Memorandum against Caelestius (complete)
Latin text: PL 20 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 20, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 1
1PL 20:712a–712b
Beatitudinis tuae justitiam obsecro, domine Zosime papa venerabilis. Numquam fides vera turbatur, et maxime in Ecclesia apostolica, in qua pravae fidei ductores ut deprehenduntur facile, ita veraciter puniuntur: ut moriatur in illis, si corrigant, quod male conceperant et deterius pepererant; et in illis vera sit fides, quam Apostoli docuerunt et Romana cum omnibus catholicae fidei doctoribus tenet Ecclesia. Quod si, ut caeteri auctores haereseos, qui jam dudum ab apostolica sede vel a patribus judicati, et extra sinum matris catholicae Ecclesiae effecti, perpetua morte perierunt, etiam hi qui nunc deprehensi sunt, vel deprehenduntur, in perfidia sua permanent, spiritali gladio quo interimantur, tradantur: ut nunc Pelagius Coelestiusque, qui a beatae memoriae praecessore tuae beatitudinis papa Innocentio, si rectam respuant fidem et in sua perversa doctrina perdurent, damnati sunt.
I beseech the justice of your beatitude, lord Zosimus, venerable pope. The true faith is never disturbed, and above all not in the apostolic church, in which the leaders of perverse faith are as truly punished as they are easily detected; so that in them, if they correct themselves, what they had wrongly conceived and worse brought forth may die, and in them may be the true faith which the apostles taught and which the Roman church holds together with all the teachers of the catholic faith. But if, like the other authors of heresy who were long ago judged by the apostolic see or by the fathers, were put outside the bosom of the mother catholic church, and perished by perpetual death, those too who have now been detected, or are being detected, persist in their faithlessness, let them be handed over to the spiritual sword, that they may be slain by it: as now Pelagius and Caelestius, who were condemned by your beatitude's predecessor, Pope Innocent of blessed memory, if they reject the right faith and persist in their perverse teaching.
Eph 6:17 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paulinus asks Pope Zosimus to deal with Pelagius and Caelestius as Innocent did, condemning them if they persist.
- The "spiritual sword" is excommunication.
Topics: Heresy, Pelagianism
Cite (SBL): Paulinus of Milan, Lib. adv. Coel. 1 (PL 20:712a–712b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-paulinus-libellus-coelestium-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (PL or CSEL); no public-domain English translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 2
2PL 20:712b–713a
Cujus sententiam secuta Beatitudo tua, Coelestio, cum a sede apostolica audiretur, inter caetera praecepit his verbis: Damnas ergo illa omnia, quae in libello Paulini continentur? hoc est de Quaestionibus. Et in alio loco: Cognovisti quales litteras dederit sedes apostolica ad fratres et coepiscopos Africanae provinciae? Et adjectum est: Damnas illa omnia quae damnavimus, et tenes quae tenemus? Et iterum: Illa omnia damnas quae jactata sunt de nomine tuo? Et iterum: Vel ea quae in libello suo exposuit Paulinus? Et cum me diceret posse, ex iis quae illi objecta sunt, haereticum approbari: sancto repletus Spiritu, apostolica auctoritate respuisti et repressisti insanientis et calumniantis verba, hujusmodi proferendo sententiam, qua ipse catholicus approbarer; illum, si sanari vellet, curares; quae hujusmodi est: Nolo nos circuitu ducas; damnas ea omnia quae tibi objecta a Paulino, sive per famam jactata sunt? Cui non sufficit ista sententia? Quis hanc tam salubrem, tam amplectibilem, tam piam respueret alius, nisi qui a fide devius est? Et ille, qui superius professus fuerat, se quaecumque illi objecta fuerant, si contra fidem judicares, esse damnaturum, audit, Damna; et non solum non damnat, sed ad injuriam tantae sedis contendit. Unde jam non ignorat Ecclesia Romana reum suum, qui tam audaci spiritu ausus est contradicere, et non damnare quae Beatitudo tua damnari decrevit.
Following his sentence, your beatitude, when Caelestius was heard by the apostolic see, among other things put it to him in these words: "Do you then condemn all the things contained in the booklet of Paulinus?", that is, concerning the Questions. And in another place: "Do you know what letters the apostolic see gave to our brothers and fellow bishops of the African province?" And it was added: "Do you condemn all that we have condemned, and hold what we hold?" And again: "Do you condemn all the things that have been spread abroad about your name?" And again: "Or the things Paulinus set out in his booklet?" And when he said that I could be shown to be a heretic from the things charged against him, you, filled with the Holy Spirit, by apostolic authority rejected and checked the words of the raving slanderer, pronouncing a sentence by which I myself was approved as catholic, while you would cure him, if he wished to be healed. It was this: "I do not want you to lead us round in circles; do you condemn all the things charged against you by Paulinus, or spread by rumour?" For whom is this sentence not enough? Who else would reject so salutary, so acceptable, so pious a sentence, except one who has strayed from the faith? And he, who had earlier professed that he would condemn whatever had been charged against him if you judged it contrary to the faith, hears "Condemn," and not only does not condemn, but contends to the injury of so great a see. Hence the Roman church is no longer ignorant of its defendant, who with so bold a spirit dared to contradict, and not to condemn what your beatitude decreed should be condemned.
Notes and citation
Summary: Paulinus recalls Zosimus's questions to Caelestius at Rome and Caelestius's refusal to condemn what was charged against him.
- The "Questions" are the charges (capitula) Paulinus had brought against Caelestius at Carthage (411).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: quos for quae; OCR: u for n): quos jactata sunt → quae jactata sunt; Cui nou sufficit → Cui non sufficit.
Topics: Heresy, Pelagianism
Cite (SBL): Paulinus of Milan, Lib. adv. Coel. 2 (PL 20:712b–713a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-paulinus-libellus-coelestium-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (PL or CSEL); no public-domain English translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 3
3PL 20:713a–714a
Ego tamen Deo et Christo Domino gratias ago, quod Ecclesiae suae causam ita agi voluit, ut sedes apostolica, a qua oportuit ore duorum suorum pontificum haeresim condemnari, ea damnanda praeceperit, quae a me Coelestio fuerant objecta: cujus ego non damnationem, sed correctionem semper optavi et opto; cui nunc jam non mecum, sed cum universa Dei Ecclesia, causa est, sicut data ad Beatitudinem tuam Afrorum episcoporum scripta testantur; cum contra apostolicam sententiam venire nititur negando originale peccatum, quod in omnes homines pertransiit, et usque ad finem mundi tenet haereditatem Adae illius, qui primus peccavit: quod in infantibus nisi per sacramentum Baptismi dimittatur, vitam aeternam et regnum aeternum habere non possunt. Contra quae etiam magister suus litigat Pelagius, qui illa ipsa damnavit in judicio orientali, quae iste in sedis apostolicae coetu conatur astruere. Habet adversum se etiam veteres Ecclesiarum doctores catholicos plurimos, orientales et occidentales, meridianae partis atque septentrionalis, qui in libris suis illum de originali peccato, si sanari desiderat, possunt docere. Habet beatum Cyprianum martyrem, beatum Ambrosium confessorem, Gregorium Nazianzenum, beatum papam Innocentium. Habet etiam qui in corpore sibi colluctentur, si tamen se tanto certamini habilem judicat; aut certe quos sequi debeat, si vult magis recta discere, quam prava docere. Habet, quod primum est, beatitudinem tuam, cujus illum oportuerat obedire sententiae, cum audiret, Damna. Habet postremo ipsos lactentes, quibus misereri debeat, si sibi non vult; quibus, ut verbis Martyris utar, non propria, sed aliena dimittuntur peccata.
I, however, give thanks to God and to Christ the Lord that he willed the cause of his church to be conducted in such a way that the apostolic see, by which it was fitting that the heresy be condemned through the mouth of two of its pontiffs, ordered those things to be condemned which I had charged against Caelestius. I have always desired, and still desire, not his condemnation but his correction. His case now lies not with me but with the whole church of God, as the writings of the African bishops sent to your beatitude testify, since he strives to go against the apostolic teaching by denying original sin, which passed into all men and holds until the end of the world the inheritance of that Adam who first sinned; and unless it is remitted in infants through the sacrament of baptism, they cannot have eternal life and the eternal kingdom. Even his master Pelagius contends against these views of his, since in the Eastern trial he condemned the very things this man is trying to establish before the assembly of the apostolic see. He has against him also very many ancient catholic teachers of the churches, Eastern and Western, of the south and of the north, who in their books can teach him about original sin, if he desires to be healed. He has the blessed martyr Cyprian, the blessed confessor Ambrose, Gregory of Nazianzus, blessed Pope Innocent. He has also men still in the body to contend with him, if indeed he judges himself fit for so great a contest; or at least men he ought to follow, if he wishes rather to learn what is right than to teach what is wrong. He has, what comes first, your beatitude, whose sentence he ought to have obeyed when he heard "Condemn." He has, finally, the nursing infants themselves, on whom he ought to have pity if he will not have it on himself; to whom, to use the martyr's words, not their own sins but another's are remitted.
Rom 5:12 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:5 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Caelestius's denial of original sin and of infants' need of baptism is opposed by Pelagius's own disavowal at Diospolis, by Cyprian, Ambrose, Gregory, Innocent and Zosimus.
- "The Eastern trial" is the synod of Diospolis (415). The martyr's words are from Cyprian, Letter 64.5 (Hartel numbering), on infant baptism. "Two of its pontiffs": Innocent and Zosimus.
Extrabiblical texts: Cyprian, Ep. 64.5 (Letters; quotation)
Topics: Baptism, Heresy, Original sin and concupiscence, Pelagianism
Cite (SBL): Paulinus of Milan, Lib. adv. Coel. 3 (PL 20:713a–714a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-paulinus-libellus-coelestium-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (PL or CSEL); no public-domain English translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 4
4PL 20:714b–715a
Unde oro beatum apostolatum tuum, ut hunc meum libellum suscipi jubeas, quo gratiam referam tantae sedi, et sententiis justissimis pro parte mea latis: quem idcirco direxi, quia me, licet sermone. Basiliscus subdiaconus a tua beatitudine cum Gestis sedis apostolicae directis Carthagine convenit quarto nonas Novembris die, ut adessem ad apostolicam sedem et tuae judicio sanctitatis, ad quam me fugisse suggestum est, nec defuturum fore promittere, si adversum me, et non pro me, fuisset lata sententia. Ubi tunc ideo nihil agere potui, quia is qui ad sedem apostolicam provocaverat defuit: quem oportuerat utique merita suae appellationis astruere, maxime cum nihil agente appellatore, secundum etiam humanas leges, superior est semper ille qui vicit. Quid enim jam mea intererat, ut etiam apud vestram reverentiam pravae ejus doctrinae astipulator exsisterem: de quo congaudere possem, si damnatis iis quae illi a me objecta fuerant, sic et apostolicae sedis judicium roboraret, ut meruisset absolvi; nec prius se ordinari, quam purgari, pateretur.
Therefore I pray your blessed apostleship to order this booklet of mine to be received, by which I return thanks to so great a see, and for the most just sentences given on my side. I sent it for this reason: the subdeacon Basiliscus, sent by your beatitude with the Acts of the apostolic see, summoned me at Carthage, though only by word of mouth, on the fourth day before the Nones of November, to appear before the apostolic see and the judgment of your holiness, which it was alleged I had fled, and to promise that I would not fail to appear, as though the sentence had been given against me and not for me. I could do nothing there at that time, because the one who had appealed to the apostolic see was absent; he certainly ought to have established the merits of his appeal, especially since, when the appellant does nothing, the one who won always prevails, even by human laws. For what concern was it of mine now to appear even before your reverence as a party in the matter of his perverse teaching? I could have rejoiced with him if, by condemning the things I had charged against him, he had so strengthened the judgment of the apostolic see as to deserve absolution, and had not allowed himself to be ordained before being cleared.
Notes and citation
Summary: Paulinus explains why he did not answer the summons to Rome: Caelestius, the appellant, had not pursued his appeal.
- The date is 2 November (418). "A party in the matter" renders astipulator (literally "one who joins in a stipulation", a supporter); the sense is uncertain.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: l for t; OCR: question mark for e): el sententiis → et sententiis; merita sua? appellationis → merita suae appellationis.
Topics: Heresy, Pelagianism
Cite (SBL): Paulinus of Milan, Lib. adv. Coel. 4 (PL 20:714b–715a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-paulinus-libellus-coelestium-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (PL or CSEL); no public-domain English translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 5
5PL 20:715a–716a
Sed vulpecula fraudibus fuit semper studens: ingenium suum mutare nescit. Non se credidit posse deprehendi: quoniam confidentiam semper in foveis habuit, in quibus demersum caput conscientiae suae nititur occultare. Quod jam diutius latere non potuit, sed manifestius publicatum, spiritali per tuam beatitudinem gladio resecatur: ne amplius ferinis dentibus grex Domini secetur in partes, quem pastor bonus sollicita et pervigili cautela custodis. Hunc autem libellum direxi beatitudini tuae per Marcellinum subdiaconum ecclesiae Carthaginiensis. Dat. vi idus Novembris.
But the little fox has always been given to tricks; he does not know how to change his nature. He did not believe he could be caught, since he always put his confidence in holes, in which he tries to hide the sunken head of his conscience. This could no longer lie hidden, but, made known more openly, is cut off by the spiritual sword through your beatitude, so that the Lord's flock, which you, the good shepherd, guard with anxious and wakeful care, may no longer be torn apart by the teeth of wild beasts. I have sent this booklet to your beatitude through Marcellinus, subdeacon of the church of Carthage. Given on the sixth day before the Ides of November.
Song 2:15 (echo, low confidence) · Matt 8:20 (echo, low confidence) · John 10:11 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Caelestius, a cunning fox, has been exposed and cut off; the booklet is sent through the subdeacon Marcellinus.
- Dated 8 November (418).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: l for t): per luam → per tuam.
Topics: Heresy, Pelagianism
Cite (SBL): Paulinus of Milan, Lib. adv. Coel. 5 (PL 20:715a–716a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/paulinus-libellus-coelestium/5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-paulinus-libellus-coelestium-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (PL or CSEL); no public-domain English translation exists, so the translation was re-read against the Latin.