Sermons 154–159

Latin text: Migne, PL 52 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 154

154PL 52:607–509

In D. Slephanum protomartyrem. Sicut dominum praediorum limitibus affixitituli proloquuntur,ita nomina ipsa sæpe sanctorum merita,indicant, testantur insignia. Ita Abraham,quod fide credidit,nominis abjectione monstravit,quando ex Abram Abraham divinitus nuncupatur: ut dilatandus genere, nomine ante dilataretur, dicente Domino: Et non vocabitur amplius nomen tuum Abram,sedd Abraham eritnomentuum, quia patrem multarum geMitum posui te (Gen. xvn). Sic conjux sancta ejus cum de sterili fitfecunda, ex Sarai vocitata est Sarah,ut et ipsa ante crescat nomine quam crescat pignore; et quia permittente Domino risum edidit si vetula conciperetexaratajamrugis,si pareret desperata jam fecunditas, si sterilitas jam penes senectutis extrema prægnans fieret,risum mox quod genuit, nuncupavit; et hoc aptavitin nomine, quod sensu passa est cum rideret: Et vocavit nomen ctus Isaac, quod interpretatur risus (Gen.XXI). Sic Jacob, qui in utero coepit ante luctari quam videre, ante viribus superare quam membris, etiam inter viscera materna ipsa supplantatoris est vocabulum consecutus, eo quod antequam nascereturnoscitur divinitus reprobatum supplantasse germanum (Gen. xxv). Et quia longum est ire per singula, sicut Petrus a petra nomen adeptus est, quia primus meruit Ecclesiam fidei firmitate fundare;ita Stephanus vocatus est a corona, quia primus meruit pro Christi nomine subire conflictum, primus meruit sanguine militum Christi martyrium dedicare. Petrus apostoli i chori vetustum teneat principatum, aperiat intrantibus regnum cœlorum, reos potestate vinciat, pœnitentes clementer absolvat; Stephanus est mar tyrum primus, Stephanus purpuratam a ducatexercitum, qui pro Domini sui adhuc calente sanguine sanguinem suum avidus bellator effundit. Et quia cruore proprio tinctam sibi ipse purpuram conquisivit, merito a rege suo consecutus est post coronam, qui jam cum nasceretur nomen sortitus est a corona: vere quem præscivitet et prædestinavit, ipsum nunc martyrii primum vocavit ad gloriam. c

[On St Stephen the first martyr.] As titles fixed to the boundaries of estates declare their owner, so the very names of the saints often indicate their merits and testify to their distinctions. So Abraham showed in the casting off of his name what he believed by faith, when from Abram he is divinely named Abraham, so that he who was to be enlarged in his descendants might first be enlarged in name, as the Lord says: “No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham, for I have made you the father of many nations” (Gen 17). So his holy wife, when from barren she became fruitful, was called Sarah instead of Sarai, so that she too might grow in name before she grew in offspring; and because, by the Lord's permission, she laughed at the thought that an old woman already furrowed with wrinkles should conceive, that fruitfulness already despaired of should give birth, that barrenness at the very end of old age should become pregnant, she at once named the one she bore Laughter, and fitted into his name what she felt when she laughed: “And she called his name Isaac,” which is interpreted laughter (Gen 21). So Jacob, who began to wrestle in the womb before he saw, to prevail by strength before he had limbs, even within his mother's womb obtained the name of supplanter, because before he was born he is known to have supplanted his brother, whom God had rejected (Gen 25). And since it would be long to go through them one by one: as Peter obtained his name from the rock, because he first deserved to found the Church by the firmness of faith, so Stephen was named from the crown, because he first deserved to undergo combat for the name of Christ, he first deserved to dedicate martyrdom with the blood of Christ's soldiers. Let Peter hold the ancient primacy of the apostolic choir, open the kingdom of heaven to those who enter, bind the guilty by his power, mercifully absolve the penitent; Stephen is the first of the martyrs, Stephen leads the purple-clad army, an eager warrior who pours out his blood for the still warm blood of his Lord. And since he won for himself a purple dyed with his own blood, he rightly obtained a crown from his king, he who even at his birth received his name from a crown: truly him whom he foreknew and predestined he has now called first to the glory of martyrdom.

Gen 17:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 17:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 18:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 21:3–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 25:22–26 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 27:36 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 16:18–19 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 7:54–60 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:29–30 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: On the feast of St Stephen, Chrysologus shows from Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob and Peter that saints' names announce their merits, and explains that Stephen, whose name means “crown,” was the first to win the martyr's crown.

  • The play is on the Greek stephanos, “crown.” The description of Peter's “primacy of the apostolic choir” and power to bind and absolve is translated as written.

Topics: Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 154 (PL 52:607–509; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/154). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-154) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 155

155PL 52:509–611

De kalendis Januarii, quae varia gentium superstitione polluebanlur. Ubi nostram Christus pie natus est ad salutem, mox diabolus divinae bonitati numerosa genuit et perniciosa portenta, ut ridiculum de religionecomponeret, in sacrilegium verteret sanctitatem, de ho- nore Dei Deo pararet injuriam. Hinc est, fratres, hinc estquod a hodie gentiles deos suos foeditatibus exquisitis, excogitato dedecore, et ipsa turpitudine turpiores e videndos trahunt, distrahunt, pertrahunt, quos faciunt non videndos. Quae vanitas, qualis dementia, quanta caecitas, fateri deos, et eos ludibriis infelicibus infamare! Irrisores sunt, cultores non sunt, qui deos quos venerantur illudunt; inj uriis afficiunt, non honorant, qui deosa quibus se formatos existimant, sic deformant, confundunt, non glorificant, qui eos de ipsa confusione componunt. Vere sicut ait Apostolus, Quia non probaverunt Deum habereinnotitia,tradidit illos Deus in reprobum sensum, ut faciant ea quæ non conveniunt (Rom. 1): quando eis quibus humana abrogant, dant divina, quando eosjudicantdignos coelo, quando ipsos faciunt terra ipsa non dignos, vere dati suntin reprobum sensum; et R non est hoc judicii humani, est hoc sapientiae Dei, ut ipsi sint injuriarumDei vindices,qui injuriae probantur auctores. Quae ira, quæ ultio,sicin Deum de idolis exsequeretur offensam, ut eos quos vetustas aris, incenso,victimis, gemmis, auro deos esse mentita est, posteritas turpi cultu homines fuisse turpissimosjudicaret, et eorum vitam, mores, actus, ipsis eorum signaret in vultibus, ac doceret tales fugiendos esse potius quam colendos! Defleamus, fratres, et eosqui talia sunt secuti,etnos evasisse talia ccelitus gaudeamus. Quorum formant adulteria in simulacris, quorum fornicationes imaginibus mandant,quorum titulant incesta picturis, quorum cru- delitates commendant libris, quorum parricidia tradunt saeculis, quorum impietates personanttragœdiis, quorum obscenaludunt, hos qua dementia deos crederent, nisi quia criminum desiderio, amore scelerum possidentur, ' deas exoptanthabere criminosos? Qui peccare cupit, peccatorum colit et veneratur auctores. Hinc est quod se Veneri adulter inseruit; hinc est quod se Marti crudelis addicit.j Hæc diximus, fratres, ut proderemus causam; quaregentiles hodie faciant deos suos talia committere, quae sustinemus,et faciant tales qui videntibus ethorrori sint et pudori; faciant ut eos aliquando et ipsiquifaciunt horreant et relinquant, et Christiani glorientur a talibus seliberatos esse perChristum: si modo non eorum ex spectaculis polluantur, si eorum non in quinent thura tactu, si hujusmodifugiant de assensione discrimen, quia factis semper est æqualis assensus, Apostolo probante, oum dioit: Non solum qui faciuntea, sedetiam qui consentiant facientibus (Rom. 1). Et Ii tanta est de assensione damnatio, quis satis lugeat eos qui * simulacra faciunt semet- ipsos? Nonne isti amiserunt imaginem Del, similitudinem perdiderunt, Christi exuti sunt indumentum, qui se simulaororum formis sacrilegis formaverunt? Sed dicitaliquis, Non sunt hæc sacrilegiorum studia, vota sunt hæc jocorum; et hoo esse novitatis lætitiam non vetustatis errorem; esse hoo anni prinoipium, non gentilitatis offensam. Erras, homo, non sunt hæc ludicra, sunt crimina. Quis de impietate ludit, de sacrilegio quis jocatur, piaculum quis dicit risum? Satis se deoipit, qui sic sentit; tyrannus est, tyranni habitum qui præsumit. Qui se deum facit, Deo vero oontradictor existit; imaginem Dei portare noluit, qui idoli voluerit portare personam; qui jocari voluerit cum diabolo,non poterit gaudere cum Christo. Nemo cum serpentesecurusludit,nemo oum diabolo jocatur impune. Si quaesunt ergo viscerapietatisin nobis, si quæ est in nobis contemplatio hnmanitatis, si quæ nos habet fraternæ salutisaffectio,abstrahamus eos qui sic ad perditionem currunt,rapiuntur ad mortem, trahuntur ad tartara, festini sunt in gehennam. Abstrahat ergopater filium, servumdominus, parens parentem, civem civis, homo hominem, Christianus omnes qui se bestiis compararunt, exæquarunt jumentis,b aptaverunt pecudibus,dæmonibus formaverunt. Et ille qui liberat, invenit prænium; qui negligit, acquirit offensam. Beatus qui suæ vitæ custos est, etprovisor est satutis alienæ.

[On the Kalends of January, which were polluted by various superstitions of the gentiles.] As soon as Christ was graciously born for our salvation, the devil at once bred numerous and pernicious monstrosities against the divine goodness, so as to make a mockery of religion, turn holiness into sacrilege, and make out of God's honor an insult to God. Hence, brothers, hence it is that today the gentiles drag about, pull apart and draw along their gods, done up with exquisite filthiness, with contrived disgrace, more shameful than shame itself, to be gazed at, whom they make fit not to be seen. What vanity, what madness, what blindness, to confess gods and defame them with wretched mockeries! They are mockers, not worshipers, who make sport of the gods they venerate; they insult, they do not honor, who so deform the gods by whom they think themselves formed; they confound them, they do not glorify them, who make them up out of confusion itself. Truly, as the Apostle says: “Since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a reprobate mind, to do what is not fitting” (Rom 1): when they give divine honors to those to whom they deny human ones, when they judge worthy of heaven those whom they make unworthy of the earth itself, truly they have been given up to a reprobate mind; and this is not of human judgment, it is of God's wisdom, that those who are shown to be the authors of insults to God should themselves be the avengers of God's insults. What wrath, what vengeance could so carry out against the idols the offense against God, as that those whom antiquity, with altars, incense, victims, gems and gold, falsely claimed to be gods, posterity by a shameful cult should judge to have been most shameful men, and should mark their life, morals and deeds on their very faces, and teach that such are to be fled rather than worshiped! Let us weep, brothers, both for those who have followed such things, and rejoice that by heaven's help we have escaped them. Those whose adulteries they shape in statues, whose sexual immoralities they commit to images, whose incests they label in pictures, whose cruelties they commend in books, whose parricides they hand down to the ages, whose impieties resound in tragedies, whose obscenities they play out: by what madness would they believe these to be gods, unless, possessed by desire for crimes and love of wickedness, they wish to have criminal gods? He who desires to sin worships and venerates the authors of sins. Hence the adulterer has attached himself to Venus; hence the cruel man devotes himself to Mars. We have said this, brothers, to expose the reason why today the gentiles make their gods commit such things as we endure, and make them such that they are a horror and a shame to those who see them; may they make them so that those who make them may one day shudder at them and leave them, and Christians may glory that they have been freed from such things through Christ: provided only that they are not defiled by their spectacles, do not stain themselves by touching their incense, and flee the danger of assent to such things, because assent is always equal to deeds, as the Apostle proves when he says: “Not only those who do them, but also those who consent to those who do them” (Rom 1). And if there is such condemnation for assent, who can sufficiently mourn those who make themselves into images of idols? Have these not lost the image of God, destroyed the likeness, stripped off the garment of Christ, who have formed themselves in the sacrilegious forms of idols? But someone says: “These are not pursuits of sacrilege, these are vows of jest; this is the gladness of newness, not the error of antiquity; this is the beginning of the year, not an offense of paganism.” You err, man: these are not games, they are crimes. Who plays with impiety, who jokes about sacrilege, who calls a sacrilege a laugh? He deceives himself well enough who thinks so; he is a tyrant who presumes to put on a tyrant's dress. He who makes himself a god sets himself against the true God; he did not want to bear the image of God who chose to bear the mask of an idol; he who chooses to jest with the devil will not be able to rejoice with Christ. No one plays safely with a serpent; no one jokes with the devil with impunity. If, then, there is any tender mercy in us, any regard for humanity, any affection for a brother's salvation, let us drag away those who run so to perdition, are snatched to death, are drawn to Tartarus, hasten into Gehenna. Let the father drag away his son, the master his slave, a kinsman his kinsman, citizen citizen, man man, the Christian all who have compared themselves to beasts, made themselves equal to cattle, fitted themselves to brutes, formed themselves into demons. And he who frees them finds a reward; he who neglects them incurs offense. Blessed is he who is the guardian of his own life and provides for another's salvation.

Rom 1:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:26–27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gal 3:27 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Preaching on 1 January, Chrysologus condemns the New Year masquerades in which people dressed as the pagan gods and as animals, argues that such mockery exposes the gods' shame, and urges Christians to keep away and pull others back from what is sacrilege, not a joke.

  • The Kalends of January festival included processions and masquerades in the costume of gods and animals; the sermon's descriptions are translated as written.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 155 (PL 52:509–611; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/155). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-155) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 156

156PL 52:611–613

De Epiphania et magis. Quoties salutaribus succis contra lethales morbos antidotum temperat peritia præcauta medicorum, si præterartem,præter medicinam,prætertempus,ac. cipere præsumat ægrotus, sit periculi causa, quod provisum est ad salutem; sic Dei verbum, si praeter magisterium præter doctrinam, præterdoKooa fidei, scire temerarius præsumat auditor, quod est vitae materia, fit perditionis occasio,c Quærendum est, fratres, ne per audiendi imperitiam, quod adprofeotum nobis divinitus scriptum est,adanimarumve- nili detrimentum. Putasne Chaldaeos siderum scrutatores, errantes per astra magos, cœli negotia in tenebris noctium perquirentes, nascendi, moriendi causas, stellarum cursibus ascribentes,bona,malave hominumdearbitriolum)Dariumfirmantes,evangelista hodie ortum Christi absconditumsteculis stella duce docuit invenisse? Absit. Sicsentitmundus,sic gentiles intelligunt, sic facit species lectionis: cæterum sermo evangelicus non humana loquitur, sed divina; non usitata, sed nova; non arte fallentia, sed veritatesubnixa; non oculis alludentia, sed cordibus infixa; non conjecturis nutantia, sed auctoritate firmata; a Deo venientia, non afato; non collecta numeris,sedvirtutibusacquisita. Cum natus esset Jesus, inquit,in Bet lekem Judæ,indiebus Herodis regis,ecce magi ab Oriente venerunt Hierosolymam, dicentes: Ubi est qui natus est RexJudæorum? Vidimus stellam, ejus in Oriente, et venimus adorare eum (Matth. 11). Dum nascitur Jesus, oritur origo rerum, generatur largitor generis, nascitur auctor naturæ, utrepararet naturam, genus redderet, originem recrearet. Adam primus homo, pater generis, origo generationis, naturæ bonum, libertatem generis et germinis vitam sic perdidit, dum deliquit, ut malum naturæ, servitutem generis, germinis mortem successio lamentanda portaret. Hinc est quod Christusnascendo naturam reddidit, sustulit moriendo mortem, vitam revocat dum resurgit: et qui homini animam dcderatde coelo, inde hominem fecit et carne constare, ne terrenalabes cœlestem sensum rursum carnisdemergatinlasum, dicente Apostolo: Primus homo de terra, ter- renus;secundus homo de cœlo, cœlestus: qualis terrenus, tales et terreni;et qualis cœlestis,tales et caelestes (ICor. xv). EtJoannes Evangelista: Omnis qui ex Deo natus est, non peccat, sed generatio Dei servat illum (Joan. v). Hinc est ergo quod nascitur Christus, ut jacentes in terrenogermine cœlestem tolleret ad naturam.Cum natus esset Jesus in Bethlehem Judæ. Bethlehem, fratres, Hebraice domus panis vocatur. His ergo vocabulis J udæ signatur dom us, genus vocatur, ut promissionis fides,ut prophetiæ veritasi impleatur, dicente Jacob: Juda, te laudabunt fratres tui, manus tuæ supra dorsum inimicorum tuorum, adorabunt te filiipatris tui (Gen. XLIX, juxta LXX). Et post: Non deficiel princeps ex Juda, nee dux ex femoribus ejus. donec veniat cui reposita sunt, et ipse erit exspectatio gentium. Unde et David, Juda rex meus (Psal. LIX). Cum natus esset Jesus in Bethlehem Judæ in diebul Herodis regis. Quid est, quod' tempore regis nefandi Deus descendit ad terras? miscetur divinitas carni? fit terreno corpori cœleste commercium? Quid est? et quando non verus rex expulsurus tyrannum,vindicaturus patriam, instauraturus orbem, libertatem redditurus adventat?Herodesb refuga gentis Judaicæ invasitregnum,libertatem sustulit,profanavit sancta, confudit ordinem; quidquid disciplinæ, quidquid cultus est, abolevit; merito ergo genti sanctæ, quia humana desunt, divina succurrunt, et adest Deus ipsi, cui homo non erat qui adesset.Sic iterum Christus veniet, ut Antichristus subruat, liberetur orbis, paradisi patria reddatur,mundi perpetuetur libertas, saeculi servitus tota tollatur. Ecce magi ab Oriente venerunt. Ab Oriente ad Orientem veniunt magi, ut susciperet venientes ipse qui jusserat ut venirent: quandoenimDeum magus,nisi Deo jubente perquireret quando regem cœlinisi revelante Deo astrologus invenisset? quando unum Deum sine Deo Chaldæus adoraret in terra, qui in coelo diis totidem quot sideribus serviebat? Plus coeleste de magis quam de stella signum est,quod Judææ regem, quod legis auctorem magus scit, nescit Judæus; Chaldea defert, non defert Judæa; Hierosolyma a versatur et refugit; Syriasequituretadorat. Ecce magi ab Oriente venerunt dicentes: Ubi est qui natus est rex Judæorum? Vidimus stellam ejus.Et quid tamen est quod videtur? Vere sicut dixit Apostolus: Cum esset dives, pauper factus est (H Cor. VIII); cum esset in deitate sua dives,nostra fit pauper in carne; et habere cœpit stellam unam, totam qui fecit,babet et continet creaturam. Vidimus steltam ejus. Aliquando videt magus illum qui habet stellam, non habetur a stella; nec ipse agitur cursu stellæ,sed ipse stellæ agit cursum, cujus per cælum sic cursum dirigit, sic moderatur incessum, sic viam temperat, e ut magorum serviat et mittatur ad gressum.Nam ambulante mago, stella ambulat: sedente mago,stat stella; mago dormiente, excubat stella: sic sentit magus,ut quibus viandi par conditio est, par sit necessitas serviendi; et stellam jam non Deum credit, sedjudicat esse conservam, quam cernit taliter suis obsequiis mancipatam. Ubi est qui natus est rex Judæorum'? Vidimus stellam ejus in oriente, et venimus adorare eum. Dicendo,ubi est qui natus est rex Judaeorum, non interrogant, sed insultant: quando scientes interrogant nescientes, I non ipsi ignorant, sed negngentes arguunt, merepant desides,malos produnt, contumaces verberant, servos Domino nonoccurrisse nccusant.Nam quid ab hominibus quaerunt, qui per Deum noverant quod quærebant? Ut quid illis adhochumanaedemonstrationis officium quibus ad hoc coeli sidera serviebant? Quo illis lucerna templi, quibus cœli sidus mirabile perlucebat' Ubi est qui natus est rex Judæorum?Hoc estdicere: Currex Judaeorum in praesepejacet,etnon decumbit in templo? Cur non fulgetin purpura, sed squalet in pannis? Cur latet in specu, at manifestus in sanctuario non habetur? Receperunt jumenta in præsepi, quem in domo sua recipere vos sprevistis. Agnovit, sicut scriptum est,bos posssesorem suum, et asinus præsepe domini sui (Isai. 1); tu autem, Israel, tuum Dominum non quæsisti. Vidimus stellam ejus. Apparuit stella non volens,sed jussa; non coeli nutu, sed Divinitatis impulsu; non lege siderum,sed novitate signorum; non coeli climate,sed virtute nascenlis; non ab arte, sed a Deo; non astrologi scientia, sed præscientia Conditoris; non arithmetica ratione, sed sanctione divina; superna procuratione, non curiositate Chaldea; non arte magica, sed Judaica propbetia. Sic ubi vidit magus humanas periisse curas, suas defecisse artes, mundanæ sapientiæ exinanitos labores,omnium sudores obriguisse sectarum, totius philosophiae thesauros esse vacuatos, fugisse paganam noctem,opinionum nebulas concidisse,ipsas deemonum delituisse umbras,stellam non ut cometam incirconfuso crine occultare quod nuntiat, obscurare quod lucet, sic dicit: Fas est, tu novo radio, signifero lumine, splendore certo radiare videam in Judaeam, atque illic natum regem, praeter mundi legem,preeter carnis ordinem,præter humanam monstrare naturam. Sic deposito errore,sequitur, currit, pervenit, invenit, gaudet, procidit, adorat; quia non per steilam, non per artem, sed per Deum, Deum se invenisse humana miratur in carne. Ergo, fratres, lectione praesenti non est firmatus error magicus, sed solutus. Sed sufficiant ista hodie, ut per Deum quæ sunt in sequentibus clare elucescant.

[On the Epiphany and the magi.] Whenever the careful skill of physicians blends an antidote of healthful juices against deadly diseases, if the sick man presumes to take it beyond the art, beyond the prescription, beyond the time, what was provided for health becomes a cause of danger; so the word of God, if a rash hearer presumes to know it beyond the teaching, beyond the doctrine, beyond the documents of faith, what is the material of life becomes an occasion of perdition. We must take care, brothers, lest through unskilled hearing what was divinely written for our progress should turn to the harm of our souls. Do you think that the evangelist today taught that Chaldeans, searchers of the stars, magi wandering among the constellations, inquiring into the business of heaven in the darkness of the nights, ascribing the causes of birth and death to the courses of the stars, affirming men's good or evil fortunes by the will of the stars, found the rising of Christ, hidden for ages, with a star as guide? Far from it. So the world thinks, so the gentiles understand, so the surface of the reading makes it seem; but the word of the Gospel speaks not human things but divine; not customary things but new; not things deceiving by art but resting on truth; not things playing on the eyes but fixed in hearts; not things wavering on conjectures but confirmed by authority; coming from God, not from fate; not gathered by numbers but acquired by powers. “When Jesus had been born,” it says, “in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of King Herod, behold, magi came from the East to Jerusalem, saying: Where is he who has been born King of the Jews? We have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him” (Matt 2). When Jesus is born, the origin of things rises, the giver of the race is begotten, the author of nature is born, so as to restore nature, give back the race, re-create the origin. Adam, the first man, father of the race, source of generation, so lost by his offense the good of nature, the freedom of the race and the life of the offspring that a lamentable succession carried the evil of nature, the slavery of the race, and the death of the offspring. Hence Christ by being born gave back nature, by dying took away death, by rising calls back life; and he who had given man a soul from heaven made man from there consist also of flesh, so that earthly stain might not again sink the heavenly sense into the fall of the flesh, as the Apostle says: “The first man was from the earth, earthly; the second man from heaven, heavenly: as was the earthly, so are those who are earthly; and as is the heavenly, so are those who are heavenly” (1 Cor 15). And John the Evangelist: “Everyone who is born of God does not sin, but the generation of God keeps him” (1 John 5). This, then, is why Christ is born: to lift those lying in earthly offspring to a heavenly nature. “When Jesus had been born in Bethlehem of Judea.” Bethlehem, brothers, in Hebrew is called “house of bread.” By these words, then, the house of Judah is marked out, the tribe is named, so that the faithfulness of the promise and the truth of prophecy might be fulfilled, as Jacob says: “Judah, your brothers will praise you; your hands will be on the back of your enemies; the sons of your father will worship you” (Gen 49, following the LXX). And afterward: “A ruler shall not fail from Judah, nor a leader from his thighs, until he comes for whom it is laid up, and he will be the expectation of the nations.” Hence David too: “Judah is my king” (Ps 60:7 [LXX 59:9]). “When Jesus had been born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of King Herod.” Why is it that God comes down to earth in the time of a wicked king? that the Godhead is mingled with flesh? that heaven enters into commerce with an earthly body? Why? And when does the true king not come to drive out a tyrant, avenge the homeland, restore the world, give back freedom? Herod, a renegade from the Jewish nation, invaded the kingdom, took away freedom, profaned holy things, confounded order; whatever there was of discipline, whatever of worship, he abolished; rightly, then, since human help failed the holy nation, divine help came to its aid, and God stood by the one whom no man was standing by. So Christ will come again, to overthrow Antichrist, to free the world, to give back the homeland of paradise, to make the freedom of the world everlasting, to take away all the slavery of the age. “Behold, magi came from the East.” The magi come from the East to the East, so that he who had ordered them to come might receive them as they came: for when would a magus seek God unless God ordered it? When would an astrologer have found the King of heaven unless God revealed him? When would a Chaldean on earth worship one God without God, who in heaven served as many gods as there are stars? The sign from heaven is greater in the magi than in the star: that the magus knows the King of Judea, the Author of the law, and the Jew does not know him; Chaldea brings him gifts, Judea does not; Jerusalem turns away and flees, Syria follows and worships. “Behold, magi came from the East, saying: Where is he who has been born King of the Jews? We have seen his star.” And yet what is it that is seen? Truly, as the Apostle said: “Though he was rich, he became poor” (2 Cor 8); though he was rich in his Godhead, he became poor in our flesh; and he who made, has and holds all creation began to have one star. “We have seen his star.” At last the magus sees him who has a star and is not had by a star; he is not driven by the course of a star, but he drives the star's course, whose course through the sky he so directs, whose going he so governs, whose way he so regulates, that it serves the magi's steps and is sent according to them. For when the magus walks, the star walks; when the magus sits, the star stands; when the magus sleeps, the star keeps watch: so the magus perceives that those who share the same condition of traveling share the same necessity of serving; and he no longer believes the star a god, but judges it a fellow servant, seeing it so bound to his service. “Where is he who has been born King of the Jews? We have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him.” In saying, “Where is he who has been born King of the Jews?” they do not ask but taunt: since the knowing question the ignorant, it is not that they themselves do not know, but they rebuke the negligent, reprove the slothful, expose the wicked, scourge the stubborn, and accuse the servants of not having gone out to meet their Lord. For why do they ask men, who knew through God what they were seeking? Why do they need the office of human direction, whom the stars of heaven served for this purpose? What need had they of the lamp of the temple, for whom a wonderful star of heaven was shining? “Where is he who has been born King of the Jews?” That is to say: Why does the King of the Jews lie in a manger and not recline in the temple? Why does he not shine in purple but lie in rags? Why does he hide in a cave and not appear openly in the sanctuary? The beasts received in a manger him whom you scorned to receive into your house. “The ox,” as it is written, “knew its owner, and the ass its master's manger” (Isa 1); but you, Israel, did not seek your Lord. “We have seen his star.” The star appeared not by its own will but by command; not by the nod of heaven but by the impulse of the Godhead; not by the law of the stars but by the novelty of signs; not by the climate of heaven but by the power of the one being born; not by art but by God; not by the astrologer's knowledge but by the Creator's foreknowledge; not by arithmetical reckoning but by divine decree; by heavenly providence, not Chaldean curiosity; not by magic art but by Jewish prophecy. So when the magus saw that human cares had perished, his arts had failed, the labors of worldly wisdom were emptied, the sweat of all the sects had frozen, the treasures of all philosophy were exhausted, the pagan night had fled, the clouds of opinions had fallen, the very shadows of the demons had hidden themselves, and the star did not, like a comet with streaming hair, hide what it announced or darken what it lit, he says: “It is right that I see you shine with a new ray, a sign-bearing light, a sure splendor, toward Judea, and show there a king born beyond the law of the world, beyond the order of the flesh, beyond human nature.” So, laying aside his error, he follows, runs, arrives, finds, rejoices, falls down, worships; because not through the star, not through his art, but through God, he marvels that he has found God in human flesh. So, brothers, the present reading does not confirm the error of the magi; it dissolves it. But let this suffice for today, so that, through God, what follows may shine out clearly.

Matt 2:1–2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:47–48 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 49:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 49:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 60:7 (59:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Thess 2:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 8:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 2:9–11 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: On the Epiphany (Matt 2:1–2), Chrysologus warns against reading the story as approval of astrology: the star was God's servant, not a god or a fate, the magi came by God's revelation, and their question shames Jerusalem for not seeking the King born among them.

  • Gen 49:8 and 10 are quoted in their LXX form. Ps 60:7 (LXX 59:9) is quoted as “Judah is my king.” The rebuke of Jerusalem and Israel for not seeking Christ is translated as written.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 156 (PL 52:611–613; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/156). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-156) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 157

157PL 52:613–615

De eisdem. Dominicæ festivitates causas suas suis vocabulis eloquuntur: nam sicut nascendo Christus diem dedit natalem,et resurgendo resurrectionis diem dedit; sic lumine signorum diem suae illuminationis ostendit. Quienim nascendo ante humano corpore sevelavit, postea operando ipse se coelesti revelavit arcano: post Deus ipse apparuit trino modo, qui homo in partu patuit singularis.Merito ergo a solemnitas præsens Epiphaniæ vocabulo nuncupatur, in qua illuxit deitas quae nostra nobis obscurabatur in carne. Ista est, fratres, ista est festivitas quae, concepta tempore diverso, peperit tria deitatis insignia. Per Epiphaniam magi Christum Dominum muneribus mysticis confitentur, et cultores siderum, noctis incolae, auctorem lucis densis inveniunt in tenebris: ut sit hoc auctoris gratia,non sit hoc industria sic quærentis; non sit stellae, sed Dei; sit creatoris donum, non sit beneficium creaturae; non sit humane artis, muneris sit divini.Ecce magi,inquit,ab oriente venerunt, dicentes: Ubi est qui natus est rex Judæorum? Vidimus enim stellam ejus in Oriente,et venimus adorare eum (Matth. n). Vidimus stellam ejus. Et quid non ejus? Stella ejus est, non ille stellae. Stellam ejus. Quæ accepit esse, sed non dedit; stellam,cujusortum tenebat auctor, non quæ ortum tenebat auctoris. Stellam ejus. Venientem, non a genesi, sed a genitore; mandato, non fato; non a computatore,sed ab auctore; non quæ daret ortum, sed quæ sustineret occasum, Stellam non legiferam, sed signiferam; ferentem non dierum ordinem, sed noctium lumen. Stella hæc ministra viæ,non vitae; comes magorum, non cognata Christi; non Dominantis domina, sed ancillula servorum. Sed dicit aliquis: Quare magi? Quare per stellam? si cum stellis, cum origine nulla causa est,nuHa ratio cum natura?Quare magi?Quare stella? Ut per Christum ipsa materia erroris sic fieret salutis occasio: quemadmodum per Christum mortis causa, causa facta est vitæ. Hostem proprio mucrone turbare singulareest insigne virtutis. Apud magos in culpa erat ignorantia, non voluntas; et erat in crimine non studium,sed error. e QueerereDeum, et nescire quærere,necessitas magis est quam reatus. Fuit ergo pium,ut et Deus invenire se a quærentibus daret et culpam deputaret errori. Denique Paulus judicio tali de persecutore factus est prædicator,quia per zelum legis impugnabat legem, et in Deum fDei amore peccabat.Hincestquod fides currit ad Paulum, perfidia ad ignorantiam recurrit. Sed adhuc dicit auditor: Esto quod stella, non nutu proprio, sed Dei jussu ostenderet viam quærentibus magis: unde tanta munerum scientia mysticorum,undedonorum sacramenta tanta? Non Chaldæa arte,sed de prisca sancLorum traditionemajorum:erantisti gdegenere Noe, de filiis Abrahae,qui Christum nasci per Deum didicerant, non per artem; eumque hominem, Deum, regem,moriturum alto cognoverantsacramento.Hinc est quod apta patrum fidei munera portaverunt, ut aurum regi,incensum Deo, morituro myrrham scienter offerrent, talique munereet pietati satisfacerent et honori. Sed de magis ista sufficiant. Per Epiphaniam Christus in nuptiis aquas saporavit in vinum (Joan. 11), ut Christum nuptiis interfuisse virtutis fuerit, non voluptatis; non fuerit humanitatis, sed potestatis; signi fuerit causa,non ventris; ebrietatis non fueritapparatus,fuerit deitatis ostensio.Denique ubi aqua mutavit naturam,moxpatefecit auctorem, et elementorum creator mutatione revelatus est creaturae. Felicesnuptiae, felices illae quibus Christus est præsens, quæ non luxu, sed virtutibus consecrantur. Quid ibi non transivitin gratiam, ubi aqua transivit in vinum? Per Epiphaniam Christus Jordanis alveum baptisma nostrum consecratus intravit (Matth. 111), ut quosnascendo, in terra susceperat, hos renascendo relevaret in coelum; in se haberet liberos, quos praeter se viderat esse captivos; faceret vitales ipse, quos culpa fecerat esse mortales; perpetuos redderet,quos mors dederat temporales;et quos diabolus exsules fecerat terrenorum,hos ipse in coelestibus sibi faeeret esse consortes. Hinc est,fratres,quod Spiritus sanctus tunc toto se fuit illapsu, quando Pater de celestibus clamat: Hic est Filius meus dilectus(Matth. III); ut quibus in creandis nobis operatio fuerat una cum Filio, una fieret de nostra reparatione dignatio; sicque Christus diverso tempore uno eodemque die magorum munere, aquae mutatione, atque Patris voce Deustrino testimonio nosceretur, fieretque de trina ostensione Christi Epiphaniae una et sacrata solemnitas. i

[On the same.] The Lord's feasts declare their causes by their names: for as Christ by being born gave the day of his birth, and by rising gave the day of resurrection, so by the light of signs he showed the day of his illumination. For he who by being born first veiled himself in a human body, afterward by working revealed himself by a heavenly mystery: afterward God himself appeared in a threefold way, who as man in childbirth was shown singly. Rightly, then, the present solemnity is called by the name Epiphany, on which the Godhead shone forth that was obscured for us in our flesh. This is, brothers, this is the feast which, conceived at different times, has brought forth three insignia of the Godhead. Through the Epiphany the magi confess Christ the Lord with mystical gifts, and worshipers of the stars, dwellers in the night, find the Author of light in thick darkness: so that this may be the grace of the Author, not the industry of the one seeking; not of the star but of God; the gift of the Creator, not the benefit of a creature; not of human art but of divine gift. “Behold,” it says, “magi came from the East, saying: Where is he who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him” (Matt 2). “We have seen his star.” And what is not his? The star is his; he is not the star's. “His star”: which received being and did not give it; a star whose rising the Author held, not one that held the Author's rising. “His star”: coming not from a horoscope but from the Begetter; by command, not by fate; not from a calculator but from the Author; not one that would give a rising but one that would undergo a setting. A star not law-giving but sign-bearing; bearing not the order of days but the light of nights. This star was a servant of the way, not of life; the companion of the magi, not a kinswoman of Christ; not the mistress of the Ruler but a little handmaid of servants. But someone says: “Why magi? Why by a star? If there is no cause in the stars with birth, no reason with nature, why magi? why a star?” So that through Christ the very material of error might become the occasion of salvation, just as through Christ the cause of death became the cause of life. To rout an enemy with his own sword is a singular mark of valor. With the magi the fault was ignorance, not will; and in their crime there was not zeal but error. To seek God and not know how to seek is necessity rather than guilt. It was kind, therefore, for God both to grant that he be found by those seeking him and to put down the fault to error. In short, Paul by such a judgment was made a preacher from a persecutor, because through zeal for the law he fought against the law, and sinned against God out of love of God. Hence faith runs to Paul, faithlessness runs back to ignorance. But the hearer still says: “Granted that the star, not by its own will but by God's command, showed the way to the magi as they sought: where did they get such knowledge of mystical gifts, where such mysteries in the gifts?” Not from Chaldean art, but from the ancient tradition of the holy forefathers: they were of the race of Noah, of the sons of Abraham, who had learned that Christ would be born through God, not through art, and had known by a deep mystery that he was man, God, king, and one who would die. Hence they brought gifts suited to the faith of the fathers, so as knowingly to offer gold to the king, incense to God, myrrh to one who would die, and by such a gift satisfy both devotion and honor. But enough about the magi. Through the Epiphany Christ at a wedding gave water the savor of wine (John 2), so that Christ's presence at the wedding was a matter of power, not of pleasure; not of humanity but of might; it was for the sake of a sign, not of the belly; it was not a preparation for drunkenness but a showing of the Godhead. In short, when water changed its nature, it at once revealed its Author, and the Creator of the elements was revealed to the creature by its change. Happy the wedding, happy those weddings at which Christ is present, which are consecrated not by luxury but by virtues. What did not pass into grace there, where water passed into wine? Through the Epiphany Christ, to consecrate our baptism, entered the bed of the Jordan (Matt 3), so that those whom he had taken up on earth by being born he might raise to heaven by their being reborn; so that he might have as free in himself those whom he had seen to be captives outside himself; might himself make living those whom guilt had made mortal; might make everlasting those whom death had made temporal; and might make his partners in heaven those whom the devil had made exiles from earthly things. Hence, brothers, the Holy Spirit came down with his whole descent at the moment when the Father cries from heaven: “This is my beloved Son” (Matt 3), so that those whose work with the Son in creating us had been one might share one condescension in our restoration; and so that Christ, at different times but on one and the same day, by the gift of the magi, the change of the water, and the Father's voice, might be known as God by a threefold testimony, and one sacred solemnity of Epiphany might be made from the threefold showing of Christ.

Matt 2:1–2 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 2:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 9:1–22 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 1:13 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 2:1–11 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:13–17 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Explaining the feast of Epiphany as the threefold manifestation of Christ's Godhead, Chrysologus treats the magi, whose star was Christ's servant and whose gifts came from ancient tradition, the changing of water into wine at Cana, and the Father's voice and the Spirit's descent at Christ's baptism.

  • The claim that the magi were descendants of Noah and Abraham who knew of Christ from ancient tradition is the sermon's own. “Not a kinswoman of Christ” renders non cognata Christi, playing on the star's not being bound up with Christ's birth (genesis).

Topics: Christology, Baptism, Marriage

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 157 (PL 52:613–615; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/157). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-157) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 158

158PL 52:615–619

De eisdem. Saepequaerimusquaresic mundum Christus intrat, ut ventris experiatur angustias, partus patiatur injuriam, sustineat vincla pannorum, cunabula toleret imbecilla,lacrymis uberum nutrimenta disquirat, ætatum gradus,necessitatesque persentiat. Et qualiter venire debuit,qui voluit apportare gratiam, timorem pellere, quærere charitatem? Natura docet omnes quid valeat,quid meretur infantia Infantia, quam barbariem non vincit, quam non feritatem mitigat, quam crudelitatem noncomprimit,quem noncompescit furorem,quam non potestatem deponit,quem non molli trigorem, quamduritiam non resolvit, quid non amoris expostulat, quid non affectionis extorquet,quam non imponit gratiam,quam non impetrat charitatem? Hoc ita esse sciunt patres,matres sen- tiunt,probant omnes, viscera humana testantur.Sic ergo nasci voluit, qui amari voluit, non timeri: et tamen apud malitiam humanam sic blanda,sic pia, sic chara. audite quid proficit infantia. Audiens, inquit, Herodes rex,turbatus est, tet omnis Hierosolyma cum ipso,et congregans omnes principes sacerdotum,et scribas populi,sciscitabatur ab eis ubi Christus nasceretur (Matth. 11). Si Hierosolyma, si rex, si scribæ, si principes sacerdotum ad Christi sic turbantur infantiam, quid isti facerent, Christus perfectum mox in hominem si venisset,si fultus divitiis, et multitudine,si cum suspectis, si cum extraneis? Qui nil dant tempori,nilætati, nil pauperi,nil parenti; sed ut audiunt natum,parant nascenti mortem,innocenti dolos, scelus pio, nudo gladios, soli milites,vagienti necem,pœnam parenti:etut vis misceatur sanguini, crudelitas acerba cunabulis bella indicit, ubera telis urget, clypeos illidit gremiis, quatenus humanam divinamque sobolem ante sepulcrum faciat intrare quam mundum.Esto quod Herodes rex amore regni, successoris timore, coactus sit talia moliri; quare Hierosolyma, quare principes, quare scribæ? Quia nasci non vult profanus Deum, servus dominum, judicem reus,rebellis principem,perfidus cognitorem. Hierosolyma varia se contaminatione perfuderat, sacerdotes profanaverant sancta, et a peccata vendentes, in quaestum veniam pietatemque converterant. Scribæ doctrinam cœlestem, scientiam salutarem, vitale magisterium, in sævum sensum,in pertidiae lapsum, in lethalevaniloquium commutarant. Hine est quod Christum nolunt nasci,viveretiment, quia noverant se mox ignominiae dandos,trahendos opprobriis,ejiciendos templo,privandos sacerdotio, oblationum munere vacuandos.Semel enim cupiditate flammati, capti pompa,vitiis sauciati,vanitate ebrii, madefacti luxu,quia de correctione nil cogitare poterant, de venia nil sperabant. Bonus villicus quando copiosum fructum continuo labore conquirit venire dominum suum adlucrum suumcupit,suum con- cupiscit ad gaudium:diligens operarius,quando opus suscepti laboris impleverit,ut mercedem percipiat, patremfamilias desiderat advenire: devotus miles post conflictum, post victoriam, præsentiam regis optat, ut præmiis sudores et vulnera remuneratione compenset; sic ad palmam suam cupitvenire Christum, qui bella mundi indefessa virtute prosternit; sic Christum venire non vult,qui superatus illecebris saeculi de pœna trepidat, de venia nil praesumit, Fratres,faciamus bona,declinemus a malis:fugiamus vitia, virtutes sequamur, dissimulemus praesentia, futura cogitemus, nostrum petamus ad regnum, nostram veniamus ad palmam,optemus ad gloriam, tendamus votis omnibus ad coronam. Sed ad illa sermo quæ sunt in sequenlibus jam recurrat. Tunc Herodes,inquit, clam vocatis magis, diligenter didicit ab eis tempus stellœ quæ apparuit eis, et mittens in Bethlehem, dixit: Ite et interrogate diligenter de pueroet cum inveneritis, renuntiate mihi,ut et ego veniens adorem eum.Occulte vocat magos,quia palam nil audet simulata mens, conscientia dolosa. Occulte vocat magos,quia fur amat noctem,latro in occulto tendit insidias. Diligenter inquirit tempus stellae:sed cum timet regnum.signumcceli non timet,temporis non pertimescit auctorem.Quid turbaris,Herodes?Quid es tantum de successore sollicitus? Cui sidera militant,terreno imperio non teneturIte, et interrogate diligenter de puero,et cum inveneritis,renuntiatemihi. Herodes, erras: magus adorare jussus est,non deferre; testari venit ille, non prodere; videre illi datum est,tibi non datum est invenire. Ite, et interrogate. Quasi magos semel interrogare non sufficit Interrogantibus pie datum est csine pietateresponsum.salutis nuntiusmale audientibusconversus est in ruinam.Contumaxservusauditnatum Dominum, sed Domino nascenti parat laqueos, non honorem; mortem præparat,ut careat servitute. Sed quia nec finiri Deus, necperiresalus, nec vita poterat interire, permanet in honore Dominus, servus remansit in crimine;et adpcenam trahitur qui ad obsequium venire contempsit; capitur ad sententiam, qui ad gratiam noluit pervenire. Inte, et interrogate diligenter depuero,et cum inveneretis,renuntiate mihi.Convenienter dixit renuntiate mihi,quia semper diabolo renuntiat, qui pervenire festinat ad Christum;Christianus futurus a sacerdote cum audit, Renuntias dia- bolo, respondit, Renuntio. Proprie ergo Herodes a magis sibi renuntiare debere dicit, qui se diaboli sciebat tenere locum,Satanae noveratimplere personam. Ut et ego veniens adorem eum.Vult mentiri, sed non potest:veniet,utad tormentacurvetur,adsupplicia jaciatur, sternatur ad poenam, qui adorare finxerat,ut saeviret. Sed magi,ubi Judaicae perfidiee nubila transierunt,et in Christianæ fidei sermo a revident, quam viderunt stellam, ipsa prævia, ipsa duce,ad ortus Dominici locum sacratissimum pervenevunt. Et apertis thesauris suis obtulerunt ei munera aurum, thus, et myrrham.Aurum regi,thus Deo, morituro myrrham,Dominicæ devotioni offlerunt, scientiæ thesauros maximos in posterum credituris;sic ad sua perinnocentiæ viam redeunt,quiiter Herodianæ fraudis calcaverunt in ruinam.

[On the same.] We often ask why Christ enters the world in such a way as to experience the narrowness of the womb, suffer the indignity of childbirth, bear the bonds of swaddling clothes, endure a weak cradle, seek the nourishment of the breast with tears, and feel the stages and needs of the ages of life. And how ought he to have come, who wished to bring grace, drive out fear, and seek love? Nature teaches everyone what infancy can do and what it deserves. What barbarity does infancy not overcome, what savagery not soften, what cruelty not restrain, what fury not check, what power not lay down, what rigor not soften, what hardness not melt? What love does it not call forth, what affection not wring out, what favor not impose, what love not obtain? Fathers know this to be so, mothers feel it, all approve it, human hearts bear witness. So he who wished to be loved, not feared, willed to be born like this: and yet hear what infancy, so gentle, so tender, so dear, achieves with human malice. “Herod the king,” it says, “hearing this, was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him; and gathering all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born” (Matt 2). If Jerusalem, if the king, if the scribes, if the chief priests are so troubled at the infancy of Christ, what would they have done if Christ had come at once as a grown man, if he had been supported by riches and a multitude, with suspect followers, with foreigners? They who give nothing to time, nothing to age, nothing to the poor, nothing to a parent; but as soon as they hear he is born, they prepare death for the one born, snares for the innocent, crime for the holy one, swords for the naked, soldiers for one alone, slaughter for one wailing, punishment for a parent; and so that violence may be mixed with blood, bitter cruelty declares war on cradles, presses breasts with weapons, dashes shields against laps, so as to make a human and divine offspring enter the tomb before the world. Granted that King Herod was driven to such schemes by love of his kingdom and fear of a successor; why Jerusalem, why the chief priests, why the scribes? Because the profane does not want God to be born, the slave his master, the guilty his judge, the rebel his prince, the faithless his examiner. Jerusalem had drenched itself with various pollution; the priests had profaned holy things, and, selling sins, had turned pardon and godliness into gain. The scribes had changed heavenly doctrine, saving knowledge, life-giving teaching into savage sense, into the fall of faithlessness, into deadly empty talk. Hence they do not want Christ to be born, they fear him to live, because they knew that they would soon be given over to disgrace, dragged to reproaches, cast out of the temple, deprived of the priesthood, emptied of the profit of offerings. For once inflamed with greed, captured by pomp, wounded by vices, drunk with vanity, soaked in luxury, since they could think nothing of correction, they hoped nothing of pardon. A good steward, when by continuous labor he has gained abundant fruit, wants his master to come to his gain, longs for him to come to his joy; a diligent workman, when he has finished the work he undertook, wants the householder to come so that he may receive his wages; a devoted soldier after the conflict, after the victory, wishes for the king's presence, so as to have his sweat and wounds repaid with rewards; so he who lays low the wars of the world with tireless virtue wants Christ to come to his palm; so he does not want Christ to come who, overcome by the allurements of the world, trembles at punishment and presumes nothing of pardon. Brothers, let us do good, turn away from evil; let us flee vices, follow virtues; let us disregard the present, think of the future; let us seek our kingdom, come to our palm, long for glory, strive with all our prayers for the crown. But let the sermon now return to what follows. “Then Herod,” it says, “secretly calling the magi, learned diligently from them the time of the star that had appeared to them, and sending them to Bethlehem, said: Go and inquire diligently about the child, and when you have found him, report to me, so that I too may come and worship him.” He calls the magi secretly, because a pretending mind, a deceitful conscience, dares nothing openly. He calls the magi secretly, because the thief loves the night, the robber lays his ambush in hiding. He inquires diligently the time of the star; but while he fears for his kingdom, he does not fear the sign of heaven, he does not dread the Author of time. Why are you troubled, Herod? Why are you so anxious about a successor? He for whom the stars serve as soldiers is not held by an earthly empire. “Go and inquire diligently about the child, and when you have found him, report to me.” Herod, you err: the magus was ordered to worship, not to inform; he came to bear witness, not to betray; to him it was given to see, to you it was not given to find. “Go and inquire.” As if it were not enough to have asked the magi once! To those who asked devoutly an answer was given; to one without devotion the message of salvation, heard wickedly, was turned into ruin. The stubborn slave hears that his Lord is born, but prepares snares for the Lord at his birth, not honor; he prepares death, so as to escape servitude. But since God could not be ended, nor salvation perish, nor life die, the Lord remains in honor, the slave remained in his crime; and he is dragged to punishment who scorned to come to service; he is seized for sentence who would not come to grace. “Go and inquire diligently about the child, and when you have found him, report to me.” Fittingly he said “report to me” [renuntiate], because whoever hastens to come to Christ always renounces [renuntiat] the devil; the one who is to become a Christian, when he hears from the priest, “Do you renounce the devil?”, answers, “I renounce.” Properly, then, Herod says that the magi must report [renuntiare] to him, since he knew that he held the devil's place and filled the role of Satan. “So that I too may come and worship him.” He wants to lie but cannot: he will come, to be bowed to torments, thrown to punishments, laid low for penalty, he who pretended to worship so as to rage. But the magi, when they had passed through the clouds of Jewish faithlessness and came again into the clear sky of Christian faith, saw again the star they had seen, and with it going before, with it as guide, they came to the most holy place of the Lord's birth. “And opening their treasures they offered him gifts, gold, frankincense and myrrh.” Gold to the king, frankincense to God, myrrh to one who would die, they offered in devotion to the Lord, the greatest treasures of knowledge for those who would believe in the future; so they return to their own country by the way of innocence, who trampled the path of Herod's fraud to its ruin.

Matt 2:3–12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:21 (allusion, low confidence) · John 10:1 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Chrysologus explains that Christ came as an infant so as to be loved, not feared, yet Herod, the priests and the scribes were troubled even at a child; expounding Matt 2:3–12, he exposes Herod's secret plot, plays on “report” and the baptismal “renounce,” and interprets the magi's gifts.

  • “Report” and “renounce” render the same Latin verb, renuntiare; the sermon alludes to the baptismal renunciation of the devil. The charges against the priests and scribes of Jerusalem are translated as written. “The clear sky” renders the sense of a garbled phrase (in Christianae fidei sermo a revident).

Topics: Christology, Baptism

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 158 (PL 52:615–619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/158). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-158) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 159

159PL 52:619

De eisdem. Ante hos dies,id est, diem octavum kalendarum mensis hujus quo crescere dies coepit,quiadiesverus illuxit, in carne natum Dominum Christum Jesum,in Evangelio scriptum (Luc.II), facile recolunt, qui legerunt, vel qui aurem legentibus praebuerunt. Israelitici pastores super gregem suum vigilantes, angelis nutiantibus, cognoverunt: hodie in eadem carne manifestatum gentiles magi curiosa sectantes, signis indicantibus,invenerunt.lllis ortum Dominicæ nativitatis annuntians locuta est vox spirituali um ministrorum, istis stella tanquam lingua coelorum. Dicunt illi ad quos saepius prophetae missi fuerant: Transeamus usque Bethleem,et videamus hoc verbum quod factum est ad nos; dicunt isti, quibus nullus umquam locutus fuerat prophetarum, et sciscitantes interrogant: Ubi est qui natus est rex Judæorum? Vidimus stellam ejus in Oriente,et venimus adorare eum (Matth.II). Accedunt ergo illi deproximo, hi veniunt de longinquo, utrique tamen ad unum eumdemque fidei locum, pia devotione conveniunt: ibique regem Christurn appositum anteduo cprophetica illa jumenta, duorum videlicet populorum typum figuramque gestantia, intuentur, admirantur,ãgnoscunt.Agnovit enim bos possessorem suum, et asinus præsepe domini sui (Isai. 1). AgnovitenimbosJudaeus jugo legis excusso,agcovit et asinus paganus stultitiae feritate deposita;ille deserens superfluum observationis laborem,hic relinquens vagum superstitionis errorem. Uterque agnovit, quia uterque ad unum præsepe Domini epulaturus accessit, epulaturusnon fenum mortis, sed cibum salutis.Edite, edite,pia animalia,æternæ vitae cibaria: et perpetuæ retributionis escam avidis quantum potestis faucibus occupate, non dividentes in frusta, sed integrum, solidumque sumentes.Non potestenim edi Christus, et dividi;integer a credentibus sumitur, integer in ore cordis recipitur. Verbumenim caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. 1): habitavit, ex quo uterum Virginis dignanter implevit. Obtulerunt illi, ut scriptum est,aurum,thus et myrrham.Nos fidei e thus longinquee regionis,nos proximae confessionis myrrham boniodoris,nos suaveolentia dona charitatis tria namque ista offerimus,quando Christum, et regem,etDominum, et hominem confitemur. Sed in spiritu et veritate adoremus Christum, si ei munera fidei et confessionis obtulimus; et nos sicut illi magi, qui sunt Mei nostrae duces credulitatisque principes, commoniti in somnis, id est,inhac vita, quæ somno est similis, illuso Herode rege,id est, diabolo hujus mundi principe, per aliam viam, id est, per alteram vitam,ad illam nostram patriamrevertamur, de qua per Adam ejecti infeliciter sumus, per Chri- stum vero misencorditernunc reducti.

[On the same.] Some days ago, that is, on the eighth day before the Kalends of this month, when the day began to grow because the true day had shone, those who have read it, or have given ear to those reading, easily recall that the Lord Christ Jesus was born in the flesh, as written in the Gospel (Luke 2). The Israelite shepherds, watching over their flock, learned it at the angels' announcement; today the gentile magi, following their curious arts, found him manifested in the same flesh at the guidance of signs. To the former the voice of spiritual ministers spoke, announcing the rising of the Lord's nativity; to the latter a star, as the tongue of the heavens. They, to whom the prophets had often been sent, say: “Let us go over to Bethlehem and see this word that has come about for us.” These, to whom none of the prophets had ever spoken, inquire and ask: “Where is he who has been born King of the Jews? We have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him” (Matt 2). So those come from near at hand, these come from afar, yet both meet with holy devotion at one and the same place of faith: and there they behold, wonder at and recognize Christ the King laid before those two prophetic animals, which bear the type and figure of the two peoples. For “the ox knew its owner, and the ass its master's manger” (Isa 1). The ox, the Jew, recognized him, having shaken off the yoke of the law; the ass, the pagan, also recognized him, having laid aside the wildness of folly; the one leaving the superfluous labor of observance, the other abandoning the wandering error of superstition. Both recognized him, because both came to the one manger of the Lord to feed, to feed not on the hay of death but on the food of salvation. Eat, eat, holy animals, the food of eternal life; and take hold with greedy jaws, as much as you can, of the food of everlasting reward, not dividing it into pieces but taking it whole and entire. For Christ cannot be eaten and divided; he is taken whole by believers, he is received whole in the mouth of the heart. For “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1): he dwelt, from the time he deigned to fill the Virgin's womb. They offered him, as it is written, gold, frankincense and myrrh. We offer the frankincense of faith from a distant region, the myrrh of good odor from a near confession, the sweet-smelling gifts of love; for we offer these three when we confess Christ as King, Lord and man. But let us worship Christ in spirit and truth, if we have offered him the gifts of faith and confession; and let us, like those magi, who are the leaders of our faith and the first of our belief, warned in sleep, that is, in this life, which is like sleep, having eluded King Herod, that is, the devil, the prince of this world, return by another way, that is, by another life, to that homeland of ours from which we were unhappily cast out through Adam, but now mercifully brought back through Christ.

Luke 2:8–15 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 2:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 2:11–12 (allusion, high confidence) · John 4:23 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 12:31 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Comparing the shepherds and the magi, who came from near and far to the one manger, the preacher reads the ox and ass of Isa 1:3 as Jews and gentiles who both recognized Christ, and urges hearers to offer the gifts of faith and return to paradise by another way.

  • The editor of the modern critical edition (Olivar) judges this sermon not to be by Chrysologus; it is translated as printed in Migne. “The eighth day before the Kalends of this month” is 25 December, counted from the Kalends of January.

Topics: Christology, Eucharist

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 159 (PL 52:619; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/159). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-159) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.