Recognitions 8.46–9.7
Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, who tells how he found Christ, followed Peter, and was reunited with his lost family (the 'recognitions'). It is not a work of Clement. It survives complete only in Rufinus of Aquileia's Latin translation; the Greek original is lost (fragments in Eusebius and Origen's Philocalia, and a Syriac version of parts). It shares a source with the Greek Clementine Homilies (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift', probably 3rd-century Syria), and the Recognitions are usually dated to the 4th century in their Greek form. Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius is reference 0.1.
Latin text: Migne, PG 1 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 1 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).
Chapter 8
8.46PG 1:1393a–1393b
Sed de his alias latius disseremus. Nunc interim, cum sit iste minister bonus, ad vicissitudines temporum moderandas, tamen ubi secundum voluntatem Dei correptio mortalibus datur, incandescit acrius et urit mundum vehementioribus flammis. Similiter et luna: cursus, atque haec quae imperitis videtur inordinata permutatio, incrementis frugum et pecudum omniumque animantium commoda est; augmentis enim ejus detrimentisque mira quadam Providentiae arte omne quod gignitur, alitur et crescit, de quibus latius prosequi possemus et aperire de singulis rationem, nisi nos propositae quaestionis ordo revocaret. His tamen ipsis eisdemque ministeriis quibus gignuntur, aluntur, augentur universa; cum fuerit justa aliqua ex causa ordinis instituti mutata temperies, corruptio oritur et intemperantia, ut in homines, sicut supra diximus, castigatio Dei voluntate procedat.
“But we shall discuss these things more fully elsewhere. Now meanwhile, though the sun is a good minister for regulating the changes of the seasons, yet when, according to the will of God, correction is given to mortals, it glows more fiercely and burns the world with more violent flames. Similarly the course of the moon, and that change which seems disordered to the unskilled, is beneficial to the growth of crops and herds and all living things; for by its waxings and wanings, by a wonderful art of Providence, everything that is begotten is nourished and grows. We could pursue these things more fully and set out the reason of each, if the order of the proposed question did not call us back. Yet by these very same ministries by which all things are begotten, nourished, and increased, when for some just cause the tempering of the established order has been changed, corruption and intemperance arise, so that, as we said above, chastisement proceeds against men by the will of God.
Notes and citation
Summary: Sun and moon, normally beneficial, become instruments of God's chastisement when, for just cause, he alters their tempering.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): atque hac qua imperitis → atque haec quae imperitis.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.46 (PG 1:1393a–1393b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-46). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-46) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.47PG 1:1393b–1394a
Sed fortasse dices: Quid, quod in ista communi castigatione similia impii patiuntur et pii? Verum est, etiam nos fatemur; sed piis castigatio ad profectum cedit, ut in praesenti vita afflicti purgatiores veniant ad futuram, in qua perpetua eis requies praeparata est, simul autem ut et impii aliquantulum ex ipsorum castigatione proficiant, aut justa in eos feratur judicii futuri sententia, cum in eisdem castigationibus justi quidem gratias egerint Deo, injusti autem blasphemaverint. Igitur cum in duas partes rerum dividatur opinio, quod alia per ordinem, alia contra ordinem fiant: ex his quidem quae secundum ordinem sunt, oportuit credi esse Providentiam; de his vero qua: contra ordinem geruntur, causas requirere ab his, qui eas per doctrinam propheticam didicere; quibus enim innotescere potuit sermo propheticus, sciunt quando et ob quam causam aerugo, grando, pestilentia, et horum similia per singulas quasque generationes exorta sint, et ex quibus peccatis haec ad vindictam data sint, unde humano generi causa tristitiae, unde gemitus ac dolores acciderint, unde etiam tremoris languor advenerit, et quod haec ab initio fuerit vindicta parricidii.
“But perhaps you will say: ‘What of the fact that in this common chastisement the impious and the pious suffer alike?’ It is true; we too confess it. But for the pious, chastisement turns to their progress, so that, afflicted in the present life, they may come more purified to the future life, in which perpetual rest is prepared for them; and at the same time, so that the impious may profit a little from their chastisement, or else the sentence of the future judgment may be justly passed on them, when in the same chastisements the just have given thanks to God and the unjust have blasphemed. Since, then, opinion about things is divided into two parts—that some things happen in order and others against order—from the things that are according to order one ought to have believed that there is Providence; but of the things done against order one ought to seek the causes from those who have learned them through prophetic teaching. For those to whom the prophetic word has been able to become known know when and for what cause mildew, hail, pestilence, and the like have arisen in each generation, and for what sins these have been given as punishment; whence the cause of sadness came to the human race, whence groans and griefs, whence also the weakness of trembling came, and that this was from the beginning the punishment of fratricide.
Gen 4:12 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Common calamities purify the pious and leave the impious without excuse, and the prophets reveal the sins that brought disorder, beginning with the trembling punishment of Cain.
- “The punishment of fratricide”: Cain's sentence, “groaning and trembling” in Gen 4:12 LXX.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): all'licti → afflicti; proticiant → proficiant; eaStigationibus → castigationibus.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.47 (PG 1:1393b–1394a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-47). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-47) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.48PG 1:1394a–1394b
Nam ab origine mundi nihil horum fuit, Sed ex impietate hominum initium mala ista sumpsere, et inde semper crescentibus iniquitatibus et malorum numerus crevit. Sed idcirco divina Providentia judicium erga omnes statuit, quia praesens saeculum non erat tale, in quo unusquisque possit pro meritis dispensari. Non ergo ex his, quae pro peccatis hominum mundo acciderunt malis, illa contemplanda sunt, quae ab initio cum nullae mali causae existerent, bene et ordinate instituta sunt. Denique ad indicium eorum quae ab initio fuere, inveniuntur nonnullae gentes alienae ab hujusmodi malis. Nam Seres quia caste vivunt, expertes habentur horum omnium, quia neque post conceptum adiri ultra apud eos feminam fas est, neque cum purgatur; carnibus ibi immundis nemo vescitur, sacrificia nemo novit, secundum justitiam omnes sibi ipsis judices fiunt. Idcirco igitur neque castigantur istis plagis quas supra diximus, et plurimum temporis in vita durantes, absque aegritudine finiunt vitam. Nos autem miseri, velut cum serpentibus pessimis habitantes, cum hominibus dico iniquis, perferimus necessario cum ipsis afflictionum plagas in hoc mundo, sed spem gerimus ex consolatione futurorum bonorum.
“For from the origin of the world there was nothing of these things; but these evils took their beginning from the impiety of men, and from then on, as iniquities always increased, the number of evils also grew. But divine Providence has appointed a judgment for all because the present age was not such that each could be dealt with according to his merits. So we must not, from the evils that have befallen the world because of men's sins, judge those things which from the beginning, when no cause of evil existed, were well and orderly established. Indeed, as a sign of what was from the beginning, some nations are found free from evils of this kind. For the Seres, because they live chastely, are held to be exempt from all these things; for among them it is not lawful for a woman to be approached after conception, nor while she is being purified. No one there eats unclean flesh, no one knows sacrifices; all become judges of themselves according to justice. Therefore they are not chastised by those plagues we spoke of above, and, living a very long time, they end their life without sickness. But we wretched ones, living as it were with the worst serpents—with wicked men, I mean—necessarily endure with them the plagues of afflictions in this world, but we bear hope from the consolation of the good things to come.
Ezek 2:6 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Evils entered the world through human sin, as shown by the chaste Seres, who keep purity laws and live long without disease, while believers suffer among the wicked in hope of what is to come.
- The Seres (a people of the Far East, the silk people) are idealized as living by purity laws (compare Bardesanes, Book of the Laws of Countries, which the Recognitions use in Book 9). Part of the sentence on their customs is garbled in the scan and is translated by sense. “Living with serpents” may echo Ezek 2:6.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin); stray mark): erevit → crevit; habemur δοΐυω omnium, qnia ηθίιυθ P05t → habentur horum omnium, quia neque post; neque ctrm purgatur → neque cum purgatur; absque agritudine → absque aegritudine; habitantes”, → habitantes,.
Topics: Marriage
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.48 (PG 1:1394a–1394b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-48). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-48) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.49PG 1:1394b
Si propter iniquitates, inquit senex, aliorum cruciantur etiam justi, oportuit Deum tanquam provisorem jubere hominibus, ut non facerent ea, ex quibus necesse esset cum injustis affligi etiam justos, aut si facerent emendationem aliquam, aut purificationem mundo adhiberent. Jussit, inquit Aquila, Deus haec et dedit praecepta per prophetas, quomodo homines vivere deberent; sed et haec contempserunt, imo vero et eos si qui forte observare cupiebant, diversis injuriis afflixerunt, donec etiam ipsos a proposita observatione dejicerent, et ad incredulitatis nihilominus verterent turbam sibique similes efficerent.
“If,” said the old man, “the just too are tormented because of the iniquities of others, God, as a provider, ought to have commanded men not to do the things from which the just must needs be afflicted along with the unjust; or, if they did them, he ought to have applied some correction or purification to the world.” “God did command these things,” said Aquila, “and gave precepts through the prophets about how men ought to live. But they despised these too; indeed, if any wished to keep them, they afflicted them with various injuries, until they cast even them down from the observance they had purposed, and turned them likewise to the crowd of unbelief and made them like themselves.
Notes and citation
Summary: To the objection that God should have forbidden the sins that harm the just, Aquila answers that he did, through the prophets, but men despised and persecuted those who obeyed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): amigi etiam → affligi etiam.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.49 (PG 1:1394b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-49). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-49) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.50PG 1:1394b–1395a
Propterea denique ab initio cum fuisset omnis terra maculata peccatis, Deus diluvium mundo induxit, quod vos sub Deucalione factum dicitis, et tunc unum quemdam justum cum filiis suis in arca reservavit, et cum eo omnium seminum omniumque animantium genus. Et tamen etiam qui ex ipsis nati sunt, tempore intercedente, rursus similia prioribus agunt; oblivioni enim quae acciderant data sunt. ita ut posteri ne hoc ipsum quidem crederent. quod diluvium factum est. Unde et statuit Deus in praesenti saeculo ultra non fieri diluvium, alioqui secundum rationem peccaturum necesse erat etiam per singulas generationes hoc fieri infidelitatis gratia; sed magis indulsit per singulas gentes angelos quosdam agere principatum qui malis gaudent, quibus tamen ea conditione potestas adversum unumquemque mortalium data est, si prius se ipse quis peccando eis fecisset obnoxium, donec adveniret ille qui bonis gaudet, et compleretur per ipsum numerus justorum, et per omnem mundum crescente multitudine piorum, aliqua ex parte reprimeretur impietas et innotesceret omnibus, quia omne quod bonum est a Deo fit.
“For this reason, indeed, when in the beginning the whole earth had been stained with sins, God brought a flood on the world—which you say happened under Deucalion—and then preserved one righteous man with his sons in an ark, and with him the kind of all seeds and all living things. Yet even those who were born of them, as time went on, again did the same things as those before; for what had happened was given over to forgetfulness, so that their descendants did not even believe that a flood had happened. Hence God decreed that in the present age there should be no more flood; otherwise, by the logic of those who would sin, it would have had to happen in every generation because of unbelief. Rather, he allowed certain angels who rejoice in evil to exercise rule over each nation; yet power was given them over each mortal only on this condition, that he had first made himself liable to them by sinning; until he should come who rejoices in the good, and the number of the righteous should be completed through him, and as the multitude of the pious grew throughout the world, impiety might be checked in some measure and it might become known to all that everything good is done by God.
Gen 6:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 9:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 32:8 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: After the flood, which pagans call Deucalion's, God promised no more floods but set evil angels over the nations with power only over those who sin, until the coming of the one who rejoices in good.
- Gen 6–9; Gen 9:11. The angels set over the nations: Deut 32:8 LXX. “He who rejoices in the good” is Christ (compare 8.52, 8.54).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): etcum eo → et cum eo; qui bouis gaudet → qui bonis gaudet.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.50 (PG 1:1394b–1395a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-50). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-50) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.51PG 1:1395a
Ex arbitrii autem libertate unusquisque hominum dum incredulus est de futuris, per malos actus incurrit in mala. Et haec sunt quae videntur in mundo contra ordinem geri, quibus causas, ut essent, infidelitas dedit. Miranda igitur per omnia est divina Providentia dispensatio. qua his qui initio fuerint, bonam quidem viam vita incedentibus, bonis incorruptibilibus dedit perfrui; ubi vero peccaverunt [mali originem peccato pariente sumpserunt], et unicuique bono quasi quodam conjugii foedere ex parte peccati sociatum est malum, quoniam quidem humano sanguine terra polluta est, et ara damonibus succensa. aerem quoque ipsum incesto sacrificiorum fumo temerarunt, et ita demum corrupta prius elementa hominibus corruptela vitium, velut radices ramis ac fructibus tradiderunt.
“By freedom of choice each man, while he does not believe in what is to come, falls into evils through evil acts. And these are the things that seem to be done in the world against order, whose causes for existing unbelief has given. Wonderful, then, in every way is the dispensation of divine Providence, which gave to those who were in the beginning, as they walked the good way of life, to enjoy incorruptible goods. But when they sinned (evils took their origin, sin giving them birth), and to each good, as by a kind of marriage bond, evil was joined on the side of sin; since the earth was polluted with human blood and altars were kindled for demons, and they defiled the very air with the unholy smoke of sacrifices. And so at last the elements, first corrupted, passed on the vice of corruption to men, as roots to branches and fruits.
Notes and citation
Summary: Disorder in the world comes from unbelief and sin: when humans shed blood and sacrificed to demons, the elements were corrupted and passed that corruption on to them.
- The words in round brackets are in square brackets in the edition, which marks them as doubtful. A line of stray marks in the scan has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR, stray marks): Et hac sunt qua videntur ν, ------- π- ---- η--- γ.....--..-_. in mundo → Et haec sunt quae videntur in mundo; Miraucla igitur → Miranda igitur; suinpserunt J, → sumpserunt],; temerarnnt → temerarunt.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.51 (PG 1:1395a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-51). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-51) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.52PG 1:1395a
Vide ergo in hoc, ut dixi. quam juste vitiatis rebus Providentia divina succurrit, ut quoniam bonis Dei, mala quae ex peccato originem sumpserant sociata sunt, duabus his partibus duos principes poneret. et ei qui bonis gaudet bonorum ordinem, qui ad fidem providentia sua credentes adduceret, statuit, ei vero qui malis gaudet, ea quae contra ordinem et inutiliter geruntur, ex quibus sine dubio etiam providentia fides in dubium veniat; et habita est per hoc a justo Deo justa divisio. Hinc ergo est, quod cum ordinatus astrorum cursus fidem faciat manu artificis conditum mundum, rursum conturbatio aeris, aura pestilens, fulminum vagi ignes, Providentia opus refellant. Habent enim, ut diximus, singula quaque bona. contraria et conjuncta sibi mala, ut fecundis imbribus grando inimica est, ut rori placido rubiginis est sociata corruptio, ut ventis lenibus procellarum turbines juncti sunt, fructuosis arboribus infructuosa, herbis utilibus noxia, animalibus mitibus fera et perniciosa connexa sunt. Haec autem omnia posita sunt a Deo, pro eo quod hominibus voluntas arbitrii a bonorum proposito discessit et declinavit ad mala.
“See, then, in this, as I said, how justly divine Providence came to the aid of things that had been corrupted. Since evils that had taken their origin from sin had been joined to the good things of God, it set two princes over these two parts. To him who rejoices in good things it assigned the order of good things, that he might lead believers to faith in its providence; to him who rejoices in evils, the things done against order and uselessly, by which without doubt faith in providence also comes into doubt. And by this a just division was made by the just God. Hence it is that, while the ordered course of the stars makes one believe that the world was founded by a craftsman's hand, again the disturbance of the air, the pestilent breeze, the wandering fires of lightning, seem to refute the work of Providence. For, as we said, each good thing has evils contrary and joined to it: as hail is the enemy of fertile rains, as the corruption of mildew is joined to the gentle dew, as whirlwinds of storms are joined to gentle winds, unfruitful trees to fruitful, harmful herbs to useful, savage and destructive animals to gentle ones. All these things were set by God because the will of men's free choice departed from the purpose of good things and turned aside to evils.
Notes and citation
Summary: God appointed two princes, one over the ordered good and one over disorder and evil, so that every good thing in nature has an opposing evil since human will turned to wickedness.
- The doctrine of two princes, of good and of evil, is characteristic of the Pseudo-Clementines (compare Homilies 15.7, 20.2–3); translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): vitiatis rcbus → vitiatis rebus; mala qua ex peccato → mala quae ex peccato; ea qua contra ordinem → ea quae contra ordinem; veutis lenibus → ventis lenibus.
Extrabiblical texts: Ps.-Clem. Hom. 20.2–3 (Homilies; echo)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.52 (PG 1:1395a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-52). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-52) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.53PG 1:1395a–1396a
Igitur in omnibus mundi rebus habetur ista divisio, et sicut sunt pii, ita et impii, ut sunt propheta, ita et falsi propheta; sed et apud gentiles sunt philosophi, sunt et falsi philosophi; Judaorum quoque circumcisionem Arabica gentes aliaque plurima ad ministerium sua impietatis imitati sunt. Sic et divino cultui est contrarius daemonum cultus, et baptismo baptismus, et legi leges, et apostolis pseudoapostoli, et doctoribus falsi doctores. Et inde est unde apud philosophos alii asserunt providentiam, alii negant, alii unum Deum, alii Plures defendunt. Usque ad hoc res denique accessit, ut cum verbo Dei fugentur daemones, per quod esse Providentia declaratur, invenerit ars magica ad infidelitatem confirmandam, quomodo etiam hoc ex contrariis imitetur. Sic serpentum venena mitigare carminibus inventum, et verbo ac potestati Dei contrarias inducere sanitates. Angelis quoque Dei contraria reperit ars magica ministeria, animarum suscitationes contra hac et figmenta damonum ponens. Et ne multa enumerando sermonem longius traham, nihil omnino est quod fidem Providentia faciat, et non habeat econtrario aliud ad infidelitatem paratum; et ideo qui ignorant istam divisionem rerum, pro his qua a semetipsis discordant in mundo, non putant esse Providentiam. Sed tu, Pater, quasi vir sapiens ex ista divisione elige partem, quae ordinem servat et fidem providentia facit, et non solum sequaris illam partem, qua contra ordinem currit et Providentia derogat fidem
“So in all the things of the world this division holds; and as there are pious, so there are impious; as there are prophets, so also false prophets. Among the Gentiles too there are philosophers, and there are also false philosophers. The Arab nations and very many others have imitated the circumcision of the Jews for the service of their impiety. So too the worship of demons is contrary to divine worship, baptism to baptism, laws to the law, false apostles to apostles, and false teachers to teachers. And this is why among philosophers some assert providence, others deny it; some defend one God, others many. Indeed the matter has come to this, that since demons are put to flight by the word of God, by which it is declared that there is Providence, the magic art, to confirm unbelief, has found how to imitate even this from the contrary side. So it was invented to soothe the venom of serpents by incantations, and to bring in cures contrary to the word and power of God. The magic art has also found ministries contrary to the angels of God, setting against them the raising of souls and the figments of demons. And not to drag out the discourse by listing many things: there is absolutely nothing that produces faith in Providence that does not have, on the contrary side, something else ready for unbelief. And so those who do not know this division of things do not think there is Providence, because of the things in the world that are at odds with themselves. But you, father, as a wise man, choose from this division the part that keeps order and produces faith in providence, and do not follow only that part which runs against order and takes away faith in Providence.”
2 Cor 11:13 (echo, medium confidence) · 2 Pet 2:1 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Every good has its counterfeit—false prophets, false philosophers, imitated circumcision, rival baptisms, magic healing and necromancy—so the old man should choose the side of order that proves providence.
- The doctrine of pairs (syzygies), good and counterfeit, is characteristic of the Pseudo-Clementines (compare Homilies 2.15–18).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): damonqu cultus → daemonum cultus; baptismus, ct legi → baptismus, et legi; Et ue multa → Et ne multa.
Extrabiblical texts: Ps.-Clem. Hom. 2.15–18 (Homilies; echo)
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.53 (PG 1:1395a–1396a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-53). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-53) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.54PG 1:1396a
Ad hac senex respondit: Da mihi viam, fili, qua possim ex duobus istis ordinibus, quorum alter asserit, alter refutat Providentiam, unum aliquem in meis sensibus confirmare. Rectum, inquit Aquila, habenti judicium facile discrimen est: nam et hoc ipsum quod ais, ordo et inordinatio, ab artifice fieri potest, a natura vero insensibili non potest; nam verbi gratia ponamus de excelsa rupe abruptum saxum in praeceps ferri, idque illisum solo in multa fragmenta comminui, nunquid evenire ullo modo potest, ut in illa multitudine fragmentorum inveniatur unum saltem fragmentum, in quo perfecta aliqua species per omnia habeatur ac forma? Et senex respondit: Non potest. Quod si adsit, inquit Aquila, signorum artifex, excisum de monte saxum manu artifici et sensu rationabili formare in quam velit speciem potest. Et senex: Verum, inquit, istud est. Ergo, ait Aquila, ubi sensus non est rationabilis, nulla species ex integro formari potest, ubi autem sensus est artifex, ibi et forma et informitas esse potest: verbi gratia, si excidat e monte saxum artifex cui formam velit imponere, necesse est ut id primo informe cadat et barbarum, tum deinde paulatim excudens et ad libram sua artis exsculpens, exprimat formam quam mente conceperit. Ita ergo ex informitate vel deformitate, artificis manu pervenitur ad formam, et utrumque ab artifice procedit; simili igitur modo et ea qua in mundo geruntur, per artificis providentiam fiunt, etiamsi minus ordinata videantur. Et ideo quia tibi duae istae innotuerunt viae, earumque accepisti divisiones, fuge infidelitatis viam, ne forte perducat te ad illum principem qui malis gaudet, sequere fidei viam, ut pervenire possis ad regem illum qui bonis hominibus gaudet.
To this the old man answered: “Give me a way, my son, by which I can confirm in my mind one of these two orders, of which one asserts and the other refutes Providence.” “For one who has right judgment,” said Aquila, “the distinction is easy. For this very thing you speak of, order and disorder, can be produced by a craftsman, but cannot be produced by insensible nature. For example, let us suppose that a stone broken off from a high rock is carried down headlong and, dashed on the ground, is shattered into many fragments; can it happen in any way that in that multitude of fragments there is found even one fragment in which some perfect shape and form is had in every respect?” The old man answered: “It cannot.” “But if,” said Aquila, “a maker of statues is present, he can form a stone cut from the mountain into whatever shape he wishes by a craftsman's hand and rational intelligence.” The old man said: “That is true.” “So,” said Aquila, “where there is no rational intelligence, no form can be wholly formed; but where there is a craftsman's intelligence, there can be both form and formlessness. For example, if a craftsman cuts from the mountain a stone to which he wishes to give a form, it must first fall shapeless and rough; then, gradually hewing it and carving it to the measure of his art, he expresses the form he has conceived in his mind. So from formlessness or deformity one comes to form by the craftsman's hand, and both proceed from the craftsman. In a similar way, then, the things done in the world are done by the providence of the craftsman, even if they seem less ordered. And therefore, since these two ways have become known to you and you have received their divisions, flee the way of unbelief, lest it lead you to that prince who rejoices in evils; follow the way of faith, so that you may reach that King who rejoices in good men.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila argues that only a craftsman can produce both form and formlessness, as a sculptor's rough stone becomes a statue, so the world's apparent disorder also belongs to providence.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): in praceps → in praeceps; ac forma’ Et → ac forma? Et; lta ergo → Ita ergo; dua ista innotueruut via → duae istae innotuerunt viae.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.54 (PG 1:1396a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-54). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-54) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.55PG 1:1396a–1397b
Ad hac senex respondit: Cur autem et princeps ille qui malis gaudet factus est, et unde factus est aut non est factus? Aquila ait: Alterius temporis est iste tractatus; verum ne expers abeas etiam hujus responsionis, pauca tibi de hoc quoque insinuabo. Praescius omnium Deus ante constitutionem mundi, sciens quia futuri homines, alii quidem ad bona, alii vero ad contraria declinabunt, eos qui bona elegerint, suo principatui et sua cura sociavit atque hareditatem sibi eos propriam nominavit; eos vero qui ad mala declinarint, angelis regendos permisit his qui non per substantiam, sed per oppositum cum Deo permanere noluerunt invidia et superbia vitio corrupti; dignos ergo dignorum principes fecit. Ita tamen eos tradidit, ut non habeant potestatem in eos faciendi quod volunt, nisi statutum sibi ab initio terminum transeant. Hic est autem statutus terminus, ut nisi quis prius fecerit damonum voluntatem, damones in eo non habeant potestatem.
To this the old man answered: “But why was that prince who rejoices in evils made, and from where was he made, or was he not made?” Aquila said: “That treatise belongs to another time; but so that you may not go away without any answer to this, I will suggest a few things to you on it too. God, foreknowing all things before the foundation of the world, knowing that of future men some would turn aside to good and others to the contrary, joined those who would choose good to his own rule and care, and named them his own inheritance; but those who would turn aside to evil he permitted to be ruled by those angels who, not by substance but by choice, refused to remain with God, corrupted by the vice of envy and pride. So he made the worthy rulers of the worthy. Yet he so handed them over that they have no power to do what they wish to them unless they cross the boundary set for them from the beginning. And this is the boundary set: that unless someone has first done the will of the demons, the demons have no power over him.”
Deut 32:9 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God, foreknowing human choices, kept the good as his inheritance and gave the wicked to be ruled by angels who fell by choice, though they have power only over those who first obey them.
- Deut 32:8–9 (the Lord's portion and inheritance).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin); stray marks): factus εει, et → factus est, et; nominavit ‘°;reos vero → nominavit; eos vero; tradiditiut non habeant paestatem → tradidit, ut non habeant potestatem.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.55 (PG 1:1396a–1397b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-55). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-55) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.56PG 1:1397b–1397d
Et senex ait: Magnifice prosecutus es, fili; superest nunc ut dicas unde est substantia mali; si enim a Deo facta est, fructus malus radicem culpabilem docet, videtur enim et ipsa mala natura: si vero coaeterna fuit haec substantia Deo, quomodo potest quod aqualiter ingenitum et coaeternum est, alteri esse subjectum? Non semper fuit, inquit Aquila; sed neque si ex Deo facta est, continuo necesse est etiam conditorem ejus talem videri, quale est illud quod ab eo factum est. Nam substantias quidem Deus fecit omnium, sed si rationabilis mens quae a Deo facta est, nequaquam conditoris sui legibus acquiescit, et modum statuta sibi temperantia excedit, quid hoc ad conditorem spectat? Vel si aliqua est ratio haec superior, ignoramus; neque enim de singulis ad perfectum scire possumus, et de his praecipue pro quibus non sumus judicandi, cur ignoremus. Ea vero pro quibus judicandi sumus, facillima sunt ad intelligendum, et pene uno sermone absolvuntur. Omnis enim propemodum actuum nostrorum in eo colligitur observantia, ut quod ipsi pati nolumus, ne hoc aliis inferamus; sicut enim ipse occidi non vis, caveas oportet ne alium occidas; et sicut tuum non vis violari matrimonium, nec tu alterius macules torum; furtum pati non vis, nec ipse facias; et intra hanc regulam humanorum gestorum singula quaque concurrunt.
The old man said: “You have argued magnificently, my son. It remains now for you to say where the substance of evil comes from. For if it was made by God, the evil fruit shows a culpable root, for the nature itself seems evil; but if this substance was coeternal with God, how can what is equally unbegotten and coeternal be subject to the other?” “It did not always exist,” said Aquila. “But even if it was made from God, it does not at once follow that its founder should seem to be of the same kind as what was made by him. For God made the substances of all things; but if a rational mind made by God does not acquiesce in its founder's laws and exceeds the measure of the temperance set for it, what has this to do with the founder? Or if there is some reason higher than this, we do not know it. For we cannot know everything perfectly, especially about things for which we shall not be judged if we are ignorant of them. But the things for which we shall be judged are very easy to understand and are settled almost in one sentence. For almost the whole observance of our actions is summed up in this: that what we ourselves do not wish to suffer, we should not inflict on others. For as you do not wish to be killed yourself, you must take care not to kill another; and as you do not wish your marriage to be violated, do not you defile another's bed; you do not wish to suffer theft, do not commit it yourself. And within this rule each and every human action falls.”
Matt 7:12 (echo, medium confidence) · Exod 20:14 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Evil did not always exist and comes from rational creatures who exceed God's laws, not from God; what we will be judged on is simply not doing to others what we would not suffer.
- The negative Golden Rule (Tob 4:15; compare Matt 7:12) applied to murder, adultery, and theft (Exod 20:13–15).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): prosecutus es, illi; → prosecutus es, fili;; coaterna fuit hac substantia → coaeterna fuit haec substantia; mens qua a Deo → mens quae a Deo; ratio hac superior → ratio haec superior; neque enin → neque enim.
Extrabiblical texts: Tob 4:15 (Tobit [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; echo)
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.56 (PG 1:1397b–1397d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-56). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-56) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.57PG 1:1397d–1398a
Tum senex: Ne aegre, inquit, accipias, fili, quod dicturus sum; sermones tui quamvis validi sint, non possunt tamen flectere me ut credam fieri aliquid posse extra genesim. Scio enim omnia mihi necessitate genesis accidisse, et ideo suaderi mihi non potest, quia vel bene vel male agere in nostra potestate sit; et si actus nostros in potestate non habemus, non potest credi futurum esse judicium, per quod vel malis poena vel bonis praemia tribuantur. Denique quoniam te imbutum video in hujuscemodi disciplinis, pauca tibi ex ipsa arte proferam. Si, inquit Aquila, ex ipsa disciplina astruere aliquid cupis, frater meus Clemens tibi diligentius respondebit, qui plenius scientiam mathesis attigit; ego enim aliis viis asserere possum, quod actus nostri in nostra sint positi potestate, ista autem quae non didici, praesumere non debeo.
Then the old man said: “Do not take it ill, my son, what I am about to say: your words, though they are strong, cannot bend me to believe that anything can happen outside birth-fate. For I know that everything has happened to me by the necessity of birth-fate; and so I cannot be persuaded that it is in our power to act either well or badly. And if we do not have our actions in our power, it cannot be believed that there will be a judgment through which punishment is given to the evil or rewards to the good. Since I see that you are trained in disciplines of this kind, I will bring forward a few things to you from the art itself.” “If,” said Aquila, “you wish to build something from that discipline, my brother Clement will answer you more carefully, since he has gained a fuller knowledge of astrology. I can assert by other ways that our actions are placed in our power; but the things I have not learned I ought not to presume.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man insists that his own life proves all is governed by birth-fate, leaving no free will or judgment, and Aquila defers the astrological argument to Clement.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): Ne agre, inquit → Ne aegre, inquit; genesrs accidisse.et → genesis accidisse, et; poteState → potestate; malis pana → malis poena; asserere possunt → asserere possum; ista autem qua non didici, prasumere → ista autem quae non didici, praesumere.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.57 (PG 1:1397d–1398a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-57). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-57) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.58PG 1:1398b
Cum haec Aquila dixisset, ego Clemens: Crastino, inquam, dices, Pater, ut voles. et audiemus libenter, nam et te puto grate habiturum, quod cum his tibi erit sermo, qui expertes non sunt ejus quam protuleris disciplina. Cum ergo placuisset inter me et senem, ut sequenti die disputatio nobis de ratione genesis haberetur, utrum omnia ex ea fierent, an esset aliquid in nobis, quod non genesis sed animi judicium gereret, Petrus surrexit et sermonem facere hoc modo coepit: Mirum mihi admodum est, quod res quae facile inveniri possunt, homines exquisitis cogitationibus ac verbis difficiles faciunt, et hi maxime qui videntur sibi sapientes, quique volentes Dei voluntatem comprehendere, quasi homine utuntur Deo, imo et si quid minus; nam hominis consilium vel sensum scire nemo potest, nisi ipse prodat qui cogitaverit, sed neque artem quis discere potest, nisi multo tempore a magistro fuerit imbutus; quanto magis invisibilis et incomprehensibilis Dei neque sensum neque Opus scire quis potest, nisi ipse mittat prophetam, qui enarret consilium suum et viam conditionis exponat, in quantum discere hominibus fas est. Unde ridiculum puto, cum naturalibus viis de virtute Dei homines judicant, et putant hoc quidem ei esse possibile, illud vero impossibile, aut hoc majus, illud minus, ignari omnium, qui cum sint homines injusti, judicant Deum justum, artificem imperiti, incorruptibilem corrupti, factura factorem.
When Aquila had said this, I, Clement, said: “Tomorrow, father, you shall speak as you wish, and we will listen gladly; for I think you too will be pleased that you will be speaking with those who are not without experience of the discipline you have put forward.” So when it had been agreed between me and the old man that on the following day we would hold a discussion about the theory of birth-fate—whether everything happens by it, or whether there is something in us which not birth-fate but the judgment of the mind directs—Peter rose and began to speak in this way: “It is very surprising to me that men, by elaborate thoughts and words, make difficult things that can easily be found—and especially those who think themselves wise, who, wishing to comprehend the will of God, treat God as if he were a man, or even something less. For no one can know a man's counsel or thought unless he who thought it reveals it; nor can anyone learn an art unless he has been trained for a long time by a master. How much more can no one know either the mind or the work of the invisible and incomprehensible God, unless he himself sends a prophet to tell his counsel and set out the way of creation, as far as it is lawful for men to learn it. Hence I think it ridiculous when men judge the power of God by natural ways, and think this possible for him and that impossible, or this greater and that less—ignorant of everything—who, being unjust men, judge the just God; unskilled, the craftsman; corrupt, the incorruptible; the work, its maker.
1 Cor 2:11 (echo, medium confidence) · Rom 9:20 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement agrees to debate birth-fate the next day, and Peter teaches that God's mind and works can be known only through a prophet he sends, not by human speculation.
- 1 Cor 2:11; Rom 9:20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): , Cum hac Aquila → Cum haec Aquila; capit: Mirum → coepit: Mirum; res qua facile → res quae facile; dilliciles faciunt, ct hi → difficiles faciunt, et hi.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.58 (PG 1:1398b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-58). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-58) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.59PG 1:1398d–1399b
Et nolo putetis, quia hac dicens judicandi de rebus perimo facultatem, sed consilium do ne per devia quis incedens, sine fine incurrat errores. Et ideo non solum sapientibus, sed et omnibus hominibus qui desiderium gerunt agnoscendi quod sibi expedit, suadeo ut requirant verum Prophetam, quia ipse solus est, qui novit omnia, et scit quid et quomodo unusquisque quaerat. Inest enim intra uniuscujusque nostrum mentem, sed in illis quidem, qui desiderium Dei agnitionis et justitia: ejus nullum gerunt, otiatur, in his vero qui quod anima: sua: expedit quaerunt, operatur et scientiae lumen accendit. Propter quod primo omnium hunc requirite, quem si non inveneritis, ab alio vos agnituros aliquid non speretis. Invenitur autem cito ab his qui veritatis amore perquirunt, et quorum anima praeoccupata non tenetur in malitia. Adest enim his qui eum in innocentia spiritus sui desiderant, qui per patientiam sustinent, et suspiria de profundo cordis veritatis amore producunt; fugit autem malevolas mentes, quia ut propheta cognoscit cogitationes uniuscujusque. Et ideo nemo putet eum per prudentiam suam invenire posse, nisi, ut supra diximus, mentem suam omni nequitia vacuam effecerit, atque agnitionis ejus desiderium purum et fidele conceperit. Ubi enim talem se quis praeparaverit, ipse ut propheta, videns praeparatam mentem sponte se adhibet ad agnoscendum.
“And I do not want you to think that in saying this I am destroying the ability to judge about things; rather, I give counsel that no one, walking by byways, should run into errors without end. And therefore I urge not only the wise but all men who have the desire to know what is profitable for them to seek the true Prophet, because he alone knows all things and knows what and how each one seeks. For he is within the mind of each one of us; but in those who have no desire for the knowledge of God and his righteousness he is idle, while in those who seek what is profitable for their soul he works and kindles the light of knowledge. Therefore seek him first of all; and if you do not find him, do not hope to learn anything from another. He is quickly found by those who search for him with love of truth, and whose soul is not preoccupied and held in wickedness. For he is present to those who desire him in the innocence of their spirit, who wait with patience and bring forth sighs from the depth of the heart out of love of truth; but he flees malevolent minds, because as a prophet he knows the thoughts of each. And so let no one think that he can find him by his own prudence, unless, as we said above, he has made his mind empty of all wickedness and has conceived a pure and faithful desire for knowledge of him. For when someone has prepared himself so, he, as a prophet, seeing the mind prepared, offers himself of his own accord to be known.
Matt 7:7 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter urges all to seek the true Prophet, who dwells within each mind but works only in those who seek him with a pure and patient desire for truth.
- “Flees malevolent minds” echoes Wis 1:4–5.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join; stray mark): quisincedens → quis incedens; h0minibus → hominibus; qurerat.‘ → quaerat.; Operatur ct scientia: → operatur et scientiae; Pr0pter quod → Propter quod; pra:occupata → praeoccupata; malevolas mentes“, → malevolas mentes,; prteparaverit → praeparaverit.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 1:4–5 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; echo)
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.59 (PG 1:1398d–1399b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-59). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-59) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.60PG 1:1399b–1400a
Si quis igitur vult omnia discere, non per singula discutiens; neque enim poterit, cum sit mortalis, Dei investigare consilium et ipsam immensitatem perscrutari: sed si discere, ut diximus, omnia desiderat, verum prophetam requirat. Quem cum invenerit, non quaestionibus et disputationibus neque argumentis cum eo agat, sed si quid responderit, si quid pronuntiaverit, hoc certum esse non potest dubitari. Et ideo quaeratur verus propheta ante omnia, et ejus verba teneantur; in quibus illud tantummodo discutiendum unicuique est, ut satisfaciat sibi si vere prophetica ejus verba sunt, id est, si indubitatam fidem continent futurorum, si tempora definita consignant, si rerum ordinem servant, si non quae prima sunt, novissima, et quae in novissimis gesta sunt, prima narrarunt, si nihil versutum, nihil magica arte ad decipiendum compositum continent, aut si non quae aliis revelata sunt, ad se transtulerit admistis mendaciis. Et cum his omnibus recto judicio discussis, verba constiterit esse prophetica, ita demum credi eis de omnibus quibus dixerint et responderint, debet.
“If, then, someone wishes to learn all things, let him not do so by discussing each; for he will not be able, being mortal, to search out the counsel of God and explore his very immensity. But if he desires, as we said, to learn all things, let him seek the true Prophet. When he has found him, let him not deal with him by questions and disputations and arguments; but whatever he answers, whatever he declares, this cannot be doubted to be certain. And therefore let the true Prophet be sought before all things, and his words be held. In them each one need only examine this, so as to satisfy himself whether his words are truly prophetic: that is, whether they contain undoubted faith about things to come, whether they mark out fixed times, whether they keep the order of things, whether they have not narrated as last what is first and as first what was done last, whether they contain nothing crafty, nothing composed by magic art to deceive, or whether he has not transferred to himself, with lies mixed in, what was revealed to others. And when, all these things having been examined with right judgment, the words are established to be prophetic, then at last he ought to be believed in everything he has said and answered.
Deut 18:22 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Rather than disputing, one should find the true Prophet and test whether his words are truly prophetic, then trust him in everything.
- A line of stray marks in the scan has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; stray marks): irrmensitatem → immensitatem; ut dixi. mus → ut diximus; non quastionibus → non quaestionibus; quzeratur → quaeratur; quas in novissimis → quae in novissimis; non quas aliis → non quae aliis; ita de-...__._______________,_____________________________, mum → ita demum; responderiut → responderint.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.60 (PG 1:1399b–1400a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-60). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-60) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.61PG 1:1400a–1400b
Etenim consideremus diligentius opus divina: Providentiae. Nam quod philosophi introduxerunt verba subtilia quaedam et difficilia, ita ut ne ipsa quidem vocabula sermonum nota esse omnibus possent et intelligibilia, Deus eos qui sibi artifices verborum videbantur, per omnia imperitos erga agnitionem veritatis ostendit. Simplex enim est et manifesta ac brevis rerum scientia, quae per verum prophetam traditur, quam isti per devia incedentes et scrupeas verborum difficultates, tota ignoraverunt via. Igitur verecundis et simplicibus mentibus, cum viderint fieri quae pradicta sunt, satis abundeque sufficit, ut de certissima praescientia certissimam scientiam capiant, et de caetero requiescant evidenti agnitione veritatis assumpta; cattera omnia aestimatione tractantur, in quibus firmum nihil esse potest. Quis enim sermo est, qui non recipiat contradictionem? et quae argumentatio est. quae non possit alia argumentatione subverti? Et inde est quod ad nullum finem scientiae et agnitionis per hujusmodi disputationem pervenire homines possunt, priusque finem vitae inveniunt quam qua’stionum.
“For let us consider more carefully the work of divine Providence. Since the philosophers introduced certain subtle and difficult words, so that not even the very terms of their discourses could be known and intelligible to all, God showed those who thought themselves craftsmen of words to be in every way unskilled in the knowledge of the truth. For the knowledge of things which is handed down by the true Prophet is simple, plain, and brief; and they, walking by byways and the rough difficulties of words, have not known it at all. So for modest and simple minds, when they see happen what was foretold, it is enough and more than enough that they should take the most certain knowledge from the most certain foreknowledge, and thereafter rest, having taken up an evident knowledge of the truth. All other things are handled by conjecture, in which nothing can be firm. For what statement is there that does not admit contradiction? And what argument is there that cannot be overturned by another argument? And that is why men can reach no end of knowledge and understanding by disputation of this kind, and they find the end of life sooner than the end of their questions.
1 Cor 1:20 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The philosophers' subtle words lead nowhere, while the true Prophet's simple knowledge, proved by fulfilled prophecy, gives certainty.
- 1 Cor 1:19–20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): utne ipsa → ut ne ipsa; difiicultatcs,.ota → difficultates, tota; simplicbus → simplicibus; subvertilEt → subverti? Et; scentiaa → scientiae; bomines → homines.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.61 (PG 1:1400a–1400b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-61). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-61) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
8.62PG 1:1400b
Et ideo cum in his omnia habeantur incerta, ad verum prophetam veniendum est, quem Deus Pater volens ab omnibus diligi, haec quae homines induxerunt, in quibus nihil potest apprehendi, voluit penitus exstinguere, ut eo magis iste quaereretur, et quem illi occluserant, hic hominibus viam veritatis aperiret. Propter hunc enim Deus etiam mundum fecit et ab ipso mundus repletur, unde et quaerentibus se adest ubique, etiamsi in ultimis terra: finibus quaeratur. Si vero non puro eum quis nec sancte neque fideliter quaerat, intra ipsum quidem est, quia ubique est et intra sensus omnium invenitur; sed, ut supra diximus, infidelibus dormit et absens habetur his, a quibus esse non creditur. Cumque hac et alia hujusmodi Petrus de vero propheta prosecutus esset, turbas dimisit, senem vero cum rogasset plurimum permanere nobiscum, obtinere non potuit, sed et ipse discessit. alia die sicut placuerat rediturus. Et post haec nos una cum Petro ingressi hospitium, cibo et quiete solito utimur.
“And therefore, since in these things everything is held uncertain, one must come to the true Prophet. God the Father, wishing him to be loved by all, willed wholly to extinguish these things that men have introduced, in which nothing can be grasped, so that he might be sought all the more, and that he might open to men the way of truth which they had shut. For on his account God also made the world, and by him the world is filled; hence he is present everywhere to those who seek him, even if they are at the furthest ends of the earth. But if someone does not seek him purely, holily, and faithfully, he is indeed within him, since he is everywhere and is found within the minds of all; but, as we said above, he sleeps for the unbelieving and is held absent by those by whom he is not believed to exist.” When Peter had set out these and other such things about the true Prophet, he dismissed the crowds. When he had asked the old man earnestly to stay with us, he could not prevail; the old man also left, to return on another day as had been agreed. After this we went into the lodging with Peter and took food and rest as usual.
Col 1:16 (echo, medium confidence) · Acts 17:27 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God made the world for the true Prophet, who is present everywhere to those who seek him but asleep to unbelievers; the old man declines to stay and leaves until the next day.
- Col 1:16; Eph 1:23, 4:10; Acts 17:27.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; book heading of the edition in the text): ab onmibus → ab omnibus; hac quae homines → haec quae homines; quareretur → quaereretur; obclnserant → occluserant; rep|etur → repletur; finibus quantm → finibus quaeratur; sed, It supra → sed, ut supra; prosewtus → prosecutus; nohiscum → nobiscum; NONUS. → .
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 8.62 (PG 1:1400b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-8-62). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-8-62) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
Chapter 9
9.1PG 1:1399b–1401b
Sequenti die Petrus una nobiscum mature ad locum, in quo pridie habita fuerat disputatio, properavit, atque ibi cum plurimas jam ad audiendum convenisse turbas et senem cum eis videret, ait ad eum: Hesterna die, o senex, cum Clemente placuerat ut hodie sermo fieret, et aut tu ostenderes nihil extra genesim fieri, aut Clemens doceret genesim non esse [sed in nobis et in nostra potestate haberi quae gerimus]. Ad haec senex respondit: quid placuerit memini, et tua verba teneo quae post pactiones locutus es, quibus docuisti impossibile esse homini scire aliquid, nisi a vero Propheta didicerit. Et Petrus: Nescis, inquit, quomodo dixerim, sed nunc te ego commonebo, de voluntate dixi et consilio Dei, quam habuit priusquam mundus esset, et quo consilio fecerit mundum, tempora statuerit, legem dederit, iustis ad bonorum remunerationem futurum saeculum promiserit, iniustis poenas ex iudicii sententia statuerit; hoc ego dixi consilium, et hanc voluntatem Dei ab hominibus inveniri non posse, quia nemo hominum potest sensum Dei coniecturis et aestimatione colligere, nisi propheta ab eo missus enuntiet. Non ergo de quibuscunque disciplinis aut studiis dixi, quia inveniri sine propheta aut sciri non possint; quippe qui sciam et artificia et disciplinas sciri et exerceri ab hominibus, quas non a vero propheta, sed a magistris hominibus didicerint.
On the following day Peter hurried early with us to the place where the discussion had been held the day before; and there, seeing that very great crowds had already gathered to listen and the old man with them, he said to him: “Yesterday, old man, it was agreed with Clement that the discussion should take place today, and that either you should show that nothing happens outside birth-fate, or Clement should teach that there is no birth-fate (but that what we do is in us and in our power).” To this the old man answered: “I remember what was agreed, and I hold the words you spoke after the agreement, in which you taught that it is impossible for a man to know anything unless he has learned it from the true Prophet.” Peter said: “You do not know how I said it; but now I will remind you. I spoke of the will and counsel of God, which he had before the world was, and by what counsel he made the world, appointed times, gave the law, promised the age to come to the just as the reward of good things, and appointed punishments for the unjust by the sentence of judgment. This counsel and this will of God, I said, cannot be found out by men, because no man can gather the mind of God by conjectures and estimation unless a prophet sent by him announces it. I did not say, then, that any disciplines or studies whatever cannot be found or known without a prophet; for I know that arts and disciplines are known and practiced by men, which they have learned not from the true Prophet but from human teachers.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter clarifies that only God's own counsel, not ordinary arts and sciences, requires the true Prophet to be known.
- The words in round brackets are in square brackets in the edition, which marks them as doubtful. An editor's note printed in the text has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; editor's note leaked into the text): potcsute → potestate; verba teneo qua post pactiones locutus es", → verba teneo quae post pactiones locutus es,; a vero Pro. usquead cap. med. sequuntur, sic leaitur: Luttpoeta didicerit → a vero Propheta didicerit; futuram sarculum → futurum saeculum; iniustis ptenas → iniustis poenas; sine prOpheta → sine propheta; artiticia → artificia.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.1 (PG 1:1399b–1401b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
9.2PG 1:1401b
Quoniam ergo te professus es gnarum esse positionis siderum et stellarum cursus, ex quibus convinceres Clementem quod genesi omnia subiaceant, aut ab ipso disceres quod per Providentiam reguntur universa, et est etiam aliquid in nobis, hoc expedire vos convenit. Ad haec senex respondit: Jam quidem necessarium non erat huiusmodi movere quaestiones. si possibile esset nobis a vero propheta discere et audire definita sententia, quia sit aliquid in nobis et in arbitrii positum libertate; valde enim me sermo tuus movit hesternus, in quo de virtute prophetica disputasti. Unde et ego assentio et confirmo sententiam tuam, quia nihil potest ab homine certum indubitatumque cognosci, cui et exiguum vitae tempus est et breve ac tenue spiramen, quo retineri videtur in vita. Verumtamen quoniam priusquam de prophetica virtute aliquid audirem, pollicitus videor Clementi, ut ostenderem, quia omnia subiecta sunt genesi, aut ab ipso discerem, quia est aliquid et in nobis, praestet mihi ipse in hoc gratiam ut primus incipiat et quae obiici possunt, proponat et absolvat; ego enim, ex quo paucis a te audivi de virtute prophetiae, magnitudinem praescientiae considerans obstupui, fateor, nec omnino recipiendum quidquam censeo, quod coniecturis et aestimatione colligitur.
“Since, then, you have professed to know the position of the constellations and the courses of the stars, by which you might convince Clement that all things are subject to birth-fate, or learn from him that all things are ruled by Providence and that there is something in us, it is fitting that you settle this.” To this the old man answered: “There would be no need now to raise questions of this kind, if it were possible for us to learn and hear from the true Prophet a definite pronouncement that there is something in us and placed in the freedom of choice. For your discourse yesterday, in which you discussed prophetic power, moved me greatly. Hence I agree and confirm your opinion, that nothing certain and undoubted can be known by a man, who has but a short span of life and a brief and slender breath by which he seems to be held in life. Yet since, before I heard anything about prophetic power, I seem to have promised Clement that I would show that all things are subject to birth-fate, or learn from him that there is something in us too, let him do me this favor: let him begin first and propose and resolve the objections that can be raised. For since I heard from you a little about the power of prophecy, considering the greatness of foreknowledge, I confess I have been astounded, and I think nothing at all should be accepted that is gathered by conjecture and estimation.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The old man, moved by Peter's teaching on prophecy, admits human knowledge is uncertain but asks Clement to open the debate on birth-fate.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): etest etiam → et est etiam; pau cis → paucis; praescientiaa → praescientiae; astimatione → aestimatione.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.2 (PG 1:1401b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
9.3PG 1:1401b–1402a
Et cum haec senex dixisset, ego Clemens dicere ita coepi: Deus per Filium suum creavit mundum tanquam duplicem domum, interiectu firmamenti huius quod caelum appellatur distinctam, et in superiori quidem angelicas habitare virtutes, in isto autem visibili mundo nasci hominum multitudinem dedit, ex quibus eligeret amicos Filio suo, cum quibus laetaretur, et qui ei tanquam sponso ut dilecta sponsa pararentur. Verum usque ad nuptiarum tempus, quod est praesentia saeculi venturi, statuit virtutem quamdam, quae ex his quae in hoc mundo nascuntur, eligat et custodiat meliores, ac servet Filio suo sequestratos in loco quodam mundi qui extra peccatum est, in quo jam sunt aliquanti, qui ibi velut sponsa, ut dixi, decora ad sponsi praesentiam praeparantur. Nam mundi huius et praesentis temporis princeps adultero similis est, qui mentes hominum corrumpit ac violat, et a desiderio veri Sponsi seducens, illicit ad aliena desideria.
When the old man had said this, I, Clement, began to speak thus: “God through his Son created the world like a double house, divided by the interposition of this firmament which is called heaven; and he gave the angelic powers to dwell in the upper part, and granted that a multitude of men be born in this visible world, from whom he might choose friends for his Son, with whom he might rejoice, and who might be prepared for him as a beloved bride for the bridegroom. But until the time of the wedding, which is the presence of the age to come, he appointed a certain power to choose and guard the better ones from among those born in this world, and to keep them set apart for his Son in a certain place of the world which is outside sin, in which there are already some who are being prepared there, as a bride adorned, as I said, for the bridegroom's presence. For the prince of this world and of the present time is like an adulterer, who corrupts and violates the minds of men, and, leading them away from desire for the true Bridegroom, entices them to alien desires.
Rev 21:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 11:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 12:31 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement explains that God, through his Son, made a two-storied world and raises humans as a bride for the Son, while the prince of this world, like an adulterer, seduces them.
- Rev 19:7, 21:2; Matt 22:2; John 12:31; 2 Cor 11:2. The place “outside sin” where the elect are kept is not otherwise specified.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): tauquam duplicem → tanquam duplicem; lirmanienti → firmamenti; qum ex his → quae ex his; in quoiam sunt → in quo jam sunt; pra:scntiam → praesentiam; similis cst. → similis est,; déoiderio → desiderio.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.3 (PG 1:1401b–1402a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
9.4PG 1:1402a–1402b
Sed dicet aliquis: Quid ergo necesse erat istum principem fieri, qui a vero principe mentes hominum declinaret? Quoniam Deus qui, ut dixi, Filio suo amicos voluit praeparare, non eos tales esse voluit, qui necessitate natura: aliud quid esse non possent, sed qui arbitrio suo et voluntate boni esse desiderarent; quia nec laudabile est, quod non est desiderabile, nec bonum iudicatur, quod non proposito expetitur: nihil enim laudis est id esse, a quo te mutari naturae necessitas non sinat. Providentia ergo Dei hominum multitudinem nasci in hoc mundo voluit, ut ex pluribus eligerentur qui iustam diligerent vitam. Et quia praesentem mundum praevidit non aliter posse nisi diversitate et inaequalitate constare, secundum praesentium rerum diversitates unicuique menti libertatem motuum dedit, et hunc principem posuit, quo ea quae contraria videntur agitante, electio meliorum virtutis opere constaret.
“But someone will say: ‘What need was there, then, for this prince to come into being, to turn men's minds aside from the true prince?’ Because God, who, as I said, wished to prepare friends for his Son, did not want them to be such that by necessity of nature they could not be anything else, but such as would desire to be good by their own choice and will. For what is not desirable is not praiseworthy, and what is not sought by purpose is not judged good; for there is no praise in being what the necessity of nature does not allow you to change from. So the providence of God willed a multitude of men to be born in this world, so that from many those might be chosen who would love a just life. And since he foresaw that the present world could exist only by diversity and inequality, he gave each mind freedom of movement according to the diversities of present things, and set this prince, so that, while he stirs up things that seem contrary, the choice of the better might consist in the work of virtue.
Notes and citation
Summary: God permitted the evil prince so that the good might be good by free choice in a world of diversity, not by necessity.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): voluntate boui esse → voluntate boni esse; prtesentem mundum prazvidit → praesentem mundum praevidit; constaret., → constaret..
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.4 (PG 1:1402a–1402b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
9.5PG 1:1402b
Sed ut planius fiat quod dicimus, per singula exponemus. Nunquid omnes, verbi gratia, oportebat esse in hoc mundo reges, aut principes, aut dominos, aut paedagogos, aut legisperitos, aut geometras, aut aurifices, aut pistores, aut fabros, aut grammaticos, aut divites, aut agricolas, aut olitores, aut piscatores aut pauperes? Hoc certum est quia omnes esse non poterant. Omnia tamen haec officia et multo plura praesens vita hominum requirit, et sine his transigi non potest; est ergo necessaria in hoc mundo inaequalitas. Non enim potest esse rex, nisi habeat quos regat et quibus imperet, neque potest esse dominus, nisi habeat cui dominetur, et caetera similiter.
“But so that what we say may become clearer, we will explain it point by point. Should all in this world, for example, be kings, or princes, or masters, or tutors, or lawyers, or geometers, or goldsmiths, or bakers, or smiths, or grammarians, or rich men, or farmers, or gardeners, or fishermen, or poor? It is certain that all could not be these. Yet the present life of men requires all these offices and many more, and cannot be carried on without them. Inequality, then, is necessary in this world. For there cannot be a king unless he has those whom he rules and commands, nor can there be a master unless he has someone to master, and so on.
Notes and citation
Summary: Human society needs many different roles, so inequality is necessary in this world.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): fiatquod dicimus. per singula exponemus.Nunquid → fiat quod dicimus, per singula exponemus. Nunquid; padagogos → paedagogos; autfabros → aut fabros; pauperes?ba2c certum → pauperes? Hoc certum; haac oflicia → haec officia.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.5 (PG 1:1402b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
9.6PG 1:1402b–1403a
Sciens ergo Conditor a nullo sponte veniri ad agonem, dum refugitur labor, hoc est ad exercendas artes istas quas supra diximus, per quas vel iustitia uniuscuiusque vel misericordia manifestari potest, corpus homini fecit, quod famem et sitim et frigus reciperet, ut reficiendi corporis causa compulsi homines, ad omnes quas supra exposuimus artes victus necessitate descenderent. Cibi enim et potus atque indumenti gratia, singulas quasque artes expetere edocemur. Et hic iam uniuscujusque mentis propositum declaratur, utrum necessitatem famis et frigoris per furta et homicidia ac periuria sarciat, perque alia huiusmodi scelera, an iustitiam, misericordiam, continentiamque custodiens, artis studio et manuum labore imminentis necessitatis expleat ministerium. Si enim cum iustitia et pietate ac misericordia necessitatem corporis transigat, velut propositi agonis victor, amicus Filii Dei et electus abscedit; si vero per fraudes, per iniquitates et scelera concupiscentiis deservit corporalibus, principis huius mundi atque omnium daemonum amicus efficitur, a quibus etiam hoc edocetur, ut stellarum cursibus malorum suorum ascribat errores, quos nonnisi proposito ac voluntate delegit. Etenim artes, cogente, ut diximus, cibi ac potus voluptate, discuntur et exercentur; quae voluptas, cum accesserit unicuique veritatis agnitio, infirmior efficitur succedente parcimonia. Quantus enim sumptus est, aqua et pane utentibus et hunc a Deo sperantibus?
“So the Founder, knowing that no one would come willingly to the contest while toil is shunned—that is, to practicing those arts we mentioned above, through which either the justice or the mercy of each can be shown—made for man a body that would feel hunger and thirst and cold, so that men, compelled for the sake of sustaining the body, might come down by the necessity of livelihood to all the arts we set out above. For we are taught to seek each art for the sake of food and drink and clothing. And here now the purpose of each mind is declared: whether it makes up the need of hunger and cold by thefts and murders and perjuries and other crimes of this kind, or, keeping justice, mercy, and self-control, fulfills the service of the pressing need by the study of an art and the labor of the hands. For if one gets through the body's need with justice, piety, and mercy, he departs, as victor in the contest set before him, a friend of the Son of God and chosen; but if through frauds, iniquities, and crimes he serves bodily desires, he becomes a friend of the prince of this world and of all the demons, by whom he is also taught to ascribe to the courses of the stars the errors of his evils, which he chose only by purpose and will. For the arts, as we said, are learned and practiced under the compulsion of the pleasure of food and drink; and this pleasure, when the knowledge of the truth comes to each one, is weakened as frugality takes its place. For how great an expense is there for those who use water and bread and hope for it from God?
Notes and citation
Summary: God gave humans bodily needs to drive them to work, which tests whether they meet those needs justly or by crime; the wicked then blame the stars for their own choices.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): uniuscujusque menο tis prepositum → uniuscujusque mentis propositum.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.6 (PG 1:1402b–1403a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
9.7PG 1:1403a
Est ergo, ut diximus, necessaria quaedam in dispensatione mundi inaequalitas, dum omnes quidem homines non omnia possunt scire vel implere artificia. usu tamen et ministerio omnium pene omnes indigent, et ob hoc necesse est alium operari, alium operanti praebere mercedem, alium servire, alium dominari, alium regi, alium regere. Sed hanc inaequalitatem quae mortalium vitam necessario subsecuta est, divina Providentia in occasionem justitiae, misericordiae humanitatisque convertit, ut dum haec inter homines aguntur, sit unicuique causa juste agendi cum eo, cui merces operis exsolvenda est, et faciendi misericordiam cum eo, qui debilitate fortassis aut penuria intercedente, debitum solvere non potest, sed et humane agendi cum his qui conditione videntur obnoxii, mansuetudinem quoque conservandi erga subjectos, et omnia prorsus gerendi secundum legem Dei. Dedit enim legem, juvans per hoc humanas mentes, ut facilius erga unumquodque qualiter agi deberet, adverterent, qua via effugerent malum et qua ad futura tenderent bona, et ut in aqua regenerati per opera bona, ignem vetustae nativitatis exstinguerent. Prima enim nostra nativitas per ignem concupiscentia: descendit, et ideo dispensatione divina secunda haec per aquam introducitur, quae restinguat ignis naturam, et caelesti spiritu anima illuminata, metum prima: nativitatis abjiciat, si tamen ita de reliquo vivat, ut nullas omnino mundi hujus voluptates requirat, sed sit tanquam peregrinus et advena, atque alterius civitatis civis.
“There is, then, as we said, a certain necessary inequality in the ordering of the world, since all men cannot know or carry out all crafts, yet almost all need the use and service of all; and for this reason it is necessary that one work and another pay the worker his wage, one serve and another be master, one be ruled and another rule. But this inequality, which has necessarily followed the life of mortals, divine Providence has turned into an occasion of justice, mercy, and kindness; so that while these things are carried on among men, each has cause to act justly with one to whom the wage for work must be paid, and to show mercy to one who, perhaps through weakness or poverty, cannot pay a debt; and also to act humanely with those who seem bound by their condition, to keep gentleness toward subordinates, and to do everything altogether according to the law of God. For he gave the law, helping human minds by it, so that they might more easily notice how they ought to act toward each person, by what way they might escape evil and by what way tend toward future goods, and so that, regenerated in water through good works, they might extinguish the fire of their old birth. For our first birth comes down through the fire of desire; and therefore by divine dispensation this second birth through water is introduced, to quench the nature of fire, so that the soul, enlightened by the heavenly Spirit, may cast off the fear of the first birth—provided that thereafter it so lives as to seek no pleasures of this world at all, but is as a stranger and sojourner and a citizen of another city.
1 Pet 2:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Heb 11:13 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 3:5 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Providence turns social inequality into an occasion for justice and mercy under God's law, and baptism's water quenches the fire of desire through which we were first born.
- 1 Pet 2:11; Heb 11:13–16; Phil 3:20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): exsolvenda est,et faciendi misericordiam cum eo,qui, → exsolvenda est, et faciendi misericordiam cum eo, qui; ell'ugerent → effugerent; bona,ignem vetusta → bona, ignem vetustae; cmlesti spiritu → caelesti spiritu; utnullas → ut nullas.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 9.7 (PG 1:1403a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/8-46/#p-9-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-9-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).