Recognitions 1.45–1.71
Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, who tells how he found Christ, followed Peter, and was reunited with his lost family (the 'recognitions'). It is not a work of Clement. It survives complete only in Rufinus of Aquileia's Latin translation; the Greek original is lost (fragments in Eusebius and Origen's Philocalia, and a Syriac version of parts). It shares a source with the Greek Clementine Homilies (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift', probably 3rd-century Syria), and the Recognitions are usually dated to the 4th century in their Greek form. Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius is reference 0.1.
Latin text: Migne, PG 1 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 1 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).
Chapter 1
1.45PG 1:1233a–1234a
Tunc Petrus docere me hoc modo coepit: Deus cum fecisset mundum, tanquam universitatis Dominus singulis quibusque creaturis principes statuit, ipsis quoque arboribus, montibusque ac fontibus, et fluminibus, et universis, ut diximus, quae fecerat. Multum enim est ire per singula. Statuit ergo angelis angelum principem, et spiritibus spiritum, sideribus sidus, daemonibus daemonem, avibus avem, bestiis bestiam, serpentem serpentibus, piscem piscibus, hominibus hominem, qui est Christus Jesus. Christus autem dicitur eximio quodam religionis ritu; nam sicut regum sunt quaedam communia nomina, ita ut apud Persas Arsaces, apud Romanos Caesar, apud Egyptios Pharao, ita apud Iudaeos Christus communi nomine rex appellatur. Causa autem hujus appellationis haec est: quoniam quidem cum esset Filius Dei et initium omnium, homo factus est, hunc primum Pater oleo perunxit, quod ex ligno vitae fuerat sumptum. Ex illo ergo unguento Christus appellatur. Inde denique etiam ipse secundum praedestinationem Patris, pios quosque, cum ad regnum ejus pervenerint, velut qui asperam superaverint viam, pro laborum refectione simili oleo perunget, ut et ipsorum lux luceat, et Spiritu sancto repleti immortalitate donentur. Virgulti vero hujus, ex quo sumptum est istud unguentum, universam naturam tibi sufficienter exposuisse me memini.
Then Peter began to teach me in this way: “When God had made the world, as Lord of the universe he appointed rulers over each of the creatures, even over the trees, the mountains and springs, the rivers, and all the things, as we said, that he had made; for it would be long to go through them one by one. So he appointed an angel as ruler over the angels, a spirit over the spirits, a star over the stars, a demon over the demons, a bird over the birds, a beast over the beasts, a serpent over the serpents, a fish over the fishes, and over men a man, who is Christ Jesus. He is called Christ by a certain special rite of religion; for as there are certain names common to kings, as Arsaces among the Persians, Caesar among the Romans, Pharaoh among the Egyptians, so among the Jews a king is called by the common name Christ. The reason for this title is this: although he was the Son of God and the beginning of all things, he became man; him first the Father anointed with oil that had been taken from the tree of life. From that ointment, then, he is called Christ. Hence, finally, he himself also, according to the Father's predestination, will anoint with similar oil all the godly when they come to his kingdom, as those who have overcome a rough road, for refreshment from their labors, so that their light too may shine, and that, filled with the Holy Spirit, they may be endowed with immortality. I remember that I have sufficiently explained to you the whole nature of the plant from which this ointment was taken.”
Gen 2:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 13:43 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter explains that Christ, ruler over men, is so called because the Father anointed him with oil from the tree of life, with which he will anoint the godly in his kingdom.
- The anointing of Christ with oil from the tree of life is the author's own explanation of the title; oil from the tree of life also appears in the Life of Adam and Eve (36, 40–42). Translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: Latin read as Greek letters; OCR: ae read as a:; leaked footnote): cmpit → coepit; damonem → daemonem; comπηιηῆ nomine → communi nomine; ligno vita: → ligno vitae; luceat, et ” Exod. xxlx; Lev. vm Spiritu → luceat, et Spiritu.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.45 (PG 1:1233a–1234a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-45). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-45) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.46PG 1:1234a–1234b
Sed et nunc per brevissimam speciem de omnibus te in memoriam revocabo. In praesenti vita primus pontifex Aaron chrismatis compositione perunctus, quod ad imaginem illius de quo supra diximus spiritalis unguenti factum est, princeps populi fuit, et tanquam rex primitias et tributum per capita accepit a populo, et judicandi plebem sorte suscepta de mundis immundisque judicabat. Sed et si quis alius ex ipso unguento perunctus est, tanquam virtute inde concepta, jam ipse rex, aut propheta fiebat, aut pontifex. Quod si temporalis haec gratia ab hominibus composita tantum potuit, intellige jam tu, quantum sit illud unguentum, quod a Deo de virgulto vitae prolatum est, cum hoc quod ab hominibus factum est, tam eximias inter homines conferat dignitates. Quid enim in praesenti saeculo propheta gloriosius, pontifice clarius, rege sublimius?
“But now too I will recall all this to your memory by a very brief outline. In the present life Aaron, the first high priest, anointed with a compound of chrism which was made after the pattern of that spiritual ointment of which we spoke above, was prince of the people, and as a king received first fruits and a poll tribute from the people; and having received by lot the judging of the people, he judged concerning clean and unclean. And if anyone else was anointed with the same ointment, as if receiving power from it, he became a king, or a prophet, or a high priest. If, then, this temporal grace compounded by men could do so much, understand now how great is that ointment which was brought forth by God from the plant of life, when this which was made by men confers such excellent dignities among men. For what in the present age is more glorious than a prophet, more illustrious than a high priest, more exalted than a king?”
Exod 29:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 30:25 (allusion, medium confidence) · Lev 8:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Lev 10:10 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter explains that Aaron's anointing with compounded chrism was an image of Christ's spiritual anointing and conferred kingship, prophecy, and priesthood.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: digit for letter; OCR: question mark misread; leaked footnote marker): ln praesenti → In praesenti; perunctus ’, → perunctus,; tiebat → fiebat; pr0pheta → propheta; sublimius ἲ → sublimius?.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.46 (PG 1:1234a–1234b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-46). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-46) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.47PG 1:1234b–1235a
Et ego ad haec respondi: Memini, Petre, dixisse te de primo homine, quia propheta fuit; quod autem unctus fuerit, non dixisti. Si ergo sine unguento propheta nullus est, quo modo primus homo, cum non esset unctus, fuit propheta? Tum subridens Petrus: Si primus, inquit, homo prophetavit, certum est quod et unctus sit. Licet enim unctionem illius siluerit ille, qui legem in paginis condidit, nobis tamen intelligenda haec evidenter reliquit. Sicut enim, si unctum eum dixisset, non dubitaretur et prophetam eum fuisse, etiamsi scriptum non esset in lege: ita cum certum sit eum prophetam fuisse, similiter certum est et quod unctus sit, quia sine unguento prophetare non poterat. Verum hoc magis dicere te oportuit, si chrisma arte myropolica compositum est ab Aaron, quomodo primus homo perungi potuit unguento, ante compositionis artibus nondum repertis? Et ego respondi: Non me traducas, Petre; non enim de unguento composito et temporali oleo loquor, sed de illo simplici et aeterno, quod a Deo factum esse docuisti, ad cujus similitudinem istud compositum esse ab hominibus dicis.
And I answered to this: “I remember, Peter, that you said of the first man that he was a prophet; but that he was anointed you did not say. If, then, there is no prophet without ointment, how was the first man a prophet when he was not anointed?” Then Peter, smiling, said: “If the first man prophesied, it is certain that he was also anointed. For although he who set down the law in writing was silent about his anointing, he plainly left these things for us to understand. For as, if he had said that he was anointed, it would not be doubted that he was also a prophet, even if that were not written in the law, so, since it is certain that he was a prophet, it is likewise certain that he was anointed, because he could not prophesy without the ointment. But you ought rather to have said this: if the chrism was compounded by Aaron with the perfumer's art, how could the first man be anointed with ointment before the arts of compounding had been discovered?” And I answered: “Do not misrepresent me, Peter; I am not speaking of the compounded ointment and temporal oil, but of that simple and eternal one which you taught was made by God, and after whose likeness, you say, this one was compounded by men.”
Exod 30:25 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter argues that Adam, being a prophet, must have been anointed, and Clement clarifies that he means the eternal ointment made by God.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: Latin read as Greek letters; OCR: broken word): prapheta nullus → propheta nullus; unctus εἰι. → unctus sit.; le- ἶ gem → legem; reliquitl → reliquit.; unguento ante, compositionis → unguento, ante compositionis; repertis ἲ Ει ego → repertis? Et ego; aeterno. quod → aeterno, quod; ah hominibus → ab hominibus.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.47 (PG 1:1234b–1235a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-47). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-47) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.48PG 1:1235a–1235b
Et Petrus ad haec, ut videbatur, indignans: Quid putas, Clemens, quia omnes omnia ante tempus scire possumus! Sed nunc uti ne a proposito sermone recedamus, alias tibi cum profectus tuus manifestus fuerit, de his apertius exponemus. Tunc autem unguento composito perunctus pontifex vel propheta, Dei altare succendens in omni mundo clarus habebatur. Sed post Aaron qui pontifex fuit, alius ex aquis assumitur, non Moysen dico, sed Illum qui in aquis baptismi Filius a Deo appellatus est. Jesus namque est, qui ignem illum quem accendebat pontifex pro peccatis, restinxit per baptismi gratiam; ex quo enim hic apparuit, cessavit chrisma, per quod pontificatus praebebatur, vel prophetia, vel regnum.
And Peter, seemingly indignant at this, said: “What, Clement? Do you think that we can all know everything before the time? But now, so as not to depart from the subject of our discourse, we will explain these things to you more openly another time, when your progress has become manifest. At that time, then, the high priest or prophet anointed with the compounded ointment, kindling the altar of God, was held illustrious in all the world. But after Aaron, who was high priest, another is taken from the waters—I do not mean Moses, but him who in the waters of baptism was called Son by God. For it is Jesus who by the grace of baptism put out that fire which the high priest kindled for sins; for from the time that he appeared, the chrism ceased by which the priesthood, or prophecy, or kingship was conferred.”
Matt 3:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 2:10 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter postpones Clement's question and teaches that Jesus, called Son at his baptism, ended the sacrificial fire and the old anointing by the grace of baptism.
- 'Taken from the waters' plays on Moses' name (Exod 2:10). The teaching that baptism ends the sacrificial system is the author's; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; stray marks): indiguans → indignans; proposilo → proposito; profettus → profectus; appellatus’ est ”. → appellatus est.; est. qui ignem → est, qui ignem; gratiamtex quo enim hic appa ruit → gratiam; ex quo enim hic apparuit; prophetia. vel → prophetia, vel.
Topics: Baptism, Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.48 (PG 1:1235a–1235b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-48). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-48) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.49PG 1:1235c
Hunc igitur adfuturum praedixit Moyses, qui legem Dei hominibus tradidit; sed et alius ante ipsum, sicut tibi et ante jam tradidi. Ipse ergo indicavit eum venturum primo quidem adventu humilem, secundo vero gloriosum. Et primus quidem jam impletus est, cum venit et docuit, et judex omnium judicatus est ac peremptus. Secundo vero adventu judicaturus adveniet, et impios quidem condemnabit, pios vero in consortium regni societatemque suscipiet. Fides vero secundi adventus constat ex primo. Prophetae enim de primo locuti sunt, et praecipue Jacob et Moyses, nonnulli tamen etiam de secundo. Sed magnificentia prophetiae in hoc maxime comprobatur, quod nihil secundum consequentiam rerum de futuris dixerunt; alioqui aestimasse potius sapientes viri, quod rerum consequentia dictaverat, viderentur.
“This one, then, Moses foretold would come, he who handed down the law of God to men; and another before him did so too, as I have already told you. He indicated, then, that he would come humble in his first coming, but glorious in his second. And the first has already been fulfilled, when he came and taught, and he, the judge of all, was judged and put to death. But at his second coming he will come to judge, and he will condemn the wicked, but receive the godly into the fellowship and society of the kingdom. Faith in the second coming rests on the first. For the prophets spoke of the first, especially Jacob and Moses, though some spoke also of the second. But the greatness of prophecy is proved most of all in this, that they said nothing about the future according to the natural sequence of things; otherwise they would seem rather to be wise men who had guessed what the sequence of things dictated.”
Deut 18:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 49:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 25:31 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter teaches the two comings of Christ, the first in humility and the second in glory, both foretold by the prophets.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): iudicavit eum venturum → indicavit eum venturum; juo de'x omnium judicatus est. ac peremptus → judex omnium judicatus est ac peremptus; Prophetas enim → Prophetae enim; praicipue Jacoh → praecipue Jacob; m'agnilicentia prophetia‘. → magnificentia prophetiae; sapientes v ri → sapientes viri.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.49 (PG 1:1235c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-49). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-49) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.50PG 1:1235c–1236a
Quod autem dico, tale est: Christum suscipi a Iudaeis ad quos venerat, et credi ei, qui exspectabatur ad salutem populi secundum traditiones patrum, consequens erat, gentes vero alienas ab eo fore, quibus neque promissum quidquam de eo neque annuntiatum fuerat, imo quibus ne nomine quidem ipso aliquando innotuerat. Et tamen prophetae, contra ordinem et consequentiam rerum dixere eum exspectationem gentium, et non Judaeorum futurum. Ita denique et gestum est. Cum enim venisset, ab his qui eum exspectare videbantur ex traditione majorum, omnino agnitus non est; hi vero qui nihil de ipso penitus audierant, et venisse credunt, et venturum sperant. Et ita in omnibus prophetia fidelis apparuit, quae dixit ipsum esse exspectationem gentium. Erraverunt ergo Judaei de primo Domini adventu; et inter nos atque ipsos de hoc est solo dissidium. Nam quod venturus sit Christus, norunt etiam ipsi et exspectant; quod autem jam venerit in humilitate hic qui dicitur Iesus, ignorant. Et in hoc maxime ejus confirmatur adventus, quod ei non omnes credunt.
“What I mean is this: it was to be expected that Christ would be received by the Jews, to whom he had come, and that he who was expected for the salvation of the people according to the traditions of the fathers would be believed; but that the foreign nations would be estranged from him, since nothing had been promised or announced to them about him, and indeed he had never been known to them even by name. And yet the prophets, against the order and sequence of things, said that he would be the expectation of the nations, and not of the Jews. And so indeed it came about. For when he came, he was not at all recognized by those who seemed to expect him from the tradition of their ancestors; but those who had heard nothing at all of him both believe that he has come and hope that he will come. And thus in everything the prophecy proved faithful which said that he is the expectation of the nations. The Jews, then, erred about the first coming of the Lord; and between us and them there is disagreement on this point alone. For they too know and expect that Christ will come; but that he has already come in humility, this one who is called Jesus, they do not know. And his coming is confirmed most of all by this, that not all believe in him.”
Gen 49:10 (quotation, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter argues that prophecy is confirmed because the Gentiles, not the Jews who expected him, received Christ, the 'expectation of the nations'.
- 'The expectation of the nations' is the Latin form of Gen 49:10. The passage states the author's view of the Jews' disagreement with the Christians; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: broken word; OCR: words joined; leaked footnote marker; leaked footnotes and column number): tale cst → tale est; ei. qui exspec-. tabatur → ei, qui exspectabatur; abeo fore → ab eo fore; Et tamen propheta, → Et tamen prophetae,; gentium '°°, → gentium,; Judaaorum → Judaeorum; venisset. ab his → venisset, ab his; exspectare.videhaniur → exspectare videbantur; " Matth. III, I7. δ” Gen. χιιι, I0. ί Gen. v, 24. I336 hi vero → hi vero; audierant. etve' nisse → audierant, et venisse; Et its in → Et ita in; Iidelis apparuit, qua dixit → fidelis apparuit, quae dixit; adventus. quod → adventus, quod.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.50 (PG 1:1235c–1236a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-50). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-50) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.51PG 1:1236a–1236b
Hunc ergo Deus destinavit in fine mundi, quia impossibile erat mortalium mala purgari per alium, integra duntaxat permanente humani generis creatura, hoc est salva arbitrii libertate. Hoc igitur statu incolumi reservato, invitare venit ad regnum justos quosque et eos qui placere studuerunt ei, quibus bona ineffabilia praeparavit et Hierusalem civitatem caelestem, quae super splendorem solis fulgebit in habitatione sanctorum. Injustos vero et impios, et qui pro nihilo habuerunt Deum, commissamque sibi vitam diversa ad flagitia contulerunt, ac tempus operis justi, exercitium fecere malitiae, competentibus ipsisque dignis ultionibus tradet. Caetera vero quae ibi gerentur proferri et eloqui, neque angelis neque hominibus fas est; sed hoc tantum scire nos sufficit, quod bonis aeternam bonorum possessionem conferet Deus.
“God, then, appointed him at the end of the world, because it was impossible for the evils of mortals to be purged by anyone else, so long as the nature of the human race remained intact, that is, with freedom of choice preserved. Keeping this condition unimpaired, then, he came to invite to the kingdom all the righteous and those who have striven to please him, for whom he has prepared ineffable good things and the heavenly city Jerusalem, which will shine above the brightness of the sun as the dwelling of the saints. But the unrighteous and wicked, those who have held God as nothing, have spent the life entrusted to them on various crimes, and have made the time for righteous work an exercise of malice, he will hand over to fitting punishments that they deserve. The rest of what will be done there it is not lawful for angels or men to utter or declare; but it is enough for us to know this, that God will confer on the good an eternal possession of good things.”
Rev 21:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rev 21:23 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 2:9 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter teaches that Christ came at the end of the world to invite the righteous to the heavenly Jerusalem, while the wicked will be punished.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): inelfabilia → ineffabilia; Ilierusalem → Hierusalem; lnjustos → Injustos; exercitium fecere malitias → exercitium fecere malitiae; Ibi gerentur → ibi gerentur; suffictt → sufficit; sternam → aeternam.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.51 (PG 1:1236a–1236b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-51). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-51) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.52PG 1:1236b–1236c
His ab eo dictis ego respondi: Si Christi regno fruentur hi, quos justos invenerit ejus adventus, ergo qui ante adventum ejus defuncti sunt, regno penitus carebunt? Tum Petrus: Cogis me, inquit, o Clemens, aliqua de ineffabilibus publicare. Verumtamen quoadusque proferri licet, facere non pigebit. Christus, qui ab initio et semper erat, per singulas quasque generationes piis, latenter licet, semper tamen aderat, his praecipue, a quibus exspectabatur, quibusque frequenter apparuit. Sed non erat tempus, ut tunc resolutis corporibus fieret resurrectio; sed haec magis remuneratio videbatur a Deo, ut qui inveniretur justus, diutius permaneret in corpore, aut certe, sicut de quodam justo evidenter refertur in litteris legis, quod transtulerit eum Deus. Simili exemplo etiam cum caeteris gestum est qui ejus voluntati placuerunt, ut ad paradisum translati serventur ad regnum; eorum vero qui non ad integrum potuere explere normam justitiae, sed aliquas in sua carne malitiae reliquias habuere, corpora quidem resolverentur, animae vero servarentur in bonis laetisque regionibus, ut in resurrectione mortuorum, cum sua receperint, ipsa jam resolutione purgati, pro his quae bene gesserant, aeterna haereditate potiantur. Et ideo beati sunt omnes qui regnum Christi fuerint adepti, quia non solum inferni poenas effugient, sed et incorruptibiles permanebunt, et primi Deum Patrem videbunt, atque inter primos apud Deum honoris ordinem consequentur.
When he had said this, I answered: “If those whom his coming finds righteous will enjoy the kingdom of Christ, will those who died before his coming, then, be wholly deprived of the kingdom?” Then Peter said: “You compel me, Clement, to make known some things about matters that are ineffable. Yet, as far as it is lawful to declare them, I will not be reluctant. Christ, who was from the beginning and always, was always present to the godly in every generation, though secretly, and especially to those by whom he was expected, and to whom he frequently appeared. But it was not then the time for the resurrection to take place for bodies that had been dissolved; rather this seemed to be a reward from God, that whoever was found righteous should remain longer in the body, or indeed, as is plainly related of a certain righteous man in the writings of the law, that God translated him. In a similar way it has been done with others who pleased his will, so that, translated to paradise, they are kept for the kingdom. But as for those who could not fulfill the rule of righteousness completely, but had some remains of wickedness in their flesh, their bodies were indeed dissolved, but their souls are kept in good and happy regions, so that at the resurrection of the dead, when they have received back their own, purified by the very dissolution, they may obtain an eternal inheritance for the good they did. And therefore blessed are all who attain the kingdom of Christ, because not only will they escape the punishments of hell, but they will also remain incorruptible, will be the first to see God the Father, and will obtain a rank of honor among the first with God.”
Gen 5:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 11:5 (echo, low confidence) · Matt 5:8 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter explains that Christ was present to the righteous of every generation; some were translated to paradise, and the souls of others await the resurrection in happy regions.
- The 'certain righteous man' translated by God is Enoch (Gen 5:24).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: words joined): me. inquit → me, inquit; ineilahilihus → ineffabilibus; Verumtamcn → Verumtamen; ah initio → ab initio; piis. lateo. ter licet → piis, latenter licet; bare magis → haec magis; certe. sicut → certe, sicut; cum caneris → cum caeteris; regnum. eorum → regnum; eorum; justitize → justitiae; malitiareliquias → malitiae reliquias; resolverentur. animae → resolverentur, animae; regionibus. ut → regionibus, ut; mterna lizeredilate → aeterna haereditate; fucrint → fuerint; inferni pinnas εσυgient → inferni poenas effugient.
Topics: Eschatology, Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.52 (PG 1:1236b–1236c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-52). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-52) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.53PG 1:1236c–1237b
Propter quod non minima de Christo quaestio habetur, et infideles quique ex Judaeis immensa adversum nos insania commoventur, verentes ne forte ipse sit, in quem peccaverunt; et eo magis metus increscit, quod sciunt, statim ut eum cruci affixere, universum ei compassum esse mundum, corpusque ejus diligenti se custodia conservatum nusquam comparuisse, atque ad fidem nominis ejus innumeras multitudines convenire. Unde et compulsi sunt una cum pontifice Caipha, saepius mittere ad nos, ut de nominis ejus veritate quaereretur. Cumque crebro deposcerent ut de Jesu aut discerent aut docerent, si ipse esset Christus, visum nobis est ascendere ad templum, et coram omni populo protestari de eo, simul et arguere Judaeos de multis, quae ab eis absurde gerebantur. in multas etenim jam partes populus scindebatur, initio sumpto a Joanne Baptista.
“For this reason no small question is raised about Christ, and all the unbelievers among the Jews are stirred against us with immense madness, fearing lest perhaps he is the one against whom they sinned; and their fear grows all the more because they know that as soon as they fastened him to the cross the whole world suffered with him, that his body, though kept under careful guard, was nowhere to be found, and that countless multitudes are coming to faith in his name. Hence they, together with the high priest Caiaphas, were compelled to send to us more often, so that the truth of his name might be inquired into. And when they repeatedly demanded either to learn or to teach about Jesus, whether he was the Christ, it seemed good to us to go up to the temple and bear witness concerning him before all the people, and at the same time to reprove the Jews for many things that were being done by them absurdly. For the people was already being split into many parties, beginning from John the Baptist.”
Matt 27:66 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The unbelieving Jews, alarmed by the empty tomb and the growth of the church, press the apostles to debate, and the apostles decide to go up to the temple.
- Translated as written; the hostility described is the author's account.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: broken word; OCR: digit for letter): qua» stio → quaestio; Judaais → Judaeis; statim ιιι eum cruci aliixere → statim ut eum cruci affixere; sapius → saepius; quae- Ieretur → quaereretur; p0pulo → populo; Judmos → Judaeos.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.53 (PG 1:1236c–1237b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-53). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-53) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.54PG 1:1237b–1238a
Cum enim jam immineret ortus Christi ad sacrificia quidem reprimenda, baptismi vero gratiam largiendam, inimicus ex his quae praedicta erant adesse tempus intelligens, diversa schismata operabatur in populo, ut si forte prius peccatum potuisset aboleri, secunda corrigi culpa non posset. Erat ergo primum schisma eorum qui dicebantur Sadducaei, initio Joannis jam pene temporibus sumpto. Hique ut caeteris justiores, segregare se coepere a populi coetu, et mortuorum resurrectionem negare, idque argumento infidelitatis asserere, dicentes non esset dignum ut quasi sub mercede proposita colatur Deus. Auctor vero sententiae hujus primus Dositheus, secundus Simon fuit. Aliud Samaraaum schisma est; ipsi enim resurrectionem mortuorum negantes asserunt, non in Hierosolymis, sed in monte Garizin adorandum esse Deum. Qui tamen unum verum prophetam ex Moysis vaticinationibus recte exspectantes, pravitate Dosithei impediti sunt, ne hunc quem exspectabant, crederent esse Jesum. Scribae quoque et Pharisaei in aliud schisma deducuntur. Sed hi baptizati a Joanne, et velut clavem regni coelorum verbum veritatis tenentes ex Moysis traditione susceptum, occultarunt auribus populi. Sed et ex discipulis Joannis, qui videbantur esse magni, segregarunt se a populo et magistrum suum veluti Christum praedicarunt. Haec autem omnia praeparata sunt schismata, ut et fides Christi per haec impediretur, et baptisma.
“For when the rising of Christ was already at hand, to restrain sacrifices and to bestow the grace of baptism, the enemy, understanding from what had been foretold that the time was at hand, worked various schisms among the people, so that, if perhaps the former sin could be abolished, the second fault might not be corrected. The first schism, then, was that of those called Sadducees, which began almost in the time of John. These, as being more righteous than the rest, began to separate themselves from the assembly of the people and to deny the resurrection of the dead, asserting this by an argument of unbelief: they said it was not fitting that God should be worshiped as if for a reward set before them. The first author of this opinion was Dositheus, the second Simon. Another schism is that of the Samaritans; for they deny the resurrection of the dead and assert that God is to be worshiped not in Jerusalem but on Mount Gerizim. Yet, though they rightly expect the one true Prophet from the prophecies of Moses, they were prevented by the depravity of Dositheus from believing that the one they expected is Jesus. The scribes and Pharisees, too, are drawn off into another schism. But these, baptized by John and holding as the key of the kingdom of heaven the word of truth received from the tradition of Moses, hid it from the ears of the people. And some of the disciples of John, who seemed to be great, separated themselves from the people and proclaimed their master as if he were the Christ. All these schisms were prepared so that by them both faith in Christ and baptism might be hindered.”
Matt 22:23 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 23:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 4:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 11:52 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 23:13 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 3:15 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter describes the schisms the enemy raised among the Jews before Christ: Sadducees, Samaritans, scribes and Pharisees, and John's disciples.
- The account of the Jewish parties, including Dositheus and Simon as founders of Sadducean denial of the resurrection, is the author's own; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: Latin read as Greek letters; OCR: ae read as a:; OCR: words joined; leaked footnotes and column number; stray marks): ex bis quae praedicta merant → ex his quae praedicta erant; [diversa schinata → diversa schismata; populo, ιιι si → populo, ut si; caeterisjustiores, - → caeteris justiores,; cmpere a populi cmtu → coepere a populi coetu; negare ι· idque → negare, idque; sententia} hujus → sententiae hujus; Scriba: quoque → Scribae quoque; Joanne. et velut clavem regni cmlorum → Joanne, et velut clavem regni coelorum; populi ι. Sed et ex dis- ’Matth. xxu, 25. Luc. si, 52. 1 258 cipulis → populi. Sed et ex discipulis; utet fides → ut et fides; per hac impediretur, et baptisma. “ → per haec impediretur, et baptisma..
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.54 (PG 1:1237b–1238a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-54). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-54) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.55PG 1:1238a–1238b
Verumtamen, ut dicere coeperamus, cum frequenter nos pontifex per sacerdotes rogasset, ut de Jesu sermo nobis haberetur ad alterutrum, ubi opportunum visum est et omni Ecclesiae placuit, ascendimus ad templum, et stantes in gradibus una cum fidelibus fratribus nostris, facto populi summo silentio, prior pontifex coepit adhortari populum, ut patienter et cum quiete audiant, simulque eorum quae dicenda sunt testes et judices fiant. Tum deinde multis laudibus efferens sacrificiorum ritum, qui ad remissionem peccatorum humano generi divinitus esset indultus, causabatur Jesu nostri baptisma velut contra haec nuper inductum. Sed propositionibus ejus occurrens Matthaeus, evidenter ostendit quod si quis Jesu baptisma non fuerit consecutus, is non solum coelorum regno fraudabitur, verum et in resurrectione mortuorum non absque periculo erit, etiamsi bonae vitae et rectae mentis praerogativa muniatur. Haec et his similia prosecutus siluit Matthaeus.
“Nevertheless, as we had begun to say, when the high priest had frequently asked us through the priests that a discussion about Jesus be held between us, when it seemed opportune and the whole church agreed, we went up to the temple; and standing on the steps together with our faithful brethren, when the people had fallen completely silent, the high priest first began to exhort the people to listen patiently and quietly, and at the same time to become witnesses and judges of what was to be said. Then, extolling with many praises the rite of sacrifices, which had been granted by God to the human race for the remission of sins, he complained of the baptism of our Jesus as recently introduced in opposition to them. But Matthew, meeting his propositions, showed clearly that if anyone did not obtain the baptism of Jesus, he will not only be deprived of the kingdom of heaven, but will not be without danger at the resurrection of the dead, even if he is fortified by the advantage of a good life and an upright mind. Having gone through these and similar things, Matthew fell silent.”
John 3:5 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In the temple debate the high priest praises sacrifice and attacks baptism, and Matthew replies that without the baptism of Jesus no one enters the kingdom.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: Latin read as Greek letters; OCR: words joined): Ecclesize → Ecclesiae; pontifex ςωρὶι adhortari → pontifex coepit adhortari; etjudices → et judices; efi'erens → efferens; Matthzeus → Matthaeus; cmlorum regno → coelorum regno; bona: vita: 'et recta: mentis → bonae vitae et rectae mentis; Mattbazus → Matthaeus.
Topics: Baptism
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.55 (PG 1:1238a–1238b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-55). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-55) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.56PG 1:1238b
Sed Sadducaeorum pars, quae negat esse resurrectionem mortuorum, indignata est, ita ut quidam ex ipsis de medio populi exclamaret, dicens multum errare eos qui putent mortuos aliquando resurgere. Contra hunc Andreas meus frater respondens, docuit errorem non esse, sed certissimam fidem, quod mortui resurgant, secundum ea quae docuit is, quem Moyses praedixit venturum prophetam; aut si non videretur eis ipse esse quem praedixit Moyses, de hoc, inquit, primo requiratur, ut cum evidenter ipse fuerit probatus, nihil reliquo super his quae docuit ambigatur. Haec autem et his similia plura protestatus siluit Andreas.
“But the party of the Sadducees, who deny that there is a resurrection of the dead, were indignant, so that one of them cried out from the midst of the people that those greatly err who think that the dead will ever rise. Against him my brother Andrew replied, and taught that it is not an error but a most certain faith that the dead rise, according to what was taught by him whom Moses foretold as the prophet to come; ‘or if he does not seem to you to be the one whom Moses foretold,’ he said, ‘let this first be inquired into, so that, once he has been clearly proved to be so, there may be no further doubt about what he taught.’ Having testified these and many similar things, Andrew fell silent.”
Matt 22:23 (allusion, medium confidence) · Deut 18:15 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In the temple debate Andrew answers a Sadducee who denies the resurrection.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip): pra‘dixit → praedixit; requiratur. ut → requiratur, ut; Ilaec autem → Haec autem.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.56 (PG 1:1238b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-56). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-56) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.57PG 1:1238b–1239b
Samaraeus vero quidam, contraria populo et Deo loquens, et neque mortuos asserens resurrecturos, neque eum qui est in Hierusalem cultum Dei tenendum, sed montem Garizin venerandum addidit contra nos etiam haec, quod Jesus noster non esset ipse, quem Moyses prophetam venturum esse praedixerit. Adversum hunc et alium qui cum ipso haec eadem prosequebatur Zebedaei filii Jacobus et Joannes vehementer obnisi sunt, et quamvis haberent mandatum, ne ingrederentur civitates eorum neque verbum eis praedicationis inferrent, tamen ne sermo eorum, si confutatus non esset, aliorum laederet fidem, ita prudenter et fortiter responderunt, ut perpetuum eis silentium darent. Nam Jacobus de resurrectione mortuorum cum totius populi favore peroravit, Joannes vero ostendit, quia si cessarent ab errore montis Garizin, consequenter agnoscerent ipsum esse Jesum, qui secundum prophetiam Moysis exspectabatur esse venturus, quoniam quidem signa et prodigia, ut fecit Moyses, ita fecit etiam Jesus, et dubium non est quin similitudo signorum ipsum esse testetur, quem sicut se dixit esse venturum. Haec et alia plura his similia protestati siluere.
“But a certain Samaritan, speaking against the people and against God, and asserting neither that the dead will rise nor that the worship of God in Jerusalem should be kept, but that Mount Gerizim should be revered, added this too against us, that our Jesus was not the one whom Moses foretold as the prophet to come. Against him and another who was pursuing the same things with him James and John, the sons of Zebedee, strove vigorously; and although they had a command not to enter their cities nor bring the word of preaching to them, yet, lest their talk, if not refuted, should harm the faith of others, they answered so prudently and boldly that they reduced them to perpetual silence. For James spoke on the resurrection of the dead with the approval of the whole people, while John showed that if they ceased from the error of Mount Gerizim, they would consequently recognize that Jesus is the one who, according to the prophecy of Moses, was expected to come; since, as Moses did signs and wonders, so did Jesus also, and there is no doubt that the likeness of the signs testifies that he is the one who Moses said would come like himself. Having testified these and many other similar things, they fell silent.”
Matt 10:5 (allusion, high confidence) · John 4:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Deut 18:15 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: James and John, the sons of Zebedee, answer two Samaritans on the resurrection and on whether Jesus is the prophet like Moses.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray mark): contraria popqu et Deo → contraria populo et Deo; prcdixerit → praedixerit; bac eadem → haec eadem; Zebeda'i → Zebedaei; baberent → haberent; iuferrent → inferrent; Garizln → Garizin; Ilaec et alia → Haec et alia.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.57 (PG 1:1238b–1239b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-57). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-57) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.58PG 1:1239b
Et ecce quidam de Scribis de medio populi exclamans ait: Jesus vester signa et prodigia quae fecit, ut magus non ut propheta fecit. Huic Philippus vehementer occurrit ostendens, quia hac ratione accusaret etiam Moysen. Cum enim Moyses signa et prodigia fecerit in Egypto, similiter autem et Jesus in Judaea, dubitari non possit, quin quod de Jesu diceretur, hoc etiam de Moyse dici videretur. Haec et his similia plura protestatus siluit Philippus.
“And behold, one of the scribes cried out from the midst of the people: ‘The signs and wonders your Jesus did, he did as a magician, not as a prophet.’ Philip met him vigorously, showing that on this reasoning he would accuse Moses too. For since Moses did signs and wonders in Egypt, and likewise Jesus in Judaea, there could be no doubt that what was said of Jesus would seem to be said of Moses also. Having testified these and many similar things, Philip fell silent.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Philip answers a scribe who calls Jesus a magician by pointing out that the charge would apply equally to Moses.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): lIuic → Huic; Judaza → Judaea; Ilaec et his → Haec et his.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.58 (PG 1:1239b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-58). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-58) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.59PG 1:1239b–1240b
Pharisaeus autem quidam audiens haec, insimulabat Philippum, quod Moysen aequalem diceret Jesu. Cui Bartholomaeus respondens, constanter edocuit, quia non dicimus Jesum solum aequalem Moysi, sed majorem; quia Moyses quidem propheta fuit, quod fuit et Jesus, quod autem fuit Jesus, Moyses non fuit, hoc est Christus, et ideo major ille sine dubio, qui et propheta et Christus est, quam ille qui solum propheta est. Haec et his similia plura prosecutus siluit. Post hunc Jacobus Alphaei sermonem fecit ad populum, quo ostenderet, non ideo credendum esse Jesu, quia de eo prophetae praedixerint, sed ideo magis credendum esse prophetis, quod vere prophetae sint, quia eis testimonium Christus reddat. Nam praesentia et adventus Christi illos vere prophetas fuisse designat. Dicebat enim non ab inferioribus majori, sed a majore inferioribus fidei testimonium dari. Haec et multa his similia prosecutus, etiam Jacobus siluit. Post hunc Lebbaeus populum coepit vehementer arguere, quod non crederent Jesu, qui eis tantum profuerit, docendo quae Dei sunt, solando afflictos, medendo infirmis, pauperes consolando, sed pro his omnibus bonis odia mortemque reddiderint. Haec et his similia plura cum esset populo protestatus, siluit.
“But a certain Pharisee, hearing this, charged Philip with making Moses equal to Jesus. Bartholomew answered him and steadfastly taught that we do not say that Jesus is only equal to Moses, but greater; because Moses was indeed a prophet, as Jesus also was, but what Jesus was, Moses was not, that is, the Christ; and therefore he who is both prophet and Christ is without doubt greater than he who is only a prophet. Having gone through these and many similar things, he fell silent. After him James the son of Alphaeus addressed the people, to show that we should not believe in Jesus because the prophets foretold him, but rather believe the prophets to be truly prophets because Christ bears witness to them. For the presence and coming of Christ shows that they were truly prophets. For he said that the testimony of faith is given not by inferiors to the greater, but by the greater to inferiors. Having gone through these and many similar things, James too fell silent. After him Lebbaeus began vehemently to reproach the people for not believing in Jesus, who had done them so much good, teaching the things of God, comforting the afflicted, healing the sick, consoling the poor, and for all these good things they had returned hatred and death. When he had testified these and many similar things to the people, he fell silent.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Bartholomew argues that Jesus is greater than Moses, James son of Alphaeus that Christ authenticates the prophets, and Lebbaeus rebukes the people's ingratitude.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: ae read as a:; leaked footnote marker; stray marks): Pharisazus → Pharisaeus; audiens lucc, in- Ξ simulabat → audiens haec, insimulabat; Bartholomaaus → Bartholomaeus; aqualem hloysi → aequalem Moysi; ideo {2‘0 major → ideo major; Hac et his similia plura prosecutus siluit. Post → Haec et his similia plura prosecutus siluit. Post; Jacnhus Alphazi → Jacobus Alphaei; propheta: praedixerint → prophetae praedixerint; vere propheta sint → vere prophetae sint; Haac et multa → Haec et multa; caspit → coepit; Jesu ', qui → Jesu, qui; pro bis omnibus → pro his omnibus; Ilaec et bis similia → Haec et his similia.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.59 (PG 1:1239b–1240b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-59). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-59) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.60PG 1:1240b–1241a
Et ecce unus ex discipulis Joannis affirmabat, Christum Joannem fuisse, et non Jesum; in tantum, inquit, ut et ipse Jesus omnibus hominibus et prophetis majorem esse pronuntiaverit Joannem. Si ergo, inquit, major est omnibus, sine dubio et Moyse et ipso Jesu major habendus est. Quod si omnium major est, ipse est Christus. Ad haec Cananaeus Simon respondens, asseruit Joannem majorem quidem fuisse omnibus prophetis, et omnibus qui sunt filii mulierum, non tamen majorem esse Filio hominis. Et ideo Jesus quidem et Christus est, Joannes vero solum propheta, et tantum interest inter ipsum et Jesum, quantum inter praecursorem et eum cui praecurritur, et quantum inter eum qui legem dat et eum qui legem servat. Haec et his similia prosecutus siluit etiam Cananaeus. Post quem Barnabas qui et Matthias, qui in locum Judae subrogatus est apostolus, monere populum coepit, ne odio haberent Jesum neque blasphemarent eum. Multo enim esse rectius, etiam ignoranti vel dubitanti de Jesu, amare eum quam odisse. Charitati enim Deus praemium posuit, odiis poenam. Hoc ipsum enim, inquit, quod Judaicum corpus assumpsit et inter Judaeos natus est, quo modo non omnibus vobis incentiva sui amoris incussit? Haec et his similia cum perorasset, dicendi finem fecit.
“And behold, one of John's disciples asserted that John had been the Christ, and not Jesus; ‘so much so,’ he said, ‘that Jesus himself declared John to be greater than all men and prophets. If, then,’ he said, ‘he is greater than all, he must without doubt be held greater than Moses and than Jesus himself. And if he is the greatest of all, he is the Christ.’ To this Simon the Canaanite replied, asserting that John was indeed greater than all the prophets and all who are sons of women, yet not greater than the Son of Man. And therefore Jesus is also the Christ, whereas John is only a prophet; and there is as much difference between him and Jesus as between the forerunner and him before whom he runs, and as between him who gives the law and him who keeps the law. Having gone through these and similar things, the Canaanite too fell silent. After him Barnabas, who is also Matthias, who was substituted as an apostle in place of Judas, began to admonish the people not to hate Jesus nor blaspheme him. For it is much more right, even for one who is ignorant of Jesus or in doubt about him, to love him than to hate him. For God has set a reward for love, and punishment for hatred. ‘For this very fact,’ he said, ‘that he took a Jewish body and was born among the Jews—how has it not kindled in all of you the incentives of love for him?’ When he had spoken these and similar things, he made an end of speaking.”
Matt 11:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 7:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 1:26 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Simon the Canaanite refutes a disciple of John who claims John was the Christ, and Barnabas, called Matthias, urges the people to love Jesus.
- The identification of Barnabas with Matthias, Judas's replacement, is the author's own.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: words joined; leaked footnote; leaked footnote marker): Joannem ‘. → Joannem.; siue dubio → sine dubio; majorest → major est; lilii mulierum → filii mulierum; Jesum. quantum → Jesum, quantum; prOpheta → propheta; Cananaaus → Cananaeus; apo- 9, Il. ’ I9.“ stolus → apostolus; pOpqum cmpit → populum coepit; pra:mium → praemium; pmnam. Iloc ipsmn → poenam. Hoc ipsum; Judaieum corpus assumpsit ct → Judaicum corpus assumpsit et.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.60 (PG 1:1240b–1241a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-60). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-60) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.61PG 1:1241a–1241b
Tunc Caiphas doctrinam Jesu culpare tentabat, dicens eum res vanas locutum: beatos enim pauperes dixit, et terrenas fore remunerationes promisit, ac summam muneris in terrena haereditate constituit, cibisque ac potu eos qui justitiam servarint, promisit esse saturandos; et his similia multa docuisse deprehenditur. Cui Thomas respondens arguit eum frustra causantem, ostendens, quia prophetae magis, quibus etiam ipse credit, ita docuerint, nec tamen quomodo erunt haec aut quomodo percipientur, ostenderint, Jesus vero qualiter accipi haec debeant, demonstraverit. Et cum haec atque his similia plura dixisset, siluit etiam Thomas.
“Then Caiaphas tried to find fault with the teaching of Jesus, saying that he had spoken vain things: for he called the poor blessed, promised earthly rewards, placed the chief reward in an earthly inheritance, and promised that those who kept righteousness would be filled with food and drink; and he is found to have taught many things like these. Thomas, answering him, showed that he was finding fault in vain, pointing out that it was rather the prophets, whom he himself believes, who taught so, and yet did not show how these things will be or how they are to be received, whereas Jesus showed in what way they ought to be understood. And when he had said these and many similar things, Thomas too fell silent.”
Matt 5:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 6:20 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Thomas answers Caiaphas's charge that Jesus promised merely earthly rewards.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slips; OCR: broken word): ten tabat → tentabat; deprehenditur, Cui → deprehenditur. Cui; hazc atque bis → haec atque his.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.61 (PG 1:1241a–1241b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-61). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-61) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.62PG 1:1241b
Post haec rursum Caiphas me intuens, et nunc ut monens, nunc vero ut culpans, dicebat, cessare me debere de reliquo a praedicatione Christi Jesu, ne in perniciem mei hoc agerem, neve ipse errore deceptus alios quoque meo errore deciperem. Tum praeterea arguebat me temeritatis, quod cum essem ipse imperitus, piscator et rusticus, officium subire doctoris auderem. Haec et alia plura his similia dicenti, ego quoque in haec verba respondi: Mihi quidem minus esse periculi, si, ut ipse ait, iste non sit Christus, quia doctorem legis receperim; ipsi vero ingens esse discrimen, si hic ipse sit Christus, sicut et certe est. Ego enim credo huic qui apparuit; ipse autem cui alii fidem servare se credit, qui nullus apparuit? Si vero et idiota, ut ais, et imperitus ac piscator et rusticus, super presbyteros sapientes intelligam, hoc tibi, inquam, magis metum debet incutere. Nam si ex eruditione aliqua disputans obtinerem vos sapientes et eruditos, videretur utique doctrina hoc mihi longi temporis et non divinae virtutis gratia contulisse, nunc autem cum, ut dixi, nos imperiti vos sapientes convincimus et superamus, cui sensum habenti non palam est, quia hoc non humanae argutiae opus est, sed divinae voluntatis et muneris?
“After this Caiaphas, looking at me again, now as if warning, now as if blaming, said that I ought henceforth to cease from preaching Christ Jesus, lest I do this to my own ruin, and lest, being deceived by error myself, I should also deceive others by my error. Then besides he charged me with rashness, because, though I was myself unlearned, a fisherman and a rustic, I dared to take up the office of teacher. When he said these and many similar things, I too answered in these words: that there was less danger for me if, as he said, this man is not the Christ, because I had received a teacher of the law; but for him the risk was enormous if this man is the Christ, as he certainly is. ‘For I believe in him who has appeared; but for what other, who has never appeared, does he think he is keeping his faith? But if I, an unlettered man, as you say, unskilled, a fisherman and a rustic, have more understanding than wise elders, this,’ I said, ‘ought to strike you with more fear. For if by disputing from some learning I prevailed over you, wise and learned men, it would surely seem that long study, and not the grace of divine power, had given me this; but now, when, as I said, we unskilled men convince and overcome you wise men, to whom that has sense is it not plain that this is not the work of human cleverness, but of the divine will and gift?’”
Acts 4:13 (echo, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 1:27 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter answers Caiaphas's charge that an unlearned fisherman presumes to teach, arguing that the victory of the unlearned shows divine power.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: ae read as a:; OCR: broken word; stray mark): Post hzec → Post haec; prarterea → praeterea; ofiicium → officium; bis similia dicenti → his similia dicenti; in hate verba respondi:Mihi quidem minus esse. periculi, si. ut ipse ait → in haec verba respondi: Mihi quidem minus esse periculi, si, ut ipse ait; idiota, ut? ais → idiota, ut ais; divinze → divinae; non pa- Ῑ) Iam est → non palam est; humana: argutia: opus est, sed divina: voluntatis → humanae argutiae opus est, sed divinae voluntatis.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.62 (PG 1:1241b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-62). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-62) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.63PG 1:1241b–1242b
Haec igitur et alia hujusmodi prosequentes, consequenter protestati sumus ac docuimus nos imperiti et piscatores, sacerdotes quidem de uno solo Deo coeli, Sadducaeos de resurrectione mortuorum. Samaritas de consecratione Hierusalem, non tamen ingressi civitatem ipsorum, sed publice disputantes, Scribas vero et Pharisaeos de regno caelorum, discipulos Joannis, ne scandalum paterentur in Joanne, omnem vero populum, quia Iesus est Christus aeternus. Ad ultimum autem monui eos, ut priusquam progrederemur ad gentes praedicare eis agnitionem Dei Patris, ipsi reconciliarentur Deo suscipientes Filium ejus. Aliter enim nullo modo eos ostendi posse salvari, nisi per sancti Spiritus gratiam trinae invocationis dilui baptismate properarent, et Eucharistiam Christi Domini sumerent, cui soli, de his quae docuit credere deberent, ut sic aeternam salutem consequi mererentur, aliter vero impossibile prorsus esse reconciliari eos Deo, etiam si mille ei aras et altaria mille succendunt.
“Going through these and other such things, then, we unskilled men and fishermen testified and taught in turn: the priests concerning the one only God of heaven; the Sadducees concerning the resurrection of the dead; the Samaritans concerning the sanctity of Jerusalem (not entering their city, however, but disputing in public); the scribes and Pharisees concerning the kingdom of heaven; the disciples of John, that they should not stumble over John; and all the people, that Jesus is the eternal Christ. Last of all I admonished them that, before we went out to the Gentiles to preach to them the knowledge of God the Father, they themselves should be reconciled to God by receiving his Son. For I showed that they could in no other way be saved than by hastening, through the grace of the Holy Spirit, to be washed in baptism with the threefold invocation, and by receiving the Eucharist of Christ the Lord, whom alone they ought to believe concerning what he taught, so that thus they might be found worthy to attain eternal salvation; but that otherwise it is altogether impossible for them to be reconciled to God, even if they kindle a thousand altars and a thousand high altars to him.”
Matt 28:19 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter summarizes the apostles' testimony and urges the people to be reconciled to God through baptism with the threefold invocation and the Eucharist.
- 'The threefold invocation' refers to baptism in the name of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (compare 1.69).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; stray mark): cmli → coeli; Samantas → Samaritas; Joannis. ne → Joannis, ne; trime invocationis → trinae invocationis; Eucharisniam → Eucharistiam; sumerent“, cui → sumerent, cui; de bis quae → de his quae.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.63 (PG 1:1241b–1242b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-63). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-63) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.64PG 1:1242b
Nos enim, inquam, pro certo comperimus, quod super sacrificiis quae offertis, multo magis exasperatur Deus, sacrificiorum tempore duntaxat expleto. Et quia vos non vultis agnoscere, emensum esse jam tempus hostias offerendi, ob hoc destruetur et templum, et abominatio desolationis statuetur in loco sancto, et tunc gentibus Evangelium praedicabitur ad testimonium vestri, ut ex illorum fide vestra infidelitas judicetur. Omnis etenim mundus diversis temporibus diversas malitiae aegritudines patitur, vel per omnes generaliter, vel per singulos quosque specialiter, et ideo indiget medico, qui eum visitet ad salutem. Nos ergo protestamur vobis, et quod unumquemque vestrum latuit nuntiamus. Vestrum est deliberare, quid expediat vobis.
“‘For we have learned for certain,’ I said, ‘that God is much more provoked by the sacrifices you offer, now that the time of sacrifices has been completed. And because you do not wish to acknowledge that the time for offering victims has already run out, for this reason the temple too will be destroyed, and the abomination of desolation will be set up in the holy place; and then the gospel will be preached to the Gentiles as a testimony against you, so that your unbelief may be judged by their faith. For the whole world at different times suffers different diseases of wickedness, either in all generally or in individuals specially, and therefore needs a physician to visit it for its healing. So we testify to you and announce what has been hidden from each of you. It is for you to deliberate what is profitable for you.’”
Matt 24:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Dan 9:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 24:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 24:2 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter warns that because sacrifices continue after their time has ended, the temple will be destroyed and the gospel preached to the Gentiles.
- Translated as written; the prophecy of the temple's destruction draws on Matt 24:15.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray mark; OCR slips; OCR: words joined): ofi‘ertis → offertis; Deus. sacrificiormn → Deus, sacrificiorum; ofierendi → offerendi; loco saneto”, → loco sancto,; prmdicabitur → praedicabitur; etquod → et quod.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.64 (PG 1:1242b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-64). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-64) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.65PG 1:1242b–1243a
His a me dictis, ingemuit omnis multitudo sacerdotum, quod eis de templi subversione praedixerim. Quod cum vidisset Gamaliel princeps populi qui latenter frater noster erat in fide, sed consilio nostro inter eos erat, quia valde fremerent et ingenti adversum nos furore moverentur, assurgens ait: Quiescite paulisper, o viri Israelitae, non enim advertitis tentationem quae imminet vobis, propter quod desinite ab hominibus istis, et si quidem humani consilii est quod agunt, cito cessabit, si autem a Deo est, cur sine causa peccatis nec proficitis quidquam? Dei enim voluntatem quis potest superare? Nunc ergo, quoniam quidem in vesperam vergitur dies, crastino hoc ipso in loco audientibus vobis, ego ipse cum istis disputabo, ut omnem errorem palam arguam, dilucideque confutem. Et his dictis repressus est eorum aliquatenus furor, ea praecipue spe, quod die crastina erroris nos publice arguendos sperarent. Et sic cum pace populum dimisit.
“When I had said this, the whole multitude of priests groaned because I had foretold to them the overthrow of the temple. When Gamaliel, a ruler of the people, who was secretly our brother in the faith but by our counsel remained among them, saw that they were raging greatly and were moved with enormous fury against us, he rose and said: ‘Be quiet for a little, men of Israel; for you do not perceive the trial that hangs over you. Therefore refrain from these men; and if what they are doing is of human counsel, it will soon cease; but if it is from God, why do you sin without cause and gain nothing? For who can overcome the will of God? Now, then, since the day is declining toward evening, tomorrow, in this very place and in your hearing, I myself will dispute with them, so as to refute all error openly and confute it clearly.’ By these words their fury was somewhat checked, especially by the hope that on the next day we would be publicly convicted of error. And so he dismissed the people in peace.”
Acts 5:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 5:38 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 5:39 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Gamaliel, secretly a believer, calms the priests' fury and promises to debate the apostles the next day.
- Gamaliel's speech follows Acts 5:34–39; the claim that he was secretly a believer is the author's.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; leaked apparatus; leaked footnote marker): llis a me → His a me; erat [50] ), → erat,; Israelitre → Israelitae; superare?Nunc → superare? Nunc; dilucidcque → dilucideque; erroris in codd. Lips. 1. nos → erroris nos.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.65 (PG 1:1242b–1243a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-65). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-65) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.66PG 1:1243a–1243b
Nos vero cum venissemus ad Iacobum nostrum, omnia quae dicta gestaque fuerant exponentes, apud eum cibo sumpto mansimus, omnipotenti Deo per totam noctem supplicantes, ut futurae disputationis sermo indubitatam fidei nostrae ostenderet veritatem. Igitur postera die Iacobus episcopus nobiscum simul et cum omni ecclesia ascendit ad templum, ubi ingentem reperimus multitudinem, a medio noctis exspectantem nos. Stetimus ergo in locis, quibus et prius, ut eminentius stantes ab universo populo cerneremur. Cumque esset summum silentium factum, Gamaliel, qui, ut supra diximus, nostrae fidei erat, dispensatione vero manebat inter ipsos, ut si quando iniquum aliquid adversum nos aut impium molirentur, vel ipsos consilio reprimeret prudenter aptato, vel nos commoneret ut aut curare aut declinare possemus; is ergo tanquam adversum nos agens, prior omnium episcopum Iacobum intuens hoc modo allocutus est:
“We, then, when we had come to our James and set out all that had been said and done, took food with him and stayed there, praying to almighty God through the whole night that the discourse of the coming disputation might show the undoubted truth of our faith. So on the following day James the bishop went up to the temple with us and with the whole church, where we found a vast multitude that had been waiting for us since midnight. We stood, then, in the same places as before, so that, standing higher, we might be seen by all the people. And when there was complete silence, Gamaliel—who, as we said above, was of our faith, but by arrangement remained among them, so that if ever they plotted anything unjust or impious against us, he might either restrain them by counsel prudently adapted or warn us, so that we could either guard against it or avoid it—he, then, as if acting against us, looking first of all at James the bishop, addressed him in this way:”
Notes and citation
Summary: After a night of prayer, James the bishop leads the church to the temple, and Gamaliel opens the second day's debate.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR: ae read as a:): futura! disputationis → futurae disputationis; fidei nostra; ostenderet → fidei nostrae ostenderet; popqu cerneremur → populo cerneremur; sileniiiim → silentium; Camaliel, qui → Gamaliel, qui; nostra: fidei → nostrae fidei; isancbat → manebat.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.66 (PG 1:1243a–1243b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-66). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-66) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.67PG 1:1243b–1244a
Si ego Gamaliel neque eruditionis meae, neque senectutis opprobrium duco, discere aliquid a parvulis et ab imperitis, si quid forte est utilitatis aut salutis acquirere (qui enim rationabiliter vivit, scit quia nihil est anima pretiosius), quomodo non omnibus amabile est, cunctisque exoptatum, ut quae ignorat discat, quae didicerit doceat? Certissimum namque est, quod neque amicitia, neque propinquitas generis, neque regni sublimitas homini debet esse pretiosior veritate. Et vos ergo fratres, si quid amplius nostis, populo Dei qui adest, itemque fratribus vestris proferre non pigeat, omni populo libenter et tota conquiete quae dicitis audiente. Quomodo enim non hoc faciat populus, cum meipsum videat secum pariter velle a vobis discere, si quid forte amplius vobis revelavit Deus? Si vero vos in aliquo indigetis, similiter etiam vos a nobis non pigeat doceri, ut erga utramque partem, si quid deest, adimpleat Deus. Quod si aliquis forte vos nunc sollicitat metus, propter nonnullos nostrorum qui praejudicatis adversum vos animis utuntur, et insidias eorum verentes, non audetis dicere quod sentitis apertius, ego ut vos etiam hujus occasione timoris absolvam, juro vobis per omnipotentem Deum et viventem in secula, quia nullum permittam injicere vobis manus. Habentes ergo hujus juramenti mei omnem hunc populum testem, et idoneum pignus sacramenti nostri foedus tenentes, absque ulla cunctatione unusquisque vestrum quod didicit proferat, et nos fratres intente et cum silentio audiamus.
“‘If I, Gamaliel, consider it no disgrace either to my learning or to my old age to learn something from little ones and the unlearned, if perhaps there is something of profit or salvation to be gained (for one who lives reasonably knows that nothing is more precious than the soul), how should it not be lovable to all and desired by all to learn what they do not know and to teach what they have learned? For it is most certain that neither friendship, nor kinship, nor the height of royal power ought to be more precious to a man than the truth. You too, then, brethren, if you know anything more, do not hesitate to set it before the people of God who are present, and likewise before your brethren, while the whole people hears what you say gladly and in all quiet. For how should the people not do this, when they see me myself wishing, together with them, to learn from you, if perhaps God has revealed something more to you? But if you are lacking in anything, likewise do not hesitate to be taught by us, so that God may fill up whatever is lacking on either side. And if perhaps some fear troubles you now because of some of our people who bear prejudiced minds against you, and, fearing their plots, you do not dare to say more openly what you think, then, to free you from this occasion of fear also, I swear to you by almighty God, who lives forever, that I will allow no one to lay hands on you. Having, then, all this people as witness of this oath of mine, and holding the covenant of our oath as a fit pledge, let each one of you without any hesitation set forth what he has learned, and let us, brethren, listen attentively and in silence.’”
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Notes and citation
Summary: Gamaliel invites the apostles to speak freely and swears to protect them.
- A note of the edition that had leaked into this section of the scan (removed below) says that the words from 'To this he also added' to 'the Paraclete' in 1.69 are not found in some manuscripts.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; leaked footnote and column number): eruditionis mete, neque senectutis-opprobrium → eruditionis meae, neque senectutis opprobrium; quoque neque amicitia. neque → quod neque amicitia, neque; przejudicatis → praejudicatis; non audetis Vocabula Quibus etiam - de Paracleto dicimus uiti, quod uncis includimus, non agnoscunt. 12H dicere → non audetis dicere; ornnipotentem → omnipotentem; uullum → nullum; jnramenti → juramenti; unusquisqueveatrum → unusquisque vestrum.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.67 (PG 1:1243b–1244a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-67). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-67) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.68PG 1:1244a–1244b
Haec dicens Gamaliel non valde placebat Caiphae, et, ut videbatur, suspectum habens eum, ipse magis inserere se subtiliter disputationibus coepit: subridens enim ad ea quae Gamaliel dixerat, Iacobum episcoporum principem sacerdotum princeps orabat, ut de Christo non aliunde sermo quam de scripturis fieret, ut sciamus, inquit, utrum Iesus ipse sit Christus, an non. Tum Iacobus, primo, inquit, requiramus, ex quibus scripturis potissimum disputationem haberi oporteat. At ille vix aliquando ratione ipsa superatus respondit, ex lege habendam, et post hoc etiam prophetarum addidit mentionem.
“As Gamaliel said this, he did not greatly please Caiaphas; and, holding him suspect, as it seemed, Caiaphas began to insert himself more subtly into the disputations. For, smiling at what Gamaliel had said, the chief of the priests asked James, the chief of the bishops, that the discussion about Christ should be drawn from no other source than the Scriptures, ‘so that we may know,’ he said, ‘whether Jesus is the Christ or not.’ Then James said: ‘First let us inquire from which Scriptures especially the disputation ought to be held.’ And he, scarcely at last overcome by reason itself, answered that it must be held from the law, and after this added mention of the prophets too.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Caiaphas asks that the debate be held from the Scriptures, and James secures agreement that the law and the prophets will be the basis.
- James is called 'chief of the bishops' (episcoporum princeps), a title characteristic of the Pseudo-Clementine writings.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; leaked footnote marker): Iizec dicens Camaliel non valde plaeebat → Haec dicens Gamaliel non valde placebat; caapit → coepit; principem (SI) → principem; orabat, nt → orabat, ut; sciamus. inquit → sciamus, inquit; seripturis → scripturis.
Topics: Scripture and canon, Church office
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.68 (PG 1:1244a–1244b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-68). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-68) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.69PG 1:1244b–1245a
Cui Iacobus noster coepit ostendere, quia et prophetae quae dicunt, ex lege sumpserint et legi consona sint locuti. Sed et de libris Regnorum disseruit aliqua, quomodo, et quando, et a quo scripti sint, et quomodo eis uti oporteat. Cumque et de lege plenissime disputasset, ac singula quae de Christo sunt, purissima expositione protulisset in lucem, ostendit abundantissimis probationibus, quia Iesus est Christus, et in ipso universa quae de humili ejus adventu fuerant praedicta, complentur. Duos enim ejus praedictos esse docuit adventus, unum humilitatis quem adimplevit, alium gloriae qui speratur implendus, cum veniet dare regnum credentibus in se et servantibus omnia quae praecepit. Cumque de his evidenter populum docuisset, addebat etiam hoc; quia nisi quis baptizatus fuisset in aqua sub appellatione trinae beatitudinis, sicut docuit verus propheta, neque remissionem acciperet peccatorum, neque introiret in regna caelorum: et hanc esse Dei [ingeniti] praefinitionem confirmavit. Quibus etiam haec addidit: Nolite putare nos duos ingenitos dicere deos, aut unum divisum esse in duos, vel sicut impii dicunt, eumdem masculum et feminam sui effectum; sed Filium Dei unigenitum dicimus, non ex alio initio, sed ex ipso ineffabiliter natum. Similiter etiam de Paracleto dicimus. Sed et de baptismate cum aliquanta dixisset, per septem continuos dies persuasit omni populo et pontifici, ut confestim ad percipiendum baptismum festinarent.
“Our James began to show him that the prophets too took what they say from the law and spoke in harmony with the law. He also discussed something of the books of the Kingdoms: how, when, and by whom they were written, and how they ought to be used. And when he had discussed the law most fully, and by the clearest exposition had brought to light everything in it concerning Christ, he showed by the most abundant proofs that Jesus is the Christ, and that in him all that had been foretold of his humble coming is fulfilled. For he taught that two comings of his had been foretold: one of humility, which he has fulfilled; the other of glory, which is hoped to be fulfilled when he comes to give the kingdom to those who believe in him and keep all that he has commanded. And when he had clearly taught the people about these things, he added this too: that unless someone has been baptized in water under the name of the threefold blessedness, as the true Prophet taught, he will neither receive remission of sins nor enter the kingdom of heaven; and he affirmed that this is the decree of the unbegotten God. To this he also added: ‘Do not think that we speak of two unbegotten gods, or that one is divided into two, or, as the impious say, that the same became male and female of himself; but we say that the only-begotten Son of God was born ineffably, not from another beginning, but from him himself. And we say likewise concerning the Paraclete.’ And when he had said some things also about baptism, through seven continuous days he persuaded all the people and the high priest to hasten at once to receive baptism.”
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 28:19 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 3:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 1:18 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: James proves from the law that Jesus is the Christ, teaches the necessity of baptism in the threefold name, and persuades the people and the high priest to seek baptism.
- 'Unbegotten' (ingeniti) is printed in square brackets in the edition. An edition note says that the words from 'To this he also added' to 'the Paraclete' are missing in some manuscripts. The 'threefold blessedness' refers to the threefold name of Matt 28:19.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: ae read as a:; stray mark): erepit ostendere → coepit ostendere; propheta: quae → prophetae quae; quomodo, et quando. et a quo → quomodo, et quando, et a quo; etde lege plenissime disputasset. ac singula quae de ϐίη-ιεsto sunt, purissima expositione protulisset in lucem. ostendit → et de lege plenissime disputasset, ac singula quae de Christo sunt, purissima expositione protulisset in lucem, ostendit; adiniplevit → adimplevit; [ingenili] prafinitionem → [ingeniti] praefinitionem; etiam ” haec addidit:Nolite → etiam haec addidit: Nolite; ingenitus → ingenitos; effectum; scd → effectum; sed; unigenitum dicimus. non → unigenitum dicimus, non; dc baptismate → de baptismate; feStinarent → festinarent.
Topics: Baptism, Trinity, Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.69 (PG 1:1244b–1245a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-69). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-69) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.70PG 1:1245a–1246a
Cumque in eo jam res esset, ut venirent et baptizarentur, homo quidam inimicus, tunc cum paucis admodum ingrediens templum, clamare coepit et dicere: Quid facitis, o viri Israelitae? cur vobis tam facile subripitur? cur praecipites ducimini ab hominibus infelicissimis, et a [Simone] Mago deceptis? Cumque haec diceret et ad haec adderet ac superaretur ab episcopo Jacobo, conturbare populum et seditiones suscitare coepit, uti ne ea quae dicebantur plebs posset audire. Igitur exagitare cuncta clamoribus, et quae fuerant multa labore ordinata convellere, simulque incusare sacerdotes, et opprobriis atque increpationibus coepit accendere, et velut furibundus singulos quosque ad caedem concitare, dicens: Quid agitis? quid cessatis? O segnes et desides, cur non manibus nostris invadimus et discerpimus omnes hos? Et cum haec dixisset, primus rapto ex ara torre robusto caedis fecit exordium. Tum deinde et caeteri videntes eum, simili efferebantur insania; fit omnium clamor, caedentium pariter et caesorum, sanguis plurimus funditur, fuga permista habetur, cum interim ille inimicus homo Iacobum aggressus, de summis gradibus praecipitem dedit, quem cum mortuum credidisset, ultra mulctare neglexit.
“And when matters had come to this point, that they should come and be baptized, a certain hostile man, entering the temple at that time with very few others, began to shout and say: ‘What are you doing, men of Israel? Why are you so easily carried away? Why are you led headlong by most wretched men, deceived by Simon, a magician?’ And when he was saying this and adding more, and was being overcome by James the bishop, he began to stir up the people and raise riots, so that the people could not hear what was being said. So he began to throw everything into confusion with shouts, to overturn what had been arranged with much labor, and at the same time to accuse the priests and inflame them with reproaches and rebukes, and like a madman to rouse each one to slaughter, saying: ‘What are you doing? Why do you hesitate? You sluggish and idle men, why do we not lay hands on all these and tear them to pieces?’ When he had said this, he was the first to snatch a strong brand from the altar and to begin the slaughter. Then the rest too, seeing him, were carried away with like madness; a shout goes up from all, from those striking and those struck alike; much blood is shed; there is confused flight; and meanwhile that hostile man attacked James and threw him headlong from the top of the steps, and, believing him dead, took no care to beat him further.”
Matt 13:28 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As the people are about to be baptized, a hostile man stirs up a riot in the temple and throws James down the steps.
- The 'hostile man' is not named; 1.71 describes him receiving letters from Caiaphas to persecute believers at Damascus, as Saul does in Acts 9:1–2. 'Simon' is printed in square brackets in the edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR punctuation; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR: Greek letter for Latin O; leaked footnote; stray mark): esset. ut venirent et haptizarentur. homo → esset, ut venirent et baptizarentur, homo; ccepit → coepit; lsraelitae → Israelitae; flago → Mago; Cumque hinc diceret → Cumque haec diceret; cmpit, uti → coepit, uti; ea qua dicebantur → ea quae dicebantur; sacerdotes,et opprobriis atque increpationibus cmpit → sacerdotes, et opprobriis atque increpationibus coepit; diceus → dicens; Ο segnes → O segnes; rapto 'ex ara → rapto ex ara; cadis → caedis; eflerebantur → efferebantur; funditur. fuga → funditur, fuga; suminis gradibus pracipitem → summis gradibus praecipitem; quem cum “ Act. xxn, 5. ‘tats mortuum → quem cum mortuum.
Topics: Persecution
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.70 (PG 1:1245a–1246a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-70). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-70) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
1.71PG 1:1246a–1246b
Nostri vero sublatum eum collegerunt; erant enim et numero plures quam illi et virtute majores, Sed propter reverentiam Dei ipsi magis interimi se a paucioribus, quam interimere alios patiebantur. Cum autem vespera adfuisset, templum quidem sacerdotes claudunt; nos vero ad domum Jacobi regressi et pernoctantes ibi in oratione, ante lucem descendimus Hiericho ad quinque millia viri. Post triduum autem venit ad eos ex fratribus quidam a Gamaliele, de quo supra diximus, occultos nobis nuntios deferens, quod inimicus ille homo legationem suscepisset a Caipha pontifice, ut omnes qui crederent in Jesum persequeretur et Damascum pergeret cum epistolis ejus, ut etiam inibi auxilio usus infidelium fidelibus inferret exitium; idcirco autem praecipue Damascum festinaret, quod illuc confugisse crederet Petrum. Et post dies fere triginta digressus est per Hiericho Damascum tendens, cum per idem temporis progressi essemus nos ad sepulcra duorum fratrum quorumdam, quae sponte sua per annos singulos dealbabantur; quo miraculo multorum adversum nos repressus est furor, videntium haberi nostros in memoria apud Deum.
“But our people took him up and carried him off; for they were both more numerous and stronger than the others, but out of reverence for God they preferred to let themselves be killed by fewer men rather than to kill others. When evening came, the priests shut the temple; and we, returning to the house of James and spending the night there in prayer, went down before dawn to Jericho, about five thousand men. After three days one of the brethren came to us from Gamaliel, whom we mentioned above, bringing us secret news that that hostile man had received a commission from Caiaphas the high priest to persecute all who believed in Jesus, and to go to Damascus with his letters, so that there too, using the help of the unbelievers, he might bring destruction on the faithful; and that he was hastening to Damascus especially because he believed Peter had fled there. And after about thirty days he passed through Jericho on his way to Damascus, at the time when we had gone out to the tombs of two of the brethren, which were whitened of their own accord every year; by this miracle the fury of many against us was checked, as they saw that our brethren were held in remembrance before God.”
Acts 9:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 9:2 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The believers flee to Jericho, and Gamaliel warns them that the hostile man has letters from Caiaphas to persecute them at Damascus.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): et Virtute majores → et virtute majores; oratione,.ante → oratione, ante; ad cos → ad eos; Jesum. persequeretur → Jesum persequeretur; infidelium: iideli; bus → infidelium fidelibus; Petrum η. Ει post → Petrum. Et post.
Topics: Persecution
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 1.71 (PG 1:1246a–1246b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/1-45/#p-1-71). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-1-71) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).