Recognitions 9.35–10.19

Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, who tells how he found Christ, followed Peter, and was reunited with his lost family (the 'recognitions'). It is not a work of Clement. It survives complete only in Rufinus of Aquileia's Latin translation; the Greek original is lost (fragments in Eusebius and Origen's Philocalia, and a Syriac version of parts). It shares a source with the Greek Clementine Homilies (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift', probably 3rd-century Syria), and the Recognitions are usually dated to the 4th century in their Greek form. Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius is reference 0.1.

Latin text: Migne, PG 1 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 1 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).

Show

Chapter 9

9.35PG 1:1418a–1418b

Et cum haec dixisset, conversus ad turbas ita coepit: Hic quem videtis, o viri, in hac veste pauperrima, Romana: urbis est civis, ex genere ipsius Caesaris descendens; nomen ei Faustinianus, uxorem quoque nobilissimam Matthidiam nomine sortitus est, ex qua tres filios suscepit, quorum duo gemini, unus autem qui erat junior, cui nomen Clemens, hic est. Et cum hoc dixisset, digito me ostendit. Gemini autem filii ejus sunt isti, Niceta et Aquila, quorum alius Faustinus vocabatur prius, et alius Faustus. Simul autem ut nomina nostra enuntiavit Petrus, senex resolutis membris omnibus, quasi interceptus concidit. Nos autem filii irruentes super eum, complectebamur et osculabamur, verentes simul ne spiritum revocare non posset. Et cum haec fierent, populus quidem admiratione ipsa obstupefactus est.

When he had said this, he turned to the crowds and began thus: “This man whom you see, men, in this very poor garment, is a citizen of the city of Rome, descended from the family of Caesar himself; his name is Faustinianus, and he married a most noble wife named Mattidia, by whom he had three sons, of whom two were twins, and the one who was younger, named Clement, is this man.” And when he had said this, he pointed to me with his finger. “And his twin sons are these, Niceta and Aquila, of whom one was formerly called Faustinus and the other Faustus.” As soon as Peter pronounced our names, the old man, all his limbs failing, collapsed as if struck down. We his sons rushed upon him, embraced and kissed him, fearing at the same time that he might not be able to recover his breath. While this was happening, the people were stunned with amazement.

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter reveals before the crowd that the old man is Faustinianus and that Clement, Niceta, and Aquila are his sons, and the old man collapses.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): cmpit: llic quem → coepit: Hic quem; pauperi-ima → pauperrima; quasr interceptus → quasi interceptus; eomplectebamur → complectebamur; ret-'0care → revocare.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.35 (PG 1:1418a–1418b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-9-35). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-35) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

9.36PG 1:1418b–1419a

Petrus autem surgere nos a complexibus patris, ne eum necaremus jubet, et ipse apprehensa manu ejus, quasi de somno quodam profundo elevans eum et paululum recreans, omnia quae gesta fuerant secundum veritatem coepit exponere: quomodo frater ejus in amorem inciderit Matthidiae, et illa cum esset pudicissima, illicitum fratris amorem viro indicare noluerit, ne vel bellum fratribus vel opprobrium generi indiceret, sed sapienter somnium finxerit, quo ex Urbe juberetur excedere cum geminis filiis, juniore apud patrem relicto; utque navigantes naufragium vi tempestatis incurrerint, et ad insulam Antaradum nomine expulsi, Matthidia quidem supra saxum quoddam fluctu jactante projecta sit, gemini vero liberi rapti a piratis et Caesaream perducti, religiosae cuidam femina: venundati sint, quae eos in filiorum loco habens liberaliter educaverit et erudiri fecerit, eorumque nomina piratae immutaverint et Nicetam alium, alium Aquilam vocitaverint; utque post haec studiorum et consuetudinis causa Simoni adhaeserint, atque ab eo, ubi magum et deceptorem viderunt, aversi accesserint ad Zacchaeum, et ut post haec sociati sunt sibi; sed et Clemens quomodo ex Urbe agnoscenda: veritatis causa profectus, per Barnaba: notitiam Caesaream venerit sibique innotuerit et adhaeserit, utque ab eo sit de fide religionis edoctus; sed et qualiter apud Antaradum mendicantem repererit et recognoverit matrem, utque omnis insula in ejus recognitione gavisa sit, et de pudicissimae hospitae contubernio atque ejus per semetipsum collata sanitate, et de liberalitate Clementis in eos qui erga matrem benefici exstiterant; utque post haec Niceta et Aquila requirentes quaenam esset peregrina mulier, cum audissent a Clemente omne negotium, se esse geminos ejus filios Faustinum exclamaverunt et Faustum, omnemque historiam quae eos egerit patefecerint; utque post haec matri cautius, ne subito gaudio interciperetur, ipso insinuante Petro, oblati sint.

Peter told us to rise from our father's embraces, lest we kill him; and he himself, taking his hand, raised him as if from a deep sleep, revived him a little, and began to set out truthfully everything that had happened: how his brother had fallen in love with Mattidia, and she, being most chaste, would not reveal his brother's unlawful love to her husband, lest she bring war upon the brothers or disgrace upon the family, but wisely invented a dream by which she was ordered to leave the city with her twin sons, the younger being left with his father; how, sailing, they suffered shipwreck by the violence of a storm and were cast upon the island called Antaradus; how Mattidia was thrown by the tossing waves onto a rock, while the twin children were seized by pirates, taken to Caesarea, and sold to a religious woman, who held them in place of sons, brought them up liberally, and had them educated; how the pirates changed their names and called one Niceta and the other Aquila; how after this, for the sake of their studies and companionship, they attached themselves to Simon, and when they saw he was a magician and deceiver, turned from him and came to Zacchaeus; and how after this they joined Peter. Also how Clement set out from the city to know the truth, came to Caesarea through acquaintance with Barnabas, became known to Peter and attached himself to him, and was taught by him the faith of religion; and how at Antaradus he found and recognized his mother begging, and how the whole island rejoiced at her recognition; of her life with her most chaste hostess and of the healing granted her through Peter himself; and of Clement's generosity to those who had been kind to his mother; and how after this Niceta and Aquila, asking who the strange woman was, when they had heard the whole matter from Clement, cried out that they were her twin sons Faustinus and Faustus and disclosed the whole story of what had happened to them; and how after this, at Peter's own suggestion, they were presented to their mother cautiously, lest she be overcome by sudden joy.

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter revives Faustinianus and recounts the whole history of Mattidia's flight, the shipwreck, the twins' fortunes, Clement's conversion, and the recognitions so far.

  • A column number printed in the text has been removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR punctuation; column number in the text): somno quodam proo fundo → somno quodam profundo; omnia qua gesta fuerant secundum veritatem cmpit → omnia quae gesta fuerant secundum veritatem coepit; Matthidite → Matthidiae; Cazsaream → Caesaream; eormnque → eorumque; Zacchzeum → Zacchaeum; de pudicissio ma: hOSpitae → de pudicissimae hospitae; post hac Niceta → post haec Niceta; Faustinum ’15 exclamaverunt → Faustinum exclamaverunt; matri cautius,ne subito gaudio interciperetur, ipso insinuante, oblati sint,Petro. → matri cautius, ne subito gaudio interciperetur, ipso insinuante Petro, oblati sint..

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.36 (PG 1:1418b–1419a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-9-36). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-36) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

9.37PG 1:1419a–1419b

Sed cum haec in auditu senis narratione gratissima turbis exponeret Petrus, ita ut audientes gestorum miraculis et humanitatis miseratione lacrymarent, nescio unde audiens mater de recognitione patris, cursu concito irruit in medium nostri, cum clamore dicens: Ubi est meus vir, meus dominus Faustinianus, qui tam multis temporibus affligitur, ambulans per urbes singulas et me quaerens? Haec cum illa quasi amens clamaret et circumspiceret, senex accurrens cum multis lacrymis amplecti et constringere eam coepit. Et cum haec gererentur, Petrus rogavit turbas ut discederent, dicens inverecundum esse ultra persistere, sed dandum eis locum familiarius invicem se videndi; crastino autem hic, inquit, si qui vestrum volunt, conveniant ad audiendum verbum.

While Peter was setting these things out to the crowds in a narrative most welcome to the old man's ears, so that the hearers wept at the wonder of the events and in compassion, my mother, hearing from somewhere of the recognition of my father, rushed with hurried steps into our midst, crying out: “Where is my husband, my lord Faustinianus, who has been afflicted so many years, going about through each city looking for me?” As she was crying this out, as if beside herself, and looking around, the old man ran to her with many tears and began to embrace and hold her tight. While this was happening, Peter asked the crowds to leave, saying it was unseemly to stay any longer, but that room should be given them to see one another more intimately; “but tomorrow,” he said, “let any of you who wish come together here to hear the word.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Mattidia hears of the recognition, rushes in calling for her husband, and the couple embrace while Peter dismisses the crowd until the next day.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): amigitur → affligitur; me quarens → me quaerens; constringere eam cmpit → constringere eam coepit.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.37 (PG 1:1419a–1419b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-9-37). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-37) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

9.38PG 1:1419b–1420b

His a Petro dictis secesserunt turba:, et cum vellemus nos quoque ire ad hospitium, dominus domus ait ad nos: Turpe est et impium tales ac tantos viros manere in stabulo, cum ego omnem pene domum vacantem habeam, lectosque stratos quamplurimas et quae necessaria sunt parata. Sed Petro contradicente, uxor patrisfamilias una cum liberis suis prostrabat se ante eum et exorabat dicens: Obsecro te, mane apud nos. Sed ne sic quidem acquiescebat Petrus, donec filia eorum qui rogabant, ab immundo spiritu temporibus multis vexata et catenis vincta, quae fuerat intra conclave clausa, effugato a se daemone et ostiis patefactis cum catenis suis veniens procidit ad pedes Petri, dicens: Rectum est, mi domine, ut agas hodie hic salutaria mea, et non contristes neque me neque parentes meos. Petro autem requirente catenarum sermonumque ejus causam, parentes praeter spem laeti effecti de filia: sanitate, velut stupore quodam attoniti ipsi quidem dicere nequeunt, astantes autem famuli aiunt: Haec septimo aetatis anno a daemone occupata, omnes qui accedere tentassent ad eam, scindere, dilaniare morsibus, etiam disrumpere, et hoc per viginti annos usque ad praesens facere nunquam destitit, nec ab aliquo potuit curari, sed ne accedere ad eam quisquam valebat; multos enim inutiles reddidit, alios et peremit, omnibus enim viris validior erat, sine dubio viribus daemonis nisa. Nunc autem, ut vides, ex praesentia tua daemon quidem fugit, ostia vero quae summo cum munimento clausa fuerant, aperta sunt, et ipsa sana stat ante te rogans, ut diem salutarium suorum laetum et ipsi et parentibus facias, et maneas apud eos. Haec cum ita unus ex famulis enarrasset, et ipsae catena: de manibus ejus ac pedibus fuissent sponte resoluta, Petrus, certus quod per ipsum sanitas haec reddita sit puellae, acquievit manere apud eos. Sed et illos qui remanserant in hospitio una cum uxore sua transire jussit, et unusquisque acceptis seorsum cubiculis mansimus, atque ex more cibo sumpto redditisque laudibus Deo. suis singuli requievimus locis.

When Peter had said this, the crowds withdrew. And when we too wished to go to the lodging, the master of the house said to us: “It is shameful and impious for such and so great men to stay at an inn, when I have almost the whole house empty, and very many beds spread, and everything necessary prepared.” But when Peter declined, the wife of the master of the house with her children prostrated herself before him and begged him, saying: “I beg you, stay with us.” But even so Peter did not agree, until the daughter of those who were asking, who had been tormented for a long time by an unclean spirit and bound with chains, and had been shut within a chamber, the demon having been driven from her and the doors thrown open, came with her chains, fell at Peter's feet, and said: “It is right, my lord, that you should keep here today the feast of my deliverance, and not grieve either me or my parents.” When Peter asked the reason for her chains and her words, the parents, made joyful beyond hope at their daughter's healing, were themselves unable to speak, as if stunned; but the servants standing by said: “She was seized by a demon in the seventh year of her age, and she never ceased to tear, to rend with her teeth, even to break apart all who tried to approach her; and she did this for twenty years until now, and could not be cured by anyone; nor could anyone even approach her. For she made many useless and killed others; for she was stronger than all men, relying without doubt on the strength of the demon. But now, as you see, at your presence the demon has fled, the doors that had been shut with the strongest fastening are opened, and she herself stands healed before you, asking you to make the day of her deliverance joyful for her and for her parents and to stay with them.” When one of the servants had told this, and the chains themselves had fallen of their own accord from her hands and feet, Peter, sure that this healing had been given to the girl through him, agreed to stay with them. He also ordered those who had remained at the lodging, together with his wife, to come over; and each of us received separate rooms and stayed there; and having taken food as usual and given praise to God, we each rested in our places.

Mark 5:4 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: When the host's demon-possessed daughter is suddenly freed at Peter's presence and comes to him with her chains, Peter agrees to lodge with the family.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; book heading of the edition in the text; stray mark): Ilis a Petro → His a Petro; efl‘ugato a se daemone → effugato a se daemone; Petro autem rcquircnte → Petro autem requirente; dilaniarc → dilaniare; daamon quidem → daemon quidem; mansimus_, → mansimus,; DECIMUS. → .

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.38 (PG 1:1419b–1420b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-9-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-38) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

Chapter 10

10.1PG 1:1419b–1420b

Mane autem, exorto sole, ego Clemens et Niceta atque Aquila una cum Petro venimus ad locum in quo pater simul cum matre requiescebat; et cum adhuc eos dormientes reperissemus, pro foribus consedimus, ubi Petrus talibus apud nos sermonibus utitur: Audite me, dilectissimi conservi, scio quia grandem habetis affectum erga patrem vestrum, vereor ergo ne ante tempus eum perurgeatis jugum religionis suscipere, nondum ad id paratum, ad quod forte pro vestri gratia videatur acquiescere. Sed hoc non est firmum; quod enim propter homines fit, probabile non est et cito dilabitur. Ideoque videtur mihi, ut concedatis ei anno uno vivere pro arbitrio, in quo potest iter agens nobiscum, dum nos alios docemus, etiam ipse simpliciter audire; et audiens, siquidem agnoscenda: veritatis rectum propositum gerit, ipse rogabit ut suscipiat religionis jugum, aut si non placet ei recipere, permaneat amicus. Hi enim qui non id ex corde suscipiunt, cum ceperint ferre non posse, non solum abjiciunt quod susceperant, sed quasi pro excusatione infirmitatis suae, incipiunt viam religionis blasphemare, et male loqui de his quos nequaquam sequi aut imitari potuerunt.

In the morning, at sunrise, I, Clement, and Niceta and Aquila came with Peter to the place where my father was resting together with my mother; and finding them still asleep, we sat down before the doors, where Peter used such words with us: “Listen to me, dearest fellow servants. I know that you have great affection for your father; so I fear that you may press him before the time to take up the yoke of religion when he is not yet ready for it, though perhaps for your sake he may seem to agree. But this is not firm; for what is done because of men is not approved and quickly falls away. And so it seems to me that you should allow him to live one year as he chooses, during which, travelling with us while we teach others, he can also simply listen; and listening, if he has an upright purpose of knowing the truth, he himself will ask to take up the yoke of religion; or if he does not wish to accept it, let him remain a friend. For those who do not take it up from the heart, when they begin to be unable to bear it, not only cast off what they had taken up, but, as if to excuse their own weakness, begin to blaspheme the way of religion and speak ill of those whom they could by no means follow or imitate.”

Matt 11:29 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter advises the sons not to press their father to convert but to let him travel and listen freely for a year.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR word join): non idex corde → non id ex corde.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.1 (PG 1:1419b–1420b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.2PG 1:1420d–1421a

Ad haec Niceta respondit: Non contradico, domine mi Petre, rectis et bonis consiliis tuis, sed dicere aliquid volo, ut per hoc discam quod nescio. Quid si intra annum hunc, quo differri eum jubes, moriatur pater noster? descendet in infernum vacuus et cruciandus in aeternum. Tum Petrus: Amplector, inquit, benignum erga patrem propositum tuum, et ignosco tibi de his quae ignoras. Quid enim censes, quia si quis putatur juste vixisse, iste continuo salvabitur? Non putas eum discutiendum ab eo qui occulta hominum novit, quomodo juste vixerit, ne forte ritu gentilium, institutis eorum et legibus parens, vel pro amicitiis hominum, aut pro sola consuetudine aut qualibet alia ex causa vel necessitate, et non propter ipsam justitiam neque propter Deum? Qui enim propter solum Deum et justitiam ejus juste vixerint, ipsi ad aeternam requiem venient et perpetuitatem regni caelestis accipient. Salus enim non vi acquiritur, sed libertate, nec per hominum gratiam, sed per Dei fidem. Tum praeterea cogitare debes, quia Deus praescius est et novit si hic suus est; quod si novit eum non esse, quid faciemus ad ea quae ex initio statuta sunt ab eo? In quo autem possum, consilium do; cum evigilaverit et sederimus, vos quasi aliquid discere volentes, proponite ex his duntaxat quae illi expedit discere, et dum nos loquimur inter nos, ille instruetur. Sed tamen primo quiescite, ut si forte ipse videatur aliquid interrogare; quod si fecerit, aptior erit sermonis occasio; si vero ipse nihil quaerit, nos ab alterutro, sicut dixi, discere aliquid volentes rogemus vicissim. Mihi ita videtur, etiam vobis quid placeat dicite.

To this Niceta answered: “I do not contradict your right and good counsels, my lord Peter, but I want to say something, so as to learn by it what I do not know. What if within this year for which you tell us to put him off our father should die? He will go down to the underworld empty, to be tormented forever.” Then Peter said: “I embrace your kind purpose toward your father, and I pardon you for what you do not know. For do you think that if someone is thought to have lived justly, he will at once be saved? Do you not think that he must be examined by him who knows the hidden things of men as to how he lived justly—whether perhaps after the manner of the Gentiles, obeying their institutions and laws, or for the sake of friendships with men, or from mere habit or for any other cause or necessity, and not for the sake of justice itself nor for God? For those who have lived justly for the sake of God alone and his justice will come to eternal rest and receive the perpetuity of the heavenly kingdom. For salvation is acquired not by force but by freedom, not through the favor of men but through faith in God. Besides, you ought to consider that God foreknows and knows whether this man is his; and if he knows he is not, what shall we do against what was established by him from the beginning? But as far as I can, I give counsel: when he has woken and we have sat down, propose, as if wishing to learn something, only those things that it is profitable for him to learn; and while we talk among ourselves, he will be instructed. But first keep quiet, in case he seems to ask something; if he does, the occasion for discourse will be more suitable. But if he asks nothing, let us, as I said, ask one another in turn, as if wishing to learn something. This is how it seems to me; you too say what you think.”

Notes and citation

Summary: To Niceta's fear that their father might die unsaved, Peter replies that God judges motives and foreknows his own, and suggests they discuss useful topics in his hearing.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin)): Non contradico..domine → Non contradico, domine; vIxerit → vixerit; non pr0pter → non propter; ιη quo autem possum → In quo autem possum; qu’ae illi → quae illi; iustruetur → instruetur; vi. cissim → vicissim.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.2 (PG 1:1420d–1421a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.3PG 1:1421a

Cumque collaudassemus eius rectum consilium, ego Clemens aio: In omnibus rebus plurima ex parte ad initium respicit finis, similisque principiis rerum exitus datur; spero ergo etiam circa patrem nostrum, quoniam per te Deus bona initia dedit, his congruum seque dignum largietur et finem. Verumtamen etiam illud suggero, si, ut dixisti, coeperimus, praesente patre, quasi inter nos aliquid tractandi vel discendi gratia loqui, tu mi domine Petre, non debes eum locum agere, quasi qui discere aliquid debeas; hoc enim si videat, fortasse magis offendetur, certus est enim te omnia scire diligenter, sicut et vere est. Quale ergo erit, si te videat ignorantiam simulantem? Hoc eum, ut dixi, magis laedere poterit, nescientem consilium tuum. Sed nos quidem fratres inter nos sermonem habentes. si in aliquo dubitemus, a te quaestioni nostrae finis congruus detur; nam et si te cunctantem videat aut dubitantem, tunc vere putabit, quod apud nullum erit scientia veritatis.

When we had praised his right counsel, I, Clement, said: “In all things the end looks for the most part to the beginning, and the outcome of things is given like their beginnings. So I hope that for our father too, since God has given good beginnings through you, he will grant an end fitting and worthy of them. But I also suggest this: if, as you said, in our father's presence we begin to talk among ourselves as if to discuss or learn something, you, my lord Peter, ought not to play the part of one who needs to learn something. For if he sees this, he will perhaps be more offended, for he is sure that you know everything thoroughly, as is truly the case. What will it be like, then, if he sees you feigning ignorance? This, as I said, could hurt him more, not knowing your plan. But let us brothers converse among ourselves, and if we are in doubt about anything, let a fitting conclusion to our question be given by you. For if he sees you hesitating or doubting, then he will truly think that the knowledge of truth will be with no one.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement suggests that the brothers should do the questioning, with Peter giving the answers, rather than Peter feigning ignorance.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): respicit linis → respicit finis; suggero,si → suggero, si; gratia— loqui → gratia loqui; cun- ‘ctantem → cunctantem.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.3 (PG 1:1421a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.4PG 1:1421a–1422a

Et Petrus ad haec respondit: Omittamus haec, et si quidem dignum est ut ingrediatur januam vitae, Deus occasionem competentem dabit, eritque initium ex Deo et non ex homine. Et ideo, sicut prius dixi, permittite eum iter agentem nobiscum audire nos aliquid disputantes; sed quoniam festinantes vos vidi, idcirco dixi Opportunitatem quaerendam; quam cum dederit Deus, vos quoque ad ea quae dixero obtemperate mihi. Haec nobis sermocinantibus, venit puer dicens vigilare jam patrem; et cum vellemus ingredi ad eum, ipse venit ad nos, et osculo nos salutans, cum resedissemus, ait: Licetne percunctari, si quid volet quis, an secundum Pythagoricos tacendum semper est? Et Petrus: Nos nec silere semper, neque percunctari cogimus accedentes ad nos, sed relinquimus ipsorum libertati facere ut volunt, scientes quod qui curam gerit salutis suae, si in parte aliqua sentit anima: sua: dolorem, tacere non patitur. Qui vero negligit salutem suam, si interrogare cogatur, nihil ex hoc utilitati ejus confertur, nisi hoc solum, ut studiosus esse videatur et diligens. Quamobrem tu si quid discere vis, require.

Peter answered this: “Let us leave this. If it is fitting that he should enter the door of life, God will give a suitable occasion, and the beginning will be from God and not from man. And so, as I said before, let him travel with us and hear us discussing something. But since I saw you in a hurry, I said that an opportunity must be sought; and when God gives it, you too must obey me in what I say.” While we were talking thus, a servant came saying that our father was now awake; and when we wished to go in to him, he himself came to us, greeted us with a kiss, and when we had sat down said: “Is it permitted to ask, if one wishes, or must one always keep silent, like the Pythagoreans?” Peter said: “We neither compel those who come to us always to be silent nor to ask, but leave it to their freedom to do as they wish, knowing that one who cares for his salvation, if he feels pain in any part of his soul, does not endure to keep silent; but one who neglects his salvation, if he is compelled to ask, gains no benefit from it except this only, that he seems studious and diligent. So if you wish to learn anything, ask.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter leaves the occasion to God; their father wakes and asks whether questions are allowed, and Peter invites him to ask freely.

  • The Pythagoreans were known for a period of silence imposed on new disciples.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): quaarendam → quaerendam; vos quoquc → vos quoque; libertati lacere → libertati facere; hoc solum,_ut → hoc solum, ut.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.4 (PG 1:1421a–1422a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.5PG 1:1422a–1423a

Et senex ait: Est quidam sermo apud Graecorum philosophos vehemens valde, qui dicit, in vita hominum re ipsa neque bonum esse aliquid, neque malum; sed quae videntur hominibus usu et consuetudine praeventis vitae, haec aut mala dicunt aut bona. Nam neque homicidium revera malum est, quia animam vinculis carnis absolvit; denique, aiunt, et justi quique judices peccantes perimunt. Quod si homicidium scirent malum esse, non uti. ille id ius“ homines Ῑίιοθτθηιο Neque θάιιηοΐὶυπι malum esse dicunt: si enim ignoretvir aut non cuο τοι. nihil. aiunt. mali θει- Sed neque furtum malum esse: quod enim deest alicui, aufert ab alio qui habet, quod quidem oportebat libere sumi et publice; sed quia occulte fit, in hoc magis illius a quo clam aufertur inhumanitas redarguitur. Communis enim usus omnium quae sunt in hoc mundo, omnibus esse hominibus debuit; sed per iniquitatem alius hoc suum dicit esse, et alius illud, et sic inter mortales divisio facta est. Denique Graecorum quidam sapientissimus haec ita sciens esse, ait, communia debere esse amicorum omnia; in omnibus autem sunt sine dubio et conjuges. Et sicut non potest, inquit, dividi aer neque splendor solis, ita nec reliqua quae communiter in hoc mundo data sunt omnibus ad habendum, dividi debere, sed habenda esse communia. Haec autem dicere volui, et non possum bene agere, nisi prius didicero quid sit bonum; quod si intelligere potuero. ex ipso etiam quid sit malum, hoc est huic contrarium, advertam.

The old man said: “There is a very forceful saying among the philosophers of the Greeks, which says that in the life of men there is in reality nothing either good or evil, but that men, preoccupied by the use and custom of life, call things evil or good as they appear to them. For not even murder is really an evil, since it frees the soul from the bonds of the flesh; indeed, they say, even just judges put sinners to death—and if they knew murder to be an evil, the just would not do it. Nor do they say that adultery is an evil; for if the husband does not know or does not care, there is, they say, no evil in it. Nor is theft an evil: for one who lacks something takes it from another who has it—which indeed ought to be taken freely and publicly; but because it is done secretly, in this rather the inhumanity of the one from whom it is secretly taken is exposed. For the common use of all things in this world ought to have belonged to all men; but through iniquity one calls this his own and another that, and so division was made among mortals. Indeed one of the wisest of the Greeks, knowing this to be so, said that all things of friends ought to be common—and among ‘all things’ wives are no doubt included. And as the air, he says, cannot be divided, nor the brightness of the sun, so neither should the other things given in common in this world to all to possess be divided, but they should be held in common. This I wished to say; and I cannot act well unless I first learn what the good is; and if I can understand that, I will notice from it what evil is, that is, its contrary.

Notes and citation

Summary: Faustinianus presents the Greek view that nothing is good or evil by nature—not murder, adultery, or theft—and Plato's teaching that friends should hold all things, even wives, in common.

  • The “wisest of the Greeks” is Plato (Resp. 5.457c–d; compare the proverb “friends have all things in common”); compare Homilies 19.19. The argument is the old man's, not the author's. A few words are garbled in the scan and translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): alius-illud → alius illud; sine dubio ct conjuges → sine dubio et conjuges; et njon possum → et non possum.

Extrabiblical texts: Plato, Resp. 5.457c–d (Plato (works); allusion)

Topics: Marriage, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.5 (PG 1:1422a–1423a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.6PG 1:1423a–1423b

Verum ad haec quae dixi, unum e vobis respondere volo, non Petrum; non enim dignum est, ab illo verba et doctrinam cum quaestionibus capere, sed ille si quid pronuntiaverit, hoc absque aliqua retractatione teneatur. Et ideo ipse nobis servetur quasi arbiter, ut sicubi disputatio nostra exitum non invenerit, ipse quod sibi visum fuerit pronuntians, indubitatum finem rebus dubiis imponat. Et nunc ergo possem sola ejus sententia contentus credere, si quid ei videretur, quod et ad u'limum “Ciam; V010 “me” Prius Videre. εἰ εει possibile disputando invenire quod quaeritur. Placet ergo ut Clemens primus incipiat, et ostendat, si est aliquid in substantia et actibus bonum vel malum.

“But to what I have said I want one of you to answer, not Peter. For it is not fitting to take words and teaching from him by way of questions; rather, whatever he pronounces should be held without any reconsideration. So let him be kept for us as arbiter, so that wherever our discussion finds no outcome, he may pronounce what he thinks and put an undoubted end to doubtful matters. And even now I could believe, content with his opinion alone, whatever he thought—which I shall do in the end; but I want first to see whether it is possible to find by disputation what is sought. So let Clement begin first, and show whether anything is good or evil in substance and in acts.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Faustinianus asks that Clement, not Peter, answer him, keeping Peter as final arbiter, and that Clement show whether anything is good or evil by nature.

  • A line is garbled in the scan (“which I shall do in the end; but I want first to see whether it is possible”); translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): Plaeet ergo → Placet ergo.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.6 (PG 1:1423a–1423b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.7PG 1:1423b

Ad haec ego respondi: Quoniam quidem a me vis discere, si est aliquid natura aut actu bonum vel malum, an potius usu praeventis hominibus bona quaedam et alia videntur mala, pro eo quod divisionem inter se rerum fecere communium, qua: deberent, ut ais, ita esse communia, ut aer et splendor solis; puto quod non debeam tibi aliunde assertiones adhibere, nisi ex his disciplinis quibus ipse uteris et quas ipse confirmas, et indubitata tibi sint quae dicuntur. Omnium elementorum et stellarum certos ponitis fines, quasque stellas dicitis in quibusdam absque noxa coire sicut in conjugiis, in aliis vero noxie misceri sicut in adulteriis. Et dicitis quaedam generalia esse omnium, quaedam vero non omnium neque generalia. Sed ne prolixa disputatio fiat, breviter et de re dicam. Terra quae arida est, conjugio et admistione indiget aquae, ut possit generare fructus, sine quibus vita hominibus non est; est ergo haec legitima conjunctio. Econtra si aut pruina: frigus terra: misceatur aut calor aquis. huiusmodi conjunctio corruptelam facit; et hoc in talibus adulterium est.

To this I answered: “Since you wish to learn from me whether anything is good or evil by nature or by act, or rather whether some things seem good and others evil to men preoccupied by custom, because they made a division among themselves of things that ought, as you say, to be common like the air and the brightness of the sun, I think I should not bring you proofs from elsewhere but from those disciplines which you yourself use and which you yourself confirm, so that what is said may be undoubted for you. You set fixed limits for all the elements and stars, and you say that some stars come together in certain cases without harm, as in marriages, but in others mix harmfully, as in adulteries. And you say that some things are general to all, and others neither belong to all nor are general. But so that the discussion may not be long, I will speak briefly and to the point. The earth, which is dry, needs union and mixture with water in order to produce the fruits without which there is no life for men; this, then, is a lawful union. On the contrary, if the cold of frost is mixed with the earth, or heat with the waters, such a union causes corruption; and in such things this is adultery.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement answers from astrology itself: the union of earth and water is fruitful, like lawful marriage, while harmful mixtures of elements are like adultery.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): usu prmventis → usu praeventis; non debean: tibi aliunde asscrtioncs adhibere, nisi ex liis → non debeam tibi aliunde assertiones adhibere, nisi ex his; sicut iu adulteriis → sicut in adulteriis; disputatio flat → disputatio fiat; admistione indiget aquze → admistione indiget aquae; est ergo base legitima conjunetio. Ecoutra → est ergo haec legitima conjunctio. Econtra.

Topics: Marriage

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.7 (PG 1:1423b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.8PG 1:1423b–1424a

Et pater respondit: Sed sicut elementorum vel stellarum inconsonae conjunctionis statim proditur noxa, ita deberet et adulterium statim ostendi quam malum est. Et ego aio: Hoc mihi primo confirma, si, ut etiam ipse confessus es, ex incongrua et inconsona admistione efficiuntur mala, et istud in consequentibus requiretur. Et pater ait: Ut se habet rei natura, ita ais, fili. Tum ego respondi: Quia ergo discere cupis de his, vide quanta sint videtur malum esse febris, incendium, seditio, ruina, caedes, vincula, supplicia, dolores. luctus, et his similia? Et pater: Verum est, inquit, fili, haec mala esse et valde mala; aut certe qui negat haec esse mala, patiatur ea.

My father answered: “But as the harm of a discordant union of elements or stars is at once betrayed, so it ought also to be shown at once how evil adultery is.” I said: “First confirm this for me: whether, as you yourself admitted, evils are produced from an unsuitable and discordant mixture; and that other point will be inquired into in what follows.” My father said: “As the nature of the thing is, so you say, my son.” Then I answered: “Since you wish to learn about these things, see how many things there are that no one doubts to be evils: do not fever, fire, sedition, collapse, slaughter, chains, punishments, pains, mourning, and things like these seem to you to be evil?” My father said: “It is true, my son, that these are evils, and very great evils; or at any rate let him who denies these are evils suffer them.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Faustinianus agrees that discordant mixtures produce evils such as fever, fire, slaughter, and grief.

  • A few words are lost or garbled in the scan (“that no one doubts to be evils”); supplied by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): ciliciuntur mala → efficiuntur mala; ita ais, flli → ita ais, fili; discere cupis de bis → discere cupis de his; et bis similia? Et pater: Verum est, inquit, fili, hac mala → et his similia? Et pater: Verum est, inquit, fili, haec mala.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.8 (PG 1:1423b–1424a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.9PG 1:1424a–1424b

Et ego respondi: Quia ergo cum eo mihi sermo est, qui in astrologica disciplina eruditus est. secundum ipsam tecum agam, ut de his quae tibi in usu sunt accipiens rationem, citius acquiescas. Audi nunc ergo. Confessus es mala esse ea quae supra diximus, id est febres, incendia, et his similia; haec secundum vos a malitiosis stellis fieri dicuntur, id est ab humido Saturno et calido Marte; horum vero contraria a benignis fieri stellis, id est a temperato Jove et humida Venere; aut non ita est? Et pater respondit: Ita est, fili, nec aliter fieri potest. Tum ego: Quia ergo a bonis stellis, Jove dico et Venere, bona fieri dicitis, videamus unaquaeque malarum stellarum cum admista fuerit bonis, quid est quod efficit; et illud esse intelligamus malum. Etenim nuptias facere Venerem ponitis; quae si Jovem habeat in schemate suo, pudicas efficiat, Jove autem non respiciente, si adfuerit Mars, corrumpi nuptias per adulterium pronuntiatis. Et pater: Ita se, inquit, habet. Ego respondi: Ergo malum est adulterium, quandoquidem ex malarum stellarum admistione committitur; et ut compendiosius explicemus, omnia quae dicitis ex malarum admistione stellarum bonas perpeti Stellas, mala esse sine dubio pronuntianda sunt. Istae ergo stellae quarum admistione diximus febres, incendia, et caetera his similia effici mala, ipsae secundum vos etiam homicidia, adulteria, furta operantur, protervos etiam et stolidos ipsa: efficiunt.

I answered: “Since I am speaking with one who is learned in the astrological discipline, I will deal with you according to it, so that receiving the account from things familiar to you, you may agree the more quickly. Hear now, then. You have admitted that the things we mentioned above are evils, that is, fevers, fires, and the like. These, according to you, are said to be caused by malicious stars, that is, by moist Saturn and hot Mars; and their opposites by benign stars, that is, by temperate Jupiter and moist Venus. Or is it not so?” My father answered: “It is so, my son, and it cannot be otherwise.” Then I said: “Since, then, you say that good things are caused by the good stars, I mean Jupiter and Venus, let us see what each of the evil stars produces when it is mixed with the good; and let us understand that to be evil. For you hold that Venus makes marriages; and if she has Jupiter in her figure, she makes chaste women; but if Jupiter does not regard her and Mars is present, you declare that marriages are corrupted by adultery.” My father said: “So it is.” I answered: “Then adultery is evil, since it is committed by the mixture of evil stars. And to explain more briefly: all the things you say the good stars suffer from the mixture of evil stars must without doubt be declared evil. Those stars, then, by whose mixture we said evils are produced—fevers, fires, and the rest like them—are the very ones that, according to you, also work murders, adulteries, thefts, and make men insolent and stupid.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Using astrology's own terms, Clement shows that adultery, murder, and theft come from the same malign stars as fevers and fires, so by the old man's own principles they are evil.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): de bis quae tibi → de his quae tibi; liaec secundum vos → haec secundum vos; id est va temperato → id est a temperato; Ita est, lili → Ita est, fili; quid est quod etIicit → quid est quod efficit; pudicas eliiciat → pudicas efficiat; onmia quae → omnia quae; lstze ergo stella: → Istae ergo stellae; et uetera his similia eilici mala, ipsa: → et caetera his similia effici mala, ipsae.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.9 (PG 1:1424a–1424b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.10PG 1:1424b–1425b

Et pater: Vere, inquit, breviter et incomparabiliter ostendisti, quia sint mala in actibus, sed hoc adhuc velim discere, quomodo juste iudicat Deus eos qui peccant, sicut vos dicitis, si peccare eos genesis cogit? Tum ego respondi: Vereor dicere tibi aliquid, pater, quia in omni te honore haberi a me decet, alioquin erat quod possim dicere si deceret. Et pater ait: Dic quod tibi occurrit, fili, etiamsi iniuriosum videtur; non enim tu. sed quaestionis ratio iniuriam facit, sicut pudica mulier intemperanti viro, si pro salute indignetur et honestate. Et ego respondi: Si prima quaeque inter nos confirmata et confessa non bene retineamus, sed semper quae definita sunt resolvantur per oblivionem, videbimur telam texere Penelopes, ea quae texuimus resolventes; et ideo debemus aut non facile acquiescere, priusquam diligenter examinetur sermo propositus, aut si jam acquievimus et confirmata sententia est, servare semper quod semel definitum est, ut possimus et de aliis quaerere. Et pater ait: Bene dicis, fili, et scio quam ob causam dicis, quia hesterno die de naturalibus disputans causis, ostendisti quia virtus quaedam maligna transformans se in ordinem stellarum humanas concupiscentias exagitat, diversis modis provocans ad peccatum, non tamen cogens aut efficiens peccatum. Cui ego respondi: Bene, quia et meministi et cum memineris errasti. Et pater: Ignosce, inquit, fili: nondum enim usum. multum in his habeo; nam et hesterni sermones tui veritate ipsa concluserunt me ut tibi acquiescerem, in conscientia tamen mea sunt quasi quaedam reliquiae febrium, quae paululum me a fide quasi a sanitate retrahunt. Discrucior enim, quia scio multa mihi, imo pene omnia accidisse secundum genesim.

My father said: “Truly you have shown briefly and incomparably that there are evils in acts. But I should still like to learn this: how does God judge justly those who sin, as you say, if birth-fate compels them to sin?” Then I answered: “I am afraid to say something to you, father, because it is fitting that you be held in all honor by me; otherwise there is something I could say, if it were fitting.” My father said: “Say what occurs to you, my son, even if it seems insulting; for it is not you but the logic of the question that does the injury—as a chaste woman to an intemperate husband, if she is indignant for her salvation and honor.” I answered: “If we do not keep well what has been first confirmed and admitted between us, but what has been defined is always undone through forgetfulness, we shall seem to be weaving the web of Penelope, undoing what we have woven. And so we ought either not to agree easily before the proposed statement is carefully examined, or, if we have already agreed and the opinion is confirmed, always to keep what has once been defined, so that we may also inquire about other things.” My father said: “You speak well, my son, and I know why you say it: because yesterday, discussing natural causes, you showed that a certain malignant power, transforming itself into the order of the stars, stirs up human desires, provoking to sin in various ways, yet not compelling or effecting sin.” I answered him: “Good—you have both remembered, and, while remembering, gone astray.” My father said: “Forgive me, my son; I do not yet have much practice in these things. For your words yesterday shut me in by their very truth so that I agreed with you; yet in my conscience there remain, as it were, some remnants of fevers, which draw me back a little from faith as from health. For I am tormented because I know that many things, indeed almost all things, have happened to me according to birth-fate.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Faustinianus asks how God can justly judge sins compelled by fate; Clement reminds him that yesterday they agreed demons incite but do not compel, and the old man admits lingering doubts from his own experience.

  • Penelope's web: Homer, Od. 2.93–105.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): incompa» rabiliter → incomparabiliter; prima quie‘lue → prima quaeque; semper qua! definita → semper quae definita; scrvare semper → servare semper; di- λ sputans → disputans; ad "peccatum, non tamen cogens aut etliciens → ad peccatum, non tamen cogens aut efficiens; ut tibi. acquiescerem → ut tibi acquiescerem; a lide quasi → a fide quasi.

Extrabiblical texts: Homer, Od. 2.93–105 (Homer, Odyssey; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.10 (PG 1:1424b–1425b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.11PG 1:1425b–1426b

Et ego respondi: Audi ergo, pater, quae sit mathesis natura, et facito secundum ea quae dico tibi. Vide mathematicum et dic ei primo, quia talia quaedam mihi acciderunt mala in illo tempore; unde ergo aut quo modo aut per quas mihi acciderint stellas, discere volo. Respondebit tibi sine dubio, quia tempora tua malitiosus suscepit Mars aut Saturnus, aut aliquis eorum apocatastaticus fuit, aut aliquis annum tuum aspexit ex diametro aut conjunctus aut in centro, vel alia his similia respondebit, addens, quia in his omnibus aliquis aut asyndetus fuit cum malo, aut invisibilis, aut in schemate, aut extra haeresim, aut deficiens, aut non contingens, aut in obscuris stellis, et multa alia his similia secundum rationes proprias respondebit et de singulis assignabit. Post hunc alium adito mathematicum et dicito contraria. quia illud mihi boni contigit in illo tempore; tempus autem hoc idem dicito, et require ex quibus partibus genesis hoc tibi evenerit boni, et tempora ut dixi, eadem quae de malis interrogaveras. custodito. Cumque tu fefelleris de temporibus, vide quanta tibi inveniet schemata, per quas ostendat quod tibi in illis ipsis temporibus evenire debuerint bona. Impossibile enim est hominum genesim tractantibus, non in omni quam dicunt regione stellarum semper invenire quasdam bene positas stellas, et quasdam male; circulus enim est aequaliter ex omni parte collectus secundum mathesim, diversas et varias accipiens causas, ex quibus occasionem capiant dicendi quod volunt.

I answered: “Hear, then, father, what the nature of astrology is, and do as I tell you. Go to an astrologer and say to him first: ‘Such and such evils happened to me at that time; I want to learn, then, from where or how or through which stars they happened to me.’ He will without doubt answer you that malicious Mars or Saturn took over your times, or one of them was in apocatastasis, or one regarded your year from the diameter, or in conjunction, or at a cardinal point; or he will answer other such things, adding that in all these one was either unconnected with the malefic, or invisible, or in figure, or outside its sect, or waning, or not in contact, or among obscure stars; and he will answer many other such things according to his own reasons and assign them in each case. After him go to another astrologer and say the opposite: ‘Such and such good happened to me at that time’—but name the same time—and ask from what parts of the birth-fate this good came to you; and keep, as I said, the same times you asked about for the evils. And when you have deceived him about the times, see how many figures he will find for you, by which he will show that good things must have come to you at those very times. For it is impossible for those who handle men's birth-fate not always to find, in every region of the stars they speak of, some stars well placed and some badly. For the circle, according to astrology, is gathered equally on every side, admitting diverse and varied causes, from which they take occasion to say what they wish.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement suggests testing astrologers by reporting the same date as unlucky to one and lucky to another, since their system always lets them find a configuration to explain any outcome.

  • Astrological technical terms (apocatastasis, diameter, cardinal point, sect, etc.) translated as in the Latin. Footnote and column numbers printed in the text have been removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; column number in the text; footnote number in the text; stray mark): acciderunt» mala → acciderunt mala; perrquas → per quas; Respondebit tibi I426 sine → Respondebit tibi sine; apocatastaticus fuit (l2), → apocatastaticus fuit,; cum malo (1.1), → cum malo,; preprias → proprias; tem—. pus → tempus; ex quibus. partibus → ex quibus partibus; debiterint → debuerint; lmpossibile → Impossibile.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.11 (PG 1:1425b–1426b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.12PG 1:1427a–1427b

Sicut enim fieri solet ubi somnia obliqua viderint homines, et nihil certi intelligunt, cum aliquis occurrerit exitus rerum, tunc ad ea quae acciderint aptant etiam somnii visum, ita est et mathesis; antequam aliquid fiat, certi nihil pronuntiatur, postea vero quam aliquid acciderit. rei jam gesta: colligunt causas. Denique frequenter cum erraverint et aliter res acciderit, semetipsos increpant dicentes quia illa fuit stella quae impedivit, quae occurrit, et non vidimus, ignorantes quia error eorum non ex artis imprudentia, sed ex totius causa: inconvenientia descendit: ignorant enim quae sint, quae facere quidem concupiscamus, non tamen indulgeamus concupiscentiis. Nos autem qui mysterii hujus didicimus rationem, scimus et causam, quia libertatem habentes arbitrii interdum concupiscentiis obsistimus, interdum cedimus: et ideo humanorum gestorum incertus est exitus, quia in libertate pendet arbitrii. Nam concupiscentiam quidem, quam operatur maligna virtus, potest indicare mathematicus; sed si concupiscentia: hujus actus vel exitus impleri possit necne, quia in arbitrii Iibertate est, sciri ante effectum rei nullo potest. Et hoc est quod ignorantes astrologi invenerunt sibi ut climacteras dicerent, rei scilicet incertae perfugia, sicut hesterno plenissime ostendimus.

“For as usually happens when men have seen ambiguous dreams and understand nothing certain: when some outcome of events occurs, they then fit the vision of the dream to what has happened. So it is with astrology: before anything happens, nothing certain is declared; but after something has happened, they gather the causes of the thing already done. Indeed, when they have often erred and the thing has turned out otherwise, they reproach themselves, saying that it was such and such a star that hindered, that intervened, and we did not see it—not knowing that their error comes not from lack of skill in the art but from the unsuitability of the whole system. For they do not know what the things are which we desire to do, yet do not indulge our desires. But we who have learned the reason of this mystery also know the cause: that, having freedom of choice, we sometimes resist desires and sometimes yield; and therefore the outcome of human actions is uncertain, because it hangs on freedom of choice. For the astrologer can indicate the desire which the malignant power works; but whether the act or outcome of this desire can be fulfilled or not, since it lies in freedom of choice, can be known by no one before the event. And this is why the astrologers, in their ignorance, invented for themselves the talk of climacterics—refuges, of course, for an uncertain matter—as we showed most fully yesterday.

Notes and citation

Summary: Astrologers, like interpreters of ambiguous dreams, explain events only after the fact; they can detect desires stirred by demons but not whether free will will act on them.

  • “Yesterday”: 9.12. Footnote numbers printed in the text have been removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR and footnote number in the text; stray marks): nihil_'certi → nihil certi; ad ea qua; acciderint → ad ea quae acciderint; etnon vidimus,ignorantes → et non vidimus, ignorantes; cedimus: ct ideo humanorum gestorum (l7) incertus → cedimus: et ideo humanorum gestorum incertus; quis dem → quidem; ante clIectum rei nullo potest._Et → ante effectum rei nullo potest. Et; scilicetincertre perfugia (l8), → scilicet incertae perfugia,.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.12 (PG 1:1427a–1427b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.13PG 1:1427b–1427c

Ad haec si quid tibi dicendum videtur, dicito. Et pater: Nihil verius, inquit, fili, his quae prosecutus es. Cumque haec loqueremur inter nos, nuntiavit quidam plurimum stare populum foris qui audiendi gratia convenerint, et Petrus jussit his ingrediendi copiam dari; erat enim locus opportunus et amplus. Cumque ingressi fuissent, ait ad nos Petrus: Si quis vult vestrum, faciat ad populum sermonem et de idololatria disserat. Cui ego Clemens respondi: Multa benignitas tua et erga omnes lenitas ac patientia indulget nobis, ut audeamus loqui coram te et rogare quae volumus; et ideo, ut dixi, morum tuorum mansuetudo invitat omnes et adhortatur salutaris doctrina: praecepta suscipere. Hoc ego usque ad praesens apud nullum alium vidi, nisi apud te solum, apud quem invidia nulla est neque indignatio; aut quid tibi videtur?

“If you think anything should be said to this, say it.” My father said: “Nothing is truer, my son, than what you have set out.” While we were talking thus among ourselves, someone announced that a very great crowd was standing outside, who had gathered to listen; and Peter ordered that they be allowed to come in, for the place was suitable and spacious. When they had come in, Peter said to us: “If any of you wishes, let him address the people and speak about idolatry.” I, Clement, answered him: “Your great kindness, and your gentleness and patience toward all, allow us to dare to speak in your presence and to ask what we wish. And therefore, as I said, the mildness of your character invites all and encourages them to receive the precepts of saving teaching. Until now I have seen this in no one else but you alone, in whom there is no envy or indignation. Or what do you think?”

Notes and citation

Summary: Faustinianus accepts Clement's argument; a crowd gathers, and Peter invites any of his companions to speak on idolatry, while Clement praises his freedom from envy.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join; stray mark): Petrusjussit → Petrus jussit; vnltlvestrutn → vult vestrum; videtur"? → videtur?.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.13 (PG 1:1427b–1427c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.14PG 1:1427c–1428a

Et Petrus: Non solum haec ex invidia aut indignatione veniunt, sed interdum inest aliquibus verecundia, ne forte de his quae proponuntur, plene respondere non possint, et fugiunt imperitiae notam. Sed non debet pro hoc quis verecundiam pati, quia nec est aliquis hominum qui profiteri debeat omnia se scire; unus enim est qui scit omnia, ipse qui et fecit omnia. Si enim Magister noster diem et horam, cujus etiam signa praedixit, nescire se professus est, ut totum revocaret ad Patrem, quomodo nos turpe ducemus, si aliqua nos ignorare fateamur, cum Magistri in hoc habeamus exemplum? Hoc tamen unum profitemur ea nos scire, quae a vero propheta didicimus; ea autem a vero propheta nobis esse tradita, quae sufficere humanae scientiae judicavit.

Peter said: “These things do not come only from envy or indignation; sometimes there is in some a shame lest they be unable to answer fully about the things proposed, and they flee the mark of ignorance. But no one ought to feel shame for this, because there is no man who ought to profess that he knows everything. For there is one who knows all things, he who also made all things. For if our Master professed that he did not know the day and the hour, whose signs he even foretold, so as to refer everything to the Father, how shall we think it shameful if we admit that we are ignorant of some things, when we have the example of the Master in this? This one thing, however, we profess: that we know what we have learned from the true Prophet, and that those things were handed down to us by the true Prophet which he judged sufficient for human knowledge.”

Matt 24:36 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 13:32 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter says no one should be ashamed of not knowing everything, since even Christ professed not to know the day and hour; his followers know what the true Prophet judged sufficient.

  • Matt 24:36 (Mark 13:32).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): non possint,et → non possint, et; qni scit omnia, ipsequi → qui scit omnia, ipse qui; c ujus etiam → cujus etiam; Hoc tamen unum - profitemur → Hoc tamen unum profitemur; tradita, qum sufficere humana: scientia: → tradita, quae sufficere humanae scientiae.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.14 (PG 1:1427c–1428a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.15PG 1:1428a–1428b

Tum ego Clemens dicere ita coepi: Apud Tripolim cum contra gentiles disputares, domine mi Petre, valde miratus sum te, qui a patribus Hebraeo ritu et observantiis propriae legis imbutus, Graecae eruditionis studiis in nullo inquinatus es, quomodo tam magnifice et tam incomparabiliter prosecutus sis, ita ut etiam quaedam de historiis deorum quae in theatris decantari solent, contingeres. Verum quoniam sensi tibi ipsas fabulas et blasphemias eorum minus esse notas, de his, si placet, aliqua in auditu tuo repetens ab ipsa origine disseram. Et Petrus: Dic, inquit, bene facis juvare praedicationem nostram. Tum ego: Dicam igitur quia jubes, non ut docens, sed quam stultas de diis suis opiniones habeant gentiles, in medium proferens.

Then I, Clement, began to speak thus: “At Tripolis, when you were disputing against the Gentiles, my lord Peter, I greatly marveled how you, who were brought up by your fathers in the Hebrew rite and the observances of your own law, and in no way defiled by the studies of Greek learning, argued so magnificently and incomparably that you even touched on some of the stories of the gods which are usually sung in the theaters. But since I perceived that their very fables and blasphemies are less known to you, I will, if you please, discuss some of them in your hearing, repeating them from their very origin.” Peter said: “Speak; you do well to help our preaching.” Then I said: “Since you order it, I will speak, not as teaching, but bringing into the open what foolish opinions the Gentiles have about their gods.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement offers to recount the pagan myths of the gods, which Peter, raised in the Jewish law and untouched by Greek learning, knew less well.

  • The Tripolis discourses are in Books 4–6 and the Homilies.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin)): dicere ita ηαξρὶ:Apud → dicere ita coepi: Apud; propria: legis → propriae legis; pnedicationem → praedicationem.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.15 (PG 1:1428a–1428b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.16PG 1:1428b–1428c

Cumque vellem dicere, Niceta labrum mordicus stringens, innuebat mihi ut tacerem; quem cum vidisset Petrus, ait: Cur ingenium liberale et generosam laedere vis naturam, ut in honorem mei, qui nullus est, tacere eum velis? Aut nescis, quia si omnes gentes, postquam audierint a me praedicationem veritatis et crediderint, velint se ad docendum conferre, mihi majorem pariunt gloriam, siquidem gloria: me cupidum putas? Quid enim tam gloriosum quam Christo discipulos praeparasse, non qui taceant et soli salvi fiant, sed qui loquantur quae didicerunt, et multis prosint? Utinam quidem et tu, Niceta, sed et tu, dulcissime Aquila, juvaretis me ad praedicandum verbum Dei, eo magis quo ea in quibus errant gentiles, bene vobis comperta sunt: et non solum vos, sed et omnes qui audiunt me, opto ita audire et discere, ut et docere possint; multis namque adjutoribus indiget mundus, quibus homines ab errore revocentur. Cumque haec dixisset, ait ad me: Tu ergo, Clemens, exsequere quae coepisti.

When I wished to speak, Niceta, biting his lip, signaled to me to be silent. When Peter saw him he said: “Why do you want to hurt a liberal mind and a noble nature, wishing him to keep silent in honor of me, who am nothing? Or do you not know that if all the nations, after they have heard the preaching of truth from me and believed, wish to devote themselves to teaching, they bring me greater glory—if indeed you think me desirous of glory? For what is so glorious as to have prepared disciples for Christ, not who keep silent and alone are saved, but who speak what they have learned and help many? I wish that you too, Niceta, and you also, sweetest Aquila, would help me to preach the word of God, all the more because the things in which the Gentiles err are well known to you. And not only you, but all who hear me, I wish so to hear and learn that they may also be able to teach; for the world needs many helpers by whom men may be called back from error.” When he had said this, he said to me: “You, then, Clement, carry out what you have begun.”

Matt 9:37 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter rebukes Niceta for signaling Clement to be silent, saying he wishes all disciples to teach, for the world needs many helpers.

  • Matt 9:37–38.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): innuebat mibi_ut → innuebat mihi ut; praedio cationem → praedicationem; tu,Niceta → tu, Niceta; Opto, ut dixiqita → opto ita; quibns homines → quibus homines; exsc‘ υ quere quae cmpisti → exsequere quae coepisti.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.16 (PG 1:1428b–1428c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.17PG 1:1428c–1429b

Et ego continuo subjunxi: Quoniam, dixi, apud Tripolim disputans, multa de diis gentium utiliter et necessario disseruisti, cupio de origine eorum ridicula te coram exponere, ut neque te lateat vanae hujus superstitionis commentum, et auditores qui assistunt erroris sui probra cognoscant. Aiunt ergo qui sapientiores sunt inter gentiles, primo omnium chaos fuisse: hoc per multum tempus exteriores sui solidans partes, fines sibi et fundum quemdam fecisse tanquam in ovi immanis modum formamque collectum, intra quod multo nihilominus tempore, quasi intra ovi testam, fotum vivificatumque esse animal quoddam; disruptoque post haec immani illo globo processisse speciem quamdam hominis duplicis formae, quam illi masculo—feminam vocant; hunc etiam Phanetam nominarunt, ab apparendo, quia cum apparuisset, inquiunt, tunc etiam lux effulsit. Et ex hoc dicunt progenitam esse substantiam, prudentiam, motum, coitum: ex his factum caelum et terram. Ex coelo sex progenitos mares, quos et Titanas appellant; similiter et de terra sex feminas, quas Titanidas vocitarunt, et sunt nomina eorum quidem qui ex coelo orti sunt haec: Oceanus, Catus, Crios, Hyperion, Iapetos, Cronos, qui apud nos Saturnus nominatur. Similiter et earum quae e terra ortae sunt nomina sunt haec: Theia, Rhea. Themis, Mnemosyne, Tethys, Hebe.

And I at once added: “Since,” I said, “when disputing at Tripolis you discussed many things usefully and necessarily about the gods of the nations, I wish to set out in your presence their ridiculous origin, so that neither the fabrication of this vain superstition may escape you, nor the hearers present fail to recognize the disgrace of their error. Those, then, who are wiser among the Gentiles say that first of all there was Chaos; that this, solidifying its outer parts over a long time, made for itself boundaries and a kind of bottom, gathered in the manner and shape of an immense egg; and that within it, likewise over a long time, as within the shell of an egg, a certain living creature was cherished and quickened; and that after this, that immense globe having burst, there came forth a certain form of a man of double shape, which they call male-female. Him they also named Phanes, from appearing, because, they say, when he appeared, then light also shone forth. And from him, they say, were begotten substance, prudence, motion, intercourse; from these were made heaven and earth. From heaven six males were begotten, whom they call Titans; likewise from earth six females, whom they called Titanesses. And the names of those born from heaven are these: Oceanus, Coeus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, who among us is called Saturn. Likewise the names of those born from earth are these: Theia, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Tethys, Hebe.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement recounts the Orphic cosmogony of the cosmic egg and the androgynous Phanes, and the birth of the six Titans and six Titanesses.

  • The cosmic egg and Phanes are Orphic (compare Homilies 6.3–5); the Titans follow Hesiod, Theog. 133–138, with Hebe in place of Phoebe and Tethys. Footnote numbers printed in the text have been removed. “Coeus” renders the printed “Catus”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; footnote number in the text): Phanetam (‘20) nominarunt → Phanetam nominarunt; lux etfulsit → lux effulsit; ex bis factum ccelum → ex his factum caelum; Titanas (2|) appellant → Titanas appellant; sex teminas → sex feminas; lapetos → Iapetos; earum qua; e terra → earum quae e terra; haec ε Theia → haec: Theia.

Extrabiblical texts: Orpheus (attributed), Orph. frag. cosmic egg, Phanes (Orpheus (attributed), Orphic poems (fragments); allusion); Hesiod, Theog. 133–138 (Hesiod, Theogony; allusion); Ps.-Clem. Hom. 6.3–5 (Homilies; echo)

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.17 (PG 1:1428c–1429b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.18PG 1:1429b–1430a

Ex his omnibus qui primus fuerat e caelo natus, primam terrae filiam accepit uxorem, secundus secundam et caeteri similiter per ordinem. Primus ergo qui primam duxerat, propter eam deductus est deorsum; secunda vero propter eum cui nupserat, ascendit sursum; et ita singuli per ordinem facientes, manserunt in his qui eis nuptiali sorte obvenerant locis. Ex istorum coniunctionibus alios quoque innumeros asserunt progenitos. Sed de illis sex maribus unus, qui dicitur Saturnus, in conjugium accepit Rheam, et cum responso quodam commonitus esset, quod qui ex ea nasceretur fortior ipso futurus esset regnoque eum depelleret, omnes qui ei nascerentur filios devorare, instituit. Huic ergo primus nascitur filius, quem Aiden appellarunt, qui apud nos Orcus nominatur, quem pro causis quibus supra diximus, assumptum devorat pater. Post hunc secundum genuit, quem Neptunum dicunt, quemque simili modo devoravit. Novissimum genuit eum, quem Jovem appellant, sed hunc mater miserans Rhea, per artem devoraturo subtrahit patri, et primo quidem ne vagitus pueri innotesceret, Corybantas quosdam cymbala fecit ac tympana percutere, ut obstrepente sonitu vagitus non audiretur infantis.

“Of all these, he who was born first from heaven took the first daughter of earth as wife, the second the second, and the rest likewise in order. The first, who had married the first, was led down below on her account; the second, on account of him whom she had married, went up above; and so, each doing likewise in order, they remained in the places that had fallen to them by the lot of marriage. From their unions they assert that countless others were also begotten. But of those six males, one, who is called Saturn, took Rhea in marriage; and having been warned by an oracle that one born of her would be stronger than he and drive him from his kingdom, he resolved to devour all the sons who were born to him. So his first son is born, whom they called Aides, who among us is named Orcus; and for the reasons we stated above, the father took him and devoured him. After him he begot a second, whom they call Neptune, and devoured him in the same way. Last he begot the one they call Jupiter; but his mother Rhea, pitying him, by a trick withdrew him from the father who was about to devour him; and first, so that the child's crying might not become known, she had certain Corybantes beat cymbals and drums, so that the infant's crying might not be heard over the noise.

Notes and citation

Summary: Clement recounts how the Titans married the Titanesses, and how Saturn devoured his sons Aides and Neptune until Rhea hid Jupiter, with the Corybantes drowning out his cries.

  • Hesiod, Theog. 453–491, with variations.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR): Novissinlum → Novissimum; devoraturo sub. trahit → devoraturo subtrahit.

Extrabiblical texts: Hesiod, Theog. 453–491 (Hesiod, Theogony; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.18 (PG 1:1429b–1430a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).

10.19PG 1:1430a–1430b

Sed cum ex uteri imminutione intellexisset pater editum partum, expetebat ad devorandum; tunc Rhea lapidem ei offerens magnum, Hunc genui, inquit. At ille accipiens absorbuit, et lapis devoratus eos quos primo absorbuerat filios, trusit et coegit exire. Primus ergo procedens descendit Orcus, et inferiora, hoc est inferna occupat loca. Secundus utpote illo superior super aquas detruditur, is quem Neptunum vocant. Tertius qui arte matris Rheae superfuit, ab ipsa caprae superpositus in caelum emissus est.

“But when the father understood from the shrinking of her womb that the child had been born, he demanded it to devour it. Then Rhea, offering him a large stone, said: ‘This is what I bore.’ He took it and swallowed it; and the swallowed stone pushed out and forced to come forth the sons he had first swallowed. The first to come out, Orcus, went down and occupies the lower, that is the infernal, regions. The second, as being above him, is thrust down upon the waters—he whom they call Neptune. The third, who survived through the art of his mother Rhea, was set upon a goat by her and sent up into heaven.

Notes and citation

Summary: Saturn swallows a stone in place of Jupiter, which forces him to disgorge Orcus, who takes the underworld, and Neptune, who takes the waters, while Jupiter is carried to heaven on a goat.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): ofl‘erens → offerens; trusitet coegit → trusit et coegit; capra: superpositus in CBlum → caprae superpositus in caelum.

Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.19 (PG 1:1430a–1430b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/9-35/#p-10-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).