are burned. But not for that reason do all the women of the Indians who are burned alive have, in a night nativity, the Sun below the earth with Mars in the portions of Mars. Very many of the Germans end their life by the noose; yet not for that reason do they all have the Moon with the hour hemmed in by Saturn and Mars. Are not men born in every nation and on every day under every diversity of birth-fate? From all this it appears that the fear of the laws rules in each region, and the freedom of choice that is implanted in men by the spirit obeys the laws; and birth-fate cannot compel either the Seres to commit murder, or the Brahmans to eat flesh, or the Persians to avoid incest, or the Indians not to be burned, or the Medes not to be devoured by dogs, or the Parthians not to have several wives, or the women of Mesopotamia not to keep chastity, or the Greeks not to exercise in the wrestling schools, or the boys of the Gauls not to suffer womanly treatment, or the barbarian nations to be trained in the studies of the Greeks; but, as we said, each nation uses its own laws according to the freedom of choice, and drives away the decrees of birth-fate by the severity of the laws.
9.26PG 1:1413b–1414a
Sed dicet aliquis eorum qui in disciplina mathesis eruditi sunt, genesim in septem partes dirimi, quae illi climata appellant, dominari vero unicuique climati unam ex septem stellis, et istas quas exposuimus diversas leges non ab hominibus positas, sed ab istis principibus secundum uniuscujusque voluntatem; et hoc quod stellae visum est, legem ab hominibus observatam. Ad haec ergo respondebimus, quod primo quidem non est in septem partes orbis terrae divisus, tum deinde et si ita esset, in una parte et in una regione invenimus multas differentias legum, et ideo neque septem sunt secundum numerum stellarum, neque duodecim secundum numerum signorum, neque triginta et sex secundum numerum decanorum, sed sunt innumerae.
“But someone of those learned in the discipline of astrology will say that birth-fate is divided into seven parts, which they call climes, and that one of the seven stars rules each clime; and that these diverse laws we have set out were laid down not by men but by these rulers according to the will of each, and what the star decided became a law observed by men. To this, then, we shall answer: first, the world is not divided into seven parts; then, even if it were so, in one part and in one region we find many differences of laws. And so they are neither seven according to the number of the stars, nor twelve according to the number of the signs, nor thirty-six according to the number of the decans, but innumerable.
9.27PG 1:1414a–1414b
Meminisse autem debemus eorum qua: supra enumerata sunt, quod in una Indiae regione sunt et qui hominum carnibus vescantur, et sunt qui etiam a pecudibus vel avibus omnibusque animantibus abstineant, et quia Magusaei non solum in Perside matres ac filias accipiunt in matrimonium, sed et in omni gente ubicunque habitaverint, malorum suorum incesta instituta custodiunt. Tum praeterea et innumeras gentes memoravimus, quae penitus studia nesciunt litterarum. Sed et aliquanti, sapientes viri ipsas leges in nonnullis commutaverunt locis, alia: vero etiam sponte pro sui vel impossibilitate vel inhonestate derelicta: sunt. Certe. quod in promptu est noscere, quanti imperatores gentium quas vicerant leges et instituta mutarunt, et suis eas legibus subiecerunt! Quod evidenter a Romanis factum docetur, qui omnem pene orbem omnesque nationes propriis primo et variis legibus institutisque viventes, in Romanorum jus et civilia scita verterunt. Superest ergo ut et stellae gentium, quae a Romanis victa: sunt, climata sua partesque perdiderint.
“We must remember what was listed above: that in one region of India there are both those who eat human flesh and those who abstain even from cattle and birds and all living things; and that the Magusaeans take mothers and daughters in marriage not only in Persia but in every nation wherever they live, keeping the incestuous institutions of their wickedness. Besides, we mentioned innumerable nations which know nothing at all of the study of letters. And some wise men have changed the laws themselves in some places, while other laws have been abandoned of their own accord because of their impracticability or dishonor. Certainly, as is easy to know, how many emperors have changed the laws and institutions of the nations they conquered and subjected them to their own laws! This is plainly shown to have been done by the Romans, who turned almost the whole world and all nations, which at first lived by their own and various laws and institutions, to Roman law and civil decrees. It remains, then, that the stars of the nations conquered by the Romans have lost their climes and parts!”
9.28PG 1:1414b–1415a
Addam adhuc rem, quae possit etiam valde incredulis satisfacere. Judaei omnes qui sub lege Moysi vivunt, filios suos octava die absque ulla dilatione circumcidunt, et infantis teneri sanguinem fundunt; a saeculo autem nullus ex gentibus hoc die octava perpessus est, et econtra Iudaeorum nullus omisit. Quomodo ergo in hoc ratio genesis stabit? cum per cunctas orbis terrae partes omnes Judaei admisti gentibus vivant, et octava ferrum perferant die unius in membri loco, et nemo gentilium, sed ipsi soli, ut dixi, hoc faciunt, non stella cogente nec perfusione sanguinis perurgente, sed lege religionis adducti, et in quocunque orbis loco fuerint hoc est eis insigne vernaculum. Sed et quod unum nomen omnibus inest ubicunque fuerint, nunquid et hoc per genesim venit? et quod nunquam apud eos infans natus exponitur, et quod septimo quoque die omnes ubicunque fuerint, otium gerunt nec iter incedunt nec igni utuntur? Quid est ergo, quod nullum Iudaeorum in illa die cogit genesis aut iter agere, aut aedificare, aut vendere aliquid, aut emere?
“I will add yet another matter that can satisfy even the very incredulous. All the Jews who live under the law of Moses circumcise their sons on the eighth day without any delay and shed the blood of the tender infant; but from the beginning of the age none of the Gentiles has undergone this on the eighth day, and on the other hand none of the Jews has omitted it. How, then, will the theory of birth-fate stand in this, when the Jews live mixed among the Gentiles throughout all parts of the world, and endure the knife on the eighth day in the place of one member, and none of the Gentiles but they alone, as I said, do this, not compelled by a star nor driven by the shedding of blood, but led by the law of religion; and in whatever place in the world they are, this is their native mark. And that they all have one name wherever they are—has this too come by birth-fate? And that among them an infant once born is never exposed, and that every seventh day all, wherever they are, keep rest, neither go on a journey nor use fire? Why is it, then, that birth-fate compels none of the Jews on that day either to make a journey, or to build, or to sell or buy anything?
9.29PG 1:1415a–1415b
Quinimo et majorem fidem rerum praesentium dabo. Ecce enim ex adventu justi et veri Propheta: vixdum septem anni sunt, in quibus ex omnibus gentibus convenientes homines ad Judaeam, et signis ac virtutibus quae viderant, sed et doctrina: majestate permoti, ubi receperunt fidem ejus, abeuntes ad regiones suas illicitos quosque gentilium ritus et incesta sprevere conjugia. Denique apud Parthos, sicut nobis Thomas, qui apud illos Evangelium praedicat, scripsit, non multi jam erga plurima matrimonia diffunduntur, nec multi apud Medos canibus objiciunt mortuos suos, neque Persa: matrum conjugiis aut filiarum incestis matrimoniis delectantur, nec mulieres Susides licita ducunt adulteria; nec potuit ad crimina genesis compellere, quos religionis doctrina prohibebat.
“Indeed, I will give still greater proof from present things. For see, since the coming of the just and true Prophet scarcely seven years have passed, in which men from all nations coming to Judea, moved by the signs and mighty works they had seen and by the majesty of his teaching, when they received faith in him, went back to their own regions and despised the unlawful rites of the Gentiles and incestuous marriages. Indeed among the Parthians, as Thomas, who preaches the gospel among them, has written to us, not many any longer spread themselves among many marriages; nor do many among the Medes cast their dead to the dogs; nor do the Persians delight in marriages with their mothers or incestuous marriages with their daughters; nor do the women of Susa practice the adulteries once lawful; nor could birth-fate compel to crimes those whom the teaching of religion forbade.
9.30PG 1:1415b–1416b
Ecce ex hoc ipso conjice, et de his in quibus sumus locis, conjecturam cape, quomodo fama tantum perferente ad aures hominum, quod Propheta in Iudaea apparuit, qui signis et virtutibus doceret homines unum colere Deum, omnes paratis intentisque animis exspectabant, etiam ante adventum domini mei Petri, ut sibi aliquis quae docuisset ille qui apparuit, nuntiaret. Sed ne multa enumerare videamur, dicam quo debeant cuncta concludi: Cum Deus justus sit et ipse fecerit hominum naturam, quomodo poterat fieri, ut ipse poneret genesim contrariam nobis, quae nos cogeret ad peccatum et rursus ulcisceretur ipse peccantes? Unde certum est, quod non aliam ob causam Deus sive in praesenti sive in futuro saeculo peccatorem punit, nisi quia scit eum potuisse vincere, sed neglexisse victoriam; infert enim et in praesenti saeculo vindictam in homines, sicut in eos fecit qui diluvio perierunt, qui utique omnes una die, imo una hora exstincti sunt, cum certum sit non eos esse secundum genesis ordinem una hora natos. Absurdissimum est autem dicere, quia ex natura nobis accidat pati mala, si non prius peccata praecesserint.
“See, from this very thing make a guess, and take a conjecture from these places where we are, how, when only report brought to men's ears that a Prophet had appeared in Judea who by signs and mighty works taught men to worship one God, all were waiting with ready and attentive minds, even before the coming of my lord Peter, for someone to announce to them what he who appeared had taught. But not to seem to list many things, I will say how all should be concluded. Since God is just and himself made the nature of men, how could it be that he himself should set a birth-fate contrary to us, which would compel us to sin, and then himself punish sinners? Hence it is certain that God punishes the sinner, whether in the present or in the future age, for no other reason than that he knows he could have conquered but neglected the victory. For he inflicts vengeance on men in the present age too, as he did on those who perished in the flood, who were all destroyed in one day, indeed in one hour, though it is certain that they were not all born in one hour according to the order of birth-fate. And it is most absurd to say that we suffer evils by nature, if sins have not gone before.
9.31PG 1:1416b–1417a
Et ideo si salutis curam gerimus, ante omnia scientiae debemus operam dare, certi quod si mens nostra in ignorantia perseveret, non solum genesis mala, sed et alia extrinsecus quaecunque daemonibus visa fuerint perferemus, nisi metus legum et futuri judicii obsistat omnibus desideriis, et impetum peccandi refrenet. Nam et humanus timor multa bona, multa etiam mala agit, quae genesis nescit, sicut supra ostendimus. Triplici igitur modo mens nostra erroribus subjacet: ex his quae per malam consuetudinem veniunt, vel ex his quae corpus naturaliter suggerit desideriis, vel his quae contrariae potestates perurgent; sed his singulis obsistere et repugnare habet in natura sua mens, cum ei obfulserit veritatis agnitio, per quam scientiam timor futuri judicii datur, qui sit idoneus animae gubernator et qui eam possit a concupiscentiarum praecipitiis revocare. Quia ergo sint haec in nostra potestate, sufficienter dictum est.
“And therefore, if we care for salvation, we must above all devote ourselves to knowledge, sure that if our mind remains in ignorance, we shall endure not only the evils of birth-fate but also whatever else from outside seems good to the demons—unless fear of the laws and of the coming judgment resists all desires and curbs the impulse to sin. For human fear too does many good things and also many evil things, which birth-fate does not know, as we showed above. Our mind, then, is subject to errors in a threefold way: from things that come through evil habit, or from those that the body naturally suggests by desires, or from those that the hostile powers urge. But the mind has it in its nature to resist and fight against each of these, when the knowledge of truth has shone on it; through this knowledge the fear of the coming judgment is given, which is a fit pilot of the soul and can call it back from the precipices of desires. That these things are in our power, then, has been sufficiently said.
9.32PG 1:1417a–1417b
Nunc et tu senex, si quid habes quod ad haec respondeas, incipe. Senex ad haec: Plenissime, ait, ostendisti, fili; sed ego, sicut dixi ex initio, omni huic incomparabili assertioni tuae, a propria conscientia prohibeor accommodare consensum. Novi enim et meam genesim et conjugis meae, et scio ea quae unicuique nostrum dictabat genesis accidisse, et ab his quae rebus et operibus comperta sunt mihi, nunc verbis transferri non possum. Denique quoniam te apprime imbutum video in hujuscemodi disciplinis, audi conjugis meae thema, et invenies schema cujus exitus accidit. Habuit enim Martem cum Venere super centrum, Lunam vero in occasu in domibus Martis et finibus Saturni, quod schema adulteras facit et servos proprios amare, in peregrinatione et in aquis defungi, quod et ita factum est; incidit namque in amorem servi, et periculum simul atque opprobrium metuens fugit cum ipso, et peregre profecta ubi amori suo satisfecit, periit in mari.
“Now you too, old man, if you have anything to answer to this, begin.” The old man said to this: “You have shown it most fully, my son. But I, as I said from the beginning, am prevented by my own knowledge from giving assent to this whole incomparable argument of yours. For I know my own birth-fate and my wife's, and I know that what birth-fate dictated for each of us has happened; and from what I have found out by facts and deeds I cannot now be moved by words. Indeed, since I see you thoroughly trained in disciplines of this kind, hear my wife's horoscope, and you will find the figure whose outcome took place. She had Mars with Venus above the cardinal point, and the Moon setting in the houses of Mars and the terms of Saturn—a figure that makes women adulteresses and lovers of their own slaves, and makes them die abroad and in the waters. And so it happened. For she fell in love with a slave, and fearing danger and disgrace alike, fled with him; and having gone abroad, where she satisfied her love, she perished in the sea.”
9.33PG 1:1417b
Et ego respondi: Unde scis quia peregre servo suo sociata est et in ejus consortio posita defungitur? Et senex: Certissime, inquit, scio, revera non quia nupserit servo, quippe qui neque hoc quidem quod eum amaret agnoveram, sed postquam profecta est, frater meus mihi enarravit, dicens, quod primo quidem ipsum adamasset; sed ille quia erat honestus, utpote frater, noluit torum fratris incesti macula polluere. Sed illa et me verens, et Opprobrium non ferens infelix (neque enim imputandum ei est, quod eam genesis facere compulit), finxit somnium et ait ad me: Astitit mihi quidam per visum, qui jussit me cum duobus geminis meis sine mora ex Urbe proficisci. Haec ergo cum audissem, pro salute ejus filiorumque sollicitus, confestim ipsam et liberos exire feci; unum qui erat junior, mihi retinui; hoc enim eum qui responsa in somnis dederat, permisisse dicebat.
I answered: “How do you know that she was joined to her slave abroad and died in his company?” The old man said: “I know it most certainly—not indeed that she married the slave, for I did not even know that she loved him; but after she had gone, my brother told me, saying that first she had fallen in love with him; but he, being honorable, as a brother, would not pollute his brother's bed with the stain of incest. But she, unhappy woman, fearing both me and the disgrace that she could not bear (for it is not to be imputed to her, since birth-fate compelled her to do it), invented a dream and said to me: ‘Someone stood by me in a vision and ordered me to leave the city without delay with my two twins.’ When I heard this, anxious for her safety and the children's, I at once had her and the children leave; one, who was the younger, I kept with me, for she said that he who had given the answers in dreams had permitted this.”
9.34PG 1:1417b–1418a
Tum ego Clemens, intelligens quod ipse fortassis esset pater meus, lacrymis oppletus sum; fratres quoque meos volentes prosilire et aperire rem, prohibuit Petrus dicens: Quiescite quoadusque mihi placuerit. Respondens ergo Petrus ait ad senem: Quod nomen erat juniori filio tuo? At ille ait: Clemens. Et Petrus: Si tibi, inquit, hodie conjugem tuam castissimam consignavero cum tribus filiis tuis, credis quia potest pudica mens motus irrationabiles superare, et quod omnia quae a nobis dicta sunt, vera sint et genesis nihil sit? Et senex: Sicut impossibile est, inquit, te exhibere quod promisisti, ita impossibile est extra genesim fieri aliquid. Tum Petrus: Testes, inquit, habere volo omnes hos qui praesentes sunt, me tibi hodie conjugem tuam cum tribus vestris liberis viventem pudicissime traditurum; et jam nunc accipe fidem rerum ex eo, quod omnem causam multo diligentius scio quam tu, cunctaque tibi per ordinem quae gesta sunt enarrabo, ut et tu cognoscas et qui praesentes sunt discant.
Then I, Clement, understanding that he was perhaps my father, was filled with tears. My brothers also wanted to leap up and reveal the matter, but Peter prevented them, saying: “Be quiet until I see fit.” Then Peter answered and said to the old man: “What was the name of your younger son?” He said: “Clement.” Peter said: “If today I hand over to you your most chaste wife with your three sons, do you believe that a chaste mind can overcome irrational impulses, and that all we have said is true and birth-fate is nothing?” The old man said: “As it is impossible for you to produce what you have promised, so it is impossible for anything to happen outside birth-fate.” Then Peter said: “I want to have as witnesses all these who are present, that today I will deliver to you your wife, who has lived most chastely, with your three children. And now take proof of the matter from this, that I know the whole affair much more accurately than you, and I will tell you in order everything that happened, so that you may know and those present may learn.”
9.35PG 1:1418a–1418b
Et cum haec dixisset, conversus ad turbas ita coepit: Hic quem videtis, o viri, in hac veste pauperrima, Romana: urbis est civis, ex genere ipsius Caesaris descendens; nomen ei Faustinianus, uxorem quoque nobilissimam Matthidiam nomine sortitus est, ex qua tres filios suscepit, quorum duo gemini, unus autem qui erat junior, cui nomen Clemens, hic est. Et cum hoc dixisset, digito me ostendit. Gemini autem filii ejus sunt isti, Niceta et Aquila, quorum alius Faustinus vocabatur prius, et alius Faustus. Simul autem ut nomina nostra enuntiavit Petrus, senex resolutis membris omnibus, quasi interceptus concidit. Nos autem filii irruentes super eum, complectebamur et osculabamur, verentes simul ne spiritum revocare non posset. Et cum haec fierent, populus quidem admiratione ipsa obstupefactus est.
When he had said this, he turned to the crowds and began thus: “This man whom you see, men, in this very poor garment, is a citizen of the city of Rome, descended from the family of Caesar himself; his name is Faustinianus, and he married a most noble wife named Mattidia, by whom he had three sons, of whom two were twins, and the one who was younger, named Clement, is this man.” And when he had said this, he pointed to me with his finger. “And his twin sons are these, Niceta and Aquila, of whom one was formerly called Faustinus and the other Faustus.” As soon as Peter pronounced our names, the old man, all his limbs failing, collapsed as if struck down. We his sons rushed upon him, embraced and kissed him, fearing at the same time that he might not be able to recover his breath. While this was happening, the people were stunned with amazement.
9.36PG 1:1418b–1419a
Petrus autem surgere nos a complexibus patris, ne eum necaremus jubet, et ipse apprehensa manu ejus, quasi de somno quodam profundo elevans eum et paululum recreans, omnia quae gesta fuerant secundum veritatem coepit exponere: quomodo frater ejus in amorem inciderit Matthidiae, et illa cum esset pudicissima, illicitum fratris amorem viro indicare noluerit, ne vel bellum fratribus vel opprobrium generi indiceret, sed sapienter somnium finxerit, quo ex Urbe juberetur excedere cum geminis filiis, juniore apud patrem relicto; utque navigantes naufragium vi tempestatis incurrerint, et ad insulam Antaradum nomine expulsi, Matthidia quidem supra saxum quoddam fluctu jactante projecta sit, gemini vero liberi rapti a piratis et Caesaream perducti, religiosae cuidam femina: venundati sint, quae eos in filiorum loco habens liberaliter educaverit et erudiri fecerit, eorumque nomina piratae immutaverint et Nicetam alium, alium Aquilam vocitaverint; utque post haec studiorum et consuetudinis causa Simoni adhaeserint, atque ab eo, ubi magum et deceptorem viderunt, aversi accesserint ad Zacchaeum, et ut post haec sociati sunt sibi; sed et Clemens quomodo ex Urbe agnoscenda: veritatis causa profectus, per Barnaba: notitiam Caesaream venerit sibique innotuerit et adhaeserit, utque ab eo sit de fide religionis edoctus; sed et qualiter apud Antaradum mendicantem repererit et recognoverit matrem, utque omnis insula in ejus recognitione gavisa sit, et de pudicissimae hospitae contubernio atque ejus per semetipsum collata sanitate, et de liberalitate Clementis in eos qui erga matrem benefici exstiterant; utque post haec Niceta et Aquila requirentes quaenam esset peregrina mulier, cum audissent a Clemente omne negotium, se esse geminos ejus filios Faustinum exclamaverunt et Faustum, omnemque historiam quae eos egerit patefecerint; utque post haec matri cautius, ne subito gaudio interciperetur, ipso insinuante Petro, oblati sint.
Peter told us to rise from our father's embraces, lest we kill him; and he himself, taking his hand, raised him as if from a deep sleep, revived him a little, and began to set out truthfully everything that had happened: how his brother had fallen in love with Mattidia, and she, being most chaste, would not reveal his brother's unlawful love to her husband, lest she bring war upon the brothers or disgrace upon the family, but wisely invented a dream by which she was ordered to leave the city with her twin sons, the younger being left with his father; how, sailing, they suffered shipwreck by the violence of a storm and were cast upon the island called Antaradus; how Mattidia was thrown by the tossing waves onto a rock, while the twin children were seized by pirates, taken to Caesarea, and sold to a religious woman, who held them in place of sons, brought them up liberally, and had them educated; how the pirates changed their names and called one Niceta and the other Aquila; how after this, for the sake of their studies and companionship, they attached themselves to Simon, and when they saw he was a magician and deceiver, turned from him and came to Zacchaeus; and how after this they joined Peter. Also how Clement set out from the city to know the truth, came to Caesarea through acquaintance with Barnabas, became known to Peter and attached himself to him, and was taught by him the faith of religion; and how at Antaradus he found and recognized his mother begging, and how the whole island rejoiced at her recognition; of her life with her most chaste hostess and of the healing granted her through Peter himself; and of Clement's generosity to those who had been kind to his mother; and how after this Niceta and Aquila, asking who the strange woman was, when they had heard the whole matter from Clement, cried out that they were her twin sons Faustinus and Faustus and disclosed the whole story of what had happened to them; and how after this, at Peter's own suggestion, they were presented to their mother cautiously, lest she be overcome by sudden joy.
9.37PG 1:1419a–1419b
Sed cum haec in auditu senis narratione gratissima turbis exponeret Petrus, ita ut audientes gestorum miraculis et humanitatis miseratione lacrymarent, nescio unde audiens mater de recognitione patris, cursu concito irruit in medium nostri, cum clamore dicens: Ubi est meus vir, meus dominus Faustinianus, qui tam multis temporibus affligitur, ambulans per urbes singulas et me quaerens? Haec cum illa quasi amens clamaret et circumspiceret, senex accurrens cum multis lacrymis amplecti et constringere eam coepit. Et cum haec gererentur, Petrus rogavit turbas ut discederent, dicens inverecundum esse ultra persistere, sed dandum eis locum familiarius invicem se videndi; crastino autem hic, inquit, si qui vestrum volunt, conveniant ad audiendum verbum.
While Peter was setting these things out to the crowds in a narrative most welcome to the old man's ears, so that the hearers wept at the wonder of the events and in compassion, my mother, hearing from somewhere of the recognition of my father, rushed with hurried steps into our midst, crying out: “Where is my husband, my lord Faustinianus, who has been afflicted so many years, going about through each city looking for me?” As she was crying this out, as if beside herself, and looking around, the old man ran to her with many tears and began to embrace and hold her tight. While this was happening, Peter asked the crowds to leave, saying it was unseemly to stay any longer, but that room should be given them to see one another more intimately; “but tomorrow,” he said, “let any of you who wish come together here to hear the word.”
9.38PG 1:1419b–1420b
His a Petro dictis secesserunt turba:, et cum vellemus nos quoque ire ad hospitium, dominus domus ait ad nos: Turpe est et impium tales ac tantos viros manere in stabulo, cum ego omnem pene domum vacantem habeam, lectosque stratos quamplurimas et quae necessaria sunt parata. Sed Petro contradicente, uxor patrisfamilias una cum liberis suis prostrabat se ante eum et exorabat dicens: Obsecro te, mane apud nos. Sed ne sic quidem acquiescebat Petrus, donec filia eorum qui rogabant, ab immundo spiritu temporibus multis vexata et catenis vincta, quae fuerat intra conclave clausa, effugato a se daemone et ostiis patefactis cum catenis suis veniens procidit ad pedes Petri, dicens: Rectum est, mi domine, ut agas hodie hic salutaria mea, et non contristes neque me neque parentes meos. Petro autem requirente catenarum sermonumque ejus causam, parentes praeter spem laeti effecti de filia: sanitate, velut stupore quodam attoniti ipsi quidem dicere nequeunt, astantes autem famuli aiunt: Haec septimo aetatis anno a daemone occupata, omnes qui accedere tentassent ad eam, scindere, dilaniare morsibus, etiam disrumpere, et hoc per viginti annos usque ad praesens facere nunquam destitit, nec ab aliquo potuit curari, sed ne accedere ad eam quisquam valebat; multos enim inutiles reddidit, alios et peremit, omnibus enim viris validior erat, sine dubio viribus daemonis nisa. Nunc autem, ut vides, ex praesentia tua daemon quidem fugit, ostia vero quae summo cum munimento clausa fuerant, aperta sunt, et ipsa sana stat ante te rogans, ut diem salutarium suorum laetum et ipsi et parentibus facias, et maneas apud eos. Haec cum ita unus ex famulis enarrasset, et ipsae catena: de manibus ejus ac pedibus fuissent sponte resoluta, Petrus, certus quod per ipsum sanitas haec reddita sit puellae, acquievit manere apud eos. Sed et illos qui remanserant in hospitio una cum uxore sua transire jussit, et unusquisque acceptis seorsum cubiculis mansimus, atque ex more cibo sumpto redditisque laudibus Deo. suis singuli requievimus locis.
When Peter had said this, the crowds withdrew. And when we too wished to go to the lodging, the master of the house said to us: “It is shameful and impious for such and so great men to stay at an inn, when I have almost the whole house empty, and very many beds spread, and everything necessary prepared.” But when Peter declined, the wife of the master of the house with her children prostrated herself before him and begged him, saying: “I beg you, stay with us.” But even so Peter did not agree, until the daughter of those who were asking, who had been tormented for a long time by an unclean spirit and bound with chains, and had been shut within a chamber, the demon having been driven from her and the doors thrown open, came with her chains, fell at Peter's feet, and said: “It is right, my lord, that you should keep here today the feast of my deliverance, and not grieve either me or my parents.” When Peter asked the reason for her chains and her words, the parents, made joyful beyond hope at their daughter's healing, were themselves unable to speak, as if stunned; but the servants standing by said: “She was seized by a demon in the seventh year of her age, and she never ceased to tear, to rend with her teeth, even to break apart all who tried to approach her; and she did this for twenty years until now, and could not be cured by anyone; nor could anyone even approach her. For she made many useless and killed others; for she was stronger than all men, relying without doubt on the strength of the demon. But now, as you see, at your presence the demon has fled, the doors that had been shut with the strongest fastening are opened, and she herself stands healed before you, asking you to make the day of her deliverance joyful for her and for her parents and to stay with them.” When one of the servants had told this, and the chains themselves had fallen of their own accord from her hands and feet, Peter, sure that this healing had been given to the girl through him, agreed to stay with them. He also ordered those who had remained at the lodging, together with his wife, to come over; and each of us received separate rooms and stayed there; and having taken food as usual and given praise to God, we each rested in our places.
Chapter 10
10.1PG 1:1419b–1420b
Mane autem, exorto sole, ego Clemens et Niceta atque Aquila una cum Petro venimus ad locum in quo pater simul cum matre requiescebat; et cum adhuc eos dormientes reperissemus, pro foribus consedimus, ubi Petrus talibus apud nos sermonibus utitur: Audite me, dilectissimi conservi, scio quia grandem habetis affectum erga patrem vestrum, vereor ergo ne ante tempus eum perurgeatis jugum religionis suscipere, nondum ad id paratum, ad quod forte pro vestri gratia videatur acquiescere. Sed hoc non est firmum; quod enim propter homines fit, probabile non est et cito dilabitur. Ideoque videtur mihi, ut concedatis ei anno uno vivere pro arbitrio, in quo potest iter agens nobiscum, dum nos alios docemus, etiam ipse simpliciter audire; et audiens, siquidem agnoscenda: veritatis rectum propositum gerit, ipse rogabit ut suscipiat religionis jugum, aut si non placet ei recipere, permaneat amicus. Hi enim qui non id ex corde suscipiunt, cum ceperint ferre non posse, non solum abjiciunt quod susceperant, sed quasi pro excusatione infirmitatis suae, incipiunt viam religionis blasphemare, et male loqui de his quos nequaquam sequi aut imitari potuerunt.
In the morning, at sunrise, I, Clement, and Niceta and Aquila came with Peter to the place where my father was resting together with my mother; and finding them still asleep, we sat down before the doors, where Peter used such words with us: “Listen to me, dearest fellow servants. I know that you have great affection for your father; so I fear that you may press him before the time to take up the yoke of religion when he is not yet ready for it, though perhaps for your sake he may seem to agree. But this is not firm; for what is done because of men is not approved and quickly falls away. And so it seems to me that you should allow him to live one year as he chooses, during which, travelling with us while we teach others, he can also simply listen; and listening, if he has an upright purpose of knowing the truth, he himself will ask to take up the yoke of religion; or if he does not wish to accept it, let him remain a friend. For those who do not take it up from the heart, when they begin to be unable to bear it, not only cast off what they had taken up, but, as if to excuse their own weakness, begin to blaspheme the way of religion and speak ill of those whom they could by no means follow or imitate.”
10.2PG 1:1420d–1421a
Ad haec Niceta respondit: Non contradico, domine mi Petre, rectis et bonis consiliis tuis, sed dicere aliquid volo, ut per hoc discam quod nescio. Quid si intra annum hunc, quo differri eum jubes, moriatur pater noster? descendet in infernum vacuus et cruciandus in aeternum. Tum Petrus: Amplector, inquit, benignum erga patrem propositum tuum, et ignosco tibi de his quae ignoras. Quid enim censes, quia si quis putatur juste vixisse, iste continuo salvabitur? Non putas eum discutiendum ab eo qui occulta hominum novit, quomodo juste vixerit, ne forte ritu gentilium, institutis eorum et legibus parens, vel pro amicitiis hominum, aut pro sola consuetudine aut qualibet alia ex causa vel necessitate, et non propter ipsam justitiam neque propter Deum? Qui enim propter solum Deum et justitiam ejus juste vixerint, ipsi ad aeternam requiem venient et perpetuitatem regni caelestis accipient. Salus enim non vi acquiritur, sed libertate, nec per hominum gratiam, sed per Dei fidem. Tum praeterea cogitare debes, quia Deus praescius est et novit si hic suus est; quod si novit eum non esse, quid faciemus ad ea quae ex initio statuta sunt ab eo? In quo autem possum, consilium do; cum evigilaverit et sederimus, vos quasi aliquid discere volentes, proponite ex his duntaxat quae illi expedit discere, et dum nos loquimur inter nos, ille instruetur. Sed tamen primo quiescite, ut si forte ipse videatur aliquid interrogare; quod si fecerit, aptior erit sermonis occasio; si vero ipse nihil quaerit, nos ab alterutro, sicut dixi, discere aliquid volentes rogemus vicissim. Mihi ita videtur, etiam vobis quid placeat dicite.
To this Niceta answered: “I do not contradict your right and good counsels, my lord Peter, but I want to say something, so as to learn by it what I do not know. What if within this year for which you tell us to put him off our father should die? He will go down to the underworld empty, to be tormented forever.” Then Peter said: “I embrace your kind purpose toward your father, and I pardon you for what you do not know. For do you think that if someone is thought to have lived justly, he will at once be saved? Do you not think that he must be examined by him who knows the hidden things of men as to how he lived justly—whether perhaps after the manner of the Gentiles, obeying their institutions and laws, or for the sake of friendships with men, or from mere habit or for any other cause or necessity, and not for the sake of justice itself nor for God? For those who have lived justly for the sake of God alone and his justice will come to eternal rest and receive the perpetuity of the heavenly kingdom. For salvation is acquired not by force but by freedom, not through the favor of men but through faith in God. Besides, you ought to consider that God foreknows and knows whether this man is his; and if he knows he is not, what shall we do against what was established by him from the beginning? But as far as I can, I give counsel: when he has woken and we have sat down, propose, as if wishing to learn something, only those things that it is profitable for him to learn; and while we talk among ourselves, he will be instructed. But first keep quiet, in case he seems to ask something; if he does, the occasion for discourse will be more suitable. But if he asks nothing, let us, as I said, ask one another in turn, as if wishing to learn something. This is how it seems to me; you too say what you think.”
10.3PG 1:1421a
Cumque collaudassemus eius rectum consilium, ego Clemens aio: In omnibus rebus plurima ex parte ad initium respicit finis, similisque principiis rerum exitus datur; spero ergo etiam circa patrem nostrum, quoniam per te Deus bona initia dedit, his congruum seque dignum largietur et finem. Verumtamen etiam illud suggero, si, ut dixisti, coeperimus, praesente patre, quasi inter nos aliquid tractandi vel discendi gratia loqui, tu mi domine Petre, non debes eum locum agere, quasi qui discere aliquid debeas; hoc enim si videat, fortasse magis offendetur, certus est enim te omnia scire diligenter, sicut et vere est. Quale ergo erit, si te videat ignorantiam simulantem? Hoc eum, ut dixi, magis laedere poterit, nescientem consilium tuum. Sed nos quidem fratres inter nos sermonem habentes. si in aliquo dubitemus, a te quaestioni nostrae finis congruus detur; nam et si te cunctantem videat aut dubitantem, tunc vere putabit, quod apud nullum erit scientia veritatis.
When we had praised his right counsel, I, Clement, said: “In all things the end looks for the most part to the beginning, and the outcome of things is given like their beginnings. So I hope that for our father too, since God has given good beginnings through you, he will grant an end fitting and worthy of them. But I also suggest this: if, as you said, in our father's presence we begin to talk among ourselves as if to discuss or learn something, you, my lord Peter, ought not to play the part of one who needs to learn something. For if he sees this, he will perhaps be more offended, for he is sure that you know everything thoroughly, as is truly the case. What will it be like, then, if he sees you feigning ignorance? This, as I said, could hurt him more, not knowing your plan. But let us brothers converse among ourselves, and if we are in doubt about anything, let a fitting conclusion to our question be given by you. For if he sees you hesitating or doubting, then he will truly think that the knowledge of truth will be with no one.”
10.4PG 1:1421a–1422a
Et Petrus ad haec respondit: Omittamus haec, et si quidem dignum est ut ingrediatur januam vitae, Deus occasionem competentem dabit, eritque initium ex Deo et non ex homine. Et ideo, sicut prius dixi, permittite eum iter agentem nobiscum audire nos aliquid disputantes; sed quoniam festinantes vos vidi, idcirco dixi Opportunitatem quaerendam; quam cum dederit Deus, vos quoque ad ea quae dixero obtemperate mihi. Haec nobis sermocinantibus, venit puer dicens vigilare jam patrem; et cum vellemus ingredi ad eum, ipse venit ad nos, et osculo nos salutans, cum resedissemus, ait: Licetne percunctari, si quid volet quis, an secundum Pythagoricos tacendum semper est? Et Petrus: Nos nec silere semper, neque percunctari cogimus accedentes ad nos, sed relinquimus ipsorum libertati facere ut volunt, scientes quod qui curam gerit salutis suae, si in parte aliqua sentit anima: sua: dolorem, tacere non patitur. Qui vero negligit salutem suam, si interrogare cogatur, nihil ex hoc utilitati ejus confertur, nisi hoc solum, ut studiosus esse videatur et diligens. Quamobrem tu si quid discere vis, require.
Peter answered this: “Let us leave this. If it is fitting that he should enter the door of life, God will give a suitable occasion, and the beginning will be from God and not from man. And so, as I said before, let him travel with us and hear us discussing something. But since I saw you in a hurry, I said that an opportunity must be sought; and when God gives it, you too must obey me in what I say.” While we were talking thus, a servant came saying that our father was now awake; and when we wished to go in to him, he himself came to us, greeted us with a kiss, and when we had sat down said: “Is it permitted to ask, if one wishes, or must one always keep silent, like the Pythagoreans?” Peter said: “We neither compel those who come to us always to be silent nor to ask, but leave it to their freedom to do as they wish, knowing that one who cares for his salvation, if he feels pain in any part of his soul, does not endure to keep silent; but one who neglects his salvation, if he is compelled to ask, gains no benefit from it except this only, that he seems studious and diligent. So if you wish to learn anything, ask.”
10.5PG 1:1422a–1423a
Et senex ait: Est quidam sermo apud Graecorum philosophos vehemens valde, qui dicit, in vita hominum re ipsa neque bonum esse aliquid, neque malum; sed quae videntur hominibus usu et consuetudine praeventis vitae, haec aut mala dicunt aut bona. Nam neque homicidium revera malum est, quia animam vinculis carnis absolvit; denique, aiunt, et justi quique judices peccantes perimunt. Quod si homicidium scirent malum esse, non uti. ille id ius“ homines Ῑίιοθτθηιο Neque θάιιηοΐὶυπι malum esse dicunt: si enim ignoretvir aut non cuο τοι. nihil. aiunt. mali θει- Sed neque furtum malum esse: quod enim deest alicui, aufert ab alio qui habet, quod quidem oportebat libere sumi et publice; sed quia occulte fit, in hoc magis illius a quo clam aufertur inhumanitas redarguitur. Communis enim usus omnium quae sunt in hoc mundo, omnibus esse hominibus debuit; sed per iniquitatem alius hoc suum dicit esse, et alius illud, et sic inter mortales divisio facta est. Denique Graecorum quidam sapientissimus haec ita sciens esse, ait, communia debere esse amicorum omnia; in omnibus autem sunt sine dubio et conjuges. Et sicut non potest, inquit, dividi aer neque splendor solis, ita nec reliqua quae communiter in hoc mundo data sunt omnibus ad habendum, dividi debere, sed habenda esse communia. Haec autem dicere volui, et non possum bene agere, nisi prius didicero quid sit bonum; quod si intelligere potuero. ex ipso etiam quid sit malum, hoc est huic contrarium, advertam.
The old man said: “There is a very forceful saying among the philosophers of the Greeks, which says that in the life of men there is in reality nothing either good or evil, but that men, preoccupied by the use and custom of life, call things evil or good as they appear to them. For not even murder is really an evil, since it frees the soul from the bonds of the flesh; indeed, they say, even just judges put sinners to death—and if they knew murder to be an evil, the just would not do it. Nor do they say that adultery is an evil; for if the husband does not know or does not care, there is, they say, no evil in it. Nor is theft an evil: for one who lacks something takes it from another who has it—which indeed ought to be taken freely and publicly; but because it is done secretly, in this rather the inhumanity of the one from whom it is secretly taken is exposed. For the common use of all things in this world ought to have belonged to all men; but through iniquity one calls this his own and another that, and so division was made among mortals. Indeed one of the wisest of the Greeks, knowing this to be so, said that all things of friends ought to be common—and among ‘all things’ wives are no doubt included. And as the air, he says, cannot be divided, nor the brightness of the sun, so neither should the other things given in common in this world to all to possess be divided, but they should be held in common. This I wished to say; and I cannot act well unless I first learn what the good is; and if I can understand that, I will notice from it what evil is, that is, its contrary.
10.6PG 1:1423a–1423b
Verum ad haec quae dixi, unum e vobis respondere volo, non Petrum; non enim dignum est, ab illo verba et doctrinam cum quaestionibus capere, sed ille si quid pronuntiaverit, hoc absque aliqua retractatione teneatur. Et ideo ipse nobis servetur quasi arbiter, ut sicubi disputatio nostra exitum non invenerit, ipse quod sibi visum fuerit pronuntians, indubitatum finem rebus dubiis imponat. Et nunc ergo possem sola ejus sententia contentus credere, si quid ei videretur, quod et ad u'limum “Ciam; V010 “me” Prius Videre. εἰ εει possibile disputando invenire quod quaeritur. Placet ergo ut Clemens primus incipiat, et ostendat, si est aliquid in substantia et actibus bonum vel malum.
“But to what I have said I want one of you to answer, not Peter. For it is not fitting to take words and teaching from him by way of questions; rather, whatever he pronounces should be held without any reconsideration. So let him be kept for us as arbiter, so that wherever our discussion finds no outcome, he may pronounce what he thinks and put an undoubted end to doubtful matters. And even now I could believe, content with his opinion alone, whatever he thought—which I shall do in the end; but I want first to see whether it is possible to find by disputation what is sought. So let Clement begin first, and show whether anything is good or evil in substance and in acts.”
10.7PG 1:1423b
Ad haec ego respondi: Quoniam quidem a me vis discere, si est aliquid natura aut actu bonum vel malum, an potius usu praeventis hominibus bona quaedam et alia videntur mala, pro eo quod divisionem inter se rerum fecere communium, qua: deberent, ut ais, ita esse communia, ut aer et splendor solis; puto quod non debeam tibi aliunde assertiones adhibere, nisi ex his disciplinis quibus ipse uteris et quas ipse confirmas, et indubitata tibi sint quae dicuntur. Omnium elementorum et stellarum certos ponitis fines, quasque stellas dicitis in quibusdam absque noxa coire sicut in conjugiis, in aliis vero noxie misceri sicut in adulteriis. Et dicitis quaedam generalia esse omnium, quaedam vero non omnium neque generalia. Sed ne prolixa disputatio fiat, breviter et de re dicam. Terra quae arida est, conjugio et admistione indiget aquae, ut possit generare fructus, sine quibus vita hominibus non est; est ergo haec legitima conjunctio. Econtra si aut pruina: frigus terra: misceatur aut calor aquis. huiusmodi conjunctio corruptelam facit; et hoc in talibus adulterium est.
To this I answered: “Since you wish to learn from me whether anything is good or evil by nature or by act, or rather whether some things seem good and others evil to men preoccupied by custom, because they made a division among themselves of things that ought, as you say, to be common like the air and the brightness of the sun, I think I should not bring you proofs from elsewhere but from those disciplines which you yourself use and which you yourself confirm, so that what is said may be undoubted for you. You set fixed limits for all the elements and stars, and you say that some stars come together in certain cases without harm, as in marriages, but in others mix harmfully, as in adulteries. And you say that some things are general to all, and others neither belong to all nor are general. But so that the discussion may not be long, I will speak briefly and to the point. The earth, which is dry, needs union and mixture with water in order to produce the fruits without which there is no life for men; this, then, is a lawful union. On the contrary, if the cold of frost is mixed with the earth, or heat with the waters, such a union causes corruption; and in such things this is adultery.
10.8PG 1:1423b–1424a
Et pater respondit: Sed sicut elementorum vel stellarum inconsonae conjunctionis statim proditur noxa, ita deberet et adulterium statim ostendi quam malum est. Et ego aio: Hoc mihi primo confirma, si, ut etiam ipse confessus es, ex incongrua et inconsona admistione efficiuntur mala, et istud in consequentibus requiretur. Et pater ait: Ut se habet rei natura, ita ais, fili. Tum ego respondi: Quia ergo discere cupis de his, vide quanta sint videtur malum esse febris, incendium, seditio, ruina, caedes, vincula, supplicia, dolores. luctus, et his similia? Et pater: Verum est, inquit, fili, haec mala esse et valde mala; aut certe qui negat haec esse mala, patiatur ea.
My father answered: “But as the harm of a discordant union of elements or stars is at once betrayed, so it ought also to be shown at once how evil adultery is.” I said: “First confirm this for me: whether, as you yourself admitted, evils are produced from an unsuitable and discordant mixture; and that other point will be inquired into in what follows.” My father said: “As the nature of the thing is, so you say, my son.” Then I answered: “Since you wish to learn about these things, see how many things there are that no one doubts to be evils: do not fever, fire, sedition, collapse, slaughter, chains, punishments, pains, mourning, and things like these seem to you to be evil?” My father said: “It is true, my son, that these are evils, and very great evils; or at any rate let him who denies these are evils suffer them.”
10.9PG 1:1424a–1424b
Et ego respondi: Quia ergo cum eo mihi sermo est, qui in astrologica disciplina eruditus est. secundum ipsam tecum agam, ut de his quae tibi in usu sunt accipiens rationem, citius acquiescas. Audi nunc ergo. Confessus es mala esse ea quae supra diximus, id est febres, incendia, et his similia; haec secundum vos a malitiosis stellis fieri dicuntur, id est ab humido Saturno et calido Marte; horum vero contraria a benignis fieri stellis, id est a temperato Jove et humida Venere; aut non ita est? Et pater respondit: Ita est, fili, nec aliter fieri potest. Tum ego: Quia ergo a bonis stellis, Jove dico et Venere, bona fieri dicitis, videamus unaquaeque malarum stellarum cum admista fuerit bonis, quid est quod efficit; et illud esse intelligamus malum. Etenim nuptias facere Venerem ponitis; quae si Jovem habeat in schemate suo, pudicas efficiat, Jove autem non respiciente, si adfuerit Mars, corrumpi nuptias per adulterium pronuntiatis. Et pater: Ita se, inquit, habet. Ego respondi: Ergo malum est adulterium, quandoquidem ex malarum stellarum admistione committitur; et ut compendiosius explicemus, omnia quae dicitis ex malarum admistione stellarum bonas perpeti Stellas, mala esse sine dubio pronuntianda sunt. Istae ergo stellae quarum admistione diximus febres, incendia, et caetera his similia effici mala, ipsae secundum vos etiam homicidia, adulteria, furta operantur, protervos etiam et stolidos ipsa: efficiunt.
I answered: “Since I am speaking with one who is learned in the astrological discipline, I will deal with you according to it, so that receiving the account from things familiar to you, you may agree the more quickly. Hear now, then. You have admitted that the things we mentioned above are evils, that is, fevers, fires, and the like. These, according to you, are said to be caused by malicious stars, that is, by moist Saturn and hot Mars; and their opposites by benign stars, that is, by temperate Jupiter and moist Venus. Or is it not so?” My father answered: “It is so, my son, and it cannot be otherwise.” Then I said: “Since, then, you say that good things are caused by the good stars, I mean Jupiter and Venus, let us see what each of the evil stars produces when it is mixed with the good; and let us understand that to be evil. For you hold that Venus makes marriages; and if she has Jupiter in her figure, she makes chaste women; but if Jupiter does not regard her and Mars is present, you declare that marriages are corrupted by adultery.” My father said: “So it is.” I answered: “Then adultery is evil, since it is committed by the mixture of evil stars. And to explain more briefly: all the things you say the good stars suffer from the mixture of evil stars must without doubt be declared evil. Those stars, then, by whose mixture we said evils are produced—fevers, fires, and the rest like them—are the very ones that, according to you, also work murders, adulteries, thefts, and make men insolent and stupid.”
10.10PG 1:1424b–1425b
Et pater: Vere, inquit, breviter et incomparabiliter ostendisti, quia sint mala in actibus, sed hoc adhuc velim discere, quomodo juste iudicat Deus eos qui peccant, sicut vos dicitis, si peccare eos genesis cogit? Tum ego respondi: Vereor dicere tibi aliquid, pater, quia in omni te honore haberi a me decet, alioquin erat quod possim dicere si deceret. Et pater ait: Dic quod tibi occurrit, fili, etiamsi iniuriosum videtur; non enim tu. sed quaestionis ratio iniuriam facit, sicut pudica mulier intemperanti viro, si pro salute indignetur et honestate. Et ego respondi: Si prima quaeque inter nos confirmata et confessa non bene retineamus, sed semper quae definita sunt resolvantur per oblivionem, videbimur telam texere Penelopes, ea quae texuimus resolventes; et ideo debemus aut non facile acquiescere, priusquam diligenter examinetur sermo propositus, aut si jam acquievimus et confirmata sententia est, servare semper quod semel definitum est, ut possimus et de aliis quaerere. Et pater ait: Bene dicis, fili, et scio quam ob causam dicis, quia hesterno die de naturalibus disputans causis, ostendisti quia virtus quaedam maligna transformans se in ordinem stellarum humanas concupiscentias exagitat, diversis modis provocans ad peccatum, non tamen cogens aut efficiens peccatum. Cui ego respondi: Bene, quia et meministi et cum memineris errasti. Et pater: Ignosce, inquit, fili: nondum enim usum. multum in his habeo; nam et hesterni sermones tui veritate ipsa concluserunt me ut tibi acquiescerem, in conscientia tamen mea sunt quasi quaedam reliquiae febrium, quae paululum me a fide quasi a sanitate retrahunt. Discrucior enim, quia scio multa mihi, imo pene omnia accidisse secundum genesim.
My father said: “Truly you have shown briefly and incomparably that there are evils in acts. But I should still like to learn this: how does God judge justly those who sin, as you say, if birth-fate compels them to sin?” Then I answered: “I am afraid to say something to you, father, because it is fitting that you be held in all honor by me; otherwise there is something I could say, if it were fitting.” My father said: “Say what occurs to you, my son, even if it seems insulting; for it is not you but the logic of the question that does the injury—as a chaste woman to an intemperate husband, if she is indignant for her salvation and honor.” I answered: “If we do not keep well what has been first confirmed and admitted between us, but what has been defined is always undone through forgetfulness, we shall seem to be weaving the web of Penelope, undoing what we have woven. And so we ought either not to agree easily before the proposed statement is carefully examined, or, if we have already agreed and the opinion is confirmed, always to keep what has once been defined, so that we may also inquire about other things.” My father said: “You speak well, my son, and I know why you say it: because yesterday, discussing natural causes, you showed that a certain malignant power, transforming itself into the order of the stars, stirs up human desires, provoking to sin in various ways, yet not compelling or effecting sin.” I answered him: “Good—you have both remembered, and, while remembering, gone astray.” My father said: “Forgive me, my son; I do not yet have much practice in these things. For your words yesterday shut me in by their very truth so that I agreed with you; yet in my conscience there remain, as it were, some remnants of fevers, which draw me back a little from faith as from health. For I am tormented because I know that many things, indeed almost all things, have happened to me according to birth-fate.”
10.11PG 1:1425b–1426b
Et ego respondi: Audi ergo, pater, quae sit mathesis natura, et facito secundum ea quae dico tibi. Vide mathematicum et dic ei primo, quia talia quaedam mihi acciderunt mala in illo tempore; unde ergo aut quo modo aut per quas mihi acciderint stellas, discere volo. Respondebit tibi sine dubio, quia tempora tua malitiosus suscepit Mars aut Saturnus, aut aliquis eorum apocatastaticus fuit, aut aliquis annum tuum aspexit ex diametro aut conjunctus aut in centro, vel alia his similia respondebit, addens, quia in his omnibus aliquis aut asyndetus fuit cum malo, aut invisibilis, aut in schemate, aut extra haeresim, aut deficiens, aut non contingens, aut in obscuris stellis, et multa alia his similia secundum rationes proprias respondebit et de singulis assignabit. Post hunc alium adito mathematicum et dicito contraria. quia illud mihi boni contigit in illo tempore; tempus autem hoc idem dicito, et require ex quibus partibus genesis hoc tibi evenerit boni, et tempora ut dixi, eadem quae de malis interrogaveras. custodito. Cumque tu fefelleris de temporibus, vide quanta tibi inveniet schemata, per quas ostendat quod tibi in illis ipsis temporibus evenire debuerint bona. Impossibile enim est hominum genesim tractantibus, non in omni quam dicunt regione stellarum semper invenire quasdam bene positas stellas, et quasdam male; circulus enim est aequaliter ex omni parte collectus secundum mathesim, diversas et varias accipiens causas, ex quibus occasionem capiant dicendi quod volunt.
I answered: “Hear, then, father, what the nature of astrology is, and do as I tell you. Go to an astrologer and say to him first: ‘Such and such evils happened to me at that time; I want to learn, then, from where or how or through which stars they happened to me.’ He will without doubt answer you that malicious Mars or Saturn took over your times, or one of them was in apocatastasis, or one regarded your year from the diameter, or in conjunction, or at a cardinal point; or he will answer other such things, adding that in all these one was either unconnected with the malefic, or invisible, or in figure, or outside its sect, or waning, or not in contact, or among obscure stars; and he will answer many other such things according to his own reasons and assign them in each case. After him go to another astrologer and say the opposite: ‘Such and such good happened to me at that time’—but name the same time—and ask from what parts of the birth-fate this good came to you; and keep, as I said, the same times you asked about for the evils. And when you have deceived him about the times, see how many figures he will find for you, by which he will show that good things must have come to you at those very times. For it is impossible for those who handle men's birth-fate not always to find, in every region of the stars they speak of, some stars well placed and some badly. For the circle, according to astrology, is gathered equally on every side, admitting diverse and varied causes, from which they take occasion to say what they wish.
10.12PG 1:1427a–1427b
Sicut enim fieri solet ubi somnia obliqua viderint homines, et nihil certi intelligunt, cum aliquis occurrerit exitus rerum, tunc ad ea quae acciderint aptant etiam somnii visum, ita est et mathesis; antequam aliquid fiat, certi nihil pronuntiatur, postea vero quam aliquid acciderit. rei jam gesta: colligunt causas. Denique frequenter cum erraverint et aliter res acciderit, semetipsos increpant dicentes quia illa fuit stella quae impedivit, quae occurrit, et non vidimus, ignorantes quia error eorum non ex artis imprudentia, sed ex totius causa: inconvenientia descendit: ignorant enim quae sint, quae facere quidem concupiscamus, non tamen indulgeamus concupiscentiis. Nos autem qui mysterii hujus didicimus rationem, scimus et causam, quia libertatem habentes arbitrii interdum concupiscentiis obsistimus, interdum cedimus: et ideo humanorum gestorum incertus est exitus, quia in libertate pendet arbitrii. Nam concupiscentiam quidem, quam operatur maligna virtus, potest indicare mathematicus; sed si concupiscentia: hujus actus vel exitus impleri possit necne, quia in arbitrii Iibertate est, sciri ante effectum rei nullo potest. Et hoc est quod ignorantes astrologi invenerunt sibi ut climacteras dicerent, rei scilicet incertae perfugia, sicut hesterno plenissime ostendimus.
“For as usually happens when men have seen ambiguous dreams and understand nothing certain: when some outcome of events occurs, they then fit the vision of the dream to what has happened. So it is with astrology: before anything happens, nothing certain is declared; but after something has happened, they gather the causes of the thing already done. Indeed, when they have often erred and the thing has turned out otherwise, they reproach themselves, saying that it was such and such a star that hindered, that intervened, and we did not see it—not knowing that their error comes not from lack of skill in the art but from the unsuitability of the whole system. For they do not know what the things are which we desire to do, yet do not indulge our desires. But we who have learned the reason of this mystery also know the cause: that, having freedom of choice, we sometimes resist desires and sometimes yield; and therefore the outcome of human actions is uncertain, because it hangs on freedom of choice. For the astrologer can indicate the desire which the malignant power works; but whether the act or outcome of this desire can be fulfilled or not, since it lies in freedom of choice, can be known by no one before the event. And this is why the astrologers, in their ignorance, invented for themselves the talk of climacterics—refuges, of course, for an uncertain matter—as we showed most fully yesterday.
10.13PG 1:1427b–1427c
Ad haec si quid tibi dicendum videtur, dicito. Et pater: Nihil verius, inquit, fili, his quae prosecutus es. Cumque haec loqueremur inter nos, nuntiavit quidam plurimum stare populum foris qui audiendi gratia convenerint, et Petrus jussit his ingrediendi copiam dari; erat enim locus opportunus et amplus. Cumque ingressi fuissent, ait ad nos Petrus: Si quis vult vestrum, faciat ad populum sermonem et de idololatria disserat. Cui ego Clemens respondi: Multa benignitas tua et erga omnes lenitas ac patientia indulget nobis, ut audeamus loqui coram te et rogare quae volumus; et ideo, ut dixi, morum tuorum mansuetudo invitat omnes et adhortatur salutaris doctrina: praecepta suscipere. Hoc ego usque ad praesens apud nullum alium vidi, nisi apud te solum, apud quem invidia nulla est neque indignatio; aut quid tibi videtur?
“If you think anything should be said to this, say it.” My father said: “Nothing is truer, my son, than what you have set out.” While we were talking thus among ourselves, someone announced that a very great crowd was standing outside, who had gathered to listen; and Peter ordered that they be allowed to come in, for the place was suitable and spacious. When they had come in, Peter said to us: “If any of you wishes, let him address the people and speak about idolatry.” I, Clement, answered him: “Your great kindness, and your gentleness and patience toward all, allow us to dare to speak in your presence and to ask what we wish. And therefore, as I said, the mildness of your character invites all and encourages them to receive the precepts of saving teaching. Until now I have seen this in no one else but you alone, in whom there is no envy or indignation. Or what do you think?”
10.14PG 1:1427c–1428a
Et Petrus: Non solum haec ex invidia aut indignatione veniunt, sed interdum inest aliquibus verecundia, ne forte de his quae proponuntur, plene respondere non possint, et fugiunt imperitiae notam. Sed non debet pro hoc quis verecundiam pati, quia nec est aliquis hominum qui profiteri debeat omnia se scire; unus enim est qui scit omnia, ipse qui et fecit omnia. Si enim Magister noster diem et horam, cujus etiam signa praedixit, nescire se professus est, ut totum revocaret ad Patrem, quomodo nos turpe ducemus, si aliqua nos ignorare fateamur, cum Magistri in hoc habeamus exemplum? Hoc tamen unum profitemur ea nos scire, quae a vero propheta didicimus; ea autem a vero propheta nobis esse tradita, quae sufficere humanae scientiae judicavit.
Peter said: “These things do not come only from envy or indignation; sometimes there is in some a shame lest they be unable to answer fully about the things proposed, and they flee the mark of ignorance. But no one ought to feel shame for this, because there is no man who ought to profess that he knows everything. For there is one who knows all things, he who also made all things. For if our Master professed that he did not know the day and the hour, whose signs he even foretold, so as to refer everything to the Father, how shall we think it shameful if we admit that we are ignorant of some things, when we have the example of the Master in this? This one thing, however, we profess: that we know what we have learned from the true Prophet, and that those things were handed down to us by the true Prophet which he judged sufficient for human knowledge.”
10.15PG 1:1428a–1428b
Tum ego Clemens dicere ita coepi: Apud Tripolim cum contra gentiles disputares, domine mi Petre, valde miratus sum te, qui a patribus Hebraeo ritu et observantiis propriae legis imbutus, Graecae eruditionis studiis in nullo inquinatus es, quomodo tam magnifice et tam incomparabiliter prosecutus sis, ita ut etiam quaedam de historiis deorum quae in theatris decantari solent, contingeres. Verum quoniam sensi tibi ipsas fabulas et blasphemias eorum minus esse notas, de his, si placet, aliqua in auditu tuo repetens ab ipsa origine disseram. Et Petrus: Dic, inquit, bene facis juvare praedicationem nostram. Tum ego: Dicam igitur quia jubes, non ut docens, sed quam stultas de diis suis opiniones habeant gentiles, in medium proferens.
Then I, Clement, began to speak thus: “At Tripolis, when you were disputing against the Gentiles, my lord Peter, I greatly marveled how you, who were brought up by your fathers in the Hebrew rite and the observances of your own law, and in no way defiled by the studies of Greek learning, argued so magnificently and incomparably that you even touched on some of the stories of the gods which are usually sung in the theaters. But since I perceived that their very fables and blasphemies are less known to you, I will, if you please, discuss some of them in your hearing, repeating them from their very origin.” Peter said: “Speak; you do well to help our preaching.” Then I said: “Since you order it, I will speak, not as teaching, but bringing into the open what foolish opinions the Gentiles have about their gods.”
10.16PG 1:1428b–1428c
Cumque vellem dicere, Niceta labrum mordicus stringens, innuebat mihi ut tacerem; quem cum vidisset Petrus, ait: Cur ingenium liberale et generosam laedere vis naturam, ut in honorem mei, qui nullus est, tacere eum velis? Aut nescis, quia si omnes gentes, postquam audierint a me praedicationem veritatis et crediderint, velint se ad docendum conferre, mihi majorem pariunt gloriam, siquidem gloria: me cupidum putas? Quid enim tam gloriosum quam Christo discipulos praeparasse, non qui taceant et soli salvi fiant, sed qui loquantur quae didicerunt, et multis prosint? Utinam quidem et tu, Niceta, sed et tu, dulcissime Aquila, juvaretis me ad praedicandum verbum Dei, eo magis quo ea in quibus errant gentiles, bene vobis comperta sunt: et non solum vos, sed et omnes qui audiunt me, opto ita audire et discere, ut et docere possint; multis namque adjutoribus indiget mundus, quibus homines ab errore revocentur. Cumque haec dixisset, ait ad me: Tu ergo, Clemens, exsequere quae coepisti.
When I wished to speak, Niceta, biting his lip, signaled to me to be silent. When Peter saw him he said: “Why do you want to hurt a liberal mind and a noble nature, wishing him to keep silent in honor of me, who am nothing? Or do you not know that if all the nations, after they have heard the preaching of truth from me and believed, wish to devote themselves to teaching, they bring me greater glory—if indeed you think me desirous of glory? For what is so glorious as to have prepared disciples for Christ, not who keep silent and alone are saved, but who speak what they have learned and help many? I wish that you too, Niceta, and you also, sweetest Aquila, would help me to preach the word of God, all the more because the things in which the Gentiles err are well known to you. And not only you, but all who hear me, I wish so to hear and learn that they may also be able to teach; for the world needs many helpers by whom men may be called back from error.” When he had said this, he said to me: “You, then, Clement, carry out what you have begun.”
10.17PG 1:1428c–1429b
Et ego continuo subjunxi: Quoniam, dixi, apud Tripolim disputans, multa de diis gentium utiliter et necessario disseruisti, cupio de origine eorum ridicula te coram exponere, ut neque te lateat vanae hujus superstitionis commentum, et auditores qui assistunt erroris sui probra cognoscant. Aiunt ergo qui sapientiores sunt inter gentiles, primo omnium chaos fuisse: hoc per multum tempus exteriores sui solidans partes, fines sibi et fundum quemdam fecisse tanquam in ovi immanis modum formamque collectum, intra quod multo nihilominus tempore, quasi intra ovi testam, fotum vivificatumque esse animal quoddam; disruptoque post haec immani illo globo processisse speciem quamdam hominis duplicis formae, quam illi masculo—feminam vocant; hunc etiam Phanetam nominarunt, ab apparendo, quia cum apparuisset, inquiunt, tunc etiam lux effulsit. Et ex hoc dicunt progenitam esse substantiam, prudentiam, motum, coitum: ex his factum caelum et terram. Ex coelo sex progenitos mares, quos et Titanas appellant; similiter et de terra sex feminas, quas Titanidas vocitarunt, et sunt nomina eorum quidem qui ex coelo orti sunt haec: Oceanus, Catus, Crios, Hyperion, Iapetos, Cronos, qui apud nos Saturnus nominatur. Similiter et earum quae e terra ortae sunt nomina sunt haec: Theia, Rhea. Themis, Mnemosyne, Tethys, Hebe.
And I at once added: “Since,” I said, “when disputing at Tripolis you discussed many things usefully and necessarily about the gods of the nations, I wish to set out in your presence their ridiculous origin, so that neither the fabrication of this vain superstition may escape you, nor the hearers present fail to recognize the disgrace of their error. Those, then, who are wiser among the Gentiles say that first of all there was Chaos; that this, solidifying its outer parts over a long time, made for itself boundaries and a kind of bottom, gathered in the manner and shape of an immense egg; and that within it, likewise over a long time, as within the shell of an egg, a certain living creature was cherished and quickened; and that after this, that immense globe having burst, there came forth a certain form of a man of double shape, which they call male-female. Him they also named Phanes, from appearing, because, they say, when he appeared, then light also shone forth. And from him, they say, were begotten substance, prudence, motion, intercourse; from these were made heaven and earth. From heaven six males were begotten, whom they call Titans; likewise from earth six females, whom they called Titanesses. And the names of those born from heaven are these: Oceanus, Coeus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, who among us is called Saturn. Likewise the names of those born from earth are these: Theia, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Tethys, Hebe.
10.18PG 1:1429b–1430a
Ex his omnibus qui primus fuerat e caelo natus, primam terrae filiam accepit uxorem, secundus secundam et caeteri similiter per ordinem. Primus ergo qui primam duxerat, propter eam deductus est deorsum; secunda vero propter eum cui nupserat, ascendit sursum; et ita singuli per ordinem facientes, manserunt in his qui eis nuptiali sorte obvenerant locis. Ex istorum coniunctionibus alios quoque innumeros asserunt progenitos. Sed de illis sex maribus unus, qui dicitur Saturnus, in conjugium accepit Rheam, et cum responso quodam commonitus esset, quod qui ex ea nasceretur fortior ipso futurus esset regnoque eum depelleret, omnes qui ei nascerentur filios devorare, instituit. Huic ergo primus nascitur filius, quem Aiden appellarunt, qui apud nos Orcus nominatur, quem pro causis quibus supra diximus, assumptum devorat pater. Post hunc secundum genuit, quem Neptunum dicunt, quemque simili modo devoravit. Novissimum genuit eum, quem Jovem appellant, sed hunc mater miserans Rhea, per artem devoraturo subtrahit patri, et primo quidem ne vagitus pueri innotesceret, Corybantas quosdam cymbala fecit ac tympana percutere, ut obstrepente sonitu vagitus non audiretur infantis.
“Of all these, he who was born first from heaven took the first daughter of earth as wife, the second the second, and the rest likewise in order. The first, who had married the first, was led down below on her account; the second, on account of him whom she had married, went up above; and so, each doing likewise in order, they remained in the places that had fallen to them by the lot of marriage. From their unions they assert that countless others were also begotten. But of those six males, one, who is called Saturn, took Rhea in marriage; and having been warned by an oracle that one born of her would be stronger than he and drive him from his kingdom, he resolved to devour all the sons who were born to him. So his first son is born, whom they called Aides, who among us is named Orcus; and for the reasons we stated above, the father took him and devoured him. After him he begot a second, whom they call Neptune, and devoured him in the same way. Last he begot the one they call Jupiter; but his mother Rhea, pitying him, by a trick withdrew him from the father who was about to devour him; and first, so that the child's crying might not become known, she had certain Corybantes beat cymbals and drums, so that the infant's crying might not be heard over the noise.
10.19PG 1:1430a–1430b
Sed cum ex uteri imminutione intellexisset pater editum partum, expetebat ad devorandum; tunc Rhea lapidem ei offerens magnum, Hunc genui, inquit. At ille accipiens absorbuit, et lapis devoratus eos quos primo absorbuerat filios, trusit et coegit exire. Primus ergo procedens descendit Orcus, et inferiora, hoc est inferna occupat loca. Secundus utpote illo superior super aquas detruditur, is quem Neptunum vocant. Tertius qui arte matris Rheae superfuit, ab ipsa caprae superpositus in caelum emissus est.
“But when the father understood from the shrinking of her womb that the child had been born, he demanded it to devour it. Then Rhea, offering him a large stone, said: ‘This is what I bore.’ He took it and swallowed it; and the swallowed stone pushed out and forced to come forth the sons he had first swallowed. The first to come out, Orcus, went down and occupies the lower, that is the infernal, regions. The second, as being above him, is thrust down upon the waters—he whom they call Neptune. The third, who survived through the art of his mother Rhea, was set upon a goat by her and sent up into heaven.
10.20PG 1:1430b–1431b
Hactenus anilis gentilium fabula et genealogia processerit; sine fine enim est, si velim omnes generationes eorum quos deos appellant, et impia gesta proferre. Sed exempli gratia, omissis caeteris, unius quem maximum et praecipuum habent, quemque Jovem nominant, flagitiosa gesta replicabo. Hunc enim caelum dicunt tenere tanquam caeteris meliorem, qui statim ut adolevit, sororem propriam, quam Junonem dicunt, duxit uxorem, in quo utique statim fit similis pecudi. Juno Vulcanum parit, sed, ut tradunt, non ex Jove conceptum. Ex ipso autem Jove Medeam genuit, quam responso accepto, quod qui ex ea nasceretur fortior ipso esset et regno eum depelleret, assumens etiam ipse devorat; et rursum genuit de cerebro quidem Minervam, de femore vero Liberum. Post haec Thetidem cum adamasset, aiunt Prometheum pronuntiasse ei, quod si concubuisset cum ea, qui ex ea nasceretur fortior esset patre, et ob hoc veritus Peleo cuidam dat eam in matrimonium; dehinc Persephonae, quae ei ex Cerere fuerat suscepta, miscetur, ex qua Dionysium genuit, qui a Titanis discerptus est. Sed recordatus, inquit, ne forte pater suus Saturnus alium filium generaret, qui etiam se fortior nasceretur regnoque depelleret, oppugnare aggreditur patrem una cum fratribus ejus Titanis; quibus oppressis, ad ultimum etiam patrem in vincula conjecit, desectaque ejus genitalia in mare projecit. Sed cruor qui defluxit ex vulnere, susceptus fluctibus et frequenti collisione in spumam versus, procreavit eam quam dicunt Aphroditen, quamque apud nos Venerem appellant. Ex hujus concubitu quae erat utique soror, hunc ipsum Jovem ferunt genuisse Cyprin, ex qua aiunt et Cupidinem natum.
“So far let the old wives' fable and genealogy of the Gentiles go; for there would be no end if I wished to set out all the generations of those they call gods and their impious deeds. But by way of example, leaving out the others, I will recount the shameful deeds of the one whom they hold greatest and chief, whom they name Jupiter. For they say that he holds heaven as better than the rest. As soon as he grew up, he took his own sister, whom they call Juno, as wife—in which he at once becomes like a beast. Juno bore Vulcan, but, as they relate, not conceived by Jupiter. By Jupiter himself she bore Medea; and he, having received an oracle that one born of her would be stronger than he and drive him from his kingdom, himself also took her and devoured her; and again he begot Minerva from his brain, and Liber from his thigh. After this, when he had fallen in love with Thetis, they say Prometheus declared to him that if he lay with her, the one born of her would be stronger than his father; and fearing this he gave her in marriage to one Peleus. Next he has intercourse with Persephone, who had been born to him from Ceres, and by her begot Dionysus, who was torn apart by the Titans. But remembering, it says, lest his father Saturn should beget another son who would be born stronger even than he and drive him from his kingdom, he set about attacking his father together with his brothers the Titans; and when they had been overcome, at last he also threw his father into chains, cut off his genitals, and threw them into the sea. But the blood that flowed from the wound, received by the waves and turned into foam by frequent dashing, produced her whom they call Aphrodite, whom among us they call Venus. From intercourse with her, who was certainly his sister, they relate that this same Jupiter begot Cypris, from whom they say Cupid was also born.
10.21PG 1:1431b–1432b
Haec quidem de incestis ejus; audi nunc et de adulteriis. Europam Oceani conjugem vitiat, ex qua nascitur Dodonaeus; Helenam Pandionis, ex qua nascitur Musaeus; Eurynomen Asopi, ex qua nascitur Ogygias; Hermionen Oceani, ex qua nascuntur Charites, Thalia, Euphrosyne, Aglaia; Themin sororem suam, ex qua nascuntur Horae, Eurynomia, Dice, Irene; Themisto Inachi, ex qua nascitur Arcas; Ideam Minois, ex qua nascitur Asterion; Phoenissam Alphionis, ex qua nascitur Endymion; Io Inachi, ex qua nascitur Epaphus; Hippodamiam et Isionen Danai filias, quarum unam Hippodamiam Olenus, Isionen vero Orchomenus sive Chryses habuit; Carmen Phoenicis, ex qua nascitur Britomartis, quae fuit sodalis Dianae; Callisto Lycaonis, ex qua nascitur Orcas; Lyheen Munanti, ex qua nascitur Belus; Latonam, ex qua nascitur Apollo et Diana; Leanidam Eurymedontis, ex qua nascitur Coron; Lysitheam Eveni, ex qua nascitur Helenus; Hippodamiam Bellerophontis, ex qua nascitur Sarpedon; Megacliten Macarei, ex qua nascitur Thebe et Locrus; Nioben Phoronei, ex qua nascitur Argus et Pelasgus; Olympiadam Neoptolemi, ex qua nascitur Alexander; Pyrrham Promethei, ex qua nascitur Helmetheus; Protogeniam et Pandoram Deucalionis filias. ex quibus genuit Ethelium et Dorum et Meleram et Pandorum; Thaicruciam Protei, ex qua nascitur Nympheus; Salaminam Asopi, ex qua nascitur Saracon: Taygeten, Electram. Maiam, Plutiden, Atlantis filias, ex quibus genuit ex Taygete quidem Lacedaemonem, ex Electra Dardanum. ex Maia Mercurium, ex Plutide Tantalum; Phthiam Phoronei, ex qua genuit Achaeum; [Choniani Aramni. ex qua genuit Laconem;] Chalceam nympham, ex qua nascitur Olympus; Charidiam nympham ex qua nascitur Alchanus; Clorida, quae fuit Ampyei, ex qua nascitur Mopsus; Cotonium Lesbi, ex qua nascitur Polymedes; Hippodamiam Aniceti: Chrysogeniam Penei, ex qua nascitur Thessalus.
“So much for his incests; hear now about his adulteries. He violates Europa, wife of Oceanus, from whom Dodonaeus is born; Helen, daughter of Pandion, from whom Musaeus is born; Eurynome, daughter of Asopus, from whom Ogygias is born; Hermione, daughter of Oceanus, from whom the Graces are born, Thalia, Euphrosyne, Aglaia; Themis his sister, from whom the Hours are born, Eurynomia, Dike, Irene; Themisto, daughter of Inachus, from whom Arcas is born; Idaea, daughter of Minos, from whom Asterion is born; Phoenissa, daughter of Alphion, from whom Endymion is born; Io, daughter of Inachus, from whom Epaphus is born; Hippodamia and Isione, daughters of Danaus, of whom Olenus had the one, Hippodamia, and Orchomenus or Chryses had Isione; Carme, daughter of Phoenix, from whom is born Britomartis, who was a companion of Diana; Callisto, daughter of Lycaon, from whom Orcas is born; Libye, daughter of Munantus, from whom Belus is born; Latona, from whom Apollo and Diana are born; Leanida, daughter of Eurymedon, from whom Coron is born; Lysithea, daughter of Evenus, from whom Helenus is born; Hippodamia, daughter of Bellerophon, from whom Sarpedon is born; Megaclite, daughter of Macareus, from whom Thebe and Locrus are born; Niobe, daughter of Phoroneus, from whom Argus and Pelasgus are born; Olympias, daughter of Neoptolemus, from whom Alexander is born; Pyrrha, daughter of Prometheus, from whom Helmetheus is born; Protogenia and Pandora, daughters of Deucalion, from whom he begot Aethlius and Dorus and Melera and Pandorus; Thaicrucia, daughter of Proteus, from whom Nympheus is born; Salamis, daughter of Asopus, from whom Saracon is born; Taygete, Electra, Maia, Plutis, daughters of Atlas, from whom he begot—from Taygete, Lacedaemon; from Electra, Dardanus; from Maia, Mercury; from Plutis, Tantalus; Phthia, daughter of Phoroneus, from whom he begot Achaeus; (Choniane, daughter of Aramnus, from whom he begot Laco;) Chalcea, a nymph, from whom Olympus is born; Charidia, a nymph, from whom Alchanus is born; Chloris, who was the wife of Ampycus, from whom Mopsus is born; Cotonia, daughter of Lesbus, from whom Polymedes is born; Hippodamia, daughter of Anicetus; Chrysogenia, daughter of Peneus, from whom Thessalus is born.
10.22PG 1:1432b–1433a
Sed et alia sunt plurima ejus adulteria, ex quibus nec progeniem suscepit, quae enumerare satis longum est. Verum ex his omnibus quas enumeravimus, nonnullas transformatus, utpote magus, vitiavit. Denique Antiopen Nyctei versus in satyrum corrupit, ex qua nascuntur Amphion et Zethus; Alcmenam mutatus in virum ejus Amphitryonem, ex qua nascitur Hercules; Aiginam Asopi mutatus in aquilam, ex qua nascitur Aeacus. Sed et Ganymedem Dardani, mutatus nihilominus in aquilam stuprat; Mantheam Phoci mutatus in ursum, ex qua nascitur Arctos; Danaen Acrisii mutatus in aurum, ex qua nascitur Perseus; Europen Phoenicis mutatus in taurum, ex qua nascitur Minos et Rhadamantus, Sarpedonque; Eurymedusam Achelai mutatus in formicam, ex qua nascitur Myrmidon; Thaliam (Afltnam) nympham mutatus in vulturem, ex qua nascuntur apud Siciliam Palisci; Imandram Geneani apud Rhodum, mutatus in imbrem; Cassiopeiam mutatus in virum ejus Phoenicem, ex qua nascitur Anchinos; Ledam Thestii mutatus in cycnum, ex qua nascitur Helena; et iterum eamdem mutatus in stellam, ex qua nascuntur Castor et Pollux; Lamiam mutatus in upupam; Mnemosynen mutatus in pastorem, ex qua nascuntur Musae novem; Nemesin mutatus in anserem; Semelen Cadmiam mutatus in ignem, ex qua nascitur Dionysius. Ex filia autem sua Cerere genuit Persephonen, quam et ipsam corrupit mutatus in draconem.
“And there are very many other adulteries of his, from which he received no offspring, which it would take too long to list. But of all those we have listed, he violated some after transforming himself, as a magician. Indeed he corrupted Antiope, daughter of Nycteus, turned into a satyr, from whom Amphion and Zethus are born; Alcmene, changed into her husband Amphitryon, from whom Hercules is born; Aegina, daughter of Asopus, changed into an eagle, from whom Aeacus is born. He also debauches Ganymede, son of Dardanus, likewise changed into an eagle; Manthea, daughter of Phocus, changed into a bear, from whom Arctos is born; Danae, daughter of Acrisius, changed into gold, from whom Perseus is born; Europa, daughter of Phoenix, changed into a bull, from whom Minos and Rhadamanthus and Sarpedon are born; Eurymedusa, daughter of Achelous, changed into an ant, from whom Myrmidon is born; Thalia (Aetna), a nymph, changed into a vulture, from whom the Palici in Sicily are born; Imandra, daughter of Geneanus, at Rhodes, changed into a shower; Cassiopeia, changed into her husband Phoenix, from whom Anchinus is born; Leda, daughter of Thestius, changed into a swan, from whom Helen is born; and again the same, changed into a star, from whom Castor and Pollux are born; Lamia, changed into a hoopoe; Mnemosyne, changed into a shepherd, from whom the nine Muses are born; Nemesis, changed into a goose; Semele, daughter of Cadmus, changed into fire, from whom Dionysus is born. And from his daughter Ceres he begot Persephone, whom he also corrupted, changed into a serpent.
10.23PG 1:1433a–1434a
Sed et Europam patrui sui Oceani uxorem et sororem ejus Eurynomen adulterat, et patrem punit, et Pluten Atlantis filii sui adulterat filiam, ex qua natum sibi filium Tantalum damnat. Ex Larisse etiam Orchomeni genuit Tityonem, quem et ipsum suppliciis tradidit. Diam Ixionis filii sui diripiens uxorem, ipsum perennibus subjicit poenis, et pene omnes quos ex adulteriis genuit filios. violentae mortis conditione damnavit, quorum et sepulcra pene omnium manifesta sunt. Ipsius denique parricidae, qui et patruos peremit et uxores eorum vitiavit, sororibus stuprum intulit, multiformis magi sepulcrum evidens est apud Cretenses, qui tamen scientes et confitentes infanda ejus atque incesta opera, et omnibus enarrantes ipsi eum confiteri deum non erubescunt; unde mirum mihi et valde mirum videtur, quomodo is qui super omnes mortales scelere et flagitiis eminet, sanctum et quod est super omne bonum nomen acceperit, ut pater deorum atque hominum vocaretur; nisi forte ille qui malis hominum gaudet, eum quem sceleribus eminere supra caeteros vidit, supra caeteros ei honorem conferre infelices animas suasit, ut ad imitationem malorum invitaret universos.
“He also commits adultery with Europa, the wife of his uncle Oceanus, and with her sister Eurynome, and punishes the father; and he commits adultery with Plute, the daughter of his son Atlas, and condemns Tantalus, the son born to him from her. From Larissa, daughter of Orchomenus, he also begot Tityus, whom he too handed over to punishments. Snatching Dia, the wife of his son Ixion, he subjects Ixion himself to everlasting punishments; and almost all the sons he begot from adulteries he condemned to the lot of a violent death, and the tombs of almost all of them are well known. Finally, the tomb of this parricide himself, who both killed his uncles and violated their wives, who debauched his sisters, the many-shaped magician, is plain to see among the Cretans; who nevertheless, knowing and confessing his unspeakable and incestuous deeds and telling them to everyone, are not ashamed to confess him a god. Hence it seems to me a wonder, and a great wonder, how he who stands above all mortals in crime and wickedness received the holy name, which is above every good, so as to be called father of gods and men—unless perhaps he who rejoices in men's evils persuaded unhappy souls to confer on him, whom he saw standing above the rest in crimes, honor above the rest, so as to invite all to imitate evil.
10.24PG 1:1434a
Sed et filiorum ejus, qui apud eos dii putantur, sepulcra singulis quibusque in locis manifestissime demonstrantur: Mercurii apud Hermopolim, Cypria: Veneris apud Cyprum, Martis in Thracia, Liberi apud Thebas, ubi discerptus traditur, Herculis apud Tyrum, ubi igni crematus est, in Epidauro Aesculapii; quique omnes non solum ut homines defuncti. sed ut nequam homines puniti pro sceleribus docentur, et tamen ab stultis hominibus ut dii adorantur.
“The tombs of his sons too, who are thought gods among them, are shown most plainly in their several places: Mercury's at Hermopolis, Cyprian Venus's in Cyprus, Mars's in Thrace, Liber's at Thebes, where he is said to have been torn apart, Hercules's at Tyre, where he was burned in fire, Aesculapius's in Epidaurus. All of these are shown to have died not only as men, but to have been punished as wicked men for their crimes; and yet they are worshiped as gods by foolish men.
10.25PG 1:1434a–1435a
Quod si argumentari volunt, et magis haec loca ortus eorum quam sepulturae vel mortis affirmant, ex vicinis et adhuc recentibus gestis priora et vetera convincentur, cum docuerimus adorari ab eis eos, quos etiam homines ipsi et defunctos vel potius punitos esse profitentur, verbi gratia ut Syri Adenem, Aegyptii Osirin, Ilienses Hectorem. apud Leuconessum Achillem, apud Pontum Patroclum, apud Rhodum Alexandrum Macedonem, multosque alios per diversa loca singuli ut deos colunt et adorant, quos homines mortuos fuisse non dubitant. Unde consequens est etiam priores simili errore prolapsos, mortuis hominibus, qui forte potentiae aliquid vel artis habuerant, maximeque si phantasiis magicis in stuporem stolidos homines adduxerant, honorem contulisse divinum.
“And if they wish to argue and assert that these places are rather of their birth than of their burial or death, they will be refuted from neighboring and still recent events concerning earlier and older ones, when we show that they worship those whom they themselves admit were men and died, or rather were punished: for example, the Syrians Adonis, the Egyptians Osiris, the people of Ilium Hector, Achilles at Leuconesus, Patroclus in Pontus, Alexander of Macedon at Rhodes; and each worships and adores as gods many others in various places, whom they do not doubt were dead men. Hence it follows that the earlier ones too, slipping into a similar error, conferred divine honor on dead men who perhaps had had some power or art, and especially if they had brought foolish men into amazement by magical phantasms.
10.26PG 1:1435a–1435b
Jam hinc additum est, ut et poetae elegantia verborum commenta erroris ornarent, et suavitate dicendi immortales effectos esse ex mortalibus persuaderent; imo et amplius aliquid, ex hominibus aiunt stellas fieri, et arbores, et animalia, et flores, et aves fontesque ac fluvios, et ni verbositas videretur, omnes pene stellas, quas ex hominibus effectas asserunt enumerare vel arbores vel fontes ac fluvios possem; exempli tamen causa singula saltem ex singulis memorabo. Andromedam Cephei in stellam dicunt esse conversam, Daphnen Ladonis fluvii filiam in arborem commutatam, Hyacinthum Apollinis dilectum in florem, Callisto in sidus quod -Arcton vocant, Prognen et Philomelam cum Tereo in aves, Thisben apud Ciliciam in fontem, et Pyramum inibi in fluvium resolutos, omnesque pene, ut dixi, vel stellas, vel arbores, fontesque ac fluvios, floresque et animalia, vel aves, aliquando homines fuisse confirmant.
“Then to this was added that the poets adorned the fabrications of error with elegance of words, and by sweetness of speech persuaded that mortals had been made immortals. Indeed they say even more: that from men stars come to be, and trees and animals and flowers and birds, springs and rivers. And if it did not seem wordy, I could list almost all the stars that they assert were made from men, or trees or springs and rivers; but by way of example I will mention at least one from each kind. They say Andromeda, daughter of Cepheus, was turned into a star; Daphne, daughter of the river Ladon, changed into a tree; Hyacinthus, the beloved of Apollo, into a flower; Callisto into the constellation they call the Bear; Procne and Philomela with Tereus into birds; Thisbe in Cilicia into a spring, and Pyramus there dissolved into a river; and almost all, as I said, whether stars or trees, springs and rivers, flowers and animals, or birds, they affirm were once men.
10.27PG 1:1435b–1436a
At Petrus haec audiens ait: Ergo secundum ipsos, antequam homines mutarentur in stellas, vel caetera quae enumeras, et cmlum sine stellis erat et terra sine arboribus et 'animalibus, nec fontes, nec flumina, nec aves erant; et quomodo ipsi homines vixerunt sine his, qui in haec postmodum mutati sunt, cum constet nec potuisse prorsus sine his vitam ducere homines in terris? Et. ego respondi: Sed ne ipsum quidem cultum deorum suorum observare consequenter norunt; unusquisque enim eorum quos colunt, habet aliquid sibi dicatum, a quo debent se continere cultores, utpote Minerva: olivam, Jovi capram ferunt dicatam, Cereri semina, Libero vinum, Osiri aquam, Hammoni arietem, Dianae cervum, Syrorum daemoni piscem et columbam, Vulcano ignem; et unicuique, ut dixi, est aliquid proprie dicatum, a quo oportebat abstinere se cultores ad honorem eorum quibus dicata sunt. Nunc autem singuli ab uno aliquo se observantes, pro unius honore caeteros omnes iratos habent; quos utique si placare velint, pro honore omnium abstinere se ab omnibus oportebat, ut ante diem iudicii justa a semetipsis sententia condemnati, morte miserrima per inediam deperirent.
When Peter heard this he said: “Then according to them, before men were changed into stars or the other things you list, heaven was without stars and earth without trees and animals, and there were neither springs nor rivers nor birds. And how did men themselves live without these things into which they were afterwards changed, since it is clear that men could not have lived on earth at all without them?” I answered: “But they do not even know how to observe the worship of their own gods consistently. For each of those they worship has something dedicated to him, from which the worshipers ought to abstain: they say the olive is dedicated to Minerva, the goat to Jupiter, seeds to Ceres, wine to Liber, water to Osiris, the ram to Ammon, the deer to Diana, the fish and the dove to the demon of the Syrians, fire to Vulcan; and to each, as I said, something is properly dedicated, from which the worshipers ought to abstain in honor of those to whom they are dedicated. But now each, keeping away from some one thing, has all the others angry with him for the sake of honoring one. Surely if they wished to placate them, they ought, in honor of all, to abstain from everything—so that before the day of judgment, condemned by a just sentence of their own, they would perish by a most miserable death from starvation.”
10.28PG 1:1436a–1436b
Verum ad propositum revertamur. Quae mala ratio est, imo quae amentia mortalium possidet mentes, ut hominem quem impium, lestum, profanum, Jovem dico, incestum, parricidam, adulterum non solum sciunt esse, sed et publice in theatris cantant, hunc ut deum colant et adorent? Aut si pro his gestis deus esse meruit, ergo et si quos audiunt homicidas, adulteros. parricidas, incestos etiam nunc debent ut deos adorare. Sed quod in aliis exsecrantur, scire omnino non possum cur in illo venerentur. Et Petrus respondit: Quoniam te nescire dicis, disce a me cur in illo facinorosa gesta venerentur; primo quidem, ut cum ipsi similia egerint, acceptos se ei futuros sciant, utpote quem imitantur in flagitiis; secundo. quod haec litteris scite recondita et versibus eleganter inserta veteres reliquerunt. Et nunc puerilis eruditionis obtentu, cum eorum notitia teneris et simplicibus adhaeserit mentibus, revelli ex eis atque abjici difficulter potest.
“But let us return to the subject. What evil reason is it, or rather what madness possesses the minds of mortals, that a man whom they not only know to be impious, monstrous, profane—Jupiter, I mean—incestuous, a parricide, an adulterer, but even sing of him publicly in the theaters, they should worship and adore as a god? Or if he deserved to be a god for these deeds, then even now they ought to adore as gods any murderers, adulterers, parricides, and incestuous persons they hear of. But why they venerate in him what they execrate in others, I cannot know at all.” Peter answered: “Since you say you do not know, learn from me why they venerate criminal deeds in him. First, so that when they themselves do similar things, they may know they are acceptable to him, as one whom they imitate in shameful acts; second, because the ancients left these things skillfully stored in writings and elegantly woven into verses. And now, under the pretext of a boy's education, since knowledge of them has clung to tender and simple minds, it can hardly be torn out and cast away.”
10.29PG 1:1436b
Haec cum dixisset Petrus, Niceta respondit: Non putes, domine mi Petre, non habere eruditos quosque gentilium verisimilitudines quasdam, quibus astruant haec quae culpabilia videntur et probrosa: quae quidem ego non ut confirmans errores eorum dico (absit enim a me, ut hoc vel ad cogitationem meam veniat), sed tamen scio esse apud prudentiores ipsorum defensiones quasdam. quibus astruere et colorare solent haec quae videntur absurda. Et si tibi placet, ut aliqua ex his proferam, quae ex parte aliqua retineo, ut jubes faciam. Cumque Petrus permisisset, Niceta hoc modo coepit:
When Peter had said this, Niceta answered: “Do not think, my lord Peter, that the learned among the Gentiles do not have certain plausible arguments by which they support these things that seem blameworthy and shameful. I say this not as confirming their errors—far be it from me that this should even come into my thought—but yet I know that among the more prudent of them there are certain defenses by which they are accustomed to support and color these things that seem absurd. And if it pleases you that I bring forward some of these, which I partly remember, I will do as you command.” When Peter had permitted it, Niceta began in this way:
10.30PG 1:1436b–1437a
Omnis sermo apud Graecos, qui de antiquitatis origine conscribitur, cum alios multos, tum duos praecipuos auctores habet. Orpheum et Hesiodum. Horum ergo scripta in duas partes intelligentiae dividuntur, id est, secundum litteram et secundum allegoriam; et ad ea quidem quae secundam litteram sunt, ignobilis vulgi turba conflamus! vero quae secundum allegoriam constant, omnis philosophorum et eruditorum loquacitas adurit-’3“ est. Orpheus igitur est, qui dicit primo fuisse chaos sempiternum, immensum, ingenitum. quo omnia facta sunt; hoc sane ipsum chaos non tenebras dixit esse, non lucem, non humidum, non aridum, non calidum, non frigidum, sed omnia simul mista, et semper unum fuisse informe; aliquando tamen quasi ad ovi immanis modum, per immensa tempora effectam peperisse ac protulisse ex se duplicem quamdam speciem, quam illi masculofeminam vocant, ex contraria admistione hujusmodi diversitatis speciem concretam; et hoc esse principium omnium, quod primum ex materia puriore processerit, quodque procedens discretionem quatuor elementorum dederit, et ex duobus quae prima sunt elementis fecerit coelum, ex aliis autem terram, ex quibus jam omnia participatione sui invicem nasci dicit et gigni. Haec quidem Orpheus.
“All writing among the Greeks that is composed about the origin of antiquity has many authors, but two especially: Orpheus and Hesiod. Their writings are divided into two parts of understanding, that is, according to the letter and according to allegory; and the ignoble crowd of the common people has flocked to what is according to the letter, but all the talkativeness of philosophers and learned men has been devoted to what consists in allegory. It is Orpheus, then, who says that first there was chaos, eternal, immeasurable, unbegotten, from which all things were made. This chaos he said was neither darkness nor light, neither moist nor dry, neither hot nor cold, but all things mixed together, and was always one formless thing; yet at some time, as if after the manner of an immense egg, brought to completion through immeasurable ages, it brought forth and produced from itself a kind of double form, which they call male-female, a form compacted from the contrary mixture of such diversity. And this, he says, is the beginning of all things, which first proceeded from purer matter, and which, proceeding, produced the separation of the four elements, and made heaven from the two elements that are first, and earth from the others; from which he says that all things are now born and begotten by mutual participation. This is what Orpheus says.
10.31PG 1:1437b
Subjungit autem his et Hesiodus, post chaos statim coelum dicens factum esse et terram, ex quibus ait progenitos illos undecim, quos interdum et duodecim dicit, ex quibus sex mares, quinque feminas ponit; nomina autem dat maribus: Oceanus, Ceus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, qui et Saturnus; item feminis: Thia, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Thetys, quae nomina per allegoriam hoc modo interpretantur: numerum quidem undecim vel duodecim, ipsam dicunt primam naturam, quam et Rheam a fluendo dictam volunt; reliquos autem decem accidentia ejus dicunt quas et qualitates appellant; duodecimum tamen addunt et Cronum quem apud nos Saturnum dicunt; hunc pro tempore accipiunt. Saturnum ergo et Rheam tempus ponunt et materiam, quae ubi cum humido et arido et calido et frigido tempore fuerint admista, omnia generant.
“Hesiod adds to this, saying that immediately after chaos heaven and earth were made, from which, he says, were begotten those eleven, whom he sometimes also calls twelve; of these he sets six as males and five as females. He gives these names to the males: Oceanus, Coeus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, who is also Saturn; and to the females: Theia, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Tethys. These names they interpret by allegory in this way: the number eleven or twelve, they say, is nature itself, the first, which they also want to be called Rhea from flowing; the other ten they call its accidents, which they also call qualities; and they add a twelfth, Cronus, whom among us they call Saturn, and take him for time. Saturn and Rhea, then, they set down as time and matter, which, when they are mixed with moist and dry and hot and cold over time, generate all things.
10.32PG 1:1437b–1438a
Haec ergo, inquit, primo omnium tempore multo concretam genuit quamdam quasi bullam, quae ex spiritu qui in aquis erat, paulatim collecta intumuit, et aliquanto tempore circumacta per superficiem materiae, ex qua quasi ex vulva processerat, rigore frigoris obdurata et glacialibus augmentis semper increscens, abrupta tandem demergitur in profundum, ac pondere ipso pertracta in infernum descendit, et quia invisibilis facta est, Aides appellata est, qui et Orcus vel Pluto nominatur. Cumque de superioribus mergeretur in inferna, locum confluendi humido praebuit elemento, et pars crassior, quae est terra, aquis cedentibus patefacta est. Hanc ergo aquarum libertatem, quae prius bulla obtegente premebatur, postquam illa inferni sortita est locum, Neptunum esse appellatam. Post hoc cum elementum frigidum per concretionem glacialis bullae ad inferiora fuisset absorptum, et aridum fuisset humidumque discretum, nullo jam impediente, elementum calidum ignis utpote vigore et levitate ad superiora convolavit aeris, spiritu et procella subvectum. Hanc ergo procellam, quae καταιγίς Graece appellatur, regem, id est capram dixerunt, et ignem qui ad superna conscendit, Jovem; et ideo eum capra subvectum conscendisse Olympum dicunt.
“This, then, he says, first of all, over a long time, brought forth a kind of compacted bubble, which, gradually gathered from the spirit that was in the waters, swelled up; and, carried round for some time over the surface of matter, from which it had come forth as from a womb, hardened by the stiffness of cold and always growing by icy accretions, at last broke off and sank into the depth; and drawn by its very weight it went down to the underworld; and because it became invisible it was called Aides, who is also named Orcus or Pluto. And when it sank from the upper regions into the lower, it gave the moist element room to flow together, and the denser part, which is earth, was laid bare as the waters gave way. This freedom of the waters, then, which had previously been pressed down by the covering bubble, after the bubble had obtained the place of the underworld, was called Neptune. After this, when the cold element had been absorbed into the lower regions through the congealing of the icy bubble, and the dry had been separated from the moist, with nothing now hindering, the hot element of fire, by its vigor and lightness, flew up to the upper regions of the air, borne up by wind and storm. This storm, then, which is called kataigis in Greek, they called a goat, and the fire which ascended to the heights, Jupiter; and therefore they say he ascended Olympus borne up by a goat.
10.33PG 1:1438a–1438b
Ipsum vero Jovem Graeci quidem a vivendo vel vitam dando, nostri a juvando nominatum volunt. Hanc ergo esse viventem substantiam ferunt, quae in superioribus posita, vi caloris velut cerebri ambitu ad se trahens cuncta. et cujusdam temperamenti moderatione componens, de capite dicitur genuisse sapientiam, quam Minervam vocant, quae a Graecis Ἀθήνη propter immortalitatem nominata est; quae quia pater omnium per sapientiam suam cuncta condidit, et ex ipso capite ejus et principali omnium genita dicitur loco, et temperata admistione elementorum universum formasse mundum et adornasse perhibetur. Igitur species quae materiae inditae sunt, ut fieret mundus, quia vi caloris constringuntur, Jovis viribus contineri dicuntur. Quae quoniam sufficienter se habent, nec ultra addi sibi indigent aliquid novi, sed unumquodque seminis sui posteritate reparatur, vinctae esse a Jove Saturni manus dicuntur: quia nihil novi jam, ut dixi, ex materia tempus producit, sed calor seminum secundum sui speciem cuncta restituit, nec ultra Rheae partus, hoc est propago materiae fluentis, ascendit, et ideo ipsam primam elementorum divisionem abscisionem Saturni nominant, quasi qui ultra mundum generare non possit.
“Jupiter himself the Greeks want to be named from living or giving life, our people from helping. This, then, they say, is the living substance, which, placed in the upper regions, drawing all things to itself by the force of heat as by the circuit of a brain, and composing them by the moderation of a certain tempering, is said to have begotten from his head wisdom, whom they call Minerva, who is named Athena by the Greeks because of her immortality. Because the father of all made all things through his wisdom, she is said to have been born from his very head, the chief place of all, and is held to have formed and adorned the whole world by the tempered mixture of the elements. So the forms that have been put into matter so that the world might come to be, since they are bound together by the force of heat, are said to be held by the strength of Jupiter. And since these are sufficiently arranged and need nothing new added to them, but each is renewed by the posterity of its own seed, the hands of Saturn are said to have been bound by Jupiter; because time no longer produces anything new from matter, as I said, but the heat of the seeds restores all things according to their kind, and the offspring of Rhea, that is, the propagation of flowing matter, no longer increases. And therefore they call the first division of the elements itself the castration of Saturn, as of one who can no longer generate a world.”
10.34PG 1:1438b–1439a
Nam de Venere hoc modo allegoriam tradunt: Ubi, aiunt, aetheri subjectum est pelagus, cum repercussus aquis splendor caeli gratior refulsisset, venustas rerum quae ex aquis pulchrior apparuerat, Venus nominata est, quae aetheri tanquam fratri suo sociata, quod concupiscibile decus effecerit, Cupidinem genuisse memorata est. Hoc ergo modo per allegoriam Cronum quidem, qui est Saturnus, tempus esse, ut diximus, tradunt, Rheam materiam, Aiden, id est Orcum, inferni profundum, Neptunum aquam, Jovem aerem, id est caloris elementum, Venerem venustatem rerum, Cupidinem concupiscentiam, quae inest rebus omnibus, per quam posteritas reparatur, vel etiam rerum ratio quae sapienter inspecta delectat. Hera, id est Juno, aer iste medius, qui de cmlo usque ad terram descendit, ponitur. Dianam, quam ipsam Proserpinam dicunt, aerem inferne tradunt. Apollinem ipsum etiam solem dicunt, circumeuntem polum; Mercurium verbum. quo ratio de singulis quibusque reddatur; Martem intemperatum ignem, qui cuncta consumat. Sed ne singula enumerando immoremur, ad hanc allegoria: speciem de unoquoque eorum quos colunt, hi quibus secretior de talibus inest peritia, honestas sibi videntur et justas reddere rationes.
“Of Venus they hand down the allegory in this way. When, they say, the sea lay beneath the ether, and the brightness of heaven reflected by the waters shone more pleasingly, the loveliness of things, which appeared more beautiful from the waters, was named Venus; and she, joined to the ether as to her brother, is recorded to have begotten Cupid, because she produced a desirable beauty. In this way, then, by allegory they hand down that Cronus, who is Saturn, is time, as we said; Rhea is matter; Aides, that is Orcus, the depth of the underworld; Neptune, water; Jupiter, the air, that is, the element of heat; Venus, the loveliness of things; Cupid, the desire that is in all things, by which posterity is renewed, or else the reason of things which, wisely contemplated, gives delight. Hera, that is Juno, is set down as this middle air which comes down from heaven to earth. Diana, whom they say is also Proserpina, they hand down as the lower air. Apollo himself they also call the sun, going round the pole; Mercury, the word, by which an account of each thing is given; Mars, intemperate fire, which consumes all things. But not to dwell on listing each, according to this form of allegory those who have more secret skill in such things think they give honorable and just accounts of each of those they worship.”
10.35PG 1:1439a–1439c
Haec cum Niceta dixisset, Aquila respondit: Valde mihi videtur, quisquis ille est auctor et inventor horum, impius exstitisse, si haec quae grata et honesta videntur abscondit, et superstitionis sua: ritum in dedecorosis et turpibus observantiis Collocavit, cum ea quae secundum litteram scripta sunt, manifeste inhonesta sint et turpia, et tota religionis eorum observantia in ipsis constet, ut per hujusmodi scelera et impietates deos suos quos colunt, doceant imitari. Nam in istis allegoriis quae eis utilitas erit? quae quamvis honestae finguntur, nullus tamen ex eis aut usus ad cultum pervenit aut ad mores emendatio
When Niceta had said this, Aquila answered: “It seems to me that whoever is the author and inventor of these things was very impious, if he hid these things that seem pleasing and honorable, and placed the rite of his superstition in disgraceful and shameful observances, since what is written according to the letter is plainly dishonorable and shameful, and the whole observance of their religion consists in these things, so that by such crimes and impieties they teach men to imitate the gods they worship. For what use will these allegories be to them? Though they are made up as honorable, yet no use for worship comes from them, nor any amendment of morals.
10.36PG 1:1439c
Unde magis constat, quod prudentes viri cum viderent communem superstitionem tam probrosam esse, tam turpem, nec tamen corrigendi modum aliquem vel scientiam didicissent, quibus potuerunt argumentis et interpretationibus conati sunt res inhonestas honesto sermone velare, et non, ut dicunt. honestas rationes inhonestis fabulis occultare; quod si esset, nunquam utique ipsa eorum simulacra atque ipsae de eis picturae cum suis vitiis et criminibus formarentur. Non cycnus adulter Ledae, nec taurus formaretur Europae, et in mille monstra eum, quem putant meliorem omnibus, verterent. Quod utique si magni et sapientes qui sunt apud eos viri, fictum scirent esse, non verum, nonne impietatis arguerent et sacrilegii eos, qui ad injuriam deorum hujusmodi aut picturam ponerent aut sculperent simulacra? Denique regem temporis sui depingunt in bovis forma, vel anseris, vel formica, vel vulturis, et scribant super regis sui nomen, atque hujusmodi vel statuam vel imaginem collocent; et injuriam facti sentient et vindictae magnitudinem.
“Hence it is rather clear that prudent men, seeing that the common superstition was so disgraceful, so shameful, and yet not having learned any way or knowledge of correcting it, tried by whatever arguments and interpretations they could to veil dishonorable things with honorable words—and not, as they say, to hide honorable reasons in dishonorable fables. If that were so, their images and paintings of them would never be made with their vices and crimes. The swan would not be shaped as Leda's adulterer, nor the bull for Europa, nor would they turn him whom they think better than all into a thousand monsters. If the great and wise men among them knew this was fiction and not truth, would they not convict of impiety and sacrilege those who set up such paintings or carved such images to the insult of the gods? Indeed, let them paint the king of their time in the form of an ox or a goose or an ant or a vulture, write their king's name above it, and set up such a statue or image: they will feel the insult of the deed and the greatness of the vengeance.
10.37PG 1:1439c–1440a
Sed quoniam vera haec magis sunt, quae publica turpitudo testatur, et ad excusationem a viris prudentibus sermonibus honestis quaesita sunt et concinnata velamina, idcirco non solum non prohibentur, sed et ipsis mysteriis Saturni filios devorantis, et occultati pueri per Corybantum et cymbala et tympanorum sonitus, exprimuntur imagines. De abscisione vero Saturni, quae major erit probatio veritatis, quam ut in honorem dei sui, simili infelicitatis sorte abscindantur etiam cultores? Cum ergo haec manifeste cernantur, quis tam exigui sensus, imo tam stolidi invenietur, cui non palam sit, haec magis vera esse de infelicibus diis, quae infeliciores cultores etiam corporum suorum vulneribus et abscisione testantur?
“But since the things that public shame bears witness to are rather the true ones, and the veils were sought out and composed with honorable words by prudent men for an excuse, therefore they are not only not forbidden, but in the very mysteries images are displayed of Saturn devouring his sons and of the boy hidden by the Corybantes with cymbals and the sound of drums. And as for the castration of Saturn, what greater proof of its truth will there be than that, in honor of their god, the worshipers too are castrated with a like unhappy lot? Since, then, these things are plainly seen, who will be found of so little sense, or rather so stupid, to whom it is not plain that these things are rather true of the unhappy gods, which their more unhappy worshipers attest even by the wounds and mutilation of their bodies?”
10.38PG 1:1440a
Quod si, ut dicunt, haec ita honeste et pie gesta tam inhonesto ritu ministrantur et impio, sacrilegus profecto est, quisquis ille vel ex initio haec tradidit, vel nunc male tradita persistit implere. Quid autem et de libris dicimus poetarum? Nonne oportuerat eos, si honesta et pia deorum gesta turpibus fabulis infamarunt, abjici protinus atque in ignem dari, ne persuaderent tenera: adhuc aetati puerorum, Jovem ipsum deorum principem. parricidam erga parentes, incestum erga sorores et filias, impurum etiam in pueros exstitisse, Venerem cum Marte adulteros, et omnia illa quae jam superius dicta sunt? Aut quid tibi videtur, domine mi Petre?
“But if, as they say, these things were done so honorably and piously, and are served by so dishonorable and impious a rite, then surely he is sacrilegious, whoever handed them down from the beginning or still persists in carrying out what was wrongly handed down. And what shall we say of the books of the poets? If they defamed the honorable and pious deeds of the gods with shameful fables, ought they not at once to have been cast away and given to the fire, so that they might not persuade the still tender age of boys that Jupiter himself, the chief of the gods, was a parricide toward his parents, incestuous toward his sisters and daughters, impure even toward boys, that Venus and Mars were adulterers, and all those things already mentioned above? Or what do you think, my lord Peter?”
10.39PG 1:1440a–1440c
Tunc ille respondit: Certus esto, dulcissime Aquila, quia omnia per bonam Dei providentiam gesta sunt, ut non solum infirma et fragilis, Verum et turpis esset causa quae futura erat contraria veritati. Si enim validior et verisimilior fuisset erroris assertio, haud facile quisquam qui in eo deceptus esset, ad iter veritatis rediret. Si enim nunc, cum tam multa probra et dedecora de diis gentium proferuntur, vix aliquis turpem derelinquit errorem, quanto magis si esset ibi aliquid honestum et verisimile? Difficulter namque transfertur animus ab his, in quibus a prima aetate praeventus est; et ob hoc, ut dixi, divina Providentia factum est ut erroris substantia et infirma esset et turpis. Sed et caetera omnia simili modo competenter et commode dispensat divina Providentia. licet nobis ignorantibus rerum causas bonae et optimae dispensationis divinae non liqueat ratio.
Then he answered: “Be sure, sweetest Aquila, that all things have been done by the good providence of God, so that the cause which was to be contrary to the truth should be not only weak and frail but also shameful. For if the assertion of error had been stronger and more plausible, hardly anyone deceived by it would easily return to the road of truth. For if now, when so many disgraces and shames are brought forward about the gods of the Gentiles, scarcely anyone abandons the shameful error, how much less if there were something honorable and plausible in it? For the mind is with difficulty moved from things with which it has been preoccupied from earliest age; and for this reason, as I said, it came about by divine providence that the substance of error should be both weak and shameful. And divine Providence arranges all other things likewise fittingly and suitably, though the reason of the good and excellent divine dispensation is not clear to us who do not know the causes of things.”
10.40PG 1:1440c
Cum haec Petrus dixisset, ego Clemens Nicetam rogabam, ut aliqua de allegoriis gentilium quas diligenter attigerat, agnoscendi gratia exponeret; utile enim est, ut quando cum gentilibus disputamus, etiam ista nos minime lateant. Et Niceta: Si, inquit, permittit dominus meus Petrus, possunt dicere. Tum Petrus: Hodie, inquit, permisi vobis dicere adversum gentiles, ut nostis. Et Niceta ait: Dic ergo, Clemens, de quibus audire velis. Cui ego aio: Quomodo tradunt de deorum cena gentiles, quam in Pelei nuptiis habuerunt et Thetidis, quem dicunt esse Paridem pastorem, et quas ponunt Junonem, Minervam et Venerem, quae. apud eum judicantur, quemve Mercurium, vel quod malum, et caetera quae per ordinem consequuntur.
When Peter had said this, I, Clement, asked Niceta to set out, for the sake of knowledge, some of the allegories of the Gentiles, which he had carefully studied; for it is useful that, when we dispute with the Gentiles, these things too should not be unknown to us. Niceta said: “If my lord Peter permits, I can speak.” Then Peter said: “Today I have permitted you to speak against the Gentiles, as you know.” And Niceta said: “Tell me, then, Clement, what you wish to hear about.” I said to him: “How do the Gentiles explain the banquet of the gods which they held at the wedding of Peleus and Thetis; whom do they say the shepherd Paris is; whom do they make Juno, Minerva, and Venus, who were judged before him; whom Mercury, or what the apple, and the rest that follows in order?”
10.41PG 1:1441a–1441b
modo se habet. Convivium mundum tradunt, discumbendi ordinem deorum stellarum positionem; quos Hesiodus cceli et terrae primos filios nominat, in quibus sex mares et sex feminas ad duodecim signorum numerum referunt, quae universum circumeunt mundum. 'Dapes autem convivii rationes esse et causas rerum tradunt dulces et concupiscibiles, quae qualiter regatur et gubernetur hic mundus, ex signorum positione et astrorum cursibus colliguntur. Ad libertatis tamen convivii modum dicunt ista constare, pro eo quod potestatem habeat uniuscujusque sensus, si velit degustare aliquid ex hujusmodi scientia aut si nolit; et sicut in convivio nemo cogitur, sed vescendi libertas penes unumquemque est, ita et philosophandi ratio pendet in voluntatis arbitrio. Discordiam concupiscentiam carnis dicunt, quae insurgit adversum propositum mentis et philosophandi impedit studium; ideo denique et tempus illud esse aiunt, in quo de nuptiis agitur. Peleum vero et Thetidem nympham, aridum et humidum ponunt elementum, ex quorum admistione substantia corporum constat. Mercurium verbum esse tradunt, per quod sensui doctrina confertur, Junonem pudicitiam, Minervam fortitudinem, Venerem libidinem dicunt, Paridem sensum. Si ergo, aiunt, accidat in homine barbarum esse et imperitum sensum, et rectum judicium nescientem, spreta pudicitia et virtute, libidini palmam, quod est malum, dabit, per quod non solum sibi, sed et civibus et universae genti subversio et pernicies aderit. Haec ergo licet illis componere ex qualibet materia visum sit, tamen aptari ad omnem hominem possunt, quia si quis pastoralem et rusticum atque imperitum habeat sensum nec velit erudiri, ubi corporis calor de libidinis suavitate suggesserit, continuo, spretis studiorum virtutibus et scientiae bonis, ad voluptates corporis animum confert. Et hinc est unde impacata bella consurgunt, urbes ruunt, patria: concidunt, sicut et Paris, rapta Helena, ad mutuum Graecos et barbaros armavit exitium.
Then Niceta said: “The matter of the banquet stands in this way. They hand down that the banquet is the world, and the order of the gods reclining is the position of the stars; those whom Hesiod names the first children of heaven and earth, among whom there are six males and six females, they refer to the number of the twelve signs, which go round the whole world. The dishes of the banquet they hand down to be the reasons and causes of things, sweet and desirable, which are gathered from the position of the signs and the courses of the stars, as to how this world is ruled and governed. They say that these things are set out in the manner of the freedom of a banquet, because each mind has the power to taste something of this knowledge if it wishes, or not; and as at a banquet no one is compelled but each has freedom to eat, so the practice of philosophizing depends on the choice of the will. Discord they say is the desire of the flesh, which rises up against the purpose of the mind and hinders the pursuit of philosophizing; and that, indeed, is why they say it was the time when a wedding was being celebrated. Peleus and the nymph Thetis they set down as the dry and moist element, from whose mixture the substance of bodies is composed. Mercury they hand down to be the word, through which teaching is conferred on the mind; Juno they call chastity, Minerva fortitude, Venus lust, Paris the mind. If, then, they say, it happens that a man's mind is barbarous and unskilled, and does not know right judgment, despising chastity and virtue it will give the palm to lust—which is the evil—through which overthrow and ruin will come not only to himself but to his fellow citizens and the whole nation. Though they have chosen to compose these things from whatever material, they can be applied to every man: for if someone has a shepherd's and rustic and unskilled mind and does not wish to be educated, when the heat of the body suggests the sweetness of lust, at once, despising the virtues of study and the goods of knowledge, he turns his mind to the pleasures of the body. And from this it is that implacable wars arise, cities fall, countries collapse, just as Paris, by carrying off Helen, armed Greeks and barbarians for mutual destruction.”
10.42PG 1:1441b–1442a
Et Petrus, collaudans prosecutionem ejus, ait: Multas, ut video, ingeniosi homines ex his quae legunt verisimilitudines capiunt, et ideo diligenter observandum est, ut lex Dei cum legitur, non secundum proprii ingenii intelligentiam legatur. Sunt enim multa verba in Scripturis divinis, quae possunt trahi ad eum sensum, quem sibi unusquisque sponte praesumpsit; quod fieri non oportet. Non enim sensum quem extrinsecus attuleris alienum et extraneum debes quaerere, quem ex Scripturarum auctoritate confirmes, sed ex ipsis Scripturis sensum capere veritatis; et ideo oportet ab eo intelligentiam discere Scripturarum, qui eam a majoribus secundum veritatem sibi traditam servat, ut et ipse possit ea quae recte suscepit, competenter asserere. Cum enim ex divinis Scripturis integram quis susceperit et firmam regulam veritatis, absurdum non erit, si aliquid etiam ex eruditione communi ac de liberalibus studiis, quae forte in pueritia attigit, ad assertionem veri dogmatis conferat. ita tamen ut ubi vera didicit, falsa et simulata declinet.
Peter, praising his exposition, said: “Clever men, as I see, draw many plausibilities from what they read; and therefore we must be careful that when the law of God is read, it is not read according to the understanding of one's own cleverness. For there are many words in the divine Scriptures which can be drawn to whatever sense each one has presumed for himself; and this ought not to be done. For you ought not to seek a foreign and alien sense brought in from outside, which you then confirm by the authority of the Scriptures, but to take the sense of truth from the Scriptures themselves. And therefore one must learn the understanding of the Scriptures from him who keeps it as handed down to him from his elders according to the truth, so that he too may fittingly assert what he has rightly received. For when someone has received from the divine Scriptures a whole and firm rule of truth, it will not be absurd if he also brings something from common education and the liberal studies, which he perhaps touched in boyhood, to the assertion of true doctrine—yet in such a way that where he has learned the truth, he avoids what is false and feigned.”
10.43PG 1:1442a–1442b
Et cum hare dixisset, ad patrem nostrum respiciens, ait: Tu ergo, senex, si quidem saluti animae tuae consulis, ut cum corpore fuerit resoluta, pro brevi hac conversione requiem inveniat sempiternam, require de quibusvis et consule, ut possis si quid in te est dubitationis abjicere. Incertum enim est etiam juvenibus vitae tempus, senibus autem jam nec incertum est; non enim dubitatur, quin quantumcunque est quod putatur superesse, breve sit. Et ideo tam juvenes quam senes Oportet de conversione et poenitentia valde esse sollicitos, et satagere ut de reliquo ornent animam suam ornamentis dignissimis, id est dogmatibus veritatis, decore pudicitiae, splendore justitiae, candore pietatis, aliisque omnibus quibus comptam decet esse rationabilem mentem; tum praeterea declinare a consortiis inhonestis et infidelibus, et societates habere fidelium atque illos frequentare conventus, in quibus de pudicitia, de justitia, de pietate tractatur; orare semper Deum ex corde et ab ipso petere quae decet a Deo posci; ipsi gratias agere, veram paenitudinem gerere praeteritorum gestorum; aliquantulum etiam, si possibile est, per misericordias pauperum juvare paenitentiam; per haec enim facilior venia dabitur et indulgenti citius indulgebitur.
And when he had said this, looking at our father, he said: “You, then, old man, if you care for the salvation of your soul, that when it is released from the body it may find everlasting rest in return for this brief conversion, inquire about whatever you wish and consult, so that you may cast off any doubt that is in you. For the time of life is uncertain even for the young, but for the old it is no longer even uncertain; for there is no doubt that however much is thought to remain is short. And therefore both young and old must be very anxious about conversion and repentance, and strive thereafter to adorn their soul with the worthiest ornaments, that is, with the doctrines of truth, the beauty of chastity, the splendor of justice, the brightness of piety, and all the other things with which it befits a rational mind to be adorned; and besides, to avoid dishonorable and unbelieving company, and to keep the society of believers and frequent those assemblies in which chastity, justice, and piety are discussed; to pray to God always from the heart and ask of him what it is fitting to ask of God; to give him thanks, to have true repentance for past deeds; and also, if possible, to help repentance somewhat by mercies to the poor. For through these, pardon will be given more easily, and he who has been indulgent will be indulged more quickly.”
10.44PG 1:1442b–1442d
Quod si provectioris aetatis sit is qui ad paenitentiam venit, eo magis gratias agere debet Deo, quod postquam fractus est omnis impetus concupiscentia carnalis, scientia veritatis accepta, nulla ei imminet pugna certaminis, per quam insurgentes adversus animum reprimat corporis voluptates. Superest ergo in agnitione veritatis et misericordia: operibus exerceri, ut afferat fructus dignos pmnitentiae, nec putet quia in temporis longitudine documentum conversionis ostenditur, et non in devotionis ac propositi firmitate. Deo enim manifesta: sunt mentes, qui non temporum rationem colligit, sed animorum: ipse enim probat, si quis agnita veritatis praedicatione non distulit neque tempus negligenda consumpsit, sed statim et si dici potest eodem momento, praeterita perhorrescens, futurorum desiderium coepit et in amorem regni caelestis exarsit.
“And if he who comes to repentance is of more advanced age, he ought all the more to give thanks to God that, since every impulse of carnal desire has been broken, having received the knowledge of truth, no battle of the contest threatens him by which he must repress the pleasures of the body rising up against the mind. It remains, then, for him to be exercised in the knowledge of truth and in works of mercy, so that he may bring forth fruits worthy of repentance; and let him not think that the proof of conversion is shown in length of time, and not in the firmness of devotion and purpose. For minds are manifest to God, who reckons not the account of times but of souls. For he approves if someone, having recognized the preaching of truth, has not delayed nor spent time in neglect, but at once, and if it can be said in the same moment, shuddering at the past, has begun to desire the things to come and burned with love of the heavenly kingdom.
10.45PG 1:1442d–1443a
Propter quod nemo vestrum ultra dissimulet nec retro respiciat, sed ad Evangelium regni Dei libenter accedat. Non dicat pauper, quia cum dives factus fuero, tunc convertar; non requirit a te Deus pecuniam, sed animum misericordem et piam mentem. Neque dives conversionem suam differat pro sollicitudine saeculari, dum cogitat quomodo dispenset abundantiam frugum; neque dicat intra semetipsum, Quid faciam, ubi recondam fructus meos? Neque dicat animae suae, Habes multa bona reposita in annos multos, epulare, laetare; nam dicetur ei: Stulte, hac nocte auferetur a te anima tua, et quae praeparasti cujus erunt? Itaque festinet ad paenitentiam omnis aetas, omnis sexus, omnisque conditio, ut vitam consequatur aeternam. Iuvenes quidem in eo grati sint, quod in ipso impetu desideriorum cervices suas jugo subjiciunt disciplinae. Senes et ipsi laudabiles, quia multi temporis consuetudinem, in qua male praeventi sunt, pro Dei timore commutant.
“Therefore let none of you any longer pretend or look back, but come gladly to the gospel of the kingdom of God. Let not the poor man say: ‘When I have become rich, then I will be converted.’ God does not require money of you, but a merciful spirit and a pious mind. Nor let the rich man put off his conversion because of worldly anxiety, while he considers how to dispose of the abundance of his crops; nor let him say within himself, ‘What shall I do, where shall I store my fruits?’ Nor let him say to his soul, ‘You have many goods laid up for many years; feast, be merry’; for it will be said to him: ‘Fool, this night your soul will be taken from you, and what you have prepared, whose will it be?’ So let every age, every sex, every condition hasten to repentance, so that they may obtain eternal life. Let the young be pleasing in this, that in the very rush of desires they submit their necks to the yoke of discipline. The old too are praiseworthy, because for the fear of God they change the habit of a long time in which they had been wrongly occupied.
10.46PG 1:1443a
Nemo ergo differat, nemo cunctetur; quae enim causa cunctandi est ad bene agendum? aut times, ne cum bene feceris, ibi remunerationem non invenias ut putasti? Et quid senties detrimenti si bene feceris gratis, nonne etiam sola in his sufficeret conscientia? Quod si inveneris ut praesumis, nonne pro parvis magna, et pro temporalibus aeterna recipies? verum ego haec propter incredulos dixi. Nos autem quae praedicamus, ita se habent, quia nec aliter esse possunt, quae prophetica voce promissa sunt.
“Let no one, then, delay, let no one hesitate; for what cause is there for hesitating to do well? Or do you fear that when you have done well, you may not find the reward there as you thought? And what loss will you feel if you have done well for nothing? Would not conscience alone suffice in these things? But if you find it as you presume, will you not receive great things for small, and eternal for temporal? But I have said this for the sake of unbelievers. What we preach is so, for the things promised by the prophetic voice cannot be otherwise.
10.47PG 1:1443a
Si quis vero cupit examussim veritatem nostra: praedicationis agnoscere, conveniat ad audiendum, et quid sit verus propheta cognoscat, et tunc demum omnis in eo cessabit ambiguitas; si tamen non obstinatis animis resistat his, quae vera esse compererit. Sunt enim quidam qui quolibet modo ad hoc tantum respiciunt ut vincant, et laudem pro hoc magis quam salutem quaerant, quibus non eveniat vel dici aliquid, ne et sermo nobilis patiatur injuriam, et injuria: suae reum aeterna morte condemnet. Quid enim est in quo adversari praedicationi nostrae quis debeat? aut in quo contra veri honestique fidem sermo praedicationis nostra? deprehenditur? qui dicit honorandum esse Deum et Patrem omnium conditorem, ejusque Filium, qui solus eum et voluntatem ejus novit, cuique soli de omnibus credendum est quae praecepit; solus enim est lex et legislator et judex justus. cujus lex decernit honorandum esse Deum Dominum omnium per vitam sobriam, castam, justam, misericordem, et in ipso solo omnem collocandam spem.
“But if anyone wishes to know exactly the truth of our preaching, let him come to hear, and learn what the true Prophet is; and then at last all ambiguity will cease in him—provided that he does not resist with obstinate mind what he has found to be true. For there are some who in whatever way look only to winning, and seek praise for it rather than salvation; to such let not anything even be said, lest the noble word suffer injury and condemn the one guilty of its injury to eternal death. For in what should anyone oppose our preaching? Or in what is the word of our preaching found to be against the faith of what is true and honorable? It says that God, the Father and maker of all, must be honored, and his Son, who alone knows him and his will, and who alone must be believed in everything he has commanded; for he alone is law and lawgiver and just judge. His law decrees that God, the Lord of all, must be honored by a sober, chaste, just, and merciful life, and that all hope must be placed in him alone.
10.48PG 1:1443a–1444a
Sed dicet aliquis, etiam a philosophis hujusmodi praecepta dari. Nihil est simile; nam de iustitia quidem ab eis et sobrietate mandatur, sed remuneratorem Deum gestorum bonorum malorumque non norunt, et ideo leges et praecepta eorum accusatorem tantummodo publicum vitant, conscientiam vero purificare non possunt. Quid enim timeat in occulto peccare, qui occultorum esse arbitrum et judicem nescit? Addunt praeterea philosophi in praeceptis suis, etiam deos qui sunt daemones honorandos, quod solum, etiamsi in aliis probabiles viderentur, gravissimae eos potest impietatis arguere et propriis condemnare sententiis, qui unum quidem esse pronuntiant Deum, pro assentatione tamen erroris humani plures mandant colendos. Aiunt autem et illud philosophi, Deum non irasci, nescientes quid dicant. Ira enim mala est, ubi mentem turbat, ut rectum consilium perdat; illa vero quae malos punit, perturbationem menti non infert, sed unus, ut ita dixerim, idemque affectus est, qui et bonis pra?mia et malis retribuit poenam; nam si bonis et malis bona restituat, et simili remuneratione erga pios utatur et impios, injustus potius quam bonus videbitur.
“But someone will say that precepts of this kind are given by the philosophers too. Nothing is alike. For they do give commands about justice and sobriety, but they do not know God as the rewarder of good and evil deeds; and therefore their laws and precepts avoid only the public accuser, but cannot purify the conscience. For why should one fear to sin in secret who does not know that there is an arbiter and judge of secret things? Besides, the philosophers add in their precepts that the gods, who are demons, must also be honored; and this alone, even if they seemed commendable in other things, can convict them of the gravest impiety and condemn them by their own sentences: they declare that there is one God, yet, flattering human error, they command many to be worshiped. The philosophers also say that God is not angry, not knowing what they say. For anger is evil when it disturbs the mind so that it loses right counsel; but the anger that punishes the wicked brings no disturbance to the mind; it is, so to speak, one and the same affection that gives rewards to the good and renders punishment to the wicked. For if he gave good things to the good and the wicked alike, and used a like reward toward the pious and the impious, he would seem unjust rather than good.
10.49PG 1:1444a
Sed ais: nec Deus debuit facere malum. Verum dicis; neque fecit. Sed qui ab eo creati sunt, dum judicandos se esse non credunt, indulgentes voluptatibus suis, a pietate et iustitia devoluti sunt. Sed dices: Si justum est punire malos, statim ut male agunt puniri debent. Tu quidem bene festinas; sed ille qui aeternus est et quem nihil latet, quanto nullus ei finis, tanto et prolixa patientia est. et non ad velocitatem vindictae, sed ad salutis respicit causas; delectatur enim non tam morte, quam conversione peccantis. Ideo denique et sanctum baptisma largitus est hominibus, ad quod si quis venire festinet, et de reliquo maneat emendatus, delentur ex eo omnia peccata, quae per ignorantiam commissa sunt.
“But you say: ‘Then God ought not to have made evil.’ You speak truly; nor did he make it. But those who were created by him, not believing that they are to be judged, indulging their pleasures, fell away from piety and justice. But you will say: ‘If it is just to punish the wicked, they ought to be punished as soon as they do evil.’ You indeed are in a hurry; but he who is eternal and from whom nothing is hidden, as he has no end, so his patience is long, and he looks not to the speed of vengeance but to the causes of salvation; for he takes pleasure not so much in the death of the sinner as in his conversion. For this reason, indeed, he has also given men holy baptism; and if anyone hastens to come to it and remains amended thereafter, all the sins committed through ignorance are blotted out from him.
10.50PG 1:1444a–1444d
Nam philosophi quid contulerunt vita: mortalium, dicendo hominibus non irasci Deum? nempe ut docerent eos nullum habere vindicta: alicujus vel judicii metum, et per hoc tota peccantibus frena laxarent. Aut quid illi humanum genus juvarunt, qui dixerunt non esse Deum, sed casu omnia et fortuito agi? nonne ut haec audientes homines et arbitrantes nullum esse judicem, nullum provisorem rerum, ad omne facinus, quod vel furor vel avaritia vel libido dictasset, neminem verendo praecipites agerentur? Nam illi multum revera juverunt mortalium vitam, qui dixerunt nihil posse sine genesi fieri, scilicet ut unusquisque malefacti causam genesi ascribens, semetipsum in sceleribus suis pronuntiaret innoxium, dum crimen suum non paenitendo diluit, sed fatum culpando congeminat. Nam de illis quid dicam philosophis, qui deos colendos esse introduxerunt, et tales deos, quales paulo ante audistis? Quid fuit aliud decernere, nisi ut vitia, nisi ut crimina, nisi ut flagitia colerentur? Pudet miseretque me vestri, si creditis quod indigna haec essent et impia atque exsecrabilia, et non deprehendistis hactenus, aut deprehensa et intellecta mala pro bonis et optimis coluistis.
“For what did the philosophers contribute to the life of mortals by telling men that God is not angry? Surely to teach them to have no fear of any vengeance or judgment, and so to loosen all reins for sinners. Or how did those help the human race who said that there is no God, but that all things are done by chance and accident? Was it not so that men hearing this and thinking that there is no judge, no provider of things, might be driven headlong, fearing no one, to every crime that rage or avarice or lust dictated? And those truly helped the life of mortals a great deal who said that nothing can happen without birth-fate!—so that each, ascribing to birth-fate the cause of his misdeeds, might declare himself innocent in his crimes, while he does not wash away his guilt by repenting but doubles it by blaming fate. And what shall I say of those philosophers who introduced the worship of gods, and of such gods as you heard a little before? What was it but to decree that vices, crimes, and shameful deeds be worshiped? I am ashamed and sorry for you if you believe these things were unworthy, impious, and execrable, and yet either did not detect it until now, or, having detected and understood the evils, worshiped them as good and excellent.
10.51PG 1:1444d–1445a
Tum praeterea et illud quale est, quod Pr? sumpseruntinnnnulli phil050phorum vel de [ξω-ιγ qui,cum sint mortales, et opinione sola de iurisibilibus dicere vel de mundi origine, ubi non 2ἀοrant cum fieret, vel de line ejus vel de animat-uta in infernis dispensatione et judicio, nescientes qui! praesentia quidem et visibilia nam hominis iionabilis, praterita vero et' futura et invisibilia scire, solius prophetica: praseientite est. Non ergo haec conjecturis et opinionibus colligenda δῑξιιῇιξ quibus valde falluntur homines, sed Iide [mpm veritatis. sicut se habet haec nostra doctrina. Nos enim nihil ex nobis loquimur, nec humana aestimatione collecta annuntiamus, hoc enim decipere est auditores; sed veri propheta: auctoritate nobis tradita et manifestata praedicamus. De cujus praescientia et virtute prophetica, si quis, ut dixi, ad liquidum vult documenta suscipere, sollicitus conveniat, et impiger sit ad audiendum, et evidentes dabimus probationes, quibus vim prophetica: praescientiae non solum auribus audire, sed et oculis etiam videre ac manu contrectare se credat. De quo cum certam fidem conceperit, jugum justitiae et pietatis absque ullo labore suscipiet, tantamque in eo sentiet suavitatem, ut non solum nihil ei laboris inesse causetur, verum et amplius aliquid addi sibi desideret et imponi.
“Besides, what kind of thing is it that some philosophers presumed to speak even about God, though they are mortal, and by opinion alone about invisible things, or about the origin of the world, when they were not present when it came to be, or about its end, or about the dispensation and judgment of souls in the underworld—not knowing that present and visible things are within the reach of man's reason, but that to know past and future and invisible things belongs to prophetic foreknowledge alone? These things, then, are not to be gathered by conjectures and opinions, by which men are greatly deceived, but by faith in prophetic truth, as this teaching of ours holds. For we speak nothing of ourselves, nor do we announce things gathered by human estimation—for that is to deceive the hearers—but we preach what has been handed down and made manifest to us by the authority of the true Prophet. Of his foreknowledge and prophetic power, if anyone, as I said, wishes to receive clear proofs, let him come carefully and be unwearied in listening, and we will give evident proofs, by which he will believe that he not only hears with his ears but also sees with his eyes and handles with his hand the power of prophetic foreknowledge. And when he has conceived a sure faith about this, he will take up the yoke of justice and piety without any labor, and will feel such sweetness in it that he will not only not complain of any labor in it, but will even desire that something more be added and laid upon him.”
10.52PG 1:1445a
Cumque haec et alia his similia dixisset, et nonnullos ex his qui aderant infirmos et daemonibus obsessos curasset, gratulantes et Deum collaudantes turbas dimisit, praecipiens eis ut ad eumdem locum etiam consequentibus diebus audiendi gratia convenirent. Cumque domi jam inter nos essemus ac praepararemus ad edendum, ingressus quidam nuntiat Appionem Plistonicensem cum Anubione nuper venisse ab Antiochia, et hospitari cum Simone. Tum pater audiens gavisus est, et ait Petro: Si permittis, volo ire et salutare Appionem et Anubionem, quia valde amici mihi sunt; fortassis autem Anubionem etiam suadere potero disputare cum Clemente de genesi. Et Petrus: Permitto, inquit, et laudo quod amicos colis; verumtamen considera, quomodo per providentiam Dei omnia tibi ex sententia concurrant; ecce enim non solum affectio tibi propria, Deo praestante, reparata est, sed et amicorum praesentia procuratur. Et pater: Vere, inquit, adverto ita esse, ut dicis. Et cum haec dixisset, abiit ad Anubionem.
When he had said these and similar things, and had healed some of those present who were sick and possessed by demons, he dismissed the crowds rejoicing and praising God, instructing them to come together at the same place on the following days too for the sake of hearing. When we were now at home among ourselves and preparing to eat, someone came in and announced that Appion Pleistonices had recently come from Antioch with Anubion and was lodging with Simon. When my father heard this he was glad and said to Peter: “If you permit, I want to go and greet Appion and Anubion, because they are great friends of mine; and perhaps I may even be able to persuade Anubion to dispute with Clement about birth-fate.” Peter said: “I permit it, and I praise you for cherishing your friends. But consider how by the providence of God everything is falling out for you as you wish: for see, not only has your own family been restored to you by God's gift, but the presence of your friends too is provided.” My father said: “Truly I notice that it is as you say.” And when he had said this he went off to Anubion.
10.53PG 1:1445a–1446a
Nos autem cum Petro positi per totam noctem interrogando de diversis et discendo ab eo, delectatione ipsa doctrinae et suavitate verborum pervigiles mansimus. Et cum jam auroresceret, Petrus intuens me ac fratres meos, ait: Miror quid visum sit patri vestro. Cumque haec diceret, supervenit pater et invenit Petrum nobis de se loquentem. Cumque salutasset, satisfacere coepit et causam exponere, ob quam foris mansisset. Nos autem respicientes ad eum expavimus, vultum in eo Simonis videntes, vocem tamen patris nostri audiebamus. Cumque refugeremus eum et exsecraremur, stupebat pater quod tam austere cum eo ageremus et barbare. Solus tamen Petrus erat, qui vultum ejus naturalem videbat: qui et ait ad nos: Cur exsecramini patrem vestrum? Cui nos una cum matre respondimus: Hic nobis Simon videtur, vocem habens patris nostri. Et Petrus: Vobis quidem vox ejus quae maleficiis mutata non est, sola nota est; mihi autem etiam vultus ejus, qui aliis arte Simonis mutatus apparet. Faustiniani patris vestri notus est. Et intuens patrem ait: Causa quae conjugem tuam conturbat ac filios, haec est, species vultus in te non videtur illa quae fuit, sed facies exsecrandi Simonis in te apparet.
We, staying with Peter, remained awake through the whole night, asking about various things and learning from him, out of the very delight of his teaching and the sweetness of his words. And when it was already dawning, Peter, looking at me and my brothers, said: “I wonder what has happened to your father.” As he was saying this, my father arrived and found Peter speaking to us about him. When he had greeted us, he began to apologize and explain the reason why he had stayed out. But we, looking at him, were terrified, seeing in him the face of Simon, though we heard our father's voice. And when we fled from him and cursed him, my father was astonished that we treated him so harshly and barbarously. Peter alone saw his natural face, and he said to us: “Why do you curse your father?” We, together with our mother, answered him: “He seems to us to be Simon, though he has our father's voice.” Peter said: “To you only his voice is known, which has not been changed by sorcery; but to me his face too, which appears to others changed by Simon's art, is known as that of your father Faustinianus.” And looking at my father he said: “The cause that troubles your wife and sons is this: the appearance of your face is not seen in you as it was, but the face of the accursed Simon appears in you.”
10.54PG 1:1446a
Et cum haec diceret, regressus quidam ex his qui Antiochiam praecesserunt, dicebat ad Petrum: Scire te volo, domine mi Petre, quia Simon apud Antiochiam publice multa faciens signa et prodigia, nihil aliud populo persuasit nisi quae ad tui odium pertinent, magum te nominans, maleficum, homicidam, et in tantum eos adversum te odium concitavit, ut magnopere desiderent, si te usquam invenire queant, etiam carnes tuas devorare; et ob hoc nos qui praemissi sumus, videntes valde commotam contra te civitatem, occulte in unum convenientes considerabamus quid fieri oporteret.
As he was saying this, one of those who had gone ahead to Antioch returned and said to Peter: “I want you to know, my lord Peter, that Simon at Antioch, doing many signs and wonders publicly, has persuaded the people of nothing but what tends to hatred of you, calling you a magician, a sorcerer, a murderer; and he has stirred up such hatred against you in them that they greatly desire, if they can find you anywhere, even to devour your flesh. And for this reason we who were sent ahead, seeing the city greatly stirred against you, met together secretly and considered what ought to be done.
10.55PG 1:1446a–1447b
Cumque nullum videremus exitum rei, supervenit Cornelius centurio, missus a Caesare ad praesidem Caesareae publici negotii gratia; hunc accersimus ad nos solum, causamque ei qua maesti essemus exponimus, ac si quid posset, ut juvaret hortamur. Tum ille promptissime repromittit se eum protinus fugaturum, si tamen consilio ejus etiam nos adniteremur. Cumque nos polliceremur impigre cuncta gesturos, ait: Caesar in urbe Roma et per provincias maleficos inquiri jussit ac perimi, ex quibus plurimi jam perempti sunt. Ego igitur divulgabo per amicos, me ut istum magum caperem venisse, et ob hoc missum a Caesare, quo etiam hic cum caeteris suis sociis puniatur. Vestri ergo qui cum ipso sunt occulte quasi undecunque audierint, indicent ei quod ego ad ipsum capiendum missus sim, et certum est, quod cum audierit, fugiat: aut si vos aliquid melius videtis, dicite. Quid plura? ita factum est a nostris quicum ipso erant, explorandi gratia simulati. Ubi didicit Simon ventum esse ad se, tanquam ingens sibi beneficium collatum ab eis accipiens, in fugam versus est. Discedens igitur ex Antiochia, cum Athenodoro huc venit sicut audivimus.
“And when we saw no way out of the matter, Cornelius the centurion arrived, sent by Caesar to the governor of Caesarea on public business. We sent for him alone and explained to him the reason for our sadness, and urged him to help if he could. Then he very readily promised that he would put him to flight at once, if only we too would support his plan. When we promised that we would do everything diligently, he said: ‘Caesar has ordered sorcerers to be sought out and put to death in the city of Rome and throughout the provinces, and very many of them have already been put to death. I will therefore spread it about through friends that I have come to seize this magician and have been sent by Caesar for this purpose, so that he too may be punished with the rest of his associates. Let your people who are with him, then, as if they had heard it from somewhere, secretly tell him that I have been sent to seize him; and it is certain that when he hears it he will flee. Or if you see anything better, say so.’ What more? It was done so by our people who were with him, pretending to be his for the sake of spying. When Simon learned that someone had come for him, accepting it as a great favor done him by them, he took to flight. So, leaving Antioch, he came here with Athenodorus, as we have heard.
10.56PG 1:1447b
Hoc ergo visum est nobis omnibus qui praecessimus, ut interim nunc non ascendas Antiochiam. usquequo videamus si illo discedente odium quod de te populo seminavit, aliqua ex parte vacuetur. Cum haec insinuasset is qui de Antiochia venerat, Petrus respiciens ad patrem nostrum ait: Faustiniane, a Simone Mago transformatus est vultus tuus, sicut apparet; putans enim quod a Caesare quaereretur ad poenam, territus fugit et suum vultum tibi imposuit, si forte tu pro ipso capereris et ad mortem duci posses, ut filiis tuis tristitiam moveret. Pater vero ubi haec audivit, cum lacrymis exclamans: Recte, inquit, aestimasti, Petre, nam et Anubion quia mihi valde amicus erat, sub mysterio quodam mihi indicare coeperat de insidiis ejus, sed infelix non credebam, quia nihil in eum commiseram mali.
“So it seemed good to all of us who went ahead that for the present you should not go up to Antioch, until we see whether, now that he has left, the hatred he sowed against you among the people may be emptied out in some degree.” When the man who had come from Antioch had reported this, Peter, looking at our father, said: “Faustinianus, your face has been transformed by Simon Magus, as is evident. For, thinking that he was being sought by Caesar for punishment, he fled in terror and put his own face on you, in case you might be seized in his place and could be led to death, so as to cause grief to your sons.” When my father heard this, he cried out with tears: “You have judged rightly, Peter; for Anubion, being a great friend of mine, had begun to hint to me in secret about his plots, but, unhappy man, I did not believe it, because I had done him no wrong.”
10.57PG 1:1447b
Cumque omnes una cum patre tristitia et lacrymis ageremur, interea et Anubion venit ad nos, indicans nobis Simonem fugisse per noctem, Judaeam petentem. Videns autem patrem nostrum plangentem et lamentantem se ac dicentem: Infelicem me, qui eum magum audiens non credebam; quid mihi misero accidit, ut una die recognitus ab uxore et filiis, laetari non potuerim cum eis, sed ad priores miserias quas in errore pertuli, revolutus sim? Mater autem multo gravius sparsis et laceratis crinibus plangebat; nos quoque in permutatione vultus patris stupentes quasi attoniti eramus et amentes, nec quid rei esset intelligere poteramus. Sed et Anubion omnes nos ita videns affligi, velut mutus stabat. Tunc Petrus nos intuens filios ejus ait Mihi credite, quod hic ipse est pater vester; propter quod et moneo vos, ut quasi patrem servetis eum. Dabit enim Deus occasionem aliquam, qua deposito Simonis vultu evidentem patris vestri, id est suam, recuperare possit effigiem.
While all of us, together with our father, were given over to sadness and tears, Anubion meanwhile came to us, telling us that Simon had fled by night, making for Judea. And seeing our father mourning and lamenting himself and saying: “Unhappy me, who heard he was a magician and did not believe it! What has happened to me, wretch that I am, that on one day, recognized by my wife and sons, I could not rejoice with them, but have been rolled back into the former miseries I endured in error?” Our mother lamented far more grievously, with disheveled and torn hair; and we too, stunned at the change in our father's face, were as if thunderstruck and out of our minds, and could not understand what the matter was. And Anubion, seeing us all so afflicted, stood as if dumb. Then Peter, looking at us his sons, said: “Believe me that this is your father himself; and therefore I warn you to keep him as your father. For God will give some occasion by which, laying aside Simon's face, he may recover the evident likeness of your father, that is, his own.”
10.58PG 1:1447b–1448b
Et ad patrem conversus ait: Ego tibi permiseram salutare Appionem et Anubionem, quos tibi amicos a puero fuisse dixeras, non tamen ut cum Simone loquereris. Et pater: Peccavi, inquit, fateor. Tum Anubion: Et ego, inquit, cum ipso rogo et deprecor te, ut ignoscas seni, viro bono et generoso; seductus est infelix et ludibrio factus a nominato mago; dicam enim quomodo res gesta est: Ubi venit ad salutandos nos, contigit ut in ipsa hora circumstaremus Simonem, audientes eum dicentem quod fugere velit in ipsa nocte; audisse enim se, quod venerint quidam etiam ad hanc Laodicia: civitatem, qui eum ex praecepto imperatoris comprehenderent; velle autem se in hunc qui nuper ingressus est Faustinianum omnem convertere furorem. Et ait ad nos: Tantum, inquit, vos facite eum cenare nobiscum, et ego unguentum quoddam componam, quo cenatus perungat faciem suam, ut ex eo meum vultum omnibus habere videatur; vos autem herbae cujusdam succo facies perungite prius, ut non fallamini de immutatione vultus ejus, ita ut, exceptis vobis, aliis omnibus Simon esse videatur.
And turning to my father, he said: “I had permitted you to greet Appion and Anubion, who you said had been your friends from boyhood, but not to talk with Simon.” My father said: “I have sinned, I confess.” Then Anubion said: “And I, together with him, ask and beg you to pardon the old man, a good and noble man; the unhappy man was led astray and made a laughingstock by the magician I named. For I will tell how it happened. When he came to greet us, it happened that at that very hour we were standing around Simon, hearing him say that he wanted to flee that very night; for he had heard that some had come even to this city of Laodicea to arrest him by the emperor's order; and that he wanted to turn all the fury on this Faustinianus who had recently arrived. And he said to us: ‘Only make him dine with us, and I will compose an ointment with which, when he has dined, he will anoint his face, so that from it he will seem to all to have my face. But you, anoint your faces first with the juice of a certain herb, so that you may not be deceived by the change of his face; so that, except for you, he will seem to all others to be Simon.’
10.59PG 1:1448b
Et cum ille haec diceret aio ad eum: Et quid tibi ex hoc facto confertur lucri? Tum Simon: Primo, inquit, ut ipsum comprehendant qui me quaerunt, et me desinant quaerere. Si vero punitus fuerit a Ctesare, ut luctum maximum habeant filii sui, qui, me derelicto, confugerunt ad Petrum et sunt modo adjutores ipsius. Ego autem confiteor tibi, Petre, quod verum est; timui tunc Faustiniano indicare hinc, sed neque spatium nobis ipse Simon dedit, ut possemus secretius loqui et plenius ei consilium Simonis aperire. Interea circa mediam noctem, Simon Judaeam petens aufugit. Deduxit autem eum Athenodorus et Appion, ego autem simulavi inaequalitatem corporis, ut domi remanens facerem hunc velocius ad vos redire, si forte possit aliquo modo occultari apud vos, ne ab his qui Simonem quaerunt comprehensus, ad Caesarem perducatur et pereat gratis, et nunc sollicitus pro ipso veni videre eum et redire antequam superveniant illi, qui deduxerunt Simonem. Et conversus ad nos Anubion ait: Ego Anubion patris vestri verum vultum video revera. quia perunctus sum prius ab ipso Simone sicut narravi vobis, ut oculis meis vera Faustiniani facies appareret, unde satis stupeo et admiror artem Simonis Magi, quod vos stantes modo non agnoscitis patrem vestrum. Flentibus autem patre et matre ac nobis omnibus pro his quae acciderant, motus miseratione etiam Anubion flebat.
“And when he said this, I said to him: ‘And what profit comes to you from this deed?’ Then Simon said: ‘First, that those who are seeking me may seize him and stop seeking me. And if he is punished by Caesar, that his sons may have the greatest grief, who, having abandoned me, fled to Peter and are now his helpers.’ And I confess the truth to you, Peter: I was afraid then to tell Faustinianus this; nor did Simon himself give us the time to speak more privately and disclose Simon's plan to him more fully. Meanwhile, about midnight, Simon fled, making for Judea. Athenodorus and Appion escorted him; but I pretended a bodily illness so that, staying at home, I might make this man return to you more quickly, in case he might somehow be hidden among you, lest he be seized by those who are seeking Simon, be brought to Caesar, and perish for nothing. And now, anxious for him, I came to see him and to return before those who escorted Simon come back.” And turning to us, Anubion said: “I, Anubion, truly see your father's true face, because I was anointed beforehand by Simon himself, as I told you, so that the true face of Faustinianus might appear to my eyes. Hence I am quite stunned and amazed at the art of Simon Magus, that you, standing here, do not recognize your father.” As our father and mother and all of us wept for what had happened, Anubion too, moved by pity, wept.
10.60PG 1:1448b–1449a
Tum Petrus, misericordia permotus, restituturum se promittit faciem patris nostri, dicens ad eum: Audi, Faustiniane, cum nobis prius utilitatis aliquid contulerit error iste transformari νυιιιιε tni et ministraverit ad ea quae volumus, tunc ego τεram tibi vultus tui imaginem reddam, si tamen βτί quae a me tibi fuerint imperata, profligaveris. Cutil' que pater meus impleturum se cuncta quae jubcrel audisti quod unus ex his qui praemissi fuerant, regressus ex Antiochia, nuntiavcrit, quomodo Simon ibi positus, turbas adversum me concitaverit, atque in odium mei totam inflammaverit civitatem; magum me et homicidam ac deceptorem confirmans, in tantum ut desiderent, si me videant, etiam carnes meas devorare. Fac ergo quod dico tibi: relinquens apud me Clementem, praecede nos Antiochiam cum conjuge tua et Fausto ac Faustino filiis tuis. Sed et alios mittam tecum, quos mihi videbitur, qui obtemperent his quae praecepero.
Then Peter, moved with compassion, promised that he would restore our father's face, saying to him: “Listen, Faustinianus: when this error of the transformation of your face has first brought us some benefit and served what we wish, then I will give you back the true image of your face, provided you carry out what I command you.” And when my father had promised that he would fulfill everything he ordered, Peter said: “You have heard what one of those sent ahead reported on returning from Antioch: how Simon, while there, stirred up the crowds against me and inflamed the whole city with hatred of me, declaring me a magician, a murderer, and a deceiver, so much so that they desire, if they see me, even to devour my flesh. Do, then, what I tell you: leaving Clement with me, go ahead of us to Antioch with your wife and your sons Faustus and Faustinus. And I will send others with you, whom I see fit, to carry out what I shall command.
10.61PG 1:1449a
Cum ergo una cum ipsis Antiochiam veneris, quandoquidem Simon videris, publice stans praedica paenitentiam tuam et dic: Ego Simon denuntio vobis et confiteor me omnia fefellisse de Petro; ille enim neque seductor est, neque magus, neque homicida, neque horum aliquid quaecunque contra eum locutus sum, sed dixi illa omnia furore commotus. Obsecro ergo vos ipse ego, qui dudum causas odii vobis contra eum dederam, ut nihil tale de eo sentiatis; sed deponite odium, cessate ab indignatione, quia vere a Deo ad salutem mundi missus est discipulus veri Propheta: et apoStolus. Propter quod suadeo, hortor et moneo ut ipsum audiatis, ipsi credatis praedicanti vobis veritatem, ne forte si spreveritis eum, ipsa etiam subito civitas vestra pereat. Quam vero ob causam haec nunc vobis confitear, indicabo. Hac nocte angelus Dei corripuit me impium, et cur inimicus essem veritatis praeconi, vehementissime flagellavit. Deprecor ergo vos, ut etiamsi ego ipse post haec veniens ad vos aliquid tentavero adversum Petrum dicere, ne suscipiatis, nec credatis. Confiteor enim vobis, ego magus, ego seductor, ego deceptor fui, sed paenitentiam ago; licet enim per paenitentiam priora male gesta delere.
“So when you have come to Antioch with them, since you are seen as Simon, stand in public, proclaim your repentance, and say: ‘I, Simon, declare to you and confess that I lied about Peter in everything; for he is neither a seducer nor a magician nor a murderer, nor any of the things I said against him; but I said all those things moved by rage. I myself, then, who formerly gave you causes of hatred against him, beg you to think nothing of the kind about him; but lay aside your hatred, cease from your indignation, because he is truly sent by God for the salvation of the world, the disciple and apostle of the true Prophet. Therefore I advise, exhort, and warn you to hear him and believe him as he preaches the truth to you, lest perhaps, if you despise him, your very city suddenly perish. And I will tell you why I confess these things to you now. This night an angel of God rebuked me, impious as I am, and flogged me most severely because I was an enemy of the herald of truth. I beg you, then, that even if I myself, coming to you after this, attempt to say anything against Peter, you do not receive or believe it. For I confess to you: I was a magician, I a seducer, I a deceiver; but I repent, for it is possible to blot out former evil deeds by repentance.’
10.62PG 1:1449a–1450a
Cum haec Petrus intimaret patri, ille respondit: Scio quid velis, ne labores ultra; intellexi enim et novi, quid Oporteat cum ad locum venero, prosequi. Et Petrus iterum suggerebat ei, dicens: Cum ergo veneris ad locum et videris populum ex sermone tuo converti, et depositis odiis recipere desiderium nostri, mitte et manda mihi, et statim veniam. Cum autem venero, sine mora alienum hunc a te vultum effugabo, et tuum proprium qui tuis omnibus notus est reddam. Et his dictis fratres meos proficisci cum ipso jubet, ac Matthidiam matrem nostram et quosdam ex familiaribus simul.’ Sed male“ recusabat Ρτοθείεοί Sim!” τί aiebat: Quasi adultera mihi ῗυιυτθ Videor. Si vultui Simollis conjuncta sim; quod etsi cogar simul ire, impossibile tamen est ut in eodem lectulo cum ipso iaceam. sed neSCiO Si vel proficisci simul acquiescam. Et cum valde renueret. Anubion hortari eam coepit, dicens: Crede mihi et Petro, sed et ipsa vox ηοη tibi Faus‘inianum esse Ρθΐευθάθι coniugem tuum? quem vere non minus ego diligo quam: tu. Denique etiam ego ipse vobiscum veniam.- Et cum haec dixisset Anubion, promisit mater simul se profecturam.
When Peter was explaining this to my father, he answered: “I know what you want; trouble yourself no further. For I have understood and know what I must carry out when I come to the place.” And Peter again advised him, saying: “When you come to the place and see the people converted by your word, and, laying aside their hatred, coming to desire us, send and let me know, and I will come at once. And when I come, I will without delay drive away from you this face that is not yours and restore your own, which is known to all your family.” And when he had said this, he ordered my brothers to set out with him, and Mattidia our mother and some of our companions as well. But my mother refused to set out with him, and said: “I seem to myself to be like an adulteress, if I am joined to the face of Simon. Even if I am compelled to go with him, it is still impossible for me to lie in the same bed with him; and I do not know whether I can even agree to set out with him.” And when she strongly refused, Anubion began to urge her, saying: “Believe me and Peter; and does not his very voice persuade you that he is Faustinianus your husband, whom truly I love no less than you do? Indeed I myself will come with you.” And when Anubion had said this, my mother promised that she would set out with him.
10.63PG 1:1450a
Tum ego, Competenter, aio, Deus negotia nostra componit; habemus enim nobiscum et Anubionem astrologum, cum quo si Antiochiam venerimus, de genesi attentius disputabimus. Cumque post medium noctis pater noster cum his quos jusserat Petrus, et Anubione profectus esset; mane priusquam procederet ad disputandum Petrus, regressi sunt illi qui deduxerunt Simonem, id est Appion et Athenodorus, et venerunt ad nos requirentes patrem meum. Petrus vero ubi cognovit, jussit eos introire. Et cum consedissent, Ubi est, aiunt, Faustinianus? Petrus respondit: Nescimus: vespere enim postquam ad vos venit, ultra nulli suorum visus est; hesterno tamen die mane Simon venit quaerens eum, et quia nihil illi respondimus, nescio quid ei visum sit, Faustinianum se esse dicebat. Quod cum ei nemo crederet, flens et dolens comminabatur perempturum semetipsum, et post haec abiit ad mare versus.
Then I said: “God arranges our affairs fittingly; for we have with us also Anubion the astrologer, with whom, if we come to Antioch, we will dispute more attentively about birth-fate.” And when after midnight our father had set out with those whom Peter had appointed and with Anubion, in the morning, before Peter went out to dispute, those who had escorted Simon, that is, Appion and Athenodorus, returned and came to us asking for my father. When Peter learned of it, he ordered them to come in. And when they had sat down, they said: “Where is Faustinianus?” Peter answered: “We do not know; for since he came to you in the evening, he has not been seen by any of his family. But yesterday morning Simon came looking for him; and because we gave him no answer, I do not know what came over him: he said he was Faustinianus. When no one believed him, weeping and grieving, he threatened to kill himself, and after that went off toward the sea.”
10.64PG 1:1450a–1451a
Haec cum audisset Appion et qui cum ipso erant, ululatum dederunt grandem, dicentes: Quid hoc fecistis, cur non recepistis eum? Et cum vellet Athenodorus dicere mihi quia ipse erat Faustinianus pater tuus, Appion praeveniens eum: Comperimus, inquit, a quodam qui cum Simone profectus est, ipso Faustiniano deprecante eum, pro eo quod nollet filios suos videre, quia Judaei erant. Nos ergo cum audissemus haec, venimus eum hic requirere, sed quia hic non est, apparet quia vere dixit qui nuntiavit cum Simone profectum; hoc ergo nuntiamus vobis. Ego autem Clemens ubi intellexi consilium Petri, quia voluerit eis suspicionem dare, quod ab ipsis quaerendus esset senex, ut timerent et fugerent, coepi juvare consilium ejus et aio ad Appionem: Audi, charissime Appion, nos quod bonum credimus, etiam patri tradere volumus; quod si noluerit recipere, sed magis, ut dicis, exhorrescens nos fugit, asperum sit fortasse quod dico, nec nos de eo curamus. Et cum haec dixissem, quasi exsecrantes crudelitatem meam discedunt, vestigia Simonis, ut sequenti die comperimus, insequentes.
When Appion and those with him heard this, they gave a great wail, saying: “Why did you do this? Why did you not receive him?” And when Athenodorus wanted to tell me that he was Faustinianus your father, Appion forestalled him and said: “We learned from someone who set out with Simon that Faustinianus himself had begged him, because he did not wish to see his sons, since they were Jews. So when we heard this, we came here to look for him; but since he is not here, it is evident that he who reported that he had set out with Simon spoke the truth. This, then, we report to you.” But I, Clement, when I understood Peter's plan—that he wished to give them the suspicion that the old man would be sought from them, so that they would be afraid and flee—began to help his plan, and said to Appion: “Listen, dearest Appion: what we believe to be good we wish to pass on to our father too; but if he does not wish to receive it, but rather, as you say, shudders at us and flees, it may perhaps sound harsh, but we do not care about him either.” And when I had said this, they went away as if cursing my cruelty, following Simon's tracks, as we learned the next day.
10.65PG 1:1451a–1451b
Interea cum Petrus ex more quotidie populum doceret et virtutes multas ac sanitates efficeret, post dies decem venit quidam nostrorum ab Antiochia missus a patre, annuntians nobis quomodo publice staret pater, Simonem quidem qui in vultu videbatur, accusans, Petrum vero immensis laudibus praeferens et omni populo commendans ac desiderabilem faciens, ita ut omnes ex ejus sermone mutati desiderarent eum videre; multos autem tantum in Petri amorem venisse, ut saevirent in patrem quasi in Simonem, et manus ei vellent injicere, velut qui tantum mali commisisset in Petrum; propter quod, aiebat, appropera, ne forte perimatur; in timore enim magno positus velociter misit me, ut sine mora venias, quo viventem eum occupes, simul et crescenti erga tui desiderium civitati Opportunus appareas. Aiebat etiam quomodo mox ut urbem Antiochiam pater ingressus esset, quasi ad Simonem omnis populus ad eum collectus est, et coepit omnibus confiteri publice secundum ea quae populi restauratio flagitabat; nam quicunque omnes simul nobiles et diversi simul divites ac pauperes convenissent, sperantes aliqua ab eo more solito prodigia posse fieri, omnes hac voce alloquitur:
Meanwhile, as Peter taught the people daily as usual and performed many mighty works and healings, after ten days one of our people came from Antioch, sent by my father, telling us how my father was standing in public accusing Simon, whom he appeared to be in face, and extolling Peter with immense praises, commending him to all the people and making them long for him, so that all, changed by his words, desired to see him; and that many had come into such love of Peter that they raged against my father as against Simon and wanted to lay hands on him, as one who had committed so great an evil against Peter. “Therefore,” he said, “hurry, lest he be killed. For in great fear he sent me quickly, that you might come without delay, so as to find him alive and at the same time appear opportunely to the city, whose longing for you is growing.” He also told how, as soon as my father entered the city of Antioch, the whole people gathered to him as to Simon, and he began to confess publicly to all according to what the restoration of the people required; for when all had come together, nobles and others, rich and poor alike, hoping that some wonders might be done by him as usual, he addressed them all with these words:
10.66PG 1:1451b–1452a
Diu est quod me Simonem infelicissimum hominum patientia divina sustinet; nam quidquid in me mirati estis, non veritatis ministerio, sed daemonum mendaciis et artibus gestum est, ut vestram fidem everterem et meam animam condemnarem. Confiteor me omnia de Petro fuisse mentitum; ille enim neque magus neque homicida unquam fuit, sed a Deo ad salutem vestrum omnium missus est, quem si ex hac hora contemnendum putaveritis, certum sit apud vos quod possit ipsa civitas vestra repente deperire. Quae autem causa sit, ut haec vobis ultro confitear: ab angelo Dei hac nocte vehementer correptus sum, et cur ei inimicus exstiterim, vehementissime flagellatus. Deprecor ergo vos, ut si ego ipse ex hac hora aperuero os meum contra eum, projiciatis me ab aspectu vestro; ille enim immundus daemon saluti hominum inimicus per os meum contra ipsum loquitur, ne per eum vos pertingatis ad vitam. Quid enim ars magica per me vobis potuit virtutis ostendere? Canes feci aereos latrare et statuas moveri, figuras mutari hominum et subito ab aspectibus hominum absentari; et per haec debuistis artem magicam exsecrari, quae ut vobis miraculum inane praetenderem, animas vestras diabolicis laqueis innodabat, ne crederetis Petro, qui et languentes in nomine ejus a quo missus est curat, et daemonas fugat, ac caecos illuminat, et paralyticis salutem reddit, et mortuos suscitat.
“‘Divine patience has long borne with me, Simon, the most unhappy of men. For whatever you admired in me was done not by the ministry of truth but by the lies and arts of demons, so that I might overturn your faith and condemn my own soul. I confess that I lied about Peter in everything; for he was never a magician or a murderer, but was sent by God for the salvation of you all; and if from this hour you think he should be despised, be sure that your city itself may suddenly perish. And the reason why I confess these things to you of my own accord is this: I was severely rebuked by an angel of God this night, and most severely flogged because I had been his enemy. I beg you, then, that if from this hour I open my mouth against him, you cast me out of your sight; for that unclean demon, the enemy of men's salvation, speaks through my mouth against him, so that you may not reach life through him. For what power could the magic art show you through me? I made bronze dogs bark and statues move, changed the shapes of men and suddenly vanished from men's sight; and by these things you ought to have abhorred the magic art, which, to show you an empty marvel, was entangling your souls in devilish snares, so that you would not believe Peter, who cures the sick in the name of him by whom he was sent, puts demons to flight, gives light to the blind, restores health to paralytics, and raises the dead.’
10.67PG 1:1452a–1452b
Haec et his similia multa eo prosequente, exsecrari eum coepit populus, et dabant fletum et gemitum, quia peccassent in Petrum credentes eum esse magum et impium. Eodem vero die ad vesperam restituta est in Faustiniano facies propria, et abscessit ab eo aspectus Simonis Magi. Audiens autem Simon vultum suum in eo ad Petri gloriam profecisse, festinus praevenit Petrum et agere cupiens arte sua, ut a Faustiniano ejus similitudo recederet, cum jam hoc juxta verbum apostoli sui Christus implesset. Videntes autem Niceta et Aquila post praedicationem necessariam paternam faciem restitutam, gratias agentes Deo, non eum permiserunt ulterius alloqui populum.
As he set out these and many similar things, the people began to curse him, and they wept and groaned because they had sinned against Peter, believing him to be a magician and impious. On the same day, toward evening, his own face was restored to Faustinianus, and the appearance of Simon Magus departed from him. When Simon heard that his face on Faustinianus had turned to Peter's glory, he hurried to get ahead of Peter, wishing to bring it about by his art that his likeness should leave Faustinianus—when Christ, according to the word of his apostle, had already accomplished this. When Niceta and Aquila saw that, after the necessary preaching, their father's face had been restored, they gave thanks to God and did not allow him to address the people any further.
10.68PG 1:1452b
Simon autem coepit licet occulte per amicos suos et familiares ambulare, et amplius Petro derogare quam antea. Tunc omnes exspuentes in faciem ejus, expulerunt eum de civitate, dicentes: Tu eris reus mortis tuae, si ulterius locutus contra Petrum huc tibi credideris esse veniendum. Quibus cognitis, Petrus postera die convenire populos jubet, et uno ex his qui sequebantur eum ordinato eis episcopo, aliis etiam presbyteris, baptizatis quoque plurimis, et omnibus qui erant vexati languoribus vel daemonibus, sanitati redditis. demoratus ibi aliud triduum, cunctis rite compositis, valedicens eis, proficiscitur a Laodicia multum desiderabilis Antiochensium plebi; et coepit per Nicetam et Aquilam tota civitas audire, quia Petrus adventaret. Omnis autem populus Antiochiae civitatis audiens Petrum venire, occurrerunt ei, et pene omnes majores natu et nobiles, cinere aspersi in capite, paenitentiam agentes, qui contra praedicationem ejus magum Simonem suscepissent.
But Simon began, though secretly, to go about through his friends and intimates and to disparage Peter more than before. Then all, spitting in his face, drove him out of the city, saying: “You will be guilty of your own death if, after speaking against Peter, you think you may come here again.” When this was known, Peter ordered the people to gather on the following day; and having ordained as their bishop one of those who followed him, and others as presbyters, having also baptized very many, and having restored to health all who were troubled by illnesses or demons, he stayed there another three days; and having arranged everything properly, he bade them farewell and set out from Laodicea, greatly longed for by the people of Antioch. And through Niceta and Aquila the whole city began to hear that Peter was coming. And all the people of the city of Antioch, hearing that Peter was coming, ran out to meet him, and almost all the elders and nobles, with ashes sprinkled on their heads, doing penance because they had received Simon the magician in opposition to his preaching.
10.69PG 1:1452b
Haec et his similia prosequentes, offerunt ei vexatos languoribus et daemoniis fatigatos, paralyticos quoque et diversa pericula patientes; et erat infinita multitudo simul languentium. Quos videns Petrus non solum paenitudinem agere, quod de eo male sensissent per Simonem, verum et tam integram fidem exhibere ut etiam omnes diversas aegritudines patientes crederent per eum posse salvari, expandit ad caelum manus suas, et cum lacrymis orationem effundens, gratias referens Deo dicebat: Benedictus es, Pater praedicabilis, qui omne verbum et promissum Filii tui adimplere dignaris, ut cognoscat omnis creatura, quia tu solus Deus in caelo et in terra.
Saying these and similar things, they brought to him those troubled by illnesses and wearied by demons, paralytics also and those suffering various dangers; and there was an endless multitude of the sick together. When Peter saw that they not only repented of having thought ill of him through Simon, but also showed such complete faith that all suffering from various sicknesses believed they could be saved through him, he spread out his hands to heaven, and, pouring out a prayer with tears, giving thanks to God, he said: “Blessed are you, Father, worthy of all praise, who deign to fulfill every word and promise of your Son, so that all creation may know that you alone are God in heaven and on earth.”
10.70PG 1:1452b–1453a
Haec et his similia dicens. ascendit in eminentiori loco et jussit ante se poni omnem multitudinem aegrotantium, quos omnes hac voce allocutus est: Similem vobis hominem me esse videntes, nolite putare quod a me possitis recuperare salutem vestram, sed per eum qui de caelo descendens, ostendit credentibus sibi integram animae et corporis medicinam; unde vox vestra testem habeat hunc omnem populum, quia ex toto corde creditis in Domino Jesu Christo, ut sciant etiam se ipsos ab ipso posse salvari. Cumque omnis multitudo infirmantium una voce clamaret, hunc esse verum Deum quem Petrus annuntiat, subito immensum lumen gratiae Dei in medio plebis apparuit, et coeperunt paralytici currere ad pedes Petri sani, caeci recuperato visu clamare, claudi restaurato gressu gratias agere, languentes recepta sanitate gaudere, nonnulli etiam solo flatu viventes jam sine sensu et sine voce recuperati sunt, omnes quoque lunatici et pleni daemoniis liberati sunt.
Saying these and similar things, he went up to a higher place and ordered the whole multitude of the sick to be placed before him, and addressed them all with these words: “Seeing that I am a man like you, do not think that you can recover your health from me, but through him who, coming down from heaven, offers to those who believe in him complete healing of soul and body. Therefore let your voice have this whole people as witness that you believe with your whole heart in the Lord Jesus Christ, so that they too may know that they can be saved by him.” And when the whole multitude of the sick cried out with one voice that he is the true God whom Peter proclaims, suddenly an immense light of the grace of God appeared in the midst of the people, and the paralytics began to run healed to Peter's feet, the blind, their sight recovered, to cry out, the lame, their walk restored, to give thanks, the sick, their health received, to rejoice; some too who were living by breath alone, already without sense and voice, were restored; and all the lunatics and those full of demons were set free.
10.71PG 1:1453a
Tantam itaque Spiritus sanctus in illa die gratiam suae virtutis ostendit, ut omnes a minimo usque ad maximum una voce confiterentur Dominum; et ne multis immorer, intra septem dies plus quam decem millia hominum credentes Deo baptizati sunt et sanctificatione consecrati, ita ut omni aviditatis desiderio Theophilus, qui erat cunctis potentibus in civitate sublimior. domus suae ingentem basilicam ecclesiae nomine consecraret, in qua Petro apostolo constituta est ab omni populo cathedra, et omnis multitudo quotidie ad audiendum verbum conveniens, credebat sanae doctrinae quam sanitatum efficacitas affirmabat.
So great a grace of his power did the Holy Spirit show on that day that all, from the least to the greatest, confessed the Lord with one voice. And not to dwell on many things: within seven days more than ten thousand men, believing God, were baptized and consecrated by sanctification, so that Theophilus, who was more exalted than all the powerful men in the city, with all eagerness of desire consecrated the great hall of his house under the name of a church; in it a chair was set up for the apostle Peter by all the people; and the whole multitude, gathering daily to hear the word, believed the sound teaching, which the efficacy of the healings confirmed.
10.72PG 1:1454a
Tum ego Clemens cum fratribus meis et matre patrem alloquimur, utrum aliquae infidelitatis in eo reliquiae remansissent. At ille: Venite, ait, et videbitis coram Petro, quantum in me fidei creverit incrementum. Tunc accedens Faustinianus, procidit ad pedes Petri dicens: Semina verbi tui quae ager meae mentis accepit, jam nata sunt, atque ita ad fecundam maturitatem provecta sunt, ut nihil desit, nisi ut a paleis me spiritali illa tua deseces falce et reponas me in horreo Dominico, faciens me mensae divinae participem. Tum Petrus cum omni alacritate apprehendens manum ejus, tradidit eum mihi Clementi et fratribus meis, dicens: Sicut tibi patri filios restituit Deus, ita et patrem filii restituunt Deo. Indixit autem jejunium omni plebi, et veniente die Dominica baptizavit eum, atque in medio populo ex conversione ejus materiam sumens, omnes casus ejus exposuit, ita ut omnis civitas quasi angelum eum susciperet, et non minorem ei gratiam quam apostolo exhiberet. [Quibus cognitis, Petrus postera die convenire populos jubet, et uno ex his qui sequebantur eum, ordinato episcopo, et aliis presbyteris, plurimum quoque populum baptizavit, omnesque qui erant vexati languoribus sanitati restituit.]
Then I, Clement, with my brothers and mother, asked our father whether any remnants of unbelief remained in him. He said: “Come, and you will see in Peter's presence how great an increase of faith has grown in me.” Then Faustinianus came forward and fell at Peter's feet, saying: “The seeds of your word which the field of my mind received have now sprung up and have advanced to such fruitful ripeness that nothing is lacking except that you cut me off from the chaff with that spiritual sickle of yours and lay me up in the Lord's barn, making me a partaker of the divine table.” Then Peter, with all eagerness, took his hand and handed him over to me, Clement, and my brothers, saying: “As God has restored the sons to you, the father, so the sons restore the father to God.” And he proclaimed a fast for all the people, and when the Lord's day came he baptized him; and taking occasion from his conversion in the midst of the people, he set out all his misfortunes, so that the whole city received him like an angel and showed him no less favor than the apostle. (When this was known, Peter ordered the people to gather on the following day; and having ordained one of those who followed him as bishop, and others as presbyters, he also baptized a great number of people, and restored to health all who were troubled by illnesses.)