Tractates on the Gospel of John 14.1–14.13

Latin text: Migne, PL 35 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 7 (1888).

Show

Chapter 14

14.1PL 35:1501

Lectio ista de sancto Evangelio excellentiam divinitatis Domini nostri Jesu Christi, et humilitatem hominis qui meruit dici amicus sponsi, nos docet; ut distinguamus quid intersit inter hominem hominem, et hominem Deum. Quia homo Deus Dominus noster Jesus Christus, Deus ante omnia saecula, et homo in nostro sæculo: Deus de Patre, homo de Virgine, unus tamen atque idem Dominus et Salvator Jesus Christus, Filius Dei, Deus et homo. Joannes vero excellentis gratiæ missus ante ipsum; illuminatus ab illo qui lumen est. De Joanne enim dictum est, Non erat ille lumen, sed ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine, Potest quidem dici lumen, et bene dici­ tur et ipse lumen; sed illuminatum, non illuminans. Aliud est enim lumen quod illuminat, et aliud lumen quod iUuminatur: nam et oculi nostri lumina dicun­ tur, et tamen in tenebris patent, et non vident. Lu­ men autem illuminans a seipso lumen est, et sibi lumen est, et non indiget alio lumine ut lucere pos­ sit, sed ipso indigent cætera ut luceant.

This reading from the holy Gospel teaches us the excellence of the divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ and the humility of the man who was found worthy to be called the friend of the bridegroom, so that we may distinguish the difference between the man who is man and the man who is God. For our Lord Jesus Christ is man and God: God before all ages, and man in our age; God from the Father, man from the Virgin; yet one and the same Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Son of God, God and man. John, on the other hand, a man of excellent grace, was sent before him, enlightened by him who is the light. For of John it was said, “He was not the light, but came to bear witness to the light.” He can indeed be called a light, and he too is rightly called a light; but a light enlightened, not enlightening. For the light that enlightens is one thing, and the light that is enlightened is another: for our eyes too are called lights, and yet in darkness they are open and do not see. But the light that enlightens is light from itself, and is light to itself, and needs no other light in order to shine; rather, all other things need it in order to shine.

John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:29 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ is God and man, the light that enlightens; John is a light only as enlightened by him.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR letter slip): de sahcto Evangelio → de sancto Evangelio; sxcula → saecula.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.1 (PL 35:1501; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.2PL 35:1501–1503

Confessus est ergo Joannes, sicut audistis, quia cum discipulos multos faceret Jesus, et perferretur ad eum veluti ut instigaretur; quasi invido enim nar­ raverunt, Ecce ille facit plures discipulos quam tu: ille confessus est quid esset, et inde meruit ad ipsum pertinere, quia nou est ausus se dicere quod cst ille. Hoc ergo dixit Joannes, < Non potest homo accipere quidquam, nisi datum illi fuerit de coelo. > Ergo Chri­ atus dat, homo accipit. « Ipsi vos mihi testimonium per­ hibetis quod dixerim, Ego non sum Christus, sed quia missus sum ante illum. Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est: amicus autem sponsi, qui stat et audit eum, gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi >. Non sibi gaudium fecit de se. Qui cnim vult gaudere de se, tristis erit: qui autem de Deo vuit gaudere, semper gaudebit; quia Deus sempiternus est. Vis habere gaudium sempiternum? Inhære illi qui sempiternus est. Talem se dixit Joannes. Propter vo­ cem sponsi gaudet amicus sponsi, ait, non propter vocem suam: et stat, et audit eum. Si ergo cadit, non audit eum: de illo enim quodam qui recidit, dictum est, Et in veritate non stetit; de diabolo dictum est. Ergo stare debet amicus sponsi et audirc. Quid est stare? Permanere in gratia cjus quam accc­ pit. Et audit vocem ad quam gaudeat. Sic crat Joannes: noverat undc gaudcbat, non sibi arrogabat quod ipse non crat; sciebat illuminatum se, non illumina­ torero. Erat autcm lumen verum, ait Evangelista, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum. Si ergo omnem hominem, ct ipsum Joan­ nem; quia et ipse de hominibus. Elcnim quamvis nemo exsurrexerit major Joanne in natis mulierum, unus tamen ct ipse ex his qui nati sunt ex mulieribus. Numquid comparandus est ei qui, quia voluit, natus cst; et idco novo partu, quia no­ vus natus? Ambae enim generationes Domini inusi­ tatæ sunt, ct divina et humana: divina non habet matrem, humana non habet patrem. Ergo unus de caeteris Joannes, sed tamen majoris gratiæ, ita ut in natis mulicrum nemo exsurgeret major illo, tantam testificationem tribuit Domino nostro Jesu Christo, ut illum dicat sponsum, se amicum sponsi, non dignum tamen solvere corrigiam calceamenti ipsius. Hinc au­ divit jam multa Charitas vestra: quod sequitur vi­ deamus; aliquantum enim spissum est ad intelligen­ dum. Sed quoniam dicit ipse Joannes, quia non po­ test homo accipere quidquam, nisi datum ilii fuerit de cælo; quidquid non intellexerimus, rogemus eum qui dat de coelo: quia homines sumus, et non possu­ mus accipere quidqnam, nisi ille dederit qui homo non est.

So John confessed, as you have heard, when Jesus was making many disciples and it was reported to him as if to provoke him (for they told it to him as to one who would be envious: “See, he is making more disciples than you”): he confessed what he was, and thereby was found worthy to belong to him, because he did not dare to call himself what he is. This, then, is what John said: “A man cannot receive anything unless it is given him from heaven.” So Christ gives, man receives. “You yourselves bear me witness that I said, ‘I am not the Christ, but I have been sent before him.’ He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom, who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom's voice.” He did not make his joy out of himself. For he who wants to rejoice in himself will be sad; but he who wants to rejoice in God will always rejoice, because God is everlasting. Do you want to have everlasting joy? Cling to him who is everlasting. Such John said he was. The friend of the bridegroom rejoices because of the bridegroom's voice, he says, not because of his own voice; and he stands and hears him. If then he falls, he does not hear him: for of a certain one who fell away it was said, “And he did not stand in the truth”; it was said of the devil. So the friend of the bridegroom must stand and hear. What is it to stand? To remain in his grace, which he has received. And he hears a voice at which to rejoice. So was John: he knew in what he rejoiced; he did not claim for himself what he was not; he knew that he was enlightened, not the enlightener. “That was the true light,” says the evangelist, “which enlightens every man coming into this world.” If every man, then John himself too, because he too is one of mankind. For although no one has arisen greater than John among those born of women, yet he too is one of those who were born of women. Is he to be compared with him who was born because he willed it, and therefore by a new kind of birth, because he was born a new kind of man? For both generations of the Lord are unusual, both the divine and the human: the divine has no mother, the human has no father. So John was one among the rest, but of greater grace, so that among those born of women no one arose greater than he; and he gave such testimony to our Lord Jesus Christ as to call him the bridegroom, and himself the friend of the bridegroom, yet not worthy to loose the strap of his sandal. On this your Charity has already heard much: let us see what follows, for it is somewhat dense to understand. But since John himself says that a man cannot receive anything unless it is given him from heaven, whatever we do not understand let us ask of him who gives from heaven; for we are men, and we can receive nothing unless he gives it who is not a man.

John 4:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 3:26 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:29 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:11 (allusion, high confidence) · John 1:27 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: John confessed that he was not the Christ but the bridegroom's friend, rejoicing in Christ's voice, not his own, and owing all he had to the true light.

  • “Who is not a man” means who is not merely a man; Augustine is contrasting Christ's divinity with John's humanity.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR letter slip; OCR: colon read as v; OCR: joined words and letter slip; OCR: split and garbled word): potest horno accipere → potest homo accipere; ante ilium → ante illum; r,on audit → non audit; Joan- Des → Joannes; Damini → Domini; humana v divina → humana: divina; rogcmuseum → rogemus eum; nisi illo dederit → nisi ille dederit.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.2 (PL 35:1501–1503; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.3PL 35:1503

Hoc ergo sequitur, ct dicit Joannes, Hoc ergo gaudium meum impletum est. Quod est gaudium ipsius? Ut gaudeat ad vocem sponsi. Impletum est in me, habeo gratiam meam, plus mihi non assumo, ne et quod accepi amittam. Quod est hoc gaudium? Gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi. Intelligat ergo homo non se gaudere debere de sapientia sua, sed de sapientia. quam accepit a Deo. Nihil plus quærat, et non amit­ tit qnod invenit. Multi enim ideo facti sunt insipientes, quia dixerunt sc esse sapicntes. Arguit illos Aposto­ lus, et dicit de ipsis: « Quia quod notum est Dei, ait, manifestum est illis: Deus enim illis manifestavit. De quibusdam ingratis, impiis, audite quid dicat: < Deus enim illis manifestavit. Invisibilia enim cjus,a creatura mundi, per ea quæ facta sunt, intellecta con­ spiciuntur; sempiterna quoque virtus ejus ac divinitas, ut sint ipsi inexcusabiles. » Quare « inexcusabiles?»Quia « cognoscentes Deum; » non dixit, quia non cognove­ runt; < cognoscentes Deum, non sicut Deum gloria­ caverunt aut gratias egerunt; sed evanuerunt in cogi­ tationibus suis, et obscuratum est insipiens cor corum: dicentes enim se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt ». Si enim Deum cognoverant, simul cognove­ rant quia non eos fecerat sapientes nisi Deus. Non crgo sibi tribuerent quod a se non habebant, sed ei a quo acceperant. Non autem agendo gratias insipientes facti sunt. Ergo Deus quod dederat gratis, tulit in­ gratis. Noluit esse hoc Joannes, gratus esse voluit: confessus cst accepisse sc, et gaudere se dixit propter vocem sponsi, ct ait, Hoc ergo gaudium meum imple­ tum est.

This, then, follows, and John says: “Therefore this joy of mine is fulfilled.” What is his joy? To rejoice at the bridegroom's voice. It is fulfilled in me, I have my grace, I take no more upon myself, lest I lose even what I have received. What is this joy? “He rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom's voice.” Let man understand, then, that he ought not to rejoice in his own wisdom, but in the wisdom he has received from God. Let him seek nothing more, and he does not lose what he has found. For many have become fools precisely because they called themselves wise. The apostle rebukes them and says of them: “Because what can be known of God is manifest to them; for God has shown it to them.” Hear what he says of certain ungrateful and impious men: “For God has shown it to them. For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that have been made, his eternal power also and divinity, so that they are without excuse.” Why “without excuse”? Because “knowing God” (he did not say, because they did not know), “knowing God, they did not glorify him as God or give thanks; but they became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened: for claiming to be wise, they became fools.” For if they had known God, they had known at the same time that no one but God had made them wise. So they should not have attributed to themselves what they did not have from themselves, but to him from whom they had received it. But by not giving thanks they became fools. So God took away from the ungrateful what he had given freely. John did not want to be this; he wanted to be grateful. He confessed that he had received, and said that he rejoiced because of the bridegroom's voice, and he says, “Therefore this joy of mine is fulfilled.”

John 3:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:22 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: John's joy is fulfilled in rejoicing at Christ's voice; unlike the ungrateful wise men Paul condemns, he acknowledged that his gifts came from God.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR letter slip; OCR: c for opening quotation mark; OCR: i for quotation marks): gaudium meum impletum eat → gaudium meum impletum est; farti sunt → facti sunt; c Quia quod notum → « Quia quod notum; Quia i cognoscentes Deum; i non → Quia « cognoscentes Deum; » non; graiis → gratis.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.3 (PL 35:1503; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.4PL 35:1503

Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Quid cst hoc? Illum oportet exaltari, me autem humiliari. Quomodo crescit Jesus? quomodo crescit Deus? Pcr­ fectus non crescit. Deus autem nee crescit, nec rni­ nuitur. Si cnim crescit, perfectus non est: si minui. tur, Deus non est. Jesus autem Deus quomodo cre­ scit? Si ad ætatem, quia dignatus est csse homo, et fuit puer; et cum sit Verbum Dei, infans in præsepi jacuit, et cum ipse matrem suam condiderit, lac in­ fantiæ de matre suxit: quia crevit ergo Jesus ætate carnis, ideo fortc dictum est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Sed quare et hoc? Joannes ct Jesus, quod ad carnem pertinct, coævi erant: sex menses inter se habebant, paritcr creverant; et si diutius ante mortem Dominus noster Jcsus Chri­ stus vellet hic esse, et ipsum Joannem hic secum csse, quomodo pariter creverant, ita pariter senescere po­ terant: quare ergo, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui? Primo, quia jam ct Dominus triginta annorum erat: numquid juvenis, si jam triginta annorum sit, adhuc crescit? Jam ab ipsa ætate vcr­ gere incipiunt homines; et declinare ad graviorem ætatem, ct indc ad senectutem. Sed et si pueri cssent ambo, non diceret, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui; sed dicerct, Simul nos oportet crescere. Nunc autcm triginta annorum ille, triginta et ille: sex menses qui intererant, nullam distinguunt ætatem; magis illud invenit lectio quam aspectio.

“He must increase, but I must decrease.” What does this mean? He must be exalted, but I must be humbled. How does Jesus increase? How does God increase? The perfect does not increase. And God neither increases nor decreases. For if he increases, he is not perfect; if he decreases, he is not God. How then does Jesus, who is God, increase? If in age, because he deigned to be man and was a child; and though he is the Word of God, he lay as an infant in a manger, and though he himself created his mother, he sucked an infant's milk from his mother: since Jesus grew in the age of his flesh, perhaps that is why it was said, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” But why this too? John and Jesus, as regards the flesh, were of the same age: there were six months between them; they had grown up alike; and if our Lord Jesus Christ had wished to be here longer before his death, and John himself to be here with him, as they had grown up alike, so they could have grown old alike. Why then, “He must increase, but I must decrease”? First, because the Lord was already thirty years old: does a young man who is already thirty still grow? From that very age men begin to turn, and to decline toward a heavier age, and from there toward old age. But even if they were both boys, he would not say, “He must increase, but I must decrease,” but he would say, “We must grow together.” But as it is, he was thirty, and the other was thirty: the six months between them make no difference in age; reading finds that out rather than looking.

John 3:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 2:52 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 1:36 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 3:23 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: John's saying that Christ must increase cannot refer to bodily growth, since they were almost the same age and both grown men.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR letter slip; OCR letter slips): lllum oportet → Illum oportet; quia crerit ergo → quia crevit ergo; oportet cretcere → oportet crescere; numquid junonis → numquid juvenis.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.4 (PL 35:1503; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.5PL 35:1503–1505

Quid ergo est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui? Magnum hoc sacramentum! intelligat Charitas vestra. Antequam venirct Dominus Jesus, homines gloriabantur de se: venit illc homo, ut minueretur hominis gloria, et augeretur gloria Dei. Etenim venit ille sine peccato, et invenit omnes cum peccato. Si sic venit ille ut dimitteret peccata, Deus largiatur, homo confiteatur. Etenim confessio hominis, humi­ litas hominis: miseratio Dei, altitudo Dei. Si ergo venit ille dimittere homini peccata, agnoscat horno humilitatem suam, et Deus faciat misericordiam suam. Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui: hoc est, illum oportet dare, me autem accipere; illum oportet glo - rificari, me autem confiteri. Intelligat homo gradum suum, et confiteatur Deo, et audiat Apostolum di­ centem homini superbienti et elato, extollere se vo­ lenti: Quid enim habes quod non accepisti? si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis? Intelligat crgo homo quia accepit, qui volcbat suum dicere quod non est ejus, et minuatur: bonum est enim illi ut Deus in illo glorificetur. Ipse in se minuatur, ut in Deo augeatur. Hæc testimonia et hanc veritatem, etiam passionibus suis significaverunt Christus et Joannes. Nam Joannes capite minutus, Christus in cruce exaltatus; ut et ibi apparcret quid est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Dcinde na­ tus est Christus cum jam inciperent crescere dies, natus est Joannes quando coepcrunt minui dies. Attestata est ipsa crcatura cl ipsæ passiones verbis Joannis dicentis, Illum oportet crescere, me autem mi­ nui. Crescat ergo in nobis gloria Dei, et minuatur gloria nostra, ut in Deo crescat et nostra. Hoc enim dicit Apostolus, hoc dicit Scriptura sancta: Qui glo­ riatur, in Domino glorietur. In te vis gloriari? crescere vis: sed malo tuo male crescis. Qui enim male crescit, juste minuitur. Crescat ergo Dcus qui semper perfectus est, crescat in te. Quanto enim magis intelligis Deum, ct quanto magis capis, videtur in te crescere Deus: in se autem non crescit, sed semper perfectus est. Intelligebas heri modicum, intelligis hodie amplius, intelliges cras multo amplius: lumen ipsum Dei crescit in te; ita velut Deus crescit, qui semper perfectus manet. Quemadmodum si curarentur alicujus oculi ex pri­ stina cæcitate, et inciperet videre paululum lucis, et alia dic plus videret, et tertia die amplius, videretur illi lux crescere: lux tamen perfecta est, sive ipse videat, sive non videat. Sic est et interior homo: proficit quidem in Deo, et Deus in illo videtur cre­ scere; ipse tamen minuitur, ut a gloria sua decidat, et in gloriam Dei surgat.

What then does “He must increase, but I must decrease” mean? A great mystery! Let your Charity understand. Before the Lord Jesus came, men gloried in themselves. That man came so that man's glory might be lessened and God's glory increased. For he came without sin, and found all with sin. If he came thus to forgive sins, let God bestow it, let man confess. For man's confession is man's humility; God's mercy is God's loftiness. If then he came to forgive man his sins, let man acknowledge his humility, and let God show his mercy. “He must increase, but I must decrease”: that is, he must give, but I must receive; he must be glorified, but I must confess. Let man understand his rank and confess to God, and hear the apostle saying to the proud and lofty man who wants to exalt himself: “For what do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it?” Let man understand, then, that he has received, he who wanted to call his own what is not his, and let him decrease: for it is good for him that God be glorified in him. Let him decrease in himself, so as to be increased in God. Christ and John signified these testimonies and this truth even by their sufferings. For John was diminished by his head, Christ was exalted on the cross; so that there too it might appear what “He must increase, but I must decrease” means. Then Christ was born when the days were beginning to grow longer; John was born when the days began to grow shorter. Creation itself and their very sufferings bear witness to John's words, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” Let God's glory, then, increase in us, and our glory decrease, so that ours too may increase in God. For this is what the apostle says, this is what holy Scripture says: “Let him who glories glory in the Lord.” Do you want to glory in yourself? You want to grow; but you grow badly, to your own harm. For he who grows badly is justly diminished. So let God, who is always perfect, grow; let him grow in you. For the more you understand God and the more you grasp him, the more God seems to grow in you; but in himself he does not grow, but is always perfect. Yesterday you understood a little; today you understand more; tomorrow you will understand much more: the very light of God grows in you; so, as it were, God grows, who remains always perfect. Just as if someone's eyes were being cured of an old blindness, and he began to see a little light, and the next day saw more, and the third day more still, the light would seem to him to grow; yet the light is perfect, whether he sees or does not see. So it is with the inner man: he advances in God, and God seems to grow in him; yet he himself is diminished, so as to fall from his own glory and rise into the glory of God.

John 3:30 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:31 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 10:17 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 14:10 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ must increase and John decrease, signifying that man's glory must yield to God's; this was shown even in John's beheading and Christ's lifting up, and in the seasons of their births.

  • Augustine refers to the dates of the feasts: Christ's birth at the winter solstice (25 December), after which days lengthen, and John's at the summer solstice (24 June), after which days shorten.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR letter slip; OCR letter slips; OCR: split word; stray apostrophe): Dominus lesus → Dominus Jesus; oportet cresceret me autem → oportet crescere, me autem; honum est → bonum est; iti se minuatur → in se minuatur; in cmce → in cruce; oportet creare, me autem → oportet crescere, me autem; minii dies → minui dies; At. testata → Attestata; Grescat ergo → Crescat ergo; Hoc cain dicit → Hoc enim dicit; Quanto eniin magis → Quanto enim magis; quaulo inagis → quanto magis; iia velut → ita velut; in Deo', → in Deo,.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.5 (PL 35:1503–1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.6PL 35:1505

Et distincte jam ct manifestc apparet quod modo audivimus. Qui de sursum venit, supra omnes est. Vide quid dicat de Christo. Quid de se? Qui est de terra, de terra est, et de terra loquitur. Qui de sursum venit, su­ pra omnes est; Christus est: Qui autem est de terra, de terra eat, et de terra loquitur; Joannes est. Et hoc est totum, Joannes de terra est, et de terra loquitur? totum testimonium quod perhibet de Christo, de terra loquitur? non voces Dei audiuntur a Joanne, ubi te­ stimonium perhibet de Christo? Quomodo ergo de terra loquitur? Sed de homine dicebat. Quantum ad ipsum hominem pertinet, de terra est, et de terra lo­ quitur: si autem aliqua loquitur divina, illuminatus cst ab eo. Nam si non esset illuminatus, terra terram loqueretur. Ergo seorsum est gratia Dei, seorsum na­ tura hominis. Modo naturam hominis interroga: na­ scitur et crescit, usitata ista hominum discit. Quid no­ vit nisi terram de terra? Humana loquitur, humana novit, humana sapit; carnalis carnaliter aestimat, car­ naliter suspicatur: ecce est totus homo. Veniat gra­ tia Dei, illuminet tenebras illius, sicut dicit, Tu illu­ minabis lucernam meam, Domine; Deus meus, illumina tenebras meas; assumat mentem huma­ nam, convertat ad lucem suam: incipit jam dicere, quod Apostolus dicit, Non ego autem, sed gratia Dei mecum; et, Vivo autem jam non ego, vi­ vit autem in me Christus. Hoc cst, Il­ lum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Ergo Joannes, quod ad Joannem pertinet, de terra est, ct de terra loquitur: si quid divinum audisti a Joanne, illumi­ nantis cst, non recipientis.

And now what we have just heard appears distinctly and plainly: “He who comes from above is above all.” See what he says of Christ. What of himself? “He who is of the earth is of the earth, and speaks of the earth.” “He who comes from above is above all”: that is Christ. “But he who is of the earth is of the earth, and speaks of the earth”: that is John. And is this the whole of it: John is of the earth, and speaks of the earth? Does the whole testimony he bears to Christ speak of the earth? Are not the words of God heard from John when he bears witness to Christ? How then does he speak of the earth? But he was speaking of man. As far as man himself is concerned, he is of the earth and speaks of the earth; but if he speaks any divine things, he has been enlightened by him. For if he were not enlightened, earth would speak earth. So the grace of God is one thing, the nature of man another. Now question the nature of man: he is born and grows, he learns these customary things of men. What does he know but earth from earth? He speaks human things, knows human things, savors human things; being carnal, he judges carnally, conjectures carnally: see, that is the whole man. Let the grace of God come, let it enlighten his darkness, as he says, “You will light my lamp, O Lord; my God, enlighten my darkness”; let it take up the human mind and turn it to its own light; he now begins to say what the apostle says, “Yet not I, but the grace of God with me”; and, “I live, yet no longer I, but Christ lives in me.” This is “He must increase, but I must decrease.” So John, as far as John is concerned, is of the earth and speaks of the earth; if you have heard anything divine from John, it belongs to him who enlightens, not to him who receives.

John 3:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 18:28 (17:29 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 2:20 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:30 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: John, as a man, is of the earth; whatever divine thing he speaks comes from the grace of Christ who enlightens him.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR letter slip; OCR letter slips; stray character (footnote sign)): EI distincte → Et distincte; loquiLur? → loquitur?; a l eo → ab eo; na­ tura liominis → na­ tura hominis; convertat I ad → convertat ad.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.6 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.7PL 35:1505

Qui de cælo venit, supra omnes est; et quod vi­ dit et audivit, hoc testificatur; et testimonium ejus nemo accipit. De cælo venit, supra omnes est, Dominus noster Jesus Christus: de quo superius dictum est, Nemo ascendit in cælum, nisi qui de cælo descendit, Filius hominis qui est in coelo. Est au­ tem super omnes; et quod vidit et audivit, hoc loqui­ tur. Habet enim et Patrem ipse Filius Dei; habet et Patrem, et audit a Patre. Et quod audit a Patre quid est? quis hoc explicat? Quando lingua mea, quando cor meum sufficere potest, vel cor ad intelligendum, vel lingua ad proferendum, quid est quod Filius audivit a Patre? Forte Filius Verbum Patris audivit? Imo Filius Verbum Patris est. Videtis quemadmodum hic fatige­ tur omnis conatus humanus; videtis quemadmodum hic deficiat omnis conjectura pectoris nostri, et omnis intentio mentis caligantis. Audio dicentem Scripturam quia Filius hoc loquitur, quod audit a Patre; ct rursus audio dicentem Scripturam quia ipse Filius Verbum Patris est: In principio erat Ver­ bum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Nos loquimur verba volantia et transeuntia: mox ut sonuerit ore tuo verbum tuum, transit; peragit stre­ pitum suum ct transit in silentium. Numquid potes sequi sonum tuum, et tenere ut stet? Cogitatio tamen tua manet, et de ipsa cogitatione manente dicis multa verba transeuntia. Quid dicimus, fratres? Deus cum loqueretur, adhibuit vocem, adhibuit sonos, adhibuit syllabas? Si adhibuit ista, qua lingua locutus est? Hebræa, an græca, an latina? ibi necessariæ linguæ, ubi distinctio gentium. Ibi autem nemo potest dicere, illa lingua, vel illa lingua locutum esse Dcum. Cor tuum attende. Quando concipis verbum quod dicas: dicam cnim, si potuero, quod in nobis attendamus, non unde illud comprehendamus: quando crgo con­ cipis verbum quod proferas, rem vis dicere, et ipsa rei conceptio in corde tuo jam verbum est; nondum processit, sed jam natum est in corde, et manet ut procedat: attendis autem ad quem procedat, cum quo loquaris; si Latinus est, vocem latinam quaeris; si Græcus est, verba græca mcditaris; si Punicus cst, attendis si nosti linguam punicam; pro diversitate au­ ditorum diversas linguas adhibcs, ut proferas verbum conceptum: illud autem quod cordc concepcras, nulla lingua tenebatur. Cum ergo Deus loquens, linguam non quæreret, et genus locutionis non assumeret, quomodo auditus est a Filio, cum ipsum Filium sit locutus Deus? Quomodo enim tu verbum quod lo­ qucris, in corde habes, et apud te est, et ipsa con­ ceptio spiritualis est (nam sicut anima tua spiritus est, ita et verbum quod concepisti, spiritus est; nondum enim accepit sonum ut per syllabas divida­ tur, sed manet in conceptione cordis et in speculo mentis): sic Deus edidit Verbum, hoc est, genuit Filium. Et tu quidem ex tempore gignis verbum etiam in corde: Deus sine tempore genuit Filium, per quem creavit omnia tempora. Cum ergo Verbum Dci Filius sit, Filius autem locutus est nobis, non verbum tuum, sed Verbum Patris, se nobis loqui voluit, qui Verbum Patris loquebatur. Hoc ergo quomodo decuit et oportuit, dixit Joannes: quomodo potuimus, nos exposuimus. Cui ad cor nondum pervenit dignus de tanta re intellectus, habet quo se convertat, habet quo pulset, habet a quo quaerat, habet a quo petat, habet a quo accipiat.

“He who comes from heaven is above all; and what he has seen and heard, to that he testifies; and no one receives his testimony.” He who comes from heaven, who is above all, is our Lord Jesus Christ, of whom it was said above, “No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man who is in heaven.” And he is above all; and what he has seen and heard, that he speaks. For the Son of God himself also has a Father; he has a Father, and he hears from the Father. And what is it that he hears from the Father? Who can explain this? When can my tongue, when can my heart be sufficient, either the heart to understand or the tongue to express, what it is that the Son heard from the Father? Did the Son perhaps hear the Father's word? No, the Son is the Father's Word. You see how all human effort is wearied here; you see how every conjecture of our breast fails here, and every effort of a darkened mind. I hear Scripture saying that the Son speaks what he hears from the Father; and again I hear Scripture saying that the Son himself is the Father's Word: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” We speak words that fly and pass away: as soon as your word has sounded from your mouth, it passes; it makes its noise and passes into silence. Can you follow your sound and hold it so that it stays? Yet your thought remains, and from that remaining thought you speak many passing words. What do we say, brothers? When God spoke, did he use a voice, did he use sounds, did he use syllables? If he used these, in what language did he speak? Hebrew, or Greek, or Latin? Languages are needed where there is distinction of nations. But there no one can say that God spoke in this language or that. Attend to your heart. When you conceive a word to say (for I will say, if I can, what we may observe in ourselves, not that by which we may comprehend that other), when, then, you conceive a word to utter, you want to say a thing, and the very conception of the thing in your heart is already a word: it has not yet gone out, but it is already born in the heart, and it waits to go out. But you consider to whom it is to go out, with whom you are speaking: if he is a Latin, you look for a Latin expression; if he is a Greek, you think of Greek words; if he is a Carthaginian, you consider whether you know the Punic language. According to the diversity of your hearers you use different languages to utter the word you have conceived; but what you had conceived in your heart was held by no language. Since, then, God in speaking did not seek a language or take up a kind of speech, how was he heard by the Son, since God spoke the Son himself? For just as you have in your heart the word that you speak, and it is with you, and the conception itself is spiritual (for as your soul is spirit, so the word you have conceived is spirit; for it has not yet received sound to be divided into syllables, but remains in the conception of the heart and in the mirror of the mind), so God uttered the Word, that is, begot the Son. And you indeed beget a word in time, even in the heart; God without time begot the Son, through whom he created all times. Since, then, the Word of God is the Son, and the Son has spoken to us, not your word but the Father's Word, he willed to speak himself to us, he who was speaking the Father's Word. This John said as was fitting and right; we have expounded it as we could. He to whose heart a worthy understanding of so great a matter has not yet come has where to turn, has where to knock, has of whom to ask, has of whom to seek, has from whom to receive.

John 3:31 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:32 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:26 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:3 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:7 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Son speaks what he hears from the Father, yet he is himself the Father's Word, begotten without time as a word is conceived in the heart before any language.

  • Augustine's analogy of the inner word, conceived before it is spoken in any language, is developed further in On the Trinity 15. The closing sentences of this section are badly garbled in the digital text and are corrected as logged.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR errors in the scan-supplied text (proofread); OCR letter slip; OCR letter slips; OCR: garbled word; OCR: joined words; OCR: joined words and letter slip; stray apostrophe): Filis hominis → Filius hominis; Ilabet enim ct Patrem ipsc → Habet enim et Patrem ipse; habct et Patrem → habet et Patrem; lingua mca → lingua mea; quid estquod Filius → quid est quod Filius; hic falige → hic fatige; videlis quemadmodum → videtis quemadmodum; transenntia → transeuntia; Namquid polcs → Numquid potes; dicismulla → dicis multa; verbum qnod dicas → verbum quod dicas; si poicro → si potuero; vocem latnam quicris → vocem latinam quaeris; linguarn non → linguam non; nox assumeret → non assumeret; Quomodo euim tu → Quomodo enim tu; ipsa ton → ipsa con; mentis') → mentis); eliam in corde → etiam in corde; Fdius autem → Filius autem; Verbum tatris, se nobis loqul voluii, qui Yerlrom Palris loquebatur → Verbum Patris, se nobis loqui voluit, qui Verbum Patris loquebatur; decuit,et oportuit, dixii Joannes: quomodo potui mas, nos espoftuimtts. Gui ad cor nondum pervenit di gnus de tanta re intellectos, habet quo se converlal habet quo pulset, habet a quo quaerat, habet a quo pctat, faabeta quo accipiat. → decuit et oportuit, dixit Joannes: quomodo potuimus, nos exposuimus. Cui ad cor nondum pervenit dignus de tanta re intellectus, habet quo se convertat, habet quo pulset, habet a quo quaerat, habet a quo petat, habet a quo accipiat..

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.7 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.8PL 35:1505

Qui de coelo venit, supra omnes est: et quod vidit et audivit, hoc testatur; et testimonium ejus nemo accipit. Si nemo, utquid venit? Quorumdam ergo nemo. Est quidam populus praeparatus ad iram Dei, damnandus cum diabolo: horum nemo accipit testimonium Christi. Nam si omnino nemo, nullus homo; quid est quod sequitur, Qui autem accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est? Certe ergo non nemo, si tu ipse dicis, Qui accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est. Responderet ergo fortasse Joannes interrogatus, et diceret, Novi quid dixerim, nemo. Est enim quidam populus natus ad iram Dei, et ad hoc praecognitus. Qui sint enim credituri, et qui non sint credituri, novit Deus; qui sint perseveraturi in eo quod crediderunt, et qui sint lapsuri, novit Deus: et numerati sunt Deo omnes futuri in vitam aeternam; et novit jam illum populum distinctum. Et si ipse novit, et Prophetis dedit nosse per Spiritum suum, dedit et Joanni. Attendebat ergo Joannes, non oculo suo; nam quantum ad ipsum pertinet, terra est, et de terra loquitur: sed in ea gratia Spiritus, quam accepit a Deo, vidit quemdam populum impium, infidelem; attendens illum in infidelitate sua, ait, Testimonium ejus qui venit de coelo, nemo accipit. Quorum nemo? Eorum qui ad sinistram futuri sunt, eorum quibus dicetur, Ite in ignem aeternum, qui praeparatus est diabolo et angelis ejus. Qui ergo accipiunt? Illi qui ad dexteram futuri sunt, illi quibus dicetur, Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum quod vobis paratum est ab origine mundi. Attendit ergo in spiritu divisionem, in genere autem humano commixtionem; et quod nondum locis separatum est, separavit intellectu, separavit cordis aspectu; et vidit duos populos, fidelium et infidelium: attendit infideles, et ait, Qui de coelo venit, supra omnes est: et quod vidit et audivit, hoc testatur; et testimonium ejus nemo accipit. Deinde transtulit se a sinistra, et aspexit ad dexteram, et secutus ait, Qui accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est. Quid est, signavit quia Deus verax est, nisi, homo mendax est, et Deus verax est? Quia nemo hominum potest dicere quod veritatis est, nisi illuminetur ab eo qui mentiri non potest. Deus ergo verax, Christus autem Deus. Vis probare? Accipe testimonium ejus, et invenis: Qui enim accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est. Quis? Ipse qui de coelo venit et supra omnes est, Deus verax est. Sed si nondum illum intelligis Deum, nondum accepisti testimonium ejus: accipe, et signas, praesumenter intelligis, definienter agnoscis quia Deus verax est.

“He who comes from heaven is above all; and what he has seen and heard, to that he testifies; and no one receives his testimony.” If no one, why did he come? No one, then, of certain people. There is a certain people prepared for the wrath of God, to be condemned with the devil: of these no one receives the testimony of Christ. For if absolutely no one, not a single man, what is it that follows: “But he who has received his testimony has set his seal that God is true”? Certainly, then, not no one, if you yourself say, “He who has received his testimony has set his seal that God is true.” Perhaps John, if asked, would answer and say: I know what I said when I said “no one.” For there is a certain people born for the wrath of God, and foreknown for this. For God knows who will believe and who will not believe; God knows who will persevere in what they have believed and who will fall away; and all who are to come to eternal life are numbered by God; and he already knows that people as set apart. And if he himself knows, and has given it to the prophets to know through his Spirit, he gave it to John too. So John was observing, not with his own eye (for as far as he himself is concerned, he is earth and speaks of the earth), but in that grace of the Spirit which he received from God he saw a certain people, impious, unbelieving; observing them in their unbelief, he says, “No one receives the testimony of him who came from heaven.” No one of whom? Of those who will be on the left, of those to whom it will be said, “Go into the eternal fire, which has been prepared for the devil and his angels.” Who, then, receive it? Those who will be on the right, those to whom it will be said, “Come, you blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom that has been prepared for you from the foundation of the world.” So he observed in the Spirit the division, but in the human race the mixture; and what is not yet separated in place he separated by understanding, separated by the gaze of the heart; and he saw two peoples, of believers and of unbelievers. He observed the unbelievers and said, “He who comes from heaven is above all; and what he has seen and heard, to that he testifies; and no one receives his testimony.” Then he turned from the left, looked to the right, and went on to say, “He who has received his testimony has set his seal that God is true.” What does “has set his seal that God is true” mean, if not that man is a liar and God is true? For no man can say what belongs to truth unless he is enlightened by him who cannot lie. So God is true, and Christ is God. Do you want to prove it? Receive his testimony, and you find it: for “he who has received his testimony has set his seal that God is true.” Who? He himself who came from heaven and is above all is God, true. But if you do not yet understand him to be God, you have not yet received his testimony: receive it, and you set your seal; you understand with confidence, you acknowledge with certainty, that God is true.

John 3:31 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:32 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Tim 2:19 (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 25:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 3:4 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: “No one receives his testimony” refers to those foreknown as unbelievers; those who receive it set their seal that God, that is Christ, is true.

  • This section is supplied from a scan's OCR and was heavily garbled; the Latin has been proofread and every correction logged. Augustine's language about a people “prepared for” and “born for” the wrath of God and foreknown by him concerns predestination; it is translated exactly. Augustine takes “God is true” as said of Christ.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread)): de ccelo venit, → de coelo venit,; i>mne$ ett: el → omnes est: et; ei mdifiti → et audivit,; tt tatimonium → et testimonium; acdjnt Si nemo) utquid venlt? → accipit. Si nemo, utquid venit?; ncmo. Estquidam populuspraeparatusad irAm Dei,damnandus → nemo. Est quidam populus praeparatus ad iram Dei, damnandus; nemo nullus bomo; → nemo, nullus homo;; Qm autem accefnt testimonium ejut ngfmii → Qui autem accepit testimonium ejus, signavit; est f → est?; nerno si lu ipse dicls, Qui aecepit te$timorum eju$ iignavU uia → nemo, si tu ipse dicis, Qui accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia; Joan nes → Joannes; Noviquid dixerim, mo. → Novi quid dixerim, nemo.; Dei, el ad → Dei, et ad; praecognilus. → praecognitus.; novil → novit; iu eo qnod → in eo quod; viiamaeternam; etnovii → vitam aeternam; et novit; Etsi → Et si; suum dedil ei → suum, dedit et; lerra → terra; Spirilus, quam accepitaDeo, Tiditquemdam → Spiritus, quam accepit a Deo, vidit quemdam; TetHmoniumejuB qui venitdeccelo, nemo aecipit. Quoruin → Testimonium ejus qui venit de coelo, nemo accipit. Quorum; eoruiai quibus dicelur, lu → eorum quibus dicetur, Ite; mtemum, qm prcsparatu utdiabolo et angeUt eju$, → aeternum, qui praeparatus est diabolo et angelis ejus.; iili → illi; perdite regnum quodvobis foratum → percipite regnum quod vobis paratum; gcnere autcm → genere autem; ct infidelium: allendit infideles, etat → et infidelium: attendit infideles, et ait,; c(bIo → coelo; mnne$ e$t: H → omnes est: et; te$tatur >; ei U$timiomum eju$ → testatur; et testimonium ejus; te$timomim eju$, donavit quia Deu$ → testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus; estt tignavU → est, signavit; esi? Quia ncmo → est? Quia nemo; autemDeos. → autem Deus.; iViVenis: Qid enimaccepit testimomum → invenis: Qui enim accepit testimonium; Deu$ verax e$t, → Deus verax est.; venil ct flupra → venit et supra; acccpisli testimonium ejtis: → accepisti testimonium ejus:; praesumentcr intelligis, dertnlentcr → praesumenter intelligis, definienter; cst. → est..

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.8 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.9PL 35:1505

Quem enim misit Deus, verba Dei loquitur. Ipse est Deus verax, et misit illum Deus: Deus misit Deum. Junge ambos, unus Deus, Deus verax missus a Deo. De singulis interroga, Deus: et de ambobus interroga, Deus. Non singuli Deus et ambo dii, sed singulus quisque Deus et ambo Deus. Tanta enim ibi est charitas Spiritus sancti, tanta pax unitatis, ut de singulis cum interrogatur, Deus tibi respondeatur; de Trinitate cum interrogatur, Deus tibi respondeatur. Si enim spiritus hominis quando inhaeret Deo unus spiritus est, aperte Apostolo dicente, Qui adhaeret Domino, unus spiritus est; quanto magis Filius aequalis adhaerens Patri simul cum illo unus Deus est? Audite alterum testimonium. Nostis quam multi crediderunt, quando omnia quae habebant, ad pedes Apostolorum vendita posuerunt, ut distribueretur unicuique sicut opus erat: et de illa congregatione sanctorum quid dicit Scriptura? Erat illis anima una et cor unum in Domino. Si charitas de tot animis fecit animam unam, et de tot cordibus fecit cor unum, quanta est charitas inter Patrem et Filium? Major utique potest esse quam inter illos homines quibus erat cor unum. Si ergo multorum fratrum cor unum propter charitatem, et multorum fratrum anima una propter charitatem; Deus Pater et Deus Filius, dicturus es quia duo sunt? Si duo dii sunt, non est ibi summa charitas. Si enim hic tanta charitas est, ut animam tuam et animam amici tui unam animam faciat; quomodo ibi non est unus Deus Pater et Filius? Absit ut hoc sentiat fides non ficta. Prorsus quantum excellat charitas illa, hinc intelligite. Multae animae sunt multorum hominum, et si se diligunt, una anima est; sed possunt dici et multae animae, possunt in hominibus, quia non est tanta conjunctio: ibi autem, unum Deum licet dicas; duos aut tres deos non licet dicas. Hinc tibi commendatur supereminentia et summitas charitatis tanta, ut major esse non possit.

“For he whom God has sent speaks the words of God.” He is God, true, and God sent him: God sent God. Join both: one God, true God, sent by God. Ask about each: God. And ask about both: God. Not each God and both gods, but each one God and both God. For so great there is the love of the Holy Spirit, so great the peace of unity, that when you ask about each, the answer to you is “God”; when you ask about the Trinity, the answer to you is “God.” For if the spirit of man, when it clings to God, is one spirit, as the apostle plainly says, “He who clings to the Lord is one spirit,” how much more is the equal Son, clinging to the Father, one God together with him? Hear another testimony. You know how many believed when they sold all they had and laid it at the apostles' feet, so that it might be distributed to each as he had need; and what does Scripture say of that gathering of saints? “They had one soul and one heart in the Lord.” If love made one soul of so many souls, and one heart of so many hearts, how great is the love between the Father and the Son? It can surely be greater than among those men who had one heart. If then the heart of many brothers was one because of love, and the soul of many brothers one because of love, will you say of God the Father and God the Son that they are two? If they are two gods, there is not the highest love there. For if love here is so great as to make your soul and your friend's soul one soul, how is the Father and the Son not one God there? Far be it from unfeigned faith to think this. Understand from this how far that love excels. The souls of many men are many, and if they love one another, it is one soul; but they can also be called many souls, they can among men, because the union is not so great; but there you may say one God, you may not say two or three gods. From this the supereminence and summit of love is commended to you, so great that it cannot be greater.

John 3:34 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 4:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 4:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 4:32 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 1:5 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Father and Son are one God, not two gods, since the love that made the first believers one heart and soul is infinitely surpassed by the love within the Trinity.

  • This section is supplied from a scan's OCR and was heavily garbled; the Latin has been proofread and every correction logged. A run of meaningless characters after the opening sentence (scan noise) has been removed. “In the Lord” is Augustine's addition to Acts 4:32. In the digital text the word read here as charitas (“love”) in “how far that love excels” appears as claritas (“brightness”); the context favors charitas.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread); OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread); meaningless characters (scan noise) removed): mi$U Deu$ → misit Deus,; lofiuitur. ipse uss., toattttur: el post, loco, tranetHlU, habent, titi, → loquitur. Ipse; nium Dcus: Dcus → illum Deus: Deus; Interroga → interroga,; dii, scd singulus → dii, sed singulus; ambo Deus Tanta → ambo Deus. Tanta; unitatis utde → unitatis, ut de; interrogalur Dus tibi respon deatur; de Trinllate cum interrogalur, Deus libi rcspondcatur. → interrogatur, Deus tibi respondeatur; de Trinitate cum interrogatur, Deus tibi respondeatur.; spirilus → spiritus; tdhceret Domino, unuS $spiritu$e$t; → adhaeret Domino, unus spiritus est;; xqualis adhærens → aequalis adhaerens; curo → cum; Deiis est? Audite-alterum → Deus est? Audite alterum; qux liabc bant, → quae habebant,; uendita → vendita; Hli$ → illis; fccit → fecit; feoit → fecit; in ter → inter; utiqoe → utique; Si eio multorum → Si ergo multorum; mullorum → multorum; propier → propter; Paier → Pater; Fillus, → Filius,; Ijinta charitas esi f → tanta charitas est,; tiii → tui; fidcs → fides; quanlum excellat claritas illa, binc → quantum excellat charitas illa, hinc; animac → animae; homi num, → hominum,; multac → multae; auiem, unum Deuin → autem, unum Deum; libt conimendalur superemineniia → tibi commendatur supereminentia; cbariiatis → charitatis.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.9 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.10PL 35:1505

Quem enim misit Deus, verba Dei loquitur. Hoc utique de Christo dicebat, ut se ab illo distingueret. Quid enim? ipsum Joannem nonne Deus misit? An non ipse dixit, Missus sum ante eum; et, Qui me misit baptizare in aqua: et de illo dictum est, Ecce mitto angelum meum ante te, et praeparabit viam tuam? Nonne et ipse verba Dei loquitur, de quo etiam dictum est quod sit amplius quam propheta? Si ergo et ipsum Deus misit, et verba Dei loquitur; quomodo ad distinctionem, de Christo eum dixisse accipimus, Quem enim misit Deus, verba Dei loquitur? Sed vide quid adjungat: Non enim ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum. Quid est hoc, Non enim ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum? Invenimus quia ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum. Audi Apostolum dicentem, Secundum mensuram donationis Christi. Hominibus ad mensuram dat, unico Filio non dat ad mensuram. Quomodo hominibus ad mensuram? Alii quidem datur per Spiritum sermo sapientiae, alii sermo scientiae secundum eumdem Spiritum; alii fides in eodem Spiritu, alii prophetia, alii dijudicatio spirituum, alii genera linguarum, alii donatio curationum. Numquid omnes apostoli? numquid omnes prophetae? numquid omnes doctores? numquid omnes virtutes? numquid omnes dona habent sanitatum? numquid omnes linguis loquuntur? numquid omnes interpretantur? Aliud habet iste, aliud ille; et quod habet ille, non habet iste: mensura est, divisio quaedam donorum est. Ergo hominibus ad mensuram datur, et concordia ibi unum corpus facit. Quomodo aliud accipit manus ut operetur, aliud oculus ut videat, aliud auris ut audiat, aliud pes ut ambulet; anima tamen una est quae agit omnia, in manu ut operetur, in pede ut ambulet, in aure ut audiat, in oculo ut videat: sic sunt etiam diversa dona fidelium, tanquam membris ad mensuram cuique propriam distributa. Sed Christus qui dat, non ad mensuram accipit.

“For he whom God has sent speaks the words of God.” This he said of Christ, to distinguish himself from him. For what? Did not God send John himself? Did he not himself say, “I have been sent before him,” and, “He who sent me to baptize with water”? And was it not said of him, “Behold, I send my messenger before you, and he will prepare your way”? Does not he too speak the words of God, he of whom it was also said that he is more than a prophet? If then God sent him too, and he speaks the words of God, how do we take him to have said it of Christ by way of distinction: “For he whom God has sent speaks the words of God”? But see what he adds: “For God does not give the Spirit by measure.” What does this mean: “For God does not give the Spirit by measure”? We find that God gives the Spirit by measure. Hear the apostle saying, “According to the measure of Christ's gift.” To men he gives by measure; to the only Son he does not give by measure. How to men by measure? “To one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith in the same Spirit, to another prophecy, to another the discernment of spirits, to another kinds of tongues, to another the gift of healings.” “Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? Do all have gifts of healings? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret?” One has this, another that; and what the one has, the other does not have: there is a measure, a certain division of gifts. So to men it is given by measure, and harmony there makes one body. Just as the hand receives one thing to work, the eye another to see, the ear another to hear, the foot another to walk, yet it is one soul that does all things, in the hand to work, in the foot to walk, in the ear to hear, in the eye to see: so too the gifts of the faithful are different, distributed as to members, to each by its own measure. But Christ, who gives, does not receive by measure.

John 3:34 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Mal 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 4:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:29 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:30 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:12 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God gives the Spirit to men by measure, distributing different gifts among the members of one body, but to Christ he gives without measure.

  • This section is supplied from a scan's OCR and was heavily garbled; the Latin has been proofread and every correction logged. Augustine's list of gifts is from 1 Cor 12:8–10 and 12:29–30.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread)): Dd loquitur. IIuc uiique → Dei loquitur. Hoc utique; ui sc → ut se; distingucrct → distingueret.; ante eum et, → ante eum; et,; prceparabit → praeparabit; vcrba Dei loqui tur, → verba Dei loquitur,; diclum → dictum; prophcla? → propheta?; loquilur; → loquitur;; cum dixisse accipiiuus, → eum dixisse accipimus,; misU → misit; (oquitur? → loquitur?; Spi ritum. → Spiritum.; men$uram dat Deue → mensuram dat Deus; Deiis Spirilum. → Deus Spiritum.; dicentein, Secundummen euram donationi$ Christi. llomltiibus ad mcnsuram → dicentem, Secundum mensuram donationis Christi. Hominibus ad mensuram; mcnsuram. → mensuram.; mensuram? AIH quidem → mensuram? Alii quidem; senio $apicntias; alii $ermo scienticc se cundum eumdem spiritum; alH fidet → sermo sapientiae, alii sermo scientiae secundum eumdem Spiritum; alii fides; epiritn fl/n propheta, alH dijudicat ipmtuum, aln genera linguam, alH donatio cwralionum, Numquid omnei apostoli f nwuiuid oames prophettef numquid omnei dactoresf nmuimd onmettnrtute? num(fuid → Spiritu, alii prophetia, alii dijudicatio spirituum, alii genera linguarum, alii donatio curationum. Numquid omnes apostoli? numquid omnes prophetae? numquid omnes doctores? numquid omnes virtutes? numquid; lubent sanitatnmf → habent sanitatum?; taquuntur? numquid amnes → loquuntur? numquid omnes; isie → iste,; ille; el quod → ille; et quod; aic, non habel → ille, non habet; divbio quxdam doBflTuin e(. Ergo Uoniinibus ad roensuram datur, ct → divisio quaedam donorum est. Ergo hominibus ad mensuram datur, et; tinum corpus faeit. → unum corpus facit.; ac cipil manis → accipit manus; aliiid aoris → aliud auris; aliud prs ut → aliud pes ut; aitima tanien nna cst qnx agtt → anima tamen una est quae agit; ul opcrelur, → ut operetur,; nt ambulct, in Siure nt → ut ambulet, in aure ut; uculo ut vi deat: → oculo ut videat:; eiiam → etiam; fldelmm, tanquam roeihbiis → fidelium, tanquam membris; distributa Sed Christos → distributa. Sed Christus.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.10 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.11PL 35:1505

Audi enim adhuc quid sequitur; quia de Filio dixerit, Non enim ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum: Pater diligit Filium, et omnia dedit in manu ejus. Adjecit, Omnia dedit in manu ejus, ut nosses et hic qua distinctione dictum sit, Pater diligit Filium. Quare enim? Pater non diligit Joannem? et tamen non omnia dedit in manu ejus. Pater non diligit Paulum? et tamen non omnia dedit in manu ejus. Pater diligit Filium: sed quomodo Pater Filium; non quomodo dominus servum; quomodo unicum, non quomodo adoptatum. Itaque omnia dedit in manu ejus. Quid est omnia? Ut tantus sit Filius, quantus est Pater. Ad aequalitatem enim sibi genuit eum, cui rapina non esset in forma Dei esse aequalem Deo. Pater diligit Filium, et omnia dedit in manu ejus. Ergo cum ad nos dignatus est mittere Filium, non putemus aliquid minus nobis missum quam est Pater. Pater mittens Filium, se alterum misit.

For hear further what follows, since he has said of the Son, “For God does not give the Spirit by measure”: “The Father loves the Son and has given all things into his hand.” He added, “has given all things into his hand,” so that you might know here too with what distinction it is said, “The Father loves the Son.” For why? Does the Father not love John? And yet he has not given all things into his hand. Does the Father not love Paul? And yet he has not given all things into his hand. “The Father loves the Son”: but as a Father loves a Son, not as a master a servant; as an only Son, not as an adopted one. Therefore “he has given all things into his hand.” What does “all things” mean? That the Son should be as great as the Father is. For he begot him to equality with himself, him for whom it was not robbery to be equal with God in the form of God. “The Father loves the Son and has given all things into his hand.” So when he deigned to send the Son to us, let us not think that anything less than the Father has been sent to us. The Father, sending the Son, sent his other self.

John 3:34 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Father loves the Son as his only Son and has given all things into his hand, making him equal to himself; in sending the Son he sent his other self.

  • This section is supplied from a scan's OCR and was heavily garbled; the Latin has been proofread and every correction logged.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread)): Aadi enim adhiic → Audi enim adhuc; quiade Filio dixcrit, → quia de Filio dixerit,; DeusSpiritum:- Pater diUgil Ft/tim, ei → Deus Spiritum: Pater diligit Filium, et; manu us. Adjecit, → manu ejus. Adjecit,; numu → manu; sit Pater dHigit Fi/tim. → sit, Pater diligit Filium.; ejns. → ejus.; Pauium? → Paulum?; ejos. Pa$er → ejus. Pater; Filium i non qnomodo dominus serrum; quomodo Uuiaim, → Filium;; adoptaiam. ltaque → dominus servum; quomodo unicum, non quomodo adoptatum. Itaque; ejns Quid tsimnniaf → ejus. Quid est omnia?; sitFilins, quanlus → sit Filius, quantus; aeqnaliuiem → aequalitatem; fonna → forma; PiUer → Pater; cjus. Ergo cani → ejus. Ergo cum; roitiere Filium, iion puUmnis → mittere Filium, non putemus; missnm → missum; mitlcns → mittens.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.11 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.12PL 35:1505

Namque putantes adhuc discipuli quia Pater aliquid majus est quam Filius, videntes carnem et non intelligentes divinitatem, dixerunt ei: Domine, ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis. Tanquam dicerent, Jam novimus te, et benedicimus te, quia novimus te: gratias enim tibi agimus, quia ostendisti te nobis; sed Patrem nondum novimus: propterea cor nostrum ardet, et satagit concupiscentia quadam sancta videndi Patris tui qui te misit; ipsum nobis ostende, et nihil amplius a te desiderabimus: sufficit enim nobis cum ille fuerit demonstratus, quo major esse nemo potest. Bona concupiscentia, bonum desiderium; sed parvus intellectus. Attendens enim ipse Dominus Jesus parvos magna quaerentes, et se ipsum magnum inter parvos, et parvum inter parvos, ait Philippo qui hoc dixerat, uni ex discipulis: Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me, Philippe? Posset hic Philippus respondere, Cognovimus te; sed numquid diximus tibi, Ostende nobis te? Te cognovimus, sed Patrem quaerimus. Subjecit statim: Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem. Si ergo aequalis Patri missus est, non eum aestimemus ex infirmitate carnis; sed cogitemus majestatem indutam carne, non oppressam carne. Manens etiam Deus apud Patrem, apud homines factus est homo, ut tu per illum qui ad te factus est homo, fieres talis qualis capit Deum. Non enim homo poterat capere Deum: videre poterat homo hominem, capere Deum non poterat. Unde non poterat capere Deum? Quia oculum cordis unde caperet, non habebat. Erat ergo aliquid intus saucium, et aliquid foris sanum: corporis oculos habebat sanos, cordis oculos habebat saucios. Factus est ille homo ad corporis oculum; ut credens in eum qui videri corporaliter potuit, curareris ad eum ipsum videndum quem spiritualiter videre non poteras. Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me, Philippe? Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem. Quare illi non illum videbant? Ecce videbant illum, et Patrem non videbant: videbant carnem, sed majestas latebat. Quod videbant discipuli qui amaverunt, viderunt et Judaei qui crucifixerunt. Intus ergo erat totus ille, et sic intus in carne, ut apud Patrem maneret: non enim deseruit Patrem quando venit ad carnem.

For the disciples, still thinking that the Father was something greater than the Son, seeing the flesh and not understanding the divinity, said to him: “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” As if they were saying: We already know you, and we bless you, because we know you; for we thank you that you have shown yourself to us; but we do not yet know the Father; therefore our heart burns and is restless with a certain holy desire to see your Father who sent you: show him to us, and we will desire nothing more from you; for it is enough for us when he has been shown, than whom no one can be greater. A good desire, a good longing; but a small understanding. For the Lord Jesus himself, seeing little ones seeking great things, and himself great among the little ones and little among the little ones, said to Philip, one of the disciples, who had said this: “Have I been with you so long, and you have not known me, Philip?” Here Philip could have answered: We have known you; but did we say to you, “Show us yourself”? We have known you, but we are seeking the Father. He added at once: “He who has seen me has seen the Father also.” If then he was sent as equal to the Father, let us not judge him by the weakness of the flesh, but let us think of majesty clothed with flesh, not weighed down by flesh. Remaining God with the Father, he was made man among men, so that through him who was made man for you, you might become such as can grasp God. For man could not grasp God: man could see man; he could not grasp God. Why could he not grasp God? Because he did not have the eye of the heart with which to grasp him. So there was something wounded within, and something healthy outside: he had healthy eyes of the body, he had wounded eyes of the heart. That man was made for the eye of the body, so that, believing in him who could be seen bodily, you might be healed to see him whom you could not see spiritually. “Have I been with you so long, and you have not known me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father also.” Why did they not see him? See, they did see him, and did not see the Father: they saw the flesh, but the majesty lay hidden. What the disciples who loved him saw, the Jews who crucified him saw too. So he was wholly within, and within the flesh in such a way as to remain with the Father: for he did not leave the Father when he came to the flesh.

John 14:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Philip asked to see the Father because he saw only Christ's flesh; Christ, equal to the Father, became visible man so that believers might be healed to see his hidden divinity.

  • This section is supplied from a scan's OCR and was heavily garbled; the Latin has been proofread and every correction logged. “Great among the little ones” (magnum inter parvos) is kept as the text reads. The Gospel's “the Jews” is kept.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread)): Naraque putantes adbuc → Namque putantes adhuc; Paler → Pater; Filins, videntes camem → Filius, videntes carnem; divini(al<m, → divinitatem,; Domine → Domine,; lc, ei benedicimus tc, quia novimiis le: → te, et benedicimus te, quia novimus te:; (ibi → tibi; ostendisti le nobis; → ostendisti te nobis;; iiondiim → nondum; nostnim → nostrum; satagii co.cupiscentia → satagit concupiscentia; Tidendi → videndi; le misil; iiisum nobis ostende cl → te misit; ipsum nobis ostende, et; le desiderabimns: sufQcit enim no bis com iile → te desiderabimus: sufficit enim nobis cum ille; scmo potest. Bonaconcupiscentia, → nemo potest. Bona concupiscentia,; parvns inicileclus. Altendens → parvus intellectus. Attendens; raagna quærentes, ct → magna quaerentes, et; inier parvos, ct → inter parvos, et; boc dixeral, uui → hoc dixerat, uni; nobiseum siun → vobiscum sum,; eognometi me, PhiHppe? Possel hie PhUippos → cognovistis me, Philippe? Posset hic Philippus; nobis tc? Te → nobis te? Te; Palrem quærimus → Patrem quaerimus.; Qt mevidit t → Qui me vidit, vidit; eio aqualis Patri nssos esl, nou → ergo aequalis Patri missus est, non; ox infirmitatecamis sedeogilemasinajesutemindutamcarae, pon → ex infirmitate carnis; sed cogitemus majestatem indutam carne, non; Mancns etiain Dens apud Patrcin, → Manens etiam Deus apud Patrem,; cst homo, ui tu pcr → est homo, ut tu per; cnim homo polerat cnpcrc Deum: vidcrc → enim homo poterat capere Deum: videre; capere Dcum non → capere Deum non; Dcum? → Deum?; uiidc ca-- peret, → unde caperet,; ergoallquid → ergo aliquid; etaliquid roris sanum:corporisoculoshabebat.sanos, tordis → et aliquid foris sanum: corporis oculos habebat sanos, cordis; Factns csi → Factus est; vidcrl corporatitcr potuit, curarcris ' → videri corporaliter potuit, curareris; spirilualttervidorenon → spiritualiter videre non; temporevobisi:um sumet → tempore vobiscum sum, et; Qidme vtdit viditet Patrem, Quare illl non illnm → Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem. Quare illi non illum; ilium, etPatrem → illum, et Patrem; scd majestas lalebat. → sed majestas latebat.; aroaverunt, vidcrunt → amaverunt, viderunt; came, → carne,; Paircm quando venll ad camem. → Patrem quando venit ad carnem..

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.12 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

14.13PL 35:1505

Carnalis cogitatio non capit quod dico: differat intellectum, et incipiat a fide; audiat quod sequitur: Qui credit in Filium, habet vitam aeternam: qui autem incredulus est Filio, non videbit vitam, sed ira Dei manet super eum. Non dixit, ira Dei venit ad eum; sed, ira Dei manet super eum. Omnes qui nascuntur mortales, habent secum iram Dei. Quam iram Dei? Quam accepit primus Adam. Si enim peccavit primus homo, et audivit, Morte morieris; factus est mortalis ille, et coepimus nasci mortales; cum ira Dei nati sumus. Venit inde Filius non habens peccatum, et indutus est carne, indutus est mortalitate. Si ille nobiscum communicavit iram Dei, nos pigri sumus cum illo communicare gratiam Dei? Qui ergo non vult credere in Filium, ira Dei manet super eum. Quae ira Dei? De qua dicit Apostolus, Fuimus et nos natura filii irae, sicut et caeteri. Omnes ergo filii irae; quia de maledicto mortis venientes. Crede in Christum factum pro te mortalem, ut illum capias immortalem: quando enim ceperis ejus immortalitatem, nec tu eris mortalis. Vivebat, moriebaris: mortuus est, ut vivas. Attulit gratiam Dei, abstulit iram Dei. Deus vicit mortem, ne mors vinceret hominem.

Carnal thinking does not grasp what I say: let it put off understanding and begin from faith; let it hear what follows: “He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not believe the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.” He did not say, “the wrath of God comes to him,” but, “the wrath of God remains on him.” All who are born mortal have the wrath of God with them. What wrath of God? That which the first Adam received. For if the first man sinned and heard, “You shall surely die,” he was made mortal, and we began to be born mortal; we were born with the wrath of God. Then the Son came, not having sin, and he was clothed with flesh, clothed with mortality. If he shared with us the wrath of God, are we slow to share with him the grace of God? So he who will not believe in the Son, the wrath of God remains on him. What wrath of God? That of which the apostle speaks: “We too were by nature children of wrath, as were the rest.” So all are children of wrath, because they come from the curse of death. Believe in Christ, made mortal for you, so that you may receive him immortal: for when you have received his immortality, you too will not be mortal. He was living, you were dying: he died, that you might live. He brought the grace of God, he took away the wrath of God. God conquered death, so that death might not conquer man.

John 3:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 2:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: All are born under the wrath of God through Adam's sin and mortality; Christ shared our mortality so that those who believe in him might share his life and grace.

  • This section is supplied from a scan's OCR and was heavily garbled; the Latin has been proofread and every correction logged.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR error in the scan-supplied text (proofread)): Cariialis → Carnalis; capll → capit; differal → differat; fidc; → fide;; scquitur: → sequitur:; FHium, → Filium,; eelemam: → aeternam:; incredttius → incredulus; ma nct → manet; dixit → dixit,; nmnei supcr eum, → manet super eum.; mor laJcs, habcntsccuin rain → mortales, habent secum iram; inimDei?Qaam → iram Dei? Quam; peccavitprimushomoi ct audivit → peccavit primus homo, et audivit,; morkilis ille et ccepimus → mortalis ille, et coepimus; nali suinus. Venit indc → nati sumus. Venit inde; habeas pecca tum, → habens peccatum,; carue, → carne,; nobiSGum → nobiscum; iram Dei nos → iram Dei, nos; Dei? Qtn ergo → Dei? Qui ergo; eum, Quse → eum. Quae; dicil Apostolus, FutmKf → dicit Apostolus, Fuimus; /Uii irw → filii irae,; cateri. → caeteri.; filii ir; quia → filii irae; quia; malediclo → maledicto; Chrislum → Christum; immorialein: → immortalem:; eeperis ejus im mortalitatem, nec lu → ceperis ejus immortalitatem, nec tu; morieliaris: → moriebaris:; Altulit gratiam Dci → Attulit gratiam Dei,; Dcl. Deus vicil mortem → Dei. Deus vicit mortem,; viiieerct hoininem → vinceret hominem..

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 14.13 (PL 35:1505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/14-1/#p-14-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-14-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.