On Repentance 5

Summary: Repentance once made must not be undone by returning to sin: this is contempt and ingratitude toward God and a triumph for the devil; nor may anyone claim that inward fear of God excuses outward sin.

Show

Latin text · Oehler 1:651–652

Hoc enim dico, paenitentiam, quae per dei gratiam ostensa et indicta nobis in gratiam nos domino revocat, semel cognitam atque susceptam nunquam posthac iteratione delicti resignari oportere. Iam quidem nullum ignorantiae praetextum tibi patrocinatur, quod domino agnito praeceptisque eius admissis denique paenitentia delictorum functus rursus te in delicta restituis. Ita in quantum ignorantia segregaris, in tantum contumaciae adglutinaris. Nam si idcirco te deliquisse paenituerat, quia dominum coeperas timere, cur, quod metus gratia gessisti, rescindere maluisti, nisi quia metuere desisti? Neque enim timorem alia res quam contumacia subvertit. Cum etiam ignorantes dominum nulla exceptio tueatur ad poenam, quia deum in aperto constitutum et vel ex ipsis caelestibus bonis comprehensibilem ignorari non licet, quanto cognitum despici periculosum est? Despicit porro qui bonorum ac malorum intellectum ab illo consecutus quod intellegit fugiendum quodque iam fugit resumens intellectui suo, id est dei dono, contumeliam facit: respuit datorem, cum datum deserit, negat beneficum, cum beneficium non honorat. Quemadmodum ei potest placere cuius munus sibi displicet? Ita in dominum non modo contumax, sed etiam ingratus apparet. Ceterum non leviter in dominum peccat qui, cum aemulo eius diabolo paenitentia renuntiasset et hoc nomine illum domino subiecisset rursus eundem regressu suo erigit et exultationem eius seipsum facit, ut denuo malus recuperata praeda sua adversus dominum gaudeat. Nonne, quod dicere quoque periculosum est, sed ad aedificationem proferendum est, diabolum domino praeponit? Comparationem enim videtur egisse qui utrumque cognoverit, et iudicato pronuntiasse eum meliorem cuius se rursus esse maluerit. Ita qui per delictorum paenitentiam instituerat domino satisfacere, diabolo per aliam paenitentiae paenitentiam satisfaciet, eritque tanto magis perosus deo, quanto aemulo eius acceptus. Sed aiunt quidam satis deum habere, si corde et animo suspiciatur, licet actu minus fiat; itaque se salvo metu et fide peccare, hoc est salva castitate matrimonia violare, salva pietate parenti venenum temperare. Sic ergo et ipsi salva venia in gehennam detrudentur, dum salvo metu peccant. Primum exemplum perversitatis: quia timent, delinquunt. Opinor, non delinquerent, si non timerent. Igitur qui deum nolit offensum, nec revereatur omnino, si timor offendendi patrocinium est. Sed ista ingenia de semine hypocritarum pullulare consuerunt, quorum individua cum diabolo amicitia est, quorum paenitentia nunquam fidelis.

English · Claude translation

This, then, is what I say: that repentance, which, shown and enjoined upon us by God's grace, recalls us into the Lord's favor, once it has been known and taken up must never afterwards be cancelled by a repetition of sin. Now no plea of ignorance protects you, since, having come to know the Lord and accepted his commandments, and having then performed repentance for your sins, you put yourself back into sins. So the more you are separated from ignorance, the more closely you are glued to contumacy. For if you had repented of having sinned because you had begun to fear the Lord, why have you preferred to undo what you did for fear's sake, unless because you have ceased to fear? For nothing overthrows fear but contumacy. Since no plea protects from punishment even those who are ignorant of the Lord, because it is not permitted to be ignorant of God, who is set in the open and is comprehensible even from his heavenly benefits, how dangerous is it to despise him once known? And he despises him who, having received from him the understanding of good and evil, takes up again what he understands must be shunned and what he has already shunned, and so insults his understanding, that is, God's gift. He rejects the giver when he abandons the gift; he denies the benefactor when he does not honor the benefit. How can he please one whose gift displeases himself? So he appears not only contumacious toward the Lord but also ungrateful. Besides, he sins not lightly against the Lord who, after renouncing by repentance the Lord's rival, the devil, and on this account subjecting him to the Lord, raises him up again by his own return and makes himself the devil's triumph, so that the evil one, having recovered his prey, rejoices anew against the Lord. Does he not (it is dangerous even to say it, but it must be put forward for edification) set the devil above the Lord? For he seems to have made a comparison, having known both, and to have pronounced judgment that he is the better whose he has preferred to be again. So he who had begun to make satisfaction to the Lord through repentance for his sins will make satisfaction to the devil through another repentance, a repentance of his repentance, and will be as much the more hateful to God as he is acceptable to his rival. But some say that God is satisfied if he is looked up to in heart and mind, even if this is less done in act; and so they sin while keeping their fear and faith intact, that is, they violate marriages while keeping their chastity intact, they mix poison for a parent while keeping their piety intact. So, then, they too will be thrust down into Gehenna with their pardon intact, while they sin with their fear intact! A prime example of perversity: they sin because they fear! I suppose they would not sin if they did not fear. So let him who would not have God offended not revere him at all, if fear of offending is a license. But such minds usually sprout from the seed of the hypocrites, whose friendship with the devil is inseparable, whose repentance is never faithful.

About this passage

Source
Oehler 1:651–652 · Franz Oehler, ed., Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani quae supersunt omnia, vol. 1 (Leipzig: T. O. Weigel, 1853), 643–665 · Latin text: Franz Oehler (Oehler 1), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library (canonical-latinLit), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Oehler 1. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Oehler, vol. 1 (1853); made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Ethics, Baptism

Notes

Translation notes

  • The allusion is Rom 1:19-20 (God known from his works). “Satisfaction” renders satisfacere.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (letter dropped in the digital text): ingratus appare. → ingratus apparet..

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Paen. 5 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-paenitentia/5/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Paen. 5 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-paenitentia/5/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage