Sermons to the People 362.14–362.24
Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).
Chapter 362
362.14PL 39:1585
Possemus hanc quæstionem ita solvere, et resistere vanis calumniatoribus: verumtamen et sic solvetur, quomodo potest cito responderi, et diligentius, quod ait Apostolus, considerabimus unde sit dictum. Dico ergo quomodo possimus facillime respondere. Quid habet Evangelium? Quod resurrexit Christus in eo corpore, quo sepultus est: quia visus, quia contrectatus est, quia discipulis ait putantibus quod spiritus esset, Palpate, et videte, quia spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me videtis habere (Luc. XXIV, 39). Quid contra Apostolus? Caro et sanguis, inquit, regnum Dei non possidebunt. Amplector utrumque, nec dico ista pugnantia, ne ego ipse contra stimulum pugnem. Quomodo ergo amplector utrumque? Cito, ut dixi, possem sic respondere: Apostolus ait, Caro et sanguis regnum Dei hæreditate possidere non possunt. Recte dixit; non est enim carnis possidere, sed possideri. Non enim corpus tuum aliquid possidet, sed anima tua per corpus possidet, quæ ipsum etiam corpus possidet. Si ergo sic resurgit caro, ut habeatur, non habeat; ut possideatur, non possideat: quid mirum si caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit, quia utique possidebitur? Nam eos possidet caro, qui non sunt regnum Dei, sed regnum diaboli, et ideo subditi sunt voluptatibus carnis. Unde et ille paralyticus grabato portabatur: sed sanato Dominus ait, Tolle grabatum tuum, et vade in domum tuam (Marc. II, 11). Sic ergo paralysi sanata tenet carnem suam, et ducit quo vult: non quo non vult a carne ipse trahitur, et portat potius corpus, quam portatur a corpore. Manifestum est quod in illa resurrectione non habebit caro illecebrarum tractum, ut ducat animam per quasdam titillationes atque blanditias, quo anima non vult, et plerumque superatur, dicens: Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem, legi mentis meæ, et captivum me ducentem in lege peccati, quæ est in membris meis. Adhuc portatur grabato paralyticus, nondum portat: exclamet ergo, Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus? Respondeatur, Gratia Dei per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Cum ergo resurrexerimus, non nos caro portabit, sed nos eam portabimus: si nos portabimus, nos eam possidebimus: si nos eam possidebimus, non ab ea possidebimur; quia liberati a diabolo regnum Dei sumus: atque ita caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit. Ergo calumniatores illi conticescant, qui vere sunt caro et sanguis, et nihil possunt nisi carnaliter cogitare. Quia etiam de illis in eadem prudentia carnis perseverantibus, unde caro et sanguis merito appellantur, recte dici potuit, Caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebunt. Etiam hoc modo solvatur hæc quaestio: quia tales homines, qui caro et sanguis appellantur ( de talibus enim etiam Apostolus dicit, Non est nobis colluctatio adversus carnem et sanguinem (Ephes. VI, 12)), si non se ad spiritualem vitam converterint, et spiritu facta carnis mortificaverint, regnum Dei possidere non poterunt.
We could solve this question in this way and resist vain slanderers; yet it will be solved both in the way that allows a quick answer, and we shall then consider more carefully from what context the apostle's saying comes. I say, then, how we can answer most easily. What does the gospel contain? That Christ rose in the body in which he was buried: he was seen, he was handled, he said to the disciples when they thought he was a spirit, "Touch and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have." What does the apostle say against this? "Flesh and blood," he says, "will not possess the kingdom of God." I embrace both, and I do not say that they conflict, lest I myself kick against the goad. How then do I embrace both? Quickly, as I said, I could answer in this way. The apostle says, "Flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God by inheritance." He spoke rightly; for it belongs to the flesh not to possess but to be possessed. Your body does not possess anything, but your soul possesses through the body, and the soul possesses the body itself. If, then, the flesh rises in such a way as to be held, not to hold; to be possessed, not to possess; what wonder if flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God, since it will certainly be possessed? For the flesh possesses those who are not the kingdom of God but the kingdom of the devil, and who are therefore subject to the pleasures of the flesh. Hence too that paralytic was carried on his pallet; but when he was healed the Lord said to him, "Take up your pallet and go to your house." So, his paralysis healed, he holds his flesh and leads it where he will: he is not dragged by the flesh where he does not will, and he carries the body rather than being carried by the body. It is plain that in that resurrection the flesh will not have the pull of enticements to lead the soul, by certain ticklings and blandishments, where the soul does not will, the soul that is now often overcome and says: "I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and leading me captive in the law of sin which is in my members." The paralytic is still carried on his pallet; he does not yet carry it. Let him cry out, then, "Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from the body of this death?" Let the answer be given, "The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord." When, then, we have risen, the flesh will not carry us, but we shall carry it; if we carry it, we shall possess it; if we possess it, we shall not be possessed by it; because, delivered from the devil, we are the kingdom of God; and so flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God. So let those slanderers fall silent, who are truly flesh and blood and can think of nothing except carnally. For about them too, persisting in that same prudence of the flesh for which they are rightly called flesh and blood, it could rightly be said, "Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God." Let the question also be solved in this way: such men, who are called flesh and blood (for of such the apostle also says, "Our struggle is not against flesh and blood"), unless they turn to the spiritual life and by the Spirit put to death the deeds of the flesh, will not be able to possess the kingdom of God.
Luke 24:39 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:50 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 26:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mark 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:24–25 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:6 (echo, medium confidence) · Eph 6:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:13 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: A quick answer to the objection: flesh does not possess but is possessed; risen, we shall carry and rule the flesh, and carnal-minded people, who are "flesh and blood," will not possess the kingdom.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip in the reference; OCR slips; OCR slips in the reference): Possenius → Possemus; unde sil dic tum → unde sit dictum; carnem et essa non habet → carnem et ossa non habet; (Luc. XXIV, 59 Quid → (Luc. XXIV, 39). Quid; regnum D. i non → regnum Dei non; ali. quid possidet, sed arama tua per corpus possidct → aliquid possidet, sed anima tua per corpus possidet; si carn et sanguis regnum Dei non possidcbit → si caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit; (Marc. n, 11) → (Marc. II, 11); a camo ipse → a carne ipse; Yideo aliam → Video aliam; mentis meas → mentis meæ; nos eam possidcbimus → nos eam possidebimus; Quia eliam de illis → Quia etiam de illis; sanguis memo appellantur → sanguis merito appellantur; rEtiam boc modo → Etiam hoc modo; quia talcs homines → quia tales homines; CEphea. vi, 12]) → (Ephes. VI, 12)).
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.14 (PL 39:1585; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-14
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.15PL 39:1585–1586
Verumtamen quid ait Apostolus, dixerit aliquis? Ille enim verior sensus est, qui circumstantia lectionis aperitur. Itaque ipsum potius audiamus, et ex tota quæ circa est contextione Scripturæ, quid in eo loco intelligi voluerit, videamus. Sic enim ait: Primus homo de terra, terrenus; secundus homo de cælo. Qualis terrenus, tales et terreni; et qualis cælestis, tales et cælestes. Sicut portavimus imaginem terreni, portemus et imaginem ejus qui de cælo est. Hoc autem dico, fratres, quia caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit; neque corruptio incorruptionem (I Cor. XV, 47-50). Singula ergo videamus. Primus homo, inquit, de terra, terrenus; secundus homo, de cælo. Qualis terrenus, tales et terreni, id est, omnes morituri: et qualis cælestis, tales et coelestes, id est, omnes resurrecturi. Jam enim coelestis homo resurrexit, et ascendit in coelum: cui per fidem nunc incorporamur, ut sit ipse caput nostrum; membra autem ordine suo sequantur caput suum, et quod præmonstratum est in capite, tempore suo demonstretur in membris: modo autem hoc fide portemus, ut ad ipsam rem et speciem suo tempore veniamus. Sic enim alio loco dicit: Si autem resurrexistis cum Christo, quæ sursum sunt quærite, ubi Christus est in dextera Dei sedens; quæ sursum sunt sapite, non quæ super terram ( Coloss. III, 1 et 2). Sicut ergo cum in nobismetipsis nondum surreximus, sicut Christus in corpore, per fidem tamen cum Christo resurrexisse nos dicimur: ita imaginem coelestis hominis, id est, qui jam in caelis est, fide interim portare nos jubet.
But what does the apostle mean, someone may say? For that sense is truer which is opened up by the context of the reading. So let us rather hear him, and from the whole surrounding context of Scripture let us see what he wanted understood in that place. For he says: "The first man from the earth, earthly; the second man from heaven. As was the earthly one, so are the earthly; and as is the heavenly one, so are the heavenly. As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear also the image of him who is from heaven. This I say, brothers, that flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God, nor corruption incorruption." Let us, then, look at each point. "The first man," he says, "from the earth, earthly; the second man from heaven. As was the earthly one, so are the earthly," that is, all who are going to die; "and as is the heavenly one, so are the heavenly," that is, all who are going to rise. For the heavenly man has already risen and ascended into heaven; into him we are now incorporated by faith, so that he may be our head; and the members follow their head in their order, so that what was shown beforehand in the head may be shown in its time in the members. But now let us bear this by faith, so that in its time we may come to the reality itself and to sight. For so he says in another place: "If you have risen with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God; set your minds on the things that are above, not on the things on earth." As, then, though we have not yet risen in ourselves as Christ has risen in the body, we are nevertheless said to have risen with Christ by faith, so he commands us meanwhile to bear by faith the image of the heavenly man, that is, of him who is already in heaven.
1 Cor 15:47–50 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:1–2 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Read in context, 1 Cor 15:47–50 contrasts the earthly man, whose image all mortals bear, with the heavenly man, whose image believers now bear by faith as members of their risen head.
- Augustine reads 1 Cor 15:49 as an exhortation, "let us bear" (portemus), a reading also found in Greek manuscripts.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip in the reference; OCR slips; OCR slips in the reference): in co loco → in eo loco; videainus → videamus; qui de cælo eat → qui de cælo est; Iloc autem dico → Hoc autem dico; (I Cor. x v, 17-50) → (I Cor. XV, 47-50); videa tius → videamus; de terrat lerrenus → de terra, terrenus; tates et terreni → tales et terreni; cl qualis cælestis → et qualis cælestis; id cst, omnes resurrecturi → id est, omnes resurrecturi; rem cl speciem → rem et speciem; Sic euim alio → Sic enim alio; ( Coloss. III, i et 2) → ( Coloss. III, 1 et 2); Chrislo → Christo; bominis, id cst → hominis, id est; pOrlarc → portare.
Topics: Eschatology, Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.15 (PL 39:1585–1586; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-15
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.16PL 39:1586
Si quis autem quærit cur hominem secundum non in cælo dixerit, sed de coelo, cum et ipse Dominus de terra corpus acceperit, quia utique Maria ex Adam et Eva erat progenita; intelligat terrenum hominem secundum terrenam concupiscentiam dictum: et quoniam affectus ille terrenus est, quo per concubitum maris et feminæ nascuntur homines, trahentes etiam ex parentibus originale peccatum; corpus autem Domini nullo tali affectu ex utero virginali creatum est, quamvis de terra Christus assumpserit carnem, quod intelligitur Spiritus sanctus significare, dicens, Veritas de terra orta est; non tamen terrenus, sed caelestis homo, et de coelo dicitur. Si enim suis hoc fidelibus per gratiam præstitit, ut recte dicat Apostolus, Nostra enim conversatio in cælis est ( Philipp. III, 20): quanto magis ipse caelestis homo, et de cælo dicendus est, in quo nullum unquam peccatum fuit? Propter peccatum enim dictum est homini, Terra est et in terram ibis ( Gen. III, 19). De coelo ergo cælestis homo ille rectissime dicitur, cujus conversatio de cælo nunquam recessit: quamvis Dei Filius etiam hominis filius factus de terra corpus assumpserit, id est, formam servi. Non enim ascendit, nisi qui descendit. Quia etsi ceteri, quibuscumque donaverit ascendunt, vel potius ejus gratia levantur in cælum, etiam sic ipse ascendit, quia corpus ejus fiunt; et secundum hoc unus ascendit: quoniam sacramentum magnum in Christo et Ecclesia exponit Apostolus, quo scriptum est, Et erunt duo in carnem unam ( Ephes. V, 31). Unde etiam dicitur, Igitur non jam duo, sed una caro. Quapropter nemo ascendit in cœlum, nisi qui de cœlo descendit, Filius hominis, qui est in cælo. Propter hoc enim addidit, qui est in cælo, ne quisquam ejus conversationem de coelo recessisse arbitraretur, cum per terrenum corpus in terra hominibus appareret. Ergo sicut portavimus imaginem terreni, portemus et imaginem ejus qui de cælo est, interim fide, per quam etiam cum illo resurreximus; ut et sursum cor habeamus, ubi Christus est in dextera Dei sedens; et ideo quæ sursum sunt quæramus, atque sapiamus, non quæ super terram.
But if anyone asks why he said that the second man is not "in heaven" but "from heaven," when the Lord himself also received a body from the earth, since Mary was certainly descended from Adam and Eve, let him understand that the man is called earthly on account of earthly desire. That disposition is earthly by which human beings are born through the union of male and female, drawing even original sin from their parents; but the Lord's body was formed in the virgin's womb with no such disposition. So, although Christ took flesh from the earth, which the Holy Spirit is understood to signify when he says, "Truth has sprung from the earth," he is nevertheless called not an earthly but a heavenly man, and from heaven. For if he granted this to his faithful by grace, so that the apostle rightly says, "For our citizenship is in heaven," how much more is he himself, in whom there was never any sin, to be called a heavenly man, and from heaven? For it was because of sin that it was said to man, "You are earth, and to earth you shall go." That man, then, is most rightly called heavenly, from heaven, whose citizenship never left heaven, although the Son of God, having become also the son of man, took a body from the earth, that is, the form of a servant. For no one ascends except he who descended. For even though the others, to whom he grants it, ascend, or rather are lifted into heaven by his grace, even so it is he who ascends, because they become his body; and in this sense one ascends, since the apostle explains as the great sacrament in Christ and the Church the text where it is written, "And the two shall be in one flesh." Hence it is also said, "So they are no longer two, but one flesh." Therefore no one has ascended into heaven except he who came down from heaven, the Son of man, who is in heaven. For he added "who is in heaven" for this reason, so that no one would think his citizenship had left heaven when he appeared to men on earth in an earthly body. Therefore, as we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear also the image of him who is from heaven, meanwhile by faith, through which we have also risen with him; so that we may also lift up our heart on high, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God; and therefore let us seek and set our minds on the things that are above, not on the things on earth.
Ps 85:11 (84:12 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 4:9–10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 5:31–32 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:6 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:49 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:1–2 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ is called "from heaven" though his body came from Mary, because he was born without earthly desire or sin and his citizenship never left heaven; his members ascend in him.
- The two shall be "in one flesh" follows Augustine's Latin of Eph 5:31 (Gen 2:24).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip in the reference; OCR slips): in Ctelo → in cælo; originale pecralum → originale peccatum; iulelligilur → intelligitur; el de coelo dicitur → et de coelo dicitur; graHam → gratiam; conversaiio in cæ/is est ( Philipp. m, 20) → conversatio in cælis est ( Philipp. III, 20); Propter peccatum cnim → Propter peccatum enim; ( Gell. III, 19) → ( Gen. III, 19); lilius factus → filius factus; Non euim asicndit → Non enim ascendit; cæleri, quibuscumque → ceteri, quibuscumque; pot ius ojus gratia → potius ejus gratia; fiunt; ct secundum → fiunt; et secundum; ( Ephes. v, 51) → ( Ephes. V, 31); Unde eliam dicitur → Unde etiam dicitur; ascendit in cutum → ascendit in cœlum; qui est in cæ/o → qui est in cælo; qui cst in cælo → qui est in cælo; interim lide → interim fide; ut ei sursum cor Iubeamus → ut et sursum cor habeamus; et idco quæ sursum → et ideo quæ sursum; super It,,ram → super terram.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.16 (PL 39:1586; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-16
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-16) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.17PL 39:1586–1587
Sed quia de resurrectione corporis agebat; nam ita proposuerat: Sed dicit aliquis, Quomodo resurgunt mortui ( I Cor. XV, 35 )? quo autem corpore veniunt? et propterea dixerat, Primus homo de terra terrenus, secundus homo, de cæ/o. Qualis terrenus, tales et terreni; et qualis cæ/estis, tales et cœtestes: ut hoc speremus in nostro corpore futurum, quod in Christi corpore præcessit; atque hoc quanquam nondum reipsa percepimus, interim fide teneamus. Ideo subjunxerat, Sicut portavimus imaginem terreni, portemus et imaginem ejus qui de cæ/o est. Ne ad talia nos resurrecturos crederemus, qualia secundum primum hominem corruptibiliter agebamus, subjecit statim: Hoc autem dico., fratres, quia caro et sanguis regnum Dei hæreditate possidere non possunt. Atque ostendere volens quid dixerit carnem et sanguinem, quia non ipsam speciem corporis, sed corruptionem significat nomine carnis et sanguinis, quæ corruptio tunc non erit. Corpus enim sine corruptione, non proprie dicitur caro et sanguis, sed corpus. Si enim caro est, corruptibilis atque mortalis est: si autem jam non moritur, jam non corruptibilis; et ideo sine corruptione manente specie, non jam caro, sed corpus dicitur: et si dicitur caro, non jam proprie dicitur, sed propter quamdam speciei similitudinem. Sicut possumus forte propter eamdem similitudinem, etiam Angelorum carnem dicere, cum sicut homines apparuerunt hominibus; cum essent corpus, non caro: quia corruptionis indigentia non inerat. Quia ergo possumus secundum similitudinem carnem appellare etiam corpus quod jam non corrumpitur, secutus sollicitus Apostolus exponere voluit quid dixerit carnem et sanguinem; quia secundum corruptionem hoc dixit, non secundum speciem: et subjecit statim, Neque corruptio incorruptionem hæreditate possidebit: tanquam diceret, Quod dixi, Caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit; hoc dixi, quoniam corruptio incorruptionem non possidebit. Et ne quisquam diceret, Si ergo incorruptio a corruptione non potest possideri, quomodo ibi erit corpus nostrum? audite quod sequitur. Quasi enim diceretur Apostolo, Quid est ergo quod dicis? frustrane credidimus carnis resurrectionem? Si caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit, frustra credidimus resurrexisse Dominum nostrum a mortuis in corpore in quo natus et crucifixus est, in eo ascendisse in cœlum coram oculis discipulorum suorum, de quo coelo ad te clamavit, Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? Occurrit hoc Paulo sancto ct beato apostolo, et pia charitate parturienti filios suos in Christo per Evangelium genitos (I Cor. IV, 15), quos adhuc parturiebat donec Christus in eis reformaretur, id est, donec portarent per fidem imaginem ejus qui de caelo est. Nolebat enim eos in ea ruina remanere, ut arbitrarentur se talia facturos in regno Dei, in illa æterna vita, qualia faciebant in hac vita, in voluptatibus manducandi et bibendi, nubendi, uxores ducendi, et eos carnaliter generandi: hæc enim opera corruptio carnis habet, non ipsa species carnis. Jam ergo quia non ad talia resurrecturi sumus, praescripsit, ut jam dudum dixeram, Dominus in evangelica lectione quæ modo recitata est. Judæi enim resurrectionem quidem credebant carnis, sed talem futuram putabant, ut ea vita esset in resurrectione, qualem in hoc sæculo gerebant; atque ita carnaliter cogitantes, Sadducæis respondere non poterant proponentibus de resurrectione quæstionem, cujus erit uxor mulier, quam septem fratres sibi succedentes habuerunt, cum vellet unusquisque fratri suo mortuo ex ejus uxore semen excitare. Sadducæi enim secta erat quædam Judæorum, quae non credebat resurrectionem. Judæi ergo Sadducæis istam quæstionem proponentibus fluctuantes et hæsitantes respondere non poterant, quia regnum Dei a carne et sanguine, id est, incorruptionem a corruptione possideri posse arbitrabantur. Venit Veritas, interrogatur a deceptis et deceptoribus Sadducæis, proponitur illa quæstio Domino. Et Dominus qui sciret quid diceret, et quod nesciebamus credere nos vellet, respondet auctoritate majestatis suæ quod credamus. Apostolus autem exposuit quantum ei datum est: quod, quantum possumus intelligamus. Quid ergo Dominus Sadducæis? Erratis, inquit, non scientes Scripturas, neque virtutem Dei. In resurrectione enim neque nubunt, neque uxores ducunt; neque enim incipiunt mori, sed erunt æquales Angelis Dei. Magna virtus Dei. Quare non nubunt, neque uxores ducunt? Quia non incipient mori. Ibi enim successor, ubi decessor. Nulla ergo ibi talis corruptio. Et ille Dominus per ætates ab infantia usque ad juventutem cucurrit, quia carnis adhuc mortalis gerebat substantiam: posteaquam resurrexit in ætate in qua sepultus est, numquid credimus eum in cœlo senescere? Ergo erunt, inquit, æquales Angelis Dei. Abstulit de medio suspicionem Judæorum, refellit calumnias Sadducæorum: quia Judæi credebant quidem resurrecturos mortuos, sed ad quæ opera resurgerent carnaliter sentiebant. Erunt æquales, inquit, Angelis Dei. Audisti de virtute Dei, audi etiam de Scripturis. De resurrectione, inquit, non legistis, quomodo locutus sit Dominus ad Moysen de rubo, dicens: Ego sum Deus Abraham, Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob? Non est Deus mortuorum, sed vivorum.
But he was dealing with the resurrection of the body; for so he had set out the question: "But someone says, How do the dead rise? With what body do they come?" And that is why he had said, "The first man from the earth, earthly; the second man from heaven. As was the earthly one, so are the earthly; and as is the heavenly one, so are the heavenly": so that we may hope that what went before in Christ's body will come to be in our body, and, though we have not yet received it in reality, may hold it meanwhile by faith. Therefore he had added, "As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear also the image of him who is from heaven." And so that we would not believe that we shall rise to the kind of things we did corruptibly according to the first man, he added at once: "This I say, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God by inheritance." He wanted to show what he meant by flesh and blood: that by the name of flesh and blood he signifies not the form of the body itself but corruption, and that corruption will not exist then. For a body without corruption is not properly called flesh and blood, but body. If it is flesh, it is corruptible and mortal; but if it no longer dies, it is no longer corruptible; and therefore, since its form remains without corruption, it is called not flesh but body; and if it is called flesh, it is no longer called so properly, but because of a certain likeness of form. In the same way, perhaps, because of the same likeness, we can speak even of the flesh of angels, when they appeared to men as men, though they were body, not flesh, because the need that belongs to corruption was not in them. Since, then, by likeness we can call even a body that is no longer corrupted "flesh," the apostle, being careful, went on to explain what he meant by flesh and blood: that he said it with regard to corruption, not with regard to form. And he added at once, "Nor will corruption possess incorruption by inheritance"; as if to say, What I said, "Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God," I said because corruption will not possess incorruption. [18] And so that no one would say, "If incorruption cannot be possessed by corruption, how then will our body be there?" hear what follows. It is as though someone said to the apostle: What is it, then, that you are saying? Have we believed in the resurrection of the flesh in vain? If flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God, we have believed in vain that our Lord rose from the dead in the body in which he was born and crucified, and in it ascended into heaven before the eyes of his disciples, the heaven from which he cried out to you, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?" This objection occurred to Paul, the holy and blessed apostle, as he labored with devout love over his children, begotten in Christ through the gospel, with whom he was still in labor until Christ was formed again in them, that is, until they bore by faith the image of him who is from heaven. For he did not want them to remain in the ruinous error of thinking that in the kingdom of God, in that eternal life, they would do the kind of things they did in this life, in the pleasures of eating and drinking, of marrying, of taking wives and begetting children from them carnally; for these works belong to the corruption of the flesh, not to the form of the flesh itself. That we are not going to rise to such things, then, the Lord laid down, as I said a while ago, in the gospel reading that has just been read. For the Jews did believe in the resurrection of the flesh, but they thought it would be such that the life in the resurrection would be like the life they led in this world; and so, thinking carnally, they could not answer the Sadducees when these raised their question about the resurrection: whose wife would the woman be whom seven brothers had one after another, since each wished to raise up offspring for his dead brother from his wife? For the Sadducees were a sect of the Jews that did not believe in the resurrection. So the Jews, wavering and hesitating, could not answer the Sadducees who put this question, because they thought the kingdom of God could be possessed by flesh and blood, that is, incorruption by corruption. The Truth came; he is questioned by the Sadducees, who were deceived and deceivers; that question is put to the Lord. And the Lord, who knew what he was saying and wanted us to believe what we did not know, answers with the authority of his majesty what we are to believe; the apostle explained it as far as was given to him; let us understand it as far as we can. What then did the Lord say to the Sadducees? "You are wrong," he says, "knowing neither the Scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor take wives; for they do not begin to die, but they will be equal to the angels of God." Great is the power of God. Why do they not marry or take wives? Because they will not begin to die. For successors are needed only where there are those who pass away. There will be no such corruption there, then. That Lord ran through the ages of life from infancy to young manhood because he still bore the substance of mortal flesh; but since he rose at the age at which he was buried, do we believe that he is growing old in heaven? "Therefore," he says, "they will be equal to the angels of God." He removed the Jews' supposition and refuted the slanders of the Sadducees; for the Jews did believe that the dead would rise, but they thought carnally about the works to which they would rise. "They will be equal," he says, "to the angels of God." You have heard about the power of God; hear also about the Scriptures. "About the resurrection," he says, "have you not read how the Lord spoke to Moses from the bush, saying, I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living."
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
1 Cor 15:35 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:47–49 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:50 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 9:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 4:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 22:23–28 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 22:29–30 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 20:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 12:26–27 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 3:6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: By "flesh and blood" Paul means corruption, not the body's form; Christ's answer to the Sadducees shows that the risen will not marry or die but be equal to the angels.
- The opening sentences "Hoc nobis resurrectione præstandum, quod in Christo præcessit. Caro sanguis pro corruptione" ("What went before in Christ will be granted us in the resurrection. Flesh and blood stand for corruption") are Migne's marginal headings and have been removed.
- Paragraph 18 is merged into this section in the digital text; its printed number is marked [18]. The marginal headings before it (on our body in heaven, the works of the flesh after the resurrection, the error of the Jews and Sadducees, and resurrection to the life of angels) have been removed.
- "For they do not begin to die" reflects Luke 20:36, which Augustine combines with Matt 22:29–30.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal headings; OCR slip; OCR slip in the reference; OCR slips; paragraph number 18 (misread) and Migne's marginal headings; split word; stray mark): Hoc nobis resurrectione præstandum, quod in Christo præcessit. Caro sanguis pro corruptione. Sed quia → Sed quia; ( I Cor. xv, 55 ) → ( I Cor. XV, 35 ); ct propterea dixcrat → et propterea dixerat; tcneamus → teneamus; dixcritcarnemct sanguinem → dixerit carnem et sanguinem; corruptibilis atque mortalis cst → corruptibilis atque mortalis est; cl ideo sine corruplionc → et ideo sine corruptione; dicitur: ct si dicitur → dicitur: et si dicitur; etam Angelorum → etiam Angelorum; cam essent corpus → cum essent corpus; similitudincm → similitudinem; currumpitur, secutus sollicilus → corrumpitur, secutus sollicitus; dixeril carnem → dixerit carnem; seculIdum corruptioncm → secundum corruptionem; hoe dixi → hoc dixi; iS Quomodo in caelo erit corpus nostrum, si non erit ibi corruptio. Carnis non erunt eadem opera posl resurrectionem. Judæorum ct Sudducæorum error de resurrectione. Resurrectio ad vitam Angelorum. Et ne quisquam → Et ne quisquam; seqnitur → sequitur; Quasi euim → Quasi enim; Si caro cL sanguis → Si caro et sanguis; apostolo I et pia → apostolo, et pia; Chri sto → Christo; (/ Cor. iv, 15) → (I Cor. IV, 15); III arbitrarentur → ut arbitrarentur; rcgno Dei → regno Dei; opcra corruptio → opera corruptio; su'nus → sumus; Juda;! enim → Judæi enim; fratri sun mortuo ex cjus uxore → fratri suo mortuo ex ejus uxore; secta crat → secta erat; non credcbat → non credebat; Sadduc?eis → Sadducæis; passe arbitrabantur → posse arbitrabantur; Sadducxis → Sadducæis; dicercL → diceret; autcm exposuit → autem exposuit; quantuin possumus → quantum possumus; nrque enim → neque enim; virtus Dci. Quare → virtus Dei. Quare; por ætates → per ætates; gercbat → gerebat; xtatc → ætate; in roelo senescere → in cœlo senescere; Abslulit de mcdio → Abstulit de medio; Judacorum, rcfellit → Judæorum, refellit; qnia Judæi → quia Judæi; de virtute Dci, audi → de virtute Dei, audi; £cripturis → Scripturis.
Topics: Eschatology, Marriage
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.17 (PL 39:1586–1587; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-17
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-17) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.19PL 39:1587
Quod ergo resurgamus, dictum est: et quoniam ad vitam Angelorum resurgimus, a Domino audivimus: in qua vero specie resurgamus, ipse ostendit in resurrectione sua. Quia vero ipsa species corruptionem non habebit, Apostolus dicit: Hoc autem dico, fratres, quia caro et sanguis regnum Dei hæreditate possidere non possunt; neque corruptio incorruptionem hæreditate possidebit: ut ostenderet nomine carnis et sanguinis corruptionem mortalis animalisque corporis se intelligere voluisse. Deinde solvit jam ipse quæstionem, quam possent ab eo solliciti auditores exquirere: quia sollicitior ipse de intellectu filiorum, quam filii sunt de verbis parentum. Subjungit ergo, et dicit: Ecce mysterium vobis dico. Quiescat cogitatio tua, o homo, quisquis es. Coeperas enim cogitare de verbis Apostoli, quod caro humana non resurgat, cum audires, Caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit: sed præbe aurem consequentibus verbis, et corrige præsumptionem cogitationis. Ecce, inquit, mysterium dico vobis: omnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur. Quid est hoc? Mutatio quippe aut in pejus est, aut in melius. Si ergo posita est mutatio, ut nondum videamus qualis erit, utrum in aliquid melius, an in aliquid deterius: ergo sequatur, et ipse exponat; quid nobis est suspicari? Et fortasse humana suspicione labi in errorem te non permittit in conjecturas tuas apostolica auctoritas, et hoc liquido exponit, cujusmodi mutationem velit intelligi. Quid ergo? Cum dixisset, Omnes resurgemus, non tamen omnes immutabimur: video omnes resurrecturos et bonos et malos; sed qui immutabuntur, videamus; et hinc intelligamus mutationem, utrum in melius an in deterius sit futura. Si enim malorum est ista mutatio, in pejus; si autem bonorum, in melius erit. In atomo, inquit, in ictu oculi, in novissima tuba. Canet enim tuba, et mortui resurgent incorrupti, et nos immutabimur. Jam ergo in melius erit ista mutatio, cum dicit, Et nos immutabimur: sed nondum expressum est quantum exprimi oportuit, quousque corpus nostrum commutatur in melius. Quid est ipsum melius, nondum dictum est. Nam et ab infantia in adolescentiam cum mutatur, potest dici in melius commutari, ubi etsi minus infirmum, adhuc tamen infirmum et mortale est.
That we shall rise, then, has been stated; that we rise to the life of angels we have heard from the Lord; and in what form we shall rise he himself showed in his resurrection. That this form will have no corruption, the apostle says: "This I say, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God by inheritance; nor will corruption possess incorruption by inheritance": to show that by the name of flesh and blood he meant the corruption of the mortal and animal body. Then he himself solves the question which anxious hearers might put to him; for he is more anxious about his children's understanding than the children are about their parents' words. So he goes on to say: "Behold, I tell you a mystery." Let your thoughts be quiet, O man, whoever you are. For you had begun to think from the apostle's words that human flesh does not rise, when you heard, "Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God"; but lend your ear to the words that follow and correct the presumption of your thought. "Behold," he says, "I tell you a mystery: we shall all rise, but we shall not all be changed." What is this? Change is either for the worse or for the better. If, then, change has been mentioned in such a way that we do not yet see what kind it will be, whether into something better or something worse, let him go on and explain it himself; why should we guess? And perhaps apostolic authority does not let you slip into error through human guesswork in your conjectures, and explains clearly what kind of change it wants understood. What then? Since he said, "We shall all rise, yet we shall not all be changed," I see that all will rise, both good and bad; but let us see who will be changed, and from that understand the change, whether it will be for the better or for the worse. For if this change belongs to the wicked, it will be for the worse; but if to the good, for the better. "In an atom," he says, "in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will rise incorrupt, and we shall be changed." So this change will be for the better, since he says, "And we shall be changed"; but it has not yet been stated as fully as it should be how far our body is changed for the better. What that better is has not yet been said. For even when the body is changed from infancy to youth, it can be said to be changed for the better, though even then, while less weak, it is still weak and mortal.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Luke 20:36 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:50 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:51–52 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paul removes the misunderstanding of "flesh and blood" by announcing a mystery: all will rise, but only the faithful will be changed, and that for the better.
- The opening words "Mutatio carnis in melius bonorum propria" ("The change of the flesh for the better belongs to the good") are Migne's marginal heading and have been removed.
- Augustine's text of 1 Cor 15:51 reads "we shall all rise, but we shall not all be changed," a variant attested in Latin and some Greek witnesses. "In an atom" renders the Greek ἐν ἀτόμῳ ("in a moment"), which Augustine explains in the next section.
- The previous paragraph (18) is translated inside 362.17.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading; OCR slip; OCR slip; OCR slips): Mutatio carnis in melius bonorum propria. Quod crgo → Quod ergo; ct quoniam → et quoniam; in qua vcro → in qua vero; Qnia vero ipsa species corruptionem non habcbit → Quia vero ipsa species corruptionem non habebit; quia curo et sanguis → quia caro et sanguis; quacstionem → quæstionem; auditorcs → auditores; Coeperas cnim cogitare do verbis → Coeperas enim cogitare de verbis; quippo aut in pcjus → quippe aut in pejus; permitit → permittit; expouit → exponit; Quid crgo? Cum → Quid ergo? Cum; resurrecturos ct bonos → resurrecturos et bonos; si autcm bonorum → si autem bonorum; et noa immutabimur → et nos immutabimur.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.19 (PL 39:1587; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-19
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.20PL 39:1587–1588
Ergo singula diligentius retractemus. In atomo, inquit. Difficile videtur hominibus resurgere mortuos: sed mirum est quemadmodum abstulerit Apostolus omnes ancipites difficultates de cordibus fidelium. Dicis tu, Non resurgunt mortui: ego non solum resurgere mortuum dico, sed tanta celeritate, quanta non conceptus et natus es. Quanta enim mora est ut formetur homo in utero, ut perficiatur, ut nascatur, ut ætatum successione roboretur? Numquid forte sic resurrecturus est? Non: sed in atomo, inquit. Multi nesciunt quid sit atomus. Atomus dictus est a τομή, quod est sectio: ἄτομος græce quod secari non potest. Sed dicitur atomus in corpore, dicitur in tempore. In corpore dicitur, si quid inveniri potest quod quidem dividi non posse perhibeatur, corpusculum aliquod tam minutum, ut jam non habeat ubi secari possit. Atomus autem in tempore momentum est breve, quod jam non habet ubi dividatur. Verbi gratia, ut possint etiam corda tardiora capere quod dico: lapis est; divide eum in partes, et partes ipsas divide in lapillos, lapillos quidem in grana, veluti sunt arenæ, rursusque ipsa arenæ grana divide in minutissimum pulverem, donec si possit pervenias ad aliquam minutiam, qualis jam dividi non potest. Hæc est atomus in corporibus. In tempore vero sic intelligitur. Annus, verbi gratia, dividitur in menses, menses dividuntur in dies, dies adhuc in horas dividi possunt, horæ adhuc in partes horarum quasdam productiores, quæ admittunt divisiones, quousque venias ad tantum temporis punctum, et quamdam momenti stillam, ut per nullam morulam produci possit, et ideo jam dividi non possit: hæc est atomus temporis. Dicebas ergo non resurgere mortuos: non solum resurgunt, sed tanta celeritate resurgunt, ut in atomo temporis futura sit omnium resurrectio mortuorum. Et exponens tibi atomi celeritatem, cum dixisset, in atomo, adjunxit continuo, quantum fieri possit actionis ac motus in atomo temporis, In ictu oculi ait. Scivit enim obscure dixisse, in atomo, et planius dicere voluit quod facilius intelligeretur. Quid est ictus oculi? Non quo palpebris claudimus oculum vel aperimus: sed ictum dicit oculi emissionem radiorum ad aliquid cernendum. Mox enim ut conjeceris aspectum, emissus radius in coelum pervenit, ubi solem et lunam et stellas et sidera contuemur, tam immenso intervallo a terra separata. Tubam vero novissimam, signum novissimum dicit. Canet enim, inquit, tuba, et mortui resurgent incorrupti, et nos immutabimur. Nos utique fideles dixit, et priores resurgentes ad vitam æternam. Ergo illa mutatio, quia piorum atque sanctorum est, in melius erit, non in deterius.
Let us, then, go over each point more carefully. "In an atom," he says. It seems hard to people that the dead should rise; but it is wonderful how the apostle has removed every doubt and difficulty from the hearts of the faithful. You say, "The dead do not rise"; I say not only that the dead man rises, but that he rises with a speed greater than that with which you were conceived and born. For how much time passes before a man is formed in the womb, before he is completed, before he is born, before he grows strong through the succession of the ages of life! Is he perhaps going to rise like that? No: but "in an atom," he says. Many do not know what an atom is. Atom is named from tomē, which means cutting; atomos in Greek is what cannot be cut. But we speak of an atom in body and in time. We speak of it in body if something can be found which is held to be indivisible, some tiny body so small that there is nowhere left where it can be cut. An atom in time is a brief moment which has nowhere left where it can be divided. For example, so that even slower hearts may grasp what I say: there is a stone; divide it into parts, and divide the parts into pebbles, the pebbles into grains like grains of sand, and again divide the grains of sand into the finest dust, until, if you can, you reach some tiny particle that can no longer be divided. This is the atom in bodies. In time it is understood thus. A year, for example, is divided into months, months are divided into days, days can be further divided into hours, hours further into certain longer parts of hours which admit divisions, until you come to such a point of time, a drop of a moment as it were, that it cannot be stretched out by any tiny delay and therefore can no longer be divided: this is the atom of time. You said, then, that the dead do not rise: not only do they rise, but they rise with such speed that the resurrection of all the dead will take place in an atom of time. And to explain to you the speed of the atom, after saying "in an atom," he added at once how much action and motion can take place in an atom of time: "in the twinkling of an eye," he says. For he knew that he had spoken obscurely in saying "in an atom," and he wanted to say more plainly something that would be more easily understood. What is the twinkling, the stroke, of an eye? Not the movement by which we close or open the eye with the eyelids; by the stroke of the eye he means the sending out of the rays to see something. For as soon as you cast your gaze, the ray sent out reaches the sky, where we behold the sun and moon and stars and constellations, separated from the earth by so immense a distance. And by the last trumpet he means the last signal. "For the trumpet will sound," he says, "and the dead will rise incorrupt, and we shall be changed." By "we" he certainly meant the faithful, those who rise first to eternal life. Therefore that change, because it belongs to the devout and the saints, will be for the better, not for the worse.
1 Cor 15:52 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine explains the "atom" of time and the "twinkling of an eye": the dead will rise in an indivisible instant, and the change of the faithful will be for the better.
- The opening words "Atomus, quid. Atomus in corpore. Atomus in tempore. Ictus oculi" ("What an atom is. The atom in body. The atom in time. The twinkling of the eye") are Migne's marginal headings and have been removed.
- Augustine explains ictus oculi by the ancient theory that the eye sees by sending out rays.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal headings; OCR slip; OCR slips): Atomus, quid. Atomus in corpore. Atomus in tempore. Ictus oculi. Ergo singula → Ergo singula; abstulcriL → abstulerit; uatus es → natus es; III corpore dicitur → In corpore dicitur; dividi non posse p rliibetar, corpusculum aliquo..; tam minutum → dividi non posse perhibeatur, corpusculum aliquod tam minutum; lapis cst; divide cum in partes → lapis est; divide eum in partes; veluti sunt arenti → veluti sunt arenæ; horx adhuc → horæ adhuc; qux admittunt → quæ admittunt; et idco jam → et ideo jam; ernissus radius → emissus radius; Canet euim → Canet enim; fidelcs dixit, ct priores → fideles dixit, et priores.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.20 (PL 39:1587–1588; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-20
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.21PL 39:1588
Sed quæ est ista mutatio? quid est illud quod ait, Immutabimur? Species amittitur quæ nunc est, an sola corruptio, propter id quod dictum est, Caro et sanguis regnum Dei possidere non possunt; neque corruptio incorruptionem hæreditate possidebit? Quod ne auditorem moveret ad desperandam carnis resurrectionem, subjecit, Ecce mysterium vobis dico: omnes resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur. Et ne putaremus immutationem in pejus futuram: et nos, inquit, immutabimur. Restat ergo ut dicat qualis immutatio futura sit. Oportet enim hoc corruptibile, inquit, induere incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induere immortalitatem. Si corruptibile hoc induetur incorruptione, et mortale hoc induetur immortalitate; jam non erit corruptibilis caro. Si ergo non erit corruptibilis caro, cessabit nomen corruptionis in carne et sanguine, cessabit etiam nomen proprium carnis et sanguinis; quia mortalitatis sunt ista nomina. Et si ita est, et caro resurget, et quia immutatur ut sit incorrupta, caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit. Quod si illam immutationem in eis aliquis intelligere voluerit, quos tunc adhuc vivos ille dies inventurus est; ut qui jam mortui erant, resurgant, qui autem adhuc vivunt, immutentur; ut eorum personam suscepisse credatur Apostolus, cum ait, Et nos immutabimur: eadem tamen ratio consequetur, quia illa incorruptio ad omnes utique pertinebit, cum corruptibile hoc induet incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induet immortalitatem. Tunc fiet sermo qui scriptus est, Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Corpus autem quod jam mortale non est, non proprie dicitur caro et sanguis, quæ terrena sunt corpora: sed corpus dicitur, quod jam coeleste dici potest. Sicut idem apostolus cum diceret de carnium differentia: Non omnis, inquit, caro eadem caro. Alia quidem est hominum, alia pecorum, alia piscium, alia volucrum, alia serpentium. Et corpora, inquit, cælestia, et corpora terrestria. Nullo modo autem diceret carnes cœlestes; quamvis carnes possint dici corpora, sed terrestria. Omnis enim caro corpus est: non autem omne corpus caro: non solum quia coeleste corpus non dicitur caro, sed etiam quædam ipsa terrestria, sicut ligna et lapides, et si quid ejusmodi est. Etiam sic ergo caro et sanguis regnum Dei possidere non possunt: quia resurgens caro in tale corpus commutabitur, in quo jam non erit mortalis corruptio, et propterea nec carnis et sanguinis nomen.
But what is this change? What does he mean by "we shall be changed"? Is the form that now exists lost, or only corruption, because of what was said, "Flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God, nor will corruption possess incorruption by inheritance"? So that this would not move the hearer to despair of the resurrection of the flesh, he added, "Behold, I tell you a mystery: we shall all rise, but we shall not all be changed." And so that we would not think the change would be for the worse: "And we," he says, "shall be changed." It remains, then, for him to say what kind of change it will be. "For this corruptible," he says, "must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality." If this corruptible is clothed with incorruption, and this mortal is clothed with immortality, the flesh will no longer be corruptible. If, then, the flesh will not be corruptible, the name of corruption will cease in flesh and blood, and the proper name of flesh and blood will cease too, because these are names of mortality. And if this is so, the flesh will both rise and, because it is changed so as to be incorrupt, flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God. But if anyone wants to understand that change as referring to those whom that day will find still alive, so that those who were already dead rise, while those who are still alive are changed, and the apostle is thought to have spoken in their person when he says, "And we shall be changed," the same reasoning will still follow, since that incorruption will surely belong to all, when this corruptible puts on incorruption and this mortal puts on immortality. "Then the word that is written will come to pass: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your contention? Where, O death, is your sting?" But a body that is no longer mortal is not properly called flesh and blood, which are earthly bodies; it is called body, which can now be called heavenly. So the same apostle said, speaking of the differences between kinds of flesh: "Not all flesh," he says, "is the same flesh. There is one for men, another for cattle, another for fish, another for birds, another for serpents." "And there are heavenly bodies," he says, "and earthly bodies." But he would by no means say "heavenly fleshes," though fleshes can be called bodies, earthly ones. For all flesh is body, but not every body is flesh; not only because a heavenly body is not called flesh, but because certain earthly things are not called flesh either, such as wood and stones and anything of that kind. In this way too, then, flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God: because the rising flesh will be changed into a body in which there will no longer be mortal corruption, and therefore not the name of flesh and blood either.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
1 Cor 15:50 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:51 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53–55 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 25:8 (echo, medium confidence) · Hos 13:14 (echo, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:39–40 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The change is the putting on of incorruption and immortality; the risen flesh is no longer properly called "flesh and blood," names of mortality, but a heavenly body.
- The opening words "Caro et sanguis proprie corruptionis et mortalitatis nomina" ("Flesh and blood are properly names of corruption and mortality") are Migne's marginal heading and have been removed.
- "Another for serpents" is in Augustine's Latin of 1 Cor 15:39 but not in the standard Greek text.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading; OCR slip; OCR slips; split word): Caro et sanguis proprie corruptionis et mortalitatis nomina. Sed quæ → Sed quæ; reguum Dei → regnum Dei; cor ruptio → corruptio; immortalilate → immortalitate; immutatur ei nt incorrupta → immutatur ut sit incorrupta; induel incorruptionem → induet incorruptionem; induNt → induet; nf.n proprie → non proprie; Alia quidam est → Alia quidem est; diceretearnes → diceret carnes; Umnis enim → Omnis enim; oninc corpus → omne corpus; pos,idcre → possidere; jam non crit mortalis corruptio,ct → jam non erit mortalis corruptio, et.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.21 (PL 39:1588; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-21
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.22PL 39:1588–1589
Sed intendite, fratres, rogamus vos; non est res parvi pendenda, de fide nostra agitur: cui non tam a Paganis cavendum est, quam a quibusdam perversis, qui se Christianos dici et videri volunt. Non enim deerant etiam sub Apostolis, qui dicerent resurrectionem jam factam esse, et fidem quorumdam perverterent, de quibus Apostolus, Qui circa veritatem, inquit, erraverunt, dicentes resurrectionem jam factam esse; et fidem quorumdam subverterunt. Non autem vacat quod non ait, A veritate aberraverunt; sed, circa veritatem, non tamen veritatem tenuerunt. Mors ergo tollitur, et non erit quodam modo: sicut Apostolus ait, Absorbebitur mortale a vita. Sic enim dictum est et de Domino, quia deglutivit mortem. Non enim quasi recedit mors habens aliquam substantiam suam: sed in ipso corpore ubi erat, esse desinet, ut speciem videas, speciem teneas, quæras corruptionem et mortalitatem, et non invenias. Discessit ergo aliquo corruptio? Non: sed ibi interempta est, ibi absorpta est. Propterea cum dixisset, Oportet corruptibile hoc induere incorruptionem, et mortale hoc immortalitatem induere: tunc fiet, inquit, sermo qui scriptus est, Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Et non ait, Discessit mors in victoriam; sed, Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Quomodo ergo illi circa veritatem aberraverunt? Quia veram dixerunt resurrectionem unam, sed aliam negaverunt.
But pay attention, brothers, we beg you; this is not a matter to be taken lightly; our faith is at stake, and it must be guarded not so much against pagans as against certain perverse people who want to be called and seen as Christians. For even in the time of the apostles there were some who said that the resurrection had already taken place and who perverted the faith of some; of them the apostle says, "They have erred concerning the truth, saying that the resurrection has already taken place; and they have overturned the faith of some." Not without reason does he say, not "They have strayed from the truth," but "concerning the truth"; yet they did not hold the truth. Death, then, is taken away and in a certain way will not exist, as the apostle says: "What is mortal will be swallowed up by life." For so it has also been said of the Lord that he swallowed up death. For death does not withdraw as though it had some substance of its own; but in the very body where it was it will cease to be, so that you see the form, you hold the form, you look for corruption and mortality and do not find them. Did corruption, then, go away somewhere? No: it was destroyed there, it was swallowed up there. That is why, after saying, "This corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality," he says, "then the word that is written will come to pass: Death is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your contention? Where, O death, is your sting?" He does not say, "Death has departed in victory," but "Death is swallowed up in victory." How then did those people go astray concerning the truth? Because they spoke of one true resurrection but denied the other.
2 Tim 2:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 3:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53–55 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Some, already in the apostles' time, said the resurrection had already happened; Augustine explains that death will not depart but be swallowed up in the body itself.
- "He swallowed up death" echoes the Latin of 1 Pet 3:22 ("deglutiens mortem").
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): dcerant → deerant; inqnil → inquit; resurreclionem → resurrectionem; Morsergo tollitur, ct non → Mors ergo tollitur, et non; dictum tat ct de Domino → dictum est et de Domino; mora in victoriam → mors in victoriam; scd, Absorpta → sed, Absorpta; Quomodo crgo illi circa veritatcm → Quomodo ergo illi circa veritatem.
Topics: Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.22 (PL 39:1588–1589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-22
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-22) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.23PL 39:1589
Est enim resurrectio secundum fidem, in qua omnis qui credit, resurgit in spiritu. Etenim ille bene resurget in corpore, qui primo resurrexit in spiritu. Nam qui antea in spiritu per fidem non resurrexerint, non ad illam commutationem resurgent in corpore, ubi assumetur et absorbebitur omnis corruptio, sed ad illam pœnalem integritatem. Nam integra erunt et corpora impiorum, nihil ex eis imminutum apparebit; sed ad poenam erit integritas corporis, et quædam, ut ita dicam, quaedam firmitas corporis, corruptibilis firmitas: quia ubi dolor esse poterit, non potest dici non esse corruptio; quamvis non deficiat illa infirmitas in doloribus, ne dolor ipse moriatur. Nam ipsam corruptionem nomine vermis prophetice significatam non incongrue creditur, et ipsum dolorem nomine ignis. Sed quia firmitas tanta erit, ut nec doloribus cedat in mortem, nec ad incorruptionem, in qua nullus dolor est, commutetur; propterea sic scriptum est, Vermis eorum non morietur, et ignis eorum non exstinguetur. Commutatio vero quæ corruptionem non habebit, sanctorum erit. Illorum ergo erit, qui modo habent resurrectionem spiritus per fidem: de qua resurrectione dicit Apostolus, Si autem resurrexistis cum Christo, quæ sursum sunt quærite, ubi Christus est in dextera Dei sedens: quæ sursum sunt sapite, non quæ super terram. Mortui enim estis, et vita vestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo. Quomodo morimur secundum spiritum, et resurgimus secundum spiritum: sic postea morimur secundum carnem, et resurgimus secundum carnem. Secundum spiritum mors est, non credere vana quæ credebat, non facere mala quæ faciebat. Secundum spiritum resurrectio est credere salubria quae non credebat, et facere bona quæ non faciebat. Qui terrena idola et figmenta deos putabat, unum Deum cognovit, in eum credidit, mortuus est in idololatria, resurrexit in fide christiana. Ebriosus erat, sobrius est; mortuus est ab ebrietate, resurrexit in sobrietate. Sic ab omnibus malis operibus cum receditur, mors quædam fit in anima, et in ejus bonis operibus resurgit. Mortificate, inquit Apostolus, membra vestra quæ sunt super terram, immunditiam, perturbationem, concupiscentiam malam, et avaritiam, inquit, quæ est idolorum servitus. Mortificatis ergo istis membris, resurgimus in bonis quae sunt istis contraria; in sanctitate, in tranquillitate, in charitate, in eleemosynis. Quomodo autem præcedit mors secundum spiritum, resurrectionem quæ est secundum spiritum: sic præcessura est mors secundum carnem, resurrectionem quæ futura est secundum carnem.
For there is a resurrection according to faith, in which everyone who believes rises in spirit. And indeed he will rise well in the body who first rose in the spirit. For those who have not first risen in spirit through faith will rise in the body not to that change in which all corruption will be taken up and swallowed, but to that penal wholeness. For the bodies of the wicked too will be whole; nothing in them will appear diminished; but the wholeness of the body will serve for punishment, and a kind of firmness of body, so to speak, a corruptible firmness: for where there can be pain, it cannot be said that there is no corruption; though that weakness does not give out under the pains, so that the pain itself may not die. For it is not unfittingly believed that the corruption itself is signified prophetically by the name of the worm, and the pain itself by the name of fire. But because the firmness will be so great that it will neither yield to the pains so as to die, nor be changed into incorruption, in which there is no pain, therefore it is written thus: "Their worm will not die, and their fire will not be quenched." But the change that will have no corruption will belong to the saints. It will belong, then, to those who now have the resurrection of the spirit through faith, of which resurrection the apostle says, "If you have risen with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God; set your minds on the things that are above, not on the things on earth. For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God." As we die according to the spirit and rise according to the spirit, so afterwards we die according to the flesh and rise according to the flesh. Death according to the spirit is to stop believing the vain things one used to believe, to stop doing the evil things one used to do. Resurrection according to the spirit is to believe the saving things one did not believe, and to do the good things one did not do. One who thought earthly idols and figments were gods has come to know the one God and believed in him: he has died in idolatry and risen in the Christian faith. He was a drunkard; he is sober: he has died from drunkenness and risen in sobriety. So when one turns away from all evil works, a kind of death takes place in the soul, and it rises in its good works. "Put to death," says the apostle, "your members that are on earth: impurity, disturbance, evil desire, and greed," he says, "which is the service of idols." When these members have been put to death, then, we rise in the goods that are their opposites: in holiness, in tranquility, in love, in almsgiving. And as death according to the spirit precedes the resurrection according to the spirit, so death according to the flesh will precede the resurrection that is to come according to the flesh.
Isa 66:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 9:48 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:1–3 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: There is a spiritual resurrection now through faith, turning from sin to good works, and a bodily one to come; the wicked will rise whole but only for unending pain.
- The opening words "Corpora impiorum qualia resurgent" ("What kind of bodies the wicked will rise with") are Migne's marginal heading and have been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading; OCR slip; OCR slips): Corpora impiorum qualia resurgent. Est enim → Est enim; Elenirn ille bene resurget in corpore, qui prino → Etenim ille bene resurget in corpore, qui primo; anlca in spiritu → antea in spiritu; poenadem integritatem → pœnalem integritatem; integra crunt → integra erunt; inlegritas → integritas; ipsain corruptionem → ipsam corruptionem; nee ad incorruplioncm → nec ad incorruptionem; sanctorum crit. Illorum ergoerit → sanctorum erit. Illorum ergo erit; dicil Apostolus → dicit Apostolus; et rita vestra → et vita vestra; morimur sccundum spiritum → morimur secundum spiritum; uon. facere → non facere; ct facerc bona → et facere bona; dcos putabat, unum Dcum cognovit, ill eum eredidit → deos putabat, unum Deum cognovit, in eum credidit; resurrexit ill fide → resurrexit in fide; rccedilur → receditur; Hortificate → Mortificate; tuper terram → super terram; idolotum → idolorum; Mortificatis crgo istis membris,resurgimus → Mortificatis ergo istis membris, resurgimus; tranquillitale → tranquillitate; præcedit mors sccundum → præcedit mors secundum.
Topics: Eschatology, Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.23 (PL 39:1589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-23
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-23) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
362.24PL 39:1589
Utramque ergo noverimus, et spiritualem et corporalem. Ad spiritualem pertinet quod dictum est, Surge, qui dormis; et exsurge a mortuis: et iliud, Qui sedebant in umbra mortis, lux orta est eis; et illud quod paulo ante commemoravi, Si consurrexistis cum Christo, quæ sursum sunt quærite. Ad corporalem autem resurrectionem pertinet quod nunc dicit Apostolus, qui talem sibi quæstionem proposuerat: Sed dicit aliquis, quomodo resurgunt mortui? quo autem corpore venient? Agebat ergo de resurrectione corporis, in qua præcessit Dominus Ecclesiam suam: de hac ergo ait, Oportet corruptibile hoc induere incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induere immortalitatem. Propter illud quod dixerat, Caro et sanguis regnum Dei non possidebit. Habemus autem alio loco apertissime ipsius apostoli Pauli testimonium de resurrectione secundum spiritum, et de resurrectione secundum carnem. Corpus enim mortale, quod animatum est vel animatum fuit, caro dicitur. Sic ergo Apostolus loquitur: Si autem Christus in vobis, corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus autem vita est propter justitiam. Ecce jam resurrectio spiritus per justitiam facta intelligitur: vide utrum speranda sit etiam corporis resurrectio. Mortale enim corpus noluit appellare mortale, sed mortuum; et tamen hoc se significasse in consequentibus aperit. Sequitur itaque, et dicit: Si ergo spiritus ejus qui suscitavit Jesum a mortuis, habitat in vobis; qui suscitavit Dominum nostrum Jesum, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra per habitantem Spiritum ejus in vobis. Quapropter illi circa veritatem aberraverunt, unam negaverunt resurrectionem. Si enim omni modo eam negarent, a veritate aberrarent, non circa veritatem. Quia vero circa veritatem aberraverunt, confessi sunt unam, quæ secundum spiritum fit; negaverint autem alteram, quæ per carnis resurrectionem speratur, dicentes resurrectionem jam factam esse: quod nisi ita dicerent, ut illam quæ in corpore futura est credi et sperari prohiberent, non de his diceretur, Fidem quorumdam subvertunt.
Let us know both, then, the spiritual and the bodily. To the spiritual belongs what was said, "Rise, you who sleep, and arise from the dead"; and this, "For those who sat in the shadow of death a light has dawned"; and what I mentioned a little before, "If you have risen with Christ, seek the things that are above." But to the bodily resurrection belongs what the apostle now says, after setting himself this question: "But someone says, How do the dead rise? With what body will they come?" He was dealing, then, with the resurrection of the body, in which the Lord went before his Church; and of this he says, "This corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality," because of what he had said: "Flesh and blood will not possess the kingdom of God." And in another place we have a most open testimony of the apostle Paul himself about the resurrection according to the spirit and the resurrection according to the flesh. For the mortal body, which is animated or was animated, is called flesh. So the apostle speaks thus: "If Christ is in you, the body is indeed dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness." Here the resurrection of the spirit, brought about through righteousness, is now understood: see whether a resurrection of the body is also to be hoped for. For he chose to call the mortal body not mortal but dead; and yet in what follows he makes clear that this is what he meant. So he goes on to say: "If, then, the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised our Lord Jesus will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit dwelling in you." Therefore those people went astray concerning the truth: they denied one resurrection. For if they denied it altogether, they would stray from the truth, not concerning the truth. But because they went astray concerning the truth, they confessed the one that takes place according to the spirit, but denied the other, which is hoped for through the resurrection of the flesh, saying that the resurrection had already taken place; and unless they said this so as to forbid belief in, and hope for, the one that will take place in the body, it would not be said of them, "They overturn the faith of some."
Eph 5:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:35 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:50 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:10–11 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:18 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture speaks of both resurrections, spiritual and bodily (Rom 8:10–11); the heretics of 2 Tim 2:18 kept the first and denied the second.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; OCR slip; line-break split): noverimus,et spiritualem et corporalem.Adspiritualem pertinet quod dictum cst → noverimus, et spiritualem et corporalem. Ad spiritualem pertinet quod dictum est; lux orta est cis → lux orta est eis; quo. modo resurgunt → quomodo resurgunt; dixcrat → dixerat; testimoninm → testimonium; resurrectione sccundum carnem → resurrectione secundum carnem; Corpus cnim mortale, quod animalum est vcl → Corpus enim mortale, quod animatum est vel; Sic crgo Apostolus → Sic ergo Apostolus; hoc sc significasse → hoc se significasse; suscitavit Jcsum → suscitavit Jesum; negaverunt rcsurrectionem. Si cnim omni modo cam negarent → negaverunt resurrectionem. Si enim omni modo eam negarent; confessi sunt unam, quaa → confessi sunt unam, quæ; negaverint autcm → negaverint autem; nisi ita diccrent → nisi ita dicerent.
Topics: Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 362.24 (PL 39:1589; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/362-24
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-362-24) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).