Recognitions 8.21–8.45
Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, who tells how he found Christ, followed Peter, and was reunited with his lost family (the 'recognitions'). It is not a work of Clement. It survives complete only in Rufinus of Aquileia's Latin translation; the Greek original is lost (fragments in Eusebius and Origen's Philocalia, and a Syriac version of parts). It shares a source with the Greek Clementine Homilies (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift', probably 3rd-century Syria), and the Recognitions are usually dated to the 4th century in their Greek form. Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius is reference 0.1.
Latin text: Migne, PG 1 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 1 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).
Chapter 8
8.21PG 1:1381a
Quod et si secundum alios Graecorum philosophos audire vis, et mechanicis imbutus es disciplinis, de excelsis quae traduntur, non te sine dubio latent. Ponunt enim sphaeram aequaliter ex omni parte collectam, et ad omnia similiter respicientem, atque a centro terrae aequis spatiis distinctam, ipsaque sui aequalitate ita stabilem, ut eam in nullam partem declinare undique aequalitas collecta permittat; et. ita a nullo fulcimento subvecta sustentatur sphaera. Quod si vere hanc habeat similitudinem mundi machina, evidens est opus in ea divinum Si vero, ut aliis visum est, super aquas posita sphaera vel super ipsas fertur, vel in ipsis volvitur, etiam sic magni in ea artificis opus declaratur.
“And if you wish to hear it according to other philosophers of the Greeks, and are trained in the mechanical disciplines, what is taught about the heavens is surely not unknown to you. For they posit a sphere gathered equally on every side and facing all parts alike, standing at equal distances from the center of the earth, and so stable by its very equality that the equality gathered on all sides allows it to incline in no direction; and so the sphere is sustained, borne up by no prop. If the fabric of the world truly has this form, the divine work in it is evident. But if, as others have held, the sphere is set on waters and either borne on them or revolves in them, even so the work of a great craftsman is declared in it.
Notes and citation
Summary: Whether the cosmic sphere stands by its own equilibrium or floats on waters, its structure shows the work of a divine craftsman.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): tequalitcr → aequaliter; a centro terra: a’quis → a centro terrae aequis; posita sphatra → posita sphaera; declaratu ι’. → declaratur..
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.21 (PG 1:1381a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.22PG 1:1382a
Sed ne de his qua! non omnibus palam sunt, incerta videatur assertio, ad ea veniamus quae neminem latent. Quis astrorum cursus tanta ratione disposuit, ortusque eorum et occasus instituit, certisque et demensis temporibus unicuique tenere cmli ambitum dedit? Quis ad occasum aliis semper tendere, aliis etiam redire in ortum permisit? Quis imposuit modum cursibus solis, ut horas et dies et menses et temporum vicissitudines diversis motibus signet, et nunc hiemem, inde ver, aestatem, post et autumnum certa cursus sui dimensione discernat, et semper eisdem vicibus anni orbem inconfusa varietate constringat? Quis, inquam, tanti ordinis moderatricem, non ipsam Dei pronuntiet sapientiam? Et haec quidem secundum illa nobis dicta sint, quae de excelsorum disciplinis traduntur a Graecis.
“But so that the assertion may not seem uncertain because it concerns things not plain to all, let us come to what is hidden from no one. Who arranged the courses of the stars with such reason, established their risings and settings, and gave each to keep its circuit of heaven in fixed and measured times? Who permitted some always to tend toward the west, and others to return to the east as well? Who set a limit to the courses of the sun, so that by its various movements it marks hours and days and months and the changes of the seasons, and now winter, then spring, summer, and afterwards autumn, it distinguishes by the fixed measure of its course, and always binds the circle of the year in the same turns with unconfused variety? Who, I say, would not declare that the governess of so great an order is the very wisdom of God? Let these things be said by us according to what the Greeks teach in the disciplines concerning the heavens.
Gen 1:14 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The ordered courses of stars and sun and the cycle of the seasons proclaim the wisdom of God.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): ineonfusa → inconfusa.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.22 (PG 1:1382a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-22) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.23PG 1:1382a
Quid autem et de his, qua! vel in terris vel in mari videmus? nonne evidenter edocemur, Dei in his non solum opus esse, sed et providentiam? Nam quod in terra montes excelsi certis quibusque habentur in locis, ut ex his velut compressus et coangustatus aer ordinatione Dei cogatur et exprimatur in ventos, ex quibus et fructus germen concipiant, et aestivus ardor temperiem sumat, cum Pleiades ignitae solis ardoribus incanduerint. Sed dices: Cur et ardor solis, ut temperies requiratur? Et quomodo fruges humanis usibus necessariae maturescerent? Sed et illud adverte, quod ad axem meridianum, ubi plus est caloris. non multa datur nubium constipatio, nec abundans copia imbrium traditur, ne morbus habitantibus generetur; humidae enim nubes, si calore rapido coquantur, aerem corruptum et pestiferum reddunt. Sed et terra calidum imbrem suscipiens, non nutrimenta segetibus, sed perniciem praebet; in quo quis dubitat opus esse divinae Providentiae? Denique Egyptus, quia Ethiopicis e vicino flagrat ardoribus, ne insanabiles corruptelas aeris imbrium necessitate susciperet, campi ejus non pluviam nubibus ministratam, sed terrenum quodammodo imbrem Nilo inundante suscipiunt.
“And what of the things we see on land or in the sea? Are we not plainly taught that there is in them not only the work of God but also his providence? For high mountains are placed in certain fixed places on the earth, so that the air, as if compressed and constricted by them, is forced by God's ordering and pressed out into winds, from which the fruits conceive their growth and the summer heat is tempered when the Pleiades glow with the fiery heats of the sun. But you will say: ‘Why the heat of the sun at all, that tempering should be needed?’ And how would the crops necessary for human use ripen? Notice this too: toward the southern pole, where there is more heat, there is no great massing of clouds and no abundant supply of rains, lest disease arise among the inhabitants; for moist clouds, if cooked by fierce heat, make the air corrupt and pestilential. And the earth, receiving a hot rain, gives not nourishment but ruin to the crops. Who doubts that in this there is the work of divine Providence? Indeed Egypt, because it burns with the heats of neighboring Ethiopia, so as not to receive incurable corruptions of the air through the necessity of rains, has fields that receive not rain supplied by clouds but, in a way, an earthly rain from the flooding Nile.
Notes and citation
Summary: Mountains that produce winds, sparse rain in hot southern lands, and the Nile's flood watering Egypt all show providence.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): ignita: solis → ignitae solis; Iuraditur → traditur; Egyptus,quia → Egyptus, quia.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.23 (PG 1:1382a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-23) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.24PG 1:1383a–1383b
Quid de fontibus dicemus et fluviis, qui perenni in mare fluunt meatu? Et per divinam Providentiam nec illis abundans deficit cursus, nec mare tantas aquarum recipiens copias ullum sentit augmentum, sed in eadem mensura et ea quae conferunt, et ea quae ibi conferuntur elementa perdurant. Sed dicis mihi: Salsa aqua naturaliter consumit fluentum dulce, quod ei fuerit infusum. Et in hoc ergo manifestum est Providentiae Opus, ut salsum faceret illud elementum, in quod cursus omnium aquarum, quas ad usum hominibus praestiterat, declinavit; uti ne per tanta saeculi spatia, repletus maris alveus inundationem perniciosam terris et hominibus redderet. Nec ita quisquam insipiens erit, ut hanc tantam rationem tantamque providentiam ab irrationabili natura arbitretur esse dispositam.
“What shall we say of the springs and rivers that flow into the sea with perennial course? By divine Providence their abundant stream does not fail, nor does the sea, receiving such great quantities of waters, feel any increase; but both the elements that contribute and those that are brought together there continue in the same measure. But you say to me: ‘Salt water naturally consumes the fresh stream that is poured into it.’ Then in this too the work of Providence is plain, that it made salt that element into which it turned the course of all the waters it had provided for men's use, so that through such long ages the filled bed of the sea might not cause a ruinous flood for lands and men. Nor will anyone be so foolish as to think that so great a reason and so great a providence was arranged by irrational nature.
Eccl 1:7 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Rivers never fail and the sea never overflows because the sea is salt, which consumes the inflowing fresh water, another sign of providence.
- Eccl 1:7.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): peremti in mare → perenni in mare; oeticit → deficit; con- <ferunt → conferunt; per— ‘durant → perdurant.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.24 (PG 1:1383a–1383b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-24) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.25PG 1:1383b–1384a
Quid autem de virgultis, quid de animalibus dicam? Nonne per providentiam factum est, ut cum senecta temporis resolverentur, virgulta quidem vel plantis vel seminibus quae ipsa dederint. animalia vero per progeniem reparentur? Et mira quadam dispensatione Providentia: nascituro pecori lac praeparatur in uberibus, ac statim ut natum fuerit, nullo docente scit ubi alimoniae suae horrea requirat. Gignuntur autem non solum mares, sed et feminae, ut ex utroque possit rursus constare posteritas. Sed ne ut putant homines, viderentur haec naturae quodam ordine et non dispensatione fieri Conditoris. pauca quaedam ad indicium et documentum providentiae suae, mutato ordine genus servare jussit in terris, verbi gratia ut per os conciperet corvus, et per aurem mustela generaret. ut aves nonnullae sicut gallina, interdum ova vel vento vel pulvere concepta parerent, alia quaedam animalia marem vicibus alternis in feminam verterent et sexum per annos singulos commutarent, ut lepores et hyaenae, quas belluas vocant, alia etiam ex terra orirentur atque inde sumerent carnem, ut talpa:, alia ex cinere, ut vipera:, alia ex putrefactis carnibus, ut vespa: quidem equinis, apes autem bubulis, alia ex fimo boum, ut scarabaei, alia ex herbis, ut de ocimo scorpius, et rursus herba ex animalibus, ut ex cornu cervi vel capra: apii et asparagi.
“And what shall I say of shrubs and of animals? Was it not done by providence that, when they were dissolved by old age, the shrubs should be renewed by the shoots or seeds they themselves produced, and the animals by offspring? And by a wonderful dispensation of Providence, milk is prepared in the udders for the animal about to be born, and as soon as it is born, with no one teaching it, it knows where to seek the storehouses of its nourishment. And not only males but also females are born, so that from both posterity may again exist. But so that these things might not seem, as men suppose, to be done by some order of nature and not by the dispensation of the Founder, he ordered a few kinds to keep their kind on earth with the order changed, as an indication and proof of his providence: for example, that the raven should conceive through its mouth and the weasel give birth through its ear; that some birds, such as the hen, should sometimes lay eggs conceived by wind or dust; that certain other animals should turn male into female by turns and change sex every year, such as hares and hyenas, which they call beasts; that others should spring from the earth and take their flesh from it, such as moles; others from ashes, such as vipers; others from rotting flesh—wasps from horses' and bees from cattle's; others from the dung of oxen, such as beetles; others from herbs, as the scorpion from basil; and again herbs from animals, as celery and asparagus from the horn of a stag or a goat.
Notes and citation
Summary: Providence ordered the renewal of plants and animals by seed and offspring, and to show it is not mere nature, made some creatures arise in unusual ways.
- The marvels listed (ravens conceiving by the mouth, weasels by the ear, spontaneous generation of bees and wasps, etc.) are ancient natural-history beliefs, translated as written. A footnote number of the edition printed in the text has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR and footnote number in the text): alimonia: sum horrea → alimoniae suae horrea; providentia: sure → providentiae suae; byaenaa → hyaenae; alia ctiam ex terra → alia etiam ex terra; ex timo boum (7‘2), ut scarabaai → ex fimo boum, ut scarabaei; ex berbis → ex herbis.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.25 (PG 1:1383b–1384a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-25). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-25) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.26PG 1:1384b–1385a
Et quid opus est plura enumerare, in quibus divina Providentia mutato ordine eo qui a natura datus putatur, multimodis differentiis nativitatem animalium constare voluit, ex quibus non irrationabilis rerum cursus, sed ipsius dispensatus ratione doceretur? Aut non et in hoc plenissimum demonstratur opus divina: Providentia, ubi ex terra et aqua ad vitam hominum semina jacta reparantur? quae cum terra: fuerint mandata, voluntate Dei humorem quem susceperit gleba, velut uberibus suis seminibus immulget. Aquis enim inest quaedam vis spiritus a Deo dati ex initio, cujus opere habitus futuri corporis, in ipso statim semine formari incipit et per culmum spicamque restitui; turgefacto etenim ex humore seminum grano, per angustos quosdam venarum meatus vis illa spiritus, quae inesse aquis data est, utpote incorporea transcurrens, ad incrementum semina suscitat et crescentium species format. Ministerio igitur humidi elementi, cui vitalis ille spiritus insitus semper et ingenitus est, efficitur ut non solum reparetur, sed ut per omnia similis species et forma his qua; jacta fuerint seminibus redeat. Quae ratio cui vel brevem sensum habenti, per irrationabilem naturam, et non per divinam sapientiam constare videbitur? Denique etiam haec ad similitudinem humanae nativitatis formata sunt; videtur enim terra vulvae locum tenere, cui semen injectum per aquae et spiritus vim, sicut supra diximus, et formatur et alitur.
“And what need is there to list more cases in which divine Providence, changing the order that is thought to be given by nature, willed the birth of animals to take place in many different ways, so that from them might be taught not an irrational course of things but its own dispensing reason? Or is not the work of divine Providence most fully shown in this too, that seeds cast into the earth and water are renewed for the life of men? When they have been committed to the earth, by the will of God the clod milks into the seeds, as from its breasts, the moisture it has received. For there is in the waters a certain power of spirit given by God from the beginning, by whose working the form of the future body begins to be shaped at once in the seed itself and is restored through stalk and ear. For when the grain of the seed is swollen by moisture, that power of spirit given to be in the waters, being incorporeal, runs through narrow channels of veins, rouses the seeds to growth, and shapes the forms of the growing things. So by the ministry of the moist element, in which that vital spirit is always implanted and inborn, it is brought about that not only is the seed renewed, but a form and shape in every way like the seeds that were cast returns. To whom with even a little sense will this reason seem to exist through irrational nature and not through divine wisdom? Indeed these things too are formed after the likeness of human birth; for the earth seems to hold the place of the womb, in which the seed cast is both formed and nourished through the power of water and spirit, as we said above.
Gen 1:2 (echo, medium confidence) · Gen 1:11 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In the growth of seeds a vital spirit given to the waters from the beginning forms each plant after its kind, as the womb forms the child, showing divine wisdom.
- The “spirit” in the waters recalls Gen 1:2.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR garble; chapter number in the text): XXV]. Et quid → Et quid; aqua ao vitam hominum semina jacls → aqua ad vitam hominum semina jacta; spiritus aDeo → spiritus a Deo; spicamο que → spicamque; nscosnrnonun vis → vis; babenti → habenti.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.26 (PG 1:1384b–1385a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-26). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-26) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.27PG 1:1385a
Sed et in hoc admiranda est divina Providentia, quod videre nos quidem et agnoscere facit quis fiunt, quo modo autem et qualiter fiant, in secreto posuit et occulto, ut non indignis ad agnitionem subjaceant, sed dignis et fidelibus cum meruerint, patefiant. Ut autem rebus ipsis et exemplis probemus, nihil omnino ex terrena substantia seminibus dari, sed totum ex elemento aqua: et spiritus qui inest ei virtute constare, pone mihi verbi gratia in cratere aliquo amplissimae magnitudinis injici terrae talenta centum, et seminentur in eo diversae species seminum vel olerum vel etiam virgultorum, his praebeatur ad rigandum aqua sufficiens, et per annos plures habeatur ista diligentia, congregemur autem semina quae collecta fuerint, verbi gratia frumenti vel hordei aliarumque specierum per singulos annos seorsim, donec uniuscujusque seminis acervus ad centum talentorum pondus ascendat, tum etiam arbores avulsae radicitus appendantur, et his omnibus ex cratere sumptis appendatur terra, centum sua nihilominus talenta salva restituet. Unde ergo dicemus omne illud pondus, omnemque quantitatem seminum diversorum atque arborum surrexisse? nonne evidenter apparet, quia ex aquis? Terra enim quod suum est, integrum tenet, aqua vero quae per singula injecta est, nusquam prorsus est, ob potentem divina: conditionis virtutem, quae per unam aquae speciem tantorum seminum virgultorumque et substantias reparat, et species format, et genus fenore multiplicato custodit.
“And in this too divine Providence is to be admired: that it makes us see and recognize what things come into being, but how and in what manner they come into being it has placed in secret and hidden, so that they may not lie open to the knowledge of the unworthy but may be disclosed to the worthy and faithful when they have deserved it. And so that we may prove by facts and examples that nothing at all is given to the seeds from the substance of the earth, but that the whole consists of the element of water and the power of the spirit that is in it: suppose, for example, that a hundred talents of earth are put into some very large vessel, and various kinds of seeds of vegetables or even shrubs are sown in it; let enough water be supplied to irrigate them, and let this care be kept up for many years; and let the seeds that are gathered—of wheat, for example, or barley and other kinds—be collected separately each year until the heap of each seed rises to the weight of a hundred talents; then let the trees too be pulled up by the roots and weighed; and when all these have been taken out of the vessel, let the earth be weighed: it will still give back its hundred talents intact. From where, then, shall we say that all that weight and all that quantity of various seeds and trees arose? Is it not plainly evident that it came from the waters? For the earth keeps what is its own intact, but the water poured in for each is nowhere at all, because of the mighty power of the divine creation, which through the one form of water both renews the substances of so many seeds and shrubs, shapes their forms, and preserves their kind with multiplied increase.
Notes and citation
Summary: Providence hides how things grow from the unworthy, but a thought experiment shows that plants grow from water, not earth, since the soil's weight remains unchanged.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): terra: talenta → terrae talenta; semincntur → seminentur; aqum speciem → aquae speciem; cu- θ stodit → custodit.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.27 (PG 1:1385a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-27). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-27) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.28PG 1:1385a–1386a
Ex quibus omnibus satis abundeque patere puto, artifici sensu et non irrationabili natura: opere cuncta effici et universa constare. Sed veniamus adhuc, si videtur, etiam ad nostram, id est ad hominis substantiam, qui est parvus in alio mundus, et consideremus quanta sit ratione compositus; et ex hoc praecipue sapientiam Conditoris intelliges, qui cum ex diversis substantiis constet, id est mortali et immortali, per artificem providentiam Conditoris societatem diversitas non refugit, et quidem longe a se substantiis [alienis et diversis]. Alia namque de terra assumitur et a Conditore formatur, alia vero ex immortalibus substantiis datur, nec tamen ei per hujuscemodi coniunctionem honor immortalitatis infringitur, nec ut quibusdam videtur [ex rationabili et concupiscibili et irascibili subsistit, sed magis inesse ei tales quidam videntur] affectus, quibus ad haec singula moveri possit. Nam corpus quod ex ossibus et carnibus constat, initium sumit ex semine viri, quod e medullis calor eliciens vulvae quasi terra: consignat, cui inhaerens ex fonte sanguinis paulatim rigatum, in carnem et ossa producitur, atque in speciem auctoris jacti seminis reformatur.
“From all this I think it is abundantly clear that all things are effected and the universe exists by a craftsman's intelligence and not by the work of irrational nature. But let us come further, if you please, to our own substance, that is, to man, who is a small world within another, and consider with how great reason he is composed; and from this especially you will understand the wisdom of the Founder. For though man consists of different substances, mortal and immortal, through the craftsmanlike providence of the Founder the diversity does not shun fellowship—and that of substances far removed from each other (foreign and different). For one is taken from the earth and formed by the Founder, the other is given from immortal substances; yet by such a union the honor of immortality is not impaired. Nor, as some think, (does the soul consist of a rational, a desiring, and an irascible part; rather, there seem to be in it certain) affections by which it can be moved to each of these. For the body, which consists of bones and flesh, takes its beginning from the seed of the man, which heat draws out from the marrow and deposits in the womb as in the earth; clinging to it and gradually watered from the fountain of blood, it is brought forth into flesh and bones and reshaped into the likeness of the author of the seed sown.
Gen 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Man, a little world, joins mortal body and immortal soul without impairing immortality; the soul has affections rather than separate parts, and the body grows from seed in the womb.
- The words in round brackets are in square brackets in the edition, which marks them as doubtful. The tripartite soul is Plato's (Resp. 4.439–441). Gen 2:7.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; stray marks): efiici et universa ctnstare → effici et universa constare; refugit,et quidem → refugit, et quidem; substantiis “J7 [alienis → substantiis [alienis; sub« stantiis → substantiis; allectus, quibus ad hac → affectus, quibus ad haec.
Extrabiblical texts: Plato, Resp. 4.439–441 (Plato (works); allusion)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.28 (PG 1:1385a–1386a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-28). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-28) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.29PG 1:1386a
Et vide in hoc Artificis opus, quomodo ossa velut columnas quasdam, quibus caro sustentetur ac portetur, inseruit. Tum deinde aequalis ex utraque parte, id est dextera et laeva, mensura servetur, ut congruat pes pedi, et manus manui, digiti quoque digitis, ut singuli ad singulos tota aequalitate concordent; sed et oculus oculo, et auris auri, quae non solum consona sibi et concordantia, sed et usibus necessariis apta formantur. Manus quidem ut operi commodae sint, pedes ut gressibus, oculi ut visibus serviant superciliorum excubiis custoditi, aures ad audiendum ita formatae ut cymbalo similes suscepti verbi repercussum sonitum altius reddant, et usque ad sensum cordis emittant, lingua autem ad loquendum illisa dentibus plectri reddat officium, ipsi vero dentes alii ut incidant et dividant cibos et interioribus tradant, interiores vero ut in modum mola conficiant et comminuant, quo Opportunius stomacho traditi coquantur, unde et molares appellati sunt.
“And see in this the Craftsman's work: how he inserted the bones like columns by which the flesh might be supported and carried. Then an equal measure is kept on both sides, right and left, so that foot matches foot and hand hand, finger also finger, so that each corresponds to each in complete equality; and eye to eye and ear to ear, which are formed not only consonant and agreeing with each other but fit for necessary uses. The hands are formed to be convenient for work, the feet for walking, the eyes to serve sight, guarded by the sentinels of the eyebrows; the ears are so formed for hearing that, like a cymbal, they give back the sound of the word received more loudly and send it on to the perception of the heart. The tongue, striking against the teeth, performs the office of a plectrum for speaking. Of the teeth themselves, some cut and divide the food and pass it to the inner ones, and the inner ones grind and crush it like a mill, so that, passed to the stomach, it may be digested more suitably; whence they are also called molars.
Notes and citation
Summary: The symmetry and fitness of bones, limbs, eyes, ears, tongue, and teeth show the Craftsman's design.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): measura servetur → mensura servetur; formata! ut → formatae ut; reddat ofiicium → reddat officium.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.29 (PG 1:1386a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-29). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-29) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.30PG 1:1386a–1387a
Sed et nares. commeandi flatus et reddendi ac recipiendi gratia factae sunt, ut innovatione spiritus calor naturalis qui in corde est, vel accendi vel refrigerari, cum res poposcerit, queat pulmonis officio, qui pectori inhaerere datus est, ut mollitie sui palpet et foveat cordis vigorem, in quo videtur vita consistere, vita dico, non anima. Nam quid dicam de substantia sanguinis, qui velut fluvius ex fonte procedens, et uno prius alveo invectus tum deinde per innumeras venas, quasi per areas 'derivatus, totam humani corporis terram vitalibus rigat fluentis, jecoris opere ministratus, quod ad efficaciam digestionis ciborum, atque in sanguinem mutandorum in dextro latere jacet. In sinistro vero splenis est locus, qui trahere ad se et purgare quodammodo sordes sanguinis possit.
“The nostrils too were made for the passage of breath, for giving it out and taking it in, so that by renewal of the breath the natural heat in the heart may be either kindled or cooled as the case requires, by the office of the lung, which has been set to cling to the breast, so that by its softness it may caress and cherish the vigor of the heart, in which life seems to reside—life, I say, not the soul. And what shall I say of the substance of the blood, which, like a river proceeding from its source, carried first in one channel and then diverted through innumerable veins as through plots of ground, waters the whole earth of the human body with life-giving streams, supplied by the work of the liver, which lies on the right side to effect the digestion of food and its change into blood? On the left side is the place of the spleen, which can draw to itself and in a way purge the impurities of the blood.
Notes and citation
Summary: The nostrils, lungs, heart, blood, liver, and spleen each serve the body's life in an ordered way.
- An editor's note printed in the text in the scan has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; editor's note leaked into the text): pulmonis ofiicio → pulmonis officio; datus est in textum recepimus,in uncis eaincludenda cuut mollitie → datus est, ut mollitie.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.30 (PG 1:1386a–1387a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-30). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-30) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.31PG 1:1387a
Intestinorum quoque ratio quanta est! quas idcirco longis nexibus in circulorum ordinata sunt modum, ut susceptas digestiones ciborum paulatim egerant, quo neque ad subitum inanes efficiant locos, et his qui superadditi fuerint non impediantur cibis. Membrana: autem in modum idcirco facta sunt, ut ex ipsis ea quat extrinsecus sunt, humorem sensim suscipiant, qui neque subito effusus exinaniret interna, neque densiore cute prohibitus, arida quae extrinsecus habentur efficeret, et totam hominis fabricam sitis necessitate turbaret.
“And how great is the plan of the intestines! They are arranged in long coils in the manner of circles so that they may gradually expel the digested food they have received, so as neither to make their places suddenly empty nor be hindered by the food that is added on top. And the membranes are made in such a way that from them the outer parts may gradually receive moisture, which, if poured out suddenly, would not empty the inner parts, and, if held back by too thick a skin, would not leave the outer parts dry and disturb the whole fabric of man by the necessity of thirst.
Notes and citation
Summary: The coiled intestines and the membranes that distribute moisture are also designed for the body's welfare.
- The second sentence is somewhat garbled in the scan; translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): elliciant → efficiant; eiiiceret → efficeret.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.31 (PG 1:1387a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-31). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-31) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.32PG 1:1387a
Porro vero feminea positio, et vulvas sinus ad recipiendum germen et confovendum vivificandumque commodissimus, quem non ratione et prudentia effecta esse quae facta sunt, suadeat, quod in ea solum parte membrorum a virili specie femina discrepat, qua posteritas sata suscipitur et fovetur, et rursus virilis habitus ea tantummodo membrorum parte immutatur, qua ei vis serendi et generandi hominis inest? Et in hoc magnum quidem testimonium Providentiae datur, ex necessaria diversitate membrorum, sed ibi majus, ubi in habitus similitudine, usus diversitas et officii varietas invenitur. Nam mamillae viris aeque sunt ac feminis, sed feminarum solae sunt quae lactis munere replentur, ut statim ubi genuerint, apta sibi parvulus inveniat nutrimenta. Quod si tanta ratione videmus in homine membra disposita, ut in caeteris omnibus similis habitus videatur, in his tantummodo discrepent, in quibus usus diversitatem requirit, et neque in viro aliquid superfluum aut egens, neque in femina quod desit videamus vel quod abundet, quis ex his omnibus non evidenter agnoscat rationis opus et sapientiam Conditoris?
“Further, the female arrangement and the hollow of the womb, most suited to receiving the seed and cherishing and quickening it—whom will it not persuade that what has been made was effected by reason and prudence, since the woman differs from the male form only in that part of the members by which the posterity sown is received and cherished, and again the male form is changed only in that part of the members in which lies the power of sowing and begetting man? In this a great testimony of Providence is given by the necessary diversity of members; but a greater one where, with likeness of form, there is found a diversity of use and variety of function. For men have breasts just as women do, but only women's are filled with the gift of milk, so that as soon as they have given birth, the little one may find nourishment suited to it. If, then, we see the members in man arranged with such reason that in all the rest there appears a similar form, and they differ only in those in which use requires diversity, and we see nothing superfluous or lacking in the man, nor anything wanting or excessive in the woman, who from all this does not plainly recognize the work of reason and the wisdom of the Founder?”
Notes and citation
Summary: The difference of male and female only in the organs of generation, and the use of the breasts in women, show the Founder's wise design.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): tantummodo ϐ membrorum → tantummodo membrorum; Quod si.tanta → Quod si tanta; tan. tummodo → tantummodo.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.32 (PG 1:1387a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-32). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-32) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.33PG 1:1387a
His astipulatur etiam caeterorum animalium rationabilis diversitas, et suo quodque usui ministerioque conveniens. Haec testatur et arborum varietas herbarumque diversitas, tam specie variata quam succis. Haec asserit et permutatio temporum in quatuor distincta vicissitudines, et certis horis, diebus, mensibus, annum circulus claudens, et ne unam quidem horam statuta: rationis excedens; hinc denique etiam mundi ipsius aetas, certa et stabili ratione, concepto annorum numero venantur.
“This is confirmed also by the rational diversity of the other animals, each suited to its own use and service. This the variety of trees and the diversity of herbs attest, varied as much in form as in juices. This the change of seasons asserts, distinguished into four turns, closing the circle of the year in fixed hours, days, and months, and not exceeding by even one hour the appointed reason. Hence, indeed, even the age of the world itself is reckoned by a sure and stable reason, the number of years being computed.
Notes and citation
Summary: The diversity of animals and plants and the regular cycle of the seasons and years also attest the Creator's reason.
- The last clause is garbled in the scan (“venantur”); translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): llis astipulatur etiam caeterorumanimalium → His astipulatur etiam caeterorum animalium; certis boris → certis horis.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.33 (PG 1:1387a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-33). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-33) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.34PG 1:1387a–1388a
Sed dices, Quando mundus factus est, et quare tam tarde? Hoc possis obtendere etiamsi ante factus fuisset; diceres enim, Cur non et ante hoc? et ita immensa saacula transcendens semper possis requirere, cur non et ante hoc? Sed nobis nunc sermo non de eo est [cur non sit ante factus quam factus est], sed si omnino factus est. Si enim factum constat, necessario potentis et summi artificis opus est; quod si constat, quando eum facere voluerit, sapientis artificis arbitrio judicioque relinquendum est. Nisi videatur tibi omnis haec sapientia, quae tam immanem mundi machinam struxit, et singulis quibusque rebus formas et species dedit, quarum habitum non decori solum convenientem, sed et futuris usibus aptissimum et necessarium poneret, hoc eam solum fugerit, quo tam magnifica: conditionis opportunum tempus assumeret. Est apud illum profecto certa ratio, sunt evidentes causa, cur et quando et qualiter fecerit mundum, quas hominibus, quibus haec quae ante oculos posita sunt et de ejus providentia contestantur, inquirere et intelligere pigrum fuit, aperiri utique non oportuit; quae enim in occulto habentur et intra sapientia: sensus, velut intra regios thesauros recondita sunt, nemini patent, nisi his qui ab illo didicerint, apud quem signata sunt haec et reposita. Deus ergo est qui fecit omnia, et ipse a nemine factus est. Qui autem naturam pro Deo nominant, et per naturam facta esse cuncta testantur. latet eos appellationis sua: error. Si enim naturam irrationabilem putant, stultissimum est rationabilem facturam ab irrationabili factore progredi. Si vero ratio est, id est logos, per quam facta constat universa, superfluo nomen immutant, ubi de Conditoris ratione profitentur. Ad haec si quid habes, Pater, prosequere.
“But you will say: ‘When was the world made, and why so late?’ You could put this forward even if it had been made earlier; for you would say, ‘Why not before that?’ And so, passing beyond immense ages, you could always ask, ‘Why not before that?’ But our discussion now is not about (why it was not made before it was made), but whether it was made at all. For if it is agreed that it was made, it is necessarily the work of a powerful and supreme craftsman; and if this is agreed, when he chose to make it must be left to the will and judgment of the wise craftsman. Unless it seems to you that all this wisdom, which built so immense a fabric of the world and gave forms and appearances to each and every thing, whose condition it made not only fitting for beauty but most apt and necessary for future uses, missed only this—when to choose the opportune time for so magnificent a creation. With him there is certainly a sure reason, there are evident causes, why and when and how he made the world; and it was certainly not right for these to be opened to men who were too lazy to inquire into and understand these things set before their eyes, which bear witness to his providence. For what is kept hidden and stored within the mind of wisdom, as in royal treasuries, lies open to no one except those who have learned from him with whom these things are sealed and laid up. It is God, then, who made all things, and he himself was made by no one. But those who name nature in place of God, and testify that all things were made by nature, do not see the error of their naming. For if they think nature irrational, it is most foolish that a rational work should proceed from an irrational maker. But if it is reason, that is, logos, through which all things are agreed to have been made, they change the name superfluously when they are professing the reason of the Founder. If you have anything against this, father, go on.”
John 1:3 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Asking why the world was made when it was is idle, for the wise Maker had his reasons, and calling the maker “nature” only renames the divine Reason or Logos.
- The words in round brackets are in square brackets in the edition, which marks them as doubtful.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): faetus est → factus est; Iloc possis → Hoc possis; res linquendum → relinquendum; bazc sapientia, quae. tam → haec sapientia, quae tam; feceritmundum → fecerit mundum; etde ejus → et de ejus; rationabi‘ lem → rationabilem.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.34 (PG 1:1387a–1388a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-34). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-34) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.35PG 1:1388a–1389a
Haec cum Niceta dixisset, senex ita respondit: Tu quidem, fili, prudenter et fortiter prosecutus es, in tantum ut melius dici posse de Providentia non putem. Sed quoniam hora jam multa est, crastino ad haec quae prosecutus es. respondere aliqua volo, de quibus si mihi satisfeceris gratia: me fateor debitorem. Et his a sene dictis, surrexit Petrus. Quidam vero ex astantibus Laodicensium primus rogabat Petrum et nos, ut senis indumenta quae habebat sordida et scissa mutaret; quem Petrus et nos amplexi, et collaudantes pro honesta et optima voluntate sua, dicebamus: Quia nec nos ita insipientes sumus et impii, ut cui tam pretiosa verba concredimus, non multo magis etiam haec quae ad usus corporeos sunt necessaria praebeamus, quae eum et libenter suscepturum credimus, tanquam a filiis patrem, sed et tectum nobis et vitam communem fore credimus. Haec cum nos diceremus, et ille primarius civitatis summa vi et blandimentis plurimis avellere a nobis cuperet senem, nos vero eo vehementius retineremus, omnis populus acclamavit ut illud magis fiat, quod ipsi placet seni; et cum silentium factum fuisset, senex juramento praevenit, dicens: Hodie apud nullum manebo neque ab aliquo quidquam suscipiam, uti ne alterius dilectio alterius tristitia fiat; haec enim postmodum si visum fuerit, fieri possunt.
When Niceta had said this, the old man answered thus: “You, my son, have argued prudently and strongly, so much so that I do not think anything better could be said about Providence. But since the hour is already late, tomorrow I wish to answer some things to what you have argued; and if you satisfy me about them, I confess myself in your debt.” When the old man had said this, Peter rose. One of the bystanders, the leading man of the Laodiceans, asked Peter and us to let him change the old man's clothes, which were dirty and torn. Peter and we embraced him, and, praising him for his honorable and excellent goodwill, said: “We are not so foolish and impious that, having entrusted such precious words to him, we would not much more provide also what is necessary for bodily uses; and we believe he will gladly accept them, as a father from his sons; indeed we believe that we shall share a roof and a common life.” While we were saying this, and that leading man of the city wished with all his might and with many coaxings to take the old man away from us, while we held on to him all the more strongly, the whole people cried out that what pleased the old man should rather be done. When silence had been made, the old man forestalled them with an oath, saying: “Today I will stay with no one and accept nothing from anyone, so that one man's love may not become another's sadness. These things can be done later, if it seems good.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man postpones his reply; the leading citizen of Laodicea and Peter's company vie to provide for him, but he declines all offers for that day.
- A column number printed in the text has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin); column number in the text): forti er prosecutus → fortiter prosecutus; qua! prosecutus → quae prosecutus; satisfeo ceris → satisfeceris; ut seι) nis indumenta quae habebat sordida et scissa ιιιῑι· taret → ut senis indumenta quae habebat sordida et scissa mutaret; impii, ικουί tam → impii, ut cui tam; eorporeos → corporeos; Hac cum nos → Haec cum nos; quod ἱρεί placet → quod ipsi placet; sane! juramento → senex juramento; apud nullum 1 589 manebo → apud nullum manebo.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.35 (PG 1:1388a–1389a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-35). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-35) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.36PG 1:1389a
Et cum haec dixisset senex, Petrus ait ad primarium civitatis: Quoniam nostri praesentia bonam voluntatem tuam ostendisti, tristem te non oportet abscedere, sed accipiemus abs te gratiam pro gratia, domum tuam nobis ostende, et praepara eam ut crastino disputatio quae futura est ibi habeatur, et si qui volunt adesse ad audiendum permittantur. Quae cum audisset primus civitatis valde gavisus est, sed et omnis populus libenter audivit. Cumque discessissent turbae, domum suam ostendit; discedere autem et senex coepit. Ego tamen uni ex pedissequis meis imperavi clam subsequi vestigium senis, et discere ubi maneret. Nos autem cum redissemus ad hospitium, enarravimus omnia fratribus quae nobis cum sene habita sunt, et ita ex more cibo sumpto requievimus.
When the old man had said this, Peter said to the leading man of the city: “Since you have shown your goodwill in our presence, you must not go away sad; we will accept a favor from you in return for a favor. Show us your house and prepare it, so that the discussion that is to take place tomorrow may be held there, and let any who wish to be present to listen be admitted.” When the leading man of the city heard this he was very glad, and the whole people heard it gladly too. When the crowds had dispersed, he showed us his house; and the old man also began to leave. But I ordered one of my attendants to follow the old man's footsteps secretly and learn where he was staying. When we had returned to the lodging, we told the brothers everything we had had with the old man, and so, having taken food as usual, we rested.
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter arranges for the next day's debate to be held in the leading citizen's house, and Clement has the old man followed to learn where he lodges.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): Qute cum → Quae cum; senex CBpit → senex coepit.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.36 (PG 1:1389a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-36). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-36) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.37PG 1:1389a
Die autem postera Petrus mature surgens suscitavit nos, et perreximus pariter ad locum secretum, in quo et pridie orationis causa fueramus; atque inde post orationem dum veniremus ad constitutam domum, in itinere monebat nos, dicens: Audite me, conservi dilectissimi, bonum est ut unusquisque vestrum secundum quod potest, prosit accedentibus ad fidem religionis nostrae, et ideo non vos pigeat secundum sapientiam, quae vobis per Dei providentiam collata est disserentes, instruere ignaros et docere, ita tamen ut his quae a me audistis et tradita sunt vobis, vestri tantum sermonis eloquentiam societis. Nec aliquid proprium et quod vobis non est traditum proloquamini, etiamsi vobis verisimile videatur, sed ea, ut dixi, quae ipse a vero propheta suscepta vobis tradidi, prosequamini, etiamsi minus plenae assertionis esse videbuntur. Hinc enim saepe contingit declinare quosdam a veritate, dum speciem sibi verioris et validioris veritatis, propriis cogitationibus reperisse se credunt.
On the next day Peter rose early, woke us, and we went together to the secluded place where we had been for prayer the day before. From there, after prayer, as we were coming to the appointed house, he admonished us on the way, saying: “Listen to me, dearest fellow servants. It is good that each of you, as far as he can, should help those who come to the faith of our religion. So do not be reluctant to instruct and teach the ignorant, discoursing according to the wisdom conferred on you by God's providence—but in such a way that you add only the eloquence of your own speech to what you have heard from me and what has been handed down to you. Do not utter anything of your own that has not been handed down to you, even if it seems plausible to you; but, as I said, set forth what I myself received from the true Prophet and handed down to you, even if it seems less fully argued. For it often happens that some turn aside from the truth because they believe that by their own thoughts they have found the appearance of a truer and stronger truth.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter urges his companions to teach others, but to add only their own eloquence to what he received from the true Prophet, never their own inventions.
- The insistence on transmitting only what was received from the true Prophet through Peter is characteristic of the Pseudo-Clementines (compare the Letter of Peter to James).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): Die autem ‘postera → Die autem postera; ad Iidem religionis → ad fidem religionis; his quaa a me → his quae a me; prepheta → propheta; prepriis → propriis.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.37 (PG 1:1389a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-37). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-37) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.38PG 1:1389a–1390a
His a Petro dictis libenter annuimus, dicentes ei, nihil nos acturos, nisi quod ipsi videretur. Tum ille: Ut ergo, inquit, sine periculo exerceamini, me coram disputate singuli, ita ut unus alii succedat ac suas unusquisque explicet quaestiones. Nunc ergo quoniam hesterno die Niceta sufficienter disseruit, hodie sermonem faciat Aquila, et post Aquilam Clemens, inde ego. si tamen etiam me res poposcerit aliquid addere. Interea dum hujuscemodi sermones credimus, ad domum ventum est in qua suscipiens nos paterfamilias, introducit ad locum quemdam in similitudinem theatri collectum et pulchre exaedificatum, in quo turbas plurimas ex tempore noctis opperientes nos reperimus, inter quos et senex qui pridie nobiscum disputaverat. Itaque medium habentes Petrum ingredimur etiam nos, circumspicientes sicubi cerneremus senem; quem prior Petrus videns in medio turbae latitantem evocavit ad se. dicens: Clariorem multis animam possidens, cur in occulto lates et verecundia contegeris? accede huc magis, et quae tibi videntur exsequere.
We gladly agreed to what Peter said, telling him that we would do nothing except what seemed good to him. Then he said: “So that you may be exercised without danger, dispute one by one in my presence, so that one succeeds another and each unfolds his own questions. Now, since Niceta argued sufficiently yesterday, let Aquila make the discourse today, and after Aquila, Clement, and then I, if the matter requires me also to add something.” While we were exchanging such words, we came to the house, where the master of the household received us and brought us into a place built in the form of a theater and beautifully constructed, in which we found very great crowds who had been waiting for us since the night; among them was the old man who had disputed with us the day before. So we went in, with Peter in our midst, looking around to see the old man somewhere. Peter saw him first, hiding in the middle of the crowd, and called him to himself, saying: “Possessing a soul brighter than many, why do you hide in obscurity and cover yourself with modesty? Come here instead and set out what you think.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter arranges for Aquila and then Clement to argue in turn, and in the leading citizen's theater-like hall he calls the hidden old man forward.
- A column number printed in the text has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin); OCR word join; column number in the text): Utergo → Ut ergo; διιΠίcienter → sufficienter; exatdificatum → exaedificatum; nobiseum → nobiscum; aui- 4 59) mam → animam.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.38 (PG 1:1389a–1390a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-38) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.39PG 1:1390a
Ubi haec dixit Petrus, statim turbae locum dare coeperunt seni. Cumque accessisset, ita coepit: Eorum quae die hesterno prosecutus est juvenis, etiamsi verba non memini, sensum tamen et ordinem teneo, et ideo necessarium puto propter eos qui hesterno non adfuerunt, anacephalaeosin facere eorum quae dicta sunt, et breviter cuncta repetere, ut etiamsi me aliquid effugerit, ab eo qui prosecutus est praesente commonear. Hic ergo fuit hesternae disputationis sensus, quod omnia quae videntur, quoniam certa mensura et arte formaque ac specie constant, sine dubio a sapiente virtute facta esse [credenda sunt; quod si mens et ratio est quae haec condidit, consequens esse] ut rationis ipsius providentia mundus regatur, etiamsi nobis ea quae geruntur in mundo, minus recte geri videantur. Consequitur autem, ut si creator omnium Deus est ac mens, sit etiam justus; quod si justus est, necessario judicat; si judicat, necesse est ut homines de suis actibus judicentur; et si de actibus suis unusquisque judicatur, erit ergo inter justos et peccatores justum quandoque discrimen. Haec fuit, ut opinor, totius verbi continentia.
When Peter said this, at once the crowds began to make room for the old man. When he had come forward, he began thus: “Of what the young man argued yesterday, even if I do not remember the words, I hold the sense and the order; and so I think it necessary, for the sake of those who were not present yesterday, to make a recapitulation of what was said and repeat it all briefly, so that if anything has escaped me I may be reminded by him who argued it, since he is present. This, then, was the sense of yesterday's discussion: that all things that are seen, since they consist in fixed measure and art, form and appearance, (are to be believed) without doubt to have been made by a wise power; (and that if it is mind and reason that founded them, it follows) that the world is ruled by the providence of reason itself, even if the things done in the world seem to us to be done less rightly. And it follows that if God, the creator of all, is also mind, he is also just; and if he is just, he necessarily judges; if he judges, men must be judged for their acts; and if each one is judged for his acts, there will one day be a just distinction between the just and sinners. This, I think, was the content of the whole discourse.
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man accurately summarizes Niceta's argument: an ordered world implies a wise maker and providence, and a just God who will judge.
- The words in round brackets are in square brackets in the edition, which marks them as doubtful.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): turbat lo» cum dare creperum → turbae locum dare coeperunt; etiarnsi → etiamsi; ell‘ugerit → effugerit; llic ergo fuit → Hic ergo fuit; etpeccatores → et peccatores.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.39 (PG 1:1390a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-39). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-39) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.40PG 1:1390a–1390d
Si ergo ostendi potest quod mens ac ratio cuncta condiderit, consequens est et ea quae sequuntur ratione et providentia geri. Si vero natura imprudens et caeca gignit universa, perimitur sine dubio judicii ratio, nec discussio peccatorum ac benefactorum remuneratio sperabitur, ubi judex non est. Quia ergo omnia in hoc pendent et huic capiti adhaerent, non indignemini, si forte paulo latius discuti haec et pertractari voluero. In hoc enim mihi ad omnia quae proponuntur, velut prima janua clauditur, et ideo hanc mihi ante omnia aperiri volo. Nunc ergo audite quae doceo, et respondeat mihi si quis vestrum volet; non enim erubescam discere. si audiero quod verum est, et recte dicenti acquiescere. Igitur hesterno a te habitus sermo, qui asserebat quod arte et mensura et ratione cuncta constarent, non valde me suadet, mentem rationemque esse quae fecerit mundum; multa enim habeo, quae ostendam competenti mensura ac forma et specie constare, nec tamen per mentem condita ac rationem. Tum praeterea video multa incondite, inconsequenter, injuste geri in mundo, et sine genesis cursu nihil fieri posse; quod post omnia etiam ex me ipso manifestissime approbabo.
“If, then, it can be shown that mind and reason founded all things, it follows that what comes after is also conducted by reason and providence. But if a nature without foresight and blind begets all things, the reason for judgment is without doubt destroyed, and no examination of sins nor reward of good deeds will be hoped for where there is no judge. Since, then, everything depends on this and hangs on this head, do not be indignant if I wish to discuss and handle these things a little more fully. For in this point, as it were, the first door to everything proposed is closed to me, and so I want this opened to me before everything. Now, then, hear what I put forward, and let any of you who wishes answer me; for I will not be ashamed to learn, if I hear what is true, and to agree with one who speaks rightly. The discourse you gave yesterday, then, which asserted that all things consist by art and measure and reason, does not much persuade me that it was mind and reason that made the world; for I have many things that I can show consist in suitable measure and form and appearance, yet were not founded by mind and reason. Besides, I see many things done in the world confusedly, inconsistently, unjustly, and that nothing can happen without the course of birth-fate; which, after all else, I will prove most clearly from my own case.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man says everything hinges on whether mind made the world, and objects that many well-formed things arise without mind and that injustice and fate show no providence.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): et ca quae scquuntur → et ea quae sequuntur; mibi si quis → mihi si quis; verum est,et → verum est, et.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.40 (PG 1:1390a–1390d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-40). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-40) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.41PG 1:1390d–1391a
Haec cum senex diceret, Aquila respondit: Quoniam ipse proposuisti, ut ad ea quae diceres haberet copiam respondendi qui velit, concedit mihi frater meus Niceta hodie facere sermonem. Et senex: Prosequere, ait, fili, ut vis. Et Aquila respondit: Promisisti quod ostenderes multa esse in mundo, quae formam ac speciem aequali ratione collectam gerant, quae tamen constet non effici per conditorem Deum. Nunc ergo quod promisisti, ostende. Et senex: Ecce arcum videmus in caelo circulum tenere omni mensura collectum, et habere speciem veri, quam fortassis nec mens condere nec describere ratio potuisset, nec tamen hic ab aliqua mente fit. Ecce in brevi totum proposui, responde ad haec.
When the old man had said this, Aquila answered: “Since you yourself proposed that whoever wishes should have the opportunity to answer what you say, my brother Niceta grants me to make the discourse today.” The old man said: “Proceed as you wish, my son.” Aquila answered: “You promised that you would show that there are many things in the world which bear a form and appearance gathered with equal reason, which nevertheless are agreed not to be made by God the founder. Now show what you promised.” The old man said: “See, we see a bow in the sky holding a circle gathered with every measure and having the appearance of a true one, which perhaps neither mind could found nor reason describe; yet it is not made by any mind. There—I have put the whole in brief; answer this.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila takes up the debate, and the old man offers the rainbow as a perfectly formed thing produced without any mind.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): haberet cepiam → haberet copiam; fili,ut vis → fili, ut vis; arcum videmus in cmlo → arcum videmus in caelo; responde ad haac → responde ad haec.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.41 (PG 1:1390d–1391a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-41). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-41) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.42PG 1:1391a–1391c
Tum Aquila: Non continuo, inquit, si quid ex typo et forma exprimitur, id intelligitur a ratione esse ac sine mente non fieri posse, quoniam typus ipse qui exprimit figuras ac formas. non sine mente factus est. Verbi causa, cera si alligatur sculpta annulo, imaginem quidem et figuram sumit ex annulo, qui sine dubio sensu caret, sed annulus qui exprimit effigiem, manu artificis sculptus est, et mens fuit ac ratio, quae typum annulo dedit. Ita ergo et arcus exprimitur in aere; sol enim nubibus rarescentibus radios suos imprimens, et humori nubilo velut cera molli affigens orbis sui typum, arcus speciem reddit, et efficit hoc ipsa, ut dixi, repercussio splendoris solis in nubibus, atque ex illis fulgorem circuli ejus reddens. Fit autem hoc non semper, sed cum opportunitatem sui humecta nubes rarescendo praestiterint. Unde et rursus cum densantur nubes et coeunt, arcus forma resolvitur et exolescit, denique nunquam sine sole et nubibus arcus apparet, sicut nec sine typo et cera vel alia hujusmodi materia exprimitur imago. Non ergo mirum est, si conditor Deus ex initio fecit typos, ex quibus nunc formae exprimantur ac species. Simile autem hoc et illi, quod ab initio Deus elementa insensibilia creavit, quibus ad reliqua omnia formanda et explicanda uteretur. Sed et qui statuas formant, typum prius luti vel cerae fingunt, et ex ipso redditur statua: effigies; tum deinde et umbra redditur ex statua, quae umbra per omnia formam ac similitudinem statuae gerit. Quid ergo dicemus insensibilem statuam formare umbram, tam diligenti quam ipsa statua est ratione collectam? an illi sine dubio ascribetur umbrae collectio, qui et statuam finxit?
Then Aquila said: “If something is impressed from a mold and form, it is not directly that thing which is understood to be from reason and unable to come about without mind; it is the mold itself, which impresses figures and forms, that was not made without mind. For example, if wax is pressed with an engraved ring, it takes its image and figure from the ring, which certainly lacks sense; but the ring that impresses the likeness was engraved by the hand of a craftsman, and it was mind and reason that gave the ring its mold. So too the bow is impressed on the air. For the sun, impressing its rays on thinning clouds and fixing the mold of its orb on the cloudy moisture as on soft wax, produces the appearance of the bow; and this, as I said, is effected by the reflection of the sun's splendor in the clouds, giving back from them the brightness of its circle. This does not happen always, but when the moist clouds, by thinning, provide the opportunity. Hence, again, when the clouds thicken and come together, the form of the bow dissolves and fades. Indeed the bow never appears without sun and clouds, just as an image is not impressed without a mold and wax or some other such material. It is no wonder, then, if God the founder made molds in the beginning, from which forms and appearances are now impressed. This is like the fact that God created insensible elements in the beginning, to use them for forming and unfolding all the rest. Those who form statues also first fashion a mold of clay or wax, and from it the likeness of the statue is produced; then a shadow too is cast by the statue, which shadow bears in every respect the form and likeness of the statue. What then shall we say—that the insensible statue forms a shadow gathered with as careful a reason as the statue itself? Or will the gathering of the shadow be ascribed without doubt to him who also fashioned the statue?”
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila answers that the rainbow is the sun's image impressed on clouds like a seal on wax, so its form derives from the sun, made by God, as a statue's shadow derives from its sculptor.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): fieriposse → fieri posse; efiigiem → effigiem; qum typum → quae typum; lta ergo → Ita ergo; prastiterint → praestiterint; Sed ct qui → Sed et qui; effigies;tum → effigies; tum; umbram,tam → umbram, tam.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.42 (PG 1:1391a–1391c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-42). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-42) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.43PG 1:1391c–1392a
Si ergo tibi videtur hoc ita se habere et sufficit quod de hoc dictum est, ad alia inquirenda veniamus; aut si aliquid adhuc deesse putas, repetamus. Et senex ait: Volo ut repetas de hoc, sunt enim et alia multa quae similiter fieri video; nam et fructus arborum simili modo pulchre formati et in rotundum mire collecti nascuntur, et foliorum species ingenti decore formatur, atque exquisita arte viridis membrana contexitur; tum praeterea pulices, mures, lacertas et his similia, nunquid et haec dicemus a Deo fieri? Unde ex his vilioribus conjectura capitur meliorum, quod nequaquam mentis arte formentur. Bene, inquit Aquila, de foliorum textura et de parvis animalibus colligis, quod ex his fides etiam melioribus deroganda sit; sed non te ista decipiant, ut putes quasi duabus solis manibus operantem Deum non posse universa complere quae fiunt, sed memento quomodo hesterno tibi frater meus Niceta respondit, et mysterium ante tempus aperuit vere quasi cum patre loquens, et cur et quomodo fiant haec quae inutilia videntur, exposuit.
“If, then, it seems to you that this is so and what has been said about it is enough, let us come to other inquiries; or if you think something is still lacking, let us go over it again.” The old man said: “I want you to go over it again; for there are many other things that I see come about in a similar way. For the fruits of trees are produced in a similar manner, beautifully formed and wonderfully gathered into roundness; and the appearance of leaves is formed with great beauty, and the green membrane is woven with exquisite art. And besides, fleas, mice, lizards, and things like these—shall we say that these too are made by God? So from these baser things one may conjecture about the better, that they are by no means formed by the art of a mind.” “You argue well,” said Aquila, “from the texture of leaves and from small animals, that faith should be withdrawn even from the better things on account of them. But do not let these things deceive you into thinking that God, working as it were with two hands only, cannot accomplish all that is made. Remember how my brother Niceta answered you yesterday, and opened a mystery before its time, truly as one speaking with his father, and explained why and how these things that seem useless are made.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man cites fruits, leaves, and vermin as forms produced without mind, and Aquila warns him not to imagine God as working with two hands like a man.
- “As one speaking with his father”: an ironic hint, since the old man is in fact the brothers' father.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): Si ergotibi → Si ergo tibi; multa quas similiter → multa quae similiter; et inec dicemusa Deo → et haec dicemus a Deo; de lo- Iiorum → de foliorum; fiant hac quae → fiant haec quae.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.43 (PG 1:1391c–1392a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-43). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-43) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.44PG 1:1392a–1392c
Et senex: Cur ista inutilia voluntate illius summae mentis fiant, velim a te audire. Si, inquit, liquido apud te constat, quod mentis et rationis opus in ipsis est, tum demum tibi etiam cur facta sunt, dicere non pigebit et quod juste facta sint edocere. Ad haec senex respondit: Non possum. fili, ea quae videntur ex arte formata, dicere per mentem fieri, propter caetera quae injuste et inordinate fieri videmus in mundo. Si te, inquit Aquila, ea quae inordinate fiunt, dicere quod per Providentiam Dei facta sint non sinunt, cur non ea quae ordinate fiunt, dicere te quod a Deo facta sint cogunt. et quia irrationabilis natura opus rationabile proferre non possit? Certum est enim, nec omnino negamus, quia in hoc mundo quaedam ordinate, quaedam inordinate fiant; ea ergo quae rationabiliter fiunt, crede quod per Providentiam fiant, quae vero irrationabiliter et inordinate, quia naturaliter eveniant et fortuito accidant. Miror autem non advertere homines, quia ubi sensus est. possunt res ordinate fieri et inordinate, ubi autem nullus est sensus, neutrum omnino effici; nam ratio ordinem facit, ordinis autem cursus, si contrarium quid acciderit quod ordinem turbet, necessario inordinatum aliquid profert. Et senex: Hoc ipsum mihi a te ostendi volo.
The old man said: “I should like to hear from you why these useless things are made by the will of that supreme mind.” Aquila said: “If it is clearly established for you that the work of mind and reason is in them, then you will not be reluctant to say why they were made, and to teach that they were justly made.” To this the old man answered: “I cannot, my son, say that the things that appear formed by art are made by mind, because of the other things we see done unjustly and without order in the world.” “If,” said Aquila, “the things done without order do not allow you to say that they were made by the providence of God, why do not the things done in order compel you to say that they were made by God, and that irrational nature cannot produce a rational work? For it is certain, and we do not at all deny it, that in this world some things are done in order and some without order. Believe, then, that the things done rationally are done by Providence, but that those done irrationally and without order happen naturally and occur by chance. But I wonder that men do not notice that where there is sense, things can be done both in order and without order, but where there is no sense, neither can be done at all. For reason makes order; but the course of order, if something contrary happens that disturbs the order, necessarily produces something disordered.” The old man said: “This very thing I want you to show me.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man says disorder in the world prevents him from crediting order to mind, and Aquila replies that order requires reason, while disorder arises when something disturbs that order.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join; stray mark): summie mentis → summae mentis; inipsis → in ipsis; formata,~ dicere → formata, dicere; quae or. dinate → quae ordinate; quadam ordinate, quadam inordinate → quaedam ordinate, quaedam inordinate; quia nec turaliter → quia naturaliter; [Ioc ipsum mlbi → Hoc ipsum mihi.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.44 (PG 1:1392a–1392c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-44). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-44) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.45PG 1:1392c–1393a
Non, inquit, morabor Aquila. Duo visibilis signa monstrantur in caelo, unum solis, aliud lunae; haec sequuntur et alia: quinque stellae, diversos et proprios singulae explicantes cursus. Haec ergo Deus posuit in caelo, quibus aeris temperies pro ratione temporum dispensetur, et ordo vicissitudinum permutationumque servetur. Horum autem ipsorum ministerio, et si quando pro peccatis hominum plaga et corruptio terris injicitur, perturbatur aer. lues animantibus. corruptio frugibus, pestilens per omnia mortalibus annus inducitur, et ita fit, ut uno eodemque ministerio et servetur ordo et corrumpatur. Etenim palam est incredulis et imperitis. quod cursus solis utilis et necessarius mundo, per Providentiam datus, semper ordinatus habeatur; lunae vero ad comparationem cursus solis. in augmentis et detrimentis suis apud imperitos inordinati cursus videntur et incompositi. Nam sol certis distinctionibus et ordinatis movetur; ex ipso enim sunt horae, ex ipso dies cum ascenderit, ex ipso etiam nox cum occiderit, ex ipso menses et anni numerantur, ex ipso vicissitudines temporum fiunt, dum ad superiora conscendens ver temperat, ubi autem ad summum caeli venerit, aestivos accendit calores; decidens rursus autumni temperiem reddit, ubi vero ad inferiorem redierit circulum, ex glaciali compage caeli rigorem nobis hiberni frigoris derelinquit.
“I will not delay,” said Aquila. “Two visible signs are shown in the sky, one of the sun, the other of the moon; and five other stars follow these, each unfolding its own different course. These, then, God placed in the sky, so that by them the temperature of the air might be regulated according to the reason of the seasons and the order of turns and changes kept. And by the ministry of these same bodies, whenever for the sins of men a plague and corruption is sent on the earth, the air is disturbed: pestilence on animals, blight on crops, a year pestilent in every way is brought on mortals; and so it comes about that by one and the same ministry order is both kept and corrupted. For even to unbelievers and the unskilled it is plain that the course of the sun, useful and necessary to the world and given by Providence, is always held in order; but the moon's course, compared with the sun's course, in its waxing and waning, seems to the unskilled disordered and irregular. For the sun moves by fixed and ordered distinctions: from it are the hours, from it the day when it rises, from it also night when it sets; by it months and years are numbered; by it the changes of seasons come about, as, climbing to the higher regions, it tempers spring, and when it has come to the height of heaven it kindles the summer heats; descending again it brings back the mildness of autumn; and when it has returned to the lower circle, it leaves us the stiffness of wintry cold from the icy framework of heaven.
Gen 1:14 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila explains that God set the sun, moon, and five planets in the sky to order the seasons, and that through the same bodies he sends plagues for human sin.
- Gen 1:14–18.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): in ccelo → in caelo; frugibUS, pestilens Ρει· omnia → frugibus, pestilens per omnia; exipso enim sunt horae,ex ipso → ex ipso enim sunt horae, ex ipso; summum caali → summum caeli; compage cmli → compage caeli.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.45 (PG 1:1392c–1393a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-21/#p-8-45). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-45) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).