Confessions

The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.

Show

Chapter 1

1.1CSEL 33:1–2

Magnus es, domine, et laudabilis ualde: magna uirtus tua et sapientiae tuae non est numerus. et laudare te uult homo, aliqua portio creaturae tuae, et homo circumferens mortalitatem suam, circumferens testimonium peccati sui et testimonium, quia superbis resistis: et tamen laudare te uult homo, aliqua portio creaturae tuae. tu excitas, ut laudare te delectet, quia fecisti nos ad te et inquietum est cor nostrum, donec requiescat in te. da mihi, domine, scire et intellegere, utrum sit prius inuocare te an laudare te et scire te prius sit an inuocare te. sed quis te inuocat nesciens te? aliud enim pro alio potest inuocare nesciens. an potius inuocaris, ut sciaris? quomodo autem inuocabunt, in quem non crediderunt? aut quomodo credent sine praedicante? et laudabunt dominum qui requirunt eum. quaerentes enim inueniunt eum et inuenientes laudabunt eum. quaeram te, domine, inuocans te et inuocem te credens in te: praedicatus enim es nobis. inuocat te, domine, fides mea, quam dedisti mihi, quam inspirasti mihi per humanitatem filii tui, per ministerium praedicatoris tui.

“You are great, Lord, and greatly to be praised”: “great is your power, and of your wisdom there is no number.” And a human being, some portion of your creation, wants to praise you: a human being carrying his mortality about with him, carrying about the evidence of his sin and the evidence that you “resist the proud”; and still a human being, some portion of your creation, wants to praise you. You stir him up so that he delights to praise you, because you made us for yourself, and our heart is restless until it rests in you. Grant me, Lord, to know and understand whether it comes first to call upon you or to praise you, and whether knowing you comes first or calling upon you. But who calls upon you without knowing you? For one who does not know you may call upon something else instead of you. Or rather, are you called upon so that you may be known? “But how shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? Or how shall they believe without a preacher?” And “they shall praise the Lord who seek him.” For those who seek him find him, and those who find him will praise him. Let me seek you, Lord, calling upon you, and let me call upon you believing in you, for you have been preached to us. My faith calls upon you, Lord, the faith you gave me, which you breathed into me through the humanity of your Son, through the ministry of your preacher.

1.2CSEL 33:2–3

Et quomodo inuocabo deum meum, deum et dominum meum, quoniam utique in me ipsum eum inuocabo, cum inuocabo eum? et quis locus est in me, quo ueniat in me deus meus? quo deus ueniat in me, deus, qui fecit caelum et terram? itane, domine deus meus, est quicquam in me, quod capiat te? an uero caelum et terra, quae fecisti et in quibus me fecisti, capiunt te? an quia sine te non esset quidquid est, fit, ut quidquid est capiat te? quoniam itaque et ego sum, quid peto, ut uenias in me, qui non essem, nisi esses in me? non enim ego iam inferi, et tamen etiam ibi es. nam etsi descendero in infernum, ades. non ergo essem, deus meus, non omnino essem, nisi esses in me. an potius non essem, nisi essem in te, ex quo omnia, per quem omnia, in quo omnia? etiam sic, domine, etiam sic. quo te inuoco, cum in te sim? aut unde uenias in me? quo enim recedam extra caelum et terram, ut inde in me ueniat deus meus, qui dixit: caelum et terram ego impleo?

And how shall I call upon my God, my God and Lord, since surely when I call upon him I shall be calling him into myself? And what place is there in me into which my God may come into me? Into what place may God come into me, the God “who made heaven and earth”? Is there anything in me, Lord my God, that can contain you? Or do heaven and earth, which you made and in which you made me, contain you? Or, since nothing that exists would exist without you, does it follow that whatever exists contains you? Since, then, I too exist, why do I ask you to come into me, when I would not exist unless you were in me? For I am not yet in the underworld, and yet you are there too: for “if I go down into the underworld, you are there.” So I would not exist, my God, I would not exist at all, unless you were in me. Or rather, I would not exist unless I were in you, “from whom are all things, through whom are all things, in whom are all things.” Even so, Lord, even so. Where do I call you to, since I am in you? Or from where would you come into me? For where could I withdraw outside heaven and earth, so that my God might come into me from there, he who said, “I fill heaven and earth”?

1.3CSEL 33:3

Capiunt ergone te caelum et terra, quoniam tu imples ea? an imples et restat, quoniam non te capiunt et quo refundes quidquid impleto caelo et terra restat ex te? an non opus habes, ut quoquam continearis, qui contines omnia, quoniam quae imples continendo imples? non enim uasa, quae te plena sunt, stabilem te faciunt, quia etsi frangantur non effunderis. et cum effunderis super nos, non tu iaces, sed erigis nos, nec tu dissiparis, sed colligis nos. sed quae imples omnia, te toto imples omnia. an quia non possunt te totum capere omnia, partem tui capiunt et eandem partem simul omnia capiunt? an singulas singula et maiores maiora, minores minora capiunt? ergo est aliqua pars tua maior, aliqua minor? an ubique totus es et res nulla te totum capit?

Do heaven and earth, then, contain you, since you fill them? Or do you fill them and there is still some of you left over, since they do not contain you? And where do you pour out whatever of you remains once heaven and earth are filled? Or do you have no need to be contained anywhere, you who contain all things, since what you fill you fill by containing it? For the vessels that are full of you do not make you stable, because even if they are broken you are not spilled out. And when you are poured out upon us, you do not lie on the ground; rather you raise us up. You are not scattered; rather you gather us together. But you who fill all things, you fill them all with the whole of yourself. Or, since all things cannot contain the whole of you, do they contain a part of you, and do all things contain the same part at once? Or does each thing contain its own part, larger things larger parts and smaller things smaller? Is some part of you then larger and some smaller? Or are you wholly everywhere, and does nothing contain the whole of you?

1.4CSEL 33:3–4

Quid est ergo deus meus? quid, rogo, nisi dominus deus? quis enim dominus praeter dominum? aut quis deus praeter deum nostrum? summe, optime, potentissime, omnipotentissime, misericordissime et iustissime, secretissime et praesentissime, pulcherrime et fortissime, stabilis et inconprehensibilis, inmutabilis, mutans omnia, numquam nouus, numquam uetus, innouans omnia, in uetustatem perducens superbos et nesciunt; semper agens, semper quietus, colligens et non egens, portans et implens et protegens, creans et nutriens, perficiens, quaerens, cum nihil desit tibi. amas nec aestuas, zelas et securus es, paenitet te et non doles, irasceris et tranquillus es, opera mutas nec mutas consilium; recipis quod iuuenis et numquam amisisti; numquam inops et gaudes lucris, numquam auarus et usuras exigis. supererogatur tibi, ut debeas, et quis habet quicquam non tuum? reddens debita nulli debens, donans debita nihil perdens. et quid diximus, deus meus, uita mea, dulcedo mea sancta, aut quid dicit aliquis, cum de te dicit? et uae tacentibus de te, quoniam loquaces muti sunt.

What, then, is my God? What, I ask, but the Lord God? “For who is Lord but the Lord? Or who is God but our God?” Most high, most good, most mighty, most almighty, most merciful and most just, most hidden and most present, most beautiful and most strong, abiding and incomprehensible, unchangeable yet changing all things, never new, never old, renewing all things and “bringing the proud to old age, and they do not know it”; always acting, always at rest, gathering and not in need, bearing and filling and protecting, creating and nourishing and perfecting, seeking though you lack nothing. You love, yet without passion; you are jealous, yet untroubled; you repent, yet without grief; you are angry, yet calm; you change your works but not your plan; you take back what you find and yet never lost; never in need, yet you rejoice in gains; never greedy, yet you demand interest. More than is owed is paid to you, so that you become a debtor, and yet who has anything that is not yours? You pay debts though you owe no one; you forgive debts and lose nothing. And what have we said, my God, my life, my holy sweetness? Or what does anyone say when he speaks of you? And woe to those who are silent about you, since even the talkative are mute.

1.5CSEL 33:4–5

Quis mihi dabit adquiescere in te? quis dabit mihi, ut uenias in cor meum et inebries illud, ut obliuiscar mala mea et unum bonum meum amplectar, te? quid mihi es? miserere, ut loquar. quid tibi sum ipse, ut amari te iubeas a me et, nisi faciam, irascaris mihi et mineris ingentes miserias? paruane ipsa est, si non amem te? ei mihi! dic mihi per miserationes tuas, domine deus meus, quid sis mihi. dic animae meae: salus tua ego sum. sic dic, ut audiam. ecce aures cordis mei ante te, domine; aperi eas, et dic animae meae: salus tua ego sum. curram post uocem hanc et adprehendam te. noli abscondere a me faciem tuam: moriar, ne moriar, ut eam uideam.

Who will grant me to rest in you? Who will grant me that you come into my heart and make it drunk, so that I forget my evils and embrace my one good, you? What are you to me? Have mercy, so that I may speak. What am I myself to you, that you command me to love you, and if I do not, you are angry with me and threaten me with enormous miseries? Is it a small misery in itself if I do not love you? Alas for me! Tell me, by your mercies, Lord my God, what you are to me. “Say to my soul: I am your salvation.” Say it so that I may hear. See, the ears of my heart are before you, Lord; open them and “say to my soul: I am your salvation.” I will run after this voice and lay hold of you. Do not hide your face from me: let me die, so that I may not die, in order to see it.

1.6CSEL 33:5

Angusta est domus animae meae, quo uenias ad eam: dilatetur abs te. ruinosa est: refice eam. habet quae offendant oculos tuos: fateor et scio. sed quis mundabit eam? aut cui alteri praeter te clamabo: ab occultis meis munda me, domine, et ab alienis parce seruo tuo? credo, propter quod et loquor. domine, tu scis. nonne tibi prolocutus sum aduersum me delicta mea, deus meus, et tu dimisisti inpietatem cordis mei? non iudicio contendo tecum, qui ueritas es; et ego nolo fallere me ipsum, ne mentiatur iniquitas mea sibi. non ergo iudicio contendo tecum, quia, si iniquitates obseruaueris, domine, domine, quis sustinebit?

The house of my soul is too narrow for you to come into it: let it be enlarged by you. It is in ruins: repair it. It has things in it that offend your eyes: I confess it and I know it. But who will cleanse it? Or to whom but you shall I cry, “Cleanse me from my secret faults, Lord, and spare your servant from the faults of others”? “I believe, and therefore I speak.” Lord, you know. Have I not declared my offenses against myself to you, my God, “and you forgave the wickedness of my heart”? I do not contend in judgment with you, who are the truth; and I do not want to deceive myself, “lest my iniquity lie to itself.” So I do not contend in judgment with you, because “if you, Lord, mark iniquities, Lord, who shall stand?”

1.7CSEL 33:5–6

Sed tamen sine me loqui apud misericordiam tuam, me terram et cinerem, sine tamen loqui, quoniam ecce misericordia tua est, non homo, inrisor meus, cui loquor. et tu fortasse inrides me, sed conuersus misereberis mei. quid enim est quod uolo dicere, domine, nisi quia nescio, unde uenerim huc, in istam dico uitam mortalem an mortem uitalem? nescio. et susceperunt me consolationes miserationum tuarum, sicut audiui a parentibus carnis meae, ex quo et in qua me formasti in tempore; non enim ego memini. exceperunt ergo me consolationes lactis humani, nec mater mea uel nutrices meae sibi ubera implebant, sed tu mihi per eas dabas alimentum infantiae secundum institutionem tuam et diuitias usque ad fundum rerum dispositas. tu etiam mihi dabas nolle amplius, quam dabas, et nutrientibus me dare mihi uelle quod eis dabas: dare enim mihi per ordinatum affectum nolebant quo abundabant ex te. nam bonum erat eis bonum meum ex eis, quod ex eis non, sed per eas erat: ex te quippe bona omnia, deus, et ex deo meo salus mihi uniuersa. quod animaduerti postmodum clamante te mihi per haec ipsa, quae tribuis intus et foris. nam tunc sugere noram et adquiescere delectationibus, flere autem offensiones carnis meae, nihil amplius.

Yet allow me to speak before your mercy, me, “dust and ashes”; allow me still to speak, since, see, it is your mercy I am speaking to, and not a human being who would mock me. Perhaps you too mock me, but “you will turn and have mercy on me.” For what is it I want to say, Lord, except that I do not know where I came from into this, shall I call it, dying life or living death? I do not know. And the comforts of your mercies received me, as I have heard from the parents of my flesh, from whom and in whom you formed me in time; for I myself do not remember. So the comforts of human milk received me; and neither my mother nor my nurses filled their own breasts, but you gave me the nourishment of infancy through them, according to your ordinance and the riches you have laid down even to the very foundation of things. You also gave me not to want more than you gave, and gave to those who nursed me the will to give me what you gave them; for with an ordered affection they wanted to give me what they had in abundance from you. For the good that came to me from them was good for them; yet it was not from them but through them, since all good things are from you, God, and “from my God is all my salvation.” This I noticed afterwards, when you cried out to me through these very things that you bestow, within and without. For at that time I knew how to suck and to be content with what pleased me, and to cry at what hurt my flesh, nothing more.

1.8CSEL 33:6–7

Post et ridere coepi, dormiens primo, deinde uigilans. hoc enim de me mihi indicatum est et credidi, quoniam sic uidemus alios infantes; nam ista mea non memini. et ecce paulatim sentiebam, ubi essem, et uoluntates meas nolebam ostendere eis, per quos implerentur, et non poteram, quia illae intus erant, foris autem illi nec ullo suo sensu ualebant introire in animam meam. itaque iactabam et membra et uoces, signa similia uoluntatibus meis, pauca quae poteram, qualia poteram: non enim erant ueri similia. et cum mihi non obtemperabatur uel non intellecto uel ne obesset, indignabar non subditis maioribus et liberis non seruientibus et me de illis flendo uindicabam. tales esse infantes didici, quos discere potui, et me talem fuisse magis mihi ipsi indicauerunt nescientes quam scientes nutritores mei.

Afterwards I began to smile as well, first in sleep, then awake. This was told me about myself and I believed it, since we see other infants do so; for I do not remember these things of my own. And see, little by little I began to sense where I was, and I wanted to show my wishes to those who could fulfill them, and I could not, because the wishes were inside and they were outside, and by none of their senses could they enter into my soul. So I threw about my limbs and my cries, signs resembling my wishes, the few I could make and such as I could make; for they were not really like them. And when I was not obeyed, either because I was not understood or because it would have harmed me, I was indignant with my elders for not submitting to me, and with free people for not serving me, and I took revenge on them by crying. That infants are like this I have learned from those I could learn from; and that I was like this myself my nurses, without knowing it, have shown me better than those who knew.

1.9CSEL 33:7–8

Et ecce infantia mea olim mortua est et ego uiuo. tu autem, domine, qui et semper uiuis et nihil moritur in te, quoniam ante primordia saeculorum et ante omne, quod uel ante dici potest, tu es et deus es dominusque omnium, quae creasti, et apud te rerum omnium instabilium stant causae et rerum omnium mutabilium inmutabiles manent origines et omnium inrationalium et temporalium sempiternae uiuunt rationes, dic mihi supplici tuo, deus, et misericors misero tuo, dic mihi, utrum alicui iam aetati meae mortuae successerit infantia mea. an illa est, quam egi intra uiscera matris meae? nam et de illa mihi nonnihil indicatum est et praegnantes ipse uidi feminas. quid ante hanc etiam, dulcedo mea, deus meus? fuine alicubi aut aliquis? nam quis mihi dicat ista, non habeo; nec pater nec mater potuerunt nec aliorum experimentum nec memoria mea. an irrides me ista quaerentem teque de hoc, quod noui, laudari a me iubes et confiteri me tibi?

And see, my infancy died long ago, and I am alive. But you, Lord, who both live forever and in whom nothing dies, since before the beginnings of the ages and before everything that can even be called “before,” you are, and you are God and Lord of all that you have created; and with you stand the causes of all unstable things, and the unchangeable origins of all changeable things abide, and the eternal reasons of all irrational and temporal things live: tell me, your suppliant, God, and in your mercy tell me, your wretched one, whether my infancy followed some earlier age of mine that had already died. Is it the one I spent in my mother's womb? For about that too something has been told me, and I have myself seen pregnant women. And what before that, my sweetness, my God? Was I anywhere, or anyone? For I have no one to tell me this: neither father nor mother could, nor the experience of others, nor my own memory. Or do you laugh at me for asking such things, and command me to praise you and confess to you for what I do know?

1.10CSEL 33:8–9

Confiteor tibi, domine caeli et terrae, laudem dicens tibi de primordiis et infantia mea, quae non memini; et dedisti ea homini ex aliis de se conicere et auctoritatibus etiam muliercularum multa de se credere. eram enim et uiuebam etiam tunc et signa, quibus sensa mea nota aliis facerem, iam in fine infantiae quaerebam. unde hoc tale animal nisi abs te, domine? an quisquam se faciendi erit artifex? aut ulla uena trahitur aliunde, qua esse et uiuere currat in nos, praeterquam quod tu facis nos, domine, cui esse et uiuere non aliud atque aliud est, quia summe esse atque summe uiuere id ipsum est? summus enim es et non mutaris, neque peragitur in te hodiernus dies, et tamen in te peragitur, quia in te sunt et ista omnia: non enim haberent uias transeundi, nisi contineres ea. et quoniam anni tui non deficiunt, anni tui hodiernus dies: et quam multi iam dies nostri et patrum nostrorum per hodiernum tuum transierunt et ex illo acceperunt modos et utcumque extiterunt, et transibunt adhuc alii et accipient et utcumque existent. tu autem idem ipse es et omnia crastina atque ultra omniaque hesterna et retro hodie facies, hodie fecisti. quid ad me, si quis non intellegat? gaudeat et ipse dicens: quid est hoc? gaudeat etiam sic et amet non inueniendo inuenire potius quam inueniendo non inuenire te.

I confess to you, Lord of heaven and earth, giving praise to you for my beginnings and my infancy, which I do not remember; and you have granted a human being to infer these things about himself from others and to believe much about himself even on the authority of mere women. For I existed and lived even then, and already at the end of infancy I was looking for signs by which to make my feelings known to others. Where could such a living being come from, if not from you, Lord? Or will anyone be the craftsman of his own making? Or is there any channel drawn from elsewhere by which being and life flow into us, except that you make us, Lord, for whom being and living are not two different things, because to be supremely and to live supremely are one and the same? For you are supreme and you do not change, and today is not completed in you, and yet it is completed in you, because all these things too are in you; for they would have no way of passing if you did not contain them. And since “your years do not fail,” your years are a single today. How many of our days and our fathers' days have already passed through your today, and received from it their measure and whatever existence they had; and still others will pass and receive, and exist in whatever way they will. “But you are the same,” and all of tomorrow and beyond, and all of yesterday and before, you will make today, you have made today. What is it to me if someone does not understand this? Let him too rejoice and say, “What is this?” Let him rejoice even so, and love to find you by not finding, rather than by finding not to find you.

1.11CSEL 33:9–10

Exaudi, deus. uae peccatis hominum! et homo dicit haec, et misereris eius, quoniam tu fecisti eum et peccatum non fecisti in eo. quis me commemorat peccatum infantiae meae? quoniam nemo mundus a peccato coram te, nec infans, cuius est unius diei uita super terram. quis me commemorat? an quilibet tantillus nunc paruulus, in quo uideo quod non memini de me? quid ergo tunc peccabam? an quia uberibus inhiabam plorans? nam si nunc faciam, non quidem uberibus, sed escae congruenti annis meis ita inhians, deridebor atque reprehendar iustissime. tunc ergo reprehendenda faciebam, sed quia reprehendentem intellegere non poteram, nec mos reprehendi me nec ratio sinebat. nam extirpamus et eicimus ista crescentes. nec uidi quemquam scientem, cum aliquid purgat, bona proicere. an pro tempore etiam illa bona erant, flendo petere etiam quod noxie daretur, indignari acriter non subiectis hominibus liberis et maioribus hisque, a quibus genitus est, multisque praeterea prudentioribus non ad nutum uoluntatis obtemperantibus feriendo nocere niti quantum potest, quia non oboeditur imperiis, quibus perniciose oboediretur? ita imbecillitas membrorum infantilium innocens est, non animus infantium. uidi ego et expertus sum zelantem paruulum: nondum loquebatur et intuebatur pallidus amaro aspectu conlactaneum suum. quis hoc ignorat? expiare se dicunt ista matres atque nutrices nescio quibus remediis. nisi uero et ista innocentia est, in fonte lactis ubertim manante atque abundante opis egentissimum et illo adhuc uno alimento uitam ducentem consortem non pati. sed blande tolerantur haec, non quia nulla uel parua, sed quia aetatis accessu peritura sunt. quod licet probes, cum ferri aequo animo eadem ipsa non possunt, quando in aliquo annosiore deprehenduntur.

Hear me, God. Woe to the sins of human beings! And a human being says this, and you have mercy on him, because you made him, and you did not make the sin in him. Who reminds me of the sin of my infancy? For “no one is clean from sin before you, not even an infant whose life on earth is a single day.” Who reminds me? Some little child, anyone at all, in whom I see what I do not remember of myself? What then was my sin at that time? That I gaped for the breast, crying? For if I did that now, gaping not for the breast but for food suited to my years, I would be laughed at and rebuked, quite rightly. So then I was doing things that deserved rebuke, but since I could not understand the one rebuking me, neither custom nor reason allowed me to be rebuked. For as we grow we root these things out and throw them away; and I have never seen anyone who, when cleaning something, knowingly throws away what is good. Or were these things good, for that time of life: to cry for things that would have been harmful if given, to be bitterly indignant at people who were not subject to me, free people and elders, and those who gave me birth, and many others besides who were wiser and did not obey at a nod of my will, and to try to hurt them by striking out as hard as I could, because commands were not obeyed which would have been obeyed to my harm? So it is the weakness of infants' limbs that is innocent, not the infants' minds. I have seen and known a jealous little one: he could not yet speak, and he glared, pale, with a bitter look at his foster brother. Who does not know this? Mothers and nurses say they cure such things by who knows what remedies. Unless this too is innocence: not to tolerate a sharer, one in the greatest need and still living on that one food, at a fountain of milk flowing richly and in abundance. But these things are gently tolerated, not because they are nothing or small, but because they will pass away as age advances. You may prove this by the fact that the very same things cannot be borne calmly when they are caught in someone older.

1.12CSEL 33:10–11

Tu itaque, domine deus meus, qui dedisti uitam infanti et corpus, quod ita, ut uidemus, instruxisti sensibus, conpegisti membris, figura decorasti proque eius uniuersitate atque incolumitate omnes conatus animantis insinuasti, iubes me laudare te in istis et confiteri tibi et psallere nomini tuo, altissime, quia deus es omnipotens et bonus, etiamsi sola ista fecisses, quae nemo alius potest facere nisi tu, une, a quo est omnis modus, formosissime, qui formas omnia et lege tua ordinas omnia. hanc ergo aetatem, domine, qua me uixisse non memini, de qua aliis credidi et quam me egisse ex aliis infantibus conieci, quamquam ista multum fida coniectura sit, piget me adnumerare huic uitae meae, quam uiuo in hoc saeculo. quantum enim adtinet ad obliuionis meae tenebras, par illi est, quam uixi in matris utero. quod si et in iniquitate conceptus sum et in peccatis mater mea me in utero aluit, ubi, oro te, deus meus, ubi, domine, ego, seruus tuus, ubi aut quando innocens fui? sed ecce omitto illud tempus: et quid mihi iam cum eo est, cuius nulla uestigia recolo?

So you, Lord my God, who gave the infant life and a body, which, as we see, you furnished with senses, fitted together with limbs, adorned with form, and in which you implanted all the impulses of a living being for its wholeness and safety: you command me to praise you for these things and to confess to you and “to sing to your name, Most High,” because you are God, almighty and good, even if you had made only these things, which no one else can make but you, the One, from whom is every measure, the most beautiful, who forms all things and orders all things by your law. This age, then, Lord, which I do not remember living, about which I have believed others and which I have inferred that I passed from other infants, though that inference is quite trustworthy, I am reluctant to count as part of this life of mine that I live in this world. For as far as the darkness of my forgetting is concerned, it is equal to the life I lived in my mother's womb. But if “I was conceived in iniquity and in sins my mother nourished me in the womb,” where, I beg you, my God, where, Lord, was I, your servant, where or when was I innocent? But see, I pass over that time: what have I now to do with a time of which I recall no trace?

1.13CSEL 33:11–12

Nonne ab infantia huc pergens ueni in pueritiam? uel potius ipsa in me uenit et successit infantiae? nec discessit illa: quo enim abiit? et tamen iam non erat. non enim eram infans, qui non farer, sed iam puer loquens eram. et memini hoc, et unde loqui didiceram, post aduerti. non enim docebant maiores homines praebentes mihi uerba certo aliquo ordine doctrinae sicut paulo post litteras, sed ego ipse mente, quam dedisti mihi, deus meus, cum gemitibus et uocibus uariis et uariis membrorum motibus edere uellem sensa cordis mei, ut uoluntati pareretur, nec ualerem quae uolebam omnia nec quibus uolebam omnibus. pensabam memoria: cum ipsi appellabant rem aliquam et cum secundum eam uocem corpus ad aliquid mouebant, uidebam et tenebam hoc ab eis uocari rem illam, quod sonabant, cum eam uellent ostendere. hoc autem eos uelle ex motu corporis aperiebatur tamquam uerbis naturalibus omnium gentium, quae fiunt uultu et nutu oculorum ceterorumque membrorum actu et sonitu uocis indicante affectionem animi in petendis, habendis, reiciendis fugiendisue rebus. ita uerba in uariis sententiis locis suis posita et crebro audita, quarum rerum signa essent, paulatim colligebam measque iam uoluntates edomito in eis signis ore per haec enuntiabam. sic cum his, inter quos eram, uoluntatum enuntiandarum signa conmunicaui et uitae humanae procellosam societatem altius ingressus sum pendens ex parentum auctoritate nutuque maiorum hominum.

Did I not, moving on from infancy, come to boyhood? Or rather, did boyhood come into me and succeed infancy? Nor did infancy depart; for where did it go? And yet it was no longer there. For I was no longer an infant who could not speak, but already a boy who spoke. And I remember this; and how I had learned to speak I realized later. For it was not that my elders taught me, offering me words in some fixed order of instruction as they did the alphabet a little later; but I myself, with the mind you gave me, my God, when I wanted to express the feelings of my heart with groans and various sounds and various movements of my limbs, so that my will would be obeyed, and could not express everything I wanted to everyone I wanted to, I pondered in memory. When they named something and, as they said the word, moved their body toward something, I saw and grasped that the thing was called by the sound they uttered when they wanted to point it out. That they meant this was made plain by the movement of their bodies, the natural language, as it were, of all peoples, made by the face and the glance of the eyes, by the action of the other limbs, and by the tone of voice that shows the mind's feeling in seeking, having, rejecting, or avoiding things. So little by little I gathered what things the words stood for, which I heard often, set in their places in various sentences; and once my mouth had been trained to these signs, I began to express my own wishes by them. Thus I shared with those among whom I lived the signs for expressing our wishes, and I entered more deeply into the stormy fellowship of human life, depending on the authority of my parents and the nod of my elders.

1.14CSEL 33:12–13

Deus, deus meus, quas ibi miserias expertus sum et ludificationes, quandoquidem recte mihi uiuere puero id proponebatur, obtemperare monentibus, ut in hoc saeculo florerem et excellerem linguosis artibus ad honorem hominum et falsas diuitias famulantibus. inde in scholam datus sum, ut discerem litteras, in quibus quid utilitatis esset ignorabam miser. et tamen, si segnis in discendo essem, uapulabam. laudabatur enim hoc a maioribus, et multi ante nos uitam istam agentes praestruxerant aerumnosas uias, per quas transire cogebamur multiplicato labore et dolore filiis Adam. inuenimus autem, domine, homines rogantes te et didicimus ab eis, sentientes te, ut poteramus, esse magnum aliquem, qui posses etiam non adparens sensibus nostris exaudire nos et subuenire nobis. nam puer coepi rogare te, auxilium et refugium meum, et in tuam inuocationem rumpebam nodos linguae meae et rogabam te paruus non paruo affectu, ne in schola uapularem. et cum me non exaudiebas, quod non erat ad insipientiam mihi, ridebantur a maioribus hominibus usque ab ipsis parentibus, qui mihi accidere mali nihil uolebant, plagae meae, magnum tunc et graue malum meum.

God, my God, what miseries and mockeries I experienced there, since the right way for a boy to live was set before me as obeying those who urged me to flourish in this world and to excel in the arts of the tongue, which serve human honor and false riches! Then I was sent to school to learn letters, and I, poor wretch, did not know what use there was in them. And yet if I was slow at learning, I was beaten. For this was approved by my elders, and many who had lived this life before us had built the hard roads along which we were forced to pass, with labor and sorrow multiplied for the sons of Adam. But we found, Lord, people who prayed to you, and we learned from them to think of you, as far as we could, as someone great who, even without appearing to our senses, could hear us and help us. For as a boy I began to pray to you, my help and my refuge, and in calling upon you I broke the knots of my tongue; and small as I was, I prayed to you with no small feeling that I might not be beaten at school. And when you did not hear me, which was not to make me foolish, my beatings, then a great and heavy evil to me, were laughed at by grown-ups, even by my own parents, who wanted no harm to come to me.

1.15CSEL 33:13–14

Estne quisquam, domine, tam magnus animus, praegrandi affectu tibi cohaerens, estne, inquam, quisquam — facit enim hoc quaedam etiam stoliditas — est ergo, qui tibi pie cohaerendo ita sit affectus granditer, ut eculeos et ungulas atque huiuscemodi uaria tormenta, pro quibus effugiendis tibi per uniuersas terras cum timore magno supplicatur, ita parui aestimet, diligens eos, qui haec acerbissime formidant, quemadmodum parentes nostri ridebant tormenta, quibus pueri a magistris affligebamur? non enim aut minus ea metuebamus aut minus te de his euadendis deprecabamur, et peccabamus tamen minus scribendo aut legendo aut cogitando de litteris, quam exigebatur a nobis. non enim deerat, domine, memoria uel ingenium, quae nos habere noluisti pro illa aetate satis, sed delectabat ludere et uindicabatur in nos ab eis qui talia utique agebant. sed maiorum nugae negotia uocabantur, puerorum autem talia cum sint, puniuntur a maioribus, et nemo miseratur pueros uel illos uel utrosque. nisi uero adprobat quisquam bonus rerum arbiter uapulasse me, quia ludebam pila puer et eo ludo inpediebar, quominus celeriter discerem litteras, quibus maior deformius luderem. aut aliud faciebat idem ipse, a quo uapulabam, qui si in aliqua quaestiuncula a condoctore suo uictus esset, magis bile atque inuidia torqueretur quam ego, cum in certamine pilae a conlusore meo superabar?

Is there anyone, Lord, of so great a spirit, clinging to you with such immense love, is there anyone, I say (for a kind of dullness can also do this), is there anyone, then, who by clinging to you in devotion is so greatly moved that he thinks so little of the rack and the hooks and such various tortures, to escape which people pray to you in great fear all over the world, that he loves those who dread them most bitterly, just as our parents laughed at the torments we boys suffered from our teachers? For we did not fear them any less, or pray to you any less to escape them; and yet we sinned by writing or reading or thinking about our lessons less than was demanded of us. For we did not lack memory or ability, Lord, which you willed us to have sufficiently for that age; but we loved to play, and we were punished for it by those who were certainly doing the same sort of thing. But the trifles of adults are called business, while when boys do the same sort of thing they are punished by adults; and no one pities the boys, or the adults, or both. Unless, perhaps, some good judge of things approves of my being beaten because as a boy I played ball and the game kept me from learning my letters quickly, letters with which, as an adult, I would play a more disgraceful game. Or was the very man who beat me doing anything different? If he was beaten by a fellow teacher in some trivial dispute, he was more tormented by bile and envy than I was when beaten at ball by a playmate.

1.16CSEL 33:14–15

Et tamen peccabam, domine deus meus, ordinator et creator rerum omnium naturalium, peccatorum autem tantum ordinator, domine deus meus, peccabam faciendo contra praecepta parentum et magistrorum illorum. poteram enim postea bene uti litteris, quas uolebant ut discerem quocumque animo illi mei. non enim meliora eligens inoboediens eram, sed amore ludendi, amans in certaminibus superbas uictorias et scalpi aures meas falsis fabellis, quo prurirent ardentius, eadem curiositate magis magisque per oculos emicante in spectacula, ludos maiorum; quos tamen qui edunt, ea dignitate praediti excellunt, ut hoc paene omnes optent paruulis suis, quos tamen caedi libenter patiuntur, si spectaculis talibus inpediantur ab studio, quo eos ad talia edenda cupiunt peruenire. uide ista, domine, misericorditer et libera nos iam inuocantes te, libera etiam eos qui nondum te inuocant, ut inuocent te et liberes eos.

And yet I sinned, Lord my God, orderer and creator of all natural things, but only the orderer of sins; Lord my God, I sinned by acting against the commands of my parents and those teachers. For I could later have made good use of the letters that my elders wanted me to learn, whatever their motive. For I was not disobedient because I chose better things, but out of love of play, loving proud victories in contests and having my ears tickled with false stories so that they itched more hotly, the same curiosity flashing more and more through my eyes toward the shows, the games of adults. Yet those who put on these shows are so distinguished by that rank that almost everyone wishes it for their little ones; and yet they gladly let them be beaten if such shows keep them from the study by which they want them to reach the point of putting on such shows. Look on these things mercifully, Lord, and deliver us who now call upon you; deliver also those who do not yet call upon you, so that they may call upon you and you may deliver them.

1.17CSEL 33:15–16

Audieram enim ego adhuc puer de uita aeterna promissa nobis per humilitatem domini dei nostri descendentis ad superbiam nostram et signabar iam signo crucis eius et condiebar eius sale iam inde ab utero matris meae, quae multum sperauit in te. uidisti, domine, cum adhuc puer essem et quodam die pressu stomachi repente aestuarem paene moriturus, uidisti, deus meus, quoniam custos meus iam eras, quo motu animi et qua fide baptismum Christi tui, dei et domini mei, flagitaui a pietate matris meae et matris omnium nostrum, ecclesiae tuae. et conturbata mater carnis meae, quoniam et sempiternam salutem meam carius parturibat corde casto in fide tua, iam curaret festinabunda, ut sacramentis salutaribus initiarer et abluerer, te, domine Iesu, confitens in remissionem peccatorum, nisi statim recreatus essem. dilata est itaque mundatio mea, quasi necesse esset, ut adhuc sordidarer, si uiuerem, quia uidelicet post lauacrum illud maior et periculosior in sordibus delictorum reatus foret. ita iam credebam et illa et omnis domus, nisi pater solus, qui tamen non euicit in me ius maternae pietatis, quominus in Christum crederem, sicut ille nondum crediderat. nam illa satagebat, ut tu mihi pater esses, deus meus, potius quam ille, et in hoc adiuuabas eam, ut superaret uirum, cui melior seruiebat, quia et in hoc tibi utique id iubenti seruiebat.

For even as a boy I had heard of the eternal life promised to us through the humility of the Lord our God, who came down to our pride; and I was already being signed with the sign of his cross and seasoned with his salt from the time I left the womb of my mother, who greatly hoped in you. You saw, Lord, when I was still a boy and one day suddenly burned with fever from a stomach seizure and was near death, you saw, my God, since you were already my guardian, with what urgency of mind and what faith I begged for the baptism of your Christ, my God and Lord, from the devotion of my mother and of the mother of us all, your church. And the mother of my flesh was distressed, since with a chaste heart in your faith she was in more loving labor for my eternal salvation; and she would have hastened to have me initiated into the saving sacraments and washed, confessing you, Lord Jesus, for the forgiveness of sins, had I not suddenly recovered. So my cleansing was postponed, as though I must necessarily be further defiled if I lived, since, evidently, after that washing the guilt in the filth of sins would be greater and more dangerous. So I already believed, as did she and the whole household, except my father alone; yet he did not overcome in me the right of my mother's devotion so as to keep me from believing in Christ, as he had not yet believed. For she was anxious that you, my God, should be my father rather than he; and in this you helped her to prevail over her husband, whom she, the better of the two, served, because in this too she was serving you, who certainly command it.

1.18CSEL 33:16–17

Rogo te, deus meus, uellem scire, si tu etiam uelles, quo consilio dilatus sum, ne tunc baptizarer, utrum bono meo mihi quasi laxata sint lora peccandi an non laxata sint. unde ergo etiam nunc de aliis atque aliis sonat undique in auribus nostris: "sine illum, faciat; nondum enim baptizatus est." et tamen in salute corporis non dicimus: sine uulneretur amplius; nondum enim sanatus est. quanto ergo melius et cito sanarer et id ageretur mecum meorum meaque diligentia, ut recepta salus animae meae tuta esset tutela tua, qui dedisses eam. melius uero. sed quot et quanti fluctus inpendere temptationum post pueritiam uidebantur, nouerat eos iam illa mater et terram potius, unde postea formarer, quam ipsam iam effigiem conmittere nolebat.

I ask you, my God, I would like to know, if you also would have it so, for what purpose my baptism was put off at that time: was it for my good that the reins of sinning were, as it were, loosened for me, or were they not loosened? Why is it, then, that even now we hear on all sides about one person and another: “Let him alone, let him do it; he is not yet baptized”? And yet in the health of the body we do not say, “Let him be wounded more; he is not yet healed.” How much better it would have been if I had been healed quickly, and if by my family's diligence and my own it had been arranged that the health of my soul, once received, should be kept safe under your protection, who had given it. Much better indeed. But how many and how great were the waves of temptation that seemed to threaten after boyhood! My mother already knew them, and she preferred to entrust to them the clay from which I might later be formed rather than the image itself.

1.19CSEL 33:17–18

In ipsa tamen pueritia, de qua mihi minus quam de adulescentia metuebatur, non amabam litteras et me in eas urgeri oderam; et urgebar tamen et bene mihi fiebat nec faciebam ego bene: non enim discerem, nisi cogerer. nemo enim inuitus bene facit, etiamsi bonum est quod facit. nec qui me urgebant, bene faciebant, sed bene mihi fiebat abs te, deus meus. illi enim non intuebantur, quo referrem quod me discere cogebant, praeterquam ad satiandas insatiabiles cupiditates copiosae inopiae et ignominiosae gloriae. tu uero, cui numerati sunt capilli nostri, errore omnium, qui mihi instabant ut discerem, utebaris ad utilitatem meam, meo autem, qui discere nolebam, utebaris ad poenam meam, qua plecti non eram indignus tantillus puer et tantus peccator. ita non de bene facientibus tu bene faciebas mihi et de peccante me ipso iuste retribuebas mihi. iussisti enim et sic est, ut poena sua sibi sit omnis inordinatus animus.

Yet in boyhood itself, for which less was feared on my account than for adolescence, I did not love letters and I hated being pressed to learn them; and yet I was pressed, and good was done to me, though I did not do good: for I would not have learned unless I had been forced. For no one does good against his will, even if what he does is good. Nor did those who pressed me do good; but good was done to me by you, my God. For they did not consider to what end I would put what they forced me to learn, except to satisfying the insatiable desires of a wealthy poverty and a shameful glory. But you, by whom “the hairs of our head are numbered,” used the error of all who pressed me to learn for my benefit, and used my own error, who did not want to learn, for my punishment, a punishment which so small a boy and so great a sinner well deserved. So you did me good by means of those who did not do good, and you justly repaid me for my own sin. For you have commanded, and so it is, that every disordered mind is its own punishment.

1.20CSEL 33:18

Quid autem erat causae, cur graecas litteras oderam, quibus puerulus imbuebar, ne nunc quidem mihi satis exploratum est. adamaueram enim latinas, non quas primi magistri, sed quas docent qui grammatici uocantur. nam illas primas, ubi legere et scribere et numerare discitur, non minus onerosas poenalesque habebam quam omnes graecas. unde tamen et hoc nisi de peccato et uanitate uitae, qua caro eram et spiritus ambulans et non reuertens? nam utique meliores, quia certiores, erant primae illae litterae, quibus fiebat in me et factum est et habeo illud, ut et legam, si quid scriptum inuenio, et scribam ipse, si quid uolo, quam illae, quibus tenere cogebar Aeneae nescio cuius errores oblitus errorum meorum et plorare Didonem mortuam, quia se occidit ab amore, cum interea me ipsum in his a te morientem, deus uita mea, siccis oculis ferrem miserrimus.

But why I hated Greek, which I was taught as a little boy, is not clear enough to me even now. For I had come to love Latin, not the elementary lessons of the first teachers, but what those called grammarians teach. The first lessons, in which one learns to read and write and count, I found no less burdensome and painful than all of Greek. Yet where did this too come from, except from sin and the vanity of life, by which I was “flesh, a wind that goes and does not return”? For those first letters were surely better, because more certain, by which there came to be in me, and has come to be, and I still have it, the ability both to read whatever I find written and to write whatever I wish myself, than those in which I was forced to memorize the wanderings of some Aeneas or other, forgetting my own wanderings, and to weep for Dido dead because she killed herself for love, while meanwhile I bore dry-eyed, most wretched, my own death in these things, away from you, God my life.

1.21CSEL 33:18–19

Quid enim miserius misero non miserante se ipsum et flente Didonis mortem, quae fiebat amando Aenean, non flente autem mortem suam, quae fiebat non amando te, deus, lumen cordis mei et panis oris intus animae meae et uirtus maritans mentem meam et sinum cogitationis meae? non te amabam et fornicabar abs te et fornicanti sonabat undique: euge, euge. amicitia enim mundi huius fornicatio est abs te et euge, euge dicitur, ut pudeat, si non ita homo sit. et haec non flebam et flebam Didonem extinctam ferroque extrema secutam, sequens ipse extrema condita tua relicto te et terra iens in terram: et si prohiberer ea legere, dolerem, quia non legerem quod dolerem. talis dementia honestiores et uberiores litterae putantur quam illae, quibus legere et scribere didici.

For what is more wretched than a wretch who does not pity himself, and who weeps for the death of Dido, which came about through loving Aeneas, but does not weep for his own death, which came about through not loving you, God, light of my heart, bread of the inner mouth of my soul, and power that weds my mind and the bosom of my thought? I did not love you, and I committed fornication away from you, and as I committed fornication, “Well done! Well done!” sounded all around me. For “the friendship of this world is fornication” away from you; and “Well done! Well done!” is said so that one is ashamed not to be like that. And I did not weep for this; and I wept for Dido, “dead, who sought her end by the sword,” while I myself followed after the lowest of your creatures, having abandoned you, earth going into earth. And if I had been forbidden to read these things, I would have grieved, because I would not be reading what made me grieve. Such madness is thought a more honorable and richer learning than that by which I learned to read and write.

1.22CSEL 33:19–20

Sed nunc in anima mea clamet deus meus et ueritas tua dicat mihi: non est ita, non est ita; melior est prorsus doctrina illa prior. nam ecce paratior sum obliuisci errores Aeneae atque omnia eius modi quam scribere et legere. at enim uela pendent liminibus grammaticarum scholarum, sed non illa magis honorem secreti quam tegimentum erroris significant. non clament aduersus me quos iam non timeo, dum confiteor tibi quae uult anima mea, deus meus, et adquiesco in reprehensione malarum uiarum mearum, ut diligam bonas uias tuas. non clament aduersus me uenditores grammaticae uel emptores, quia, si proponam eis interrogans, utrum uerum sit quod Aenean aliquando Karthaginem uenisse poeta dicit, indoctiores nescire se respondebunt, doctiores autem etiam negabunt uerum esse. at si quaeram, quibus litteris scribatur Aeneae nomen, omnes mihi, qui haec didicerunt, uerum respondent et secundum id pactum et placitum, quo inter se homines ista signa firmarunt. item si quaeram, quid horum maiore uitae huius incommodo quisque obliuiscatur, legere et scribere an poetica illa figmenta, quis non uideat, quid responsurus sit, qui non est paenitus oblitus sui? peccabam ergo puer, cum illa inania istis utilioribus amore praeponebam uel potius ista oderam, illa amabam. iam uero unum et unum duo, duo et duo quattuor odiosa cantio mihi erat et dulcissimum spectaculum uanitatis equus ligneus plenus armatis et Troiae incendium atque ipsius umbra Creusae.

But now let my God cry out in my soul, and let your truth say to me: “It is not so, it is not so. That earlier teaching is far better.” For see, I am more ready to forget the wanderings of Aeneas and everything of that kind than to forget how to write and read. True, curtains hang at the doors of the grammar schools; but they signify not so much the honor of a mystery as the covering of error. Let them not cry out against me, those whom I no longer fear, while I confess to you what my soul desires, my God, and find rest in rebuking my evil ways, so that I may love your good ways. Let the sellers and buyers of grammar not cry out against me; for if I put the question to them whether it is true, as the poet says, that Aeneas once came to Carthage, the less learned will answer that they do not know, and the more learned will even deny that it is true. But if I ask with what letters Aeneas's name is written, all who have learned these things will answer me truly, according to the agreement and convention by which people have settled these signs among themselves. Likewise, if I ask which of these one would forget with greater harm to this life, reading and writing or those poetic fictions, who does not see what anyone will answer who has not utterly forgotten himself? So I sinned as a boy when I preferred those empty things to these more useful ones in my affection, or rather hated these and loved those. For “one and one are two, two and two are four” was a hateful chant to me, while the wooden horse full of armed men, and the burning of Troy, and “the very ghost of Creusa” were a most delightful spectacle of vanity.

1.23CSEL 33:20–21

Cur ergo graecam etiam grammaticam oderam talia cantantem? nam et Homerus peritus texuerat tales fabellas et dulcissime uanus est et mihi tamen amarus erat puero. credo etiam graecis pueris Vergilius ita sit, cum eum sic discere coguntur ut ego illum. uidelicet difficultas, difficultas omnino ediscendae linguae peregrinae quasi felle aspergebat omnes suauitates graecas fabulosarum narrationum. nulla enim uerba illa noueram et saeuis terroribus ac poenis, ut nossem, instabatur mihi uehementer. nam et latina aliquando infans utique nulla noueram et tamen aduertendo didici sine ullo metu atque cruciatu inter etiam blandimenta nutricum et ioca arridentium et laetitias alludentium. didici uero illa sine poenali onere urgentium, cum me urgeret cor meum ad parienda concepta sua, id quod non esset, nisi aliqua uerba didicissem non a docentibus, sed a loquentibus, in quorum et ego auribus parturiebam quidquid sentiebam. hinc satis elucet maiorem habere uim ad discenda ista liberam curiositatem quam meticulosam necessitatem. sed illius fluxum haec restringit legibus tuis, deus, legibus tuis a magistrorum ferulis usque ad temptationes martyrum, ualentibus legibus tuis miscere salubres amaritudines reuocantes nos ad te a iucunditate pestifera, qua recessimus a te.

Why, then, did I also hate Greek literature, which sings of such things? For Homer too was skilled at weaving such tales, and is most sweetly vain; and yet to me as a boy he was bitter. I believe Virgil is the same to Greek boys, when they are forced to learn him as I was forced to learn Homer. The difficulty, clearly, the difficulty of learning a foreign language thoroughly, sprinkled gall, as it were, over all the Greek charms of the fabulous stories. For I did not know any of those words, and I was pressed hard with savage threats and punishments to know them. Now, as an infant I certainly knew no Latin either, and yet I learned it by paying attention, without any fear or torment, amid the coaxing of nurses and the jokes of those who smiled at me and the joy of those who played with me. I learned it without the painful burden of people pressing me, since my own heart pressed me to bring forth what it had conceived, which would not have been possible unless I had learned some words, not from people teaching, but from people talking, into whose ears I in turn brought forth whatever I felt. From this it is quite clear that free curiosity has greater power for learning these things than fearful compulsion. But compulsion restrains the free flow of curiosity by your laws, God, your laws, from the teachers' canes to the trials of the martyrs; for your laws have power to mix in wholesome bitternesses that call us back to you from the pestilent pleasure by which we withdrew from you.

1.24CSEL 33:21–22

Exaudi, domine, deprecationem meam, ne deficiat anima mea sub disciplina tua neque deficiam in confitendo tibi miserationes tuas, quibus eruisti me ab omnibus uiis meis pessimis, ut dulcescas mihi super omnes seductiones, quas sequebar, et amem te ualidissime et amplexem manum tuam totis praecordiis meis et eruas me ab omni temptatione usque in finem. ecce enim tu, domine, rex meus et deus meus, tibi seruiat quidquid utile puer didici, tibi seruiat quod loquor et scribo et lego et numero, quoniam cum uana discerem, tu disciplinam dabas mihi et in eis uanis peccata delectationum mearum dimisisti mihi. didici in eis multa uerba utilia; sed et in rebus non uanis disci possunt, et ea uia tuta est, in qua pueri ambularent.

“Hear my prayer, Lord,” so that my soul may not fail under your discipline, and that I may not fail in confessing to you your mercies, by which you rescued me from all my most evil ways, that you might become sweet to me above all the seductions I pursued, and that I might love you most strongly and clasp your hand with all my heart, and that you might rescue me from every temptation to the end. For see, you, Lord, “my King and my God,” let whatever useful thing I learned as a boy serve you; let what I speak and write and read and count serve you. For when I was learning vain things, you gave me discipline, and you forgave me the sins of my delight in those vain things. I learned many useful words in them; but they can also be learned in things that are not vain, and that is the safe way in which boys should walk.

1.25CSEL 33:22–23

Sed uae tibi, flumen moris humani! quis resistit tibi? quamdiu non siccaberis? quousque uolues Euae filios in mare magnum et formidulosum, quod uix transeunt qui lignum conscenderint? nonne ego in te legi et tonantem Iouem et adulterantem? et utique non posset haec duo, sed actum est, ut haberet auctoritatem imitandum uerum adulterium lenocinante falso tonitru. quis autem paenulatorum magistrorum audit aure sobria ex eodem puluere hominem clamantem et dicentem: fingebat haec Homerus et humana ad deos transferebat; diuina mallem ad nos? sed uerius dicitur, quod fingebat haec quidem ille, sed hominibus flagitiosis diuina tribuendo, ne flagitia flagitia putarentur et ut quisquis ea fecisset, non homines perditos, sed caelestes deos uideretur imitatus.

But woe to you, torrent of human custom! Who withstands you? How long before you dry up? How long will you roll the children of Eve into the great and fearful sea, which even those who have climbed aboard the wood can scarcely cross? Did I not read in you of Jupiter both thundering and committing adultery? Of course he could not do both; but it was written so that real adultery might have authority for imitation, with false thunder acting as its pander. And which of the cloaked schoolmasters listens with a sober ear to a man of their own dust crying out and saying: “Homer invented these things and transferred human things to the gods; I would rather he had transferred divine things to us”? But it is truer to say that he did indeed invent them, but by attributing divine qualities to disgraceful men, so that disgraceful deeds would not be thought disgraceful, and whoever did them would seem to imitate not abandoned men but the gods of heaven.

1.26CSEL 33:23–24

Et tamen, o flumen tartareum, iactantur in te fili hominum cum mercedibus, ut haec discant, et magna res agitur, cum hoc agitur publice in foro, in conspectu legum supra mercedem salaria decernentium, et saxa tua percutis et sonas dicens: "hinc uerba discuntur, hinc adquiritur eloquentia rebus persuadendis sententiisque explicandis maxime necessaria." ita ergo non cognosceremus uerba haec, imbrem et aureum et gremium et fucum et templa caeli et alia uerba, quae in eo loco scripta sunt, nisi Terentius induceret nequam adulescentem proponentem sibi Iouem ad exemplum stupri, dum spectat tabulam quandam pictam in pariete, ubi inerat pictura haec, Iouem quo pacto Danaae misisse aiunt in gremium quondam imbrem aureum, fucum factum mulieri? et uide, quemadmodum se concitat ad libidinem quasi caelesti magisterio: at quem deum! — inquit — qui templa caeli summo sonitu concutit. ego homuncio id non facerem? ego uero illud feci ac libens. Non omnino, non omnino per hanc turpitudinem uerba ista conmodius discuntur, sed per haec uerba turpitudo ista confidentius perpetratur. non accuso uerba quasi uasa lecta atque pretiosa, sed uinum erroris, quod in eis nobis propinabatur ab ebriis doctoribus, et nisi biberemus, caedebamur nec appellare ad aliquem iudicem sobrium licebat. et tamen ego, deus meus, in cuius conspectu iam secura est recordatio mea, libenter haec didici et eis delectabar miser et ob hoc bonae spei puer appellabar.

And yet, hellish torrent, the sons of men are thrown into you, with fees paid, so that they may learn these things; and a great to-do is made when this is done publicly in the forum, in full view of laws that decree salaries over and above the fees; and you strike your rocks and roar, saying, “From this words are learned; from this is gained eloquence, most necessary for persuading people and setting out one's views.” So we would not have known these words, “shower,” “golden,” “lap,” “deceit,” “temples of heaven,” and the other words written in that passage, unless Terence had brought on stage a worthless youth who set Jupiter before himself as an example of debauchery, while he looks at a painting on a wall that showed “how Jupiter, they say, once sent a golden shower into Danae's lap and played a trick on a woman.” And see how he excites himself to lust as if by heavenly instruction: “And what a god!” he says, “who shakes the temples of heaven with a mighty crash. And I, poor little man, should I not do it? Indeed I did it, and gladly.” Not at all, not at all are these words learned more easily through this filth; rather, through these words the filth is committed more confidently. I do not blame the words, which are like choice and precious vessels, but the wine of error that was poured for us in them by drunken teachers; and if we did not drink, we were beaten, and we were not allowed to appeal to any sober judge. And yet, my God, in whose sight my remembering is now free of fear, I learned these things gladly and delighted in them, wretch that I was, and for this I was called a boy of great promise.

1.27CSEL 33:24–25

Sine me, deus meus, dicere aliquid de ingenio meo, munere tuo, in quibus a me deliramentis atterebatur. proponebatur enim mihi negotium animae meae satis inquietum praemio laudis et dedecoris uel plagarum metu, ut dicerem uerba Iunonis irascentis et dolentis, quod non possit Italia Teucrorum auertere regem, quae numquam Iunonem dixisse audieram. sed figmentorum poeticorum uestigia errantes sequi cogebamur et tale aliquid dicere solutis uerbis, quale poeta dixisset uersibus: et ille dicebat laudabilius, in quo pro dignitate adumbratae personae irae ac doloris similior affectus eminebat, uerbis sententias congruenter uestientibus. ut quid mihi illud, o uera uita, deus meus? quid mihi recitanti adclamabatur prae multis coaetaneis et conlectoribus meis? nonne ecce illa omnia fumus et uentus? itane aliud non erat, ubi exerceretur ingenium et lingua mea? laudes tuae, domine, laudes tuae per scripturas tuas suspenderent palmitem cordis mei et non raperetur per inania nugarum turpis praeda uolatilibus. non enim uno modo sacrificatur transgressoribus angelis.

Allow me, my God, to say something about my talent, your gift, and the follies on which I wore it away. For a task was set before me that was quite troubling to my soul, with the reward of praise and the fear of disgrace or beatings: to speak the words of Juno, angry and grieving that she “could not turn the king of the Trojans away from Italy,” words I had heard Juno never spoke. But we were forced to follow, astray, in the footsteps of poetic fictions, and to say in prose something like what the poet had said in verse. And the one who spoke most praiseworthily was the one in whom the passion of anger and grief stood out most lifelike, fitting the dignity of the character portrayed, with words that clothed the thoughts appropriately. What was that to me, my true life, my God? Why was I applauded when I declaimed, above many of my contemporaries and fellow students? See, was not all that smoke and wind? Was there nothing else on which my talent and my tongue could be exercised? Your praises, Lord, your praises through your Scriptures would have held up the young shoot of my heart, and it would not have been snatched away through empty trifles, a shameful prey for the birds. For there is more than one way of sacrificing to the rebel angels.

1.28CSEL 33:25–26

Quid autem mirum, quod in uanitates ita ferebar et a te, deus meus, ibam foras, quando mihi imitandi proponebantur homines, qui aliqua facta sua non mala, si cum barbarismo aut soloecismo enuntiarent, reprehensi confundebantur, si autem libidines suas integris et rite consequentibus uerbis copiose ordinateque narrarent, laudati gloriabantur? uides haec, domine, et taces longanimis et multum misericors et uerax. numquid semper tacebis? et nunc erues de hoc inmanissimo profundo quaerentem te animam et sitientem delectationes tuas, et cuius cor dicit tibi: quaesiui uultum tuum; uultum tuum, domine, requiram: nam longe a uultu tuo in affectu tenebroso. non enim pedibus aut spatiis locorum itur abs te aut reditur ad te, aut uero filius ille tuus equos aut currus uel naues quaesiuit aut auolauit pinna uisibili aut moto poplite iter egit, ut in longinqua regione uiuens prodige dissiparet quod dederas proficiscenti dulcis pater, quia dederas, et egeno redeunti dulcior: in affectu ergo libidinoso, id enim est tenebroso atque id est longe a uultu tuo.

What wonder, then, that I was carried away into vanities and went out away from you, my God, when men were held up to me for imitation who, if they related some deeds of theirs that were not evil with a barbarism or a solecism, were covered with confusion when rebuked, but if they narrated their lusts in correct and well-ordered words, fully and elegantly, were praised and boasted of it? You see these things, Lord, and are silent, “long-suffering and abounding in mercy and truth.” Will you be silent forever? Even now you draw out of this most monstrous abyss the soul that seeks you and thirsts for your delights, whose heart says to you, “I have sought your face; your face, Lord, will I seek.” For I was far from your face in darkened affection. For it is not by feet or by distances of place that one goes away from you or returns to you. Did that younger son of yours look for horses or chariots or ships, or fly away on visible wings, or make his journey by moving his knees, so that, living in a far country, he might squander prodigally what you, a sweet father, had given him when he set out? Sweet because you had given, and sweeter still to him when he returned in need. So it is in lustful affection, that is, darkened affection, that one is far from your face.

1.29CSEL 33:26–27

Vide, domine deus meus, et patienter, ut uides, uide, quomodo diligenter obseruent filii hominum pacta litterarum et syllabarum accepta a prioribus locutoribus et a te accepta aeterna pacta perpetuae salutis neglegant, ut qui illa sonorum uetera placita teneat aut doceat, si contra disciplinam grammaticam sine adspiratione primae syllabae hominem dixerit, magis displiceat hominibus, quam si contra tua praecepta hominem oderit, cum sit homo. quasi uero quemlibet inimicum hominem perniciosius sentiat quam ipsum odium, quo in eum irritatur, aut uastet quisquam persequendo alium grauius, quam cor suum uastat inimicando. et certe non est interior litterarum scientia quam scripta conscientia, id se alteri facere quod nolit pati. quam tu secretus es, habitans in excelsis in silentio, deus solus magnus, lege infatigabili spargens poenales caecitates supra inlicitas cupiditates, cum homo eloquentiae famam quaeritans ante hominem iudicem circumstante hominum multitudine inimicum suum odio inmanissimo insectans uigilantissime cauet, ne per linguae errorem dicat: inter hominibus, et ne per mentis furorem hominem auferat ex hominibus, non cauet.

See, Lord my God, and see patiently, as you do see, how carefully the sons of men observe the conventions of letters and syllables received from earlier speakers, and neglect the eternal conventions of everlasting salvation received from you; so that one who holds or teaches those old agreements about sounds, if against the rules of grammar he says “’uman being” without aspirating the first syllable, displeases people more than if, against your commandments, he hates a human being, though he is one himself. As if anyone could feel that any enemy is more harmful to him than the very hatred with which he is roused against him, or as if anyone could do more damage by persecuting another than he does to his own heart by his enmity. And certainly the knowledge of letters is not more inward than the conscience inscribed within us, that one should not do to another what one would not wish to suffer. How hidden you are, dwelling on high in silence, God, who alone are great, scattering by an unwearied law the penalty of blindness upon unlawful desires! When a man in search of a reputation for eloquence, before a human judge with a crowd of people standing around, attacks his enemy with the most monstrous hatred, he takes the greatest care not to say “among the men” with a slip of the tongue; but that he may not, by the fury of his mind, take a man away from among men, he takes no care.

1.30CSEL 33:27–28

Horum ego puer morum in limine iacebam miser, et huius harenae palaestra erat illa, ubi magis timebam barbarismum facere quam cauebam, si facerem, non facientibus inuidere. dico haec et confiteor tibi, deus meus, in quibus laudabar ab eis, quibus placere tunc mihi erat honeste uiuere. non enim uidebam uoraginem turpitudinis, in quam proiectus eram ab oculis tuis. nam in illis iam quid me foedius fuit, ubi etiam talibus displicebam fallendo innumerabilibus mendaciis et paedagogum et magistros et parentes amore ludendi, studio spectandi nugatoria et imitandi ludicra inquietudine? furta etiam faciebam de cellario parentum et de mensa uel gula imperante, uel ut haberem quod darem pueris, ludum suum mihi, quo pariter utique delectabantur, tamen uendentibus. in quo etiam ludo fraudulentas uictorias ipse uana excellentiae cupiditate uictus saepe aucupabar. quid enim tam nolebam pati atque atrociter, si deprehenderem, arguebam, quam id quod aliis faciebam et, si deprehensus arguerer, saeuire magis quam cedere libebat? istane est innocentia puerilis? non est, domine, non est, oro te, deus meus. nam haec ipsa sunt, quae a paedagogis et magistris, a nucibus et pilulis et passeribus, ad praefectos et reges, aurum, praedia, mancipia, haec ipsa omnino succedentibus maioribus aetatibus transeunt, sicuti ferulis maiora supplicia succedunt. humilitatis ergo signum in statura pueritiae, rex noster, probasti, cum aisti: talium est regnum caelorum.

On the threshold of such morals I lay as a wretched boy, and that was the training ground for this arena, where I was more afraid of committing a barbarism than careful, if I committed one, not to envy those who did not. I say these things and confess them to you, my God, things for which I was praised by those whom I then thought it the honorable life to please. For I did not see the whirlpool of filth into which I had been cast away from your eyes. For in their eyes, what was fouler than I, when I even displeased such people by deceiving my tutor and teachers and parents with countless lies, out of love of play, eagerness to watch trifling shows, and restless desire to imitate the stage? I also committed thefts from my parents' cellar and table, either at the command of my gluttony or so as to have something to give to boys who sold me their play, though they certainly enjoyed it just as much. In that play too I often hunted for fraudulent victories, myself conquered by a vain desire to excel. For what was I so unwilling to suffer, and what did I so fiercely denounce if I caught it, as the very thing I was doing to others? And if I was caught and denounced, I preferred to rage rather than give in. Is this the innocence of boyhood? It is not, Lord, it is not, I beg you, my God. For these are the very things that pass, from tutors and teachers, nuts and balls and sparrows, to prefects and kings, gold, estates, and slaves; these same things altogether, as the later ages succeed, just as greater punishments succeed the cane. So it was the sign of humility in the small stature of childhood that you, our King, commended when you said, “Of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

1.31CSEL 33:28–29

Sed tamen, domine, tibi excellentissimo, optimo conditori et rectori uniuersitatis, deo nostro gratias, etiamsi me puerum tantum esse noluisses. eram enim etiam tunc, uiuebam atque sentiebam meamque incolumitatem, uestigium secretissimae unitatis, ex qua eram, curae habebam, custodiebam interiore sensu integritatem sensuum meorum inque ipsis paruis paruarumque rerum cogitationibus ueritate delectabar. falli nolebam, memoria uigebam, locutione instruebar, amicitia mulcebar, fugiebam dolorem, abiectionem, ignorantiam. quid in tali animante non mirabile atque laudabile? at ista omnia dei mei dona sunt, non mihi ego dedi haec: et bona sunt et haec omnia ego. bonus ergo est qui fecit me, et ipse est bonum meum et illi exulto bonis omnibus, quibus etiam puer eram. hoc enim peccabam, quod non in ipso, sed in creaturis eius me atque ceteras uoluptates, sublimitates, ueritates quaerebam, atque ita inruebam in dolores, confusiones, errores. gratias tibi, dulcedo mea et honor meus et fiducia mea, deus meus, gratias tibi de donis tuis; sed tu mihi ea serua. ita enim seruabis me, et augebuntur et perficientur quae dedisti mihi, et ero ipse tecum, quia et ut sim tu dedisti mihi.

Yet thanks be to you, Lord, our God, most excellent and best founder and ruler of the universe, even if you had willed me to be no more than a boy. For even then I existed, I lived and I felt, and I cared for my own well-being, a trace of that most hidden unity from which I came. With an inner sense I guarded the soundness of my senses, and even in my small thoughts about small things I delighted in truth. I did not want to be deceived, I had a strong memory, I was being equipped with speech, I was soothed by friendship, I shunned pain, disgrace, and ignorance. What in such a living being is not wonderful and praiseworthy? But all these are gifts of my God; I did not give them to myself. And they are good, and all these things are me. So he who made me is good, and he himself is my good, and I exult to him for all the good things of which even as a boy I consisted. For my sin was this: that I sought pleasures, heights, and truths not in him but in his creatures, myself and the rest, and so I rushed headlong into pains, confusions, and errors. Thanks be to you, my sweetness, my honor, my confidence, my God; thanks be to you for your gifts; but keep them for me. For so you will keep me, and what you have given me will be increased and perfected, and I myself shall be with you, because you have given me even my existence.

Chapter 2

2.1CSEL 33:29

Recordari uolo transactas foeditates meas et carnales corruptiones animae meae, non quod eas amem, sed ut amem te, deus meus. amore amoris tui facio istuc, recolens uias meas nequissimas in amaritudine recogitationis meae, ut tu dulcescas mihi, dulcedo non fallax, dulcedo felix et secura, et colligens me a dispersione, in qua frustatim discissus sum, dum ab uno te auersus in multa euanui. exarsi enim aliquando satiari inferis in adulescentia et siluescere ausus sum uariis et umbrosis amoribus, et contabuit species mea et conputrui coram oculis tuis placens mihi et placere cupiens oculis hominum. Et quid erat, quod me delectabat, nisi amare et amari?

I want to call to mind my past foulness and the carnal corruptions of my soul, not because I love them, but so that I may love you, my God. I do this out of love for your love, going back over my most wicked ways in the bitterness of my remembering, so that you may grow sweet to me, sweetness that does not deceive, sweetness happy and secure, gathering me up from the scattering in which I was torn to pieces, when, turned away from you, the One, I vanished into the many. For in my adolescence I once burned to be glutted with the things below, and I dared to run wild in various shadowy loves; and my beauty wasted away, and I rotted before your eyes, pleasing myself and eager to please the eyes of men. And what was it that delighted me, but to love and be loved?

2.2CSEL 33:29–30

sed non tenebatur modus ab animo usque ad animum, quatenus est luminosus limes amicitiae, sed exhalabantur nebulae de limosa concupiscentia carnis et scatebra pubertatis et obnubilabant atque obfuscabant cor meum, ut non discerneretur serenitas dilectionis a caligine libidinis. utrumque in confuso aestuabat et rapiebat inbeccillam aetatem per abrupta cupiditatum atque mersabat gurgite flagitiorum. inualuerat super me ira tua et nesciebam. obsurdueram stridore catenae mortalitatis meae, poena superbiae animae meae, et ibam longius a te, et sinebas, et iactabar et effundebar et diffluebam et ebulliebam per fornicationes meas, et tacebas. o tardum gaudium meum! tacebas tunc, et ego ibam porro longe a te in plura et plura sterilia semina dolorum superba deiectione et inquieta lassitudine.

But the measure was not kept, from mind to mind, as far as the bright boundary of friendship; instead, mists rose from the muddy desire of the flesh and the bubbling spring of puberty, and they clouded and darkened my heart, so that the clear sky of love could not be distinguished from the fog of lust. Both seethed together in confusion, and swept my weak youth over the cliffs of desire and plunged it in a whirlpool of disgraceful acts. Your wrath had grown strong over me, and I did not know it. I had become deaf from the clanking of the chain of my mortality, the punishment of my soul's pride, and I went further from you, and you let me; and I was tossed about and poured out, I flowed away and boiled over in my fornications, and you were silent. O my late-coming joy! You were silent then, and I went further and further from you into more and more barren seeds of sorrows, with a proud dejection and a restless weariness.

2.3CSEL 33:30–31

Quis mihi modularetur aerumnam meam et nouissimarum rerum fugaces pulchritudines in usum uerteret earumque suauitatibus metas praefigeret, ut usque ad coniugale litus exaestuarent fluctus aetatis meae, si tranquillitas in eis non poterat esse fine procreandorum liberorum contenta, sicut praescribit lex tua, domine, qui formas etiam propaginem mortis nostrae, potens inponere lenem manum ad temperamentum spinarum a paradiso tuo seclusarum? non enim longe est a nobis omnipotentia tua, etiam cum longe sumus a te. aut certe sonitum nubium tuarum uigilantius aduerterem: tribulationem autem carnis habebunt huius modi. ego autem uobis parco, et: bonum est homini mulierem non tangere, et: qui sine uxore est, cogitat ea quae sunt dei, quomodo placeat deo; qui autem matrimonio iunctus est, cogitat ea quae sunt mundi, quomodo placeat uxori. has ergo uoces exaudirem uigilantior et abscisus propter regnum caelorum felicior expectarem amplexus tuos.

Who would have set a measure to my misery, turned the fleeting beauties of the lowest things to good use, and fixed limits to their sweetness, so that the waves of my youth might have broken on the shore of marriage, if calm could not be found in them otherwise, being content with the end of begetting children, as your law prescribes, Lord? For you shape even the offspring of our mortality, able to lay a gentle hand to soften the thorns that were shut out of your paradise. For your omnipotence is not far from us, even when we are far from you. Or at least I should have paid closer attention to the sound from your clouds: “Such people will have trouble in the flesh, but I would spare you”; and “It is good for a man not to touch a woman”; and “He who is without a wife thinks of the things of God, how to please God; but he who is joined in marriage thinks of the things of the world, how to please his wife.” I should have listened more attentively to these words, and, having made myself a eunuch for the kingdom of heaven, I would have awaited your embrace more happily.

2.4CSEL 33:31–32

Sed efferbui miser, sequens impetum fluxus mei relicto te, et excessi omnia legitima tua nec euasi flagella tua: quis enim hoc mortalium? nam tu semper aderas misericorditer saeuiens, et amarissimis aspargens offensionibus omnes illicitas iucunditates meas, ut ita quaererem sine offensione iucundari, et ubi hoc possem, non inuenirem quicquam praeter te, domine, praeter te, qui fingis dolorem in praecepto et percutis, ut sanes, et occidis nos, ne moriamur abs te. ubi eram et quam longe exulabam a deliciis domus tuae anno illo sexto decimo aetatis carnis meae, cum accepit in me sceptrum et totas manus ei dedi uesania libidinis, licentiosae per dedecus humanum, inlicitae autem per leges tuas? non fuit cura meorum ruentem excipere me matrimonio, sed cura fuit tantum, ut discerem sermonem facere quam optimum et persuadere dictione.

But I boiled over, wretch that I was, following the rush of my own current and abandoning you; I went beyond all your lawful bounds, and I did not escape your scourges. For what mortal does? For you were always there, mercifully severe, sprinkling all my unlawful pleasures with the bitterest vexations, so that I might seek a pleasure without vexation; and where I could find that, I would find nothing but you, Lord, nothing but you, who “fashion pain into a precept,” and strike in order to heal, and kill us so that we may not die away from you. Where was I, and how far was I exiled from the delights of your house, in that sixteenth year of the age of my flesh, when the madness of lust, licensed by human shamelessness but forbidden by your laws, took the scepter over me, and I surrendered to it completely? My family took no care to catch me as I fell by means of marriage; their only care was that I should learn to make the best possible speeches and to persuade by eloquence.

2.5CSEL 33:32–33

Et anno quidem illo intermissa erant studia mea, dum mihi reducto a Madauris, in qua uicina urbe iam coeperam litteraturae atque oratoriae percipiendae gratia peregrinari, longinquioris apud Karthaginem peregrinationis sumptus parabantur animositate magis quam opibus patris, municipis Thagastensis admodum tenuis. cui narro haec? neque enim tibi, deus meus, sed apud te narro haec generi meo, generi humano, quantulacumque ex particula incidere potest in istas meas litteras. et ut quid hoc? ut uidelicet ego et quisquis haec legit cogitemus, de quam profundo clamandum sit ad te. et quid propius auribus tuis, si cor confitens et uita ex fide est? quis enim non extollebat laudibus tunc hominem patrem meum, quod ultra uires rei familiaris suae impenderet filio, quidquid etiam longe peregrinanti studiorum causa opus esset? multorum enim ciuium longe opulentiorum nullum tale negotium pro liberis erat, cum interea non satageret idem pater, qualis crescerem tibi aut quam castus essem, dummodo essem disertus uel desertus potius a cultura tua, deus, qui es unus uerus et bonus dominus agri tui, cordis mei.

In that year my studies were interrupted. I had been brought back from Madauros, the neighboring town where I had already begun to live away from home to study literature and oratory, while the expenses of a longer stay away at Carthage were being gathered, more by my father's determination than his means, for he was a burgess of Thagaste of quite modest means. To whom am I telling this? Not to you, my God; but before you I tell it to my own kind, the human race, however small the portion of it that may come upon these writings of mine. And to what end? So that I and whoever reads this may consider from what depths we must cry to you. And what is nearer to your ears than a confessing heart and a life lived by faith? For who did not then praise my father to the skies because, beyond the resources of his estate, he spent on his son whatever was needed for him to live far away for his studies? For many citizens far richer did nothing of the kind for their children. Yet meanwhile this same father took no trouble about how I was growing up toward you or how chaste I was, provided only that I was eloquent, or rather deserted, uncultivated by you, God, the one true and good Lord of your field, my heart.

2.6CSEL 33:33

Sed ubi sexto illo et decimo anno interposito otio ex necessitate domestica feriatus ab omni schola cum parentibus esse coepi, excesserant caput meum uepres libidinum, et nulla erat eradicans manus. quin inmo ubi me ille pater in balneis uidit pubescentem et inquieta indutum adolescentia, quasi iam ex hoc in nepotes gestiret, gaudens matri indicauit, gaudens uinulentia, in qua te iste mundus oblitus est creatorem suum et creaturam tuam pro te amauit, de uino inuisibili peruersae atque inclinatae in ima uoluntatis suae. sed matris in pectore iam inchoaueras templum tuum et exordium sanctae habitationis tuae: nam ille adhuc catechumenus et hoc recens erat. itaque illa exsiluit pia trepidatione ac tremore et quamuis mihi nondum fideli, timuit tamen uias distortas, in quibus ambulant qui ponunt ad te tergum et non faciem.

But when in that sixteenth year, through a period of leisure caused by the family's straitened means, I began to live with my parents on holiday from all schooling, the brambles of lust grew above my head, and there was no hand to root them out. On the contrary, when my father saw me at the baths growing into manhood and clothed with restless youth, he told my mother with joy, as though already delighted by the thought of grandchildren, rejoicing with that drunkenness in which this world forgets you its creator and loves your creature instead of you, from the invisible wine of its own perverse will, bent toward the lowest things. But in my mother's breast you had already begun your temple and the foundation of your holy dwelling; for he was still a catechumen, and a recent one. So she started up with a holy trembling and fear, and although I was not yet one of the faithful, she feared for me the crooked ways in which those walk who turn their back to you and not their face.

2.7CSEL 33:33–34

Ei mihi! et audeo dicere tacuisse te, deus meus, cum irem abs te longius? itane tu tacebas tunc mihi? et cuius erant nisi tua uerba illa per matrem meam, fidelem tuam, quae cantasti in aures meas? nec inde quicquam descendit in cor, ut facerem illud. uolebat enim illa, et secreto memini, ut monuerit cum sollicitudine ingenti, ne fornicarer maximeque ne adulterarem cuiusquam uxorem. qui mihi monitus muliebres uidebantur, quibus obtemperare erubescerem. illi autem tui erant, et nesciebam et te tacere putabam atque illam loqui, per quam mihi tu non tacebas, et in illa contemnebaris a me, a me, filio eius, filio ancillae tuae, seruo tuo. sed nesciebam et praeceps ibam tanta caecitate, ut inter coaetaneos meos puderet me minoris dedecoris, quoniam audiebam eos iactantes flagitia sua et tanto gloriantes magis, quanto magis turpes essent, et libebat facere non solum libidine facti uerum etiam laudis. quid dignum est uituperatione nisi uitium? ego, ne uituperarer, uitiosior fiebam, et ubi non suberat, quo admisso aequarer perditis, fingebam me fecisse quod non feceram, ne uiderer abiectior, quo eram innocentior, et ne uilior haberer, quo eram castior.

Alas for me! And do I dare to say that you were silent, my God, when I went further from you? Were you really silent to me then? And whose were those words, if not yours, which you sang in my ears through my mother, your faithful one? Yet none of it sank into my heart so that I would do it. For she wanted, and I remember how she warned me privately with great anxiety, that I should not commit fornication, and above all that I should not commit adultery with anyone's wife. These seemed to me a woman's warnings, which I would have blushed to obey. But they were yours, and I did not know it; I thought that you were silent and that she was speaking, when through her you were not silent to me, and in her you were despised by me, by me, her son, “the son of your handmaid, your servant.” But I did not know, and I rushed headlong with such blindness that among my companions I was ashamed of being less shameless, since I heard them boasting of their disgraceful acts and glorying the more, the more disgraceful they were; and I took pleasure in doing it not only for the lust of the deed but also for the praise. What deserves blame but vice? Yet I became more vicious so as not to be blamed; and when there was nothing I had done to put me on a level with the abandoned, I pretended I had done what I had not, so as not to seem more contemptible for being more innocent, or be held cheaper for being more chaste.

2.8CSEL 33:34–35

Ecce cum quibus comitibus iter agebam platearum Babyloniae et uolutabar in caeno eius tamquam in cinnamis et unguentis pretiosis. et in umbilico eius quo tenacius haererem, calcabat me inimicus inuisibilis et seducebat me, quia ego seductilis eram. non enim et illa, quae iam de medio Babylonis fugerat, sed ibat in ceteris eius tardior, mater carnis meae, sicut monuit me pudicitiam, ita curauit quod de me a uiro suo audierat, iamque pestilentiosum et in posterum periculosum sentiebat cohercere termino coniugalis affectus, si resecari ad uiuum non poterat. non curauit hoc, quia metus erat, ne inpediretur spes mea conpede uxoria, non spes illa, quam in te futuri saeculi habebat mater, sed spes litterarum, quas ut nossem nimis uolebat parens uterque, ille, quia de te prope nihil cogitabat, de me autem inania, illa autem, quia non solum nullo detrimento, sed etiam nonnullo adiumento ad te adipiscendum futura existimabat usitata illa studia doctrinae. ita enim conicio recolens, ut possum, mores parentum meorum. relaxabantur etiam mihi ad ludendum habenae ultra temperamentum seueritatis in dissolutionem afflictionum uariarum, et in omnibus erat caligo intercludens mihi, deus meus, serenitatem ueritatis tuae, et prodiebat tamquam ex adipe iniquitas mea.

See with what companions I walked the streets of Babylon and rolled in its mud as if in cinnamon and precious ointments. And in its very navel, so that I would stick the more firmly, the invisible enemy trampled me and seduced me, because I was easily seduced. For even the mother of my flesh, who had already fled from the midst of Babylon but went more slowly in its other quarters, though she had warned me to be chaste, did not take care about what she had heard of me from her husband, namely, to restrain within the bounds of married affection what she already felt was pestilent and dangerous for the future, if it could not be cut back to the quick. She did not take care of this, because she feared that my prospects would be hindered by the fetter of a wife: not that hope of the world to come which my mother had in you, but the hope of learning, which both my parents wanted me very much to acquire; he, because he thought almost nothing of you and only vain things about me; she, because she thought that the usual course of studies would be not only no hindrance but even some help toward reaching you. So I conjecture, recalling as best I can the characters of my parents. The reins were also let loose for me to play, beyond any measure of strictness, into the dissipation of various passions; and in all of it was a fog, my God, shutting me off from the clear sky of your truth, and “my iniquity came forth as from fatness.”

2.9CSEL 33:35–36

Furtum certe punit lex tua, domine, et lex scripta in cordibus hominum, quam ne ipsa quidem delet iniquitas: quis enim fur aequo animo furem patitur? nec copiosus adactum inopia. et ego furtum facere uolui et feci nulla conpulsus egestate nisi penuria et fastidio iustitiae et sagina iniquitatis. nam id furatus sum, quod mihi abundabat et multo melius, nec ea re uolebam frui, quam furto appetebam, sed ipso furto et peccato. arbor erat pirus in uicinia nostrae uineae pomis onusta nec forma nec sapore inlecebrosis. ad hanc excutiendam atque asportandam nequissimi adulescentuli perreximus nocte intempesta, quo usque ludum de pestilentiae more in areis produxeramus, et abstulimus inde onera ingentia non ad nostras epulas, sed uel proicienda porcis, etiamsi aliquid inde comedimus, dum tamen fieret a nobis quod eo liberet, quo non liceret. ecce cor meum, deus, ecce cor meum, quod miseratus es in imo abyssi. dicat tibi nunc ecce cor meum, quid ibi quaerebat, ut essem gratis malus et malitiae meae causa nulla esset nisi malitia. foeda erat et amaui eam; amaui perire, amaui defectum meum, non illud, ad quod deficiebam, sed defectum meum ipsum amaui, turpis anima et dissiliens a firmamento tuo in exterminium, non dedecore aliquid, sed dedecus appetens.

Theft is certainly punished by your law, Lord, and by the law written in human hearts, which not even iniquity itself erases. For what thief calmly puts up with a thief? Not even a rich one with one driven by want. Yet I wanted to commit theft, and did it, compelled by no need, but by a poverty of justice and a distaste for it, and a glut of iniquity. For I stole what I had in plenty, and much better; nor did I want to enjoy the thing I sought by theft, but the theft itself and the sin. There was a pear tree near our vineyard, laden with fruit tempting neither in appearance nor in taste. We went to shake it and carry off the fruit, a gang of the worst young fellows, late at night, having kept up our games in the streets until then, as was our vicious custom; and we took huge loads from it, not for our own feasting but even to throw to the pigs, though we ate a little of it, provided only that we did what pleased us because it was not allowed. See my heart, God, see my heart, on which you had pity in the depth of the abyss. Let my heart now tell you what it was seeking there, that I should be evil for nothing, and that there should be no cause of my wickedness but wickedness itself. It was foul, and I loved it. I loved to perish, I loved my own falling away, not that for which I fell away, but my falling away itself I loved, a foul soul leaping down from your firm support into destruction, not seeking something through disgrace, but seeking disgrace itself.

2.10CSEL 33:36–37

Etenim species est pulchris corporibus et auro et argento et omnibus, et in contactu carnis congruentia ualet plurimum ceterisque sensibus est sua cuique adconmodata modificatio corporum; habet etiam honor temporalis et imperitandi atque superandi potentia suum decus, unde etiam uindictae auiditas oritur: et tamen in cuncta haec adipiscenda non est egrediendum abs te, domine, neque deuiandum a lege tua. et uita, quam hic uiuimus, habet inlecebram suam propter quendam modum decoris sui et conuenientiam cum his omnibus infimis pulchris. amicitia quoque hominum caro nodo dulcis est propter unitatem de multis animis. propter uniuersa haec atque huius modi peccatum admittitur, dum inmoderata in ista inclinatione, cum extrema bona sint, meliora et summa deseruntur, tu, domine deus noster, et ueritas tua et lex tua. habent enim et haec ima delectationes, sed non sicut deus meus, qui fecit omnia, quia in ipso delectatur iustus, et ipse est deliciae rectorum corde.

There is indeed beauty in beautiful bodies, in gold and silver and all things; in bodily touch, what is fitting counts for most; and for each of the other senses there is a suitable adjustment of bodies. Worldly honor, and the power to command and to prevail, also have their own splendor, from which the appetite for revenge also arises. And yet, to gain all these things, one must not go away from you, Lord, nor stray from your law. And the life we live here has its own allure, because of a certain measure of beauty it has and its harmony with all these lowest beautiful things. Human friendship too is sweet with its dear bond, because of the unity it makes of many souls. For all these things and things like them sin is committed, when, through an immoderate inclination toward them, since they are the lowest goods, the better and highest goods are abandoned: you, Lord our God, and your truth and your law. For these lowest things have their delights too, but not like my God, who made all things, for “in him the just man delights,” and he himself is the delight of the upright in heart.

2.11CSEL 33:37–38

Cum itaque de facinore quaeritur, qua causa factum sit, credi non solet, nisi cum appetitus adipiscendi alicuius illorum bonorum, quae infima diximus, esse potuisse adparuerit aut metus amittendi. pulchra sunt enim et decora, quamquam prae bonis superioribus et beatificis abiecta et iacentia. homicidium fecit. cur fecit? adamauit eius coniugem aut praedium aut uoluit depraedari, unde uiueret, aut timuit ab illo tale aliquid amittere aut laesus ulcisci se exarsit. num homicidium sine causa faceret ipso homicidio delectatus? quis crediderit? nam et de quodam dictum est uaecordi et nimis crudeli homine, quod gratuito potius malus atque crudelis erat; praedicta est tamen causa: ne per otium, inquit, torpesceret manus aut animus. quare id quoque? cur ita? ut scilicet illa exercitatione scelerum capta urbe honores, imperia, diuitias adsequeretur et careret metu legum et difficultate rerum propter inopiam rei familiaris et conscientiam scelerum. nec ipse igitur Catilina amauit facinora sua, sed utique aliud, cuius causa illa faciebat.

So when the cause of a crime is investigated, the usual view is that it cannot be believed unless it appears that there could have been a desire to gain one of those goods we called lowest, or a fear of losing them. For they are beautiful and fine, though, compared with the higher goods that make us blessed, they are lowly and base. A man has committed murder. Why did he do it? He loved the man's wife or his estate, or he wanted to rob him to have something to live on, or he feared to lose something of the kind to him, or, having been wronged, he burned to avenge himself. Would he commit murder without a cause, delighted by murder itself? Who would believe it? For even of a certain senseless and exceedingly cruel man it was said that he was evil and cruel for no reason; yet a cause was given: “so that,” he says, “his hand or his mind would not grow sluggish through idleness.” Why that too? Why so? Clearly so that, by that practice in crime, once the city was taken he might gain honors, power, and riches, and be free of fear of the laws and of the difficulties of his situation caused by his lack of means and his consciousness of his crimes. So not even Catiline himself loved his crimes, but certainly something else for whose sake he committed them.

2.12CSEL 33:38–39

Quid ego miser in te amaui, o furtum meum, o facinus illud meum nocturnum sexti decimi anni aetatis meae? non enim pulchrum eras, cum furtum esses. aut uero aliquid es, ut loquar ad te? pulchra erant poma illa, quae furati sumus, quoniam creatura tua erat, pulcherrime omnium, creator omnium, deus bone, deus summum bonum et bonum uerum meum; pulchra erant illa poma, sed non ipsa concupiuit anima mea miserabilis. erat mihi enim meliorum copia, illa autem decerpsi, tantum ut furarer. nam decerpta proieci epulatus inde solam iniquitatem, qua laetabar fruens. nam et si quid illorum pomorum intrauit in os meum, condimentum ibi facinus erat. et nunc, domine deus meus, quaero, quid me in furto delectauerit, et ecce species nulla est: non dico sicut in aequitate atque prudentia, sed neque sicut in mente hominis atque memoria et sensibus et uegetante uita, neque sicut speciosa sunt sidera et decora locis suis et terra et mare plena fetibus, qui succedunt nascendo decedentibus; non saltem ut est quaedam defectiua species et umbratica uitiis fallentibus.

What did I, wretch, love in you, my theft, my crime by night in the sixteenth year of my age? For you were not beautiful, since you were a theft. Or are you anything at all, that I should speak to you? The fruit we stole was beautiful, because it was your creation, most beautiful of all, creator of all, good God, God the highest good and my true good. The fruit was beautiful, but my wretched soul did not desire the fruit itself. For I had plenty of better fruit; I picked those only in order to steal. Once picked, I threw them away, having feasted only on the iniquity, which I enjoyed with delight. For if any of that fruit entered my mouth, the crime was its seasoning. And now, Lord my God, I ask what delighted me in the theft, and see, there is no beauty in it: I do not say the beauty there is in justice and prudence, nor even that in the human mind and memory and senses and vegetative life, nor the beauty of the stars, fair in their places, and of earth and sea full of offspring that succeed by birth those that die; not even the kind of defective and shadowy beauty found in deceiving vices.

2.13CSEL 33:39–40

Nam et superbia celsitudinem imitatur, cum tu sis unus super omnia deus excelsus. et ambitio quid nisi honores quaerit et gloriam, cum tu sis prae cunctis honorandus unus et gloriosus in aeternum? et saeuitia potestatum timeri uult: quis autem timendus nisi unus deus, cuius potestati eripi aut subtrahi quid, quando aut ubi aut quo uel a quo potest? et blanditiae lasciuientium amari nolunt: sed neque blandius est aliquid tua caritate nec amatur quicquam salubrius quam illa prae cunctis formosa et luminosa ueritas tua. et curiositas affectare uidetur studium scientiae, cum tu omnia summe noueris. ignorantia quoque ipsa atque stultitia simplicitatis et innocentiae nomine tegitur, quia te simplicius quicquam non reperitur. quid te autem innocentius, quandoquidem opera sua malis inimica sunt? et ignauia quasi quietem appetit: quae uero quies certa praeter dominum? luxuria satietatem atque abundantiam se cupit uocari: tu es autem plenitudo et indeficiens copia incorruptibilis suauitatis. effusio liberalitatis obtendit umbram: sed bonorum omnium largitor affluentissimus tu es. auaritia multa possidere uult: et tu possides omnia. inuidentia de excellentia litigat: quid te excellentius? ira uindictam quaerit: te iustius quis uindicat? timor insolita et repentina exhorrescit rebus, quae amantur, aduersantia, dum praecauet securitati: tibi enim quid insolitum? quid repentinum? aut quis a te separat quod diligis? aut ubi nisi apud te firma securitas? tristitia rebus amissis contabescit, quibus se oblectabat cupiditas, quia ita sibi nollet, sicut tibi auferri nihil potest.

For even pride imitates loftiness, whereas you are the one God, exalted above all things. And what does ambition seek but honors and glory, whereas you alone are to be honored above all and are glorious forever? The cruelty of the powerful wants to be feared; but who is to be feared but the one God, from whose power what can be seized or withdrawn, when, where, how, or by whom? The caresses of the lustful want to be loved; but nothing is more caressing than your charity, and nothing is loved more healthily than your truth, beautiful and radiant above all things. Curiosity seems to aspire to a zeal for knowledge, whereas you know all things supremely. Ignorance itself and folly are cloaked under the name of simplicity and innocence, because nothing is found simpler than you. And what is more innocent than you, since it is their own works that are hostile to the wicked? Sloth seeks rest, as it were; but what sure rest is there besides the Lord? Luxury wants to be called fullness and abundance; but you are the fullness and unfailing store of incorruptible sweetness. Prodigality casts a shadow of generosity; but you are the most bountiful giver of all good things. Avarice wants to possess much; and you possess all things. Envy contends for preeminence; what is more preeminent than you? Anger seeks revenge; who avenges more justly than you? Fear shudders at unusual and sudden things that threaten what it loves, while it takes precautions for its safety; but to you what is unusual? what is sudden? Or who separates from you what you love? Or where but with you is there firm security? Sadness pines at the loss of things in which desire delighted, because it would wish that nothing could be taken from it, as nothing can be taken from you.

2.14CSEL 33:40

Ita fornicatur anima, cum auertitur abs te et quaerit extra te ea quae pura et liquida non inuenit, nisi cum redit ad te. peruerse te imitantur omnes, qui longe se a te faciunt et extollunt se aduersum te. sed etiam sic te imitando indicant creatorem te esse omnis naturae et ideo non esse, quo a te omni modo recedatur. quid ergo in illo furto ego dilexi et in quo dominum meum uel uitiose atque peruerse imitatus sum? an libuit facere contra legem saltem fallacia, quia potentatu non poteram, ut mancam libertatem captiuus imitarer faciendo inpune, quod non liceret, tenebrosa omnipotentiae similitudine? ecce est ille seruus fugiens dominum suum et consecutus umbram. o putredo, o monstrum uitae et mortis profunditas! potuitne libere quod non licebat, non ob aliud, nisi quia non licebat?

So the soul commits fornication when it turns away from you and seeks outside you what it cannot find pure and clear except when it returns to you. All who put themselves far from you and exalt themselves against you imitate you perversely. But even by imitating you in this way they show that you are the creator of all nature, and that there is therefore nowhere to withdraw from you altogether. What, then, did I love in that theft, and in what did I imitate my Lord, even viciously and perversely? Did I take pleasure in acting against the law at least by deceit, since I could not by power, so that, a prisoner, I might imitate a crippled freedom by doing with impunity what was not allowed, in a darkened likeness of omnipotence? See, here is that slave fleeing his master and chasing a shadow. O rottenness, O monstrous life and depth of death! Could it please me to do what was not allowed, for no other reason than that it was not allowed?

2.15CSEL 33:40–41

Quid retribuam domino, quod recolit haec memoria mea et anima mea non metuit inde? diligam te, domine, et gratias agam et confitear nomini tuo, quoniam tanta dimisisti mihi mala et nefaria opera mea. gratiae tuae deputo et misericordiae tuae, quod peccata mea tamquam glaciem soluisti. gratiae tuae deputo et quaecumque non feci mala: quid enim non facere potui, qui etiam gratuitum facinus amaui? et omnia mihi dimissa esse fateor, et quae mea sponte feci mala et quae te duce non feci. quis est hominum, qui suam cogitans infirmitatem audet uiribus suis tribuere castitatem atque innocentiam suam, ut minus amet te, quasi minus ei necessaria fuerit misericordia tua, qua donas peccata conuersis ad te? qui enim uocatus a te secutus est uocem tuam et uitauit ea, quae me de me ipso recordantem et fatentem legit, non me derideat ab eo medico aegrum sanari, a quo sibi praestitum est, ut non aegrotaret, uel potius ut minus aegrotaret, et ideo te tantundem, inmo uero amplius diligat, quia per quem me uidet tantis peccatorum meorum languoribus exui, per eum se uidet tantis peccatorum languoribus non inplicari.

“What shall I render to the Lord,” that my memory recalls these things and my soul is not afraid because of them? “I will love you, Lord,” and give thanks, and confess to your name, since you have forgiven me such evil and wicked deeds. I credit it to your grace and your mercy that you have melted away my sins like ice. I credit to your grace also whatever evils I did not do; for what could I not have done, I who loved even a crime done for nothing? And I confess that all has been forgiven me, both the evils I did of my own accord and those I did not do because you guided me. What human being, considering his own weakness, dares to credit his chastity and innocence to his own strength, so as to love you less, as if he had less need of your mercy, by which you forgive the sins of those who turn to you? For whoever, called by you, has followed your voice and avoided the things he reads of me as I recall and confess them about myself, let him not mock me, sick as I was, for being healed by that physician through whom it was granted to him not to fall sick, or rather to be less sick; and let him therefore love you as much, or rather even more, because he sees that the one through whom I am freed from the great sicknesses of my sins is the one through whom he is kept from being entangled in such great sicknesses of sin.

2.16CSEL 33:41–42

Quem fructum habui miser aliquando in his, quae nunc recolens erubesco, maxime in illo furto, in quo ipsum furtum amaui, nihil aliud, cum et ipsum esset nihil et eo ipso ego miserior? et tamen solus id non fecissem — sic recordor animum tunc meum — solus omnino id non fecissem. ergo amaui ibi etiam consortium eorum, cum quibus id feci. non ergo nihil aliud quam furtum amaui; inmo uero nihil aliud, quia et illud nihil est. quid est re uera? quis est, qui doceat me, nisi qui inluminat cor meum et discernit umbras eius? quid est, quod mihi uenit in mentem quaerere et discutere et considerare, quia si tunc amarem poma illa, quae furatus sum, et eis frui cuperem, possem etiam solus, si satis esset, conmittere illam iniquitatem, qua peruenirem ad uoluptatem meam, nec confricatione consciorum animorum accenderem pruritum cupiditatis meae? sed quoniam in illis pomis uoluptas mihi non erat, ea erat in ipso facinore, quam faciebat consortium simul peccantium.

“What fruit did I ever have,” wretch that I was, in the things of which I now blush to remember, especially in that theft, in which I loved the theft itself and nothing else, since it was itself nothing and I was the more wretched for it? And yet I would not have done it alone. So I recall my state of mind then: alone I would not have done it at all. So I loved there also the companionship of those with whom I did it. So it is not true that I loved nothing but the theft; or rather, it is true that I loved nothing else, because that companionship too is nothing. What is it really? Who is there to teach me, except the one who enlightens my heart and discerns its shadows? What is it that has come into my mind to inquire into, discuss, and consider? That if I had loved the fruit I stole and wanted to enjoy it, I could have committed that iniquity alone, if that were enough to reach my pleasure, without inflaming the itch of my desire by rubbing against accomplices' minds. But since my pleasure was not in the fruit, it was in the crime itself, which the companionship of fellow sinners produced.

2.17CSEL 33:42–43

Quid erat ille affectus animi? certe enim plane turpis erat nimis, et uae mihi erat, qui habebam illum. sed tamen quid erat? delicta quis intellegit? risus erat quasi titillato corde, quod fallebamus eos, qui haec a nobis fieri non putabant et uehementer nolebant. cur ergo eo me delectabat, quo id non faciebam solus? an quia etiam nemo facile solus ridet? nemo quidem facile, sed tamen etiam solos et singulos homines, cum alius nemo praesens est, uincit risus aliquando, si aliquid nimie ridiculum uel sensibus occurrit uel animo. at ego illud solus non facerem, non facerem omnino solus. ecce est coram te, deus meus, uiua recordatio animae meae. solus non facerem furtum illud, in quo me non libebat id quod furabar, sed quia furabar: quod me solum facere prorsus non liberet nec facerem. o nimis inimica amicitia, seductio mentis inuestigabilis, ex ludo et ioco nocendi auiditas et alieni damni appetitus nulla lucri mei, nulla ulciscendi libidine, sed cum dicitur: "eamus, faciamus" et pudet non esse impudentem.

What was that state of mind? It was certainly exceedingly foul, and woe to me who had it. But still, what was it? “Who understands sins?” It was a laugh, as if our hearts were tickled, that we were deceiving those who did not think we would do such things and strongly disapproved. Why, then, did it delight me that I did not do it alone? Is it because no one laughs easily alone? No one does so easily; yet sometimes laughter does overcome people alone and by themselves, with no one else present, if something very ridiculous meets their senses or their mind. But I would not have done that alone; I would not have done it at all alone. See, before you, my God, is the living memory of my soul. Alone I would not have committed that theft, in which I took pleasure not in what I stole but in stealing; and I would not have enjoyed doing it alone at all, nor would I have done it. O friendship too unfriendly, unfathomable seduction of the mind, eagerness to harm arising from play and jest, appetite for another's loss with no desire for my own gain or for revenge; but when someone says, “Let's go, let's do it,” one is ashamed not to be shameless.

2.18CSEL 33:43

Quis exaperit istam tortuosissimam et inplicatissimam nodositatem? foeda est; nolo in eam intendere, nolo eam uidere. te uolo, iustitia et innocentia, pulchra et decora honestis luminibus et insatiabili satietate. quies est apud te ualde et uita inperturbabilis. qui intrat in te, intrat in gaudium domini sui et non timebit et habebit se optime in optimo. defluxi abs te ego et erraui, deus meus, nimis deuius ab stabilitate tua in adulescentia et factus sum mihi regio egestatis.

Who can untie this most twisted and tangled knot? It is foul; I do not want to look at it, I do not want to see it. I want you, justice and innocence, beautiful and fair with honorable light and a satisfaction that never cloys. With you is true rest and a life that cannot be disturbed. Whoever enters into you “enters into the joy of his Lord,” and will not fear, and will be supremely well in the supreme Good. I slipped away from you and wandered, my God, too far astray from your stability in my youth, and I became to myself a land of want.

Chapter 3

3.1CSEL 33:43–44

Veni Karthaginem et circumstrepebat me undique sartago flagitiosorum amorum. nondum amabam et amare amabam et secretiore indigentia oderam me minus indigentem. quaerebam quid amarem, amans amare, et oderam securitatem et uiam sine muscipulis, quoniam famis mihi erat intus ab interiore cibo, te ipso, deus meus, et ea fame non esuriebam, sed eram sine desiderio alimentorum incorruptibilium, non quia plenus eis eram, sed quo inanior, fastidiosior. et ideo non bene ualebat anima mea et ulcerosa proiciebat se foras, miserabiliter scalpi auida contactu sensibilium. sed si non haberent animam, non utique amarentur. amare et amari dulce mihi erat magis, si et amantis corpore fruerer. uenam igitur amicitiae coinquinabam sordibus concupiscentiae candoremque eius obnubilabam de tartaro libidinis, et tamen foedus atque inhonestus, elegans et urbanus esse gestiebam abundanti uanitate. rui etiam in amorem, quo cupiebam capi. deus meus, misericordia mea, quanto felle mihi suauitatem illam et quam bonus aspersisti, quia et amatus sum et perueni ad uinculum fruendi et conligabar laetus aerumnosis nexibus, ut caederer uirgis ferreis ardentibus zeli et suspicionum et timorum et irarum atque rixarum.

I came to Carthage, and all around me there hissed a frying pan of disgraceful loves. I was not yet in love, but I loved to love, and from a more hidden want I hated myself for wanting less. I was looking for something to love, in love with loving, and I hated safety and a path without snares; for I had a hunger within, for the inner food, you yourself, my God, and yet with that hunger I was not hungry, but was without desire for incorruptible food, not because I was full of it, but the emptier I was, the more I loathed it. And so my soul was not healthy; covered in sores, it threw itself outward, wretchedly eager to be scratched by contact with things of sense. But if these things had no soul, they would certainly not be loved. To love and to be loved was sweet to me, all the more if I could also enjoy the body of the one I loved. So I defiled the spring of friendship with the filth of lust, and clouded its brightness with the hell of desire; and yet, foul and dishonorable as I was, in my overflowing vanity I longed to be elegant and sophisticated. I rushed also into love, by which I longed to be captured. My God, my mercy, with how much gall you in your goodness sprinkled that sweetness for me! For I was loved, and I reached the bond of enjoyment, and I was gladly tied up in painful knots, so as to be beaten with the burning iron rods of jealousy and suspicions and fears and angers and quarrels.

3.2CSEL 33:44–45

Rapiebant me spectacula theatrica plena imaginibus miseriarum mearum et fomitibus ignis mei. quid est, quod ibi homo uult dolere luctuosa et tragica, quae tamen pati ipse nollet? et tamen pati uult ex eis dolorem spectator et dolor ipse est uoluptas eius. quid est nisi miserabilis insania? nam eo magis eis mouetur quisque, quo minus a talibus affectibus sanus est, quamquam, cum ipse patitur, miseria, cum aliis compatitur, misericordia dici solet. sed qualis tandem misericordia in rebus fictis et scenicis? non enim ad subueniendum prouocatur auditor, sed tantum ad dolendum inuitatur et auctori earum imaginum amplius fauet, cum amplius dolet. et si calamitates illae hominum uel antiquae uel falsae sic agantur, ut qui spectat non doleat, abscedit inde fastidiens et reprehendens; si autem doleat, manet intentus et gaudens.

I was carried away by theatrical shows, full of images of my own miseries and of fuel for my fire. Why is it that a person wants to feel grief there at sad and tragic events which he would not want to suffer himself? And yet as a spectator he wants to feel grief from them, and the grief itself is his pleasure. What is this but pitiable madness? For each one is moved by them the more, the less healthy he is from such passions; although when a person suffers himself it is usually called misery, and when he suffers with others, mercy. But what kind of mercy is it, after all, in fictitious and staged events? For the listener is not called on to help, but only invited to grieve; and the more he grieves, the more he applauds the author of those images. And if those human calamities, whether ancient or invented, are acted in such a way that the spectator does not grieve, he leaves in disgust and criticizes; but if he grieves, he stays, intent and rejoicing.

3.3CSEL 33:45–46

Lacrimae ergo amantur et dolores. certe omnis homo gaudere uult. an cum miserum esse neminem libeat, libet tamen esse misericordem, quod quia non sine dolore est, hac una causa amantur dolores? et hoc de illa uena amicitiae est. sed quo uadit? quo fluit? ut quid decurrit in torrentem picis bullientis, aestus inmanes taetrarum libidinum, in quos ipsa mutatur et uertitur per nutum proprium de caelesti serenitate detorta atque deiecta? repudietur ergo misericordia? nequaquam. ergo amentur dolores aliquando. sed caue inmunditiam, anima mea, sub tutore, deo meo, deo patrum nostrorum et laudabili et superelato in omnia saecula, caue inmunditiam. neque enim nunc non misereor, sed tunc in theatris congaudebam amantibus, cum sese fruebantur per flagitia, quamuis haec imaginarie gererent in ludo spectaculi, cum autem sese amittebant, quasi misericors contristabar; et utrumque delectabat tamen. nunc uero magis miseror gaudentem in flagitio quam uelut dura perpessum detrimento perniciosae uoluptatis et amissione miserae felicitatis. haec certe uerior misericordia, sed non in ea delectat dolor. nam etsi adprobatur officio caritatis qui dolet miserum, mallet tamen utique non esse quod doleret, qui germanitus misericors est. si enim est maliuola beniuolentia, quod fieri non potest, potest et ille, qui ueraciter sinceriterque miseretur, cupere esse miseros, ut misereatur. nonnullus itaque dolor adprobandus, nullus amandus est. hoc enim tu, domine deus, qui animas amas, longe alteque purius quam nos et incorruptibilius misereris, quod nullo dolore sauciaris. et ad haec quis idoneus?

So tears are loved, and griefs. Certainly everyone wants to rejoice. Or is it that, while no one likes to be miserable, one does like to be merciful, and since that is not without grief, for this one reason griefs are loved? This too comes from that spring of friendship. But where does it go? Where does it flow? Why does it run down into a torrent of boiling pitch, the monstrous heat of foul lusts, into which it is itself changed and turned by its own will, twisted and thrown down from heavenly clearness? Should mercy then be rejected? By no means. So let griefs sometimes be loved. But beware of uncleanness, my soul, under the protection of my God, “the God of our fathers, praiseworthy and exalted above all forever”; beware of uncleanness. For I do not now lack compassion; but then in the theaters I rejoiced with lovers when they enjoyed one another in disgraceful acts, though they did this only in pretense in the play of the show; and when they lost one another, I was saddened as if merciful; and yet both delighted me. But now I have more pity for one who rejoices in a disgraceful act than for one who is thought to have suffered hardship by losing a pernicious pleasure and forfeiting a miserable happiness. This is certainly the truer mercy, but in it grief does not delight. For though one who grieves over a wretched person is approved for the duty of love, still one who is genuinely merciful would rather there were nothing to grieve over. For if there is such a thing as malevolent benevolence, which is impossible, then someone who truly and sincerely has mercy could wish there to be wretched people so that he could have mercy on them. So some grief is to be approved, but none is to be loved. For this is how you, Lord God, who love souls, have mercy far more deeply and purely than we, and more incorruptibly: you are wounded by no grief. “And who is sufficient for these things?”

3.4CSEL 33:46–47

At ego tunc miser dolere amabam et quaerebam, ut esset quod dolerem, quando mihi in aerumna aliena et falsa et saltatoria ea magis placebat actio histrionis meque alliciebat uehementius, qua mihi lacrimae excutiebantur. quid autem mirum, cum infelix pecus aberrans a grege tuo et inpatiens custodiae tuae turpi scabie foedarer? et inde erant dolorum amores, non quibus altius penetrarer — non enim amabam talia perpeti, qualia spectare — sed quibus auditis et fictis tamquam in superficie raderer: quos tamen quasi ungues scalpentium feruidus tumor et tabes et sanies horrida consequebatur. talis uita mea numquid uita erat, deus meus?

But I, wretch that I was, loved to grieve then, and sought for something to grieve over, since in another's misfortune, fictitious and acted in a show, the actor's performance pleased me more and attracted me more strongly the more it drew tears from me. What wonder, when I, an unhappy sheep straying from your flock and impatient of your keeping, was befouled with a disgusting mange? Hence came my love of griefs, not griefs that would pierce me more deeply (for I did not love to suffer such things as I loved to watch), but griefs heard and invented that would scratch me, as it were, on the surface; yet, as with the nails of those who scratch themselves, a burning swelling followed, and rot and horrid pus. Such was my life: was it life, my God?

3.5CSEL 33:47

Et circumuolabat super me fidelis a longe misericordia tua. in quantas iniquitates distabui et sacrilega curiositate secutus sum, ut deserentem te deduceret me ad ima infida et circumuentoria obsequia daemoniorum, quibus immolabam facta mea mala, et in omnibus flagellabas me! ausus sum etiam in celebritate sollemnitatum tuarum intra parietes ecclesiae tuae concupiscere et agere negotium procurandi fructus mortis: unde me uerberasti grauibus poenis, sed nil ad culpam meam, o tu praegrandis misericordia mea, deus meus, refugium meum a terribilibus nocentibus, in quibus uagatus sum praefidenti collo ad longe recedendum a te, amans uias meas et non tuas, amans fugitiuam libertatem.

And your faithful mercy hovered over me from afar. In what iniquities I wasted away! And I followed a sacrilegious curiosity, so that, as I deserted you, it led me down to the depths of faithlessness and the deceitful services of demons, to whom I sacrificed my evil deeds; and in all of them you scourged me! I even dared, during the celebration of your solemn rites, within the walls of your church, to desire and to carry on an affair for procuring the fruits of death; for which you struck me with heavy punishments, but nothing in comparison with my guilt, O you my immense mercy, my God, my refuge from the terrible harmful things among which I wandered with a stiff neck, withdrawing far from you, loving my ways and not yours, loving a runaway's freedom.

3.6CSEL 33:47–48

Habebant et illa studia, quae honesta uocabantur, ductum suum intuentem fora litigiosa, ut excellerem in eis, hoc laudabilior, quo fraudulentior. tanta est caecitas hominum de caecitate etiam gloriantium. et maior iam eram in schola rhetoris et gaudebam superbe et tumebam tyfo, quamquam longe sedatior, domine, tu scis, et remotus omnino ab euersionibus, quas faciebant euersores — hoc enim nomen scaeuum et diabolicum uelut insigne urbanitatis est — inter quos uiuebam pudore inpudenti, quia talis non eram: et cum eis eram et amicitiis eorum delectabar aliquando, a quorum semper factis abhorrebam, hoc est ab euersionibus, quibus proterue insectabantur ignotorum uerecundiam, quam proturbarent gratis inludendo atque inde pascendo maliuolas laetitias suas. nihil est illo actu similius actibus daemoniorum. quid itaque uerius quam euersores uocarentur, euersi plane prius ipsi atque peruersi deridentibus eos et seducentibus fallacibus occulte spiritibus in eo ipso, quo alios inridere amant et fallere?

Those studies too that were called respectable had their direction, looking toward the litigious law courts, so that I might excel in them, and be the more praised the more deceitful I was. So great is the blindness of human beings, who even glory in their blindness! And I was already top of the class in the school of rhetoric, and I rejoiced proudly and swelled with conceit, though I was far more restrained, Lord, as you know, and completely removed from the “overturnings” carried out by the Overturners (for this ill-omened and devilish name is a sort of badge of sophistication), among whom I lived with a shameless shame, because I was not like them. I was with them and sometimes enjoyed their friendship, though I always abhorred what they did, that is, the overturnings with which they wantonly assailed the modesty of strangers, harassing it for no reason by mockery and so feeding their malicious amusements. Nothing is more like the doings of demons than that. What, then, could they be more truly called than Overturners, since they had themselves first been overturned and perverted, mocked and seduced by deceiving spirits in secret, in the very thing by which they love to mock and deceive others?

3.7CSEL 33:48–49

Inter hos ego inbecilla tunc aetate discebam libros eloquentiae, in qua eminere cupiebam fine damnabili et uentoso per gaudia uanitatis humanae, et usitato iam discendi ordine perueneram in librum cuiusdam Ciceronis, cuius linguam fere omnes mirantur, pectus non ita. sed liber ille ipsius exhortationem continet ad philosophiam et uocatur Hortensius. ille uero liber mutauit affectum meum et ad te ipsum, domine, mutauit preces meas et uota ac desideria mea fecit alia. uiluit mihi repente omnis uana spes et inmortalitatem sapientiae concupiscebam aestu cordis incredibili et surgere coeperam, ut ad te redirem. non enim ad acuendam linguam, quod uidebar emere maternis mercedibus, cum agerem annum aetatis undeuicensimum iam defuncto patre ante biennium, non ergo ad acuendam linguam referebam illum librum neque mihi locutionem, sed quod loquebatur persuaserat.

Among these, at that unstable age, I was studying the books of eloquence, in which I wanted to excel for a damnable and windy end, out of the joys of human vanity; and in the usual course of study I had come to a book by a certain Cicero, whose tongue almost everyone admires, though not his heart. But that book of his contains an exhortation to philosophy and is called Hortensius. That book changed my affections and turned my prayers to you yourself, Lord, and made my wishes and desires different. Suddenly every vain hope became worthless to me, and with an incredible burning of heart I longed for the immortality of wisdom, and I had begun to rise up to return to you. For it was not to sharpen my tongue, which I seemed to be buying with my mother's money, in my nineteenth year, my father having died two years before; it was not to sharpen my tongue that I used that book, nor was it its style that had persuaded me, but what it said.

3.8CSEL 33:49–50

Quomodo ardebam, deus meus, quomodo ardebam reuolare a terrenis ad te, et nesciebam quid ageres mecum! apud te est enim sapientia. amor autem sapientiae nomen graecum habet philosophiam, quo me accendebant illae litterae. sunt qui seducant per philosophiam magno et blando et honesto nomine colorantes et fucantes errores suos, et prope omnes, qui ex illis et supra temporibus tales erant, notantur in eo libro et demonstrantur, et manifestatur ibi salutifera illa admonitio spiritus tui per seruum tuum bonum et pium: uidete, ne quis uos decipiat per philosophiam et inanem seductionem secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa huius mundi et non secundum Christum, quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo diuinitatis corporaliter. et ego illo tempore, scis tu, lumen cordis mei, quoniam necdum mihi haec apostolica nota erant, hoc tamen solo delectabar in illa exhortatione, quod non illam aut illam sectam, sed ipsam quaecumque esset sapientiam ut diligerem et quaererem et adsequerer et tenerem atque amplexarer fortiter, excitabar sermone illo et accendebar et ardebam, et hoc solum me in tanta flagrantia refrangebat, quod nomen Christi non erat ibi, quoniam hoc nomen secundum misericordiam tuam, domine, hoc nomen saluatoris mei, fili tui, in ipso adhuc lacte matris tenerum cor meum pie biberat et alte retinebat, et quidquid sine hoc nomine fuisset quamuis litteratum et expolitum et ueridicum, non me totum rapiebat.

How I burned, my God, how I burned to fly back from earthly things to you, and I did not know what you were doing with me! For “with you is wisdom.” But the love of wisdom has a Greek name, philosophy, and it was with this that those writings set me on fire. There are those who lead people astray through philosophy, coloring and painting over their errors with that great, attractive, and honorable name; and almost all who were such in that time and earlier are noted and exposed in that book; and there too is made clear that saving warning of your Spirit through your good and devout servant: “See that no one deceives you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elements of this world and not according to Christ; for in him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.” And at that time, as you know, light of my heart, since these apostolic words were not yet known to me, I was delighted in that exhortation by this alone: that I was stirred up by that discourse to love and seek and pursue and hold and strongly embrace not this or that sect, but wisdom itself, whatever it might be; and I was set on fire and burned. And this alone checked me in so great a blaze: that the name of Christ was not there. For this name, by your mercy, Lord, this name of my Savior, your Son, my tender heart had devoutly drunk in with my mother's very milk and kept deep within; and whatever lacked this name, however learned and polished and truthful, did not carry me away completely.

3.9CSEL 33:50

Itaque institui animum intendere in scripturas sanctas et uidere, quales essent. et ecce uideo rem non conpertam superbis neque nudatam pueris, sed incessu humilem, successu excelsam et uelatam mysteriis, et non eram ego talis, ut intrare in eam possem aut inclinare ceruicem ad eius gressus. non enim sicut modo loquor, ita sensi, cum adtendi ad illam scripturam, sed uisa est mihi indigna, quam Tullianae dignitati conpararem. tumor enim meus refugiebat modum eius et acies mea non penetrabat interiora eius. uerum tamen illa erat, quae cresceret cum paruulis, sed ego dedignabar esse paruulus et turgidus fastu mihi grandis uidebar.

So I decided to turn my mind to the Holy Scriptures and see what they were like. And see, I behold something not discovered by the proud nor laid bare to children, but lowly in its approach, lofty in its advance, and veiled in mysteries; and I was not the kind of person who could enter into it or bow my neck to its steps. For I did not feel then as I speak now when I turned to that Scripture; it seemed to me unworthy to be compared with the dignity of Cicero. For my swollen pride shrank from its measure, and my sharp sight did not penetrate its inner meaning. Yet it was the kind of thing that grows up with little ones; but I scorned to be a little one, and, puffed up with pride, I thought myself grown up.

3.10CSEL 33:50–52

Itaque incidi in homines superbe delirantes, carnales nimis et loquaces, in quorum ore laquei diaboli et uiscum confectum conmixtione syllabarum nominis tui et domini Iesu Christi et paracleti consolatoris nostri spiritus sancti. haec nomina non recedebant de ore eorum, sed tenus sono et strepitu linguae; ceterum cor inane ueri. et dicebant: "ueritas et ueritas" et multum eam dicebant mihi et nusquam erat in eis, sed falsa loquebantur non de te tantum, qui uere ueritas es, sed etiam de istis elementis mundi, creatura tua, de quibus etiam uera dicentes philosophos transgredi debui prae amore tuo, mi pater summe bone, pulchritudo pulchrorum omnium. o ueritas, ueritas, quam intime etiam tum medullae animi mei suspirabant tibi, cum te illi sonarent mihi frequenter et multipliciter uoce sola et libris multis et ingentibus! et illa erant fercula, in quibus mihi esurienti te inferebatur sol et luna, pulchra opera tua, sed tamen opera tua, non tu, nec ipsa prima. priora enim spiritalia opera tua quam ista corporea quamuis lucida et caelestia. at ego nec priora illa, sed te ipsam, ueritas, in qua non est conmutatio nec momenti obumbratio, esuriebam et sitiebam. et apponebantur adhuc mihi in illis ferculis phantasmata splendida, quibus iam melius erat amare istum solem saltem istis oculis uerum quam illa falsa animo decepto per oculos. et tamen, quia te putabam, manducabam, non auide quidem, quia nec sapiebas in ore meo sicuti es — neque enim tu eras illa figmenta inania — nec nutriebar eis, sed exhauriebar magis. cibus in somnis simillimus est cibis uigilantium, quo tamen dormientes non aluntur; dormiunt enim. at illa nec similia erant ullo modo tibi, sicut nunc mihi locuta es, quia illa erant corporalia phantasmata, falsa corpora, quibus certiora sunt uera corpora ista, quae uidemus uisu carneo, siue caelestia siue terrestria: cum pecudibus et uolatilibus uidemus, et certiora sunt, quam cum imaginamur ea. et rursus certius imaginamur ea quam ex eis suspicamur alia grandiora et infinita, quae omnino nulla sunt. qualibus ego tunc pascebar inanibus et non pascebar. at tu, amor meus, in quem deficio, ut fortis sim, nec ista corpora es, quae uidemus quamquam in caelo, nec ea, quae non uidemus ibi, quia tu ista condidisti nec in summis tuis conditionibus habes. quanto ergo longe es a phantasmatis illis meis, phantasmatis corporum, quae omnino non sunt! quibus certiores sunt phantasiae corporum eorum, quae sunt, et eis certiora corpora, quae tamen non es. sed nec anima es, quae uita est corporum — ideo melior uita corporum certiorque quam corpora — sed tu uita es animarum, uita uitarum, uiuens te ipsa et non mutaris, uita animae meae.

So I fell among men proudly raving, exceedingly carnal and talkative, in whose mouths were the snares of the devil and a birdlime made from a mixture of the syllables of your name, and of the Lord Jesus Christ, and of the Paraclete, our Comforter, the Holy Spirit. These names never left their mouths, but only as far as the sound and noise of the tongue; otherwise their heart was empty of truth. And they said, “Truth, truth,” and said it to me a great deal, and it was nowhere in them; but they spoke falsehood not only about you, who are truly the Truth, but also about the elements of this world, your creation, about which I ought to have passed beyond even the philosophers who spoke the truth, for love of you, my Father, supremely good, beauty of all beautiful things. O Truth, Truth, how deeply even then the marrow of my mind sighed for you, when they sounded your name to me often and in many ways, by voice alone and in many huge books! And those were the dishes on which, while I hungered for you, they served up to me the sun and moon, your beautiful works, but still your works, not you, and not even your first works. For your spiritual works come before these bodily ones, however bright and heavenly. But I hungered and thirsted not even for those first works, but for you yourself, the Truth, “in whom there is no change nor shadow of turning.” And on those dishes they still set before me splendid phantasms, compared with which it would have been better to love this sun, which is at least real to these eyes, than those false things, by which the mind is deceived through the eyes. And yet, because I thought they were you, I ate, not greedily indeed, because you did not taste in my mouth as you are (for you were not those empty fictions), nor was I nourished by them, but rather drained. Food in dreams is very like the food of those who are awake, yet sleepers are not nourished by it, for they are asleep. But those things were not like you in any way, as you have now told me, because they were bodily phantasms, false bodies; and these real bodies which we see with the eye of flesh, whether heavenly or earthly, are more certain than they. We see them as the beasts and birds do, and they are more certain than when we imagine them. And again, we imagine them with more certainty than when from them we conjecture other greater and infinite bodies, which do not exist at all. On such empty things was I then fed, and not fed. But you, my love, for whom I faint so that I may be strong, are neither these bodies which we see, even in the sky, nor those which we do not see there, because you created these, and you do not count them among your highest creations. How far, then, you are from those phantasms of mine, phantasms of bodies that do not exist at all! Images of bodies that do exist are more certain than they, and bodies more certain than the images; yet you are not bodies. Nor are you the soul, which is the life of bodies (so the life of bodies is better and more certain than bodies); but you are the life of souls, the life of lives, living yourself, and you do not change, life of my soul.

3.11CSEL 33:52–53

Vbi ergo mihi tunc eras et quam longe? et longe peregrinabar abs te exclusus et a siliquis porcorum, quos de siliquis pascebam. quanto enim meliores grammaticorum et poetarum fabellae quam illa decipula! nam uersus et carmen et Medea uolans utiliores certe quam quinque elementa uarie fucata propter quinque antra tenebrarum, quae omnino nulla sunt et occidunt credentem. nam uersum et carmen etiam ad uera pulmenta transfero; uolantem autem Medeam etsi cantabam, non asserebam, etsi cantari audiebam, non credebam: illa autem credidi, uae, uae! quibus gradibus deductus in profunda inferi, quippe laborans et aestuans inopia ueri, cum te, deus meus — tibi confiteor, qui me miseratus es et nondum confitentem — cum te non secundum intellectum mentis, quo me praestare uoluisti beluis, sed secundum sensum carnis quaererem. tu autem eras interior intimo meo et superior summo meo. offendi illam mulierem audacem, inopem prudentiae, aenigma Salomonis, sedentem super sellam in foribus et dicentem: panes occultos libenter edite et aquam dulcem furtiuam bibite. quae me seduxit, quia inuenit foris habitantem in oculo carnis meae et talia ruminantem apud me, qualia per illum uorassem.

Where were you to me then, and how far away? And I was wandering far away from you, shut out even from the husks of the pigs whom I fed with husks. For how much better were the tales of the grammarians and poets than those traps! For verse and song and Medea flying are certainly more useful than the five elements variously painted to match the five caves of darkness, which do not exist at all and kill the one who believes in them. For verse and song I can turn into real nourishment; and though I sang of Medea flying, I did not assert it, and though I heard it sung, I did not believe it; but those things I did believe. Woe, woe! By what steps was I led down into the depths of hell, toiling and burning for lack of truth, since I sought you, my God (I confess it to you, who had mercy on me even before I confessed), not by the understanding of the mind, by which you willed me to surpass the beasts, but by the sense of the flesh. But you were more inward than my inmost self and higher than my highest. I came upon that bold woman, lacking prudence, Solomon's riddle, sitting on a seat at her door and saying, “Eat hidden bread gladly and drink sweet stolen water.” She seduced me because she found me living outside, in the eye of my flesh, and ruminating within myself such things as I had devoured through it.

3.12CSEL 33:53–54

Nesciebam enim aliud, uere quod est, et quasi acutule mouebar, ut suffragarer stultis deceptoribus, cum a me quaereretur, unde malum est et utrum forma corporea deus finiretur et haberet capillos et ungues et utrum iusti existimandi essent qui haberent uxores multas simul et occiderent homines et sacrificarent de animalibus. quibus rerum ignarus perturbabar et recedens a ueritate ire in eam mihi uidebar, quia non noueram malum non esse nisi priuationem boni usque ad quod omnino non est. quod unde uiderem, cuius uidere usque ad corpus erat oculis et animo usque ad phantasma? non noueram deum esse spiritum, non cui membra essent per longum et latum nec cui esse moles esset, quia moles in parte minor est quam in toto suo, et si infinita sit, minor est in aliqua parte certo spatio definita quam per infinitum et non est tota ubique sicut spiritus, sicut deus. et quid in nobis esset, secundum quod essemus, et quid in scriptura diceremur ad imaginem dei, prorsus ignorabam.

For I did not know that other reality, what truly is, and I was, as it were, sharply prodded into siding with foolish deceivers when they asked me where evil comes from, and whether God was bounded by a bodily form and had hair and nails, and whether those were to be thought righteous who had many wives at once and killed people and offered animal sacrifices. Ignorant of these things, I was disturbed by them, and while I was withdrawing from the truth I thought I was going toward it, because I did not know that evil is nothing but the privation of good, down to the point where there is nothing at all. How could I see this, when the seeing of my eyes went no further than bodies and of my mind no further than phantasms? I did not know that God is spirit, not something with limbs extending in length and breadth, nor something whose being is bulk; because bulk is less in its part than in its whole, and if it is infinite, it is less in some part bounded by a definite space than in its infinity, and it is not wholly everywhere, as spirit is, as God is. And what it was in us by which we exist, and by which Scripture says we are “in the image of God,” I was entirely ignorant.

3.13CSEL 33:54–56

Et non noueram iustitiam ueram interiorem non ex consuetudine iudicantem, sed ex lege lectissima dei omnipotentis, qua formarentur mores regionum et dierum pro regionibus et diebus, cum ipsa ubique ac semper esset, non alibi alia nec alias aliter, secundum quam iusti essent Abraham et Isaac et Iacob et Moyses et Dauid et illi omnes laudati ore dei; sed eos ab imperitis iudicari iniquos, iudicantibus ex humano die et uniuersos mores humani generis ex parte moris sui metientibus, tamquam si quis nescius in armamentis, quid cui membro adcommodatum sit, ocrea uelit caput contegi et galea calciari et murmuret, quod non apte conueniat, aut in uno die indicto a pomeridianis horis iustitio quisquam stomachetur non sibi concedi quod uenale proponere, quia mane concessum est, aut in una domo uideat aliquid tractari manibus a quoquam seruo, quod facere non sinatur qui pocula ministrat, aut aliquid post praesepia fieri, quod ante mensam prohibeatur, et indignetur, cum sit unum habitaculum et una familia, non ubique atque omnibus idem tribui. sic sunt isti qui indignantur, cum audierint illo saeculo licuisse iustis aliquid, quod isto non licet iustis, et quia illis aliud praecepit deus, istis aliud pro temporalibus causis, cum eidem iustitiae utrique seruierint, cum in uno homine et in uno die et in unis aedibus uideant aliud alii membro congruere et aliud iam dudum licuisse, post horam non licere, quiddam in illo angulo permitti aut iuberi, quod in isto iuxta uetetur et uindicetur. numquid iustitia uaria est et mutabilis? sed tempora, quibus praesidet, non pariter eunt; tempora enim sunt. homines autem, quorum uita super terram breuis est, quia sensu non ualent causas contexere saeculorum priorum aliarumque gentium, quas experti non sunt, cum his quas experti sunt, in uno autem corpore uel die uel domo facile possunt uidere, quid cui membro, quibus momentis, quibus partibus personisue congruat, in illis offenduntur, hic seruiunt.

And I did not know the true inner justice that judges not by custom but by the most upright law of almighty God, by which the customs of regions and times were shaped to suit those regions and times, while that law itself is everywhere and always the same, not one thing in one place and another in another; by which Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and Moses and David, and all those praised by the mouth of God, were righteous. But they are judged unrighteous by the unskilled, who judge “by man's day” and measure the customs of the whole human race by the part that is their own custom. It is as if someone in an armory, not knowing what fits which limb, wanted to cover his head with a greave and shoe his foot with a helmet, and complained that they did not fit well; or as if, on a day when a public holiday was declared from the afternoon hours, someone were angry that he was not allowed to put something up for sale, since it had been allowed in the morning; or as if in a single house he saw something handled by some slave which the one who serves the cups is not permitted to do, or something done behind the stables that is forbidden before the dining table, and were indignant that, since there is one dwelling and one household, the same thing is not allowed everywhere and to everyone. Such are those who are indignant when they hear that something was permitted to the righteous in that age which is not permitted to the righteous in this one, and that God commanded one thing to them and another to these for temporal reasons, though both served the same justice; while in one person, on one day, and in one house they see one thing suiting one limb and another another, and something long permitted no longer permitted after an hour, and something allowed or commanded in one corner which is forbidden and punished in the one next to it. Is justice then varied and changeable? No; but the times over which it presides do not run alike, for they are times. But human beings, whose life on earth is short, since they cannot by their senses connect the causes of earlier ages and other peoples, of which they have no experience, with those of which they have experience, though in a single body or day or house they can easily see what suits which limb, at which moments, in which parts or persons, take offense at the former and submit to the latter.

3.14CSEL 33:56

Haec ego tunc nesciebam et non aduertebam, et feriebant undique ista oculos meos et non uidebam. et cantabam carmina et non mihi licebat ponere pedem quemlibet et ubilibet, sed in alio atque alio metro aliter atque aliter et in uno aliquo uersu non omnibus locis eundem pedem; et ars ipsa, qua canebam, non habebat aliud alibi, sed omnia simul. et non intuebar iustitiam, cui seruirent boni et sancti homines, longe excellentius atque sublimius habere simul omnia quae praecipit et nulla ex parte uarie, tamen uariis temporibus non omnia simul, sed propria distribuentem ac praecipientem. et reprehendebam caecus pios patres non solum, sicut deus iuberet atque inspiraret, utentes praesentibus uerum quoque, sicut deus reuelaret, futura praenuntiantes.

These things I did not know then and did not notice; they struck my eyes on every side and I did not see. I composed poems, and I was not allowed to place any foot anywhere I liked, but differently in one meter and another, and not the same foot in every place even in a single line; and yet the art by which I composed did not have one rule here and another there, but held them all at once. And I did not see that the justice which good and holy men served held all that it commands together at once, far more excellently and sublimely, and varied in no part, though in varying times it assigned and commanded not all things at once but what was proper to each. And in my blindness I blamed the holy fathers, not only for using present things as God commanded and inspired them, but also for foretelling future things as God revealed them.

3.15CSEL 33:56–57

Numquid aliquando aut alicubi iniustum est diligere deum ex toto corde et ex tota anima et ex tota mente et diligere proximum tamquam te ipsum? itaque flagitia, quae sunt contra naturam, ubique ac semper detestanda atque punienda sunt, qualia Sodomitarum fuerunt. quae si omnes gentes facerent, eodem criminis diuina lege tenerentur, quae non sic fecit homines, ut hoc se uterentur modo. uiolatur quippe ipsa societas, quae cum deo nobis esse debet, cum eadem natura, cuius ille auctor est, libidinis peruersitate polluitur. quae autem contra mores hominum sunt flagitia, pro morum diuersitate uitanda sunt, ut pactum inter se ciuitatis aut gentis consuetudine uel lege firmatum nulla ciuis aut peregrini libidine uioletur. turpis enim omnis pars uniuerso suo non congruens. cum autem deus aliquid contra morem aut pactum quorumlibet iubet, etsi numquam ibi factum est, faciendum est, et si omissum, instaurandum, et si institutum non erat, instituendum est. si enim regi licet in ciuitate, cui regnat, iubere aliquid, quod neque ante illum quisquam nec ipse umquam iusserat, et non contra societatem ciuitatis eius obtemperatur, inmo contra societatem non obtemperatur — generale quippe pactum est societatis humanae oboedire regibus suis — quanto magis deus regnator uniuersae creaturae, cui ad ea quae iusserit sine dubitatione seruiendum est! sicut enim in potestatibus societatis humanae maior potestas minori ad oboediendum praeponitur, ita deus omnibus.

Is it ever, anywhere, unjust to love God with all one's heart and with all one's soul and with all one's mind, and to love one's neighbor as oneself? So those shameful acts that are against nature, such as those of the Sodomites, are to be detested and punished everywhere and always. If all nations did them, they would all be held guilty of the same crime by the divine law, which did not make human beings to use one another in this way. For the very fellowship that we ought to have with God is violated when the same nature of which he is the author is polluted by the perversity of lust. But shameful acts against human customs are to be avoided according to the diversity of customs, so that an agreement of a city or nation among itself, confirmed by custom or law, may not be violated by the lust of any citizen or foreigner. For every part that does not fit its whole is unseemly. But when God commands something against the custom or agreement of any people, even if it was never done there, it must be done; and if it has been dropped, it must be restored; and if it had not been established, it must be established. For if a king may command in the city he rules something that neither anyone before him nor he himself had ever commanded, and it is not against the fellowship of that city to obey him (indeed, it is against that fellowship not to obey, for it is a general agreement of human society to obey its kings), how much more must God, ruler of all creation, be served without hesitation in whatever he commands! For just as among the authorities of human society the greater authority is placed above the lesser to be obeyed, so is God above all.

3.16CSEL 33:57–58

Item in facinoribus, ubi libido est nocendi siue per contumeliam siue per iniuriam et utrumque uel ulciscendi causa, sicut inimico inimicus, uel adipiscendi alicuius extra conmodi, sicut latro uiatori, uel euitandi mali, sicut ei qui timetur, uel inuidendo, sicut feliciori miserior aut in aliquo prosperatus ei, quem sibi aequari timet aut aequalem dolet, uel sola uoluptate alieni mali, sicut spectatores gladiatorum aut inrisores aut inlusores quorumlibet. haec sunt capita iniquitatis, quae pullulant principandi et spectandi et sentiendi libidine aut una aut duabus earum aut simul omnibus, et uiuitur male aduersum tria et septem, psalterium decem chordarum, decalogum tuum, deus altissime et dulcissime. sed quae flagitia in te, qui non corrumperis? aut quae aduersus te facinora, cui noceri non potest? sed hoc uindicas, quod in se homines perpetrant, quia etiam cum in te peccant, inpie faciunt in animas suas, et mentitur iniquitas sibi siue corrumpendo ac peruertendo naturam suam, quam tu fecisti et ordinasti, uel inmoderate utendo concessis rebus uel in non concessa flagrando in eum usum, qui est contra naturam; aut rei tenentur animo et uerbis saeuientes aduersus te et aduersus stimulum calcitrantes, aut cum diruptis limitibus humanae societatis laetantur audaces priuatis conciliationibus aut diremptionibus, prout quidque delectauerit aut offenderit. et ea fiunt, cum tu derelinqueris, fons uitae, qui es unus et uerus creator et rector uniuersitatis, et priuata superbia diligitur in parte, unum falsum. itaque pietate humili reditur in te et purgas nos a consuetudine mala et propitius es peccatis confitentium et exaudis gemitus conpeditorum et soluis a uinculis, quae nobis fecimus, si iam non erigamus aduersus te cornua falsae libertatis auaritia plus habendi et damno totum amittendi, amplius amando proprium nostrum quam te, omnium bonum.

So too with crimes of violence, where there is a lust to harm, whether by insult or by injury, and both either for revenge, as enemy against enemy; or to gain some advantage belonging to another, as the robber against the traveler; or to avoid some evil, as against one who is feared; or from envy, as the less fortunate against the more fortunate, or one who has prospered in something against one he fears will become his equal or grieves to see as his equal; or for the mere pleasure of another's harm, as spectators of gladiators, or those who laugh at and mock anyone at all. These are the chief kinds of iniquity, which sprout from the lust of ruling, of seeing, and of feeling, either one or two of them or all at once; and people live wickedly against the three and the seven, the “psaltery of ten strings,” your Decalogue, God most high and most sweet. But what shameful acts can there be against you, who cannot be corrupted? Or what crimes against you, who cannot be harmed? But you punish what people commit against themselves, because even when they sin against you they act wickedly against their own souls, and “iniquity lies to itself,” whether by corrupting and perverting their nature, which you made and ordered, or by using permitted things immoderately, or by burning for things not permitted, for the use that is against nature. Or they are held guilty for raging against you in mind and words, and “kicking against the goad”; or when, having broken the bounds of human society, they boldly rejoice in private alliances or divisions, according as anything has pleased or offended them. And these things happen when you are forsaken, fountain of life, who are the one true creator and ruler of the universe, and when with private pride a single false thing is loved in a part. So it is by humble devotion that one returns to you, and you cleanse us from evil habit, and are gracious to the sins of those who confess, and “hear the groans of the prisoners,” and loose us from the chains we have made for ourselves, provided we no longer raise against you the horns of a false freedom, through greed to have more and at the cost of losing everything, loving our own private good more than you, the good of all.

3.17CSEL 33:58–59

Sed inter flagitia et facinora et tam multas iniquitates sunt peccato proficientium, quae a bene iudicantibus et uituperantur ex regula perfectionis et laudantur spe frugis sicut herba segetis. et sunt quaedam similia uel flagitio uel facinori et non sunt peccata, quia nec te offendunt, dominum deum nostrum, nec sociale consortium, cum conciliantur aliqua in usum uitae congrua et tempori, et incertum est an libidine habendi, aut puniuntur corrigendi studio potestate ordinata, et incertum est an libidine nocendi. multa itaque facta, quae hominibus inprobanda uiderentur, testimonio tuo adprobata sunt et multa laudata ab hominibus te teste damnantur, cum saepe se aliter habet species facti et aliter facientis animus atque articulus occulti temporis. cum uero aliquid tu repente inusitatum et inprouisum imperas, etiamsi hoc aliquando uetuisti, quamuis causam imperii tui pro tempore occultes et quamuis contra pactum sit aliquorum hominum societatis, quis dubitet esse faciendum, quando ea iusta est societas hominum, quae seruit tibi? sed beati qui te imperasse sciunt. fiunt enim omnia a seruientibus tibi uel ad exhibendum, quod ad praesens opus est, uel ad futura praenuntianda.

But among shameful acts and crimes and so many iniquities there are the sins of those who are making progress, which are blamed by those who judge well according to the rule of perfection, and yet praised in hope of fruit, like the green blade of the grain. And there are some things that resemble a shameful act or a crime and yet are not sins, because they offend neither you, the Lord our God, nor the fellowship of society: as when things suited to the use of life and to the time are acquired, and it is uncertain whether it is from lust of possession; or when acts are punished by lawful authority out of a desire to correct, and it is uncertain whether it is from lust to harm. So many deeds that might seem to people to deserve disapproval are approved by your testimony, and many praised by people are condemned with you as witness, since often the appearance of the deed is one thing, and the intention of the doer another, and the circumstances of the hidden time another. But when you suddenly command something unusual and unforeseen, even something you once forbade, although for the time you hide the reason for your command and although it is against the agreement of some human society, who would doubt that it must be done, since that human society is just which serves you? But blessed are those who know that you commanded it. For all things are done by those who serve you either to show what is needed at present or to foretell things to come.

3.18CSEL 33:59–60

Haec ego nesciens inridebam illos sanctos seruos et prophetas tuos. et quid agebam, cum inridebam eos, nisi ut inriderer abs te sensim atque paulatim perductus ad eas nugas, ut crederem ficum plorare, cum decerpitur, et matrem eius arborem lacrimis lacteis? quam tamen ficum si comedisset aliquis sanctus alieno sane, non suo scelere decerptam, misceret uisceribus et anhelaret de illa angelos, inmo uero particulas dei gemendo in oratione atque ructando: quae particulae summi et ueri dei ligatae fuissent in illo pomo, nisi electi sancti dente ac uentre soluerentur. et credidi miser magis misericordiam praestandam fructibus terrae quam hominibus, propter quos nascerentur. si quis uero esuriens peteret, qui manichaeus non esset, quasi capitali supplicio damnanda buccella uideretur, si ei daretur.

Not knowing these things, I mocked those holy servants and prophets of yours. And what was I doing when I mocked them, but getting myself mocked by you, led gradually and little by little to such nonsense as to believe that a fig weeps when it is picked, and that its mother tree weeps milky tears? Yet if some saint ate that fig, picked, of course, by another's crime and not his own, he would mix it with his insides and breathe out angels from it, or rather particles of God, as he groaned and belched in prayer; and those particles of the supreme and true God would have remained bound in that fruit unless they were released by the teeth and belly of the elect saint. And I believed, wretch that I was, that more mercy should be shown to the fruits of the earth than to human beings, for whom they grow. For if someone hungry asked for it who was not a Manichee, giving him a mouthful would seem to deserve capital punishment.

3.19CSEL 33:60–61

Et misisti manum tuam ex alto et de hac profunda caligine eruisti animam meam, cum pro me fleret ad te mea mater, fidelis tua, amplius quam flent matres corporea funera. uidebat enim illa mortem meam ex fide et spiritu, quem habebat ex te, et exaudisti eam, domine. exaudisti eam nec despexisti lacrimas eius, cum profluentes rigarent terram sub oculis eius in omni loco orationis eius: exaudisti eam. nam unde illud somnium, quo eam consolatus es, ut uiuere mecum cederet et habere mecum eandem mensam in domo? quod nolle coeperat auersans et detestans blasphemias erroris mei. uidit enim se stantem in quadam regula lignea et uenientem ad se iuuenem splendidum hilarem atque arridentem sibi, cum illa esset maerens et maerore confecta. qui cum causas ab ea quaesisset maestitiae suae cotidianarumque lacrimarum docendi, ut adsolet, non discendi gratia, atque illa respondisset perditionem meam se plangere, iussisse illum, quo secura esset, atque admonuisse, ut adtenderet et uideret, ubi esset illa, ibi esse et me. quod illa ubi adtendit, uidit me iuxta se in eadem regula stantem. unde hoc, nisi quia erant aures tuae ad cor eius, o tu bone omnipotens, qui sic curas unumquemque nostrum, tamquam solum cures, et sic omnes, tamquam singulos?

And “you sent your hand from on high” and rescued my soul from this deep darkness, when my mother, your faithful one, wept to you for me more than mothers weep for the bodily deaths of their children. For she saw my death by the faith and the spirit which she had from you, and you heard her, Lord. You heard her and did not despise her tears when they streamed down and watered the ground beneath her eyes in every place where she prayed: you heard her. For where else did that dream come from, by which you consoled her, so that she agreed to live with me and to share the same table in the house? She had begun to refuse this, turning away from and loathing the blasphemies of my error. For she saw herself standing on a wooden rule, and a young man coming toward her, radiant, cheerful, and smiling at her, while she was grieving and worn out with grief. When he asked her the reasons for her sadness and her daily tears (in order to teach, as is usual, not to learn), and she answered that she was mourning my perdition, he told her to be at ease and admonished her to pay attention and see that where she was, there I was too. And when she looked, she saw me standing beside her on the same rule. Where did this come from, unless your ears were at her heart, O good and almighty one, who care for each one of us as if you cared for him alone, and for all as for each?

3.20CSEL 33:61–62

Vnde illud etiam, quod cum mihi narrasset ipsum uisum et ego ad id detrahere conarer, ut illa se potius non desperaret futuram esse quod eram, continuo sine aliqua haesitatione: "non" inquit; "non enim mihi dictum est: ubi ille, ibi et tu, sed: ubi tu, ibi et ille." confiteor tibi, domine, recordationem meam, quantum recolo, quod saepe non tacui, amplius me isto per matrem responso tuo, quod tam uicina interpretationis falsitate turbata non est et tam cito uidit quod uidendum fuit, quod ego certe, antequam dixisset, non uideram, etiam tum fuisse conmotum quam ipso somnio, quo feminae piae gaudium tanto post futurum ad consolationem tunc praesentis sollicitudinis tanto ante praedictum est. nam nouem ferme anni secuti sunt, quibus ego in illo limo profundi ac tenebris falsitatis, cum saepe surgere conarer et grauius alliderer, uolutatus sum, cum tamen illa uidua casta, pia et sobria, quales amas, iam quidem spe alacrior, sed fletu et gemitu non segnior, non desineret horis omnibus orationum suarum de me plangere ad te, et intrabant in conspectum tuum preces eius, et tamen dimittebas adhuc uolui et inuolui illa caligine.

Where did this come from as well: that when she had told me the vision and I tried to twist it to mean that she should rather not despair of becoming what I was, she said at once, without any hesitation, “No. For I was not told, ‘Where he is, there you will be too,’ but, ‘Where you are, there he will be too.’” I confess to you, Lord, my memory of it, as far as I recall (and I have often spoken of it): I was more moved by this answer of yours through my mother, who was not disturbed by so plausible a false interpretation and saw so quickly what was to be seen, which I certainly had not seen before she spoke, than by the dream itself, by which the joy that this devout woman would have so much later was foretold so long before, to console her present anxiety. For nearly nine years followed in which I rolled in that “mire of the deep” and darkness of falsehood, often trying to rise and being dashed down more heavily; while that chaste widow, devout and sober, such as you love, now more hopeful indeed, but no less given to weeping and groaning, did not cease at all her hours of prayer to lament for me to you; and her prayers entered into your sight, and yet you still left me to be rolled and enveloped in that darkness.

3.21CSEL 33:62–63

Et dedisti alterum responsum interim, quod recolo. nam et multa praetereo, propter quod propero ad ea quae me magis urguent confiteri tibi, et multa non memini. dedisti ergo alterum per sacerdotem tuum, quendam episcopum nutritum in ecclesia et exercitatum in libris tuis. quem cum illa femina rogasset, ut dignaretur mecum conloqui et refellere errores meos et dedocere me mala ac docere bona - faciebat enim hoc, quos forte idoneos inuenisset - noluit ille, prudenter sane, quantum sensi postea. respondit enim me adhuc esse indocilem, et quod inflatus essem nouitate haeresis illius et nonnullis quaestiunculis iam multos inperitos exagitassem, sicut illa indicauerat ei. "sed" inquit "sine illum ibi. tantum roga pro eo dominum: ipse legendo reperiet, quis ille sit error et quanta inpietas." simul etiam narrauit se quoque paruulum a seducta matre sua datum fuisse manichaeis et omnes paene non legisse tantum uerum etiam scriptitasse libros eorum sibique adparuisse nullo contra disputante et conuincente, quam esset illa secta fugienda: itaque fugisse. quae cum ille dixisset atque illa nollet adquiescere, sed instaret magis deprecando et ubertim flendo, ut me uideret et mecum dissereret, ille iam substomachans: "uade" inquit "a me; ita uiuas, fieri non potest, ut filius istarum lacrimarum pereat." quod illa ita se accepisse inter conloquia sua mecum saepe recordabatur, ac si de caelo sonuisset.

And meanwhile you gave another answer, which I recall. (I pass over much, because I am hurrying on to the things that press me more to confess to you, and much I do not remember.) You gave another answer, then, through your priest, a certain bishop brought up in the church and well trained in your books. When that woman asked him to be so kind as to talk with me, refute my errors, unteach me what was evil and teach me what was good (for she used to do this whenever she found suitable people), he refused, very wisely, as I realized later. For he answered that I was still unteachable, because I was puffed up with the novelty of that heresy and had already upset many unskilled people with some petty questions, as she had told him. “But,” he said, “leave him there. Only pray to the Lord for him; he will discover by reading what that error is and how great its impiety.” At the same time he also told her that he too, as a small boy, had been handed over to the Manichees by his mother, who had been led astray, and that he had not only read but even copied out almost all their books, and it had become clear to him, without anyone arguing against him or refuting him, how much that sect was to be avoided; and so he had left it. When he had said this and she would not accept it, but pressed him all the more with entreaties and floods of tears to see me and discuss with me, he, now somewhat irritated, said, “Go away from me. As you live, it cannot be that the son of these tears should perish.” She often recalled in her conversations with me that she took this as if it had sounded from heaven.

Chapter 4

4.1CSEL 33:63–64

Per idem tempus annorum nouem, ab undeuicensimo anno aetatis meae usque ad duodetricensimum, seducebamur et seducebamus falsi atque fallentes in uariis cupiditatibus et palam per doctrinas, quas liberales uocant, occulte autem falso nomine religionis, hic superbi, ibi superstitiosi, ubique uani, hac popularis gloriae sectantes inanitatem usque ad theatricos plausus et contentiosa carmina et agonem coronarum faenearum et spectaculorum nugas et intemperantiam libidinum, illac autem purgari nos ab istis sordibus expetentes, cum eis, qui appellarentur electi et sancti, afferremus escas, de quibus nobis in officina aqualiculi sui fabricarent angelos et deos, per quos liberaremur. et sectabar ista atque faciebam cum amicis meis per me ac mecum deceptis. inrideant me arrogantes et nondum salubriter prostrati et elisi a te, deus meus, et ego tamen confitear tibi dedecora mea in laude tua. sine me, obsecro, et da mihi circuire praesenti memoria praeteritos circuitus erroris mei et immolare tibi hostiam iubilationis. quid enim sum ego mihi sine te nisi dux in praeceps? aut quid sum, cum mihi bene est, nisi sugens lac tuum aut fruens te cibo, qui non corrumpitur? et quis homo est quilibet homo, cum sit homo? sed inrideant nos fortes et potentes, nos autem infirmi et inopes confiteamur tibi.

Throughout that same period of nine years, from my nineteenth year to my twenty-eighth, we were led astray and led others astray, deceived and deceiving, in various desires: openly through the teachings they call liberal, and secretly under the false name of religion; here proud, there superstitious, everywhere vain. On one side we pursued the emptiness of popular glory, down to theatrical applause and poetry competitions and contests for garlands of hay, the trifles of the shows and the intemperance of lusts; on the other side we sought to be cleansed of these filthy things by bringing food to those who were called the elect and holy, from which, in the workshop of their bellies, they would manufacture for us angels and gods through whom we would be set free. These things I pursued and did with my friends, who were deceived through me and with me. Let the arrogant laugh at me, and those not yet savingly struck down and crushed by you, my God; yet let me confess my disgraces to you in your praise. Allow me, I beg you, and grant me to go round in present memory the past circuits of my error, and to “offer you a sacrifice of jubilation.” For what am I to myself without you but a guide to my own downfall? Or what am I, when all is well with me, but one sucking your milk or feeding on you, the food that does not perish? And what is any human being, since he is only human? But let the strong and powerful laugh at us; and let us, weak and needy, confess to you.

4.2CSEL 33:64–65

Docebam in illis annis artem rhetoricam et uictoriosam loquacitatem uictus cupiditate uendebam. malebam tamen, domine, tu scis, bonos habere discipulos, sicut appellantur boni, et eos sine dolo docebam dolos, non quibus contra caput innocentis agerent, sed aliquando pro capite nocentis. et, deus, uidisti de longinquo lapsantem in lubrico et in multo fumo scintillantem fidem meam, quam exhibebam in illo magisterio diligentibus uanitatem et quaerentibus mendacium, socius eorum. in illis annis unam habebam non eo quod legitimum uocatur coniugio cognitam, sed quam indagauerat uagus ardor inops prudentiae; sed unam tamen, ei quoque seruans tori fidem, in qua sane experirer exemplo meo, quid distaret inter coniugalis placiti modum, quod foederatum esset generandi gratia, et pactum libidinosi amoris, ubi proles etiam contra uotum nascitur, quamuis iam nata cogat se diligi.

In those years I taught the art of rhetoric, and, overcome by greed, I sold a loquacity that could overcome others. Yet I preferred, Lord, as you know, to have good students, as they are called good, and without guile I taught them guile, not to be used against the life of an innocent person, but sometimes for the life of a guilty one. And you saw from afar, God, my faith slipping on slippery ground and flickering amid much smoke, the faith I showed in that teaching to those who “loved vanity and sought falsehood,” being their companion. In those years I had one woman, not known to me in what is called lawful marriage, but one whom my wandering passion, lacking prudence, had tracked down; yet only one, and I kept faith with her bed. With her I learned by my own experience the difference between the restraint of a marriage covenant, contracted for the sake of begetting children, and the bargain of lustful love, in which offspring is born even against one's wish, though once born it compels love.

4.3CSEL 33:65–66

Recolo etiam, cum mihi theatrici carminis certamen inire placuisset, mandasse mihi nescio quem haruspicem, quid ei dare uellem mercedis, ut uincerem, me autem foeda illa sacramenta detestatum et abominatum respondisse, nec si corona illa ita esset inmortaliter aurea, muscam pro uictoria mea necari sinere. necaturus enim erat ille in sacrificiis suis animantia et illis honoribus inuitaturus mihi suffragatura daemonia uidebatur. sed hoc quoque malum non ex tua castitate repudiaui, deus cordis mei. non enim amare te noueram, qui nisi fulgores corporeos cogitare non noueram. talibus enim figmentis suspirans anima nonne fornicatur abs te et fidit in falsis et pascit uentos? sed uidelicet sacrificari pro me nollem daemonibus, quibus me illa superstitione ipse sacrificabam. quid est enim aliud uentos pascere quam ipsos pascere, hoc est errando eis esse uoluptati atque derisui?

I also recall that when I had decided to enter a competition in dramatic poetry, some soothsayer or other sent to ask me what fee I would give him to make me win; and I, detesting and loathing those foul rites, replied that even if the crown were of gold that never perished, I would not allow a fly to be killed for my victory. For he was going to kill living creatures in his sacrifices and, by those honors, seemed likely to invite demons to support me. But I rejected this evil too not out of your chastity, God of my heart. For I did not know how to love you, since I did not know how to think of anything but bodily splendors. And does not a soul that sighs after such fictions commit fornication away from you, and trust in falsehoods, and feed the winds? But of course I did not want sacrifices offered to demons for me, while by that superstition I was sacrificing myself to them. For what else is feeding the winds but feeding them, that is, becoming by one's errors their pleasure and laughingstock?

4.4CSEL 33:66

Itaque illos planos, quos mathematicos uocant, plane consulere non desistebam, quod quasi nullum eis esset sacrificium et nullae preces ad aliquem spiritum ob diuinationem dirigerentur. quod tamen christiana et uera pietas consequenter repellit et damnat. bonum est enim confiteri tibi, domine, et dicere: miserere mei: cura animam meam, quoniam peccaui tibi, neque ad licentiam peccandi abuti indulgentia tua, sed meminisse dominicae uocis: ecce sanus factus es; iam noli peccare, ne quid tibi deterius contingat. quam totam illi salubritatem interficere conantur, cum dicunt: "de caelo tibi est ineuitabilis causa peccandi" et "Venus hoc fecit aut Saturnus aut Mars," scilicet ut homo sine culpa sit, caro et sanguis et superba putredo, culpandus sit autem caeli ac siderum creator et ordinator. et quis est hic nisi deus noster, suauitas et origo iustitiae, qui reddes unicuique secundum opera eius et cor contritum et humiliatum non spernis?

So I did not stop consulting openly those impostors called astrologers, on the ground that they offered no sacrifice, as it were, and directed no prayers to any spirit for divination. Yet true Christian piety consistently rejects and condemns this too. For “it is good to confess to you, Lord,” and to say, “Have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you,” and not to abuse your indulgence as a license to sin, but to remember the Lord's word: “See, you have been made well; sin no more, lest something worse happen to you.” All this wholesome teaching they try to kill when they say, “The cause of your sinning is inevitably determined by the heavens,” and “Venus did this, or Saturn, or Mars”: evidently so that a human being, flesh and blood and proud rottenness, may be without blame, while the creator and orderer of the heavens and the stars is to be blamed. And who is he but our God, the sweetness and source of justice, who “will render to each according to his works” and “does not despise a contrite and humbled heart”?

4.5CSEL 33:66–68

Erat eo tempore uir sagax, medicinae artis peritissimus atque in ea nobilissimus, qui proconsul manu sua coronam illam agonisticam inposuerat non sano capiti meo, sed non ut medicus. nam illius morbi tu sanator, qui resistis superbis, humilibus autem das gratiam. numquid tamen etiam per illum senem defuisti mihi aut destitisti mederi animae meae? quia enim factus ei eram familiarior et eius sermonibus — erant enim sine uerborum culta uiuacitate sententiarum iucundi et graues — adsiduus et fixus inhaerebam, ubi cognouit et ex conloquio meo libris genethliacorum esse me deditum, benigne ac paterne monuit, ut eos abicerem neque curam et operam rebus utilibus necessariam illi uanitati frustra inpenderem, dicens ita se illa didicisse, ut eam professionem primis annis aetatis suae deferre uoluisset, qua uitam degeret, et si Hippocraten intellexisset, et illas utique litteras potuisse intellegere: et tamen non ob aliam causam se postea illis relictis medicinam adsecutum, nisi eas falsissimas conperisset et nollet uir grauis decipiendis hominibus uictum quaerere. "at tu" inquit "quo te in hominibus sustentas, rhetoricam tenes, hanc autem fallaciam libero studio, non necessitate rei familiaris sectaris. quo magis mihi te oportet de illa credere, qui eam tam perfecte discere elaboraui, quam ex ea sola uiuere uolui." a quo ego cum quaesissem, quae causa ergo faceret, ut multa inde uera pronuntiarentur, respondit ille, ut potuit, sortem hoc facere in rerum natura usquequaque diffusam. si enim de paginis poetae cuiuspiam longe aliud canentis atque intendentis, cum forte quis consulit, mirabiliter consonus negotio saepe uersus exiret, et mirandum non esse dicebat, si ex anima humana superiore aliquo instinctu nesciente, quid in se fieret, non arte, sed sorte sonaret aliquid, quod interrogantis rebus factisque concineret.

There was at that time a shrewd man, highly skilled and very distinguished in the art of medicine, who as proconsul had with his own hand placed that contest crown on my unhealthy head, but not as a physician. For of that disease you are the healer, who “resist the proud but give grace to the humble.” Yet did you fail me even through that old man, or cease to heal my soul? For I had become quite intimate with him and clung to his conversations constantly and attentively (they were without polished diction, but pleasant and weighty from the liveliness of their thought); and when he learned from my talk that I was devoted to the books of the casters of nativities, he warned me kindly and like a father to throw them away and not to waste on that vanity the care and effort needed for useful things. He said that he had learned that art himself, so much so that in his early years he had intended to make it the profession by which he would earn his living; and that, since he had understood Hippocrates, he could certainly have understood those writings too; and yet he had afterwards abandoned them and taken up medicine for no other reason than that he had found them utterly false, and as a serious man he did not want to earn his living by deceiving people. “But you,” he said, “have rhetoric to support you among men, and you pursue this deception out of free interest, not from need of means. So you should all the more believe me about it, since I worked to learn it so thoroughly that I meant to live from it alone.” When I asked him why, then, many true things were foretold by it, he answered as best he could that it was the work of chance, which is spread everywhere throughout nature. For if, when someone consulted the pages of some poet who sang and intended something quite different, a verse often came out marvelously apt to the matter, he said it was no wonder if from a human soul, by some higher instinct and without knowing what was happening within it, not by art but by chance, something sounded that matched the affairs and deeds of the one who asked.

4.6CSEL 33:68

Et hoc quidem ab illo uel per illum procurasti mihi, et quid ipse postea per me ipsum quaererem, in memoria mea deliniasti. tunc autem nec ipse nec carissimus Nebridius, adulescens ualde bonus et ualde castus, inridens totum illud diuinationis genus, persuadere mihi potuerunt, ut haec abicerem, quoniam me amplius ipsorum auctorum mouebat auctoritas et nullum certum quale quaerebam documentum adhuc inueneram, quo mihi sine ambiguitate appareret, quae ab eis consultis uera dicerentur, forte uel sorte, non arte inspectorum siderum dici.

This, then, you provided for me from him or through him, and you sketched in my memory what I would later investigate for myself. But at that time neither he nor my dearest Nebridius, a very good and very chaste young man, who laughed at that whole kind of divination, could persuade me to throw these things away, because the authority of their authors moved me more, and I had not yet found any certain proof, such as I was looking for, that would show me unambiguously that the true things said by astrologers when consulted were said by luck or chance, not by the art of observing the stars.

4.7CSEL 33:68–69

In illis annis, quo primum tempore in municipio, quo natus sum, docere coeperam, conparaueram amicum societate studiorum nimis carum, coaeuum mihi et conflorentem flore adulescentiae. mecum puer creuerat et pariter in scholam ieramus pariterque luseramus. sed nondum erat sic amicus, quamquam ne tum quidem sic, uti est uera amicitia, quia non est uera, nisi cum eam tu agglutinas inter haerentes sibi caritate diffusa in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. sed tamen dulcis erat nobis, cocta feruore parilium studiorum. nam et a fide uera, quam non germanitus et penitus adulescens tenebat, deflexeram eum in superstitiosas fabellas et perniciosas, propter quas me plangebat mater. mecum iam errabat in animo ille homo et non poterat anima mea sine illo. et ecce tu inminens dorso fugitiuorum tuorum, deus ultionum et fons misericordiarum simul, qui conuertis nos ad te miris modis, ecce abstulisti hominem de hac uita, cum uix expleuisset annum in amicitia mea, suaui mihi super omnes suauitates illius uitae meae.

In those years, when I first began to teach in the town where I was born, I had gained a friend, very dear to me because we shared our studies, of my own age and flowering with me in the flower of youth. He had grown up with me as a boy, and we had gone to school together and played together. But he was not then such a friend as he later became; and even later he was not a friend in the way true friendship is, because it is not true unless you glue it together between those who cling to one another by the “love poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.” Yet it was sweet to us, ripened by the warmth of shared studies. For I had also turned him away from the true faith, which as a young man he did not hold genuinely and deeply, into the superstitious and pernicious fables for which my mother wept over me. That man was already wandering in mind with me, and my soul could not be without him. And see, you, who press close upon the backs of those who flee from you, God of vengeance and at the same time fountain of mercies, who turn us to yourself in wonderful ways, see, you took the man away from this life when he had scarcely completed a year in my friendship, a friendship sweet to me above all the sweetnesses of that life of mine.

4.8CSEL 33:69–70

Quis laudes tuas enumerat unus in se uno, quas expertus est? quid tunc fecisti, deus meus, et quam inuestigabilis abyssus iudiciorum tuorum? cum enim laboraret ille febribus, iacuit diu sine sensu in sudore laetali et, cum desperaretur, baptizatus est nesciens me non curante et praesumente id retinere potius animam eius quod a me acceperat, non quod in nescientis corpore fiebat. longe autem aliter erat. nam recreatus est et saluus factus, statimque, ut primo cum eo loqui potui — potui autem mox, ut ille potuit, quando non discedebam et nimis pendebamus ex inuicem — temtaui apud illum inridere, tamquam et illo inrisuro mecum baptismum, quem acceperat mente atque sensu absentissimus. sed tamen iam se accepisse didicerat. at ille ita me exhorruit ut inimicum admonuitque mirabili et repentina libertate, ut, si amicus esse uellem, talia sibi dicere desinerem. ego autem stupefactus atque turbatus distuli omnes motus meos, ut conualesceret prius essetque idoneus uiribus ualetudinis, cum quo agere possem quod uellem. sed ille abreptus dementiae meae, ut apud te seruaretur consolationi meae: post paucos dies me absente repetitur febribus et defungitur.

Who can recount your praises that he has experienced in himself alone? What did you do then, my God, and how unsearchable is the abyss of your judgments! For when he was suffering from fever, he lay long unconscious in a deathly sweat; and when he was despaired of, he was baptized without knowing it. I did not care, presuming that his soul would retain what it had received from me rather than what was being done to the body of one unaware. But it was far otherwise. For he revived and recovered, and at once, as soon as I could speak with him (and I could as soon as he could, since I never left him, and we depended on each other too much), I tried to mock, in his presence, the baptism he had received while utterly absent in mind and sense, thinking that he would mock it with me. But he had already learned that he had received it. And he recoiled from me as from an enemy, and with a wonderful and sudden freedom warned me that if I wanted to be his friend I must stop saying such things to him. I, astonished and disturbed, put off all my impulses until he should first recover and be strong enough in health for me to do what I wanted with him. But he was snatched away from my madness, to be kept with you for my consolation: a few days later, while I was away, the fever returned and he died.

4.9CSEL 33:70–71

Quo dolore contenebratum est cor meum et quidquid aspiciebam mors erat. et erat mihi patria supplicium et paterna domus mira infelicitas, et quidquid cum illo conmunicaueram, sine illo in cruciatum inmanem uerterat. expetebant eum undique oculi mei, et non dabatur; et oderam omnia, quod non haberent eum, nec mihi iam dicere poterant: "ecce uenit", sicut cum ueniret, quando absens erat. factus eram ipse mihi magna quaestio et interrogabam animam meam, quare tristis esset et quare conturbaret me ualde, et nihil nouerat respondere mihi. et si dicebam: "spera in deum," iuste non obtemperabat, quia uerior erat et melior homo, quem carissimum amiserat, quam phantasma, in quod sperare iubebatur. solus fletus erat dulcis mihi et successerat amico meo in deliciis animi mei.

With this grief my heart was darkened, and whatever I looked at was death. My home town was torture to me and my father's house a strange unhappiness, and whatever I had shared with him, without him had turned into a monstrous torment. My eyes looked for him everywhere, and he was not given to them; and I hated all things because they did not have him, nor could they now say to me, “See, he is coming,” as they did when he was alive and absent. I had become a great question to myself, and I asked my soul why it was sad and why it troubled me so much, and it had no answer for me. And if I said, “Hope in God,” it rightly did not obey, because the man, most dear, whom it had lost was truer and better than the phantasm in which it was told to hope. Weeping alone was sweet to me, and it had taken my friend's place in the delights of my mind.

4.10CSEL 33:71–72

Et nunc, domine, iam illa transierunt et tempore lenitum est uulnus meum. possumne audire abs te, qui ueritas es, et admouere aurem cordis mei ori tuo, ut dicas mihi, cur fletus dulcis sit miseris? an tu, quamuis ubique adsis, longe abiecisti a te miseriam nostram, et tu in te manes, nos autem in experimentis uoluimur? et tamen nisi ad aures tuas ploraremus, nihil residui de spe nostra fieret. unde igitur suauis fructus de amaritudine uitae carpitur gemere et flere et suspirare et conqueri? an hoc ibi dulce est, quod speramus exaudire te? recte istud in precibus, quia desiderium perueniendi habent. num in dolore amissae rei et luctu, quo tunc operiebar? neque enim sperabam reuiuescere illum aut hoc petebam lacrimis, sed tantum dolebam et flebam. miser enim eram et amiseram gaudium meum. an et fletus res amara est et prae fastidio rerum, quibus prius fruebamur, et tunc, dum ab eis abhorremus, delectat?

And now, Lord, those things have passed, and my wound has been softened by time. May I hear from you, who are the Truth, and move the ear of my heart close to your mouth, so that you may tell me why weeping is sweet to the wretched? Or have you, though present everywhere, cast our misery far from you, and you remain in yourself, while we are tossed about in trials? And yet unless we wept into your ears, nothing of our hope would remain. How is it, then, that sweet fruit is plucked from the bitterness of life, to groan and weep and sigh and lament? Is what is sweet there the hope that you hear us? That is rightly so in prayers, because they have the desire to reach you. But is it so in grief over something lost, and in the mourning in which I was then enveloped? For I did not hope that he would come back to life, nor did I ask this with my tears; I only grieved and wept. For I was wretched, and I had lost my joy. Or is weeping too a bitter thing, and does it delight us out of disgust for the things we used to enjoy, at the time when we shrink from them?

4.11CSEL 33:72–73

Quid autem ista loquor? non enim tempus quaerendi nunc est, sed confitendi tibi. miser eram et miser est omnis animus uinctus amicitia rerum mortalium et dilaniatur, cum eas amittit, et tunc sentit miseriam, qua miser est et antequam amittat eas. sic ego eram illo tempore et flebam amarissime et requiescebam in amaritudine. ita miser eram et habebam cariorem illo amico meo uitam ipsam miseram. nam quamuis eam mutare uellem, nollem tamen amittere magis quam illum et nescio an uellem uel pro illo, sicut de Oreste et Pylade traditur, si non fingitur, qui uellent pro inuicem simul mori, quia morte peius eis erat non simul uiuere. sed in me nescio quis affectus nimis huic contrarius ortus erat et taedium uiuendi erat in me grauissimum et moriendi metus. credo, quo magis illum amabam, hoc magis mortem, quae mihi eum abstulerat, tamquam atrocissimam inimicam oderam et timebam et eam repente consumpturam omnes homines putabam, quia illum potuit. sic eram omnino, memini. ecce cor meum, deus meus, ecce intus; uide, quia memini, spes mea, qui me mundas a talium affectionum inmunditia, dirigens oculos meos ad te et euellens de laqueo pedes meos. mirabar enim ceteros mortales uiuere, quia ille, quem quasi non moriturum dilexeram, mortuus erat, et me magis, quia ille alter eram, uiuere illo mortuo mirabar. bene quidam dixit de amico suo: dimidium animae suae. nam ego sensi animam meam et animam illius unam fuisse animam in duobus corporibus, et ideo mihi horrori erat uita, quia nolebam dimidius uiuere, et ideo forte mori metuebam, ne totus ille moreretur, quem multum amaueram. o dementiam nescientem diligere homines humaniter!

But why do I speak of these things? For now is not the time for inquiring but for confessing to you. I was wretched, and wretched is every mind bound by friendship with mortal things; it is torn apart when it loses them, and then it feels the wretchedness by which it was wretched even before it lost them. So I was at that time, and I wept most bitterly and found rest in bitterness. So wretched was I, and I held that wretched life itself dearer than my friend. For although I wanted to change it, I would not have wanted to lose it more than him; and I do not know whether I would have wanted to lose it even for him, as is told, if it is not invented, of Orestes and Pylades, who wanted to die for each other or together, because not to live together was worse than death for them. But in me some feeling had arisen quite contrary to this: a most heavy weariness of living and a fear of dying. I believe that the more I loved him, the more I hated and feared death, which had taken him from me, as a most savage enemy, and I thought it would suddenly consume all people, since it had been able to take him. That is exactly how I was, I remember. See my heart, my God, see within; see, because I remember, my hope, who cleanse me from the uncleanness of such feelings, directing my eyes to you and plucking my feet from the snare. For I wondered that other mortals lived, since he whom I had loved as though he would never die was dead; and I wondered still more that I, who was his other self, lived when he was dead. Someone put it well when he called his friend “half of his soul.” For I felt that my soul and his soul had been one soul in two bodies; and so life was a horror to me, because I did not want to live as half; and perhaps that is why I feared to die, lest he whom I had loved so much should die wholly. O madness that does not know how to love human beings humanly!

4.12CSEL 33:73–74

o stultum hominem inmoderate humana patientem! quod ego tunc eram. itaque aestuabam, suspirabam, flebam, turbabar, nec requies erat nec consilium. portabam enim concisam et cruentam animam meam inpatientem portari a me, et ubi eam ponerem non inueniebam. non in amoenis nemoribus, non in ludis atque cantibus nec in suaue olentibus locis nec in conuiuiis apparatis nec in uoluptate cubilis et lecti, non denique in libris atque carminibus adquiescebat. horrebant omnia et ipsa lux, et quid quid non erat quod ille erat, inprobum et taediosum erat praeter gemitum et lacrimas: nam in eis solis aliquantula requies. ubi autem inde auferebatur anima mea, onerabat me grandis sarcina miseriae. ad te, domine, leuanda erat et curanda, sciebam, sed nec uolebam nec ualebam, eo magis quod mihi non eras aliquid solidum et firmum, cum de te cogitabam. non enim tu eras, sed uanum phantasma et error meus erat deus meus. si conabar eam ibi ponere, ut requiesceret, per inane labebatur et iterum ruebat super me, et ego mihi remanseram infelix locus, ubi nec esse possem nec inde recedere. quo enim cor meum fugeret a corde meo? quo a me ipso fugerem? quo non me sequerer? et tamen fugi de patria. minus enim eum quaerebant oculi mei, ubi uidere non solebant, atque a Thagastensi oppido ueni Carthaginem.

O foolish man, who suffers human things without measure! That is what I was then. So I seethed, sighed, wept, was troubled, and there was neither rest nor counsel. For I carried my soul, torn and bleeding, impatient of being carried by me, and I found nowhere to set it down. It found no rest in pleasant groves, nor in games and songs, nor in sweet-smelling places, nor in elaborate banquets, nor in the pleasure of the bedroom and the couch, nor, finally, in books and poems. Everything was horrible, even the light itself, and whatever was not what he was, was wicked and wearisome, except groaning and tears; for in them alone was there some little rest. But when my soul was taken away from them, a great burden of misery weighed me down. To you, Lord, it should have been lifted to be healed, I knew; but I neither wanted to nor was able to, the more so because when I thought of you, you were not something solid and firm for me. For it was not you, but an empty phantasm, and my error was my god. If I tried to set my soul down there to rest, it slipped through the void and came crashing down on me again, and I remained to myself an unhappy place where I could neither stay nor leave. For where could my heart flee from my heart? Where could I flee from myself? Where would I not follow myself? And yet I fled from my home town. For my eyes looked for him less where they had not been used to seeing him; and from the town of Thagaste I came to Carthage.

4.13CSEL 33:74–75

Non uacant tempora nec otiose uoluuntur per sensus nostros: faciunt in animo mira opera. ecce ueniebant et praeteribant de die in diem et ueniendo et praetereundo inserebant mihi spes alias et alias memorias et paulatim resarciebant me pristinis generibus delectationum, quibus cedebat dolor meus ille; sed succedebant non quidem dolores alii, causae tamen aliorum dolorum. nam unde me facillime et in intima dolor ille penetrauerat, nisi quia fuderam in harenam animam meam diligendo moriturum acsi non moriturum? maxime quippe me reparabant atque recreabant aliorum amicorum solacia, cum quibus amabam quod pro te amabam, et hoc erat ingens fabula et longum mendacium, cuius adulterina confricatione corrumpebatur mens nostra pruriens in auribus. sed illa mihi fabula non moriebatur, si quis amicorum meorum moreretur. alia erant, quae in eis amplius capiebant animum: conloqui et conridere et uicissim beniuole obsequi, simul legere libros dulciloquos, simul nugari et simul honestari, dissentire interdum sine odio tamquam ipse homo secum atque ipsa rarissima dissensione condire consensiones plurimas, docere aliquid inuicem aut discere ab inuicem, desiderare absentes cum molestia, suscipere uenientes cum laetitia: his atque huius modi signis a corde amantium et redamantium procedentibus per os, per linguam, per oculos et mille motus gratissimos quasi fomitibus flagrare animos et ex pluribus unum facere.

Times do not stand idle, nor do they roll by without effect through our senses; they work wonderful works in the mind. See, they came and went day after day, and by coming and going they planted in me other hopes and other memories, and little by little they patched me up again with my former kinds of pleasure, to which that grief of mine gave way. But what followed were, if not other griefs, at least the causes of other griefs. For why had that grief penetrated me so easily and so deeply, unless because I had poured out my soul onto the sand by loving a man who would die as though he would never die? What most restored and revived me was the comfort of other friends, with whom I loved what I loved instead of you; and this was a huge fable and a long lie, by whose adulterous rubbing our minds, itching in the ears, were corrupted. But that fable did not die for me if any of my friends died. There were other things in them that captured my mind more: talking and laughing together, doing kindnesses for one another in turn, reading pleasant books together, joking together and being serious together, disagreeing sometimes without ill will, as a man does with himself, and seasoning our very many agreements with those very rare disagreements; teaching one another something or learning from one another; missing the absent with pain and welcoming those who arrived with joy. By these and similar signs, coming from the hearts of those who love and are loved in return, through the face, the tongue, the eyes, and a thousand most pleasing gestures, our minds were set ablaze as if by kindling, and out of many were made one.

4.14CSEL 33:75–76

Hoc est, quod diligitur in amicis et sic diligitur, ut rea sibi sit humana conscientia, si non amauerit redamantem aut si amantem non redamauerit, nihil quaerens ex eius corpore praeter indicia beniuolentiae. hinc ille luctus, si quis moriatur, et tenebrae dolorum et uersa dulcedine in amaritudinem cor madidum et ex amissa uita morientium mors uiuentium. beatus qui amat te et amicum in te et inimicum propter te. solus enim nullum carum amittit, cui omnes in illo cari, qui non amittitur. et quis est iste nisi deus noster, deus, qui fecit caelum et terram et inplet ea, quia inplendo ea fecit ea? te nemo amittit, nisi qui dimittit, et quia dimittit, quo it aut quo fugit nisi a te placido ad te iratum? nam ubi non inuenit legem tuam in poena sua? et lex tua ueritas et ueritas tu.

This is what is loved in friends, and loved in such a way that the human conscience feels itself guilty if it does not love one who loves in return, or does not return the love of one who loves, seeking nothing from the other's body but signs of goodwill. Hence that mourning if someone dies, and the darkness of griefs, and the heart drenched as sweetness turns to bitterness, and, from the lost life of the dying, the death of the living. Blessed is the one who loves you, and his friend in you, and his enemy because of you. For he alone loses no one dear to him to whom all are dear in the one who is not lost. And who is this but our God, the God who made heaven and earth and fills them, because by filling them he made them? No one loses you except one who leaves you; and when he leaves you, where does he go, or where does he flee, but from you well pleased to you angry? For where does he not find your law in his own punishment? And “your law is truth,” and the truth is you.

4.15CSEL 33:76–77

Deus uirtutum, conuerte nos et ostende faciem tuam, et salui erimus. nam quoquouersum se uerterit anima hominis, ad dolores figitur alibi praeterquam in te, tametsi figitur in pulchris extra te et extra se. quae tamen nulla essent, nisi essent abs te. quae oriuntur et occidunt et oriendo quasi esse incipiunt et crescunt, ut perficiantur, et perfecta senescunt et intereunt: et non omnia senescunt et omnia intereunt. ergo cum oriuntur et tendunt esse, quo magis celeriter crescunt, ut sint, eo magis festinant, ut non sint. sic est modus eorum. tantum dedisti eis, quia partes sunt rerum, quae non sunt omnes simul, sed decedendo ac succedendo agunt omnes uniuersum, cuius partes sunt. ecce sic peragitur et sermo noster per signa sonantia. non enim erit totus sermo, si unum uerbum non decedat, cum sonuerit, partes suas, ut succedat aliud. laudet te ex illis anima mea, deus, creator omnium, sed non eis infigatur glutine amore per sensus corporis. eunt enim quo ibant, ut non sint, et conscindunt eam desideriis pestilentiosis, quoniam ipsa esse uult et requiescere amat in eis, quae amat. in illis autem non est ubi, quia non stant: fugiunt, et quis ea sequitur sensu carnis? aut quis ea conprehendit, uel cum praesto sunt? tardus est enim sensus carnis, quoniam sensus carnis est: ipse est modus eius. sufficit ad aliud, ad quod factus est, ad illud autem non sufficit, ut teneat transcurrentia ab initio debito usque ad finem debitum. in uerbo enim tuo, per quod creantur, ibi audiunt: "hinc et huc usque."

“God of hosts, turn us, and show us your face, and we shall be saved.” For wherever the soul of a human being turns, anywhere other than to you, it is fastened to griefs, even if it is fastened to beautiful things outside you and outside itself. Yet these would be nothing unless they were from you. They rise and set; by rising they begin, as it were, to be, and they grow so as to be perfected, and once perfected they grow old and perish; and not all grow old, but all perish. So when they rise and strive to be, the more quickly they grow so as to be, the more they hasten not to be. Such is their measure. This much you gave them, because they are parts of things that do not all exist at once, but by departing and succeeding one another they all make up the universe of which they are parts. See, so too our speech is completed by sounding signs. For there will not be a whole sentence unless one word departs when it has sounded its parts, so that another may follow. Let my soul praise you for these things, God, creator of all, but let it not be fastened to them with the glue of love through the senses of the body. For they go where they were going, so as not to be, and they tear the soul with pestilent desires, since it wants to be and loves to rest in what it loves. But in them there is nowhere to rest, because they do not stand still: they flee, and who can follow them with the sense of the flesh? Or who can grasp them, even when they are present? For the sense of the flesh is slow, because it is the sense of the flesh: that is its measure. It is sufficient for the other purpose for which it was made, but it is not sufficient to hold things that run past from their due beginning to their due end. For in your Word, through which they are created, there they hear: “From here, and as far as this.”

4.16CSEL 33:77

Noli esse uana, anima mea, et obsurdescere in aure cordis tumultu uanitatis tuae. audi et tu: uerbum ipsum clamat, ut redeas, et ibi est locus quietis inperturbabilis, ubi non deseritur amor, si ipse non deserat. ecce illa discedunt, ut alia succedant et omnibus suis partibus constet infima uniuersitas. "numquid ego aliquo discedo?" ait uerbum dei. ibi fige mansionem tuam, ibi conmenda quidquid inde habes, anima mea, saltem fatigata fallaciis. ueritati conmenda quidquid tibi est a ueritate, et non perdes aliquid, et reflorescent putria tua et sanabuntur omnes languores tui et fluxa tua reformabuntur et renouabuntur et constringentur ad te et non te deponent, quo descendunt, sed stabunt tecum et permanebunt ad semper stantem ac permanentem deum.

Do not be vain, my soul, and do not let the ear of your heart grow deaf with the tumult of your vanity. You too, listen: the Word itself cries out for you to return, and there is the place of undisturbed rest, where love is not forsaken if it does not itself forsake. See, those things depart so that others may succeed them, and the lowest universe may consist of all its parts. “But do I depart anywhere?” says the Word of God. There fix your dwelling; there entrust whatever you have from there, my soul, wearied at least by deceptions. Entrust to the Truth whatever you have from the Truth, and you will lose nothing; and your decay will flower again, and “all your diseases will be healed,” and your fleeting parts will be reformed and renewed and bound tightly to you, and they will not lay you down where they descend, but will stand with you and abide before God, who always stands and abides.

4.17CSEL 33:77–78

Vtquid peruersa sequeris carnem tuam? ipsa te sequatur conuersam. quidquid per illam sentis, in parte est et ignoras totum, cuius hae partes sunt, et delectant te tamen. sed si ad totum conprehendendum esset idoneus sensus carnis tuae ac non et ipse in parte uniuersi accepisset pro tua poena iustum modum, uelles, ut transiret quidquid existit in praesentia, ut magis tibi omnia placerent. nam et quod loquimur, per eundem sensum carnis audis et non uis utique stare syllabas, sed transuolare, ut aliae ueniant et totum audias. ita semper omnia, quibus unum aliquid constat, et non sunt omnia simul ea, quibus constat: plus delectant omnia quam singula, si possint sentiri omnia. sed longe his melior qui fecit omnia, et ipse est deus noster, et non discedit, quia nec succeditur ei.

Why do you follow your flesh, perversely turned? Let it follow you, once you are turned back. Whatever you perceive through it is in part, and you do not know the whole of which these are parts; and yet they delight you. But if the sense of your flesh were capable of grasping the whole, and had not itself, as your punishment, received a just limitation to a part of the universe, you would want whatever exists in the present to pass away, so that everything might please you more. For what we say, too, you hear through that same sense of the flesh, and you certainly do not want the syllables to stand still, but to fly past so that others may come and you may hear the whole. So it always is with all the things of which some one thing consists, when the things of which it consists do not all exist at once: all of them together delight more than each singly, if all could be perceived. But far better than these is he who made all things, and he is our God, and he does not depart, because nothing succeeds him.

4.18CSEL 33:78–79

Si placent corpora, deum ex illis lauda et in artificem eorum retorque amorem, ne in his, quae tibi placent, tu displiceas. si placent animae, in deo amentur, quia et ipsae mutabiles sunt et illo fixae stabiliuntur: alioquin irent et perirent. in illo ergo amentur, et rape ad eum tecum quas potes et dic eis: "hunc amemus: ipse fecit haec et non est longe." non enim fecit atque abiit, sed ex illo in illo sunt. ecce ubi est, ubi sapit ueritas? intimus cordi est, sed cor errauit ab eo. redite, praeuaricatores, ad cor et inhaerete illi, qui fecit uos. state cum eo et stabitis, requiescite in eo et quieti eritis. quo itis in aspera? quo itis? bonum, quod amatis, ab illo est: sed quantum est ad illum, bonum est et suaue; sed amarum erit iuste, quia iniuste amatur deserto illo quidquid ab illo est. quo uobis adhuc et adhuc ambulare uias difficiles et laboriosas? non est requies, ubi quaeritis eam. quaerite quod quaeritis, sed ibi non est, ubi quaeritis. beatam uitam quaeritis in regione mortis: non est illic. quomodo enim beata uita, ubi nec uita?

If bodies please you, praise God for them and turn your love back to their maker, lest in the things that please you, you displease him. If souls please you, let them be loved in God, because they too are changeable and are made stable by being fixed in him; otherwise they would pass away and perish. So let them be loved in him, and carry off with you to him as many as you can, and say to them: “Let us love him; he made these things and he is not far away.” For he did not make them and go away; they are from him and in him. See where he is, where truth is tasted: he is most inward to the heart, but the heart has wandered from him. “Return to the heart, you transgressors,” and cling to him who made you. Stand with him, and you will stand; rest in him, and you will be at rest. Where are you going, into rough places? Where are you going? The good that you love is from him; but only insofar as it is toward him is it good and sweet; and it will rightly become bitter, because whatever is from him is wrongly loved if he is abandoned. Why do you still go on and on walking difficult and toilsome ways? There is no rest where you seek it. Seek what you seek, but it is not where you seek it. You seek a happy life in the region of death: it is not there. For how can there be a happy life where there is not even life?

4.19CSEL 33:79–80

Et descendit huc ipsa uita nostra et tulit mortem nostram et occidit eam de abundantia uitae suae et tonuit clamans, ut redeamus hinc ad eum in illud secretum, unde processit ad nos in ipsum primum uirginalem uterum, ubi ei nupsit humana creatura, caro mortalis, ne semper mortalis; et inde uelut sponsus procedens de thalamo suo exultauit ut gigans ad currendam uiam. non enim tardauit, sed cucurrit clamans dictis, factis, morte, uita, descensu, ascensu, clamans, ut redeamus ad eum. et discessit ab oculis, ut redeamus ad cor et inueniamus eum. abscessit enim et ecce hic est. noluit nobiscum diu esse et non reliquit nos. illuc enim abscessit, unde numquam recessit, quia mundus per eum factus est et in hoc mundo erat et uenit in hunc mundum peccatores saluos facere. cui confitetur anima mea, et sanat eam, quoniam peccauit illi. fili hominum, quo usque graues corde? numquid et post descensum uitae non uultis ascendere et uiuere? sed quo ascenditis, quando in alto estis et posuistis in caelo os uestrum? descendite, ut ascendatis et ascendatis ad deum. cecidistis enim ascendendo contra deum. dic eis ista, ut plorent in conualle plorationis, et sic eos rape tecum ad deum, quia de spiritu eius haec dicis eis, si dicis ardens igne caritatis.

And our very Life came down here and took away our death and killed it out of the abundance of his own life; and he thundered, crying out for us to return from here to him, into that secret place from which he came forth to us, first into the virgin womb itself, where the human creature, mortal flesh, was wedded to him, so as not to be forever mortal; and from there, “like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, he rejoiced like a giant to run his course.” For he did not delay, but ran, crying out by words, deeds, death, life, descent, ascent, crying out for us to return to him. And he departed from our eyes so that we might return to the heart and find him. For he went away, and see, he is here. He did not want to be with us long, and yet he did not leave us. For he went away to the place from which he never withdrew, because “the world was made through him,” and “he was in this world,” and “he came into this world to save sinners.” To him my soul confesses, and he heals it, “because it has sinned against him.” “Sons of men, how long will you be heavy of heart?” Even after Life has come down, do you not want to go up and live? But where do you go up, when you are on high and “have set your mouth in heaven”? Come down, so that you may go up, and go up to God. For you fell by going up against God. Tell them these things, so that they may weep in the valley of weeping, and so carry them off with you to God; for you say these things to them by his Spirit, if you say them burning with the fire of love.

4.20CSEL 33:80

Haec tunc non noueram et amabam pulchra inferiora et ibam in profundum et dicebam amicis meis: "num amamus aliquid nisi pulchrum? quid est ergo pulchrum? et quid est pulchritudo? quid est quod nos allicit et conciliat rebus, quas amamus? nisi enim esset in eis decus et species, nullo modo nos ad se mouerent." et animaduertebam et uidebam in ipsis corporibus aliud esse quasi totum et ideo pulchrum, aliud autem, quod ideo deceret, quoniam apte accommodaretur alicui, sicut pars corporis ad uniuersum suum aut calciamentum ad pedem et similia. et ista consideratio scaturriit in animo meo ex intimo corde meo, et scripsi libros "de pulchro et apto", puto, duos aut tres; tu scis, deus: nam excidit mihi. non enim habemus eos, sed aberrauerunt a nobis nescio quomodo.

These things I did not know then, and I loved lower beauties and went down into the depths, and I said to my friends: “Do we love anything but the beautiful? What then is the beautiful? And what is beauty? What is it that attracts us and wins us to the things we love? For unless there were grace and beauty in them, they could in no way move us toward them.” And I noticed and saw that in bodies themselves there is one thing that is a kind of whole and is therefore beautiful, and another that is fitting because it is suitably adapted to something else, as a part of the body to its whole, or a shoe to a foot, and the like. And this reflection welled up in my mind from my inmost heart, and I wrote books On the Beautiful and the Fitting, two or three, I think; you know, God, for it has slipped my memory. For we do not have them; they have strayed from us, I do not know how.

4.21CSEL 33:80–81

Quid est autem, quod me mouit, domine deus meus, ut ad Hierium, Romanae urbis oratorem, scriberem illos libros? quem non noueram facie, sed amaueram hominem ex doctrinae fama, quae illi clara erat, et quaedam uerba eius audieram, et placuerant mihi. sed magis quia placebat aliis et eum efferebant laudibus stupentes, quod ex homine Syro, docto prius graecae facundiae, post in latina etiam dictor mirabilis extitisset et esset scientissimus rerum ad studium sapientiae pertinentium, mihi placebat. laudabatur homo et amabatur absens. utrumnam ab ore laudantis intrat in cor audientis amor ille? absit; sed ex amante alio accenditur alius. hinc enim amatur qui laudatur, dum non fallaci corde laudatoris praedicari creditur, id est cum amans eum laudat.

But what moved me, Lord my God, to dedicate those books to Hierius, an orator of the city of Rome? I did not know him by sight, but I had come to love the man from the reputation for learning that he enjoyed; and I had heard some words of his, and they had pleased me. But he pleased me more because he pleased others, and they praised him to the skies, amazed that a Syrian, first trained in Greek eloquence, had afterwards become a marvelous speaker in Latin too, and was most learned in the things that belong to the study of wisdom. The man was praised, and he was loved in his absence. Does that love enter the heart of the hearer from the mouth of the one who praises? Not at all; but one lover is set on fire by another. For this is why one who is praised is loved: because he is believed to be commended by a praiser whose heart is not deceitful, that is, when one who loves him praises him.

4.22CSEL 33:81–82

Sic enim tunc amabam homines ex hominum iudicio; non enim ex tuo, deus meus, in quo nemo fallitur. sed tamen cur non sicut auriga nobilis, sicut uenator studiis popularibus diffamatus, sed longe aliter et grauiter et ita, quemadmodum et me laudari uellem? non autem uellem ita laudari et amari me ut histriones, quamquam eos et ipse laudarem et amarem, sed eligens latere quam ita notus esse et uel haberi odio quam sic amari. ubi distribuuntur ista pondera uariorum et diuersorum amorum in anima una? quid est, quod amo in alio, quod rursus nisi odissem, non a me detestarer et repellerem, cum sit uterque nostrum homo? non enim sicut equus bonus amatur ab eo qui nollet hoc esse, etiamsi posset, hoc et de histrione dicendum est, qui naturae nostrae socius est. ergone amo in homine quod odi esse, cum sim homo? grande profundum est ipse homo, cuius etiam capillos tu, domine, numeratos habes et non minuuntur in te: et tamen capilli eius magis numerabiles quam affectus eius et motus cordis eius.

For I loved people then by the judgment of people, not by yours, my God, in whom no one is deceived. But still, why was it not as one loves a famous charioteer or a hunter made notorious by popular enthusiasm, but quite differently and seriously, and in the way I would have liked to be praised myself? For I would not have wanted to be praised and loved as actors are, although I myself praised and loved them; I would rather have chosen to remain unknown than to be known in that way, and even to be hated rather than to be loved like that. Where are these weights of various and different loves distributed in a single soul? What is it that I love in another, which, unless I hated it, I would not detest and reject in myself, since each of us is a human being? For it is not as a good horse is loved by someone who would not want to be a horse even if he could; this must be said also of the actor, who shares our nature. Do I then love in a human being what I hate to be, though I am a human being? The human being himself is a great deep, whose very hairs you, Lord, have numbered, and they are not lost in you; and yet his hairs are easier to count than his feelings and the movements of his heart.

4.23CSEL 33:82–83

At ille rhetor ex eo erat genere, quem sic amabam, ut esse me uellem talem; et errabam tyfo et circumferebar omni uento et nimis occulte gubernabar abs te. et unde scio et unde certus confiteor tibi, quod illum in amore laudantium magis amaueram quam in rebus ipsis, de quibus laudabatur? quia si non laudatum uituperarent eum idem ipsi et uituperando atque spernendo ea ipsa narrarent, non accenderer in eo et non excitarer, et certe res non aliae forent nec homo ipse alius, sed tantummodo alius affectus narrantium. ecce ubi iacet anima infirma nondum haerens soliditati ueritatis. sicut aurae linguarum flauerint a pectoribus opinantium, ita fertur et uertitur, torquetur ac retorquetur, et obnubilatur ei lumen et non cernitur ueritas. et ecce est ante nos. et magnum quiddam mihi erat, si sermo meus et studia mea illi uiro innotescerent: quae si probaret, flagrarem magis; si autem inprobaret, sauciaretur cor uanum et inane soliditatis tuae. et tamen pulchrum illud atque aptum, unde ad eum scripseram, libenter animo uersabam ob os contemplationis meae et nullo conlaudatore mirabar.

But that rhetorician was of the kind I loved in such a way that I wanted to be like him; and I wandered in conceit and “was carried about by every wind,” and yet was steered by you, very secretly. And how do I know, and how can I confess to you with certainty, that I had loved him more for the love of those who praised him than for the things for which he was praised? Because if those same people had not praised him but criticized him, and had related those very same things with criticism and scorn, I would not have been kindled and stirred toward him; and certainly the things would not have been different, nor the man himself, but only the feelings of those who spoke of him. See where the weak soul lies that does not yet cling to the solidity of truth. As the breezes of tongues blow from the breasts of those who give opinions, so it is carried and turned, twisted and twisted back, and the light is clouded over for it and the truth is not seen. And see, it is before us. And it was a great thing to me if my speech and my studies should become known to that man; if he approved them, I would burn more; but if he disapproved, my heart, vain and empty of your solidity, would be wounded. And yet I gladly turned over in my mind that treatise on the beautiful and the fitting which I had dedicated to him, holding it before the eye of my contemplation, and I admired it with no one to praise it with me.

4.24CSEL 33:83–84

Sed tantae rei cardinem in arte tua nondum uidebam, omnipotens, qui facis mirabilia solus, et ibat animus meus per formas corporeas et pulchrum, quod per se ipsum, aptum autem, quod ad aliquid adconmodatum deceret, definiebam et distinguebam et exemplis corporeis adstruebam. et conuerti me ad animi naturam et non me sinebat falsa opinio, quam de spiritalibus habebam, uerum cernere. et inruebat in oculos ipsa uis ueri et auertebam palpitantem mentem ab incorporea re ad liniamenta et colores et tumentes magnitudines et, quia non poteram ea uidere in animo, putabam me non posse uidere animum meum. et cum in uirtute pacem amarem, in uitiositate autem odissem discordiam, in illa unitatem, in ista quandam diuisionem notabam, inque illa unitate mens rationalis et natura ueritatis ac summi boni mihi esse uidebatur, in ista uero diuisione inrationalis uitae nescio quam substantiam et naturam summi mali, quae non solum esset substantia, sed omnino uita esset et tamen abs te non esset, deus meus, ex quo sunt omnia, miser opinabar. et illam monadem appellabam tamquam sine ullo sexu mentem, hanc uero dyadem, iram in facinoribus, libidinem in flagitiis, nesciens quid loquerer. non enim noueram neque didiceram nec ullam substantiam malum esse nec ipsam mentem nostram summum atque inconmutabile bonum.

But I did not yet see the hinge of so great a matter in your art, Almighty, “who alone do wonders”; and my mind went through bodily forms, and I defined and distinguished the beautiful as what is so in itself, and the fitting as what is becoming because it is suited to something else, and I supported this with bodily examples. And I turned to the nature of the mind, and the false opinion I held about spiritual things did not allow me to see the truth. The very force of truth rushed into my eyes, and I turned my throbbing mind away from incorporeal reality to lines and colors and swelling magnitudes; and because I could not see these in the mind, I thought I could not see my mind. And since in virtue I loved peace and in vice I hated discord, I noted unity in the one and a kind of division in the other; and in that unity I thought the rational mind and the nature of truth and of the highest good consisted, while in that division, wretch that I was, I supposed there was some substance of irrational life and a nature of the highest evil, which was not only a substance but actually life, and yet was not from you, my God, “from whom are all things.” And I called the first a Monad, as a mind without any sex, and the second a Dyad, anger in crimes and lust in shameful acts, not knowing what I was saying. For I did not know, nor had I learned, that no substance is evil, and that our mind itself is not the highest and unchangeable good.

4.25CSEL 33:84

Sicut enim facinora sunt, si uitiosus est ille animi motus, in quo est impetus, et se iactat insolenter ac turbide, et flagitia, si est inmoderata illa animae affectio, qua carnales hauriuntur uoluptates, ita errores et falsae opiniones uitam contaminant, si rationalis mens ipsa uitiosa est. qualis in me tunc erat nesciente alio lumine illam inlustrandam esse, ut sit particeps ueritatis, quia non est ipsa natura ueritatis, quoniam tu inluminabis lucernam meam, domine; deus meus, inluminabis tenebras meas, et de plenitudine tua omnes nos accepimus. es enim tu lumen uerum, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, quia in te non est transmutatio nec momenti obumbratio.

For just as there are crimes if that movement of the mind in which impulse lies is vicious and throws itself about insolently and turbulently, and shameful acts if that affection of the soul by which carnal pleasures are drunk in is immoderate, so errors and false opinions defile life if the rational mind itself is vicious. So it was in me then: I did not know that it must be illumined by another light in order to share in truth, because it is not itself the nature of truth. “For you will light my lamp, Lord; my God, you will lighten my darkness”; and “from your fullness we have all received.” For you are “the true light that enlightens every human being coming into this world,” because “in you there is no change nor shadow of turning.”

4.26CSEL 33:84–85

Sed ego conabar ad te et repellebar abs te, ut saperem mortem, quoniam superbis resistis. quid autem superbius, quam ut assererem mira dementia me id esse naturaliter, quod tu es? cum enim ego essem mutabilis et eo mihi manifestum esset, quod utique ideo sapiens esse cupiebam, ut ex deteriore melior fierem, malebam tamen etiam te opinari mutabilem quam me non hoc esse, quod tu es. itaque repellebar et resistebas uentosae ceruici meae et imaginabar formas corporeas et caro carnem accusabam et spiritus ambulans non reuertebar ad te et ambulando ambulabam in ea, quae non sunt neque in te neque in me neque in corpore neque mihi creabantur a ueritate tua, sed a mea uanitate fingebantur ex corpore, et dicebam paruulis fidelibus tuis, ciuibus meis, a quibus nesciens exulabam, dicebam illis garrulus et ineptus: "cur ergo errat anima, quam fecit deus?" et mihi nolebam dici: "cur ergo errat deus?" et contendebam magis inconmutabilem tuam substantiam coactam errare quam meam mutabilem sponte deuiasse et poena errare confitebar.

But I strove toward you and was pushed back by you, so that I might taste death, because “you resist the proud.” And what is prouder than that I should assert, with amazing madness, that I was by nature what you are? For since I was changeable, and this was clear to me from the very fact that I desired to be wise so as to become better from worse, I nevertheless preferred to think that you too were changeable rather than that I was not what you are. So I was pushed back, and you resisted my windy neck, and I imagined bodily forms; and flesh as I was, I accused the flesh, and, “a spirit going away,” I did not return to you; and going on I went into things that do not exist, neither in you nor in me nor in the body, nor were they created for me by your truth, but they were invented by my vanity from bodies. And I would say to your little faithful ones, my fellow citizens, from whom I was exiled without knowing it, I would say to them, chattering and foolish: “Why then does the soul that God made err?” And I did not want it said to me, “Why then does God err?” And I would rather contend that your unchangeable substance was forced to err than confess that my changeable substance had strayed of its own accord and erred as a punishment.

4.27CSEL 33:85

Et eram aetate annorum fortasse uiginti sex aut septem, cum illa uolumina scripsi, uoluens apud me corporalia figmenta obstrepentia cordis mei auribus, quas intendebam, dulcis ueritas, in interiorem melodiam tuam, cogitans de pulchro et apto et stare cupiens et audire te et gaudio gaudere propter uocem sponsi, et non poteram, quia uocibus erroris mei rapiebar foras et pondere superbiae meae in ima decidebam. non enim dabas auditui meo gaudium et laetitiam, aut exultabant ossa, quae humiliata non erant.

And I was perhaps twenty-six or twenty-seven years old when I wrote those volumes, turning over within me bodily fictions that made a din in the ears of my heart, which I was straining, sweet Truth, toward your inner melody, as I thought about the beautiful and the fitting, longing to stand and hear you and to “rejoice with joy because of the bridegroom's voice”; and I could not, because I was snatched outside by the voices of my error and fell to the depths by the weight of my pride. For you did not “give joy and gladness to my hearing,” nor did my bones exult, since they had not been humbled.

4.28CSEL 33:85–86

Et quid mihi proderat, quod annos natus ferme uiginti, cum in manus meas uenissent Aristotelica quaedam, quas appellant decem categorias — quarum nomine, cum eas rhetor Carthaginiensis, magister meus, buccis tyfo crepantibus conmemoraret et alii qui docti habebantur, tamquam in nescio quid magnum et diuinum suspensus inhiabam — legi eas solus et intellexi? quas cum contulissem cum eis, qui se dicebant uix eas magistris eruditissimis non loquentibus tantum, sed multa in puluere depingentibus intellexisse, nihil inde aliud mihi dicere potuerunt, quam ego solus apud me ipsum legens cognoueram; et satis aperte mihi uidebantur loquentes de substantiis, sicuti est homo, et quae in illis essent, sicuti est figura hominis, qualis sit et statura, quot pedum sit, aut cognatio, cuius frater sit, aut ubi sit constitutus aut quando natus, aut stet an sedeat aut calciatus uel armatus sit aut aliquid faciat aut patiatur aliquid, et quaecumque in his nouem generibus, quorum exempli gratia quaedam posui, uel in ipso substantiae genere innumerabilia reperiuntur.

And what did it profit me that when I was about twenty years old some writings of Aristotle came into my hands, which they call the Ten Categories (at whose name, when my teacher, the rhetorician of Carthage, and others who were considered learned, mentioned them with cheeks puffed out with conceit, I gaped in suspense as at something great and divine), and that I read them alone and understood them? When I discussed them with people who said they had understood them with difficulty, with the most learned teachers not only explaining them aloud but drawing many diagrams in the sand, they could tell me nothing about them that I had not already learned reading alone by myself. And they seemed to me to speak quite clearly about substances, such as a man, and what is in them, such as a man's shape, what kind it is, and his stature, how many feet tall, or relationship, whose brother he is, or where he is placed, or when he was born, or whether he stands or sits, or has shoes on or is armed, or does something or suffers something, and whatever innumerable things are found in these nine classes, of which I have given some examples, or in the class of substance itself.

4.29CSEL 33:86–87

Quid hoc mihi proderat, quando et oberat, cum etiam te, deus meus, mirabiliter simplicem atque inconmutabilem, illis decem praedicamentis putans quidquid esset omnino conprehensum, sic intellegere conarer, quasi et tu subiectum esses magnitudini tuae aut pulchritudini, ut illa essent in te quasi in subiecto sicut in corpore, cum tua magnitudo et tua pulchritudo tu ipse sis, corpus autem non eo sit magnum et pulchrum, quo corpus est, quia etsi minus magnum et minus pulchrum esset, nihilominus corpus esset. falsitas enim erat, quam de te cogitabam, non ueritas, et figmenta miseriae meae, non firmamenta beatitudinis tuae. iusseras enim et ita fiebat in me, ut terra spinas et tribolos pareret mihi et cum labore peruenirem ad panem meum.

What did this profit me, when it actually hindered me? For thinking that absolutely everything was comprehended in those ten categories, I tried to understand even you, my God, wonderfully simple and unchangeable, in that way, as if you too were the subject of your greatness or beauty, so that these would be in you as in a subject, as in a body; whereas your greatness and your beauty are you yourself, while a body is not great and beautiful by the fact that it is a body, since even if it were less great and less beautiful it would still be a body. For what I thought about you was falsehood, not truth, the fictions of my misery, not the firm foundations of your blessedness. For you had commanded, and so it came to pass in me, that the earth should bring forth thorns and thistles for me, and that with toil I should come to my bread.

4.30CSEL 33:87

Et quid mihi proderat, quod omnes libros artium, quas liberales uocant, tunc nequissimus malarum cupiditatum seruus per me ipsum legi et intellexi, quoscumque legere potui? et gaudebam in eis et nesciebam, unde esset quidquid ibi uerum et certum esset. dorsum enim habebam ad lumen et ad ea, quae inluminantur, faciem: unde ipsa facies mea, qua inluminata cernebam, non inluminabatur. quidquid de arte loquendi et disserendi, quidquid de dimensionibus figurarum et de musicis et de numeris sine magna difficultate nullo hominum tradente intellexi, scis tu, domine deus meus, quia et celeritas intellegendi et dispiciendi acumen donum tuum est. sed non inde sacrificabam tibi. itaque mihi non ad usum, sed ad perniciem magis ualebat, quia tam bonam partem substantiae meae sategi habere in potestate et fortitudinem meam non ad te custodiebam, sed profectus sum abs te in longinquam regionem, ut eam dissiparem in meretrices cupiditates. nam quid mihi proderat bona res non utenti bene? non enim sentiebam illas artes etiam ab studiosis et ingeniosis difficillime intellegi, nisi cum eis eadem conabar exponere et erat ille excellentissimus in eis, qui me exponentem non tardius sequeretur.

And what did it profit me that I, then a most worthless slave of evil desires, read by myself and understood all the books of the so-called liberal arts that I could read? I rejoiced in them, and I did not know where whatever was true and certain in them came from. For I had my back to the light and my face toward the things that are lit; so my face, with which I saw the illuminated things, was not itself illuminated. Whatever I understood without great difficulty and with no one teaching me about the art of speaking and reasoning, about the dimensions of figures, about music and numbers, you know, Lord my God, because both quickness of understanding and sharpness of discernment are your gift. But I did not offer sacrifice to you from it. So it served me not for use but rather for ruin, because I took care to keep so good a portion of my substance in my own power, and I did not keep my strength for you, but went away from you into a far country to squander it on harlot desires. For what did a good thing profit me when I did not use it well? For I did not realize that those arts are understood with great difficulty even by studious and gifted people, except when I tried to explain them to such people, and the most excellent among them was the one who could follow my explanation without lagging.

4.31CSEL 33:87–89

Sed quid mihi hoc proderat putanti, quod tu, domine deus ueritas, corpus esses lucidum et inmensum et ego frustum de illo corpore? nimia peruersitas! sed sic eram nec erubesco, deus meus, confiteri tibi in me misericordias tuas et inuocare te, qui non erubui tunc profiteri hominibus blasphemias meas et latrare aduersum te. quid ergo tunc mihi proderat ingenium per illas doctrinas agile et nullo adminiculo humani magisterii tot nodosissimi libri enodati, cum deformiter et sacrilega turpitudine in doctrina pietatis errarem? aut quid tantum oberat paruulis tuis longe tardius ingenium, cum a te longe non recederent, ut in nido ecclesiae tuae tuti plumescerent et alas caritatis alimento sanae fidei nutrirent? o domine deus noster, in uelamento alarum tuarum speremus et protege nos et porta nos. tu portabis, tu portabis et paruulos et usque ad canos tu portabis, quoniam firmitas nostra quando tu es, tunc est firmitas, cum autem nostra est, infirmitas est. uiuit apud te semper bonum nostrum, et quia inde auersi sumus, peruersi sumus. reuertamur iam, domine, ut non euertamur, quia uiuit apud te sine ullo defectu bonum nostrum, quod tu ipse es, et non timemus, ne non sit quo redeamus, quia nos inde ruimus; nobis autem absentibus non ruit domus nostra, aeternitas tua.

But what did this profit me, when I thought that you, Lord God, the Truth, were a luminous and immense body and I a fragment of that body? Utter perversity! But so I was; and I do not blush, my God, to confess to you your mercies toward me and to call upon you, I who did not blush then to profess my blasphemies to people and to bark against you. What, then, did it profit me that my mind was nimble in those studies, and that so many knotty books were untied without the help of any human teacher, when I erred shamefully and with sacrilegious foulness in the teaching of piety? Or what great harm was it to your little ones that their minds were far slower, since they did not withdraw far from you, so that they could safely grow their feathers in the nest of your church and nourish the wings of love with the food of sound faith? O Lord our God, “let us hope in the shelter of your wings,” and protect us and carry us. You will carry us; you will carry us both as little ones and “even to old age you will carry us”; for when our strength is you, then it is strength, but when it is our own, it is weakness. Our good lives always with you, and because we turned away from it, we became perverse. Let us return now, Lord, so that we may not be overturned, because our good lives with you without any failing, and it is you yourself; and we do not fear that there will be nowhere to return to because we fell from there. For while we were absent, our house did not fall: your eternity.

Chapter 5

5.1CSEL 33:89

Accipe sacrificium confessionum mearum de manu linguae meae, quam formasti et excitasti, ut confiteatur nomini tuo, et sana omnia ossa mea, et dicant: domine, quis similis tibi? neque enim docet te, quid in se agatur, qui tibi confitetur, quia oculum tuum non excludit cor clausum nec manum tuam repellit duritia hominum, sed soluis eam, cum uoles, aut miserans aut uindicans, et non est qui se abscondat a calore tuo. sed te laudet anima mea, ut amet te, et confiteatur tibi miserationes tuas, ut laudet te. non cessat nec tacet laudes tuas uniuersa creatura tua nec spiritus omnis hominis per os conuersum ad te nec animalia nec corporalia per os considerantium ea, ut exsurgat in te a lassitudine anima nostra innitens eis, quae fecisti, et adtransiens ad te, qui fecisti haec mirabiliter: et ibi refectio et uera fortitudo.

Accept the sacrifice of my confessions from the hand of my tongue, which you formed and stirred up to confess to your name; and “heal all my bones, and let them say, Lord, who is like you?” For one who confesses to you does not teach you what is happening within him, because a closed heart does not shut out your eye, nor does human hardness repel your hand; but you loosen it when you will, either in mercy or in punishment, “and there is no one who can hide from your heat.” But let my soul praise you so that it may love you, and let it confess to you your mercies so that it may praise you. Your whole creation does not cease or fall silent in your praises: neither every human spirit, through a mouth turned toward you, nor animals and bodily things, through the mouths of those who contemplate them; so that our soul may rise to you from its weariness, leaning on the things you have made and passing over to you who made them wonderfully; and there is refreshment and true strength.

5.2CSEL 33:89–90

Eant et fugiant a te inquieti iniqui. et tu uides eos et distinguis umbras, et ecce pulchra sunt cum eis omnia et ipsi turpes sunt. et quid nocuerunt tibi? aut in quo imperium tuum dehonestauerunt a caelis usque in nouissima iustum et integrum? quo enim fugerunt, cum fugerent a facie tua? aut ubi tu non inuenis eos? sed fugerunt, ut non uiderent te uidentem se atque excaecati in te offenderent — quia non deseris aliquid eorum, quae fecisti — in te offenderent iniusti et iuste uexarentur, subtrahentes se lenitati tuae et offendentes in rectitudinem tuam et cadentes in asperitatem tuam. uidelicet nesciunt, quod ubique sis, quem nullus circuminscribit locus, et solus es praesens etiam his, qui longe fiunt a te. conuertantur ergo et quaerant te, quia non, sicut ipsi deseruerunt creatorem suum, ita tu deseruisti creaturam tuam. ipsi conuertantur, et ecce ibi es in corde eorum, in corde confitentium tibi et proicientium se in te et plorantium in sinu tuo post uias suas difficiles: et tu facilis tergens lacrimas eorum, et magis plorant et gaudent in fletibus, quoniam tu, domine, non aliquis homo, caro et sanguis, sed tu, domine, qui fecisti, reficis et consolaris eos. et ubi ego eram, quando te quaerebam? et tu eras ante me, ego autem et a me discesseram nec me inueniebam: quanto minus te!

Let the restless and the wicked go and flee from you. You see them and distinguish their shadows; and see, all things with them are beautiful, while they themselves are foul. And how have they harmed you? Or in what have they dishonored your rule, which is just and whole from the heavens to the lowest things? For where did they flee when they fled from your face? Or where do you not find them? But they fled so as not to see you who see them, and, blinded, to stumble against you (for you forsake nothing that you have made); so that the unjust might stumble against you and be justly troubled, withdrawing themselves from your gentleness and stumbling against your uprightness and falling upon your severity. Evidently they do not know that you are everywhere, you whom no place encloses, and that you alone are present even to those who put themselves far from you. Let them then turn and seek you, because you have not forsaken your creation as they forsook their creator. Let them turn, and see, there you are in their heart, in the heart of those who confess to you and throw themselves upon you and weep in your bosom after their difficult ways; and you gently wipe away their tears, and they weep the more and rejoice in their weeping, because it is you, Lord, not some human being, flesh and blood, but you, Lord, who made them, who remake and console them. And where was I when I was seeking you? You were before me, but I had departed even from myself and could not find myself: how much less you!

5.3CSEL 33:90–91

Proloquor in conspectu dei mei annum illum undetricensimum aetatis meae. iam uenerat Carthaginem quidam manichaeorum episcopus, Faustus nomine, magnus laqueus diaboli, et multi inplicabantur in eo per inlecebram suauiloquentiae. quam ego iam tametsi laudabam, discernebam tamen a ueritate rerum, quarum discernendarum auidus eram, nec quali uasculo sermonis, sed quid mihi scientiae comedendum adponeret nominatus apud eos ille Faustus intuebar. fama enim de illo praelocuta mihi erat, quod esset honestarum omnium doctrinarum peritissimus et adprime disciplinis liberalibus eruditus. et quoniam multa philosophorum legeram memoriaeque mandata retinebam, ex eis quaedam conparabam illis manichaeorum longis fabulis, et mihi probabiliora ista uidebantur, quae dixerunt illi, qui tantum potuerunt ualere, ut possent aestimare saeculum, quamquam eius dominum minime inuenerint. quoniam magnus es, domine, et humilia respicis, excelsa autem a longe agnoscis nec propinquas nisi obtritis corde nec inueniris a superbis, nec si illi curiosa peritia numerent stellas et harenam et dimetiantur sidereas plagas et uestigent uias astrorum.

I will set out in the sight of my God that twenty-ninth year of my age. A certain bishop of the Manichees had already come to Carthage, Faustus by name, a great snare of the devil; and many were entangled in him by the allure of his smooth speech. Although I praised it, I nevertheless distinguished it from the truth of the things I was eager to learn; and I looked not at the dish of speech but at what food of knowledge that Faustus, so renowned among them, set before me to eat. For his reputation had preceded him, that he was most skilled in all honorable learning and especially well educated in the liberal disciplines. And since I had read many works of the philosophers and retained them in memory, I compared some of their teachings with those long fables of the Manichees, and what the philosophers said seemed to me more probable, those who “were able to know so much that they could assess the world,” though they did not find its Lord at all. For you are great, Lord, and you “regard the lowly, but know the lofty from afar”; you draw near only to the broken of heart, and you are not found by the proud, not even if with curious skill they number the stars and the sand, and measure the regions of the sky, and trace the paths of the heavenly bodies.

5.4CSEL 33:91–92

Mente sua enim quaerunt ista et ingenio, quod tu dedisti eis, et multa inuenerunt et praenuntiauerunt ante multos annos, defectus luminarium solis et lunae, quo die, qua hora, quanta ex parte futuri essent, et non eos fefellit numerus. et ita factum est, ut praenuntiauerunt, et scripserunt regulas indagatas et leguntur hodie atque ex eis praenuntiatur, quo anno et quo mense anni et quo die mensis et qua hora diei et quota parte luminis sui defectura sit luna uel sol: et ita fiet, ut praenuntiatur. et mirantur haec homines et stupent qui nesciunt ea, et exultant atque extolluntur qui sciunt, et per inpiam superbiam recedentes et deficientes a lumine tuo tanto ante solis defectum futurum praeuident et in praesentia suum non uident - non enim religiose quaerunt, unde habeant ingenium, quo ista quaerunt — et inuenientes, quia tu fecisti eos, non ipsi se dant tibi, se ut serues quod fecisti, et quales se ipsi fecerant occidunt se tibi et trucidant exaltationes suas sicut uolatilia et curiositates suas sicut pisces maris, quibus perambulant secretas semitas abyssi, et luxurias suas sicut pecora campi, ut tu, deus, ignis edax consumas mortuas curas eorum recreans eos immortaliter.

For they search these things out with their mind and the intelligence you gave them, and they have discovered much, and foretold many years in advance eclipses of the sun and moon, on what day, at what hour, and how great a part would be eclipsed; and their calculation did not deceive them. It happened as they foretold. And they wrote down the rules they had discovered, and these are read today, and from them it is foretold in what year and what month of the year and what day of the month and what hour of the day, and how much of its light, the moon or the sun will be eclipsed; and it will happen as foretold. People who do not know these things marvel and are amazed, and those who know them exult and are lifted up; and, withdrawing through impious pride and falling away from your light, they foresee an eclipse of the sun so long before, and do not see their own in the present. For they do not ask with reverence where the intelligence comes from by which they investigate these things. And finding that you made them, they do not give themselves to you, so that you may preserve what you made; nor do they slay to you what they had made of themselves, and slaughter their high-flying pride like the birds, and their curiosity, by which they walk the hidden paths of the deep, like the fish of the sea, and their self-indulgence like the beasts of the field, so that you, God, a consuming fire, may burn up their dead cares and re-create them immortally.

5.5CSEL 33:92–93

Sed non nouerunt uiam, uerbum tuum, per quod fecisti ea quae numerant et ipsos qui numerant et sensum, quo cernunt quae numerant, et mentem, de qua numerant; et sapientiae tuae non est numerus. ipse autem unigenitus factus est nobis sapientia et iustitia et sanctificatio et numeratus est inter nos et soluit tributum Caesari. non nouerunt hanc uiam, qua descendant ad illum a se et per eum ascendant ad eum. non nouerunt hanc uiam et putant se excelsos esse cum sideribus et lucidos, et ecce ruerunt in terram, et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum. et multa uera de creatura dicunt et ueritatem, creaturae artificem, non pie quaerunt et ideo non inueniunt, aut si inueniunt, cognoscentes deum non sicut deum honorant aut gratias agunt et euanescunt in cogitationibus suis et dicunt se esse sapientes sibi tribuendo quae tua sunt, ac per hoc student peruersissima caecitate etiam tibi tribuere quae sua sunt, mendacia scilicet in te conferentes, qui ueritas es, et inmutantes gloriam incorrupti dei in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis et uolucrum et quadrupedum et serpentium, et conuertunt ueritatem tuam in mendacium et colunt et seruiunt creaturae potius quam creatori.

But they did not know the way, your Word, through whom you made the things they number, and the very people who number, and the sense by which they perceive what they number, and the mind from which they number; and “of your wisdom there is no number.” But the Only-begotten himself “became for us wisdom and righteousness and sanctification,” and was numbered among us, and paid tribute to Caesar. They did not know this way, by which to come down from themselves to him and through him to go up to him. They did not know this way, and they think themselves lofty with the stars and shining; and see, they have fallen to the earth, “and their foolish heart was darkened.” They say many true things about the creation, and they do not seek with reverence the Truth, the maker of creation, and so they do not find him; or if they find him, “knowing God, they do not honor him as God or give thanks, but become vain in their thoughts, and say that they are wise,” attributing to themselves what is yours; and by this, with most perverse blindness, they strive also to attribute to you what is theirs, namely, bringing lies against you, who are the Truth, and “changing the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed beasts and serpents,” and they “change your truth into a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the creator.”

5.6CSEL 33:93

Multa tamen ab eis ex ipsa creatura uera dicta retinebam, et occurrebat mihi ratio per numeros et ordinem temporum et uisibiles attestationes siderum et conferebam cum dictis Manichaei, quae de his rebus multa scripsit copiosissime delirans, et non mihi occurrebat ratio nec solistitiorum et aequinoctiorum nec defectuum luminarium nec quidquid tale in libris saecularis sapientiae didiceram. ibi autem credere iubebar, et ad illas rationes numeris et oculis meis exploratas non occurrebat et longe diuersum erat.

Still, I retained many true things said by them about the creation itself, and their account made sense to me through calculations, the order of the seasons, and the visible evidence of the stars; and I compared it with the sayings of Mani, who wrote a great deal on these subjects, raving most copiously; and I found in him no account of the solstices and equinoxes, nor of eclipses, nor of anything of the kind I had learned in the books of worldly wisdom. There I was ordered to believe, and it did not agree with those accounts verified by calculation and by my own eyes, but was far different.

5.7CSEL 33:93–94

Numquid, domine deus ueritatis, quisquis nouit ista, iam placet tibi? infelix enim homo, qui scit illa omnia, te autem nescit; beatus autem, qui te scit, etiamsi illa nesciat. qui uero et te et illa nouit, non propter illa beatior, sed propter te solum beatus est, si cognoscens te sicut te glorificet et gratias agat et non euanescat in cogitationibus suis. sicut enim melior, qui nouit possidere arborem et de usu eius tibi gratias agit, quamuis nesciat uel quot cubitis alta sit uel quanta latitudine diffusa, quam ille, qui eam metitur et omnes ramos eius numerat et neque possidet eam neque creatorem eius nouit aut diligit, sic fidelis homo, cuius totus mundus diuitiarum est et quasi nihil habens omnia possidet inhaerendo tibi, cui seruiunt omnia, quamuis nec saltem septentrionum gyros nouerit, dubitare stultum est, quin utique melior sit quam mensor caeli et numerator siderum et pensor elementorum et neglegens tui, qui omnia in mensura et numero et pondere disposuisti.

Does anyone who knows these things, Lord God of truth, please you for that reason? For unhappy is the one who knows all those things but does not know you; and happy is the one who knows you, even if he does not know them. And one who knows both you and them is not happier because of them, but is happy because of you alone, if, knowing you, he glorifies you as you are and gives thanks and does not become vain in his thoughts. For just as one who knows how to possess a tree and gives you thanks for its use, though he does not know how many cubits high it is or how wide it spreads, is better than one who measures it and counts all its branches but neither possesses it nor knows or loves its creator; so it is foolish to doubt that the faithful man, “to whom the whole world of riches belongs,” and who, “as having nothing, possesses all things” by clinging to you, whom all things serve, even if he does not know the circuits of the Great Bear, is certainly better than one who measures the sky and numbers the stars and weighs the elements and neglects you, who have “ordered all things in measure and number and weight.”

5.8CSEL 33:94–95

Sed tamen quis quaerebat manichaeum nescio quem etiam ista scribere, sine quorum peritia pietas disci poterat? dixisti enim homini: ecce pietas est sapientia. quam ille ignorare posset, etiamsi ista perfecte nosset: ista uero quia non nouerat, impudentissime audens docere, prorsus illam nosse non posset. uanitas est enim mundana ista etiam nota profiteri, pietas autem tibi confiteri. unde ille deuius ad hoc ista multum locutus est, ut conuictus ab eis, qui ista uere didicissent, quis esset eius sensus in ceteris, quae abditiora sunt, manifeste cognosceretur. non enim parui se aestimari noluit, sed spiritum sanctum, consolatorem et ditatorem fidelium tuorum, auctoritate plenaria personaliter in se esse persuadere conatus est. itaque cum de caelo ac stellis et de solis ac lunae motibus falsa dixisse comprehenderetur, quamuis ad doctrinam religionis ista non pertineant, tamen ausus eius sacrilegos fuisse satis emineret, cum ea non solum ignorata, sed etiam falsa tam uesana superbiae uanitate diceret, ut ea tamquam diuinae personae tribuere sibi niteretur.

But who asked some Manichee or other to write about these things too, without skill in which piety could be learned? For you said to man, “See, piety is wisdom.” He could have been ignorant of this even if he had known those things perfectly; but since he did not know those things and yet most shamelessly dared to teach them, he could not possibly know piety. For it is vanity to make a profession of these worldly things even when one knows them, but piety to confess to you. So this deviant spoke a great deal about these things, with the result that, when he was refuted by those who had truly learned them, it became obvious what his understanding was in other matters that are more hidden. For he did not want to be thought little of, but tried to persuade people that the Holy Spirit, the Comforter and enricher of your faithful, was personally in him with full authority. So when he was caught saying false things about the sky and the stars and the motions of the sun and moon, although these things do not belong to the teaching of religion, it was plain enough that his presumption was sacrilegious, since he stated things that were not only unknown to him but also false, with such mad vanity of pride that he tried to attribute them to himself as to a divine person.

5.9CSEL 33:95–96

Cum enim audio christianum aliquem fratrem illum aut illum ista nescientem et aliud pro alio sentientem, patienter intueor opinantem hominem nec illi obesse uideo, cum de te, domine creator omnium, non credat indigna, si forte situs et habitus creaturae corporalis ignoret. obest autem, si hoc ad ipsam doctrinae pietatis formam pertinere arbitretur et pertinacius affirmare audeat quod ignorat. sed etiam talis infirmitas in fidei cunabulis a caritate matre sustinetur, donec assurgat nouus homo in uirum perfectum et circumferri non possit omni uento doctrinae. in illo autem, qui doctor, qui auctor, qui dux et princeps eorum, quibus illa suaderet, ita fieri ausus est, ut qui eum sequerentur non quemlibet hominem, sed spiritum tuum sanctum se sequi arbitrarentur, quis tantam dementiam, sicubi falsa dixisse conuinceretur, non detestandam longeque abiciendam esse iudicaret? sed tamen nondum liquido conpereram, utrum etiam secundum eius uerba uicissitudines longiorum et breuiorum dierum atque noctium et ipsius noctis et diei et deliquia luminum et si quid eius modi in aliis libris legeram, posset exponi, ut, si forte posset, incertum mihi fieret, utrum ita se res haberet an ita, sed ad fidem meam illius auctoritatem propter creditam sanctitatem praeponerem.

For when I hear some Christian brother or other who does not know these things and thinks one thing is another, I look patiently on the man holding his opinion; and I do not see that it harms him, provided he does not believe things unworthy of you, Lord, creator of all, even if he happens not to know the position and state of bodily creation. It does harm him, however, if he thinks this belongs to the very form of the doctrine of piety and dares to affirm stubbornly what he does not know. But even such weakness in the cradle of faith is borne by mother Charity, until the new man grows up “to a perfect man” and cannot “be carried about by every wind of doctrine.” But in the case of one who dared to make himself a teacher, an authority, a guide and leader of those he persuaded of these things, so that those who followed him thought they were following not just any man but your Holy Spirit, who would not judge that such madness, wherever he was shown to have said false things, should be detested and cast far away? But I had not yet clearly established whether the alternations of longer and shorter days and nights, and of night and day itself, and the eclipses of the lights, and whatever else of this kind I had read in other books, could also be explained according to his words; so that, if perhaps they could, it would become uncertain to me whether things were this way or that, but I would set his authority before my belief because of his reputed holiness.

5.10CSEL 33:96–97

Et per annos ferme ipsos nouem, quibus eos animo uagabundus audiui, nimis extento desiderio uenturum expectabam istum Faustum. ceteri enim eorum, in quos forte incurrissem, qui talium rerum quaestionibus a me obiectis deficiebant, illum mihi promittebant, cuius aduentu conlatoque conloquio facillime mihi haec et si qua forte maiora quaererem enodatissime expedirentur. ergo ubi uenit, expertus sum hominem gratum et iucundum uerbis et ea ipsa, quae illi solent dicere, multo suauius garrientem. sed quid ad meam sitim pretiosorum poculorum decentissimus ministrator? iam rebus talibus satiatae erant aures meae, nec ideo mihi meliora uidebantur, quia melius dicebantur, nec ideo uera, quia diserta, nec ideo sapiens anima, quia uultus congruus et decorum eloquium. illi autem, qui eum mihi promittebant, non boni rerum existimatores erant, et ideo illis uidebatur prudens et sapiens, quia delectabat eos loquens. sensi autem aliud genus hominum etiam ueritatem habere suspectam et ei nolle adquiescere, si comto atque uberi sermone promeretur. me autem iam docueras, deus meus, miris et occultis modis, et propterea credo, quod tu me docueris, quoniam uerum est nec quisquam praeter te alius doctor est ueri, ubicumque et undecumque claruerit. iam ergo abs te didiceram nec eo debere uideri aliquid uerum dici, quia eloquenter dicitur, nec eo falsum, quia inconposite sonant signa labiorum; rursus nec ideo uerum, quia inpolite enuntiatur, nec ideo falsum, quia splendidus sermo est, sed perinde esse sapientiam et stultitiam, sicut sunt cibi utiles et inutiles, uerbis autem ornatis et inornatis sicut uasis urbanis et rusticanis utrosque cibos posse ministrari.

And for almost those nine years during which, with a wandering mind, I was their hearer, I awaited the coming of this Faustus with a desire strained to excess. For the others of them whom I happened to meet, who failed to answer the questions I raised about such matters, kept promising me him, at whose coming, once we had conferred, these questions, and any greater ones I might ask, would be explained most easily and clearly. So when he came, I found him a pleasant man, agreeable in speech, and chattering the very things they usually say, but much more sweetly. But what use to my thirst was the most elegant server of precious cups? My ears were already sated with such things; nor did they seem better to me because they were better said, nor true because eloquent, nor was the soul wise because the face was fitting and the speech graceful. Those who had promised him to me were not good judges of things, and so he seemed prudent and wise to them because his speaking delighted them. I have also known another kind of people who hold even truth suspect and refuse to accept it if it is offered in polished and rich language. But you, my God, had already taught me in wonderful and hidden ways; and I believe that it was you who taught me, because it is true, and there is no other teacher of truth but you, wherever and from wherever it shines forth. So I had already learned from you that nothing ought to seem true because it is said eloquently, nor false because the signs from the lips sound clumsy; nor, again, true because it is stated unpolished, nor false because the speech is splendid; but that wisdom and folly are like wholesome and unwholesome food, and that both kinds of food can be served in ornate and plain words, as in elegant and rustic dishes.

5.11CSEL 33:97–98

Igitur auiditas mea, qua illum tanto tempore expectaueram hominem, delectabatur quidem motu affectuque disputantis et uerbis congruentibus atque ad uestiendas sententias facile occurrentibus. delectabar autem et cum multis uel etiam prae multis laudabam ac ferebam; sed moleste habebam, quod in coetu audientium non sinerer ingerere illi et partiri cum eo curas quaestionum mearum conferendo familiariter et accipiendo ac reddendo sermonem. quod ubi potui et aures eius cum familiaribus meis eoque tempore occupare coepi, quo non dedeceret alternis disserere, et protuli quaedam, quae me monebant, expertus sum prius hominem expertem liberalium disciplinarum nisi grammaticae atque eius ipsius usitato modo. et quia legerat aliquas Tullianas orationes et paucissimos Senecae libros et nonnulla poetarum et suae sectae si qua uolumina latine atque conposite conscripta erant, et quia aderat cotidiana sermocinandi exercitatio, inde suppetebat eloquium, quod fiebat acceptius magisque seductorium moderamine ingenii et quodam lepore naturali. itane est, ut recolo, domine deus meus, arbiter conscientiae meae? coram te cor meum et recordatio mea, qui mecum tunc agebas abdito secreto prouidentiae tuae et inhonestos errores meos iam conuertebas ante faciem meam, ut uiderem et odissem.

So my eagerness, with which I had awaited that man for so long, was indeed delighted by his lively manner and feeling in debate and by his apt words, which came readily to clothe his thoughts. I was delighted, and with many, or even more than many, I praised and extolled him. But it annoyed me that in the gathering of his hearers I was not allowed to put my questions to him and share the concerns that troubled me by conferring with him informally, giving and receiving arguments. When I was able to do this, and with my friends began to engage his attention at a time when it was not unfitting to discuss in turn, and I brought forward some things that were troubling me, I found first that he was a man without knowledge of the liberal disciplines except grammar, and that only in the ordinary way. And because he had read some of Cicero's speeches and a very few books of Seneca, and some of the poets, and such volumes of his own sect as were written in Latin and in good style, and because he had daily practice in speaking, he had a ready eloquence, which became more acceptable and more seductive through the control of his intelligence and a certain natural charm. Is it so, as I recall it, Lord my God, judge of my conscience? My heart and my memory are before you, who were then dealing with me in the hidden secret of your providence, and were already turning my shameful errors before my face, so that I might see them and hate them.

5.12CSEL 33:98–99

Nam posteaquam ille mihi inperitus earum artium, quibus eum excellere putaueram, satis apparuit, desperare coepi posse mihi eum illa, quae me mouebant, aperire atque dissoluere; quorum quidem ignarus posset ueritatem tenere pietatis, sed si manichaeus non esset. libri quippe eorum pleni sunt longissimis fabulis de caelo et de sideribus et sole et luna: quae mihi eum, quod utique cupiebam, conlatis numerorum rationibus, quas alibi ego legeram, utrum potius ita essent, ut Manichaei libris continebatur, an certe uel par etiam inde ratio redderetur, subtiliter explicare posse iam non arbitrabar. quae tamen ubi consideranda et discutienda protuli, modeste sane ille nec ausus est subire ipsam sarcinam. nouerat enim se ista non nosse nec eum puduit confiteri. non erat de talibus, quales multos loquaces passus eram, conantes ea me docere et dicentes nihil. iste uero cor habebat, etsi non rectum ad te, nec tamen nimis incautum ad se ipsum. non usquequaque inperitus erat inperitiae suae et noluit se temere disputando in ea coartari, unde nec exitus ei ullus nec facilis esset reditus: etiam hinc mihi amplius placuit. pulchrior est enim temperantia confitentis animi quam illa, quae nosse cupiebam. et eum in omnibus difficilioribus et subtilioribus quaestionibus talem inueniebam.

For after it had become quite clear to me that he was unskilled in those arts in which I had thought he excelled, I began to despair of his being able to open up and resolve the things that troubled me; one could indeed be ignorant of them and still hold the truth of piety, but only if one were not a Manichee. For their books are full of very long fables about the sky and the stars and the sun and moon; and I no longer thought he could explain to me with precision what I especially wanted, namely, by comparing the calculations I had read elsewhere, whether things were rather as they were contained in Mani's books, or at least whether an equally good account could be given from them. But when I brought these matters forward to be considered and discussed, he very modestly did not dare to take up the burden. For he knew that he did not know these things and was not ashamed to confess it. He was not one of those many talkers I had endured, who tried to teach me these things and said nothing. This man had a heart, if not right toward you, at least not too incautious toward himself. He was not altogether ignorant of his own ignorance, and he did not want to be trapped by rash argument in a position from which there would be no way out and no easy return. For this too he pleased me more. For the moderation of a mind that confesses is more beautiful than the things I wanted to know. And I found him like this in all the more difficult and subtle questions.

5.13CSEL 33:99–100

Refracto itaque studio, quod intenderam in Manichaei litteras, magisque desperans de ceteris eorum doctoribus, quando in multis, quae me monebant, ita ille nominatus apparuit, coepi cum eo pro studio illius agere uitam, quo ipse flagrabat in eas litteras, quas tunc iam rhetor Karthaginis adulescentes docebam, et legere cum eo siue quae ille audita desideraret siue quae ipse tali ingenio apta existimarem. ceterum conatus omnis meus, qui proficere in illa secta statueram, illo homine cognito prorsus intercidit, non ut ab eis omnino separarer, sed quasi melius quicquam non inueniens eo, quo iam quoquo modo inrueram, contentus interim esse decreueram, nisi aliquid forte, quod magis eligendum esset, eluceret. ita ille Faustus, qui multis laqueus mortis extitit, meum quo captus eram relaxare iam coeperat nec nolens nec sciens. manus enim tuae, deus meus, in abdito prouidentiae tuae non deserebant animam meam, et sanguine cordis matris meae per lacrimas eius diebus et noctibus pro me sacrificabatur tibi, et egisti mecum miris modis. tu illud egisti, deus meus. nam a domino gressus hominis diriguntur, et uiam eius uolet. aut quae procuratio salutis praeter manum tuam reficientem quae fecisti?

So when the zeal I had directed toward Mani's writings was broken, and I despaired still more of their other teachers, since in many of the questions that troubled me the famous man had shown himself to be as I have said, I began to spend time with him for the sake of his own zeal, with which he burned for the literature I was then teaching young men as rhetorician of Carthage, and to read with him either what he wanted to hear or what I thought suited to such a mind. But all my effort to advance in that sect, which I had resolved on, collapsed completely once I came to know that man; not that I separated from them altogether, but as if I could find nothing better, I had decided to be content for the time being with what I had somehow rushed into, unless by chance something more worth choosing should shine forth. So that Faustus, who was a snare of death to many, had already begun, without willing or knowing it, to loosen the snare in which I was caught. For your hands, my God, in the hidden depth of your providence, did not abandon my soul; and from the blood of my mother's heart, through her tears day and night, a sacrifice was offered to you for me; and you dealt with me in wonderful ways. You did it, my God. For “by the Lord a man's steps are directed, and he will choose his way.” Or what provision for salvation is there but your hand, remaking what it made?

5.14CSEL 33:100–101

Egisti ergo mecum, ut mihi persuaderetur Romam pergere et potius ibi docere quod docebam Carthagini. et hoc unde mihi persuasum est, non praeteribo confiteri tibi, quoniam et in his altissimi tui recessus et praesentissima in nos misericordia tua cogitanda et praedicanda est. non ideo Romam pergere uolui, quod maiores quaestus maiorque mihi dignitas ab amicis, qui hoc suadebant, promittebatur — quamquam et ista ducebant animum tunc meum — sed illa erat causa maxima et paene sola, quod audiebam quietius ibi studere adulescentes et ordinatiore disciplinae cohercitione sedari, ne in eius scholam, quo magistro non utuntur, passim et proterue inruant, nec eos admitti omnino, nisi ille permiserit. contra apud Carthaginem foeda est et intemperans licentia scholasticorum: inrumpunt inpudenter et prope furiosa fronte perturbant ordinem, quem quisque discipulis ad proficiendum instituerit. multa iniuriosa faciunt mira hebetudine et punienda legibus, nisi consuetudo patrona sit, hoc miseriores eos ostendens, quo iam quasi liceat faciunt, quod per tuam aeternam legem numquam licebit, et inpune se facere arbitrantur, cum ipsa faciendi caecitate puniantur et inconparabiliter patiantur peiora, quam faciunt. ergo quos mores cum studerem meos esse nolui, eos cum docerem cogebar perpeti alienos, et ideo placebat ire, ubi talia non fieri omnes qui nouerant indicabant. uerum autem tu, spes mea et portio mea in terra uiuentium, ad mutandum terrarum locum pro salute animae meae et Carthagini stimulos, quibus inde auellerer, admonebas et Romae inlecebras, quibus adtraherer, proponebas mihi per homines, qui diligunt uitam mortuam, hinc insana facientes, inde uana pollicentes, et ad corrigendos gressus meos utebaris occulte et illorum et mea peruersitate. nam et qui perturbabant otium meum, foeda rabie caeci erant, et qui inuitabant ad aliud, terram sapiebant, ego autem, qui detestabar hic ueram miseriam, illic falsam felicitatem appetebam.

So you dealt with me so that I was persuaded to go to Rome and to teach there, rather than at Carthage, what I was teaching. And how I was persuaded of this I will not pass over confessing to you, because in these things too your deepest counsels and your mercy, most present to us, are to be pondered and proclaimed. I did not want to go to Rome because greater earnings and greater standing were promised me by the friends who urged it, although these things too drew my mind at that time; but the greatest and almost the only reason was that I heard that young men studied more quietly there and were kept in check by a more orderly discipline, so that they did not rush wantonly and at random into the school of a teacher who was not their own, and were not admitted at all unless he permitted it. At Carthage, on the other hand, the license of students is foul and unrestrained: they burst in shamelessly and, with an almost frenzied look, disrupt the order that each teacher has set up for the progress of his pupils. They do many outrageous things with amazing stupidity, things that would be punishable by law if custom were not their patron; and this shows them to be all the more wretched, since they do as if it were permitted what will never be permitted by your eternal law, and they think they do it with impunity, when they are punished by the very blindness of doing it and suffer incomparably worse things than they do. So the manners I refused to make my own when I was a student I was forced to endure in others when I was a teacher; and so I was pleased to go where all who knew said such things did not happen. But it was you, “my hope and my portion in the land of the living,” who, to make me change my country for the salvation of my soul, applied goads at Carthage to pull me away, and set before me allurements at Rome to draw me there, through people who love a dead life, doing mad things here and promising vain things there; and to correct my steps you secretly used both their perversity and mine. For those who disturbed my peace were blind with a foul frenzy, and those who invited me elsewhere savored of the earth; while I, who detested real misery here, was seeking a false happiness there.

5.15CSEL 33:101–102

Sed quare hinc abirem et illuc irem, tu sciebas, deus, nec indicabas mihi nec matri, quae me profectum atrociter planxit et usque ad mare secuta est. sed fefelli eam uiolenter me tenentem, ut aut reuocaret aut mecum pergeret, et finxi me amicum nolle deserere, donec uento facto nauigaret. et mentitus sum matri, et illi matri, et euasi: quia et hoc tu dimisisti mihi misericorditer seruans me ab aquis maris plenum exsecrandis sordibus usque ad aquam gratiae tuae, qua me abluto siccarentur flumina maternorum oculorum, quibus pro me cotidie tibi rigabat terram sub uultu suo. et tamen recusanti sine me redire uix persuasi, ut in loco, qui proximus nostrae naui erat, memoria beati Cypriani, maneret ea nocte. sed ea nocte clanculo ego profectus sum, illa autem non mansit orando et flendo. et quid a te petebat, deus meus, tantis lacrimis, nisi ut nauigare me non sineres? sed alte consulens et exaudiens cardinem desiderii eius non curasti quod tunc petebat, ut me faceres quod semper petebat. flauit uentus et impleuit uela nostra et litus subtraxit aspectibus nostris, in quo mane illa insaniebat dolore et querellis et gemitu implebat aures tuas contemnentis ista, cum et me cupiditatibus raperes ad finiendas ipsas cupiditates et illius carnale desiderium iusto dolorum flagello uapularet. amabat enim secum praesentiam meam more matrum, sed multis multo amplius, et nesciebat, quid tu illi gaudiorum facturus esses de absentia mea. nesciebat, ideo flebat et eiulabat atque illis cruciatibus arguebatur in ea reliquiarium Euae, cum gemitu quaerens quod cum gemitu pepererat. et tamen post accusationem fallaciarum et crudelitatis meae conuersa rursum ad deprecandum te pro me abiit ad solita, et ego Romam.

But why I was leaving here and going there, you knew, God, and you did not tell me or my mother, who grieved terribly at my departure and followed me as far as the sea. But I deceived her as she clung to me with all her strength, to call me back or to go with me; and I pretended that I did not want to leave a friend until the wind rose and he could sail. And I lied to my mother, and such a mother, and I got away. For this too you mercifully forgave me, preserving me, full of accursed filth, from the waters of the sea until the water of your grace, by which I would be washed and the rivers of my mother's eyes would be dried, with which she daily watered the ground beneath her face for me before you. Yet when she refused to go back without me, I barely persuaded her to stay that night in a place close to our ship, a memorial chapel of blessed Cyprian. But that night I secretly set out, and she did not; she stayed praying and weeping. And what did she ask of you, my God, with so many tears, but that you would not let me sail? But you, taking deep counsel and hearing the hinge of her desire, did not grant what she then asked, so that you might make me what she always asked. The wind blew and filled our sails and took the shore from our sight; and on that shore in the morning she was frantic with grief, and filled your ears with complaints and groans, which you disregarded, while you were snatching me away by my desires to put an end to those very desires, and her carnal longing was beaten with the just scourge of sorrow. For she loved to have me with her, as mothers do, but much more than many; and she did not know what joys you were going to make for her out of my absence. She did not know, and so she wept and wailed, and by those torments the remnant of Eve in her was shown, seeking with groaning what she had brought forth with groaning. And yet, after accusing me of deceit and cruelty, she turned again to praying to you for me, and went back to her usual life, and I went to Rome.

5.16CSEL 33:102–104

Et ecce excipior ibi flagello aegritudinis corporalis et ibam iam ad inferos portans omnia mala, quae conmiseram et in te et in me et in alios, multa et grauia super originalis peccati uinculum, quo omnes in Adam morimur. non enim quicquam eorum mihi donaueras in Christo nec soluerat ille in cruce sua inimicitias, quas tecum contraxeram peccatis meis. quomodo enim eas solueret in cruce phantasmatis, quod de illo credideram? quam ergo falsa mihi uidebatur mors carnis eius, tam uera erat animae meae, et quam uera erat mors carnis eius, tam falsa uita animae meae, quae id non credebat. et ingrauescentibus febribus iam ibam et peribam. quo enim irem, si hinc tunc abirem, nisi in ignem atque tormenta digna factis meis in ueritate ordinis tui? et hoc illa nesciebat et tamen pro me orabat absens. tu autem ubique praesens ubi erat exaudiebas eam et ubi eram miserabaris mei, ut recuperarem salutem corporis adhuc insanus corde sacrilego. neque enim desiderabam in illo tanto periculo baptismum tuum et melior eram puer, quo illum de materna pietate flagitaui, sicut iam recordatus atque confessus sum. sed in dedecus meum creueram et consilia medicinae tuae demens irridebam, qui non me siuisti talem bis mori. quo uulnere si feriretur cor matris, numquam sanaretur. non enim satis eloquor, quid erga me habebat animi et quanto maiore sollicitudine me parturiebat spiritu, quam carne pepererat.

And see, there I was received with the scourge of bodily sickness, and I was already going to the underworld, carrying all the evils I had committed against you and myself and others, many and grievous, besides the bond of original sin by which “we all die in Adam.” For you had not yet forgiven me any of them in Christ, nor had he by his cross dissolved the enmities I had contracted with you by my sins. For how could he dissolve them on the cross of a phantasm, which is what I had believed about him? So the more false the death of his flesh seemed to me, the more real was the death of my soul; and the more real the death of his flesh was, the more false was the life of my soul, which did not believe it. And as the fever grew worse, I was already going and perishing. For where would I have gone, if I had departed from here then, but into the fire and the torments my deeds deserved in the truth of your order? And she did not know this, and yet she prayed for me in her absence. But you, present everywhere, heard her where she was, and where I was you had mercy on me, so that I recovered the health of my body, though still sick in my sacrilegious heart. For in that great danger I did not desire your baptism; and I was better as a boy, when I begged for it from my mother's devotion, as I have already recalled and confessed. But I had grown up to my own disgrace, and in my madness I laughed at the counsels of your medicine, you who did not allow me, being such, to die twice. If my mother's heart had been struck by that wound, it would never have healed. For I cannot say enough what feeling she had for me, and with how much greater anxiety she was in labor with me in the spirit than she had borne me in the flesh.

5.17CSEL 33:104–105

Non itaque uideo, quomodo sanaretur, si mea talis illa mors transuerberasset uiscera dilectionis eius. et ubi essent tantae preces, tam crebrae sine intermissione? nusquam nisi ad te. an uero tu, deus misericordiarum, sperneres cor contritum et humiliatum uiduae castae ac sobriae, frequentantis elemosynas, obsequentis atque seruientis sanctis tuis, nullum diem praetermittentis oblationem ad altare tuum, bis die, mane et uespere, ad ecclesiam tuam sine ulla intermissione uenientis, non ad uanas fabulas et aniles loquacitates, sed ut te audiret in tuis sermonibus et tu illam in suis orationibus? huiusne tu lacrimas, quibus non a te aurum et argentum petebat nec aliquod nutabile aut uolubile bonum, sed salutem animae filii sui, tu, cuius munere talis erat, contemneres et repelleres ab auxilio tuo? nequaquam, domine, inmo uero aderas et exaudiebas et faciebas ordine, quo praedestinaueras esse faciendum. absit, ut tu falleres eam in illis uisionibus et responsionibus tuis, quae iam conmemoraui et quae non conmemoraui, quae illa fideli pectore tenebat et semper orans tamquam chirografa tua ingerebat tibi. dignaris enim, quoniam in saeculum misericordia tua, eis quibus omnia debita dimittis, etiam promissionibus debitor fieri.

So I do not see how she would have been healed if such a death of mine had pierced the heart of her love. And where would so many prayers have been, so frequent and without ceasing? Nowhere but with you. Or would you, God of mercies, despise the “contrite and humbled heart” of a chaste and sober widow, frequent in almsgiving, attentive and serving to your saints, letting no day pass without an offering at your altar, coming to your church twice a day, morning and evening, without fail, not for empty tales and old women's chatter, but so that she might hear you in your words and you might hear her in her prayers? Would you, by whose gift she was such, despise and reject from your help the tears of such a woman, by which she asked of you not gold or silver or any fleeting or changeable good, but the salvation of her son's soul? By no means, Lord; rather you were present and heard her, and you acted in the order in which you had predestined it to be done. Far be it that you should deceive her in those visions and answers of yours, those I have mentioned and those I have not, which she held in her faithful heart and, always praying, pressed upon you like your own signed promissory notes. For you deign, because “your mercy is forever,” to become a debtor by your promises to those whose debts you forgive entirely.

5.18CSEL 33:105–106

Recreasti ergo me ab illa aegritudine et saluum fecisti filium ancillae tuae tunc interim corpore, ut esset cui salutem meliorem atque certiorem dares. et iungebar etiam tunc Romae falsis illis atque fallentibus sanctis: non enim tantum auditoribus eorum, quorum e numero erat etiam is, in cuius domo aegrotaueram et conualueram, sed eis etiam, quos electos uocant. adhuc enim mihi uidebatur non esse nos, qui peccamus, sed nescio quam aliam in nobis peccare naturam et delectabat superbiam meam extra culpam esse et, cum aliquid mali fecissem, non confiteri me fecisse, ut sanares animam meam, quoniam peccabat tibi, sed excusare me amabam et accusare nescio quid aliud, quod mecum esset et ego non essem. uerum autem totum ego eram et aduersus me inpietas mea me diuiserat, et id erat peccatum insanabilius, quo me peccatorem non esse arbitrabar, et execrabilis iniquitas, te, deus omnipotens, te in me ad perniciem meam, quam me a te ad salutem malle superari. nondum ergo posueras custodiam ori meo et ostium continentiae circum labia mea, ut non declinaret cor meum in uerba mala ad excusandas excusationes in peccatis cum hominibus operantibus iniquitatem, et ideo adhuc conbinabam cum electis eorum, sed tamen desperans in ea falsa doctrina me posse proficere, eaque ipsa, quibus, si nil melius reperirem, contentus esse decreueram, iam remissius neglegentiusque retinebam.

So you restored me from that sickness and saved “the son of your handmaid,” for the time being in body, so that there might be someone to whom you could give a better and more certain salvation. And even then at Rome I associated with those false and deceiving “saints”: not only with their hearers, among whom was the man in whose house I had fallen ill and recovered, but also with those they call the elect. For it still seemed to me that it is not we who sin, but some other nature in us that sins; and it pleased my pride to be free of blame, and when I had done something evil, not to confess that I had done it, so that you might “heal my soul, because it had sinned against you,” but I loved to excuse myself and accuse some other thing that was with me and was not I. But in truth it was all I, and my impiety had divided me against myself; and that sin was the more incurable because I did not think myself a sinner; and it was an execrable iniquity that I preferred you, almighty God, to be overcome in me to my destruction, rather than myself to be overcome by you to my salvation. So you had not yet “set a guard on my mouth and a door of restraint about my lips, that my heart might not turn aside to evil words, to make excuses in sins with men who work iniquity”; and so I still associated with their elect, though I despaired of being able to make progress in that false doctrine; and even the things with which I had decided to be content if I found nothing better, I now held more loosely and carelessly.

5.19CSEL 33:106–107

Etenim suborta est etiam mihi cogitatio, prudentiores illos ceteris fuisse philosophos, quos Academicos appellant, quod de omnibus dubitandum esse censuerant nec aliquid ueri ab homine conprehendi posse decreuerant. ita enim et mihi liquido sensisse uidebantur, ut uulgo habentur, etiam illorum intentionem nondum intellegenti. nec dissimulaui eundem hospitem meum reprimere a nimia fiducia, quam sensi eum habere de rebus fabulosis, quibus manichaei libri pleni sunt. amicitia tamen eorum familiarius utebar quam ceterorum hominum, qui in illa haeresi non fuissent. nec eam defendebam pristina animositate, sed tamen familiaritas eorum - plures enim eos Roma occultabat — pigrius me faciebat aliud quaerere praesertim desperantem in ecclesia tua, domine caeli et terrae, creator omnium uisibilium et inuisibilium, posse inueniri uerum, unde me illi auerterant, multumque mihi turpe uidebatur credere figuram te habere humanae carnis et membrorum nostrorum liniamentis corporalibus terminari. et quoniam cum de deo meo cogitare uellem, cogitare nisi moles corporum non noueram — neque enim uidebatur mihi esse quicquam, quod tale non esset — ea maxima et prope sola causa erat ineuitabilis erroris mei.

For the thought also arose in me that the philosophers called Academics had been wiser than the rest, because they had held that everything should be doubted and had concluded that nothing true can be grasped by a human being. For so they seemed to me to have plainly thought, as they are commonly taken to have done, since I did not yet understand their intention. Nor did I hesitate to restrain my host from the excessive confidence I perceived he had in the fabulous things of which the Manichaean books are full. Yet I enjoyed their friendship more intimately than that of other people who had not been in that heresy. I no longer defended it with my former zeal; but still my familiarity with them (for Rome concealed many of them) made me slower to look for anything else, especially since I despaired of finding the truth in your church, Lord of heaven and earth, creator of all things visible and invisible, from which they had turned me away. And it seemed to me very shameful to believe that you had the shape of human flesh and were bounded by the bodily outlines of our limbs. And because, when I wanted to think of my God, I did not know how to think of anything but bodily masses (for it did not seem to me that anything existed that was not such), this was the greatest and almost the only cause of my inevitable error.

5.20CSEL 33:107–108

Hinc enim et mali substantiam quandam credebam esse talem et habere suam molem tetram et deformem siue crassam, quam terram dicebant, siue tenuem atque subtilem, sicuti est aeris corpus: quam malignam mentem per illam terram repentem imaginantur. et quia deum bonum nullam malam naturam creasse qualiscumque me pietas credere cogebat, constituebam ex aduerso sibi duas moles, utramque infinitam, sed malam angustius, bonam grandius, et ex hoc initio pestilentioso me cetera sacrilegia sequebantur. cum enim conaretur animus meus recurrere in catholicam fidem, repercutiebatur, quia non erat catholica fides, quam esse arbitrabar. et magis pius mihi uidebar, si te, deus meus, cui confitentur ex me miserationes tuae, uel ex ceteris partibus infinitum crederem, quamuis ex una, qua tibi moles mali opponebatur, cogerer finitum fateri, quam si ex omnibus partibus in corporis humani forma te opinarer finiri. et melius mihi uidebar credere nullum malum te creasse — quod mihi nescienti non solum aliqua substantia sed etiam corporea uidebatur, quia et mentem cogitare non noueram nisi eam subtile corpus esse, quod tamen per loci spatia diffunderetur — quam credere abs te esse qualem putabam naturam mali. ipsum quoque saluatorem nostrum, unigenitum tuum, tamquam de massa lucidissimae molis tuae porrectum ad nostram salutem ita putabam, ut aliud de illo non crederem nisi quod possem uanitate imaginari. talem itaque naturam eius nasci non posse de Maria uirgine arbitrabar, nisi carni concerneretur. concerni autem et non coinquinari non uidebam, quod mihi tale figurabam. metuebam itaque credere incarnatum, ne credere cogerer ex carne inquinatum. nunc spiritales tui blande et amanter ridebunt me, si has confusiones meas legerint; sed tamen talis eram.

For from this I also believed that evil was some such substance and had its own mass, foul and misshapen, either dense, which they called earth, or thin and subtle, like the body of air, which they imagine as a malignant mind creeping through that earth. And because such piety as I had compelled me to believe that the good God had created no evil nature, I set up two masses opposed to each other, both infinite, but the evil one more narrowly, the good one more largely; and from this pestilent beginning the other sacrileges followed. For when my mind tried to run back to the catholic faith, it was driven back, because what I thought was the catholic faith was not the catholic faith. And it seemed to me more pious to believe you, my God, to whom your mercies toward me confess, to be infinite at least on the other sides, though on the one side where the mass of evil was set against you I was forced to admit that you were finite, than to think you bounded on all sides in the form of a human body. And it seemed to me better to believe that you had created no evil (which in my ignorance seemed to me not only some substance but even a bodily one, since I did not know how to think even of the mind except as a subtle body, spread out through the spaces of place) than to believe that the kind of nature of evil I imagined came from you. Our Savior himself too, your only-begotten, I thought of as if extended for our salvation from the mass of your most luminous bulk, so that I believed nothing about him except what I could imagine in my vanity. So I thought that such a nature as his could not be born of the Virgin Mary without being mingled with flesh; and I did not see how it could be mingled and not defiled, picturing it as I did. So I was afraid to believe him incarnate, lest I be forced to believe him defiled by the flesh. Now your spiritual ones will laugh at me gently and lovingly if they read of these confusions of mine; but such I was.

5.21CSEL 33:108–109

Deinde quae illi in scripturis tuis reprehenderant defendi posse non existimabam, sed aliquando sane cupiebam cum aliquo illorum librorum doctissimo conferre singula et experiri, quid inde sentiret. iam enim Elpidii cuiusdam aduersus eosdem manichaeos coram loquentis et disserentis sermones etiam apud Carthaginem monere me coeperant, cum talia de scripturis proferret, quibus resisti non facile posset. et inbecilla mihi responsio uidebatur istorum; quam quidem non facile palam promebant, sed nobis secretius, cum dicerent scripturas noui testamenti falsatas fuisse a nescio quibus, qui Iudaeorum legem inserere Christianae fidei noluerunt, atque ipsi incorrupta exemplaria nulla proferrent. sed me maxime captum et offocatum quodam modo deprimebant corporalia cogitantem moles illae, sub quibus anhelans in auram tuae ueritatis liquidam et simplicem respirare non poteram.

Next, I did not think that what they had criticized in your Scriptures could be defended; yet sometimes I did want to discuss the points one by one with someone very learned in those books and find out what he thought of them. For already at Carthage the speeches of a certain Elpidius, speaking and debating face to face against those same Manichees, had begun to move me, since he brought forward such things from the Scriptures as could not easily be resisted. And their reply seemed weak to me; indeed they did not readily bring it out in public, but only to us in private: they said that the Scriptures of the New Testament had been falsified by some people or other who wanted to insert the Jewish law into the Christian faith; yet they themselves produced no uncorrupted copies. But what most held me captive and, as it were, stifled and weighed me down, as I thought in bodily terms, were those masses, under which I panted and could not breathe the clear and simple air of your truth.

5.22CSEL 33:109

Sedulo ergo agere coeperam, propter quod ueneram, ut docerem Romae artem rhetoricam, et prius domi congregare aliquos, quibus et per quos innotescere coeperam. et ecce cognosco alia Romae fieri, quae non patiebar in Africa. nam re uera illas euersiones a perditis adulescentibus ibi non fieri manifestatum est mihi: "sed subito" inquiunt "ne mercedem magistro reddant, conspirant multi adulescentes et transferunt se ad alium, desertores fidei et quibus prae pecuniae caritate iustitia uilis est." oderat etiam istos cor meum quamuis non perfecto odio. quod enim ab eis passurus eram, magis oderam fortasse quam eo, quod cuilibet inlicita faciebant. certe tamen turpes sunt tales et fornicantur abs te amando uolatica ludibria temporum et lucrum luteum, quod cum adprehenditur manum inquinat, et amplectendo mundum fugientem, contemnendo te manentem et reuocantem et ignoscentem redeunti ad te meretrici humanae animae. et nunc tales odi prauos et distortos, quamuis eos corrigendos diligam, ut pecuniae doctrinam ipsam, quam discunt, praeferant, ei uero te deum ueritatem et ubertatem certi boni et pacem castissimam. sed tunc magis eos pati nolebam malos propter me, quam fieri propter te bonos uolebam.

So I had begun diligently to do what I had come for, to teach the art of rhetoric at Rome, first gathering some students at my house, to whom and through whom I had begun to become known. And see, I learned that other things were done at Rome which I had not had to endure in Africa. For it was made clear to me that those “overturnings” by abandoned youths did not happen there; “but suddenly,” they said, “to avoid paying their teacher his fee, a number of young men conspire and transfer themselves to another, breakers of faith, to whom justice is cheap compared with love of money.” My heart hated these too, though not with a perfect hatred. For perhaps I hated what I was going to suffer from them more than the fact that they did what was unlawful to anyone. Certainly such people are base, and they commit fornication away from you by loving the fleeting mockeries of time and filthy gain, which soils the hand that grasps it, and by embracing a world that flees, while despising you who abide and call back and pardon the harlot human soul when it returns to you. And now I hate such crooked and twisted people, though I love them so that they may be corrected, that they may prefer to money the learning they study, and to that learning you, God, the Truth and abundance of certain good and most chaste peace. But then I was more unwilling to suffer them as bad people for my own sake than willing that they should become good for yours.

5.23CSEL 33:109–111

Itaque posteaquam missum est a Mediolanio Romam ad praefectum urbis, ut illi ciuitati rhetoricae magister prouideretur inpertita etiam euectione publica, ego ipse ambiui per eos ipsos manichaeis uanitatibus ebrios - quibus ut carerem ibam, sed utrique nesciebamus — ut dictione proposita me probatum praefectus tunc Symmachus mitteret. et ueni Mediolanium ad Ambrosium episcopum, in optimis notum orbi terrae, pium cultorem tuum, cuius tunc eloquia strenue ministrabant adipem frumenti tui et laetitiam olei et sobriam uini ebrietatem populo tuo. ad eum autem ducebar abs te, nesciens, ut per eum ad te sciens ducerer. suscepit me paterne ille homo dei et peregrinationem meam satis episcopaliter dilexit. et eum amare coepi primo quidem non tamquam doctorem ueri, quod in ecclesia tua prorsus desperabam, sed tamquam hominem benignum in me. studiose audiebam disputantem in populo, non intentione, qua debui, sed quasi explorans eius facundiam, utrum conueniret famae suae an maior minorue proflueret, quam praedicabatur, et uerbis eius suspendebar intentus, rerum autem incuriosus et contemptor adstabam et delectabar sermonis suauitate, quamquam eruditioris, minus tamen hilarescentis atque mulcentis, quam Fausti erat, quod attinet ad dicendi modum. ceterum rerum ipsarum nulla conparatio: nam ille per manichaeas fallacias aberrabat, ille autem saluberrime docebat salutem. sed longe est a peccatoribus salus, qualis ego tunc aderam. et tamen propinquabam sensim et nesciens.

So when a request came from Milan to the prefect of the city of Rome to provide that city with a teacher of rhetoric, with travel at public expense granted as well, I myself canvassed, through those very people drunk with Manichaean vanities (to be rid of whom I was going, though neither they nor I knew it), that Symmachus, then prefect, should test me by setting a speech and send me. And I came to Milan, to Ambrose the bishop, known throughout the world as among the best, your devout worshiper, whose eloquence at that time was vigorously ministering to your people “the fat of your wheat,” “the gladness of oil,” and the sober intoxication of your wine. To him I was led by you without knowing it, so that through him I might be led to you knowing it. That man of God received me like a father and welcomed my coming as a bishop should. And I began to love him, at first not as a teacher of the truth, which I utterly despaired of finding in your church, but as a man who was kind to me. I listened eagerly when he preached to the people, not with the intention I should have had, but as if testing his eloquence, whether it matched his reputation or flowed more or less fully than was reported; and I hung intently on his words, but stood by uninterested in and scornful of the content; and I delighted in the sweetness of his speech, which was more learned, but less cheerful and soothing, than Faustus's in manner of speaking. But as to the content itself there was no comparison: for the one wandered astray in Manichaean deceptions, while the other taught salvation most soundly. But “salvation is far from sinners,” such as I then was present; and yet I was drawing nearer, gradually and without knowing it.

5.24CSEL 33:111–112

Cum enim non satagerem discere quae dicebat, sed tantum quemadmodum dicebat audire — ea mihi quippe desperanti ad te uiam patere homini inanis cura remanserat — ueniebant in animum meum simul cum uerbis, quae diligebam, res etiam, quas neglegebam. neque enim ea dirimere poteram. et dum cor aperirem ad excipiendum, quam diserte diceret, pariter intrabat et quam uera diceret, gradatim quidem. nam primo etiam ipsa defendi posse mihi iam coeperunt uideri et fidem catholicam, pro qua nihil posse dici aduersus oppugnantes manichaeos putaueram, iam non inpudenter asseri existimabam, maxime audito uno atque altero et saepius aenigmate soluto de scriptis ueteribus, ubi, cum ad litteram acciperem, occidebar. spiritaliter itaque plerisque illorum librorum locis expositis iam reprehendebam desperationem meam illam dumtaxat, qua credideram legem et prophetas detestantibus atque irridentibus resisti omnino non posse. nec tamen iam ideo mihi catholicam uiam tenendam esse sentiebam, quia et ipsa poterat habere doctos adsertores suos, qui copiose et non absurde obiecta refellerent, nec ideo iam damnandum illud, quod tenebam, quia defensionis partes aequabantur. ita enim catholica non mihi uicta uidebatur, ut nondum etiam uictrix appareret.

For while I did not trouble to learn what he said, but only to hear how he said it (for that empty concern was all that remained to me, now that I despaired that a way to you lay open for a human being), the content too, which I disregarded, came into my mind together with the words, which I loved. For I could not separate them. And while I opened my heart to take in how eloquently he spoke, there entered at the same time how truly he spoke, though by degrees. For first these things too began to seem to me defensible, and I began to think that the catholic faith, for which I had supposed nothing could be said against the attacks of the Manichees, could be asserted without shame, especially after I had heard one and another, and often, of the riddles of the Old Testament writings resolved, which had killed me when I took them literally. So when many passages of those books had been expounded spiritually, I began to blame that despair of mine, at least in so far as I had believed that no resistance at all could be made to those who hated and mocked the Law and the Prophets. Yet I did not therefore feel that I must hold to the catholic way, because it too could have its learned defenders who refuted objections fully and not absurdly; nor did I think that what I held must therefore be condemned, because the two sides were equal in their defense. For the catholic faith did not seem to me defeated, yet it did not yet appear victorious.

5.25CSEL 33:112–113

Tunc uero fortiter intendi animum, si quo modo possem certis aliquibus documentis manichaeos conuincere falsitatis. quod si possem spiritalem substantiam cogitare, statim machinamenta illa omnia soluerentur et abicerentur ex animo meo: sed non poteram. uerum tamen de ipso mundi huius corpore omnique natura, quam sensus carnis attingeret, multo probabiliora plerosque sensisse philosophos magis magisque considerans atque comparans iudicabam. itaque Academicorum more, sicut existimantur, dubitans de omnibus atque inter omnia fluctuans manichaeos quidem relinquendos esse decreui, non arbitrans eo ipso tempore dubitationis meae in illa secta mihi permanendum esse, cui iam nonnullos philosophos praeponebam: quibus tamen philosophis, quod sine salutari nomine Christi essent, curationem languoris animae meae conmittere omnino recusabam. statui ergo tamdiu esse catechumenus in catholica ecclesia mihi a parentibus conmendata, donec aliquid certi eluceret, quo cursum dirigerem.

Then I bent my mind vigorously to see whether I could by some certain proofs convict the Manichees of falsehood. If I could have conceived of a spiritual substance, all those contrivances would at once have been dissolved and thrown out of my mind; but I could not. Nevertheless, regarding the very body of this world and all the nature that the sense of the flesh can reach, I judged, as I considered and compared more and more, that many of the philosophers had held views far more probable. So, in the manner of the Academics as they are commonly understood, doubting everything and wavering among all things, I decided that the Manichees at least must be abandoned, not thinking that during that very time of my doubt I should remain in a sect to which I already preferred some philosophers. Yet to those philosophers, because they were without the saving name of Christ, I altogether refused to entrust the healing of my soul's sickness. So I decided to remain a catechumen in the catholic church, commended to me by my parents, until something certain should shine forth by which to direct my course.

Chapter 6

6.1CSEL 33:113–114

Spes mea a iuuentute mea, ubi mihi eras et quo recesseras? an uero non tu feceras me et discreueras me a quadrupedibus et uolatilibus caeli? sapientiorem me feceras, et ambulabam per tenebras et lubricum et quaerebam te foris a me et non inueniebam deum cordis mei; et ueneram in profundum maris et diffidebam et desperabam de inuentione ueri. iam uenerat ad me mater pietate fortis, terra marique me sequens et in periculis omnibus de te secura. nam et per marina discrimina ipsos nautas consolabatur, a quibus rudes abyssi uiatores, cum perturbantur, consolari solent, pollicens eis peruentionem cum salute, quia hoc ei tu per uisum pollicitus eras. et inuenit me periclitantem quidem grauiter desperatione indagandae ueritatis, sed tamen ei cum indicassem non me quidem iam esse manichaeum, sed neque catholicum christianum, non, quasi inopinatum aliquid audierit, exiluit laetitia, cum iam secura fieret ex ea parte miseriae meae, in qua me tamquam mortuum resuscitandum tibi flebat et feretro cogitationis offerebat, ut diceres filio uiduae: iuuenis, tibi dico, surge, et reuiuesceret et inciperet loqui et traderes illum matri suae. nulla ergo turbulenta exultatione trepidauit cor eius, cum audisset ex tanta parte iam factum, quod tibi cotidie plangebat ut fieret, ueritatem me nondum adeptum, sed falsitati iam ereptum: inmo uero quia certa erat, quod restabat te daturum, qui totum promiseras, placidissime et pectore pleno fiduciae respondit mihi credere se in Christo, quod, priusquam de hac uita emigraret, me uisura esset fidelem catholicum. et hoc quidem mihi. tibi autem, fons misericordiarum, preces et lacrimas densiores, ut accelerares adiutorium et inluminares tenebras meas, et studiosius ad ecclesiam currere et in Ambrosi ora suspendi, ad fontem salientis aquae in uitam aeternam. diligebat autem illum uirum sicut angelum dei, quod per illum cognouerat me interim ad illam ancipitem fluctuationem iam esse perductum, per quam transiturum me ab aegritudine ad sanitatem intercurrente artiore periculo quasi per accessionem, quam criticam medici uocant, certa praesumebat.

“My hope from my youth,” where were you to me, and where had you withdrawn? Had you not made me and distinguished me from the four-footed beasts and the birds of the sky? You had made me wiser, and yet I walked through darkness and on slippery ground, and I sought you outside myself and did not find the God of my heart; and I had come into the depth of the sea, and I lost confidence and despaired of finding the truth. My mother had already come to me, strong in her devotion, following me by land and sea and secure in you in all dangers. For even in the perils of the sea she comforted the sailors themselves, by whom inexperienced travelers on the deep are usually comforted when they are alarmed, promising them a safe arrival, because you had promised this to her in a vision. And she found me in grave danger through despair of finding the truth. Yet when I told her that I was no longer a Manichee, though not a catholic Christian either, she did not leap for joy as if she had heard something unexpected, since she had already become secure about that part of my misery in which she wept for me as one dead but to be raised by you, and carried me out on the bier of her thought, so that you might say to the widow's son, “Young man, I say to you, arise,” and he would revive and begin to speak, and you would give him back to his mother. So her heart was not shaken by any turbulent exultation when she heard that so great a part of what she daily wept to you for had already been done: that I had not yet attained the truth, but had already been rescued from falsehood. Rather, because she was certain that you would give what remained, since you had promised the whole, she answered me very calmly and with a heart full of confidence that she believed in Christ that before she departed this life she would see me a faithful catholic. This, indeed, she said to me. But to you, fountain of mercies, she poured out more frequent prayers and tears, that you would hasten your help and lighten my darkness; and she ran more eagerly to church and hung on the lips of Ambrose, on “the fountain of water springing up to eternal life.” She loved that man as an angel of God, because she had learned that it was through him that I had meanwhile been brought to that doubtful wavering, through which she presumed with certainty that I would pass from sickness to health, after an intervening sharper danger, like the paroxysm that physicians call the crisis.

6.2CSEL 33:114–116

Itaque cum ad memorias sanctorum, sicut in Africa solebat, pultes et panem et merum adtulisset atque ab ostiario prohiberetur, ubi hoc episcopum uetuisse cognouit, tam pie atque oboedienter amplexa est, ut ipse mirarer, quam facile accusatrix potius consuetudinis suae quam disceptatrix illius prohibitionis effecta sit. non enim obsidebat spiritum eius uinulentia eamque stimulabat in odium ueri amor uini, sicut plerosque mares et feminas, qui ad canticum sobrietatis sicut ad potionem aquatam madidi nausiant: sed illa cum attulisset canistrum cum sollemnibus epulis praegustandis atque largiendis, plus etiam quam unum pocillum pro suo palato satis sobrio temperatum, unde dignationem sumeret, non ponebat, et si multae essent quae illo modo uidebantur honorandae memoriae defunctorum, idem ipsum unum, quod ubique poneret, circumferebat, quo iam non solum aquatissimo, sed etiam tepidissimo cum suis praesentibus per sorbitiones exiguas partiretur, quia pietatem ibi quaerebat, non uoluptatem. itaque ubi conperit a praeclaro praedicatore atque antistite pietatis praeceptum esse ista non fieri nec ab eis qui sobrie facerent, ne ulla occasio se ingurgitandi daretur ebriosis, et quia illa quasi parentalia superstitioni gentilium essent simillima, abstinuit se libentissime et pro canistro pleno terrenis fructibus plenum purgatioribus uotis pectus ad memorias martyrum afferre didicerat, ut et quod posset daret egentibus et sic communicatio dominici corporis illic celebraretur, cuius passionis imitatione immolati et coronati sunt martyres. sed tamen uidetur mihi, domine deus meus — et ita est in conspectu tuo de hac re cor meum — non facile fortasse de hac amputanda consuetudine matrem meam fuisse cessuram, si ab alio prohiberetur, quem non sicut Ambrosium diligebat. quem propter salutem meam maxime diligebat, eam uero ille propter eius religiosissimam conuersationem, qua in bonis operibus tam feruens spiritu frequentabat ecclesiam, ita ut saepe erumperet, cum me uideret, in eius praedicationem gratulans mihi, quod talem matrem haberem, nesciens, qualem illa filium, qui dubitabam de illis omnibus et inueniri posse uiam uitae minime putabam.

So when she had brought porridge and bread and unmixed wine to the shrines of the saints, as she used to do in Africa, and was stopped by the doorkeeper, as soon as she learned that the bishop had forbidden it, she accepted it so devoutly and obediently that I myself was amazed how readily she became an accuser of her own custom rather than a critic of his prohibition. For no love of wine besieged her spirit and goaded her to hatred of the truth, as it does many men and women who are sickened by a song of sobriety as drunkards are by a watered drink. But when she had brought her basket with the customary food to be tasted first and then shared, she never set out more than one small cup, mixed to suit her very sober palate, from which to take a sip out of respect; and if there were many shrines of the dead to be honored in that way, she carried around the same single cup to set down everywhere, and shared it with those present in tiny sips, by then not only very watery but quite lukewarm, because she sought devotion there, not pleasure. So when she discovered that the famous preacher and master of piety had commanded that these things not be done even by those who did them soberly, so that no occasion for gorging might be given to drunkards, and because these quasi-funeral feasts were very like the superstition of the pagans, she abstained most willingly; and in place of a basket full of the fruits of the earth she had learned to bring to the shrines of the martyrs a heart full of purer prayers, so that she might give what she could to the needy, and so that the communion of the Lord's body might be celebrated there, in imitation of whose passion the martyrs were sacrificed and crowned. Yet it seems to me, Lord my God (and so my heart is on this matter in your sight), that my mother would perhaps not easily have given way on cutting off this custom if it had been forbidden by someone else whom she did not love as she loved Ambrose. She loved him most of all for the sake of my salvation, and he loved her for her most devout way of life, in which, “fervent in spirit” in good works, she frequented the church; so that often, when he saw me, he would break out in her praise, congratulating me on having such a mother, not knowing what kind of son she had in me, who doubted all those things and thought that the way of life could not be found at all.

6.3CSEL 33:116–117

Nec iam ingemescebam orando, ut subuenires mihi, sed ad quaerendum intentus et ad disserendum inquietus erat animus meus ipsumque Ambrosium felicem quendam hominem secundum saeculum opinabar, quem sic tantae potestates honorarent: caelibatus tantum eius mihi laboriosus uidebatur. quid autem ille spei gereret, aduersus ipsius excellentiae temtamenta quid luctaminis haberet quidue solaminis in aduersis, et occultum os eius, quod erat in corde eius, quam sapida gaudia de pane tuo ruminaret, nec conicere noueram nec expertus eram. nec ille sciebat aestus meos nec foueam periculi mei. non enim quaerere ab eo poteram quod uolebam, sicut nolebam, secludentibus me ab eius aure atque ore cateruis negotiosorum hominum, quorum infirmitatibus seruiebat: cum quibus quando non erat, quod perexiguum temporis erat, aut corpus reficiebat necessariis sustentaculis aut lectione animum. sed cum legebat, oculi ducebantur per paginas et cor intellectum rimabatur, uox autem et lingua quiescebant. saepe, cum adessemus — non enim uetabatur quisquam ingredi aut ei uenientem nuntiari mos erat — sic eum legentem uidimus tacite et aliter numquam sedentesque in diuturno silentio — quis enim tam intento esse oneri auderet? — discedebamus et coniectabamus eum paruo ipso tempore, quod reparandae menti suae nanciscebatur, feriatum ab strepitu causarum alienarum nolle in aliud auocari et cauere fortasse, ne auditore suspenso et intento, si qua obscurius posuisset ille quem legeret, etiam exponere esset necesse aut de aliquibus difficilioribus dissertare quaestionibus atque huic operi temporibus inpensis minus quam uellet uoluminum euolueret, quamquam et causa seruandae uocis, quae illi facillime obtundebatur, poterat esse iustior tacite legendi. quolibet tamen animo id ageret, bono utique ille uir agebat.

Nor did I yet groan in prayer for you to help me; but my mind was intent on seeking and restless for debate, and I thought Ambrose himself a happy man by the world's standards, since such great powers honored him; only his celibacy seemed to me burdensome. But what hope he carried, what struggle he had against the temptations of his very eminence, what comfort in adversity, and what savory joys the hidden mouth of his heart tasted as it chewed on your bread, I could not guess and had not experienced. Nor did he know my turmoil or the pit of my danger. For I could not ask him what I wanted as I wanted, since crowds of busy people, whose weaknesses he served, shut me out from his ear and his mouth; and when he was not with them, which was a very short time, he was refreshing either his body with necessary food or his mind with reading. But when he read, his eyes moved over the pages and his heart searched out the sense, while his voice and tongue were silent. Often when we were present (for no one was forbidden to enter, nor was it the custom for visitors to be announced to him), we saw him reading silently like this, and never otherwise; and after sitting in long silence (for who would dare to burden one so intent?), we would go away. We guessed that in the little time he found for refreshing his mind, free from the din of other people's cases, he did not want to be distracted by anything else; and perhaps he was careful lest, if a listener were intent and in suspense, he might have to explain something the author he was reading had put rather obscurely, or discuss some more difficult questions, and, spending his time on this work, get through fewer volumes than he wished; though preserving his voice, which easily grew hoarse, may have been a more valid reason for reading silently. But whatever his purpose in doing it, that man certainly did it for a good one.

6.4CSEL 33:117–118

Sed certe mihi nulla dabatur copia sciscitandi quae cupiebam de tam sancto oraculo tuo, pectore illius, nisi cum aliquid breuiter esset audiendum. aestus autem illi mei otiosum eum ualde, cui refunderentur, requirebant nec umquam inueniebant. et eum quidem in populo uerbum ueritatis recte tractantem omni die dominico audiebam, et magis magisque mihi confirmabatur omnes uersutarum calumniarum nodos, quos illi deceptores nostri aduersus diuinos libros innectebant, posse dissolui. ubi uero etiam conperi ad imaginem tuam hominem a te factum ab spiritalibus filiis tuis, quos de matre catholica per gratiam regenerasti, non sic intellegi, ut humani corporis forma determinatum crederent atque cogitarent, quamquam quomodo se haberet spiritalis substantia, ne quidem tenuiter atque aenigmate suspicabar, tamen gaudens erubui non me tot annos aduersus catholicam fidem, sed contra carnalium cogitationum figmenta latrasse. eo quippe temerarius et inpius fueram, quod ea quae debebam quaerendo discere, accusando dixeram. tu autem, altissime et proxime, secretissime et praesentissime, cui membra non sunt alia maiora et alia minora, sed ubique totus es et nusquam locorum es, non es utique forma ista corporea, tamen fecisti hominem ad imaginem tuam, et ecce ipse a capite usque ad pedes in loco est.

But certainly I was given no opportunity to inquire what I wanted of that holy oracle of yours, his heart, except when something could be heard briefly. But my turmoil required him to have plenty of leisure for me to pour it out to him, and never found it. I did hear him every Sunday “rightly handling the word of truth” among the people, and I became more and more convinced that all the knots of cunning slander that those deceivers of ours had tied against the divine books could be untied. And when I also discovered that your spiritual children, whom you have regenerated by grace from the catholic mother, do not understand the words that man was made by you “in your image” in such a way as to believe and think that you are bounded by the form of a human body (although I did not have even the faintest or most riddling notion of what a spiritual substance might be like), I blushed with joy that for so many years I had barked not against the catholic faith but against the fictions of carnal thoughts. I had been so rash and impious in that I had spoken in accusation of what I ought to have learned by inquiry. But you, most high and most near, most hidden and most present, who have no limbs larger and smaller, but are everywhere whole and nowhere in place, are certainly not of that bodily form; yet you made man in your image, and see, he is in place from head to foot.

6.5CSEL 33:118–119

Cum ergo nescirem, quomodo haec subsisteret imago tua, pulsans proponerem, quomodo credendum esset, non insultans opponerem, quasi ita creditum esset. tanto igitur acrior cura rodebat intima mea, quid certi retinerem, quanto me magis pudebat tam diu inlusum et deceptum promissione certorum puerili errore et animositate tam multa incerta quasi certa garrisse. quod enim falsa essent, postea mihi claruit. certum tamen erat, quod incerta essent et a me aliquando pro certis habita fuissent, cum catholicam tuam caecis contentionibus accusarem, etsi nondum conpertam uera docentem, non tamen ea docentem, quae grauiter accusabam. itaque confundebar et conuertebar et gaudebam, deus meus, quod ecclesia unica, corpus unici tui, in qua mihi nomen Christi infanti est inditum, non saperet infantiles nugas neque hoc haberet in doctrina sua sana, quod te creatorem omnium in spatium loci quamuis summum et amplum, tamen undique terminatum membrorum humanorum figura contruderet.

So, since I did not know how this image of yours subsisted, I should have knocked and asked how it was to be believed, not insultingly objected as if it were believed as I supposed. So the sharper was the anxiety that gnawed at my inmost self about what I should hold as certain, the more ashamed I was to have been so long mocked and deceived by the promise of certainties, and with childish error and animosity to have chattered about so many uncertain things as if they were certain. For that they were false became clear to me later. But it was already certain that they were uncertain and that I had once held them as certain, when I accused your catholic church with blind contentiousness; though I had not yet discovered that it taught truth, it at least did not teach the things I so vehemently accused it of. So I was confounded and converted, and I rejoiced, my God, that the one church, the body of your only Son, in which the name of Christ was put upon me as an infant, did not relish childish trifles, nor held in its sound doctrine that you, the creator of all, were crammed into a space of place, however high and wide, bounded on all sides by the shape of human limbs.

6.6CSEL 33:119–120

Gaudebam etiam, quod uetera scripta legis et prophetarum iam non illo oculo mihi legenda proponerentur, quo antea uidebantur absurda, cum arguebam tamquam ita sentientes sanctos tuos; uerum autem non ita sentiebant. et tamquam regulam diligentissime conmendaret, saepe in popularibus sermonibus suis dicentem Ambrosium laetus audiebam: littera occidit, spiritus autem uiuificat, cum ea, quae ad litteram peruersitatem docere uidebantur, remoto mystico uelamento spiritaliter aperiret, non dicens quod me offenderet, quamuis ea diceret, quae utrum uera essent adhuc ignorarem. tenebam cor meum ab omni adsensione timens praecipitium et suspendio magis necabar. uolebam enim eorum quae non uiderem ita me certum fieri, ut certus essem, quod septem et tria decem sint. neque enim tam insanus eram, ut ne hoc quidem putarem posse conprehendi, sed sicut hoc, ita cetera cupiebam siue corporalia, quae coram sensibus meis non adessent, siue spiritalia, de quibus cogitare nisi corporaliter nesciebam. et sanari credendo poteram, ut purgatior acies mentis meae dirigeretur aliquo modo in ueritatem tuam semper manentem et ex nullo deficientem; sed, sicut euenire assolet, ut malum medicum expertus etiam bono timeat se conmittere, ita erat ualetudo animae meae, quae utique nisi credendo sanari non poterat et, ne falsa crederet, curari recusabat, resistens manibus tuis, qui medicamenta fidei confecisti et sparsisti super morbos orbis terrarum et tantam illis auctoritatem tribuisti.

I also rejoiced that the ancient writings of the Law and the Prophets were now set before me to be read not with that eye with which they had previously seemed absurd, when I criticized your saints as if they thought such things; in truth they did not think so. And gladly I heard Ambrose often say in his sermons to the people, as if he were most carefully commending it as a rule, “The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life,” when he drew aside the mystical veil and opened up spiritually those things which, taken according to the letter, seemed to teach perversity. He said nothing that offended me, although he said things whose truth I still did not know. I kept my heart from all assent, fearing a fall, and I was being killed all the more by that suspension. For I wanted to be made as certain of things I did not see as I was certain that seven and three make ten. For I was not so mad as to think that not even this could be grasped; but as I was of this, so I wanted to be of other things, whether bodily things not present to my senses, or spiritual things, of which I did not know how to think except bodily. And I could have been healed by believing, so that the sight of my mind, being purified, might be directed somehow toward your truth, which always abides and fails in nothing. But, as usually happens, one who has had a bad doctor is afraid to entrust himself even to a good one; so it was with the health of my soul, which certainly could not be healed except by believing, and, for fear of believing falsehoods, refused to be cured, resisting your hands, you who have prepared the medicines of faith and sprinkled them upon the diseases of the whole world and given them such great authority.

6.7CSEL 33:120–121

Ex hoc tamen quoque iam praeponens doctrinam catholicam modestius ibi minimeque fallaciter sentiebam iuberi, ut crederetur quod non demonstrabatur — siue esset quid, sed cui forte non esset, siue nec quid esset — quam illic temeraria pollicitatione scientiae credulitatem inrideri et postea tam multa fabulosissima et absurdissima, quia demonstrari non poterant, credenda imperari. deinde paulatim tu, domine, manu mitissima et misericordissima pertractans et conponens cor meum, consideranti, quam innumerabilia crederem, quae non uiderem neque cum gererentur affuissem, sicut tam multa in historia gentium, tam multa de locis atque urbibus, quae non uideram, tam multa amicis, tam multa medicis, tam multa hominibus aliis atque aliis, quae nisi crederentur, omnino in hac uita nihil ageremus, postremo quam inconcusse fixum fide retinerem, de quibus parentibus ortus essem, quod scire non possem, nisi audiendo credidissem, persuasisti mihi non qui crederent libris tuis, quos tanta in omnibus fere gentibus auctoritate fundasti, sed qui non crederent esse culpandos nec audiendos esse, si qui forte mihi dicerent: unde scis illos libros unius ueri et ueracissimi dei spiritu esse humano generi ministratos? id ipsum enim maxime credendum erat, quoniam nulla pugnacitas calumniosarum quaestionum per tam multa quae legeram inter se confligentium philosophorum extorquere mihi potuit, ut aliquando non crederem te esse quidquid esses, quod ego nescirem, aut administrationem rerum humanarum ad te pertinere.

From this time, however, I began to prefer catholic doctrine. I felt that it acted more modestly and without any deceit in commanding that what was not demonstrated be believed (whether it could be demonstrated but perhaps not to everyone, or could not be demonstrated at all), than the Manichees did, who mocked credulity with a rash promise of knowledge and then commanded that so many utterly fabulous and absurd things be believed because they could not be demonstrated. Then little by little, Lord, handling and composing my heart with a most gentle and merciful hand, you persuaded me, as I considered how countless were the things I believed that I had not seen, nor had been present when they happened, such as so many things in the history of the nations, so many about places and cities I had never seen, so many on the word of friends, so many of doctors, so many of other people, which unless we believed them we would do nothing at all in this life; and, finally, with how unshakably firm a faith I held from what parents I was born, which I could not know unless I had believed what I heard: you persuaded me that it is not those who believe your books, which you have established with such great authority among almost all nations, who are to be blamed, but those who do not believe them; and that no one should be listened to who might say to me, “How do you know that those books were given to the human race by the Spirit of the one true and most truthful God?” For that was the very thing most to be believed, since no contentiousness of slanderous questions, of the many I had read among the philosophers contradicting one another, could ever wring from me the refusal to believe that you exist, whatever you are (which I did not know), and that the government of human affairs belongs to you.

6.8CSEL 33:121–122

Sed credebam aliquando robustius, aliquando exilius, semper tamen credidi et esse te et curam nostri gerere, etiamsi ignorabam uel quid sentiendum esset de substantia tua uel quae uia duceret aut reduceret ad te. ideoque cum essemus infirmi ad inueniendam liquida ratione ueritatem et ob hoc nobis opus esset auctoritate sanctarum litterarum, iam credere coeperam nullo modo te fuisse tributurum tam excellentem illi scripturae per omnes iam terras auctoritatem, nisi et per ipsam tibi credi et per ipsam te quaeri uoluisses. iam enim absurditatem, quae me in illis litteris solebat offendere, cum multa ex eis probabiliter exposita audissem, ad sacramentorum altitudinem referebam eoque mihi illa uenerabilior et sacrosancta fide dignior apparebat auctoritas, quo et omnibus ad legendum esset in promtu et secreti sui dignitatem in intellectu profundiore seruaret, uerbis apertissimis et humillimo genere loquendi se cunctis praebens et exercens intentionem eorum, qui non sunt leues corde, ut exciperet omnes populari sinu et per angusta foramina paucos ad te traiceret, multo tamen plures, quam si nec tanto apice auctoritatis emineret nec turbas gremio sanctae humilitatis hauriret. cogitabam haec et aderas mihi, suspirabam et audiebas me, fluctuabam et gubernabas me, ibam per uiam saeculi latam nec deserebas.

But I believed sometimes more strongly, sometimes more weakly; yet I always believed both that you exist and that you care for us, even though I did not know either what should be thought about your substance or what way led, or led back, to you. And so, since we were too weak to find the truth by clear reason, and for this reason needed the authority of the holy writings, I had now begun to believe that you would in no way have given such surpassing authority to that Scripture throughout all lands unless you had willed that through it you should be believed and through it sought. For the absurdity that used to offend me in those writings, now that I had heard many of them plausibly explained, I referred to the depth of their mysteries; and their authority seemed to me all the more worthy of reverence and of holy faith because it was ready to hand for all to read and yet kept the dignity of its secret in a deeper understanding; offering itself to all in the plainest words and the humblest style of speech, and exercising the attention of those who are not “light of heart”; so that it might receive all in its popular embrace and bring a few through narrow openings to you, yet many more than if it did not stand out with so lofty an authority and draw the crowds into the bosom of its holy humility. I thought about these things and you were present to me; I sighed and you heard me; I wavered and you steered me; I went along the broad way of the world and you did not abandon me.

6.9CSEL 33:122–123

Inhiabam honoribus, lucris, coniugio, et tu inridebas. patiebar in eis cupiditatibus amarissimas difficultates te propitio tanto magis, quanto minus sinebas mihi dulcescere quod non eras tu. uide cor meum, domine, qui noluisti, ut hoc recordarer et confiterer tibi. nunc tibi inhaereat anima mea, quam de uisco tam tenaci mortis exuisti. quam misera erat! et sensum uulneris tu pungebas, ut relictis omnibus conuerteretur ad te, qui es super omnia et sine quo nulla essent omnia, conuerteretur et sanaretur. quam ergo miser eram et quomodo egisti, ut sentirem miseriam meam die illo, quo, cum pararem recitare imperatori laudes, quibus plura mentirer, et mentienti faueretur ab scientibus easque curas anhelaret cor meum et cogitationum tabificarum febribus aestuaret, transiens per quendam uicum Mediolanensem animaduerti pauperem mendicum iam, credo, saturum iocantem atque laetantem. et ingemui et locutus sum cum amicis, qui mecum erant, multos dolores insaniarum nostrarum, quia omnibus talibus conatibus nostris, qualibus tunc laborabam, sub stimulis cupiditatum trahens infelicitatis meae sarcinam et trahendo exaggerans nihil uellemus aliud nisi ad securam laetitiam peruenire, quo nos mendicus ille iam praecessisset numquam illuc fortasse uenturos. quod enim iam ille pauculis et emendicatis nummulis adeptus erat, ad hoc ego tam aerumnosis anfractibus et circuitibus ambiebam, ad laetitiam scilicet temporalis felicitatis. non enim uerum gaudium habebat: sed et ego illis ambitionibus multo falsius quaerebam. et certe ille laetabatur, ego anxius eram, securus ille, ego trepidus. et si quisquam percontaretur me, utrum mallem exultare an metuere, responderem: "exultare"; rursus si rogaret, utrum me talem mallem, qualis ille, an qualis ego tunc essem, me ipsum curis timoribusque confectum eligerem, sed peruersitate: numquid ueritate? neque enim eo me praeponere illi debebam, quo doctior eram, quoniam non inde gaudebam, sed placere inde quaerebam hominibus, non ut eos docerem, sed tantum ut placerem. propter et baculo disciplinae tuae confringebas ossa mea.

I gaped after honors, wealth, marriage, and you laughed at me. In those desires I suffered very bitter difficulties, and you were the more gracious to me the less you allowed anything that was not you to grow sweet to me. See my heart, Lord, you who willed that I should recall this and confess it to you. Now let my soul cling to you, which you have freed from so tenacious a birdlime of death. How wretched it was! And you pricked the feeling of its wound, so that, leaving all things, it might turn to you, who are above all things and without whom all things would be nothing, might turn and be healed. How wretched, then, I was, and how you acted to make me feel my wretchedness on that day when I was preparing to recite a panegyric to the emperor, in which I would tell many lies and be applauded for lying by those who knew it, and my heart was panting with these cares and seething with the fevers of consuming thoughts. Passing through a street in Milan, I noticed a poor beggar, already well fed, I believe, joking and merry. And I groaned and spoke with the friends who were with me of the many sorrows of our follies, because in all such efforts as those I was then laboring at, dragging the burden of my unhappiness under the goads of desire and making it heavier by dragging it, we wanted nothing but to reach a carefree joy, where that beggar had already gone before us, and where perhaps we would never arrive. For what he had already gained with a few coins begged from others, I was striving for by such painful windings and detours, namely, the joy of a temporal happiness. For he did not have true joy; but I too, with those ambitions, was seeking one much more false. And certainly he was glad, I was anxious; he was carefree, I was fearful. And if anyone had asked me whether I preferred to rejoice or to fear, I would have answered, “To rejoice”; again, if he had asked whether I preferred to be like the beggar or as I then was, I would have chosen myself, worn out with cares and fears, but perversely: surely not truly? For I ought not to have preferred myself to him because I was more learned, since I took no joy from it, but sought by it to please people, not to teach them, but only to please them. For this reason you broke my bones with the rod of your discipline.

6.10CSEL 33:123–124

Recedant ergo ab anima mea qui dicunt ei: "interest, unde quis gaudeat." gaudebat mendicus ille uinulentia, tu gloria. qua gloria, domine? quae non est in te. nam sicut uerum gaudium non erat, ita nec illa uera gloria et amplius uertebat mentem meam. et ille ipsa nocte digesturus erat ebrietatem suam, ego cum mea dormieram et surrexeram et dormiturus et surrecturus eram; uide quot dies! interest uero, unde quis gaudeat, scio, et gaudium spei fidelis inconparabiliter distat ab illa uanitate. sed et tunc distabat inter nos: nimirum quippe ille felicior erat, non tantum quod hilaritate perfundebatur, cum ego curis euiscerarer, uerum etiam quod ille bene optando adquisiuerat uinum, ego mentiendo quaerebam tyfum. dixi tunc multa in hac sententia caris meis et saepe aduertebam in his, quomodo mihi esset, et inueniebam male mihi esse et dolebam et conduplicabam ipsum male, et si quid adrisisset prosperum, taedebat adprehendere, quia paene priusquam teneretur auolabat.

Let them depart from my soul, then, who say to it, “It matters what one rejoices in.” That beggar rejoiced in drunkenness, you in glory. What glory, Lord? One that is not in you. For just as his was not true joy, so neither was that true glory; and it turned my mind still more. And he would sleep off his drunkenness that very night, while I had slept with mine and risen with it, and would sleep and rise with it again: see how many days! It does matter what one rejoices in, I know, and the joy of faithful hope is incomparably distant from that vanity. But even then there was a distance between us: he was certainly the happier, not only because he was drenched with cheerfulness while I was eviscerated by cares, but also because he had gained his wine by wishing people well, while I was seeking conceit by lying. I said much to this effect then to my dear friends, and I often noticed in these things how it was with me, and I found that it was bad with me, and I grieved and doubled that very badness; and if any prosperity smiled on me, I was loath to grasp it, because almost before it could be held it flew away.

6.11CSEL 33:124–125

Congemescebamus in his qui simul amice uiuebamus, et maxime cum Alypio et Nebridio ista conloquebar. quorum Alypius ex eodem quo ego eram ortus municipio, parentibus primatibus municipalibus, me minor natu. nam et studuerat apud me, cum in nostro oppido docere coepi, et postea Carthagini et diligebat multum, quod ei bonus et doctus uiderer, et ego illum propter magnam uirtutis indolem, quae in non magna aetate satis eminebat. gurges tamen morum Carthaginensium, quibus nugatoria feruent spectacula, absorbuerat eum in insaniam circensium. sed cum in eo miserabiliter uolueretur, ego autem rhetoricam ibi professus publica schola uterer, nondum me audiebat ut magistrum propter quandam simultatem, quae inter me et patrem eius erat exorta. et conpereram, quod circum exitiabiliter amaret, et grauiter angebar, quod tantam spem perditurus uel etiam perdidisse mihi uidebatur. sed monendi eum et aliqua cohercitione reuocandi nulla erat copia uel amicitiae beniuolentia uel iure magisterii. putabam enim eum de me cum patre sentire, ille uero non sic erat. itaque postposita in hac re patris uoluntate salutare me coeperat ueniens in auditorium meum et audire aliquid atque abire.

We groaned together over these things, those of us who lived together as friends, and I discussed them especially with Alypius and Nebridius. Alypius was born in the same town as I, of parents who were leading citizens there, and was younger than I. For he had studied with me when I began to teach in our town, and afterwards at Carthage, and he loved me very much because I seemed to him good and learned, and I loved him for his great natural bent toward virtue, which was quite conspicuous at no great age. Yet the whirlpool of Carthaginian morals, in which frivolous shows are hotly pursued, had sucked him into the madness of the circus games. But while he was miserably rolling in it, and I was teaching rhetoric there in a public school, he did not yet attend my lectures, because of some quarrel that had arisen between his father and me. And I had found out that he loved the circus ruinously, and I was deeply distressed, because he seemed to me about to lose, or to have already lost, such great promise. But I had no opportunity to warn him and call him back by some restraint, either by the goodwill of friendship or by the right of a teacher. For I thought he shared his father's opinion of me; but he did not. So, disregarding his father's wishes in this matter, he had begun to greet me, coming into my lecture room, listening for a while, and leaving.

6.12CSEL 33:125–127

Sed enim de memoria mihi lapsum erat agere cum illo, ne uanorum ludorum caeco et praecipiti studio tam bonum interimeretur ingenium. uerum autem, domine, tu, qui praesides gubernaculis omnium, quae creasti, non eum oblitus eras futurum inter filios tuos antistitem sacramenti tui et, ut aperte tibi tribueretur eius correctio, per me quidem illam sed nescientem operatus es. nam quodam die cum sederem loco solito et coram me adessent discipuli, uenit, salutauit; sedit atque in ea quae agebantur intendit animum. et forte lectio in manibus erat. quam dum exponerem et opportune mihi adhibenda uideretur similitudo circensium, quo illud quod insinuabam et iucundius et planius fieret et cum inrisione mordaci eorum, quos illa captiuasset insania, scis tu, deus noster, quod tunc de Alypio ab illa peste sanando non cogitauerim. at ille in se rapuit meque illud non nisi propter se dixisse credidit et quod alius acciperet ad suscensendum mihi, accepit honestus adulescens ad suscensendum sibi et ad me ardentius diligendum. dixeras enim tu iam olim et innexueras litteris tuis: corripe sapientem, et amabit te. at illum ego non corripueram, sed utens tu omnibus et scientibus et nescientibus ordine quo nosti — et ille ordo iustus est — de corde et lingua mea carbones ardentes operatus es, quibus mentem spei bonae adureres tabescentem ac sanares. taceat laudes tuas qui miserationes tuas non considerat, quae tibi de medullis meis confitentur. etenim uero ille post illa uerba proripuit se ex fouea tam alta, qua libenter demergebatur et cum mira uoluptate caecabatur, et excussit animum forti temperantia, et resiluerunt omnes circensium sordes ab eo ampliusque illuc non accessit. deinde patrem reluctantem euicit, ut me magistro uteretur: cessit ille atque concessit. et audire me rursus incipiens illa mecum superstitione inuolutus est amans in manichaeis ostentationem continentiae, quam ueram et germanam putabat. erat autem illa uecors et seductoria, pretiosas animas captans nondum uirtutis altitudinem scientes tangere et superficie decipi faciles, sed tamen adumbratae simulataeque uirtutis.

But it had slipped my mind to deal with him, so that so good a mind might not be destroyed by a blind and headlong passion for empty games. But you, Lord, who preside at the helm of all that you have created, had not forgotten that he would be among your sons, a bishop of your sacrament; and so that his correction might be openly attributed to you, you worked it through me, indeed, but without my knowing it. For one day, when I was sitting in my usual place with my students before me, he came, greeted me, sat down, and gave his attention to what was being discussed. By chance I had a text in hand; and while I was explaining it, it seemed opportune to use a comparison with the circus games, to make what I was conveying more pleasant and clearer, with biting mockery of those captivated by that madness. You know, our God, that I was not then thinking of curing Alypius of that plague. But he took it to himself and believed I had said it only because of him; and what another would have taken as a reason to be angry with me, the honorable young man took as a reason to be angry with himself and to love me more ardently. For you had said long ago and woven into your writings, “Rebuke a wise man, and he will love you.” But I had not rebuked him; you, however, who use all, knowing and unknowing, in the order you know (and that order is just), made of my heart and tongue burning coals, by which to sear and heal a mind of good promise that was wasting away. Let him be silent in your praises who does not consider your mercies, which confess to you from my inmost being. For indeed after those words he tore himself out of the deep pit in which he was willingly plunged and blinded with amazing pleasure, and he shook his mind with strong self-control, and all the filth of the circus fell away from him, and he never went there again. Then he overcame his father's reluctance so that he might have me as his teacher; the father gave way and allowed it. And beginning to hear me again, he became entangled with me in that superstition, loving in the Manichees their display of continence, which he thought true and genuine. But it was senseless and seductive, capturing precious souls not yet able to reach the height of virtue and easily deceived by the surface, though of a virtue only shadowed and feigned.

6.13CSEL 33:127–128

Non sane relinquens incantatam sibi a parentibus terrenam uiam Romam praecesserat, ut ius disceret, et ibi gladiatorii spectaculi hiatu incredibili et incredibiliter abreptus est. cum enim auersaretur et detestaretur talia, quidam eius amici et condiscipuli, cum forte de prandio redeuntibus peruium esset, recusantem uehementer et resistentem familiari uiolentia duxerunt in amphitheatrum crudelium et funestorum ludorum diebus haec dicentem: "si corpus meum in locum illum trahitis, numquid et animum et oculos meos in illa spectacula potestis intendere? adero itaque absens ac sic et uos et illa superabo". quibus auditis illi nihilo setius eum adduxerunt secum, id ipsum forte explorare cupientes utrum posset efficere. quo ubi uentum est et sedibus quibus potuerunt locati sunt, feruebant omnia inmanissimis uoluptatibus. ille clausis foribus oculorum interdixit animo, ne in tanta mala procederet. atque utinam et aures opturasset! nam quodam pugnae casu, cum clamor ingens totius populi uehementer eum pulsasset, curiositate uictus et quasi paratus, quidquid illud esset, etiam uisum contemnere et uincere, aperuit et percussus est grauiore uulnere in anima quam ille in corpore, quem cernere concupiuit, ceciditque miserabilius quam ille, quo cadente factus est clamor: qui per eius aures intrauit et reserauit eius lumina, ut esset, qua feriretur et deiceretur audax adhuc potius quam fortis animus et eo infirmior, quo de se praesumserat, qui debuit de te. ut enim uidit illum sanguinem, inmanitatem simul ebibit et non se auertit, sed fixit aspectum et hauriebat furias et nesciebat et delectabatur scelere certaminis et cruenta uoluptate inebriabatur. et non erat iam ille, qui uenerat, sed unus de turba, ad quam uenerat, et uerus eorum socius, a quibus adductus erat. quid plura? spectauit, clamauit, exarsit, abstulit inde secum insaniam, qua stimularetur redire non tantum cum illis, a quibus abstractus est, sed etiam prae illis et alios trahens. et inde tamen manu ualidissima et misericordissima eruisti eum tu et docuisti eum non sui habere, sed tui fiduciam, sed longe postea.

Not abandoning the worldly path that his parents had sung to him as a charm, he had gone ahead of me to Rome to study law; and there he was carried away, incredibly, by an incredible craving for gladiatorial shows. For although he turned away from such things and detested them, some friends and fellow students of his, whom he happened to meet on their way back from lunch, took him with friendly violence, though he vehemently refused and resisted, into the amphitheater during the days of the cruel and deadly games, while he said: “If you drag my body into that place, can you also fix my mind and my eyes on those shows? I will be there as one absent, and so I will overcome both you and them.” Hearing this, they nonetheless took him with them, perhaps wanting to find out whether he could do it. When they had arrived and taken what seats they could, the whole place was seething with the most savage pleasures. He closed the doors of his eyes and forbade his mind to go out to such great evils. If only he had also stopped his ears! For at some turn of the fight, when a huge shout from the whole crowd struck him violently, overcome by curiosity and as if prepared to despise and overcome whatever it was even if he saw it, he opened his eyes; and he was struck with a heavier wound in his soul than the man he wanted to see had received in his body, and he fell more wretchedly than the one whose fall had raised the shout. The shout entered through his ears and unlocked his eyes, so that there was a way to strike down and overthrow a mind that was bold rather than strong, and the weaker because it had presumed on itself when it should have relied on you. For as soon as he saw that blood, he drank in the savagery at the same time, and did not turn away but fixed his gaze, and drank in the frenzy without knowing it, and delighted in the wickedness of the contest and was intoxicated with bloody pleasure. And he was no longer the man who had come, but one of the crowd he had come to, and a true companion of those who had brought him. What more? He watched, he shouted, he burned, he carried away from there a madness that would goad him to return, not only with those who had dragged him there, but even ahead of them, dragging others. And yet from this you rescued him with your most powerful and merciful hand, and taught him to place his confidence not in himself but in you; but that was long afterward.

6.14CSEL 33:128–129

Verum tamen iam hoc ad medicinam futuram in eius memoria reponebatur. nam et illud, quod, cum adhuc studeret iam me audiens apud Carthaginem et medio die cogitaret in foro quod recitaturus erat, sicut exerceri scholastici solent, siuisti eum conprehendi ab aeditimis fori tamquam furem, non arbitror aliam ob causam te permisisse, deus noster, nisi ut ille uir tantus futurus iam inciperet discere, quam non facile in noscendis causis homo ab homine damnandus esset temeraria credulitate. quippe ante tribunal deambulabat solus cum tabulis ac stilo, cum ecce adulescens quidam ex numero scholasticorum, fur uerus, securim clanculo apportans illo non sentiente ingressus est ad cancellos plumbeos, qui uico argentario desuper praeminent, et praecidere plumbum coepit. sono autem securis audito submurmurauerunt argentarii, qui subter erant, et miserunt qui adprehenderent quem forte inuenissent. quorum uocibus auditis relicto instrumento ille discessit timens, ne cum eo teneretur. Alypius autem, qui non uiderat intrantem, exeuntem sensit et celeriter uidit abeuntem et causam scire cupiens ingressus est locum et inuentam securim stans atque admirans considerabat, cum ecce illi, qui missi erant, reperiunt eum solum ferentem ferrum, cuius sonitu exciti uenerant: tenent, adtrahunt, congregatis inquilinis fori tamquam furem manifestum se conprehendisse gloriantur, et inde offerendus iudiciis ducebatur.

Nevertheless, this was already being stored up in his memory as medicine for the future. There was also that incident when he was still a student, already attending my lectures at Carthage, and was thinking over in the forum at midday what he was going to recite, as students usually practice; you allowed him to be arrested by the forum guards as a thief. I think you permitted this, our God, for no other reason than that he who was to be so great a man might already begin to learn how, in examining cases, one person should not easily be condemned by another through rash credulity. For he was walking alone in front of the tribunal with his tablets and stylus, when see, a young man, one of the students, the real thief, secretly bringing an axe, without his noticing, went in to the leaden railings that overhang the silversmiths' street and began to cut off the lead. But when the sound of the axe was heard, the silversmiths below murmured and sent men to seize whomever they might find. Hearing their voices, he left his tool and went off, afraid of being caught with it. Alypius, who had not seen him go in, noticed him going out and saw him leaving quickly; and wanting to know the reason, he went into the place, found the axe, and was standing looking at it in surprise, when see, those who had been sent found him alone holding the iron tool whose sound had roused them. They seized him, dragged him off, and, gathering the tenants of the forum, boasted that they had caught a thief red-handed; and from there he was being led away to be handed over for trial.

6.15CSEL 33:129–130

Sed hactenus docendus fuit. statim enim, domine, adfuisti innocentiae, cuius testis eras tu solus. cum enim duceretur uel ad custodiam uel ad supplicium, fit eis obuiam quidam architectus, cuius maxima erat cura publicarum fabricarum. gaudent illi eum potissimum occurrisse, cui solebant in suspicionem uenire ablatarum rerum, quae perissent de foro, ut quasi tandem iam ille cognosceret, a quibus haec fierent. uerum autem uiderat homo saepe Alypium in domo cuiusdam senatoris, ad quem salutandum uentitabat, statimque cognitum manu adprehensa semouit a turbis et tanti mali causam quaerens, quid gestum esset, audiuit omnesque tumultuantes, qui aderant, et minaciter frementes iussit uenire secum. et uenerunt ad domum illius adulescentis, qui rem conmiserat. puer uero erat ante ostium et tam paruus erat, ut nihil exinde domino suo metuens facile posset totum indicare; cum eo quippe in foro fuit pedisecus. quem posteaquam recoluit Alypius, architecto intimauit. at ille securim demonstrauit puero quaerens ab eo, cuius esset. qui confestim "nostra" inquit; deinde interrogatus aperuit cetera. sic in illam domum translata causa confusisque turbis, quae de illo triumphare iam coeperant, futurus dispensator uerbi tui et multarum in ecclesia tua causarum examinator experientior instructiorque discessit.

But he was to be taught only so far. For at once, Lord, you came to the aid of his innocence, of which you alone were witness. For as he was being led either to prison or to punishment, they were met by an architect who had chief charge of the public buildings. They were glad that he above all had met them, since they were usually suspected by him of stealing things that had disappeared from the forum, so that now at last, as they thought, he would know who was doing these things. But the man had often seen Alypius at the house of a certain senator whom he used to visit to pay his respects; and recognizing him at once, he took him by the hand and led him apart from the crowd, and asking the cause of so great a trouble, he heard what had happened; and he ordered all those who were present, raging and threatening, to come with him. And they came to the house of the young man who had committed the deed. There was a slave boy in front of the door, so small that, fearing nothing for his master from it, he could easily tell everything; for he had been with him in the forum as his attendant. When Alypius remembered him, he told the architect. The architect showed the axe to the boy, asking him whose it was. He said at once, “Ours,” and then, when questioned, disclosed the rest. So the case was transferred to that house, and the crowds that had already begun to triumph over him were confounded; and the future dispenser of your word and examiner of many cases in your church went away more experienced and better instructed.

6.16CSEL 33:130–131

Hunc ergo Romae inueneram, et adhaesit mihi fortissimo uinculo mecumque Mediolanium profectus est, ut nec me desereret et de iure, quod didicerat, aliquid ageret secundum uotum magis parentum quam suum. et ter iam adsederat mirabili continentia ceteris, cum ille magis miraretur eos, qui aurum innocentiae praeponerent. temtata est quoque eius indoles non solum de inlecebra cupiditatis sed etiam stimulo timoris. Romae adsidebat comiti largitionum Italicianarum. erat eo tempore quidam potentissimus senator, cuius et beneficiis obstricti multi et terrori subditi erant. noluit sibi licere nescio quid ex more potentiae suae, quod esset per leges inlicitum; restitit Alypius. promissum est praemium; inrisit animo. praetentae minae; calcauit mirantibus omnibus inusitatam animam, quae hominem tantum et innumerabilibus praestandi nocendique modis ingenti fama celebratum uel amicum non optaret uel non formidaret inimicum. ipse autem iudex, cui consiliarius erat, quamuis et ipse fieri nollet, non tamen aperte recusabat, sed in istum causam transferens ab eo se non permitti adserebat, quia et re uera, si ipse faceret, iste discederet. hoc solo autem paene iam inlectus erat studio litterario, ut pretiis praetorianis codices sibi conficiendos curaret, sed consulta iustitia deliberationem in melius uertit utiliorem iudicans aequitatem, qua prohibebatur, quam potestatem, qua sinebatur. paruum est hoc; sed qui in paruo fidelis est, et in magno fidelis est, nec ullo modo erit inane, quod tuae ueritatis ore processit: si in iniusto mamona fideles non fuistis, uerum quis dabit uobis? et si in alieno fideles non fuistis, uestrum quis dabit uobis? talis tunc ille inhaerebat mihi mecumque nutabat in consilio, quisnam esset tenendus uitae modus.

I had found him, then, at Rome, and he clung to me with the strongest bond, and set out with me to Milan, so as not to leave me and to practice something of the law he had studied, more in accordance with his parents' wishes than his own. He had already sat three times as an assessor, with an integrity that amazed others, while he was more amazed at those who preferred gold to innocence. His character was also tested not only by the lure of greed but by the goad of fear. At Rome he was assessor to the count of the Italian treasury. There was at that time a very powerful senator, to whom many were bound by his favors and many subject through fear. He wanted to be allowed something or other, as was the custom of his power, which was forbidden by law; Alypius resisted. A bribe was promised; he laughed at it in his heart. Threats were held out; he trampled on them, while all marveled at so unusual a soul, which neither desired as a friend nor feared as an enemy a man so great and so widely renowned for countless ways of helping and harming. The judge himself, whose counselor he was, though he too did not want it done, did not openly refuse, but shifted the matter onto Alypius, saying that Alypius would not permit him; and in truth, if the judge had done it, Alypius would have left. He was almost tempted in one thing only, by his love of literature: to have books copied for himself at praetorian rates. But he consulted justice and turned his deliberation to the better course, judging the equity by which he was forbidden more useful than the power by which he was permitted. This is a small thing; but “he who is faithful in a little is faithful also in much,” nor will anything be empty that has come from the mouth of your truth: “If you have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will give you the true? And if you have not been faithful in what is another's, who will give you what is your own?” Such was the man who then clung to me and wavered with me in deciding what way of life we should hold to.

6.17CSEL 33:131–132

Nebridius etiam, qui relicta patria uicina Carthagini atque ipsa Carthagine, ubi frequentissimus erat, relicto paterno rure optimo, relicta domo et non secutura matre nullam ob aliam causam Mediolanium uenerat, nisi ut mecum uiueret in flagrantissimo studio ueritatis atque sapientiae, pariter suspirabat pariterque fluctuabat beatae uitae inquisitor ardens et quaestionum difficillimarum scrutator acerrimus. et erant ora trium egentium et inopiam suam sibimet inuicem anhelantium et ad te expectantium, ut dares eis escam in tempore opportuno. et in omni amaritudine, quae nostros saeculares actus de misericordia tua sequebatur, intuentibus nobis finem, cur ea pateremur, occurrebant tenebrae, et auersabamur gementes et dicebamus: "quamdiu haec?" et hoc crebro dicebamus et dicentes non relinquebamus ea, quia non elucebat certum aliquid, quod illis relictis adprehenderemus.

Nebridius too had left his native place near Carthage, and Carthage itself, where he was very often to be found, had left his father's excellent country estate, had left his home and a mother who would not follow him, and had come to Milan for no other reason than to live with me in the most ardent pursuit of truth and wisdom. He sighed with us and wavered with us, a burning seeker of the happy life and a most acute investigator of the most difficult questions. So there were the mouths of three needy people, sighing out their want to one another and waiting upon you, that you might “give them their food in due season.” And in all the bitterness that, by your mercy, followed our worldly activities, when we looked for the end for which we were suffering these things, darkness met us; and we turned away groaning and said, “How long will this go on?” And we said this often, and saying it we did not leave those things, because nothing certain shone forth that we could grasp once they were abandoned.

6.18CSEL 33:132–133

Et ego maxime mirabar satagens et recolens, quam longum tempus esset ab undeuicensimo anno aetatis meae, quo feruere coeperam studio sapientiae, disponens ea inuenta relinquere omnes uanarum cupiditatum spes inanes et insanias mendaces. et ecce iam tricenariam aetatem gerebam in eodem luto haesitans auiditate fruendi praesentibus fugientibus et dissipantibus me, dum dico: "cras inueniam; ecce manifestum apparebit, et tenebo; ecce Faustus ueniet et exponet omnia. o magni uiri Academici! nihil ad agendam uitam certi conprehendi potest. inmo quaeramus diligentius et non desperemus. ecce iam non sunt absurda in libris ecclesiasticis, quae absurda uidebantur, et possunt aliter atque honeste intellegi. figam pedes in eo gradu, in quo puer a parentibus positus eram, donec inueniatur perspicua ueritas. sed ubi quaeretur? quando quaeretur? non uacat Ambrosio, non uacat legere. ubi ipsos codices quaerimus? unde aut quando conparamus? a quibus sumimus? deputentur tempora, distribuantur horae pro salute animae. magna spes oborta est: non docet catholica fides, quod putabamus et uani accusabamus. nefas habent docti eius credere deum figura humani corporis terminatum. et dubitamus pulsare, quo aperiantur cetera? antemeridianis horis discipuli occupant; ceteris quid facimus? cur non id agimus? sed quando salutamus amicos maiores, quorum suffragiis opus habemus? quando praeparamus quod emant scholastici? quando reparamus nos ipsos relaxando animo ab intentione curarum?

And I was most amazed, as I anxiously recalled how long a time it had been since the nineteenth year of my age, when I had begun to burn with the pursuit of wisdom, planning, once I found it, to abandon all the empty hopes and lying madnesses of vain desires. And see, I was now in my thirtieth year, still stuck in the same mud, greedy to enjoy present things that fled and scattered me, while I said: “Tomorrow I will find it; see, it will appear plainly, and I will hold it; see, Faustus will come and explain everything. O great men, the Academics! Nothing certain for the conduct of life can be grasped. No, let us seek more diligently and not despair. See, the things in the church's books that seemed absurd are no longer absurd, and can be understood differently and in an honorable sense. I will plant my feet on the step where my parents placed me as a boy, until the clear truth is found. But where is it to be sought? When is it to be sought? Ambrose has no time; there is no time to read. Where do we look for the books themselves? From where, or when, do we buy them? From whom do we borrow them? Let times be set aside, let hours be allotted for the salvation of the soul. A great hope has arisen: the catholic faith does not teach what we thought and vainly accused it of. Its learned men hold it wicked to believe that God is bounded by the shape of a human body. And do we hesitate to knock, so that the rest may be opened? Our students take up the morning hours; what do we do with the rest? Why do we not do this? But when do we pay our respects to our more powerful friends, whose support we need? When do we prepare what the students pay for? When do we restore ourselves by relaxing our minds from the strain of our cares?”

6.19CSEL 33:133–134

pereant omnia et dimittamus haec uana et inania: conferamus nos ad solam inquisitionem ueritatis. uita misera est, mors incerta est; subito obrepat: quomodo hinc exibimus? et ubi nobis discenda sunt quae hinc negleximus? ac non potius huius neglegentiae supplicia luenda? quid, si mors ipsa omnem curam cum sensu amputabit et finiet? ergo et hoc quaerendum. sed absit, ut ita sit. non uacat, non est inane, quod tam eminens culmen auctoritatis Christianae fidei toto orbe diffunditur. numquam tanta et talia pro nobis diuinitus agerentur, si morte corporis etiam uita animae consumeretur. quid cunctamur igitur relicta spe saeculi conferre nos totos, ad quaerendum deum et uitam beatam? sed expecta: iucunda sunt etiam ista, habent non paruam dulcedinem suam; non facile ab eis praecidenda est intentio, quia turpe est ad ea rursum redire. ecce iam quantum est, ut inpetretur aliquis honor. et quid amplius in his desiderandum? suppetit amicorum maiorum copia: ut nihil aliud multum festinemus, uel praesidatus dari potest. et ducenda uxor cum aliqua pecunia, ne sumptum nostrum grauet, et ille erit modus cupiditatis. multi magni uiri et imitatione dignissimi sapientiae studio cum coniugibus dediti fuerunt.

“Let everything perish, and let us dismiss these vain and empty things; let us devote ourselves to the search for truth alone. Life is wretched, death uncertain; it may creep up suddenly: in what state shall we depart from here? And where must we learn what we have neglected here? Or rather, shall we not have to pay the penalty for this negligence? What if death itself cuts off and ends all care along with sensation? Then this too must be investigated. But far be it that it should be so. It is not for nothing, it is not empty, that the lofty summit of the authority of the Christian faith is spread through the whole world. Never would such great things be done for us by God if the life of the soul were also consumed by the death of the body. Why then do we delay to abandon worldly hope and devote ourselves wholly to seeking God and the happy life? But wait: these things too are pleasant, they have no small sweetness of their own; one's attention should not lightly be cut off from them, because it is shameful to return to them again. See, it is already a great thing to obtain some position of honor. And what more is to be desired in these things? We have plenty of powerful friends: if we hurry for nothing else, at least a governorship can be given. And a wife must be married with some money, so that she does not increase our expenses; and that will be the limit of desire. Many great men, most worthy of imitation, have devoted themselves to the pursuit of wisdom with their wives.”

6.20CSEL 33:134–135

Cum haec dicebam et alternabant hi uenti et inpellebant huc atque illuc cor meum, transibant tempora, et tardabam conuerti ad dominum et differebam de die in diem uiuere in te et non differebam cotidie in memet ipso mori: amans beatam uitam timebam illam in sede sua et ab ea fugiens quaerebam eam. putabam enim me miserum fore nimis, si feminae priuarer amplexibus, et medicinam misericordiae tuae ad eandem infirmitatem sanandam non cogitabam, quia expertus non eram, et propriarum uirium credebam esse continentiam, quarum mihi non eram conscius, cum tam stultus essem, ut nescirem, sicut scriptum est, neminem posse esse continentem, nisi tu dederis. utique dares, si gemitu interno pulsarem aures tuas et fide solida in te iactarem curam meam.

While I said these things, and these winds shifted and drove my heart this way and that, time passed, and I was slow to turn to the Lord, and I put off from day to day living in you, but did not put off dying daily in myself. Loving the happy life, I feared it in its own dwelling, and fleeing from it I sought it. For I thought I would be too miserable if I were deprived of the embraces of a woman; and I did not think of the medicine of your mercy for healing that same weakness, because I had not tried it; and I believed continence to be a matter of one's own strength, which I was not aware of having, being so foolish as not to know that, as it is written, no one can be continent unless you give it. Certainly you would have given it, if I had knocked at your ears with inner groaning and with firm faith had cast my care upon you.

6.21CSEL 33:135

Prohibebat me sane Alypius ab uxore ducenda cantans nullo modo nos posse securo otio simul in amore sapientiae uiuere, sicut iam diu desideraremus, si id fecissem. erat enim ipse in ea re etiam tunc castissimus, ita ut mirum esset, quia uel experientiam concubitus ceperat in ingressu adulescentiae suae, sed non haeserat magisque doluerat et spreuerat et deinde iam continentissime uiuebat. ego autem resistebam illi exemplis eorum, qui coniugati coluissent sapientiam et promeruissent deum et habuissent fideliter ac dilexissent amicos. a quorum ego granditate quidem animi longe aberam et deligatus morbo carnis mortifera suauitate trahebam catenam meam solui timens et quasi concusso uulnere repellens uerba bene suadentis tamquam manum soluentis. insuper etiam per me ipsi quoque Alypio loquebatur serpens et innectebat atque spargebat per linguam meam dulces laqueos in uia eius, quibus illi honesti et expediti pedes inplicarentur.

Alypius indeed kept me from marrying a wife, insisting that if I did, we could in no way live together in carefree leisure in the love of wisdom, as we had long desired. For he was himself extremely chaste in this matter even then, so much so that it was remarkable; for although he had had experience of intercourse at the beginning of his youth, he had not become attached to it, but rather regretted and scorned it, and from then on lived most continently. But I resisted him with the examples of those who, as married men, had cultivated wisdom, pleased God, and been faithful to their friends and loved them. From their greatness of soul I was indeed far removed; bound by the disease of the flesh with its deadly sweetness, I dragged my chain, afraid to be set free, and, as if my wound were jarred, I pushed away the words of one who advised me well, like the hand of one who would untie me. Moreover, through me the serpent spoke to Alypius himself, and wove and scattered through my tongue sweet snares in his path, in which his honorable and free feet might be entangled.

6.22CSEL 33:135–136

Cum enim me ille miraretur, quem non parui penderet, ita haerere uisco illius uoluptatis, ut me adfirmarem, quotienscumque inde inter nos quaereremus, caelibem uitam nullo modo posse degere atque ita me defenderem, cum illum mirantem uiderem, ut dicerem multum interesse inter illud, quod ipse raptim et furtim expertus esset, quod paene iam ne meminisset quidem atque ideo nulla molestia facile contemneret, et delectationes consuetudinis meae, ad quas si accessisset honestum nomen matrimonii, non eum mirari oportere, cur ego illam uitam nequirem spernere, coeperat et ipse desiderare coniugium nequaquam uictus libidine talis uoluptatis, sed curiositatis. dicebat enim scire se cupere, quidnam esset illud, sine quo uita mea, quae illi sic placebat, non mihi uita, sed poena uideretur. stupebat enim liber ab illo uinculo animus seruitutem meam et stupendo ibat in experiendi cupidinem uenturus in ipsam experientiam atque inde fortasse lapsurus in eam quam stupebat seruitutem, quoniam sponsionem uolebat facere cum morte, et qui amat periculum, incidet in illud. neutrum enim nostrum, si quod est coniugale decus in officio regendi matrimonii et suscipiendorum liberorum, ducebat nisi tenuiter. magna autem ex parte atque uehementer consuetudo satiandae insatiabilis concupiscentiae me captum excruciabat, illum autem admiratio capiendum trahebat. sic eramus, donec tu, altissime, non deserens humum nostrum miseratus miseros subuenires miris et occultis modis.

For when he marveled that I, whom he esteemed not a little, was so stuck in the birdlime of that pleasure as to affirm, whenever we discussed it between us, that I could in no way lead a celibate life; and when I defended myself, seeing him amazed, by saying that there was a great difference between what he had experienced hastily and furtively, which he now scarcely remembered and so could easily despise without any trouble, and the delights of my habit, to which, if the honorable name of marriage were added, he ought not to wonder why I could not spurn that life; he too began to desire marriage, not at all overcome by lust for such pleasure, but by curiosity. For he said he wanted to know what that was without which my life, which pleased him so much, seemed to me not a life but a punishment. For his mind, free from that chain, was amazed at my slavery, and by being amazed was going on to a desire to try it, about to come to the experience itself and from there perhaps to fall into the slavery that amazed him, since he wanted “to make a covenant with death”; and “he who loves danger will fall into it.” For neither of us gave more than slight thought to whatever dignity there is in marriage, in the duty of ordering a married life and raising children. For the most part it was the habit of satisfying an insatiable lust that held me captive and tormented me violently, while he was being drawn to captivity by wonder. So we were, until you, Most High, not abandoning our clay, had mercy on us wretches and came to our aid in wonderful and hidden ways.

6.23CSEL 33:136–137

Et instabatur inpigre, ut ducerem uxorem. iam petebam, iam promittebatur maxime matre dante operam, quo me iam coniugatum baptismus salutaris ablueret, quo me in dies gaudebat aptari et uota sua ac promissa tua in mea fide conpleri animaduertebat. cum sane et rogatu meo et desiderio suo forti clamore cordis abs te deprecaretur cotidie, ut ei per uisum ostenderes aliquid de futuro matrimonio meo, numquam noluisti. et uidebat quaedam uana et phantastica, quo cogebat inpetus de hac re satagentis humani spiritus, et narrabat mihi non cum fiducia, qua solebat, cum tu demonstrabas ei, sed contemnens ea. dicebat enim discernere se nescio quo sapore, quem uerbis explicare non poterat, quid interesset inter reuelantem te et animam suam somniantem. instabatur tamen, et puella petebatur, cuius aetas ferme biennio minus quam nubilis erat, et quia ea placebat, exspectabatur.

And I was pressed without letup to marry a wife. I was already making my suit, and a promise was already being made, chiefly through my mother's efforts, so that once married I might be washed by saving baptism; she rejoiced that I was daily being made ready for it, and she noticed that her prayers and your promises were being fulfilled in my faith. Indeed, both at my request and from her own desire, she begged you daily with a strong cry of her heart to show her something in a vision about my future marriage, and you never would. She saw some vain and fanciful things, such as the force of a human spirit preoccupied with this matter produced, and she told them to me, not with the confidence she usually had when you showed her something, but making light of them. For she said she could tell, by some kind of taste which she could not explain in words, the difference between your revealing and her own soul's dreaming. Still I was pressed, and a girl was sought in marriage who was almost two years under the age for marrying; and because she was pleasing, we were waiting.

6.24CSEL 33:137–138

Et multi amici agitaueramus animo et conloquentes ac detestantes turbulentas humanae uitae molestias paene iam firmaueramus remoti a turbis otiose uiuere, id otium sic moliti, ut, si quid habere possemus, conferremus in medium unamque rem familiarem conflaremus ex omnibus, ut per amicitiae sinceritatem non esset aliud huius et aliud illius, sed quod ex cunctis fieret unum, et uniuersum singulorum esset et omnia omnium, cum uideremur nobis esse posse decem ferme homines in eadem societate essentque inter nos praediuites, Romanianus maxime communiceps noster, quem tunc graues aestus negotiorum suorum ad comitatum adtraxerant, ab ineunte aetate mihi familiarissimus. qui maxime instabat huic rei et magnam in suadendo habebat auctoritatem, quod ampla res eius multam ceteris anteibat. et placuerat nobis, ut bini annui tamquam magistratus omnia necessaria curarent ceteris quietis. sed posteaquam coepit cogitari, utrum hoc mulierculae sinerent, quas et alii nostrum iam habebant et nos habere uolebamus, totum illud placitum, quod bene formabamus, dissiluit in manibus atque confractum et abiectum est. inde ad suspiria et gemitus et gressus ad sequendas latas et tritas uias saeculi, quoniam multae cogitationes erant in corde nostro, consilium autem tuum manet in aeternum. ex quo consilio deridebas nostra et tua praeparabas nobis daturus escam in opportunitate et aperturus manum atque impleturus animas nostras benedictione.

And many of us friends, turning over in our minds and talking about and detesting the turbulent troubles of human life, had almost decided to live in leisure away from the crowds. We planned that leisure so that whatever we could possess we would put into a common fund and make one household out of all, so that through the sincerity of friendship nothing would belong to this one or that, but what was made one out of all would belong wholly to each, and everything to everyone. It seemed to us that there could be about ten people in that community, and there were some very rich men among us, especially Romanianus, our fellow townsman, a close friend of mine from my early youth, whom serious turmoil in his affairs had then brought to the court. He pressed this plan most of all and had great authority in urging it, because his ample wealth far exceeded the others'. And we had agreed that two officers each year, like magistrates, should see to all necessary things, while the others were left in peace. But after we began to consider whether the women would allow this, those whom some of us already had and whom we wished to have, that whole plan, which we were shaping so well, fell apart in our hands and was broken and thrown aside. Then back to sighs and groans, and to steps following the broad and beaten ways of the world; for “many thoughts were in our heart, but your counsel abides forever.” By that counsel you laughed at our plans and prepared your own for us, intending to “give us food in due season,” and to “open your hand and fill our souls with blessing.”

6.25CSEL 33:138

Interea mea peccata multiplicabantur, et auulsa a latere meo tamquam inpedimento coniugii cum qua cubare solitus eram, cor, ubi adhaerebat, concisum et uulneratum mihi erat et trahebat sanguinem. et illa in Africam redierat uouens tibi alium se uirum nescituram relicto apud me naturali ex illa filio meo. at ego infelix nec feminae imitator, dilationis inpatiens, tamquam post biennium accepturus eam quam petebam, quia non amator coniugii sed libidinis seruus eram, procuraui aliam, non utique coniugem, quo tamquam sustentaretur et perduceretur uel integer uel auctior morbus animae meae satellitio perdurantis consuetudinis in regnum uxorium. nec sanabatur uulnus illud meum, quod prioris praecisione factum erat, sed post feruorem doloremque acerrimum putrescebat et quasi frigidius, sed desperatius dolebat.

Meanwhile my sins were multiplied, and the woman with whom I had been accustomed to sleep was torn from my side as an obstacle to marriage; my heart, where it clung to her, was cut and wounded and bleeding. She had returned to Africa, vowing to you that she would never know another man, leaving with me my natural son by her. But I, unhappy, not even imitating a woman, impatient of delay, since I was to receive the girl I was seeking only after two years, because I was not a lover of marriage but a slave of lust, procured another woman, certainly not a wife, so that the disease of my soul might be sustained and carried on, either intact or even increased, under the escort of lasting habit, into the realm of marriage. Nor was that wound of mine healed which had been made by cutting off the first; but after the fever and the sharpest pain it festered, and ached more coldly, as it were, but more desperately.

6.26CSEL 33:138–140

Tibi laus, tibi gloria, fons misericordiarum. ego fiebam miserior et tu propinquior. aderat iam iamque dextera tua raptura me de caeno et ablutura, et ignorabam. nec me reuocabat a profundiore uoluptatum carnalium gurgite nisi metus mortis et futuri iudicii tui, qui per uarias quidem opiniones, numquam tamen recessit de pectore meo. et disputabam cum amicis meis Alypio et Nebridio de finibus bonorum et malorum Epicurum accepturum fuisse palmam in animo meo, nisi ego credidissem post mortem restare animae uitam et tractus meritorum, quod Epicurus credere noluit. et quaerebam, si essemus inmortales et in perpetua corporis uoluptate sine ullo amissionis terrore uiueremus, cur non essemus beati aut quid aliud quaereremus, nesciens id ipsum ad magnam miseriam pertinere, quod ita demersus et caecus cogitare non possem lumen honestatis et gratis amplectendae pulchritudinis, quam non uidet oculus carnis et uidetur ex intimo. nec considerabam miser, ex qua uena mihi manaret, quod ista ipsa foeda tamen cum amicis dulciter conferebam nec esse sine amicis poteram beatus etiam secundum sensum, quem tunc habebam quantalibet affluentia carnalium uoluptatum. quos utique amicos gratis diligebam uicissimque ab eis me diligi gratis sentiebam. o tortuosas uias! uae animae meae audaci, quae sperauit, si a te recessisset, se aliquid melius habituram! uersa et reuersa in tergum et in latera et in uentrem, et dura sunt omnia, et tu solus requies. et ecce ades et liberas a miserabilibus erroribus et constitues nos in uia tua et consolaris et dicis: "currite, ego feram et ego perducam et ibi ego feram."

Praise to you, glory to you, fountain of mercies! I was becoming more wretched, and you nearer. Your right hand was already there, ready at any moment to snatch me from the mire and wash me, and I did not know it. Nothing called me back from a deeper whirlpool of carnal pleasures but the fear of death and of your future judgment, which, through all my various opinions, never left my breast. And I argued with my friends Alypius and Nebridius about the ends of good and evil, that in my mind Epicurus would have won the palm, had I not believed that after death there remains life for the soul and the consequences of our deserts, which Epicurus refused to believe. And I asked, if we were immortal and lived in perpetual bodily pleasure without any fear of losing it, why we would not be happy, or what else we would seek; not knowing that this very thing belonged to great misery, that, so sunk and blind, I could not conceive the light of goodness and of a beauty to be embraced for its own sake, which the eye of the flesh does not see and which is seen from within. Nor did I, wretch, consider from what spring it flowed to me that I discussed even these foul things with friends with pleasure, and that I could not be happy without friends, even according to the sense I then had, however great the abundance of carnal pleasures. These friends I certainly loved for their own sake, and I felt that I was loved by them for my own sake in return. O crooked ways! Woe to my rash soul, which hoped that if it withdrew from you it would have something better! Turned and turned again, on its back, on its sides, on its belly, all is hard, and you alone are rest. And see, you are here, and you free us from our wretched errors and set us on your way, and console us and say: “Run; I will carry you, and I will bring you through, and there too I will carry you.”

Chapter 7

7.1CSEL 33:140–141

Iam mortua erat adulescentia mea mala et nefanda, et ibam in iuuentutem, quanto aetate maior, tanto uanitate turpior, qui cogitare aliquid substantiae nisi tale non poteram, quale per hos oculos uideri solet. non te cogitabam, deus, in figura corporis humani, ex quo audire aliquid de sapientia coepi; semper hoc fugi et gaudebam me hoc reperire in fide spiritalis matris nostrae, catholicae tuae; sed quid te aliud cogitarem non occurrebat. et conabar cogitare te homo, et talis homo, summum et solum et uerum deum, et te incorruptibilem et inuiolabilem et inconmutabilem totis medullis credebam, quia nesciens, unde et quomodo, plane tamen uidebam et certus eram id, quod corrumpi potest, deterius esse quam id quod non potest, et quod uiolari non potest, incunctanter praeponebam uiolabili, et quod nullam patitur mutationem, melius esse quam id quod mutari potest. clamabat uiolenter cor meum aduersus omnia phantasmata mea et hoc uno ictu conabar abigere circumuolantem turbam inmunditiae ab acie mentis meae: et nix dimota in ictu oculi ecce conglobata rursus aderat et inruebat in aspectum meum et obnubilabat eum, ut quamuis non forma humani corporis, corporeum tamen aliquid cogitare cogerer per spatia locorum siue infusum mundo siue etiam extra mundum per infinita diffusum, etiam ipsum incorruptibile et inuiolabile et inconmutabile, quod corruptibili et uiolabili et conmutabili praeponebam, quoniam quidquid priuabam spatiis talibus, nihil mihi esse uidebatur, sed prorsus nihil, ne inane quidem, tamquam si corpus auferatur loco et maneat locus omni corpore uacuatus et terreno et humido et aerio et caelesti, sed tamen sit locus inanis tamquam spatiosum nihil.

My evil and abominable adolescence was already dead, and I was passing into young manhood; the older I was in years, the more shameful in vanity, since I could not conceive of any substance except such as is usually seen with these eyes. I did not think of you, God, in the shape of a human body; ever since I began to hear something of wisdom I always shunned this, and I rejoiced to find it so in the faith of our spiritual mother, your catholic church. But what else to think of you did not occur to me. And I, a man, and such a man, tried to think of you, the supreme and only and true God; and with all my inmost being I believed you to be incorruptible and inviolable and unchangeable. For, though I did not know from where or how, I saw plainly and was certain that what can be corrupted is worse than what cannot, and I unhesitatingly preferred what cannot be violated to what can, and that what suffers no change is better than what can be changed. My heart cried out violently against all my phantasms, and with this one blow I tried to drive away from the sight of my mind the unclean swarm flying around it; and, scattered in the twinkling of an eye, see, it gathered again and was back, and rushed upon my sight and clouded it. So, although not in the form of a human body, I was still forced to think of something bodily, extended through spaces of place, either infused into the world or even diffused outside the world through infinite space; even that incorruptible, inviolable, and unchangeable being, which I preferred to the corruptible, violable, and changeable. For whatever I deprived of such spaces seemed to me to be nothing, absolutely nothing, not even a void, as if a body were taken out of a place and the place remained empty of every body, earthly, watery, airy, and heavenly, but still a place, empty, like a spacious nothing.

7.2CSEL 33:141–142

Ego itaque incrassatus corde nec mihimet ipsi uel ipse conspicuus, quidquid non per aliquanta spatia tenderetur uel diffunderetur uel conglobaretur uel tumeret uel tale aliquid caperet aut capere posset, nihil prorsus esse arbitrabar. per quales enim formas ire solent oculi mei, per tales imagines ibat cor meum, nec uidebam hanc eandem intentionem, qua illas ipsas imagines formabam, non esse tale aliquid: quae tamen ipsas non formaret, nisi esset magnum aliquid. ita etiam te, uita uitae meae, grandem per infinita spatia undique cogitabam penetrare totam mundi molem et extra eam quaquauersum per inmensa sine termino, ut haberet te terra, haberet caelum, haberent omnia et illa finirentur in te, tu autem nusquam. sicut autem luci solis non obsisteret aeris corpus, aeris huius, qui supra terram est, quominus per eum traiceretur penetrans eum non dirrumpendo aut concidendo, sed implendo eum totum, sic tibi putabam non solum caeli et aeris et maris, sed etiam terrae corpus peruium et ex omnibus maximis minimisque partibus penetrabile ad capiendam praesentiam tuam, occulta inspiratione intrinsecus et extrinsecus administrante omnia, quae creasti. ita suspicabar, quia cogitare aliud non poteram; nam falsum erat. illo enim modo maior pars terrae maiorem tui partem haberet et minorem minor, atque ita te plena essent omnia, ut amplius tui caperet elephanti corpus quam passeris, quo esset isto grandius grandioremque occuparet locum, atque ita frustatim partibus mundi magnis magnas, breuibus breues partes tuas praesentes faceres. non est autem ita. sed nondum inluminaueras tenebras meas.

So I, grown gross of heart and not even clear to myself, thought that whatever was not extended through some spaces, or diffused, or massed together, or swelling, or did not take or could not take some such form, was absolutely nothing. For through such forms as my eyes usually travel, through such images my heart traveled; nor did I see that this very attention by which I formed those images was not something of that kind; and yet it would not form them unless it were something great. So I thought of you too, Life of my life, as great, penetrating through infinite spaces on every side the whole mass of the world, and beyond it in every direction through immensities without limit, so that the earth would have you, the sky would have you, all things would have you, and they would be bounded in you, but you nowhere. And just as the body of the air, this air above the earth, would not hinder the light of the sun from passing through it, penetrating it not by bursting or cutting it but by filling it wholly, so I thought that the body not only of the sky and air and sea but also of the earth was open to you, and penetrable in all its greatest and smallest parts to receive your presence, as by a hidden inspiration you govern within and without all the things you have created. So I supposed, because I could think of nothing else; but it was false. For in that way a larger part of the earth would have a larger part of you, and a smaller a smaller; and all things would be full of you in such a way that the body of an elephant would contain more of you than that of a sparrow, by as much as it was larger and occupied a larger place; and so you would make your parts present piecemeal to the parts of the world, large parts to large ones and small to small. But it is not so. But you had not yet lightened my darkness.

7.3CSEL 33:142–143

Sat erat mihi, domine, aduersus illos deceptos deceptores et loquaces mutos, quoniam non ex eis sonabat uerbum tuum, sat erat ergo illud quod iam diu ab usque Carthagine a Nebridio proponi solebat et omnes, qui audiebamus, concussi sumus: quid erat tibi factura nescio qua gens tenebrarum, quam ex aduersa mole solent proponere, si tu cum ea pugnare noluisses? si enim responderetur aliquid fuisse nocituram, uiolabilis tu et corruptibilis fores. si autem nihil ea nocere potuisse diceretur, nulla afferretur causa pugnandi et ita pugnandi, ut quaedam portio tua et membrum tuum uel proles de ipsa substantia tua misceretur aduersis potestatibus et non a te creatis naturis atque in tantum ab eis corrumperetur et conmutaretur in deterius, ut a beatitudine in miseriam uerteretur et egeret auxilio, quo erui purgarique posset, et hanc esse animam, cui tuus sermo seruienti liber et contaminatae purus et corruptae integer subueniret, sed et ipse corruptibilis, quia ex una eademque substantia. itaque si te, quidquid es, id est substantiam tuam, qua es, incorruptibilem dicerent, falsa esse illa omnia et exsecrabilia; si autem corruptibilem, id ipsum iam falsum et prima uoce abominandum. sat erat ergo istuc aduersus eos omni modo euomendos a pressura pectoris, quia non habebant, qua exirent sine horribili sacrilegio cordis et linguae sentiendo de te ista et loquendo.

It was enough for me, Lord, against those deceived deceivers and talkative mutes, since your Word did not sound from them; it was enough, then, that argument which Nebridius used to put forward long ago at Carthage, and all of us who heard it were shaken: what would that nation of darkness, which they usually set up as an opposing mass, have done to you if you had refused to fight with it? For if the answer were that it would have done you some harm, you would be violable and corruptible. But if it were said that it could have done you no harm, no reason would be given for fighting, and for fighting in such a way that some portion of you, some member of yours, or offspring of your very substance, should be mingled with hostile powers and natures not created by you, and be so far corrupted by them and changed for the worse as to be turned from happiness into misery and need help to be rescued and cleansed; and that this is the soul, to which your Word, free, pure, and whole, came to the aid of it in its slavery, contamination, and corruption; yet the Word too would be corruptible, since it would be of one and the same substance. So if they said that you, whatever you are, that is, your substance by which you are, were incorruptible, all those things of theirs were false and abominable; but if corruptible, that very statement was false and to be abhorred at the first word. So this argument was enough against them, that they should be utterly vomited out from an oppressed heart, since they had no way out without horrible sacrilege of heart and tongue in thinking and speaking such things about you.

7.4CSEL 33:143–144

Sed et ego adhuc, quamuis incontaminabilem et inconuertibilem et nulla ex parte mutabilem dicerem firmeque sentirem dominum nostrum, deum uerum, qui fecisti non solum animas nostras sed etiam corpora, nec tantum nostras animas et corpora, sed omnes et omnia, non tenebam explicitam et enodatam causam mali. quaecumque tamen esset, sic eam quaerendam uidebam, ut non per illam constringerem deum inconmutabilem mutabilem credere, ne ipse fierem quod quaerebam. itaque securus eam quaerebam et certus non esse uerum quod illi dicerent, quos toto animo fugiebam, quia uidebam quaerendo, unde malum, repletos malitia, qua opinarentur tuam potius substantiam male pati quam suam male facere.

But I too, although I said and firmly held that our Lord, the true God, who made not only our souls but also our bodies, and not only our souls and bodies but all beings and all things, was undefilable and unalterable and in no part changeable, still did not grasp the cause of evil clearly and unraveled. Yet whatever it was, I saw that it must be sought in such a way that I would not be forced by it to believe the unchangeable God changeable, lest I myself should become what I was seeking. So I sought it without anxiety, and certain that what those people said was not true, whom I was fleeing with all my heart; because I saw that in seeking where evil comes from, they were filled with malice, by which they would rather think that your substance suffers evil than that their own does evil.

7.5CSEL 33:144–145

Et intendebam, ut cernerem quod audiebam, liberum uoluntatis arbitrium causam esse, ut male faceremus et rectum iudicium tuum ut pateremur, et eam liquido cernere non ualebam. itaque aciem mentis de profundo educere conatus mergebar iterum et saepe conatus mergebar iterum atque iterum. subleuabat enim me in lucem tuam, quod tam sciebam me habere uoluntatem quam me uiuere. itaque cum aliquid uellem aut nollem, non alium quam me uelle ac nolle certissimus eram et ibi esse causam peccati mei iam iamque aduertebam. quod autem inuitus facerem, pati me potius quam facere uidebam et id non culpam, sed poenam esse iudicabam, qua me non iniuste plecti, te iustum cogitans, cito fatebar. sed rursus dicebam: "quis fecit me? nonne deus meus, non tantum bonus, sed ipsum bonum? unde igitur mihi male uelle et bene nolle? ut esset, cur iuste poenas luerem? quis in me hoc posuit et inseuit mihi plantarium amaritudinis, cum totus fierem a dulcissimo deo meo? si diabolus auctor, unde ipse diabolus? quod si et ipse peruersa uoluntate ex bono angelo diabolus factus est, unde et in ipso uoluntas mala, qua diabolus fieret, quando totus angelus a conditore optimo factus esset?" his cogitationibus deprimebar iterum et suffocabar, sed non usque ad illum infernum subducebar erroris, ubi nemo tibi confitetur, dum tu potius mala pati quam homo facere putatur.

And I strained to see what I had heard, that the free choice of the will is the cause of our doing evil, and your just judgment the cause of our suffering it; and I could not see it clearly. So, trying to draw the sight of my mind up out of the depths, I sank again; and trying often, I sank again and again. For what raised me toward your light was that I knew I had a will as surely as I knew I was alive. So when I willed or did not will something, I was most certain that it was no one other than I who willed or did not will; and I was just beginning to notice that the cause of my sin lay there. But what I did unwillingly I saw that I suffered rather than did, and I judged it not a fault but a punishment, by which I quickly admitted I was not unjustly punished, thinking of you as just. But again I would say: “Who made me? Was it not my God, who is not only good but goodness itself? Where then does my willing evil and not willing good come from? So that there might be a reason for my being justly punished? Who put this in me and sowed in me this seedbed of bitterness, when I was made wholly by my most sweet God? If the devil is the author, where does the devil himself come from? And if he too was made a devil from a good angel by a perverse will, where did the evil will in him come from, by which he became a devil, when the angel was made wholly by the best creator?” By these thoughts I was pressed down again and stifled; but I was not brought down to that hell of error where no one confesses to you, while it is thought that you suffer evil rather than that a human being does it.

7.6CSEL 33:145–146

Sic enim nitebar inuenire cetera, ut iam inueneram melius esse incorruptibile quam corruptibile, et ideo te, quidquid esses, esse incorruptibilem confitebar. neque enim ulla anima umquam potuit poteritue cogitare aliquid, quod sit te melius, qui summum et optimum bonum es. cum autem uerissime atque certissime incorruptibile corruptibili praeponatur, sicut ego iam praeponebam, poteram iam cogitatione aliquid adtingere, quod esset melius deo meo, nisi tu esses incorruptibilis. ubi igitur uidebam incorruptibile corruptibili esse praeferendum, ibi te quaerere debebam atque inde aduertere, ubi sit malum, id est unde sit ipsa corruptio, qua uiolari substantia tua nullo modo potest. nullo enim prorsus uiolat corruptio deum nostrum, nulla uoluntate, nulla necessitate, nullo inprouiso casu, quoniam ipse est deus et quod sibi uult, bonum est et ipse est idem bonum; corrumpi autem non est bonum. nec cogeris inuitus ad aliquid, quia uoluntas tua non est maior quam potentia tua. esset autem maior, si te ipso tu ipse maior esses: uoluntas enim et potentia dei deus ipse est. quid inprouisum tibi, qui nosti omnia? et nulla natura est, nisi quia nosti eam. et ut quid multa dicimus, cur non sit corruptibilis substantia, quae deus est, quando, si hoc esset, non esset deus?

For I was striving to find the rest in the same way as I had already found that the incorruptible is better than the corruptible; and so I confessed that you, whatever you are, are incorruptible. For no soul ever could or ever will be able to conceive of anything better than you, who are the highest and best good. And since the incorruptible is most truly and certainly preferred to the corruptible, as I already preferred it, I could already reach in thought something better than my God, if you were not incorruptible. So where I saw that the incorruptible was to be preferred to the corruptible, there I ought to have sought you, and from there to notice where evil is, that is, where corruption itself comes from, by which your substance can in no way be violated. For corruption in no way whatever violates our God: by no will, by no necessity, by no unforeseen chance; since he is God, and what he wills for himself is good, and he himself is that same good; but to be corrupted is not good. Nor are you forced to anything against your will, because your will is not greater than your power. It would be greater if you yourself were greater than yourself: for the will and power of God is God himself. What is unforeseen to you, who know all things? And no nature exists except because you know it. And why do we say so much about why the substance which is God is not corruptible, when, if it were, it would not be God?

7.7CSEL 33:146–148

Et quaerebam, unde malum, et male quaerebam et in ipsa inquisitione mea non uidebam malum. et constituebam in conspectu spiritus mei uniuersam creaturam, quidquid in ea cernere possumus, sicuti est terra et mare et aer et sidera et arbores et animalia mortalia, et quidquid in ea non uidemus, sicut firmamentum caeli insuper et omnes angelos et cuncta spiritalia eius, sed etiam ipsa, quasi corpora essent, locis et locis ordinata, ut imaginatio mea; et feci unam massam grandem distinctam generibus corporum creaturam tuam, siue re uera quae corpora erant, siue quae ipse pro spiritibus finxeram, et eam feci grandem, non quantum erat, quod scire non poteram, sed quantum libuit, undiqueuersum sane finitam, te autem, domine, ex omni parte ambientem et penetrantem eam, sed usquequaque infinitum, tamquam si mare esset ubique et undique per inmensa infinitum solum mare et haberet intra se spongiam quamlibet magnam, sed finitam tamen, plena esset utique spongia illa ex omni sua parte ex inmenso mari: sic creaturam tuam finitam te infinito plenam putabam et dicebam: "ecce deus et ecce quae creauit deus, et bonus deus atque his ualidissime longissimeque praestantior; sed tamen bonus bona creauit: et ecce quomodo ambit atque implet ea? ubi ergo malum et unde et qua huc inrepsit? quae radix eius et quod semen eius? an omnino non est? cur ergo timemus et cauemus quod non est? aut si inaniter timemus, timor ipse malum est, quo incassum stimulatur et excruciatur cor, et tanto grauius malum, quanto non est, quod timeamus, et timemus. idcirco aut est malum, quod timemus, aut hoc malum est, quia timemus. unde est igitur, quia deus fecit haec omnia bonus bona? maius quidem et summum bonum minora fecit bona, sed tamen et creans et creata bona sunt omnia. unde est malum? an unde fecit ea, materies aliqua mala erat, et formauit atque ordinauit eam, sed reliquit aliquid in illa, quod in bonum non conuerteret? cur et hoc? an inpotens erat totam uertere et conmutare, ut nihil mali remaneret, cum sit omnipotens? postremo cur inde aliquid facere uoluit ac non potius eadem omnipotentia fecit, ut nulla esset omnino? aut uero exsistere poterat contra eius uoluntatem? aut si aeterna erat, cur tam diu per infinita retro spatia temporum sic eam siuit esse ac tanto post placuit aliquid ex ea facere? aut iam, si aliquid subito uoluit agere, hoc potius ageret omnipotens, ut illa non esset atque ipse solus esset totum uerum et summum et infinitum bonum? aut si non erat bene, ut non aliquid boni etiam fabricaretur et conderet qui bonus erat, illa sublata et ad nihilum redacta materie, quae mala erat, bonam ipse institueret, unde omnia crearet? non enim esset omnipotens, si condere non posset aliquid boni, nisi ea quam non ipse condiderat adiuuaretur materia". talia uoluebam pectore misero, ingrauidato curis mordacissimis de timore mortis et non inuenta ueritate; stabiliter tamen haerebat in corde meo in catholica ecclesia fides Christi tui, domini et saluatoris nostri, in multis quidem adhuc informis et praeter doctrinae normam fluitans, sed tamen non eam relinquebat animus, inmo in dies magis magisque inbibebat.

And I asked where evil comes from, and I asked badly, and I did not see the evil in my very inquiry. And I set before the sight of my spirit the whole creation, whatever we can see in it, such as earth and sea and air and stars and trees and mortal animals, and whatever we do not see in it, such as the firmament of heaven above, and all the angels and all its spiritual beings; but even these, as if they were bodies, arranged in their various places, as my imagination had it. And I made your creation one great mass, distinguished by kinds of bodies, whether real bodies or those I had invented in place of spirits; and I made it great, not as great as it was, which I could not know, but as great as I pleased, though bounded on every side; and you, Lord, surrounding it and penetrating it on every side, but infinite in every direction: as if there were a sea everywhere, and on every side through immensity nothing but an infinite sea, and it had within it a sponge, as large as you like, but still finite; that sponge would of course be full in every part from the immense sea. So I thought your creation, finite, was full of you, the infinite; and I said: “See God, and see what God has created; and God is good, and most mightily and incomparably surpasses these things; but still, being good, he created good things; and see how he surrounds and fills them. Where then is evil, and from where, and by what way did it creep in here? What is its root, and what its seed? Or does it not exist at all? Why then do we fear and guard against what does not exist? Or if we fear in vain, the fear itself is an evil, by which the heart is goaded and tormented for nothing; and so much the worse an evil, since there is nothing to fear and yet we fear. Therefore either there is evil that we fear, or this is the evil, that we fear. Where then does it come from, since God, being good, made all these things good? He, the greater and highest good, made lesser goods; but still both creator and created are all good. Where does evil come from? Or was there some evil matter from which he made them, and he formed and ordered it, but left something in it that he did not turn into good? Why that too? Was he powerless to turn and change the whole of it, so that no evil remained, though he is almighty? Finally, why did he want to make anything from it, and not rather, by the same omnipotence, cause it not to exist at all? Or could it exist against his will? Or if it was eternal, why did he let it be so for so long, through infinite spaces of time past, and only so much later decide to make something from it? Or if he suddenly wanted to do something, would not the Almighty rather have done this, that it should not exist, and he alone should be, the whole, true, highest, and infinite good? Or if it was not good that he who was good should not also make and establish something good, why did he not remove and reduce to nothing the matter that was evil, and himself establish good matter from which to create all things? For he would not be almighty if he could not establish something good without being helped by matter he had not himself established.” Such things I turned over in my wretched breast, weighed down with the most gnawing cares about the fear of death and about not finding the truth. Yet the faith of your Christ, our Lord and Savior, as held in the catholic church, was firmly fixed in my heart; in many points still unformed and wavering from the norm of doctrine; yet my mind did not abandon it, but rather drank it in more and more day by day.

7.8CSEL 33:148–150

Iam etiam mathematicorum fallaces diuinationes et inpia deliramenta reieceram. confiteantur etiam hinc tibi de intimis uisceribus animae meae miserationes tuae, deus meus! tu enim, tu omnino — nam quis alius a morte omnis erroris reuocat nos nisi uita, quae mori nescit, et sapientia mentes indigentes inluminans, nullo indigens lumine, qua mundus administratur usque ad arborum uolatica folia? — tu procurasti peruicaciae meae, qua obluctatus sum Vindiciano acuto seni et Nebridio adulescenti mirabilis animae, illi uehementer adfirmanti, huic cum dubitatione quidem aliqua, sed tamen crebro dicenti non esse illam artem futura praeuidendi, coniecturas autem hominum habere saepe uim sortis et multa dicendo dici pleraque uentura nescientibus eis, qui dicerent, sed in ea non tacendo incurrentibus, procurasti tu ergo hominem amicum, non quidem segnem consultatorem mathematicorum nec eas litteras bene callentem, sed, ut dixi, consultorem curiosum et tamen scientem aliquid, quod a patre suo se audisse dicebat: quod quantum ualeret ad illius artis opinionem euertendam, ignorabat. is ergo uir nomine Firminus, liberaliter institutus et excultus eloquio, cum me tamquam carissimum de quibusdam suis rebus, in quas saecularis spes eius intumuerat, consuleret, quid mihi secundum suas quas constellationes appellant uideretur, ego autem, qui iam de hac re in Nebridii sententiam flecti coeperam, non quidem abnuerem conicere ac dicere quod nutanti occurrebat, sed tamen subicerem prope iam esse mihi persuasum ridicula illa esse et inania, tum ille mihi narrauit patrem suum fuisse librorum talium curiosissimum et habuisse amicum aeque illa simulque sectantem. qui pari studio et conlatione flagrabant in eas nugas igne cordis sui, ita ut mutorum quoque animalium, si quae domi parerent, obseruarent momenta nascentium atque ad ea caeli positionem notarent, unde illius quasi artis experimenta colligerent. itaque dicebat audisse se a patre suo, quod cum eundem Firminum praegnans mater esset, etiam illius paterni amici famula quaedam pariter utero grandescebat. quod latere non potuit dominum, qui etiam canum suarum partus examinatissima diligentia nosse curabat; atque ita factum esse, ut cum iste coniugis, ille autem ancillae dies et horas minutioresque horarum articulos cautissima obseruatione numerarent, enixae essent ambae simul, ita ut easdem constellationes usque ad easdem minutias utrique nascenti facere cogerentur, iste filio, ille seruulo. nam cum mulieres parturire coepissent, indicauerunt sibi ambo, quid sua cuiusque domo ageretur, et parauerunt quos ad se inuicem mitterent, simul ut natum quod parturiebatur esset cuique nuntiatum: quod tamen ut continuo nuntiaretur, tamquam in regno suo facile effecerant. atque ita qui ab alterutro missi sunt, tam ex paribus domorum interuallis sibi obuiam factos esse dicebat, ut aliam positionem siderum aliasque particulas momentorum neuter eorum notare sineretur: et tamen Firminus amplo apud suos loco natus dealbatiores uias saeculi cursitabat, augebatur diuitiis, sublimabatur honoribus, seruus autem ille conditionis iugo nullatenus relaxato dominis seruiebat ipso indicante, qui nouerat eum.

By now I had also rejected the deceptive divinations and impious ravings of the astrologers. Let your mercies confess to you for this too, my God, from the inmost depths of my soul! For it was you, you alone (for who else calls us back from the death of all error but the Life that does not know how to die, and the Wisdom that enlightens needy minds while needing no light itself, by which the world is governed down to the fluttering leaves of the trees?), you who provided for my obstinacy, with which I had struggled against Vindicianus, a shrewd old man, and Nebridius, a young man of admirable soul. The former vehemently affirmed, and the latter, though with some hesitation, often said, that there was no art of foreseeing the future, but that human guesses often have the force of chance, and that by saying many things many that would happen are said, without those who say them knowing it, but hitting upon them by not keeping silent. You provided, then, a friend, not indeed a lazy consulter of the astrologers, nor well versed in their writings, but, as I said, a curious consulter, and yet one who knew something he said he had heard from his father; how much it could do to overturn belief in that art he did not know. This man, named Firminus, liberally educated and cultivated in eloquence, consulted me as a very dear friend about certain affairs of his, in which his worldly hopes had swelled, asking what I thought according to his so-called constellations. I, who had already begun to be swayed toward Nebridius's opinion on this matter, did not refuse to conjecture and say what occurred to my wavering mind, but added that I was almost persuaded by now that those things were ridiculous and empty. Then he told me that his father had been very curious about such books, and had had a friend who pursued them equally and together with him. With equal zeal and sharing of notes they burned for those trifles with the fire of their hearts, so much so that they even observed the moments of birth of dumb animals, if any gave birth in their houses, and noted the position of the sky at those moments, to gather experimental evidence for that so-called art. So he said he had heard from his father that when his mother was pregnant with this same Firminus, a certain maidservant of that friend of his father's was also growing big with child. This could not escape her master, who took care to know even the births of his dogs with the most exact diligence. And so it happened that while the one counted the days and hours and the smaller divisions of the hours for his wife, and the other for his maidservant, with the most careful observation, both women gave birth at the same time, so that they were forced to cast the same constellations, down to the same minutes, for each newborn, the one for his son, the other for his little slave. For when the women began to be in labor, they informed each other what was happening in each one's house, and they prepared messengers to send to each other, so that the birth, as soon as it happened, would be announced to each; and they had easily arranged, as in their own domain, that it should be announced immediately. And so the messengers sent by each, he said, met each other at a point equidistant from the two houses, so that neither of them was able to note any other position of the stars or any other fraction of a moment. And yet Firminus, born to an ample position among his family, ran along the brighter paths of the world, grew in riches, was raised to honors; while that slave served his masters, the yoke of his condition not at all loosened, as the very man who knew him reported.

7.9CSEL 33:150–151

His itaque auditis et creditis — talis quippe narrauerat—omnis illa reluctatio mea soluta concidit, et primo Firminum ipsum conatus sum ab illa curiositate reuocare, cum dicerem, constellationibus eius inspectis ut uera pronuntiarem, debuisse me utique uidere ibi parentes inter suos esse primarios, nobilem familiam propriae ciuitatis, natales ingenuos, honestam educationem liberalesque doctrinas; at si me ille seruus ex eisdem constellationibus — quia et illius ipsae essent — consuluisset, ut eidem quoque uera proferrem, debuisse me rursus ibi uidere abiectissimam familiam, conditionem seruilem et cetera longe a prioribus aliena longeque distantia. unde autem fieret, ut eadem inspiciens diuersa dicerem, si uera dicerem — si autem eadem dicerem, falsa dicerem - inde certissime colligi ea, quae uera consideratis constellationibus dicerentur, non arte dici, sed sorte, quae autem falsa, non artis inperitia, sed sortis mendacio.

When I had heard and believed this (for such a man had told it), all my resistance collapsed and fell; and first I tried to call Firminus himself back from that curiosity, telling him that if, on inspecting his constellations, I were to declare the truth, I should certainly have seen there parents who were leading citizens among their own people, a noble family in their city, free birth, a respectable upbringing, and liberal education; but if that slave had consulted me on the basis of the same constellations (since they were his too), then in order to tell him too the truth I should have seen there a most lowly family, a servile condition, and everything else far removed and far different from the first. So if, looking at the same things, I were to say different things, I would be speaking truly; but if I said the same things, I would be speaking falsely. From this it could be concluded with the greatest certainty that the true things said on consideration of the constellations are said not by art but by chance, and the false ones not from lack of skill in the art but from the lies of chance.

7.10CSEL 33:151–152

Hinc autem accepto aditu ipse mecum talia ruminando, ne quis eorundem delirorum, qui talem quaestum sequerentur, quos iam iamque inuadere atque inrisos refellere cupiebam, mihi ita resisteret, quasi aut Firminus mihi aut illi pater falsa narrauerit, intendi considerationem in eos qui gemini nascuntur, quorum plerique ita post inuicem funduntur ex utero, ut paruum ipsum temporis interuallum, quantamlibet uim in rerum natura habere contendant, colligi tamen humana obseruatione non possit litterisque signari omnino non ualeat, quas mathematicus inspecturus est, ut uera pronuntiet. et non erunt uera, quia easdem litteras inspiciens eadem debuit dicere de Esau et Iacob; sed non eadem utrique acciderunt. falsa ergo diceret aut, si uera diceret, non eadem diceret: at eadem inspiceret. non ergo arte, sed sorte uera diceret. tu enim, domine, iustissime moderator uniuersitatis, consulentibus consultisque nescientibus occulto instinctu agis, ut, dum quisque consulit, hoc audiat, quod eum oportet audire occultis meritis animarum ex abysso iusti iudicii tui. cui non dicat homo: "quid est hoc?" "ut quid hoc?" non dicat, non dicat; homo est enim.

With this opening, and ruminating on such things by myself, so that none of those madmen who pursued such gain, whom I now longed to attack and refute with ridicule, could resist me by saying that Firminus had told me falsehoods or his father had told him, I turned my attention to those who are born twins. Most of them come from the womb so soon one after the other that the small interval of time, however much force they claim it has in the nature of things, cannot be caught by human observation or recorded at all in the tables that the astrologer is to inspect in order to declare the truth. And they will not be true, because, inspecting the same tables, he would have had to say the same things of Esau and Jacob; but the same things did not happen to both. So he would speak falsely; or, if he spoke truly, he would not say the same things; yet he would be inspecting the same things. So he would speak truly not by art but by chance. For you, Lord, most just ruler of the universe, by a hidden instinct, while those who consult and those consulted do not know it, bring it about that each one who consults hears what he ought to hear, according to the hidden merits of souls, from the abyss of your just judgment. Let no one say to you, “What is this?” or “Why is this?” Let him not say it, let him not say it; for he is a human being.

7.11CSEL 33:152–153

Iam itaque me, adiutor meus, illis uinculis solueras, et quaerebam, unde malum, et non erat exitus. sed me non sinebas ullis fluctibus cogitationis auferri ab ea fide, qua credebam et esse te et esse inconmutabilem substantiam tuam et esse de hominibus curam et iudicium tuum et in Christo, filio tuo, domino nostro, atque scripturis sanctis, quas ecclesiae tuae catholicae conmendaret auctoritas, uiam te posuisse salutis humanae ad eam uitam, quae post hanc mortem futura est. his itaque saluis atque inconcusse roboratis in animo meo quaerebam aestuans, unde sit malum. quae illa tormenta parturientis cordis mei, qui gemitus, deus meus! et ibi erant aures tuae nesciente me. et cum in silentio fortiter quaererem, magnae uoces erant ad misericordiam tuam, tacitae contritiones animi mei. tu sciebas, quid patiebar, et nullus hominum. quantum enim erat, quod inde digerebatur per linguam meam in aures familiarissimorum meorum! numquid tumultus animae meae, cui nec tempora nec os meum sufficiebat, sonabat eis? totum tamen ibat in auditum tuum, quod rugiebam a gemitu cordis mei, et ante te erat desiderium meum et lumen oculorum meorum non erat mecum. intus enim erat, ego autem foris, nec in loco illud. at ego intendebam in ea, quae locis continentur, et non ibi inueniebam locum ad requiescendum, nec recipiebant me ista, ut dicerem: "at est et bene est," nec dimittebant redire, ubi mihi satis esset bene. superior enim eram istis, te uero inferior, et tu gaudium uerum mihi subdito tibi et tu mihi subieceras quae infra me creasti. et hoc erat rectum temperamentum et media regio salutis meae, ut manerem ad imaginem tuam et tibi seruiens dominarer corpori. sed cum superbe contra te surgerem et currerem aduersus dominum in ceruice crassa scuti mei, etiam ista infima supra me facta sunt et premebant, et nusquam erat laxamentum et respiramentum. ipsa occurrebant undique aceruatim et conglobatim cernenti, cogitanti autem imagines corporum ipsae opponebantur redeunti, quasi diceretur: "quo is, indigne et sordide?" et haec de uulnere meo creuerant, quia humiliasti tamquam uulneratum superbum, et tumore meo separabar abs te et nimis inflata facies claudebat oculos meos.

So now, my Helper, you had freed me from those chains, and I was asking where evil comes from, and there was no way out. But you did not allow me to be carried away by any waves of thought from the faith by which I believed that you exist, and that your substance is unchangeable, and that you care for human beings and judge them, and that in Christ, your Son, our Lord, and in the Holy Scriptures, which the authority of your catholic church commended, you had set the way of human salvation to the life that will come after this death. With these things safe and unshakably strengthened in my mind, I sought feverishly where evil comes from. What torments of my heart in labor, what groans, my God! And your ears were there, though I did not know it. And when I sought vigorously in silence, the silent contritions of my mind were loud cries to your mercy. You knew what I was suffering, and no human being did. For how much of it was expressed through my tongue into the ears of my closest friends? Did the tumult of my soul, for which neither time nor my mouth sufficed, sound to them? Yet all of it went into your hearing, “what I roared from the groaning of my heart; and my desire was before you, and the light of my eyes was not with me.” For it was within, and I was outside; nor was it in a place. But I was attending to things contained in places, and there I found no place to rest; nor did those things receive me so that I could say, “It is enough, and it is well”; nor did they let me return to where it would be well enough for me. For I was superior to those things, but inferior to you; and you are my true joy when I am subject to you, and you had subjected to me the things you created below me. And this was the right balance and the middle region of my salvation: that I should remain in your image, and by serving you be master of the body. But when I rose up proudly against you and “ran against the Lord with the thick neck of my shield,” even these lowest things were placed above me and pressed me down, and there was nowhere any relief or breathing space. They met me on every side in heaps and masses as I looked; and as I thought, the images of bodies themselves blocked my return, as if to say, “Where are you going, unworthy and filthy one?” And these things had grown out of my wound, because “you humbled the proud like one wounded,” and by my swelling I was separated from you, and my face, too puffed up, closed my eyes.

7.12CSEL 33:153–154

Tu uero, domine, in aeternum manes et non in aeternum irasceris nobis, quoniam miseratus es terram et cinerem, et placuit in conspectu tuo reformare deformia mea. et stimulis internis agitabas me, ut inpatiens essem, donec mihi per interiorem aspectum certus esses. et residebat tumor meus ex occulta manu medicinae tuae aciesque conturbata et contenebrata mentis meae acri collyrio salubrium dolorum de die in diem sanabatur.

But you, Lord, “abide forever,” and you are not “angry with us forever,” since you have had pity on dust and ashes, and it pleased you in your sight to reform my deformities. And you stirred me with inner goads, so that I would be restless until you were certain to me by inner sight. And my swelling subsided under the hidden hand of your healing, and the troubled and darkened sight of my mind was healed from day to day by the sharp salve of salutary sorrows.

7.13CSEL 33:154

Et primo uolens ostendere mihi, quam resistas superbis, humilibus autem des gratiam et quanta misericordia tua demonstrata sit hominibus uia humilitatis, quod uerbum caro factum est et habitauit inter homines, procurasti mihi per quendam hominem inmanissimo tyfo turgidum quosdam Platonicorum libros ex graeca lingua in latinum uersos, et ibi legi non quidem his uerbis, sed hoc idem omnino multis et multiplicibus suaderi rationibus, quod in principio erat uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum: hoc erat in principio apud deum; omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil, quod factum est; in eo uita est, et uita erat lux hominum; et lux in tenebris lucet, et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt; et quia hominis anima, quamuis testimonium perhibeat de lumine, non est tamen ipsa lumen, sed uerbum, deus ipse, est lumen uerum, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum; et quia in hoc mundo erat, et mundus per eum factus est, et mundus eum non cognouit. quia uero in sua propria uenit et sui eum non receperunt, quotquot autem receperunt eum, dedit eis potestatem filios dei fieri credentibus in nomine eius, non ibi legi.

And first, wishing to show me how you “resist the proud but give grace to the humble,” and with how great mercy the way of humility has been shown to people, in that “the Word was made flesh and dwelt” among men, you procured for me, through a certain man puffed up with most monstrous pride, some books of the Platonists translated from Greek into Latin. And there I read, not indeed in these words, but entirely the same thing urged by many and varied reasons: that “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; he was in the beginning with God; all things were made through him, and without him nothing was made that was made; in him is life, and the life was the light of men; and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it”; and that the soul of man, though it “bears witness to the light,” is not itself the light, but the Word, God himself, is “the true light that enlightens every man coming into this world”; and that “he was in this world, and the world was made through him, and the world did not know him.” But that “he came to his own, and his own did not receive him; but as many as received him, to them he gave power to become children of God, to those who believe in his name,” I did not read there.

7.14CSEL 33:154–156

Item legi ibi, quia uerbum, deus, non ex carne, non ex sanguine neque ex uoluntate uiri neque ex uoluntate carnis, sed ex deo natus est; sed quia uerbum caro factus est et habitauit in nobis, non ibi legi. indagaui quippe in illis litteris uarie dictum et in multis modis, quod sit filius in forma patris non rapinam arbitratus esse aequalis deo, quia naturaliter id ipsum est, sed quia semet ipsum exinaniuit formam serui accipiens, in similitudinem hominum factus et habitu inuentus ut homo, humiliauit se factus oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis: propter quod deus eum exaltauit a mortuis et donauit ei nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur caelestium, terrestrium et infernorum et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris non habent illi libri. quod autem ante omnia tempora et supra omnia tempora inconmutabiliter manet unigenitus filius tuus coaeternus tibi et quia de plenitudine eius accipiunt animae, ut beatae sint, et quia participatione manentis in se sapientiae renouantur, ut sapientes sint, est ibi; quod autem secundum tempus pro inpiis mortuus est et filio unico tuo non pepercisti, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidisti eum non est ibi. abscondisti enim haec a sapientibus et reuelasti ea paruulis, ut uenirent ad eum laborantes et onerati et reficeret eos, quoniam mitis est et humilis corde, et dirigit mites in iudicio et docet mansuetos uias suas uidens humilitatem nostram et laborem nostrum et dimittens omnia peccata nostra. qui autem cothurno tamquam doctrinae sublimioris elati non audiunt dicentem: discite a me, quoniam mitis sum et humilis corde, et inuenietis requiem animabus uestris, etsi cognoscunt deum, non sicut deum glorificant aut gratias agunt, sed euanescunt in cogitationibus suis et obscuratur insipiens cor eorum; dicentes se esse sapientes stulti fiunt.

I also read there that the Word, God, was born “not of flesh, nor of blood, nor of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of God.” But that “the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us,” I did not read there. For I found in those writings, said variously and in many ways, that the Son, being “in the form of the Father, did not think it robbery to be equal with God,” because by nature he is the very same. But that “he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men and found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross; wherefore God exalted him” from the dead “and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father”: those books do not have. That before all times and above all times your only-begotten Son abides unchangeably, coeternal with you, and that souls receive “of his fullness” so as to be happy, and that they are renewed by participation in the wisdom that abides in itself so as to be wise: this is there. But that “in due time he died for the ungodly,” and that “you did not spare your only Son, but delivered him up for us all,” is not there. For “you have hidden these things from the wise and revealed them to little ones,” so that “those who labor and are burdened” might come to him and he might refresh them, because he is “gentle and humble of heart,” and “guides the gentle in judgment and teaches the meek his ways, seeing our humility and our toil and forgiving all our sins.” But those who are lifted up on the tragic buskin, as it were, of a loftier teaching do not hear him saying, “Learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart, and you will find rest for your souls”; and “although they know God, they do not glorify him as God or give thanks, but become vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart is darkened; saying that they are wise, they become fools.”

7.15CSEL 33:156–157

Et ideo legebam ibi etiam inmutatam gloriam incorruptionis tuae in idola et uaria simulacra, in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis et uolucrum et quadrupedum et serpentium, uidelicet Aegyptium cibum, quo Esau perdidit primogenita sua, quoniam caput quadrupedis pro te honorauit populus primogenitus, conuersus corde in Aegyptum et curuans imaginem tuam, animam suam, ante imaginem uituli manducantis foenum. inueni haec ibi et non manducaui. placuit enim tibi, domine, auferre opprobrium diminutionis ab Iacob, ut maior seruiret minori, et uocasti gentes in hereditatem tuam. et ego ad te ueneram ex gentibus et intendi in aurum, quod ab Aegypto uoluisti ut auferret populus tuus, quoniam tuum erat, ubicumque erat. et dixisti Atheniensibus per apostolum tuum, quod in te uiuimus et mouemur et sumus, sicut et quidam secundum eos dixerunt, et utique inde erant illi libri. et non adtendi in idola Aegyptiorum, quibus de auro tuo ministrabant, qui transmutauerunt ueritatem dei in mendacium et coluerunt et seruierunt creaturae potius quam creatori.

And so I also read there that the glory of your incorruption had been changed into idols and various images, "into the likeness of the image of corruptible man, and of birds and four-footed beasts and serpents": that is, into the Egyptian food for which Esau lost his birthright, since your first-born people honored the head of a four-footed beast in place of you, turning back in heart to Egypt and bowing your image, their own soul, before the image "of a calf that eats hay." I found these things there, and I did not feed on them. For it pleased you, O Lord, to take away from Jacob the reproach of being the lesser, "that the elder should serve the younger"; and you called the Gentiles into your inheritance. And I had come to you from among the Gentiles, and I set my mind on the gold which you willed your people to carry away from Egypt, since it was yours wherever it was. And you said to the Athenians through your apostle that in you "we live and move and have our being," as some of their own had also said; and it was from there, surely, that those books came. And I paid no heed to the idols of the Egyptians, whom they served with your gold, they "who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator."

7.16CSEL 33:157–158

Et inde admonitus redire ad memet ipsum intraui in intima mea duce te et potui, quoniam factus es adiutor meus. intraui et uidi qualicumque oculo animae meae supra eundem oculum animae meae, supra mentem meam lucem inconmutabilem, non hanc uulgarem et conspicuam omni carni nec quasi ex eodem genere grandior erat, tamquam si ista multo multoque clarius claresceret totumque occuparet magnitudine. non hoc illa erat, sed aliud, aliud ualde ab istis omnibus. nec ita erat supra mentem meam, sicut oleum super aquam nec sicut caelum super terram, sed superior, quia ipsa fecit me, et ego inferior, quia factus ab ea. qui nouit ueritatem, nouit eam, et qui nouit eam, nouit aeternitatem. caritas nouit eam. o aeterna ueritas et uera caritas et cara aeternitas! tu es deus meus, tibi suspiro die ac nocte. et cum te primum cognoui, tu assumsisti me, ut uiderem esse, quod uiderem, et nondum me esse, qui uiderem. et reuerberasti infirmitatem aspectus mei radians in me uehementer, et contremui amore et horrore: et inueni longe me esse a te in regione dissimilitudinis, tamquam audirem uocem tuam de excelso: "cibus sum grandium: cresce et manducabis me. nec tu me in te mutabis sicut cibum carnis tuae, sed tu mutaberis in me." et cognoui, quoniam pro iniquitate erudisti hominem et tabescere fecisti sicut araneam animam meam, et dixi: "numquid nihil est ueritas, quoniam neque per finita neque per infinita locorum spatia diffusa est?" et clamasti de longinquo: ego sum qui sum. et audiui, sicut auditur in corde, et non erat prorsus, unde dubitarem faciliusque dubitarem uiuere me quam non esse. ueritatem, quae per ea, quae facta sunt, intellecta conspicitur.

And being admonished by this to return to my own self, I entered into my inmost being with you as my guide, and I was able to, because "you had become my helper." I entered, and with the eye of my soul, such as it was, I saw above that same eye of my soul, above my mind, the unchangeable light: not this common light visible to all flesh, nor something of the same kind, only greater, as if this light were to shine far, far more brightly and fill all things with its greatness. It was not that, but something else, something very different from all these. Nor was it above my mind as oil is above water, or as heaven is above earth; it was higher, because it made me, and I was lower, because I was made by it. Whoever knows the truth knows it, and whoever knows it knows eternity. Love knows it. O eternal truth and true love and beloved eternity! You are my God; to you I sigh day and night. And when I first knew you, you lifted me up so that I might see that there was something to see, but that I was not yet one able to see it. And you beat back the weakness of my sight, shining upon me with great force, and I trembled with love and dread; and I found that I was far from you in the region of unlikeness, as if I heard your voice from on high: "I am the food of the full-grown; grow, and you will feed on me. Nor will you change me into you, like the food of your flesh; you will be changed into me." And I knew that "for iniquity you have chastened man, and made my soul waste away like a spider's web," and I said, "Is truth then nothing, since it is not spread through space, either finite or infinite?" And you cried from afar: "I am who I am." And I heard, as one hears in the heart, and there was no longer any ground at all for me to doubt; I would sooner have doubted that I was alive than that truth exists, "which is clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made."

7.17CSEL 33:158

Et inspexi cetera infra te et uidi nec omnino esse nec omnino non esse: esse quidem, quoniam abs te sunt, non esse autem, quoniam id quod es non sunt. id enim uere est, quod inconmutabiliter manet. mihi autem inhaerere deo bonum est, quia, si non manebo in illo, nec in me potero. ille autem in se manens innouat omnia; et dominus meus es, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges.

And I looked at the other things below you, and I saw that they neither wholly are nor wholly are not: they are, because they are from you; yet they are not, because they are not what you are. For that truly is which remains unchangeably. "But it is good for me to cling to God," because if I do not remain in him, I shall not be able to remain in myself either. But he, "remaining in himself, renews all things"; and "you are my Lord, since you have no need of my goods."

7.18CSEL 33:158–159

Et manifestatum est mihi, quoniam bona sunt, quae corrumpuntur, quae neque si summa bona essent, corrumpi possent, neque nisi bona essent, corrumpi possent, quia, si summa bona essent, incorruptibilia essent, si autem nulla bona essent, quid in eis conrumperetur non esset. nocet enim corruptio et, nisi bonum minueret, non noceret. aut igitur nihil nocet corruptio, quod fieri non potest, aut, quod certissimum est, omnia, quae corrumpuntur, priuantur bono. si autem omni bono priuabuntur, omnino non erunt. si enim erunt et corrumpi iam non poterunt, meliora erunt, quia incorruptibiliter permanebunt. et quid monstrosius quam ea dicere omni bono amisso facta meliora? ergo si omni bono priuabuntur, omnino nulla erunt: ergo quamdiu sunt, bona sunt. ergo quaecumque sunt, bona sunt, malumque illud, quod quaerebam unde esset, non est substantia, quia, si substantia esset, bonum esset. aut enim esset incorruptibilis substantia, magnum utique bonum, aut substantia corruptibilis esset, quae nisi bona esset, corruptibilis non esset. itaque uidi et manifestatum est mihi, quia omnia bona tu fecisti et prorsus nullae substantiae sunt, quas tu non fecisti. et quoniam non aequalia omnia fecisti, ideo sunt omnia, quia singula bona sunt et simul omnia ualde bona, quoniam fecit deus noster omnia bona ualde.

And it was made plain to me that things which are corrupted are good. They could not be corrupted if they were the highest goods, nor could they be corrupted unless they were good: if they were the highest goods, they would be incorruptible; but if they were not good at all, there would be nothing in them to be corrupted. For corruption does harm, and unless it diminished some good, it would do no harm. So either corruption does no harm, which cannot be, or, what is most certain, all things that are corrupted are deprived of some good. But if they are deprived of all good, they will not exist at all. For if they exist and can no longer be corrupted, they will be better, because they will remain incorruptibly. And what could be more monstrous than to say that things become better by losing all good? So if they are deprived of all good, they will be nothing at all; therefore, as long as they exist, they are good. Therefore whatever exists is good, and that evil whose origin I was seeking is not a substance, because if it were a substance, it would be good. For it would be either an incorruptible substance, which is certainly a great good, or a corruptible substance, which could not be corruptible unless it were good. And so I saw, and it was made plain to me, that you made all things good, and that there are absolutely no substances which you did not make. And because you did not make all things equal, all things exist in this way: each one is good, and all together are very good, since "our God made all things very good."

7.19CSEL 33:159–160

Et tibi omnino non est malum, non solum tibi sed nec uniuersae creaturae tuae, quia extra non est aliquid, quod inrumpat et corrumpat ordinem, quem inposuisti ei. in partibus autem eius quaedam quibusdam quia non conueniunt, mala putantur; et eadem ipsa non conueniunt aliis et bona sunt et in semet ipsis bona sunt. et omnia haec, quae sibimet inuicem non conueniunt, conueniunt inferiori parti rerum, quam terram dicimus, habentem caelum suum nubilosum atque uentosum congruum sibi. et absit, ut dicerem iam: "non essent ista", quia etsi sola ista cernerem, desiderarem quidem meliora, sed iam etiam de solis istis laudare te deberem, quoniam laudandum te ostendunt de terra dracones et omnes abyssi, ignis, grando, nix, glacies, spiritus tempestatis, quae faciunt uerbum tuum, montes et omnes colles, ligna fructifera et omnes cedri, bestiae et omnia pecora, reptilia et uolatilia pennata; reges terrae et omnes populi, principes et omnes iudices terrae, iuuenes et uirgines, seniores cum iunioribus laudent nomen tuum. cum uero etiam de caelis te laudent, laudent te, deus noster, in excelsis omnes angeli tui, omnes uirtutes tuae, sol et luna, omnes stellae et lumen, caeli caelorum et aquae, quae super caelos sunt, laudent nomen tuum: non iam desiderabam meliora, quia omnia cogitabam, et meliora quidem superiora quam inferiora, sed meliora omnia quam sola superiora indicio saniore pendebam.

And for you there is no evil at all, and not only for you but for your whole creation, because there is nothing outside it that could break in and corrupt the order you have imposed on it. But in its parts some things are thought evil because they do not suit certain others; yet these same things suit others and are good, and they are good in themselves. And all these things that do not suit one another suit the lower part of the universe, which we call the earth, with its cloudy and windy sky fitted to it. And far be it from me now to say, "These things should not exist," because even if I saw these alone, I would indeed long for better things, but even for these alone I ought to praise you; since from the earth "dragons and all the deeps, fire, hail, snow, ice, the stormy wind, which fulfill your word; mountains and all hills, fruitful trees and all cedars; beasts and all cattle, creeping things and winged birds; kings of the earth and all peoples, princes and all judges of the earth; young men and maidens, old men with the younger, praise your name" and show that you are to be praised. And since from the heavens also they praise you, "let all your angels praise you, our God, in the heights, all your powers, sun and moon, all the stars and light, the heaven of heavens and the waters that are above the heavens; let them praise your name." I no longer longed for better things, because I was considering them all, and with a sounder judgment I weighed that higher things are indeed better than lower, but that all things together are better than the higher alone.

7.20CSEL 33:160–161

Non est sanitas eis, quibus displicet aliquid creaturae tuae, sicut mihi non erat, cum displicerent multa, quae fecisti. et quia non audebat anima mea, ut ei displiceret deus meus, nolebat esse tuum quidquid ei displicebat. et inde ierat in opinionem duarum substantiarum et non requiescebat et aliena loquebatur. et inde rediens fecerat sibi deum per infinita spatia locorum omnium et eum putauerat esse te et eum collocauerat in corde suo et facta erat rursus templum idoli sui abominandum tibi. sed posteaquam fouisti caput nescientis et clausisti oculos meos, ne uiderent uanitatem, cessaui de me paululum, et consopita est insania mea; et euigilaui in te et uidi te infinitum aliter, et uisus iste non a carne trahebatur.

There is no soundness in those who are displeased with any part of your creation, as there was none in me when many things you made displeased me. And because my soul did not dare to be displeased with my God, it would not have anything that displeased it be yours. And from there it had gone off into the opinion of two substances, and it found no rest, and it spoke strange things. And turning back from there, it had made for itself a god spread through the infinite spaces of all places, and it had thought him to be you, and had set him up in its heart, and had again become the temple of its own idol, abominable to you. But after you cherished my head while I did not know it, and "closed my eyes lest they should see vanity," I ceased from myself a little, and my madness was lulled to sleep; and I awoke in you and saw you infinite in another way, and this sight was not drawn from the flesh.

7.21CSEL 33:161

Et respexi alia et uidi tibi debere quia sunt et in te cuncta finita, sed aliter, non quasi in loco, sed quia tu es omnitenens manu ueritate, et omnia uera sunt, in quantum sunt, nec quicquam est falsitas, nisi cum putatur esse quod non est. et uidi, quia non solum locis sua quaeque suis conueniunt sed etiam temporibus et quia tu, qui solus aeternus es, non post innumerabilia spatia temporum coepisti operari, quia omnia spatia temporum, quae praeterierunt et quae praeteribunt, nec abirent nec uenirent nisi te operante et manente.

And I looked back at other things, and I saw that they owe to you the fact that they exist, and that all things are bounded in you, but in another way: not as in a place, but because you hold all things in your hand in truth; and all things are true insofar as they exist, and falsehood is nothing except when something is thought to be which is not. And I saw that each thing suits not only its own place but also its own time, and that you, who alone are eternal, did not begin to work after countless spaces of time, because all spaces of time, both those that have passed and those that will pass, would neither go nor come unless you were working and abiding.

7.22CSEL 33:161

Et sensi expertus non esse mirum, quod palato non sano poena est et panis, qui sano suauis est, et oculis aegris odiosa lux, quae puris amabilis. et iustitia tua displicet iniquis, nedum uipera et uermiculus, quae bona creasti, apta inferioribus creaturae tuae partibus, quibus et ipsi iniqui apti sunt, quanto dissimiliores sunt tibi, apti autem superioribus, quanto similiores fiunt tibi. et quaesiui, quid esset iniquitas, et non inueni substantiam, sed a summa substantia, te deo, detortae in infima uoluntatis peruersitatem proicientis intima sua et tumescentis foras.

And I learned by experience that it is no wonder that bread which is pleasant to a healthy palate is torment to an unhealthy one, and that light, which is lovely to clear eyes, is hateful to sick ones. And your justice displeases the wicked; how much more the viper and the little worm, which you created good, fitted to the lower parts of your creation, to which the wicked themselves are fitted insofar as they are unlike you, but fitted to the higher parts insofar as they become more like you. And I asked what wickedness is, and I found not a substance, but the perversity of a will turned aside from the highest substance, from you, O God, toward the lowest things, casting away its inward parts and swelling outward.

7.23CSEL 33:161–163

Et mirabar, quod iam te amabam, non pro te phantasma, et non stabam frui deo meo, sed rapiebar ad te decore tuo moxque diripiebar abs te pondere meo et ruebam in ista cum gemitu; et pondus hoc consuetudo carnalis. sed mecum erat memoria tui, neque ullo modo dubitabam esse cui cohaererem, sed nondum me esse, qui cohaererem, quoniam corpus, quod corrumpitur, adgrauat animam et deprimit terrena inhabitatio sensum multa cogitantem, eramque certissimus, quod inuisibilia tua a constitutione mundi per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur, sempiterna quoque uirtus et diuinitas tua. quaerens enim, unde adprobarem pulchritudinem corporum siue caelestium siue terrestrium et quid mihi praesto esset integre de mutabilibus iudicanti et dicenti: "hoc ita esse debet, illud non ita", hoc ergo quaerens, unde iudicarem, cum ita iudicarem, inueneram inconmutabilem et ueram ueritatis aeternitatem supra mentem meam conmutabilem. atque ita gradatim a corporibus ad sentientem per corpus animam atque inde ad eius interiorem uim, cui sensus corporis exteriora nuntiaret, et quousque possunt bestiae, atque inde rursus ad ratiocinantem potentiam, ad quam refertur iudicandum quod sumitur a sensibus corporis; quae se quoque in me conperiens mutabilem erexit se ad intellegentiam suam et abduxit cogitationem a consuetudine, subtrahens se contradicentibus turbis phantasmatum, ut inueniret, quo lumine aspargeretur, cum sine ulla dubitatione clamaret inconmutabile praeferendum esse mutabili, unde nosset ipsum inconmutabile — quod nisi aliquo modo nosset, nullo modo illud mutabili certa praeponeret — et peruenit ad id, quod est in ictu trepidantis aspectus. tunc uero inuisibilia tua per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspexi, sed aciem figere non eualui et repercussa infirmitate redditus solitis non mecum ferebam nisi amantem memoriam et quasi olefacta desiderantem, quae comedere nondum possem.

And I marveled that I now loved you, and not a phantom in your place; and yet I did not stand still to enjoy my God, but I was swept up to you by your beauty and soon torn away from you by my own weight, and I fell back into these things with a groan; and this weight was carnal habit. Yet the memory of you was with me, and I had no doubt at all that there was one to whom I should cling, but that I was not yet one who could cling, since "the body, which is corrupted, weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling presses down the mind that thinks many things." And I was most certain that "your invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made, even your eternal power and divinity." For I was asking by what standard I approved the beauty of bodies, whether heavenly or earthly, and what was at hand to help me judge soundly about changeable things and say, "This ought to be so, that ought not." Asking, then, by what I judged when I judged in this way, I had found the unchangeable and true eternity of truth above my changeable mind. And so, step by step, I went from bodies to the soul that perceives through the body, and from there to its inner power, to which the bodily senses report external things, as far as the beasts can go; and from there again to the reasoning power, to which is referred for judgment what is taken in by the bodily senses. This power too, finding itself changeable in me, raised itself up to its own understanding and drew its thought away from habit, withdrawing from the contradictory crowds of images, so as to find what light it was flooded with when it cried out without any doubt that the unchangeable is to be preferred to the changeable, and how it knew the unchangeable itself (for unless it knew it in some way, it could never have set it with certainty above the changeable); and it arrived at That Which Is, in the flash of a trembling glance. Then indeed I saw "your invisible things, understood through the things that are made"; but I was not strong enough to fix my gaze, and my weakness was struck back and I returned to my usual things, carrying with me nothing but a loving memory, a longing, as it were, for things whose fragrance I had caught but which I could not yet eat.

7.24CSEL 33:163–164

Et quaerebam uiam conparandi roboris, quod esset idoneum ad fruendum te, nec inueniebam, donec amplecterer mediatorem dei et hominum, hominem Christum Iesum, qui est super omnia deus benedictus in saecula, uocantem et dicentem: ego sum uia ueritatis et uita, et cibum, cui capiendo inualidus eram, miscentem carni, quoniam uerbum caro factum est, ut infantiae nostrae lactesceret sapientia tua, per quam creasti omnia. non enim tenebam deum meum Iesum humilis humilem nec cuius rei magistra esset eius infirmitas noueram. uerbum enim tuum, aeterna ueritas, superioribus creaturae tuae partibus supereminens subditos erigit ad se ipsam, in inferioribus autem aedificauit sibi humilem domum de limo nostro, per quam subdendos deprimeret a se ipsis et ad se traiceret, sanans tumorem et nutriens amorem, ne fiducia sui progrederentur longius, sed potius infirmarentur uidentes ante pedes suos infirmam diuinitatem ex participatione tunicae pelliciae nostrae et lassi prosternerentur in eam, illa autem surgens leuaret eos.

And I sought a way to gain the strength that would make me fit to enjoy you, and I did not find it until I embraced "the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who is over all, God blessed for ever," calling and saying, "I am the way of truth and the life," and mingling with flesh the food which I was too weak to take, since "the Word was made flesh," so that your wisdom, through which you created all things, might become milk for our infancy. For I did not hold my God, the humble Jesus, with humility, nor did I know what his weakness was meant to teach. For your Word, the eternal Truth, towering above the higher parts of your creation, raises those who are subject to it up to itself; but in the lower parts it built for itself a humble house from our clay, through which to bring down from themselves those who were to be made subject and carry them over to itself, healing their pride and nourishing their love, so that they would go no further in self-confidence, but rather become weak, seeing at their feet the Godhead made weak by sharing our "garment of skin," and, weary, would cast themselves down upon it, and it, rising, would lift them up.

7.25CSEL 33:164–165

Ego uero aliud putabam tantumque sentiebam de domino Christo meo, quantum de excellentis sapientiae uiro, cui nullus posset aequari, praesertim quia mirabiliter natus ex uirgine ad exemplum contemnendorum temporalium prae adipiscenda immortalitate diuina pro nobis cura tantam auctoritatem magisterii meruisse uidebatur. quid autem sacramenti haberet uerbum caro factum, ne suspicari quidem poteram. tantum cognoueram ex his, quae de illo scripta traderentur, quia manducauit et bibit, dormiuit, ambulauit, exhilaratus est, contristatus est, sermocinatus est, non haesisse carnem illam uerbo tuo nisi cum anima et mente humana. nouit hoc omnis, qui nouit incommutabilitatem uerbi tui, quam ego iam noueram, quantum poteram, nec omnino quicquam inde dubitabam. etenim nunc mouere membra corporis per uoluntatem, nunc non mouere, nunc aliquo affectu affici, nunc non affici, nunc proferre per signa sapientes sententias, nunc esse in silentio propria sunt mutabilitatis animae et mentis. quae si falsa de illo scripta essent, etiam omnia periclitarentur mendacio neque in illis litteris ulla fidei salus generi humano remaneret. quia itaque uera scripta sunt, totum hominem in Christo agnoscebam, non corpus tantum hominis aut cum corpore sine mente animum, sed ipsum hominem, non persona ueritatis, sed magna quadam naturae humanae excellentia et perfectiore participatione sapientiae praeferri ceteris arbitrabar. Alypius autem deum carne indutum ita putabat credi a catholicis, ut praeter deum et carnem non esset in Christo anima, mentemque hominis non existimabat in eo praedicari. et quoniam bene persuasum tenebat ea, quae de illo memoriae mandata sunt, sine uitali et rationali creatura non fieri, ad ipsam Christianam fidem pigrius mouebatur. sed postea haereticorum Apollinaristarum hunc errorem esse cognoscens catholicae fidei conlaetatus et contemperatus est. ego autem aliquanto posterius didicisse me fateor, in eo quod uerbum caro factum est quomodo catholica ueritas a Fotini falsitate dirimatur. inprobatio quippe haereticorum facit eminere, quid ecclesia tua sentiat et quid habeat sana doctrina. oportuit enim et haereses esse, ut probati manifesti fierent inter infirmos.

But I thought otherwise, and I thought of Christ my Lord only as of a man of surpassing wisdom whom no one could equal; especially because, born wonderfully of a virgin to give an example of despising temporal things for the sake of gaining immortality, he seemed by divine care for us to have earned so great an authority as a teacher. But what mystery was contained in "the Word was made flesh," I could not even guess. I had only learned from what was handed down in writing about him that he ate and drank, slept, walked, rejoiced, was sad, and conversed; that this flesh had not been joined to your Word except together with a human soul and mind. Everyone knows this who knows the unchangeableness of your Word, which I already knew as far as I could, and I had no doubt at all about it. For at one time to move the limbs of the body by the will and at another not to move them, at one time to be affected by some emotion and at another not, at one time to utter wise sayings by signs and at another to keep silence, belong to the changeableness of soul and mind. If these things written about him were false, all the rest would also be endangered by falsehood, and no saving faith for the human race would remain in those writings. Since, then, what is written is true, I acknowledged in Christ a whole man: not the body of a man only, nor a soul with the body but without a mind, but a man himself; yet I thought him to be preferred to others not as the person of the Truth, but because of some great excellence of his human nature and a more perfect share in wisdom. Alypius, on the other hand, thought that the catholics believed God to be clothed with flesh in such a way that there was no soul in Christ besides God and flesh, and he did not think that a human mind was proclaimed in him. And since he was firmly persuaded that the things recorded of him could not be done except by a living and rational creature, he moved rather slowly toward the Christian faith itself. But later, learning that this was the error of the Apollinarian heretics, he rejoiced in the catholic faith and conformed himself to it. I, for my part, confess that it was some while later that I learned how, in the matter of "the Word was made flesh," catholic truth is distinguished from the falsehood of Photinus. For the refutation of heretics makes what your church holds, and what sound doctrine contains, stand out. "For there had to be heresies, so that those who are approved might be made manifest" among the weak.

7.26CSEL 33:165–166

Sed tunc lectis Platonicorum illis libris posteaquam inde admonitus quaerere incorpoream ueritatem inuisibilia tua per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspexi et repulsus sensi, quid per tenebras animae meae contemplari non sinerer, certus esse te et infinitum esse nec tamen per locos finitos infinitosue diffundi et uere te esse, qui semper idem ipse esses, ex nulla parte nulloque motu alter aut aliter, cetera uero ex te esse omnia, hoc solo firmissimo documento, quia sunt, certus quidem in istis eram, nimis tamen infirmus ad fruendum te. garriebam plane quasi peritus et, nisi in Christo, saluatore nostro, uiam tuam quaererem, non peritus, sed periturus essem. iam enim coeperam uelle uideri sapiens plenus poena mea et non flebam, insuper autem inflabar scientia. ubi enim erat illa aedificans caritas a fundamento humilitatis, quod est Christus Iesus? aut quando illi libri me docerent eam? in quos me propterea, priusquam scripturas tuas considerarem, credo uoluisti incurrere, ut inprimeretur memoriae meae, quomodo ex eis affectus essem et, cum postea in libris tuis mansuefactus essem et curantibus digitis tuis contrectarentur uulnera mea, discernerem atque distinguerem, quid interesset inter praesumptionem et confessionem, inter uidentes, quo eundum sit, nec uidentes qua, et uiam ducentem ad beatificam patriam non tantum cernendam sed et habitandam. nam si primo sanctis tuis litteris informatus essem et in earum familiaritate obdulcuisses mihi et post in illa uolumina incidissem, fortasse aut abripuissent me a solidamento pietatis, aut si in affectu quem salubrem inbiberam perstitissem, putarem etiam ex illis libris eum posse concipi, si eos solos quisque didicisset.

But at that time, after reading those books of the Platonists and being admonished by them to seek incorporeal truth, I saw "your invisible things, understood through the things that are made"; and, thrust back, I sensed what it was that the darkness of my soul would not let me contemplate. I was certain that you exist, and are infinite, yet not spread through finite or infinite spaces; that you truly are, you who are always the same, not other or otherwise in any part or by any motion; and that all other things are from you, by this one most solid proof, that they exist. Of these things I was certain, yet far too weak to enjoy you. I chattered away as if I were expert, and unless I had sought your way in Christ our Savior, I would have been not expert but expired. For I had now begun to want to seem wise, full of my own punishment, and I did not weep; worse, I was "puffed up with knowledge." For where was that love which builds up on the foundation of humility, which is Christ Jesus? Or when would those books teach me that? I believe it was your will that I should come upon them before I studied your Scriptures, so that it would be stamped on my memory how I had been affected by them, and so that later, when I had been tamed by your books and my wounds were tended by your healing fingers, I might discern and distinguish the difference between presumption and confession, between those who see where they must go but do not see the way, and the way that leads to the blessed homeland, not only to be seen but to be dwelt in. For if I had first been formed by your holy writings and you had grown sweet to me in familiarity with them, and I had afterward fallen upon those volumes, perhaps they would have torn me away from the solid ground of piety; or, if I had stood firm in the healthy disposition I had drunk in, I might have thought that it could be gained from those books too, if one had learned from them alone.

7.27CSEL 33:166–169

Itaque auidissime arripui uenerabilem stilum spiritus tui et prae ceteris apostolum Paulum, et perierunt illae quaestiones, in quibus mihi aliquando uisus est aduersari sibi et non congruere testimoniis legis et prophetarum textus sermonis eius, et apparuit mihi una facies eloquiorum castorum, et exultare cum tremore didici. et coepi et inueni quidquid illae uerum legeram, hac cum conmendatione gratiae tuae dici, ut qui uidet non sic glorietur, quasi non acceperit, non solum quod uidet, sed etiam ut uideat — quid enim habet quod non accepit? — et ut te, qui es semper idem, non solum admoneatur ut uideat, sed etiam sanetur ut teneat, et qui de longinquo uidere non potest, uiam tamen ambulet, qua ueniat et uideat et teneat, quia, etsi condelectetur homo legi dei secundum interiorem hominem, quid faciet de alia lege in membris suis repugnante legi mentis suae et se captiuum ducente in lege peccati, quae est in membris eius? quoniam iustus es, domine; nos autem peccauimus, inique fecimus, inpie gessimus, et grauata est super nos manus tua, et iuste traditi sumus antiquo peccatori, praeposito mortis, quia persuasit uoluntati nostrae similitudinem uoluntatis suae, qua in ueritate tua non stetit. quid faciet miser homo? quis eum liberabit de corpore mortis huius nisi gratia tua per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, quem genuisti coaeternum et creasti in principio uiarum tuarum, in quo princeps huius mundi non inuenit quicquam morte dignum, et occidit eum; et euacuatum est chirografum, quod erat contrarium nobis? hoc illae litterae non habent. non habent illae paginae uultum pietatis illius, lacrimas confessionis, sacrificium tuum, spiritum contribulatum, cor contritum et humiliatum, populi salutem, sponsam ciuitatem, arram spiritus sancti, poculum pretii nostri. nemo ibi cantat: nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? ab ipso enim salutare meum: etenim ipse deus meus et salutaris meus, susceptor meus: non mouebor amplius. nemo ibi audit uocantem: uenite ad me, qui laboratis. dedignantur ab eo discere, quoniam mitis est et humilis corde. abscondisti enim haec a sapientibus et prudentibus et reuelasti ea paruulis. et aliud est de siluestri cacumine uidere patriam pacis et iter ad eam non inuenire et frustra conari per inuia circum obsidentibus et insidiantibus fugitiuis desertoribus cum principe suo leone et dracone, et aliud tenere uiam illuc ducentem cura caelestis imperatoris munitam, ubi non latrocinantur qui caelestem militiam deseruerunt; uitant enim eam sicut supplicium. haec mihi inuiscerabantur miris modis, cum minimum apostolorum tuorum legerem, et consideraueram opera tua et expaueram.

So I seized most eagerly on the venerable writing of your Spirit, and above all the apostle Paul; and those questions vanished in which he had at one time seemed to me to contradict himself, and the text of his discourse not to agree with the testimonies of the Law and the Prophets; and the one face of the pure words appeared to me, and I learned "to rejoice with trembling." And I began, and I found that whatever truth I had read there is said here together with the commendation of your grace: so that whoever sees should not boast as if he had not received, not only what he sees but also the ability to see ("for what does he have that he did not receive?"); and so that he may be not only admonished to see you, who are always the same, but also healed so as to hold you; and so that one who cannot see from afar may yet walk on the way by which he may come and see and hold. For even if a man "delights in the law of God according to the inner man," what will he do about "another law in his members, warring against the law of his mind and leading him captive in the law of sin, which is in his members"? For "you are just, O Lord," but "we have sinned, we have done iniquity, we have acted wickedly," and "your hand has been heavy upon us," and we have justly been handed over to the ancient sinner, the ruler of death, because he persuaded our will to be like his will, by which "he did not stand in your truth." What will a wretched man do? "Who will deliver him from the body of this death, but your grace, through Jesus Christ our Lord," whom you begot coeternal and "created in the beginning of your ways," in whom "the ruler of this world found nothing" worthy of death, and yet killed him; and "the bond that was against us was canceled"? Those writings do not have this. Those pages do not have the face of this piety, the tears of confession, your sacrifice, "a troubled spirit, a contrite and humbled heart," the salvation of the people, the bride that is a city, the pledge of the Holy Spirit, the cup of our redemption. No one there sings: "Shall not my soul be subject to God? For from him is my salvation; for he is my God and my salvation, my protector; I shall be moved no more." No one there hears him calling: "Come to me, you who labor." They disdain to learn from him, because he is "gentle and humble of heart." "For you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to little ones." And it is one thing to see the homeland of peace from a wooded summit and not find the road to it, and to strive in vain through trackless ways, beset and ambushed by fugitive deserters with their chief, the lion and the dragon; and another to keep to the way that leads there, guarded by the care of the heavenly emperor, where those who have deserted the heavenly army do not rob, for they shun it like a torment. These things sank into my very being in wonderful ways when I read "the least of your apostles," and I had "considered your works and trembled."

Chapter 8

8.1CSEL 33:169–170

Deus meus, recorder in gratiarum actione tibi et confitear misericordias tuas super me. perfundantur ossa mea dilectione tua et dicant: domine, quis similis tibi? dirrupisti uincula mea: sacrificem tibi sacrificium laudis. quomodo dirrupisti ea, narrabo, et dicent omnes, qui adorant te, cum audient haec: "benedictus dominus in caelo et in terra; magnum et mirabile nomen eius." inhaeserant praecordiis meis uerba tua, et undique circumuallabar abs te. de uita tua aeterna certus eram, quamuis eam in aenigmate et quasi per speculum uideram; dubitatio tamen omnis de incorruptibili substantia, quod ab illa esset omnis substantia, ablata mihi erat, nec certior de te, sed stabilior in te esse cupiebam. de mea uero temporali uita nutabant omnia et mundandum erat cor a fermento ueteri; et placebat uia ipse saluator et ire per eius angustias adhuc pigebat. et inmisisti in mentem meam uisumque est bonum in conspectu meo pergere ad Simplicianum, qui mihi bonus apparebat seruus tuus et lucebat in eo gratia tua. audieram etiam, quod a iuuentute sua deuotissime tibi uiueret; iam uero tunc senuerat et longa aetate in tam bono studio sectandae uiae tuae multa expertus, multa edoctus mihi uidebatur: et uere sic erat. unde mihi ut proferret uolebam conferenti secum aestus meos, quis esset aptus modus sic affecto, ut ego eram, ad ambulandum in uia tua.

My God, let me remember with thanksgiving to you, and confess your mercies upon me. Let my bones be steeped in your love and say, "Lord, who is like you? You have broken my bonds; let me offer to you the sacrifice of praise." How you broke them I will tell, and all who worship you will say, when they hear it: "Blessed be the Lord in heaven and on earth; great and wonderful is his name." Your words had fastened in my heart, and I was hemmed in by you on every side. Of your eternal life I was certain, although I had seen it "in a riddle and as through a mirror"; yet all doubt about incorruptible substance, that every substance comes from it, had been taken away from me, and I desired not to be more certain of you but more steadfast in you. But in my temporal life everything was wavering, and my heart had to be cleansed of "the old leaven"; and the Way, the Savior himself, pleased me, but I was still reluctant to go through its narrow places. And you put it into my mind, and it seemed good in my sight, to go to Simplicianus, who appeared to me a good servant of yours, and your grace shone in him. I had heard also that from his youth he had lived most devoutly for you; and by then he had grown old, and in his long life of such good zeal in following your way he seemed to me to have experienced much and learned much: and so indeed it was. So I wanted him, as I talked over my turmoil with him, to tell me what would be the fitting way for someone in my condition to walk in your way.

8.2CSEL 33:170–171

Videbam enim plenam ecclesiam, et alius sic ibat, alius autem sic. mihi autem displicebat, quod agebam in saeculo, et oneri mihi erat ualde non iam inflammantibus cupiditatibus, ut solebant, spe honoris et pecuniae ad tolerandam illam seruitutem tam grauem. iam enim me illa non delectabant prae dulcedine tua et decore domus tuae, quam dilexi, sed adhuc tenaciter alligabar ex femina, nec me prohibebat apostolus coniugari, quamuis exhortaretur ad melius maxime uolens omnes homines sic esse, ut ipse erat. sed ego infirmior eligebam molliorem locum et propter hoc unum uoluebar in ceteris languidus et tabescens curis marcidis, quod et in aliis rebus, quas nolebam pati, congruere cogebar uitae coniugali, cui deditus obstringebar. audieram ex ore ueritatis esse spadones, qui se ipsos absciderunt propter regnum caelorum; sed, qui potest, inquit, capere, capiat. uani sunt certe omnes homines, quibus non inest dei scientia, nec de his, quae uidentur bona, potuerunt inuenire eum qui est. at ego iam non eram in illa uanitate; transcenderam eam et contestante uniuersa creatura inueneram te creatorem nostrum et uerbum tuum apud te deum, tecumque unum deum, per quod creasti omnia. et est aliud genus inpiorum, qui cognoscentes deum non sicut deum glorificauerunt aut gratias egerunt. in hoc quoque incideram, et dextera tua suscepit me et inde ablatum posuisti, ubi conualescerem, quia dixisti homini: ecce pietas est sapientia et: noli uelle uideri sapiens, quoniam dicentes se esse sapientes stulti facti sunt. et inueneram iam bonam margaritam, et uenditis omnibus, quae haberem, emenda erat, et dubitabam.

For I saw the church full, and one went this way and another that. But I was displeased with what I was doing in the world, and it was a great burden to me, now that my desires no longer inflamed me as they used to with the hope of honor and money, to endure so heavy a servitude. For those things no longer delighted me compared with your sweetness and "the beauty of your house, which I have loved." But I was still tightly bound by a woman; and the apostle did not forbid me to marry, although he exhorted to something better, most earnestly wishing all men to be as he himself was. But I, being weaker, chose the softer place, and for this one reason I was tossed about in everything else, listless and wasting away with withering cares, because in other matters too, which I did not want to suffer, I was forced to fit in with married life, to which I was given over and bound. I had heard from the mouth of Truth that there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake; "but," he says, "let him who can receive it, receive it." Surely "all men are vain in whom there is no knowledge of God, and who could not, from the good things that are seen, find him who is." But I was no longer in that vanity; I had passed beyond it, and with the whole creation bearing witness I had found you, our Creator, and your Word, God with you and one God with you, through whom you created all things. And there is another kind of ungodly people, who, "knowing God, did not glorify him as God or give thanks." Into this too I had fallen, and "your right hand upheld me," and you took me out of it and placed me where I might recover, because you have said to man, "Behold, piety is wisdom," and "Do not wish to seem wise," because "those who call themselves wise have become fools." And I had now found the good pearl, and I ought to have sold all that I had and bought it; and I hesitated.

8.3CSEL 33:171–172

Perrexi ergo ad Simplicianum, patrem in accipienda gratia tunc episcopi Ambrosii et quem uere ut patrem diligebat. narraui ei circuitus erroris mei. ubi autem conmemoraui legisse me quosdam libros Platonicorum, quos Victorinus quondam rhetor urbis Romae, quem christianum defunctum esse audieram, in latinam linguam transtulisset, gratulatus est mihi, quod non in aliorum philosophorum scripta incidissem plena fallaciarum et deceptionum secundum elementa huius mundi, in istis autem omnibus modis insinuari deum et eius uerbum. deinde, ut me exhortaretur ad humilitatem Christi sapientibus absconditam et reuelatam paruulis, Victorinum ipsum recordatus est, quem, Romae cum esset, familiarissime nouerat, deque illo mihi narrauit quod non silebo. habet enim magnam laudem gratiae tuae confitendam tibi, quemadmodum ille doctissimus senex et omnium liberalium doctrinarum peritissimus quique philosophorum tam multa legerat et diiudicauerat, doctor tot nobilium senatorum, qui etiam ob insigne praeclari magisterii, quod ciues huius mundi eximium putant, statuam Romano foro meruerat et acceperat, usque ad illam aetatem venerator idolorum sacrorumque sacrilegorum particeps, quibus tunc tota fere Romana nobilitas inflata spirabat prodigia iam et omnigenum deum monstra et Anubem latratorem, quae aliquando contra Neptunum et Venerem contraque Minervam tela tenuerant et a se victis iam Roma supplicabat, quae iste senex Victorinus tot annos ore terricrepo defensitaverat, non erubuerit esse puer Christi tui et infans fontis tui subiecto collo ad humilitatis iugum et edomita fronte ad crucis opprobrium.

So I went to Simplicianus, the father of Ambrose, then bishop, in the receiving of grace, and whom Ambrose truly loved as a father. I told him the windings of my wandering. But when I mentioned that I had read certain books of the Platonists, which Victorinus, once rhetor of the city of Rome, who I had heard had died a Christian, had translated into Latin, he congratulated me that I had not fallen upon the writings of other philosophers, full of falsehoods and deceptions "according to the elements of this world," whereas in these God and his Word are suggested in every way. Then, to exhort me to the humility of Christ, "hidden from the wise and revealed to little ones," he called to mind Victorinus himself, whom he had known very intimately when he was in Rome, and he told me about him something I will not pass over in silence. For it contains great praise of your grace, which must be confessed to you: how that most learned old man, highly skilled in all the liberal disciplines, who had read and weighed so many works of the philosophers, the teacher of so many noble senators, who, as a mark of his distinguished teaching (something the citizens of this world think outstanding), had deserved and received a statue in the Roman Forum; who until that age had been a worshiper of idols and a partaker in sacrilegious rites, with which almost the whole Roman nobility was then puffed up, breathing out portents, "monsters of every kind of god, and barking Anubis, who once held weapons against Neptune and Venus and against Minerva," gods whom Rome had conquered and now supplicated, gods whom this old man Victorinus had defended for so many years with his thundering eloquence: he did not blush to become a child of your Christ and an infant at your font, bowing his neck to the yoke of humility and subduing his brow to the reproach of the cross.

8.4CSEL 33:172–173

O domine, domine, qui inclinasti caelos et descendisti, tetigisti montes et fumigaverunt, quibus modis te insinuasti illi pectori? legebat, sicut ait Simplicianus, sanctam scripturam omnesque christianas litteras investigabat studiosissime et perscrutabatur et dicebat Simpliciano non palam, sed secretius et familiarius: "noveris iam me esse christianum". et respondebat ille: „non credam nec deputabo te inter christianos, nisi in ecclesia Christi videro". ille autem inridebat dicens: „ergo parietes faciunt christianos?" et hoc saepe dicebat, iam se esse christianum, et Simplicianus illud saepe respondebat et saepe ab illo parietum inrisio repetebatur. amicos enim suos reverebatur offendere, superbos daemonicolas, quorum ex culmine Babylonicae dignitatis quasi ex cedris Libani, quas nondum contriuerat dominus, grauiter ruituras in se inimicitias arbitrabatur. sed posteaquam legendo et inhiando hausit firmitatem timuitque negari a Christo coram angelis sanctis, si eum timeret coram hominibus confiteri, reusque sibi magni criminis adparuit erubescendo de sacramentis humilitatis uerbi tui et non erubescendo de sacris sacrilegis superborum daemoniorum, quae imitator superbus acceperat, depuduit uanitati et erubuit ueritati subitoque et inopinatus ait Simpliciano, ut ipse narrabat: "eamus in ecclesiam: Christianus uolo fieri". at ille non se capiens laetitia perrexit cum eo. ubi autem imbutus est primis instructionis sacramentis, non multo post nomen dedit, ut per baptismum regeneraretur mirante Roma, gaudente ecclesia. superbi uidebant et irascebantur, dentibus suis stridebant et tabescebant: seruo autem tuo dominus deus erat spes eius et non respiciebat in uanitates et insanias mendaces.

O Lord, Lord, "who bowed the heavens and came down, touched the mountains and they smoked," by what means did you find your way into that breast? He read, as Simplicianus said, the holy Scripture, and he most studiously searched out and examined all the Christian writings, and he said to Simplicianus, not openly but privately and as a friend, "You should know that I am already a Christian." And Simplicianus answered, "I will not believe it or count you among the Christians until I see you in the church of Christ." But he laughed and said, "Do walls, then, make Christians?" And he often said this, that he was already a Christian, and Simplicianus often gave that answer, and the joke about the walls was often repeated. For he was afraid of offending his friends, proud worshipers of demons, and he thought that from the summit of their Babylonian dignity, as from the cedars of Lebanon which the Lord had not yet broken, heavy enmity would come crashing down on him. But after he had drawn strength by reading and longing, and feared to be denied by Christ before the holy angels if he were afraid to confess him before men, and appeared to himself guilty of a great crime in being ashamed of the sacraments of the humility of your Word while not being ashamed of the sacrilegious rites of proud demons, which he had accepted as their proud imitator, he lost his shame before vanity and grew ashamed before truth, and suddenly and unexpectedly he said to Simplicianus, as Simplicianus himself told it, "Let us go to the church: I want to become a Christian." And Simplicianus, beside himself with joy, went with him. And when he had been instructed in the first sacraments of instruction, not long afterward he gave in his name to be reborn through baptism, while Rome marveled and the church rejoiced. The proud saw and were angry, they gnashed with their teeth and wasted away; but for your servant "the Lord God was his hope, and he did not look to vanities and lying follies."

8.5CSEL 33:173–174

Denique ut uentum est ad horam profitendae fidei, quae uerbis certis conceptis retentisque memoriter de loco eminentiore in conspectu populi fidelis Romae reddi solet ab eis, qui accessuri sunt ad gratiam tuam, oblatum esse dicebat Victorino a presbyteris, ut secretius redderet, sicut nonnullis, qui uerecundia trepidaturi uidebantur, offerri mos erat; illum autem maluisse salutem suam in conspectu sanctae multitudinis profiteri. non enim erat salus, quam docebat, in rhetorica et tamen eam publice professus erat. quanto minus ergo uereri debuit mansuetum gregem tuum pronuntians uerbum tuum, qui non uerebatur in uerbis suis turbas insanorum? itaque ubi ascendit, ut redderet, omnes sibimet inuicem, quisque ut eum nouerat, instrepuerunt nomen strepitu gratulationis. quis autem ibi non eum nouerat? et sonuit presso sonitu per ora cunctorum conlaetantium: "Victorinus, Victorinus". cito sonuerunt exultatione, quia uidebant eum, et cito siluerunt intentione, ut audirent eum. pronuntiauit ille fidem ueracem praeclara fiducia, et uolebant eum omnes rapere intro in cor suum. et rapiebant amando et gaudendo: hae rapientium manus erant.

Finally, when the hour came to profess the faith (which at Rome is usually recited, in fixed words learned and held in memory, from a raised place in the sight of the faithful people, by those who are about to approach your grace), he said that the presbyters offered Victorinus the chance to recite it more privately, as it was customary to offer to some who seemed likely to tremble from shyness; but he preferred to profess his salvation in the sight of the holy multitude. For there was no salvation in the rhetoric he taught, and yet he had professed that publicly. How much less, then, should he have feared your gentle flock when pronouncing your word, when he had not feared crowds of madmen when pronouncing his own words? So when he went up to recite, all of them, each as he knew him, murmured his name to one another with a stir of rejoicing. And who was there who did not know him? And a hushed sound ran through the mouths of all who rejoiced together: "Victorinus, Victorinus." Quickly they broke out in exultation, because they saw him, and quickly they fell silent in attention, so as to hear him. He pronounced the true faith with splendid confidence, and all of them wanted to snatch him into their hearts. And they did snatch him, by loving and rejoicing: these were the hands that snatched him.

8.6CSEL 33:174–175

Deus bone, quid agitur in homine, ut plus gaudeat de salute desperatae animae et de maiore periculo liberatae, quam si spes ei semper affuisset aut periculum minus fuisset? etenim tu quoque, misericors pater, plus gaudes de uno paenitente quam de nonaginta nouem iustis, quibus non opus est paenitentia. et nos cum magna iucunditate audimus, cum audimus quam exsultantibus pastoris umeris reportetur ouis, quae errauerat, et drachma referatur in thesauros tuos conlaetantibus uicinis mulieri, quae inuenit, et lacrimas excutit gaudium sollemnitatis domus tuae, cum legitur in domo tua de minore filio tuo, quoniam mortuus fuerat et reuixit, perierat et inuentus est. gaudes quippe in nobis et in angelis tuis sancta caritate sanctis. nam tu semper idem, quia ea quae non semper nec eodem modo sunt eodem modo semper nosti omnia.

Good God, what happens in a man that he rejoices more over the salvation of a soul that was despaired of and set free from greater danger than if there had always been hope for it or the danger had been less? For you too, merciful Father, "rejoice more over one who repents than over ninety-nine righteous who need no repentance." And we hear with great delight when we hear how the sheep that had strayed is carried back on the shepherd's exultant shoulders, and the coin is restored to your treasuries while the neighbors rejoice with the woman who found it; and the joy of the solemn feast of your house brings tears to our eyes when it is read in your house of your younger son, that "he was dead and is alive again, he was lost and is found." For you rejoice in us and in your angels, who are holy with holy love. For you are always the same, because you always know in the same way all things that neither always exist nor exist in the same way.

8.7CSEL 33:175–176

Quid ergo agitur in anima, cum amplius delectatur inuentis aut redditis rebus, quas diligit, quam si eas semper habuisset? contestantur enim et cetera et plena sunt omnia testimoniis clamantibus: "ita est". triumphat uictor imperator et non uicisset, nisi pugnauisset, et quanto maius periculum fuit in proelio, tanto est gaudium maius in triumpho. iactat tempestas nauigantes minaturque naufragium; omnes futura morte pallescunt: tranquillatur caelum et mare, et exultant nimis, quoniam timuerunt nimis. aeger est carus et uena eius malum renuntiat; omnes, qui eum saluum cupiunt, aegrotant simul animo: fit ei recte et nondum ambulat pristinis uiribus, et fit iam tale gaudium, quale non fuit, cum antea saluus et fortis ambularet. easque ipsas uoluptates humanae uitae etiam non inopinatis et praeter uoluntatem inruentibus, sed institutis et uoluntariis molestiis homines adquirunt. edendi et bibendi uoluptas nulla est, nisi praecedat esuriendi et sitiendi molestia. et ebriosi quaedam salsiuscula comedunt, quo fiat molestus ardor, quem dum exstinguit potatio, fit delectatio. et institutum est, ut iam pactae sponsae non tradantur statim, ne uile habeat maritus datam, quam non suspirauerit sponsus dilatam.

What happens, then, in the soul, that it delights more in things it loves when they are found or restored than if it had always had them? Everything else bears witness to this too, and all things are full of testimonies crying, "It is so." The victorious general celebrates a triumph, and he would not have conquered had he not fought; and the greater the danger in battle, the greater the joy in the triumph. The storm tosses the sailors and threatens shipwreck; all grow pale at coming death; sky and sea grow calm, and they exult beyond measure because they feared beyond measure. A dear friend is sick, and his pulse reports that he is doing badly; all who long for his recovery are sick in mind with him; he gets better, and though he does not yet walk with his former strength, there is already such joy as there was not before when he walked healthy and strong. And men obtain these very pleasures of human life through discomforts, not only those that come upon them unexpectedly and against their will, but also ones they arrange and choose. There is no pleasure in eating and drinking unless the discomfort of hunger and thirst comes first. Drunkards eat salty things to create a painful thirst, and when drinking quenches it, there is delight. And it is an established custom that betrothed brides are not handed over at once, lest the husband hold cheap a bride given to him for whom, as a bridegroom, he did not sigh while she was withheld.

8.8CSEL 33:176

Hoc in turpi et exsecranda laetitia, hoc in ea quae concessa et licita est, hoc in ipsa sincerissima honestate amicitiae, hoc in eo qui mortuus erat et reuixit, perierat et inuentus est: ubique maius gaudium molestia maiore praeceditur. quid est hoc, domine deus meus, cum tu aeternum tibi, tu ipse sis gaudium, et quaedam de te circa te semper gaudeant? quid est, quod haec rerum pars alternat defectu et profectu, offensionibus et conciliationibus? an is est modus earum et tantum dedisti eis, cum a summis caelorum usque ad ima terrarum, ab initio usque in finem saeculorum, ab angelo usque ad uermiculum, a motu primo usque ad extremum omnia genera bonorum et omnia iusta opera tua suis quaeque sedibus locares et suis quaeque temporibus ageres? ei mihi, quam excelsus es in excelsis et quam profundus in profundis! et nusquam recedis, et uix redimus ad te.

This is so in shameful and accursed joy, so in joy that is permitted and lawful, so in the most sincere and honorable friendship, so in him who "was dead and is alive again, was lost and is found": everywhere greater joy is preceded by greater distress. What is this, O Lord my God, when you are your own eternal joy, you yourself, and some things around you rejoice in you forever? What is it that this part of creation alternates between loss and gain, between offense and reconciliation? Is this their measure, and is this as much as you have given them, since from the heights of the heavens to the depths of the earth, from the beginning to the end of the ages, from the angel to the little worm, from the first motion to the last, you set each kind of good thing and each of your just works in its proper place, and brought each about in its proper time? Alas for me, how high you are in the heights and how deep in the depths! And you never go away, and we scarcely return to you.

8.9CSEL 33:176–177

Age, domine, fac excita et reuoca nos, accende et rape, fragra, dulcesce: amemus, curramus. nonne multi ex profundiore tartaro caecitatis quam Victorinus redeunt ad te et accedunt et inluminantur recipientes lumen, quod si qui recipiunt, accipiunt a te potestatem, ut filii tui fiant? sed si minus noti sunt populis, minus de illis gaudent etiam qui nouerunt eos. quando enim cum multis gaudetur, et in singulis uberius est gaudium, quia feruefaciunt se et inflammantur ex alterutro. deinde, quod multis noti, multis sunt auctoritati ad salutem et multis praeeunt secuturis, ideoque multum de illis et qui eos praecesserunt laetantur, quia non de solis laetantur. absit enim, ut in tabernaculo tuo prae pauperibus accipiantur personae diuitum aut prae ignobilibus nobiles, quando potius infirma mundi elegisti, ut confunderes fortia, et ignobilia huius mundi elegisti et contemtibilia et ea quae non sunt, tamquam sint, ut ea quae sunt euacuares. et tamen idem ipse minimus apostolorum tuorum, per cuius linguam tua ista uerba sonuisti, cum Paulus pro consule per eius militiam debellata superbia sub lene iugum Christi tui missus esset regis magni prouincialis effectus, ipse quoque ex priore Saulo Paulus uocari amauit ob tam magnae insigne uictoriae. plus enim hostis uincitur in eo, quem plus tenet et de quo plures tenet. plus autem superbos tenet nomine nobilitatis et de his plures nomine auctoritatis. quanto igitur gratius cogitabatur Victorini pectus, quod tam inexpugnabile receptaculum diabolus obtinuerat, Victorini lingua, quo telo grandi et acuto multos peremerat, abundantius exultare oportuit filios tuos, quia rex noster alligauit fortem, et uidebant uasa eius erepta mundari et aptari in honorem tuum et fieri utilia domino ad omne opus bonum.

Come, Lord, act: stir us up and call us back, kindle and seize us, be fragrant, grow sweet: let us love, let us run. Do not many return to you from a deeper hell of blindness than Victorinus, and approach, and are enlightened, receiving the light, and whoever receive it "receive from you power to become your children"? But if they are less known to the people, even those who know them rejoice less over them. For when joy is shared with many, the joy in each one is richer, because they warm one another and are set on fire by each other. Then, because they are known to many, they are an authority for salvation to many, and they lead the way for many who will follow; and so even those who have gone before them rejoice greatly over them, because they rejoice not over them alone. Far be it that in your tabernacle the persons of the rich should be accepted before the poor, or the noble before the lowborn, since rather "you have chosen the weak things of the world to confound the strong, and the base things of this world and the despised you have chosen, and the things that are not, as though they were, to bring to nothing the things that are." And yet that same "least of your apostles," through whose tongue you sounded these words, when the proconsul Paulus had had his pride overthrown by his campaign and had been sent under the gentle yoke of your Christ and made a subject of the great King, he too, formerly Saul, loved to be called Paul in token of so great a victory. For the enemy is more defeated in one whom he holds more strongly and through whom he holds more people. And he holds the proud more strongly through the name of nobility, and through them he holds more people through the name of authority. So the more gratefully the heart of Victorinus was thought of, which the devil had held as an impregnable stronghold, and the tongue of Victorinus, a great sharp weapon with which he had slain many, the more abundantly your children had to rejoice, because our King "had bound the strong man," and they saw his vessels taken from him, cleansed, and made fit for your honor, and "useful to the Lord for every good work."

8.10CSEL 33:177–178

Sed ubi mihi homo tuus Simplicianus de Victorino ista narrauit, exarsi ad imitandum: ad hoc enim et ille narrauerat. posteaquam uero et illud addidit, quod imperatoris Iuliani temporibus lege data prohibiti sunt christiani docere litteraturam et oratoriam — quam legem ille amplexus loquacem scholam deserere maluit quam uerbum tuum, quo linguas infantium facis disertas — non mihi fortior quam felicior uisus est, quia inuenit occasionem uacandi tibi. cui rei ego suspirabam ligatus non ferro alieno, sed mea ferrea uoluntate. uelle meum tenebat inimicus et inde mihi catenam fecerat et constrinxerat me. quippe uoluntate peruersa facta est libido, et dum seruitur libidini, facta est consuetudo, et dum consuetudini non resistitur, facta est necessitas. quibus quasi ansulis sibimet innexis — unde catenam appellaui — tenebat me obstrictum dura seruitus. uoluntas autem noua, quae mihi esse coeperat, ut te gratis colere fruique te uellem, deus, sola certa iucunditas, nondum erat idonea ad superandam priorem uetustate roboratam. ita duae uoluntates meae, una uetus, alia noua, illa carnalis, illa spiritalis, confligebant inter se atque discordando dissipabant animam meam.

But when your servant Simplicianus told me these things about Victorinus, I burned to imitate him; indeed it was for this that he had told them. And when he added that in the time of the emperor Julian a law was issued forbidding Christians to teach literature and rhetoric, and that Victorinus embraced that law and chose to abandon his talkative school rather than your word, "by which you make eloquent the tongues of infants," he seemed to me not so much brave as fortunate, because he found an occasion to be free for you. I sighed for this, bound not by another's iron but by my own iron will. The enemy held my will, and from it he had made a chain for me and bound me fast. For from a perverse will came lust; and while lust is served, habit is formed; and while habit is not resisted, it becomes necessity. By these links, as it were, joined to one another (which is why I called it a chain), a hard servitude held me bound. But the new will which had begun in me, to worship you freely and to want to enjoy you, O God, the only sure delight, was not yet able to overcome the earlier one, strengthened by long standing. So my two wills, one old, the other new, the one carnal, the other spiritual, fought with each other, and by their discord they tore my soul apart.

8.11CSEL 33:178–179

Sic intellegebam me ipso experimento id quod legeram, quomodo caro concupisceret aduersus spiritum et spiritus aduersus carnem, ego quidem in utroque, sed magis ego in eo, quod in me approbabam quam in eo, quod in me improbabam. ibi enim magis iam non ego, quia ex magna parte id patiebar inuitus quam faciebam nolens. sed tamen consuetudo aduersus me pugnacior ex me facta erat, quoniam nolens quo nollem perueneram. et quis iure contradiceret, cum peccantem iusta poena sequeretur? et non erat iam illa excusatio, qua uideri mihi solebam propterea me nondum contemto saeculo seruire tibi, quia incerta mihi esset perceptio ueritatis: iam enim et ipsa certa erat. ego autem adhuc terra obligatus militare tibi recusabam et inpedimentis omnibus sic timebam expediri, quemadmodum inpediri timendum est.

So I understood by my own experience what I had read, how "the flesh lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh": I was in both, but I was more in what I approved in myself than in what I disapproved in myself. For in the latter it was now "no longer I," because for the most part I suffered it unwillingly rather than did it willingly. And yet habit had become more warlike against me through me, since willingly I had come to where I did not want to be. And who could justly object, when just punishment follows the sinner? And I no longer had that excuse by which I used to think that I was not yet despising the world and serving you because my perception of the truth was uncertain; for now that too was certain. But I, still bound to the earth, refused to be your soldier, and I was as afraid of being freed from all my entanglements as one ought to be afraid of being entangled.

8.12CSEL 33:179–180

Ita sarcina saeculi, uelut somno assolet, dulciter premebar, et cogitationes, quibus meditabar in te, similes erant conatibus expergisci uolentium, qui tamen superati soporis altitudine remerguntur. et sicut nemo est, qui dormire semper uelit, omniumque sano iudicio uigilare praestat. differt tamen plerumque homo somnum excutere, cum grauis torpor in membris est, eumque iam displicentem carpit libentius, quamuis surgendi tempus aduenerit: ita certum habebam esse melius tuae caritati me dedere quam meae cupiditati cedere; sed illud placebat et uincebat, hoc libebat et uinciebat. non enim erat quod tibi responderem dicenti mihi: surge qui dormis et exsurge a mortuis, et inluminabit te Christus, et undique ostendenti uera te dicere, non erat omnino, quid responderem ueritate conuictus, nisi tantum uerba lenta et somnolenta: "modo", "ecce modo", "sine paululum". sed "modo et modo" non habebat modum et "sine paululum" in longum ibat. frustra condelectabatur legi tuae secundum interiorem hominem, cum alia lex in membris meis repugnaret legi mentis meae et captiuum me duceret in lege peccati, quae in membris meis erat. lex enim peccati est uiolentia consuetudinis, qua trahitur et tenetur etiam inuitus animus eo merito, quo in eam uolens inlabitur. miserum ergo me quis liberaret de corpore mortis huius nisi gratia tua per Iesum Christum, dominum nostrum?

So I was pressed down sweetly by the burden of the world, as often happens in sleep; and the thoughts with which I meditated on you were like the efforts of people who want to wake up but are overcome by the depth of their drowsiness and sink back again. And as there is no one who wants to sleep forever, and in everyone's sound judgment it is better to be awake, yet a man usually puts off shaking off sleep when a heavy torpor is in his limbs, and though he is already displeased with it, he enjoys it all the more willingly, even though the time to get up has come: so I was certain that it was better to give myself up to your love than to yield to my own desire; but the one pleased and convinced me, the other attracted and bound me. For I had nothing to answer you when you said to me, "Rise, you who sleep, and arise from the dead, and Christ will give you light"; and when you showed me on every side that you spoke the truth, I had nothing at all to answer, convicted by the truth, except slow and sleepy words: "Soon," "Yes, soon," "Let me be a little while." But "soon, soon" had no end, and "a little while" went on for a long while. In vain did I delight in your law according to the inner man, when another law in my members fought against the law of my mind and led me captive in the law of sin which was in my members. For the law of sin is the violence of habit, by which the mind is dragged and held even against its will, deservedly, since it slipped into it willingly. Wretched man that I was, who would deliver me from the body of this death, except your grace, through Jesus Christ our Lord?

8.13CSEL 33:180–181

Et de uinculo quidem desiderii concubitus, quo artissimo tenebar, et saecularium negotiorum seruitute quemadmodum exemeris narrabo et confitebor nomini tuo, domine, adiutor meus et redemptor meus. agebam solita crescente anxitudine et cotidie suspirabam tibi, frequentabam ecclesiam tuam, quantum uacabat ab eis negotiis, sub quorum pondere gemebam. mecum erat Alypius otiosus ab opere iuris peritorum post assessionem tertiam, expectans, quibus iterum consilia uenderet, sicut ego uendebam dicendi facultatem, si qua docendo praestari potest. Nebridius autem amicitiae nostrae cesserat, ut omnium nostrum familiarissimo Verecundo, Mediolanensi et ciui et grammatico, subdoceret, uehementer desideranti et familiaritatis iure flagitanti de numero nostro fidele adiutorium, quo indigebat nimis. non itaque Nebridium cupiditas conmodorum eo traxit — maiora enim posset, si uellet, de litteris agere — sed officio beniuolentiae petitionem nostram contemnere noluit amicus dulcissimus et mitissimus. agebat autem illud prudentissime cauens innotescere personis secundum hoc saeculum maioribus, deuitans in eis omnem inquietudinem animi, quem uolebat habere liberum et quam multis posset horis feriatum ad quaerendum aliquid uel legendum uel audiendum de sapientia.

And now I will tell how you set me free from the bond of desire for sexual intercourse, by which I was held most tightly, and from the slavery of worldly business, and I will confess to your name, O Lord, "my helper and my redeemer." I carried on as usual, with growing anxiety, and every day I sighed to you; I went often to your church, as much as I was free from the business under whose weight I groaned. Alypius was with me, free from his work as a legal expert after his third term as assessor, waiting for others to whom he could again sell his advice, as I sold the skill of speaking, if teaching can supply it. Nebridius, for his part, had yielded to our friendship so far as to be assistant teacher to Verecundus, a citizen and grammarian of Milan and a very close friend to all of us, who earnestly wanted, and by right of friendship demanded, faithful help from our number, which he badly needed. So it was not desire for gain that drew Nebridius there (he could have made more from his learning, had he wished), but as a most sweet and gentle friend he would not, out of kindness, scorn our request. But he did it very prudently, taking care not to become known to persons great in the eyes of this world, and avoiding all disturbance of mind among them, for he wanted his mind free and at leisure for as many hours as possible to seek, read, or hear something about wisdom.

8.14CSEL 33:181–182

Quodam igitur die — non recolo causam, qua erat absens Nebridius — cum ecce ad nos domum uenit ad me et Alypium Ponticianus quidam, ciuis noster, in quantum Afer, praeclare in palatio militans: nescio quid a nobis uolebat. et consedimus, ut conloqueremur. et forte supra mensam lusoriam, quae ante nos erat, adtendit codicem: tulit, aperuit, inuenit apostolum Paulum, inopinate sane; putauerat enim aliquid de libris, quorum professio me conterebat. tum uero arridens meque intuens gratulatorie miratus est, quod eas et solas prae oculis meis litteras repente conperisset. Christianus quippe et fidelis erat et saepe tibi, deo nostro, prosternebatur in ecclesia crebris et diuturnis orationibus. cui ego cum indicassem illis me scripturis curam maximam inpendere, ortus est sermo ipso narrante de Antonio Aegyptio monacho, cuius nomen excellenter clarebat apud seruos tuos, nos autem usque in illam horam latebat. quod ille ubi conperit, inmoratus est in eo sermone insinuans tantum uirum ignorantibus et admirans eandem nostram ignorantiam. stupebamus autem audientes tam recenti memoria et prope nostris temporibus testatissima mirabilia tua in fide recta et catholica ecclesia. omnes mirabamur, et nos, quia tam magna erant, et ille, quia inaudita nobis erant.

One day, then (I do not remember the reason why Nebridius was absent), there came to our house, to Alypius and me, a certain Ponticianus, a fellow citizen of ours insofar as he was an African, who held a distinguished post at the palace; I do not know what he wanted of us. And we sat down to talk. And by chance he noticed a book on the gaming table in front of us; he picked it up, opened it, and found the apostle Paul, quite unexpectedly, for he had thought it was one of the books whose teaching was wearing me out. Then, smiling and looking at me, he expressed his joy and surprise that he had suddenly found these writings, and these alone, before my eyes. For he was a Christian and one of the faithful, and he often prostrated himself before you, our God, in church, in frequent and lengthy prayers. When I told him that I was giving the greatest attention to those Scriptures, a conversation began in which he spoke of Antony, the Egyptian monk, whose name was highly renowned among your servants, though until that hour it had been unknown to us. When he learned this, he dwelt on that subject, making known so great a man to us who did not know him, and marveling at our ignorance. And we were astonished to hear of your wonders, so well attested, in recent memory and almost in our own times, in the true faith and the catholic church. We were all amazed: we because they were so great, and he because we had not heard of them.

8.15CSEL 33:182–184

Inde sermo eius deuolutus est ad monasteriorum greges et mores suaueolentiae tuae et ubera deserta heremi, quorum nos nihil sciebamus. et erat monasterium Mediolanii plenum bonis fratribus extra urbis moenia sub Ambrosio nutritore, et non noueramus. pertendebat ille et loquebatur adhuc, et nos intenti tacebamus. unde incidit, ut diceret nescio quando se et tres alios contubernales suos, nimirum apud Treueros, cum imperator pomeridiano circensium spectaculo teneretur, exisse deambulatum in hortos muris contiguos atque illic, ut forte combinati spatiabantur, unum secum seorsum et alios duos itidem seorsum pariterque digressos; sed illos uagabundos inruisse in quandam casam, ubi habitabant quidam serui tui spiritu pauperes, qualium est regnum caelorum, et inuenisse ibi codicem, in quo scripta erat uita Antonii. quam legere coepit unus eorum et mirari et accendi et inter legendum meditari arripere talem uitam et relicta militia saeculari seruire tibi. erant autem ex eis, quos dicunt agentes in rebus. tum subito repletus amore sancto et sobrio pudore iratus sibi coniecit oculos in amicum et ait illi: "dic, quaeso te, omnibus istis laboribus nostris quo ambimus peruenire? quid quaerimus? cuius rei causa militamus? maiorne esse poterit spes nostra in palatio, quam ut amici imperatoris simus? et ibi quid non fragile plenumque periculis? et per quot pericula peruenitur ad grandius periculum? et quando istuc erit? amicus autem dei, si noluero, ecce nunc fio". dixit hoc et turbidus parturitione nouae uitae reddidit oculos paginis: et legebat et mutabatur intus, ubi tu uidebas, et exuebatur mundo mens eius, ut mox apparuit. namque dum legit et uoluit fluctus cordis sui, infremuit aliquando et discreuit decreuitque meliora iamque tuus ait amico suo: "ego iam abrupi me ab illa spe nostra et deo seruire statui et hoc ex hac hora, in hoc loco aggredior. te si piget imitari, noli aduersari". respondit ille adhaerere se socium tantae mercedis tantaeque militiae. et ambo iam tui aedificabant turrem sumptu idoneo relinquendi omnia sua et sequendi te. tum Ponticianus et qui cum eo per alias horti partes deambulabant, quaerentes eos deuenerunt in eundem locum et inuenientes admonuerunt, ut redirent, quod iam declinasset dies. at illi narrato placito et proposito suo, quoque modo in eis talis uoluntas orta est atque firmata petiuerunt, ne sibi molesti essent, si adiungi recusarent. isti autem nihil mutati a pristinis fleuerunt se tamen, ut dicebat, atque illis pie congratulati sunt et conmendauerunt se orationibus eorum et trahentes cor in terra abierunt in palatium, illi autem affigentes cor caelo manserunt in casa. et habebant ambo sponsas: quae posteaquam hoc audierunt, dicauerunt etiam ipsae uirginitatem tibi.

From there his talk turned to the flocks in the monasteries and their way of life, fragrant with your sweetness, and the fruitful wildernesses of the desert, of which we knew nothing. And there was a monastery at Milan, outside the city walls, full of good brothers, under the fostering care of Ambrose, and we did not know it. He went on and kept talking, and we listened in silence. So it came about that he told how once (I do not know when, but it was at Trier), while the emperor was held by the afternoon show at the circus, he and three companions went out to walk in the gardens next to the walls; and there, as they happened to stroll in pairs, one went off apart with him, and the other two likewise wandered off apart. But those two, as they wandered, came upon a certain cottage where some of your servants lived, "poor in spirit, of whom is the kingdom of heaven," and found there a book in which the life of Antony was written. One of them began to read it, and to marvel and be set on fire, and while reading to think of taking up such a life, leaving his worldly service, and serving you. They were among those called agents in affairs. Then, suddenly filled with holy love and sober shame, angry with himself, he turned his eyes on his friend and said to him: "Tell me, please, with all these labors of ours, what are we striving to reach? What are we looking for? For what cause are we serving? Can our hope at the palace be any greater than to be friends of the emperor? And there what is not fragile and full of dangers? And through how many dangers does one arrive at a greater danger? And when will that be? But a friend of God, if I want it, look, I become one now." He said this, and, troubled with the birth pangs of a new life, he turned his eyes back to the pages; and he read and was changed within, where you saw, and his mind was stripped of the world, as soon became clear. For while he read and rolled the waves of his heart, he groaned aloud at one point, and discerned and decided on the better course; and, now yours, he said to his friend: "I have now broken away from that hope of ours and decided to serve God, and I begin this from this hour, in this place. If you do not want to imitate me, do not oppose me." The other replied that he would cling to him as a comrade in so great a reward and so great a service. And both, now yours, were building the tower at the fitting cost, leaving all they had and following you. Then Ponticianus and the one who was walking with him in other parts of the garden, looking for them, came to the same place, and finding them, reminded them to return, since the day was already declining. But they told of their decision and purpose, and how this will had arisen and been strengthened in them, and asked them not to trouble them if they refused to join them. The two, though not changed from their former state, nevertheless wept for themselves, as he said, and piously congratulated the others and commended themselves to their prayers, and dragging their hearts along the earth they went off to the palace, while the others, fixing their hearts on heaven, stayed in the cottage. And both had fiancées, who, when they heard of it, also dedicated their virginity to you.

8.16CSEL 33:184

Narrabat haec Ponticianus. tu autem, domine, inter uerba eius retorquebas me ad me ipsum, auferens me a dorso meo, ubi me posueram, dum nollem me adtendere, et constituebas me ante faciem meam, ut uiderem, quam turpis essem, quam distortus et sordidus, maculosus et ulcerosus. et uidebam et horrebam, et quo a me fugerem non erat. et si conabar a me auertere aspectum, narrabat ille quod narrabat, et tu me rursus opponebas mihi et inpingebas me in oculos meos, ut inuenirem iniquitatem et odissem. noueram eam, sed dissimulabam et cohibebam et obliuiscebar.

This is what Ponticianus told us. But you, Lord, while he was speaking, turned me back upon myself, taking me from behind my own back, where I had placed myself while I did not want to look at myself; and you set me before my own face, so that I might see how foul I was, how twisted and filthy, spotted and ulcerous. And I saw, and I was horrified, and there was nowhere for me to flee from myself. And if I tried to turn my gaze away from myself, he went on telling what he was telling, and you again set me before myself and thrust me into my own eyes, so that I might find my iniquity and hate it. I had known it, but I pretended not to, and kept it down, and forgot it.

8.17CSEL 33:184–185

Tunc uero quanto ardentius amabam illos, de quibus audiebam salubres affectus, quod se totos tibi sanandos dederant, tanto exsecrabilius me conparatum eis oderam. quoniam multi mei anni mecum effluxerant — forte duodecim anni — ex quo ab undeuicensimo anno aetatis meae lecto Ciceronis Hortensio excitatus eram studio sapientiae et differebam contemta felicitate terrena ad eam inuestigandam uacare, cuius non inuentio, sed uel sola inquisitio iam praeponenda erat etiam inuentis thesauris regnisque gentium et ad nutum circumfluentibus corporis uoluptatibus. at ego adulescens miser ualde, miserior in exordio ipsius adulescentiae, etiam petieram a te castitatem et dixeram: "da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo". timebam enim, ne me cito exaudires et cito sanares a morbo concupiscentiae, quem malebam expleri quam exstingui. et ieram per uias prauas superstitione sacrilega, non quidem certus in ea, sed quasi praeponens eam ceteris, quae non pie quaerebam, sed inimice oppugnabam.

Then indeed, the more ardently I loved those men of whose healthy affections I was hearing, because they had given themselves wholly to you to be healed, the more I hated myself with loathing when I compared myself with them. For many years of mine had flowed away with me, perhaps twelve years, since in my nineteenth year, on reading Cicero's Hortensius, I had been roused to the pursuit of wisdom; and I kept putting off despising earthly happiness and giving myself to the search for wisdom, when not the finding but the mere seeking of it ought to have been preferred even to treasures found and kingdoms of the nations and bodily pleasures flowing round me at a nod. But I, a very wretched young man, more wretched at the very start of my youth, had even asked you for chastity and said, "Give me chastity and continence, but not yet." For I was afraid that you would hear me quickly and quickly heal me of the disease of lust, which I preferred to have satisfied rather than extinguished. And I had gone along crooked ways in a sacrilegious superstition, not indeed certain of it, but as it were preferring it to the rest, which I did not seek piously but fought against as an enemy.

8.18CSEL 33:185

Et putaueram me propterea differre de die in diem contemta spe saeculi te solum sequi, quia non mihi apparebat certum aliquid, quo dirigerem cursum meum. et uenerat dies, quo nudarer mihi et increparet in me conscientia mea: "ubi est lingua mea? nempe tu dicebas propter incertum uerum nolle te abicere sarcinam uanitatis. ecce iam certum est, et illa te adhuc premit umerisque liberioribus pinnas recipiunt, qui neque ita in quaerendo adtriti sunt nec decennio et amplius ista meditati". ita rodebar intus et confundebar pudore horribili uehementer, cum Ponticianus talia loqueretur. terminato autem sermone et causa, qua uenerat, abiit ille, et ego ad me. quae non in me dixi? quibus sententiarum uerberibus non flagellaui animam meam, ut sequeretur me conantem post te ire? et renitebatur, recusabat et non se excusabat. consumpta erant et conuicta argumenta omnia: remanserat muta trepidatio et quasi mortem formidabat restringi a fluxu consuetudinis, quo tabescebat in mortem.

And I had thought that I was putting off despising worldly hope and following you alone because nothing certain appeared to me by which to direct my course. And the day had come when I was stripped naked before myself and my conscience scolded me: "Where is my tongue now? Surely you used to say that you would not throw off the burden of vanity for the sake of an uncertain truth. Look, now it is certain, and that burden still weighs you down, while those who were not so worn out with searching and have not meditated on these things for ten years or more receive wings on freer shoulders." So I was gnawed within and violently confounded with dreadful shame while Ponticianus spoke of such things. When his talk and the business for which he had come were finished, he went away, and I went back to myself. What did I not say against myself? With what lashes of rebuke did I not scourge my soul to make it follow me as I tried to go after you? And it resisted; it refused, and it offered no excuse. All its arguments were used up and refuted; there remained only a mute trembling, and it dreaded, as if it were death, being held back from the flow of habit by which it was wasting away to death.

8.19CSEL 33:185–187

Tum in illa grandi rixa interioris domus meae, quam fortiter excitaueram cum anima mea in cubiculo nostro, corde meo, tam uultu quam mente turbatus inuado Alypium, exclamo: "quid patimur? quid est hoc, quod audisti? surgunt indocti et caelum rapiunt, et nos cum doctrinis nostris ecce ubi uolutamur in carne et sanguine! an quia praecesserunt, pudet sequi et non pudet nec saltem sequi?" dixi nescio qua talia, et abripuit me ab illo aestus meus, cum taceret attonitus me intuens. neque enim solita sonabam. plus loquebantur animum meum frons, genae, oculi, color, modus uocis quam uerba, quae promebam. hortulus quidam erat hospitii nostri, quo nos utebamur sicut tota domo: nam hospes ibi non habitabat, dominus domus. illuc me abstulerat tumultus pectoris, ubi nemo impediret ardentem litem, quam mecum aggressus eram, donec exiret qua tu sciebas, ego autem non: sed tantum insanibam salubriter et moriebar uitaliter, gnarus, quid mali essem, et ignarus, quid boni post paululum futurus essem. abscessi ergo in hortum et Alypius pedem post pedem. neque enim secretum meum non erat, ubi ille aderat. et quando me sic affectum desereret? sedimus quantum potuimus remoti ab aedibus. ego fremebam spiritu indignans indignatione turbulentissima, quod non irem in placitum et pactum tecum, deus meus, in quod eundum esse omnia ossa mea clamabant et in caelum tollebant laudibus: et non illuc ibatur nauibus aut quadrigis aut pedibus, quantum saltem de domo in eum locum ieram, ubi sedebamus. nam non solum ire uerum etiam peruenire illuc nihil erat aliud quam uelle ire, sed uelle fortiter et integre, non semisauciam hac atque hac uersare et iactare uoluntatem parte adsurgente cum alia parte cadente luctantem.

Then, in that great struggle of my inner house, which I had stirred up violently with my soul in our chamber, my heart, troubled in face as much as in mind, I turned on Alypius and cried out: "What is wrong with us? What is this that you have heard? The unlearned rise up and take heaven by force, and we with our learning, look where we are wallowing in flesh and blood! Is it because they have gone ahead that we are ashamed to follow, and not ashamed not even to follow?" I said something of this kind, and my turmoil tore me away from him, while he said nothing and stared at me in astonishment. For I did not sound as I usually did. My brow, cheeks, eyes, color, and tone of voice spoke my mind more than the words I uttered. There was a little garden at our lodging, which we used as we did the whole house, for our host, the owner of the house, did not live there. The tumult in my breast had carried me there, where no one would hinder the burning quarrel I had begun with myself until it came to the end which you knew, but I did not. I was only going mad to be made sane, and dying to be made alive, knowing what evil I was, and not knowing what good I was soon to be. So I withdrew into the garden, and Alypius followed step by step. For my privacy was no less private when he was there; and how could he leave me in such a state? We sat down as far from the building as we could. I was groaning in spirit, indignant with the most turbulent indignation, that I did not enter into your will and covenant, my God, into which all my bones cried out that I must go, and praised it to the skies. And one did not go there by ships or chariots or on foot, not even as far as I had gone from the house to the place where we were sitting. For not only to go but also to arrive there was nothing other than to will to go, but to will strongly and wholly, not to turn and toss this way and that a half-wounded will, struggling with one part rising up and the other falling down.

8.20CSEL 33:187

Denique tam multa faciebam corpore in ipsis cunctationis aestibus, quae aliquando nolunt homines et non ualent, si aut ipsa membra non habeant aut ea uel conligata uinculis uel resoluta languore uel quoquo modo impedita sint. si uulsi capillum, si percussi frontem, si consertis digitis amplexatus sum genu, quia uolui, feci. potui autem uelle et non facere, si mobilitas membrorum non obsequeretur. tam multa ergo feci, ubi non hoc erat uelle quod posse: et non faciebam, quod et inconparabili affectu amplius mihi placebat et mox, ut uellem, possem, quia mox, ut uellem, utique uellem. ibi enim facultas ea, quae uoluntas, et ipsum uelle iam facere erat; et tamen non fiebat, faciliusque obtemperabat corpus tenuissimae uoluntati animae, ut ad nutum membra mouerentur, quam ipsa sibi anima ad uoluntatem suam magnam in sola uoluntate perficiendam.

In the very heat of my hesitation I did many things with my body which people sometimes want to do but cannot, if they do not have the limbs themselves, or if these are bound with chains, or weakened by illness, or hindered in some other way. If I tore my hair, if I struck my forehead, if I clasped my knee with interlocked fingers, I did it because I willed it. But I could have willed it and not done it, if my limbs had not obeyed. So I did many things where willing was not the same as being able; and I did not do the thing that pleased me with incomparably greater desire, and which I could have done as soon as I willed, because as soon as I willed it, I would certainly will it. For there the ability is the same as the will, and to will is itself already to do; and yet it was not done. And the body obeyed the slightest will of the soul more easily, moving its limbs at a nod, than the soul obeyed itself in carrying out its great will in the will alone.

8.21CSEL 33:187–188

Vnde hoc monstrum? et quare istuc? luceat misericordia tua, et interrogem, si forte mihi respondere possint latebrae poenarum hominum et tenebrosissimae contritiones filiorum Adam. unde hoc monstrum? et quare istuc? imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. imperat animus, ut moueatur manus, et tanta est facilitas, ut uix a seruitio discernatur imperium: et animus animus est, manus autem corpus est. imperat animus, ut uelit animus, nec alter est nec facit tamen. unde hoc monstrum? et quare istuc? imperat, inquam, ut uelit, qui non imperaret, nisi uellet, et non facit quod imperat. sed non ex toto uult: non ergo ex toto imperat. nam in tantum imperat, in quantum uult, et in tantum non fit quod imperat, in quantum non uult, quoniam uoluntas imperat, ut sit uoluntas, nec alia, sed ipsa. non itaque plena imperat; ideo non est quod imperat. nam si plena esset, nec imperaret ut esset, quia iam esset. non igitur monstrum partim uelle, partim nolle, sed aegritudo animi est, quia non totus assurgit ueritate subleuatus, consuetudine praegrauatus. et ideo sunt duae uoluntates, quia una earum tota non est et hoc adest alteri, quod deest alteri.

Where does this monstrous thing come from? And why is it so? Let your mercy shine, and let me ask, if perhaps the hidden depths of men's punishments and the darkest afflictions of the sons of Adam can answer me. Where does this monstrous thing come from? And why is it so? The mind commands the body, and it obeys at once; the mind commands itself, and it is resisted. The mind commands the hand to move, and it is so easy that command can hardly be told apart from obedience; and yet the mind is mind, while the hand is body. The mind commands the mind to will, and it is not another mind, and yet it does not do it. Where does this monstrous thing come from? And why is it so? It commands, I say, that it will, and it would not command unless it willed, and yet it does not do what it commands. But it does not will wholly; therefore it does not command wholly. For it commands to the extent that it wills, and what it commands is not done to the extent that it does not will, since the will commands that there be a will, and not another, but itself. So it is not a full will that commands; and therefore what it commands does not happen. For if the will were full, it would not command that it be, because it would already be. So it is not monstrous partly to will and partly not to will; it is a sickness of the mind, which does not rise up wholly, lifted up by truth but weighed down by habit. And so there are two wills, because one of them is not whole, and what is present to the one is lacking to the other.

8.22CSEL 33:188–189

Pereant a facie tua, deus, sicuti pereunt, uaniloqui et mentis seductores, qui cum duas uoluntates in deliberando animaduerterint, duas naturas duarum mentium esse asseuerant, unam bonam, alteram malam. ipsi uere mali sunt, cum ista mala sentiunt, et idem ipsi boni erunt, si uera senserint uerisque consenserint, ut dicat eis apostolus tuus: fuistis aliquando tenebrae, nunc autem lux in domino. illi enim dum uolunt esse lux non in domino, sed in se ipsis, putando animae naturam hoc esse, quod deus est, ita facti sunt densiores tenebrae, quoniam longius a te recesserunt horrenda arrogantia, a te, uero lumine inluminante omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum. adtendite, quid dicatis, et erubescite et accedite ad eum et inluminamini, et uultus uestri non erubescent. ego cum deliberabam, ut seruirem domino deo meo, sicut diu disposueram, ego eram, qui uolebam, ego, qui nolebam; ego eram. nec plene uolebam nec plene nolebam. ideo mecum contendebam et dissipabar a me ipso, et ipsa dissipatio me inuito quidem fiebat, nec tamen ostendebat naturam mentis alienae, sed poenam meae. et ideo non iam ego operabar illam, sed quod habitat in me peccatum de supplicio liberioris peccati, quia eram filius Adam.

Let them perish from your presence, O God, as they do perish, the "vain talkers and seducers of the mind," who, having noticed two wills in deliberation, assert that there are two natures of two minds, one good and the other evil. They themselves are truly evil when they hold these evil views, and these same people will be good if they hold true views and assent to the truth, so that your apostle may say to them, "You were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord." For they, wanting to be light not in the Lord but in themselves, by thinking that the nature of the soul is what God is, have become thicker darkness, because by their dreadful arrogance they have withdrawn further from you, from you, "the true light that enlightens every man coming into this world." Pay attention to what you are saying, and blush, and "come to him and be enlightened, and your faces will not blush." When I was deliberating about serving the Lord my God, as I had long intended, it was I who willed and I who did not will; it was I. I neither fully willed nor fully refused. So I was at war with myself and was torn apart by myself, and this very tearing apart happened against my will; yet it showed not the nature of another mind but the punishment of my own. And so it was no longer I who did it, "but the sin that dwells in me," from the punishment of a sin more freely committed, because I was a son of Adam.

8.23CSEL 33:189–190

Nam si tot sunt contrariae naturae, quot uoluntates sibi resistunt, non iam duae, sed plures erunt. si deliberet quisquam, utrum ad conuenticulum eorum pergat an ad theatrum, clamant isti: "ecce duae naturae, una bona hac ducit, altera mala illac redducit. nam unde ista cunctatio sibimet aduersantium uoluntatum?" ego autem dico ambas malas, et quae ad illos ducit et quae ad theatrum redducit. sed non credunt nisi bonam esse, qua itur ad eos. quid? si ergo quisquam noster deliberet et secum altercantibus duabus uoluntatibus fluctuet, utrum ad theatrum pergat an ad ecclesiam nostram, nonne et isti quid respondeant fluctuabunt? aut enim fatebuntur, quod nolunt, bona uoluntate pergi in ecclesiam nostram, sicut in eam pergunt qui sacramentis eius imbuti sunt atque detinentur, aut duas malas naturas et duas malas mentes in uno homine confligere putabunt, et non erit uerum quod solent dicere, unam bonam, alteram malam, aut conuertentur ad uerum et non negabunt, cum quisque deliberat, animam unam diuersis uoluntatibus aestuare.

For if there are as many contrary natures as there are wills resisting one another, there will be not two but many. If someone deliberates whether to go to their meeting or to the theater, these people cry out: "Look, two natures: a good one leads him this way, a bad one draws him back that way. For where else does this hesitation between opposing wills come from?" But I say that both are bad, both the one that leads to them and the one that draws back to the theater. But they believe that only the one by which one goes to them is good. What then? If one of us deliberates, and wavers between two wills quarreling with each other, whether to go to the theater or to our church, will not these people also waver about what to answer? For either they will admit, which they do not want to, that it is by a good will that one goes to our church, as those go there who have been initiated into its sacraments and are held by them; or they will think that two evil natures and two evil minds are in conflict in one man, and then what they usually say, that one is good and the other evil, will not be true; or they will be converted to the truth and will not deny that, when anyone deliberates, one soul is tossed about by different wills.

8.24CSEL 33:190–191

Iam ergo non dicant, cum duas uoluntates in homine uno aduersari sibi sentiunt, duas contrarias mentes de duabus contrariis substantiis et de duobus contrariis principiis contendere, unam bonam, alteram malam. nam tu, deus uerax, inprobas eos et redarguis atque conuincis eos, sicut in utraque mala uoluntate, cum quisque deliberat, utrum hominem ueneno interimat an ferro, utrum fundum alienum illum an illum inuadat, quando utrumque non potest, utrum emat uoluptatem luxuria an pecuniam seruet auaritia, utrum ad circum pergat an ad theatrum, si uno die utrumque exhibeatur; addo etiam tertium, an ad furtum de domo aliena, si subest occasio; addo et quartum, an ad conmittendum adulterium, si et inde simul facultas aperitur, si omnia concurrant in unum articulum temporis pariterque cupiuntur omnia, quae simul agi nequeunt: discerpunt enim animum sibimet aduersantibus quattuor uoluntatibus uel etiam pluribus in tanta copia rerum, quae appetuntur, nec tamen tantam multitudinem diuersarum substantiarum solent dicere. ita et in bonis uoluntatibus. nam quaero ab eis, utrum bonum sit delectari lectione apostoli et utrum bonum sit delectari psalmo sobrio et utrum bonum sit euangelium disserere. respondebunt ad singula: "bonum." quid? si ergo pariter delectent omnia simulque uno tempore, nonne diuersae uoluntates distendunt cor hominis, dum deliberatur, quid potissimum arripiamus? et omnes bonae sunt et certant secum, donec eligatur unum, quo feriatur tota uoluntas una, quae in plures diuidebatur. ita etiam, cum aeternitas delectat superius et temporalis boni uoluptas retentat inferius, eadem anima est non tota uoluntate illud aut hoc uolens et ideo discerpitur graui molestia, dum illud ueritate praeponit, hoc familiaritate non ponit.

So let them no longer say, when they perceive two wills opposing each other in one man, that two contrary minds, from two contrary substances and two contrary principles, one good and the other evil, are in conflict. For you, truthful God, refute them and rebuke and convict them, as in the case where both wills are evil: when someone deliberates whether to kill a man by poison or by the sword; whether to seize this or that piece of another's land, when he cannot seize both; whether to buy pleasure by extravagance or keep his money by avarice; whether to go to the circus or the theater, if both are showing on the same day. I add a third: or to steal from another's house, if the opportunity arises; and I add a fourth: or to commit adultery, if the chance opens up at the same time; if all these come together at one point in time, and all are equally desired, though they cannot be done at once. For they tear the mind apart with four wills opposing one another, or even more, given the great number of things that are desired; and yet they do not usually speak of such a great multitude of different substances. So also with good wills. For I ask them whether it is good to delight in reading the apostle, and whether it is good to delight in a sober psalm, and whether it is good to discuss the gospel. They will answer to each, "It is good." What then? If all of these delight us equally and at one and the same time, do not different wills stretch a man's heart while he deliberates which we should take up first? And all of them are good, and they contend with one another until one is chosen, to which the whole will, which was divided among many, is then carried as one. So too, when eternity delights us from above and the pleasure of a temporal good holds us back from below, it is the same soul willing this or that, but not with its whole will; and so it is torn apart with grievous distress, while it prefers the one because of its truth but does not set aside the other because of habit.

8.25CSEL 33:191–192

Sic aegrotabam et excruciabar accusans memet ipsum solito acerbius nimis ac uoluens et uersans me in uinculo meo, donec abrumperetur totum, quo iam exiguo tenebar. sed tenebar tamen. et instabas tamen in occultis meis, domine, seuera misericordia flagella ingeminans timoris et pudoris, ne rursus cessarem et non abrumperetur id ipsum exiguum et tenue, quod remanserat, et reualesceret iterum et me robustius alligaret. dicebam enim apud me intus: "ecce modo fiat, modo fiat," et cum uerbo iam ibam in placitum. iam paene faciebam et non faciebam nec relabebar tamen in pristina, sed de proximo stabam et respirabam. et item conabar et paulo minus ibi eram et paulo minus, iam iamque adtingebam et tenebam: et non ibi eram nec adtingebam nec tenebam, haesitans mori morti et uitae uiuere, plusque in me ualebat inolitum, quam melius insolitum, punctumque ipsum temporis, quo aliud futurus eram, quanto propius admouebatur, tanto ampliorem incutiebat horrorem; sed non recutiebat retro nec auertebat, sed suspendebat.

So I was sick and tormented, accusing myself far more bitterly than usual, and twisting and turning in my chain until it would be broken completely, since I was now held by only a little of it. But I was still held. And you pressed upon me in my hidden depths, Lord, with a severe mercy redoubling the lashes of fear and shame, lest I give up again and that very small and slender remnant not be broken, but grow strong again and bind me more firmly. For I kept saying within myself, "Let it be now, let it be now," and with the word I was already moving toward the decision. I was almost doing it, and I did not do it; yet I did not slip back into my former state, but stood close by and caught my breath. And I tried again, and I was a little less far from it, and a little less, and now, now I was touching it and holding it; and I was not there, and did not touch it or hold it, hesitating to die to death and live to life. The ingrained worse had more power in me than the unaccustomed better, and the very moment of time at which I was to become something else struck me with greater horror the nearer it came; but it did not drive me back or turn me away, it held me in suspense.

8.26CSEL 33:192

Retinebant nugae nugarum et uanitates uanitantium, antiquae amicae meae, et succutiebant uestem meam carneam et submurmurabant: "dimittisne nos?" et "a momento isto non erimus tecum ultra in aeternum" et "a momento isto non tibi licebit hoc et illud ultra in aeternum". et quae suggerebant in eo, quod dixi "hoc et illud," quae suggerebant, deus meus? auertat ab anima serui tui misericordia tua! quas sordes suggerebant, quae dedecora! et audiebam eas iam longe minus quam dimidius, non tamquam libere contradicentes eundo in obuiam, sed uelut a dorso mussitantes et discedentem quasi furtim uellicantes, ut respicerem. retardabant tamen cunctantem me abripere atque excutere ab eis et transilire quo uocabar, cum diceret mihi consuetudo uiolenta: "putas sine istis poteris?"

Trifles of trifles and vanities of vanities, my old loves, held me back, and they plucked at my garment of flesh and whispered softly: "Are you sending us away?" and "From this moment we shall no longer be with you, for ever," and "From this moment this and that will no longer be allowed you, for ever." And what did they suggest by what I have called "this and that"? What did they suggest, my God? Let your mercy turn it away from the soul of your servant! What filth they suggested, what shameful things! And now I heard them far less than half as loudly, not as if they openly contradicted me by coming to meet me face to face, but as if muttering behind my back and furtively plucking at me as I went away, to make me look back. Yet they delayed me as I hesitated to tear myself away and shake myself free of them and leap across to where I was being called, while violent habit said to me, "Do you think you can live without them?"

8.27CSEL 33:192–193

Sed iam tepidissime hoc dicebat. aperiebatur enim ab ea parte, qua intenderam faciem et quo transire trepidabam, casta dignitas continentiae, serena et non dissolute hilaris, honeste blandiens, ut uenirem neque dubitarem, et extendens ad me suscipiendum et amplectendum pias manus plenas gregibus bonorum exemplorum. ibi tot pueri et puellae, ibi iuuentus multa et omnis aetas et graues uiduae et uirgines anus, et in omnibus ipsa continentia nequaquam sterilis, sed fecunda mater filiorum, gaudiorum de marito te, domine. et inridebat me inrisione hortatoria, quasi diceret: "tu non poteris quod isti, quod istae? an uero isti et istae in se ipsis possunt ac non in domino deo suo? dominus deus eorum me dedit eis. quid in te stas et non in te stas? proice te in eum, noli metuere; non se subtrahet, ut cadas: proice te securus, excipiet et sanabit te." et erubescebam nimis, quia illarum nugarum murmura adhuc audiebam, et cunctabundus pendebam. et rursus illa, quasi diceret: "obsurdesce aduersus inmunda illa membra tua, ut mortificentur. narrant tibi delectationes, sed non sicut lex domini dei tui." ista controuersia in corde meo non nisi de me ipso aduersus me ipsum. at Alypius affixus lateri meo inusitati motus mei exitum tacitus opperiebatur.

But now it said this very half-heartedly. For on the side toward which I had turned my face, and to which I trembled to cross over, there was opening up the chaste dignity of Continence, serene and cheerful without wantonness, honorably coaxing me to come and not hesitate, and stretching out to receive and embrace me her holy hands, full of flocks of good examples. There were so many boys and girls, there were many young people and every age, grave widows and aged virgins, and in all of them Continence herself, not at all barren, but a fruitful "mother of children," of joys from you, Lord, her husband. And she laughed at me with an encouraging laugh, as if to say: "Can you not do what these men and these women have done? Or can these men and women do it in themselves, and not in the Lord their God? The Lord their God gave me to them. Why do you stand in yourself, and so do not stand? Cast yourself on him; do not be afraid. He will not withdraw so that you fall. Cast yourself on him without fear; he will receive you and heal you." And I blushed deeply, because I still heard the murmurs of those trifles, and I hung there hesitating. And again she seemed to say: "Stop your ears against those unclean members of yours on the earth, so that they may be put to death. They tell you of delights, but not such as the law of the Lord your God." This controversy in my heart was nothing but myself against myself. And Alypius, fixed at my side, silently awaited the outcome of my unusual agitation.

8.28CSEL 33:193–194

Vbi uero a fundo arcano alta consideratio traxit et congessit totam miseriam meam in conspectu cordis mei, oborta est procella ingens ferens ingentem imbrem lacrimarum. et ut totum effunderem cum uocibus suis, surrexi ab Alypio — solitudo mihi ad negotium flendi aptior suggerebatur — et secessi remotius, quam ut posset mihi onerosa esse etiam eius praesentia. sic tunc eram, et ille sensit: nescio quid enim, puto, dixeram, in quo apparebat sonus uocis meae iam fletu grauidus, et sic surrexeram. mansit ergo ille ubi sedebamus nimie stupens. ego sub quadam fici arbore straui me nescio quomodo et dimisi habenas lacrimis, et proruperunt flumina oculorum meorum, acceptabile sacrificium tuum, et non quidem his uerbis, sed in hac sententia multa dixi tibi: et tu, domine, usquequo? usquequo, domine, irasceris in finem? ne memor fueris iniquitatum nostrarum antiquarum. sentiebam enim eis me teneri. iactabam uoces miserabiles: "quamdiu, quamdiu cras et cras? quare non modo? quare non hac hora finis turpitudinis meae?"

But when deep reflection had drawn out from its secret depths and heaped up all my misery in the sight of my heart, a mighty storm arose, bringing a mighty shower of tears. And to pour it all out with its own cries, I rose up from Alypius (solitude seemed to me more fitting for the business of weeping) and withdrew further, so that even his presence would not be a burden to me. That was how I was then, and he sensed it; for I had said something, I think, in which the sound of my voice was already heavy with tears, and so I had risen. He stayed, therefore, where we had been sitting, utterly astonished. I flung myself down, I do not know how, under a certain fig tree, and gave free rein to my tears, and the rivers of my eyes burst forth, an acceptable sacrifice to you; and I said many things to you, not indeed in these words but in this sense: "And you, Lord, how long? How long, Lord, will you be angry to the end? Do not remember our old iniquities." For I felt that I was held by them. I cried out pitiful words: "How long, how long? Tomorrow and tomorrow? Why not now? Why not an end to my shame this very hour?"

8.29CSEL 33:194–195

Dicebam haec et flebam amarissima contritione cordis mei. et ecce audio uocem de diuina domo cum cantu dicentis et crebro repetentis quasi pueri an puellae, nescio: "tolle lege, tolle lege". statimque mutato uultu intentissimus cogitare coepi, utrumnam solerent pueri in aliquo genere ludendi cantitare tale aliquid, nec occurrebat omnino audisse me uspiam repressoque impetu lacrimarum surrexi nihil aliud interpretans diuinitus mihi iuberi, nisi ut aperirem codicem et legerem quod primum caput inuenissem. audieram enim de Antonio, quod ex euangelica lectione, cui forte superuenerat, admonitus fuerit, tamquam sibi diceretur quod legebatur: uade, uende omnia, quae habes, da pauperibus et habebis thesaurum in caelis; et ueni, sequere me, et tali oraculo confestim ad te esse conuersum. itaque concitus redii in eum locum, ubi sedebat Alypius: ibi enim posueram codicem apostoli, cum inde surrexeram. arripui, aperui et legi in silentio capitulum, quo primum coniecti sunt oculi mei: non in comisationibus et ebrietatibus, non in cubilibus et inpudicitiis, non in contentione et aemulatione, sed induite dominum Iesum Christum et carnis prouidentiam ne feceritis in concupiscentiis. nec ultra uolui legere nec opus erat. statim quippe cum fine huiusce sententiae quasi luce securitatis infusa cordi meo omnes dubitationis tenebrae diffugerunt.

I was saying these things and weeping in the most bitter contrition of my heart. And suddenly I hear a voice from the neighboring house, chanting and repeating over and over, whether a boy's or a girl's I do not know: "Take up and read, take up and read." At once my expression changed, and I began to think most intently whether children usually chanted anything like this in some kind of game, and I could not remember ever having heard it anywhere. So, checking the rush of my tears, I got up, interpreting it as nothing other than a divine command to me to open the book and read the first chapter I should find. For I had heard of Antony that, coming in by chance on a reading of the gospel, he had been admonished as if what was read was said to himself: "Go, sell all that you have, give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me," and that by such an oracle he had at once been converted to you. So I hurried back to the place where Alypius was sitting, for I had put down the book of the apostle there when I got up. I seized it, opened it, and read in silence the passage on which my eyes first fell: "Not in reveling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and wantonness, not in strife and envy; but put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh in its lusts." I did not want to read further, nor was there any need. For immediately, with the end of this sentence, as if a light of certainty had been poured into my heart, all the darkness of doubt fled away.

8.30CSEL 33:195–196

Tum interiecto aut digito aut nescio quo alio signo codicem clausi et tranquillo iam uultu indicaui Alypio. at ille quid in se ageretur — quod ego nesciebam — sic indicauit. petit uidere quid legissem: ostendi, et adtendit etiam ultra quam ego legeram. et ignorabam quid sequeretur. sequebatur autem: infirmum uero in fide recipe. quod ille ad se rettulit mihique aperuit. sed tali admonitione firmatus est placitoque ac proposito bono et congruentissimo suis moribus, quibus a me in melius iam olim ualde longeque distabat, sine ulla turbulenta cunctatione coniunctus est. inde ad matrem ingredimur, indicamus: gaudet. narramus quemadmodum gestum sit: exultat et triumphat et benedicebat tibi, qui potens est ultra quam petimus aut intellegimus facere, quia tanto amplius sibi a te concessum de me uidebat, quam petere solebat miserabilibus flebilibusque gemitibus. conuertisti enim me ad te, ut nec uxorem quaererem nec aliquam spem saeculi huius stans in ea regula fidei, in qua me ante tot annos ei reuelaueras, et conuertisti luctum eius in gaudium multo uberius, quam uoluerat, et multo carius atque castius, quam de nepotibus carnis meae requirebat.

Then, putting my finger or some other marker in the book, I closed it, and with a calm face now I told Alypius. And he, in turn, told me what was happening in him, which I did not know. He asked to see what I had read; I showed him, and he looked further than I had read. I did not know what followed. What followed was: "Receive him who is weak in the faith." He applied this to himself and disclosed it to me. And strengthened by this admonition, he joined me in my decision and good purpose, which was very well suited to his character (in which he had long been far, far better than I), without any troubled hesitation. Then we go in to my mother and tell her: she rejoices. We tell her how it happened: she exults and triumphs and blessed you, "who are able to do beyond what we ask or understand," because she saw that you had granted her so much more concerning me than she used to ask with her pitiful and tearful groans. For you converted me to yourself, so that I sought neither a wife nor any hope of this world, standing on that rule of faith on which you had shown me to her so many years before; and you "turned her mourning into joy," far more abundantly than she had wanted, and far more dear and chaste than the joy she sought from grandchildren of my flesh.

Chapter 9

9.1CSEL 33:196–197

O domine, ego seruus tuus, ego seruus tuus et filius ancillae tuae. disrupisti uincula mea; tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis. laudet te cor meum et lingua mea, et omnia ossa mea dicent: domine, quis similis tibi? dicant, et responde mihi et dic animae meae: salus tua ego sum. quis ego et qualis ego? quid non mali aut facta mea aut, si non facta, dicta mea aut, si non dicta, uoluntas mea fuit? tu autem, domine, bonus et misericors et dextera tua respiciens profunditatem mortis meae et a fundo cordis mei exhauriens abyssum corruptionis. et hoc erat totum nolle quod uolebam, et uelle quod uolebas. sed ubi erat tam annoso tempore et de quo imo altoque secreto euocatum est in momento liberum arbitrium meum, quo subderem ceruicem leni iugo tuo et umeros leni sarcinae tuae, Christe Iesu, adiutor meus et redemptor meus? quam suaue mihi subito factum est carere suauitatibus nugarum, et quas amittere metus fuerat, iam dimittere gaudium erat. eiciebas enim eas a me, uera tu et summa suauitas, eiciebas et intrabas pro eis omni uoluptate dulcior, sed non carni et sanguini, omni luce clarior, sed omni secreto interior, omni honore sublimior, sed non sublimibus in se. iam liber erat animus meus a curis mordacibus ambiendi et adquirendi et uolutandi atque scalpendi scabiem libidinum, et garriebam tibi, claritati meae et diuitiis et saluti meae, domino deo meo.

O Lord, I am your servant; I am your servant and the son of your handmaid. You have broken my bonds; I will offer you the sacrifice of praise. Let my heart and my tongue praise you, and let all my bones say, "Lord, who is like you?" Let them say it, and answer me, and "say to my soul: I am your salvation." Who am I, and what am I? What evil has there not been, if not in my deeds, then in my words, or if not in my words, then in my will? But you, Lord, are good and merciful, and your right hand looked into the depth of my death and drained from the bottom of my heart the abyss of corruption. And this was the whole of it: not to will what I willed, and to will what you willed. But where was my free choice through so many long years, and from what deep and hidden recess was it called forth in a moment, so that I might bend my neck to your gentle yoke and my shoulders to your light burden, Christ Jesus, "my helper and my redeemer"? How sweet it suddenly became to me to be without the sweetness of trifles; and what I had feared to lose, it was now a joy to let go. For you cast them out from me, you, the true and highest sweetness; you cast them out and entered in their place, sweeter than every pleasure, though not to flesh and blood; brighter than every light, yet more inward than any secret; higher than every honor, though not to those who are high in their own eyes. Now my mind was free from the gnawing cares of seeking office and gain and of wallowing and scratching the itch of lusts, and I was chattering away to you, my glory and my riches and my salvation, the Lord my God.

9.2CSEL 33:197–198

Et placuit mihi in conspectu tuo non tumultuose abripere, sed leniter subtrahere ministerium linguae meae nundinis loquacitatis, ne ulterius pueri meditantes non legem tuam, non pacem tuam, sed insanias mendaces et bella forensia mercarentur ex ore meo arma furori suo. et opportune iam paucissimi dies supererant ad uindemiales ferias, et statui tolerare illos, ut sollemniter abscederem et redemtus a te iam non redirem uenalis. consilium ergo nostrum erat coram te, coram hominibus autem nisi nostris non erat. et conuenerat inter nos, ne passim cuiquam effunderetur, quamquam tu nobis in conualle plorationis ascendentibus et cantantibus canticum graduum dederas sagittas acutas et carbones uastatores aduersus linguam subdolam uelut consulendo contradicentem et, sicut cibum assolet, amando consumentem.

And it seemed good to me in your sight not to snatch the service of my tongue away from the market of talkativeness with a commotion, but to withdraw it quietly, so that boys who were meditating not on your law, not on your peace, but on lying follies and the battles of the courts, should no longer buy from my mouth weapons for their madness. And conveniently, only a very few days remained until the vintage holidays, and I decided to endure them, so as to leave in the ordinary way, and, redeemed by you, not return to put myself up for sale again. So our plan was known to you, but not to men except our own friends. And we had agreed among ourselves that it should not be spread about to anyone, although you had given us, as we went up from the valley of weeping and sang "the song of ascents," sharp arrows and destroying coals against the deceitful tongue that opposes under the guise of giving advice and, as with food, consumes by loving.

9.3CSEL 33:198

Sagittaueras tu cor nostrum caritate tua, et gestabamus uerba tua transfixa uisceribus et exempla seruorum tuorum, quos de nigris lucidos et de mortuis uiuos feceras, congesta in sinum cogitationis nostrae urebant et absumebant grauem torporem, ne in ima uergeremus, et accendebant nos ualide, ut omnis ex lingua subdola contradictionis flatus inflammare nos acrius posset, non extinguere. uerum tamen quia propter nomen tuum, quod sanctificasti per terras, etiam laudatores utique haberet uotum et propositum nostrum, iactantiae simile uidebatur non opperiri tam proximum feriarum tempus, sed de publica professione atque ante oculos omnium sita ante discedere, ut conuersa in factum meum ora cunctorum intuentium, quam uicinum uindemialium diem praeuenire noluerim, multa dicerent, quod quasi appetissem magnus uideri. et quo mihi erat istuc, ut putaretur et disputaretur de animo meo et blasphemaretur bonum nostrum?

You had pierced our heart with your love, and we carried your words fixed in our inmost parts; and the examples of your servants, whom you had made bright from dark and living from dead, gathered into the bosom of our thought, burned up and consumed our heavy torpor, so that we would not sink into the depths, and they set us so strongly on fire that every blast of contradiction from a deceitful tongue could only inflame us more fiercely, not extinguish us. Yet, because our vow and purpose would certainly also have its praisers on account of your name, which you have sanctified throughout the earth, it seemed like boasting not to wait for the holiday season, now so near, but to leave beforehand a public profession placed before the eyes of all; so that all who looked at what I had done, and at how I had not been willing to wait for the vintage day so close at hand, would say a great deal about my having wanted, as it were, to seem great. And what good would it do me for people to judge and dispute about my intentions, and for "our good to be spoken evil of"?

9.4CSEL 33:198–199

Quin etiam quod ipsa aestate litterario labori nimio pulmo meus cedere coeperat et difficulter trahere suspiria doloribusque pectoris testari se saucium uocemque clariorem productioremue recusare, primo perturbauerat me, quia magisterii illius sarcinam paene iam necessitate ponere cogebat aut, si curari et conualescere potuissem, certe intermittere. sed ubi plena uoluntas uacandi et uidendi, quoniam tu es dominus, oborta mihi est atque firmata — nosti, deus meus — etiam gaudere coepi, quod haec quoque suberat non mendax excusatio, quae offensionem hominum temperaret, qui propter liberos suos me liberum esse numquam uolebant. plenus igitur tali gaudio tolerabam illud interuallum temporis, donec decurreret — nescio utrum uel uiginti dies erant — sed tamen fortiter tolerabantur, quia recesserat cupiditas, quae mecum solebat ferre graue negotium, et ego premendus remanseram, nisi patientia succederet. peccasse me in hoc quisquam seruorum tuorum, fratrum meorum, dixerit, quod iam pleno corde militia tua passus me fuerim uel una hora sedere in cathedra mendacii. at ego non contendo. sed tu, domine misericordissime, nonne et hoc peccatum cum ceteris horrendis et funereis in aqua sancta ignouisti et remisisti mihi?

Moreover, that very summer my lungs had begun to give way under too much literary labor; I breathed with difficulty, and pains in my chest showed that they were injured, and they refused a clear or prolonged voice. At first this had troubled me, because it was forcing me almost of necessity to lay down the burden of that teaching, or at least to interrupt it, if I could be cured and recover. But when the full will to be free and "to see that you are the Lord" had arisen in me and been confirmed (you know it, my God), I even began to rejoice that I also had this excuse, and not a false one, to soften the offense of the people who, for the sake of their children, never wanted me to be free. Full of such joy, then, I endured that interval of time until it ran out (I do not know whether it was as much as twenty days); yet they were endured bravely, because the ambition that used to help me bear the heavy business had gone, and I would have been left crushed if patience had not taken its place. Someone among your servants, my brothers, may say that I sinned in this, that with my heart now fully in your service I allowed myself to sit even one hour in the chair of lies. I do not dispute it. But you, most merciful Lord, did you not pardon and forgive me this sin too, with the other dreadful and deadly ones, in the holy water?

9.5CSEL 33:199–200

Macerabatur anxitudine Verecundus de isto nostro bono, quod propter uincula sua, quibus tenacissime tenebatur, deseri se nostro consortio uidebat. nondum Christianus coniuge fideli ea tamen ipsa artiore prae ceteris conpede ab itinere, quod aggressi eramus, retardabatur nec christianum esse alio modo se uelle dicebat quam illo, quo non poterat. benigne tamen obtulit, ut, quamdiu ibi essemus, in re eius essemus. retribues illi, domine, in retributione iustorum, quia iam ipsam sortem retribuisti ei. quamuis enim absentibus nobis, cum Romae iam essemus, corporali aegritudine correptus et in ea Christianus et fidelis factus ex hac uita emigrauit. ita misertus es non solum eius sed etiam nostri, ne cogitantes egregiam erga nos amici humanitatem nec eum in grege tuo numerantes dolore intolerabili cruciaremur. gratias tibi, deus noster, tui sumus. indicant hortationes et consolationes tuae: fidelis promissor reddis Verecundo pro rure illo eius Cassiciaco, ubi ab aestu saeculi requieuimus in te, amoenitatem sempiternae uirtutis paradisi tui, quoniam dimisisti ei peccata super terram in monte incaseato, monte tuo, monte uberi.

Verecundus was wasting away with anxiety over this good of ours, because he saw that, on account of the bonds by which he was held most tightly, he would be left out of our company. Not yet a Christian himself, though his wife was one of the faithful, he was held back from the journey we had begun by her, a fetter tighter than all the rest; and he said he did not want to be a Christian in any other way than the one that was impossible for him. Yet he kindly offered that we might stay at his property as long as we were there. You will repay him, Lord, "at the resurrection of the just," since you have already repaid him with that very lot. For while we were away, when we were already in Rome, he was seized with a bodily illness, and in it he became a Christian and one of the faithful, and departed this life. So you had mercy not only on him but also on us, so that we would not be tormented with unbearable grief, thinking of our friend's outstanding kindness toward us and not counting him in your flock. Thanks be to you, our God; we are yours. Your exhortations and consolations show it: faithful in your promises, you repay Verecundus for that country estate of his at Cassiciacum, where we rested in you from the heat of the world, with the loveliness of your ever-green paradise, since you forgave him his sins on earth "on the curdled mountain, your mountain, the fertile mountain."

9.6CSEL 33:200–201

Angebatur ergo tunc ipse, Nebridius autem conlaetabatur. quamuis enim et ipse nondum Christianus in illam foueam perniciosissimi erroris inciderat, ut ueritatis filii tui carnem phantasma crederet, tamen inde emergens sic sibi erat, nondum imbutus ullis ecclesiae tuae sacramentis, sed inquisitor ardentissimus ueritatis. quem non multo post conuersionem nostram et regenerationem per baptismum tuum ipsum etiam fidelem catholicum castitate perfecta atque continentia tibi seruientem in Africa apud suos, cum tota domus eius per eum christiana facta esset, carne soluisti. et nunc ille uiuit in sinu Abraham. quidquid illud est, quod illo significatur sinu, ibi Nebridius meus uiuit, dulcis amicus meus, tuus autem adoptiuus ex liberto filius: ibi uiuit. nam quis alius tali animae locus? ibi uiuit, unde me multa interrogabat homuncionem inexpertum. iam non ponit aurem ad os meum, sed spiritale os ad fontem tuum et bibit, quantum potest, sapientiam pro auiditate sua sine fine felix. nec eum sic arbitror inebriari ex ea, ut obliuiscatur mei, cum tu, domine, quem potat ille, nostri sis memor. sic ergo eramus, Verecundum consolantes tristem salua amicitia de tali conuersione nostra et exhortantes ad fidem gradus sui, uitae scilicet coniugalis, Nebridium autem opperientes, quando sequeretur. quod de tam proximo poterat et erat iam iamque facturus, cum ecce euoluti sunt dies illi tandem. nam longi et multi uidebantur prae amore libertatis otiosae ad cantandum de medullis omnibus: tibi dixit cor meum, quaesiui uultum tuum; uultum tuum, domine, requiram.

He, then, was distressed, but Nebridius rejoiced with us. For although he too, not yet a Christian, had fallen into that pit of most pernicious error of believing the flesh of your Son, the Truth, to be a phantom, yet he was emerging from it and was in this state: not yet initiated into any sacraments of your church, but a most ardent seeker of the truth. Not long after our conversion and our regeneration through your baptism, he too became one of the catholic faithful, serving you in perfect chastity and continence among his own people in Africa, and after his whole household had become Christian through him, you released him from the flesh. And now he lives in Abraham's bosom. Whatever is signified by that bosom, there my Nebridius lives, my sweet friend, and your son, adopted from a freedman: there he lives. For what other place is there for such a soul? He lives there, in the place about which he used to ask me, an inexperienced little man, so many questions. Now he no longer puts his ear to my mouth, but his spiritual mouth to your fountain, and he drinks as much wisdom as he can, as much as he thirsts, happy without end. And I do not think he is so intoxicated by it that he forgets me, since you, Lord, whom he drinks, are mindful of us. That, then, was how we were: consoling Verecundus in his sadness, our friendship unharmed by such a conversion of ours, and exhorting him to faith according to his own station, that is, married life; and waiting for Nebridius to follow, which he could do very soon and was on the point of doing, when at last those days rolled by. For they seemed long and many for the love of free leisure to sing from the depths of my being: "My heart has said to you, I have sought your face; your face, Lord, will I seek."

9.7CSEL 33:201–202

Et uenit dies, quo etiam actu soluerer a professione rhetorica, unde iam cogitatu solutus eram. et factum est, eruisti linguam meam, unde iam erueras cor meum, et benedicebam tibi gaudens profectus in uillam cum meis omnibus. ubi quid egerim in litteris iam quidem sentientibus tibi, sed adhuc superbiae scholam tamquam in pausatione anhelantibus testantur libri disputati cum praesentibus et cum ipso me solo coram te; quae autem cum absente Nebridio, testantur epistulae. et quando mihi sufficiat tempus conmemorandi omnia magna erga nos beneficia tua in illo tempore praesertim ad alia maiora properanti? reuocat enim me recordatio mea, et dulce mihi fit, domine, confiteri tibi, quibus internis me stimulis perdomueris et quemadmodum me conplanaueris humilitatis montibus et collibus cogitationum mearum et tortuosa mea direxeris et aspera lenieris quoque modo ipsum etiam Alypium, fratrem cordis mei, subegeris nomini unigeniti tui, domini et saluatoris nostri Iesu Christi, quod primo dedignabatur inseri litteris nostris. magis enim eas uolebat redolere gymnasiorum cedros, quas iam contriuit dominus, quam salubres herbas ecclesiasticas aduersas serpentibus.

And the day came when I was actually released from the profession of rhetoric, from which I had already been released in thought. And it was done: you delivered my tongue as you had already delivered my heart, and I blessed you and rejoiced as I set out for the country house with all my people. What I did there in literary work, now indeed in your service, but still breathing the school of pride as if in a pause for breath, is attested by the books of discussions with those present and with myself alone before you; and what I did with Nebridius, who was absent, is attested by my letters. And when will I have enough time to recall all your great benefits to us at that time, especially as I am hurrying on to other, greater things? For my memory calls me back, and it becomes sweet to me, Lord, to confess to you by what inward goads you tamed me, and how you leveled me, bringing low the mountains and hills of my thoughts, and made my crooked ways straight and my rough ways smooth; and how you subdued Alypius himself, the brother of my heart, to the name of your only-begotten, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, which at first he disdained to have put into our writings. For he wanted them to smell rather of the cedars of the schools, which the Lord has now broken, than of the wholesome herbs of the church that are good against serpents.

9.8CSEL 33:202–203

Quas tibi, deus meus, uoces dedi, cum legerem psalmos Dauid, cantica fidelia, sonos pietatis excludentes turgidum spiritum, rudis in germano amore tuo, catechumenus in uilla cum catechumeno Alypio feriatus, matre adhaerente nobis muliebri habitu, uirili fide, anili securitate, materna caritate, christiana pietate! quas tibi uoces dabam in psalmis illis et quomodo in te inflammabar ex eis et accendebar eos recitare, si possem, toto orbi terrarum aduersum tyfum generis humani! et tamen toto orbe cantantur, et non est qui se abscondat a calore tuo. quam uehementi et acri dolore indignabar manichaeis et miserabar eos rursus, quod illa sacramenta, illa medicamenta nescirent et insani essent aduersus antidotum, quo sani esse potuissent! uellem, ut alicubi iuxta essent tunc et me nesciente, quod ibi essent, intuerentur faciem meam et audirent uoces meas, quando legi quartum psalmum in illo tunc otio, quid de me fecerit ille psalmus: cum inuocarem te, exaudisti me, deus iustitiae meae; in tribulatione dilatasti mihi. miserere mei, domine, et exaudi orationem meam: audirent ignorante me, utrum audirent, ne me propter se illa dicere putarent, quae inter haec uerba dixerim, quia et re uera nec ea dicerem nec sic ea dicerem, si me ab eis audiri uiderique sentirem, nec, si dicerem, sic acciperent, quomodo mecum et mihi coram te de familiari affectu animi mei.

What cries I uttered to you, my God, when I read the Psalms of David, songs of faith, sounds of piety that shut out a swollen spirit, while I was still a novice in true love of you, a catechumen on holiday at the country house with Alypius, also a catechumen, and my mother staying with us, a woman in dress, a man in faith, with the calm of an old woman, a mother's love, and Christian piety! What cries I uttered to you in those psalms, and how I was set on fire toward you by them, and burned to recite them, if I could, to the whole world against the pride of the human race! And yet they are sung throughout the whole world, and "there is no one who hides himself from your heat." With what vehement and bitter grief I was indignant with the Manichees, and again I pitied them, because they did not know those sacraments, those medicines, and raged against the antidote by which they could have been made sane! I wished that they had been somewhere nearby then, without my knowing they were there, and could watch my face and hear my cries, when I read the fourth psalm in that time of leisure, and see what that psalm did to me: "When I called upon you, you heard me, O God of my righteousness; in tribulation you enlarged me. Have mercy on me, Lord, and hear my prayer." I wish they could have heard, without my knowing whether they heard, so that they would not think I was saying on their account what I said between these words; for in truth I would not have said those things, or said them in that way, if I had felt that I was being heard and seen by them; nor, if I had said them, would they have received them as I spoke them with myself and to myself before you, from the intimate feeling of my soul.

9.9CSEL 33:203–204

Inhorrui timendo ibidemque inferbui sperando et exultando in tua misericordia, pater. et haec omnia exibant per oculos et uocem meam, cum conuersus ad nos spiritus tuus bonus ait nobis: filii hominum, quousque graues corde? ut quid diligitis uanitatem et quaeritis mendacium? dilexeram enim uanitatem et quaesieram mendacium. et tu, domine, iam magnificaueras sanctum tuum, suscitans eum a mortuis et collocans ad dexteram tuam, unde mitteret ex alto promissionem suam, paracletum, spiritum ueritatis. et miserat eum iam, sed ego nesciebam. miserat eum, quia iam magnificatus erat resurgens a mortuis et ascendens in caelum. ante autem spiritus nondum erat datus, quia Iesus nondum erat clarificatus. et clamat prophetia: quousque graues corde? ut quid diligitis uanitatem et quaeritis mendacium? et scitote, quoniam dominus magnificauit sanctum suum. clamat quousque, clamat scitote, et ego tamdiu nesciens uanitatem dilexi et mendacium quaesiui et ideo audiui et contremui, quoniam talibus dicitur, qualem me fuisse reminiscebar. in phantasmatis enim, quae pro ueritate tenueram, uanitas erat et mendacium. et insonui multa grauiter et fortiter in dolore recordationis meae. quae utinam audissent qui adhuc usque diligunt uanitatem et quaerunt mendacium: forte conturbarentur et euomuissent illud, et exaudires eos, cum clamarent ad te, quoniam uera morte carnis mortuus est pro nobis, qui te interpellat pro nobis.

I trembled with fear, and at the same time I grew warm with hope and exultation in your mercy, Father. And all this came out through my eyes and my voice when your good Spirit turned to us and said, "Sons of men, how long will you be heavy of heart? Why do you love vanity and seek after a lie?" For I had loved vanity and sought after a lie. And you, Lord, had already glorified your Holy One, raising him from the dead and setting him at your right hand, whence he would send from on high his promise, the Paraclete, the Spirit of truth. And he had already sent him, but I did not know it. He had sent him, because he had already been glorified, rising from the dead and ascending into heaven. But before that, "the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet been glorified." And the prophecy cries out: "How long will you be heavy of heart? Why do you love vanity and seek after a lie? Know that the Lord has glorified his Holy One." It cries "How long," it cries "Know"; and I, not knowing for so long, loved vanity and sought after a lie. And so I heard it and trembled, because it is said to such people as I remembered I had been. For in the phantoms which I had held for truth there was vanity and a lie. And I cried out many things, gravely and strongly, in the pain of my remembering. If only those who still love vanity and seek after a lie had heard them! Perhaps they would have been troubled and vomited it up, and you would have heard them when they cried to you, because he who intercedes with you for us died for us by a true death of the flesh.

9.10CSEL 33:204–205

Legebam: irascimini et nolite peccare, et quomodo mouebar, deus meus, qui iam didiceram irasci mihi de praeteritis, ut de cetero non peccarem, et merito irasci, quia non alia natura gentis tenebrarum de me peccabat, sicut dicunt qui sibi non irascuntur et thesaurizant sibi iram in die irae et reuelationis iusti iudicii tui. nec iam bona mea foris erant nec oculis carneis in isto sole quaerebantur. uolentes enim gaudere forinsecus facile uanescunt et effunduntur in ea, quae uidentur et temporalia sunt, et imagines eorum famelica cogitatione lambiunt. et o si fatigentur inedia et dicant: quis ostendet nobis bona? et dicamus, et audiant: signatum est in nobis lumen uultus tui, domine. non enim lumen nos sumus, quod inluminat omnem hominem, sed inluminamur a te, ut, qui fuimus aliquando tenebrae, simus lux in te. o si uiderent internum aeternum, quod ego quia gustaueram, frendebam, quoniam non eis poteram ostendere, si afferrent ad me cor in oculis suis foris a te et dicerent: quis ostendit nobis bona? ibi enim, ubi mihi iratus eram, intus in cubili, ubi conpunctus eram, ubi sacrificaueram mactans uetustatem meam et inchoata meditatione renouationis meae sperans in te, ibi mihi dulcescere coeperas et dederas laetitiam in corde meo. et exclamabam legens haec foris et agnoscens intus nec uolebam multiplicari terrenis bonis et deuorans tempora et deuoratus temporibus, cum haberem in aeterna simplicitate aliud frumentum et uinum et oleum.

I read: "Be angry, and do not sin," and how I was moved, my God, I who had already learned to be angry with myself for past things, so as not to sin in future; and to be rightly angry, because it was not another nature, from the race of darkness, that sinned in me, as those say who are not angry with themselves and "store up for themselves wrath on the day of wrath and of the revelation of your just judgment." My good things were no longer outside, nor were they sought with eyes of flesh in this sun. For those who want to find joy outside themselves easily become empty and pour themselves out on "the things that are seen and are temporal," and lick their images with starving thought. Oh, if only they would grow weary with hunger and say, "Who will show us good things?" and we would say, and they would hear: "The light of your face, Lord, is sealed upon us." For we are not the light that enlightens every man, but we are enlightened by you, so that we who "were once darkness may be light" in you. Oh, if only they could see the inward eternal thing, which, because I had tasted it, I gnashed my teeth that I could not show them, if they were to bring me their heart in their eyes, turned outward away from you, and say, "Who will show us good things?" For there, where I was angry with myself, within, in the chamber where I was pierced with sorrow, where I had sacrificed, slaying my old self and, beginning to meditate on my renewal, hoping in you, there you had begun to grow sweet to me, and "had put gladness in my heart." And I cried out as I read these things outwardly and recognized them inwardly, and I did not want to be multiplied with earthly goods, devouring time and devoured by time, when I had in eternal simplicity another "grain and wine and oil."

9.11CSEL 33:205–206

Et clamabam in consequenti uersu clamore alto cordis mei: o in pace! o in id ipsum! o quid dixit: obdormiam et somnum capiam? quoniam quis resistet nobis, cum fiet sermo, qui scriptus est: absorpta est mors in uictoria? et tu es id ipsum ualde, qui non mutaris, et in te requies obliuiscens laborum omnium, quoniam nullus alius tecum nec ad alia adipiscenda, quae non sunt quod tu, sed tu, domine, singulariter in spe constituisti me. legebam et ardebam nec inueniebam, quid facerem surdis mortuis, ex quibus fueram, pestis, latrator amarus et caecus aduersus litteras de melle caeli melleas et de lumine tuo luminosas, et super inimicis scripturae huius tabescebam.

And I cried out at the next verse with a loud cry of my heart: "O in peace! O in the Selfsame!" O what did it say: "I will lie down and sleep"? For who will withstand us when the saying that is written comes to pass: "Death is swallowed up in victory"? And you are exceedingly the Selfsame, you who do not change, and in you is rest, forgetting all toil, because there is no other with you, nor are we to gain other things that are not what you are; but you, Lord, "have made me dwell alone in hope." I read and I burned, and I did not find what to do for those deaf and dead, among whom I had been, a plague, a bitter and blind barker against writings sweet with the honey of heaven and luminous with your light; and I wasted away with grief over the enemies of this Scripture.

9.12CSEL 33:206

Quando recordabor omnia dierum illorum feriatorum? sed nec oblitus sum nec silebo flagelli tui asperitatem et misericordiae tuae mirabilem celeritatem. dolore dentium tunc excruciabas me, et cum in tantum ingrauesceret, ut non ualerem loqui, ascendit in cor meum admonere omnes meos qui aderant, ut deprecarentur te pro me, deum salutis omnimodae. et scripsi hoc in cera et dedi, ut eis legeretur. mox ut genua simplici affectu fiximus, fugit dolor ille. sed quis dolor? aut quomodo fugit? expaui, fateor, domine meus et deus meus: nihil enim tale ab ineunte aetate expertus fueram. et insinuati sunt mihi in profundo nutus tui et gaudens in fide laudaui nomen tuum, et ea fides me securum esse non sinebat de praeteritis peccatis meis, quae mihi per baptismum tuum remissa nondum erant.

When shall I recall everything from those days of rest? But I have not forgotten, nor will I pass over in silence, the sharpness of your scourge and the wonderful swiftness of your mercy. You tormented me then with toothache, and when it grew so bad that I could not speak, it came into my heart to urge all my friends who were present to pray to you for me, the God of every kind of health. And I wrote this on a wax tablet and gave it to them to be read. As soon as we knelt in simple devotion, that pain fled. But what pain? Or how did it flee? I was terrified, I confess, my Lord and my God; for I had never experienced anything like it from my earliest years. And your will was impressed on me in the depths, and rejoicing in faith I praised your name; and that faith did not let me be at ease about my past sins, which had not yet been forgiven me through your baptism.

9.13CSEL 33:206–207

Renuntiaui peractis uindemialibus, ut scholasticis suis Mediolanenses uenditorem uerborum alium prouiderent, quod et tibi ego seruire delegissem et illi professioni prae difficultate spirandi ac dolore pectoris non sufficerem. et insinuaui per litteras antistiti tuo, uiro sancto Ambrosio, pristinos errores meos et praesens uotum meum, ut moneret quid mihi potissimum de libris tuis legendum esset, quo percipiendae tantae gratiae paratior aptiorque fierem. at ille iussit Eseiam prophetam, credo, quod prae ceteris euangelii uocationisque gentium sit praenuntiator apertior. uerum tamen ego primam huius lectionem non intellegens totumque talem arbitrans distuli repetendum exercitatior in dominico eloquio.

When the vintage holidays were over, I gave notice that the people of Milan should provide their students with another seller of words, both because I had chosen to serve you and because I was not equal to that profession on account of my difficulty in breathing and the pain in my chest. And I made known by letter to your bishop, the holy man Ambrose, my former errors and my present intention, so that he might advise me which of your books I should read above all, to become better prepared and more fit to receive so great a grace. He told me to read the prophet Isaiah, I believe because he foretells the gospel and the calling of the Gentiles more plainly than the others. But I, not understanding the first part of it and thinking the whole was like that, put it aside to be taken up again when I was more practiced in the Lord's language.

9.14CSEL 33:207–208

Inde ubi tempus aduenit, quo me nomen dare oporteret, relicto rure Mediolanium remeauimus. placuit et Alypio renasci in te mecum iam induto humilitate sacramentis tuis congrua et fortissimo dominatori corporis usque ad Italicum solum glaciale nudo pede obterendum insolito ausu. adiunximus etiam nobis puerum Adeodatum ex me natum carnaliter de peccato meo. tu bene feceras eum. annorum erat ferme quindecim et ingenio praeueniebat multos graues et doctos uiros. munera tua tibi confiteor, domine deus meus, creator omnium et multum potens formare nostra deformia: nam ego in illo puero praeter delictum non habebam. quod enim et nutriebatur a nobis in disciplina tua, tu inspiraueras nobis, nullus alius: munera tua tibi confiteor. est liber noster, qui inscribitur "de Magistro": ipse ibi mecum loquitur. tu scis illius esse sensa omnia, quae inseruntur ibi ex persona conlocutoris mei, cum esset in annis sedecim. multa eius alia mirabiliora expertus sum. horrori mihi erat illud ingenium: et quis praeter te talium miraculorum opifex? cito de terra abstulisti uitam eius, et securior eum recordor non timens quicquam pueritiae nec adulescentiae nec omnino homini illi. sociauimus eum coaeuum nobis in gratia tua, educandum in disciplina tua: et baptizati sumus et fugit a nobis sollicitudo uitae praeteritae. nec satiabar in illis diebus dulcitudine mirabili, considerare altitudinem consilii tui super salute generis humani. quantum fleui in hymnis et canticis tuis suaue sonantis ecclesiae tuae uocibus conmotus acriter! uoces illae influebant auribus meis et eliquabatur ueritas in cor meum et exaestuabat inde affectus pietatis, et currebant lacrimae, et bene mihi erat cum eis.

Then, when the time came for me to give in my name, we left the country and returned to Milan. Alypius too decided to be reborn in you with me; he had already put on the humility that befits your sacraments, and was a most strong master of his body, so that with unusual daring he wore down the frozen soil of Italy with bare feet. We also took with us the boy Adeodatus, born of me in the flesh from my sin. You had made him well. He was about fifteen years old, and in intelligence he surpassed many grave and learned men. I confess your gifts to you, Lord my God, Creator of all, and very powerful to form our deformities; for I had nothing in that boy but the sin. That he was brought up by us in your discipline, you had inspired us to do, and no one else: I confess your gifts to you. There is a book of ours entitled On the Teacher: he speaks with me there. You know that all the thoughts placed there in the mouth of the one who speaks with me were his, when he was sixteen years old. I experienced many other things in him more wonderful still. His intelligence filled me with awe; and who but you is the maker of such wonders? Soon you took his life from the earth, and I remember him with less anxiety, fearing nothing for his boyhood or youth, or for him at all. We took him with us, the same age as ourselves in your grace, to be brought up in your discipline; and we were baptized, and anxiety about our past life fled from us. Nor could I have enough in those days of the wonderful sweetness of considering the depth of your counsel for the salvation of the human race. How much I wept at your hymns and songs, deeply moved by the voices of your sweetly singing church! Those voices flowed into my ears, and truth was distilled into my heart, and from it the feeling of devotion welled up, and the tears ran, and it was good for me to be with them.

9.15CSEL 33:208

Non longe coeperat Mediolanensis ecclesia genus hoc consolationis et exhortationis celebrare magno studio fratrum concinentium uocibus et cordibus. nimirum annus erat aut non multo amplius, cum Iustina, Valentiniani regis pueri mater, hominem tuum Ambrosium persequeretur haeresis suae causa, qua fuerat seducta ab Arrianis. excubabat pia plebs in ecclesia mori parata cum episcopo suo, seruo tuo. ibi mater mea, ancilla tua, sollicitudinis et uigiliarum primas tenens, orationibus uiuebat. nos adhuc frigidi a calore spiritus tui excitabamur tamen ciuitate adtonita atque turbata. tunc hymni et psalmi ut canerentur secundum morem orientalium partium, ne populus maeroris taedio contabesceret, institutum est: ex illo in hodiernum retentum multis iam ac paene omnibus gregibus tuis et per cetera orbis imitantibus.

It was not long before this that the church of Milan had begun to practice this kind of consolation and exhortation, the brothers singing together with great zeal of voice and heart. It was, in fact, a year or not much more since Justina, the mother of the boy emperor Valentinian, had been persecuting your servant Ambrose on account of her heresy, into which she had been led by the Arians. The devout people kept watch in the church, ready to die with their bishop, your servant. There my mother, your handmaid, taking a leading part in the anxiety and the vigils, lived on prayers. We, still cold, untouched by the heat of your Spirit, were nevertheless stirred by the astonished and troubled city. It was then that the custom was established of singing hymns and psalms after the manner of the eastern regions, so that the people would not waste away with the weariness of grief; and from then until today it has been kept, and many, indeed almost all, of your flocks throughout the rest of the world have imitated it.

9.16CSEL 33:208–210

Tunc memorato antistiti tuo per uisum aperuisti, quo loco laterent martyrum corpora Protasi et Geruasi, quae per tot annos incorrupta in thesauro secreti tui reconderas, unde opportune promeres ad cohercendam rabiem femineam, sed regiam. cum enim prolata et effossa digno cum honore transferrentur ad Ambrosianam basilicam, non solum quos inmundi uexabant spiritus confessis eisdem daemonibus sanabantur, uerum etiam quidam plures annos caecus ciuis ciuitatique notissimus, cum populi tumultuante laetitia causam quaesisset atque audisset, exiluit eoque se ut duceret suum ducem rogauit. quo perductus inpetrauit admitti, ut sudario tangeret feretrum pretiosae in conspectu tuo mortis sanctorum tuorum. quod ubi fecit atque admouit oculis, confestim aperti sunt. inde fama discurrens, inde laudes tuae feruentes, lucentes, inde illius inimicae animus etsi ad credendi sanitatem non applicatus, a persequendi tamen furore conpressus est. gratias tibi, deus meus! unde et quo duxisti recordationem meam, ut haec etiam confiterer tibi, quae magna oblitus praeterieram? et tamen tunc, cum ita fragraret odor unguentorum tuorum, non currebamus post te; ideo plus flebam inter cantica hymnorum tuorum, olim suspirans tibi et tandem respirans, quantum patet aura in domo faenea.

At that time you revealed in a vision to your bishop whom I have named where the bodies of the martyrs Protasius and Gervasius lay hidden, which you had kept uncorrupted for so many years in the treasury of your secret, so that you might bring them out at the right time to check the fury of a woman, but a royal one. For when they had been brought out and dug up and were being carried with due honor to the Ambrosian basilica, not only were those who were troubled by unclean spirits healed, the demons themselves confessing it, but also a certain citizen who had been blind for many years and was very well known to the city, having asked and learned the reason for the people's tumultuous joy, leapt up and asked his guide to lead him there. When he was brought there, he obtained permission to touch with a cloth the bier of your saints, "whose death is precious in your sight." When he had done this and put it to his eyes, they were immediately opened. From this the news spread, from this came your praises, fervent and shining; from this the mind of that enemy, though not brought to the health of believing, was nevertheless restrained from the fury of persecuting. Thanks be to you, my God! From where and to where have you led my memory, that I should confess to you even these things, great as they are, which I had forgotten and passed over? And yet at that time, when "the fragrance of your ointments" was so sweet, "we did not run after you"; and so I wept all the more at the singing of your hymns, once sighing for you, and at last breathing you, as far as the air is free in a house of grass.

9.17CSEL 33:210–211

Qui habitare facis unanimes in domo, consociasti nobis et Euodium iuuenem ex nostro municipio. qui cum agens in rebus militaret, prior nobis ad te conuersus est et baptizatus et relicta militia saeculari accinctus in tua. simul eramus, simul habitaturi placito sancto. quaerebamus, quisnam locus nos utilius haberet seruientes tibi: pariter remeabamus in Africam. et cum apud Ostia Tiberina essemus, mater defuncta est. multa praetereo, quia multum festino. accipe confessiones meas et gratiarum actiones, deus meus, de rebus innumerabilibus etiam in silentio. sed non praeteribo quidquid mihi anima parturit. de illa famula tua, quae me parturiuit et carne, ut in hanc temporalem, et corde, ut in aeternam lucem nascerer. non eius, sed tua dicam dona in eam. neque enim se ipsa fecerat aut educauerat se ipsam: tu creasti eam, nec pater nec mater sciebat, qualis ex eis fieret. et erudiuit eam in timore tuo uirga Christi tui, regimen unici tui in domo fideli, bono membro ecclesiae tuae. nec tantam erga suam disciplinam diligentiam matris praedicabat quantam famulae cuiusdam decrepitae, quae patrem eius infantem portauerat, sicut dorso grandiuscularum puellarum paruuli portari solent. cuius rei gratia et propter senectam ac mores optimos in domo christiana satis a dominis honorabatur. unde etiam curam dominicarum filiarum conmissam diligenter gerebat et erat in eis cohercendis, cum opus esset, sancta seueritate uehemens atque in docendis sobria prudentia. nam eas praeter illas horas, quibus ad mensam parentum moderatissime alebantur, etiamsi exardescerent siti, nec aquam bibere sinebat praecauens consuetudinem malam et addens uerbum sanum: "modo aquam bibitis, quia in potestate uinum non habetis; cum autem ad maritos ueneritis factae dominae apothecarum et cellariorum, aqua sordebit, sed mos potandi praeualebit." hac ratione praecipiendi et auctoritate imperandi frenabat auiditatem tenerioris aetatis et ipsam puellarum sitim formabat ad honestum modum, ut iam non liberet quod non deceret.

You who make those of one mind to dwell in a house also joined to us Evodius, a young man from our own town. While he was serving as an agent in affairs, he was converted to you before us and baptized, and, leaving worldly service, he girded himself for yours. We were together, intending to live together in our holy resolve. We were looking for the place where we could be most useful in serving you, and we were going back to Africa together. And when we were at Ostia on the Tiber, my mother died. I pass over many things, because I am in great haste. Accept my confessions and thanksgivings, my God, for innumerable things, even in silence. But I will not pass over whatever my soul brings forth concerning that servant of yours who brought me forth both in the flesh, that I might be born into this temporal light, and in her heart, that I might be born into the eternal light. I will speak not of her gifts but of your gifts in her. For she had not made herself or brought herself up: you created her, and neither her father nor her mother knew what kind of person would come from them. And the rod of your Christ, the rule of your only Son, trained her in your fear in a faithful household, a good member of your church. Yet she used to praise not so much her mother's care for her upbringing as that of a certain aged servant, who had carried her father as a baby, as little children are carried on the backs of bigger girls. For this reason, and because of her age and excellent character, she was greatly respected by her masters in that Christian house. So she was also entrusted with the care of her masters' daughters, and she carried it out diligently, and was vehement with a holy severity in restraining them when necessary, and sober and prudent in teaching them. For apart from the hours when they ate very moderately at their parents' table, she would not let them drink even water, however much they burned with thirst, guarding against a bad habit and adding this sound word: "Now you drink water, because you do not have wine in your power; but when you come to husbands and have become mistresses of storerooms and cellars, water will seem poor to you, but the habit of drinking will prevail." By this manner of teaching and the authority of her command she curbed the greed of their tender age and shaped the girls' very thirst to an honorable measure, so that they no longer wanted what was not fitting.

9.18CSEL 33:211–213

Et subrepserat tamen, sicut mihi filio famula tua narrabat, subrepserat ei uinulentia. nam cum de more puella sobria iuberetur a parentibus de cupa uinum depromere, submisso poculo qua desuper patet, priusquam in lagunculam funderet merum, primoribus labris sorbebat exiguum, quia non poterat amplius sensu recusante. non enim ulla temulenta cupidine faciebat hoc, sed quibusdam superfluentibus aetatis excessibus, qui ludicris motibus ebulliunt et in puerilibus annis maiorum pondere premi solent. itaque ad illud modicum cotidianum cotidiana modica addendo quoniam qui modica spernit, paulatim decidit— in eam consuetudinem lapsa erat, ut prope iam plenos mero caliculos inhianter hauriret. ubi tunc sagax anus et uehemens illa prohibitio? numquid ualebat aliquid aduersus latentem morbum, nisi tua medicina, domine, uigilaret super nos? absente patre et matre et nutritoribus tu praesens, qui creasti, qui uocas, qui etiam per praepositos homines boni aliquid agis ad animarum salutem. quid tunc egisti, deus meus? unde curasti? unde sanasti? nonne protulisti durum et acutum ex altera anima conuicium tamquam medicinale ferrum ex occultis prouisionibus tuis et uno ictu putredinem illam praecidisti? ancilla enim, cum qua solebat accedere ad cupam, litigans cum domina minore, ut fit, sola cum sola, obiecit hoc crimen amarissima insultatione uocans meribibulam. quo illa stimulo percussa respexit foeditatem suam confestimque damnauit atque exuit. sicut amici adulantes peruertunt, sic inimici litigantes plerumque corrigunt. nec tu quod per eos agis, sed quod ipsi noluerunt, retribuis eis. illa enim irata exagitare appetiuit minorem dominam, non sanare, et ideo clanculo, aut quia ita eas inuenerat locus et tempus litis, aut ne forte et ipsa periclitaretur, quod tam sero prodidisset. at tu, domine, rector caelitum et terrenorum, ad usus tuos contorquens profunda torrentis, fluxum saeculorum ordinate turbulentum, etiam de alterius animae insania sanasti alteram, ne quisquam, cum hoc aduertit, potentiae suae tribuat, si uerbo eius alius corrigatur, quem uult corrigi.

And yet, as your handmaid used to tell me, her son, a liking for wine had crept up on her. For when, as the custom was, she as a sober girl was told by her parents to draw wine from the cask, she would dip the cup in through the opening at the top, and before pouring the wine into the flask she would sip a little with the tip of her lips, since she could not take more because her taste refused it. For she did not do this from any craving for drink, but from a certain overflowing of youthful high spirits, which bubble up in playful impulses and are usually kept down in childhood by the authority of elders. And so, adding daily little bits to that daily little bit (for "he who despises small things falls little by little"), she had slipped into such a habit that she was greedily gulping down little cups almost full of wine. Where then was the shrewd old woman and her strict prohibition? Could anything prevail against a hidden disease unless your medicine, Lord, watched over us? Father, mother, and nurses were absent, but you were present, who created, who call, who work some good for the salvation of souls even through those set over us. What did you do then, my God? How did you cure her? How did you heal her? Did you not bring out from another soul a hard and sharp taunt, like a surgeon's knife from your hidden stores, and with one stroke cut away that rottenness? For the maidservant with whom she used to go to the cask, quarreling with her young mistress, as happens, when they were alone together, threw this fault in her face with a most bitter insult, calling her a wine-bibber. Stung by this goad, she looked at her own foulness, and at once condemned it and gave it up. As flattering friends corrupt, so quarreling enemies often correct. And you repay them not for what you do through them, but for what they themselves intended. For she in her anger wanted to provoke her young mistress, not to heal her, and she did it secretly, either because the time and place of the quarrel found them so, or perhaps so that she would not herself be in danger for having told it so late. But you, Lord, ruler of things in heaven and on earth, who turn to your own purposes the depths of the torrent and the turbulent but ordered flow of the ages, healed one soul even through the unsoundness of another, so that no one, when he notices this, should attribute it to his own power if another whom he wishes to be corrected is corrected by his word.

9.19CSEL 33:213–214

Educata itaque pudice ac sobrie potiusque a te subdita parentibus quam a parentibus tibi, ubi plenis annis nubilis facta est, tradita uiro seruiuit ueluti domino et sategit eum lucrari tibi loquens te illi moribus suis, quibus eam pulchram faciebas et reuerenter amabilem atque mirabilem uiro. ita autem tolerauit cubilis iniurias, ut nullam de hac re cum marito haberet umquam simultatem. expectabat enim misericordiam tuam super eum, ut in te credens castificaretur. erat uero ille praeterea sicut beniuolentia praecipuus, ita ira feruidus. sed nouerat haec non resistere irato uiro, non tantum facto, sed ne uerbo quidem. iam uero refractum et quietum cum opportunum uiderat, rationem facti sui reddebat, si forte ille inconsideratius conmotus fuerat. denique cum matronae multae, quarum uiri mansuetiores erant, plagarum uestigia etiam dehonestata facie gererent, inter amica conloquia illae arguebant maritorum uitam, haec earum linguam, ueluti per iocum grauiter admonens, ex quo illas tabulas, quae matrimoniales uocantur, recitari audissent, tamquam instrumenta, quibus ancillae factae essent, deputare debuisse; proinde memores conditionis superbire aduersus dominos non oportere. cumque mirarentur illae scientes, quam ferocem coniugem sustineret, numquam fuisse auditum aut aliquo indicio claruisse, quod Patricius ceciderit uxorem aut quod a se inuicem uel unum diem domestica lite dissenserint, et causam familiariter quaererent, docebat illa institutum suum, quod supra memoraui. quae obseruabant, expertae gratulabantur: quae non obseruabant, subiectae uexabantur.

So she was brought up modestly and soberly, made subject by you to her parents rather than by her parents to you; and when she reached a full marriageable age, she was given to a husband and served him as her lord, and she took pains to win him for you, speaking of you to him by her conduct, by which you made her beautiful and reverently lovable and admirable to her husband. She bore the wrongs done to her marriage bed in such a way that she never had any quarrel with her husband about it. For she waited for your mercy upon him, that believing in you he might become chaste. He was, besides, as remarkable for kindness as he was hot in anger. But she knew not to resist an angry husband, not only in deed but not even in word. When she saw that he had calmed down and was quiet, and the moment was right, she would give an account of what she had done, if perhaps he had been roused without good reason. Indeed, when many wives, whose husbands were milder, bore the marks of blows even on their disfigured faces, they would blame their husbands' conduct in friendly conversation, and she would blame their tongues, advising them seriously as if in jest that from the time they had heard the documents called marriage contracts read to them, they ought to have regarded them as instruments by which they had been made servants; and so, remembering their condition, they ought not to be proud toward their lords. And when they marveled, knowing what a violent husband she had to put up with, that it had never been heard, nor had there been any sign, that Patricius had beaten his wife, or that they had disagreed with each other in a domestic quarrel even for a single day, and asked her the reason in confidence, she taught them her rule, which I have mentioned above. Those who followed it found it good and thanked her; those who did not follow it were kept down and ill-treated.

9.20CSEL 33:214

Socrum etiam suam primo susurris malarum ancillarum aduersus se irritatam sic uicit obsequiis perseuerans tolerantia et mansuetudine, ut illa ultro filio suo medias linguas famularum proderet, quibus inter se et nurum pax domestica turbabatur, expeteretque uindictam. itaque posteaquam ille et matri obtemperans et curans familiae disciplinam et concordiae suorum consulens proditas ad prodentis arbitrium uerberibus cohercuit, promisit illa talia de se praemia sperare debere, quaecumque de sua nuru sibi, quo placeret, mali aliquid loqueretur, nullaque iam audente memorabili inter se beniuolentiae suauitate uixerunt.

Her mother-in-law too, who at first was set against her by the whisperings of bad servants, she won over by her attentiveness, persevering patience, and gentleness, so that the old woman of her own accord reported to her son the meddling tongues of the maids by which domestic peace between herself and her daughter-in-law was being disturbed, and asked that they be punished. So when he, obeying his mother, caring for the discipline of the household, and looking to the harmony of his family, had punished with beatings those who had been reported, at the discretion of the one who reported them, she promised that anyone who spoke ill of her daughter-in-law to her in order to please her must expect a similar reward; and since no one dared any longer, they lived together in a sweetness of goodwill worth remembering.

9.21CSEL 33:214–215

Hoc quoque illi bono mancipio tuo, in cuius utero me creasti, deus meus, misericordia mea, munus grande donaueras, quod inter dissidentes atque discordes quaslibet animas, ubi poterat, tam se praebebat pacificam, ut cum ab utraque multa de inuicem audiret amarissima, qualia solet eructuare turgens atque indigesta discordia, quando praesenti amicae de absente inimica per acida conloquia cruditas exhalatur odiorum, nihil tamen alteri de altera proderet, nisi quod ad eas reconciliandas ualeret. paruum hoc bonum mihi uideretur, nisi turbas innumerabiles tristis experirer nescio qua horrenda pestilentia peccatorum latissime peruagante non solum iratorum inimicorum iratis inimicis dicta prodere, sed etiam quae non dicta sunt addere, cum contra homini humano parum esse debeat inimicitias hominum nec excitare nec augere male loquendo, nisi eas etiam extinguere bene loquendo studuerit. qualis illa erat docente te magistro intimo in schola pectoris.

To that good servant of yours, in whose womb you created me, my God, my mercy, you had also given this great gift, that between any souls at odds and in discord, wherever she could, she showed herself such a peacemaker that, although she heard from both sides many very bitter things about each other, such as swollen and undigested discord usually belches out when the crudity of hatred is breathed out in sour talk to a present friend about an absent enemy, she would report nothing of the one to the other except what would help to reconcile them. This would seem a small good to me, did I not know to my sorrow that countless crowds, through some horrible and far-spreading plague of sins, not only report the words of angry enemies to angry enemies, but even add things that were not said; whereas, on the contrary, for a humane man it ought to be too little not to stir up or increase men's enmities by speaking ill, unless he also tries to extinguish them by speaking well. Such was she, taught by you, her inmost teacher, in the school of her heart.

9.22CSEL 33:215

Denique etiam uirum suum iam in extrema uita temporali eius lucrata est tibi nec in eo iam fideli planxit, quod in nondum fideli tolerauerat. erat etiam serua seruorum tuorum. quisquis eorum nouerat eam, multum in ea laudabat et honorabat et diligebat te, quia sentiebat praesentiam tuam in corde eius sanctae conuersationis fructibus testibus. fuerat enim unius uiri uxor, mutuam uicem parentibus reddiderat, domum suam pie tractauerat, in operibus bonis testimonium habebat. nutrierat filios totiens eos parturiens, quotiens abs te deuiare cernebat. postremo nobis, domine, omnibus, quia ex munere tuo sinis loqui seruis tuis, qui ante dormitionem eius in te iam consociati uiuebamus percepta gratia baptismi tui, ita curam gessit, quasi omnes genuisset, ita seruiuit, quasi ab omnibus genita fuisset.

Finally, near the very end of his temporal life she won her husband too for you; and once he was one of the faithful, she no longer lamented in him what she had borne while he was not yet one of the faithful. She was also a servant of your servants. Whoever of them knew her praised and honored and loved you greatly in her, because he sensed your presence in her heart, witnessed by the fruits of her holy way of life. For she had been "the wife of one husband," had "repaid her parents," had governed her house devoutly, was "well reported for good works." She had brought up her children, being in labor with them as often as she saw them straying from you. Finally, Lord, for all of us (since by your gift you allow your servants to speak), who before she fell asleep were already living together in you, having received the grace of your baptism, she cared as if she had given birth to us all, and served us as if she had been born of us all.

9.23CSEL 33:215–216

Impendente autem die, quo ex hac uita erat exitura — quem diem tu noueras ignorantibus nobis — prouenerat, ut credo, procurante te occultis tuis modis, ut ego et ipsa soli staremus incumbentes ad quandam fenestram, unde hortus intra domum, quae nos habebat, prospectabatur, illic apud Ostia Tiberina, ubi remoti a turbis post longi itineris laborem instaurabamus nos nauigationi. conloquebamur ergo soli ualde dulciter et praeterita obliuiscentes in ea quae ante sunt extenti quaerebamus inter nos apud praesentem ueritatem, quod tu es, qualis futura esset uita aeterna sanctorum, quam nec oculus uidit nec auris audiuit nec in cor hominis ascendit. sed inhiabamus ore cordis in superna fluenta fontis tui, fontis uitae, qui est apud te, ut inde pro captu nostro aspersi quoquo modo rem tantam cogitaremus.

When the day was approaching on which she was to depart this life (a day you knew, though we did not), it happened, I believe by your arrangement in your hidden ways, that she and I stood alone, leaning at a window from which the garden inside the house where we were staying could be seen, there at Ostia on the Tiber, where, far from the crowds, after the toil of a long journey, we were resting ourselves for the voyage. So we talked alone together very sweetly, and "forgetting what lies behind and reaching out to what lies ahead," we asked each other, in the presence of the Truth, which you are, what the eternal life of the saints would be like, which "eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man." But we opened wide the mouth of our heart to the heavenly streams of your fountain, "the fountain of life, which is with you," so that, sprinkled from it according to our capacity, we might in some way think about so great a thing.

9.24CSEL 33:216–217

Cumque ad eum finem sermo perduceretur, ut carnalium sensuum delectatio quantalibet in quantalibet luce corporea prae illius uitae iucunditate non conparatione, sed ne conmemoratione quidem digna uideretur, erigentes nos ardentiore affectu in id ipsum perambulauimus gradatim cuncta corporalia et ipsum caelum, unde sol et luna et stellae lucent super terram. et adhuc ascendebamus interius cogitando et loquendo et mirando opera tua et uenimus in mentes nostras et transcendimus eas, ut attingeremus regionem ubertatis indeficientis, unde pascis Israel in aeternum ueritate pabulo, et ibi uita sapientia est, per quam fiunt omnia ista, et quae fuerunt et quae futura sunt, et ipsa non fit, sed sic est, ut fuit, et sic erit semper. quin potius fuisse et futurum esse non est in ea, sed esse solum, quoniam aeterna est: nam fuisse et futurum esse non est aeternum. et dum loquimur et inhiamus illi, attingimus eam modice toto ictu cordis; et suspirauimus et reliquimus ibi religatas primitias spiritus et remeauimus ad strepitum oris nostri, ubi uerbum et incipitur et finitur. et quid simile uerbo tuo, domino nostro, in se permanenti sine uetustate atque innouanti omnia?

And when our talk had reached this point, that the delight of the bodily senses, however great, in however great a bodily light, seemed in comparison with the joy of that life not only unworthy of comparison but not even worth mentioning, we rose up with more ardent love toward the Selfsame, and step by step we passed through all bodily things and the heaven itself, from which sun and moon and stars shine upon the earth. And we went higher still, inwardly thinking and speaking and marveling at your works, and we came to our own minds and passed beyond them, so as to reach the region of unfailing abundance where you feed Israel for ever with the food of truth; and there life is Wisdom, through whom all these things come to be, both those that have been and those that will be; and she herself does not come to be, but is as she was, and so will be always. Rather, to have been and to be going to be are not in her, but only to be, since she is eternal; for to have been and to be going to be are not eternal. And while we spoke and longed for her, we touched her slightly with the whole force of our heart; and we sighed, and left there, bound fast, "the first fruits of the Spirit," and returned to the noise of our mouths, where a word both begins and ends. And what is like your Word, our Lord, who remains in himself without growing old and "renews all things"?

9.25CSEL 33:217–218

Dicebamus ergo: "si cui sileat tumultus carnis, sileant phantasiae terrae et aquarum et aeris, sileant et poli et ipsa sibi anima sileat et transeat se non se cogitando, sileant somnia et imaginariae reuelationes, omnis lingua et omne signum et quidquid transeundo fit si cui sileat omnino — quoniam si quis audiat, dicunt haec omnia: non ipsa nos fecimus, sed fecit nos qui manet in aeternum — his dictis si iam taceant, quoniam erexerunt aurem in eum, qui fecit ea, et loquatur ipse solus non per ea, sed per se ipsum, ut audiamus uerbum eius, non per linguam carnis neque per uocem angeli nec per sonitum nubis nec per aenigma similitudinis, sed ipsum, quem in his amamus, ipsum sine his audiamus, sicut nunc extendimus nos et rapida cogitatione attingimus aeternam sapientiam super omnia manentem, si continuetur hoc et subtrahantur aliae uisiones longe inparis generis et haec una rapiat et absorbeat et recondat in interiora gaudia spectatorem suum, ut talis sit sempiterna uita, quale fuit hoc momentum intellegentiae, cui suspirauimus, nonne hoc est: intra in gaudium domini tui? et istud quando? an cum omnes resurgimus, sed non omnes inmutabimur?"

So we said: "If for anyone the tumult of the flesh were silent; if the images of earth, water, and air were silent; if the heavens were silent, and the soul itself were silent to itself and passed beyond itself by not thinking of itself; if dreams and imaginary revelations were silent, and every tongue and every sign and whatever comes into being by passing away were wholly silent for anyone (since if anyone hears them, all these say, 'We did not make ourselves, but he made us who abides for ever'); if, having said this, they now fell silent, having turned their ear to him who made them, and he alone spoke, not through them but through himself, so that we might hear his Word, not through a tongue of flesh, nor through the voice of an angel, nor through the sound of thunder, nor through the riddle of a likeness, but might hear him himself, whom we love in these things, without these things, as we just now reached out and in a flash of thought touched the eternal Wisdom that abides above all things; if this were to continue, and other visions of a far lower kind were taken away, and this one alone were to seize and absorb and enfold its beholder in inward joys, so that eternal life might be like that moment of understanding for which we sighed: would not this be 'Enter into the joy of your Lord'? And when will that be? When we all rise again, but are not all changed?"

9.26CSEL 33:218

Dicebam talia, etsi non isto modo et his uerbis, tamen, domine, tu scis, quod illo die, cum talia loqueremur et mundus iste nobis inter uerba uilesceret cum omnibus delectationibus suis, tunc ait illa: "fili, quantum ad me adtinet, nulla re iam delector in hac uita. quid hic faciam adhuc et cur hic sim, nescio, iam consumpta spe huius saeculi. unum erat, propter quod in hac uita aliquantum inmorari cupiebam, ut te christianum catholicum uiderem, priusquam morerer. cumulatius hoc mihi deus praestitit, ut te etiam contemta felicitate terrena seruum eius uideam. quid hic facio?"

I said such things, if not in this way and in these words; yet, Lord, you know that on that day, when we were talking of such things and this world with all its delights grew worthless to us as we spoke, she said: "Son, for my part, I no longer take delight in anything in this life. What I am still doing here, and why I am here, I do not know, since my hope in this world is now spent. There was one thing for which I wanted to stay a little longer in this life: to see you a catholic Christian before I died. My God has granted this to me more abundantly, so that I see you even despising earthly happiness and his servant. What am I doing here?"

9.27CSEL 33:218–219

Ad haec ei quid responderim, non satis recolo, cum interea uix intra quinque dies aut non multo amplius decubuit febribus. et cum aegrotaret, quodam die defectum animae passa est et paululum subtracta a praesentibus. nos concurrimus, sed cito reddita est sensui et aspexit astantes me et fratrem meum et ait nobis quasi quaerenti similis: "ubi eram?" deinde nos intuens maerore attonitos: "ponitis hic" inquit "matrem uestram." ego silebam et fletum frenabam. frater autem meus quiddam locutus est, quo eam non in peregre, sed in patria defungi tamquam felicius optaret. quo audito illa uultu anxio reuerberans eum oculis, quod talia saperet, atque inde me intuens: "uide" ait "quid dicit." et mox ambobus: "ponite" inquit "hoc corpus ubicumque: nihil uos eius cura conturbet; tantum illud uos rogo, ut ad domini altare memineritis mei, ubiubi fueritis". cumque hanc sententiam uerbis quibus poterat explicasset, conticuit et ingrauescente morbo exercebatur.

What I answered her I do not well remember, when meanwhile, within five days or not much more, she took to her bed with a fever. And while she was ill, one day she fainted and was for a little while withdrawn from those present. We ran to her, but she quickly came to her senses, and looked at us standing there, my brother and me, and said to us like one asking a question, "Where was I?" Then, looking at us stricken with grief, she said, "You will bury your mother here." I was silent and held back my tears. But my brother said something to the effect that he wished she might die not abroad but in her own country, as a happier lot. When she heard this, she looked at him with an anxious face, rebuking him with her eyes for thinking such things, and then, looking at me, said, "See what he says." And soon she said to us both: "Lay this body anywhere; let no care for it trouble you. This only I ask of you, that you remember me at the altar of the Lord, wherever you may be." And when she had expressed this wish in such words as she could, she fell silent, and her illness grew worse and afflicted her.

9.28CSEL 33:219–220

Ego uero cogitans dona tua, deus inuisibilis, quae immittis in corda fidelium tuorum, et proueniunt inde fruges admirabiles, gaudebam et gratias tibi agebam recolens, quod noueram, quanta cura semper aestuasset de sepulchro, quod sibi prouiderat et praeparauerat iuxta corpus uiri sui. quia enim ualde concorditer uixerant, id etiam uolebat, ut est animus humanus minus capax diuinorum, adiungi ad illam felicitatem et conmemorari ab hominibus, concessum sibi esse post transmarinam peregrinationem, ut coniuncta terra amborum coniugum terra tegeretur. quando autem ista inanitas plenitudine bonitatis tuae coeperat in eius corde non esse, nesciebam et laetabar admirans, quod sic mihi apparuisset, quamquam et in illo sermone nostro ad fenestram, cum dixit: "iam quid hic facio?" non apparuit desiderare in patria mori. audiui etiam postea, quod iam, cum Ostiis essemus, cum quibusdam amicis meis materna fiducia conloquebatur quodam die de contemtu uitae huius et bono mortis, ubi ipse non aderam, illisque stupentibus uirtutem feminae — quoniam tu dederas ei — quaerentibusque, utrum non formidaret tam longe a sua ciuitate corpus relinquere: "nihil" inquit "longe est deo, neque timendum est, ne ille non agnoscat in fine saeculi, unde me resuscitet". ergo die nono aegritudinis suae, quinquagensimo et sexto anno aetatis suae, tricensimo et tertio aetatis meae, anima illa religiosa et pia corpore soluta est.

But I, thinking of your gifts, invisible God, which you put into the hearts of your faithful, and from which wonderful fruits spring up, rejoiced and gave you thanks, remembering what I knew: how anxiously she had always been concerned about the tomb which she had provided and prepared for herself beside the body of her husband. For because they had lived in great harmony, she also wanted (so little is the human mind able to grasp divine things) this to be added to that happiness and to be remembered among men: that it had been granted to her, after her journey across the sea, that the joined earth of both spouses should be covered by earth. But when this vanity had begun, by the fullness of your goodness, to be no longer in her heart, I did not know; and I rejoiced and marveled that she had shown herself so to me, although even in our conversation at the window, when she said, "What am I doing here now?" she did not seem to want to die in her own country. I heard also afterward that, when we were at Ostia, she spoke one day with a mother's confidence to some of my friends, when I was not present, about contempt for this life and the good of death; and when they were amazed at the courage of the woman (since you had given it to her) and asked whether she was not afraid to leave her body so far from her own city, she said: "Nothing is far from God, and there is no need to fear that at the end of the world he will not recognize where to raise me up from." So on the ninth day of her illness, in the fifty-sixth year of her age and the thirty-third of mine, that devout and holy soul was released from the body.

9.29CSEL 33:220

Premebam oculos eius, et confluebat in praecordia mea maestitudo ingens et transfluebat in lacrimas, ibidemque oculi mei uiolento animi imperio resorbebant fontem suum usque ad siccitatem, et in tali luctamine ualde male mihi erat. tum uero, ubi efflauit extremum, puer Adeodatus exclamauit in planctu atque ab omnibus nobis cohercitus tacuit. hoc modo etiam meum quiddam puerile, quod labebatur in fletus, iuuenali uoce, uoce cordis, cohercebatur et tacebat. neque enim decere arbitrabamur funus illud questibus lacrimosis gemitibusque celebrare, quia his plerumque solet deplorari quaedam miseria morientium aut quasi omnimoda extinctio. at illa nec misere moriebatur nec omnino moriebatur. hoc et documentis morum eius et fide non ficta rationibusque certis tenebamus.

I closed her eyes, and a great sadness flowed into my heart and was passing over into tears; and at the same moment my eyes, under the violent command of my mind, drank back their fountain until they were dry, and in such a struggle it went very badly with me. Then, when she had breathed her last, the boy Adeodatus burst out in lamentation, and, checked by all of us, he fell silent. In the same way something childish in me too, which was slipping into tears, was checked by a young man's voice, the voice of the heart, and fell silent. For we did not think it fitting to celebrate that funeral with tearful laments and groans, because by these people usually lament some misery of the dying, or a kind of complete extinction. But she was neither dying miserably nor dying altogether. This we held for certain from the evidence of her character and from her "faith unfeigned" and from sure reasons.

9.30CSEL 33:220–221

Quid ergo quod intus mihi grauiter dolebat, nisi ex consuetudine simul uiuendi dulcissima et carissima repente dirrupta uulnus recens? gratulabar quidem testimonio eius, quod in ea ipsa ultima aegritudine obsequiis meis interblandiens appellabat me pium et conmemorabat grandi dilectionis affectu numquam se audisse ex ore meo iaculatum in se durum aut contumeliosum sonum. sed tamen quid tale, deus meus, qui fecisti nos, quid conparabile habebat honor a me delatus illi et seruitus ab illa mihi? quoniam itaque deserebar tam magno eius solacio, sauciabatur anima et quasi dilaniabatur uita, quae una facta erat ex mea et illius.

What, then, was it that grieved me so heavily within, if not the fresh wound from the sudden breaking of that most sweet and dear habit of living together? I was indeed glad of her testimony, that in that very last illness, caressing me in return for my attentions, she called me dutiful and recalled with great love that she had never heard from my mouth any harsh or insulting word hurled at her. But yet, my God, who made us, what was there alike, what was there comparable, between the honor I paid her and the service she gave me? And so, because I was deprived of so great a comfort in her, my soul was wounded, and my life was, as it were, torn apart, since it had been made one from hers and mine.

9.31CSEL 33:221

Cohibito ergo a fletu illo puero psalterium arripuit Euodius et cantare coepit psalmum. cui respondebamus omnis domus: misericordiam et iudicium cantabo tibi, domine. audito autem, quid ageretur, conuenerunt multi fratres ac religiosae feminae, et de more illis, quorum officium erat, funus curantibus ego in parte, ubi decenter poteram, cum eis, qui me non deserendum esse censebant, quod erat tempori congruum disputabam eoque fomento ueritatis mitigabam cruciatum tibi notum illis ignorantibus et intente audientibus et sine sensu doloris me esse arbitrantibus. at ego in auribus tuis, ubi eorum nullus audiebat, increpabam mollitiam affectus mei et constringebam fluxum maeroris, cedebatque mihi paululum: rursusque impetu suo ferebatur non usque ad eruptionem lacrimarum nec usque ad uultus mutationem, sed ego sciebam, quid corde premerem. et quia mihi uehementer displicebat tantum in me posse haec humana, quae ordine debito et sorte conditionis nostrae accidere necesse est, alio dolore dolebam dolorem meum et duplici tristitia macerabar. Cum ecce corpus elatum est, imus, redimus sine lacrimis.

When the boy had been restrained from weeping, Evodius took up the psalter and began to sing a psalm, to which the whole household responded: "Of mercy and judgment I will sing to you, O Lord." When they heard what was happening, many brothers and devout women gathered; and while those whose duty it was were attending to the burial according to custom, I, in a part of the house where I could fittingly do so, with those who thought I should not be left alone, discussed what was suitable to the occasion; and with this balm of truth I soothed a torment known to you, while they did not know it, listened attentively, and thought me to be without any feeling of grief. But in your ears, where none of them heard, I rebuked the softness of my feeling and held back the flood of sorrow, and it gave way to me a little; and again it was carried along by its own force, not as far as bursting into tears or changing my expression, but I knew what I was holding down in my heart. And because it greatly displeased me that these human things, which must happen in the due order and lot of our condition, had so much power over me, I grieved over my grief with another grief and was worn down by a double sadness. And then the body was carried out; we went, and we came back without tears.

9.32CSEL 33:221–222

nam neque in eis precibus, quas tibi fudimus, cum offerretur pro ea sacrificium pretii nostri iam iuxta sepulchrum posito cadauere, priusquam deponeretur, sicut illic fieri solet, nec in eis ergo precibus fleui, sed toto die grauiter in occulto maestus eram et mente turbata rogabam te, ut poteram, quo sanares dolorem meum, nec faciebas, credo, conmendans memoriae meae uel hoc uno documento omnis consuetudinis uinculum etiam aduersus mentem, quae iam non fallaci uerbo pascitur. uisum etiam mihi est, ut irem lauatum, quod audieram inde balneis nomen inditum, quia Graeci βαλανεῖον dixerint, quod anxietatem pellat ex animo. ecce et hoc confiteor misericordiae tuae, pater orfanorum, quoniam laui et talis eram, qualis priusquam lauissem. neque enim exudauit de corde meo maeroris amaritudo. deinde dormiui et uigilaui et non parua ex parte mitigatum inueni dolorem meum atque, ut eram in lecto meo solus, recordatus sum ueridicos uersus Ambrosii tui: tu es enim, deus, creator omnium polique rector uestiens diem decoro lumine, noctem sopora gratia, artus solutos ut quies reddat laboris usui mentesque fessas alleuet luctuque soluat anxios.

For not even in those prayers which we poured out to you when the sacrifice of our redemption was offered for her, with the body already placed beside the grave before it was laid in it, as is the custom there, not even in those prayers did I weep; but all day long I was heavily sad in secret, and with troubled mind I asked you, as well as I could, to heal my grief, and you did not; I believe you were impressing on my memory by this one proof how strong is the bond of all habit, even against a mind that no longer feeds on a deceitful word. It seemed good to me also to go and bathe, because I had heard that baths got their name from the fact that the Greeks called them balaneion, because it drives anxiety from the mind. See, this too I confess to your mercy, "father of the fatherless": I bathed, and I was the same as before I bathed. For the bitterness of grief did not sweat out of my heart. Then I slept, and woke, and found my grief not a little softened; and as I lay alone in my bed, I remembered the true verses of your Ambrose: for you are "God, Creator of all things, and ruler of the heavens, clothing the day with the beauty of light, the night with the grace of sleep, so that rest may restore loosened limbs to the use of labor, and lift up weary minds, and free the anxious from their grief."

9.33CSEL 33:222–223

Atque inde paulatim redducebam in pristinum sensum ancillam tuam conuersationemque eius piam in te et sancte in nos blandam atque morigeram, qua subito destitutus sum, et libuit flere in conspectu tuo de illa et pro illa, de me et pro me. et dimisi lacrimas, quas continebam, ut effluerent quantum uellent, substernens eas cordi meo: et requieuit in eis, quoniam ibi erant aures tuae, non cuiusquam hominis superbe interpretantis ploratum meum. et nunc, domine, confiteor tibi in litteris. legat qui uolet et interpretetur, ut uolet, et si peccatum inuenerit, fleuisse me matrem exigua parte horae, matrem oculis meis interim mortuam, quae me multos annos fleuerat, ut oculis tuis uiuerem, non inrideat, sed potius, si est grandi caritate, pro peccatis meis fleat ipse ad te, patrem omnium fratrum Christi tui.

And then, little by little, I brought back to mind my former thoughts of your handmaid, her devout life toward you and her holy tenderness and compliance toward us, of which I had suddenly been deprived; and I wanted to weep in your sight about her and for her, about myself and for myself. And I let go the tears I had been holding back, to flow as much as they would, making them a bed for my heart; and it rested on them, because your ears were there, not those of some man who would put a proud interpretation on my weeping. And now, Lord, I confess to you in writing. Let whoever wishes read it and interpret it as he wishes; and if he finds it a sin that I wept for my mother for a small part of an hour, the mother now dead to my eyes who had wept for me many years that I might live in your eyes, let him not laugh at me, but rather, if he is a man of great love, let him himself weep for my sins before you, the Father of all the brothers of your Christ.

9.34CSEL 33:223–224

Ego autem iam sanato corde ab illo uulnere, in quo postea redargui carnales affectus, fundo tibi, deus noster, pro illa famula tua longe aliud lacrimarum genus, quod manat de concusso spiritu consideratione periculorum omnis animae, quae in Adam moritur. quamquam illa in Christo uiuificata etiam nondum a carne resoluta sic uixerit, ut laudetur nomen tuum in fide moribusque eius, non tamen audeo dicere, ex quo eam per baptismum regenerasti, nullum uerbum exisse ab ore eius contra praeceptum tuum. et dictum est a ueritate, filio tuo: si quis dixerit fratri suo: fatue, reus erit gehennae ignis; et uae etiam laudabili uitae hominum, si remota misericordia discutiam eam. quia omnino non exquiris delicta uehementer, fiducialiter speramus aliquem apud te locum. quisquis autem tibi enumerat uera merita sua, quid tibi enumerat nisi munera tua? o si cognoscant se homines homines et qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur!

But now, with my heart healed of that wound, in which I might be blamed for a carnal feeling, I pour out to you, our God, for that handmaid of yours a very different kind of tears, which flows from a spirit shaken by considering the dangers of every soul that dies in Adam. Although she, made alive in Christ even before she was released from the flesh, lived in such a way that your name is praised in her faith and conduct, yet I do not dare to say that from the time you regenerated her through baptism no word came out of her mouth against your commandment. And it has been said by the Truth, your Son: "Whoever says to his brother, 'You fool,' will be liable to the fire of hell." And woe even to the praiseworthy life of men, if you examine it with mercy set aside! But because you do not search out our faults severely, we hope with confidence for some place with you. But whoever enumerates his true merits to you, what does he enumerate to you but your own gifts? Oh, if only men would know themselves to be men, and "let him who boasts boast in the Lord"!

9.35CSEL 33:224

Ego itaque, laus mea et uita mea, deus cordis mei, sepositis paulisper bonis eius actibus, pro quibus tibi gaudens gratias ago, nunc pro peccatis matris meae deprecor te: exaudi me per medicinam uulnerum nostrorum, quae pependit in ligno et sedens ad dexteram tuam te interpellat pro nobis. scio misericorditer operatam et ex corde dimisisse debita debitoribus suis: dimitte et tu illi debita sua, si qua etiam contraxit per tot annos post aquam salutis. dimitte, domine, dimitte, obsecro, ne intres cum ea in iudicium. superexultet misericordia iudicio, quoniam eloquia tua uera sunt et promisisti misericordiam misericordibus. quod ut essent, tu dedisti eis, qui misereberis, cui misertus eris, et misericordiam praestabis, cui misericors fueris.

So I, my praise and my life, God of my heart, setting aside for a little while her good deeds, for which I give you thanks with joy, now pray to you for the sins of my mother. Hear me through the healing of our wounds, who hung on the tree and, sitting at your right hand, intercedes with you for us. I know that she acted mercifully and from her heart forgave her debtors their debts: forgive her too her debts, if she contracted any in so many years after the water of salvation. Forgive, Lord, forgive, I beg you; "do not enter into judgment with her." Let "mercy triumph over judgment," because your words are true and you have promised mercy to the merciful. That they should be merciful, you gave them, you "who will have mercy on whom you have mercy, and will show compassion on whom you have compassion."

9.36CSEL 33:224–225

Et, credo, iam feceris quod te rogo, sed uoluntaria oris mei adproba, domine. namque illa imminente die resolutionis suae non cogitauit suum corpus sumptuose contegi aut condi aromatis aut monumentum electum concupiuit aut curauit sepulchrum patrium: non ista mandauit nobis, sed tantummodo memoriam sui ad altare tuum fieri desiderauit, cui nullius diei praetermissione seruierat, unde sciret dispensari uictimam sanctam, qua deletum est chirografum, quod erat contrarium nobis, qua triumphatus est hostis conputans delicta nostra et quaerens, quod obiciat, et nihil inueniens in illo, in quo uincimus. quis ei refundet innocentem sanguinem? quis ei restituet pretium, quo nos emit, ut nos auferat ei? ad cuius pretii nostri sacramentum ligauit ancilla tua animam suam uinculo fidei. nemo a protectione tua dirrumpat eam. non se interponat nec ui nec insidiis leo et draco: neque enim respondebit illa nihil se debere, ne conuincatur et obtineatur ab accusatore callido, sed respondebit dimissa debita sua ab eo, cui nemo reddet quod pro nobis non debens reddidit.

And I believe you have already done what I ask; but "accept the freewill offerings of my mouth," Lord. For when the day of her release was at hand, she did not think of having her body sumptuously wrapped or embalmed with spices, nor did she desire a choice monument or care about a tomb in her homeland. She did not charge us with these things; she only desired that she be remembered at your altar, which she had served without missing a single day, and from which she knew the holy victim was dispensed, by which "the bond that was against us was canceled," by which the enemy was triumphed over, who reckons up our sins and looks for something to charge us with, and found nothing in him, in whom we conquer. Who will pour back into him his innocent blood? Who will give back to him the price with which he bought us, so as to take us away from him? To the sacrament of this price of ours your handmaid bound her soul with the bond of faith. Let no one tear her away from your protection. Let not the lion and the dragon thrust himself in, either by force or by snares. For she will not answer that she owes nothing, lest she be convicted and seized by the cunning accuser; but she will answer that her debts have been forgiven by him to whom no one can repay what he, owing nothing, repaid for us.

9.37CSEL 33:225–226

Sit ergo in pace cum uiro, ante quem nulli et post quem nulli nupta est, cui seruiuit fructum tibi afferens cum tolerantia, ut eum quoque lucraretur tibi. et inspira, domine meus, deus meus, inspira seruis tuis, fratribus meis, filiis tuis, dominis meis, quibus et corde et uoce et litteris seruio, ut quotquot hoc legerint, meminerint ad altare tuum Monnicae, famulae tuae, cum Patricio, quondam eius coniuge, per quorum carnem introduxisti me in hac uita, quemadmodum nescio. meminerint cum affectu pio parentum meorum in hac luce transitoria et fratrum meorum sub te patre in matre catholica et ciuium meorum in aeterna Hierusalem, cui suspirat peregrinatio populi tui ab exitu usque ad reditum, ut quod a me illa poposcit extremum uberius ei praestetur in multorum orationibus per confessiones quam per orationes meas.

So let her rest in peace with her husband, before whom and after whom she was married to no one; whom she served, bringing forth fruit for you with patience, so that she might win him too for you. And inspire, my Lord, my God, inspire your servants, my brothers, your sons, my masters, whom I serve with heart and voice and pen, that as many as read this may remember at your altar Monica, your handmaid, with Patricius, once her husband, through whose flesh you brought me into this life, how I do not know. May they remember with devout feeling my parents in this passing light, and my brothers under you, our Father, in our catholic mother, and my fellow citizens in the eternal Jerusalem, for which the pilgrimage of your people sighs from its going out until its return; so that what she asked of me at the last may be granted her more richly by the prayers of many, through these confessions, than by my prayers alone.

Chapter 10

10.1CSEL 33:226

Cognoscam te, cognitor meus, cognoscam, sicut et cognitus sum. uirtus animae meae, intra in eam et coapta tibi, ut habeas et possideas sine macula et ruga. haec est mea spes, ideo loquor et in ea spe gaudeo, quando sanum gaudeo. cetera uero uitae huius tanto minus flenda, quanto magis fletur, et tanto magis flenda, quanto minus fletur in eis. ecce enim ueritatem dilexisti, quoniam qui facit eam, uenit ad lucem. uolo eam facere in corde meo coram te in confessione, in stilo autem meo coram multis testibus.

Let me know you, you who know me; let me know you as I also am known. Power of my soul, enter into it and fit it to yourself, so that you may have and hold it "without spot or wrinkle." This is my hope; therefore I speak, and in this hope I rejoice, when I rejoice soundly. As for the other things of this life, the more they are wept for, the less they deserve weeping; and the less they are wept for, the more they deserve it. For see, "you have loved truth," because "he who does it comes to the light." I want to do it in my heart, before you in confession, and in my writing before many witnesses.

10.2CSEL 33:226–227

Et tibi quidem, domine, cuius oculis nuda est abyssus humanae conscientiae, quid occultum esset in me, etiamsi nollem confiteri tibi? te enim mihi absconderem, non me tibi. nunc autem quod gemitus meus testis est displicere me mihi, tu refulges et places et amaris et desideraris, ut erubescam de me et abiciam me atque eligam te et nec tibi nec mihi placeam nisi de te. tibi ergo, domine, manifestus sum quicumque sim. et quo fructu tibi confitear, dixi. neque id ago uerbis carnis et uocibus, sed uerbis animae et clamore cogitationis, quem nouit auris tua. cum enim malus sum, nihil est aliud confiteri tibi quam displicere mihi; cum uero pius, nihil est aliud confiteri tibi quam hoc non tribuere mihi, quoniam tu, domine, benedicis iustum, sed prius eum iustificas inpium. confessio itaque mea, deus meus, in conspectu tuo tibi tacite fit et non tacite. tacet enim strepitu, clamat affectu. neque enim dico recti aliquid hominibus, quod non a me tu prius audieris, aut etiam tu aliquid tale audis a me, quod non mihi tu prius dixeris.

And indeed from you, Lord, to whose eyes the abyss of human conscience lies bare, what could be hidden in me, even if I did not want to confess it to you? I would be hiding you from myself, not myself from you. But now, since my groaning is witness that I am displeasing to myself, you shine out and are pleasing and loved and longed for, so that I blush for myself and cast myself away and choose you, and please neither you nor myself except by you. To you, then, Lord, I am laid open, whatever I am. And I have said with what fruit I confess to you. I do not do it with the words and sounds of the flesh, but with the words of the soul and the cry of thought, which your ear knows. For when I am evil, to confess to you is nothing other than to be displeased with myself; but when I am devout, to confess to you is nothing other than not to attribute this to myself, since you, Lord, bless the righteous, but first you justify him when he is ungodly. So my confession, my God, is made to you in your sight silently and not silently: silent in sound, it cries out in feeling. For I say nothing right to men that you have not first heard from me, nor do you hear anything of that kind from me that you have not first said to me.

10.3CSEL 33:227–228

Quid mihi ergo est cum hominibus, ut audiant confessiones meas, quasi ipsi sanaturi sint omnes languores meos? curiosum genus ad cognoscendam uitam alienam, desidiosum ad corrigendam suam. quid a me quaerunt audire qui sim, qui nolunt a te audire qui sint? et unde sciunt, cum a me ipso de me ipso audiunt, an uerum dicam, quandoquidem nemo scit hominum, quid agatur in homine, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est? si autem a te audiant de se ipsis, non poterunt dicere: "mentitur dominus". quid est enim a te audire de se nisi cognoscere se? quis porro cognoscit et dicit: "falsum est", nisi ipse mentiatur? sed quia caritas omnia credit, inter eos utique, quos conexos sibimet unum facit, ego quoque, domine, etiam sic tibi confiteor, ut audiant homines, quibus demonstrare non possum, an uera confitear; sed credunt mihi, quorum mihi aures caritas aperit.

What have I to do with men, then, that they should hear my confessions, as if they were going to heal all my diseases? A race curious to know another's life, lazy to correct their own! Why do they seek to hear from me what I am, when they do not want to hear from you what they are? And how do they know, when they hear from me about myself, whether I am telling the truth, since "no one among men knows what goes on in a man except the spirit of the man that is in him"? But if they hear from you about themselves, they will not be able to say, "The Lord is lying." For what is it to hear from you about oneself but to know oneself? And who knows himself and says, "It is false," unless he himself is lying? But because "love believes all things," at least among those whom it makes one by binding them to itself, I too, Lord, confess to you in such a way that men may hear, though I cannot prove to them whether my confession is true; but those whose ears love opens to me believe me.

10.4CSEL 33:228–229

Verum tamen tu, medice meus intime, quo fructu ista faciam, eliqua mihi. nam confessiones praeteritorum malorum meorum, quae remisisti et texisti, ut beares me in te, mutans animam meam fide et sacramento tuo, cum leguntur et audiuntur, excitant cor, ne dormiat in desperatione et dicat: "non possum", sed euigilet in amore misericordiae tuae et dulcedine gratiae tuae, qua potens est omnis infirmus, qui sibi per ipsam fit conscius infirmitatis suae. et delectat bonos audire praeterita mala eorum, qui iam carent eis, nec ideo delectat, quia mala sunt, sed quia fuerunt et non sunt. quo itaque fructu, domine meus, cui cotidie confitetur conscientia mea spe misericordiae tuae securior quam innocentia sua, quo fructu, quaeso, etiam hominibus coram te confiteor per has litteras adhuc, quis ego sim, non quis fuerim? nam illum fructum uidi et conmemoraui. sed quis adhuc sim ecce in ipso tempore confessionum mearum, et multi hoc nosse cupiunt, qui me nouerunt, et non me nouerant, qui ex me uel de me aliquid audierunt, sed auris eorum non est ad cor meum, ubi ego sum quicumque sum. uolunt ergo audire confitente me, quid ipse intus sim, quo nec oculum nec aurem nec mentem possunt intendere; credituri tamen uolunt, numquid cognituri? dicit enim eis caritas, qua boni sunt, non mentiri me de me confitentem, et ipsa in eis credit mihi.

But you, my inmost physician, make clear to me with what fruit I do this. For the confessions of my past evils, which you have forgiven and covered, to make me happy in you, changing my soul by faith and your sacrament, when they are read and heard, stir up the heart so that it does not sleep in despair and say, "I cannot," but wakes up in the love of your mercy and the sweetness of your grace, by which every weak person is strong who through it becomes aware of his own weakness. And good people are delighted to hear of the past evils of those who are now free of them; they are delighted not because they are evils, but because they were and are no longer. With what fruit, then, my Lord, to whom my conscience confesses daily, more secure in the hope of your mercy than in its own innocence, with what fruit, I ask, do I also confess to men before you through this writing, not what I was, but what I am now? For that other fruit I have seen and mentioned. But what I still am, at this very time of my confessions, many who know me want to know, and many who do not know me but have heard something from me or about me; yet their ear is not at my heart, where I am whatever I am. So they want to hear me confess what I am within, where they cannot direct eye or ear or mind; they want to, as people who will believe; will they know? For the love by which they are good tells them that I am not lying in confessing about myself, and that love in them believes me.

10.5CSEL 33:229–230

Sed quo fructu id uolunt? an congratulari mihi cupiunt, cum audierint, quantum ad te accedam munere tuo, et orare pro me, cum audierint, quantum retarder pondere meo? indicabo me talibus. non enim paruus est fructus, domine deus meus, ut a multis tibi gratiae agantur de nobis et a multis rogeris pro nobis. amet in me fraternus animus quod amandum doces, et doleat in me quod dolendum doces. animus ille hoc faciat fraternus, non extraneus, non filiorum alienorum, quorum os locutum est uanitatem, et dextera eorum dextera iniquitatis, sed fraternus ille, qui cum approbat me, gaudet de me, cum autem inprobat me, contristatur pro me, quia siue approbet siue improbet me, diligit me. indicabo me talibus: respirent in bonis meis, suspirent in malis meis. bona mea instituta tua sunt et dona tua, mala mea delicta mea sunt et indicia tua. respirent in illis et suspirent in his, et hymnus et fletus ascendant in conspectum tuum de fraternis cordibus, turibulis tuis. tu autem, domine, delectatus odore sancti templi tui, miserere mei secundum magnam misericordiam tuam propter nomen tuum et nequaquam deserens coepta tua consumma inperfecta mea.

But with what fruit do they want this? Do they want to rejoice with me when they hear how close I come to you by your gift, and to pray for me when they hear how much I am held back by my own weight? To such people I will reveal myself. For it is no small fruit, Lord my God, that many should give you thanks for us and many should pray to you for us. Let a brotherly mind love in me what you teach is to be loved, and grieve in me over what you teach is to be grieved over. Let a brotherly mind do this, not a stranger's, not that of "alien children, whose mouth speaks vanity, and their right hand is a right hand of iniquity"; but that brotherly mind which, when it approves me, rejoices over me, and when it disapproves me, is sad for me, because whether it approves or disapproves me, it loves me. To such people I will reveal myself: let them breathe freely at my good things and sigh at my evil things. My good things are your works and your gifts; my evil things are my faults and your judgments. Let them breathe freely at the one and sigh at the other, and let hymn and weeping rise into your sight from brotherly hearts, your censers. And you, Lord, delighted with the fragrance of your holy temple, "have mercy on me according to your great mercy," for your name's sake; and, never abandoning what you have begun, bring to completion what is incomplete in me.

10.6CSEL 33:230

Hic est fructus confessionum mearum, non qualis fuerim, sed qualis sim, ut hoc confitear non tantum coram te secreta exultatione cum tremore et secreto maerore cum spe, sed etiam in auribus credentium filiorum hominum, sociorum gaudii mei et consortium mortalitatis meae, ciuium meorum et mecum peregrinorum, praecedentium et consequentium et comitum uiae meae. hi sunt serui tui, fratres mei, quos filios tuos esse uoluisti dominos meos, quibus iussisti ut seruiam, si uolo tecum de te uiuere. et hoc mihi uerbum tuum parum erat si loquendo praeciperet, nisi et faciendo praeiret. et ego id ago factis et dictis, id ago sub alis tuis nimis cum ingenti periculo, nisi quia sub alis tuis tibi subdita est anima mea et infirmitas mea tibi nota est. paruulus sum, sed uiuit semper pater meus et idoneus est mihi tutor meus; idem ipse est enim, qui genuit me et tuetur me, et tu ipse es omnia bona mea, tu omnipotens, qui mecum es et priusquam tecum sim. indicabo ergo talibus, qualibus iubes ut seruiam, non quis fuerim, sed quis iam sim et quis adhuc sim; sed neque me ipsum diiudico. sic itaque audiar.

This is the fruit of my confessions, not of what I was but of what I am: that I should confess this not only before you, with secret exultation and trembling and with secret sorrow and hope, but also in the ears of the believing sons of men, companions of my joy and sharers of my mortality, my fellow citizens and fellow pilgrims, those who go before, those who follow, and the companions of my way. These are your servants, my brothers, whom you willed to be your sons and my masters, whom you commanded me to serve if I wish to live with you from you. And this word of yours would have been too little for me if it had commanded only by speaking, and had not gone before by doing. I do this in deeds and in words; I do it under your wings, with very great danger, were it not that under your wings my soul is subject to you and my weakness is known to you. I am a little child, but my Father lives for ever, and my guardian is sufficient for me; for he who begot me and he who guards me is the same, and you yourself are all my good things, you, the Almighty, who are with me even before I am with you. To such, then, as you command me to serve, I will reveal not what I was, but what I now am and still am; "but I do not judge myself." So let me be heard in this way.

10.7CSEL 33:230–231

Tu enim, domine, diiudicas me, quia etsi nemo scit hominum, quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est, tamen est aliquid hominis, quod nec ipse scit spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est, tu autem, domine, scis eius omnia, qui fecisti eum. ego uero quamuis prae tuo conspectu me despiciam et aestimem me terram et cinerem, tamen aliquid de te scio, quod de me nescio. et certe uidemus nunc per speculum in aenigmate, nondum facie ad faciem; et ideo, quamdiu peregrinor abs te, mihi sum praesentior quam tibi et tamen te noui nullo modo posse uiolari; ego uero quibus temptationibus resistere ualeam quibusue non ualeam, nescio. et spes est, quia fidelis es, qui nos non sinis temptari supra quam possumus ferre, sed facis cum temptatione etiam exitum, ut possimus sustinere. confitear ergo quid de me sciam, confitear et quid de me nesciam, quoniam et quod de me scio, te mihi lucente scio, et quod de me nescio, tamdiu nescio, donec fiant tenebrae meae sicut meridies in uultu tuo.

For it is you, Lord, who judge me; because although "no one among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him," yet there is something of a man which not even the spirit of the man that is in him knows; but you, Lord, know all of him, for you made him. And I, though in your sight I despise myself and count myself "dust and ashes," yet know something of you that I do not know of myself. And certainly "we see now through a mirror in a riddle, not yet face to face"; and so, as long as "I am a pilgrim away from you," I am more present to myself than to you; and yet I know that you cannot be violated in any way, while I do not know which temptations I am able to resist and which I am not. And there is hope, because "you are faithful, and do not let us be tempted beyond what we can bear, but with the temptation also make a way out, so that we may be able to endure it." Let me confess, then, what I know of myself; let me confess also what I do not know of myself, since what I know of myself I know by your light, and what I do not know of myself I do not know until "my darkness becomes like noonday" in your sight.

10.8CSEL 33:231–232

Non dubia, sed certa conscientia, domine, amo te. percussisti cor meum uerbo tuo, et amaui te. sed et caelum et terra et omnia, quae in eis sunt, ecce undique mihi dicunt, ut te amem, nec cessant dicere omnibus, ut sint inexcusabiles. altius autem tu misereberis, cui misertus eris, et misericordiam praestabis, cui misericors fueris: alioquin caelum et terra surdis locuntur laudes tuas. quid autem amo, cum te amo? non speciem corporis nec decus temporis, non candorem lucis ecce istum amicum oculis, non dulces melodias cantilenarum omnimodarum, non florum et ungentorum et aromatum suauiolentiam, non manna et mella, non membra acceptabilia carnis amplexibus: non haec amo, cum amo deum meum. et tamen amo quandam lucem et quandam uocem et quendam odorem et quendam cibum et quendam amplexum, cum amo deum meum, lucem, uocem, odorem, cibum, amplexum interioris hominis mei, ubi fulget animae meae, quod non capit locus, et ubi sonat, quod non rapit tempus, et ubi olet, quod non spargit flatus, et ubi sapit, quod non minuit edacitas, et ubi haeret, quod non diuellit satietas. hoc est quod amo, cum deum meum amo.

Not with a doubtful but with a certain conscience, Lord, I love you. You struck my heart with your word, and I loved you. But heaven and earth and all that is in them, see, on every side they tell me to love you, and they do not cease to tell it to everyone, "so that they are without excuse." But more deeply you "will have mercy on whom you have mercy, and show compassion on whom you have compassion"; otherwise heaven and earth speak your praises to the deaf. But what do I love when I love you? Not the beauty of a body, nor the grace of time, nor the brightness of light, so friendly to these eyes; not the sweet melodies of every kind of song, not the fragrance of flowers and ointments and spices, not manna and honey, not limbs welcome to the embraces of the flesh: I do not love these when I love my God. And yet I love a kind of light and a kind of voice and a kind of fragrance and a kind of food and a kind of embrace when I love my God: the light, voice, fragrance, food, and embrace of my inner man, where there shines for my soul what no place contains, where there sounds what time does not snatch away, where there is fragrance which no wind scatters, where there is taste which eating does not lessen, and where there is a clinging which satiety does not tear apart. This is what I love when I love my God.

10.9CSEL 33:232–233

Et quid est hoc? interrogaui terram, et dixit: "non sum"; et quaecumque in eadem sunt, idem confessa sunt. interrogaui mare et abyssos et reptilia animarum uiuarum, et responderunt: "non sumus deus tuus; quaere super nos". interrogaui auras flabiles, et inquit uniuersus aer cum incolis suis: "fallitur Anaximenes; non sum deus". interrogaui caelum, solem, lunam, stellas: "neque nos sumus deus, quem quaeris", inquiunt. et dixi omnibus, quae circumstant fores carnis meae: dicite mihi de deo meo, quod uos non estis, dicite mihi de illo aliquid. et exclamauerunt uoce magna: ipse fecit nos. interrogatio mea intentio mea et responsio eorum species eorum. et direxi me ad me et dixi mihi: "tu quis es"? et respondi: "homo". et ecce corpus et anima in me mihi praesto sunt, unum exterius et alterum interius. quid horum est, unde quaerere debui deum meum, quem iam quaesiueram per corpus a terra usque ad caelum, quousque potui mittere nuntios radios oculorum meorum? sed melius quod interius. ei quippe renuntiabant omnes nuntii corporales praesidenti et iudicanti de responsionibus caeli et terrae et omnium, quae in eis sunt, dicentium: "non sumus deus" et: ipse fecit nos. homo interior cognouit haec per exterioris ministerium; ego interior cognoui haec, ego, ego animus per sensum corporis mei. interrogaui mundi molem de deo meo, et respondit mihi: non ego sum, sed ipse me fecit.

And what is this? I asked the earth, and it said, "I am not he"; and all things in it confessed the same. I asked the sea and the deeps and the creeping things with living souls, and they answered, "We are not your God; look above us." I asked the breezes that blow, and the whole air with its inhabitants said, "Anaximenes is mistaken; I am not God." I asked the sky, the sun, the moon, the stars: "Nor are we the God whom you seek," they say. And I said to all the things that stand around the doors of my flesh: "Tell me about my God, since you are not he; tell me something about him." And they cried out with a loud voice: "He made us." My question was my attention, and their answer was their beauty. And I turned to myself and said to myself, "Who are you?" And I answered, "A man." And see, body and soul are present in me, the one outer and the other inner. Which of these should I have asked about my God, whom I had already sought through the body from earth to heaven, as far as I could send messengers, the rays of my eyes? But the inner is better. For to it, as ruler and judge, all the bodily messengers reported the answers of heaven and earth and all that is in them, saying, "We are not God," and "He made us." The inner man knew these things through the service of the outer; I, the inner, knew these things, I, I the mind, through the senses of my body. I asked the mass of the world about my God, and it answered me, "I am not he, but he made me."

10.10CSEL 33:233–234

Nonne omnibus, quibus integer sensus est, apparet haec species? cur non omnibus eadem loquitur? animalia pusilla et magna uident eam, sed interrogare nequeunt. non enim praeposita est in eis nuntiantibus sensibus iudex ratio. homines autem possunt interrogare, ut inuisibilia dei per ea, quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciant, sed amore subduntur eis et subditi indicare non possunt. nec respondent ista interrogantibus nisi indicantibus nec uocem suam mutant, id est speciem suam, si alius tantum uideat, alius autem uidens interroget, ut aliter illi appareat, aliter huic, sed eodem modo utrique apparens illi muta est, huic loquitur: inmo uero omnibus loquitur, sed illi intellegunt, qui eius uocem acceptam foris intus cum ueritate conferant. ueritas enim dicit mihi: "non est deus tuus caelum et terra neque omne corpus". hoc dicit eorum natura. uident: moles est, minor in parte quam in toto. iam tu melior es, tibi dico, anima, quoniam tu uegetas molem corporis tui praebens ei uitam, quod nullum corpus praestat corpori. deus autem tuus etiam tibi uitae uita est.

Is not this beauty apparent to all whose senses are sound? Why does it not speak the same to all? Animals small and great see it, but they cannot ask about it, for reason is not set over them as a judge of what the senses report. But men can ask, so that "the invisible things of God are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made"; but by love they become subject to them, and being subject they cannot judge. Nor do these things answer those who ask unless they judge; nor do they change their voice, that is, their beauty, if one man only sees and another sees and asks, so as to appear one way to the one and another way to the other; but appearing in the same way to both, it is mute to the one and speaks to the other. Or rather, it speaks to all, but they understand who compare its voice, received from outside, with the truth within. For the truth says to me: "Your God is not heaven and earth, nor any body." Their nature says this. They see: it is a mass, less in the part than in the whole. Now you are better, I tell you, my soul, since you quicken the mass of your body, giving it life, which no body gives to a body. But your God is for you also the life of your life.

10.11CSEL 33:234

Quid ergo amo, cum deum amo? quis est ille super caput animae meae? per ipsam animam meam ascendam ad illum. transibo uim meam, qua haereo corpori et uitaliter compagem eius repleo. non ea ui reperio deum meum: nam reperiret et equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus, et est eadem uis, qua uiuunt etiam eorum corpora. est alia uis, non solum qua uiuifico sed etiam qua sensifico carnem meam, quam mihi fabricauit dominus, iubens oculo, ut non audiat, et auri, ut non uideat, sed illi, per quem uideam, huic, per quam audiam, et propria singillatim ceteris sensibus sedibus et officiis suis: quae diuersa per eos ago unus ego animus. transibo et istam uim meam; nam et hanc habet equus et mulus: sentiunt etiam ipsi per corpus.

What, then, do I love when I love my God? Who is he who is above the head of my soul? Through my soul itself I will ascend to him. I will pass beyond the power by which I cling to the body and fill its frame with life. It is not by this power that I find my God; for then "the horse and mule, which have no understanding," would find him, since theirs is the same power by which their bodies also live. There is another power, not only by which I give life but also by which I give sensation to my flesh, which the Lord made for me, commanding the eye not to hear and the ear not to see, but the one to be that through which I see, the other that through which I hear, and assigning to each of the other senses its own seat and office: the various things I do through them, I, one mind. I will pass beyond this power of mine too, for the horse and mule have this also; they too sense through the body.

10.12CSEL 33:234–235

Transibo ergo et istam naturae meae, gradibus ascendens ad eum, qui fecit me, et uenio in campos et lata praetoria memoriae, ubi sunt thesauri innumerabilium imaginum de cuiuscemodi rebus sensis inuectarum. ibi reconditum est, quidquid etiam cogitamus, uel augendo uel minuendo uel utcumque uariando ea quae sensus attigerit, et si quid aliud conmendatum et repositum est, quod nondum absorbuit et sepeliuit obliuio. ibi quando sum, posco, ut proferatur quidquid uolo, et quaedam statim prodeunt, quaedam requiruntur diutius et tamquam de abstrusioribus quibusdam receptaculis eruuntur, quaedam cateruatim se proruunt et, dum aliud petitur et quaeritur, prosiliunt in medium quasi dicentia: "ne forte nos sumus"? et abigo ea manu cordis a facie recordationis meae, donec enubiletur quod uolo atque in conspectum prodeat ex abditis. alia faciliter atque inperturbata serie sicut poscuntur suggeruntur et cedunt praecedentia consequentibus et cedendo conduntur, iterum cum noluero processura. quod totum fit, cum aliquid narro memoriter.

So I will pass beyond this power of my nature too, ascending by steps to him who made me, and I come to the fields and spacious palaces of memory, where the treasures of countless images are, brought in from things of every kind perceived by the senses. There is stored away whatever we think as well, when we enlarge or diminish or in any way vary what the senses have touched, and anything else that has been entrusted and laid up there, which forgetfulness has not yet swallowed and buried. When I am there, I ask for whatever I want to be brought out, and some things come forth at once; some are sought for longer and are dug out, as it were, from more hidden storerooms; some rush out in crowds, and while something else is being asked for and sought, they leap out into the middle as if saying, "Is it perhaps us?" And I drive them away with the hand of my heart from the face of my remembering, until what I want is cleared of clouds and comes into sight from its hiding places. Other things are supplied easily and in unbroken order as they are called for, and those in front give way to those that follow, and in giving way are stored away, to come forth again when I wish. All this happens when I tell something from memory.

10.13CSEL 33:235–236

Ibi sunt omnia distincte generatimque seruata, quae suo quaeque aditu ingesta sunt, sicut lux atque omnes colores formaeque corporum per oculos, per aures autem omnia genera sonorum omnesque odores per aditum narium, omnes sapores per oris aditum, a sensu autem totius corporis, quid durum, quid molle, quid calidum frigidumue, lene aut asperum, graue seu leue siue extrinsecus siue intrinsecus corpori. haec omnia recipit recolenda, cum opus est, et retractanda grandis memoriae recessus et nescio qui secreti atque ineffabiles sinus eius: quae omnia suis quaeque foribus intrant ad eam et reponuntur in ea. nec ipsa tamen intrant, sed rerum sensarum imagines illic praesto sunt cogitationi reminiscentis eas. quae quomodo fabricatae sint quis dicit, cum appareat, quibus sensibus raptae sint interiusque reconditae? nam et in tenebris atque in silentio dum habito, in memoria mea profero, si uolo, colores, et discerno inter album et nigrum et inter quos alios uolo, nec incurrunt soni atque perturbant quod per oculos haustum considero, cum et ipsi ibi sint et quasi seorsum repositi lateant. nam et ipsos posco, si placet, atque adsunt illico, et quiescente lingua ac silente gutture canto quantum uolo, imaginesque illae colorum, quae nihilo minus ibi sunt, non se interponunt neque interrumpunt, cum thesaurus alius retractatur, qui influxit ab auribus. ita cetera, quae per sensus ceteros ingesta atque congesta sunt, recordor prout libet et auram liliorum discerno a uiolis nihil olfaciens et mel defrito, lene aspero, nihil tum gustando neque contractando, sed reminiscendo antepono.

There all things are kept distinct and according to their kinds, each brought in by its own entrance: light and all colors and shapes of bodies through the eyes; through the ears all kinds of sounds; all smells through the entrance of the nostrils; all tastes through the entrance of the mouth; and from the sense of the whole body, what is hard, what is soft, what is hot or cold, smooth or rough, heavy or light, whether outside or inside the body. All these the great recess of memory receives, to be recalled when needed and reconsidered, together with its secret and indescribable folds, I know not which; all these enter it, each by its own door, and are stored in it. Yet the things themselves do not enter, but the images of the things perceived are there, ready for the thought that recalls them. Who can say how these images were formed, although it is plain by which senses they were seized and stored within? For even while I dwell in darkness and silence, I bring out colors in my memory, if I wish, and I distinguish between white and black and between any others I wish; and sounds do not rush in and disturb what I am considering, drawn in through the eyes, although they too are there, lying hidden as if stored apart. For I call for them too, if I like, and they are there at once; and with tongue at rest and throat silent I sing as much as I want, and those images of colors, which are there nonetheless, do not interpose themselves or interrupt when the other treasure, which flowed in from the ears, is being handled. So too the other things brought in and heaped up by the other senses I recall as I please; I distinguish the scent of lilies from violets while smelling nothing, and I prefer honey to boiled wine, smooth to rough, not tasting or touching anything then, but remembering.

10.14CSEL 33:236–237

Intus haec ago, in aula ingenti memoriae meae. ibi enim mihi caelum et terra et mare praesto sunt cum omnibus, quae in eis sentire potui, praeter illa, quae oblitus sum. ibi mihi et ipse occurro meque recolo, quid, quando et ubi egerim quoque modo, cum agerem, affectus fuerim. ibi sunt omnia, quae siue experta a me siue credita memini. ex eadem copia etiam similitudines rerum uel expertarum uel ex eis, quas expertus sum, creditarum alias atque alias et ipse contexo praeteritis atque ex his etiam futuras actiones et euenta et spes, et haec omnia rursus quasi praesentia meditor. "faciam hoc et illud" dico apud me in ipso ingenti sinu animi mei pleno tot et tantarum rerum imaginibus, et hoc aut illud sequitur. „o si esset hoc aut illud!" "auertat deus hoc aut illud": dico apud me ista et, cum dico, praesto sunt imagines omnium quae dico ex eodem thesauro memoriae, nec omnino aliquid eorum dicerem, si defuissent.

I do these things within, in the vast hall of my memory. For there heaven and earth and sea are present to me, with everything I have been able to perceive in them, except what I have forgotten. There I also meet myself and recall myself, what I did, when and where, and how I was affected when I did it. There is everything I remember, whether experienced by me or believed. From the same store I also weave together, one after another, likenesses of things either experienced or believed on the basis of what I have experienced, and join them to past things; and from them I also ponder future actions and events and hopes, and all these again as if present. "I will do this and that," I say to myself in that huge bosom of my mind, full of images of so many and such great things, and this or that follows. "Oh, if only this or that would happen!" "May God prevent this or that!" I say these things to myself, and when I say them, the images of all that I say are present from the same treasury of memory, and I would not say any of them at all if they were absent.

10.15CSEL 33:237–238

Magna ista uis est memoriae, magna nimis, deus, penetrale amplum et infinitum. quis ad fundum eius peruenit? et uis est haec animi mei atque ad meam naturam pertinet, nec ego ipse capio totum, quod sum. ergo animus ad habendum se ipsum angustus est, ut ubi sit quod sui non capit. numquid extra ipsum ac non in ipso? quomodo ergo non capit? multa mihi super hoc oboritur admiratio, stupor adprehendit me. et eunt homines mirari alta montium et ingentes fluctus maris et latissimos lapsus fluminum et Oceani ambitum et gyros siderum et relinquunt se ipsos nec mirantur, quod haec omnia cum dicerem, non ea uidebam oculis, nec tamen dicerem, nisi montes et fluctus et flumina et sidera, quae uidi, et Oceanum, quem credidi, intus in memoria mea uiderem spatiis tam ingentibus, quasi foris uiderem. nec ea tamen uidendo absorbui, quando uidi oculis, nec ipsa sunt apud me, sed imagines eorum, et noui, quid ex quo sensu corporis inpressum sit mihi.

Great is this power of memory, exceedingly great, my God, a vast and boundless inner chamber. Who has reached its bottom? And this is a power of my mind and belongs to my nature, and yet I myself do not grasp all that I am. So the mind is too narrow to contain itself; where, then, is that part of itself which it does not contain? Is it outside itself and not in itself? How, then, does it not contain it? Great wonder rises in me at this; amazement seizes me. And men go out to wonder at the heights of mountains, the huge waves of the sea, the broad courses of rivers, the circuit of the Ocean, and the revolutions of the stars, and they pass themselves by, and do not wonder that when I spoke of all these things I was not seeing them with my eyes; and yet I could not speak of them unless I saw within, in my memory, the mountains and waves and rivers and stars which I have seen, and the Ocean which I have believed in, in spaces as vast as if I saw them outside. Yet I did not swallow them up by seeing them when I saw them with my eyes; nor are the things themselves with me, but their images, and I know by which bodily sense each was impressed on me.

10.16CSEL 33:238

Sed non ea sola gestat immensa ista capacitas memoriae meae. hic sunt et illa omnia, quae de doctrinis liberalibus percepta nondum exciderunt, quasi remota interiore loco, non loco; nec eorum imagines, sed res ipsas gero. nam quid sit litteratura, quid peritia disputandi, quot genera quaestionum, quidquid horum scio, sic est in memoria mea, ut non retenta imagine rem foris reliquerim aut sonuerit aut praeterierit, sicut uox inpressa per aures uestigio, quo recoleretur, quasi sonaret, cum iam non sonaret, aut sicut odor dum transit et uanescit in uentos, olfactum afficit, unde traicit in memoriam imaginem sui, quam reminiscendo repetamus, aut sicut cibus, qui certe in uentre iam non sapit et tamen in memoria quasi sapit, aut sicut aliquid, quod corpore tangendo sentitur, quod etiam separatum a nobis imaginatur memoria. istae quippe res non intromittuntur ad eam, sed eorum solae imagines mira celeritate capiuntur et miris tamquam cellis reponuntur et mirabiliter recordando proferuntur.

But this immense capacity of my memory does not hold these things alone. Here are also all the things learned from the liberal disciplines which have not yet slipped away, set apart, as it were, in an inner place that is not a place; and of these I carry not the images but the things themselves. For what literature is, what skill in argument is, how many kinds of questions there are, whatever of these I know is in my memory in such a way that I have not kept an image and left the thing outside. It is not as if it had sounded and passed away, like a voice impressed through the ears, leaving a trace by which it can be recalled as if it were sounding when it no longer sounds; or like a smell, which while it passes and vanishes into the winds affects the sense of smell, from which it sends an image of itself into the memory for us to recall by remembering; or like food, which certainly has no taste once in the stomach and yet in memory still has a kind of taste; or like something perceived by the body's touch, which memory imagines even when it is separated from us. For these things are not let into memory; only their images are caught with wonderful speed, stored away in wonderful cells, as it were, and wonderfully brought out by remembering.

10.17CSEL 33:238–239

At uero, cum audio tria genera esse quaestionum, an sit, quid sit, quale sit, sonorum quidem, quibus haec uerba confecta sunt, imagines teneo et eos per auras cum strepitu transisse ac iam non esse scio. res uero ipsas, quae illis significantur sonis, neque ullo sensu corporis attigi neque uspiam uidi praeter animum meum et in memoria recondidi non imagines earum, sed ipsas: quae unde ad me intrauerint dicant, si possunt. nam percurro ianuas omnes carnis meae nec inuenio, qua earum ingressae sint. quippe oculi dicunt: "si coloratae sunt, nos eas nuntiauimus"; aures dicunt: "si sonuerunt, a nobis indicatae sunt"; nares dicunt: "si oluerunt, per nos transierunt"; dicit etiam sensus gustandi: "si sapor non est, nihil me interroges"; tactus dicit: "si corpulentum non est, non contrectaui, si non contrectaui, non indicaui": unde et qua haec intrauerunt in memoriam meam? nescio quomodo; nam cum ea didici, non credidi alieno cordi, sed in meo recognoui et uera esse approbaui et conmendaui ei tamquam reponens, unde proferrem, cum uellem. ibi ergo erant et antequam ea didicissem, sed in memoria non erant. ubi ergo aut quare, cum dicerentur, agnoui et dixi: "ita est, uerum est", nisi quia iam erant in memoria, sed tam remota et retrusa quasi in cauis abditioribus, ut nisi admonente aliquo eruerentur, ea fortasse cogitare non possem?

But when I hear that there are three kinds of questions, whether a thing is, what it is, and of what sort it is, I hold images of the sounds of which these words are made, and I know that they passed through the air with a noise and are no longer. But the things themselves which are signified by those sounds I never reached with any bodily sense, nor did I see them anywhere except in my mind; and I stored in my memory not their images but the things themselves. Let them say, if they can, from where they came into me. For I go through all the doors of my flesh and do not find by which of them they entered. The eyes say, "If they are colored, we reported them"; the ears say, "If they made a sound, they were announced by us"; the nostrils say, "If they had a smell, they passed through us"; the sense of taste also says, "If there is no flavor, do not ask me"; touch says, "If it has no body, I did not handle it; if I did not handle it, I did not report it." From where and by what way did these things enter my memory? I do not know how. For when I learned them, I did not take them on trust from another's heart, but I recognized them in my own, and approved them as true, and entrusted them to it as if storing them away, to be brought out when I wished. So they were there even before I learned them, but they were not in the memory. Where, then, or why, when they were spoken, did I recognize them and say, "It is so, it is true," unless they were already in the memory, but so far off and pushed back, as if in the more hidden caves, that unless someone reminded me and they were dug out, I might perhaps not have been able to think of them?

10.18CSEL 33:239–240

Quocirca inuenimus nihil esse aliud discere ista, quorum non per sensus haurimus imagines, sed sine imaginibus, sicuti sunt, per se ipsa intus cernimus, nisi ea, quae passim atque indisposite memoria continebat, cogitando quasi colligere atque animaduertendo curare, ut tamquam ad manum posita in ipsa memoria, ubi sparsa prius et neglecta latitabant, iam familiari intentioni facile occurrant. et quam multa huius modi gestat memoria mea, quae iam inuenta sunt et, sicut dixi, quasi ad manum posita, quae didicisse et nosse dicimur. quae si modestis temporum interuallis recolere desiuero, ita rursus demerguntur et quasi in remotiora penetralia dilabuntur, ut denuo uelut noua excogitanda sint indidem iterum — neque enim est alia regio eorum — et cogenda rursus, ut sciri possint, id est uelut ex quadam dispersione colligenda, unde dictum est cogitare. nam cogo et cogito sic est, ut ago et agito, facio et factito. uerum tamen sibi animus hoc uerbum proprie uindicauit, ut non quod alibi, sed quod in animo colligitur, id est cogitur, cogitari proprie iam dicatur.

So we find that to learn these things, whose images we do not draw in through the senses, but which we perceive within, as they are in themselves, without images, is nothing other than this: by thinking, as it were, to gather together things which the memory held scattered and unordered, and by attending to them to see that, as if placed at hand in the memory itself, where before they lay hidden, scattered and neglected, they now readily come to meet our familiar attention. And how many things of this kind my memory carries, which have already been found and, as I said, placed as it were at hand, which we are said to have learned and to know! If I stop recalling them for even short intervals of time, they sink again and slip away into more remote recesses, so that they must be thought out afresh as if new, from the same place (for they have no other dwelling), and must be gathered together again so that they can be known; that is, they must be collected, as it were, from a kind of scattering; hence the word cogitare, "to think." For cogo and cogito are related as ago and agito, facio and factito. Yet the mind has claimed this word as properly its own, so that what is gathered together, that is, "collected" (cogitur), not anywhere else but in the mind, is now properly said to be "thought" (cogitari).

10.19CSEL 33:240–241

Item continet memoria numerorum dimensionumque rationes et leges innumerabiles, quarum nullam corporis sensus inpressit, quia nec ipsae coloratae sunt aut sonant aut olent aut gustatae aut contrectatae sunt. audiui sonos uerborum, quibus significantur, cum de his disseritur, sed illi alii, istae autem aliae sunt. nam illi aliter graece, aliter latine sonant, istae uero nec graecae nec latinae sunt nec aliud eloquiorum genus. uidi lineas fabrorum uel etiam tenuissimas, sicut filum araneae; sed illae aliae sunt, non sunt imagines earum, quas mihi nuntiauit carnis oculus: nouit eas quisquis sine ulla cogitatione qualiscumque corporis intus agnouit eas. sensi etiam numeros omnibus corporis sensibus, quos numeramus; sed illi alii sunt, quibus numeramus, nec imagines istorum sunt et ideo ualde sunt. rideat me ista dicentem, qui non eos uidet, et ego doleam ridentem me.

Memory also contains the principles and countless laws of numbers and measures, none of which any bodily sense impressed, since they have no color, sound, smell, taste, or touch. I have heard the sounds of the words by which they are signified when they are discussed, but the sounds are one thing and the principles another. For the sounds are different in Greek and in Latin, but the principles are neither Greek nor Latin nor any other kind of language. I have seen lines drawn by craftsmen, even very fine ones, like a spider's thread; but those lines are something else; they are not images of the lines my eye of flesh reported to me. Whoever recognizes them within, without any thought of a body of any kind, knows them. I have also perceived with all the bodily senses the numbers we count; but the numbers by which we count are different; they are not images of the others, and therefore they truly are. Let whoever does not see them laugh at me for saying this; and I will grieve for him who laughs at me.

10.20CSEL 33:241

Haec omnia memoria teneo et quomodo ea didicerim memoria teneo. multa etiam, quae aduersus haec falsissime disputantur, audiui et memoria teneo; quae tamenetsi falsa sunt, tamen ea meminisse me non est falsum; et discreuisse me inter illa uera et haec falsa, quae contradicuntur, et hoc memini aliterque nunc uideo cernere me ista, aliter autem memini saepe me discreuisse, cum ea saepe cogitarem. ergo et intellexisse me saepius ista memini, et quod nunc discerno et intellego, recondo in memoria, ut postea me nunc intellegisse meminerim. et meminisse me memini, sicut postea, quod haec reminisci nunc potui, si recordabor, utique per uim memoriae recordabor.

All these things I hold in memory, and how I learned them I hold in memory. I have also heard and hold in memory many things argued most falsely against them; and though these are false, yet it is not false that I remember them. And I remember that I distinguished between those true things and these false things that are brought against them; and I see that it is one thing to distinguish them now, and another to remember that I often distinguished them when I often thought about them. So I remember that I have often understood these things, and what I now distinguish and understand I store away in memory, so that afterward I may remember that I understood it now. And I remember that I have remembered; just as afterward, if I recall that I was able to remember these things now, I shall certainly recall it by the power of memory.

10.21CSEL 33:241–242

Affectiones quoque animi mei eadem memoria continet non eo modo, quo eas habet ipse animus, cum patitur eas, sed alio multum diuerso, sicut sese habet uis memoriae. nam et laetatum me fuisse reminiscor non laetus et tristitiam meam praeteritam recordor non tristis et me aliquando timuisse recolo sine timore et pristinae cupiditatis sine cupiditate sum memor. aliquando et e contrario tristitiam meam transactam laetus reminiscor et tristis laetitiam. quod mirandum non est de corpore: aliud enim animus, aliud corpus. itaque si praeteritum dolorem corporis gaudens memini, non ita mirum est. hic uero cum animus sit etiam ipsa memoria — nam et cum mandamus aliquid, ut memoriter habeatur, dicimus: "uide, ut illud in animo habeas", et cum obliuiscimur, dicimus: "non fuit in animo" et "elapsum est animo", ipsam memoriam uocantes animum — cum ergo ita sit, quid est hoc, quod cum tristitiam meam praeteritam laetus memini, animus habet laetitiam et memoria tristitiam laetusque est animus ex eo, quod inest ei laetitia, memoria uero ex eo, quod inest ei tristitia, tristis non est? num forte non pertinet ad animum? quis hoc dixerit? nimirum ergo memoria quasi uenter est animi, laetitia uero atque tristitia quasi cibus dulcis et amarus: cum memoriae conmendantur, quasi traiecta in uentrem recondi illic possunt, sapere non possunt. ridiculum est haec illis similia putare, nec tamen sunt omni modo dissimilia.

The same memory also contains the feelings of my mind, not in the way the mind itself has them when it experiences them, but in another way, very different, as the power of memory has itself. For I remember that I was glad without being glad, I recall my past sadness without being sad, I recollect that I was once afraid without fear, and I remember former desire without desire. Sometimes, on the contrary, I remember my past sadness with gladness, and gladness with sadness. This is not surprising in the case of the body, for the mind is one thing and the body another. So if I remember past bodily pain with joy, it is not so strange. But here, since the memory is itself the mind (for when we tell someone to keep something in memory, we say, "See that you keep it in mind," and when we forget, we say, "It was not in my mind" and "It slipped my mind," calling memory itself the mind), since this is so, what is it that when I remember my past sadness with gladness, the mind has gladness and the memory sadness, and the mind is glad because gladness is in it, while the memory is not sad, although sadness is in it? Does memory perhaps not belong to the mind? Who would say that? Surely, then, memory is like the stomach of the mind, and gladness and sadness are like sweet and bitter food: when they are committed to memory, they can be stored there, as if passed into the stomach, but they cannot be tasted. It is ridiculous to think these things are like those, and yet they are not wholly unlike.

10.22CSEL 33:242–243

Sed ecce de memoria profero, cum dico quattuor esse perturbationes animi, cupiditatem, laetitiam, metum, tristitiam, et quidquid de his disputare potuero diuidendo singula per species sui cuiusque generis et definiendo, ibi inuenio quid dicam atque inde profero, nec tamen ulla earum perturbatione perturbor, cum eas reminiscendo conmemoro; et antequam recolerentur a me et retractarentur, ibi erant; propterea inde per recordationem potuere depromi. forte ergo sicut de uentre cibus ruminando, sic ista de memoria recordando proferuntur. cur igitur in ore cogitationis non sentitur a disputante, hoc est a reminiscente, laetitiae dulcedo uel amaritudo maestitiae? an in hoc dissimile est, quod non undique simile est? quis enim talia uolens loqueretur, si quotiens tristitiam metumue nominamus, totiens maerere uel timere cogeremur? et tamen non ea loqueremur, nisi in memoria nostra non tantum sonos nominum secundum imagines inpressas a sensibus corporis sed etiam rerum ipsarum notiones inueniremus, quas nulla ianua carnis accepimus, sed eas ipse animus per experientiam passionum suarum sentiens memoriae conmendauit aut ipsa sibi haec etiam non conmendata retinuit. Sed utrum per imagines an non, quis facile dixerit?

But see, I bring it out of memory when I say that there are four disturbances of the mind: desire, gladness, fear, and sadness; and whatever I can argue about them, by dividing each into the species of its own kind and by defining, I find there what to say, and bring it out from there; and yet I am not disturbed by any of these disturbances when I call them to mind by remembering. And before I recalled and reconsidered them, they were there; that is why they could be brought out from there by remembering. Perhaps, then, as food is brought up from the stomach by chewing the cud, so these things are brought up from the memory by recalling. Why, then, does the one who discusses them, that is, the one who remembers, not feel in the mouth of thought the sweetness of gladness or the bitterness of grief? Or is the comparison unlike in this, that it is not alike in every respect? For who would willingly speak of such things if every time we named sadness or fear we were forced to grieve or be afraid? And yet we would not speak of them unless we found in our memory not only the sounds of the names, according to images impressed by the bodily senses, but also notions of the things themselves, which we did not receive through any door of the flesh; but the mind itself, perceiving them through the experience of its own passions, entrusted them to memory, or the memory itself retained them even when they were not entrusted to it. But whether this is through images or not, who could easily say?

10.23CSEL 33:243–244

nomino quippe lapidem, nomino solem, cum res ipsae non adsunt sensibus meis; in memoria sane mea praesto sunt imagines earum. nomino dolorem corporis, nec mihi adest, dum nihil dolet; nisi tamen adesset imago eius in memoria mea, nescirem quid dicerem, nec eum in disputando a uoluptate discernerem. nomino salutem corporis, cum saluus sum corpore; adest mihi res ipsa; uerum tamen nisi et imago eius esset in memoria mea, nullo modo recordarer, quid huius nominis significaret sonus, nec aegrotantes agnoscerent salute nominata, quid esset dictum, nisi eadem imago ui memoriae teneretur, quamuis ipsa res abesset a corpore. nomino numeros, quibus numeramus: en assunt in memoria mea non imagines eorum, sed ipsi. nomino imaginem solis, et haec adest in memoria mea; neque enim imaginem imaginis eius, sed ipsam recolo: ipsa mihi reminiscenti praesto est. nomino memoriam et agnosco quod nomino. et ubi agnosco nisi in ipsa memoria? num et ipsa per imaginem suam sibi adest ac non per se ipsam?

For I name a stone, I name the sun, when the things themselves are not present to my senses; but in my memory their images are certainly present. I name bodily pain, and it is not present to me when nothing hurts; yet unless its image were present in my memory, I would not know what I was saying, nor would I distinguish it from pleasure in discussion. I name bodily health when I am healthy in body; the thing itself is present to me; yet unless its image also were in my memory, I would in no way recall what the sound of this name signified; nor would sick people recognize what was meant when health was named, unless the same image were held by the power of memory, although the thing itself was absent from the body. I name the numbers by which we count: see, they are present in my memory, not their images, but themselves. I name the image of the sun, and it is present in my memory; for I recall not the image of its image, but the image itself: it is present to me when I remember. I name memory, and I recognize what I name. And where do I recognize it but in memory itself? Is memory too present to itself through its image and not through itself?

10.24CSEL 33:244

Quid, cum obliuionem nomino atque itidem agnosco quod nomino, unde agnosco rem, nisi meminissem? non eundem sonum nominis dico, sed rem, quam significat; quam si oblitus essem, quid ille ualeret sonus, agnoscere utique non ualerem. cum memoriam memini, per se ipsam sibi praesto est ipsa memoria; cum uero memini obliuionem, et memoria praesto est et obliuio, memoria, ex qua meminerim, obliuio, quam meminerim. sed quid est obliuio nisi priuatio memoriae? quomodo ergo adest, ut eam meminerim, quando cum adest meminisse non possum? at si quod meminimus memoria retinemus, obliuionem autem nisi meminissemus, nequaquam possimus audito isto nomine rem, quae illo significatur, agnoscere, memoria retinetur obliuio. adest ergo, ne obliuiscamur, quae cum adest, obliuiscimur. an ex hoc intellegitur non se per ipsam inesse memoriae, cum eam meminimus, sed per imaginem suam, quia, si per se ipsam praesto esset obliuio, non ut meminissemus, sed ut obliuisceremur, efficeret? et hoc quis tandem indagabit? quis conprehendet, quomodo sit?

What, when I name forgetfulness and likewise recognize what I name? From where do I recognize the thing, unless I remembered it? I do not mean the sound of the name, but the thing it signifies; if I had forgotten that, I would certainly not be able to recognize what the sound meant. When I remember memory, memory itself is present to itself through itself; but when I remember forgetfulness, both memory and forgetfulness are present: memory by which I remember, forgetfulness which I remember. But what is forgetfulness but the absence of memory? How, then, is it present so that I remember it, when, if it is present, I cannot remember? But if what we remember we hold by memory, and unless we remembered forgetfulness we could in no way recognize the thing signified by that name when we heard it, then forgetfulness is held by memory. So that is present, so that we may not forget, which, when it is present, makes us forget. Is it to be understood from this that forgetfulness is not in memory through itself when we remember it, but through its image? Because, if forgetfulness were present through itself, it would make us not remember but forget. And who will ever search this out? Who will grasp how it is?

10.25CSEL 33:244–245

Ego certe, domine, laboro hic et laboro in me ipso: factus sum mihi terra difficultatis et sudoris nimii. neque enim nunc scrutamur plagas caeli aut siderum interualla demetimur uel terrae libramenta quaerimus: ego sum, qui memini, ego animus. non ita mirum, si a me longe est quidquid ego non sum: quid autem propinquius me ipso mihi? et ecce memoriae meae uis non conprehenditur a me, cum ipsum me non dicam praeter illam. quid enim dicturus sum, quando mihi certum est meminisse me obliuionem? an dicturus sum non esse in memoria mea quod memini? an dicturus sum ad hoc inesse obliuionem in memoria mea, ut non obliuiscar? utrumque absurdissimum est. quid illud tertium? quo pacto dicam imaginem obliuionis teneri memoria mea, non ipsam obliuionem, cum eam memini? quo pacto et hoc dicam, quandoquidem cum inprimitur rei cuiusque imago in memoria, prius necesse est, ut adsit res ipsa, unde illa imago possit inprimi? sic enim Carthaginis memini, sic omnium locorum, quibus interfui, sic facies hominum, quas uidi, et ceterorum sensuum nuntiata, sic ipsius corporis salutem siue dolorem: cum praesto essent ista, cepit ab eis imagines memoria, quas intuerer praesentes et retractarem animo, cum illa et absentia reminiscerer. si ergo per imaginem suam, non per se ipsam in memoria tenetur obliuio, ipsa utique aderat, ut eius imago caperetur. cum autem adesset, quomodo imaginem suam in memoria conscribebat, quando id etiam, quod iam notatum inuenit, praesentia sua delet obliuio? et tamen quocumque modo, licet sit modus iste inconprehensibilis et inexplicabilis, ipsam obliuionem meminisse me certus sum, qua id quod meminerimus obruitur.

I certainly, Lord, labor over this, and labor in myself: I have become to myself a land of hardship and of too much sweat. For we are not now searching the regions of the sky or measuring the distances of the stars or seeking how the earth is balanced: it is I who remember, I, the mind. It is not so strange if whatever I am not is far from me; but what is nearer to me than myself? And see, the power of my own memory is not grasped by me, though without it I could not even say "I myself." For what am I to say, when I am certain that I remember forgetfulness? Am I to say that what I remember is not in my memory? Or am I to say that forgetfulness is in my memory so that I may not forget? Both are utterly absurd. What of the third possibility? How can I say that the image of forgetfulness is held by my memory, not forgetfulness itself, when I remember it? How can I say this either, since when the image of anything is impressed on the memory, the thing itself must first be present, from which the image can be impressed? For so I remember Carthage, so all the places where I have been, so the faces of the people I have seen and the reports of the other senses, so the health or pain of the body itself: when these were present, memory took images from them, which I could look at as present and reconsider in my mind when I remembered them in their absence. If, then, forgetfulness is held in memory through its image and not through itself, then it was itself present, so that its image might be taken. But when it was present, how did it write its image in the memory, when forgetfulness by its presence deletes even what it finds already noted there? And yet, in whatever way, though that way is incomprehensible and inexplicable, I am certain that I remember forgetfulness itself, by which what we remember is buried.

10.26CSEL 33:245–247

Magna uis est memoriae, nescio quid horrendum, deus meus, profunda et infinita multiplicitas; et hoc animus est, et hoc ego ipse sum. quid ergo sum, deus meus? quae natura sum? uaria, multimoda uita et inmensa uehementer. ecce in memoriae meae campis et antris et cauernis innumerabilibus atque innumerabiliter plenis innumerabilium rerum generibus siue per imagines, sicut omnium corporum, siue per praesentiam, sicut artium, siue per nescio quas notiones uel notationes, sicut affectionum animi — quas et cum animus non patitur, memoria tenet, cum in animo sit quidquid est in memoria per haec omnia discurro et uolito hac illac, penetro etiam quantum possum, et finis nusquam: tanta uis est memoriae, tanta uitae uis est in homine uiuente mortaliter! quid igitur agam, tu uera mea uita, deus meus? transibo et hanc uim meam, quae memoria uocatur, transibo eam, ut pertendam ad te, dulce lumen. quid dicis mihi? ego ascendens per animum meum ad te, qui desuper mihi manes, transibo et istam uim meam, quae memoria uocatur, uolens te attingere, unde attingi potes, et inhaerere tibi, unde inhaereri tibi potest. habent enim memoriam et pecora et aues, alioquin non cubilia, non nidos suos repeterent, non alia multa, quibus assuescunt; neque enim et assuescere ualerent ullis rebus nisi per memoriam. transibo ergo et memoriam, ut attingam eum, qui separauit me a quadrupedibus et uolatilibus caeli sapientiorem me fecit. transibo et memoriam, ut ubi te inueniam, uere bone et secura suauitas, ut ubi te inueniam? si praeter memoriam meam te inuenio, inmemor tui sum. et quomodo iam inueniam te, si memor non sum tui?

Great is the power of memory, something awe-inspiring, my God, a deep and boundless manifoldness; and this is the mind, and this I am myself. What, then, am I, my God? What is my nature? A life varied, manifold, and exceedingly immense. See, in the fields and caves and caverns of my memory, countless and countlessly full of countless kinds of things, present either through images, as with all bodies, or in themselves, as with the arts, or through some notions or marks, as with the feelings of the mind (which memory holds even when the mind is not experiencing them, since whatever is in memory is in the mind), through all these I run and fly this way and that; I penetrate as far as I can, and there is no end anywhere: so great is the power of memory, so great the power of life in a man living mortally! What, then, shall I do, you my true life, my God? I will pass beyond this power of mine too, which is called memory; I will pass beyond it, so as to reach you, sweet light. What do you say to me? Ascending through my mind to you, who abide above me, I will pass beyond this power of mine too, which is called memory, wanting to reach you where you can be reached, and to cling to you where one can cling to you. For cattle and birds also have memory; otherwise they would not find their dens and nests again, nor many other things they grow used to; for they could not grow used to anything except through memory. So I will pass beyond memory too, so as to reach him who "separated me from the four-footed beasts and made me wiser than the birds of the air." I will pass beyond memory too, so as to find you (where?), you truly good and secure sweetness, so as to find you where? If I find you beyond my memory, I am forgetful of you. And how shall I find you if I do not remember you?

10.27CSEL 33:247

Perdiderat enim mulier drachmam et quaesiuit eam cum lucerna et, nisi memor eius esset, non inueniret eam. cum enim esset inuenta, unde sciret, utrum ipsa esset, si memor eius non esset? multa memini me perdita quaesisse atque inuenisse. inde istuc scio, quia, cum quaererem aliquid eorum et diceretur mihi: "num forte hoc est?" "num forte illud"? tamdiu dicebam: "non est", donec id offerretur quod quaerebam. cuius nisi memor essem, quidquid illud esset, etiamsi mihi offerretur, non inuenirem, quia non agnoscerem. et semper ita fit, cum aliquid perditum quaerimus et inuenimus. uerum tamen si forte aliquid ab oculis perit, non a memoria, ueluti corpus quodlibet uisibile, tenetur intus imago eius et quaeritur, donec reddatur aspectui. quod cum inuentum fuerit, ex imagine, quae intus est, recognoscitur. nec inuenisse nos dicimus quod perierat, si non agnoscimus, nec agnoscere possumus, si non meminimus: sed hoc perierat quidem oculis, memoria tenebatur.

For the woman had lost her coin and searched for it with a lamp, and unless she had remembered it, she would not have found it. For when it was found, how would she know whether it was the same one, if she did not remember it? I remember that I have looked for and found many lost things. That is how I know this: when I was looking for one of them and someone said to me, "Is it this, perhaps?" "Is it that?" I kept saying, "It is not," until the thing I was looking for was offered. Unless I had remembered it, whatever it was, I would not have found it even if it were offered to me, because I would not have recognized it. And it always happens so when we look for and find something lost. Yet if something is lost from the eyes but not from the memory, some visible body for instance, its image is held within and it is sought until it is restored to sight. When it has been found, it is recognized from the image that is within. Nor do we say that we have found what was lost if we do not recognize it, nor can we recognize it if we do not remember it; this was lost to the eyes, but held by the memory.

10.28CSEL 33:247–248

Quid? cum ipsa memoria perdit aliquid, sicut fit, cum obliuiscimur et quaerimus, ut recordemur, ubi tandem quaerimus nisi in ipsa memoria? et ibi si aliud pro alio forte offeratur, respuimus, donec illud occurrat quod quaerimus. et cum occurrit, dicimus: "hoc est"; quod non diceremus, nisi agnosceremus, nec agnosceremus, nisi meminissemus. certe enim obliti fueramus. an non totum exciderat, sed ex parte, quae tenebatur, pars alia quaerebatur, quia sentiebat se memoria non simul uoluere, quod simul solebat, et quasi detruncata consuetudine claudicans reddi quod deerat flagitabat? tamquam si homo notus siue conspiciatur oculis siue cogitetur et nomen eius obliti requiramus, quidquid aliud occurrerit non conectitur, quia non cum illo cogitari consueuit ideoque respuitur, donec illud adsit, ubi simul adsuefacta notitia non inaequaliter adquiescat. et unde adest nisi ex ipsa memoria? nam et cum ab alio conmoniti recognoscimus, inde adest. non enim quasi nouum credimus, sed recordantes adprobamus hoc esse, quod dictum est. si autem penitus aboleatur ex animo, nec admoniti reminiscimur. neque enim omni modo adhuc obliti sumus quod uel oblitos nos esse meminimus. hoc ergo nec amissum quaerere poterimus, quod omnino obliti fuerimus.

What, then, when memory itself loses something, as happens when we forget and search in order to remember? Where do we search in the end, but in memory itself? And there, if one thing is perhaps offered in place of another, we reject it until the thing we are looking for turns up. And when it turns up, we say, "This is it"; which we would not say unless we recognized it, and we would not recognize it unless we remembered it. Certainly we had forgotten it. Or had it not slipped away entirely, but from the part that was still held, the other part was being sought, because memory felt that it was not turning over together what it used to turn over together, and, limping as if its habit had been cut short, demanded that what was missing be given back? It is as when a known man is seen with our eyes or thought of and we try to recall his name, having forgotten it: whatever else occurs to us is not connected, because it has not been usual to think of it together with him, and so it is rejected until that name is present on which our accustomed knowledge rests evenly, as on its match. And from where is it present, if not from memory itself? For even when we recognize it on being reminded by someone else, it is from there that it comes. For we do not believe it as something new, but, remembering, we approve that what has been said is right. But if it were wholly erased from the mind, we would not remember it even when reminded. For we have not yet wholly forgotten what we at least remember that we have forgotten. So what we have entirely forgotten we shall not even be able to seek as lost.

10.29CSEL 33:248–250

Quomodo ergo te quaero, domine? cum enim te, deum meum, quaero, uitam beatam quaero. quaeram te, ut uiuat anima mea. uiuit enim corpus meum de anima mea et uiuit anima mea de te. quomodo ergo quaero uitam beatam? quia non est mihi, donec dicam: "sat, est illic". ubi oportet ut dicam, quomodo eam quaero, utrum per recordationem, tamquam eam oblitus sim oblitumque me esse adhuc teneam, an per appetitum discendi incognitam, siue quam numquam scierim siue quam sic oblitus fuerim, ut me nec oblitum esse meminerim. nonne ipsa est beata uita, quam omnes uolunt et omnino qui nolit nemo est? ubi nouerunt eam, quod sic uolunt eam? ubi uiderunt, ut amarent eam? nimirum habemus eam nescio quomodo. et est alius quidam modus, quo quisque cum habet eam, tunc beatus est, et sunt, qui spe beati sunt. inferiore modo isti habent eam quam illi, qui iam re ipsa beati sunt, sed tamen meliores quam illi, qui nec re nec spe beati sunt. qui tamen etiam ipsi nisi aliquo modo haberent eam, non ita uellent beati esse: quod eos uelle certissimum est. nescio quomodo nouerunt eam ideoque habent eam in nescio qua notitia, de qua satago, utrum in memoria sit, quia, si ibi est, iam beati fuimus aliquando, utrum singillatim omnes, an in illo homine, qui primus peccauit, in quo et omnes mortui sumus et de quo omnes cum miseria nati sumus, non quaero nunc, sed quaero, utrum in memoria sit beata uita. neque enim amaremus eam, nisi nossemus. audiuimus nomen hoc et omnes rem, omnes nos adpetere fatemur; non enim solo sono delectamur. nam hoc cum latine audit Graecus, non delectatur, quia ignorat, quid dictum sit; nos autem delectamur, sicut etiam ille, si graece hoc audierit, quoniam res ipsa nec graeca nec latina est, cui adipiscendae Graeci Latinique inhiant ceterarumque linguarum homines. nota est igitur omnibus, qui una uoce si interrogari possent, utrum beati esse uellent, sine ulla dubitatione uelle responderent. quod non fieret, nisi res ipsa, cuius hoc nomen est, eorum memoria teneretur.

How, then, do I seek you, Lord? For when I seek you, my God, I seek a happy life. Let me seek you, so that my soul may live. For my body lives from my soul, and my soul lives from you. How, then, do I seek a happy life? For it is not mine until I say, "Enough; it is there." Here I must say how I seek it: whether by remembering, as though I had forgotten it and still held that I had forgotten it; or by a desire to learn it as something unknown, either never known or so forgotten that I do not even remember having forgotten it. Is not the happy life the very thing that all want, and there is absolutely no one who does not want it? Where did they come to know it, that they want it so? Where did they see it, that they love it? Surely we have it, I do not know how. And there is one way in which a person, when he has it, is then happy; and there are those who are happy in hope. These have it in a lower way than those who are already happy in reality, but yet better than those who are happy neither in reality nor in hope. Yet even these, unless they had it in some way, would not so want to be happy; and it is most certain that they want it. I do not know how they have come to know it, and so they have it by some knowledge or other; and I am concerned whether this is in the memory, because if it is there, we were already happy once, whether each of us individually, or in that man who first sinned, in whom we all died and from whom we have all been born with misery. That I do not ask now; but I ask whether the happy life is in the memory. For we would not love it unless we knew it. We have heard this name, and all of us confess that we desire the thing; for we are not delighted merely by the sound. For when a Greek hears it in Latin, he is not delighted, because he does not know what has been said; but we are delighted, as he too would be if he heard it in Greek, since the thing itself is neither Greek nor Latin, and Greeks and Latins and men of other languages long to gain it. So it is known to all, and if they could be asked with one voice whether they wanted to be happy, they would answer without any hesitation that they did. That would not happen unless the thing itself, whose name this is, were held in their memory.

10.30CSEL 33:250–251

Numquid ita, ut memini Carthaginem qui uidi? non; uita enim beata non uidetur oculis, quia non est corpus. numquid sicut meminimus numeros? non; hos enim qui habet in notitia, non adhuc quaerit adipisci, uitam uero beatam habemus in notitia ideoque amamus et tamen adhuc adipisci eam uolumus, ut beati simus. numquid sicut meminimus eloquentiam? non: quamuis et hoc nomine audito recordentur ipsam rem qui etiam nondum sunt eloquentes multique esse cupiant — unde apparet eam esse in eorum notitia — tamen per corporis sensus alios eloquentes animaduerterunt et delectati sunt et hoc esse desiderant — quamquam nisi ex interiore notitia non delectarentur neque hoc esse uellent, nisi delectarentur - beatam uero uitam nullo sensu corporis in aliis experimur. numquid sicut meminimus gaudium? fortasse ita. nam gaudium meum etiam tristis memini sicut uitam beatam miser, neque umquam corporis sensu gaudium meum uel uidi uel audiui uel odoratus sum uel gustaui uel tetigi, sed expertus sum in animo meo, quando laetatus sum, et adhaesit eius notitia memoriae meae, ut id reminisci ualeam aliquando cum aspernatione, aliquando cum desiderio pro earum rerum diuersitate, de quibus me gauisum esse memini. nam et de turpibus gaudio quodam perfusus sum, quod nunc recordans detestor atque exsecror, aliquando de bonis et honestis, quod desiderans recolo, tametsi forte non assunt, et ideo tristis gaudium pristinum recolo.

Is it the way I remember Carthage, which I have seen? No; for the happy life is not seen with the eyes, because it is not a body. Is it as we remember numbers? No; for whoever has these in his knowledge no longer seeks to gain them, but we have the happy life in our knowledge and so love it, and yet we still want to gain it so as to be happy. Is it as we remember eloquence? No; although when they hear this name, even those who are not yet eloquent recall the thing itself, and many want to be eloquent (from which it is clear that it is in their knowledge), yet they have noticed others being eloquent through the bodily senses and have been delighted and want to be so themselves (though they would not be delighted except from an inner knowledge, nor would they want to be so unless they were delighted); but the happy life we do not experience in others by any bodily sense. Is it as we remember joy? Perhaps so. For I remember my joy even when I am sad, as I remember the happy life when I am miserable; and I have never seen or heard or smelled or tasted or touched my joy with a bodily sense, but I experienced it in my mind when I rejoiced, and the knowledge of it stuck to my memory, so that I can recall it, sometimes with disgust, sometimes with longing, according to the different things in which I remember having rejoiced. For I have been flooded with a kind of joy even over shameful things, which I now recall with loathing and detestation; sometimes over good and honorable things, which I recall with longing, even though perhaps they are not present, and so I recall my former joy with sadness.

10.31CSEL 33:251

Vbi ergo et quando expertus sum uitam meam beatam, ut recorder eam et amem et desiderem? nec ego tantum aut cum paucis, sed beati prorsus omnes esse uolumus. quod nisi certa notitia nossemus, non tam certa uoluntate uellemus. sed quid est hoc? quid? si quaeratur a duobus, utrum militare uelint, fieri possit, ut alter eorum uelle se, alter nolle respondeat: si autem ab eis quaeratur, utrum esse beati uelint, uterque se statim sine dubitatione dicat optare, nec ob aliud ille uelit militare, non ob aliud iste nolit, nisi ut beati sint. num forte quoniam alius hinc, alius inde gaudet? ita se omnes beatos esse uelle consonant, quemadmodum consonarent, si hoc interrogarentur, se uelle gaudere atque ipsum gaudium uitam beatam uocant. quod etsi alius hinc, alius illinc assequitur, unum est tamen, quo peruenire omnes nituntur, ut gaudeant. quae quoniam res est, quam se expertum non esse nemo potest dicere, propterea reperta in memoria recognoscitur, quando beatae uitae nomen auditur.

Where, then, and when did I experience my happy life, so as to remember it and love it and long for it? And not I alone, or with a few, but absolutely all of us want to be happy. Unless we knew it with certain knowledge, we would not want it with so certain a will. But what is this? If two people are asked whether they want to be soldiers, it may happen that one answers that he does, the other that he does not; but if they are asked whether they want to be happy, each will at once say without hesitation that he wishes it; and the one wants to serve and the other does not want to for no other reason than to be happy. Is it perhaps because one finds joy in one thing and another in another? So all agree that they want to be happy, just as they would agree, if they were asked, that they want to rejoice; and they call joy itself the happy life. Although one reaches it by this way and another by that, yet there is one thing that all strive to reach, that they may rejoice. And since this is something no one can say he has not experienced, it is found in the memory and recognized when the name "happy life" is heard.

10.32CSEL 33:251–252

Absit, domine, absit a corde serui tui, qui confitetur tibi, absit, ut quocumque gaudio gaudeam beatum me putem. est enim gaudium, quod non datur inpiis, sed eis, qui te gratis colunt, quorum gaudium tu ipse es. et ipsa est beata uita, gaudere de te, ad te, propter te: ipsa est et non est altera. qui autem aliam putant esse, aliud sectantur gaudium neque ipsum uerum. ab aliqua tamen imagine gaudii uoluntas eorum non auertitur.

Far be it, Lord, far be it from the heart of your servant who confesses to you, far be it that I should think myself happy with any joy whatever. For there is a joy which is not given to the ungodly, but to those who worship you freely, whose joy you yourself are. And this is the happy life: to rejoice in you, toward you, because of you; this is it, and there is no other. But those who think there is another pursue another joy, and it is not the true one. Yet their will is not turned away from some image of joy.

10.33CSEL 33:252–253

Non ergo certum est, quod omnes esse beati uolunt, quoniam qui non de te gaudere uolunt, quae sola uita beata est, non utique uitam beatam uolunt. an omnes hoc uolunt, sed quoniam caro concupiscit aduersus spiritum et spiritus aduersus carnem, ut non faciant quod uolunt, cadunt in id quod ualent eoque contenti sunt, quia illud, quod non ualent, non tantum uolunt, quantum sat est, ut ualeant? nam quaero ab omnibus, utrum malint de ueritate quam de falsitate gaudere: tam non dubitant dicere de ueritate se malle, quam non dubitant dicere beatos esse se uelle. beata quippe uita est gaudium de ueritate. hoc est enim gaudium de te, qui ueritas es, deus, inluminatio mea, salus faciei meae, deus meus. hanc uitam beatam omnes uolunt, hanc uitam, quae sola beata est, omnes uolunt, gaudium de ueritate omnes uolunt. multos expertus sum, qui uellent fallere, qui autem falli, neminem. ubi ergo nouerunt hanc uitam beatam, nisi ubi nouerunt etiam ueritatem? amant enim et ipsam, quia falli nolunt, et cum amant beatam uitam, quod non est aliud quam de ueritate gaudium, utique amant etiam ueritatem nec amarent, nisi esset aliqua notitia eius in memoria eorum. cur ergo non de illa gaudent? cur non beati sunt? quia fortius occupantur in aliis, quae potius eos faciunt miseros quam illud beatos, quod tenuiter meminerunt. adhuc enim modicum lumen est in hominibus; ambulent, ambulent, ne tenebrae conprehendant.

So it is not certain that all want to be happy, since those who do not want to rejoice in you, which alone is the happy life, do not really want the happy life. Or do all want this, but because "the flesh lusts against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh, so that they do not do what they want," they fall back on what they are able to do and are content with that, because what they are not able to do they do not want as much as would be enough to make them able? For I ask all of them whether they would rather rejoice in truth or in falsehood; and they do not hesitate to say that they prefer truth any more than they hesitate to say that they want to be happy. For the happy life is joy in the truth. For this is joy in you, who are the Truth, God, "my light, the salvation of my face, my God." This happy life all want; this life, which alone is happy, all want; joy in the truth all want. I have known many who wanted to deceive, but none who wanted to be deceived. Where, then, did they come to know this happy life, if not where they came to know the truth as well? For they love truth too, since they do not want to be deceived; and when they love the happy life, which is nothing other than joy in the truth, they certainly love truth as well; and they would not love it unless there were some knowledge of it in their memory. Why, then, do they not rejoice in it? Why are they not happy? Because they are more strongly occupied with other things, which make them miserable rather than that which they faintly remember makes them happy. For "there is yet a little light" in men; "let them walk, let them walk, lest darkness overtake them."

10.34CSEL 33:253

Cur autem ueritas parit odium et inimicus eis factus est homo tuus uerum praedicans, cum ametur beata uita, quae non est nisi gaudium de ueritate, nisi quia sic amatur ueritas, ut quicumque aliud amant, hoc quod amant uelint esse ueritatem, et quia falli nollent, nolunt conuinci, quod falsi sint? itaque propter eam rem oderunt ueritatem, quam pro ueritate amant. amant eam lucentem, oderunt eam redarguentem. quia enim falli nolunt et fallere uolunt, amant eam, cum se ipsa indicat, et oderunt eam, cum eos ipsos indicat. inde retribuet eis, ut, qui se ab ea manifestari nolunt, et eos nolentes manifestet et eis ipsa non sit manifesta. sic, sic, etiam sic animus humanus, etiam sic caecus et languidus, turpis atque indecens latere uult, se autem ut lateat aliquid non uult. contra illi redditur, ut ipse non lateat ueritatem, ipsum autem ueritas lateat. tamen etiam sic, dum miser est, ueris mauult gaudere quam falsis. beatus ergo erit, si nulla interpellante molestia de ipsa, per quam uera sunt omnia, sola ueritate gaudebit.

But why does truth breed hatred, and why did your servant who preached the truth become an enemy to them, when the happy life is loved, which is nothing but joy in the truth? Is it not because truth is loved in such a way that whoever loves something else wants what he loves to be the truth; and because they would not want to be deceived, they do not want to be shown that they are deceived? So they hate the truth for the sake of the very thing they love instead of the truth. They love it when it shines, they hate it when it rebukes. For because they do not want to be deceived and want to deceive, they love it when it reveals itself and hate it when it reveals them. Therefore it will repay them: those who do not want to be exposed by it, it will expose against their will, and it will not be manifest to them. So, so, even so the human mind, even so blind and sick, foul and unseemly, wants to be hidden, but does not want anything to be hidden from it. It is repaid the opposite: it is not hidden from the truth, but the truth is hidden from it. Yet even so, while it is miserable, it would rather rejoice in true things than false. It will therefore be happy if, with no trouble intervening, it rejoices in the Truth alone, through which all things are true.

10.35CSEL 33:253–254

Ecce quantum spatiatus sum in memoria mea quaerens te, domine, et non te inueni extra eam. neque enim aliquid de te inuenio, quod non meminissem ex quo didici te. nam ex quo didici te, non sum oblitus tui. ubi enim inueni ueritatem, ibi inueni deum meum, ipsam ueritatem, quam ex quo didici, non sum oblitus. itaque ex quo te didici, manes in memoria mea, et illic te inuenio, cum reminiscor tui et delector in te. hae sunt sanctae deliciae meae, quas donasti mihi misericordia tua respiciens paupertatem meam.

See how far I have ranged in my memory seeking you, Lord, and I have not found you outside it. For I find nothing about you that I have not remembered since I learned you. For since I learned you, I have not forgotten you. For where I found truth, there I found my God, Truth itself, which I have not forgotten since I learned it. And so, since I learned you, you remain in my memory, and there I find you when I remember you and delight in you. These are my holy delights, which you have given me in your mercy, looking upon my poverty.

10.36CSEL 33:254–255

Sed ubi manes in memoria mea, domine, ubi illic manes? quale cubile fabricasti tibi? quale sanctuarium aedificasti tibi? tu dedisti hanc dignationem memoriae meae, ut maneas in ea, sed in qua eius parte maneas, hoc considero. transcendi enim partes eius, quas habent et bestiae, cum te recordarer, quia non ibi te inueniebam inter imagines rerum corporalium, et ueni ad partes eius, ubi conmendaui affectiones animi mei, nec illic inueni te. et intraui ad ipsius animi mei sedem, quae illi est in memoria mea, quoniam sui quoque meminit animus, nec ibi tu eras, quia sicut non es imago corporalis nec affectio uiuentis, qualis est, cum laetamur, contristamur, cupimus, metuimus, meminimus, obliuiscimur et quidquid huius modi est, ita nec ipse animus es, quia dominus deus animi tu es, et conmutantur haec omnia, tu autem inconmutabilis manes super omnia et dignatus es habitare in memoria mea ex quo te didici. et quid quaero, quo loco eius habites, quasi uero loca ibi sint? habitas certe in ea, quoniam tui memini ex quo te didici, et in ea inuenio, cum recordor te.

But where in my memory do you remain, Lord, where do you remain there? What resting place have you made for yourself? What sanctuary have you built for yourself? You have granted my memory this honor, that you remain in it; but in what part of it you remain, that I am considering. For in remembering you I passed beyond the parts of it which the beasts also have, because I did not find you there among the images of bodily things; and I came to the parts of it where I had entrusted the feelings of my mind, and I did not find you there. And I entered the seat of my mind itself, which it has in my memory, since the mind remembers itself too, and you were not there; because just as you are not a bodily image, nor the feeling of a living being such as we have when we rejoice, grieve, desire, fear, remember, forget, and anything of that kind, so you are not the mind itself either, because you are the Lord God of the mind; and all these things change, but you remain unchangeable above all things, and you have deigned to dwell in my memory since I learned you. And why do I ask in what place of it you dwell, as if there were really places there? You certainly dwell in it, since I have remembered you since I learned you, and I find you in it when I recall you.

10.37CSEL 33:255

Vbi ergo te inueni, ut discerem te? neque enim iam eras in memoria mea, priusquam te discerem. ubi ergo te inueni, ut discerem te, nisi in te supra me? et nusquam locus, et recedimus et accedimus, et nusquam locus. ueritas, ubique praesides omnibus consulentibus te simulque respondes omnibus diuersa consulentibus. liquide tu respondes, sed non liquide omnes audiunt. omnes unde uolunt consulunt, sed non semper quod uolunt audiunt. optimus minister tuus est, qui non magis intuetur hoc a te audire quod ipse uoluerit, sed potius hoc uelle quod a te audierit.

Where, then, did I find you, so as to learn you? For you were not in my memory before I learned you. Where, then, did I find you, so as to learn you, if not in you, above me? And there is no place anywhere; we go back and we come near, and there is no place anywhere. O Truth, everywhere you preside over all who consult you, and at the same time you answer all, though they consult you about different things. You answer clearly, but not all hear clearly. All consult you about what they want, but they do not always hear what they want. Your best servant is the one who does not look so much to hear from you what he himself wants, as rather to want what he hears from you.

10.38CSEL 33:255

Sero te amaui, pulchritudo tam antiqua et tam noua, sero te amaui! et ecce intus eras et ego foris et ibi te quaerebam et in ista formosa, quae fecisti, deformis inruebam. mecum eras, et tecum non eram. ea me tenebant longe a te, quae si in te non essent, non essent. uocasti et clamasti et rupisti surditatem meam, coruscasti, splenduisti et fugasti caecitatem meam, fragrasti, et duxi spiritum et anhelo tibi, gustaui et esurio et sitio, tetigisti me, et exarsi in pacem tuam.

Late have I loved you, Beauty so ancient and so new, late have I loved you! And see, you were within and I was outside, and there I sought you, and, deformed as I was, I rushed headlong into those beautiful things which you made. You were with me, and I was not with you. Those things kept me far from you which, if they were not in you, would not exist. You called and cried out and broke through my deafness; you flashed, you shone, and you put my blindness to flight; you were fragrant, and I drew breath and now I pant for you; I tasted, and now I hunger and thirst; you touched me, and I burned for your peace.

10.39CSEL 33:255–256

Cum inhaesero tibi ex omni me, nusquam erit mihi dolor et labor, et uiua erit uita mea tota plena te. nunc autem quoniam quem tu imples, subleuas eum, quoniam tui plenus nondum sum, oneri mihi sum. contendunt laetitiae meae flendae cum laetandis maeroribus, et ex qua parte stet uictoria nescio. ei mihi, domine, miserere mei! contendunt maerores mei mali cum gaudiis bonis, et ex qua parte stet uictoria nescio. ei mihi! domine, miserere mei! ei mihi! ecce uulnera mea non abscondo: medicus es, aeger sum; misericors es, miser sum. numquid non temptatio est uita humana super terram? quis uelit molestias et difficultates? tolerari iubes ea, non amari. nemo quod tolerat amat, etsi tolerare amat. quamuis enim gaudeat se tolerare, mauult tamen non esse quod toleret. prospera in aduersis desidero, aduersa in prospera timeo. quis inter haec medius locus, ubi non sit humana uita temtatio? uae prosperitatibus saeculi semel et iterum a timore aduersitatis et a corruptione laetitiae! uae aduersitatibus saeculi semel et iterum et tertio a desiderio prosperitatis, et quia ipsa aduersitas dura est, et ne frangat tolerantiam. numquid non temtatio est uita humana super terram sine ullo interstitio?

When I cling to you with all of myself, I shall have no pain or toil anywhere, and my life will be alive, wholly full of you. But now, since you lift up the one whom you fill, and I am not yet full of you, I am a burden to myself. My joys that deserve weeping contend with my sorrows that deserve rejoicing, and I do not know on which side the victory stands. Alas, Lord, have mercy on me! My evil sorrows contend with my good joys, and I do not know on which side the victory stands. Alas! Lord, have mercy on me! Alas! See, I do not hide my wounds: you are the physician, I am sick; you are merciful, I am miserable. "Is not human life on earth a trial?" Who would want troubles and difficulties? You command us to endure them, not to love them. No one loves what he endures, even if he loves to endure. For although he rejoices that he endures, he would rather there were nothing to endure. In adversity I long for prosperity; in prosperity I fear adversity. What middle place is there between them, where human life is not a trial? Woe to the prosperities of the world, once and again, from the fear of adversity and the corruption of joy! Woe to the adversities of the world, once and again and a third time, from the longing for prosperity, and because adversity itself is hard, and lest it break our endurance! Is not human life on earth a trial, without any respite?

10.40CSEL 33:256–257

Et tota spes mea non nisi in magna misericordia tua. da quod iubes et iube quod uis. imperas nobis continentiam. et cum scirem, ait quidam, quia nemo potest esse continens nisi deus det, et hoc ipsum erat sapientiae, scire cuius esset hoc donum. per continentiam quippe colligimur et redigimur in unum, a quo in multa defluximus. minus enim te amat qui tecum aliquid amat, quod non propter te amat. o amor, qui semper ardes et numquam extingueris, caritas, deus meus, accende me! continentiam iubes: da quod iubes et iube quod uis.

And all my hope is nowhere except in your great mercy. Give what you command, and command what you will. You command us to be continent. "And when I knew," someone said, "that no one can be continent unless God gives it, this too was a mark of wisdom, to know whose gift this was." For by continence we are gathered together and brought back into the One, from whom we had flowed away into the many. For he loves you too little who loves something together with you which he does not love for your sake. O Love, who always burn and are never quenched, Charity, my God, set me on fire! You command continence: give what you command, and command what you will.

10.41CSEL 33:257–258

Iubes certe, ut contineam a concupiscentia carnis et concupiscentia oculorum et ambitione saeculi. iussisti a concubitu et de ipso coniugio melius aliquid, quam concessisti, monuisti. et quoniam dedisti, factum est et antequam dispensator sacramenti tui fierem. sed adhuc uiuunt in memoria mea, de qua multa locutus sum, talium rerum imagines, quas ibi consuetudo mea fixit, et occursantur mihi uigilanti quidem carentes uiribus, in somnis autem non solum usque ad delectationem sed etiam usque ad consensionem factumque simillimum. et tantum ualet imaginis illius inlusio in anima mea in carne mea, ut dormienti falsa uisa persuadeant quod uigilanti uera non possunt. numquid tunc ego non sum, domine deus meus? et tamen tantum interest inter me ipsum et me ipsum intra momentum, quo hinc ad soporem transeo uel huc inde transeo! ubi est tunc ratio, qua talibus suggestionibus resistit uigilans et, si res ipsae ingerantur, inconcussus manet? numquid clauditur cum oculis? numquid sopitur cum sensibus corporis? et unde saepe etiam in somnis resistimus nostrique propositi memores atque in eo castissime permanentes nullum talibus inlecebris adhibemus adsensum? et tamen tantum interest, ut, cum aliter accidit, euigilantes ad conscientiae requiem redeamus ipsaque distantia reperiamus nos non fecisse, quod tamen in nobis quoquo modo factum esse doleamus.

You certainly command me to abstain from "the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the ambition of the world." You commanded me to abstain from sexual intercourse, and with regard to marriage itself you advised something better than what you permitted. And because you gave it, it was done, even before I became a dispenser of your sacrament. But there still live in my memory, of which I have said so much, the images of such things, which my habit fixed there; and they come to meet me, powerless indeed when I am awake, but in sleep not only to the point of pleasure but even to the point of consent and something very like the act. And the illusion of that image has such power in my soul, in my flesh, that false visions persuade me when asleep to what true ones cannot when I am awake. Am I not myself then, Lord my God? And yet there is so great a difference between myself and myself in the moment when I pass from here into sleep, or come back from there to here! Where then is the reason by which, when awake, the mind resists such suggestions and remains unshaken even if the things themselves are pressed upon it? Is it closed with the eyes? Is it lulled to sleep with the bodily senses? And how is it that often even in sleep we resist, and, mindful of our resolve and remaining most chastely in it, give no assent to such allurements? And yet the difference is so great that when it happens otherwise, on waking we return to peace of conscience, and by that very distance we find that we did not do what we nevertheless grieve was in some way done in us.

10.42CSEL 33:258

Numquid non potens est manus tua, deus omnipotens, sanare omnes languores animae meae atque abundantiore gratia tua lasciuos motus etiam mei soporis extinguere? augebis, domine, magis magisque in me munera tua, ut anima mea sequatur me ad te concupiscentiae uisco expedita, ut non sit rebellis sibi atque ut in somnis etiam non solum non perpetret istas corruptelarum turpitudines per imagines animales usque ad carnis fluxum, sed ne consentiat quidem. nam ut nihil tale uel tantulum libeat, quantulum possit nutu cohiberi etiam in casto dormientis affectu non tantum in hac uita, sed etiam in hac aetate, non magnum est omnipotenti, qui uales facere supra quam petimus et intellegimus. nunc tamen quid adhuc sim in hoc genere mali mei, dixi bono domino meo exultans cum tremore in eo, quod donasti mihi, et lugens in eo, quod inconsummatus sum, sperans perfecturum te in me misericordias tuas usque ad pacem plenariam, quam tecum habebunt interiora et exteriora mea, cum absorpta fuerit mors in uictoriam.

Is not your hand powerful, almighty God, to heal all the diseases of my soul, and by your more abundant grace to quench even the lustful motions of my sleep? You will increase your gifts in me more and more, Lord, so that my soul may follow me to you, freed from the birdlime of lust; so that it may not rebel against itself, and even in sleep may not only not commit these shameful corruptions through sensual images to the point of bodily discharge, but may not even consent to them. For to bring it about that nothing of the kind should please, not even so slightly that it could be checked by a nod, even in the chaste feeling of one asleep, not only in this life but at this age of mine, is no great thing for the Almighty, "who is able to do more than we ask or understand." But now I have told my good Lord what I still am in this kind of evil of mine, "rejoicing with trembling" in what you have given me, and mourning in what is still unfinished in me, hoping that you will bring your mercies to completion in me until the full peace which my inner and outer self will have with you, when "death is swallowed up in victory."

10.43CSEL 33:258–259

Est alia malitia diei, quae utinam sufficiat ei. reficimus enim cotidianas ruinas corporis edendo et bibendo, priusquam escas et uentrem destruas, cum occideris indigentiam satietate mirifica et corruptibile hoc indueris incorruptione sempiterna. nunc autem suauis est mihi necessitas, et aduersus istam suauitatem pugno, ne capiar, et cotidianum bellum gero in ieiuniis, saepius in seruitutem redigens corpus meum, et dolores mei uoluptate pelluntur. nam fames et sitis quidam dolores sunt, urunt et sicut febris necant, nisi alimentorum medicina succurrat. quae quoniam praesto est ex consolatione munerum tuorum, in quibus nostrae infirmitati terra et aqua et caelum seruiunt, calamitas deliciae uocantur.

There is another evil of the day, and I wish it were sufficient for it. For we repair the daily wear of the body by eating and drinking, until you "destroy both food and stomach," when you will kill need with a wonderful fullness and clothe "this corruptible" with eternal "incorruption." But now this necessity is sweet to me, and I fight against that sweetness so as not to be taken captive by it; and I wage a daily war by fasting, often "bringing my body into subjection," and my pains are driven out by pleasure. For hunger and thirst are pains of a sort; they burn and, like a fever, kill, unless the medicine of food comes to the rescue. And since this is at hand from the comfort of your gifts, in which earth and water and sky serve our weakness, the calamity is called a delight.

10.44CSEL 33:259

Hoc me docuisti, ut quemadmodum medicamenta sic alimenta sumpturus accedam. sed dum ad quietem satietatis ex indigentiae molestia transeo, in ipso transitu mihi insidiatur laqueus concupiscentiae. ipse enim transitus uoluptas est, et non est alius, qua transeatur quo transire cogit necessitas. et cum salus sit causa edendi ac bibendi, adiungit se tamquam pedisequa periculosa iucunditas et plerumque praeire conatur, ut eius causa fiat, quod salutis causa me facere uel dico uel uolo. nec idem modus utriusque est: nam quod saluti satis est, delectationi parum est, et saepe incertum fit, utrum adhuc necessaria corporis cura subsidium petat an uoluptaria cupiditatis fallacia ministerium suppetat. ad hoc incertum hilarescit infelix anima et in eo praeparat excusationis patrocinium gaudens non adparere, quod satis sit moderationi ualetudinis, ut obtentu salutis obumbret negotium uoluptatis. his temptationibus cotidie conor resistere et inuoco dexteram tuam et ad te refero aestus meos, quia consilium mihi de hac re nondum stat.

You have taught me this: that I should come to take food as I take medicine. But while I pass from the discomfort of need to the rest of fullness, in that very passage the snare of desire lies in wait for me. For the passage itself is pleasure, and there is no other way to pass to where necessity compels us to pass. And although health is the reason for eating and drinking, a dangerous pleasure joins itself to it like a servant following behind, and often tries to go in front, so that what I say or want to do for the sake of health is done for its sake. Nor is the measure of the two the same: for what is enough for health is too little for pleasure, and it often becomes uncertain whether the necessary care of the body is still asking for help, or whether the deceitful pleasure of desire is offering its service. The unhappy soul brightens at this uncertainty and prepares in it the defense of an excuse, glad that it is not clear what is enough for the moderate care of health, so that under the pretext of health it may cloak the business of pleasure. These temptations I try to resist every day, and I call upon your right hand and refer my turmoil to you, because my mind is not yet settled on this matter.

10.45CSEL 33:259–261

Audio uocem iubentis dei mei: non grauentur corda uestra in crapula et ebrietate. ebrietas longe est a me: misereberis, ne adpropinquet mihi. crapula autem nonnumquam subrepsit seruo tuo: misereberis, ut longe fiat a me. nemo enim potest esse continens, nisi tu des. multa nobis orantibus tribuis, et quidquid boni antequam oraremus accepimus, a te accepimus; et ut hoc postea cognosceremus, a te accepimus. ebriosus numquam fui, sed ebriosos a te factos sobrios ego noui. ergo a te factum est, ut hoc non essent qui numquam fuerunt, a quo factum est, ut hoc non semper essent qui fuerunt, a quo etiam factum est, ut scirent utrique, a quo factum est. audiui aliam uocem tuam: post concupiscentias tuas non eas et a uoluptate tua uetare. audiui et illam ex munere tuo, quam multum amaui: neque si manducauerimus, abundabimus, neque si non manducauerimus, deerit nobis; hoc est dicere: nec illa res me copiosum faciet nec illa aerumnosum. audiui et alteram: ego enim didici, in quibus sum, sufficiens esse et abundare noui et penuriam pati noui. omnia possum in eo, qui me confortat. ecce miles castrorum caelestium, non puluis, quod sumus. sed memento, domine, quoniam puluis sumus, et de puluere fecisti hominem, et perierat et inuentus est. nec ille in se potuit, quia idem puluis fuit, quem talia dicentem adflatu tuae inspirationis adamaui: omnia possum, inquit, in eo, qui me confortat. conforta me, ut possim, da quod iubes et iube quod uis. iste se accepisse confitetur et quod gloriatur in domino gloriatur. audiui alium rogantem, ut accipiat: aufer, inquit, a me concupiscentias uentris. unde adparet, sancte deus, te dare, cum fit quod imperas fieri.

I hear the voice of my God commanding: "Let not your hearts be weighed down with gluttony and drunkenness." Drunkenness is far from me; you will have mercy, so that it does not come near me. But gluttony has sometimes crept up on your servant; you will have mercy, so that it may be far from me. For no one can be continent unless you give it. You grant us many things when we pray; and whatever good we received before we prayed, we received from you; and that we should afterward know this, we received from you. I was never a drunkard, but I have known drunkards made sober by you. So it was your doing that those who never were drunkards are not, your doing that those who were are not so always, and your doing too that both know by whom it was done. I heard another voice of yours: "Do not go after your lusts, and turn away from your pleasure." I heard also, by your gift, one I have loved very much: "Neither if we eat shall we abound, nor if we do not eat shall we lack"; that is to say, neither will the one thing make me rich, nor the other wretched. I heard also another: "For I have learned to be content in whatever state I am; I know how to abound, and I know how to suffer need. I can do all things in him who strengthens me." See, a soldier of the heavenly camp, not the dust that we are. But "remember, Lord, that we are dust," and out of dust you made man, and "he was lost and is found." Nor could he do it in himself, because he was the same dust, he whom I have loved for saying such things by the breath of your inspiration: "I can do all things," he says, "in him who strengthens me." Strengthen me, so that I may be able; give what you command, and command what you will. He confesses that he has received, and "when he boasts, he boasts in the Lord." I have heard another asking to receive: "Take from me," he says, "the lusts of the belly." From which it is clear, holy God, that it is you who give, when what you command to be done is done.

10.46CSEL 33:261–262

Docuisti me, pater bone: omnia munda mundis, sed malum esse homini qui per offensionem manducat; et omnem creaturam tuam bonam esse nihilque abiciendum, quod cum gratiarum actione percipitur; et quia esca nos non conmendat deo, et ut nemo nos iudicet in cibo aut potu; et ut qui manducat non manducantem non spernat, et qui non manducat, manducantem non iudicet. didici haec, gratias tibi, laudes tibi, deo meo, magistro meo, pulsatori aurium mearum, inlustratori cordis mei: eripe me ab omni temptatione. non ego inmunditiam obsonii timeo, sed inmunditiam cupiditatis. scio Noe omne carnis genus, quod cibo esset usui, manducare permissum, Eliam cibo carnis refectum, Iohannem mirabili abstinentia praeditum animalibus, hoc est lucustis in escam cedentibus, non fuisse pollutum: et scio Esau lenticulae concupiscentia deceptum et Dauid propter aquae desiderium a se ipso reprehensum et regem nostrum non carne, sed pane temptatum. ideoque et populus in heremo non quia carnes desiderauit, sed quia escae desiderio aduersus dominum murmurauit, meruit inprobari.

You have taught me, good Father, that "to the pure all things are pure," but that "it is evil for the man who eats with offense"; and that "every creature of yours is good, and nothing is to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving"; and that "food does not commend us to God"; and that "no one should judge us in food or drink"; and that "he who eats should not despise him who does not eat, and he who does not eat should not judge him who eats." I have learned these things; thanks be to you, praise be to you, my God, my teacher, who knock at my ears and enlighten my heart: rescue me from every temptation. It is not the uncleanness of food that I fear, but the uncleanness of desire. I know that Noah was allowed to eat every kind of meat that was fit for food; that Elijah was refreshed with meat; that John, endowed with wonderful abstinence, was not defiled by the living creatures, that is, the locusts, that served him for food. And I know that Esau was deceived by his desire for lentils, and that David blamed himself for his longing for water, and that our King was tempted not by meat but by bread. And so too the people in the wilderness deserved to be rebuked, not because they desired meat, but because in their desire for food they murmured against the Lord.

10.47CSEL 33:262

In his ergo temptationibus positus certo cotidie aduersus concupiscentiam manducandi et bibendi: non enim est quod semel praecidere et ulterius non attingere decernam, sicut de concubitu potui. itaque freni gutturis temperata relaxatione et constrictione tenendi sunt. et quis est, domine, qui non rapiatur aliquantum extra metas necessitatis? quisquis est, magnus est, magnificet nomen tuum. ego autem non sum, quia peccator homo sum. sed et ego magnifico nomen tuum, et interpellat te pro peccatis meis qui uicit saeculum, numerans me inter infirma membra corporis sui, quia et inperfectum eius uiderunt oculi tui, et in libro tuo omnes scribentur.

Placed among these temptations, then, I struggle daily against the desire for eating and drinking. For this is not something I can decide to cut off once and never touch again, as I could with sexual intercourse. So the reins of the throat must be held with a moderate slackening and tightening. And who is there, Lord, who is not carried a little beyond the bounds of necessity? Whoever he is, he is great; let him magnify your name. But I am not he, "for I am a sinful man." Yet I too magnify your name; and he who "has overcome the world" intercedes with you for my sins, counting me among the weak members of his body, because "your eyes have seen" his "imperfect part, and in your book all shall be written."

10.48CSEL 33:262–263

De inlecebra odorum non satago nimis: cum absunt, non requiro, cum assunt, non respuo, paratus eis etiam semper carere. ita mihi uideor; forsitan fallar. sunt enim et istae plangendae tenebrae, in quibus me latet facultas mea, quae in me est, ut animus meus de uiribus suis ipse se interrogans non facile sibi credendum existimet, quia et quod inest plerumque occultum est, nisi experientia manifestetur et nemo securus esse debet in ista uita, quae tota temptatio nominatur, utrum qui fieri potuit ex deteriore melior, non fiat etiam ex meliore deterior. una spes, una fiducia, una firma promissio misericordia tua.

With the allurement of scents I am not much concerned: when they are absent, I do not seek them; when they are present, I do not reject them, and I am ready to do without them always. So it seems to me; perhaps I am deceived. For this too is a darkness to be lamented, in which my own capacity is hidden from me, so that my mind, questioning itself about its strength, does not think it should easily trust itself; because even what is in it is mostly hidden unless experience makes it plain; and no one ought to be secure in this life, which is called wholly a trial, as to whether one who could be made better from worse may not also become worse from better. One hope, one confidence, one firm promise: your mercy.

10.49CSEL 33:263

Voluptates aurium tenacius me inplicauerant et subiugauerant, sed resoluisti et liberasti me. nunc in sonis, quos animant eloquia tua, cum suaui et artificiosa uoce cantantur, fateor, aliquantulum adquiesco, non quidem ut haeream, sed ut surgam, cum uolo. attamen cum ipsis sententiis quibus uiuunt ut admittantur ad me, quaerunt in corde meo nonnullius dignitatis locum, et uix eis praebeo congruentem. aliquando enim plus mihi uideor honoris eis tribuere, quam decet, dum ipsis sanctis dictis religiosius et ardentius sentio moueri animos nostros in flammam pietatis, cum ita cantantur, quam si non ita cantarentur, et omnes affectus spiritus nostri pro sui diuersitate habere proprios modos in uoce atque cantu, quorum nescio qua occulta familiaritate excitentur. sed delectatio carnis meae, cui mentem eneruandam non oportet dari, saepe me fallit, dum rationi sensus non ita comitatur, ut patienter sit posterior, sed tantum, quia propter illam meruit admitti, etiam praecurrere ac ducere conatur. ita in his pecco non sentiens et postea sentio.

The pleasures of the ears had entangled and subdued me more tightly, but you loosed and freed me. Now, in the sounds to which your words give life, when they are sung with a sweet and trained voice, I confess that I find some rest, not indeed so as to cling to them, but so that I can rise when I will. Yet together with the thoughts by which they live, so that they may be admitted to me, they seek in my heart a place of some honor, and I can hardly give them a fitting one. For sometimes I seem to myself to give them more honor than is proper, when I feel that our minds are moved more devoutly and ardently to a flame of piety by the holy words themselves when they are sung so than if they were not so sung, and that all the feelings of our spirit, in their variety, have their own measures in voice and song, by which they are stirred through some hidden kinship. But the pleasure of my flesh, to which the mind ought not to be given over to be weakened, often deceives me, when the sense does not accompany reason so as to follow patiently behind, but, having been admitted only for reason's sake, tries even to run ahead and lead. So in these things I sin without noticing, and afterward I notice.

10.50CSEL 33:263–264

Aliquando autem hanc ipsam fallaciam inmoderatius cauens erro nimia seueritate, sed ualde interdum, ut melos omnes cantilenarum suauium, quibus Dauiticum psalterium frequentatur; ab auribus meis remoueri uelim atque ipsius ecclesiae, tutiusque mihi uidetur, quod de Alexandrino episcopo Athanasio saepe dictum mihi conmemini, qui tam modico flexu uocis faciebat sonare lectorem psalmi, ut pronuntianti uicinior esset quam canenti. uerum tamen cum reminiscor lacrimas meas, quas fudi ad cantus ecclesiae in primordiis recuperatae fidei meae, et nunc ipsum quod moneor non cantu, sed rebus quae cantantur, cum liquida uoce et conuenientissima modulatione cantantur, magnam instituti huius utilitatem rursus agnosco. ita fluctuo inter periculum uoluptatis et experimentum salubritatis magisque adducor non quidem inretractabilem sententiam proferens cantandi consuetudinem approbare in ecclesia, ut per oblectamenta aurium infirmior animus in affectum pietatis adsurgat. tamen cum mihi accidit, ut me amplius cantus quam res, quae canitur, moneat, poenaliter me peccare confiteor et tunc mallem non audire cantantem. ecce ubi sum! flete mecum et pro me flete qui aliquid boni uobiscum intus agitis, unde facta procedunt. nam qui non agitis, non uos haec monent. tu autem, domine deus meus, exaudi et respice et uide et miserere et sana me, in cuius oculis mihi quaestio factus sum, et ipse est languor meus.

But sometimes, guarding too immoderately against this very deception, I err by too great severity, so much so at times that I would want every melody of the sweet songs to which David's psalter is regularly sung to be removed from my ears and from those of the church itself; and it seems safer to me to follow what I remember having often been told of Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, who made the reader of the psalm sound it with so little inflection of the voice that it was nearer to speaking than singing. Yet when I remember the tears I shed at the songs of the church in the early days of my recovered faith, and that even now I am moved not by the singing but by the things that are sung, when they are sung with a clear voice and the most fitting melody, I acknowledge again the great usefulness of this practice. So I waver between the danger of pleasure and the experience of its benefit, and I am more inclined, though not putting forward an irrevocable opinion, to approve the custom of singing in church, so that through the delights of the ears the weaker mind may rise to a feeling of devotion. Yet when it happens to me that the singing moves me more than what is sung, I confess that I sin in a way that deserves punishment, and then I would rather not hear the singer. See where I am! Weep with me and weep for me, you who have some good within you, from which good deeds come. For you who do not, these things do not move you. But you, Lord my God, hear, look, see, and have mercy and heal me, in whose eyes I have become a question to myself; and that is my sickness.

10.51CSEL 33:264–265

Restat uoluptas oculorum istorum carnis meae, de qua loquor confessiones, quas audiant aures templi tui, aures fraternae ac piae, ut concludamus temptationes concupiscentiae carnis, quae me adhuc pulsant ingemescentem et habitaculum meum, quod de caelo est, superindui cupientem. pulchras formas et uarias, nitidos et amoenos colores amant oculi. non teneant haec animam meam; teneat eam deus, qui fecit haec bona quidem ualde, sed ipse est bonum meum, non haec. tangunt me uigilantem totis diebus, nec requies ab eis datur mihi, sicut datur a uocibus canoris, aliquando ab omnibus, in silentio. ipsa enim regina colorum lux ista perfundens cuncta, quae cernimus, ubiubi per diem fuero, multimodo adlapsu blanditur mihi aliud agenti et ad eam non aduertenti. insinuat autem se ita uehementer, ut si repente subtrahatur, cum desiderio requiratur; et si diu absit, contristat animum.

There remains the pleasure of these eyes of my flesh, about which I make my confessions, to be heard by the ears of your temple, brotherly and devout ears; so that we may conclude the temptations of the lust of the flesh which still assail me as I groan and long "to be clothed over with my dwelling which is from heaven." The eyes love beautiful and varied forms, bright and pleasant colors. Let these not hold my soul; let God hold it, who made these things, "very good" indeed, but he is my good, not these. They touch me while I am awake all day long, and no rest from them is given me, as there is from musical voices, and sometimes from all sounds, in silence. For this queen of colors, the light, bathing all that we see, wherever I am during the day, caresses me with manifold approach while I am doing something else and not paying attention to it. And it insinuates itself so strongly that if it is suddenly taken away, it is sought with longing; and if it is absent for long, it saddens the mind.

10.52CSEL 33:265–266

O lux, quam uidebat Tobis, cum clausis istis oculis filium docebat uitae uiam et ei praeibat pede caritatis nusquam errans; aut quam uidebat Isaac praegrauatis et opertis senectute carneis luminibus, cum filios non agnoscendo benedicere, sed benedicendo agnoscere meruit; aut quam uidebat Iacob, cum et ipse prae grandi aetate captus oculis in filiis praesignata futuri populi genera luminoso corde radiauit. et nepotibus suis ex Ioseph diuexas mystice manus, non sicut pater eorum foris corrigebat, sed sicut ipse intus discernebat, imposuit. ipsa est lux, una est et unum omnes, qui uident et amant eam. at ista corporalis, de qua loquebar, inlecebrosa ac periculosa dulcedine condit uitam saeculi caecis amatoribus. cum autem et de ipsa laudare te norunt, deus creator omnium, assumunt eam in hymno tuo, non assumuntur ab ea in somno suo: sic esse cupio. resisto seductionibus oculorum, ne inplicentur pedes mei, quibus ingredior uiam tuam, et erigo ad te inuisibiles oculos, ut tu euellas de laqueo pedes meos. tu subinde euelles eos, nam inlaqueantur. tu non cessas euellere, ego autem crebro haereo in ubique sparsis insidiis, quoniam non dormies neque dormitabis, qui custodis Israel.

O the light which Tobit saw, when with these eyes closed he taught his son the way of life and went before him on the foot of love, never going astray; or which Isaac saw, when his fleshly eyes were heavy and covered with old age, and it was granted him to bless his sons not by recognizing them, but to recognize them by blessing them; or which Jacob saw, when he too, deprived of sight by great age, with an enlightened heart shone light upon the tribes of the future people foreshadowed in his sons, and laid on his grandsons by Joseph his hands, mystically crossed, not as their father outwardly tried to correct them, but as he himself inwardly discerned. That is the light; it is one, and all who see and love it are one. But this bodily light I was speaking of seasons the life of the world for its blind lovers with an alluring and dangerous sweetness. But those who know how to praise you for it too, "God, creator of all things," take it up into your hymn and are not taken up by it into their sleep: so I desire to be. I resist the seductions of the eyes, lest my feet, with which I walk on your way, be entangled; and I lift up to you invisible eyes, so that you may "pluck my feet out of the snare." You pluck them out again and again, for they are caught. You do not cease to pluck them out, while I often get stuck in the snares spread everywhere; for "you will neither slumber nor sleep, you who keep Israel."

10.53CSEL 33:266–267

Quam innumerabilia uariis artibus et opificiis in uestibus, calciamentis, uasis et cuiuscemodi fabricationibus, picturis etiam diuersisque figmentis atque his usum necessarium atque moderatum et piam significationem longe transgredientibus addiderunt homines ad inlecebras oculorum, foras sequentes quod faciunt, intus relinquentes a quo facti sunt et exterminantes quod facti sunt. at ego, deus meus et decus meum, etiam hinc tibi dico hymnum et sacrifico laudem sacrificatori meo, quoniam pulchra traiecta per animas in manus artificiosas ab illa pulchritudine ueniunt, quae supra animas est, cui suspirat anima mea die ac nocte. sed pulchritudinum exteriorum operatores et sectatores inde trahunt adprobandi modum, non autem inde trahunt utendi modum. et ibi est et non uident eum, ut non eant longius et fortitudinem suam ad te custodiant nec eam spargant in deliciosas lassitudines. ego autem haec loquens atque discernens etiam istis pulchris gressum innecto, sed tu euelles, domine, euelles tu, quoniam misericordia tua ante oculos meos est. nam ego capior miserabiliter, et tu euelles misericorditer aliquando non sentientem, quia suspensus incideram, aliquando cum dolore, quia iam inhaeseram.

How countless are the things that men, by various arts and crafts, have added to the allurements of the eyes, in clothes, shoes, vessels, and manufactures of every kind, in pictures too and various images, going far beyond necessary and moderate use and devout meaning; following outwardly what they make, abandoning inwardly him by whom they were made, and destroying what they were made to be. But I, my God and my glory, even from this sing a hymn to you and offer a sacrifice of praise to him who sacrificed himself for me, because the beautiful things passed through souls into skillful hands come from that Beauty which is above souls, for which my soul sighs day and night. But the makers and followers of outward beauties draw from it their standard of approval, but not their standard of use. And it is there, and they do not see it, so that they would go no further and would "keep their strength for you," and not scatter it on pleasurable wearinesses. But I, while saying and discerning this, entangle my steps even in these beautiful things; but you pluck me out, Lord, you pluck me out, "for your mercy is before my eyes." For I am caught miserably, and you pluck me out mercifully, sometimes without my noticing, because I had only lightly fallen upon it, sometimes with pain, because I had already stuck fast.

10.54CSEL 33:267–268

Huc accedit alia forma temptationis multiplicius periculosa. praeter enim concupiscentiam carnis, quae inest in delectatione omnium sensuum et uoluptatum, cui seruientes depereunt qui longe se faciunt a te, inest animae per eosdem sensus corporis quaedam non se oblectandi in carne, sed experiendi per carnem uana et curiosa cupiditas nomine cognitionis et scientiae palliata. quae quoniam in appetitu noscendi est, oculi autem sunt ad noscendum in sensibus principes, concupiscentia oculorum eloquio diuino adpellata est. ad oculos enim uidere proprie pertinet. utimur autem hoc uerbo etiam in ceteris sensibus, cum eos ad cognoscendum intendimus. neque enim dicimus: audi quid rutilet, aut: olefac quam niteat, aut: gusta quam splendeat, aut: palpa quam fulgeat: uideri enim dicuntur haec omnia. dicimus autem non solum: uide quid lucet, quod soli oculi sentire possunt, sed etiam: uide quid sonet, uide quid oleat, uide quid sapiat, uide quam durum sit. ideoque generalis experientia sensuum concupiscentia, sicut dictum est, oculorum uocatur, quia uidendi officium, in quo primatum oculi tenent, etiam ceteri sensus sibi de similitudine usurpant, cum aliquid cognitionis explorant

To this is added another form of temptation, dangerous in many more ways. For besides the lust of the flesh, which lies in the delight of all the senses and pleasures, and whose slaves perish as they put themselves far from you, there is in the soul, through the same bodily senses, a certain vain and curious desire, cloaked under the name of knowledge and learning, not to take pleasure in the flesh but to gain experience through the flesh. Since this lies in the appetite for knowing, and the eyes are the chief of the senses for knowing, it is called in the divine word "the lust of the eyes." For seeing belongs properly to the eyes; but we use this word of the other senses too, when we apply them to knowing. For we do not say, "Hear how it glows," or "Smell how it shines," or "Taste how it gleams," or "Feel how bright it is"; for all these things are said to be seen. But we say not only "See how it shines," which the eyes alone can perceive, but also "See how it sounds," "See how it smells," "See how it tastes," "See how hard it is." And so the general experience of the senses is called, as has been said, the lust of the eyes, because the office of seeing, in which the eyes hold the first place, is taken over by the other senses too by analogy when they explore any knowledge.

10.55CSEL 33:268

Ex hoc autem euidentius discernitur, quid uoluptatis, quid curiositatis agatur per sensus, quod uoluptas pulchra, canora, suauia, sapida, lenia sectatur, curiositas autem etiam his contraria temptandi causa non ad subeundam molestiam, sed experiendi noscendique libidine. quid autem uoluptatis habet uidere in laniato cadauere quod exhorreas? et tamen sicubi iaceat, concurrunt, ut contristentur, ut palleant. timent etiam, ne in somnis hoc uideant, quasi quisquam eos uigilantes uidere coegerit aut pulchritudinis ulla fama persuaserit. ita et in ceteris sensibus, quae persequi longum est. ex hoc morbo cupiditatis in spectaculis exhibentur quaeque miracula. hinc ad perscrutanda naturae, quae praeter nos non est, operata proceditur, quae scire nihil prodest et nihil aliud quam scire homines cupiunt. hinc etiam, si quid eodem peruersae scientiae fine per artes magicas quaeritur. hinc etiam in ipsa religione deus temptatur, cum signa et prodigia flagitantur non ad aliquam salutem, sed ad solam experientiam desiderata.

From this it is more clearly seen what is done through the senses by pleasure and what by curiosity: pleasure pursues what is beautiful, melodious, fragrant, tasty, and smooth, but curiosity pursues even their opposites, for the sake of trying them, not to undergo discomfort but from a lust for experience and knowledge. For what pleasure is there in seeing a mangled corpse, which makes you shudder? And yet, if one is lying somewhere, people flock to be saddened, to turn pale. They are even afraid of seeing it in their sleep, as if anyone had forced them to look at it while awake, or any report of its beauty had persuaded them. So too with the other senses, which it would take long to go through. From this disease of desire all kinds of marvels are exhibited in the shows. From this people go on to search out the workings of nature, which is outside us, which it does no good to know, and which men desire only to know. From this also comes whatever is sought through the magic arts with the same aim of perverse knowledge. From this too, even in religion itself, God is tempted, when signs and wonders are demanded, desired not for any salvation but only for the experience.

10.56CSEL 33:268–269

In hac tam immensa silua plena insidiarum et periculorum ecce multa praeciderim et a meo corde dispulerim, sicuti donasti me facere, deus salutis meae; attamen quando audeo dicere, cum circumquaque cotidianam uitam nostram tam multa huius generis rerum circumstrepant, quando audeo dicere nulla re tali me intentum fieri ad spectandum et uana cura capiendum? sane me iam theatra non rapiunt, nec curo nosse transitus siderum, nec anima mea umquam responsa quaesiuit umbrarum: omnia sacrilega sacramenta detestor. a te, domine deus meus, cui humilem famulatum ac simplicem debeo, quantis mecum suggestionum machinationibus agit inimicus ut signum aliquod petam! sed obsecro te per regem nostrum et patriam Hierusalem simplicem, castam, ut quemadmodum a me longe est ad ista consensio, ita sit semper longe atque longius. pro salute autem cuiusquam cum te rogo, alius multum differens finis est intentionis meae, et te faciente quod uis das mihi et dabis libenter sequi.

In this immense forest, so full of snares and dangers, see, I have cut away many things and driven them from my heart, as you have granted me to do, God of my salvation. Yet when do I dare to say, since so many things of this kind make their noise around our daily life on every side, when do I dare to say that nothing of this sort makes me intent on watching it and captures me with vain interest? Certainly the theaters no longer carry me away, nor do I care to know the courses of the stars, nor has my soul ever sought answers from the shades; I detest all sacrilegious rites. From you, Lord my God, to whom I owe humble and single-hearted service, with what schemes of suggestion the enemy works on me to make me ask for some sign! But I beseech you by our King and by our homeland, Jerusalem, simple and chaste, that as consent to such things is far from me, so it may always be farther and farther. But when I pray to you for anyone's salvation, the aim of my intention is very different; and as you do what you will, you give and will give me to follow willingly.

10.57CSEL 33:269–270

Verum tamen in quam multis minutissimis et contemtibilibus rebus curiositas cotidie nostra temtetur et quam saepe labamur, quis enumerat? quotiens narrantes inania primo quasi toleramus, ne offendamus infirmos, deinde paulatim libenter aduertimus. canem currentem post leporem iam non specto, cum in circo fit; at uero in agro, si casu transeam, auertit me fortassis et ab aliqua magna cogitatione atque ad se conuertit illa uenatio, non deuiare cogens corpore iumenti, sed cordis inclinatione, et nisi iam mihi demonstrata infirmitate mea cito admoneas aut ex ipsa uisione per aliquam considerationem in te adsurgere aut totum contemnere atque transire, uanus hebesco. quid cum me domi sedentem stelio muscas captans uel aranea retibus suis inruentes inplicans saepe intentum me facit? num quia parua sunt animalia, ideo non res eadem geritur? pergo inde ad laudandum te, creatorem mirificum atque ordinatorem rerum omnium, sed non inde intentus esse incipio. aliud est cito surgere, aliud est non cadere. et talibus uita mea plena est et una spes mea magna ualde misericordia tua. cum enim huiuscemodi rerum conceptaculum fit cor nostrum et portat copiosae uanitatis cateruas, hinc et orationes nostrae saepe interrumpuntur atque turbantur, et ante conspectum tuum, dum ad aures tuas uocem cordis intendimus, nescio unde inruentibus nugatoriis cogitationibus res tanta praeciditur.

Yet in how many very small and contemptible things our curiosity is tempted every day, and how often we slip, who can count? How often, when people tell idle tales, we at first put up with them, as it were, so as not to offend the weak, and then little by little we listen willingly! I no longer watch a dog running after a hare when it happens in the circus; but in the country, if I happen to pass by, that hunt may perhaps distract me even from some great thought and turn me toward it, not forcing me to turn aside the body of my horse, but the inclination of my heart; and unless you, having already shown me my weakness, quickly warn me either to rise to you through some reflection drawn from the sight itself, or to despise the whole thing and pass on, I grow dull and vain. What of when, sitting at home, a lizard catching flies, or a spider entangling them as they rush into its webs, often holds my attention? Is it not the same thing just because they are small animals? I go on from there to praise you, the wonderful Creator and orderer of all things, but that is not why I begin to pay attention. It is one thing to get up quickly, another not to fall. And my life is full of such things, and my one hope is your very great mercy. For when our heart becomes a receptacle of things of this kind and carries crowds of abundant vanity, our prayers too are often interrupted and disturbed by them; and in your sight, while we direct the voice of our heart to your ears, so great a matter is cut short by trifling thoughts rushing in from I know not where.

10.58CSEL 33:270–271

Numquid etiam hoc inter contemnenda deputabimus aut aliquid nos redducet in spem nisi nota misericordia tua, quoniam coepisti mutare nos? et tu scis, quanta ex parte mutaueris, qui me primitus sanas a libidine uindicandi me, ut propitius fias etiam ceteris omnibus iniquitatibus meis et sanes omnes languores meos et redimas de corruptione uitam meam et corones me in miseratione et misericordia et saties in bonis desiderium meum, qui conpressisti a timore tuo superbiam meam et mansuefecisti iugo tuo ceruicem meam. et nunc porto illud, et lene est mihi, quoniam sic promisisti et fecisti; et uere sic erat et nesciebam, quando id subire metuebam.

Shall we count this too among things to be despised, or will anything bring us back to hope except your known mercy, since you have begun to change us? And you know how far you have changed me, you who first heal me of the lust to vindicate myself, so that you may be gracious to all my other iniquities too, and heal all my diseases, and redeem my life from corruption, and crown me with pity and mercy, and satisfy my desire with good things; you who have checked my pride with your fear and tamed my neck to your yoke. And now I bear it, and it is light to me, because so you promised and so you did; and truly it was so, and I did not know it when I was afraid to take it up.

10.59CSEL 33:271–272

Sed numquid, domine, qui solus sine tyfo dominaris, quia solus uerus dominus es, qui non habes dominam, numquid hoc quoque tertium temtationis genus cessauit a me aut cessare in hac tota uita potest, timeri et amari uelle ab hominibus, non propter aliud, sed ut inde sit gaudium, quod non est gaudium? misera uita est et foeda iactantia. hinc fit uel maxime non amare te nec caste timere te, ideoque tu superbis resistis, humilibus autem das gratiam et intonas super ambitiones saeculi, et contremunt fundamenta montium. itaque nobis, quoniam propter quaedam humanae societatis officia necessarium est amari et timeri ab hominibus, instat aduersarius uerae beatitudinis nostrae ubique spargens in laqueis "euge, euge", ut dum auide colligimus, incaute capiamur et a ueritate gaudium nostrum deponamus atque in hominum fallacia ponamus, libeatque nos amari et timeri non propter te, sed pro te, atque isto modo sui similes factos secum habeat non ad concordiam caritatis, sed ad consortium supplicii qui statuit sedem suam ponere in aquilone, ut te peruersa et distorta uia imitanti tenebrosi frigidique seruirent. nos autem, domine, pusillus grex tuus ecce sumus, tu nos posside. praetende alas tuas, et fugiamus sub eas. gloria nostra tu esto; propter te amemur et timeamur in nobis. qui laudari uult ab hominibus uituperante te, non defenditur ab hominibus iudicante te nec eripietur damnante te. cum autem non peccator laudatur in desideriis animae suae, nec qui iniqua gerit benedicitur, sed laudatur homo propter aliquod donum, quod dedisti ei, at ille plus gaudet sibi laudari se quam ipsum donum habere, unde laudatur, etiam iste te uituperante laudatur, et melior iam ille, qui laudauit, quam iste, qui laudatus est. illi enim placuit in homine donum dei, huic amplius placuit donum hominis quam dei.

But, Lord, you who alone rule without pride, because you alone are the true Lord, who have no lord: has this third kind of temptation also ceased from me, or can it cease in this whole life, the wish to be feared and loved by men, for no other reason than that there may be a joy from it which is no joy? It is a miserable life and a foul boasting. From this especially comes not loving you and not fearing you chastely; and therefore "you resist the proud but give grace to the humble," and you thunder upon the ambitions of the world, "and the foundations of the mountains tremble." So, because certain duties of human society make it necessary for us to be loved and feared by men, the adversary of our true happiness presses upon us, scattering everywhere in his snares "Well done, well done," so that while we eagerly gather them up we may be caught unawares, and may take our joy away from the truth and place it in men's deceit, and be pleased to be loved and feared not for your sake but in your place; and so, having made us like himself, he may have us with him, not for the concord of love but for fellowship in punishment, he who resolved to set his throne in the north, so that dark and cold men might serve him as he imitates you in a perverse and twisted way. But we, Lord, see, we are your "little flock"; possess us. Stretch out your wings, and let us flee under them. Be our glory; let us be loved and feared in ourselves for your sake. Whoever wants to be praised by men when you blame will not be defended by men when you judge, nor rescued when you condemn. But when it is not "the sinner who is praised in the desires of his soul, nor he who does wickedly who is blessed," but a man is praised for some gift you have given him, and he rejoices more in being praised than in having the gift for which he is praised, he too is praised while you blame him; and the one who praised is better than the one who was praised. For the one was pleased by the gift of God in a man, the other was more pleased by the gift of man than by that of God.

10.60CSEL 33:272–273

Temtamur his temtationibus cotidie, domine, sine cessatione temtamur. cotidiana fornax nostra est humana lingua. imperas nobis et in hoc genere continentiam: da quod iubes et iube quod uis. tu nosti de hac re ad te gemitum cordis mei et flumina oculorum meorum. neque enim facile colligo, quam sim ab ista peste mundatior, et multum timeo occulta mea, quae norunt oculi tui, mei autem non. est enim qualiscumque in aliis generibus temtationum mihi facultas explorandi me, in hoc paene nulla est. nam et a uoluptatibus carnis et a curiositate superuacuanea cognoscendi uideo quantum assecutus sim posse refrenare animum meum, cum eis rebus careo uel uoluntate uel cum absunt. tunc enim me interrogo, quam magis minusue mihi molestum sit non habere. diuitiae uero, quae ob hoc expetuntur, ut alicui trium istarum cupiditatium uel duabus earum uel omnibus seruiant, si persentiscere non potest animus, utrum eas habens contemnat, possunt et dimitti, ut se probet. laude uero ut careamus atque in eo experiamur, quid possumus, numquid male uiuendum est et tam perdite atque immaniter, ut nemo nos nouerit, qui non detestetur? quae maior dementia dici aut cogitari potest? at si bonae uitae bonorumque operum comes et solet et debet esse laudatio, tam comitatum eius quam ipsam bonam uitam deseri non oportet. non autem sentio, sine quo esse aut aequo animo aut aegre possim, nisi cum afuerit.

We are tempted by these temptations every day, Lord; we are tempted without ceasing. Our daily furnace is the human tongue. In this kind too you command us to be continent: give what you command, and command what you will. You know the groaning of my heart to you about this, and the rivers of my eyes. For I cannot easily gather how far I am cleansed of this plague, and I greatly fear my hidden faults, which your eyes know, but mine do not. For in other kinds of temptation I have some means of examining myself; in this one, almost none. For with regard to the pleasures of the flesh and to superfluous curiosity for knowing, I see how far I have succeeded in being able to rein in my mind when I do without those things, either by choice or when they are absent. For then I ask myself how much more or less it troubles me not to have them. Riches, too, which are sought in order to serve one or two or all three of these desires, can be given up, if the mind cannot perceive whether it despises them while having them, so that it may test itself. But in order to do without praise and test in this what we can do, must we live badly, so wickedly and monstrously that no one knows us without detesting us? What greater madness can be said or thought? But if praise usually and properly accompanies a good life and good works, we ought not to abandon its company any more than the good life itself. Yet I do not perceive whether I can do without something calmly or with difficulty unless it is absent.

10.61CSEL 33:273–274

Quid igitur tibi in hoc genere temptationis, domine, confiteor? quid, nisi delectari me laudibus? sed amplius ipsa ueritate quam laudibus. nam si mihi proponatur, utrum malim furens aut in omnibus rebus errans ab omnibus hominibus laudari an constans et in ueritate certissimus ab omnibus uituperari, uideo quid eligam. uerum tamen nollem, ut uel augeret mihi gaudium cuiuslibet boni mei suffragatio oris alieni. sed auget, fateor, non solum, sed et uituperatio minuit. et cum ista miseria mea perturbor, subintrat mihi excusatio, quae qualis sit, tu scis, deus; nam me incertum facit. quia enim nobis imperasti non tantum continentiam, id est a quibus rebus amorem cohibeamus, uerum etiam iustitiam, id est quo eum conferamus, nec te tantum noluisti a nobis uerum etiam proximum diligi, saepe mihi uideor de prouectu aut spe proximi delectari, cum bene intellegentis laude delector, et rursus eius malo contristari, cum eum audio uituperare quod aut ignorat aut bonum est. nam et contristor aliquando laudibus meis, cum uel ea laudantur in me, in quibus mihi ipse displiceo, uel etiam bona minora et leuia pluris aestimantur, quam aestimanda sunt. sed rursus unde scio, an propterea sic afficior, quia nolo de me ipso a me dissentire laudatorem meum, non quia illius utilitate moueor, sed quia eadem bona, quae mihi in me placent, iucundiora mihi sunt, cum et alteri placent? quodam modo enim non ego laudor, cum de me sententia mea non laudatur, quandoquidem aut illa laudantur, quae mihi displicent, aut illa amplius, quae mihi minus placent. ergone de hoc incertus sum mei?

What, then, do I confess to you, Lord, in this kind of temptation? What, but that I am delighted by praise? But more by the truth itself than by praise. For if I were offered the choice whether I would rather be praised by all men while mad or in error in everything, or be blamed by all men while steadfast and most certain in the truth, I see which I would choose. Yet I would not want the approval of another's mouth even to increase my joy in any good of mine. But it does increase it, I confess; and not only that, but blame diminishes it. And when I am troubled by this misery of mine, an excuse slips in, and what kind it is you know, God, for it makes me uncertain. For since you have commanded us not only continence, that is, from what things to hold back our love, but also justice, that is, on what to bestow it, and have willed not only yourself to be loved by us but also our neighbor, I often seem to myself to be delighted at the progress or promise of my neighbor when I am delighted by the praise of one who understands well; and again to be saddened at his fault when I hear him blame what he does not understand or what is good. For I am sometimes saddened by my own praises, either when things are praised in me that displease me in myself, or even when lesser and slight goods are valued more than they should be. But again, how do I know whether I am affected in this way because I do not want the one who praises me to disagree with me about myself, not because I am moved by his benefit, but because the same good things that please me in myself are more pleasant to me when they please another too? For in a way it is not I who am praised when my judgment of myself is not praised, since either things are praised that displease me, or things are praised more that please me less. Am I, then, uncertain of myself in this?

10.62CSEL 33:274

Ecce in te, ueritas, uideo non me laudibus meis propter me, sed propter proximi utilitatem moueri oportere. et utrum ita sim, nescio. minus mihi de hac re notus sum ipse quam tu. obsecro te, deus meus, et me ipsum mihi indica, ut confitear oraturis pro me fratribus meis, quod in me saucium conperero. iterum me diligentius interrogem. si utilitate proximi moueor in laudibus meis, cur minus moueor, si quisquam alius iniuste uituperetur quam si ego? cur ea contumelia magis mordeor, quae in me quam quae in alium eadem iniquitate coram me iacitur? an et hoc nescio? etiamne id restat, ut ipse me seducam et uerum non faciam coram te in corde et lingua mea? insaniam istam, domine, longe fac a me, ne oleum peccatoris mihi sit os meum ad inpinguandum caput meum.

See, in you, O Truth, I see that I ought to be moved by my praises not for my own sake but for my neighbor's benefit. And whether I am so, I do not know. I know less of myself in this matter than you do. I beseech you, my God, show me myself too, so that I may confess to my brothers who will pray for me what I find wounded in me. Let me question myself again more carefully. If I am moved by my neighbor's benefit in my praises, why am I less moved if someone else is unjustly blamed than if I am? Why am I more stung by an insult cast at me than by one cast at another with the same injustice in my presence? Do I not know this too? Or does it remain that I deceive myself and do not do the truth before you in my heart and tongue? Put this madness far from me, Lord, lest my own mouth be "the oil of the sinner to anoint my head."

10.63CSEL 33:274–275

Egenus et pauper ego sum et melior in occulto gemitu displicens mihi et quaerens misericordiam tuam, donec reficiatur defectus meus et perficiatur usque in pacem, quam nescit arrogantis oculus. sermo autem ore procedens et facta, quae innotescunt hominibus, habent temptationem periculosissimam ab amore laudis, qui ad priuatam quandam excellentiam contrahit emendicata suffragia: temtat et cum a me in me arguitur, eo ipso, quo arguitur, et saepe de ipso uanae gloriae contemptu uanius gloriatur ideoque non iam de ipso contemptu gloriae gloriatur: non enim eam contemnit, cum gloriatur.

"I am needy and poor," and better when in secret groaning I am displeased with myself and seek your mercy, until my lack is repaired and made whole, even to the peace which the eye of the arrogant does not know. But speech coming from the mouth, and deeds that become known to men, carry a most dangerous temptation from the love of praise, which gathers votes begged from others for a kind of private distinction. It tempts me even when I rebuke it in myself, by the very fact that I rebuke it; and often a man boasts more vainly of his very contempt for vainglory, and so no longer boasts of his contempt for glory; for he does not despise it when he boasts.

10.64CSEL 33:275

Intus etiam, intus est aliud in eodem genere temtationis malum, quo inanescunt qui placent sibi de se, quamuis aliis uel non placeant uel displiceant nec placere affectent ceteris. sed sibi placentes multum tibi displicent non tantum de non bonis quasi bonis uerum etiam de bonis tuis quasi suis, aut etiam sicut de tuis, sed tamquam de meritis suis, aut etiam sicut ex tua gratia, non tamen socialiter gaudentes, sed aliis inuidentes eam. in his omnibus atque in huius modi periculis et laboribus uides tremorem cordis mei, et uulnera mea magis subinde a te sanari quam mihi non infligi sentio.

Within too, within, there is another evil in the same kind of temptation, by which those become empty who are pleased with themselves, even though they do not please others, or displease them, and do not try to please the rest. But those who please themselves greatly displease you, not only by taking pleasure in things not good as if they were good, but also in your good things as if they were their own; or even as yours, but as if by their own merits; or even as from your grace, yet not rejoicing in fellowship with others, but envying it to others. In all these and similar dangers and labors you see the trembling of my heart; and I feel that my wounds are healed by you again and again rather than not inflicted on me.

10.65CSEL 33:275–277

Vbi non mecum ambulasti, ueritas, docens quid caueam et quid appetam, cum ad te referrem inferiora uisa mea, quae potui, teque consulerem? lustraui mundum foris sensu, quo potui, et adtendi uitam corporis mei de me sensusque ipsos meos. inde ingressus sum in recessus memoriae meae, multiplices amplitudines plenas miris modis copiarum innumerabilium, et consideraui et expaui et nihil eorum discernere potui sine te et nihil eorum te esse inueni. nec ego ipse inuentor, qui peragraui omnia et distinguere et pro suis quaeque dignitatibus aestimare conatus sum, excipiens alia nutantibus sensibus et interrogans, alia mecum conmixta sentiens ipsosque nuntios dinoscens atque dinumerans iamque in memoriae latis opibus alia pertractans, alia recondens, alia eruens: nec ego ipse, cum haec agerem, id est uis mea, qua id agebam, nec ipsa eras tu, quia lux es tu permanens, quam de omnibus consulebam, an essent, quid essent, quanti pendenda essent: et audiebam docentem ac iubentem. et saepe istuc facio; hoc me delectat, et ab actionibus necessitatis quantum relaxari possum, ad istam uoluptatem refugio. neque in his omnibus, quae percurro consulens te, inuenio tutum locum animae meae nisi in te, quo colligantur sparsa mea nec a te quicquam recedat ex me. et aliquando intromittis me in affectum multum inusitatum introrsus ad nescio quam dulcedinem, quae si perficiatur in me, nescio quid erit, quod uita ista non erit. sed reccido in haec aerumnosis ponderibus et resorbeor solitis et teneor et multum fleo, sed multum teneor. tantum consuetudinis sarcina digna est! hic esse ualeo nec uolo, illic nolo nec ualeo, miser utrubique.

Where have you not walked with me, O Truth, teaching me what to beware of and what to seek, when I referred to you what I could see down here, and consulted you? I surveyed the world outside with my senses as I could, and I observed the life my body has from me, and my senses themselves. From there I entered the recesses of my memory, manifold spaces wonderfully full of countless riches; and I considered them and was awed, and I could discern none of them without you, and I found that none of them was you. Nor was I myself the discoverer, I who went through all these things and tried to distinguish them and value each according to its worth, receiving some through the reporting senses and questioning them, perceiving others mixed with myself, distinguishing and numbering the messengers themselves, and in the broad wealth of memory handling some things, storing others, digging out others: neither I myself, when I did this, that is, my power by which I did it, nor was that power you; for you are the abiding light which I consulted about all these things, whether they were, what they were, and how much they were to be valued; and I heard you teaching and commanding. And I often do this; it delights me, and whenever I can be released from necessary business, I take refuge in this pleasure. Yet in all these things that I run through consulting you, I find no safe place for my soul except in you, where my scattered parts may be gathered and nothing of me may depart from you. And sometimes you let me into a feeling very unusual, within, into a sweetness I know not what, which, if it were brought to completion in me, would be something I know not what, which this life will not be. But I fall back into these things with miserable weights, and I am swallowed up again by the usual things, and held, and I weep much, but I am held much. So great is the burden of habit! Here I am able to be, but do not want to; there I want to be, but am not able; wretched in both.

10.66CSEL 33:277

Ideoque consideraui languores peccatorum meorum in cupiditate triplici et dexteram tuam inuocaui ad salutem meam. uidi enim splendorem tuum corde saucio et repercussus dixi: quis illuc potest? proiectus sum a facie oculorum tuorum. tu es ueritas super omnia praesidens. at ego per auaritiam meam non amittere te uolui, sed uolui tecum possidere mendacium, sicut nemo uult ita falsum dicere, ut nesciat ipse, quid uerum sit. itaque amisi te, quia non dignaris cum mendacio possideri.

And so I have considered the diseases of my sins in the threefold lust, and I have called upon your right hand for my salvation. For I saw your splendor with a wounded heart, and beaten back I said: "Who can reach there? I am cast out from the sight of your eyes." You are the Truth presiding over all. But I, in my greed, did not want to lose you, but wanted to possess a lie together with you, just as no one wants to say what is false in such a way that he himself does not know what is true. And so I lost you, because you do not deign to be possessed together with a lie.

10.67CSEL 33:277–278

Quem inuenirem, qui me reconciliaret tibi? ambiendum mihi fuit ad angelos? qua prece? quibus sacramentis? multi conantes ad te redire neque per se ipsos ualentes, sicut audio, temtauerunt haec et inciderunt in desiderium curiosarum uisionum et digni habiti sunt inlusionibus. elati enim te quaerebant doctrinae fastu exserentes potius quam tundentes pectora et adduxerunt sibi per similitudinem cordis sui conspirantes et socias superbiae suae potestates aeris huius, a quibus per potentias magicas deciperentur, quaerentes mediatorem, per quem purgarentur, et non erat. diabolus enim erat transfigurans se in angelum lucis. et multum inlexit superbam carnem, quod carneo corpore ipse non esset. erant enim illi mortales et peccatores, tu autem, domine, cui reconciliari uolebant, immortalis et sine peccato. mediator autem inter deum et homines oportebat ut haberet aliquid simile deo, aliquid simile hominibus, ne in utroque hominibus similis longe esset a deo aut in utroque deo similis longe esset ab hominibus atque ita mediator non esset. fallax itaque ille mediator, quo per secreta iudicia tua superbia meretur indui, unum cum hominibus habet, id est peccatum, aliud uideri uult habere cum deo, ut, quia carnis mortalitate non tegitur, pro inmortali se ostentet. sed quia stipendium peccati mors est, hoc habet conmune cum hominibus, unde simul damnetur in mortem.

Whom could I find to reconcile me to you? Should I have sought the help of angels? By what prayer? By what rites? Many, trying to return to you and not able by themselves, have tried these things, as I hear, and have fallen into a desire for curious visions and have been found worthy of delusions. For they sought you in their pride, puffing out their chests in the arrogance of learning rather than beating them, and by likeness of heart they drew to themselves "the powers of this air" as accomplices and allies of their pride, by whom they were deceived through magical powers; they sought a mediator through whom they might be purified, and there was none. For it was the devil, "transforming himself into an angel of light." And it greatly enticed proud flesh that he himself was not in a fleshly body. For they were mortal and sinners, but you, Lord, to whom they wanted to be reconciled, are immortal and without sin. But a mediator between God and men had to have something like God and something like men, lest, being like men in both, he be far from God, or, being like God in both, he be far from men, and so not be a mediator. So that deceitful mediator, by whom, through your secret judgments, pride deserves to be deceived, has one thing in common with men, namely sin, and wants to seem to have another in common with God, so that, because he is not clothed with the mortality of flesh, he may show himself off as immortal. But because "the wages of sin is death," he has this in common with men, for which he is condemned to death together with them.

10.68CSEL 33:278

Verax autem mediator, quem secreta tua misericordia demonstrasti hominibus et misisti, ut eius exemplo etiam ipsam discerent humilitatem, mediator ille dei et hominum, homo Christus Iesus, inter mortales peccatores et inmortalem iustum apparuit, mortalis cum hominibus, iustus cum deo, ut, quoniam stipendium iustitiae uita et pax est, per iustitiam coniunctam deo euacuaret mortem iustificatorum inpiorum, quam cum illis uoluit habere conmunem. hic demonstratus est antiquis sanctis, ut ita ipsi per fidem futurae passionis eius, sicut nos per fidem praeteritae, salui fierent. in quantum enim homo, in tantum mediator, in quantum autem uerbum, non medius, quia aequalis deo et deus apud deum et simul unus deus.

But the true Mediator, whom in your secret mercy you have shown to men and sent, so that by his example they might learn humility itself, that "mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus," appeared between mortal sinners and the immortal Just One, mortal with men, just with God; so that, since the wages of justice is life and peace, by the justice joined to God he might make void the death of the ungodly who are justified, the death which he willed to have in common with them. He was shown to the saints of old, so that they might be saved through faith in his future passion, as we are through faith in his passion that is past. For insofar as he is man, he is Mediator; but insofar as he is the Word, he is not in the middle, because he is equal to God, God with God, and together one God.

10.69CSEL 33:278–279

In quantum nos amasti, pater bone, qui filio tuo unico non pepercisti, sed pro nobis inpiis tradidisti eum! quomodo nos amasti, pro quibus ille non rapinam arbitratus esse aequalis tibi factus est subditus usque ad mortem crucis, unus ille in mortuis liber, potestatem habens ponendi animam suam et potestatem habens iterum sumendi eam, pro nobis tibi uictor et uictima, et ideo uictor, quia uictima, pro nobis tibi sacerdos et sacrificium, et ideo sacerdos, quia sacrificium, faciens tibi nos de seruis filios de te nascendo, tibi seruiendo. merito mihi spes ualida in illo est, quod sanabis omnes languores meos per eum, qui sedet ad dexteram tuam et te interpellat pro nobis: alioquin desperarem. multi enim et magni sunt idem languores, multi sunt et magni; sed amplior est medicina tua. potuimus putare uerbum tuum remotum esse a coniunctione hominis et desperare de nobis, nisi caro fieret et habitaret in nobis.

How you have loved us, good Father, who "did not spare your only Son, but delivered him up" for us ungodly! How you have loved us, for whom he, "who thought it not robbery to be equal" with you, "became subject even to the death of the cross"; he alone "free among the dead," "having power to lay down his life and power to take it up again"; for us both victor and victim before you, and victor because victim; for us both priest and sacrifice before you, and priest because sacrifice; making us, from slaves, sons to you, by being born of you and serving you. Rightly is my hope strong in him, that you will heal all my diseases through him who "sits at your right hand and intercedes for us"; otherwise I would despair. For many and great are those diseases, many and great; but your medicine is greater. We might have thought that your Word was far from union with man, and despaired of ourselves, if he had not "become flesh and dwelt among us."

10.70CSEL 33:279–280

Conterritus peccatis meis et mole miseriae meae agitaueram corde meditatusque fueram fugam in solitudinem, sed prohibuisti me et confortasti me dicens: ideo Christus pro omnibus mortuus est, ut et qui uiuunt iam non sibi uiuant, sed ei qui pro omnibus mortuus est. ecce, domine, iacto in te curam meam, ut uiuam, et considerabo mirabilia de lege tua. tu scis inperitiam meam et infirmitatem meam: doce me et sana me. ille tuus unicus, in quo sunt omnes thesauri sapientiae et scientiae absconditi, redemit me sanguine suo. non calumnientur mihi superbi, quoniam cogito pretium meum et manduco et bibo et erogo et pauper cupio saturari ex eo inter illos, qui edunt et saturantur: et laudabunt dominum qui requirunt eum.

Terrified by my sins and the weight of my misery, I had turned over in my heart and pondered a flight into solitude; but you forbade me and strengthened me, saying: "Therefore Christ died for all, that those who live may no longer live for themselves, but for him who died for all." See, Lord, "I cast my care upon you," that I may live, and "I will consider the wonders of your law." You know my ignorance and my weakness: teach me and heal me. Your only Son, "in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge," has redeemed me with his blood. "Let not the proud slander me," because I think of my ransom, and I eat and drink it and distribute it, and, poor, I desire to be filled from it among those who "eat and are filled: and they shall praise the Lord who seek him."

Chapter 11

11.1CSEL 33:280–281

Numquid, domine, cum tua sit aeternitas, ignoras, quae tibi dico, aut ad tempus uides quod fit in tempore? cur ergo tibi tot rerum narrationes digero? non utique per me noueris ea, sed affectum meum excito in te et eorum, qui haec legunt, ut dicamus omnes: magnus dominus et laudabilis ualde. iam dixi et dicam: amore amoris tui facio istuc. nam et oramus, et tamen ueritas ait: nouit pater uester quid uobis opus sit, priusquam petatis ab eo. affectum ergo nostrum patefacimus in te confitendo tibi miserias nostras et misericordias tuas super nos, ut liberes nos omnino, quoniam coepisti, ut desinamus esse miseri in nobis et beatificemur in te, quoniam uocasti nos, ut simus pauperes spiritu et mites et lugentes et esurientes ac sitientes iustitiam et misericordes et mundicordes et pacifici. ecce narraui tibi multa, quae potui et quae uolui, quoniam tu prior uoluisti, ut confiterer tibi, domino deo meo, quoniam bonus es, quoniam in saeculum misericordia tua.

Lord, since eternity is yours, are you ignorant of what I say to you, or do you see in time what happens in time? Why, then, do I set before you such an account of so many things? Certainly not so that you may learn them through me, but I stir up my own love toward you, and that of those who read these things, so that we may all say, "Great is the Lord and greatly to be praised." I have said it already and I will say it again: I do this for love of your love. For we pray too, and yet the Truth says, "Your Father knows what you need before you ask him." So we lay open our love to you by confessing to you our miseries and your mercies upon us, so that you may free us completely, since you have begun, that we may cease to be miserable in ourselves and be made happy in you; since you have called us to be poor in spirit, and meek, and mourners, and hungering and thirsting for righteousness, and merciful, and pure in heart, and peacemakers. See, I have told you many things, as I could and as I wished, because you first willed that I should confess to you, the Lord my God, "for you are good, for your mercy endures for ever."

11.2CSEL 33:281

Quando autem sufficio lingua calami enuntiare omnia hortamenta tua et omnes terrores tuos et consolationes et gubernationes, quibus me perduxisti praedicare uerbum et sacramentum tuum dispensare populo tuo? et si sufficio haec enuntiare ex ordine, caro mihi ualent stillae temporum. et olim inardesco meditari in lege tua et in ea tibi confiteri scientiam et inperitiam meam, primordia inluminationis tuae et reliquias tenebrarum mearum, quousque deuoretur a fortitudine infirmitas. et nolo in aliud horae diffluant, quas inuenio liberas a necessitatibus reficiendi corporis et intentionis animi et seruitutis, quam debemus hominibus et quam non debemus et tamen reddimus.

But when am I able, with the tongue of my pen, to tell all your exhortations and all your terrors, consolations, and guidance, by which you led me to preach your word and dispense your sacrament to your people? And even if I were able to tell these things in order, the drops of time are costly to me. And for a long time now I have been burning to meditate on your law, and to confess to you in it my knowledge and my ignorance, the beginnings of your enlightenment and the remains of my darkness, until weakness is swallowed up by strength. And I do not want the hours to flow away into anything else which I find free from the needs of refreshing the body and of mental effort and of the service we owe to men, and that which we do not owe and yet render.

11.3CSEL 33:281–282

Domine deus meus, intende orationi meae, et misericordia tua exaudiat desiderium meum, quoniam non mihi soli aestuat sed usui uult esse fraternae caritati: et uides in corde meo quia sic est. sacrificem tibi famulatum cogitationis et linguae meae, et da quod offeram tibi. inops enim et pauper sum, tu diues in omnes inuocantes te, qui securus curam nostri geris. circumcide ab omni temeritate omnique mendacio interiora et exteriora mea, labia mea. sint castae deliciae meae scripturae tuae, nec fallar in eis nec fallam ex eis. domine, adtende et miserere, domine deus meus, lux caecorum et uirtus infirmorum statimque lux uidentium et uirtus fortium, adtende animam meam et audi clamantem de profundo. nam nisi assint et in profundo aures tuae, quo ibimus? quo clamabimus? tuus est dies et tua est nox: ad nutum tuum momenta transuolant. largire inde spatium meditationibus nostris in abdita legis tuae neque aduersus pulsantes claudas eam. neque enim frustra scribi uoluisti tot paginarum opaca secreta, aut non habent illae siluae ceruos suos recipientes se in eas et resumentes, ambulantes et pascentes, recumbentes et ruminantes. o domine, perfice me et reuela mihi eas. ecce uox tua gaudium meum, uox tua super affluentiam uoluptatum. da quod amo: amo enim. et hoc tu dedisti. ne dona tua deseras nec herbam tuam spernas sitientem. confitear tibi quidquid inuenero in libris tuis et audiam uocem laudis et te bibam et considerem mirabilia de lege tua ab usque principio, in quo fecisti caelum et terram, usque ad regnum tecum perpetuum sanctae ciuitatis tuae.

Lord my God, "attend to my prayer," and let your mercy hear my desire, since it burns not for myself alone but wants to be of use to brotherly love; and you see in my heart that it is so. Let me sacrifice to you the service of my thought and my tongue, and give me what I may offer you. For "I am needy and poor," "you are rich toward all who call upon you," and, free from care, you take care of us. Circumcise from all rashness and all lying my inner and outer self, my lips. Let your Scriptures be my chaste delights; let me not be deceived in them nor deceive others from them. Lord, attend and have mercy, Lord my God, light of the blind and strength of the weak, and also light of those who see and strength of the strong; attend to my soul and hear it crying "out of the depths." For unless your ears are present in the depths too, where shall we go? To whom shall we cry? "Yours is the day and yours the night"; at your nod the moments fly by. Grant from them room for our meditations on the hidden things of your law, and do not close it against those who knock. For not in vain have you willed that the dark secrets of so many pages be written; nor do those forests lack their deer, which take refuge in them and recover there, walk and feed, lie down and chew the cud. O Lord, perfect me and reveal them to me. See, your voice is my joy; your voice is above an abundance of pleasures. Give what I love: for I do love; and this too you have given. Do not forsake your gifts, nor despise your grass that thirsts. Let me confess to you whatever I find in your books, and "hear the voice of praise," and drink you, and "consider the wonders of your law" from the very beginning, in which you made heaven and earth, to the everlasting kingdom of your holy city with you.

11.4CSEL 33:282–283

Domine, miserere mei et exaudi desiderium meum. puto enim, quod non sit de terra, non de auro et argento et lapidibus aut decoris uestibus aut honoribus et potestatibus aut uoluptatibus carnis neque de necessariis corpori et huic uitae peregrinationis nostrae, quae omnia nobis adponuntur quaerentibus regnum et iustitiam tuam. uide, deus meus, unde sit desiderium meum. narrauerunt mihi iniusti delectationes, sed non sicut lex tua, domine. ecce unde est desiderium meum. uide, pater, aspice et uide et adproba, et placeat in conspectu misericordiae tuae inuenire me gratiam ante te, ut aperiantur pulsanti mihi interiora sermonum tuorum. obsecro per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum filium tuum, uirum dexterae tuae, filium hominis, quem confirmasti tibi mediatorem tuum et nostrum, per quem nos quaesisti non quaerentes te, quaesisti autem, ut quaereremus te, uerbum tuum, per quod fecisti omnia, in quibus et me, unicum tuum, per quem uocasti in adoptionem populum credentium, in quo et me: per eum te obsecro, qui sedet ad dexteram tuam et te interpellat pro nobis, in quo sunt omnes thesauri sapientiae et scientiae absconditi. ipsos quaero in libris tuis. Moyses de illo scripsit: hoc ipse ait, hoc ueritas ait.

Lord, have mercy on me and hear my desire. For I think it is not of the earth, not for gold and silver and precious stones, or fine clothes, or honors and powers, or pleasures of the flesh, nor for things necessary for the body and for this life of our pilgrimage; all of which "are added to us who seek your kingdom and your righteousness." See, my God, where my desire comes from. "The wicked have told me of delights, but not as your law, Lord." See, that is where my desire comes from. See, Father, look and see and approve, and let it be pleasing in the sight of your mercy that I find grace before you, so that the inner meaning of your words may be opened to me when I knock. I beseech you by our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, "the man of your right hand, the son of man, whom you have made strong for yourself" as your mediator and ours, through whom you sought us when we were not seeking you, and sought us so that we might seek you; your Word, through whom you made all things, among them me too; your only Son, through whom you called to adoption the people of believers, among them me too: I beseech you through him who "sits at your right hand and intercedes for us," "in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge." These are what I seek in your books. "Moses wrote of him": he himself says this; the Truth says this.

11.5CSEL 33:283–284

Audiam et intellegam, quomodo in principio fecisti caelum et terram. scripsit hoc Moyses, scripsit et abiit, transiit hinc a te ad te neque nunc ante me est. nam si esset, tenerem eum et rogarem eum et per te obsecrarem, ut mihi ista panderet, et praeberem aures corporis mei sonis erumpentibus ex ore eius, et si hebraea uoce loqueretur, frustra pulsaret sensum meum nec inde mentem meam quicquam tangeret; si autem latine, scirem quid diceret. sed unde scirem, an uerum diceret? quod si et hoc scirem, num ab illo scirem? intus utique mihi, intus in domicilio cogitationis nec hebraea nec graeca nec latina nec barbara ueritas sine oris et linguae organis, sine strepitu syllabarum diceret: "uerum dicit" et ego statim certus confidenter illi homini tuo dicerem: "uerum dicis." quum ergo illum interrogare non possim, te, quo plenus uera dixit, ueritas, rogo, te, deus meus, rogo, parce peccatis meis, et qui illi seruo tuo dedisti haec dicere, da et mihi haec intellegere.

Let me hear and understand how "in the beginning you made heaven and earth." Moses wrote this; he wrote it and went away; he passed from here, from you to you, and he is not now before me. For if he were, I would take hold of him and ask him and beg him by you to explain these things to me, and I would lend the ears of my body to the sounds bursting from his mouth; and if he spoke in Hebrew, it would strike my senses in vain and nothing of it would touch my mind; but if in Latin, I would know what he said. But how would I know whether he spoke the truth? And if I knew this too, would I know it from him? Surely within me, within in the dwelling of thought, truth, neither Hebrew nor Greek nor Latin nor barbarian, without organs of mouth and tongue, without the noise of syllables, would say, "He speaks the truth," and I, at once certain, would say confidently to that man of yours, "You speak the truth." Since, then, I cannot question him, I ask you, O Truth, by whom he was filled when he spoke true things; I ask you, my God: spare my sins, and you who gave that servant of yours to say these things, grant me also to understand them.

11.6CSEL 33:284

Ecce sunt caelum et terra, clamant, quod facta sint; mutantur enim atque uariantur. quidquid autem factum non est et tamen est, non est in eo quicquam, quod ante non erat: quod est mutari atque uariari. clamant etiam, quod se ipsa non fecerint: "ideo sumus, quia facta sumus; non ergo eramus, antequam essemus, ut fieri possemus a nobis. " et uox dicentium est ipsa euidentia. tu ergo, domine, fecisti ea, qui pulcher es: pulchra sunt enim; qui bonus es: bona sunt enim; qui es: sunt enim. nec ita pulchra sunt nec ita bona sunt nec ita sunt, sicut tu conditor eorum, quo conparato nec pulchra sunt nec bona sunt nec sunt. scimus haec, gratias tibi, et scientia nostra scientiae tuae conparata ignorantia est.

See, heaven and earth exist; they cry out that they were made; for they change and vary. But whatever was not made and yet exists has nothing in it that was not there before; and that is what it is to change and vary. They cry out too that they did not make themselves: "We exist because we were made; so we did not exist before we existed, so as to be able to be made by ourselves." And the voice of those who speak is their very evidence. You, then, Lord, made them, you who are beautiful, for they are beautiful; you who are good, for they are good; you who are, for they are. Yet they are not so beautiful, nor so good, nor do they so exist, as you their maker, compared with whom they are neither beautiful nor good nor exist. We know this, thanks be to you; and our knowledge compared with your knowledge is ignorance.

11.7CSEL 33:284–285

Quomodo autem fecisti caelum et terram et quae machina tam grandis operationis tuae? non enim sicut homo artifex formans corpus de corpore arbitratu animae ualentis imponere utcumque speciem, quam cernit in semet ipsa interno oculo — et unde hoc ualeret, nisi quia tu fecisti eam? — et imponit speciem iam exsistenti et habenti, ut esset, ueluti terrae aut lapidi aut ligno aut auro aut id genus rerum cuilibet. et unde ista essent, nisi tu instituisses ea? tu fabro corpus, tu animam membris imperitantem fecisti, tu materiam, unde facit aliquid, tu ingenium, quo artem capiat et uideat intus quid faciat foris, tu sensum corporis, quo interprete traiciat ab animo ad materiam id quod facit, et renuntiet animo quid factum sit, ut ille intus consulat praesidentem sibi ueritatem, an bene factum sit. te laudant haec omnia creatorem omnium. sed tu quomodo facis ea? quomodo fecisti, deus, caelum et terram? non utique in caelo neque in terra fecisti caelum et terram neque in aere aut in aquis, quoniam et haec pertinent ad caelum et terram, neque in uniuerso mundo fecisti uniuersum mundum, quia non erat, ubi fieret, antequam fieret ut esset. nec manu tenebas aliquid, unde faceres caelum et terram: nam unde tibi hoc, quod tu non feceras, unde aliquid faceres? quid enim est, nisi quia tu es? ergo dixisti et facta sunt atque in uerbo tuo fecisti ea.

But how did you make heaven and earth, and what was the instrument of so great a work of yours? For you did not do it as a human craftsman, who forms a body from a body at the will of a soul able to impose in some way a form which it sees within itself with the inner eye (and how would it be able to do this unless you had made it?), and he imposes the form on something that already exists and has being, such as earth or stone or wood or gold or anything of that kind. And how would these exist unless you had established them? You made the craftsman's body, you made the soul that commands his limbs, you made the material from which he makes something, you made the talent by which he grasps his art and sees within what he makes outside, you made the bodily sense, by which as an interpreter he conveys from his mind to his material what he makes, and reports back to his mind what has been made, so that the mind may consult within the truth that presides over it whether it has been made well. All these praise you, the Creator of all. But how do you make them? How, God, did you make heaven and earth? Certainly you did not make heaven and earth in heaven or on earth, nor in the air or in the waters, since these too belong to heaven and earth; nor did you make the whole world in the whole world, because there was nowhere for it to be made before it was made to exist. Nor did you hold anything in your hand from which to make heaven and earth. For where would you get something you had not made, from which to make something? For what exists, except because you exist? So "you spoke and they were made," and in your Word you made them.

11.8CSEL 33:285–286

Sed quomodo dixisti? numquid illo modo, quo facta est uox de nube dicens: hic est filius meus dilectus? illa enim uox acta atque transacta est, coepta et finita. sonuerunt syllabae atque transierant, secunda post primam, tertia post secundam atque inde ex ordine, donec ultima post ceteras silentiumque post ultimam. unde claret atque eminet, quod creaturae motus expressit eam seruiens aeternae uoluntati tuae ipse temporalis. et haec ad tempus facta uerba tua nuntiauit auris exterior menti prudenti, cuius auris interior posita est ad aeternum uerbum tuum. at illa conparauit haec uerba temporaliter sonantia cum aeterno in silentio uerbo tuo et dixit: aliud est longe, longe aliud est. haec longe infra me sunt nec sunt, quia fugiunt et praetereunt: uerbum autem dei mei supra me manet in aeternum. si ergo uerbis sonantibus et praetereuntibus dixisti, ut fieret caelum et terra, atque ita fecisti caelum et terram, erat iam creatura corporalis ante caelum et terram, cuius motibus temporalibus temporaliter uox illa percurreret. nullum autem corpus ante caelum et terram, aut si erat, id certe sine transitoria uoce feceras, unde transitoriam uocem faceres, qua diceres ut fieret caelum et terra. quidquid enim illud esset, unde talis uox fieret, nisi abs te factum esset, omnino non esset. ut ergo fieret corpus, unde ista uerba fierent, quo uerbo a te dictum est?

But how did you speak? Was it in the way that the voice came from the cloud saying, "This is my beloved Son"? For that voice was uttered and passed away; it began and ended. The syllables sounded and passed away, the second after the first, the third after the second, and so on in order, until the last after the others, and silence after the last. From this it is clear and evident that the movement of a creature expressed it, itself temporal, serving your eternal will. And these words of yours, made for a time, the outer ear reported to the understanding mind, whose inner ear is set toward your eternal Word. But the mind compared these words sounding in time with your Word, eternal in its silence, and said: "It is different, far different. These are far below me, and they do not even exist, because they flee and pass away; but the Word of my God abides above me for ever." If, then, you spoke with words that sounded and passed away, saying that heaven and earth should be made, and so made heaven and earth, there was already a bodily creature before heaven and earth, by whose temporal movements that voice ran its course in time. But there was no body before heaven and earth; or if there was, you had certainly made it without a passing voice, so as to make from it a passing voice by which to say that heaven and earth should be made. For whatever that was from which such a voice was made, unless it had been made by you, it would not exist at all. So, that a body might be made from which these words could be made, by what word was it spoken by you?

11.9CSEL 33:286–287

Vocas itaque nos ad intellegendum uerbum, deum apud te deum, quod sempiterne dicitur et eo sempiterne dicuntur omnia. neque enim finitur, quod dicebatur, et dicitur aliud, ut possint dici omnia, sed simul ac sempiterne omnia: alioquin iam tempus et mutatio et non uera aeternitas nec uera inmortalitas. hoc noui, deus meus, et gratias ago. noui, confiteor tibi, domine deus, mecumque nouit et benedicit te quisquis ingratus non est certae ueritati. nouimus enim, domine, nouimus, quoniam in quantum quidque non est quod erat et est quod non erat, in tantum moritur et oritur. non ergo quicquam uerbi tui cedit atque succedit, quoniam uere inmortale atque aeternum est. et ideo uerbo tibi coaeterno simul et sempiterne dicis omnia, quae dicis, et fit, quidquid dicis ut fiat; nec aliter quam dicendo facis: nec tamen simul et sempiterna fiunt omnia, quae dicendo facis.

So you call us to understand the Word, God with you, God, which is spoken eternally, and by which all things are spoken eternally. For what was being spoken does not come to an end, and another thing is then spoken, so that all things may be spoken; but all things are spoken at once and eternally; otherwise there would already be time and change, and not true eternity or true immortality. This I know, my God, and I give thanks. I know it, I confess to you, Lord God, and whoever is not ungrateful to sure truth knows it with me and blesses you. For we know, Lord, we know that insofar as anything is not what it was and is what it was not, to that extent it dies and arises. So nothing of your Word gives way or follows on, since it is truly immortal and eternal. And so by the Word coeternal with you, you say at once and eternally all that you say, and whatever you say should be made is made; and you make it in no other way than by saying it. And yet not all the things you make by saying are made at once and eternally.

11.10CSEL 33:287–288

Cur, quaeso, domine deus meus? utcumque uideo, sed quomodo id eloquar nescio, nisi quia omne, quod esse incipit et esse desinit, tunc esse incipit et tunc desinit, quando debuisse incipere uel desinere in aeterna ratione cognoscitur, ubi nec incipit aliquid nec desinit. ipsum est uerbum tuum, quod et principium est, quia et loquitur nobis. sic in euangelio per carnem ait, et hoc insonuit foris auribus hominum, ut crederetur et intus quaereretur et inueniretur in aeterna ueritate, ubi omnes discipulos bonus et solus magister docet. ibi audio uocem tuam, domine, dicentis mihi, quoniam ille loquitur nobis, qui docet nos, qui autem non docet nos, etiam si loquitur, non nobis loquitur. quis porro nos docet nisi stabilis ueritas? quia et per creaturam mutabilem cum admonemur, ad ueritatem stabilem ducimur, ubi uere discimus, cum stamus et audimus eum et gaudio gaudemus propter uocem sponsi, reddentes nos, unde sumus. et ideo principium, quia nisi maneret, cum erraremus, non esset quo rediremus. cum autem redimus ab errore, cognoscendo utique redimus; ut autem cognoscamus, docet nos, quia principium est et loquitur nobis.

Why so, I ask, Lord my God? In some way I see it, but how to express it I do not know, except that everything that begins to be and ceases to be begins and ceases when it is known in the eternal Reason that it ought to have begun or ceased, where nothing either begins or ceases. That is your Word, which is also "the Beginning, because it also speaks to us." So in the gospel he speaks through the flesh, and this sounded outwardly in men's ears, so that he might be believed and sought within and found in the eternal Truth, where the good and only Teacher teaches all his disciples. There I hear your voice, Lord, saying to me that he speaks to us who teaches us; but he who does not teach us, even if he speaks, does not speak to us. Who, then, teaches us but the unchanging Truth? For even when we are admonished through a changeable creature, we are led to the unchanging Truth, where we truly learn when we stand and hear him, and "rejoice greatly because of the bridegroom's voice," giving ourselves back to him from whom we are. And therefore he is the Beginning, because if he did not remain when we went astray, there would be nowhere for us to return. But when we return from error, we certainly return by knowing; and so that we may know, he teaches us, because he is the Beginning and speaks to us.

11.11CSEL 33:288–289

In hoc principio fecisti, deus, caelum et terram in uerbo tuo, in filio tuo, in uirtute tua, in sapientia tua, in ueritate tua miro modo dicens et miro modo faciens. quis conprehendet? quis enarrabit? quid est illud, quod interlucet mihi et percutit cor meum sine laesione? et inhorresco et inardesco: inhorresco, in quantum dissimilis ei sum, inardesco, in quantum similis ei sum. sapientia, sapientia ipsa est, quae interlucet mihi, discindens nubilum meum, quod me rursus cooperit deficientem ab ea caligine atque aggere poenarum mearum, quoniam sic infirmatus est in egestate uigor meus, ut non sufferam bonum meum, donec tu, domine, qui propitius factus es omnibus iniquitatibus meis, etiam sanes omnes languores meos, quia et redimes de corruptione uitam meam et coronabis me in miseratione et misericordia et satiabis in bonis desiderium meum, quoniam renouabitur iuuentus mea sicut aquilae. spe enim salui facti sumus et promissa tua per patientiam expectamus. audiat te intus sermocinantem qui potest; ego fidenter ex oraculo tuo clamabo: quam magnificata sunt opera tua, domine, omnia in sapientia fecisti! et illa principium, et in eo principio fecisti caelum et terram.

In this Beginning, God, you made heaven and earth, in your Word, in your Son, in your Power, in your Wisdom, in your Truth, speaking in a wonderful way and making in a wonderful way. Who will grasp it? Who will tell it? What is that which shines through to me and strikes my heart without wounding it? I shudder and I burn: I shudder insofar as I am unlike it, I burn insofar as I am like it. It is Wisdom, Wisdom itself, that shines through to me, parting my cloud, which covers me again as I fall away from it under the fog and heap of my punishments; for my strength is so weakened in need that I cannot bear my own good, until you, Lord, who have been gracious to all my iniquities, also "heal all my diseases"; for you will also "redeem my life from corruption, and crown me with pity and mercy, and satisfy my desire with good things," since "my youth will be renewed like the eagle's." "For in hope we have been saved," and "we wait with patience" for your promises. Let him who can hear you speaking within; I will cry out confidently from your oracle: "How magnified are your works, Lord! In wisdom you have made them all." And Wisdom is the Beginning, and in that Beginning you made heaven and earth.

11.12CSEL 33:289

Nonne ecce pleni sunt uetustatis suae qui nobis dicunt: quid faciebat deus, antequam faceret caelum et terram? si enim uacabat, inquiunt, et non operabatur aliquid, cur non sic semper et deinceps, quemadmodum retro semper cessauit ab opere? si enim ullus motus in deo nouus extitit et uoluntas noua, ut creaturam conderet, quam numquam ante condiderat, quomodo iam uera aeternitas, ubi oritur uoluntas, quae non erat? neque enim uoluntas dei creatura est, sed ante creaturam, quia non crearetur aliquid, nisi creatoris uoluntas praecederet. ad ipsam ergo dei substantiam pertinet uoluntas eius. quod si exortum est aliquid in dei substantia, quod prius non erat, non ueraciter dicitur aeterna illa substantia; si autem dei uoluntas sempiterna erat, ut esset creatura, cur non sempiterna et creatura?

See, are they not full of their old nature who say to us: "What was God doing before he made heaven and earth? For if he was at leisure," they say, "and doing nothing, why did he not always remain so, and from then on, just as for ever before he had rested from work? For if any new motion arose in God, and a new will, to establish a creation which he had never established before, how is there then true eternity, where a will arises that was not there before? For the will of God is not a creature, but is before the creature, because nothing would be created unless the will of the Creator came first. So his will belongs to the very substance of God. And if something arose in God's substance which was not there before, that substance is not truly called eternal; but if God's will that there should be a creation was eternal, why is the creation not eternal too?"

11.13CSEL 33:289–290

Qui haec dicunt, nondum te intellegunt, o sapientia dei, lux mentium, nondum intellegunt, quomodo fiant, quae per te atque in te fiunt, et conantur aeterna sapere, sed adhuc in praeteritis et futuris rerum motibus cor eorum uolitat et adhuc uanum est. quis tenebit illud et figet illud, ut paululum stet et paululum rapiat splendorem semper stantis aeternitatis et conparet cum temporibus numquam stantibus et uideat esse inconparabilem et uideat longum tempus nisi ex multis praetereuntibus motibus, qui simul extendi non possunt, longum non fieri; non autem praeterire quicquam in aeterno, sed totum esse praesens; nullum uero tempus totum esse praesens: et uideat omne praeteritum propelli ex futuro et omne futurum ex praeterito consequi et omne praeteritum ac futurum ab eo, quod semper est praesens, creari et excurrere? quis tenebit cor hominis, ut stet et uideat, quomodo stans dictet futura et praeterita tempora nec futura nec praeterita aeternitas? numquid manus mea ualet hoc aut manus oris mei per loquellas agit tam grandem rem?

Those who say this do not yet understand you, O Wisdom of God, light of minds; they do not yet understand how the things are made that are made through you and in you; and they try to taste eternal things, but their heart still flutters about in the past and future motions of things, and is still vain. Who will hold it and fix it, so that it may stand still a little and a little catch the splendor of ever-standing eternity, and compare it with times that never stand still, and see that it is incomparable; and see that a long time does not become long except from many passing motions, which cannot be extended all at once; but that in the eternal nothing passes, but the whole is present; whereas no time is wholly present; and see that all past time is driven on by the future, and all future follows from the past, and all past and future is created by, and runs out from, that which is always present? Who will hold the heart of man, so that it may stand still and see how eternity, standing still, neither future nor past, dictates future and past times? Is my hand able to do this, or does the hand of my mouth accomplish so great a thing by speaking?

11.14CSEL 33:290

Ecce respondeo dicenti: "quid faciebat deus, antequam faceret caelum et terram?" respondeo non illud, quod quidam respondisse perhibetur ioculariter eludens quaestionis uiolentiam: "alta", inquit, "scrutantibus gehennas parabat". aliud est uidere, aliud ridere. haec non respondeo. libentius enim responderim: „nescio, quod nescio" quam illud, unde irridetur qui alta interrogauit et laudatur qui falsa respondit. sed dico deus noster, omnis creaturae creatorem et, si caeli et terrae nomine omnis creatura intellegitur, audenter dico: antequam faceret deus caelum et terram, non faciebat aliquid. si enim faciebat, quid nisi creaturam faciebat? et utinam sic sciam, quidquid utiliter scire cupio, quemadmodum scio, quod nulla fiebat creatura, antequam fieret ulla creatura.

See, I answer the one who asks, "What was God doing before he made heaven and earth?" I do not give the answer which someone is said to have given, jokingly evading the force of the question: "He was preparing hell," he said, "for those who pry into deep matters." It is one thing to see, another to scoff. I do not give that answer. For I would more willingly answer, "I do not know what I do not know," than give an answer by which the one who asked deep things is mocked and the one who answered falsely is praised. But I say that you, our God, are the Creator of every creature, and if every creature is understood by the name of heaven and earth, I boldly say: before God made heaven and earth, he made nothing. For if he was making anything, what was he making but a creature? And I wish I knew whatever I desire to know for my good as surely as I know that no creature was being made before any creature was made.

11.15CSEL 33:290–291

At si cuiusquam uolatilis sensus uagatur per imagines retro temporum et te, deum omnipotentem et omnicreantem et omnitenentem, caeli et terrae artificem, ab opere tanto, antequam id faceres, per innumerabilia saecula cessasse miratur, euigilet atque adtendat, quia falsa miratur. nam unde poterant innumerabilia saecula praeterire, quae ipse non feceras, cum sis omnium saeculorum auctor et conditor? aut quae tempora fuissent, quae abs te condita non essent? aut quomodo praeterirent, si numquam fuissent? cum ergo sis operator omnium temporum, si fuit aliquod tempus, antequam faceres caelum et terram, cur dicitur, quod ab opere cessabas? id ipsum enim tempus tu feceras, nec praeterire potuerunt tempora, antequam faceres tempora. si autem ante caelum et terram nullum erat tempus, cur quaeritur, quid tunc faciebas? non enim erat tunc, ubi non erat tempus.

But if someone's fickle mind wanders among images of past times, and marvels that you, God almighty, all-creating and all-sustaining, maker of heaven and earth, refrained from so great a work for countless ages before you made it, let him wake up and take note that he marvels at something false. For how could countless ages pass which you yourself had not made, since you are the author and founder of all ages? Or what times could there have been which were not founded by you? Or how could they pass if they had never been? Since, then, you are the maker of all times, if there was any time before you made heaven and earth, why is it said that you refrained from work? For you had made that very time, and times could not pass before you made times. But if there was no time before heaven and earth, why is it asked what you were doing then? For there was no "then" where there was no time.

11.16CSEL 33:291–292

Nec tu tempore tempora praecedis: alioquin non omnia tempora praecederes. sed praecedis omnia praeterita celsitudine semper praesentis aeternitatis et superas omnia futura, quia illa futura sunt, et cum uenerint, praeterita erunt; tu autem idem ipse es, et anni tui non deficient. anni tui nec eunt nec ueniunt: isti autem nostri eunt et ueniunt, ut omnes ueniant. anni tui omnes simul stant, quoniam stant, nec euntes a uenientibus excluduntur, quia non transeunt: isti autem nostri omnes erunt, cum omnes non erunt. anni tui dies unus, et dies tuus non cotidie, sed hodie, quia hodiernus tuus non cedit crastino; neque enim succedit hesterno. hodiernus tuus aeternitas: ideo coaeternum genuisti, cui dixisti: ego hodie genui te. omnia tempora tu fecisti et ante omnia tempora tu es, nec aliquo tempore non erat tempus.

Nor do you precede times in time; otherwise you would not precede all times. But you precede all past times in the height of an ever-present eternity, and you surpass all future times, because they are future, and when they have come they will be past; "but you are the same, and your years do not fail." Your years neither go nor come; but these years of ours go and come, so that all may come. Your years all stand at once, because they stand still, and those that go are not excluded by those that come, because they do not pass; but these years of ours will all be only when they all are no more. "Your years are one day," and your day is not daily but today, because your today does not give way to tomorrow, nor does it follow yesterday. Your today is eternity; therefore you begot the Coeternal, to whom you said, "Today I have begotten you." You made all times, and you are before all times, and there was no time when there was no time.

11.17CSEL 33:292

Nullo ergo tempore non feceras aliquid, quia ipsum tempus tu feceras. et nulla tempora tibi coaeterna sunt, quia tu permanes; at illa si permanerent, non essent tempora. quid est enim tempus? quis hoc facile breuiterque explicauerit? quis hoc ad uerbum de illo proferendum uel cogitatione conprehenderit? quid autem familiarius et notius in loquendo conmemoramus quam tempus? et intellegimus utique, cum id loquimur, intellegimus etiam, cum alio loquente id audimus. quid est ergo tempus? si nemo ex me quaerat, scio; si quaerenti explicare uelim, nescio: fidenter tamen dico scire me, quod, si nihil praeteriret, non esset praeteritum tempus, et si nihil adueniret, non esset futurum tempus, et si nihil esset, non esset praesens tempus. duo ergo illa tempora, praeteritum et futurum, quomodo sunt, quando et praeteritum iam non est et futurum nondum est? praesens autem si semper esset praesens nec in praeteritum transiret, non iam esset tempus, sed aeternitas. si ergo praesens, ut tempus sit, ideo fit, quia in praeteritum transit, quomodo et hoc esse dicimus, cui causa, ut sit, illa est, quia non erit, ut scilicet non uere dicamus tempus esse, nisi quia tendit non esse.

So at no time had you not made something, because you had made time itself. And no times are coeternal with you, because you remain; but if they remained, they would not be times. For what is time? Who can easily and briefly explain it? Who can grasp it even in thought, so as to put it into words? Yet what do we mention more familiarly and knowingly in our speech than time? And we certainly understand when we speak of it; we understand also when we hear another speak of it. What, then, is time? If no one asks me, I know; if I want to explain it to someone who asks, I do not know. Yet I say with confidence that I know that if nothing passed away, there would be no past time; and if nothing were coming, there would be no future time; and if nothing were, there would be no present time. How, then, do those two times, the past and the future, exist, when the past is no longer and the future is not yet? But if the present were always present and did not pass into the past, it would no longer be time but eternity. If, then, the present, in order to be time, comes to be only because it passes into the past, how can we say that it exists, when the cause of its being is that it will not be? So we cannot truly say that time exists, except in the sense that it tends toward not being.

11.18CSEL 33:292–293

Et tamen dicimus longum tempus et breue tempus neque hoc nisi de praeterito aut futuro dicimus. praeteritum tempus longum uerbi gratia uocamus ante centum annos, futurum itidem longum post centum annos, breue autem praeteritum sic, ut puta dicamus ante decem dies, et breue futurum post decem dies. sed quo pacto longum est aut breue, quod non est? praeteritum enim iam non est et futurum nondum est. non itaque dicamus: longum est, sed dicamus de praeterito: longum fuit, et de futuro: longum erit. domine meus, lux mea, nonne et hic ueritas tua deridebit hominem? quod enim longum fuit praeteritum tempus, cum iam esset praeteritum, longum fuit, an ante, cum adhuc praesens esset? tunc enim poterat esse longum, quando erat, quod esset longum: praeteritum uero iam non erat; unde nec longum esse poterat, quod omnino non erat. non ergo dicamus: longum fuit praeteritum tempus; neque enim inueniemus, quid fuerit longum, quando ex quo praeteritum est non est, sed dicamus: "longum fuit illud praesens tempus", quia cum praesens esset, longum erat. nondum enim praeterierat, ut non esset, et ideo erat, quod longum esse posset; postea uero quam praeteriit, simul et longum esse destitit, quod esse destitit.

And yet we speak of a long time and a short time, and we say this only of the past or the future. We call a past time long, for example, a hundred years ago, and a future time likewise long, a hundred years hence; and a short past time, say ten days ago, and a short future time, ten days hence. But how can something be long or short which does not exist? For the past is no longer and the future is not yet. So let us not say "it is long," but let us say of the past "it was long," and of the future "it will be long." My Lord, my light, will not your truth mock man here too? For was the past time that was long long when it was already past, or before, when it was still present? For it could be long then, when there was something to be long; but the past no longer existed, so it could not be long, since it did not exist at all. So let us not say, "The past time was long"; for we will not find what was long, since from the moment it became past it does not exist. Let us say, "That present time was long," because when it was present it was long. For it had not yet passed away so as not to exist, and so there was something that could be long; but after it passed away, it ceased to be long at the same moment that it ceased to be.

11.19CSEL 33:293–294

Videamus ergo, anima humana, utrum praesens tempus possit esse longum: datum enim tibi est sentire moras atque metiri. quid respondebis mihi? an centum anni praesentes longum tempus est? uide prius, utrum possint praesentes esse centum anni. si enim primus eorum annus agitur, ipse praesens est, nonaginta uero et nouem futuri sunt, et ideo nondum sunt: si autem secundus annus agitur, iam unus est praeteritus, alter praesens, ceteri futuri. atque ita mediorum quemlibet centenarii huius numeri annum praesentem posuerimus: ante illum praeteriti erunt, post illum futuri. quocirca centum anni praesentes esse non poterunt. uide saltem, utrum qui agitur unus ipse sit praesens. et eius enim si primus agitur mensis, futuri sunt ceteri, si secundus, iam et primus praeteriit et reliqui nondum sunt. ergo nec annus, qui agitur, totus est praesens, et si non totus est praesens, non annus est praesens. duodecim enim menses annus est, quorum quilibet unus mensis, qui agitur, ipse praesens est, ceteri aut praeteriti aut futuri. quamquam neque mensis, qui agitur, praesens est, sed unus dies: si primus, futuris ceteris, si nouissimus, praeteritis ceteris, si mediorum quilibet, inter praeteritos et futuros.

Let us see, then, human soul, whether present time can be long; for it has been given to you to perceive intervals and to measure them. What will you answer me? Are a hundred present years a long time? First see whether a hundred years can be present. For if the first of them is going on, it is present, but ninety-nine are future and so do not yet exist; if the second year is going on, one is already past, another present, the rest future. And so whichever year of this hundred we take as present, those before it will be past and those after it future. So a hundred years cannot be present. See at least whether the one year that is going on is itself present. For if its first month is going on, the rest are future; if the second, the first has already passed and the rest do not yet exist. So not even the year that is going on is wholly present; and if it is not wholly present, it is not a year that is present. For a year is twelve months, of which whichever month is going on is present, the rest past or future. And yet not even the month that is going on is present, but one day: if the first, the rest are future; if the last, the rest are past; if any in between, it is between past and future.

11.20CSEL 33:294–295

Ecce praesens tempus, quod solum inueniebamus longum appellandum, uix ad unius diei spatium contractum est. sed discutiamus etiam ipsum, quia nec unus dies totus est praesens. nocturnis enim et diurnis horis omnibus uiginti quattuor expletur, quarum prima ceteras futuras habet, nouissima praeteritas, aliqua uero interiectarum ante se praeteritas, post se futuras. et ipsa una hora fugitiuis particulis agitur: quidquid eius auolauit, praeteritum est, quidquid ei restat, futurum. si quid intellegitur temporis, quod in nullas iam uel minutissimas momentorum partes diuidi possit, id solum est, quod praesens dicatur; quod tamen ita raptim a futuro in praeteritum transuolat, ut nulla morula extendatur. nam si extenditur, diuiditur in praeteritum et futurum: praesens autem nullum habet spatium. ubi est ergo tempus, quod longum dicamus? an futurum? non quidem dicimus: longum est, quia nondum est quod longum sit, sed dicimus: longum erit. quando igitur erit? si enim et tunc adhuc futurum erit, non erit longum, quia quid sit longum nondum erit: si autem tunc erit longum, cum ex futuro quod nondum est esse iam coeperit et praesens factum erit, ut possit esse quod longum sit, iam superioribus uocibus clamat praesens tempus longum se esse non posse.

See, the present time, which alone we found might be called long, has shrunk to the space of scarcely one day. But let us examine even that, because not even one day is wholly present. For it is made up of twenty-four hours of night and day, of which the first has the rest in the future, the last has them in the past, and any in between has those before it past and those after it future. And that one hour itself passes in fleeting particles: whatever of it has flown away is past, whatever remains is future. If any time can be conceived which cannot be divided into even the tiniest parts of moments, that alone can be called present; yet it flies so swiftly from the future into the past that it is not extended by the least delay. For if it is extended, it is divided into past and future; but the present has no extent. Where, then, is the time we may call long? Is it the future? We do not say, "It is long," because there is not yet anything to be long, but we say, "It will be long." When, then, will it be? For if even then it is still future, it will not be long, because what may be long does not yet exist; but if it will be long at the time when, from being future and not yet existing, it has begun to exist and has become present, so that there can be something long, the present time cries out in the words above that it cannot be long.

11.21CSEL 33:295

Et tamen, domine, sentimus interualla temporum et conparamus sibimet et dicimus alia longiora et alia breuiora. metimur etiam, quanto sit longius aut breuius illud tempus quam illud et respondemus duplum esse hoc uel triplum, illud autem simplum aut tantum hoc esse quantum illud. sed praetereuntia metimur tempora, cum sentiendo metimur; praeterita uero, quae iam non sunt, aut futura, quae nondum sunt, quis metiri potest, nisi forte audebit quis dicere metiri posse quod non est? cum ergo praeterit tempus, sentiri et metiri potest, cum autem praeterierit, quoniam non est, non potest.

And yet, Lord, we perceive intervals of time and compare them with each other, and we say that some are longer and others shorter. We even measure how much longer or shorter one time is than another, and we answer that this is double or triple that, and that one single, or that this is as long as that. But it is times passing by that we measure, when we measure them by perceiving them; but who can measure past times, which no longer exist, or future times, which do not yet exist, unless perhaps someone will dare to say that what does not exist can be measured? So while time is passing, it can be perceived and measured; but when it has passed, it cannot, because it does not exist.

11.22CSEL 33:295–296

Quaero, pater, non adfirmo: deus meus, praeside mihi et rege me. quisnam est, qui dicat mihi non esse tria tempora, sicut pueri didicimus puerosque docuimus, praeteritum, praesens et futurum, sed tantum praesens, quoniam illa duo non sunt? an et ipsa sunt, sed ex aliquo procedit occulto, cum ex futuro fit praesens, et in aliquod recedit occultum, cum ex praesenti fit praeteritum? nam ubi ea uiderunt qui futura cecinerunt, si nondum sunt? neque enim potest uideri id quod non est. et qui narrant praeterita, non utique uera narrarent, si animo illa non cernerent: quae si nulla essent, cerni omnino non possent. sunt ergo et futura et praeterita.

I am inquiring, Father, not asserting. My God, preside over me and rule me. Who is there to tell me that there are not three times, as we learned as boys and have taught boys, past, present, and future, but only the present, since those two do not exist? Or do they exist too, but come forth from some hidden place when from future it becomes present, and withdraw into some hidden place when from present it becomes past? For where did those who sang of the future see these things, if they do not yet exist? For what does not exist cannot be seen. And those who tell of the past would certainly not tell true things if they did not discern them in their minds; and if these things did not exist at all, they could not be discerned at all. So both future and past things exist.

11.23CSEL 33:296

Sine me, domine, amplius quaerere, spes mea; non conturbetur intentio mea. si enim sunt futura et praeterita, uolo scire, ubi sint. quod si nondum ualeo, scio tamen, ubicumque sunt, non ibi ea futura esse aut praeterita, sed praesentia. nam et si ibi futura sunt, nondum ibi sunt, si et ibi praeterita sunt, iam non ibi sunt. ubicumque ergo sunt, quaecumque sunt, non sunt nisi praesentia. quamquam praeterita cum uera narrantur, ex memoria proferuntur non res ipsae, quae praeterierunt, sed uerba concepta ex imaginibus earum, quae in animo uelut uestigia per sensus praetereundo fixerunt. pueritia quippe mea, quae iam non est, in tempore praeterito est, quod iam non est; imaginem uero eius, cum eam recolo et narro, in praesenti tempore intueor, quia est adhuc in memoria mea. utrum similis sit causa etiam praedicendorum futurorum, ut rerum, quae nondum sunt, iam exsistentes praesentiantur imagines, confiteor, deus meus, nescio. illud sane scio, nos plerumque praemeditari futuras actiones nostras eamque praemeditationem esse praesentem, actionem autem, quam praemeditamur, nondum esse, quia futura est; quam cum aggressi fuerimus et quod praemeditabamur agere coeperimus, tunc erit illa actio, quia tunc non futura, sed praesens erit.

Allow me, Lord, my hope, to inquire further; let my attention not be confused. For if future and past things exist, I want to know where they are. And if I am not yet able to know that, I do know that wherever they are, they are not there as future or past, but as present. For if they are future there too, they are not yet there; and if they are past there too, they are no longer there. So wherever they are, whatever they are, they are only present. Although when past things are truly told, what is brought out of memory is not the things themselves, which have passed away, but words conceived from their images, which they fixed in the mind like footprints as they passed through the senses. My boyhood, for instance, which no longer exists, is in past time, which no longer exists; but when I recall and tell of it, I see its image in present time, because it is still in my memory. Whether there is a similar cause for foretelling future things, so that already existing images of things that do not yet exist are perceived beforehand, I confess, my God, I do not know. This I do know: that we often plan our future actions beforehand, and that this planning is present, whereas the action we are planning does not yet exist, because it is future; when we have set about it and begun to do what we were planning, then that action will exist, because then it will not be future but present.

11.24CSEL 33:296–297

Quoquo modo se itaque habeat arcana praesensio futurorum, uideri nisi quod est non potest. quod autem iam est, non futurum sed praesens est. cum ergo uideri dicuntur futura, non ipsa, quae nondum sunt, id est quae futura sunt, sed eorum causae uel signa forsitan uidentur, quae iam sunt: ideo non futura, sed praesentia sunt iam uidentibus, ex quibus futura praedicantur animo concepta. quae rursus conceptiones iam sunt, et eas praesentes apud se intuentur qui illa praedicunt. loquatur mihi aliquod exemplum tanta rerum numerositas. intueor auroram: oriturum solem praenuntio. quod intueor, praesens est, quod praenuntio, futurum: non sol futurus, qui iam est, sed ortus eius, qui nondum est: tamen etiam ortum ipsum nisi animo imaginarer, sicut modo cum id loquor, non eum possem praedicere. sed nec illa aurora, quam in caelo uideo, solis ortus est, quamuis eum praecedat, nec illa imaginatio in animo meo: quae duo praesentia cernuntur, ut futurus ille ante dicatur. futura ergo nondum sunt, et si nondum sunt, non sunt, et si non sunt, uideri omnino non possunt; sed praedici possunt ex praesentibus, quae iam sunt et uidentur.

So, however it is with the mysterious foreknowledge of future things, nothing can be seen except what exists. And what already exists is not future but present. So when future things are said to be seen, it is not the things themselves which do not yet exist, that is, which are future, that are seen, but perhaps their causes or signs, which already exist; so they are not future but present to those who see them, and from them future things are foretold, conceived in the mind. These conceptions in turn already exist, and those who foretell those things see them present in themselves. Let some example out of the vast number of things speak to me. I look at the dawn; I announce that the sun is about to rise. What I look at is present; what I announce is future: not the sun, which already exists, but its rising, which does not yet exist. Yet unless I imagined the rising itself in my mind, as now when I speak of it, I could not foretell it. But neither that dawn which I see in the sky is the sunrise, although it precedes it, nor is that image in my mind: these two are seen as present, so that the future rising may be spoken of beforehand. So future things do not yet exist, and if they do not yet exist, they do not exist, and if they do not exist, they cannot be seen at all; but they can be foretold from present things, which already exist and are seen.

11.25CSEL 33:297

Tu itaque, regnator creaturae tuae, quis est modus, quo doces animas ea quae futura sunt? docuisti enim prophetas tuos. quisnam ille modus est, quo doces futura, cui futurorum quicquam non est? uel potius de futuris doces praesentia? nam quod non est, nec doceri utique potest. nimis longe est modus iste ab acie mea; inualuit ex me, nec potero ad illum; potero autem ex te, cum dederis tu, dulce lumen occultorum oculorum meorum.

You, then, ruler of your creation, what is the way in which you teach souls things that are future? For you taught your prophets. What is the way in which you teach the future, you to whom nothing is future? Or rather, do you teach present things about the future? For what does not exist certainly cannot be taught. That way is far beyond my sight; "it has grown too strong for me, and I shall not be able to reach it"; but I shall be able by you, when you grant it, sweet light of my hidden eyes.

11.26CSEL 33:297–298

Quod autem nunc liquet et claret, nec futura sunt nec praeterita, nec proprie dicitur: tempora sunt tria, praeteritum, praesens et futurum. sed fortasse proprie diceretur: tempora sunt tria, praesens de praeteritis, praesens de praesentibus, praesens de futuris. sunt enim haec in anima tria quaedam et alibi ea non uideo, praesens de praeteritis memoria, praesens de praesentibus contuitus, praesens de futuris expectatio. si haec permittimur dicere, tria tempora uideo fateorque, tria sunt. dicatur etiam: tempora sunt tria, praeteritum, praesens et futurum, sicut abutitur consuetudo; dicatur. ecce non curo nec resisto nec reprehendo, dum tamen intellegatur quod dicitur, neque id, quod futurum est, esse iam, neque id, quod praeteritum est. pauca sunt enim, quae proprie loquimur, plura non proprie, sed agnoscitur quid uelimus.

But what is now clear and plain is that neither future nor past things exist, nor is it properly said, "There are three times, past, present, and future." But perhaps it would be properly said, "There are three times: a present of past things, a present of present things, a present of future things." For these three are in the soul in some way, and I do not see them anywhere else: the present of past things is memory, the present of present things is direct attention, the present of future things is expectation. If we are allowed to say this, I see three times, and I confess there are three. Let it still be said, "There are three times, past, present, and future," as custom misuses the words; let it be said. See, I do not mind, nor resist, nor find fault, as long as what is said is understood: that neither what is future nor what is past exists now. For there are few things we speak of properly, and many improperly; but what we mean is recognized.

11.27CSEL 33:298–299

Dixi ergo paulo ante, quod praetereuntia tempora metimur, ut possimus dicere duplum esse hoc temporis ad illud simplum aut tantum hoc quantum illud et si quid aliud de partibus temporum possumus renuntiare metiendo. quocirca, ut dicebam, praetereuntia metimur tempora, et si quis mihi dicat: "unde scis?" respondeam: scio, quia metimur, nec metiri quae non sunt possumus, et non sunt praeterita uel futura. praesens uero tempus quomodo metimur, quando non habet spatium? metitur ergo cum praeterit, cum autem praeterierit, non metitur; quid enim metiatur, non erit. sed unde et qua et quo praeterit, cum metitur? unde nisi ex futuro? qua nisi per praesens? quo nisi in praeteritum? ex illo ergo, quod nondum est, per illud, quod spatio caret, in illud, quod iam non est. quid autem metimur nisi tempus in aliquo spatio? neque enim dicimus simpla et dupla et tripla et aequalia et si quid hoc modo in tempore dicimus nisi spatia temporum. in quo ergo spatio metimur tempus praeteriens? utrum in futuro, unde praeterit? sed quod nondum est, non metimur. an in praesenti, qua praeterit? sed nullum spatium non metimur. an in praeterito, quo praeterit? sed quod iam non est, non metimur.

I said a little earlier, then, that we measure times as they pass, so that we can say that this time is double that single one, or this as long as that, and whatever else we can report about the parts of time by measuring. So, as I was saying, we measure times as they pass; and if anyone says to me, "How do you know?" I would answer: I know because we measure them, and we cannot measure what does not exist, and past and future things do not exist. But how do we measure present time, when it has no extent? It is measured, then, while it passes; but when it has passed, it is not measured, for there will be nothing to measure. But from where, by which way, and to where does it pass while it is measured? From where but from the future? By which way but through the present? To where but into the past? From that, then, which does not yet exist, through that which has no extent, into that which no longer exists. But what do we measure, if not time in some extent? For we do not speak of single and double and triple and equal, and anything else of this kind in time, except of extents of time. In what extent, then, do we measure time as it passes? In the future, from which it passes? But we do not measure what does not yet exist. In the present, by which it passes? But we do not measure what has no extent. In the past, into which it passes? But we do not measure what no longer exists.

11.28CSEL 33:299–300

Exarsit animus meus nosse istuc inplicatissimum aenigma. noli claudere, domine deus meus, bone pater, per Christum obsecro, noli claudere desiderio meo ista et usitata et abdita, quominus in ea penetret et dilucescant allucente misericordia tua, domine. quem percontabor de his? et cui fructuosius confitebor inperitiam meam nisi tibi, cui non sunt molesta studia mea flammantia uehementer in scripturas tuas? da quod amo: amo enim, et hoc tu dedisti. da, pater, qui uere nosti data bona dare filiis tuis, da, quoniam suscepi cognoscere et labor est ante me, donec aperias. per Christum obsecro, in nomine eius sancti sanctorum nemo mihi obstrepat. et ego credidi, propter quod et loquor. haec est spes mea; ad hanc uiuo, ut contempler delectationem domini. ecce ueteres posuisti dies meos et transeunt, et quomodo, nescio. et dicimus tempus et tempus, tempora et tempora: "quamdiu dixit hoc ille", "quamdiu fecit hoc ille" et: "quam longo tempore illud non uidi" et: "duplum temporis habet haec syllaba ad illam simplam breuem." dicimus haec et audiuimus haec et intellegimur et intellegimus. manifestissima et usitatissima sunt, et eadem rursus nimis latent et noua est inuentio eorum.

My mind is on fire to know this most intricate riddle. Do not shut them, Lord my God, good Father; I beseech you through Christ, do not shut these things, both familiar and hidden, against my desire, so that it may not enter into them and they may not grow clear as your mercy shines on them, Lord. Whom shall I ask about these things? And to whom shall I confess my ignorance more fruitfully than to you, who are not wearied by my studies burning so vehemently toward your Scriptures? Give what I love; for I do love, and this you have given. Give, Father, who truly know how to give good gifts to your children; give, because I have undertaken to know, and "it is toil before me" until you open it. I beseech you through Christ, in his name, the Holy of holies, let no one disturb me. "I too have believed, and therefore I speak." This is my hope; for this I live, "to contemplate the delight of the Lord." "See, you have made my days old," and they pass, and how, I do not know. And we speak of time and time, times and times: "How long did he say this?" "How long did he do this?" and "How long a time it is since I saw that!" and "This syllable has double the time of that single short one." We say these things and hear them, and we are understood and we understand. They are most plain and most familiar, and at the same time they are deeply hidden, and their discovery is new.

11.29CSEL 33:300

Audiui a quodam homine docto, quod solis et lunae ac siderum motus ipsa sint tempora, et non adnui. cur enim non potius omnium corporum motus sint tempora? an uero, si cessarent caeli lumina et moueretur rota figuli, non esset tempus, quo metiremur eos gyros et diceremus aut aequalibus morulis agi, aut si alias tardius, alias uelocius moueretur, alios magis diuturnos esse, alios minus? aut cum haec diceremus, non et nos in tempore loqueremur aut essent in uerbis nostris aliae longae syllabae, aliae breues, nisi quia illae longiore tempore sonuissent, istae breuiore? deus, dona hominibus uidere in paruo communes notitias rerum paruarum atque magnarum. sunt sidera et luminaria caeli in signis et in temporibus et in diebus et in annis. sunt uero; sed nec ego dixerim circuitum illius ligneolae rotae diem esse, nec tamen ideo tempus non esse ille dixerit.

I have heard from a certain learned man that the motions of the sun and moon and stars are themselves times, and I did not agree. For why should not the motions of all bodies rather be times? Or indeed, if the lights of heaven ceased and a potter's wheel were moving, would there be no time by which we could measure its turns and say either that they went at equal intervals, or, if it moved sometimes more slowly and sometimes faster, that some turns were longer and others shorter? Or when we said this, would we not also be speaking in time, and would there be some long syllables in our words and others short, except because the former sounded for a longer time and the latter for a shorter? God, grant men to see in something small the notions common to small and great things. The stars and lights of heaven are "for signs and for times and for days and for years." They are indeed; but neither would I say that the turning of that little wooden wheel is a day, nor would that learned man say that it is therefore not time.

11.30CSEL 33:300–301

Ego scire cupio uim naturamque temporis, quo metimur corporum motus et dicimus illum motum uerbi gratia tempore duplo esse diuturniorem quam istum. nam quaero, quoniam dies dicitur non tantum mora solis super terram, secundum quod aliud est dies, aliud nox, sed etiam totius eius circuitus ab oriente usque orientem, secundum quod dicimus: "tot dies transierunt". cum suis enim noctibus dicuntur tot dies, nec extra reputantur spatia noctium. quoniam ergo dies expletur motu solis atque circuitu ab oriente usque ad orientem, quaero, utrum motus ipse sit dies an mora ipsa, quanta peragitur, an utrumque. si enim primum dies esset, dies ergo esset, etiamsi tanto spatio temporis sol cursum illum peregisset, quantum est horae unius. si secundum, non ergo esset dies, si ab ortu solis usque in ortum alterum tam breuis mora esset, quam est horae unius, sed uiciens et quater circuiret sol, ut expleret diem. si utrumque, nec ille appellaretur dies, si horae spatio sol totum suum gyrum circumiret, nec ille, si sole cessante tantum temporis praeteriret, quanto peragere sol totum ambitum de mane in mane adsolet. non itaque nunc quaeram, quid sit illud, quod uocatur dies, sed quid sit tempus, quo metientes solis circuitum diceremus eum dimidio spatio temporis peractum minus quam solet, si tanto spatio temporis peractus esset, quanto peraguntur horae duodecim, et utrumque tempus conparantes diceremus illud simplum, hoc duplum, etiamsi aliquando illo simplo, aliquando isto duplo sol ab oriente usque orientem circuiret. nemo ergo mihi dicat caelestium corporum motus esse tempora, quia et cuiusdam uoto cum sol stetisset, ut uictoriosum proelium perageret, sol stabat, sed tempus ibat. per suum quippe spatium temporis, quod ei sufficeret, illa pugna gesta atque finita est. uideo igitur quandam esse distentionem. sed uideo? an uidere mihi uideor? tu demonstrabis, lux, ueritas.

I want to know the power and nature of time, by which we measure the motions of bodies and say, for example, that this motion lasts twice as long as that. For I ask this: since a day is called not only the stay of the sun above the earth, by which day is one thing and night another, but also its whole circuit from east to east, by which we say, "So many days have passed" (for so many days are counted with their nights, and the spaces of the nights are not reckoned separately); since, then, a day is completed by the motion and circuit of the sun from east to east, I ask whether the motion itself is the day, or the duration in which it is completed, or both. For if the first were the day, it would be a day even if the sun completed that course in a space of time as short as one hour. If the second, it would not be a day if from one sunrise to the next there were a duration as short as one hour, but the sun would have to go round twenty-four times to complete a day. If both, neither would that be called a day if the sun went its whole round in the space of an hour, nor would this, if the sun stopped and as much time passed as the sun usually takes to complete its whole circuit from morning to morning. So I will not now ask what it is that is called a day, but what time is, by which, measuring the sun's circuit, we would say that it was completed in half the usual space of time if it were completed in as much time as twelve hours take; and comparing both times, we would call the one single and the other double, even if the sun sometimes went round from east to east in the single and sometimes in the double time. Let no one tell me, then, that the motions of the heavenly bodies are times; for when the sun stood still at a certain man's prayer, so that he might finish a battle victoriously, the sun stood still, but time went on. For that battle was fought and finished in its own space of time, which sufficed for it. So I see that time is a kind of distension. But do I see it? Or do I seem to myself to see it? You will show me, Light, Truth.

11.31CSEL 33:301–302

Iubes ut adprobem, si quis dicat tempus esse motum corporis? non iubes. nam corpus nullum nisi in tempore moueri audio: tu dicis. ipsum autem corporis motum tempus esse non audio: non tu dicis. cum enim mouetur corpus, tempore metior, quamdiu moueatur, ex quo moueri incipit, donec desinat. et si non uidi, ex quo coepit, et perseuerat moueri, ut non uideam cum desinit, non ualeo metiri, nisi forte ex quo uidere incipio, donec desinam. quod si diu uideo, tantummodo longum tempus esse renuntio, non autem quantum sit, quia et quantum cum dicimus, conlatione dicimus, uelut: "tantum hoc, quantum illud" aut: "duplum hoc ad illud" et si quid aliud isto modo. si autem notare potuerimus locorum spatia, unde et quo ueniat corpus, quod mouetur, uel partes eius, si tamquam in torno mouetur, possumus dicere, quantum sit temporis, ex quo ab illo loco usque ad illum locum motus corporis uel partis eius effectus est. cum itaque aliud sit motus corporis, aliud, quo metimur quamdiu sit, quis non sentiat, quid horum potius tempus dicendum sit? nam si et uarie corpus aliquando mouetur, aliquando stat, non solum motum eius, sed etiam statum tempore metimur et dicimus: "tantum stetit, quantum motum est" aut: "duplo uel triplo stetit ad id quod motum est" et si quid aliud nostra dimensio siue conprehenderit siue existimauerit, ut dici solet plus minus. non ergo tempus corporis motus.

Do you command me to agree if someone says that time is the motion of a body? You do not. For I hear that no body moves except in time: you say so. But I do not hear that the motion of a body is itself time: you do not say so. For when a body moves, I measure by time how long it moves, from when it begins to move until it stops. And if I did not see when it began, and it goes on moving so that I do not see when it stops, I cannot measure it, except perhaps from when I begin to see it until I stop. And if I see it for a long time, I can only report that the time is long, not how long it is; because when we say "how long," we say it by comparison, as "this is as long as that" or "this is double that," and so on. But if we can mark the distances of the places from which and to which the moving body goes, or its parts, if it moves as on a lathe, we can say how much time it took for the motion of the body or its part from this place to that. Since, then, the motion of a body is one thing and that by which we measure how long it lasts is another, who does not see which of these should rather be called time? For if a body sometimes moves and sometimes stands still, we measure by time not only its motion but also its rest, and we say, "It stood still as long as it moved," or "It stood still twice or three times as long as it moved," and whatever else our measurement either grasps exactly or estimates, as we usually say, more or less. So time is not the motion of a body.

11.32CSEL 33:302–303

Et confiteor tibi, domine, ignorare me adhuc, quid sit tempus, et rursus confiteor tibi, domine, scire me in tempore ista dicere et diu me iam loqui de tempore atque ipsum diu non esse diu nisi mora temporis. quomodo igitur hoc scio, quando quid sit tempus nescio? an forte nescio, quemadmodum dicam quod scio? ei mihi, qui nescio saltem quid nesciam! ecce, deus meus, coram te, quia non mentior: sicut loquor, ita est cor meum. tu inluminabis lucernam meam, domine, deus meus, inluminabis tenebras meas.

And I confess to you, Lord, that I still do not know what time is; and again I confess to you, Lord, that I know that I say these things in time, and that I have now been speaking of time for a long time, and that this very "long" is not long except by a duration of time. How, then, do I know this, when I do not know what time is? Or perhaps I do not know how to say what I know? Alas for me, who do not even know what I do not know! See, my God, before you I do not lie: as I speak, so is my heart. "You will light my lamp, Lord my God; you will enlighten my darkness."

11.33CSEL 33:303–304

Nonne tibi confitetur anima mea confessione ueridica metiri me tempora? ita, domine deus meus, metior et quid metiar nescio. metior motum corporis tempore. item ipsum tempus nonne metior? an uero corporis motum metirer, quamdiu sit et quamdiu hinc illuc perueniat, nisi tempus, in quo mouetur, metirer? ipsum ergo tempus unde metior? an tempore breuiore metimur longius sicut spatio cubiti spatium transtri? sic enim uidemus spatio breuis syllabae metiri spatium longae syllabae atque id duplum dicere. ita metimur spatia carminum spatiis uersuum et spatia uersuum spatiis pedum et spatia pedum spatiis syllabarum et spatia longarum spatiis breuium, non in paginis — nam eo modo loca metimur, non tempora — sed cum uoces pronuntiando transeunt et dicimus: "longum carmen est, nam tot uersibus contexitur; longi uersus, nam tot pedibus constant; longi pedes, nam tot syllabis tenduntur; longa syllaba est, nam dupla est ad breuem". sed neque ita conprehenditur certa mensura temporis, quandoquidem fieri potest, ut ampliore spatio temporis personet uersus breuior, si productius pronuntietur, quam longior, si correptius. ita carmen, ita pes, ita syllaba. inde mihi uisum est nihil esse aliud tempus quam distentionem: sed cuius rei, nescio, et mirum, si non ipsius animi. quid enim metior, obsecro, deus meus, et dico aut indefinite: "longius est hoc tempus quam illud" aut etiam definite: "duplum est hoc ad illud?" tempus metior, scio; sed non metior futurum, quia nondum est, non metior praesens, quia nullo spatio tenditur, non metior praeteritum, quia iam non est. quid ergo metior? an praetereuntia tempora, non praeterita? sic enim dixeram.

Does not my soul confess to you with truthful confession that I measure times? So, Lord my God, I measure, and I do not know what I measure. I measure the motion of a body by time. And do I not measure time itself? Could I measure the motion of a body, how long it lasts and how long it takes to get from here to there, unless I measured the time in which it moves? With what, then, do I measure time itself? Do we measure a longer time by a shorter one, as we measure the length of a beam by the length of a cubit? For so we see the length of a long syllable measured by the length of a short one, and called double. So we measure the lengths of poems by the lengths of lines, and the lengths of lines by the lengths of feet, and the lengths of feet by the lengths of syllables, and the lengths of long syllables by those of short ones; not on pages (for in that way we measure spaces, not times), but when the words pass by as we pronounce them, and we say: "It is a long poem, for it is made up of so many lines; the lines are long, for they consist of so many feet; the feet are long, for they stretch over so many syllables; the syllable is long, for it is double a short one." But not even in this way is a sure measure of time grasped, since it can happen that a shorter line, if it is pronounced more slowly, sounds for a longer space of time than a longer one pronounced more quickly. So with a poem, so with a foot, so with a syllable. From this it seemed to me that time is nothing other than distension; but of what, I do not know, and it would be strange if it were not of the mind itself. For what do I measure, I beseech you, my God, when I say either indefinitely, "This time is longer than that," or definitely, "This is double that"? I measure time, I know; but I do not measure the future, because it does not yet exist; I do not measure the present, because it is not extended over any space; I do not measure the past, because it no longer exists. What, then, do I measure? Times passing, not past? For so I had said.

11.34CSEL 33:304–305

Insiste, anime meus, et adtende fortiter: deus adiutor noster; ipse fecit nos, et non nos. adtende, ubi albescet ueritas. ecce puta uox corporis incipit sonare et sonat et adhuc sonat et ecce desinit, iamque silentium est, et uox illa praeterita est et non est iam uox. futura erat, antequam sonaret, et non poterat metiri, quia nondum erat, et nunc non potest, quia iam non est. tunc ergo poterat, cum sonabat, quia tunc erat, quae metiri posset. sed et tunc non stabat; ibat enim et praeteriebat. an ideo magis poterat? praeteriens enim tendebatur in aliquod spatium temporis, quo metiri posset, quoniam praesens nullum habet spatium. si ergo tunc poterat, ecce puta altera coepit sonare et adhuc sonat continuato tenore sine ulla distinctione: metiamur eam, dum sonat; cum enim sonare cessauerit, iam praeterita erit et non erit, quae possit metiri. metiamur plane et dicamus, quanta sit. sed adhuc sonat nec metiri potest nisi ab initio sui, quo sonare coepit, usque ad finem, quo desinit. ipsum quippe interuallum metimur ab aliquo initio usque ad aliquem finem. quapropter uox, quae numquam finita est, metiri non potest, ut dicatur, quam longa uel breuis sit, nec dici aut aequalis alicui aut ad aliquam simpla uel dupla uel quid aliud. cum autem finita fuerit, iam non erit. quo pacto igitur metiri poterit? et metimur tamen tempora, nec ea, quae nondum sunt, nec ea, quae iam non sunt, nec ea, quae nulla mora extenduntur, nec ea, quae terminos non habent. nec futura ergo nec praeterita nec praesentia nec praetereuntia tempora metimur et metimur tamen tempora.

Persevere, my mind, and attend strongly: "God is our helper"; "he made us, and not we ourselves." Attend to where truth is dawning. See, suppose a bodily voice begins to sound, and sounds, and still sounds, and then stops, and now there is silence, and that voice is past and is no longer a voice. It was future before it sounded, and it could not be measured, because it did not yet exist; and now it cannot, because it no longer exists. So it could be measured then, while it was sounding, because then there was something that could be measured. But even then it was not standing still; for it was going and passing away. Or was it for this reason more measurable? For in passing it was stretched out into some space of time by which it could be measured, since the present has no space. If, then, it could be measured then, see, suppose another voice has begun to sound and still sounds in one continuous tone without any break: let us measure it while it sounds; for when it has stopped sounding, it will already be past and there will be nothing that can be measured. Let us measure it, then, and say how long it is. But it is still sounding, and it cannot be measured except from its beginning, when it began to sound, to its end, when it stops. For it is the interval itself that we measure, from some beginning to some end. So a voice which has never ended cannot be measured, so as to say how long or short it is, nor can it be called equal to another, or single or double in relation to another, or anything else. But when it has ended, it will no longer exist. How, then, can it be measured? And yet we measure times: not those that do not yet exist, nor those that no longer exist, nor those that are extended by no duration, nor those that have no limits. So we measure neither future nor past nor present nor passing times, and yet we measure times.

11.35CSEL 33:305–306

Deus creator omnium: uersus iste octo syllabarum breuibus et longis alternat syllabis: quattuor itaque breues, prima, tertia, quinta, septima, simplae sunt ad quattuor longas, secundam, quartam, sextam, octauam. hae singulae ad illas singulas duplum habent temporis; pronuntio et renuntio, et ita est, quantum sentitur sensu manifesto. quantum sensus manifestus est, breui syllaba longam metior eamque sentio habere bis tantum. sed cum altera post alteram sonat, si prior breuis, longa posterior, quomodo tenebo breuem et quomodo eam longae metiens applicabo, ut inueniam, quod bis tantum habeat, quandoquidem longa sonare non incipit, nisi breuis sonare destiterit? ipsamque longam num praesentem metior, quando nisi finitam non metior? eius enim finitio praeteritio est. quid ergo est, quod metior? ubi est qua metior breuis? ubi est longa quam metior? ambae sonuerunt, auolauerunt, praeterierunt, iam non sunt: et ego metior fidenterque respondeo, quantum exercitato sensu fiditur, illam simplam esse, illam duplam, in spatio scilicet temporis. neque hoc possum, nisi quia praeterierunt et finitae sunt. non ergo ipsas, quae iam non sunt, sed aliquid in memoria mea metior, quod infixum manet.

"Deus creator omnium": this line of eight syllables alternates short and long syllables. So the four short ones, the first, third, fifth, and seventh, are single in relation to the four long ones, the second, fourth, sixth, and eighth. Each of these has double the time of each of those. I pronounce it and report on it, and it is so, as far as is perceived by plain perception. As far as perception is plain, I measure the long syllable by the short one and perceive that it has twice as much. But when one sounds after the other, if the first is short and the second long, how shall I hold the short one, and how shall I apply it to the long one to measure it, so as to find that the long has twice as much, since the long does not begin to sound until the short has stopped? And do I measure the long one itself while present, when I do not measure it until it has ended? For its ending is its passing away. What, then, is it that I measure? Where is the short syllable by which I measure? Where is the long one that I measure? Both have sounded, flown away, passed, and are no more; and yet I measure, and I answer confidently, as far as a trained sense can be trusted, that the one is single and the other double, in extent of time, of course. And I cannot do this except because they have passed and ended. So it is not the syllables themselves, which no longer exist, that I measure, but something in my memory which remains fixed there.

11.36CSEL 33:306–307

In te, anime meus, tempora mea metior. noli mihi obstrepere, quod est: noli tibi obstrepere turbis affectionum tuarum. in te, inquam, tempora metior. affectionem, quam res praetereuntes in te faciunt et, cum illae praeterierint, manet, ipsam metior praesentem, non ea quae praeterierunt, ut fieret; ipsam metior, cum tempora metior. ergo aut ipsa sunt tempora, aut non tempora metior. quid cum metimur silentia et dicimus illud silentium tantum tenuisse temporis, quantum illa uox tenuit, nonne cogitationem tendimus ad mensuram uocis, quasi sonaret, ut aliquid de interuallis silentiorum in spatio temporis renuntiare possimus? nam et uoce atque ore cessante peragimus cogitando carmina et uersus et quemque sermonem motionumque dimensiones quaslibet et de spatiis temporum, quantum illud ad illud sit, renuntiamus non aliter, ac si ea sonando diceremus. si uoluerit aliquis edere longiusculam uocem et constituerit praemeditando, quam longa futura sit, egit utique iste spatium temporis in silentio memoriaeque conmendans coepit edere illam uocem, quae sonat, donec ad propositum terminum perducatur: immo sonuit et sonabit; nam quod eius iam peractum est, utique sonuit, quod autem restat, sonabit atque ita peragitur, dum praesens intentio futurum in praeteritum traicit deminutione futuri crescente praeterito, donec consumptione futuri sit totum praeteritum.

It is in you, my mind, that I measure my times. Do not interrupt me; that is, do not interrupt yourself with the crowds of your impressions. In you, I say, I measure times. The impression which passing things make in you, and which remains when they have passed, that is what I measure as present, not the things that passed to make it; that is what I measure when I measure times. So either this is time, or I do not measure times. What of when we measure silences, and say that this silence lasted as long as that voice lasted? Do we not stretch our thought to the measure of the voice, as if it were sounding, so that we can report something about the intervals of silences in extent of time? For even when voice and mouth are still, we go through poems and lines and any speech in thought, and any measures of motions, and we report on the extents of times, how long this is in relation to that, just as if we were saying them aloud. If someone wants to utter a rather long sound and has settled beforehand how long it is to be, he has certainly gone through that extent of time in silence, and entrusting it to memory he begins to utter that sound, which sounds until it is brought to the end set for it. Or rather, it has sounded and will sound; for what of it is already completed has certainly sounded, and what remains will sound; and so it is carried through, while the present attention transfers the future into the past, the past growing as the future diminishes, until by the using up of the future the whole is past.

11.37CSEL 33:307

Sed quomodo minuitur aut consumitur futurum, quod nondum est, aut quomodo crescit praeteritum, quod iam non est, nisi quia in animo, qui illud agit, tria sunt? nam et expectat et adtendit et meminit, ut id quod expectat per id quod adtendit transeat in id quod meminerit. quis igitur negat futura nondum esse? sed tamen iam est in animo expectatio futurorum. et quis negat praeterita iam non esse? sed tamen est adhuc in animo memoria praeteritorum. et quis negat praesens tempus carere spatio, quia in puncto praeterit? sed tamen perdurat attentio, per quam pergat abesse quod aderit. non igitur longum tempus futurum, quod non est, sed longum futurum longa expectatio futuri est, neque longum praeteritum tempus, quod non est, sed longum praeteritum longa memoria praeteriti est.

But how is the future, which does not yet exist, diminished or used up, or how does the past, which no longer exists, grow, unless it is because in the mind which does this there are three things? For it expects, and attends, and remembers, so that what it expects passes through what it attends to into what it remembers. Who, then, denies that future things do not yet exist? But yet there is already in the mind an expectation of future things. And who denies that past things no longer exist? But yet there is still in the mind a memory of past things. And who denies that present time lacks extent, since it passes in a point? But yet attention endures, through which what will be present passes on into being absent. So it is not future time that is long, for it does not exist; but a long future is a long expectation of the future. Nor is past time long, for it does not exist; but a long past is a long memory of the past.

11.38CSEL 33:307–308

Dicturus sum canticum, quod noui: antequam incipiam, in totum expectatio mea tenditur, cum autem coepero, quantum ex illa in praeteritum decerpsero, tenditur et memoria mea, atque distenditur uita huius actionis meae in memoriam propter quod dixi et in expectationem propter quod dicturus sum: praesens tamen adest attentio mea, per quam traicitur quod erat futurum, ut fiat praeteritum. quod quanto magis agitur et agitur, tanto breuiata expectatione prolongatur memoria, donec tota expectatio consumatur, quum tota illa actio finita transierit in memoriam. et quod in toto cantico, hoc in singulis particulis eius fit atque in singulis syllabis eius, hoc in actione longiore, cuius forte particula est illud canticum, hoc in tota uita hominis, cuius partes sunt omnes actiones hominis, hoc in toto saeculo filiorum hominum, cuius partes sunt omnes uitae hominum.

I am about to recite a psalm that I know. Before I begin, my expectation is stretched out over the whole; but when I have begun, whatever of it I have plucked off into the past, my memory too is stretched out over it, and the life of this action of mine is distended into memory, because of what I have said, and into expectation, because of what I am about to say; yet my attention is present, through which what was future is carried over so as to become past. And the more this goes on and on, the more memory is lengthened as expectation is shortened, until the whole expectation is used up, when that whole action is finished and has passed into memory. And what happens in the whole psalm happens also in each of its parts and in each of its syllables; the same in a longer action, of which that psalm is perhaps a part; the same in the whole life of a man, of which all a man's actions are parts; the same in the whole age of the sons of men, of which all men's lives are parts.

11.39CSEL 33:308–309

Sed quoniam melior est misericordia tua super uitas, ecce distentio est uita mea, et me suscepit dextera tua in domino meo, mediatore filio hominis inter te unum et nos multos, in multis per multa, ut per eum adprehendam, in quo et adprehensus sum, et a ueteribus diebus colligar sequens unum, praeterita oblitus, non in ea, quae futura et transitura sunt, sed in ea quae ante sunt non distentus, sed extentus, non secundum distentionem, sed secundum intentionem sequor ad palmam supernae uocationis, ubi audiam uocem laudis et contempler delectationem tuam nec uenientem nec praetereuntem. nunc uero anni mei in gemitibus, et tu solacium meum, domine, pater meus aeternus es; at ego in tempora dissilui, quorum ordinem nescio, et tumultuosis uarietatibus dilaniantur cogitationes meae, intima uiscera animae meae, donec in te confluam purgatus et liquidus igne amoris tui.

But because "your mercy is better than lives," see, my life is a distension, and "your right hand has upheld me" in my Lord, the Son of man, the mediator between you, the One, and us, the many, in many things and through many things, so that through him I may lay hold of him in whom I have also been laid hold of, and may be gathered from my old days to follow the One, "forgetting what lies behind," not distended toward things that will come and pass away, but extended toward "the things that are before," not by distension but by intention, I press on "toward the prize of the upward calling," where I may "hear the voice of praise" and "contemplate your delight," which neither comes nor passes away. But now "my years are spent in groaning," and you, my comfort, Lord, my Father, are eternal; but I have been scattered into times whose order I do not know, and my thoughts, the inmost bowels of my soul, are torn apart by tumultuous variety, until I flow together into you, purified and melted by the fire of your love.

11.40CSEL 33:309

Et stabo atque solidabor in te, in forma mea, ueritate tua, nec patiar quaestiones hominum, qui poenali morbo plus sitiunt, quam capiunt, et dicunt: "quid faciebat deus, antequam faceret caelum et terram?" aut "quid ei uenit in mentem, ut aliquid faceret, cum antea numquam aliquid fecerit?" da illis, domine, bene cogitare, quid dicant, et inuenire, quia non dicitur numquam, ubi non est tempus. qui ergo dicitur numquam fecisse, quid aliud dicitur nisi nullo tempore fecisse? uideant itaque nullum tempus esse posse sine creatura et desinant istam uanitatem loqui. extendantur etiam in ea, quae ante sunt, et intellegant te ante omnia tempora aeternum creatorem omnium temporum neque ulla tempora tibi esse coaeterna nec ullam creaturam, etiamsi est aliqua supra tempora.

And I will stand and be made firm in you, in my mold, your truth; and I will not endure the questions of men who, by a penal disease, thirst for more than they can hold, and say, "What was God doing before he made heaven and earth?" or "How did it come into his mind to make something, when he had never made anything before?" Grant them, Lord, to think well what they are saying, and to find that "never" is not said where there is no time. When, then, he is said never to have made anything, what else is said but that he made nothing at no time? Let them see, then, that there can be no time without creation, and stop talking this vanity. Let them also reach out to "the things that are before," and understand that you, before all times, are the eternal Creator of all times, and that no times are coeternal with you, nor any creation, even if there is some creation above times.

11.41CSEL 33:309–310

Domine deus meus, quis ille sinus est alti secreti tui et quam longe inde me proiecerunt consequentia delictorum meorum? sana oculos meos, et congaudeam luci tuae. certe si est tam grandi scientia et praescientia pollens animus, cui cuncta praeterita et futura ita nota sint, sicut mihi unum canticum notissimum, nimium mirabilis est animus iste atque ad horrorem stupendus, quippe quem ita non lateat quidquid peractum et quidquid relicum saeculorum est, quemadmodum me non latet cantantem illud canticum, quid et quantum eius abierit ab exordio, quid et quantum restet ad finem. sed absit, ut tu, conditor uniuersitatis, conditor animarum et corporum, absit, ut ita noueris omnia futura et praeterita. longe tu, longe mirabilius longeque secretius. neque enim sicut nota cantantis notumue canticum audientis expectatione uocum futurarum et memoria praeteritarum uariatur affectus sensusque distenditur, ita tibi aliquid accidit inconmutabiliter aeterno, hoc est uere aeterno creatori mentium. sicut ergo nosti in principio caelum et terram sine uarietate notitiae tuae, ita fecisti in principio caelum et terram sine distinctione actionis tuae. qui intellegit, confiteatur tibi, et qui non intellegit, confiteatur tibi. o quam excelsus es, et humiles corde sunt domus tua! tu enim erigis elisos, et non cadunt quorum celsitudo tu es.

Lord my God, what is that depth of your deep secret, and how far from it have the consequences of my sins cast me? Heal my eyes, and let me rejoice together in your light. Certainly, if there is a mind endowed with such great knowledge and foreknowledge that all past and future things are known to it as one very familiar psalm is known to me, that mind is exceedingly wonderful and astonishing to the point of awe, since whatever of the ages has been completed and whatever remains is no more hidden from it than it is hidden from me, when I sing that psalm, what and how much of it has gone by since the beginning, and what and how much remains until the end. But far be it that you, founder of the universe, founder of souls and bodies, far be it that you should know all future and past things in that way. You know them far, far more wonderfully and far more secretly. For it is not as with one singing a known psalm, or hearing a known psalm, whose feeling varies and whose perception is distended by the expectation of words to come and the memory of those past; nothing like this happens to you, who are unchangeably eternal, that is, the truly eternal Creator of minds. As, then, in the beginning you knew heaven and earth without any variation in your knowledge, so in the beginning you made heaven and earth without any division in your action. Let him who understands confess to you, and let him who does not understand confess to you. O how high you are, and the humble of heart are your house! For you raise up those who are bowed down, and they do not fall whose height you are.

Chapter 12

12.1CSEL 33:310–311

Multa satagit cor meum, domine, in hac inopia uitae meae pulsatum uerbis sanctae scripturae tuae, et ideo plerumque in sermone copiosa est egestas humanae intellegentiae, quia plus loquitur inquisitio quam inuentio et longior est petitio quam inpetratio et operosior est manus pulsans quam sumens. tenemus promissum: quis corrumpet illud? si deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? petite, et accipietis; quaerite, et inuenietis; pulsate, et aperietur uobis. omnis enim, qui petit, accipit et quaerens inueniet et pulsanti aperietur. promissa tua sunt, et quis falli timeat, cum promittit ueritas?

My heart is much troubled, Lord, in the poverty of this life of mine, when it is struck by the words of your holy Scripture; and so, for the most part, the poverty of human understanding is abundant in speech, because seeking says more than finding, and asking is longer than obtaining, and the hand that knocks works harder than the hand that receives. We hold the promise: who will make it void? "If God is for us, who can be against us?" "Ask, and you will receive; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks will find, and to him who knocks it will be opened." These are your promises; and who would fear to be deceived when the Truth promises?

12.2CSEL 33:311

Confitetur altitudini tuae humilitas linguae meae, quoniam tu fecisti caelum et terram, hoc caelum, quod uideo, terramque, quam calco, unde est haec terra, quam porto. tu fecisti. sed ubi est caelum caeli, domine, de quo audiuimus in uoce psalmi: caelum caeli domino: terram autem dedit filiis hominum? ubi es, caelum, quod non cernimus, cui terra est hoc omne, quod cernimus? hoc enim totum corporeum non ubique totum ita cepit speciem pulchram in nouissimis, cuius fundus est terra nostra, sed ad illud caelum caeli etiam terrae nostrae caelum terra est. et hoc utrumque magnum corpus non absurde terra est ad illud nescio quale caelum, quod domino est, non filiis hominum.

The lowliness of my tongue confesses to your loftiness that you made heaven and earth: this heaven which I see, and this earth on which I walk, from which comes this earth that I carry. You made it. But where is the heaven of heaven, Lord, of which we have heard in the words of the psalm, "The heaven of heaven is the Lord's, but the earth he has given to the sons of men"? Where are you, heaven which we do not see, to which all this that we see is earth? For this whole bodily world, whose base is our earth, has not received a beautiful form everywhere in its entirety, down to its lowest parts; but compared with that heaven of heaven, even the heaven of our earth is earth. And it is not absurd to call both these great bodies earth in comparison with that heaven, whatever it is, which is the Lord's and not the sons' of men.

12.3CSEL 33:311–312

Et nimirum haec terra erat inuisibilis et inconposita et nescio qua profunditas abyssi, super quam non erat lux, quia nulla species erat illi: unde iussisti, ut scriberetur, quod tenebrae erant super abyssum; quid aliud quam lucis absentia? ubi enim lux esset, si esset, nisi super esset eminendo et inlustrando? ubi ergo lux nondum erat, quid erat adesse tenebras nisi abesse lucem? super itaque erant tenebrae, quia super lux aberat, sicut sonus ubi non est, silentium est. et quid est esse ibi silentium nisi sonum ibi non esse? nonne tu, domine, docuisti hanc animam, quae tibi confitetur? nonne tu, domine, docuisti me, quod priusquam istam informem materiam formares atque distingueres, non erat aliquid, non color non figura, non corpus, non spiritus? non tamen omnino nihil: erat quaedam informitas sine ulla specie.

And certainly this earth was invisible and unformed, and a kind of depth of the abyss over which there was no light, because it had no form; therefore you had it written that "darkness was over the abyss." What else is that than the absence of light? For where would light be, if it existed, except above, standing out and shining? So where there was not yet light, what was the presence of darkness but the absence of light? So darkness was above, because light was absent from above, just as where there is no sound, there is silence. And what is it for there to be silence but for there to be no sound? Did you not, Lord, teach this soul which confesses to you? Did you not, Lord, teach me that before you formed and distinguished this formless matter, there was nothing, no color, no shape, no body, no spirit? Yet it was not absolutely nothing: there was a certain formlessness without any form.

12.4CSEL 33:312

Quid ergo uocaretur, quo etiam sensu tardioribus utcumque insinuaretur, nisi usitato aliquo uocabulo? quid autem in omnibus mundi partibus reperiri potest propinquius informitati omnimodae quam terra et abyssus? minus enim speciosa sunt pro suo gradu infimo quam cetera superiora perlucida et luculenta omnia.

What, then, should it be called, so that it might be conveyed in some way even to slower minds, except by some familiar word? And what can be found in all the parts of the world closer to total formlessness than earth and the abyss? For in their lowest rank they are less beautiful than the other, higher things, which are all bright and shining.

12.5CSEL 33:312

cur ergo non accipiam informitatem materiae, quam sine specie feceras, unde speciosum mundum faceres, ita conmode hominibus intimatam, ut appellaretur terra inuisibilis et inconposita, ut, cum in ea quaerit cogitatio, quid sensus attingat, et dicit sibi: "non est intellegibilis forma sicut uita, sicut iustitia, quia materies est corporum, neque sensibilis, quoniam quid uideatur et quid sentiatur in inuisibili et inconposita non est", dum sibi haec dicit humana cogitatio, conetur eam uel nosse ignorando uel ignorare noscendo?

Why, then, should I not take the formlessness of matter, which you had made without form so as to make from it a beautiful world, to have been so suitably conveyed to men that it was called "invisible and unformed earth"? So that when thought seeks in it something for the senses to reach, and says to itself, "It is not an intelligible form, like life or justice, because it is the matter of bodies; nor is it perceptible, because there is nothing in the invisible and unformed to be seen or perceived": while human thought says this to itself, it may try either to know it by not knowing it, or not to know it by knowing it.

12.6CSEL 33:312–314

Ego uero, domine, si totum confitear tibi ore meo et calamo meo, quidquid de ista materia docuisti me, cuius antea nomen audiens et non intellegens narrantibus mihi eis, qui non intellegerent, eam cum speciebus innumeris et uariis cogitabam et ideo non eam cogitabam; foedas et horribiles formas perturbatis ordinibus uoluebat animus, sed formas tamen, et informe appellabam non quod careret forma, sed quod talem haberet, ut, si appareret, insolitum et incongruum auersaretur sensus meus et conturbaretur infirmitas hominis; uerum autem illud quod cogitabam non priuatione omnis formae, sed conparatione formosiorum erat informe, et suadebat uera ratio, ut omnis formae qualescumque reliquias omnino detraherem, si uellem prorsus informe cogitare et non poteram; citius enim non esse censebam, quod omni forma priuaretur, quam cogitabam quiddam inter formam et nihil nec formatum nec nihil, informe prope nihil; et cessauit mens mea interrogare hinc spiritum meum plenum imaginibus formatorum corporum et eas pro arbitrio mutantem atque uariantem, et intendi in ipsa corpora eorumque mutabilitatem altius inspexi, qua desinunt esse quod fuerant et incipiunt esse quod non erant, eundemque transitum de forma in formam per informe quiddam fieri suspicatus sum, non per omnino nihil: sed nosse cupiebam, non suspicari —: et si totum tibi confiteatur uox et stilus meus, quidquid de ista quaestione enodasti mihi, quis legentium capere durabit? nec ideo tamen cessabit cor meum tibi dare honorem et canticum laudis de his, quae dictare non sufficit. mutabilitas enim rerum mutabilium ipsa capax est formarum omnium, in quas mutantur res mutabiles. et haec quid est? numquid animus? numquid corpus? numquid species animi uel corporis? si dici posset: nihil aliquid et: est non est, hoc eam dicerem; et tamen iam utcumque erat, ut species caperet istas uisibiles et conpositas.

But I, Lord, if I were to confess to you with my mouth and my pen all that you have taught me about this matter (whose name I used to hear before without understanding, when those who did not understand it spoke of it to me), I used to think of it as having countless different forms, and therefore did not think of it at all. My mind turned over foul and horrible forms in disordered array, but forms nonetheless; and I called it formless not because it lacked form, but because it had such a form that, if it appeared, my senses would turn away from it as strange and unfitting, and human weakness would be disturbed. But what I was thinking of was formless not by the lack of all form, but by comparison with more beautiful forms; and true reason was persuading me that I should strip away altogether every remnant of any form whatever, if I wanted to think of the wholly formless; and I could not. For I would sooner judge that what was deprived of all form did not exist than think of something between form and nothing, neither formed nor nothing, a formless almost-nothing. And my mind stopped questioning my spirit about this, filled as it was with images of formed bodies, changing and varying them at will; and I turned my attention to bodies themselves and looked more deeply into their changeableness, by which they cease to be what they had been and begin to be what they were not; and I suspected that this passage from form to form takes place through something formless, not through absolutely nothing. But I wanted to know, not to suspect. And if my voice and pen were to confess to you all that you have unraveled for me on this question, which of my readers would have the patience to grasp it? Yet my heart will not therefore cease to give you honor and a song of praise for the things it cannot put into words. For the changeableness of changeable things is itself capable of all the forms into which changeable things are changed. And what is this? Is it mind? Is it body? Is it some form of mind or body? If one could say "a nothing-something" and "an is-is-not," I would call it this; and yet it already existed in some way, so as to receive these visible and composite forms.

12.7CSEL 33:314

Et unde utcumque erat, ut species caperet istas uisibiles et conpositas, et unde utcumque erat, nisi esset abs te, a quo sunt omnia, in quantumcumque sunt? sed tanto a te longius, quanto dissimilius: neque enim locis. itaque tu, domine, qui non es alias aliud et alias aliter, sed id ipsum et id ipsum, sanctus, sanctus, sanctus, dominus deus omnipotens, in principio, quod est de te, in sapientia tua, quae nata est de substantia tua, fecisti aliquid et de nihilo. fecisti enim caelum et terram non de te: nam esset aequale unigenito tuo ac per hoc et tibi, et nullo modo iustum esset, ut aequale tibi esset, quod de te non esset. et aliud praeter te non erat, unde faceres ea, deus, una trinitas et trina unitas: et ideo de nihilo fecisti caelum et terram, magnum quiddam et paruum quiddam, quoniam omnipotens et bonus es ad facienda omnia bona, magnum caelum et paruam terram. tu eras et aliud nihil, unde fecisti caelum et terram, duo quaedam, unum prope te, alterum prope nihil, unum, quo superior tu esses, alterum, quo inferius nihil esset.

And from where did it exist in some way, so as to receive these visible and composite forms, and from where did it exist in any way at all, unless it were from you, from whom all things are, insofar as they are? But the more unlike you a thing is, the further it is from you; not in place. And so you, Lord, who are not one thing here and another there, nor otherwise here and otherwise there, but the Selfsame and the Selfsame and the Selfsame, "Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty," in the Beginning, which is from you, in your Wisdom, which is born of your substance, made something, and made it from nothing. For you made heaven and earth not from yourself; for then it would be equal to your only-begotten, and so to you as well; and it would in no way be right that anything should be equal to you which was not from you. And there was nothing else besides you from which you could make them, God, one Trinity and threefold Unity; and so you made heaven and earth from nothing, something great and something small, because you are almighty and good to make all things good: a great heaven and a small earth. You were, and nothing else, from which you made heaven and earth, two things: one close to you, the other close to nothing; one to which you alone would be superior, the other to which nothing would be inferior.

12.8CSEL 33:314–316

Sed illud caelum caeli tibi, domine; terra autem, quam dedisti filiis hominum cernendam atque tangendam, non erat talis, qualem nunc cernimus et tangimus. inuisibilis enim erat et inconposita et abyssus erat, super quam non erat lux, aut tenebrae erant super abyssum, id est magis quam in abysso. ista quippe abyssus aquarum iam uisibilium etiam in profundis suis habet speciei suae lucem utcumque sensibilem piscibus et repentibus in suo fundo animantibus: illud autem totum prope nihil erat, quoniam adhuc omnino informe erat; iam tamen erat, quod formari poterat. tu enim, domine, fecisti mundum de materia informi, quam fecisti de nulla re paene nullam rem, unde faceres magna, quae miramur filii hominum. ualde hoc mirabile caelum corporeum, quod firmamentum inter aquam et aquam secundo die post conditionem lucis dixisti: fiat, et sic est factum. quod firmamentum uocasti caelum, sed caelum terrae huius et maris, quae fecisti tertio die dando speciem uisibilem informi materiae, quam fecisti ante omnem diem. iam enim feceras et caelum ante omnem diem, sed caelum caeli huius, quia in principio feceras caelum et terram. terra autem ipsa, quam feceras, informis materies erat, quia inuisibilis erat et inconposita et tenebrae super abyssum: de qua terra inuisibili et inconposita, de qua informitate, de quo paene nihilo faceres haec omnia, quibus iste mutabilis mundus constat et non constat, in quo ipsa mutabilitas apparet, in qua sentiri et dinumerari possunt tempora, quia rerum mutationibus fiunt tempora, dum uariantur et uertuntur species, quarum materies praedicta est terra inuisibilis.

But that heaven of heaven is yours, Lord; while the earth, which you gave to the sons of men to see and touch, was not such as we now see and touch. For it was invisible and unformed, and there was an abyss over which there was no light; or "darkness was over the abyss," that is, more than in the abyss. For this abyss of waters, which are now visible, has even in its depths a light of its own form, perceptible in some way to the fish and creatures that crawl on its bottom; but that whole was almost nothing, since it was still wholly formless; yet it already existed, something that could be formed. For you, Lord, "made the world from formless matter," which you made from nothing, an almost-nothing, from which to make the great things that we, the sons of men, marvel at. Very wonderful is this bodily heaven, the firmament between water and water, of which you said on the second day, after the creation of light, "Let it be made," and so it was made. This firmament you called heaven, but the heaven of this earth and sea, which you made on the third day by giving visible form to the formless matter which you made before any day. For you had already made a heaven before any day, but the heaven of this heaven, because "in the beginning you made heaven and earth." But the earth itself which you had made was formless matter, because it was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss. From this invisible and unformed earth, from this formlessness, from this almost-nothing, you would make all these things of which this changeable world consists and does not consist; in which changeableness itself appears, in which times can be perceived and counted, because times are made by the changes of things, while the forms vary and turn, whose matter is the invisible earth spoken of above.

12.9CSEL 33:316

Ideoque spiritus, doctor famuli tui, cum te conmemorat fecisse in principio caelum et terram, tacet de temporibus, silet de diebus. nimirum enim caelum caeli, quod in principio fecisti, creatura est aliqua intellectualis, quamquam nequaquam tibi, trinitati, coaeterna, particeps tamen aeternitatis tuae, ualde mutabilitatem suam prae dulcedine felicissimae contemplationis tuae cohibet et sine ullo lapsu ex quo facta est inhaerendo tibi excedit omnem uolubilem uicissitudinem temporum. ista uero informitas, terra inuisibilis et inconposita, nec ipsa in diebus numerata est. ubi enim nulla species, nullus ordo, nec uenit quicquam et praeterit, et ubi hoc non fit, non sunt utique dies nec uicissitudo spatiorum temporalium.

And so the Spirit, the teacher of your servant, when he records that you made heaven and earth in the beginning, is silent about times, says nothing of days. For surely the heaven of heaven, which you made in the beginning, is some intellectual creation, which, although in no way coeternal with you, the Trinity, yet shares in your eternity; it greatly restrains its changeableness through the sweetness of its most blessed contemplation of you, and, clinging to you without any lapse from the moment it was made, it surpasses all the turning vicissitude of times. But that formlessness, the invisible and unformed earth, was not itself numbered among the days either. For where there is no form, no order, nothing comes and passes away; and where this does not happen, there are certainly no days, nor any vicissitude of temporal intervals.

12.10CSEL 33:316–317

O ueritas, lumen cordis mei, non tenebrae meae loquantur mihi. defluxi ad ista et obscuratus sum, sed hinc, etiam hinc adamaui te. erraui et recordatus sum tui. audiui uocem tuam post me, ut redirem, et uix audiui propter tumultus inpacatorum. et nunc ecce redeo aestuans et anhelans ad fontem tuum. nemo me prohibeat: hunc bibam et hunc uiuam. non ego uita mea sim: male nixi ex me, mors mihi fui: in te reuiuesco. tu me alloquere, tu mihi sermocinare. credidi libris tuis, et uerba eorum arcana ualde. iam dixisti mihi, domine, uoce forti in aurem interiorem.

O Truth, light of my heart, let not my darkness speak to me! I slid down to these things and was darkened; but from there, even from there, I loved you. I went astray, and I remembered you. I heard your voice behind me, calling me to return, and I scarcely heard it for the tumult of the restless. And now, see, I return, burning and panting, to your fountain. Let no one stop me: may I drink of it and live by it. Let me not be my own life: I lived badly from myself; I was death to myself; in you I revive. Speak to me, talk with me. I have believed your books, and their words are very deep. Already you have said to me, Lord, with a strong voice in my inner ear,

12.11CSEL 33:317

quia tu aeternus es, solus habens inmortalitatem, quoniam ex nulla specie motuue mutaris nec temporibus uariatur uoluntas tua, quia non est immortalis uoluntas, quae alia et alia est. hoc in conspectu tuo claret mihi et magis magisque clarescat, oro te, atque in ea manifestatione persistam sobrius sub alis tuis. item dixisti mihi, domine, uoce forti in aurem interiorem, quod omnes naturas atque substantias, quae non sunt quod tu es et tamen sunt, tu fecisti: hoc solum a te non est, quod non est; motusque uoluntatis a te, qui es, ad id quod minus est, quia talis motus delictum atque peccatum est, et quod nullius peccatum aut tibi nocet aut perturbat ordinem imperii tui uel in primo uel in imo. hoc in conspectu tuo claret mihi et magis magisque clarescat, oro te, atque in ea manifestatione persistam sobrius sub alis tuis.

that you are eternal, "who alone have immortality," since you are not changed by any form or motion, nor is your will varied by times; for a will which is now one thing and now another is not immortal. This is clear to me in your sight; let it become clearer and clearer, I pray you, and in that manifestation let me abide soberly under your wings. Likewise you have said to me, Lord, with a strong voice in my inner ear, that you made all natures and substances which are not what you are and yet exist; that only what does not exist is not from you; and that the motion of the will away from you, who are, toward what is less is not from you, because such a motion is a fault and a sin; and that no one's sin either harms you or disturbs the order of your rule, either in the highest or in the lowest. This is clear to me in your sight; let it become clearer and clearer, I pray you, and in that manifestation let me abide soberly under your wings.

12.12CSEL 33:317–318

Item dixisti mihi uoce forti in aurem interiorem, quod nec illa creatura tibi coaeterna est, cuius uoluptas tu solus es teque perseuerantissima castitate hauriens mutabilitatem suam nusquam et numquam exerit et te sibi semper praesente, ad quem toto affectu se tenet, non habens futurum quod expectet nec in praeteritum traiciens quod meminerit, nulla uice uariatur nec in tempora ulla distenditur. o beata, si qua ista est, inhaerendo beatitudini tuae, beata sempiterno inhabitatore te atque inlustratore suo! nec inuenio, quid libentius appellandum existimem caelum caeli domino quam domum tuam contemplantem delectationem tuam sine ullo defectu egrediendi in aliud, mentem puram concordissime unam stabilimento pacis sanctorum spirituum, ciuium ciuitatis tuae in caelestibus super ista caelestia.

Likewise you have said to me with a strong voice in my inner ear that not even that creation is coeternal with you whose delight you alone are, and which, drinking you in with most persevering chastity, never and nowhere shows its changeableness; and with you always present to it, to whom it holds with all its love, having no future to expect and transferring nothing into the past to remember, it is not varied by any change nor distended into any times. O blessed creation, if there is such, blessed in clinging to your blessedness, blessed in you, its eternal indweller and enlightener! Nor do I find anything I would more gladly call "the heaven of heaven, which is the Lord's" than your house, which contemplates your delight without any failing that would lead it out to anything else: a pure mind, most harmoniously one in the stable peace of holy spirits, the citizens of your city in the heavens above these heavens.

12.13CSEL 33:318

Vnde intellegat anima, cuius peregrinatio longinqua facta est, si iam sitit tibi, si iam factae sunt ei lacrimae suae panis, dum dicitur ei per singulos dies: ubi est deus tuus? si iam petit a te unam et hanc requirit, ut inhabitet in domo tua per omnes dies uitae suae? et quae uita eius nisi tu? et qui dies tui nisi aeternitas tua, sicut anni tui, qui non deficiunt, quia idem ipse es? hinc ergo intellegat anima, quae potest, quam longe super omnia tempora sis aeternus, quando tua domus, quae peregrinata non est, quamuis non sit tibi coaeterna, tamen indesinenter et indeficienter tibi cohaerendo nullam patitur uicissitudinem temporum. hoc in conspectu tuo claret mihi et magis magisque clarescat, oro te, atque in hac manifestatione persistam sobrius sub alis tuis.

From this let the soul understand, whose pilgrimage has taken it into a far country, if it now thirsts for you, if its tears have now become its bread while it is asked day by day, "Where is your God?", if it now asks of you "one thing" and seeks it, "that it may dwell in your house all the days of its life" (and what is its life but you? and what are your days but your eternity, like your years, which do not fail, because you are the same?): from this, then, let the soul understand, as far as it can, how far above all times you are eternal, when your house, which has never gone on pilgrimage, although it is not coeternal with you, yet, by clinging to you unceasingly and unfailingly, suffers no vicissitude of times. This is clear to me in your sight; let it become clearer and clearer, I pray you, and in this manifestation let me abide soberly under your wings.

12.14CSEL 33:318–319

Ecce nescio quid informe in istis mutationibus rerum extremarum atque infirmarum, et quis dicet mihi, nisi quisquis per inania cordis sui cum suis phantasmatis uagatur et uoluitur, quis nisi talis dicet mihi, quod deminuta atque consumpta omni specie, si sola remaneat informitas, per quam de specie in speciem res mutabatur et uertebatur, possit exhibere uices temporum? omnino enim non potest, quia sine uarietate motionum non sunt tempora: et nulla uarietas, ubi nulla species.

See, there is something formless in these changes of the lowest and weakest things; and who will tell me (unless it be someone who wanders and tosses about through the empty places of his heart with his own phantoms), who but such a one will tell me that, if all form were diminished and used up, and there remained only the formlessness through which a thing was changed and turned from form to form, it could display the succession of times? It cannot at all, because without variety of motions there are no times, and there is no variety where there is no form.

12.15CSEL 33:319–320

Quibus consideratis, deus meus, quantum donas, quantum me ad pulsandum excitas quantumque pulsanti aperis, duo reperio, quae fecisti carentia temporibus, cum tibi neutrum coaeternum sit: unum, quod ita formatum est, ut sine ullo defectu contemplationis, sine ullo interuallo mutationis, quamuis mutabile, tamen non mutatum aeternitate atque inconmutabilitate perfruatur; alterum, quod ita informe erat, ut ex qua forma in quam formam uel motionis uel stationis mutaretur, quo tempori subderetur, non haberet. sed hoc ut informe esset, non reliquisti, quoniam fecisti ante omnem diem in principio caelum et terram, haec duo quae dicebam. terra autem inuisibilis erat et inconposita et tenebrae super abyssum. quibus uerbis insinuatur informitas, ut gradatim excipiantur, qui omnimodam speciei priuationem nec tamen ad nihil peruentionem cogitare non possent, unde fieret alterum caelum et terra uisibilis atque conposita et aqua speciosa et quidquid deinceps in constitutione huius mundi non sine diebus factum conmemoratur, quia talia sunt, ut in eis agantur uicissitudines temporum propter ordinatas conmutationes motionum atque formarum.

Having considered these things, my God, as far as you grant it, as far as you rouse me to knock and open to me when I knock, I find two things which you made without times, although neither is coeternal with you: one, so formed that, without any failing of contemplation, without any interval of change, though changeable yet unchanged, it enjoys eternity and unchangeableness; the other, so formless that it had nothing from which to be changed into any form, whether of motion or of rest, so as to be subject to time. But you did not leave this to be formless, since before any day "in the beginning you made heaven and earth," these two things I was speaking of. "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss." By these words formlessness is suggested, so that those may be led on step by step who could not think of a total lack of form which yet does not amount to nothing; from which would be made the second heaven and the visible and ordered earth, and the beautiful water, and whatever else is recorded as made thereafter in the establishing of this world, not without days, since they are such that in them the successions of times take place because of the ordered changes of motions and forms.

12.16CSEL 33:320

Hoc interim sentio, deus meus, cum audio loquentem scripturam tuam: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita et tenebrae erant super abyssum, neque conmemorantem, quoto die feceris haec, sic interim sentio propter illud caelum caeli, caelum intellectuale, ubi est intellectus nosse simul, non ex parte, non in aenigmate, non per speculum, sed ex toto, in manifestatione, facie ad faciem; non modo hoc, modo illud, sed, quod dictum est, nosse simul sine ulla uicissitudine temporum, et propter inuisibilem atque inconpositam terram sine ulla uicissitudine temporum, quae solet habere modo hoc et modo illud, quia ubi nulla species, nusquam est hoc et illud: propter duo haec, primitus formatum et penitus informe, illud caelum, sed caelum caeli, hoc uero terram, sed terram inuisibilem et inconpositam, propter duo haec interim sentio sine commemoratione dierum dicere scripturam tuam: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram. statim quippe subiecit, quam terram dixerit. et quod secundo die commemoratur factum firmamentum et uocatum, caelum insinuat, de quo caelo prius sine diebus sermo locutus sit.

Meanwhile, my God, this is what I understand when I hear your Scripture saying, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth; but the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss," and not mentioning on which day you made these things. This, meanwhile, is what I understand: that it is because of that heaven of heaven, the intellectual heaven, where understanding is knowing all at once, not in part, not in a riddle, not through a mirror, but wholly, openly, face to face; not now this, now that, but, as has been said, knowing all at once without any succession of times; and because of the invisible and unformed earth, without any succession of times, which usually has now this and now that, because where there is no form, there is nowhere this and that: because of these two, the one formed from the first and the other wholly formless, the one heaven, but the heaven of heaven, the other earth, but invisible and unformed earth: because of these two, meanwhile, I understand that your Scripture says, without mentioning days, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth." For it immediately added what earth it meant. And by recording that on the second day the firmament was made and called heaven, it suggests which heaven had been spoken of earlier, without days.

12.17CSEL 33:320–321

Mira profunditas eloquiorum tuorum, quorum ecce ante nos superficies blandiens paruulis: sed mira profunditas, deus meus, mira profunditas! horror est intendere in eam, horror honoris et tremor amoris. odi hostes eius uehementer: o si occidas eos de gladio bis acuto, et non sint hostes eius! sic enim amo eos occidi sibi, ut uiuant tibi. ecce autem alii non reprehensores, sed laudatores libri Geneseos: "non" inquiunt "hoc uoluit in his uerbis intellegi spiritus dei, qui per Moysen famulum eius ista conscripsit, non hoc uoluit intellegi, quod tu dicis, sed aliud, quod nos dicimus." quibus ego te arbitro, deus omnium nostrum, ita respondeo.

Wonderful is the depth of your words! See, their surface is before us, caressing little ones; but wonderful is the depth, my God, wonderful the depth! It is awe-inspiring to look into it: the awe of reverence and the trembling of love. I hate its enemies vehemently: oh, that you would slay them with the two-edged sword, so that they might be its enemies no more! For so I love them to be slain to themselves, that they may live to you. But see, others, not critics but praisers of the book of Genesis, say: "The Spirit of God, who wrote these things through Moses his servant, did not intend this to be understood by these words; he did not intend what you say, but something else, which we say." To them, with you as judge, God of us all, I answer thus.

12.18CSEL 33:321–322

Num dicetis falsa esse, quae mihi ueritas uoce forti in aurem interiorem dicit de uera aeternitate creatoris, quod nequaquam eius substantia per tempora uarietur nec eius uoluntas extra eius substantiam sit? unde non eum modo uelle hoc modo uelle illud, sed semel et simul et semper uelle omnia quae uult, non iterum et iterum neque nunc ista nunc illa nec uelle postea quod nolebat aut nolle quod uolebat prius, quia talis uoluntas mutabilis est et omne mutabile aeternum non est; deus autem noster aeternus est. item, quod mihi dicit in aurem interiorem, expectatio rerum uenturarum fit contuitus, cum uenerint, idemque contuitus fit memoria, cum praeterierint: omnis porro intentio, quae ita uariatur, mutabilis est, et omne mutabile aeternum non est: deus autem noster aeternus est. haec colligo atque coniungo et inuenio deum meum, deum aeternum non aliqua noua uoluntate condidisse creaturam nec scientiam eius transitorium aliquid pati.

Will you say that what the Truth tells me with a strong voice in my inner ear about the true eternity of the Creator is false: that his substance is in no way varied by times, nor is his will outside his substance? So he does not will now this and now that, but once, and at once, and always he wills all that he wills; not again and again, nor now these things and now those; nor does he will afterward what he did not will, or not will what he willed before; because such a will is changeable, and nothing changeable is eternal; but our God is eternal. Likewise what it tells me in my inner ear: the expectation of things to come becomes direct attention when they come, and the same direct attention becomes memory when they have passed; and every attention which varies in this way is changeable, and nothing changeable is eternal; but our God is eternal. These things I gather and join together, and I find that my God, the eternal God, did not establish creation by some new will, nor does his knowledge undergo anything transitory.

12.19CSEL 33:322

Quid ergo dicetis, contradictores? an falsa sunt ista? "non" inquiunt. quid illud? num falsum est omnem naturam formatam materiamue formabilem non esse nisi ab illo, qui summe bonus est, quia summe est? "neque hoc negamus" inquiunt. quid igitur? an illud negatis, sublimem quandam esse creaturam tam casto amore cohaerentem deo uero et uere aeterno, ut, quamuis ei coaeterna non sit, in nullam tamen temporum uarietatem et uicissitudinem ab illo se resoluat et defluat, sed in eius solius ueracissima contemplatione requiescat, quoniam tu, deus, diligenti te, quantum praecipis, ostendis ei te et sufficis ei, et ideo non declinat a te nec a se? haec est domus dei non terrena neque ulla caelesti mole corporea, sed spiritalis et particeps aeternitatis tuae, quia sine labe in aeternum. statuisti enim eam in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi; praeceptum posuisti et non praeteribit. nec tamen tibi coaeterna, quoniam non sine initio: facta est enim.

What, then, will you say, you who object? Are these things false? "No," they say. What of this? Is it false that every formed nature, or matter capable of form, exists only from him who is supremely good, because he supremely is? "We do not deny this either," they say. What, then? Do you deny that there is a certain sublime creation, cleaving with such chaste love to the true and truly eternal God that, although it is not coeternal with him, it does not loosen itself or flow away from him into any variety or succession of times, but rests in the most true contemplation of him alone; because you, God, show yourself to one who loves you as much as you command, and are sufficient for it; and therefore it does not turn aside from you or toward itself? This is the house of God, not earthly, nor of any heavenly bodily mass, but spiritual and sharing in your eternity, because it is without stain for ever. For "you have established it for ever and for ever and ever; you have set a decree, and it will not pass away." Yet it is not coeternal with you, since it is not without a beginning; for it was made.

12.20CSEL 33:322–323

Nam etsi non inuenimus tempus ante illam — prior quippe omnium creata est sapientia — nec utique illa sapientia tibi, deus noster, patri suo, plane coaeterna et coaequalis et per quam creata sunt omnia et in quo principio fecisti caelum et terram, sed profecto sapientia, quae creata est, intellectualis natura scilicet, quae contemplatione luminis lumen est — dicitur enim et ipsa, quamuis creata, sapientia; sed quantum interest inter lumen, quod inluminat et quod inluminatur, tantum inter sapientiam, quae creat, et istam, quae creata est, sicut inter iustitiam iustificantem et iustitiam, quae iustificatione facta est; nam et nos dicti sumus iustitia tua; ait enim quidam seruus tuus: ut nos simus iustitia dei in ipso — ergo quia prior omnium creata est quaedam sapientia, quae creata est, mens rationalis et intellectualis castae ciuitatis tuae, matris nostrae, quae sursum est et libera est et aeterna in caelis — quibus caelis, nisi qui te laudant caeli caelorum, quia hoc est et caelum caeli domino? — etsi non inuenimus tempus ante illam, quia et creaturam temporis antecedit quae prior omnium creata est, ante illam tamen est ipsius creatoris aeternitas, a quo facta sumpsit exordium, quamuis non temporis, quia nondum erat tempus, ipsius tamen conditionis suae.

For even though we find no time before it (for "wisdom was created before all things"), certainly not that Wisdom which is fully coeternal and coequal with you, our God, its Father, through which all things were created and in which Beginning you made heaven and earth; but the wisdom which was created, that is, the intellectual nature, which is light by contemplating the Light (for it too, although created, is called wisdom; but as great as the difference between the Light that enlightens and that which is enlightened, so great is the difference between the Wisdom that creates and this which was created, as between the justice that justifies and the justice that has been produced by justification; for we too are called your justice, since a servant of yours says, "that we might become the justice of God in him"): so, since a certain wisdom was created before all things, the created, rational, and intellectual mind of your chaste city, our mother, which is above and is free and eternal in the heavens (in which heavens, if not those that praise you, the heavens of heavens, since this is also "the heaven of heaven, which is the Lord's"?), even though we find no time before it, because what was created before all things precedes also the creation of time, yet before it is the eternity of the Creator himself, from whom, having been made, it took its beginning: not a beginning in time, because there was not yet time, but the beginning of its own existence.

12.21CSEL 33:323–324

Vnde ita est abs te, deo nostro, ut aliud sit plane quam tu et non id ipsum, et non solum ante illam, sed nec in illa inuenimus tempus, quia est idonea faciem tuam semper uidere nec uspiam deflectitur ab ea; quo fit, ut nulla mutatione uarietur. inest ei tamen ipsa mutabilitas, unde tenebresceret et frigesceret, nisi amore grandi tibi cohaerens tamquam semper meridies luceret et ferueret ex te. o domus luminosa et speciosa, dilexi decorem tuum et locum habitationis gloriae domini mei, fabricatoris et possessoris tui! tibi suspiret peregrinatio mea, et dico ei qui fecit te, ut possideat et me in te, quia fecit et me. erraui sicut ouis perdita, sed in umeris pastoris mei, structoris tui, spero me reportari tibi.

So it is from you, our God, in such a way that it is clearly other than you and not the Selfsame; and we find time not only not before it, but not even in it, because it is fit always to see your face and never turns away from it anywhere; so it is not varied by any change. Yet changeableness itself is in it, by which it would grow dark and cold, unless, clinging to you with great love, it shone and burned from you as in an everlasting noon. O house full of light and beauty, "I have loved your beauty and the place of the dwelling of the glory" of my Lord, your builder and owner! Let my pilgrimage sigh for you, and I say to him who made you that he may possess me too in you, since he made me too. "I have gone astray like a lost sheep"; but on the shoulders of my Shepherd, your builder, I hope to be carried back to you.

12.22CSEL 33:324

Quid dicitis mihi quos alloquebar contradictores, qui tamen et Moysen pium famulum dei et libros eius oracula sancti spiritus creditis? estne ista domus dei, non quidem deo coaeterna, sed tamen secundum modum suum aeterna in caelis, ubi uices temporum frustra quaeritis, quia non inuenitis? supergreditur enim omnem distentionem et omne spatium aetatis uolubile, cui semper inhaerere deo bonum est. "est" inquiunt. quid igitur ex his, quae clamauit cor meum ad deum meum, cum audiret interius uocem laudis eius, quid tandem falsum esse contenditis? an quia erat informis materies, ubi propter nullam formam nullus ordo erat? ubi autem nullus ordo erat, nulla esse uicissitudo temporum poterat; et tamen hoc paene nihil in quantum non omnino nihil erat, ab illo utique erat, a quo est quidquid est, quod utcumque aliquid est. "hoc quoque" aiunt "non negamus".

What do you say to me, you objectors whom I was addressing, who nevertheless believe that Moses was a devout servant of God and that his books are the oracles of the Holy Spirit? Is not this the house of God, not indeed coeternal with God, yet in its own way "eternal in the heavens," where you seek changes of times in vain, because you do not find them? For it surpasses all distension and every revolving span of time, since "it is good for it always to cling to God." "It is," they say. What, then, of the things my heart cried out to my God when it heard inwardly the voice of his praise, what do you finally maintain is false? Is it that there was formless matter, where, because there was no form, there was no order? But where there was no order, there could be no succession of times; and yet this almost-nothing, insofar as it was not wholly nothing, was certainly from him from whom is whatever is, that is anything at all. "This too," they say, "we do not deny."

12.23CSEL 33:324–325

Cum his enim uolo coram te aliquid conloqui, deus meus, qui haec omnia, quae intus in mente mea non tacet ueritas tua, uera esse concedunt. nam qui haec negant, latrent quantum uolunt et obstrepant sibi: persuadere conabor, ut quiescant et uiam praebeant ad se uerbo tuo. quod si noluerint et reppulerint me, obsecro, deus meus, ne tu sileas a me. tu loquere in corde meo ueraciter; solus enim sic loqueris; et dimittam eos foris sufflantes in puluerem et excitantes terram in oculos suos et intrem in cubile meum et cantem tibi amatoria gemens inenarrabiles gemitus in peregrinatione mea et recordans Hierusalem extento in eam sursum corde, Hierusalem patriam meam, Hierusalem matrem meam, teque super eam regnatorem, inlustratorem, patrem, tutorem, maritum, castas et fortes delicias et solidum gaudium et omnia bona ineffabilia, simul omnia, quia unum summum et uerum bonum: et non auertar, donec in eius pacem, matris carissimae, ubi sunt primitiae spiritus mei, unde ista mihi certa sunt, colligas totum quod sum a dispersione et deformitate hac. et conformes atque confirmes in aeternum, deus meus, misericordia mea. cum his autem, qui cuncta illa, quae uera sunt, falsa esse non dicunt honorantes et in culmine sequendae auctoritatis nobiscum constituentes illam per sanctum Moysen editam sanctam scripturam tuam, et tamen nobis aliquid contradicunt, ita loquor. tu esto, deus noster, arbiter inter confessiones meas et contradictiones eorum.

For with these, my God, I want to speak for a little in your presence, those who grant that all these things are true which your Truth does not keep silent within my mind. As for those who deny them, let them bark as much as they like and deafen themselves; I will try to persuade them to be quiet and let your word find a way to them. But if they will not, and reject me, I beseech you, my God, "do not be silent to me." Speak truly in my heart, for you alone speak so; and I will leave them outside, blowing into the dust and raising earth into their own eyes; and I will enter my chamber and sing love songs to you, groaning with inexpressible groanings in my pilgrimage, and remembering Jerusalem, with my heart stretched up toward it: Jerusalem my homeland, Jerusalem my mother, and you who reign over it, its enlightener, father, guardian, husband, its chaste and strong delights and solid joy and all good things beyond telling, all at once, because you are the one supreme and true good. And I will not turn away until you gather all that I am from this dispersion and deformity into the peace of that dearest mother, where the first fruits of my spirit are, from which these things are certain to me; and you conform and confirm me for ever, my God, my mercy. But to those who do not say that all these true things are false, who honor your holy Scripture, published through holy Moses, and set it with us at the summit of authority to be followed, and yet contradict us in something, I speak thus. Be judge, our God, between my confessions and their contradictions.

12.24CSEL 33:325–326

Dicunt enim: "quamuis uera sint haec, non ea tamen duo Moyses intuebatur, cum reuelante spiritu diceret: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram. non caeli nomine spiritalem uel intellectualem illam creaturam semper faciem dei contemplantem significauit nec terrae nomine informem materiam." quid igitur? "quod nos dicimus" inquiunt "hoc ille uir sensit, hoc uerbis istis elocutus est". quid illud est? "nomine" aiunt "caeli et terrae totum istum uisibilem mundum prius uniuersaliter et breuiter significare uoluit, ut postea digereret dierum enumeratione quasi articulatim uniuersa, quae sancto spiritui placuit sic enuntiare. tales quippe homines erant rudis ille atque carnalis populus, cui loquebatur, ut eis opera dei non nisi sola uisibilia commendanda iudicaret." terram uero inuisibilem et incompositam tenebrosamque abyssum, unde consequenter ostenditur per illos dies facta atque disposita esse cuncta ista uisibilia, quae nota sunt omnibus, non incongruenter informem istam materiem intellegendam esse consentiunt.

For they say: "Although these things are true, yet Moses was not looking at those two things when, by the revelation of the Spirit, he said, 'In the beginning God made heaven and earth.' By the name of heaven he did not mean that spiritual or intellectual creation always contemplating the face of God, nor by the name of earth formless matter." What, then? "What we say," they say, "is what that man meant; this is what he expressed in those words." What is that? "By the name of heaven and earth," they say, "he wanted first to signify, universally and briefly, this whole visible world, so as afterward to set out, by the enumeration of the days, piece by piece as it were, all the things the Holy Spirit was pleased to express in this way. For the people to whom he spoke were such rough and carnal men that he judged that only the visible works of God should be commended to them." But they agree that the invisible and unformed earth and the dark abyss, from which, as is then shown, all these visible things known to everyone were made and set in order during those days, may not unfittingly be understood as this formless matter.

12.25CSEL 33:326–327

Quid? si dicat alius eandem informitatem confusionemque materiae caeli et terrae nomine prius insinuatam, quod ex ea mundus iste uisibilis cum omnibus naturis, quae in eo manifestissime apparent, qui caeli et terrae nomine saepe appellari solet, conditus atque perfectus est? quid? si dicat et alius caelum et terram quidem inuisibilem uisibilemque naturam non indecenter appellatam ac per hoc uniuersam creaturam, quam fecit in sapientia, id est in principio, deus, huiuscemodi duobus uocabulis esse conprehensam; uerum tamen quia non de ipsa substantia dei, sed ex nihilo cuncta facta sunt, quia non sunt id ipsum, quod deus, et inest quaedam mutabilitas omnibus, siue maneant, sicut aeterna domus dei, siue mutentur, sicut anima hominis et corpus, communem omnium rerum inuisibilium uisibiliumque materiem adhuc informem, sed certe formabilem, unde fieret caelum et terra, id est inuisibilis atque uisibilis iam utraque formata creatura, his nominibus enuntiatam, quibus appellaretur terra inuisibilis et inconposita et tenebrae super abyssum, ea distinctione, ut terra inuisibilis et inconposita intellegatur materies corporalis ante qualitatem formae, tenebrae autem super abyssum spiritalis materies ante cohibitionem quasi fluentis inmoderationis et ante inluminationem sapientiae?

What if another says that this same formlessness and confusion of matter was first suggested by the name of heaven and earth, because from it this visible world, with all the natures that appear most plainly in it, which is often called by the name of heaven and earth, was established and completed? What if yet another says that invisible and visible nature is not unfittingly called heaven and earth, and so the whole creation, which God made in Wisdom, that is, in the Beginning, is comprised in these two words; but since all things were made not from God's own substance but from nothing, because they are not the Selfsame that God is, and there is a certain changeableness in all of them, whether they remain, like the eternal house of God, or change, like the soul and body of man, then the common matter of all things invisible and visible, still formless but certainly capable of form, from which heaven and earth would be made, that is, both creations, invisible and visible, once formed, is expressed by the words by which it is called "invisible and unformed earth" and "darkness over the abyss"; with this distinction, that the invisible and unformed earth is understood as bodily matter before the quality of form, and darkness over the abyss as spiritual matter before the restraining of its flowing, as it were, unboundedness, and before the enlightening of Wisdom?

12.26CSEL 33:327

Est adhuc quod dicat, si quis alius uelit, non scilicet iam perfectas atque formatas inuisibiles uisibilesque naturas caeli et terrae nomine significari, cum legitur: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, sed ipsam adhuc informem inchoationem rerum formabilem creabilemque materiam his nominibus appellatam, quod in ea iam essent ista confusa, nondum qualitatibus formisque distincta, quae nunc iam digesta suis ordinibus uocantur caelum et terra, illa spiritalis, haec corporalis creatura.

There is yet another thing someone else may say, if he wishes: that when we read, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," what is signified by the name of heaven and earth is not invisible and visible natures already completed and formed, but the still formless beginning of things, matter capable of being formed and created, is called by these names, because in it those things were already present in confusion, not yet distinguished by qualities and forms, which now, arranged in their orders, are called heaven and earth, the one spiritual, the other bodily creation.

12.27CSEL 33:327–328

Quibus omnibus auditis et consideratis nolo uerbis contendere; ad nihil enim utile est nisi ad subuersionem audientium. ad aedificationem autem bona est lex, si quis ea legitime utatur, quia finis eius est caritas de corde puro et conscientia bona et fide non ficta; et nouit magister noster, in quibus duobus praeceptis totam legem prophetasque suspenderit. quae mihi ardenter confitenti, deus meus, lumen oculorum meorum in occulto, quid mihi obest, cum diuersa in his uerbis intellegi possint, quae tamen uera sint? quid, inquam, mihi obest, si aliud ego sensero quam sensit alius eum sensisse, qui scripsit? omnes quidem, qui legimus, nitimur hoc indagare atque conprehendere, quod uoluit ille quem legimus, et cum eum ueridicum credimus, nihil, quod falsum esse uel nouimus uel putamus, audemus eum existimare dixisse. dum ergo quisque conatur id sentire in scripturis sanctis, quod in eis sensit ille qui scripsit, quid mali est, si hoc sentiat, quod tu, lux omnium ueridicarum mentium, ostendis uerum esse, etiamsi non hoc sensit ille, quem legit, cum et ille uerum nec tamen hoc senserit?

Having heard and considered all these views, I do not want to "contend about words; for that is useful for nothing but the ruin of the hearers." But "the law is good" for edification "if one uses it lawfully," because "its end is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned"; and our Teacher knows on which two commandments he hung the whole Law and the Prophets. As I confess these things ardently, my God, light of my eyes in secret, what harm is it to me if different things, which are nevertheless true, can be understood in these words? What harm is it to me, I say, if I think something other than another thinks the writer meant? All of us who read are striving to trace and grasp what the one we read intended; and since we believe him truthful, we do not dare to think that he said anything we know or think to be false. While, then, each one tries to understand in the holy Scriptures what the writer understood in them, what harm is there if he understands what you, the light of all truthful minds, show to be true, even if the one he reads did not understand it, since that writer too understood something true, though not this?

12.28CSEL 33:328–329

Verum est enim, domine, fecisse te caelum et terram. uerum est esse principium sapientiam tuam, in qua fecisti omnia. item uerum est, quod mundus iste uisibilis habet magnas partes suas caelum et terram breui conplexione factarum omnium conditarumque naturarum. et uerum est, quod omne mutabile insinuat notitiae nostrae quandam informitatem, qua formam capit uel qua mutatur et uertitur. uerum est nulla tempora perpeti quod ita cohaeret formae incommutabili, ut, quamuis sit mutabile, non mutetur. uerum est informitatem, quae prope nihil est, uices temporum habere non posse. uerum est, quod, unde fit aliquid, potest quodam genere locutionis habere iam nomen eius rei, quae inde fit: unde potuit uocari caelum et terra quaelibet informitas, unde factum est caelum et terra. uerum est omnium formatorum nihil esse informi uicinius quam terram et abyssum. uerum est, quod non solum creatum atque formatum sed etiam quidquid creabile atque formabile est tu fecisti, ex quo sunt omnia. uerum est omne, quod ex informi formatur, prius esse informe, deinde formatum.

For it is true, Lord, that you made heaven and earth. It is true that the Beginning is your Wisdom, in which you made all things. Likewise it is true that this visible world has as its great parts heaven and earth, a brief summary of all the natures made and established. And it is true that everything changeable suggests to our knowledge a certain formlessness, by which it receives form, or by which it is changed and turned. It is true that what so clings to the unchangeable form that, though changeable, it does not change, undergoes no times. It is true that formlessness, which is almost nothing, cannot have successions of times. It is true that that from which something is made can, by a certain manner of speaking, already have the name of the thing that is made from it; so any formlessness from which heaven and earth were made could be called heaven and earth. It is true that of all formed things nothing is closer to the formless than earth and the abyss. It is true that you made not only what is created and formed, but also whatever can be created and formed, you from whom are all things. It is true that everything that is formed from the formless is first formless and then formed.

12.29CSEL 33:329–330

Ex his omnibus ueris, de quibus non dubitant, quorum interiori oculo talia uidere donasti et qui Moysen, famulum tuum, in spiritu ueritatis locutum esse immobiliter credunt, ex his ergo omnibus aliud sibi tollit qui dicit: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, id est in uerbo suo sibi coaeterno fecit deus intellegibilem atque sensibilem uel spiritalem corporalemque creaturam; aliud qui dicit: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, id est in uerbo suo sibi coaeterno fecit deus uniuersam istam molem corporei mundi huius cum omnibus quas continet manifestis notisque naturis; aliud qui dicit: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, id est in uerbo suo sibi coaeterno fecit informem materiam creaturae spiritalis et corporalis; aliud qui dicit: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, id est in uerbo suo sibi coaeterno fecit deus informem materiam creaturae corporalis, ubi confusum adhuc erat caelum et terra, quae nunc iam distincta atque formata in istius mundi mole sentimus; aliud qui dicit: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, id est in ipso exordio faciendi atque operandi fecit deus informem materiam confuse habentem caelum et terram, unde formata nunc eminent et apparent cum omnibus, quae in eis sunt.

From all these truths, which are not doubted by those to whose inner eye you have granted to see such things, and who firmly believe that Moses your servant spoke in the Spirit of truth, from all these, then, one takes one sense who says: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," that is, in his Word, coeternal with himself, God made the intelligible and the sensible, or spiritual and bodily, creation. Another who says: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," that is, in his Word, coeternal with himself, God made this whole mass of the bodily world with all the evident and known natures that it contains. Another who says: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," that is, in his Word, coeternal with himself, God made the formless matter of spiritual and bodily creation. Another who says: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," that is, in his Word, coeternal with himself, God made the formless matter of bodily creation, in which heaven and earth were still confused, which we now perceive distinguished and formed in the mass of this world. Another who says: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," that is, in the very first beginning of making and working, God made formless matter containing heaven and earth confusedly, from which, now formed, they stand out and appear with all that is in them.

12.30CSEL 33:330–331

Item quod adtinet ad intellectum uerborum sequentium, ex illis omnibus ueris aliud sibi tollit, qui dicit: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita, et tenebrae erant super abyssum, id est corporale illud, quod fecit deus, adhuc materies erat corporearum rerum informis, sine ordine, sine luce; aliud qui dicit: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita et tenebrae erant super abyssum, id est hoc totum, quod caelum et terra appellatum est, adhuc informis et tenebrosa materies erat, unde fieret caelum corporeum et terra corporea cum omnibus quae in eis sunt corporeis sensibus nota; aliud qui dicit: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita, et tenebrae erant super abyssum, id est hoc totum, quod caelum et terra appellatum est, adhuc informis et tenebrosa materies erat, unde fieret caelum intellegibile - quod alibi dicitur caelum caeli — et terra, scilicet omnis natura corporea, sub quo nomine intellegatur etiam hoc caelum corporeum, id est unde fieret omnis inuisibilis uisibilisque creatura; aliud qui dicit: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita, et tenebrae erant super abyssum, non illam informitatem nomine caeli et terrae scriptura appellauit, sed iam erat, inquit, ipsa informitas, quam terram inuisibilem et inconpositam tenebrosamque abyssum nominauit, de qua caelum et terram deum fecisse praedixerat, spiritalem scilicet corporalemque creaturam; aliud qui dicit: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita, et tenebrae erant super abyssum, id est informitas quaedam iam materies erat, unde caelum et terram deum fecisse scriptura praedixit, totam scilicet corpoream mundi molem in duas maximas partes superiorem atque inferiorem distributam cum omnibus quae in eis sunt usitatis notisque creaturis.

Likewise, as regards the understanding of the words that follow, from all those truths one takes one sense who says: "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss," that is, that bodily thing which God made was still the formless matter of bodily things, without order, without light. Another who says: "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss," that is, this whole which has been called heaven and earth was still formless and dark matter, from which would be made the bodily heaven and the bodily earth with all that is in them, known to the bodily senses. Another who says: "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss," that is, this whole which has been called heaven and earth was still formless and dark matter, from which would be made the intelligible heaven (which elsewhere is called the heaven of heaven) and the earth, namely all bodily nature, under which name this bodily heaven too is to be understood; that is, from which all invisible and visible creation would be made. Another who says: "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss": Scripture did not call that formlessness by the name of heaven and earth, but, he says, that formlessness already existed which it named the invisible and unformed earth and the dark abyss, from which it had said before that God made heaven and earth, namely the spiritual and bodily creation. Another who says: "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss," that is, there was already a certain formless matter, from which Scripture said before that God made heaven and earth, namely the whole bodily mass of the world, divided into two very great parts, upper and lower, with all the familiar and known creatures that are in them.

12.31CSEL 33:331–333

Cum enim duabus istis extremis sententiis resistere quisquam ita temptauerit: "si non uultis hanc informitatem materiae caeli et terrae nomine appellatam uideri, erat ergo aliquid, quod non fecerat deus, unde caelum et terram faceret; neque enim scriptura narrauit, quod istam materiem deus fecerit, nisi intellegamus eam caeli et terrae aut solius terrae uocabulo significatam, cum diceretur: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, ut id, quod sequitur: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita, quamuis informem materiam sic placuerit appellare, non tamen intellegamus nisi eam, quam fecit deus in eo, quod perscriptum est: fecit caelum et terram," respondebunt assertores duarum istarum sententiarum, quas extremas posuimus, aut illius aut illius, cum haec audierint, et dicent: "informem quidem istam materiam non negamus a deo factam, deo, a quo sunt omnia bona ualde, quia, sicut dicimus amplius bonum esse quod creatum atque formatum est, ita fatemur minus bonum esse quod factum est creabile atque formabile, sed tamen bonum: non autem conmemorasse scripturam, quod hanc informitatem fecerit deus, sicut alia multa non commemorauit, ut Cherubim et Seraphim, et quae apostolus distincte ait, sedes, dominationes, principatus, potestates, quae tamen omnia deum fecisse manifestum est. aut si in eo, quod dictum est: fecit caelum et terram, conprehensa sunt omnia, quid de aquis dicimus, super quas ferebatur spiritus dei? si enim terra nominata simul intelleguntur, quomodo iam terrae nomine materies informis accipitur, quando tam speciosas aquas uidemus? aut si ita accipitur, cur ex eadem informitate scriptum est factum firmamentum et uocatum caelum neque scriptum est factas esse aquas? non enim adhuc informes sunt et inuisae, quas ita decora specie fluere cernimus. aut si tunc acceperunt istam speciem, cum dixit deus: congregetur aqua, quae est sub firmamento, ut congregatio sit ipsa formatio, quid respondebitur de aquis, quae super firmamentum sunt, quia neque informes tam honorabilem sedem accipere meruissent nec scriptum est, qua uoce formatae sint? unde si aliquid Genesis tacuit deum fecisse, quod tamen deum fecisse nec sana fides nec certus ambigit intellectus, nec ideo ulla sobria doctrina dicere audebit istas aquas coaeternas deo, quia in libro Geneseos commemoratas quidem audimus, ubi autem factae sint, non inuenimus, cur non informem quoque illam materiem, quam scriptura haec terram inuisibilem et inconpositam tenebrosamque abyssum appellat, docente ueritate intellegamus ex deo factam esse de nihilo ideoque illi non esse coaeternam, quamuis ubi facta sit omiserit enuntiare ista narratio?"

For suppose someone tries to oppose the last two opinions in this way: "If you do not want this formlessness of matter to be seen as called by the name of heaven and earth, then there was something which God had not made, from which he made heaven and earth; for Scripture has not told that God made this matter, unless we understand it to be signified by the word heaven and earth, or earth alone, when it was said, 'In the beginning God made heaven and earth'; so that what follows, 'But the earth was invisible and unformed,' although it pleased Scripture to call formless matter so, we should understand only of that which God made in what is written, 'He made heaven and earth.'" The defenders of those two opinions which we put last, one or the other, when they hear this, will answer and say: "We do not deny that this formless matter was made by God, the God from whom all things are very good; for as we say that what is created and formed is a greater good, so we confess that what is made capable of being created and formed is a lesser good, but still good. But Scripture has not recorded that God made this formlessness, just as it has not recorded many other things, such as the cherubim and seraphim, and those that the apostle names distinctly, thrones, dominions, principalities, powers, all of which it is nevertheless plain that God made. Or if everything is included in what was said, 'He made heaven and earth,' what do we say of the waters over which the Spirit of God was moving? For if they are understood as included when earth is named, how is formless matter to be taken by the name of earth, when we see the waters so beautiful? Or if it is taken so, why is it written that the firmament was made from the same formlessness and called heaven, and it is not written that the waters were made? For they are no longer formless and invisible, since we see them flowing in such a lovely form. Or if they received this form when God said, 'Let the water under the firmament be gathered together,' so that the gathering is itself the forming, what will be answered about the waters above the firmament? For neither would they have deserved so honorable a place if they were formless, nor is it written by what word they were formed. So if Genesis is silent about something that God made, which yet neither sound faith nor sure understanding doubts that God made, and no sober teaching will therefore dare to say that these waters are coeternal with God because we hear them mentioned in the book of Genesis but do not find where they were made, why should we not also understand, as truth teaches, that that formless matter, which this Scripture calls the invisible and unformed earth and the dark abyss, was made by God from nothing and is therefore not coeternal with him, even though this account has omitted to say where it was made?"

12.32CSEL 33:333

His ergo auditis atque perspectis pro captu infirmitatis meae, quam tibi confiteor scienti deo meo, duo uideo dissensionum genera oboriri posse, cum aliquid a nuntiis ueracibus per signa enuntiatur, unum, si de ueritate rerum, alterum, si de ipsius qui enuntiat uoluntate dissensio est. aliter enim quaerimus de creaturae conditione, quid uerum sit, aliter autem quid in his uerbis Moyses, egregius domesticus fidei tuae, intellegere lectorem auditoremque uoluerit. in illo primo genere discedant a me omnes, qui ea, quae falsa sunt, se scire arbitrantur. in hoc item altero discedant a me omnes, qui ea quae falsa sunt Moysen dixisse arbitrantur. coniungar autem illis, domine, in te et delecter cum eis in te, qui ueritate tua pascuntur in latitudine caritatis, et accedamus simul ad uerba libri tui et quaeramus in eis uoluntatem tuam per uoluntatem famuli tui, cuius calamo dispensasti ea.

Having heard and considered these things, then, as far as my weakness allows, which I confess to you, my God, who know it, I see that two kinds of disagreement can arise when something is reported in signs by truthful messengers: one, if the disagreement concerns the truth of the things; the other, if it concerns the intention of the one who reports. For it is one thing to ask what is true about the establishing of creation, another to ask what Moses, that outstanding servant of your household of faith, intended the reader and hearer to understand by these words. In the first kind, let all depart from me who think they know things that are false. In the second, likewise, let all depart from me who think that Moses said things that are false. But let me be joined with those, Lord, in you, and delight with them in you, who feed on your truth in the breadth of love; and let us approach together the words of your book and seek in them your intention through the intention of your servant, by whose pen you dispensed them.

12.33CSEL 33:333–334

Sed quis nostrum sic inuenit eam inter tam multa uera, quae in illis uerbis aliter atque aliter intellectis occurrunt quaerentibus, ut tam fidenter dicat hoc sensisse Moysen atque hoc in illa narratione uoluisse intellegi, quam fidenter dicit hoc uerum esse, siue ille hoc senserit siue aliud? ecce enim, deus meus, ego seruus tuus, qui uoui tibi sacrificium confessionis in his litteris et oro, ut ex misericordia tua reddam tibi uota mea, ecce ego quam fidenter dico in tuo uerbo incommutabili omnia te fecisse, inuisibilia et uisibilia, numquid tam fidenter dico non aliud quam hoc adtendisse Moysen, cum scriberet: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, quia non, sicut in tua ueritate hoc certum uideo, ita in eius mente uideo id eum cogitasse, cum haec scriberet? potuit enim cogitare in ipso faciendi exordio, cum diceret: in principio; potuit et caelum et terram hoc loco nullam iam formatam perfectamque naturam siue spiritalem siue corporalem, sed utramque inchoatam et adhuc informem uelle intellegi. uideo quippe uere potuisse dici, quidquid horum diceretur, sed quid horum in his uerbis ille cogitauerit, non ita uideo, quamuis siue aliquid horum siue quid aliud, quod a me conmemoratum non est, tantus uir ille mente conspexerit, cum haec uerba promeret, uerum eum uidisse apteque id enuntiauisse non dubitem.

But which of us has so found it among so many true things, which occur to those who seek in those words understood now one way and now another, that he can say as confidently that Moses meant this and wanted this to be understood in that account as he confidently says that this is true, whether Moses meant it or something else? For see, my God, I your servant, who have vowed to you a sacrifice of confession in this writing, and pray that by your mercy I may pay you my vows: see, I say confidently that in your unchangeable Word you made all things, invisible and visible; but do I say as confidently that Moses had nothing else in mind than this when he wrote, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth"? For I do not see in his mind that he thought this when he wrote these words, as I see it to be certain in your truth. For he could have been thinking of the very start of making when he said "in the beginning"; he could also have wanted "heaven and earth" in this place to be understood not of any nature already formed and completed, whether spiritual or bodily, but of both only begun and still formless. For I see that whichever of these were said could truly be said; but which of these he had in mind in these words I do not see in the same way; although, whether that great man saw in his mind one of these or something else that I have not mentioned when he uttered these words, I do not doubt that he saw what was true and expressed it fittingly.

12.34CSEL 33:334–335

Nemo iam mihi molestus sit dicendo mihi: "non hoc sensit Moyses, quod tu dicis, sed hoc sensit, quod ego dico." si enim mihi diceret: "unde scis hoc sensisse Moysen, quod de his uerbis eius eloqueris?" aequo animo ferre deberem et responderem fortasse, quae superius respondi uel aliquanto uberius, si esset durior. cum uero dicit: "non hoc ille sensit, quod tu dicis, sed quod ego dico" neque tamen negat, quod uterque nostrum dicit, utrumque uerum esse, o uita pauperum, deus meus, in cuius sinu non est contradictio, plue mihi mitigationes in cor, ut patienter tales feram; qui non mihi hoc dicunt, quia diuini sunt et in corde famuli tui uiderunt quod dicunt, sed quia superbi sunt nec nouerunt Moysi sententiam, sed amant suam, non quia uera est, sed quia sua est. alioquin et aliam ueram pariter amarent, sicut ego amo quod dicunt, quando uerum dicunt, non quia ipsorum, sed quia uerum est: et ideo iam nec ipsorum est, quia uerum est. si autem ideo ament illud, quia uerum est, iam et ipsorum est et meum est, quoniam in commune omnium est ueritatis amatorum. illud autem, quod contendunt non hoc sensisse Moysen, quod ego dico, sed quod ipsi dicunt, nolo, non amo, quia etsi ita est, tamen ista temeritas non scientiae, sed audaciae est, nec uisus, sed tyfus eam peperit. ideoque, domine, tremenda sunt iudicia tua, quoniam ueritas tua nec mea est nec illius aut illius, sed omnium nostrum, quos ad eius communionem publice uocas, terribiliter admonens nos, ut nolimus eam habere priuatam, ne priuemur ea. nam quisquis id, quod tu omnibus ad fruendum proponis, sibi proprie uindicat et suum uult esse quod omnium est, a communi propellitur ad sua, hoc est a ueritate ad mendacium. qui enim loquitur mendacium, de suo loquitur.

Let no one now trouble me by saying to me, "Moses did not mean what you say, but what I say." For if he said to me, "How do you know that Moses meant what you say about these words of his?" I ought to bear it calmly, and answer perhaps what I answered above, or somewhat more fully if he were more stubborn. But when he says, "He did not mean what you say, but what I say," and yet does not deny that what each of us says is true, then, O life of the poor, my God, in whose bosom there is no contradiction, rain softening into my heart, so that I may bear such people patiently. They say this to me not because they are godly and have seen in the heart of your servant what they say, but because they are proud; they do not know Moses' meaning, but they love their own, not because it is true but because it is theirs. Otherwise they would equally love another true meaning, as I love what they say when they say what is true, not because it is theirs but because it is true; and for that very reason it is no longer theirs, because it is true. But if they love it because it is true, it is both theirs and mine, since it is the common property of all lovers of truth. But their contention that Moses did not mean what I say but what they say, I do not want and do not love; because even if it is so, that rashness is born not of knowledge but of audacity, not of vision but of pride. And therefore, Lord, your judgments are to be feared, because your truth is neither mine nor his nor another's, but belongs to all of us whom you publicly call to share in it, warning us terribly not to want to hold it privately, lest we be deprived of it. For whoever claims as his own what you set before all to enjoy, and wants to be his own what belongs to all, is driven from the common to his own, that is, from truth to a lie. For "he who speaks a lie speaks from his own."

12.35CSEL 33:335–336

Adtende, iudex optime, deus, ipsa ueritas, adtende, quid dicam contradictori huic, adtende; coram te enim dico et coram fratribus meis, qui legitime utuntur lege usque ad finem caritatis; adtende et uide, quid ei dicam, si placet tibi. hanc enim uocem huic refero fraternam et pacificam: si ambo uidemus uerum esse quod dicis et ambo uidemus uerum esse quod dico, ubi, quaeso, id uidemus? nec ego utique in te nec tu in me, sed ambo in ipsa quae supra mentes nostras est inconmutabili ueritate. cum ergo de ipsa domini dei nostri luce non contendamus, cur de proximi cogitatione contendimus, quam sic uidere non possumus, ut uidetur inconmutabilis ueritas, quando, si ipse Moyses apparuisset nobis atque dixisset: "hoc cogitaui", nec sic eam uideremus, sed crederemus? non itaque supra quam scriptum est unus pro altero infletur aduersus alterum. diligamus dominum deum nostrum ex toto corde, ex tota anima, ex tota mente nostra et proximum nostrum sicut nosmet ipsos. propter quae duo praecepta caritatis sensisse Moysen, quidquid in illis libris sensit, nisi crediderimus, mendacem faciemus dominum, cum de animo conserui aliter quam ille docuit opinamur. iam uide, quam stultum sit in tanta copia uerissimarum sententiarum, quae de illis uerbis erui possunt, temere adfirmare, quam earum Moyses potissimum senserit, et perniciosis contentionibus ipsam offendere caritatem, propter quam dixit omnia, cuius dicta conamur exponere.

Listen, best Judge, God, Truth itself, listen to what I say to this objector; listen, for I speak before you and before my brothers who use the law lawfully, to the end of love; listen and see what I say to him, if it pleases you. For this is the brotherly and peaceful word I give him: if we both see that what you say is true, and we both see that what I say is true, where, I ask, do we see it? Certainly I do not see it in you nor you in me, but both of us in the unchangeable Truth itself, which is above our minds. Since, then, we do not quarrel about the very light of the Lord our God, why do we quarrel about the thought of our neighbor, which we cannot see as the unchangeable Truth is seen? For even if Moses himself appeared to us and said, "This is what I meant," we would not see it even then, but believe it. So let us not "be puffed up one against another beyond what is written." "Let us love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our mind, and our neighbor as ourselves." Unless we believe that Moses meant whatever he meant in those books for the sake of these two commandments of love, we shall make the Lord a liar, when we think of our fellow servant's mind otherwise than he taught. See, then, how foolish it is, amid so great an abundance of very true meanings that can be drawn from those words, to assert rashly which of them Moses chiefly meant, and by harmful quarrels to offend love itself, for whose sake he said all the things we are trying to explain.

12.36CSEL 33:336–337

Et tamen ego, deus meus, celsitudo humilitatis meae et requies laboris mei, qui audis confessiones meas et dimittis peccata mea, quoniam tu mihi praecipis, ut diligam proximum meum sicut me ipsum, non possum minus credere de Moyse fidelissimo famulo tuo, quam mihi optarem ac desiderarem abs te dari muneris, si tempore illo natus essem quo ille eoque loci me constituisses, ut per seruitutem cordis ac linguae meae litterae illae dispensarentur, quae tanto post essent omnibus gentibus profuturae et per uniuersum orbem tanto auctoritatis culmine omnium falsarum superbarumque doctrinarum uerba superaturae. uellem quippe, si tunc ego essem Moyses — ex eadem namque massa omnes uenimus; et quid est homo, nisi quia memor es eius? — uellem ergo, si tunc ego essem quod ille et mihi abs te Geneseos liber scribendus adiungeretur, talem mihi eloquendi facultatem dari et eum texendi sermonis modum, ut neque illi, qui nondum queunt intellegere quemadmodum creat deus, tamquam excedentia uires suas dicta recusarent et illi, qui hoc iam possunt, in quamlibet ueram sententiam cogitando uenissent, eam non praetermissam in paucis uerbis tui famuli reperirent, et si alius aliam uidisset in luce ueritatis, nec ipsa in eisdem uerbis intellegenda deesset.

And yet, my God, height of my lowliness and rest of my labor, who hear my confessions and forgive my sins: since you command me to love my neighbor as myself, I cannot believe that you gave Moses, your most faithful servant, a lesser gift than I would wish and desire to be given to me by you, if I had been born at the time he was and you had placed me in that position, so that by the service of my heart and tongue those writings might be dispensed which were to benefit all nations so long afterward, and to surpass throughout the whole world, from so lofty a summit of authority, the words of all false and proud teachings. For I would have wished, if I had then been Moses (for we all come from the same lump; and "what is man, except that you are mindful of him?"), I would have wished, then, if I had been what he was and the book of Genesis had been assigned to me by you to write, that such a power of expression and such a manner of weaving words would be given me that those who cannot yet understand how God creates would not reject the words as beyond their powers, and those who can already do so would find, in the few words of your servant, whatever true meaning they had arrived at by thinking, not omitted; and if another saw another meaning in the light of truth, that too would not be missing from the same words for him to understand.

12.37CSEL 33:337–338

Sicut enim fons in paruo loco uberior est pluribusque riuis in ampliora spatia fluxum ministrat quam quilibet eorum riuorum, qui per multa locorum ab eodem fonte deducitur, ita narratio dispensatoris tui sermocinaturis pluribus profutura paruo sermonis modulo scatet fluenta liquidae ueritatis, unde sibi quisque uerum, quod de his rebus potest, hic illud, ille illud, per longiores loquellarum anfractus trahat. alii enim cum haec uerba legunt uel audiunt, cogitant deum quasi hominem aut quasi aliquam mole inmensa praeditam potestatem nouo quodam et repentino placito extra se ipsam tamquam locis distantibus fecisse caelum et terram, duo magna corpora supra et infra, quibus omnia continerentur, et cum audiunt: dixit deus: fiat illud, et factum est illud, cogitant uerba coepta et finita, sonantia temporibus atque transeuntia, post quorum transitum statim existeret quod iussum est ut existeret, et si quid forte aliud hoc modo ex familiaritate carnis opinantur. in quibus adhuc paruulis animalibus, dum isto humillimo genere uerborum tamquam materno sinu eorum gestatur infirmitas, salubriter aedificatur fides, qua certum habeant et teneant deum fecisse omnes naturas, quas eorum sensus mirabili uarietate circumspicit. quorum si quispiam quasi uilitatem dictorum aspernatus extra nutritorias cunas superba inbeccillitate se extenderit, heu! cadet miser et, domine deus, miserere, ne inplumem pullum conculcent qui transeunt uiam, et mitte angelum tuum, qui eum reponat in nido, ut uiuat, donec uolet.

For as a spring in a small place is more abundant, and supplies its flow to more streams over wider spaces than any one of those streams that is led from the same spring through many places, so the account of your dispenser, which was to benefit many who would speak of it, pours out from a small measure of speech floods of clear truth, from which each may draw for himself, by the longer windings of discussion, what truth he can about these things, one this and another that. For some, when they read or hear these words, think of God as a man, or as some power endowed with an immense mass, which by some new and sudden decision made heaven and earth outside itself, as if in distant places, two great bodies above and below, in which all things would be contained; and when they hear, "God said, 'Let it be made,' and it was made," they think of words begun and ended, sounding in time and passing away, after whose passing what had been commanded to exist at once came into existence; and whatever else of this kind they perhaps imagine from their familiarity with the flesh. In these, who are still little animals, while their weakness is carried by this very humble kind of speech as in a mother's bosom, faith is healthily built up, by which they hold for certain that God made all the natures which their senses see around them in wonderful variety. If any of them, despising the words as if lowly, stretches himself out of his nursery cradle in proud weakness, alas, he will fall, poor thing; and, Lord God, have mercy, lest those who pass by on the road trample the unfledged chick, and send your angel to put it back in the nest, so that it may live until it can fly.

12.38CSEL 33:338–339

Alii uero, quibus haec uerba non iam nidus, sed opaca frutecta sunt, uident in eis latentes fructus et uolitant laetantes et garriunt scrutantes et carpunt eos. uident enim, cum haec uerba legunt uel audiunt, tua, deus, aeterne stabili permansione cuncta praeterita et futura tempora superari nec tamen quicquam esse temporalis creaturae, quod tu non feceris, cuius uoluntas, quia id est quod tu, nullo modo mutata uel quae antea non fuisset, exorta uoluntate fecisti omnia, non de te similitudinem tuam formam omnium, sed de nihilo dissimilitudinem informem, quae formaretur per similitudinem tuam recurrens in te unum pro captu ordinato, quantum cuique rerum suo genere datum est, et fierent omnia bona ualde, siue maneant circa te, siue gradatim remotiore distantia per tempora et locos pulchras uariationes faciant aut patiantur. uident haec et gaudent in luce ueritatis tuae, quantulum hic ualent.

But others, for whom these words are no longer a nest but shady thickets, see hidden fruits in them, and fly about rejoicing, and chirp as they search them out and pluck them. For when they read or hear these words, they see that all past and future times are surpassed by your eternal, stable permanence, O God; and yet that there is nothing in temporal creation which you did not make; and that you, whose will is what you are, made all things by no changed will, nor by a will arising which had not been before; not from yourself, a likeness of yourself, the form of all things, but from nothing, a formless unlikeness, to be formed through your likeness, returning to you, the One, according to its ordered capacity, as much as has been given to each thing in its kind; and that all things were made very good, whether they remain close to you, or, at a distance increasing by degrees, through times and places, make or undergo beautiful variations. They see these things and rejoice in the light of your truth, as far as they are able here.

12.39CSEL 33:339–340

Et alius eorum intendit in id, quod dictum est: in principio fecit deus, et respicit sapientiam principium, quia et loquitur ipsa nobis. alius itidem intendit in eadem uerba et principium intellegit exordium rerum conditarum et sic accipit: in principio fecit, ac si diceretur: primo fecit. atque in eis, qui intellegunt in principio, quod in sapientia fecit caelum et terram, alius eorum ipsum caelum et terram, creabilem materiam caeli et terrae, sic esse credit cognominatam, alius iam formatas distinctasque naturas, alius unam formatam eandemque spiritalem caeli nomine, aliam informem corporalis materiae terrae nomine. qui autem intellegunt in nominibus caeli et terrae adhuc informem materiam, de qua formaretur caelum et terra, nec ipsi uno more id intellegunt, sed alius, unde consummaretur intellegibilis sensibilisque creatura, alius tantum, unde sensibilis moles ista corporea sinu grandi continens perspicuas promptasque naturas. nec illi uno modo, qui iam dispositas digestasque creaturas caelum et terram uocari hoc loco credunt, sed alius inuisibilem atque uisibilem, alius solam uisibilem, in qua luminosum caelum suspicimus et terram caliginosam quaeque in eis sunt.

And one of them attends to what was said, "In the beginning God made," and looks to Wisdom as the Beginning, "because it also speaks to us." Another likewise attends to the same words and understands "the beginning" as the start of created things, and takes "In the beginning he made" as if it were said, "First he made." And among those who understand "in the beginning" to mean that he made heaven and earth in Wisdom, one believes that heaven and earth themselves, the matter capable of creating heaven and earth, were so named; another, natures already formed and distinguished; another, one formed and spiritual nature by the name of heaven, the other the formless nature of bodily matter by the name of earth. And those who understand by the names of heaven and earth the still formless matter from which heaven and earth would be formed do not understand it in one way either; but one understands the matter from which the intelligible and sensible creation would be completed, another only that from which this sensible bodily mass would be made, holding in its great bosom the visible and evident natures. Nor do those agree who believe that heaven and earth in this place are the creatures already arranged and set in order; but one understands the invisible and visible, another only the visible, in which we look up to the shining heaven and the dark earth and the things that are in them.

12.40CSEL 33:340–342

At ille, qui non aliter accipit: in principio fecit, quam si diceretur: primo fecit, non habet quomodo ueraciter intellegat caelum et terram, nisi materiam caeli et terrae intellegat, uidelicet uniuersae, id est intellegibilis corporalisque creaturae. si enim iam formatam uelit uniuersam, recte ab eo quaeri poterit, si hoc primo fecit deus, quid fecerit deinceps, et post uniuersitatem non inueniet ac per hoc audiet inuitus: "quomodo illud primo, si postea nihil?" cum uero dicit primo informem, deinde formatam, non est absurdus, si modo est idoneus discernere, quid praecedat aeternitate, quid tempore, quid electione, quid origine: aeternitate, sicut deus omnia; tempore, sicut flos fructum; electione, sicut fructus florem; origine, sicut sonus cantum. in his quattuor primum et ultimum, quae conmemoraui, difficillime intelleguntur, duo media facillime. namque rara uisio est et nimis ardua conspicere, domine, aeternitatem tuam inconmutabiliter mutabilia facientem ac per hoc priorem. quis deinde sic acutum cernat animo, ut sine labore magno dinoscere ualeat, quomodo sit prior sonus quam cantus, ideo quia cantus est formatus sonus et esse utique aliquid non formatum potest, formari autem quod non est non potest? sic est prior materies quam id, quod ex ea fit, non ideo prior, quia ipsa efficit, cum potius fiat, nec prior interuallo temporis. neque enim priore tempore sonos edimus informes sine cantu et eos posteriore tempore in formam cantici coaptamus aut fingimus, sicut ligna, quibus arca, uel argentum, quo uasculum fabricatur; tales quippe materiae tempore etiam praecedunt formas rerum, quae fiunt ex eis. at in cantu non ita est. cum enim cantatur, auditur sonus eius, non prius informiter sonat et deinde formatur in cantum. quod enim primo utcumque sonuerit, praeterit, nec ex eo quicquam reperies, quod resumptum arte conponas: et ideo cantus in sono suo uertitur, qui sonus eius materies eius est. idem quippe formatur, ut cantus sit. et ideo, sicut dicebam, prior materies sonandi quam forma cantandi: non per faciendi potentiam prior; neque enim sonus est cantandi artifex, sed cantanti animae subiacet ex corpore, de quo cantum faciat; nec tempore prior: simul enim cum cantu editur; nec prior electione: non enim potior sonus quam cantus, quandoquidem cantus est non tantum sonus uerum etiam speciosus sonus. sed prior est origine, quia non cantus formatur, ut sonus sit, sed sonus formatur, ut cantus sit. hoc exemplo qui potest intellegat materiam rerum primo factam et appellatam caelum et terram, quia inde facta sunt caelum et terra, nec tempore primo factam, quia formae rerum exserunt tempora, illa autem erat informis iamque in temporibus simul animaduertitur, nec tamen de illa narrari aliquid potest, nisi uelut tempore prior sit, cum pendatur extremior, quia profecto meliora sunt formata quam informia, et praecedatur aeternitate creatoris, ut esset de nihilo, unde aliquid fieret.

But he who takes "In the beginning he made" in no other way than as if it were said, "First he made," has no way to understand "heaven and earth" truly unless he understands the matter of heaven and earth, that is, of the whole creation, intelligible and bodily. For if he wants it to be the whole creation already formed, he could rightly be asked: if God made this first, what did he make next? And he will find nothing after the whole, and so will hear, against his will, "How is that first, if there is nothing after?" But when he says that God made it first formless and then formed, he is not absurd, provided he is able to discern what precedes by eternity, what by time, what by choice, and what by origin: by eternity, as God precedes all things; by time, as the flower precedes the fruit; by choice, as the fruit is preferred to the flower; by origin, as sound precedes song. Of these four, the first and last I have mentioned are very hard to understand, the two in the middle very easy. For it is a rare and very arduous vision, Lord, to behold your eternity unchangeably making changeable things, and therefore prior to them. Then who has so sharp a mind as to be able to discern without great labor how sound is prior to song, because song is formed sound, and something unformed can certainly exist, but what does not exist cannot be formed? So matter is prior to what is made from it, not because it makes it, since rather it is made, nor prior by an interval of time. For we do not first utter formless sounds without song and afterward fit or shape them into the form of a song, as with wood from which a chest is made, or silver from which a vessel is fashioned; for such materials do precede in time the forms of the things made from them. But with song it is not so. For when it is sung, its sound is heard; it does not first sound formlessly and then is formed into song. For whatever has sounded in any way passes away, and you will find nothing of it that you could take up again and compose by art; and so song is turned in its own sound, and that sound is its matter. For the sound itself is formed so as to be song. And so, as I said, the matter of sounding is prior to the form of singing: not prior by the power of making, for sound is not the maker of the song, but is supplied from the body to the singing soul, from which to make the song; nor prior in time, for it is uttered together with the song; nor prior by choice, for sound is not better than song, since song is not only sound but beautiful sound. But it is prior by origin, because song is not formed so as to be sound, but sound is formed so as to be song. By this example let whoever can understand that the matter of things was made first and called heaven and earth, because heaven and earth were made from it; and not made first in time, because the forms of things give rise to times, while it was formless, and is only perceived together with them in times; and yet nothing can be told of it except as if it were prior in time, although it is ranked last, because formed things are certainly better than formless ones; and it is preceded by the eternity of the Creator, so that it might exist from nothing, from which something could be made.

12.41CSEL 33:342–343

In hac diuersitate sententiarum uerarum concordiam pariat ipsa ueritas, et deus noster misereatur nostri, ut legitime lege utamur, praecepti fine, pura caritate. ac per hoc, si quis quaerit ex me, quid horum Moyses, tuus ille famulus, senserit, non sunt hi sermones confessionum mearum. si tibi non confiteor, nescio et scio tamen illas ueras esse sententias exceptis carnalibus, de quibus quantum existimaui locutus sum. quos tamen bonae spei paruulos haec uerba libri tui non territant alta humiliter et pauca copiose; sed omnes, quos in eis uerbis uera cernere ac dicere fateor, diligamus nos inuicem pariterque diligamus te, deum nostrum, fontem ueritatis, si non uana, sed ipsam sitimus, eundemque famulum tuum, scripturae huius dispensatorem, spiritu tuo plenum, ita honoremus, ut hoc eum te reuelante, cum haec scriberet, adtendisse credamus, quod in eis maxime et luce ueritatis et fruge utilitatis excellit.

In this diversity of true opinions, let Truth itself bring forth concord, and "may our God have mercy on us," that we may use the law lawfully, for the end of the commandment, pure love. And so, if anyone asks me which of these Moses, your servant, meant, these are not the words of my confessions if I do not confess to you: I do not know. And yet I know that those opinions are true, except the carnal ones, about which I have said what I thought. Yet these words of your book, lofty in their lowliness and rich in their few words, do not frighten those little ones of good hope. But let all of us whom I acknowledge to see and speak what is true in these words love one another, and equally love you, our God, the fountain of truth, if we thirst not for vain things but for truth itself; and let us so honor your servant himself, the dispenser of this Scripture, full of your Spirit, as to believe that, when he wrote these things by your revelation, he attended to what is most excellent in them both in the light of truth and in the fruit of usefulness.

12.42CSEL 33:343

Ita cum alius dixerit: "hoc sensit, quod ego", et alius: "immo illud, quod ego", religiosius me arbitror dicere: cur non utrumque potius, si utrumque uerum est, et si quid tertium - et si quid quartum et si quid omnino aliud uerum quispiam in his uerbis uidet, cur non illa omnia uidisse credatur, per quem deus unus sacras litteras uera et diuersa uisuris multorum sensibus temperauit? ego certe, quod intrepidus de meo corde pronuntio, si ad culmen auctoritatis aliquid scriberem, sic mallem scribere, ut quod ueri quisque de his rebus capere posset, mea uerba resonarent, quam ut unam ueram sententiam ad hoc apertius ponerem, ut excluderem ceteras, quarum falsitas me non posset offendere. nolo itaque, deus meus, tam praeceps esse, ut hoc illum uirum de te meruisse non credam. sensit ille omnino in his uerbis atque cogitauit, cum ea scriberet, quidquid hic ueri potuimus inuenire et quidquid nos non potuimus aut nondum potuimus et tamen in eis inueniri potest.

So when one says, "He meant what I mean," and another, "No, what I mean," I think it more religious to say: Why not both, if both are true; and if anyone sees a third, and a fourth, and anything else at all that is true in these words, why should he not be believed to have seen all of them, he through whom the one God tempered the sacred writings to the understandings of many who would see things true and different? I at least, and I declare it fearlessly from my heart, if I were writing something to have the highest authority, would rather write so that my words would echo whatever truth each person could grasp about these things, than set down one true meaning so plainly as to exclude the others, which, not being false, could not offend me. So, my God, I do not want to be so rash as not to believe that that man deserved this from you. He certainly meant and thought in these words, when he wrote them, whatever truth we have been able to find here, and whatever we have not been able or not yet been able to find, and yet can be found in them.

12.43CSEL 33:343–344

Postremo, domine, qui deus es et non caro et sanguis, si quid homo minus uidit, numquid et spiritum tuum bonum, qui deducet me in terra recta, latere potuit, quidquid eras in eis uerbis tu ipse reuelaturus legentibus posteris, etiamsi ille, per quem dicta sunt, unam fortassis ex multis ueris sententiam cogitauit? quod si ita est, sit igitur illa quam cogitauit ceteris excelsior, nobis autem, domine, aut ipsam demonstras aut quam placet alteram ueram, ut, siue nobis hoc quod etiam illi homini tuo siue aliud ex eorundem uerborum occasione patefacias, tu tamen pascas, non error inludat. ecce, domine deus meus, quam multa de paucis uerbis, quam multa, oro te, scripsimus! quae nostrae uires, quae tempora omnibus libris tuis ad istum modum sufficient? sine me itaque breuius in eis confiteri tibi et eligere unum aliquid quod tu inspiraueris uerum, certum et bonum, etiamsi multa occurrerint, ubi multa occurrere poterunt, ea fide confessionis meae, ut, si hoc dixero, quod sensit minister tuus, recte atque optime — id enim conari me oportet — quod si assecutus non fuero, id tamen dicam, quod mihi per eius uerba tua ueritas dicere uoluerit, quae illi quoque dixit quod uoluit.

Finally, Lord, you who are God and not flesh and blood, if a man saw less, could anything be hidden from "your good Spirit, who will lead me into the right land," that you yourself were going to reveal in these words to later readers, even if he through whom they were spoken perhaps thought of only one of the many true meanings? If that is so, then let the one he thought of be higher than the rest; but to us, Lord, show either that one or any other true one you please, so that whether you reveal to us what you revealed to that man of yours or something else on the occasion of the same words, it may be you who feed us, and not error that deceives us. See, Lord my God, how much we have written about a few words, how much, I pray you! What strength of ours, what time, would suffice for all your books in this way? Let me, then, confess to you more briefly about them, and choose some one meaning which you inspire, true, certain, and good, even if many occur, where many can occur; in this faith of my confession, that if I say what your minister meant, I say it rightly and best (for that is what I must attempt); but if I do not attain it, I may still say what your Truth willed to say to me through his words, which also said to him what it willed.

Chapter 13

13.1CSEL 33:344–345

Inuoco te, deus meus, misericordia mea, qui fecisti me et oblitum tui non oblitus es. inuoco te in animam meam, quam praeparas ad capiendum te ex desiderio, quod inspirasti: nunc inuocantem te ne deseras, qui priusquam inuocarem praeuenisti et institisti crebrescens multimodis uocibus, ut audirem de longinquo et conuerterer et uocantem me inuocarem te. etenim, domine, delenisti omnia mala merita mea, ne retribueres manibus meis, in quibus a te defeci, et praeuenisti omnia bona merita mea, ut retribueres manibus tuis, quibus me fecisti, quia et priusquam essem tu eras, nec eram, cui praestares ut essem, et tamen ecce sum ex bonitate tua praeueniente totum hoc, quod me fecisti et unde me fecisti. neque enim eguisti me, aut ego tale bonum sum, quo tu adiuueris, dominus meus et deus meus, non ut tibi sic seruiam, quasi ne fatigeris in agendo, aut ne minor sit potestas tua carens obsequio meo, neque ut sic te colam quasi terram, ut sis incultus, si non te colam, sed ut seruiam tibi et colam te, ut de te mihi bene sit, a quo mihi est, ut sim cui bene sit.

I call upon you, my God, my mercy, who made me and did not forget me when I had forgotten you. I call you into my soul, which you are preparing to receive you by the desire you have breathed into it. Do not forsake me now when I call upon you, you who went before me before I called, and pressed upon me with voices growing more frequent and of many kinds, so that I might hear from afar and be converted and call upon you who were calling me. For, Lord, you blotted out all my evil deserts, so as not to repay my hands, by which I fell away from you; and you went before all my good deserts, so as to repay your own hands, by which you made me; because before I was, you were, and I did not exist for you to grant me existence; and yet see, I exist out of your goodness, which went before all this that you made me and that from which you made me. For you had no need of me, nor am I such a good that you might be helped by it, my Lord and my God: not that I should serve you as if to keep you from tiring in your work, or lest your power be less without my service; nor that I should worship you as one cultivates land, so that you would be uncultivated if I did not worship you; but that I should serve you and worship you so that it may be well with me from you, from whom I have my being, as one to whom it can be well.

13.2CSEL 33:345–346

Ex plenitudine quippe bonitatis tuae creatura tua substitit, ut bonum, quod tibi nihil prodesset nec de te aequale tibi esset, tamen quia ex te fieri potuit, non deesset. quid enim te promeruit caelum et terra, quae fecisti in principio? dicant, quid te promeruerunt spiritalis corporalisque natura, quas fecisti in sapientia tua, ut inde penderent etiam inchoata et informia quaeque in genere suo uel spiritali uel corporali euntia in immoderationem et in longinquam dissimilitudinem tuam, spiritale informe praestantius, quam si formatum corpus esset, corporale autem informe praestantius, quam si omnino nihil esset, atque ita penderent in tuo uerbo informia, nisi per idem uerbum reuocarentur ad unitatem tuam et formarentur et essent ab uno te summo bono uniuersa bona ualde. quid te promeruerant, ut essent saltem informia, quae neque hoc essent nisi ex te?

For it was out of the fullness of your goodness that your creation came to be, so that a good which would be of no benefit to you, and which, not being from your substance, would not be equal to you, should nevertheless not be lacking, since it could be made by you. For what had heaven and earth, which you made in the beginning, deserved of you? Let them say what they deserved of you, the spiritual and bodily natures which you made in your Wisdom, so that there should depend on it even things only begun and formless, each in its own kind, spiritual or bodily, tending toward unboundedness and far unlikeness to you (the formless spiritual being superior to a formed body, and the formless bodily superior to nothing at all); and so the formless things would hang upon your Word unless through the same Word they were called back to your unity and formed, and all were very good from you, the one supreme good. What had they deserved of you, that they should exist even as formless, since they would not even be this except from you?

13.3CSEL 33:346–347

Quid te promeruit materies corporalis, ut esset saltem inuisibilis et inconposita, quia neque hoc esset, nisi quia fecisti? ideoque te, quia non erat, promereri ut esset non poterat. aut quid te promeruit inchoatio creaturae spiritalis, ut saltem tenebrosa fluitaret similis abysso, tui dissimilis, nisi per idem uerbum conuerteretur ad idem, a quo facta est, atque ab eo inluminata lux fieret, quamuis non aequaliter et tamen conformis formae aequali tibi? sicut enim corpori non hoc est esse, quod pulchrum esse — alioquin deforme esse non posset — ita etiam creato spiritui non id est uiuere, quod sapienter uiuere: alioquin inconmutabiliter saperet. bonum autem illi est adhaerere tibi semper, ne quod adeptus est conuersione auersione lumen amittat et relabatur in uitam tenebrosae abysso similem. nam et nos, qui secundum animam creatura spiritalis sumus, auersi a te, nostro lumine, in ea uita fuimus aliquando tenebrae et in reliquiis obscuritatis nostrae laboramus, donec simus iustitia tua in unico tuo sicut montes dei: nam iudicia tua fuimus sicut multa abyssus.

What had bodily matter deserved of you, that it should exist even as invisible and unformed, since it would not even be this unless you had made it? And so, because it did not exist, it could not deserve of you to exist. Or what had the beginning of spiritual creation deserved of you, that it should even float in darkness like the abyss, unlike you, unless through the same Word it were turned to the same by whom it was made, and, enlightened by him, became light, although not equal to, yet conformed to, the Form that is equal to you? For just as for a body to be is not the same as to be beautiful (otherwise it could not be ugly), so too for a created spirit to live is not the same as to live wisely; otherwise it would be unchangeably wise. But it is good for it always to cling to you, lest the light it gained by turning toward you it lose by turning away, and slip back into a life like the dark abyss. For we too, who in our soul are a spiritual creation, having turned away from you, our light, were once darkness in that life, and we labor in the remains of our obscurity until we become your justice in your only Son, like the mountains of God; for we have been your judgments, like a great abyss.

13.4CSEL 33:347

Quod autem in primis conditionibus dixisti: fiat lux, et facta est lux, non incongruenter hoc intellego in creatura spiritali, quia erat iam qualiscumque uita, quam inluminares. sed sicut non te promeruerat, ut esset talis uita, quae inluminari posset, ita nec cum iam esset promeruit te, ut inluminaretur. neque enim eius informitas placeret tibi, si non lux fieret non existendo, sed intuendo inluminantem lucem eique cohaerendo, ut et quod utcumque uiuit et quod beate uiuit, non deberet nisi gratiae tuae, conuersa per conmutationem meliorem ad id, quod neque in melius neque in deterius mutari potest. quod tu solus es, quia solus simpliciter es, cui non est aliud uiuere, aliud beate uiuere, quia tua beatitudo es.

But what you said in the first acts of creation, "Let there be light, and there was light," I understand not unfittingly of the spiritual creation, because there was already some kind of life for you to enlighten. But as it had not deserved of you to be such a life as could be enlightened, so neither, once it existed, did it deserve of you to be enlightened. For its formlessness would not have pleased you unless it became light, not by existing, but by looking upon the Light that enlightens it and cleaving to it; so that both its living in any way at all and its living happily it owes to nothing but your grace, having been turned by a change for the better toward that which can be changed neither for better nor for worse. That is you alone, because you alone simply are, for whom it is not one thing to live and another to live happily, since you are your own happiness.

13.5CSEL 33:347–348

Quid ergo tibi deesset ad bonum, quod tu tibi es, etiamsi ista uel omnino nulla essent uel informia remanerent, quae non ex indigentia fecisti, sed ex plenitudine bonitatis tuae cohibens atque conuertens ad formam, non ut tamquam tuum gaudium conpleatur ex eis? perfecto enim tibi displicet eorum inperfectio, ut ex te perficiantur et tibi placeant, non autem inperfecto, tamquam et tu eorum perfectione perficiendus sis. spiritus enim tuus bonus superferebatur super aquas, non ferebatur ab eis, tamquam in eis requiesceret. in quibus enim requiescere dicitur spiritus tuus, hos in se requiescere facit. sed superferebatur incorruptibilis et inconmutabilis uoluntas tua, ipsa in se sibi sufficiens, super eam quam feceras uitam; cui non hoc est uiuere, quod beate uiuere, quia uiuit etiam fluitans in obscuritate sua; cui restat conuerti ad eum, a quo facta est, et magis magisque uiuere apud fontem uitae et in lumine eius uidere lumen et perfici et inlustrari et beari.

What, then, would be lacking to you for the good which you are to yourself, even if these things either did not exist at all or remained formless? You made them not out of need but out of the fullness of your goodness, restraining them and turning them toward form, not so that your joy might be completed by them. For you, being perfect, are displeased by their imperfection, so that they may be perfected by you and please you; but not as if you were imperfect and were to be perfected by their perfection. For your good Spirit "was borne over the waters," not borne up by them, as if resting on them. For those in whom your Spirit is said to rest, he makes to rest in himself. But your incorruptible and unchangeable will, sufficient in itself for itself, was borne over that life which you had made; for which to live is not the same as to live happily, since it lives even while floating in its own obscurity; for which it remains to be turned to him by whom it was made, and to live more and more by "the fountain of life," and "in his light to see light," and to be perfected and enlightened and made happy.

13.6CSEL 33:348–349

Ecce apparet mihi in aenigmate trinitas, quod es, deus meus, quoniam tu, pater, in principio sapientiae nostrae, quod est tua sapientia de te nata, aequalis tibi et coaeterna, id est in filio tuo, fecisti caelum et terram. et multa diximus de caelo caeli et de terra inuisibili et inconposita et de abysso tenebrosa secundum spiritalis informitatis uagabunda deliquia, nisi conuerteretur ad eum, a quo erat qualiscumque uita, et inluminatione fieret speciosa uita et esset caelum caeli eius, quod inter aquam et aquam postea factum est. et tenebam iam patrem in dei nomine, qui fecit haec, et filium in principii nomine, in quo fecit haec, et trinitatem credens deum meum, sicut credebam, quaerebam in eloquiis sanctis eius, et ecce spiritus tuus superferebatur super aquas. ecce trinitas deus meus, pater et filius et spiritus sanctus, creator uniuersae creaturae.

See, the Trinity appears to me in a riddle, which you are, my God; for you, Father, in the Beginning of our wisdom, which is your Wisdom born of you, equal to you and coeternal, that is, in your Son, made heaven and earth. And we have said much about the heaven of heaven, and about the invisible and unformed earth, and about the dark abyss, in view of the wandering failings of spiritual formlessness, unless it were turned to him from whom it had life of whatever kind, and by enlightenment became a beautiful life and the heaven of that heaven which was made afterward between water and water. And I already held the Father in the name of God, who made these things, and the Son in the name of the Beginning, in whom he made them; and believing my God to be a Trinity, as I did believe, I searched in his holy words, and see, "your Spirit was borne over the waters." See the Trinity, my God, Father and Son and Holy Spirit, Creator of all creation.

13.7CSEL 33:349

Sed quae causa fuerat, o lumen ueridicum, tibi admoueo cor meum, ne me uana doceat, discute tenebras eius et dic mihi, obsecro te per matrem caritatem, obsecro te, dic mihi, quae causa fuerat, ut post nominatum caelum et terram inuisibilem et inconpositam et tenebras super abyssum tum demum scriptura tua nominaret spiritum tuum? an quia oportebat sic eum insinuari, ut diceretur superferri? non posset hoc dici, nisi prius illud conmemoraretur, cui superferri spiritus tuus posset intellegi. nec patri enim nec filio superferebatur nec superferri recte diceretur, si nulli rei superferretur. prius ergo dicendum erat, cui superferretur, et deinde ille, quem non oportebat aliter conmemorari, nisi ut superferri diceretur. cur ergo eum aliter insinuari non oportebat, nisi ut superferri diceretur?

But what was the reason, O truthful Light (to you I bring my heart, lest it teach me vain things; scatter its darkness and tell me, I beseech you by our mother, Love, I beseech you, tell me), what was the reason why, after heaven and the invisible and unformed earth and darkness over the abyss had been named, only then did your Scripture name your Spirit? Was it because he had to be introduced in such a way as to be said to be borne over? This could not be said unless that were first mentioned over which your Spirit could be understood to be borne. For he was not borne over the Father or the Son, nor would he rightly be said to be borne over if he were borne over nothing. So first it had to be said over what he was borne, and then he, who was not to be mentioned otherwise than as being said to be borne over. Why, then, was it not fitting for him to be introduced otherwise than as being said to be borne over?

13.8CSEL 33:349–350

Hinc sequatur qui potest intellectu apostolum tuum dicentem, quia caritas tua diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis, et de spiritalibus docentem et demonstrantem supereminentem uiam caritatis et flectentem genua pro nobis ad te, ut cognoscamus supereminentem scientiam caritatis Christi. ideoque ab initio supereminens superferebatur super aquas. cui dicam, quomodo dicam de pondere cupiditatis in abruptam abyssum et de subleuatione caritatis per spiritum tuum, qui superferebatur super aquas? cui dicam? quomodo dicam? neque enim loca sunt, quibus mergimur et emergimus. quid similius et quid dissimilius? affectus sunt, amores sunt, inmunditia spiritus nostri defluens inferius amore curarum et sanctitas tui attollens nos superius amore securitatis, ut sursum cor habeamus ad te, ubi spiritus tuus superferebatur super aquas, et ueniamus ad supereminentem requiem, cum pertransierit anima nostra aquas, quae sunt sine substantia.

From here let whoever can follow with understanding your apostle, who says that "your love has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us," and who teaches concerning spiritual gifts and shows "a way of love" that is "supereminent," and "bends the knee" for us to you, that we may know "the supereminent knowledge of the love of Christ." And so from the beginning he, supereminent, "was borne over the waters." To whom shall I speak, and how shall I speak, of the weight of desire drawing us down into the steep abyss, and of the lifting up by love through your Spirit, who "was borne over the waters"? To whom shall I speak? How shall I speak? For these are not places in which we sink and rise. What is more like, and what more unlike? They are affections, they are loves: the uncleanness of our spirit flowing down through love of cares, and your holiness raising us up through love of security, so that we may have our heart lifted up to you, where your Spirit "was borne over the waters," and may come to the supereminent rest when our soul has passed through "the waters that are without substance."

13.9CSEL 33:350–351

Defluxit angelus, defluxit anima hominis et indicauerunt abyssum uniuersae spiritalis creaturae in profundo tenebroso, nisi dixisses ab initio: fiat lux, et facta esset lux, et inhaereret tibi omnis oboediens intellegentia caelestis ciuitatis tuae et requiesceret in spiritu tuo, qui superfertur inconmutabiliter super omne mutabile. alioquin et ipsum caelum caeli tenebrosa abyssus esset in se; nunc autem lux est in domino. nam et in ipsa misera inquietudine defluentium spirituum et indicantium tenebras suas nudatas ueste luminis tui satis ostendis, quam magnam rationalem creaturam feceris, cui nullo modo sufficit ad beatam requiem, quidquid te minus est, ac per hoc nec ipsa sibi. tu enim, deus noster, inluminabis tenebras nostras: ex te oriuntur uestimenta nostra, et tenebrae nostrae sicut meridies erunt. da mihi te, deus meus, et redde mihi te: en amo et, si parum est, amem ualidius. non possum metiri, ut sciam, quantum desit mihi amoris ad id quod sat est, ut currat uita mea in amplexus tuos nec auertatur, donec abscondatur in abscondito uultus tui. hoc tantum scio, quia male mihi est praeter te non solum extra me sed et in me ipso, et omnis mihi copia, quae deus meus non est, egestas est.

The angel flowed down, the soul of man flowed down, and they showed the abyss of the whole spiritual creation in dark depths, unless you had said from the beginning, "Let there be light," and there had been light, and every obedient intelligence of your heavenly city had clung to you and rested in your Spirit, who is borne unchangeably over everything changeable. Otherwise even the heaven of heaven would be a dark abyss in itself; but now it is "light in the Lord." For even in the wretched restlessness of spirits flowing down and showing their darkness, stripped of the garment of your light, you show clearly how great a rational creation you made, for which nothing less than you suffices for happy rest, and therefore not even itself. For you, our God, "will enlighten our darkness"; from you comes our clothing, and "our darkness will be as the noonday." Give me yourself, my God, give yourself back to me: see, I love, and if it is too little, let me love more strongly. I cannot measure so as to know how much love I lack to be enough, so that my life may run into your embraces and not turn away until it is hidden "in the hiding place of your face." This only I know: that it is bad for me without you, not only outside me but also within me, and all abundance which is not my God is poverty to me.

13.10CSEL 33:351–352

Numquid aut pater aut filius non superferebatur super aquas? si tamquam loco sicut corpus, nec spiritus sanctus; si autem inconmutabilis diuinitatis eminentia super omne mutabile, et pater et filius et spiritus sanctus superferebatur super aquas. cur ergo tantum de spiritu tuo dictum est hoc? cur de illo tantum dictus est quasi locus, ubi esset, qui non est locus, de quo solo dictum est, quod sit donum tuum? in dono tuo requiescimus: ibi te fruimur. requies nostra locus noster. amor illuc attollit nos et spiritus tuus bonus exaltat humilitatem nostram de portis mortis. in bona uoluntate tua pax nobis est. corpus pondere suo nititur ad locum suum. pondus non ad ima tantum est, sed ad locum suum. ignis sursum tendit, deorsum lapis. ponderibus suis aguntur, loca sua petunt. oleum infra aquam fusum super aquam attollitur, aqua supra oleum fusa infra oleum demergitur: ponderibus suis aguntur, loca sua petunt. minus ordinata inquieta sunt: ordinantur et quiescunt. pondus meum amor meus; eo feror, quocumque feror. dono tuo accendimur et sursum ferimur; inardescimus et imus. ascendimus ascensiones in corde et cantamus canticum graduum. igne tuo, igne tuo bono inardescimus et imus, quoniam sursum imus ad pacem Hierusalem, quoniam iucundatus sum in his, qui dixerunt mihi: in domum domini ibimus. ibi nos conlocabit uoluntas bona, ut nihil uelimus aliud quam permanere illic in aeternum.

Was it not the Father or the Son who was borne over the waters? If it is taken as in a place, like a body, then neither was the Holy Spirit; but if it means the pre-eminence of unchangeable divinity over everything changeable, then Father and Son and Holy Spirit were borne over the waters. Why, then, was this said only of your Spirit? Why was a kind of place, where he was, spoken of only in his case, who is not a place, he of whom alone it is said that he is your gift? In your gift we rest; there we enjoy you. Our rest is our place. Love lifts us up there, and "your good Spirit" raises our lowliness "from the gates of death." In your good will is our peace. A body tends by its weight toward its own place. Weight does not tend only downward, but to its own place. Fire tends upward, a stone downward. They are moved by their weights; they seek their own places. Oil poured under water rises above the water; water poured on oil sinks below the oil: they are moved by their weights; they seek their own places. Things not in order are restless; they are set in order and are at rest. My weight is my love; by it I am carried wherever I am carried. By your gift we are set on fire and carried upward; we burn and we go. We "climb the ascents in our heart" and sing "the song of ascents." With your fire, your good fire, we burn and go, because we go upward to the peace of Jerusalem, for "I rejoiced at those who said to me: We will go to the house of the Lord." There good will will place us, so that we will want nothing else but to remain there for ever.

13.11CSEL 33:352

Beata creatura, quae non nouit aliud, cum esset ipsa aliud, nisi dono tuo, quod superfertur super omne mutabile, mox ut facta est attolleretur nullo interuallo temporis in ea uocatione, qua dixisti: fiat lux, et fieret lux. in nobis enim distinguitur tempore, quod tenebrae fuimus et lux efficiemur: in illa uero dictum est, quid esset, nisi inluminaretur, et ita dictum est, quasi prius fuerit fluxa et tenebrosa, ut appareret causa, qua factum est, ut aliter esset, id est ut ad lumen indeficiens conuersa lux esset. qui potest, intellegat, a te petat. ut quid mihi molestus est, quasi ego inluminem ullum hominem uenientem in hunc mundum?

Blessed is the creation which has known nothing else, though it was itself something else, except to be lifted up by your gift, which is borne over everything changeable, as soon as it was made, without any interval of time, in that calling by which you said, "Let there be light," and there was light. For in us it is distinguished by time, that we were darkness and are made light; but of that creation it is said what it would have been unless it had been enlightened; and it is said as if it had first been fluid and dark, so that the cause might appear by which it came to be otherwise, that is, so that, turned to the unfailing light, it became light. Let whoever can, understand; let him ask of you. Why should he trouble me, as if I "enlighten every man coming into this world"?

13.12CSEL 33:352–353

Trinitatem omnipotentem quis intelleget? et quis non loquitur eam, si tamen eam? rara anima, quaecumque de illa loquitur, scit quod loquitur. et contendunt et dimicant, et nemo sine pace uidet istam uisionem. uellem, ut haec tria cogitarent homines in se ipsis. longe aliud sunt ista tria quam illa trinitas, sed dico, ubi se exerceant et probent et sentiant, quam longe sunt. dico autem haec tria: esse, nosse, uelle. sum enim et scio et uolo: sum sciens et uolens et scio esse me et uelle et uolo esse et scire. in his igitur tribus quam sit inseparabilis uita et una uita et una mens et una essentia, quam denique inseparabilis distinctio et tamen distinctio, uideat qui potest. certe coram se est; adtendat in se et uideat et dicat mihi. sed cum inuenerit in his aliquid et dixerit, non iam se putet inuenisse illud, quod supra ista est inconmutabile, quod est inconmutabiliter et scit inconmutabiliter et uult inconmutabiliter: et utrum propter tria haec et ibi trinitas, an in singulis haec tria, ut terna singulorum sint, an utrumque miris modis simpliciter et multipliciter infinito in se sibi fine, quo est et sibi notum est et sibi sufficit inconmutabiliter id ipsum copiosa unitatis magnitudine, quis facile cogitauerit? quis ullo modo dixerit? quis quolibet modo temere pronuntiauerit?

Who will understand the almighty Trinity? And who does not speak of it, if indeed it is of it that he speaks? Rare is the soul which, whenever it speaks of it, knows what it is saying. And they argue and fight, and no one sees this vision without peace. I would like men to think about these three things in themselves. These three are far other than that Trinity; but I say them as something in which they may exercise themselves and test themselves and perceive how far away they are. I mean these three: to be, to know, to will. For I am, and I know, and I will: I am knowing and willing, and I know that I am and that I will, and I will to be and to know. In these three, then, how inseparable a life there is, and one life, one mind, one essence; how inseparable a distinction, and yet a distinction: let him who can see it. Certainly it is before him; let him look into himself and see, and tell me. But when he has found something in these and spoken of it, let him not think that he has found that which is above them, the Unchangeable, which unchangeably is and unchangeably knows and unchangeably wills. And whether there is a Trinity there because of these three, or whether these three are in each Person so that each is threefold, or whether both are true in wonderful ways, simply and manifoldly, with an infinite end in itself and to itself, by which it is and is known to itself and is sufficient to itself unchangeably, the Selfsame, in the abundant greatness of unity, who can easily conceive? Who can say it in any way? Who would rashly pronounce on it in any way?

13.13CSEL 33:353–354

Procede in confessione, fides mea; dic domino tuo: sancte, sancte, sancte, domine deus meus, in nomine tuo baptizati sumus, pater et fili et spiritus sancte, in nomine tuo baptizamus, pater et fili et spiritus sancte, quia et apud nos in Christo suo fecit deus caelum et terram, spiritales et carnales ecclesiae suae, et terra nostra antequam acciperet formam doctrinae, inuisibilis erat et inconposita, et ignorantiae tenebris tegebamur, quoniam pro iniquitate erudisti hominem, et iudicia tua multa abyssus. sed quia spiritus tuus superferebatur super aquam, non reliquit miseriam nostram misericordia tua, et dixisti: fiat lux; paenitentiam agite, appropinquauit enim regnum caelorum. paenitentiam agite; fiat lux. et quoniam conturbata erat ad nos ipsos anima nostra, conmemorati sumus tui, domine, de terra Iordanis et de monte aequali tibi, sed paruo propter nos, et displicuerunt nobis tenebrae nostrae, et conuersi sumus ad te, et facta est lux. et ecce fuimus aliquando tenebrae, nunc autem lux in domino.

Go forward in confession, my faith; say to your Lord: Holy, holy, holy, Lord my God, in your name we have been baptized, Father and Son and Holy Spirit; in your name we baptize, Father and Son and Holy Spirit; because among us too, in his Christ, God made heaven and earth, the spiritual and carnal members of his church; and our earth, before it received the form of teaching, was invisible and unformed, and we were covered with the darkness of ignorance, because "for iniquity you have chastened man," and "your judgments are a great abyss." But because your Spirit "was borne over the water," your mercy did not abandon our misery, and you said, "Let there be light": "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." Repent; let there be light. And because "our soul was troubled within us, we remembered you, Lord, from the land of the Jordan" and from the mountain equal to you, but made small for our sake; and our darkness displeased us, and we turned to you, and there was light. And see, "we were once darkness, but now we are light in the Lord."

13.14CSEL 33:354–356

Et tamen adhuc per fidem, nondum per speciem. spe enim salui facti sumus. spes autem, quae uidetur, non est spes. adhuc abyssus abyssum inuocat, sed iam in uoce cataractarum tuarum. adhuc et ille qui dicit: non potui uobis loqui quasi spiritalibus, sed quasi carnalibus, etiam ipse nondum se arbitratur conprehendisse, et quae retro oblitus, in ea, quae ante sunt, extenditur et ingemescit grauatus, et sitit anima eius ad deum uiuum, quemadmodum cerui ad fontes aquarum, et dicit: quando ueniam? habitaculum suum, quod de caelo est, superindui cupiens, et uocat inferiorem abyssum dicens: nolite conformari huic saeculo, sed reformamini in nouitate mentis uestrae, et: nolite pueri effici mentibus, sed malitia paruuli estote, ut mentibus perfecti sitis, et: o stulti Galatae, quis uos fascinauit? sed iam non in uoce sua; in tua enim, qui misisti spiritum tuum de excelsis per eum, qui ascendit in altum et aperuit cataractas donorum suorum, ut fluminis impetus laetificarent ciuitatem tuam. illi enim suspirat sponsi amicus, habens iam spiritus primitias penes eum, sed adhuc in semet ipso ingemescens, adoptionem expectans, redemptionem corporis sui. illi suspirat — membrum est enim sponsae — et illi zelat — amicus est enim sponsi — illi zelat non sibi, quia in uoce cataractarum tuarum, non in uoce sua inuocat alteram abyssum, cui zelans timet, ne sicut serpens Euam decepit astutia sua, sic et eorum sensus corrumpantur a castitate, quae est in sponso nostro, unico tuo. quae est illa speciei lux, cum uidebimus eum, sicuti est, et transierint lacrimae, quae mihi factae sunt panis die ac nocte, dum dicitur mihi cotidie: ubi est deus tuus?

And yet still by faith, not yet by sight. "For in hope we have been saved; but hope that is seen is not hope." Still "deep calls to deep," but now "in the voice of your cataracts." Still even he who says, "I could not speak to you as to spiritual people, but as to carnal," does not yet consider himself to have laid hold, and, "forgetting what lies behind, reaches out to what lies ahead," and groans under his burden, and "his soul thirsts for the living God, as the deer for the springs of water," and he says, "When shall I come?", "longing to be clothed over with his dwelling which is from heaven"; and he calls to the lower deep, saying, "Do not be conformed to this world, but be reformed in the newness of your mind," and "Do not be children in understanding, but in malice be infants, that you may be perfect in understanding," and "O foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you?" But now not in his own voice, but in yours, who sent your Spirit from on high through him who "ascended on high" and opened the cataracts of his gifts, so that "the rush of the river might make glad your city." For him "the friend of the bridegroom" sighs, having now "the first fruits of the Spirit" with him, but still "groaning within himself, waiting for adoption, the redemption of his body." For him he sighs, for he is a member of the bride; and for him he is jealous, for he is a friend of the bridegroom; he is jealous for him, not for himself, because it is in the voice of your cataracts, not in his own voice, that he calls to the other deep, for which in his jealousy he fears lest, "as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, so their minds should be corrupted from the chastity" that is in our Bridegroom, your only Son. What is that light of sight, when "we shall see him as he is," and the tears shall have passed away which "have been my bread day and night, while it is said to me daily, Where is your God?"

13.15CSEL 33:356–357

Et ego dico: deus meus ubi est? ecce ubi es. respiro in te paululum, cum effundo super me animam meam in uoce exultationis et confessionis soni festiuitatem celebrantis. et adhuc tristis est, quia relabitur et fit abyssus, uel potius sentit adhuc se esse abyssum. dicit ei fides mea, quam accendisti in nocte ante pedes meos: quare tristis es, anima, et quare conturbas me? spera in domino; lucerna pedibus tuis uerbum eius. spera et perseuera, donec transeat nox, mater iniquorum, donec transeat ira domini, cuius filii et nos fuimus aliquando tenebrae, quarum residua trahimus in corpore propter peccatum mortuo, donec aspiret dies et remoueantur umbrae. spera in domino: mane astabo et contemplabor; semper confitebor illi. mane astabo et uidebo salutare uultus mei, deum meum, qui uiuificabit et mortalia corpora nostra propter spiritum, qui habitat in nobis, quia super interius nostrum tenebrosum et fluuidum misericorditer superferebatur. unde in hac peregrinatione pignus accepimus, ut iam simus lux, dum adhuc spe salui facti sumus et filii lucis et filii diei, non filii noctis neque tenebrarum, quod tamen fuimus. inter quos et nos in isto adhuc incerto humanae notitiae tu solus diuidis, qui probas corda nostra et uocas lucem diem et tenebras noctem. quis enim nos discernit nisi tu? quid autem habemus, quod non accepimus a te, ex eadem massa uasa in honorem, ex qua sunt et alia facta in contumeliam?

And I too say: My God, where are you? See, there you are. I breathe a little in you, when I pour out my soul above myself "with the voice of exultation and confession, the sound of those keeping festival." And still it is sad, because it slips back and becomes an abyss, or rather feels that it is still an abyss. My faith, which you kindled in the night before my feet, says to it: "Why are you sad, my soul, and why do you trouble me? Hope in the Lord"; "his word is a lamp to your feet." Hope and persevere, until the night passes, the mother of the wicked, until the wrath of the Lord passes, whose children we too once were, who were darkness, whose remnants we drag along in the body, "dead because of sin," "until the day breathes and the shadows are removed." "Hope in the Lord": "in the morning I will stand before you and contemplate"; I will always confess to him. In the morning I will stand and see "the salvation of my countenance, my God," who "will give life even to our mortal bodies through the Spirit who dwells in us," because he was mercifully borne over our dark and fluid interior. From him we have received in this pilgrimage a pledge that we are already light, while we are still "saved in hope," and "children of light and children of the day, not children of the night or of darkness," which yet we were. Between them and us, in this still uncertain state of human knowledge, you alone divide, you who "test our hearts" and "call the light day and the darkness night." For who distinguishes us but you? "And what do we have that we have not received" from you, vessels made for honor from the same lump from which others too were made for dishonor?

13.16CSEL 33:357

Aut quis nisi tu, deus noster, fecisti nobis firmamentum auctoritatis super nos in scriptura tua diuina? caelum enim plicabitur ut liber et nunc sicut pellis extenditur super nos. sublimioris enim auctoritatis est tua diuina scriptura, cum iam obierunt istam mortem illi mortales, per quos eam dispensasti nobis. et tu scis, domine, tu scis, quemadmodum pellibus indueris homines, cum peccato mortales fierent. unde sicut pellem extendisti firmamentum libri tui, concordes utique sermones tuos, quos per mortalium ministerium superposuisti nobis. namque ipsa eorum morte solidamentum auctoritatis in eloquiis tuis per eos editis sublimiter extenditur super omnia, quae subter sunt, quod, cum hic uiuerent, non ita sublimiter extentum erat. nondum sicut pellem caelum extenderas, nondum mortis eorum famam usquequaque dilataueras.

Or who but you, our God, made for us a firmament of authority over us in your divine Scripture? For "the heaven will be folded up like a book," and now it is "stretched out over us like a skin." For your divine Scripture has a more sublime authority now that those mortals through whom you dispensed it to us have undergone this death. And you know, Lord, you know how you clothed men with skins when they became mortal through sin. Therefore you have stretched out like a skin the firmament of your book, your words in harmony, which you set over us through the ministry of mortals. For by their very death the solid firmament of authority in your words, published through them, is stretched out sublimely over all things that are beneath it, which, while they lived here, was not so sublimely stretched out. You had not yet stretched out the heaven like a skin; you had not yet spread abroad everywhere the fame of their death.

13.17CSEL 33:357–358

Videamus, domine, caelos, opera digitorum tuorum: disserena oculis nostris nubilum, quo subtexisti eos. ibi est testimonium tuum sapientiam praestans paruulis. perfice, deus meus, laudem tuam ex ore infantium et lactantium. neque enim nouimus alios libros ita destruentes superbiam, ita destruentes inimicum et defensorem resistentem reconciliationi tuae defendendo peccata sua. non noui, domine, non noui alia tam casta eloquia, quae sic mihi persuaderent confessionem et lenirent ceruicem meam iugo tuo et inuitarent colere te gratis. intellegam ea, pater bone da mihi hoc subterposito, quia subterpositis solidasti ea.

Let us look, Lord, at "the heavens, the works of your fingers"; clear from our eyes the cloud with which you have covered them. There is your "testimony, giving wisdom to little ones." Perfect, my God, your praise "out of the mouth of infants and sucklings." For we know no other books that so destroy pride, so destroy "the enemy and the defender" who resists your reconciliation by defending his own sins. I do not know, Lord, I do not know any other such pure words, which so persuaded me to confession and softened my neck to your yoke and invited me to worship you freely. Let me understand them, good Father; grant this to me, who am placed beneath them, because for those placed beneath them you have made them firm.

13.18CSEL 33:358–359

Sunt aliae aquae super hoc firmamentum, credo, inmortales et a terrena corruptione secretae. laudent nomen tuum, laudent te supercaelestes populi angelorum tuorum, qui non opus habent suspicere firmamentum hoc et legendo cognoscere uerbum tuum. uident enim faciem tuam semper et ibi legunt sine syllabis temporum, quid uelit aeterna uoluntas tua. legunt, eligunt et diligunt; semper legunt et numquam praeterit quod legunt. eligendo enim et diligendo legunt ipsam inconmutabilitatem consilii tui. non clauditur codex eorum nec plicatur liber eorum, quia tu ipse illis hoc es et es in aeternum, quia super hoc firmamentum ordinasti eos, quod firmasti super infirmitatem inferiorum populorum, ubi suspicerent et cognoscerent misericordiam tuam temporaliter enuntiantem te, qui fecisti tempora. in caelo enim, domine, misericordia tua et ueritas tua usque ad nubes. transeunt nubes, caelum autem manet. transeunt praedicatores uerbi tui ex hac uita in aliam uitam, scriptura uero tua usque in finem saeculi super populos extenditur. sed et caelum et terra transibunt, sermones autem tui non transibunt, quoniam et pellis plicabitur et faenum, super quod extendebatur, cum claritate sua praeteriet, uerbum autem tuum manet in aeternum; quod nunc in aenigmate nubium et per speculum caeli, non sicuti est, apparet nobis, quia et nos quamuis filio tuo dilecti simus, nondum apparuit quod erimus. attendit per retia carnis et blanditus est et inflammauit, et currimus post odorem eius. sed cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum, sicuti est: sicuti est, domine, uidere nostrum, quod nondum est nobis.

There are other waters above this firmament, I believe, immortal and set apart from earthly corruption. Let them praise your name, let the peoples of your angels above the heavens praise you, who have no need to look up at this firmament and know your word by reading. For they "always see your face," and there they read, without syllables of time, what your eternal will wills. They read, they choose, and they love; they always read, and what they read never passes away. For by choosing and loving they read the very unchangeableness of your counsel. Their book is not closed nor their scroll folded up, because you yourself are this to them, and are so for ever; because you set them above this firmament, which you made firm over the weakness of the lower peoples, where they might look up and know your mercy proclaiming in time you who made times. For "your mercy, Lord, is in heaven, and your truth reaches to the clouds." The clouds pass, but the heaven remains. The preachers of your word pass from this life to another life, but your Scripture is stretched out over the peoples until the end of the world. But "heaven and earth will pass away, but your words will not pass away"; since the skin will be folded up, and the grass over which it was stretched will pass away with its glory, "but your word remains for ever." Now it appears to us in the riddle of the clouds and through the mirror of the heaven, not as it is; because we too, although we are loved by your Son, "it has not yet appeared what we shall be." He looked through the lattice of the flesh, and caressed us and set us on fire, and "we run after his fragrance." But "when he appears, we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is": as he is, Lord, our seeing, which is not yet ours.

13.19CSEL 33:359

Nam sicut omnino tu es, tu scis solus, quoniam es inconmutabiliter et scis inconmutabiliter et uis inconmutabiliter, et essentia tua scit et uult inconmutabiliter et scientia tua est et uult inconmutabiliter et uoluntas tua est et scit inconmutabiliter, nec uidetur iustum esse coram te, ut, quemadmodum se scit lumen inconmutabile, ita sciatur ab inluminato conmutabili. ideoque anima mea tamquam terra sine aqua tibi, quia sicut se inluminare de se non potest, ita se satiare de se non potest. sic enim apud te fons uitae, quomodo in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen.

For as you absolutely are, you alone know; since you are unchangeably, and know unchangeably, and will unchangeably; and your essence knows and wills unchangeably, and your knowledge is and wills unchangeably, and your will is and knows unchangeably. Nor does it seem right in your sight that, as the unchangeable Light knows itself, so it should be known by the changeable thing it enlightens. And so "my soul is like earth without water before you," because as it cannot enlighten itself from itself, so it cannot satisfy itself from itself. For so with you is "the fountain of life," as "in your light we shall see light."

13.20CSEL 33:359–360

Quis congregauit amaricantem societatem unam? idem namque illis finis est temporalis et terrenae felicitatis, propter quam faciunt omnia, quamuis innumerabili uarietate curarum fluctuent. quis, domine, nisi tu, qui dixisti, ut congregarentur aquae in congregationem unam et appareret arida sitiens tibi, quoniam tuum est mare, et tu fecisti illud, et aridam terram manus tuae formauerunt? neque enim amaritudo uoluntatum, sed congregatio aquarum uocatur mare. tu enim coherces etiam malas cupiditates animarum et figis limites, quousque progredi sinantur aquae, ut in se comminuantur fluctus earum, atque ita facis mare ordine imperii tui super omnia.

Who gathered the embittered into one society? For they all have the same end of temporal and earthly happiness, for the sake of which they do everything, although they toss about in countless varieties of cares. Who, Lord, but you, who said that "the waters should be gathered into one gathering and the dry land appear," thirsting for you? For "the sea is yours, and you made it, and your hands formed the dry land." For it is not the bitterness of wills but the gathering of the waters that is called the sea. For you restrain even the evil desires of souls and fix the limits of how far the waters may go, so that their waves may break upon themselves; and so you make the sea by the order of your rule over all things.

13.21CSEL 33:360–361

At animas sitientes tibi et apparentes tibi alio fine distinctas a societate maris occulto et dulci fonte irrigas, ut et terra det fructum suum: et dat fructum suum et te iubente, domino deo suo, germinat anima nostra opere misericordiae secundum genus, diligens proximum in subsidiis necessitatum carnalium, habens in se semen secundum similitudinem, quoniam ex nostra infirmitate conpatimur ad subueniendum indigentibus similiter opitulantes, quemadmodum nobis uellemus opem ferri, si eodem modo indigeremus, non tantum in facilibus tamquam in herba seminali, sed etiam in protectione adiutorii forti robore, sicut lignum fructiferum, id est beneficium ad eripiendum eum, qui iniuriam patitur, de manu potentis et praebendo protectionis umbraculum ualido robore iusti iudicii.

But souls that thirst for you and appear before you, set apart by another end from the society of the sea, you water from a hidden and sweet spring, so that the earth too may yield its fruit. And it yields its fruit, and at your command, the Lord its God, our soul sprouts works of mercy according to its kind, loving the neighbor in relieving bodily needs, having in itself "seed according to its likeness," since from our own weakness we have compassion to help the needy, aiding them in the same way as we would want help to be brought to us if we were in the same need; not only in easy things, as in the seed-bearing plant, but also in the protection of help with strong force, like the fruit-bearing tree, that is, a kindness that rescues one who suffers injury from the hand of the powerful, and offers the shelter of protection by the strong force of just judgment.

13.22CSEL 33:361–362

Ita, domine, ita, oro te, oriatur, sicuti facis, sicuti das hilaritatem et facultatem, oriatur de terra ueritas et iustitia de caelo respiciat, et fiant in firmamento luminaria. frangamus esurienti panem nostrum et egenum sine tecto inducamus in domum nostram, nudum uestiamus et domesticos seminis nostri non despiciamus. quibus in terra natis fructibus uide, quia bonum est, et erumpat temporana lux nostra, et de ista inferiore fruge actionis in delicias contemplationis uerbum uitae superius obtinentes appareamus sicut luminaria in mundo cohaerentes firmamento scripturae tuae. ibi enim nobiscum disputas, ut diuidamus inter intellegibilia et sensibilia tamquam inter diem et noctem uel inter animas alias intellegibilibus, alias sensibilibus deditas, ut iam non tu solus in abdito diiudicationis tuae, sicut antequam fieret firmamentum, diuidas inter lucem et tenebras, sed etiam spiritales tui in eodem firmamento positi atque distincti manifestata per orbem gratia tua luceant super terram et diuidant inter diem et noctem et significent tempora, quia uetera transierunt, ecce facta sunt noua, et quia propior est nostra salus, quam cum credidimus, et quia nox praecessit, dies autem adpropinquauit et quia benedicis coronam anni tui, mittens operarios in messem tuam, in qua seminanda alii laborauerunt, mittens etiam in aliam sementem, cuius messis in fine est. ita das uota optanti et benedicis annos iusti, tu autem idem ipse es et in annis tuis, qui non deficiunt, horreum praeparas annis transeuntibus. aeterno quippe consilio pro-

So, Lord, so, I pray you, let it spring up, as you do, as you give cheerfulness and ability: "let truth spring up from the earth, and justice look down from heaven," and let there be "lights in the firmament." Let us "break our bread to the hungry, and bring the homeless poor into our house, clothe the naked, and not despise those of our own flesh." When these fruits have been born on earth, see that it is good; and let "our light break forth in its season"; and from this lower fruit of action, gaining the delights of contemplation, holding on to the word of life above, let us "appear as lights in the world," clinging to the firmament of your Scripture. For there you discuss with us, so that we may divide between intelligible and sensible things as between day and night, or between souls given, some to intelligible things, others to sensible things; so that now not you alone, in the secret of your judgment, as before the firmament was made, divide between light and darkness, but your spiritual ones too, placed and distinguished in the same firmament, now that your grace has been made manifest throughout the world, may shine upon the earth and divide between day and night and signify the times; because "the old things have passed away; see, new things have come," and because "our salvation is nearer than when we believed," and because "the night is far gone, and the day is at hand," and because "you bless the crown of your year," sending "laborers into your harvest," in the sowing of which "others have labored," sending them also into another sowing, whose harvest is at the end. So you grant the prayer of him who asks, and bless the years of the just; but you are the same, and in "your years, which do not fail," you prepare a granary for the passing years. For by your eternal counsel, at their proper

13.23CSEL 33:362–363

priis temporibus bona caelestia das super terram, quoniam quidem alii datur per spiritum sermo sapientiae tamquam luminare maius propter eos, qui perspicuae ueritatis luce delectantur tamquam in principio diei, alii autem sermo scientiae secundum eundem spiritum tamquam luminare minus, alii fides, alii donatio curationum, alii operationes uirtutum, alii prophetia, alii diiudicatio spirituum, alteri genera linguarum, et haec omnia tamquam stellae. omnia enim haec operatur unus atque idem spiritus, diuidens propria unicuique prout uult et faciens apparere sidera in manifestatione ad utilitatem. sermo autem scientiae, qua continentur omnia sacramenta, quae uariantur temporibus tamquam luna, et ceterae notitiae donorum, quae deinceps tamquam stellae conmemorata sunt, quantum differunt ab illo candore sapientiae, quo gaudet praedictus dies, tantum in principio noctis sunt. his enim sunt necessaria, quibus ille prudentissimus seruus tuus non potuit loqui quasi spiritalibus, sed quasi carnalibus, ille, qui sapientiam loquitur inter perfectos. animalis autem homo tamquam paruulus in Christo lactisque potator, donec roboretur ad solidum cibum et aciem firmet ad solis aspectum, non habeat desertam noctem suam, sed luce lunae stellarumque contentus sit. haec nobiscum disputas sapientissime, deus noster, in libro tuo, firmamento tuo, ut discernamus omnia contemplatione mirabili, quamuis adhuc in signis et in temporibus et in diebus et in annis.

times you give heavenly good things upon the earth; since "to one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom," like the greater light, for those who delight in the light of clear truth, as at the beginning of the day; "to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit," like the lesser light; "to another faith, to another the gift of healing, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the discernment of spirits, to another kinds of tongues"; and all these are like the stars. "For all these are worked by one and the same Spirit, dividing to each his own as he wills," and making the stars appear in manifestation for the common good. But the word of knowledge, in which are contained all the sacraments, which vary with the times like the moon, and the other known gifts, which are named next like the stars, differ from that brightness of wisdom in which the day just mentioned rejoices, just so far as they are at the beginning of the night. For they are necessary to those to whom that most prudent servant of yours "could not speak as to spiritual people, but as to carnal," he who "speaks wisdom among the perfect." But "the natural man," like a little one in Christ and a drinker of milk, until he is strengthened for solid food and makes his eye firm to look at the sun, should not have his night deserted, but should be content with the light of the moon and stars. These things you discuss with us most wisely, our God, in your book, your firmament, so that we may discern all things in wonderful contemplation, although still "in signs and in times and in days and in years."

13.24CSEL 33:363–364

Sed prius lauamini, mundi estote, auferte nequitiam ab animis uestris atque a conspectu oculorum meorum, ut appareat arida. discite bonum facere, iudicate pupillo et iustificate uiduam, ut germinet terra herbam pabuli et lignum fructiferum, et uenite, disputemus, dicit dominus, ut fiant luminaria in firmamento caeli, ut luceant super terram. quaerebat diues ille a magistro bono, quid faceret, ut uitam aeternam consequeretur: dicat ei magister bonus, quem putabat hominem et nihil amplius — bonus est autem, quia deus est — dicat ei, ut, si uult uenire ad uitam, seruet mandata, separet a se amaritudinem malitiae atque nequitiae, non occidat, non moechetur, non furetur, non falsum testimonium dicat, ut appareat arida et germinet honorem matris et patris et dilectionem proximi. feci, inquit, haec omnia. unde ergo tantae spinae, si terra fructifera est? uade, extirpa siluosa dumeta auaritiae, uende quae possides et implere frugibus dando pauperibus et habebis thesaurum in caelis et sequere dominum, si uis esse perfectus, eis sociatus, inter quos loquitur sapientiam ille, qui nouit, quid distribuat diei et nocti, ut noris et tu, ut fiant et tibi luminaria in firmamento caeli: quod non fiet, nisi fuerit illic cor tuum; quod item non fiet, nisi fuerit illic thesaurus tuus, sicut audisti a magistro bono. sed contristata est terra sterilis, et spinae suffocauerunt uerbum.

But first, "wash yourselves, be clean, take away the wickedness from your souls and from the sight of my eyes," so that the dry land may appear. "Learn to do good, judge for the orphan and do justice to the widow," so that the earth may bring forth the grass of pasture and the fruit-bearing tree; "and come, let us reason together, says the Lord," so that there may be "lights in the firmament of heaven, to shine upon the earth." That rich man asked the good Teacher what he should do to obtain eternal life. Let the good Teacher, whom he thought a man and nothing more (but he is good because he is God), tell him that, if he wants to enter into life, he should keep the commandments, separate from himself the bitterness of malice and wickedness, not kill, not commit adultery, not steal, not bear false witness, so that the dry land may appear and sprout honor of mother and father and love of neighbor. "I have done all these," he says. Where, then, do so many thorns come from, if the earth is fruitful? Go, root out the wooded thickets of avarice, "sell what you possess," and be filled with fruit by "giving to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven"; and "follow" the Lord "if you wish to be perfect," joined to those among whom he "speaks wisdom" who knows what to allot to the day and to the night, so that you too may know it, so that for you too there may be lights in the firmament of heaven; which will not happen unless your heart is there; which again will not happen unless your treasure is there, as you have heard from the good Teacher. But the barren earth was saddened, and the thorns choked the word.

13.25CSEL 33:364–365

Vos autem, genus electum in firmamento mundi, qui dimisistis omnia, ut sequeremini dominum, ite post eum et confundite fortia, ite post eum, speciosi pedes, et lucete in firmamento, ut caeli enarrent gloriam eius diuidentes inter lucem perfectorum, sed nondum sicut angelorum, et tenebras paruulorum, sed non desperatorum: lucete super omnem terram, et dies sole candens eructet diei uerbum sapientiae et nox, luna lucens, annuntiet nocti uerbum scientiae. luna et stellae nocti lucent, sed nox non obscurat eas, quoniam ipsae inluminant eam pro modulo eius. ecce enim tamquam deo dicente: fiant luminaria in firmamento caeli, factus est subito de caelo sonus, quasi ferretur flatus uehemens, et uisae sunt linguae diuisae quasi ignis, qui et insedit super unumquemque illorum, et facta sunt luminaria in firmamento caeli uerbum uitae habentia. ubique discurrite, ignes sancti, ignes decori. uos enim estis lumen mundi nec estis sub modio. exaltatus est, cui adhaesistis, et exaltauit uos. discurrite et innotescite omnibus gentibus.

But you, a chosen race, in the firmament of the world, who have left everything to follow the Lord, go after him and confound the strong; go after him, beautiful feet, and shine in the firmament, so that "the heavens may declare his glory," dividing between the light of the perfect, though not yet like that of the angels, and the darkness of the little ones, though not of those without hope. Shine over all the earth; and let the day, bright with the sun, "pour forth to the day" the word of wisdom, and the night, shining with the moon, "proclaim to the night" the word of knowledge. The moon and stars shine for the night, but the night does not darken them, since they enlighten it according to its measure. For see, as if God were saying, "Let there be lights in the firmament of heaven," "suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, and there appeared divided tongues as of fire, and it sat upon each one of them," and there were made lights in the firmament of heaven, "holding the word of life." Run everywhere, holy fires, beautiful fires. For you are "the light of the world" and are not "under a bushel." He to whom you clung has been exalted, and he has exalted you. Run everywhere, and make yourselves known to all nations.

13.26CSEL 33:365

Concipiat et mare et pariat opera uestra, et producant aquae reptilia animarum uiuarum. separantes enim pretiosum a uili facti estis os dei, per quod diceret: producant aquae non animam uiuam, quam terra producet, sed reptilia animarum uiuarum et uolatilia uolantia super terram. repserunt enim sacramenta tua, deus, per opera sanctorum tuorum inter medios fluctus temptationum saeculi ad imbuendas gentes nomine tuo in baptismo tuo. et inter haec facta sunt magnalia mirabilia tamquam coeti grandes et uoces nuntiorum tuorum uolantes super terram iuxta firmamentum libri tui praeposito illo sibi ad auctoritatem, sub quo uolitarent, quocumque irent. neque enim sunt loquellae neque sermones, quorum non audiantur uoces eorum, quando in omnem terram exiit sonus eorum et in fines orbis terrae uerba eorum, quoniam tu, domine, benedicendo multiplicasti haec.

Let the sea too conceive and bring forth your works, and let "the waters bring forth creeping things with living souls." For, separating the precious from the worthless, you have become the mouth of God, through which he might say: Let the waters bring forth, not the living soul which the earth will bring forth, but "creeping things with living souls and birds flying over the earth." For your sacraments, God, have crept through the works of your saints amid the waves of the world's temptations, to initiate the nations in your name in your baptism. And among these were done great and wonderful works, like the great whales, and the voices of your messengers flying over the earth near the firmament of your book, which was set over them as the authority under which they should fly wherever they went. For "there is no speech or language in which their voices are not heard," since "their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world"; because you, Lord, have multiplied these things by blessing them.

13.27CSEL 33:365–366

Numquid mentior aut mixtione misceo neque distinguo lucidas cognitiones harum rerum in firmamento caeli et opera corporalia in undoso mari et sub firmamento caeli? quarum enim rerum notitiae sunt solidae et terminatae sine incrementis generationum tamquam lumina sapientiae et scientiae, earundem rerum sunt operationes corporales multae ac uariae, et aliud ex alio crescendo multiplicantur in benedictione tua, deus, qui consolatus es fastidia sensuum mortalium, ut in cognitione animi res una multis modis per corporis motiones figuretur atque dicatur. aquae produxerunt haec, sed in uerbo tuo: necessitates alienatorum ab aeternitate ueritatis tuae populorum produxerunt haec, sed in euangelio tuo, quoniam ipsae aquae ista eiecerunt, quarum amarus languor fuit causa, ut in tuo uerbo ista procederent.

Am I lying, or mixing things up in confusion and not distinguishing the clear knowledge of these things in the firmament of heaven from the bodily works in the surging sea and under the firmament of heaven? For of the things whose knowledge is solid and bounded, without increase by generation, like the lights of wisdom and knowledge, of the same things the bodily operations are many and various, and one grows from another and they are multiplied in your blessing, God, who have consoled the weariness of mortal senses, so that in the knowledge of the mind one thing may be represented and expressed in many ways by the motions of the body. The waters brought these forth, but in your word; the needs of peoples estranged from the eternity of your truth brought them forth, but in your gospel; for the waters themselves cast them up, whose bitter sickness was the cause of their coming forth in your word.

13.28CSEL 33:366

Et pulchra sunt omnia faciente te, et ecce tu inenarrabiliter pulchrior, qui fecisti omnia. a quo si non esset lapsus Adam, non diffunderetur ex utero eius salsugo maris, genus humanum profunde curiosum et procellose tumidum et instabiliter fluuidum, atque ita non opus esset, ut in aquis multis corporaliter et sensibiliter operarentur dispensatores tui mystica facta et dicta. sic enim mihi nunc occurrerunt reptilia et uolatilia, quibus imbuti et initiati homines corporalibus sacramentis subditi non ultra proficerent, nisi spiritaliter uiuesceret anima gradu alio et post initii uerbum in consummationem respiceret.

And all things are beautiful since you make them, and see, you who made all things are indescribably more beautiful. If Adam had not fallen away from you, there would not have poured forth from his loins that brine of the sea, the human race, deeply curious, stormily swelling, and restlessly fluid; and so there would have been no need for your dispensers to work mystical deeds and words bodily and perceptibly in many waters. For so the creeping things and flying creatures now appear to me: men instructed and initiated by them, being subject to bodily sacraments, would not go further unless the soul came alive spiritually on another level, and, after the word of initiation, looked toward perfection.

13.29CSEL 33:366–368

Ac per hoc in uerbo tuo non maris profunditas, sed ab aquarum amaritudine terra discreta eicit non reptilia animarum uiuarum et uolatilia, sed animam uiuam. neque enim iam opus habet baptismo, quo gentibus opus est, sicut opus habebat, cum aquis tegeretur: non enim intratur aliter in regno caelorum ex illo, quo instituisti, ut sic intretur; nec magnalia mirabilium quaerit, quibus fiat fides: neque enim nisi signa et prodigia uiderit, non credit, cum iam distincta sit terra fidelis ab aquis maris infidelitate amaris, et linguae in signo sunt non fidelibus, sed infidelibus. nec isto igitur genere uolatili, quod uerbo tuo produxerunt aquae, opus habet terra, quam fundasti super aquas. immitte in eam uerbum tuum per nuntios tuos. opera enim eorum narramus, sed tu es, qui operaris in eis, et operentur animam uiuam. terra producit eam, quia terra causa est, ut haec agant in ea, sicut mare fuit causa, ut agerent reptilia animarum uiuarum et uolatilia sub firmamento caeli, quibus iam terra non indiget, quamuis piscem manducet leuatum de profundo in ea mensa, quam parasti in conspectu credentium; ideo enim de profundo leuatus est, ut alat aridam. et aues marina progenies, sed tamen super terram multiplicantur. primarum enim uocum euangelizantium infidelitas hominum causa extitit; sed et fideles exhortantur et benedicuntur eis multipliciter de die in diem. at uero anima uiua de terra sumit exordium, quia non prodest nisi iam fidelibus continere se ab amore huius saeculi, ut anima eorum tibi uiuat, quae mortua erat in deliciis uiuens, deliciis, domine, mortiferis; nam tu puri cordis uitales deliciae.

And so, in your word, it is not the depth of the sea but the earth, separated from the bitterness of the waters, that brings forth, not "creeping things with living souls and flying creatures," but "the living soul." For it no longer needs baptism, as the nations need it, as it did need it when it was covered by the waters; for there is no other way of entering the kingdom of heaven since you established that it should be entered so. Nor does it seek great wonders to produce faith; for it is not one that "believes only if it sees signs and wonders," since the faithful earth is now separated from the waters of the sea, bitter with unbelief, and "tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers." So neither does the earth which you "founded upon the waters" need that kind of flying creature which the waters brought forth at your word. Send your word into it through your messengers. For we tell of their works, but it is you who work in them, so that they may work a living soul. The earth brings it forth, because the earth is the reason for their doing these things in it, as the sea was the reason for their working the creeping things with living souls and the flying creatures under the firmament of heaven, which the earth no longer needs, although it eats the fish lifted up from the deep at that table which you "have prepared in the sight of" believers; for it was lifted from the deep for this reason, to feed the dry land. And the birds are the offspring of the sea, yet they multiply upon the earth. For the unbelief of men was the cause of the first voices of those who preached the gospel; but the faithful too are exhorted and blessed by them in many ways from day to day. But the living soul takes its beginning from the earth, because it profits only those already faithful to restrain themselves from the love of this world, so that their soul may live to you, which was dead while living in pleasures, deadly pleasures, Lord; for you are the life-giving delight of the pure heart.

13.30CSEL 33:368–369

Operentur ergo iam in terra ministri tui, non sicut in aquis infidelitatis annuntiando et loquendo per miracula et sacramenta et uoces mysticas, ubi intenta fit ignorantia mater admirationis in timore occultorum signorum — talis enim est introitus ad fidem filiis Adam oblitis tui, dum se abscondunt a facie tua et fiunt abyssus — sed operentur etiam sicut in arida discreta a gurgitibus abyssi et sint forma fidelibus uiuendo coram eis et excitando ad imitationem. sic enim non tantum ad audiendum sed etiam ad faciendum audiunt: quaerite deum, et uiuet anima uestra, ut producat terra animam uiuentem. nolite conformari huic saeculo, continete uos ab eo. euitando uiuit anima, quae appetendo moritur. continete uos ab immani feritate superbiae, ab inerti uoluptate luxuriae et a fallaci nomine scientiae, ut sint bestiae mansuetae et pecora edomita et innoxii serpentes. motus enim animae sunt isti in allegoria: sed fastus elationis et delectatio libidinis et uenenum curiositatis motus sunt animae mortuae, quia non ita moritur, ut omni motu careat, quoniam discedendo a fonte uitae moritur atque ita suscipitur a praetereunte saeculo et conformatur ei.

So let your ministers now work on the earth, not as in the waters of unbelief, by proclaiming and speaking through miracles and sacraments and mystical words, where ignorance, the mother of wonder, becomes attentive in fear of hidden signs (for such is the entrance to faith for the children of Adam who have forgotten you, while they hide themselves from your face and become an abyss); but let them work also as on the dry land, separated from the whirlpools of the abyss, and let them be a pattern to the faithful by living before them and rousing them to imitation. For so they hear not only in order to listen but also in order to do: "Seek God, and your soul shall live," so that the earth may bring forth the living soul. "Do not be conformed to this world"; restrain yourselves from it. The soul lives by avoiding what by desiring it dies. Restrain yourselves from the savage wildness of pride, from the sluggish pleasure of lust, and from the false name of knowledge, so that there may be tame beasts, domesticated cattle, and harmless serpents. For these are motions of the soul in allegory; but the haughtiness of pride, the delight of lust, and the poison of curiosity are motions of a dead soul; for it does not die so as to lack all motion, since it dies by departing from the fountain of life, and so it is taken up by the passing world and conformed to it.

13.31CSEL 33:369

Verbum autem, deus, fons uitae aeternae est et non praeterit: ideoque in uerbo tuo cohibetur ille discessus, dum dicitur nobis: nolite conformari huic saeculo, ut producat terra in fonte uitae animam uiuentem, in uerbo tuo per euangelistas tuos animam continentem imitando imitatores Christi tui. hoc est enim secundum genus, quoniam aemulatio uiri ab amico est: estote, inquit, sicut ego, quia et ego sicut uos. ita erunt in anima uiua bestiae bonae in mansuetudine actionis. mandasti enim dicens: in mansuetudine opera tua perfice et ab omni homine diligeris. et pecora bona neque si manducauerint, abundantia, neque si non manducauerint, egentia, et serpentes boni non perniciosi ad nocendum, sed astuti ad cauendum et tantum explorantes temporalem naturam, quantum sufficit, ut per ea, quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciatur aeternitas. seruiunt enim rationi haec animalia, cum a progressu mortifero cohibita uiuunt et bona sunt.

But the Word, God, is the fountain of eternal life and does not pass away; and so in your Word that departure is restrained, when it is said to us, "Do not be conformed to this world," so that the earth may bring forth, in the fountain of life, a living soul, in your word, through your evangelists, a soul that is continent by imitating the imitators of your Christ. For this is "according to its kind," since a man's emulation comes from his friend: "Be as I am," he says, "because I too am as you are." So in the living soul there will be good beasts, in gentleness of action. For you have commanded, saying, "Do your works in gentleness, and you will be loved by every man." And there will be good cattle, neither having too much if they eat, nor lacking if they do not eat; and good serpents, not destructive to harm, but wise to be on guard, and exploring temporal nature only as much as is enough for eternity "to be clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made." For these animals serve reason when, restrained from their deadly advance, they live and are good.

13.32CSEL 33:369–371

Ecce enim, domine deus noster, creator noster, cum cohibitae fuerint affectiones ab amore saeculi, quibus moriebamur male uiuendo, et coeperit esse anima uiuens bene uiuendo completumque fuerit uerbum tuum, quo per apostolum tuum dixisti: nolite conformari huic saeculo, consequetur illud, quod adiunxisti statim et dixisti: sed reformamini in nouitate spiritu mentis uestrae, non iam secundum genus, tamquam imitantes praecedentem proximum, nec ex hominis melioris auctoritate uiuentes. neque enim dixisti: fiat homo secundum genus, sed: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram, ut nos probemus, quae sit uoluntas tua. ad hoc enim ille dispensator tuus generans per euangelium filios, ne semper paruulos haberet, quos lacte nutriret et tamquam nutrix foueret: reformamini, inquit, in nouitate mentis uestrae ad probandum uos, quae sit uoluntas dei, quod bonum et beneplacitum et perfectum. ideoque non dicis: fiat homo, sed: faciamus, nec dicis: secundum genus, sed: ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. mente quippe renouatus et conspiciens intellectam ueritatem tuam homine demonstratore non indiget, ut suum genus imitetur, sed te demonstrante probat ipse, quae sit uoluntas tua, quod bonum et beneplacitum et perfectum, et doces eum iam capacem uidere trinitatem unitatis uel unitatem trinitatis. ideoque pluraliter dicto: faciamus hominem singulariter tamen infertur: et fecit deus hominem, et pluraliter dicto: ad imaginem nostram, singulariter infertur: ad imaginem dei. ita homo renouatur in agnitione dei secundum imaginem eius, qui creauit eum, et spiritalis effectus iudicat omnia, quae utique iudicanda sunt, ipse autem a nemine iudicatur.

For see, Lord our God, our Creator, when our affections have been restrained from the love of the world, by which we were dying by living badly, and the soul has begun to be a living soul by living well, and your word has been fulfilled which you spoke through your apostle, "Do not be conformed to this world," there will follow what you added at once: "but be reformed in the newness of your mind," no longer "according to kind," as imitating a neighbor who goes before, nor living by the authority of a better man. For you did not say, "Let man be made according to his kind," but "Let us make man in our image and likeness," so that we may prove what your will is. For this is why that dispenser of yours, begetting children through the gospel, so as not always to have little ones whom he must nourish with milk and cherish like a nurse, says: "Be reformed in the newness of your mind, so that you may prove what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect." And so you do not say, "Let man be made," but "Let us make"; nor do you say, "according to his kind," but "in our image and likeness." For renewed in mind and beholding your truth, understood, he does not need a human instructor to imitate his own kind, but with you as instructor he himself proves what your will is, what is good and acceptable and perfect; and you teach him, now capable, to see the Trinity of the Unity and the Unity of the Trinity. And so, after the plural "Let us make man," the singular follows: "and God made man"; and after the plural "in our image," the singular follows: "in the image of God." So man "is renewed in the knowledge of God according to the image of him who created him," and, having become spiritual, "judges all things," those, that is, which are to be judged, "but he himself is judged by no one."

13.33CSEL 33:371–372

Quod autem iudicat omnia, hoc est, quod habet potestatem piscium maris et uolatilium caeli et omnium pecorum et ferarum et omnis terrae et omnium repentium, quae repunt super terram. hoc enim agit per mentis intellectum, per quem percipit quae sunt spiritus dei. alioquin homo in honore positus non intellexit; conparatus est iumentis insensatis et similis factus est eis. ergo in ecclesia tua, deus noster, secundum gratiam tuam, quam dedisti ei, quoniam tuum sumus figmentum creati in operibus bonis, non solum qui spiritaliter praesunt sed etiam hi qui spiritaliter subduntur eis qui praesunt — masculum et feminam fecisti hominem hoc modo in gratia tua spiritali, ubi secundum sexum corporis non est masculus et femina, quia nec Iudaeus neque Graecus neque seruus neque liber — spiritales ergo, siue qui praesunt siue qui obtemperant, spiritaliter iudicant, non de cognitionibus spiritalibus, quae lucent in firmamento — non enim oportet de tam sublimi auctoritate iudicare — neque de ipso libro tuo, etiamsi quid ibi non lucet, quoniam summittimus ei nostrum intellectum certumque habemus etiam quod clausum est aspectibus nostris, recte ueraciterque dictum esse — sic enim homo, licet iam spiritalis et renouatus in agnitione dei secundum imaginem eius, qui creauit eum, factor tamen legis debet esse, non iudex neque de illa distinctione iudicat spiritalium uidelicet atque carnalium hominum, qui tuis, deus noster, oculis noti sunt et nullis adhuc nobis apparuerunt operibus, ut ex fructibus eorum cognoscamus eos, sed tu, domine, iam scis eos et diuisisti et uocasti in occulto, antequam fieret firmamentum. neque de turbidis huius saeculi populis quamquam spiritalis homo iudicat. quid enim ei de his, qui foris sunt, iudicare ignoranti, quis inde uenturus sit in dulcedinem gratiae tuae et quis in perpetua inpietatis amaritudine remansurus?

But that he "judges all things" means that he "has dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and all cattle and wild beasts and all the earth and every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth." For he does this by the understanding of his mind, by which he perceives "the things of the Spirit of God." Otherwise, "man, being set in honor, did not understand; he has been compared to senseless cattle and has become like them." So in your church, our God, according to your grace which you have given it, since "we are your workmanship, created in good works," not only those who are spiritually in authority but also those who are spiritually subject to those in authority (for in this way you made man "male and female" in your spiritual grace, where according to bodily sex there is neither male nor female, because there is "neither Jew nor Greek, neither slave nor free"), the spiritual, then, whether they are in authority or obey, judge spiritually. They do not judge the spiritual knowledge that shines in the firmament, for it is not right to judge so sublime an authority; nor your book itself, even if something there does not shine clearly, since we submit our understanding to it and hold it certain that even what is closed to our sight has been rightly and truly said. For so man, although already spiritual and "renewed in the knowledge of God according to the image of him who created him," must be "a doer of the law, not a judge." Nor does he judge the distinction between spiritual and carnal men, who are known to your eyes, our God, and have not yet appeared to us by any works, so that "we may know them by their fruits"; but you, Lord, already know them and have divided and called them in secret, before the firmament was made. Nor does the spiritual man judge the turbulent peoples of this world. For "what is it to him to judge those outside," not knowing who from there will come into the sweetness of your grace and who will remain in the perpetual bitterness of ungodliness?

13.34CSEL 33:372–373

Ideoque homo, quem fecisti ad imaginem tuam, non accepit potestatem luminarium caeli neque ipsius occulti caeli neque diei et noctis, quae ante caeli constitutionem uocasti, neque congregationis aquarum, quod est mare, sed accepit potestatem piscium maris et uolatilium caeli et omnium pecorum et omnis terrae et omnium repentium, quae repunt super terram. iudicat enim et approbat, quod recte, improbat autem, quod perperam inuenerit, siue in ea sollemnitate sacramentorum, quibus initiantur quos peruestigat in aquis multis misericordia tua, siue in ea, qua ille piscis exhibetur, quem leuatum de profundo terra pia comedit, siue in uerborum signis uocibusque subiectis auctoritati libri tui tamquam sub firmamento uolitantibus, interpretando, exponendo, disserendo, disputando, benedicendo atque inuocando te, ore erumpentibus atque sonantibus signis, ut respondeat populus: amen. quibus omnibus uocibus corporaliter enuntiandis causa est abyssus saeculi et caecitas carnis, qua cogitata non possunt uideri, ut opus sit instrepere in auribus. ita, quamuis multiplicentur uolatilia super terram, ex aquis tamen originem ducunt. iudicat etiam spiritalis approbando, quod rectum, inprobando autem, quod perperam inuenerit in operibus moribusque fidelium, elemosynis tamquam terra fructifera et de anima uiua mansuefactis affectionibus, in castitate, in ieiuniis, in cogitationibus piis de his, quae per sensum corporis percipiuntur. de his enim iudicare nunc dicitur, in quibus et potestatem corrigendi habet.

And so man, whom you made in your image, did not receive dominion over the lights of heaven, nor over the hidden heaven itself, nor over the day and night which you called before the establishment of heaven, nor over the gathering of the waters, which is the sea; but he received dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and all cattle and all the earth and every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth. For he judges and approves what he finds right, and disapproves what he finds wrong, whether in that solemnity of the sacraments by which those are initiated whom your mercy searches out in many waters; or in that in which is presented the Fish which, lifted up from the deep, the devout earth eats; or in the signs of words and utterances subject to the authority of your book, flying as it were under the firmament, by interpreting, expounding, discussing, disputing, blessing and calling upon you, signs bursting forth and sounding from the mouth, so that the people may answer "Amen." The reason for all these utterances having to be spoken bodily is the abyss of the world and the blindness of the flesh, by which thoughts cannot be seen, so that they must be sounded in the ears. So, although the birds multiply upon the earth, they still take their origin from the waters. The spiritual man judges also, approving what he finds right and disapproving what he finds wrong, in the works and conduct of the faithful: in almsgiving, as in the fruitful earth; and in the affections of the living soul made gentle, in chastity, in fasting, in devout thoughts about things perceived by the bodily senses. For he is now said to judge those things over which he also has the power to correct.

13.35CSEL 33:373–374

Sed quid est hoc et quale mysterium est? ecce benedicis homines, o domine, ut crescant et multiplicentur et impleant terram. nihilne nobis ex hoc innuis, ut intellegamus aliquid, cur non ita benedixeris lucem, quam uocasti diem, nec firmamentum caeli nec luminaria nec sidera nec terram nec mare? dicerem te, deus noster, qui nos ad imaginem tuam creasti, dicerem te hoc donum benedictionis homini proprie uoluisse largiri, nisi hoc modo benedixisses pisces et coetos, ut crescerent et multiplicarentur et implerent aquas maris, et uolatilia multiplicarentur super terram. item dicerem ad ea rerum genera pertinere benedictionem hanc, quae gignendo ex semet ipsis propagantur, si eam reperirem in arbustis et frutectis et in pecoribus terrae. nunc autem nec herbis et lignis dictum est nec bestiis et serpentibus: crescite et multiplicamini, cum haec quoque omnia sicut pisces et aues et homines gignendo augeantur genusque custodiant.

But what is this, and what kind of mystery is it? See, you bless men, Lord, that they may "increase and multiply and fill the earth." Do you give us no hint by this, so that we may understand why you did not so bless the light, which you called day, nor the firmament of heaven, nor the lights, nor the stars, nor the earth, nor the sea? I would say, our God, who created us in your image, I would say that you wished to bestow this gift of blessing on man as his own, if you had not blessed the fish and whales in this way too, that they should increase and multiply and fill the waters of the sea, and the birds should multiply upon the earth. Likewise I would say that this blessing belongs to those kinds of things which are propagated by generating from themselves, if I found it given to trees and shrubs and the cattle of the earth. But as it is, neither to plants and trees nor to beasts and serpents was it said, "Increase and multiply," although all these too, like fish and birds and men, increase by generating and preserve their kind.

13.36CSEL 33:374–375

Quid igitur dicam, lumen meum, ueritas? quia uacat hoc, quia inaniter ita dictum est? nequaquam, pater pietatis, absit, ut hoc dicat seruus uerbi tui. et si ego non intellego, quid hoc eloquio significes, utantur eo melius meliores, id est intellegentiores quam ego sum, unicuique quantum sapere dedisti. placeat autem et confessio mea coram oculis tuis, qua tibi confiteor credere me, domine, non incassum te ita locutum, neque silebo, quod mihi lectionis huius occasio suggerit. uerum est enim nec uideo, quid inpediat ita me sentire dicta figurata librorum tuorum. noui enim multipliciter significari per corpus, quod uno modo mente intellegitur, et multipliciter mente intellegi, quod uno modo per corpus significatur. ecce simplex dilectio dei et proximi, quam multiplicibus sacramentis et innumerabilibus linguis et in unaquaque lingua innumerabilibus locutionum modis corporaliter enuntiatur! ita crescunt et multiplicantur fetus aquarum. adtende iterum quisquis haec legis: ecce quod uno modo scriptura offert et uox personat: in principio deus fecit caelum et terram, nonne multipliciter intellegitur, non errorum fallacia, sed uerarum intellegentiarum generibus? ita crescunt et multiplicantur fetus hominum.

What, then, shall I say, my light, Truth? That this is empty, that it was said in vain? Not at all, Father of piety; far be it that a servant of your word should say this. And if I do not understand what you mean by this saying, let better men, that is, more intelligent than I am, make better use of it, each according as you have given him to understand. But let my confession too be pleasing in your eyes, in which I confess to you that I believe, Lord, that you did not speak so in vain; nor will I keep silent about what the occasion of this reading suggests to me. For it is true, and I do not see what prevents me from understanding the figurative sayings of your books in this way. For I know that something understood in one way by the mind may be signified in many ways by bodily means, and that something signified in one way by bodily means may be understood in many ways by the mind. See, the single love of God and neighbor: by how many sacraments, in how many countless languages, and in each language by how many countless manners of speaking it is expressed bodily! So the offspring of the waters increase and multiply. Attend again, whoever reads this: see, what Scripture offers and the voice sounds in one way, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," is it not understood in many ways, not by deceptive errors, but by kinds of true understanding? So the offspring of men increase and multiply.

13.37CSEL 33:375–376

Itaque si naturas ipsas rerum non allegorice, sed proprie cogitemus, ad omnia, quae de seminibus gignuntur, conuenit uerbum: crescite et multiplicamini; si autem figurate posita ista tractemus — quod potius arbitror intendisse scripturam, quae utique non superuacue solis aquatilium et hominum fetibus istam benedictionem adtribuit — inuenimus quidem multitudines et in creaturis spiritalibus atque corporalibus tamquam in caelo et terra et in animis iustis et iniquis tamquam in luce et tenebris et in sanctis auctoribus, per quos lex ministrata est, tamquam in firmamento, quod solidatum est inter aquam et aquam, et in societate amaricantium populorum tamquam in mari et in studio piarum animarum tamquam in arida et in operibus misericordiae secundum praesentem uitam tamquam in herbis seminalibus et lignis fructiferis et in spiritalibus donis manifestatis ad utilitatem sicut in luminaribus caeli et in affectibus formatis ad temperantiam tamquam in anima uiua: in his omnibus nanciscimur multitudines et ubertates et incrementa; sed quod ita crescat et multiplicetur, ut una res multis modis enuntietur et una enuntiatio multis modis intellegatur, non inuenimus nisi in signis corporaliter editis et rebus intellegibiliter excogitatis. signa corporaliter edita generationes aquarum propter necessarias causas carnalis profunditatis, res autem intellegibiliter excogitatas generationes humanas propter rationis fecunditatem intelleximus. et ideo credidimus utrique horum generi dictum esse abs te, domine: crescite et multiplicamini. in hac enim benedictione concessam nobis a te facultatem ac potestatem accipio et multis modis enuntiare, quod uno modo intellectum tenuerimus, et multis modis intellegere, quod obscure uno modo enuntiatum legerimus. sic implentur aquae maris, quae non mouentur nisi uariis significatibus, sic et fetibus humanis impletur et terra, cuius ariditas apparet in studio, et dominatur ei ratio.

So if we think of the natures of things themselves, not allegorically but literally, the word "Increase and multiply" applies to all things generated from seed. But if we treat these things as set down figuratively (which I rather think Scripture intended, since it certainly did not attribute this blessing to the offspring of water creatures and men alone without reason), we find multitudes indeed in spiritual and bodily creatures, as in heaven and earth; and in just and unjust souls, as in light and darkness; and in the holy authors through whom the law was ministered, as in the firmament made firm between water and water; and in the society of embittered peoples, as in the sea; and in the zeal of devout souls, as in the dry land; and in works of mercy in this present life, as in seed-bearing plants and fruit-bearing trees; and in spiritual gifts made manifest for the common good, as in the lights of heaven; and in affections formed to self-control, as in the living soul. In all these we find multitudes and abundance and increase; but that something should increase and multiply in such a way that one thing is expressed in many ways, and one expression understood in many ways, we find only in signs uttered bodily and in things thought out intelligibly. We have understood signs uttered bodily as the generations of the waters, because of the necessary causes of carnal depth; and things thought out intelligibly as human generations, because of the fruitfulness of reason. And so we have believed that to both these kinds it was said by you, Lord, "Increase and multiply." For in this blessing I take it that we have been granted by you the ability and power both to express in many ways what we have understood in one way, and to understand in many ways what we have read expressed obscurely in one way. So the waters of the sea are filled, which are moved only by various significations; so too the earth is filled with human offspring, whose dryness appears in zeal, and reason rules over it.

13.38CSEL 33:376–377

Volo etiam dicere, domine deus meus, quod me consequens tua scriptura conmonet et dicam nec uerebor. uera enim dicam te mihi inspirante, quod ex eis uerbis uoluisti ut dicerem. neque enim alio praeter te inspirante credo me uerum dicere, cum tu sis ueritas, omnis autem homo mendax. et ideo qui loquitur mendacium, de suo loquitur. ergo ut uerum loquar, de tuo loquor. ecce dedisti nobis in escam omne faenum satiuum seminans semen, quod est super omnem terram, et omne lignum, quod habet in se fructum seminis satiui. nec nobis solis sed et omnibus auibus caeli et bestiis terrae atque serpentibus; piscibus autem et coetis magnis non dedisti haec. dicebamus enim eis terrae fructibus significari et in allegoria figurari opera misericordiae, quae huius uitae necessitatibus exhibentur ex terra fructifera. talis terra erat pius Onesiforus, cuius domui dedisti misericordiam, quia frequenter Paulum tuum refrigerauit et catenam eius non erubuit. hoc fecerunt et fratres et tali fruge fructificauerunt, qui quod ei deerat suppleuerunt ex Macedonia. quomodo autem dolet quaedam ligna, quae fructum ei debitum non dederunt, ubi ait: in prima mea defensione nemo mihi affuit, sed omnes me dereliquerunt: non illis inputetur. ista enim debentur eis, qui ministrant doctrinam rationalem per intellegentias diuinorum mysteriorum, et ita eis debentur tamquam hominibus. debentur autem eis sicut animae uiuae praebentibus se ad imitandum in omni continentia. item debentur eis tamquam uolatilibus propter benedictiones eorum, quae multiplicantur super terram, quoniam in omnem terram exiit sonus eorum.

I want also to say, Lord my God, what the next part of your Scripture reminds me of, and I will say it and not be afraid. For I will say true things by your inspiration, since you willed that I should say them from these words. For I do not believe that I speak the truth by any other inspiration than yours, since you are the Truth, but "every man is a liar"; and so "he who speaks a lie speaks from his own." So that I may speak the truth, then, I speak from what is yours. See, you have given us for food "every seed-bearing plant that is upon all the earth, and every tree that has in itself the fruit of seed"; and not to us alone, but also to all the birds of the air and the beasts of the earth and the serpents; but to the fish and the great whales you did not give these. For we said that by these fruits of the earth are signified and figured in allegory the works of mercy which are shown for the needs of this life from the fruitful earth. Such earth was the devout Onesiphorus, to whose house you gave mercy, because he often refreshed your Paul and was not ashamed of his chain. So too did the brothers, and they bore such fruit, who supplied what he lacked from Macedonia. But how he grieves over certain trees which did not give him the fruit they owed, when he says: "At my first defense no one stood by me, but all deserted me; may it not be counted against them." For these things are owed to those who minister rational teaching through the understanding of divine mysteries, and so they are owed to them as to men. They are owed to them also as to the living soul, since they offer themselves for imitation in all continence. Likewise they are owed to them as to flying creatures, because of their blessings, which multiply upon the earth, since "their sound has gone out into all the earth."

13.39CSEL 33:377–378

Pascuntur autem his escis qui laetantur eis, nec illi laetantur eis, quorum deus uenter. neque enim et in illis, qui praebent ista, ea, quae dant, fructus est, sed quo animo dant. itaque ille, qui deo seruiebat, non suo uentri, uideo plane, unde gaudeat, uideo et congratulor ei ualde. acceperat enim a Filippensibus quae per Epafroditum miserant; sed tamen unde gaudeat, uideo. unde autem gaudet, inde pascitur, quia in ueritate loquens: gauisus sum, inquit, magnifice in domino, quia tandem aliquando repullulastis sapere pro me, in quo sapiebatis; taedium autem habuistis. isti ergo diuturno taedio marcuerant et quasi exaruerant ab isto fructu boni operis, et gaudet eis, quia repullularunt, non sibi, quia eius indigentiae subuenerunt. ideo secutus ait: non quod desit aliquid dico; ego enim didici, in quibus sum, sufficiens esse. scio et minus habere, scio et abundare; in omnibus et in omni imbutus sum, et saturari et esurire et abundare et penuriam pati: omnia possum in eo, qui me confortat.

They are fed by these foods who rejoice in them; and those do not rejoice in them "whose god is their belly." For in those who give these things, too, the fruit is not what they give, but the spirit in which they give. And so I see plainly why he rejoices who "served God and not his own belly"; I see it, and I rejoice with him greatly. For he had received from the Philippians what they had sent by Epaphroditus; yet I see why he rejoices. And what he rejoices in, on that he feeds; for, speaking in truth, he says: "I rejoiced greatly in the Lord that at last you have flourished again in caring for me, as you did care; but you had grown weary." So these had withered with long weariness, and as it were dried up from this fruit of good work; and he rejoices for them, because they flourished again, not for himself, because they relieved his need. So he goes on to say: "Not that I speak of want; for I have learned to be content in whatever state I am. I know how to have little, and I know how to abound; in everything and in all things I have been instructed, both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need. I can do all things in him who strengthens me."

13.40CSEL 33:378–379

Vnde ergo gaudes, O Paule magne? unde gaudes, unde pasceris, homo renouate in agnitionem dei secundum imaginem eius, qui creauit te, et anima uiua tanta continentia et lingua uolatilis loquens mysteria? talibus quippe animantibus ista esca debetur. quid est, quod te pascit? laetitia. quod sequitur audiam: uerum tamen, inquit, bene fecistis communicantes tribulationi meae. hinc gaudet, hinc pascitur, quia illi bene fecerunt, non quia eius angustia relaxata est, qui dicit tibi: in tribulatione dilatasti mihi, quia et abundare et penuriam pati nouit in te, qui confortas eum. scitis enim, inquit, etiam uos, Filippenses, quoniam in principio euangelii, cum ex Macedonia sum profectus, nulla mihi ecclesia conmunicauit in ratione dati et accepti nisi uos soli, quia et Thessalonicam et semel et iterum usibus meis misistis. ad haec bona opera eos redisse nunc gaudet et repullulasse laetatur tamquam reuiuescente fertilitate agri.

In what, then, do you rejoice, great Paul? In what do you rejoice, on what do you feed, man "renewed in the knowledge of God according to the image of him who created you," living soul of such great continence, and winged tongue speaking mysteries? For to such living creatures this food is owed. What is it that feeds you? Joy. Let me hear what follows: "Nevertheless," he says, "you did well in sharing in my affliction." In this he rejoices, on this he feeds, that they did well, not that his distress was relieved, he who says to you, "In tribulation you have enlarged me," because he knows both how to abound and how to suffer need in you, who strengthen him. "For you yourselves also know, Philippians," he says, "that in the beginning of the gospel, when I set out from Macedonia, no church shared with me in the matter of giving and receiving except you alone; for even in Thessalonica you sent once and again for my needs." He now rejoices that they have returned to these good works, and is glad that they have flourished again, as at the reviving fertility of a field.

13.41CSEL 33:379–380

Numquid propter usus suos, quia dixit: usibus meis misistis, numquid propterea gaudet? non propterea. et hoc unde scimus? quoniam ipse sequitur dicens: non quia quaero datum, sed requiro fructum. didici a te, deus meus, inter datum et fructum discernere. datum est res ipsa, quam dat, qui inpertitur haec necessaria, ueluti est nummus, cibus, potus, uestimentum, tectum, adiutorium. fructus autem bona et recta uoluntas datoris est. non enim ait magister bonus: qui susceperit prophetam tantum, sed addidit: in nomine prophetae; neque ait tantum: qui susceperit iustum, sed addidit: in nomine iusti; ita quippe ille mercedem prophetae, iste mercedem iusti accipiet. nec solum ait: qui calicem aquae frigidae potum dederit uni ex minimis meis, sed addidit: tantum in nomine discipuli, et sic adiunxit: amen dico uobis, non perdet mercedem suam. datum est suscipere prophetam, suscipere iustum, porrigere calicem aquae frigidae discipulo; fructus autem in nomine prophetae, in nomine iusti, in nomine discipuli hoc facere. fructu pascitur Helias a uidua sciente, quod hominem dei pasceret et propter hoc pasceret; per coruum autem dato pascebatur. nec interior Helias, sed pascebatur, qui posset etiam talis cibi egestate corrumpi.

Is it for his own needs, because he said, "You sent for my needs," is it for that reason that he rejoices? Not for that reason. And how do we know this? Because he himself goes on to say: "Not that I seek the gift, but I seek the fruit." I have learned from you, my God, to distinguish between gift and fruit. The gift is the thing itself which is given by one who shares these necessities, such as money, food, drink, clothing, shelter, help. But the fruit is the good and right will of the giver. For the good Teacher did not say only, "He who receives a prophet," but added, "in the name of a prophet"; nor did he say only, "He who receives a righteous man," but added, "in the name of a righteous man"; for so the one will receive a prophet's reward, the other a righteous man's reward. Nor did he say only, "He who gives a cup of cold water to drink to one of my least ones," but added, "only in the name of a disciple," and so continued, "Truly I say to you, he will not lose his reward." The gift is to receive a prophet, to receive a righteous man, to offer a cup of cold water to a disciple; but the fruit is to do this in the name of a prophet, in the name of a righteous man, in the name of a disciple. Elijah was fed with fruit by the widow, who knew that she was feeding a man of God and fed him for that reason; but by the raven he was fed with a gift. Nor was it the inner Elijah that was fed, but the outer, who could also have perished for lack of such food.

13.42CSEL 33:380

Ideoque dicam, quod uerum est coram te, domine, cum homines idiotae atque infideles, quibus initiandis atque lucrandis necessaria sunt sacramenta initiorum et magnalia miraculorum, quae nomine piscium et coetorum significari credimus, suscipiunt corporaliter reficiendos aut in aliquo usu praesentis uitae adiuuandos pueros tuos, cum id quare faciendum sit et quo pertineat ignorent, nec illi istos pascunt nec isti ab illis pascuntur, quia nec illi haec sancta et recta uoluntate operantur nec isti eorum datis, ubi fructum nondum uident, laetantur. inde quippe animus pascitur, unde laetatur. et ideo pisces et coeti non uescuntur escis, quas non germinat nisi iam terra ab amaritudine marinorum fluctuum distincta atque discreta.

And so I will say what is true before you, Lord: when ignorant and unbelieving men, for whose initiation and winning the sacraments of initiation and the great works of miracles are necessary (which we believe are signified by the name of fish and whales), receive your servants to refresh them bodily or to help them in some need of this present life, while not knowing why this should be done or what it leads to, neither do they feed your servants nor are your servants fed by them; because neither do they do these things with a holy and right will, nor do your servants rejoice in their gifts, in which they do not yet see fruit. For the mind is fed by that in which it rejoices. And so the fish and whales do not feed on the foods which only the earth brings forth when it has been separated and divided from the bitterness of the sea's waves.

13.43CSEL 33:380–381

Et uidisti, deus, omnia quae fecisti, et ecce bona ualde, quia et nos uidemus ea, et ecce omnia bona ualde. in singulis generibus operum tuorum, cum dixisses, ut fierent, et facta essent, illud atque illud uidisti quia bonum est. septiens numeraui scriptum esse te uidisse, quia bonum est quod fecisti; et hoc octauum est, quia uidisti omnia quae fecisti, et ecce non solum bona sed etiam ualde bona tamquam simul omnia. nam singula tantum bona erant, simul autem omnia et bona et ualde. hoc dicunt etiam quaeque pulchra corpora, quia longe multo pulchrius est corpus, quod ex membris pulchris omnibus constat, quam ipsa membra singula, quorum ordinatissimo conuentu conpletur uniuersum, quamuis et illa etiam singillatim pulchra sint.

"And you saw, God, all that you had made, and behold, it was very good"; because we too see them, and behold, all things are very good. In each kind of your works, when you had said that they should be made and they had been made, you saw this and that, that it was good. I have counted seven times that it is written that you saw that what you made was good; and this is the eighth, that you saw all that you had made, and behold, it was not only good but also very good, as all together. For individually they were only good, but all together they were both good and very good. All beautiful bodies say this too; for a body made up of beautiful members is far more beautiful than the individual members themselves, by whose most ordered union the whole is completed, although they too are beautiful individually.

13.44CSEL 33:381–382

Et attendi, ut inuenirem, utrum septiens uel octiens uideris, quia bona sunt opera tua, cum tibi placuerunt, et in tua uisione non inueni tempora, per quae intellegerem, quod totiens uideris quae fecisti, et dixi: o domine, nonne ista scriptura tua uera est, quoniam tu uerax et ueritas edidisti eam? cur ergo tu mihi dicis non esse in tua uisione tempora, et ita scriptura tua mihi dicit per singulos dies ea quae fecisti te uidisse, quia bona sunt, et cum ea numerarem, inueni quotiens? ad haec tu dicis mihi, quoniam tu es deus meus et dicis uoce forti in aure interiore seruo tuo perrumpens meam surditatem et clamans: "O homo, nempe quod scriptura mea dicit, ego dico. et tamen illa temporaliter dicit, uerbo autem meo tempus non accedit, quia aequali mecum aeternitate consistit. sic ea, quae uos per spiritum meum uidetis, ego uideo, sicut ea, quae uos per spiritum meum dicitis, ego dico. atque ita cum uos temporaliter ea uideatis, non ego temporaliter uideo, quemadmodum, cum uos temporaliter ea dicatis, non ego temporaliter dico."

And I looked closely to find whether you saw seven or eight times that your works were good, when they pleased you; and I did not find in your seeing any times by which I might understand that you saw so many times what you had made. And I said: "O Lord, is not this Scripture of yours true, since you, being truthful and the Truth, have published it? Why, then, do you tell me that there are no times in your seeing, while this Scripture of yours tells me that on each day you saw that what you made was good, and when I counted them I found how many times?" To this you say to me, since you are my God and speak with a strong voice in the inner ear to your servant, breaking through my deafness and crying out: "O man, what my Scripture says, I say. And yet it says it in time, but time does not touch my Word, because it stands in eternity equal with me. So the things which you see through my Spirit, I see, just as the things which you say through my Spirit, I say. And so, while you see them in time, I do not see them in time; just as, while you say them in time, I do not say them in time."

13.45CSEL 33:382

Et audiui, domine deus meus, et elinxi stillam dulcedinis ex tua ueritate et intellexi, quoniam sunt quidam, quibus displicent opera tua, et multa eorum dicunt te fecisse necessitate conpulsum, sicut fabricas caelorum et conpositiones siderum, et hoc non de tuo, sed iam fuisse alibi creata et aliunde, quae tu contraheres et conpaginares atque contexeres, cum de hostibus uictis mundana moenia molireris, ut ea constructione deuincti aduersus te iterum rebellare non possent; alia uero nec fecisse te nec omnino conpegisse, sicut omnes carnes et minutissima quaeque animantia et quidquid radicibus terram tenet, sed hostilem mentem naturamque aliam non abs te conditam tibique contrariam in inferioribus mundi locis ista gignere atque formare. insani dicunt haec, quoniam non per spiritum tuum uident opera tua nec te cognoscunt in eis.

And I heard, Lord my God, and I licked a drop of sweetness from your truth, and I understood that there are some who are displeased with your works, and say that you made many of them under compulsion of necessity, such as the fabric of the heavens and the arrangement of the stars; and that you did not make these from what was yours, but that they had already been created elsewhere and from another source, and you drew them together and fastened and wove them together when, out of your conquered enemies, you built the walls of the world, so that, bound by that structure, they could not rebel against you again; and that other things you neither made nor put together at all, such as all flesh and all the tiniest living creatures and whatever holds the earth by roots; but that a hostile mind and another nature, not created by you and opposed to you, generates and forms these things in the lower regions of the world. Madmen say this, because they do not see your works through your Spirit, nor recognize you in them.

13.46CSEL 33:382–383

Qui autem per spiritum tuum uident ea, tu uides in eis. ergo cum uident, quia bona sunt, tu uides, quia bona sunt, et quaecumque propter te placent, tu in eis places, et quae per spiritum tuum placent nobis, tibi placent in nobis. quis enim scit hominum quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est? sic et quae dei sunt nemo scit nisi spiritus dei. nos autem, inquit, non spiritum huius mundi accepimus, sed spiritum, qui ex deo est, ut sciamus quae a deo donata sunt nobis. et admoneor, ut dicam: certe nemo scit quae dei, nisi spiritus dei. quomodo ergo scimus et nos, quae a deo donata sunt nobis? respondetur mihi, quoniam quae per eius spiritum scimus etiam sic nemo scit nisi spiritus dei. sicut enim recte dictum est: non enim uos estis, qui loquimini, eis, qui in dei spiritu loquerentur, sic recte dicitur: "non uos estis, qui scitis" eis, qui in dei spiritu sciunt. nihilo minus igitur recte dicitur: "non uos estis, qui uidetis" eis, qui in spiritu dei uident: ita quidquid in spiritu dei uident quia bonum est, non ipsi, sed deus uidet, quia bonum est. aliud ergo est, ut putet quisque malum esse quod bonum est, quales supra dicti sunt; aliud, ut quod bonum est uideat homo, quia bonum est, sicut multis tua creatura placet, quia bona est, quibus tamen non tu places in ea; unde frui magis ipsa quam te uolunt: aliud autem, ut, cum aliquid uidet homo quia bonum est, deus in illo uideat, quia bonum est, ut scilicet ille ametur in eo quod fecit, qui non amaretur nisi per spiritum, quem dedit, quoniam caritas dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis, per quem uidemus, quia bonum est, quidquid aliquo modo est: ab illo enim est, qui non aliquo modo est, sed est, est.

But in those who see them through your Spirit, you see. So when they see that they are good, you see that they are good; and whatever pleases for your sake, in it you please; and the things that please us through your Spirit please you in us. "For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him? So too no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God. But we," he says, "have received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit which is from God, so that we may know the things that have been given to us by God." And I am prompted to say: certainly no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God; how, then, do we too know the things that have been given to us by God? The answer is given me: what we know through his Spirit, even so no one knows but the Spirit of God. For as it was rightly said, "For it is not you who speak," to those who would speak in the Spirit of God, so it is rightly said, "It is not you who know," to those who know in the Spirit of God. No less rightly, then, is it said, "It is not you who see," to those who see in the Spirit of God; so whatever they see in the Spirit of God to be good, it is not they but God who sees that it is good. It is one thing, then, for someone to think evil what is good, like those mentioned above; another for a man to see that what is good is good, as your creation pleases many because it is good, though you do not please them in it, so that they want to enjoy it rather than you; and another, when a man sees that something is good, for God to see in him that it is good, that is, so that God may be loved in what he made, who would not be loved except through the Spirit he has given; "because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us," through whom we see that whatever exists in any way is good; for it is from him who does not exist in any way, but is, is.

13.47CSEL 33:383–385

Gratias tibi, domine! uidemus caelum et terram, siue corporalem partem superiorem atque inferiorem siue spiritalem corporalemque creaturam, atque in ornatu harum partium, quibus constat uel uniuersa mundi moles uel uniuersa omnino creatura, uidemus lucem factam diuisamque a tenebris. uidemus firmamentum caeli, siue inter spiritales aquas superiores et corporales inferiores, primarium corpus mundi, siue hoc spatium aeris, quia et hoc uocatur caelum, per quod uagantur uolatilia caeli inter aquas, quae uaporaliter eis superferuntur et serenis etiam noctibus rorant, et has, quae in terris graues fluitant. uidemus congregatarum aquarum speciem per campos maris et aridam terram uel nudatam uel formatam, ut esset uisibilis et conposita herbarumque atque arborum mater. uidemus luminaria fulgere desuper, solem sufficere diei, lunam et stellas consolari noctem atque his omnibus notari et significari tempora. uidemus umidam usquequaque naturam piscibus et beluis et alitibus fecundatam, quod aeris corpulentia, quae uolatus auium portat, aquarum exhalatione concrescit. uidemus terrenis animalibus faciem terrae decorari hominemque ad imaginem et similitudinem tuam cunctis inrationabilibus animantibus ipsa tua imagine ac similitudine, hoc est rationis et intellegentiae uirtute, praeponi, et quemadmodum in eius anima aliud est, quod consulendo dominatur, aliud, quod subditur ut obtemperet, sic uiro factam esse etiam corporaliter feminam, quae haberet quidem in mente rationabilis intellegentiae parem naturam, sexu tamen corporis ita masculino sexui subiceretur, quemadmodum subicitur appetitus actionis ad concipiendam de ratione mentis recte agendi sollertiam. uidemus haec et singula bona et omnia bona ualde.

Thanks be to you, Lord! We see heaven and earth, whether the upper and lower bodily parts, or the spiritual and bodily creation; and in the adornment of these parts, of which either the whole mass of the world or the whole creation altogether consists, we see light made and divided from darkness. We see the firmament of heaven, whether between the upper spiritual waters and the lower bodily ones, the primary body of the world, or this space of air, for this too is called heaven, through which the birds of heaven wander between the waters that are borne above them as vapor and fall as dew even on clear nights, and those that flow heavily on the earth. We see the beauty of the gathered waters over the plains of the sea, and the dry land, whether bare or formed so as to be visible and ordered, the mother of plants and trees. We see the lights shining from above, the sun sufficing for the day, the moon and stars consoling the night, and by all these the times marked and signified. We see the moist element everywhere made fruitful with fish and sea monsters and birds, because the density of the air, which bears the flight of birds, is thickened by the evaporation of the waters. We see the face of the earth adorned with land animals, and man, in your image and likeness, set above all irrational living creatures by that very image and likeness of yours, that is, by the power of reason and understanding; and as in his soul there is one part which rules by deliberation and another which is subject so as to obey, so for man woman was made, bodily too, who in her mind would have an equal nature of rational understanding, but by the sex of her body would be subject to the male sex, as the appetite for action is subject to the reason of the mind in order to conceive from it the skill of acting rightly. We see these things, and each is good, and all are very good.

13.48CSEL 33:385

Laudant te opera tua, ut amemus te, et amamus te, ut laudent te opera tua. habent initium et finem ex tempore, ortum et occasum, profectum et defectum, speciem et priuationem. habent ergo consequentia mane et uespera partim latenter partim euidenter. de nihilo enim a te, non de te facta sunt, non de aliqua non tua uel quae antea fuerit, sed de concreata, id est simul a te creata materia, quia eius informitatem sine ulla temporis interpositione formasti. nam cum aliud sit caeli et terrae materies, aliud caeli et terrae species, materiem quidem de omnino nihilo, mundi autem speciem de informi materia, simul tamen utrumque fecisti, ut materiam forma nulla morae intercapedine sequeretur.

Your works praise you, so that we may love you, and we love you, so that your works may praise you. They have beginning and end in time, rising and setting, growth and decline, form and privation. So they have, in succession, morning and evening, partly hidden, partly evident. For they were made by you from nothing, not from you; not from some matter not yours or which existed before, but from matter concreated, that is, created by you at the same time, because you formed its formlessness without any interval of time. For although the matter of heaven and earth is one thing and the form of heaven and earth another, you made the matter from absolutely nothing and the form of the world from formless matter; yet you made both at once, so that form followed matter without any interval of delay.

13.49CSEL 33:385–386

Inspeximus etiam, propter quorum figurationem ista uel tali ordine fieri uel tali ordine scribi uoluisti, et uidimus, quia bona sunt singula et omnia bona ualde, in uerbo tuo, in unico tuo caelum et terram, caput et corpus ecclesiae, in praedestinatione ante omnia tempora sine mane et uespera. ubi autem coepisti praedestinata temporaliter exequi, ut occulta manifestares et inconposita nostra conponeres — quoniam super nos erant peccata nostra et in profundum tenebrosum abieramus abs te, et spiritus tuus bonus superferebatur ad subueniendum nobis in tempore opportuno – et iustificasti inpios et distinxisti eos ab iniquis et solidasti auctoritatem libri tui inter superiores, qui tibi dociles essent, et inferiores, qui eis subderentur, et congregasti societatem infidelium in unam conspirationem, ut apparerent studia fidelium, ut tibi opera misericordiae parerent, distribuentes etiam pauperibus terrenas facultates ad adquirenda caelestia. et inde accendisti quaedam luminaria in firmamento, uerbum uitae habentes sanctos tuos et spiritalibus donis praelata sublimi auctoritate fulgentes; et inde ad imbuendas infideles gentes sacramenta et miracula uisibilia uocesque uerborum secundum firmamentum libri tui, quibus etiam fideles benedicerentur, ex materia corporali produxisti; et deinde fidelium animam uiuam per affectus ordinatos continentiae uigore formasti atque inde tibi soli mentem subditam et nullius auctoritatis humanae ad imitandum indigentem renouasti ad imaginem et similitudinem tuam praestantique intellectui rationabilem actionem tamquam uiro feminam subdidisti omnibusque tuis ministeriis ad perficiendos fideles in hac uita necessariis ab eisdem fidelibus ad usus temporales fructuosa in futurum opera praeberi uoluisti. haec omnia uidemus et bona sunt ualde, quoniam tu ea uides in nobis, qui spiritum, quo ea uideremus et in eis te amaremus, dedisti nobis.

We have also considered what you wished to be figured by these things being made in such an order, or written in such an order; and we have seen that each is good and all are very good, in your Word, in your only Son, heaven and earth, the head and body of the church, in predestination before all times, without morning and evening. But when you began to carry out in time what had been predestined, so as to reveal hidden things and to order our disorder (since our sins were over us, and we had gone away from you into the dark depth, and your good Spirit was borne over us to help us in due time), you justified the ungodly and separated them from the wicked, and you made firm the authority of your book between the higher ones, who would be teachable by you, and the lower ones, who would be subject to them; and you gathered the society of unbelievers into one conspiracy, so that the zeal of the faithful might appear, that they might bear works of mercy to you, even distributing their earthly goods to the poor to gain heavenly ones. And then you kindled certain lights in the firmament, your saints, holding the word of life and shining with sublime authority, raised high by spiritual gifts; and then, to initiate the unbelieving nations, you brought forth from bodily matter sacraments and visible miracles and the sounds of words according to the firmament of your book, by which the faithful too would be blessed; and next you formed the living soul of the faithful through affections ordered by the strength of continence; and then you renewed the mind, subject to you alone and needing no human authority to imitate, in your image and likeness, and you subjected rational action to the pre-eminent understanding, as woman to man; and you willed that for all your ministers, who are necessary for perfecting the faithful in this life, works useful for their temporal needs and fruitful for the future should be provided by those same faithful. All these things we see, and they are very good, because you see them in us, you who have given us the Spirit by which we might see them and love you in them.

13.50CSEL 33:386–387

Domine deus, pacem da nobis — omnia enim praestitisti nobis — pacem quietis, pacem sabbati, pacem sine uespera. omnis quippe iste ordo pulcherrimus rerum ualde bonarum modis suis peractis transiturus est: et mane quippe in eis factum est et uespera.

Lord God, give us peace (for you have given us all things), the peace of rest, the peace of the sabbath, the peace without evening. For all this most beautiful order of very good things, when its measures have been fulfilled, will pass away: for in them there was morning and evening.

13.51CSEL 33:387

Dies autem septimus sine uespera est nec habet occasum, quia sanctificasti eum ad permansionem sempiternam, ut id, quod tu post opera tua bona ualde, quamuis ea quietus feceris, requieuisti septimo die, hoc praeloquatur nobis uox libri tui, quod et nos post opera nostra ideo bona ualde, quia tu nobis ea donasti, sabbato uitae aeternae requiescamus in te.

But the seventh day is without evening and has no setting, because you sanctified it to remain for ever; so that the fact that after your very good works, although you made them while at rest, you rested on the seventh day, the voice of your book may foretell to us that we too, after our works, which are very good because you have given them to us, may rest in you in the sabbath of eternal life.

13.52CSEL 33:387

Etiam tunc enim sic requiesces in nobis, quemadmodum nunc operaris in nobis, et ita erit illa requies tua per nos, quemadmodum sunt ista opera tua per nos. tu autem, domine, semper operaris et semper requiescis nec uides ad tempus nec moueris ad tempus nec quiescis ad tempus, et tamen facis et uisiones temporales et ipsa tempora et quietem ex tempore.

For then too you will rest in us, as now you work in us; and so that rest of yours will be through us, as these works of yours are through us. But you, Lord, are always working and always at rest; you do not see in time, nor are you moved in time, nor do you rest in time; and yet you make both temporal seeings and times themselves and the rest that follows time.

13.53CSEL 33:387–388

Nos itaque ista quae fecisti uidemus, quia sunt, tu autem quia uides ea, sunt. et nos foris uidimus, quia sunt, et intus, quia bona sunt: tu autem ibi uidisti facta, ubi uidisti facienda. et nos alio tempore moti sumus ad bene faciendum, posteaquam concepit de spiritu tuo cor nostrum; priore autem tempore ad male faciendum mouebamur deserentes te: tu uero, deus une bone, numquam cessasti bene facere. et sunt quaedam bona opera nostra ex munere quidem tuo, sed non sempiterna: post illa nos requieturos in tua grandi sanctificatione speramus. tu autem bonum nullo indigens bono semper quietus es, quoniam tua quies tu ipse es. et hoc intellegere quis hominum dabit homini? quis angelus angelo? quis angelus homini? a te petatur, in te quaeratur, ad te pulsetur: sic, sic accipitur, sic inuenietur, sic aperietur.

So we see these things which you have made, because they are; but they are because you see them. And we see outwardly that they are, and inwardly that they are good; but you saw them made there where you saw that they were to be made. And we at a later time were moved to do good, after our heart conceived from your Spirit; but at an earlier time we were moved to do evil, forsaking you; but you, God, one and good, have never ceased to do good. And there are some good works of ours, from your gift indeed, but not eternal; after them we hope to rest in your great sanctification. But you, the Good that needs no good, are always at rest, since your rest is you yourself. And what man will give another man to understand this? What angel to an angel? What angel to a man? Let it be asked of you, sought in you, knocked for at your door: so, so will it be received, so will it be found, so will it be opened.