Tractates 1.4.1–1.5.9
Latin text: PL 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 11, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Tractates 1, chapter 4
1.4.1PL 11:287c–291a
Pudicitiam qui colit, quantæ nobilitatis sit, facillime agnoscit: est etenim tantæ virtutis, ut sit honorabilis etiam hostibus suis. Hæc totius humani generis fundamenta confirmat: hæc nominum proprietates universis affectibus præstat: hæc parentum, coujugum, liberorumque sacra jura custodit: hæc in utroque sexu conspicua, in omni ætate miranda, in quavis conditione non dubia, soli sibi devola, semper bene conscia, prorsus nulli rei subjecta, unum tantummodo metuens, ne sit amplius quae vocatur. Denique in solitudine, quae a metuentibus vocatur occasio, se tamquam arbitrum limet: omneque secretum plus, quam publicura reveretur. Pestiferas odit blanditias carnis inimicæ: et quidquid ingesserit mundus voluptatis, aut muneris, totum respuit, præsumens totum se habere, si pura sit. Neminem foede desideral: nec ulli similiter se desiderabilem præstat. In suo statu omni loco, omni tempore manet, plus honestati consulens, quam utilitati. Vultis scire, quantae felicitatis sit? Si te amet; qui habet, diligit: et qui non habet, diligit. Si ergo exsultat gloria ejus sæpe in Gentibus (quamvis illic fructuosa, vel vera esse non possit, quia sub impudico prædone versatur), quanto magis debet esse gloriosior in populo Christiano, qui ejus sanctificatori inviolabili deservit Deo? Nam si Ecclesia ideo Christi sponsa est, quia pudica; ideo jugo thalami caelestis honorata, quia etiam post nuptias manet postmodum virgo perpetua: nos, qui, nascimur de tanto conjugio, omnifarie conniti debemus, quemadmodum prosapiæ nostræ nobilitatem non relatione tantum, sed etiam fide similitudinis adprobemus. Unde tamen præ me Tero, fratres dilectissimi, quod ista, et non ambigua in vobis renitet adsertio: Deum enim patrem vos et habere et possidere monstratis, cum pudicitiam, in qua Deus habitat, non dicati, diligitis, sed luculentis moribus adornatis. Magna igitur gloria est ornare, per quod orneris: servare, per qhod et ipse serveris. Postremo æquiparatur laus vestra laudi pudicitiae: illa enim vobis exhibet sarictitatem, vos ei amorem. Per hanc attingitis Christum: imo illa per vos vobiscum complectitur Christum. Per hanc a Deo patre, quod petitis, impetratis: immo illa per vos impettat, pro qua sollicite laboratis, ne, dum aliquid postulai, erubescat. Beata, eum adhtdit in pueris: beatior, cum adulescentibus lapsus feliciter timet: beatissima, cum in juvenibus carnalia exstinguere laborat incendia. Sane in senibus ut est honoranda, ita miranda non est: quia licet sit Victrix, tamen triumphi sui palmam senectutis cum rigore partitur: cessat enim concupiscentiæ pugna, ubi suberebrescentibus morbis Ipsa necessitate etiam impudicorum pudica fiunt membra.
He who cultivates chastity easily recognises how noble it is: for it is of such virtue that it is honoured even by its enemies. It strengthens the foundations of the whole human race; it gives to all affections the proper meaning of their names; it guards the sacred rights of parents, spouses and children; conspicuous in both sexes, admirable at every age, not doubtful in any condition, devoted to itself alone, always of good conscience, subject to nothing at all, fearing only one thing, that it may no longer be what it is called. In solitude, which the fearful call an opportunity, it fears itself as a witness; and it reveres every secret place more than a public one. It hates the pestilent flatteries of the hostile flesh; and whatever the world offers of pleasure or of gifts, it spits out entirely, presuming that it has everything if it is pure. It desires no one shamefully, and likewise makes itself desirable to no one. It remains in its state in every place and at every time, considering honour more than advantage. Do you want to know how happy it is? If it loves you, both he who has it and he who does not have it love it. If then its glory often exults among the Gentiles (although there it cannot be fruitful or true, because it lives under a shameless robber), how much more glorious ought it to be in the Christian people, which serves God, its inviolable sanctifier? For if the church is the bride of Christ because she is chaste, and honoured with the yoke of the heavenly bridal chamber because even after the wedding she remains a perpetual virgin, we who are born of so great a marriage must strive in every way to prove the nobility of our lineage not only by descent but also by the faithfulness of likeness. Yet I rejoice, dearest brothers, that this claim shines out in you, and not doubtfully: for you show that you both have and possess God as Father, since you do not only love chastity, in which God dwells, but adorn it with shining conduct. It is great glory, then, to adorn that by which you are adorned, to keep that by which you yourself are kept. In the end your praise equals the praise of chastity: for it gives you holiness, you give it love. Through it you reach Christ; rather, through you it embraces Christ with you. Through it you obtain from God the Father what you ask; rather, through you it obtains, for which you labour anxiously, lest it blush while it asks for something. Blessed is it when it plays among children; more blessed when it happily fears falls among adolescents; most blessed when it labours to put out carnal fires in the young. In the old, as it is to be honoured, so it is not to be wondered at: because, although it is victorious, it shares the palm of its triumph with the stiffness of old age: for the fight of lust ceases where, as diseases grow frequent, by necessity even the members of the unchaste become chaste.
2 Cor 11:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 5:25–27 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno praises chastity, which guards family life and makes the church, Christ's virgin bride, fruitful in holy children.
- The church as Christ's chaste bride and perpetual virgin: allusion to 2 Cor 11:2 and Eph 5:25–27.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Chriti sponsa → Christi sponsa; pndicitiatn → pudicitiam; cnm hi juvenibus → cum in juvenibus.
Topics: Ethics, Marriage, Sexual morality, Virginity and celibacy
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.1 (PL 11:287c–291a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4.2PL 11:291a–293a
Age nunc ejus æmulæ rabiem breviter, etiam ex comparatione nominum publicemus, ut quid adpetendum, quidve fugiendum sit, facillime possit agnosci. Sub velamine Christi nominis, fratres, se adserere conatur Antichristus similiter pudicum, ut fallat: pudicitiæ nominis sonum post se trahit; sed quos fructus habeat ejus auctor ostendit. Discurrit quippe vesana per populos: hominumque lubricas mentes libidinum flagrantibus stimulis præcipitat in Putorem, non sexui parcens, non ætati, non pietati, non sibi, quia pudorein alienum qui adpetit, primo suum perdit. Pure non nox illi diesque succedit, semper enim cænosi gurgitis sui procella submergitur,dum semper exæstuans libidinis turpitudo aut veritate ant imagine perpetratur. Praemia aut tradit, aut accipit, corrumpit, aut corrumpilur; injicit amorem, paulo post odium de amore factura. Seminat illicitos hæredes, criinenque noscens nominibus pietatis excusat. Proprios aut necat, aut denudat affectu. Nihil prorsus existimat lurpe nec pati, nec facere, dummodo in effectu conata suecedant. Verumtamen in ipso fructu suo, quo ex PIIgnati pudoris alieni labe gaudere consuevit, semper infelix est. Denique post negotium perpetratum odit et seipsam cum illo, quem vicerit. Hæc sa pe indixit quietis gentbus bellum; hæc aliquotiens robusta regna subvertit; hæc aut sub turpibus, aut sub crudelibus factis subjugatos thalamos triumphavit alienos; hæc viros ardore vesana femineo stipendio ipsis feminis sic incognito inopinate dispungens, suam docuit expugnare naturam; hæc libidinis mercedem vel maxime parentum, filiorum, maritorum, uxtorumque in mortibus posuit; hæc nomina pietatis non numquam concubitu prodigioso dclevit, pudicos quidem persequens, sed impudicos tantum conguenter occidens; hæc, inquam, per momenta et parit omne, quod malum est, et peperit omne, quod pejus; nam in idolis dea est, in cultoribus vero eorum ministra. Venerandam se procurat in templis, hilarem in theatris, importunam in publicis, opportunam in quibuscumque secretis. Lasciva, non linguis, non oculis, non auribus parcens, jocalur, sperat, ambit, obsequitur, zelatur, insanit, armatur precibus, armatur et ira, similiter non numquam vi extorquens, quod blandimentis impetrare non potuit. Libidinum commutatione varia gaudet semper; et pœnitet, ad satielatem numquam lubrica utilitate perveniens. Desiderat lacere, quod timeat publicari, totum prorsus tentat, ut sibi vindicet lotum. Novum prodigii genus est. Odit pudicitiam; et tamen hoc cupit videri, quod illa est.
Come now, let us briefly expose the madness of its rival too, even by a comparison of names, so that what is to be sought and what is to be fled may very easily be recognised. Under the veil of the name of Christ, brothers, Antichrist tries to present himself; in the same way unchastity tries to present itself as chaste, in order to deceive; it trails the sound of the name of chastity behind it, but its author shows what fruits it has. It runs madly about among the peoples, and with the burning goads of lusts it hurls the slippery minds of men into stench, sparing neither sex, nor age, nor family devotion, nor itself, because he who seeks another's modesty first loses his own. For it night and day do not even follow each other in purity, for it is always drowned in the storm of its own muddy flood, while the shamefulness of lust, ever seething, is carried out in reality or in imagination. It gives or receives rewards; it corrupts or is corrupted; it casts in love, soon to make hatred out of love. It sows unlawful heirs, and knowing the crime, excuses it with the names of family affection. It either kills its own or strips them of affection. It thinks nothing at all shameful to suffer or to do, so long as its attempts succeed. Yet even in its very fruit, in which it is accustomed to rejoice from the stain of another's violated modesty, it is always unhappy. In the end, after the business is done, it hates both itself and the one it has conquered. It has often declared war on peaceful nations; it has sometimes overturned strong kingdoms; it has triumphed over other men's bridal chambers, subjugated either by shameful or by cruel deeds; it has taught men, maddened with lust, to fight against their own nature, by an unheard-of wage paid to women; it has placed the price of lust above all in the deaths of parents, children, husbands and wives; it has sometimes destroyed the names of family devotion by monstrous intercourse, persecuting the chaste, but killing only the unchaste in its embraces; it, I say, at every moment both bears every evil and has borne every worse one; for among the idols it is a goddess, among their worshippers a servant. It contrives to be revered in the temples, merry in the theatres, importunate in public places, opportune in any secret place. Wanton, sparing neither tongues, nor eyes, nor ears, it jests, hopes, canvasses, complies, is jealous, rages, arms itself with prayers, arms itself with anger, and likewise sometimes extorts by force what it could not obtain by flatteries. It always rejoices in varied change of lusts; and it repents, never reaching satiety in its slippery profit. It desires to do what it fears to have made public; it tries everything so as to claim everything for itself. It is a new kind of monster. It hates chastity, and yet it wants to seem what chastity is.
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno describes unchastity, which, like Antichrist under Christ's name, poses as chastity while ruining families, nations and kingdoms.
- The Latin is badly damaged in several clauses (e.g. 'viros ... femineo stipendio ... dispungens', probably on men led into unnatural vice); translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split and joined words): Age nuncejus æ mulæ rabiembreviter → Age nunc ejus æmulæ rabiem breviter; uHi fallat → ut fallat; ejus anctor → ejus auctor.
Topics: Ethics, Sexual morality
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.2 (PL 11:291a–293a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4.3PL 11:293a–297d
Interea miris excolit artibus sese, faciemque suam in se, quam non habet, quaerit. Pingit se in seipsam, ct lenocinante vario magistri medicaminis fuco, vultum suum vultibus vestit alienis, hoc futura, non quod natura præstilit, sed quod ei ad examen speculi arbitrium temporale diclaverit. Nunc emendat, nunc delet, quas amaverat species, nunc subjicit alias, nunc parturit novas. Manibus suis facta hydra formarum procax semper incedit, quia erubescere alienis sub coloribus nescit, non domesticis, non affinibus, non maritis nota, non sibi quia non potest esse notum, nec verum, quod est semper certum. Præterea nUmquam diligit Deum, quem scit operibus suis esse contrarium. Diaboli est sane mancipium, ejus enim possidet regnum; nam deos ipsa genuit, ipsa intulit mundo, per quos, aut in quibus diabolus colitur, quorum in actibus origo monstratur.Ipsa Jovem innumerabilibus, variis magnisque criminibus maximum redii. Ipsa Herculem, noverca deterior, in Omphalis libidine turpiter vicit, quem terribilis turba monstrorum superare non potuit. Ipsa Venerem membris omni bus denndatam' convexis manibus se tegere conantem, imo animi sui vitium et corporis demonstrantem, post multa adulteria spectaculo totius mundi quoque prosliluit. Non opus est ire per singula; quamvis et hæc non fuerint dicta digna, tamen ad exprimendam vim impudicitiæ visa sunt necessaria, ut sciat unusquisque ad idololatriam pertinere luxuriam. Ipsa, inquam, mortuorum sepulcra convertit in templa, tumulos in altaria, cadavera in simulacra, parentalia in sacrificia, mores in sacra. Sic sic genus humanum a Dei cultura rapuit, dum blanda festivitate facinorosa facinorosorum et colenda crimina ei imitanda persuadet.
Meanwhile it cultivates itself with wonderful arts, and seeks in itself a face of its own that it does not have. It paints itself over itself, and with the varied rouge of the master cosmetician acting as pander, it clothes its own face with the faces of others, to be not what nature gave, but what a passing whim dictated to it at the mirror's test. Now it corrects, now it erases the looks it had loved, now it substitutes others, now it gives birth to new ones. Made by its own hands a hydra of forms, it always walks boldly, because it does not know how to blush under other people's colours, known neither to the household, nor to relatives, nor to husbands, nor to itself, because what is always uncertain cannot be known or true. Moreover it never loves God, whom it knows to be contrary to its works. It is plainly the slave of the devil, for it possesses his kingdom; for it gave birth to the gods itself, it brought into the world the gods through whom or in whom the devil is worshipped, whose origin is shown in their deeds. It made Jupiter 'greatest' by countless, varied and great crimes. It shamefully conquered Hercules, worse than a stepmother, in his lust for Omphale, whom a terrible crowd of monsters could not overcome. It set Venus too before the gaze of the whole world, after many adulteries, stripped of all clothing on her limbs, trying to cover herself with curved hands, rather displaying the vice of her mind and body. There is no need to go through each one; although these things were not worthy to be said, yet they seemed necessary to express the force of unchastity, so that each may know that luxury belongs to idolatry. It, I say, turned the tombs of the dead into temples, burial mounds into altars, corpses into images, funeral feasts into sacrifices, customs into rites. Thus, thus it snatched the human race away from the worship of God, persuading it by flattering festivity to imitate the criminal deeds of criminals and to worship crimes.
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno describes unchastity's cosmetics and its link to idolatry, since the pagan gods Jupiter, Hercules and Venus were exalted through lust.
- Classical allusions to Jupiter's adulteries, Hercules and Omphale, and statues of Venus covering herself.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): tnterea miris excolit artibus Se se → Interea miris excolit artibus sese; llerculem → Herculem.
Topics: Ethics, Sexual morality, Idolatry
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.3 (PL 11:293a–297d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4.4PL 11:297a–299a
Adeo viris contra Dei legem Deique justitiam evagandi extra legitimum thorum peregrinæ luxuriæ inspirat infeliciter quasi liberam facultatem, ac sic eorum quoque feminas a pudorc divellit, quæ desertæ, ardore, seu dolore compulsæ. si talia gcrunt, putant se aut imitari, aut vindicari. Propter quod in praeceptis Dominus ait, Qui dimiserit uxorem suam, excepta causa adulterii, facit eam mæchari. Quid hic respondere possint lubrici mariti,non video; qui humanarum legum iniqua impunitate decepti, justitiam veram nec ex sua ipsa volunlate noscentes, quod pati nolunt, libenter efficiunt: qui profanæ libidinis detestabili furto distracti, turpibus jam non contenti latibulis, aliquoties (proh nefas!) sub ipsis obtutibus matronarum vesana congressione desudant, non advertentes miseri, quoniam in tali negotio, judice Deo, quod non licet uxoribus, non licet nec maritis; sicut praescribens talibus Paulus Apostolus dicit: Mulier sui corporis potestatem non habet, sed vir: similiter et vir sui corporis potestatem non habet, sed uxor. Sic igitur, quoniam una sunt caro, unum divini operis sacramentum, quoniam femina de viro suo facta est, alterque alteri tenetur obnoxius, ac per hoc jurc legis quoque linea una tanguntur, dubium non est horrendi supplicii perennibus absumptum iri tormentis eum, qui prævaricatus fuerit e duobus. Sed nec illis impune succedit, qui sine uxoribus, amore peccandi liberius, incertas atque inhonestas sibimet redimunt libidinum merces, non advertentes esse infelix et impudicum quidquid legitimum fuerit extra conjugium: christiano enim, fratres, ultra licere non puto, quam ut sit aut continens, aut maritus.
So it unhappily inspires in men, against God's law and God's justice, a seeming free licence to wander outside the lawful bed into foreign luxury, and so it tears their wives too away from modesty; and they, deserted, driven by passion or grief, if they do such things, think they are either imitating or avenging themselves. For this reason the Lord says in his commandments: 'Whoever puts away his wife, except for the cause of adultery, makes her commit adultery.' What slippery husbands can answer here I do not see; deceived by the unjust impunity of human laws, not knowing true justice even from their own will, they willingly do what they do not wish to suffer: distracted by the detestable theft of profane lust, no longer content with shameful hiding places, they sometimes (oh, the wickedness!) sweat in mad intercourse under the very eyes of their wives, not noticing, wretched men, that in such a matter, with God as judge, what is not permitted to wives is not permitted to husbands either; as the apostle Paul says, laying down the rule for such men: 'The wife does not have power over her own body, but the husband; likewise the husband does not have power over his own body, but the wife.' Since, then, they are one flesh, one sacrament of a divine work, since the woman was made from her husband, and each is held bound to the other, and so by the right of the law too they are touched by one line, there is no doubt that whichever of the two has transgressed will be consumed by the everlasting torments of a horrible punishment. But neither do those go unpunished who, without wives, so as to sin more freely, buy for themselves uncertain and dishonourable wages of lust, not noticing that whatever is outside lawful marriage is unhappy and unchaste: for I do not think, brothers, that anything more is permitted to a Christian than to be either continent or a husband.
Matt 5:32 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:22 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno condemns husbands who commit adultery, citing Christ's saying on putting away a wife and Paul's equal rule for husband and wife, and teaches that a Christian must be either continent or married.
- Translated exactly: 'Whoever puts away his wife, except for the cause of adultery, makes her commit adultery' (Matt 5:32, with 'adultery' for porneia); 'what is not permitted to wives is not permitted to husbands either'. Zeno does not here discuss remarriage after divorce. Other references: 1 Cor 7:4; Gen 2:24; Gen 2:22.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Propter quud → Propter quod; justitium veram → justitiam veram.
Topics: Marriage, Divorce and remarriage, Ethics, Sexual morality
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.4 (PL 11:297a–299a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4.5PL 11:299a–299c
Venio nunc ad exempla, quæ sunt negotio vel maxime necessaria; quia plus est quod geritur quam quod dicitur, ut et impudicitiæ malumet bonum pudicitiæ uno eodemque suggeslu facillime possit agnosci. Joseph Hebraeus adolescens, clarus genere, clarior pulchritudine, morum quoquc clarissimus probitate, fuit inter filios Jacob ætate minor, sed spiritu major. Hic invidae germanitatis impulsu in Ægyptum est delatus atque distractus a fratribus, quem domini sui uxor pejus amare cœperat, quem oderant fratres: nam cum medullitus mulier ardoris insani conflagraret incendio, in suadelam sacrilegam argumentisvehementer armata captat solitudinem, secretum captat et locum, in quali etiam non irritata adolescentia invitis feminis saepe violenta esse consuevit. At ubi in destinata prorumpens, neque blandimenta, neque promissa sibimet prodesse cognoscit; conserta manu, inversa vice, adorta est in suum fomitem adolescentis ignem totis viribus derivare. At ille in repugnatione vestem sibi violenter extortam relinquens, ex impudicitæ fovea nudus aufugit:sed pudicitiæ splendore vestitus post calumniosam damnationem et liberatus a Deo est et honoratus. Denique rex jure secundus factus est regni, qui insignis rex erat jam ante pudoris.
I come now to examples, which are above all necessary to the matter, because what is done counts for more than what is said, so that both the evil of unchastity and the good of chastity may very easily be recognised from one and the same platform. Joseph, a Hebrew youth, famous by birth, more famous for his beauty, and most famous for the uprightness of his conduct, was among the sons of Jacob younger in age but greater in spirit. Driven by the envy of his brothers, he was carried down into Egypt and sold by them; and his master's wife began to love him, in a worse way, whom his brothers hated: for when the woman was burning to the marrow with the fire of mad passion, armed vehemently with arguments for sacrilegious persuasion, she seizes on solitude, she seizes on a secret place, the sort of place in which youth, even unprovoked, has often been accustomed to be violent towards unwilling women. But when, bursting out towards her goal, she realises that neither flatteries nor promises help her, she lays hands on him and, reversing the roles, tries with all her strength to draw the youth's fire into her own tinder. But he, in resisting, left behind the garment violently torn from him and fled naked out of the pit of unchastity; but, clothed in the splendour of chastity, after a slanderous condemnation he was both freed and honoured by God. In the end he who was already before a distinguished king of modesty was made by right the second king of the kingdom.
Gen 37:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 39:7–20 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 41:40–43 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno gives Joseph's refusal of Potiphar's wife as an example of chastity rewarded by God.
- Gen 37; 39; 41:40–43. Leaked Migne reference and column letter removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's reference; split word; split word and stray mark): (Gen., XXXIX) → ; Ii. beratus → liberatus; jure se- I cundus → jure secundus.
Topics: Ethics, Sexual morality
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.5 (PL 11:299a–299c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4.6PL 11:299c
Susannam quoque columen matronatus inaffectatae formae pulchrius suae pulchritudinis ornamentum, insigne pudicitiæ testimonium, e senioribus duo, sed uno incensi prodigio, secus quam decnerat, deperire coeperant: quam cum adverterent muro castitatis, quæ certe vera est et aeterna formositas, in paradisi solitudine circumseptam, ubi Evam ab auctore operis sui meminerant esse deceptam; hac re ipsa nacto consilio, capere dolo aggrediuntur ac nisi culpa succumbat, veluti adulteræ deprehen sæ magnum minitantur exitium. At illa non Eva ancipitis quidem metas contemplatione praeclusa, cujus aut pudor esset jugulandus, aut anima, conscientiæ suae conscium solum contestans Deum, honestam potius elegit mortem quam vitam turpem, melius credens hominibus se ream praebere quam Deo. Interea instant illi ex amatoribus accusatores effecti, crimenque suum in simplicitatem circumventæ transfusum artificiose dum exaggerant, exinde jam priores seipsi condemnant. Verum (proh nefas!) creditur aetati, creditur auctoriuti: exsultant adulteri: damnatur integritas. Jam jamque Susanna ad supplicium immerens trahebatur: jam totus populus in ejus sanguine tumescebat: jam sui quoque familiares noværei atrocitate perculsi, miserabiliter ingemiscentes, dimissis capitibus omne studium defensionis abjecerant. Jam etiam ipsa pudoris compendio mortis oderat moras, omnibus displicens, sed soli suae conscientiæplacens. Cum subito, quavis versutia qui fallitur numquam, confestim adest in Daniele puero Deus. Omnem repente malitiæ scenamdiripuit: profectitium crimen propere recluditur: scelus suos reddit in auctores: purgaturque per innocentiam pudor. Sicque Susannam, quam, impudicitia mentiente, in publicum traxerant, probatam et vindicatam ad mariti thalamum cum ingenti triumpho victrix pudicitia reportavit.
Susanna too, the pillar of matronhood, whose unaffected beauty was a lovelier ornament than her beauty itself, a distinguished witness of chastity, two of the elders, set on fire by one monstrous passion, began to be madly in love with, otherwise than was fitting. When they noticed that she was enclosed by the wall of chastity, which is surely true and eternal beauty, in the solitude of a paradise, where they remembered Eve had been deceived by the author of her ruin, they took counsel from this very thing and set about catching her by a trick, threatening, unless she gave way to sin, great ruin as though she had been caught in adultery. But she, not an Eve, though shut in by the boundaries of a two-edged choice, in which either her modesty or her life had to be killed, calling God alone to witness as the one who knew her conscience, chose an honourable death rather than a shameful life, thinking it better to present herself as guilty before men than before God. Meanwhile they press on, turned from lovers into accusers, and while they artfully heap up their own crime, transferred onto the simplicity of the woman they had trapped, they already condemn themselves first. But (oh, the wickedness!) age is believed, authority is believed; the adulterers exult; integrity is condemned. Already Susanna was being dragged, undeserving, to punishment; already the whole people was swelling for her blood; already her own household, struck by the atrocity of the new event, groaning pitifully, with heads bowed, had abandoned all effort at defence. Already she herself hated the delay of death, as a short road for modesty, displeasing to all but pleasing to her own conscience alone. When suddenly God, who is never deceived by any cunning, is at once present in the boy Daniel. All at once he tore down the whole stage of malice; the fabricated crime is quickly laid open; the wickedness returns upon its authors; and modesty is cleared by innocence. And so victorious chastity brought Susanna back, proved and vindicated, with great triumph to her husband's bedchamber, whom the lie of unchastity had dragged into public.
Gen 3:13 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno tells the story of Susanna, falsely accused by the elders and vindicated by Daniel, as an example of chastity.
- The story of Susanna (Greek additions to Daniel) is extrabiblical. A leaked numeral was removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; leaked numeral; split word): perculsi,51 → perculsi,; iN Daniele → in Daniele; cum iu. genti → cum ingenti; reportaviL. → reportavit..
Extrabiblical texts: Sus 1-64 (Susanna [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Topics: Ethics, Sexual morality
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.6 (PL 11:299c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4.7PL 11:299c–301b
Sed o quantum est miranda, pudicitia, quae aliter laudari te non vis, quam ut custodiaris, solo bonæ conscientiæ ornamento contenta! Tu in vir-. ginibus felix, in viduis fortis, in conjugiis fidelis, in sacerdoribuspura, in martyribus gloriosa, in Angelis clara, in oMnibus vero regina. Tu nunquam carni, nunquam ulli subjaces legi. De voluntate na. sceris, sed bono portatis voluntatem ipsam paris: qulavoluntas At voluptas postmodum tua, cum per eam quotidie tricenos, sexagenos, centenosque colligisfructus. Tu in pauperibus dives, in divitibus ditior, æqualis in omnibus consummaris. Tu cs honor corporum. Tuthesaurus animarum. Ta fundamentum, culmen, ac fructus omnium coæquarum. Tn tui propositi insolubilis nodus aeternus. Per te legitima jejunia celebrantur. Per te allegatæ, priuequam fundantur, aCceptantur preces. Tu es sacrificium Deo carum: tu legitimum Dei templum: sacrarium pudorls. In te corruptio intrare non novit. Per te saeculum vincitur, concupiscentia omnis eliditur, diabotus subjugatur, Antichristus non timetur, Spiritus sanctus inducitur, glorificatur Christus, Deus pater omnipotens propitiatur. Postremo ille felix in futurum regnabit, qui tecum illo pervenerit.
But O how wonderful you are, chastity, who wish to be praised in no other way than by being guarded, content with the sole ornament of a good conscience! You are happy in virgins, strong in widows, faithful in marriages, pure in priests, glorious in martyrs, bright in angels, and queen in all. You are never subject to the flesh, never to any law. You are born of the will, but you bear the will itself to good things: for afterwards will becomes your delight, when through it you daily gather fruit thirtyfold, sixtyfold and a hundredfold. You are rich in the poor, richer in the rich; you are made complete equally in all. You are the honour of bodies. You are the treasure of souls. You are the foundation, summit and fruit of all your peers. You are the eternal, indissoluble knot of your own purpose. Through you lawful fasts are celebrated. Through you prayers that are offered are accepted even before they are poured out. You are a sacrifice dear to God; you are God's lawful temple, the sanctuary of modesty. Corruption does not know how to enter you. Through you the world is conquered, all lust is crushed, the devil is subjugated, Antichrist is not feared, the Holy Spirit is brought in, Christ is glorified, God the almighty Father is made favourable. In the end, happy is he who will reign in the future, having come there with you.
Matt 13:23 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:16–17 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno ends with a hymn to chastity, the treasure of souls and temple of God, which brings fruit thirty-, sixty- and a hundredfold.
- Allusions: Matt 13:8, 23 (the threefold harvest, read of virgins, widows and the married); 1 Cor 3:16. The clause 'qulavoluntas At voluptas' is damaged; translated by sense. A leaked numeral was removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (joined words; joined words and leaked numeral): Per telegitima52 jejunia → Per te legitima jejunia; sacrificiumDeo → sacrificium Deo.
Topics: Ethics, Fasting, Prayer, Virginity and celibacy
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.4.7 (PL 11:299c–301b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-4-7
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-4-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Tractates 1, chapter 5
1.5.1PL 11:301b
Si eui forte asperum videtur ac durum, quod fiducialiter loquimur, fratres, rem pene contra naturam; jam jamque desinat permoveri, intelligens christianæ virtutis hanc esse maximam gloriam ipsam calcare naturam. Sed quia virtus voluptates semper offuscat, nihilque unicuique, nisi quod amaverit, rectUm est, maxime quod uno desiderio omnes excolunt populi; dubium non est, quia aut hostis publicus, aut certe judicatur insanus, quisquis nuptias dissuaserit. At ego non pertimescam sermonis publici quæ de me fabulelur invidia: non enim nuptias condemno, sed nuptiis meliora præpono: et quidem ctiam apostolo hortante sic Paulo: Dico autem innuptis et viduis, bonum est illis si sic perseveraverint sicut ego, Si autem non fuerint continentes, nubant: melius est enim nubere, quam uri. Alio autem loco ait: Hoc dico secundum veniam, non secundum jussum: volo autem omnes vos esse,sicut et me: ac per hoc ideo nubere melius, quia uri deterius. Omnia quidcm licent, sed non omnia expediunt. Jam hic, christiane, cognosce, elige quid velis, remedium an sanitatem.
If what we say confidently, brothers, perhaps seems harsh and hard to anyone, a thing almost against nature, let him stop being disturbed at once, understanding that this is the greatest glory of Christian virtue: to trample on nature itself. But since virtue always darkens pleasures, and nothing is right to anyone except what he has loved, especially what all peoples cultivate with one desire, there is no doubt that whoever dissuades from marriage is judged either a public enemy or certainly mad. But I shall not fear what the envy of public talk may gossip about me: for I do not condemn marriage, but I set better things before marriage, and indeed with the apostle Paul urging thus: 'I say to the unmarried and to widows, it is good for them if they remain as I am. But if they are not continent, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.' And in another place he says: 'I say this by way of concession, not of command: I wish all of you to be as I am.' And so marrying is better for this reason, that burning is worse. 'All things are lawful, but not all things are expedient.' Here now, Christian, recognise and choose what you want: the remedy or health.
1 Cor 7:8–9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:6–7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:12 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno begins a discourse on continence: he does not condemn marriage but, with Paul, sets virginity and widowhood above it.
- Translated exactly: 'I do not condemn marriage, but I set better things before marriage'. Quotations: 1 Cor 7:8–9; 1 Cor 7:6–7; 1 Cor 6:12 (10:23).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): quisquis nuptias dissuascrit → quisquis nuptias dissuaserit; pertimescam 'emmonis → pertimescam sermonis.
Topics: Marriage, Ethics, Virginity and celibacy
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.1 (PL 11:301b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.2PL 11:301b–303a
Denique si videtur, conferamus, quae sit inter virginem nuptamque discretio. Nupta cogitat quemadmodum placeat marito: virgo, quemadmodum Deo. Haec extrariis ornamentis ornatur: longe illa ornatior, aliunde quia nescit ornari. Haec variis unguentis et odoribus fragrat: illa unici floris sui quovis prato jucundior in cœlum ipsum honore læcto respirat. Hæcliberis gaudet: at illa liberorum non limet orbitatem. Hæc eorumdem blanditiis vernantibus pascitur et incrementis adolescentibus quotidie delectatur: at illa ægra fasiidio novem mensium non bajulat pondus: sub incertopartu, parientis nascentisque de salute non gemit, nulliusque momentis omnibus variae sollicitudinis cura torquetur.
In short, if it seems good, let us compare the difference between a virgin and a married woman. The married woman thinks how she may please her husband; the virgin, how she may please God. The one is adorned with outward ornaments; the other is far more adorned, because she does not know how to be adorned from outside. The one is fragrant with various ointments and scents; the other, more pleasing than any meadow with her one flower, breathes to heaven itself with joyful honour. The one rejoices in children; but the other does not fear the loss of children. The one is fed on their budding endearments and delights daily in their growing up; but the other, sick with nine months' discomfort, does not carry the weight; in an uncertain childbirth she does not groan for the safety of mother and child, and is tormented at every moment by the care of no shifting anxiety.
1 Cor 7:34 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno compares the married woman, anxious for husband and children, with the virgin, who seeks to please God alone.
- Allusion: 1 Cor 7:34. 'sick with nine months' discomfort' describes what the virgin is spared.
Topics: Marriage, Virginity and celibacy
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.2 (PL 11:301b–303a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.3PL 11:303a–303b
Sed dicet aliquis: Etiam Maria virgo et nupsit et peperit. Sit aliqua talis et cedo. Cæterum illa fuit virgo post connubium, virgo post conceptum, virgo post filium. Denique si esset aliquid virginitate melius, Dei filius boc magis potuerat suae malri præstare, cui præstiterit, ut divinævirginitatis bonore polleret. Itaque in statu quo nata es, permanens virgo gloriare, sanctique pudoris florem nulli legi subjecta fidei thesaurum custodi: esto sancta et corpore et spiritu: amore Christi ignem carnis exstingue, ut de resurrectione gloria, quam hic jam tibi vendicas, taceam, in qua ut Dominus ait, Neque nubunt, neque nubentur, sed sicut Angeli erunt. Magnum consequere beneficium, si Deo vivas puris moribus libcra, et hominis non sis ancilla.
But someone will say: 'The virgin Mary too both married and gave birth.' Let some woman be such, and I yield. But she was a virgin after marriage, a virgin after conception, a virgin after her son. In short, if there were anything better than virginity, the Son of God could have granted it rather to his mother, to whom he granted that she should excel in the honour of divine virginity. So, remaining a virgin in the state in which you were born, glory in it; subject to no law, guard the flower of holy modesty, the treasure of faith; be holy both in body and in spirit; extinguish the fire of the flesh by the love of Christ, to say nothing of the glory of the resurrection, which you already claim for yourself here, in which, as the Lord says, 'They neither marry nor are given in marriage, but will be like the angels.' You will gain a great benefit if you live for God, free in pure conduct, and are not the handmaid of a man.
1 Cor 7:34 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 22:30 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno answers the objection from Mary's marriage by her perpetual virginity and urges virgins to keep their state, as the angels in the resurrection.
- Translated exactly: Mary 'a virgin after marriage, a virgin after conception, a virgin after her son'. Quotations and allusions: 1 Cor 7:34; Matt 22:30.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; joined words): Sit aliqua taliset cedo → Sit aliqua talis et cedo; fuitvirgo → fuit virgo; Odei thesaurum → fidei thesaurum.
Topics: Christology, Marriage, Perpetual virginity of Mary, Virginity and celibacy
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.3 (PL 11:303a–303b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.4PL 11:303b–305b
At tu vidua secundas cur desideras nuptias, cum temperare videas Apostolum primas? cujus ista sunt verba: Tempus coarctatum est: supereat ut qui habent uxores sic sint, quasi non habentes, præterit enim figura hujus mundi. At cum ante annos ferme quadringentos, vel eo amplius, apostolicum hoc operetur edictum, quo et vivaciores fuere homines, et rarissimi Christiani; cur ego christiano orbe ipso pene jam toto, hominumque vivacitate mundo senescente detrita, obtundam verbis palpantibus aciem veritatis, ac non plene denuntiem, observantiæ qua perfectione Dei cultus debeat cuslodiri? Apud Salomonem maxime cum scriptum sit: Et si multipticentur filii, non oblecteris in illis, si non est timor Domini cum illis, non corrideas animæ illorum: melior est enim unus timens Deum, quam mille filii impii. Cum hæc ita sint, age vidua, quæ sicut innocens virgo nuberc saepe festinas, interroganti responde, bonumne amiseris maritum, an malum? Si malum et desideras nubere, digna es quam pcjor affligat. Si bonum, fidei serva signaculum: pati non meretur injuriam ipse cui perhibes testimonium. Ubi est ille, qui invicem desiderantibus vobis tardior cæteris videbatur primus matrimoniidies? Ubi pretiosae virginitatis festa, utrisque dulcis, occisio? Ubi amor, qui in æquo unitoque conjugio, e duobus attero superante, non moritur? Tune non illa es quæ mariti corpus expositum lavisti lacrymis, osculisde tersisti, crinium damno velasti, scissis genis, livore fœdatisuberihus, sordido plus pulvere tecta quam veste? Tu, inquam, non es quæ nunc coelum ipsum ululatibus rumpens, post talem maritum puncto temporis vivere te non posse clamabas? Nunc clusis dolore gemitibus, sæpe inter affines morlua spiritu, labentibus membris ad terram, incertas reddcbas exsequias: cui magis lacrymas commodarent mortuone, an morienti? Post hæc, si libet nubere, omnia illa mentita es. Quid hoc est? Ecce rursus ad lenocinia redis, colorcm de pyxide mutuaris paulo ante damnatum. Ecce indulgenter ex colis crincm; odorato pulvere luctus pulverem mutas; in sti- Lio fletus includis; ornamento ligas, quod suspendio voveras, collum; ab speculo oracula inquiris, quam commode possis circumscribere petitorem. Quidquid feceris. virgo jam non eris: unum tamen scio, quia nibil distat a prodigio, quiquis alterius causaet formam mutat et mores.
But you, widow, why do you desire a second marriage, when you see the Apostle restraining the first? These are his words: 'The time is short; it remains that those who have wives be as though they had none; for the form of this world is passing away.' And since this apostolic edict was at work almost four hundred years ago or more, when men were longer-lived and Christians very few, why should I, now that the Christian world is almost complete and the vigour of men is worn away as the world grows old, blunt the edge of truth with coaxing words and not fully declare with what perfection of observance the worship of God ought to be kept? Especially since it is written in Solomon: 'Even if your children multiply, do not delight in them if the fear of the Lord is not with them; do not laugh with their souls; for one who fears God is better than a thousand ungodly sons.' Since this is so, come, widow, you who often hurry to marry like an innocent virgin, answer my question: did you lose a good husband or a bad one? If a bad one, and you desire to marry, you deserve to be afflicted by a worse. If a good one, keep the seal of fidelity: he to whom you bear witness does not deserve to suffer an injury. Where is that first day of marriage which, as you longed for each other, seemed slower to come than the others? Where the festal slaying of precious virginity, sweet to both? Where is the love which, in an equal and united marriage, does not die while one of the two survives? Are you not the one who washed your husband's laid-out body with tears, wiped it with kisses, veiled it with the loss of your hair, with torn cheeks and breasts disfigured with bruises, covered more with dirty dust than with clothing? Are you not, I say, the one who, now bursting heaven itself with your wailing, cried that after such a husband you could not live a moment longer? Now, with your groans shut in by grief, often dead in spirit among your relatives, your limbs sinking to the ground, you made the funeral uncertain: to whom should they give their tears, to the dead man or to the dying woman? After this, if you choose to marry, all that was a lie. What is this? See, you return again to the panders' arts; you borrow colour from the box, colour you condemned a little earlier. See, you tend your hair indulgently; you change the dust of mourning for scented powder; you shut your weeping in a little jar; you bind with ornament the neck you had vowed to the noose; you seek oracles from the mirror about how conveniently you can ensnare a suitor. Whatever you do, you will not be a virgin again; but one thing I know, that whoever changes both appearance and conduct for another's sake differs nothing from a monster.
1 Cor 7:29–31 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno rebukes widows who seek a second marriage, setting their earlier grief against their haste to adorn themselves for a new husband.
- Translated exactly; Zeno discourages the remarriage of widows sharply but does not call it forbidden. 'almost four hundred years ago' dates the sermon to the fourth century from Paul's letter. 'Solomon' is Sir 16:1–3. Quotation: 1 Cor 7:29, 31. A leaked Migne reference and a numeral were removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's reference; OCR slip; joined words; leaked numeral; split word): qui hubent uxores → qui habent uxores; cum illisnon corrideas → cum illis, non corrideas; (Eccl. XVI, i, 2. 3) → ; expositum 561avisti → expositum lavisti; post talem moritum → post talem maritum; possi scircumscribere → possis circumscribere.
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 16:1-3 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Marriage, Divorce and remarriage, Widows and consecrated virgins, Dress and adornment
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.4 (PL 11:303b–305b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.5PL 11:305b–305a
Sed dicis: Ardor me tenerae compellit ætatis. Credo. Ecce nupsisti. Ut de fragilitate humanitatis, casibus ut de cxleris taceam, ecce maritum tuum postridie aliqua necessitas rapit, quæ a te longe distractum decennio, vel eo amplius. ut adsolet fieri, detineat relegatum. Quid facies? Observabisne redcuntem, an ardori quæres aliunde remedium? Si observantiam pollicere, sine dubio fallis, cujus impatientiæ professio jam tenetur. Si es autem sumptura remedium, dubium non esi hoc esse solum; ut flammas tuas maritalis gladii contemplatione compescas. Mihi crede, non habet concupiscentia locum, ubi patientia dominatur, ubi vivitur sobrie, ubi mors timetur. Itaque hanc observantiam, hunc timorem, quod est verius atque justius, transler ad Deum, et quale libet illud sit, repente exstinguetur incendium.
But you say: 'The heat of my tender age drives me.' I believe it. See, you have married. To say nothing of human frailty and other mishaps, see, the day after, some necessity snatches your husband away and keeps him banished far from you for ten years or more, as often happens. What will you do? Will you wait faithfully for his return, or will you seek a remedy for your heat elsewhere? If you promise to wait, you are without doubt deceiving, since your profession of impatience is already on record. But if you are going to take a remedy, there is no doubt that this is the only one: to restrain your flames by thinking of your husband's sword. Believe me, lust has no place where patience rules, where one lives soberly, where death is feared. So transfer this observance, this fear, to God, which is truer and more just, and whatever that fire may be, it will suddenly be extinguished.
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno answers the widow who pleads youthful desire: if her husband were long absent, fear would restrain her; let her fear God instead.
- 'your husband's sword' refers to the husband's legal right to punish adultery; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Si es autem sumplura remedium → Si es autem sumptura remedium.
Topics: Marriage, Divorce and remarriage, Widows and consecrated virgins
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.5 (PL 11:305b–305a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.6PL 11:305a–307a
Sed sic ego in rebus demoror prope sanis, quasi qu:c vere exsecranda sint, jamcorrecta sint crimina. Pudet me dicere in populo gravi, anus sæpe videri novas nuptas, quarum pene plures sint nuptiæ quam natales: quæ non rogantur ut nubant, sed ut dormiant, invitantur propiores sepulcro quam thalamo: quæ ipsæ cum pereunt, detestabili exemplo adolescentulas quoque perire compellunt. Quis has diligat filius? quis maritus? confundentes sanguinis jura, delentes merita maritorum, adulantes vivis, mortuis suspirantes, nunc odientes veteres, nunc novos filios similiter et maritos? At e diverso ipsae æstiment quid sit, qnod in tam solemnibus votis sæpe contingit, ut nec filios habeant, nec maritos. Talis est etiam causa maritorum, ad quos aliquid loqui superfluum est, quia si uxor et maritus in carne sunt una, dubium non est, quia quod alter audit, amborum est. Quid agam, quo me vectam, nescio; non enim video quid in exhortationibus divini ac veri cultus Gentibus praedicem. Felicitatemne virginitatis? at habent suas virgines: et si: non felices, habent tamen. Sin vero ad viduitatis sudorem gloriosum palmamque provocavero; nobis fortassis insultent,.quia nostrae sacræ virgines viduæque magno pro immortalitatis praemio, suæ autem gratis laborent. Verum hoc est solum, nos in quo vincimus, quia pro sua sanctitate christianæ plus nubunt. Adde quod Gentibus: quod sine dolore magno, vel gemitu non potest dici.
But I linger on matters that are almost sound, as if the crimes that are truly detestable were already corrected. I am ashamed to say among a serious people that old women are often seen as new brides, whose marriages are almost more than their birthdays; who are asked not to marry but to sleep, who are invited when nearer the tomb than the bridal chamber; who, as they perish themselves, by their detestable example compel young girls too to perish. What son could love them? What husband? They confuse the rights of blood, blot out the merits of husbands, flatter the living, sigh for the dead, now hating their old children, now their new ones, and likewise their husbands. And let them consider on the other side what it means that in such solemn vows it often happens that they have neither children nor husbands. Such too is the case of husbands, to whom it is superfluous to say anything, because if wife and husband are one in the flesh, there is no doubt that what one hears belongs to both. What am I to do, where to turn, I do not know; for I do not see what I am to preach to the Gentiles in exhortations to divine and true worship. The happiness of virginity? But they have their virgins: even if not happy ones, still they have them. If I call them to the glorious toil and palm of widowhood, they may perhaps mock us, because our sacred virgins and widows labour for the great reward of immortality, but theirs for nothing. But in this alone we surpass them, that Christian women marry more, in the name of their holiness. Add that they marry Gentiles: which cannot be said without great grief or groaning.
Gen 2:24 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno deplores old women who marry again and again, and Christian women who marry pagans.
- The sentence 'pro sua sanctitate christianae plus nubunt' is ironic; translated as written. The last sentence ('Adde quod Gentibus') is elliptical; 'they marry' supplied. Allusion: Gen 2:24.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): similiter et mnritos → similiter et maritos.
Topics: Marriage, Divorce and remarriage
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.6 (PL 11:305a–307a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.7PL 11:307a
Quæ enim vox, quæ increpatio has condigne possit arguere? quae dedecus suum sacrilegio dotantes, membra Christi dæmoniorum servis addicunt; Dei templum profanis patefaciunt; sacraria usque ipsa denudant; sacra. confundunt, amissa luce lætante. in tenebris, habentes fana, non domos. Digne jugulantur, quæ Christi ingratæ beneficiis; sponte ad mortem, de qua evaserant, revertuntur. Cum igitur semper insidietur se non quærentibus diabolus, æstimate, quid faciat invitatus: cui omnes nocendi aditus reserali, praestant sine pugna, sine ullo la. bore victoriam: non enim conabitur in ditionem redigere. suam, quæ esse ejus ambivit ancilla. In domo denique quae geruntur, sed et ipsis in fanis, Christiana fidelis, sine te esse non poterunt, quia uxor infelix es, si nescis quid agatur in domo: infelicior certe, si scieris.
For what voice, what rebuke could worthily reprove these women? They endow their disgrace with sacrilege, hand over the members of Christ to the slaves of demons; open the temple of God to the profane; strip bare even the very sanctuaries; confound the sacred things, having lost the joyful light, living in darkness, having shrines, not homes. They are rightly slain who, ungrateful for Christ's benefits, of their own accord return to the death from which they had escaped. Since the devil always lies in wait for those who do not seek him, consider what he does when invited: all the approaches for harm are thrown open to him, and they give him victory without a fight, without any toil: for he will not try to bring under his rule the woman who canvassed to be his handmaid. In short, what is done in the house, and even in the very shrines, cannot happen without you, faithful Christian woman, because you are an unhappy wife if you do not know what goes on in your house; certainly more unhappy if you know.
1 Cor 6:15 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:14–16 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno rebukes Christian women who marry pagans, so handing Christ's members to the slaves of demons.
- Allusions: 1 Cor 6:15; 2 Cor 6:14–16.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray mark): Quæ enim vox I quæ → Quæ enim vox, quæ; Dei|templum → Dei templum.
Topics: Marriage
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.7 (PL 11:307a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-7
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.8PL 11:307a–309a
Proponamus itaque, ut saepe contingit, in unum sibimet convenire diversae religionis diem, quo tibi Ecclesia, illi adeunda sint templa. Quo genere unusquisque suum sacrificium procurabitis? quo sumptu? quibus vasis? quibusve ministris? At si discrete fiunt ista, nihil prodest: ex uno enim proficisceudo et in unum remeando, si non confusione, vel errore fiunt una. Quid, quod illius sacrificium publicum est, tuum secretum? illius a quovis libere tractari potest, tuum etiam a christianis ipsis minime consecratis sine sacrilegio videri non potest. Postremo detestabilis est vivendi conditio, ubi non licet facere uxori quod marito placet; ubi proponis, quia nihil te gerere sinit, nisi quae disposuerit, prior ipse compleverit. Quod si factum non fuerit, factumve displicuerit, tum tota mugiet litibus domus, blasphemabitur Deus, arreptoque forsitan ipso sacrficio tuo, tuum pectus obtundet, tuam faciem deformabit, praestans aliquando et beneficium, cum te jubet ad ecclesiam non venire. Sed multo pejus est, si places marito: neque enim sine sacrilegio possis placere sacrilego. Ut rem compendio transigam, utique a templo regrediens necessario enarrabit tibi sciscitanti, sibi de utriusque salute, vel unaninitate deorum quæ fuere responsa. Si terribilia, consternata metu, forsitan, ipso cessante, illicita eis vota donabis, quod maritis etiam sub fidelibus multæ fecere pejores Evae non discipulæ, sed magistrae; illa enim decepta, hæ sua sponte se diabolo dediderunt. Sin vero pacifica et salutaria; profecto lætaberis, eique tanto pro nuntio morigera conjux pacem si non ingeris, nec negabis.
Let us suppose, then, as often happens, that the feast-days of the different religions fall on one and the same day, when you must go to church and he to the temples. In what manner will each of you provide for your sacrifice? At what expense? With what vessels? Or with what servants? And if these things are done separately, it does no good: for, setting out from one house and returning to one, they become one, if not by confusion, then by mistake. What of the fact that his sacrifice is public, yours secret? His can be handled freely by anyone; yours cannot be seen without sacrilege even by Christians not yet consecrated. Finally, it is a detestable condition of life where a wife may not do what pleases her husband; where you propose to do nothing unless he has arranged it and completed it first. If it is not done, or if what is done displeases him, then the whole house will roar with quarrels, God will be blasphemed, and perhaps, seizing your very sacrifice, he will beat your breast, disfigure your face, granting you even a benefit at times when he orders you not to come to church. But it is much worse if you please your husband: for you cannot please a sacrilegious man without sacrilege. To settle the matter briefly: returning from the temple he will necessarily tell you, when you ask, what replies were given about the safety of both of you or the agreement of the gods. If they are terrible, struck with fear, perhaps when he stops you will offer unlawful vows to them, as many women have done for their husbands even among the faithful, worse than Eve, not her pupils but her teachers; for she was deceived, but these have given themselves to the devil of their own accord. But if they are peaceful and favourable, you will surely rejoice, and an obliging wife, for such news, even if you do not press peace upon him, you will not refuse it.
1 Tim 2:14 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno describes the practical conflicts and dangers when a Christian woman married to a pagan must keep her worship and his.
- 'his sacrifice ... yours cannot be seen ... by Christians not yet consecrated': the Eucharist was hidden from the unbaptized. 'peace' at the end probably means the kiss of peace or marital union; uncertain. A leaked numeral was removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and leaked numeral): Quo geuere unusquisque suum sacrificium procurabitis? 60 quo sumptu? → Quo genere unusquisque suum sacrificium procurabitis? quo sumptu?; tum tpta mugiet → tum tota mugiet.
Topics: Marriage, Eucharist, Paganism
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.8 (PL 11:307a–309a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-8
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.9PL 11:309a–311b
Quid agis, misera? quid, vesana, laetaris Non est pax ista, sed bellum; non osculum, sed venenum. Proh nefas adhuc fumantia busto complecteris membra, sudoremque sordidarum vaporis ararum carne tua detergis, jocaris, blandiris, obsequeris; si quod forte acceptum relatumve fuerit a fanatico solemne mysterium, ipsa suscipis, ipsa reponis, ipsa custodis. Una cibum praeterea capis reliquas poculi propinati lambendo labris exhauris, futurique haustus quasi quasdam primitias auspicaris, totum prorsus iniquitatis spiritum libens concipis per maritum: infelix jam plus in te est quam in templo remansit. At si te serves atque contineas, æstimabit non amore divini cultus, sed alterius alicujus desiderio in suam hoc contumeliam procurari: castitatis observantiæque virtulem devocabit in crimen. Quid enim ille mali non suspicetur, non efficiat, diis crudclibus, diis adulteris serviens? Itaque deinceps fuge, virgo, fuge, vidua, nuptias tales. Excusatio prorsus nulla competit tibi. Si continens esse non poteris, saltem noli tuas nuptias fenerare, ne in illo resurrectionis die inter plurimos maritos non possis cujus fueris uxor agnoscere. Noli esse sacrilega, noli proditrix legis. Profano cur nubas, cum possis nubere Christiano?
What are you doing, wretched woman? Why do you rejoice, mad woman? This is not peace but war; not a kiss but poison. Oh, the wickedness! You embrace limbs still smoking from the funeral pyre, and wipe off on your own flesh the sweat of the steam of filthy altars; you jest, flatter, comply; if by chance some solemn mystery is received or brought back by the devotee, you yourself take it, you put it away, you guard it. Besides, you take food together, you drain with your lips the remains of the cup he toasted you with, and you inaugurate, as it were, the first fruits of a future draught; you willingly conceive through your husband the whole spirit of iniquity: unhappy woman, more is now in you than has remained in the temple. But if you keep yourself and hold back, he will think that this is contrived as an insult to him, not from love of divine worship but from desire for someone else; he will turn the virtue of chastity and observance into a crime. For what evil would he not suspect, not do, serving cruel gods, adulterous gods? Therefore from now on flee, virgin, flee, widow, such marriages. No excuse at all applies to you. If you cannot be continent, at least do not lend your marriages out at interest, lest on that day of resurrection you be unable to recognise, among very many husbands, whose wife you were. Do not be sacrilegious, do not be a betrayer of the law. Why marry a pagan, when you can marry a Christian?
Matt 22:28 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 7:39 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Zeno warns virgins and widows against marriage with pagans and against many successive marriages, urging them, if they marry, to marry a Christian.
- Translated exactly: 'among very many husbands' at the resurrection alludes to Matt 22:23–28. Allusion: 1 Cor 7:39 ('only in the Lord').
Topics: Marriage, Divorce and remarriage, Widows and consecrated virgins
Cite (SBL): Zeno, Tract. 1.5.9 (PL 11:309a–311b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/zeno-tractatus/1-5-9
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-zeno-tractatus-1-5-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text; leaked footnotes, numerals and Migne's Scripture references removed by logged corrections). No public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.