The Conferences 13.8–13.14
Latin text: Petschenig, CSEL 13 (Latin text: Michael Petschenig (CSEL 13, 1886), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).
Chapter 13
13.8CSEL 13:370–372
Quam curam atque prouidentiam circa nos suam sub figura meretricis Hierusalem et perniciosa ad idolorum cultum alacritate tendentis per Osee prophetam sermo diuinus eleganter expressit. dicente namque ea: uadam post amatores meos, qui dant panes mihi, et aquas meas, lanam meam, et linum meum, oleum meum, et potum meum, respondet saluti eius, non uoluntati consulens diuina dignatio: ecce ego saepiam uias eius spinis, et saepiam eam maceria, et semitas suas non inueniet, et sequetur amatores suos, et non adprehendet: et quaeret eos, nec inueniet illos, et dicet: reuertar ad uirum meum priorem: quia bene mihi erat tunc magis quam nunc est. ac rursum contumacias nostras atque contemptus, quibus eum ad salutares inuitantem recursus rebelli spiritu dedignamur, tali conparatione describit: et dixi, inquit: patrem uocabis me, et post me ingredi non cessabis. sed quomodo si contemnat mulier amatorem suum, sic contempsit me domus Israhel, ait dominus. satis congrue, quoniam Hierusalem adulteratae conparauerat a suo coniuge discedenti, amorem quoque ac perseuerantiam benignitatis suae uiro qui feminam deperit conparauit. pietas enim ac dilectio dei quam circa humanum genus semper inpendit, eo quod nullis ita uincatur iniuriis, ut a cura nostrae salutis abscedat et quodammodo superata iniquitatibus nostris a principali suo proposito reuocetur, magis proprie exprimi alia conparatione non potuit quam exemplo uiri ardentissimo amore feminam diligentis, qui quanto magis neglegi se ac despici ab ea senserit, tanto uehementioris circa eam zeli ardore flammatur. adest igitur inseparabiliter nobis semper diuina protectio tantaque est erga creaturam suam pietas creatoris, ut non solum comitetur eam, sed etiam praecedat iugiter prouidentia, quam expertus propheta apertissime confitetur dicens: deus meus misericordia eius praeueniet me. qui cum in nobis ortum quendam bonae uoluntatis inspexerit, inluminat eam confestim atque confortat et incitat ad salutem, incrementum tribuens ei quam uel ipse plantauit uel nostro conatu uiderit emersisse. nam et antequam clament, inquit, ego audiam: adhuc loquentibus eis ego audiam, et iterum: ad uocem clamoris tui statim ut audierit, respondebit tibi et non solum sancta desideria benignus inspirat, sed etiam occasiones praestruit niUe et oportunitatem boni effectus ac salutaris uiae directionem demonstrat errantibus.
“The divine word expressed this care and providence of his for us elegantly through the prophet Hosea, under the figure of Jerusalem as a harlot, hastening with ruinous eagerness to the worship of idols. For when she says: “I will go after my lovers, who give me my bread and my water, my wool and my flax, my oil and my drink,” the divine condescension, consulting her salvation and not her will, answers: “Behold, I will hedge up her ways with thorns, and I will wall her in, and she shall not find her paths; and she shall follow her lovers and not overtake them, and seek them and not find them, and she shall say: I will return to my first husband, for it was better with me then than now.” And again he describes our stubbornness and contempt, with which we disdain him with rebellious spirit when he invites us to a saving return, by this comparison: “And I said: You shall call me Father, and shall not cease to walk after me. But as a woman despises her lover, so has the house of Israel despised me, says the Lord.” Quite fittingly, since he had compared Jerusalem to an adulteress leaving her husband, he compared the love and persistence of his own kindness to a man who is madly in love with a woman. For the kindness and love of God which he always shows toward the human race, in that it is overcome by no injuries so as to withdraw from care for our salvation or, as if defeated by our iniquities, to be called back from his principal purpose, could not be expressed more properly by any other comparison than by the example of a man who loves a woman with most ardent love, and who, the more he feels himself neglected and despised by her, the more he is inflamed with a vehement zeal for her. Divine protection, then, is inseparably with us always, and so great is the Creator’s kindness toward his creature that his providence not only accompanies it but continually goes before it. The prophet, having experienced this, confesses it most openly, saying: “My God, his mercy will go before me.” When he sees in us some beginning of good will, he at once enlightens it, strengthens it, and urges it on to salvation, giving increase to what he himself has planted or has seen spring up by our own effort. For he says: “Before they call, I will hear; while they are still speaking, I will hear,” and again: “At the voice of your cry, as soon as he hears, he will answer you.” And not only does he kindly inspire holy desires, but he also prepares occasions and the opportunity of good effect, and shows those who go astray the direction of the way of salvation.
Hos 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 3:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 3:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 59:10 (58:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 65:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 30:19 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Like a lover spurned by an unfaithful woman, God persists in seeking our salvation; his providence goes before us, and he strengthens every beginning of good will, whether he planted it or it sprang from our own effort.
- Hos 2:5–7; Jer 3:19–20; Ps 59:10 (LXX 58:11); Isa 65:24; Isa 30:19. One word in the last sentence is damaged in the digital text (“niUe”) and is translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (o for c); OCR slips): dioente → dicente; eiroa humanam → circa humanum; nolotatis → uoluntatis.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.8 (CSEL 13:370–372; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
13.9CSEL 13:372–374
Vnde non facile humana ratione discernitur quemadmodum dominus petentibus tribuat, a quaerentibus inueniatur aperiatque pulsantibus, et rursus inueniatur a non quaerentibus se, palam adpareat inter illos qui eam non interrogabant, et tota die expandat manus suas ad populum non credentem sibi et contradicentem, resistentes ac longe positos uocet, inuitos adtrahat ad salutem, peccare cupientibus explendae copiam subtrahat uoluntatis, ad nequitiam properantibus benignus obsistat. cui autem facile pateat, quomodo salutis summa nostro tribuatur arbitrio, de quo dicitur: si uolueritis, et audieritis me, quae bona sunt terrae manducabitis, et quomodo non uolentis neque currentis, sed miserentis sit dei? quid etiam sit illud, quod deus reddet unicuique secundum opera eius, et: deus est qui operatur in nobis et uelle et perficere, pro bona uoluntate, et: hoc non ex uobis, sed dei donum est: non ex operibus, ut ne quis glorietur? quid sit etiam illud quod dicitur: adpropinquate domino, et adpropinquabit uobis, et quod alibi dicit: nemo uenit ad me nisi pater qui misit me adtraxerit eum? quid sit quod dicitur: rectos cursus fac pedibus tuis, et uias tuas dirige, et quid sit quod orantes dicimus: dirige in conspectu tuo uiam meam, et: perfice gressus meos in semitis tuis: ut non moueantur uestigia mea? quid sit quod iterum conmonemur: facite uobis cor nouum, et spiritum nouum, et quid sit illud quod repromittitur: dabo eis cor unum, et spiritum nouum tribuam in uisceribus eorum: et auferam cor lapideum de carne eorum, et dabo eis cor carneum: ut in praeceptis meis ambulent, et iudicia mea custodiant? quid sit quod praecipit dominus dicens: laua a malitia cor tuum Hierusalem, ut salua fias, et quid sit quod id ipsum propheta a domino postulat dicens: cor mundum crea in me deus, et iterum: lauabis me, et super niuem dealbabor? quid sit quod ad nos dicitur: inluminate uobis lumen scientiae, et quid sit quod de deo dicitur: qui docet hominem scientiam, et: dominus inluminat caecos, uel certe quod orantes dicimus cum propheta: inlumina oculos meos ne umquam obdormiam in mortem, nisi quod in his omnibus et gratia dei et libertas nostri declaratur arbitrii, quia etiam suis interdum motibus homo ad uirtutum adpetitus possit extendi, semper uero a domino indigeat adiuuari? nec enim cum uoluerit quis sanitate perfruitur aut de aegritudinis morbo pro arbitrii sui desiderio liberatur. quid autem prodest sanitatis gratiam concupisse, nisi deus, qui uitae ipsius usum tribuit, etiam uigorem incolumitatis inpertiat? ut autem euidentius clareat etiam per naturae bonum, quod beneficio creatoris indultum est, nonnumquam bonarum uoluntatum prodire principia, quae tamen nisi a domino dirigantur ad consummationem uirtutum peruenire non possunt, apostolus testis est dicens: uelle enim adiacet mihi, perficere autem bonum non inuenio.
“Hence it is not easily discerned by human reason how the Lord gives to those who ask, is found by those who seek, and opens to those who knock, and on the other hand is found by those who do not seek him, appears openly among those who did not ask for him, and all day long stretches out his hands to a people that does not believe him and contradicts him; calls those who resist and are far off, draws the unwilling to salvation, takes from those who wish to sin the opportunity of fulfilling their will, and kindly stands in the way of those hastening to wickedness. But to whom is it easily clear how the sum of salvation is ascribed to our choice, of which it is said: “If you are willing and will listen to me, you shall eat the good things of the land,” and how it is “not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy”? What, too, is meant by this, that God “will render to each according to his works,” and: “It is God who works in you both to will and to accomplish, for his good pleasure,” and: “This is not from yourselves but is the gift of God; not from works, lest anyone should boast”? What is meant also by what is said: “Draw near to the Lord, and he will draw near to you,” and what he says elsewhere: “No one comes to me unless the Father who sent me draws him”? What is meant by what is said: “Make straight paths for your feet, and direct your ways,” and what we say in prayer: “Direct my way in your sight,” and: “Perfect my steps in your paths, that my footsteps may not be moved”? What is meant again by our being admonished: “Make yourselves a new heart and a new spirit,” and what is promised: “I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within them, and I will take away the heart of stone from their flesh and give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in my commandments and keep my judgments”? What is meant by the Lord’s command: “Wash your heart from wickedness, Jerusalem, that you may be saved,” and by the prophet’s asking the same thing of the Lord, saying: “Create a clean heart in me, O God,” and again: “You will wash me, and I shall be made whiter than snow”? What is meant by what is said to us: “Light for yourselves the light of knowledge,” and by what is said of God: “who teaches man knowledge,” and: “The Lord gives light to the blind,” or indeed by what we say in prayer with the prophet: “Enlighten my eyes, lest I ever sleep in death”? What else, but that in all these both the grace of God and the freedom of our will are declared, since even by his own movements a man can sometimes reach out toward the desire of the virtues, but always needs to be helped by the Lord? For no one enjoys health when he wishes, or is freed from the disease of sickness at the desire of his own choice. And what does it profit to have longed for the grace of health unless God, who gives the use of life itself, also imparts the vigor of soundness? But that it may be clearer that the beginnings of good wills sometimes come forth even through the good of nature, which has been granted by the kindness of the Creator, but that these cannot reach the perfection of the virtues unless they are directed by the Lord, the apostle is witness, saying: “For to will is present with me, but to accomplish the good I do not find.”
Matt 7:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 65:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 65:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 1:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:44 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 4:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 5:8 (5:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 17:5 (16:5 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 18:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 11:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 11:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 4:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:10 (50:12 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:7 (50:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 10:12 (quotation, medium confidence) · Ps 94:10 (93:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 146:8 (145:8 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 13:3 (12:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:18 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture speaks both of human choice and of God’s initiative, so both grace and free will are declared: a person can sometimes by nature begin to desire the good, but always needs God’s help to accomplish it.
- Matt 7:7; Isa 65:1–2 (with Rom 10:20–21); Isa 1:19; Rom 9:16; Rom 2:6; Phil 2:13; Eph 2:8–9; Jas 4:8; John 6:44; Prov 4:26; Ps 5:8 (LXX 5:9); Ps 17:5 (LXX 16:5); Ezek 18:31; Ezek 11:19–20; Jer 4:14; Ps 51:10, 7 (LXX 50:12, 9); Hos 10:12 (LXX); Ps 94:10 (LXX 93:10); Ps 146:8 (LXX 145:8); Ps 13:3 (LXX 12:4); Rom 7:18.
- The claim that good beginnings sometimes arise “through the good of nature” is one of the points for which Prosper of Aquitaine criticized this conference; it is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (n for u); OCR slips; stray period in the digital text; two words joined in the digital text): Ynde → Vnde; eai autem → cui autem; etum sit → etiam sit; etperficere → et perficere; adpropinquabit nobis → adpropinquabit uobis; pedibus. tuis → pedibus tuis; mOlleantur → moueantur; nec eaim → nec enim; asam → usum; at autem euidentius chreat → ut autem euidentius clareat; iadaltam eet → indultum est; tomea → tamen.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.9 (CSEL 13:372–374; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
13.10CSEL 13:374–375
Nam libertatem scriptura diuina nostri confirmat arbitrii dicens: omni custodia serua tuum cor, sed infirmitatem eius apostolus manifestat dicens: dominus custodiat corda uestra et intellegentias uestras in Christo Iesu. uirtutem liberi arbitrii Dauid enuntiat dicens: inclinaui cor meum ad faciendas iustificationes tuas, sed infirmitatem eius idem onuis similiter docet inclina, inquiens, cor meum in testimonia tua: et non in auaritiam, Salomon quoque: inclinet dominus corda nostra ad se, ut ambulemus in uniuersis uiis eius, et custodiamus mandata eius, et caerimonias eius, et iudicia eius. potestatem designat arbitrii nostri psalmographus dicens: cohibe linguam tuam a malo: et labia tua ne loquantur dolum: infirmitatem eius nostra protestatur oratio dicentibus nobis: pone domine custodiam oris meo: et ostium circumstantiae labiis meis. arbitrii nostri facultas a domino declaratur, cum dicitur: solue uincula colli tui captiua filia Sion: fragilitatem eius propheta decantat dicens: dominus soluit conpeditos, et: disrupisti uincula mea: tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis. audimus in euangelio dominum conuocantem, ut ad eum per liberum properemus arbitrium: uenite ad me omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego reficiam uos, sed infirmitatem eius idem dominus protestatur dicens: nemo potest uenire ad me nisi pater qui misit me adtraxerit eum. apostolus liberum arbitrium nostrum indicat dicens: sic currite ut conprehendatis, sed infirmitatem eius Iohannes Baptista testatur, cum ait: non potest homo accipere a se quicquam nisi fuerit ei datum de caelo. iubemur animas nostras sollicite custodire propheta dicente: custodite animas uestras, sed eodem spiritu alius propheta proclamat: nisi dominus custodierit ciuitatem, in uanum uigilauit qui custodit eam. apostolus Philippensibus scribens, ut liberum eorum designet arbitrium, cum metu et tremore, inquit, uestram salutem operamini: sed ut infirmitatem eius ostendat, adiungit: deus est enim qui operatur in nobis et uelle et perficere, pro bona uoluntate.
“For divine Scripture affirms the freedom of our will, saying: “Keep your heart with all watchfulness,” but the apostle shows its weakness, saying: “May the Lord keep your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus.” David declares the power of free will, saying: “I have inclined my heart to do your righteous ordinances,” but the same man likewise teaches us its weakness, saying: “Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to covetousness”; Solomon too: “May the Lord incline our hearts to himself, that we may walk in all his ways and keep his commandments, his ceremonies, and his judgments.” The psalmist indicates the power of our will, saying: “Keep your tongue from evil, and your lips from speaking deceit”; our prayer bears witness to its weakness when we say: “Set a guard, O Lord, on my mouth, and a door of enclosure about my lips.” The ability of our will is declared by the Lord when it is said: “Loose the bonds of your neck, O captive daughter of Sion”; the prophet sings of its frailty, saying: “The Lord looses the fettered,” and: “You have broken my bonds; to you I will offer the sacrifice of praise.” We hear the Lord in the gospel calling us to hasten to him by free will: “Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you,” but the same Lord bears witness to its weakness, saying: “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.” The apostle points to our free will, saying: “So run that you may obtain,” but John the Baptist testifies to its weakness when he says: “A man can receive nothing of himself unless it is given him from heaven.” We are commanded to guard our souls carefully, as the prophet says: “Guard your souls,” but another prophet cries out by the same Spirit: “Unless the Lord guards the city, the watchman stays awake in vain.” The apostle, writing to the Philippians, says, to indicate their free will: “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling”; but to show its weakness he adds: “For it is God who works in you both to will and to accomplish, for his good pleasure.”
Prov 4:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 4:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:112 (118:112 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:36 (118:36 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 8:58 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 34:13 (33:14 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 141:3 (140:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 52:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 146:7 (145:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 116:16 (115:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 116:17 (115:8 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 6:44 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 9:24 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 127:1 (126:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:13 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Chaeremon sets pairs of Scripture texts side by side, each affirming human free will and at the same time its weakness and need of God.
- Prov 4:23; Phil 4:7; Ps 119:112, 36 (LXX 118:112, 36); 1 Kgs 8:58; Ps 34:13 (LXX 33:14); Ps 141:3 (LXX 140:3); Isa 52:2; Ps 146:7 (LXX 145:7); Ps 116:16–17 (LXX 115:7–8); Matt 11:28; John 6:44; 1 Cor 9:24; John 3:27; Jer 17:21; Ps 127:1 (LXX 126:1); Phil 2:12–13. One word in the digital text (“onuis”) is damaged and is translated by sense as “us.”
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for n); words joined in the digital text): serua taam cor → serua tuum cor; Daaid → Dauid; testimonia taa → testimonia tua; custodiamas → custodiamus; desigoat → designat; linguam taam → linguam tuam; labia taa → labia tua; arbitrii noetri → arbitrii nostri; ninonla → uincula; enangelio → euangelio; connocantem → conuocantem; etegoreficiam → et ego reficiam; dieena → dicens.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.10 (CSEL 13:374–375; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
13.11CSEL 13:375–378
Et ita sunt haec quodammodo indiscrete permixta atque confusa, ut quid ex quo pendeat inter multos magna quaestione uoluatur, id est utrum quia initium bonae uoluntatis praebuerimus misereatur nostri deus, an quia deus misereatur consequamur bonae uoluntatis initium multi enim singula haec credentes ac iusto amplius adserentes uariis sibique contrariis sunt erroribus inuoluti. si enim dixerimus nostrum esse bonae principium uoluntatis, quod fuit in persecutore Paulo, quod in publicano Matthaeo, quorum unus cruori ac suppliciis innocentum, alius uiolentiis ac rapinis publicis incubans adtrahitur ad salutem? sin uero a gratia dei semper inspirari bonae uoluntatis principia dixerimus, quid de Zacchaei fide, quid de illius in cruce latronis pietate dicemus, qui desiderio suo uim quandam regnis caelestibus inferentes specialia uocationis monita praeuenerunt? consummationem uero uirtutum et exsecutionem mandatorum dei si nostro deputauerimus arbitrio, quomodo oramus: confirma deus hoc, quod operatus es in nobis, et: opera manuum nostrarum dirige super nos? scimus ad maledicendum Israheli Balaam fuisse conductum, sed uidemus maledicere cupienti non fuisse permissum. custoditur Abimelech, ne Rebeccam tangens peccet in deum. Ioseph fratrum liuore distrahitur, ut descensio filiorum Israhel in Aegypto fieret et illis de germani nece tractantibus futurae famis remedia pararentur. quod idem Ioseph a fratribus agnitus manifestat dicens: nolite pauere, nec durum uobis uideatur quod uendidistis me in his regionibus: pro salute enim uestra misit me deus ante uos, et infra: praemisit enim me deus ut reseruemini super terram, et escas ad uiuendum habere possitis. non uestro consilio, sed uoluntate dei missus sum: qui fecit me quasi patrem Pharaonis, et dominum totius domus eius, et principem in omni terra Aegypti. et cum post obitum patris formidantibus fratribus suspicionem timoris auferret, nolite, inquit, timere: numquid dei possumus resistere uoluntati? uos cogitastis aduersus me malum: sed deus uertit illud in bonum, ut exaltaret me, sicut in praesentiarum cernitis, ut saluos faceret populos multos. quod etiam beatus Dauid oeconomice tunc factum in psalmo centesimo quarto similiter declarauit dicens: et uocauit famem super terram: et omne firmamentum panis contriuit. misit ante eos uirum: in seruum uenundatus est Ioseph. haec ergo duo, id est uel gratia dei uel liberum arbitrium sibi quidem inuicem uidentur aduersa, sed utraque concordant et utraque nos pariter debere suscipere pietatis ratione colligimus, ne unum horum homini subtrahentes ecclesiasticae fidei regulam excessisse uideamur. nam cum uiderit nos deus ad bonam uelle deflectere, occurrit, dirigit atque confortat: ad uocem enim clamoris tui statim ut audierit, respondebit tibi, et inuoca me, inquit, in die tribulationis: et eripiam te, et glorificabis me. et rursus si nos nolle uel intepuisse perspexerit, adhortationes salutiferas admouet cordibus nostris, quibus uoluntas bona uel reparetur uel formetur in nobis.
“And so these things are in a way mingled and confused without distinction, so that among many it is debated as a great question which depends on which: that is, whether God has mercy on us because we have shown the beginning of good will, or whether we obtain the beginning of good will because God has mercy. For many, believing one or the other of these and asserting it more than is right, have become entangled in various errors contrary to each other. For if we say that the beginning of good will is ours, what was there in Paul the persecutor, what in Matthew the tax collector, of whom one, eager for the blood and torments of the innocent, the other intent on public violence and plunder, is drawn to salvation? But if we say that the beginnings of good will are always inspired by the grace of God, what shall we say of the faith of Zacchaeus, what of the devotion of that thief on the cross, who, by their own desire doing a kind of violence to the heavenly kingdom, anticipated the special admonitions of a call? And if we ascribe the perfecting of the virtues and the carrying out of God’s commandments to our own choice, how do we pray: “Confirm, O God, what you have wrought in us,” and: “Direct the works of our hands over us”? We know that Balaam was hired to curse Israel, but we see that he was not permitted to curse, though he wished to. Abimelech is kept from sinning against God by touching Rebecca. Joseph is sold away by the envy of his brothers, so that the descent of the sons of Israel into Egypt might take place, and while they were plotting their brother’s death, remedies for the coming famine were being prepared. This same Joseph, when recognized by his brothers, makes it plain, saying: “Do not be afraid, and let it not seem hard to you that you sold me into these regions; for God sent me before you for your salvation,” and below: “For God sent me before you that you may be preserved on the earth and may have food to live. I was sent not by your counsel but by the will of God, who has made me as a father to Pharaoh, and lord of all his house, and ruler in all the land of Egypt.” And when, after their father’s death, he took away the suspicion of fear from his frightened brothers, he said: “Do not fear; can we resist the will of God? You thought evil against me, but God turned it to good, to exalt me, as you see at present, that he might save many peoples.” Blessed David also declared in the hundred and fourth psalm that this was done then by God’s dispensation, saying: “And he called a famine upon the land and broke every staff of bread. He sent a man before them; Joseph was sold as a slave.” These two, then, the grace of God and free will, seem indeed opposed to each other, but both agree, and we gather by the reasoning of piety that we ought to accept both alike, lest by taking one of them away from man we seem to have gone beyond the rule of the church’s faith. For when God sees us turning to will the good, he meets, directs, and strengthens us: “For at the voice of your cry, as soon as he hears, he will answer you,” and: “Call upon me,” he says, “in the day of trouble, and I will deliver you, and you shall glorify me.” And again, if he sees that we are unwilling or have grown lukewarm, he applies saving exhortations to our hearts, by which a good will may be either restored or formed in us.
Acts 9:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 9:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 19:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:42 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 11:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 68:28 (67:29 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 90:17 (89:17 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Num 22:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 23:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 26:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 20:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 37:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 45:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 45:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 45:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 50:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 50:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 105:16 (104:16 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 105:17 (104:17 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 30:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 50:15 (49:15 LXX) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Chaeremon poses the question whether God’s mercy follows our good will or precedes it; Scripture gives examples of both, so grace and free will, though they seem opposed, must both be held according to the church’s faith.
- Acts 9:1–6; Matt 9:9; Luke 19:1–10; Luke 23:40–43; Matt 11:12; Ps 68:28 (LXX 67:29); Ps 90:17 (LXX 89:17); Num 22–24; Gen 26:10–11 (Cassian names Rebecca; the account of Abimelech being kept from sin, Gen 20:6, concerns Sarah); Gen 37:28; Gen 45:5, 7–8; Gen 50:19–20 (Latin text); Ps 105:16–17 (LXX 104:16–17; Cassian numbers it 104); Isa 30:19; Ps 50:15 (LXX 49:15).
- This section and those following set out Chaeremon’s account of grace and free will, which Prosper of Aquitaine contested; it is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); OCR slips; OCR slips (e for c); stray marks in the digital text; stray period in the digital text): deus ++ misereatur → deus misereatur; quorum nans cruori → quorum unus cruori; uiolentiis ae rapinis → uiolentiis ac rapinis; sin nero → sin uero; Zaeehaei → Zacchaei; loseph a fratribus agnitns → Ioseph a fratribus agnitus; populos. multos → populos multos; beatns → beatus; in seri uennudatus → in seruum uenundatus; nos dens → nos deus; ocourrit → occurrit; qubiu → quibus; in nebia → in nobis.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.11 (CSEL 13:375–378; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
13.12CSEL 13:378–382
Nec enim talem deus hominem fecisse credendus est, qui nec uelit umquam nec possit bonum. alioquin nec liberum si permisit arbitrium, si ei tantummodo malum ut uelit et possit, bonum uero a semet ipso nec uelle nec posse concessit. et quomodo stabit illa domini post praeuaricationem primi hominis lata sententia: ecce Adam factus est sicut unus ex nobis, sciens bonum et malum? non enim talis ante fuisse putandus est, qui boni esset prorsus ignarus. alioquin uelut quoddam inrationabile atque insensatum animal eum fatendum est fuisse formatum: quod satis absurdum atque a catholica fide omnimodis alienum est. quin immo secundum sapientissimi Salomonis sententiam fecit deus hominem rectum, id est, ut tantummodo boni scientia iugiter frueretur, sed ipsi quaesiuerunt cogitationes multas: facti enim sunt, ut dictum est, scientes bonum et malum. concepit ergo Adam post praeuaricationem quam non habuerat scientiam mali, boni uero quam acceperat scientiam non amisit. denique non amisisse humanum genus post praeuaricationem Adae scientiam boni etiam apostoli sententia euidentissime declaratur, qua dicit: cum enim gentes, quae legem non habent, naturaliter ea quae legis sunt faciunt, hi legem non habentes ipsi sibi sunt lex, qui ostendunt opus legis scriptum in cordibus suis, testimonium reddente eis conscientia et inter se inuicem cogitationibus accusantibus aut etiam defendentibus, in die qua iudicabit deus occulta hominum. quo sensu etiam dominus per prophetam increpat Iudaeorum non naturalem, sed uoluntariam caecitatem, quam ipsi sibi contumaciter inferebant. surdi, inquit, audite, et caeci intuemini ad uidendum. qui surdus, nisi seruus meus? et caecus, nisi ad quem nuntios meos misi? et ne forte hanc eorum caecitatem aliquis naturae, non uoluntati possit adscribere, alibi ait: educ foras populum caecum, et oculos habentem: surdum, et aures ei sunt, et iterum qui habentes, inquit, oculos non uidetis: et aures, et non auditis. dominus etiam in euangelio quia uidentes, inquit, non uident et audientes non audiunt neque intellegunt. et adinpletur in eis prophetia Esaiae dicens: auditu audiretis, et non intellegetis: et uidentes uidebitis, et non uidebitis. incrassatum est enim cor populi huius, et auribus grauiter audierunt: et oculos suos concluserunt: ne quando uideant oculis, et auribus suis audiant, et corde intellegant, et conuertantur, et sanem illos. denique ut possibilitatem boni eis inesse signaret, increpans Pharisaeos quid autem, inquit, etiam ex uobis ipsis non iudicatis quod iustum est? quod utique non eis dixisset, nisi eos indicio naturali id quod aequum est scisset posse discernere. unde cauendum nobis est, ne ita ad dominum omnia sanctorum merita referamus, ut nihil nisi id quod malum atque peruersum est humanae adscribamus naturae. in quo quidem sapientissimi Salomonis, immo domini onins haec uerba sunt testimonio confutamur: ita enim, cum consummata templi extructione oraret, effatus est: uoluitque Dauid pater meus aedificare domum nominis domini dei Israhel: et ait dominus ad Dauid patrem meum: quod cogitasti in corde tuo aedificare domum nomini meo, bene fecisti, hoc ipsum mente tractans. uerumtamen non tu aedificabis domum nomini meo. haec ergo cogitatio atque iste tractatus regis Dauid utrumne bonus et ex deo, an malus et ab homine fuisse dicendus est? si enim bona atque ex deo fuit illa cogitatio, cur ab eo a quo inspirata est eidem negatur effectus? si autem mala et ex homine fuit, cur laudatur a domino? restat ergo ut et bona et ex homine fuisse credatur. in quem modum etiam nostras cotidie cogitationes possumus iudicare. neque enim aut soli Dauid bonum ex semet ipso cogitare concessum est, aut nobis, ne quid boni umquam sapere aut cogitare possimus, naturaliter denegatur. dubitari ergo non potest inesse quidem omni animae naturaliter uirtutum semina beneficio creatoris inserta: sed nisi haec opitulatione dei fuerint excitata, ad incrementum perfectionis non poterunt peruenire, quia secundum beatum apostolum neque qui plantat est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat deus. adiacere autem homini in quamlibet partem arbitrii libertatem etiam liber ille qui dicitur Pastoris apertissime docet, in quo duo angeli unicuique nostrum adhaerere dicuntur, id est bonus ac malus, in hominis uero optione consistere, ut eligat quem sequatur. et idcirco manet in homine liberum semper arbitrium, quod gratiam dei possit uel neglegere uel amare. non enim praecepisset apostolus dicens: cum metu et tremore uestram salutem operamini, nisi scisset eam uel excoli a nobis posse uel neglegi. sed ne crederent se ad opus salutis diuino auxilio non egere, subiungit: deus est enim qui operatur in uobis et uelle et perficere, pro bona uoluntate. et idcirco Timotheum monens noli, inquit, neglegere gratiam dei quae est in te, et iterum: ob quam causam moneo ut resuscites gratiam dei quae est in te. inde est quod etiam Corinthiis scribens hortatur et conmonet, ne indignos se gratia dei infructuosis operibus exhiberent, dicens: adiuuantes autem et obsecramus ne in uacuum gratiam dei recipiatis. quam sine dubio quia in uacuum receperat Simon, non profuit ei perceptio gratiae salutaris. non enim praeceptis beati Petri maluit oboedire dicentis: paenitentiam age ab hac nequitia tua, et ora deum si forte remittatur tibi haec cogitatio cordis tui: in felle enim amaritudinis et obligatione iniquitatis uideo te esse. praeuenit ergo hominis uoluntatem, quia dicitur: deus meus misericordia eius praeueniet me, et rursum deum remorantem atque utiliter quodammodo subsistentem, ut nostrum experiatur arbitrium, uoluntas praeuenit nostra, cum dicitur: et mane oratio mea praeueniet te, et iterum: praeueni in maturitate, et clamaui, et: praeuenerunt oculi mei ad diluculum. aduocat etiam nos et inuitat, cum dicit: tota die expandi manus meas ad populum non credentem mihi et contradicentem, et inuitatur a nobis, cum dicimus ei: tota die expandi manus meas ad te. expectat nos, cum dicitur per prophetam: propterea expectat dominus ut misereatur uestri, et expectatur a nobis, cum dicimus: expectans expectaui dominum, et respexit me, et: expectaui salutare tuum domine. confortat nos, cum dicit: et ego erudiui, et confortaui bracchia eorum: et in me cogitauerunt malitiam, et ut nosmet ipsos confortemus hortatur, cum dicit: confortate manus dissolutas, et genua debilia roborate. clamat Iesus: si quis sitit, ueniat ad me et bibat, clamat etiam ad eum propheta: laboraui clamans, raucae factae sunt fauces meae: defecerunt oculi mei, dum spero in deum meum. quaerit nos dominus dicens: quaesiui, et non erat uir: uocaui, et non erat qui responderet, quaeritur et ipse a sponsa flebiliter conquerente: in cubili meo in noctibus quaesiui quem dilexit anima mea: quaesiui eum et non inueni eum, uocaui eum et non respondit mihi.
“For we must not believe that God made man such that he can never either will or be able to do good. Otherwise he has not granted him free will, if he has allowed him only to will and be able to do evil, but not to will or be able to do good of himself. And how will that sentence of the Lord stand, pronounced after the transgression of the first man: “Behold, Adam has become as one of us, knowing good and evil”? For we must not think that he was previously such as to be wholly ignorant of good. Otherwise we would have to admit that he was formed like some irrational and senseless animal, which is quite absurd and wholly foreign to the catholic faith. On the contrary, according to the saying of the most wise Solomon, “God made man upright,” that is, to enjoy continually the knowledge of good only; “but they themselves have sought out many thoughts,” for they became, as has been said, “knowing good and evil.” After the transgression, then, Adam acquired the knowledge of evil which he had not had, but he did not lose the knowledge of good which he had received. Finally, that the human race did not lose the knowledge of good after Adam’s transgression is declared most plainly by the apostle’s words: “For when the Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature the things of the law, these, not having the law, are a law to themselves; they show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them, and their thoughts among themselves accusing or else defending them, on the day when God will judge the secrets of men.” In this sense also the Lord through the prophet rebukes the blindness of the Jews, not natural but voluntary, which they obstinately brought upon themselves: “Hear, you deaf, and look, you blind, that you may see. Who is deaf but my servant? And who is blind but he to whom I have sent my messengers?” And lest anyone should ascribe their blindness to nature rather than will, he says elsewhere: “Bring forth the people that is blind and has eyes, deaf and has ears,” and again: “You who have eyes and do not see, and ears and do not hear.” The Lord also says in the gospel: “Because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear nor understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which says: Hearing you will hear and will not understand, and seeing you will see and will not perceive. For the heart of this people has grown fat, and with their ears they have heard heavily, and they have closed their eyes, lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and be converted, and I should heal them.” Finally, to show that the possibility of good was in them, he rebuked the Pharisees: “And why do you not even of yourselves judge what is right?” He would certainly not have said this to them unless he knew that they could discern what is just by natural judgment. Hence we must beware of referring all the merits of the saints to the Lord in such a way that we ascribe to human nature nothing but what is evil and perverse. In this we are refuted by the testimony of the most wise Solomon, or rather of the Lord himself, whose words these are; for when he prayed on the completion of the building of the temple, he said: “And David my father wished to build a house for the name of the Lord God of Israel. And the Lord said to David my father: Whereas you thought in your heart to build a house for my name, you did well in having this very thing in mind. Yet you shall not build a house for my name.” Is this thought and this intention of King David, then, to be called good and from God, or evil and from man? For if that thought was good and from God, why is its effect denied to him by the one who inspired it? But if it was evil and from man, why is it praised by the Lord? It remains, then, that it be believed to have been both good and from man. In this way we can judge our own thoughts daily too. For it was not granted to David alone to think good of himself, nor is it denied to us by nature that we can ever think or understand anything good. It cannot be doubted, then, that the seeds of the virtues have been implanted by nature in every soul by the kindness of the Creator; but unless these are stirred up by God’s help, they will not be able to reach the growth of perfection, since, according to the blessed apostle, “neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase.” That freedom of will lies open to man in either direction is also taught most plainly by the book called the Shepherd, in which two angels, a good one and an evil one, are said to attend each of us, while it rests with man’s option to choose which he will follow. And therefore free will always remains in man, which can either neglect or love the grace of God. For the apostle would not have commanded, saying: “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling,” had he not known that it could be either cultivated or neglected by us. But lest they should believe that they did not need divine help for the work of salvation, he adds: “For it is God who works in you both to will and to accomplish, for his good pleasure.” And therefore, warning Timothy, he says: “Do not neglect the grace of God which is in you,” and again: “For this reason I remind you to stir up the grace of God which is in you.” Hence also, writing to the Corinthians, he exhorts and warns them not to show themselves unworthy of God’s grace by fruitless works, saying: “And helping, we also beseech you not to receive the grace of God in vain.” Simon, no doubt because he had received it in vain, did not profit from receiving saving grace; for he would not obey the commands of blessed Peter, who said: “Repent of this wickedness of yours, and pray to God if perhaps this thought of your heart may be forgiven you; for I see that you are in the gall of bitterness and the bond of iniquity.” God, then, anticipates man’s will, as it is said: “My God, his mercy will go before me”; and again, when God waits and in a way usefully holds back in order to test our choice, our will anticipates him, as it is said: “And in the morning my prayer will go before you,” and again: “I anticipated in the dawn and cried out,” and: “My eyes anticipated the morning.” He also calls and invites us, when he says: “All day long I have stretched out my hands to a people that does not believe me and contradicts me,” and he is invited by us, when we say to him: “All day long I have stretched out my hands to you.” He waits for us, when it is said through the prophet: “Therefore the Lord waits to have mercy on you,” and he is waited for by us, when we say: “I waited patiently for the Lord, and he regarded me,” and: “I have waited for your salvation, O Lord.” He strengthens us, when he says: “And I have instructed and strengthened their arms, and they have thought evil against me,” and he exhorts us to strengthen ourselves, when he says: “Strengthen the weak hands and make firm the feeble knees.” Jesus cries: “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink”; the prophet also cries to him: “I have labored crying out; my throat has become hoarse; my eyes have failed while I hope in my God.” The Lord seeks us, saying: “I sought, and there was no man; I called, and there was no one to answer”; and he himself is sought by the bride, who laments tearfully: “On my bed by night I sought him whom my soul loved; I sought him and did not find him; I called him and he did not answer me.”
Gen 3:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 7:29 (7:30 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 42:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 42:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 43:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 8:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:57 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 8:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 8:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 8:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 4:14 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 8:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 8:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 59:10 (58:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 88:13 (87:14 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:147 (118:147 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:148 (118:148 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 65:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 88:9 (87:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 30:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 40:1 (39:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 49:18 (quotation, medium confidence) · Hos 7:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 35:3 (quotation, high confidence) · John 7:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 69:3 (68:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 50:2 (quotation, medium confidence) · Song 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Song 5:6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God did not make man incapable of good: the knowledge of good survived the fall, the seeds of virtue are implanted by nature, and David’s good intention was his own; yet they need God’s help to grow, and Scripture shows God and man each anticipating, inviting, and seeking the other.
- Gen 3:22; Eccl 7:29 (LXX 7:30); Rom 2:14–16; Isa 42:18–19; Isa 43:8; Mark 8:18; Matt 13:13–15; Luke 12:57; 1 Kgs 8:17–19 (with 2 Chr 6:7–9); 1 Cor 3:7; Phil 2:12–13; 1 Tim 4:14; 2 Tim 1:6; 2 Cor 6:1; Acts 8:22–23; Ps 59:10 (LXX 58:11); Ps 88:13 (LXX 87:14); Ps 119:147–148 (LXX 118:147–148); Isa 65:2; Ps 88:9 (LXX 87:10); Isa 30:18; Ps 40:1 (LXX 39:2); Gen 49:18; Hos 7:15; Isa 35:3; John 7:37; Ps 69:3 (LXX 68:4); Isa 50:2; Song 3:1 with 5:6.
- The Shepherd of Hermas, Mandate 6.2, describes the two angels. The statements that good thoughts can be “from man” and that the seeds of virtue are natural were among the points Prosper of Aquitaine opposed; they are translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for n); OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (l for I); OCR slip (letters lost); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); OCR slip (u for n); OCR slips; stray comma in the digital text; stray period in the digital text; two words joined in the digital text; words joined in the digital text): boaum → bonum; uelit et, possit → uelit et possit; poeee → posse; sient unus ez nobis → sicut unus ex nobis; omnimodis alienum eet → omnimodis alienum est; hnmanum → humanum; naricationem → praeuaricationem; sibisunt → sibi sunt; ant etiam → aut etiam; fprte hanc eorum oaecitatem → forte hanc eorum caecitatem; np ita → ne ita; adseribamus → adscribamus; dieuntur → dicuntur; idciroo → idcirco; possitvel → possit uel; ettremore → et tremore; adiuuautes → adiuuantes; neinuacuum → ne in uacuum; ama.ritudinis → amaritudinis; clamatti → clamaui; eum dicit: tota die → cum dicit: tota die; innitatur → inuitatur; dieit: et ego → dicit: et ego; dissoltitas → dissolutas; lesus → Iesus; adu eum → ad eum.
Extrabiblical texts: Herm. Mand. 6.2.1 (Shepherd of Hermas: Mandates; allusion)
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.12 (CSEL 13:378–382; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
13.13CSEL 13:382–384
Et ita semper gratia dei nostro in bonam partem cooperatur arbitrio atque in omnibus illud adiuuat, protegit ac defendit, ut nonnumquam etiam ab eo quosdam conatus bonae uoluntatis uel exigat uel expectet, ne penitus dormienti aut inerti otio dissoluto sua dona conferre uideatur, occasiones quodammodo quaerens quibus humanae segnitiae torpore discusso non inrationabilis munificentiae suae largitas uideatur, dum eam sub colore cuiusdam desiderii ac laboris inpertit: et nihilominus gratia dei gratuita perseuerat, dum exiguis quibusdam paruisque conatibus tantam inmortalitatis gloriam, tanta perennis beatitudinis dona inaestimabili tribuit largitate. nec enim quia illius in cruce latronis praecesserat fides, idcirco pronuntiandum est non ei beatam conmorationem paradisi gratuito esse promissam, aut paenitentiam Dauid regis illam unius uerbi qua dixit: peccaui domino, duo tam grauia eius crimina et non potius clementiam dei abstulisse credendum est, ut per Nathan prophetam mereretur audire: et dominus transtulit iniquitatem tuam: non morieris. quod igitur homicidium adulterio addidit, liberi utique fuit arbitrii: quod autem arguitur per prophetam, diuinae dignationis est gratia. rursum quod peccatum suum humiliatus agnoscit, suum est: quod uero sub breuissimo temporis puncto indulgentiam tantorum criminum promeretur, domini miserentis est donum. et quid de hac tam breui confessione et inconparabili diuinae retributionis inmensitate dicamus, cum beatus apostolus ad illam magnitudinem futurae remunerationis aspiciens quid de illis tam innumeris persecutionibus suis pronuntiauerit, considerare perfacile sit? nam momentaneum hoc, inquit, et leue tribulationis nostrae supra modum ultra conparationem aeternum pondus gloriae operatur in nobis. de quo et alibi constanter enuntiat dicens: quia non sunt condignae passiones huius temporis ad futuram gloriam quae reuelabitur in nobis. quantumlibet ergo enisa fuerit humana fragilitas, futurae retributionis par esse non poterit nec ita laboribus suis diuinam inminuet gratiam, ut non semper gratuita perseueret. et idcirco praedictus magister gentium, licet gratia dei apostolatus gradum sortitum se fuisse testetur dicens: gratia autem dei sum quod sum, tamen se quoque diuinae gratiae respondisse pronuntiat dicens: et gratia eius in me uacua non fuit, sed abundantius illis omnibus laboraui: non autem ego, sed gratia dei mecum. nam cum dicit laboraui, conatum proprii signat arbitrii: cum dicit non autem ego, sed gratia dei, uirtutem diuinae protectionis ostendit: cum dicit mecum, non otioso neque securo, sed laboranti ac desudanti eam cooperatam fuisse declarat.
“And so the grace of God always cooperates with our will for good and helps, protects, and defends it in all things, in such a way that it sometimes even requires or waits for some efforts of good will from it, lest it should seem to confer its gifts on one wholly asleep or slack in idle sloth. It seeks occasions, as it were, so that, when the torpor of human sluggishness has been shaken off, the generosity of its bounty may not seem unreasonable, since it imparts it under the appearance of a certain desire and labor. And nevertheless the grace of God remains free, since in return for certain slight and small efforts it bestows with inestimable generosity such glory of immortality and such gifts of everlasting blessedness. For it must not be declared that, because the faith of the thief on the cross came first, the blessed dwelling in paradise was therefore not promised to him freely; nor must it be believed that the repentance of King David, that one word with which he said, “I have sinned against the Lord,” rather than the mercy of God, took away two such grave crimes of his, so that he deserved to hear through the prophet Nathan: “And the Lord has taken away your iniquity; you shall not die.” That he added murder to adultery, then, was certainly of free will; that he was rebuked by the prophet is the grace of divine condescension. Again, that he humbly acknowledged his sin was his own; but that in the briefest moment of time he gained pardon for such great crimes is the gift of the merciful Lord. And what shall we say of this so brief confession and the incomparable immensity of the divine reward, when it is very easy to consider what the blessed apostle declared about his own countless persecutions, looking to that greatness of future reward? “For this momentary and light affliction of ours,” he says, “works in us beyond measure, beyond comparison, an eternal weight of glory.” Of this he also declares steadfastly elsewhere: “For the sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that will be revealed in us.” However much, then, human frailty has striven, it cannot be equal to the future reward, nor will it so lessen divine grace by its labors that grace does not always remain free. And therefore the said teacher of the Gentiles, although he testifies that he obtained the rank of apostleship by the grace of God, saying: “But by the grace of God I am what I am,” nevertheless declares that he too responded to divine grace, saying: “And his grace in me was not in vain, but I labored more abundantly than all of them; yet not I, but the grace of God with me.” For when he says “I labored,” he indicates the effort of his own will; when he says “yet not I, but the grace of God,” he shows the power of divine protection; when he says “with me,” he declares that it cooperated with him, not idle or careless, but laboring and toiling.
Luke 23:43 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Sam 12:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Grace cooperates with the will, sometimes waiting for some effort from it, yet remains free, since slight efforts receive an immeasurable reward; David’s sin and confession were his own, his pardon was God’s gift, and Paul’s labors were his yet done by grace with him.
- Luke 23:43; 2 Sam 12:13; 2 Cor 4:17; Rom 8:18; 1 Cor 15:10.
- The teaching that grace sometimes waits for an initial effort of the will is translated as written; it is one of the points of later controversy over this conference.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for n); OCR slip (a for u); OCR slips; stray period in the digital text): dam eam sub → dum eam sub; peocatum suum hnmiliatus → peccatum suum humiliatus; ultra conparationem. aeternum → ultra conparationem aeternum; quaatumlibet → quantumlibet; oum dicit laborani → cum dicit laboraui; cam dicit non → cum dicit non.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.13 (CSEL 13:382–384; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-13) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
13.14CSEL 13:384–389
Quod etiam in Iob probatissimo athleta suo, cum eum diabolus expetisset ad singulare certamen, diuinam legimus prouidisse iustitiam. si enim contra inimicum non sua uirtute, sed dei solius fuisset gratia protegente congressus et absque ulla uirtute patientiae suae diuina tantum opitulatione suffultus multiplices illas ac tota inimici crudelitate quaesitas temptationum moles et exitia pertulisset, quomodo non illam calumniosam diabolus quam prius emiserat uocem aduersus eum iustius iterasset: numquid gratis Iob colit deum? nonne tu uallasti eum et uniuersam substantiam eius per circuitum? sed aufer manum tuam, id est sine eum suis mecum uiribus decertare, nisi in faciem tuam benedixerit tibi. sed cum nullam huiuscemodi querimoniam calumniosus hostis post conflictum audeat iterare, non dei, sed illius se euictum uiribus confitetur: licet etiam gratia dei non in totum illi defuisse credenda sit, quae tantam temptatori temptandi tribuit potestatem, quantam et illum resistendi nouerat habere uirtutem, non eum ab illius inpugnatione sic protegens, ut nullum uirtuti humanae relinqueret locum, sed hoc tantum procurans, ne uiolentissimus inimicus animam eius amentem faciens et inpotem sensu inpari eum atque iniquo certaminis pondere praegrauaret. quod ergo soleat interdum temptare dominus fidem nostram, ut fortior uel gloriosior fiat, euangelici illius centurionis edocemur exemplo, cuius puerum cum sciret utique potestate sermonis sui se dominus curaturum, offerre maluit praesentiam corporalem dicens: ego ueniam et curabo eum. sed illo hanc eius oblationem feruentioris fidei flagrantia supergrediente atque dicente: domine, non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum: sed dic tantum uerbo, et sanabitur puer meus, miratur eum dominus atque conlaudat cunctisque illis qui ex Israhelis populo crediderant praefert dicens: amen dico uobis, non inueni tantam fidem in Israhel. nullius enim laudis esset aut meriti, si id in eo Christus quod ipse donauerat praetulisset. quam explorationem fidei etiam in illo magnificentissimo patriarcha diuinam legimus dispensasse iustitiam, cum dicitur: et factum est post haec uerba, temptauit deus Abraham. non enim illam fidem quam ei dominus inspirabat, sed illam quam uocatus semel atque inluminatus a domino per libertatis arbitrium poterat exhibere, experiri uoluit diuina iustitia. unde non inmerito fidei eius constantia conprobatur, atque ad eum subueniente gratia dei, quae eam paulisper subreliquerat ut probaret, ita dicitur: ne inferas manum tuam in puerum, neque facias ei quicquam: nunc enim scio quia times dominum tu, et non pepercisti filio tuo dilecto propter me. quod temptationis genus nobis quoque ad probationis meritum posse contingere in Deuteronomio satis euidenter a legislatore praedicitur: si surrexerit inter uos propheta aut qui somnium uidisse se dicat et praedixerit signum atque portentum, et euenerit quod locutus est et dixerit tibi: eamus et seruiamus diis alienis quos ignoratis, ne audias uerba prophetae illius aut somniatoris: quia temptans temptat te dominus deus tuus. utrum diligas eum in toto corde tuo et custodias mandata illius an non. quid ergo? cum istum prophetam aut somniatorem surgere permiserit deus, itane eos, quorum fidem probare disponit, protecturus esse credendus est, ut nullum penitus locum, quo suis uiribus cum temptatore confligant, libero, eorum reseruet arbitrio? et quid eos necesse est uel temptari, quos ita infirmos nouit ac fragiles, ut nequaquam uirtute sua ualeant resistere temptatori? sed utique nec temptari eos iustitia domini permisisset, nisi parem in eis resistendi scisset inesse uirtutem, qua possent aequitatis iudicio in utroque merito uel rei uel laudabiles iudicari. tale est et illud quod ab apostolo dicitur: itaque qui se existimat stare, uideat ne cadat. temptatio uos non adprehendit nisi humana. fidelis autem deus, qui non permittat uos temptari supra id quod potestis, sed faciat cum temptatione et exitum, ut sustinere possitis. cum enim dicit: qui stat, uideat ne cadat, sollicitam reddit arbitrii libertatem, quam utique nouerat percepta gratia uel stare per industriam uel cadere per neglegentiam posse. cum autem infert: temptatio uos non adprehendit nisi humana, infirmitatem eorum et inconstantiam necdum robustae mentis exprobrat, qua adhuc spiritalium nequitiarum turbinibus non poterant inpugnari, aduersum quos se ipsum uel illos perfectos nouerat cotidie dimicare, de quibus ad Ephesios dicit: iam non est nobis conluctatio aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus principatus, aduersus potestates, aduersus mundi rectores tenebrarum harum, contra spiritalia nequitiae in caelestibus. cum uero subiungit: fidelis autem deus, qui non permittat uos temptari supra id quod potestis, non utique optat ne eos dominus temptari permitteret, sed ne supra id quod sustinere poterant temptarentur. illud enim indicabat humani arbitrii facultatem; hoc uero domini gratiam temtationum luctamina moderantis ostendit. in his igitur omnibus adprobatur ita semper diuinam gratiam arbitrium hominis incitare, ut illud non in omnibus taliter protegat ac defendat non etiam propriis eum conatibus congredi aduersus spiritales faciat inimicos, in quibus uel gratiam dei uictor uel infirmitatem suam superatus intellegat et ita discat non de sua fortitudine, sed de diuino semper sperare suffragio atque suum iugiter recurrere protectorem. et ut hoc non nostra coniectura, sed euidentioribus adhuc scripturae diuinae testimoniis adprobetur, illud quod in Iesu Naue legitur retractemus: has, inquit, gentes dimisit dominus ac disperdere noluit, ut in eis experiretur Israhelem, utrum custodiret mandata domini dei sui, et ut haberent consuetudinem cum hostibus proeliandi. et ut inconparabili creatoris nostri clementiae mortale aliquid non pro aequalitate pietatis, sed ex aliqua indulgentiae similitudine conparemus: si nutrix pia atque sollicita diu paruulum sinu gestat, ut quandoque ingredi doceat, et primum quidem eum reptare permittit, dein erectum ut alternis passibus innitatur dexterae suae uirtute sustentat, mox paululum derelictum si titubantem uiderit protinus adprehendit, nutantem suscipit, lapsum erigit et uel arcet a casu uel etiam decidere leuiter sinens eleuat post ruinam, cum autem eum ad pueritiam uel adulescentiae ac iuuentutis perduxerit robur, quaedam etiam pondera uel labores quibus non obprimatur sed exerceatur iniungit et cum aemulis decertare permittit: quanto magis caelestis ille omnium pater nouit quem sinu gratiae suae gestet, quem liberae uoluntatis arbitrio in conspectu suo exerceat ad uirtutem, et tamen adiuuat laborantem, exaudit uocantem, non relinquit quaerentem, eripit de periculo interdum etiam nescientem.
“We read that divine justice provided this also in Job, his most approved athlete, when the devil had asked for him for single combat. For if he had engaged the enemy not by his own strength but solely by the protecting grace of God, and had endured those manifold masses of temptations and disasters, sought out with all the enemy’s cruelty, without any virtue of his own patience, supported only by divine aid, how could the devil not have repeated more justly against him that slanderous word which he had earlier uttered: “Does Job serve God for nothing? Have you not fenced him in, and all his property round about? But take away your hand,” that is, let him fight against me by his own strength, “and see if he does not bless you to your face.” But since the slanderous enemy does not dare to repeat any such complaint after the conflict, he confesses that he was defeated not by God’s strength but by Job’s. Yet we must not believe that the grace of God was wholly absent from him; it gave the tempter as much power to tempt as it knew Job had strength to resist, not protecting him from the attack in such a way as to leave no room for human virtue, but providing only this, that the most violent enemy should not, by making him mad and deprived of his senses, crush him with an unequal and unfair weight of combat. That the Lord is accustomed sometimes to test our faith so that it may become stronger or more glorious, we are taught by the example of the centurion in the gospel. Though the Lord certainly knew that he would heal his servant by the power of his word, he chose to offer his bodily presence, saying: “I will come and heal him.” But when the centurion surpassed this offer by the ardor of a more fervent faith and said: “Lord, I am not worthy that you should come under my roof; but only say the word, and my servant will be healed,” the Lord marvels at him, praises him, and prefers him to all those of the people of Israel who had believed, saying: “Truly I say to you, I have not found such faith in Israel.” For there would be no praise or merit if Christ had preferred in him what he himself had given. We read that divine justice arranged this testing of faith also in that most magnificent patriarch, when it is said: “And it came to pass after these words that God tested Abraham.” For divine justice wished to try, not that faith which the Lord was inspiring in him, but that which, once called and enlightened by the Lord, he could show by the choice of his freedom. Hence the constancy of his faith is not without reason proved, and when the grace of God, which had left him for a little while in order to prove him, came to his aid, it is said: “Do not lay your hand on the boy, nor do anything to him; for now I know that you fear the Lord, and you have not spared your beloved son for my sake.” That this kind of temptation can happen to us too, for the merit of proving us, is plainly foretold by the lawgiver in Deuteronomy: “If there arises among you a prophet, or one who says he has seen a dream, and foretells a sign and a wonder, and what he said comes to pass, and he says to you: Let us go and serve strange gods which you do not know, do not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer, for the Lord your God is testing you, whether you love him with all your heart and keep his commandments or not.” What then? When God has allowed that prophet or dreamer to arise, are we to believe that he will protect those whose faith he intends to prove in such a way as to leave no room at all for their free will to fight with the tempter by their own strength? And why should they be tempted at all, if he knows them to be so weak and frail that they cannot resist the tempter by their own strength? But the Lord’s justice would surely not have allowed them to be tempted unless he knew that there was in them a strength equal to resisting, by which, in the justice of his judgment, they could be judged deservedly either guilty or praiseworthy in either case. Of the same kind is what the apostle says: “Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall. No temptation has taken you but what is human. But God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but will make with the temptation also a way out, that you may be able to bear it.” For when he says, “Let him who stands take heed lest he fall,” he makes the freedom of the will watchful, knowing that, once grace has been received, it can either stand by diligence or fall by negligence. And when he adds, “No temptation has taken you but what is human,” he rebukes their weakness and the inconstancy of a mind not yet strong, by which they could not yet be attacked by the whirlwinds of the spiritual forces of wickedness, against whom he knew that he himself, or those who were perfect, fought daily; of these he says to the Ephesians: “For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.” But when he adds, “God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able,” he does not wish that the Lord should not allow them to be tempted, but that they should not be tempted beyond what they could bear. The former indicated the capacity of human will; the latter shows the grace of the Lord moderating the struggles of temptations. In all these things, then, it is proved that divine grace always stirs up man’s will, but not so as to protect and defend it in all things in such a way that it does not also make it fight by its own efforts against its spiritual enemies; in which, if victorious, it may recognize the grace of God, or, if overcome, its own weakness, and so learn to hope not in its own strength but always in divine aid, and to run continually to its protector. And that this may be proved not by our conjecture but by still clearer testimonies of divine Scripture, let us consider what we read in Joshua: “The Lord left these nations and would not destroy them, that he might test Israel by them, whether they would keep the commandments of the Lord their God, and that they might have practice in fighting with enemies.” And to compare something mortal with the incomparable mercy of our Creator, not as equal in kindness but by some likeness of indulgence: if a devoted and careful nurse carries a little child in her bosom for a long time, so that at some point she may teach it to walk, she first lets it crawl, then holds it up with the strength of her right hand so that it may lean on alternate steps; soon, leaving it a little, if she sees it stumbling, she catches it at once, supports it when it totters, lifts it when it falls, and either keeps it from falling or, letting it fall lightly, raises it after the tumble. But when she has brought it to boyhood or to the strength of adolescence and youth, she lays on it certain burdens or labors by which it is not crushed but exercised, and lets it compete with its rivals. How much more does that heavenly Father of all know whom to carry in the bosom of his grace, whom to exercise in virtue before his eyes by the choice of free will; and yet he helps the one who labors, hears the one who calls, does not abandon the one who seeks, and rescues from danger sometimes even one who does not know it.
Job 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 1:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 1:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 22:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 22:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 13:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 13:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Judg 2:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Judg 3:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Judg 3:2 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God tests people as he did Job, the centurion, and Abraham, not shielding them so completely that no room is left for their own strength; like a nurse teaching a child to walk, he supports, lets them struggle, and rescues them.
- Job 1:9–11; Matt 8:7–8, 10; Gen 22:1, 12; Deut 13:1–3; 1 Cor 10:12–13; Eph 6:12; Judg 2:22–3:2 (Cassian attributes it to the book of Joshua).
- The claim that Job overcame by his own strength, with grace not wholly absent, is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (P for ?); OCR slip (a for n); OCR slip (a for s); OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (b for t); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (f for r); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (o for c); OCR slip (o for n); OCR slip (o for u); OCR slips; line number and hyphen leaked into the digital text; missing space in the digital text; stray digit in the digital text; stray period in the digital text; two words joined in the digital text; word split in the digital text): circuitum.? → circuitum?; sed oum nullam → sed cum nullam; patriaroha → patriarcha; Abraham.non → Abraham. non; eiperiri → experiri; ad eom subueniente → ad eum subueniente; wt probaret → ut probaret; dominum to, → dominum tu,; filio tto diteoto → filio tuo dilecto; ia Deuteronomio → in Deuteronomio; legMatore → legislatore; ai surrexerit → si surrexerit; locutus Mt → locutus est; temptat be dominus → temptat te dominus; diligas eam in toto → diligas eum in toto; credendus eet → credendus est; acfragiles → ac fragiles; temptatori P sed → temptatori? sed; aequitatis indicio → aequitatis iudicio; tem ptatio → temptatio; eofum → eorum; sed1 ne → sed ne; indibat → indicabat; iia semper → ita semper; incooparabili → inconparabili; nutrII → nutrix; at quandoque → ut quandoque; iuuentatia → iuuentutis; exer-25 ceat → exerceat.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 13.14 (CSEL 13:384–389; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/13-8/#p-13-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-13-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).