On the Holy Spirit (in Jerome's Latin translation) 48–63

Latin text: PL 23 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 23, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 48

48PL 23

Si autem volueris hoc de Judaeis intelligere, qui crucifixerunt Dominum Salvatorem, et idcirco exacerbaverunt Spiritum sanctum, id quod scriptum est, « ipse debellavit eos, » ad illam est intelligentiam referendum, quod Romanis traditi sunt, quando venit super eos ira Dei in finem. In universo enim orbe cunctisque regionibus soli exsules patriae, in terra vagantur aliena, non urbem antiquam, non sedes proprias possidentes, id quod prophetis et Salvatori suo fecerunt, receperunt. Quia enim sanguinarii, et vesano semper furore capti, non solum prophetas occiderunt, lapidaveruntque eos qui ad se missi fuerant, sed ad impietatis culmen egressi, Dominum Salvatorem, qui pro cunctorum salute descendere dignatus fuerat ad terras, prodiderunt et crucifixerunt, propterea expulsi sunt urbe quam prophetarum et Christi cruore maculaverunt. Secundum igitur hunc sensum debellatos eos a Domino intelligere debemus, non ad breve tempus, sed ad omne futurum saeculum usque ad consummationem mundi. Quippe (ut diximus) profugi atque captivi, in universis aberrant nationibus, non urbem, non regionem propriam possidentes. Attamen quia naturaliter benignus est et misericors is qui eos debellaverat, tribuit eis locum poenitentiae, si velint ad meliora converti. Unde et dicitur, « recordatus est dierum saeculi. » Recordatus enim temporum futurorum, clausam januam aliqua eis ex parte reseravit, ut postquam intraverit plenitudo gentium, tunc omnis Israel (qui hac fuerit dignus appellatione) salvetur. Licet enim in id temeritatis eruperint, ut eum qui propter eos missus fuerat, interficerent, dicentes: « Sanguis ejus super nos, et super filios nostros, » tamen Deus suscitavit eum de terra, in cujus corde tribus diebus et tribus noctibus fuerat commoratus: pastorem ovium suarum. Siquidem ita contexitur, « qui eduxit de terra pastorem ovium suarum. »

But if you wish to understand this of the Jews who crucified the Lord and Saviour and therefore embittered the Holy Spirit, what is written, "he himself fought against them", must be referred to that understanding, that they were handed over to the Romans when the wrath of God came upon them to the end. For in the whole world and in all regions they alone are exiles from their homeland and wander in a foreign land, possessing neither their ancient city nor their own dwellings; they have received what they did to the prophets and to their Saviour. For since they were bloodthirsty and always gripped by insane fury, they not only killed the prophets and stoned those sent to them, but, going on to the summit of impiety, they betrayed and crucified the Lord and Saviour, who had deigned to come down to earth for the salvation of all; and therefore they were driven out of the city which they had stained with the blood of the prophets and of Christ. In this sense, then, we must understand that they were fought against by the Lord, not for a short time but for all the age to come, to the end of the world. For, as we said, fugitives and captives, they wander among all nations, possessing no city and no land of their own. Yet since he who fought against them is by nature kind and merciful, he gives them a place for repentance if they are willing to turn to better things. That is why it is said, "He remembered the days of the age." For remembering future times, he has opened the closed door to them in part, so that after the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, then all Israel (whoever is worthy of this name) may be saved. For although they burst out into such rashness as to kill him who had been sent for their sake, saying, "His blood be on us and on our children", yet God raised up from the earth him in whose heart he had remained three days and three nights, the shepherd of his sheep. For the passage runs: "Who brought up from the earth the shepherd of his sheep."

Isa 63:10–11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 2:15–16 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 23:37 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 11:25–26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:40 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 13:20 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Applied to the Jews who crucified Christ, God's fighting against them is their defeat and exile under Rome, yet God leaves them a place for repentance until all Israel is saved.

  • This polemical passage about the Jews is translated as written; it reflects the author's interpretation of the destruction of Jerusalem. Quotations: Isa 63:10-11; 1 Thess 2:16 (wrath to the end); Matt 23:37; Rom 11:25-26; Matt 27:25; Matt 12:40; Heb 13:20 (shepherd brought up from the dead).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word; uncertain characters in the digital text): ad illam est intelligentium referendum → ad illam est intelligentiam referendum; soli exsules patriea → soli exsules patriae; ad impietatis colm(??)n egressi → ad impietatis culmen egressi; usque ad consummatio-. nem mundi → usque ad consummationem mundi.

Topics: Jews and Judaism, The church and Israel

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 48 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/48). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-48) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 49

49PL 23

Quod vero pastor ovium Deus, qui nunc prophetali sermone describitur, Dominus sit, manifestius in Evangelio discimus, ipso Salvatore testante, « Ego sum pastor bonus, et animam meam pono pro ovibus meis·.» Et iterum: « Oves meae vocem meam audiunt ·.» Post haec omnia prophetes ait, « Ubi est qui posuit super eos Spiritum sanctum? » Admiratur quippe de quanta felicitate ad quantas miserias pervenerint. Et quodam modo loquitur: Qui eos redemerat, qui posuerat in illis Spiritum sanctum suum, habitans cum eis, ubi nunc est? quo abiit? Dereliquit eos, quia ipsi prius dereliquerunt, et ad iracundiam provocaverunt Sanctum Israel. Posuerat autem dudum in eis Spiritum sanctum Deus, cum adhuc boni essent, et praeceptis ejus obsequi niterentur. His enim tantummodo Spiritus sanctus inseritur, qui, vitiis derelictis, virtutum sectantur chorum, et juxta eas, et per eas in fide Christi victitant. Quod si paulatim negligentia subrepente coeperint ad pejora confluere, concitant adversum se habitatorem suum Spiritum sanctum, et eum qui illum dederat, convertunt ad inimicitias. Huic quid simile et Apostolus ad Thessalonicenses scribens, ait, « Neque enim vocavit nos Deus ad immunditiam, sed ad sanctificationem. »

That the shepherd of the sheep of God, now described in the prophet's words, is the Lord, we learn more plainly in the Gospel, the Saviour himself testifying: "I am the good shepherd, and I lay down my life for my sheep." And again: "My sheep hear my voice." After all this the prophet says: "Where is he who put his Holy Spirit upon them?" He marvels from how great happiness to how great miseries they have come, and in a way he says: He who had redeemed them, who had put his Holy Spirit in them, dwelling with them, where is he now? Where has he gone? He has forsaken them, because they forsook him first and provoked the Holy One of Israel to anger. God had once put his Holy Spirit in them, while they were still good and strove to obey his precepts. For the Holy Spirit is put only into those who, abandoning vices, follow the choir of virtues and live according to them and by them in the faith of Christ. But if, as negligence gradually creeps in, they begin to slide toward worse things, they stir up against themselves the Holy Spirit who dwells in them, and turn to enmity him who had given him. Something like this the Apostle too says, writing to the Thessalonians: "For God did not call us to uncleanness but to sanctification."

John 10:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 63:11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 4:7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The shepherd is Christ; God put his Spirit in Israel while they obeyed, but the Spirit is provoked when those he indwells turn to sin.

  • Quotations: John 10:11, 27; Isa 63:11; 1 Thess 4:7.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; uncertain character in the digital text): posuerat in iliis Spiritum → posuerat in illis Spiritum; provocaverunt Sunctum Israel → provocaverunt Sanctum Israel; virtutum se(??)tantur chorum → virtutum sectantur chorum.

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 49 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/49). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-49) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 50

50PL 23

Itaque qui spernit, sive quod melius habetur in Graeco, « qui praevaricatur,» non hominem praevaricabitur, sed Deum, qui dedit Spiritum sanctum suum in vobis. Nam in his sermonibus Deus vocans per fidem in sanctificationem, id est ut sancti Spiritus fierent credentes, dedit eis Spiritum sanctum. Et quandiu praecepta Dei servaverunt, permansit in eis Spiritus sanctus, quem acceperunt. Quando vero amore lubrico corruerunt, et ad immunditiam sunt delapsi, spreverunt, sive praevaricati sunt Dominum, qui dederat eis Spiritum sanctum, ut non immunditiae deservirent, sed ut sanctificarentur. Unde poenas luent qui ista commiserunt, non quasi hominem, sed quasi Deum spernentes. Et ut sciamus Dominum esse Spiritum sanctum, qui datur credentibus, ex ipsius prophetae Isaiae discamus eloquio, qui inducit ad quempiam dicentem Dominum: « Spiritus meus in te est, et verba mea dedi in os tuum.» Ostenditur enim ex sermone praesenti, quod qui acceperit Spiritum Dei, simul cum eo et verba Dei possideat, sermones videlicet scientiae et sapientiae. Necnon et in alio loco ejusdem prophetae Deus loquitur: « Dedi Spiritum meum super eum. » Qui ergo posuit in eis Spiritum sanctum, Moysen dextera sua sanctificatum esse commemorat, sive illum illustrem virum, et mysteriorum Dei initiatorem, de quo ad Jesum filium Nave Dominus ait: « Moyses famulus meus, » sive Legem suam, quae in Veteri scripta est Instrumento. Nam crebro legisse me memini Moysen appellatum esse pro lege, ut in Apostolo: « Usque in hodiernum diem, quando legitur Moyses. » Et Abraham ad divitem in suppliciis constitutum, « Habent, » inquit, « Moysen et prophetas.» Et certe liquido comprobatur ibi Moysen, non supradictum virum significatum esse, sed legem.

"Therefore whoever despises", or, as the Greek has it better, "whoever transgresses", "transgresses not against man but against God, who has given his Holy Spirit in you." For in these words God, calling to sanctification through faith, that is, so that believers might become of the Holy Spirit, gave them the Holy Spirit. And as long as they kept God's commands, the Holy Spirit whom they received remained in them. But when they fell through slippery love and slid into uncleanness, they despised, or transgressed against, the Lord who had given them the Holy Spirit, so that they should not serve uncleanness but be sanctified. So those who have committed these things will pay the penalty, as despising not a man but God. And to know that the Holy Spirit who is given to believers is Lord, let us learn from the words of the prophet Isaiah himself, who presents the Lord saying to someone: "My Spirit is in you, and I have put my words in your mouth." The present passage shows that one who has received the Spirit of God possesses with him the words of God too, namely words of knowledge and wisdom. And in another place of the same prophet God says: "I have put my Spirit upon him." He, then, who put his Holy Spirit in them records that Moses was sanctified by his right hand, whether that famous man, the initiator into God's mysteries, of whom the Lord said to Joshua son of Nun, "Moses my servant", or his Law, which is written in the Old Instrument. For I remember having often read that "Moses" is used for the law, as in the Apostle: "To this very day, when Moses is read." And Abraham says to the rich man placed in torment: "They have Moses and the prophets." And there it is clearly proved that "Moses" signifies not the man mentioned above but the law.

1 Thess 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 59:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 42:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 63:11–12 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 16:29 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Whoever despises the Spirit given for sanctification despises God; the Spirit brings God's words, and "Moses" in Isaiah may mean either the man or the law.

  • The stray note number "(l9)" in the digital text is removed. "Old Instrument" is an older Latin term for the Old Testament. Quotations: 1 Thess 4:8; Isa 59:21; Isa 42:1; Isa 63:11-12; Josh 1:2; 2 Cor 3:15; Luke 16:29.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word; stray note number): non hominem prae. varicabitur → non hominem praevaricabitur; Et qnandiu → Et quandiu; permansit in eis Spiritus saucius → permansit in eis Spiritus sanctus; amore lubrico(l9) corruerunt → amore lubrico corruerunt; Et Abrabam ad divitem → Et Abraham ad divitem.

Topics: Trinity, Ethics, The Holy Spirit, Interpreting Scripture

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 50 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/50). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-50) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 51

51PL 23

Porro quae est dextra Dei, quae adduxit Moysen, nisi Dominus et Salvator noster? Ipse est enim dextera Patris, per quem salvat et exaltat et facit virtutem, sicut alibi de Deo dicitur: « Salvavit sibi dextera sua, et brachium sanctum ejus.» Et rursum: « Dextera Domini fecit virtutem, dextera Domini exaltavit me: non moriar, sed vivam, et narrabo opera Domini. » Et certe vocem hanc ex persona Dominici Hominis proferri, quem unigenitus Filius Dei assumere dignatus est ex virgine. ex ipso loco manifeste comprobatur, quia ipse est dextera Dei, sicut scriptum est in Actibus apostolorum, quod factus sit ex semine David secundum carnem, genitus de Virgine, superveniente in eam Spiritu sancto, et virtute Excelsi obumbrante eam. De quo David prophetavit in Spiritu, quod a mortuis resurgens, assumptus sit in coelos, dextera Dei sublevatus. Scribitur ibi autem in hunc modum: « Providens idem David locutus est de resurrectione Christi, quoniam non derelictus in inferno, neque caro ejus vidit corruptionem. Hunc Jesum suscitavit Deus, cui nos omnes testes sumus. Dextera igitur Dei elevatus, et repromissionem Spiritus sancti accipiens a Patre, effudit hoc donum in nobis, quod vos videtis et auditis, neque enim David ascendit in coelos. » Nulli quippe dubium, exaltatum dextera Dei, et ab inferis resurgentem esse Dominum Jesum, sicut ipse Scripturae sermone testatus est. Iste ergo qui resurrexit a mortuis dicit: « Ego dormivi et somnum cepi, et resurrexi, quia Dominus suscitavit me. »

And what is the right hand of God that led Moses, if not our Lord and Saviour? For he is the right hand of the Father, through whom he saves and exalts and does mighty deeds, as is said of God elsewhere: "His right hand and his holy arm have saved for him." And again: "The right hand of the Lord has done mighty deeds; the right hand of the Lord has exalted me; I shall not die but live, and tell the works of the Lord." That this voice is uttered in the person of the Lord's Man, whom the only-begotten Son of God deigned to assume from the virgin, is clearly proved by the passage itself, since he is the right hand of God, as is written in the Acts of the Apostles: that he was made of the seed of David according to the flesh, born of the Virgin, the Holy Spirit coming upon her and the power of the Most High overshadowing her. Of him David prophesied in the Spirit that, rising from the dead, he was taken up into heaven, lifted up by the right hand of God. It is written there thus: "Foreseeing this, David spoke of the resurrection of Christ, that he was not abandoned in hell, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God raised up, of which we are all witnesses. Being therefore exalted by the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this gift on us, which you see and hear; for David did not ascend into heaven." No one doubts that the Lord Jesus is the one exalted by the right hand of God and rising from hell, as he himself testified in the words of Scripture. He, then, who rose from the dead says: "I lay down and slept, and I rose, because the Lord raised me up."

Ps 98:1 (97:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 118:16–17 (117:16-Ps Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 2:30 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 2:31–34 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 3:5 (3:6 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The right hand of God is Christ, as the Psalms and Peter's Pentecost sermon show of the risen Lord exalted at God's right hand.

  • "The Lord's Man" (Dominicus Homo) is the human nature assumed by the Son. The Latin "dextera Dei elevatus" can mean "exalted to" or "by" the right hand; the author takes it as "by". Quotations: Ps 98:1 (97:1 Vulgate); Ps 118:16-17 (117:16-17 Vulgate); Rom 1:3 and Acts 2:30; Luke 1:35; Acts 2:31-34; Ps 3:5 (3:6 Vulgate).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word): quem uni genitus Filius → quem unigenitus Filius; David loculus est → David locutus est.

Topics: Christology, Resurrection and ascension of Christ, Incarnation

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 51 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/51). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-51) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 52

52PL 23

Ipse ergo sermone Dei assumptus in coelum, elevatus esse ab ea, de qua supra diximus, dextera Dei praedicatur, et accepisse repromissiones Spiritus sancti a Patre, et effudisse illum in credentes, ita ut omnium linguis loquerentur magnalia Dei. Nam et Dominicus Homo accepit communicationem Spiritus sancti, sicut in Evangeliis scribitur; « Jesus ergo repletus Spiritu sancto, regressus est a Jordane; » et in alio loco: « Reversus est Jesus in virtute Spiritus in Galilaeam. » Haec autem absque ulla calumnia de Dominico Homine, qui totus Christus, unus est Jesus Filius Dei, sensu debemus pietatis accipere, non quod alter et alter sit, sed quod de uno atque eodem, quasi de altero secundum naturam Dei, et hominis disputetur, et quia Deus Verbum unigenitus Filius Dei, neque immutationem recipit, nec augmentum. Siquidem ipse est bonorum omnium plenitudo.

He, then, taken up into heaven by the word of God, is proclaimed to have been lifted up by the right hand of God of which we spoke above, and to have received the promises of the Holy Spirit from the Father, and to have poured him out on believers, so that they spoke in the tongues of all peoples the great deeds of God. For the Lord's Man too received communion with the Holy Spirit, as is written in the Gospels: "Jesus, then, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan"; and in another place: "Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee." These things we must take, without any cavilling, in a sense of piety concerning the Lord's Man, who is the whole Christ, the one Jesus, Son of God: not that he is one and another, but that we speak of one and the same as if of another, according to the nature of God and of man; and because God the Word, the only-begotten Son of God, admits neither change nor increase, since he is the fullness of all good things.

Acts 2:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 2:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:14 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ, exalted by God's right hand, poured out the Spirit; the Spirit's filling of Jesus is said of his humanity, for the one Christ as God the Word admits no change or increase.

  • Quotations: Acts 2:33, 2:11; Luke 4:1, 4:14.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): repromissiones Spiritus santi → repromissiones Spiritus sancti.

Topics: Christology, The Holy Spirit

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 52 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/52). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-52) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 53

53PL 23

Satis abundeque de prophetae testimonio disputatum est, nec ad reliqua pergamus, ut quomodo scimus quod Pater et Filius sanctos et bonos sui communicatione perficiunt: sic sanctus quoque Spiritus participatione sui bonos efficiat sanctosque credentes; et ex hoc etiam unius cum Patre et Filio substantiae esse doceatur. Dicitur in Psalmis ad Dominum: « Spiritus tuus bonus deducet me in terram rectam·. » Scimus autem in quibusdam exemplaribus scriptum esse, « Spiritus sanctus tuus.» Porro in Esdra absque ulla ambiguitate bonus Spiritus appellatur: « Spiritum tuum bonum dedisti, ut eos faceres intelligere. » Quod autem Pater sanctificet, Apostolus scribit, dicens: « Deus autem pacis sanctificet vos perfectos. » Et Salvator ait: « Pater sancte, sanctifica eos in veritate, quia verbum tuum est veritas. » Perspicue dicens: In me (qui Verbum tuum sum, et veritas tua) sanctifica illos fide et consortio mei. Dictus est et alibi bonus Deus: « Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus. » Superius quoque ostendimus quoniam Filius sanctificet, Paulo in eadem verba congruente: « Etenim qui sanctificat, et qui sanctificantur, ex uno omnes. » Sanctificantem significans Christum, et sanctificatos eos, qui possunt dicere, « Factus est nobis sapientia ex Deo Christus, et justitia, et sanctificatio. » Appellatur siquidem et Spiritus sanctificationis. Unde et ad eum dicitur: « Et omnes sanctificat sub manibus tuis, et sub te sunt. » Bonus Dominus noster Jesus Christus, et ex bono Patre generatus est, et de eo legimus: « Confitemini Domino, quoniam bonus. » Confiteantur illi autem qui ab eo aut veniam obsecrant peccatorum, aut gratias referunt ejus clementiae pro indultis beneficiis. Spiritus quoque sanctus eos quos dignatur implere, sanctificat, ut superius jam demonstratum est, quando ostendimus eum participabilem et a multis simul capi posse. Et nunc in praesenti Pauli testimonio largitor sanctificationis ostenditur, in eo quod ait: « Debemus autem et nos gratias agere Deo semper pro vobis, fratres dilecti a Domino, quia elegit Deus nos primitias in salutem, in sanctificatione Spiritus sancti, et fide veritatis » Nam et in hoc loco charismata Dei subintelliguntur in Spiritu, cum in sanctificatione Spiritus, fides pariter, et veritas possidentur.

Enough and more has been said on the prophet's testimony; let us go on to the rest, so that, as we know that the Father and the Son make men holy and good by communion with themselves, so it may be taught that the Holy Spirit too makes believers good and holy by participation in himself, and from this that he is of one substance with the Father and the Son. It is said to the Lord in the Psalms: "Your good Spirit will lead me into the right land." We know that in some copies it is written, "Your Holy Spirit." In Ezra, without any ambiguity, he is called the good Spirit: "You gave your good Spirit to make them understand." That the Father sanctifies, the Apostle writes, saying: "May the God of peace sanctify you completely." And the Saviour says: "Holy Father, sanctify them in the truth, because your word is truth", plainly meaning: in me, who am your Word and your truth, sanctify them by faith and fellowship with me. And elsewhere God is called good: "No one is good but God alone." We have also shown above that the Son sanctifies, Paul agreeing in these words: "For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all from one", meaning by him who sanctifies Christ, and by the sanctified those who can say: "Christ became for us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification." He is also called the Spirit of sanctification. Hence it is said to him: "And all the sanctified are under your hands, and they are under you." Our Lord Jesus Christ is good and was begotten of a good Father, and of him we read: "Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good." Let those give thanks who either beg from him pardon for sins or thank his clemency for benefits bestowed. The Holy Spirit too sanctifies those he deigns to fill, as has already been shown above, when we showed that he can be shared and received by many at once. And now in the present testimony of Paul he is shown as the giver of sanctification, when he says: "But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose us as firstfruits for salvation, in the sanctification of the Holy Spirit and faith in the truth." For in this place too God's gifts are understood to be in the Spirit, since in the sanctification of the Spirit faith and truth are possessed together.

Ps 143:10 (142:10 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Neh 9:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 5:23 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:4 (allusion, low confidence) · Deut 33:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 118:1 (117:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Thess 2:13 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Father, Son and Holy Spirit alike make believers good and holy, which shows the Spirit's one substance with them.

  • "Ezra" is Neh 9:20 (in the Latin Bible, 2 Esdras). "He is also called the Spirit of sanctification" seems to refer to Christ (cf. Rom 1:4), to whom Deut 33:3 is then applied; translated as written. Quotations: Ps 143:10 (142:10 Vulgate); 1 Thess 5:23; John 17:11, 17; Mark 10:18; Heb 2:11; 1 Cor 1:30; Deut 33:3 (LXX); Ps 118:1 (117:1 Vulgate); 2 Thess 2:13 ("firstfruits" reading).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): ut cos faceres intelligere → ut eos faceres intelligere; et sanctificalos eos → et sanctificatos eos; pro induitis beneficiis → pro indultis beneficiis; in sunetifitione Spiritus sancti → in sanctificatione Spiritus sancti.

Topics: Trinity, The Holy Spirit

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 53 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/53). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-53) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 54

54PL 23

Quia ergo recte, et pie, et ut se veritas habet, haec diximus, sanctificationis, bonitatisque vocabulum, et ad Patrem, et ad Filium· et ad Spiritum sanctum aeque refertur, sicut ipsa quoque appellatio Spiritus. Nam et Pater Spiritus dicitur, ut ibi: « Spiritus est Deus: »et Filius Spiritus: « Dominus, » inquit, « Spiritus est. » Spiritus autem sanctus, semper Spiritus sancti appellatione censetur, non quod ex consortio tantum nominis Spiritus cum Patre ponatur et Filio, sed quod una natura, unum possideat et nomen. Quia vero Spiritus vocabulum multa significat, enumerandum est breviter quibus rebus nomen ejus aptetur. Vocatur spiritus et ventus, sicut in Ezechiele: « Tertiam autem partem disperges in spiritum: » hoc est, in ventum. Quod si volueris secundum historiam illud sentire, quod scriptum est, « In spiritu violento conteres naves Tharsis,» non aliud ibi spiritus, quam ventus accipitur. Necnon Salomon inter multa hoc quoque munus a Deo accepit, ut sciret violentias spirituum; non aliud se in hoc accepisse demonstrans, quam scire rapidos ventorum flatus, et quibus causis eorum natura subsistat. Vocatur et anima spiritus, ut in Jacobi Epistola: « Quomodo corpus tuum sine spiritu mortuum est, » et reliqua. Manifestissime enim spiritus hic nihil aliud nisi anima nuncupatur. Juxta quam intelligentiam et Stephanus animam suam spiritum vocans, « Domine, » inquit, « Jesu, suscipe spiritum meum. » Illud quoque quod in Ecclesiaste dicitur: « Quis scit an spiritus hominis ascendat sursum, et spiritus jumenti descendat deorsum? » Considerandum utrumnam et pecudum animae spiritus appellentur. Dicitur etiam excepta anima, et excepto spiritu nostro, spiritus alius quis esse in homine, de quo Paulus scribit: « Quis enim scit hominum ea quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in eo est? » Si enim voluerit contendere quispiam animam hic significari in spiritu, quis erit homo cujus cogitationes, et arcana, et secreta cordis occulta nesciat homo nisi spiritus ejus, quia de corpore solitario hoc intelligere velle perstultum est.

Since, then, we have said these things rightly and piously and according to the truth, the terms holiness and goodness are applied equally to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, as is the very name "Spirit". For the Father is called Spirit, as there: "God is Spirit"; and the Son is called Spirit: "The Lord," it says, "is the Spirit." But the Holy Spirit is always reckoned under the name of Holy Spirit; not that he is placed with the Father and the Son only because they share the name "Spirit", but because, being one nature, they possess one name too. But since the word "spirit" signifies many things, we must briefly list the things to which the name is applied. Wind is called spirit, as in Ezekiel: "The third part you shall scatter to the spirit", that is, to the wind. And if you choose to take literally what is written, "With a violent spirit you will shatter the ships of Tarshish", spirit there means nothing other than wind. Solomon too, among many other gifts, received this from God, that he should know the violence of spirits, showing that what he received here was nothing other than knowing the rushing blasts of the winds and the causes on which their nature depends. The soul too is called spirit, as in the Epistle of James: "As your body without the spirit is dead", and so on. Here most plainly spirit means nothing other than the soul. In this understanding Stephen too, calling his soul spirit, says: "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit." And as to what is said in Ecclesiastes, "Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes downward?", it must be considered whether the souls of beasts too are called spirits. It is also said that there is another spirit in man, besides the soul and besides our spirit, of which Paul writes: "For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him?" For if anyone wishes to argue that the soul is signified here by spirit, who is the man whose thoughts and hidden things and secrets of the heart no one knows except his spirit? For it is utterly foolish to want to understand this of the body alone.

John 4:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 5:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 48:7 (47:8 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 2:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 7:59 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 3:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:11 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The name "spirit" is shared by Father, Son and Holy Spirit as one nature, but in Scripture it also means wind, the soul, and the spirit within a man.

  • "Besides the soul and besides our spirit" is confusing in the Latin, since the next sentence identifies this spirit with "the spirit of man"; translated as written. Quotations: John 4:24; 2 Cor 3:17; Ezek 5:2; Ps 48:7 (47:8 Vulgate); Wis 7:20 (Solomon's knowledge of the violence of winds); Jas 2:26; Acts 7:59; Eccl 3:21; 1 Cor 2:11.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word): Spiritus cutem sanctus → Spiritus autem sanctus; Spiritus sancti ap pellatione → Spiritus sancti appellatione; tantum non. inis Spiritus → tantum nominis Spiritus; enumerandam est breviter → enumerandum est breviter; eo rum natura → eorum natura.

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 7:20 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)

Topics: Trinity, The Holy Spirit, The soul

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 54 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/54). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-54) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 55

55PL 23

Quod si arguta nititur fraude subrepere, de Spiritu sancto haec scripta contestans; si diligenter verba ipsa consideret, cessabit asserere mendacium. Siquidem ita scriptum est: « Quis enim scit hominum quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in eo est? Sic et ea quae sunt Dei, nemo scit, nisi Spiritus Dei. » Quomodo enim alius est homo, alius est Deus, sic et spiritus hominis, qui est in eo, separatur a Spiritu Dei, qui est in eo: quem Spiritum sanctum frequenter ostendimus. Sed et in alio loco idem Apostolus a nostro spiritu Spiritum Dei secernens, ait: « Ipse Spiritus testimonium perhibet spiritui nostro·, » hoc significans, quod spiritus Dei, id est Spiritus sanctus, testimonium spiritui nostro praebeat: quem nunc diximus esse Spiritum hominis. Ad Thessalonicenses quoque: « Integer, » inquit, « spiritus vester, et anima et corpus. » Sicut enim alia est anima, et corpus aliud: sic et aliud est spiritus ab anima, quae suo loco specialiter appellatur. De quo et oravit [al. orat], ut integer cum anima servetur et corpore, quia incredibile est, atque blasphemum, orare Apostolum, ut Spiritus sanctus integer servetur, qui nec imminutionem potest recipere, nec profectum. De humano ergo, ut diximus, spiritu in hoc Apostoli sermo testatus est.

But if someone tries to slip in with clever fraud, claiming that these words are written of the Holy Spirit, he will cease to assert the lie if he considers the words themselves carefully. For it is written thus: "For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him? So also no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God." For as man is one thing and God another, so the spirit of man, which is in him, is distinguished from the Spirit of God, who is in him, whom we have often shown to be the Holy Spirit. And in another place too the same Apostle, distinguishing the Spirit of God from our spirit, says: "The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit", meaning that the Spirit of God, that is, the Holy Spirit, bears witness to our spirit, which we have just said is the spirit of man. To the Thessalonians also he says: "May your spirit, soul and body be kept whole." For as the soul is one thing and the body another, so the spirit is other than the soul, which in its own place is specifically named. He prayed that it might be kept whole with the soul and body, since it is incredible and blasphemous that the Apostle should pray that the Holy Spirit be kept whole, who can receive neither diminution nor increase. So, as we said, the Apostle's word testifies here about the human spirit.

1 Cor 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 5:23 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The "spirit of man" in 1 Cor 2:11, Rom 8:16 and 1 Thess 5:23 is the human spirit, distinct from the Spirit of God.

  • Quotations: 1 Cor 2:11; Rom 8:16; 1 Thess 5:23.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): testimonium perbibet spiritui nostro → testimonium perhibet spiritui nostro.

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 55 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/55). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-55) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 56

56PL 23

Appellantur quoque supernae rationabilesque virtutes, quas solet Scriptura angelos et fortitudines nominare, vocabulo spiritus, ut ibi: « qui facis [al. facit et suos] angelos tuos spiritus; » et alibi: « Nonne omnes sunt administratores spiritus? » Puto ad hunc sensum et illud referri, quod in Actibus apostolorum scribitur: « Spiritus Domini rapuit Philippum, et non amplius eum vidit eunuchus, » id est angelus Domini in sublime elevans Philippum. transtulit illum in alium locum. Rationales quoque aliae creaturae, et de bono in malum sponte propria profluentes, spiritus pessimi, et spiritus appellantur immundi; sicut ibi: « Cum autem spiritus immundus exierit ab homine; » et in consequentibus: « Assumit septem alios spiritus nequiores se. » Spiritus quoque daemones in Evangeliis appellantur. Sed et hoc notandum, nunquam simpliciter spiritum, sed cum aliquo additamento spiritum significari contrarium, ut spiritus immundus, et spiritus daemonis; hi vero qui sancti sunt spiritus, absque ullo additamento spiritus simpliciter appellantur·

The higher, rational powers, which Scripture usually calls angels and powers, are also called by the name of spirit, as there: "You who make your angels spirits"; and elsewhere: "Are they not all ministering spirits?" I think that what is written in the Acts of the Apostles also belongs to this sense: "The Spirit of the Lord caught up Philip, and the eunuch saw him no more", that is, an angel of the Lord, lifting Philip on high, carried him to another place. Other rational creatures too, sliding of their own will from good to evil, are called most wicked spirits and unclean spirits, as there: "When the unclean spirit has gone out of a man"; and in what follows: "He takes seven other spirits more wicked than himself." Demons too are called spirits in the Gospels. But this too should be noted: the opposing spirit is never signified by "spirit" simply, but with some addition, as "unclean spirit" and "spirit of a demon"; whereas those spirits that are holy are called simply spirits, without any addition.

Ps 104:4 (103:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 8:39 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:45 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:33 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: "Spirit" also names angels and, with a qualifying word, evil spirits and demons.

  • The interpretation of Acts 8:39 as an angel is the author's own ("I think"). Quotations: Ps 104:4 (103:4 Vulgate); Heb 1:14; Acts 8:39; Matt 12:43, 45; Luke 4:33 ("spirit of a demon").

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (split word): spiritum significari contra rium → spiritum significari contrarium.

Topics: Angels

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 56 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/56). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-56) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 57

57PL 23

Sciendum quoque quod nomen spiritus, et voluntatem hominis, et animi sententiam sonet. Volens quippe Apostolus virginem non solum opere, sed et mente sanctam esse, id est, non tantum corpore, sed et motu cordis interno, ait: « Ut sit sancta corpore et spiritu; » voluntatem spiritu et corpore opera significans. Considera utrum hoc ipsum in Isaia sonet, quod scriptum est: « Et scient, qui spiritu errant, intellectum. » Qui enim errore judicii alia pro aliis bona [al. bono studio] existimant, accipient intellectum, ut corrigatur error illorum, ut pro pravis ea quae recta sunt eligant. Necnon et illud: « Una fortitudo spiritus vestri [al. nostri].» vide an idipsum ostendat. Et super omnia vocabulum spiritus altiorem et mysticum in Scripturis sanctis significat intellectum, ut ibi: « Littera occidit, spiritus autem vivificat;» litteram dicens simplicem, et manifestam juxta historiam narrationem; spiritum vero, sanctum et spirituale nosse quod legitur. In hanc congruit voluntatem et illud; « Nos sumus circumcisio, qui spiritu Domino servientes sumus, et non in carne confidentes. » Qui enim non littera carnem concidunt, sed cor spiritu circumcidunt, auferentes omne ejus superfluum, quod generationi proximum est, et amicum, hi vere spiritu circumcisi sunt, in occulto Judaei, et veri Israelitae, in quibus non est dolus. Qui transcendentes umbras et imagines Veteris Testamenti, cultores veri adorant Patrem in spiritu et veritate: in spiritu, quia corporalia et humilia transcenderunt; In veritate, quia typos, et umbras, et exemplaria relinquentes, ad ipsius veritatis venere substantiam; et, ut jam diximus, humili et corporea verborum simplicitate contempta, ad spiritualem legis notitiam pervenerunt.

It should be known too that the name "spirit" also means a man's will and the intention of his mind. For the Apostle, wanting a virgin to be holy not only in deed but in mind, that is, not only in body but in the inner movement of the heart, says: "That she may be holy in body and spirit", meaning the will by spirit and deeds by body. Consider whether what is written in Isaiah has the same meaning: "And those who err in spirit will know understanding." For those who by an error of judgment think some things good in place of others will receive understanding, so that their error may be corrected and they may choose what is right instead of what is perverse. See whether this too shows the same: "One strength of your spirit." And above all, the word "spirit" signifies in the holy Scriptures a higher and mystical understanding, as there: "The letter kills, but the spirit gives life", calling letter the simple narrative, plain according to the history, and spirit the holy and spiritual knowledge of what is read. In this sense fits also: "We are the circumcision, who serve the Lord in spirit and do not trust in the flesh." For those who do not cut the flesh by the letter but circumcise the heart by the spirit, removing from it everything superfluous that is close and friendly to generation, are truly circumcised in spirit, Jews in secret, and true Israelites in whom there is no guile. Passing beyond the shadows and images of the Old Testament, as true worshippers they worship the Father in spirit and truth: in spirit, because they have passed beyond bodily and lowly things; in truth, because, leaving types and shadows and patterns, they have come to the substance of truth itself; and, as we have already said, despising the lowly and bodily simplicity of the words, they have reached a spiritual knowledge of the law.

1 Cor 7:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 29:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:28–29 (allusion, high confidence) · John 1:47 (allusion, high confidence) · John 4:23–24 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 8:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Heb 10:1 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: "Spirit" also means a person's will and, above all, the higher spiritual sense of Scripture as opposed to the letter.

  • "One strength of your spirit" is unidentified (perhaps an echo of Eph 4:4); uncertain. Quotations: 1 Cor 7:34; Isa 29:24; 2 Cor 3:6; Phil 3:3; Rom 2:29; John 1:47; John 4:23-24; Heb 8:5 and 10:1 (shadows and patterns).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (split word; uncertain characters in the digital text): Sc(??)endum quoque → Sciendum quoque; in Scripturis san ctis → in Scripturis sanctis; humilia transcende runt → humilia transcenderunt.

Topics: Scripture and canon, Interpreting Scripture, Circumcision

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 57 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/57). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-57) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 58

58PL 23

Haec interim juxta possibilitatem ingenii nostri quot res spiritus significaret, attigimus, suo tempore quid unumquodque significet, si Christus tribuerit, disserturi. Nonnunquam autem Spiritus, et Dominus noster Jesus Christus, id est, Dei Filius appellatur. « Benignus siquidem est Spiritus sapientiae. » Et in alio loco: « Dominus autem Spiritus est » ut ante diximus, ubi etiam illud adjunximus, « Spiritus Deus est, » non juxta nominis tantum communionem, sed juxta naturae substantiaeque consortium. Quomodo enim quorum diversa substantia est, interdum evenit ut communi vocabulo nuncupentur, et haec dicuntur όμώνυμα. ita eorum, quorum eadem est natura atque substantia, cum societate vocabuli, naturae quoque aequalitas copulatur, et disciplinae dialecticorum est appellare haec συνώνυμα. idcirco et Spiritus vocabulum, et si quid aliud in Trinitate usurpari solet, συνώνυμον est; verbi gratia, sanctus, bonus, et caetera his similia, de quibus paulo ante perstrinximus.

For the present, according to the capacity of our understanding, we have touched on how many things "spirit" signifies; in due time, if Christ grants it, we shall discuss what each signifies. Sometimes our Lord Jesus Christ, that is, the Son of God, is also called Spirit: "For the Spirit of wisdom is kind." And in another place: "The Lord is the Spirit", as we said before, where we also added, "God is Spirit", not by a mere sharing of the name but by a fellowship of nature and substance. For as it sometimes happens that things whose substance is different are called by a common word, and these are called homonyms (ὁμώνυμα), so with things whose nature and substance are the same, equality of nature is joined to the sharing of the word, and the discipline of the dialecticians calls these synonyms (συνώνυμα). Therefore the word "Spirit", and any other that is usually used in the Trinity, for example "holy", "good", and the like, of which we spoke a little before, is a synonym.

2 Cor 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 4:24 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Son too is called Spirit; the name is used of the Persons of the Trinity as a synonym, signifying shared nature, not as a homonym.

  • "Synonym" here is the logicians' term for things sharing both name and nature. Quotations: Wis 1:6; 2 Cor 3:17; John 4:24.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; uncertain characters in the digital text): juxta nominis tan (??)(??)m communionem → juxta nominis tantum communionem; verbi gratia, sauctus bonus → verbi gratia, sanctus, bonus.

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 1:6 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Trinity, The Holy Spirit

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 58 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/58). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-58) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 59

59PL 23

Porro ad haec necessario devoluti sumus, ut quia frequenter appellatio spiritus in Scripturis est respersa divinis, non labamur in nomine, sed unumquodque secundum locorum varietates et intelligentias accipiamus. Omni itaque studio ac diligentia vocabulum Spiritus, ubi et quomodo appellatum sit, contemplantes, sophismata eorum et fraudulentas decipulas conteramus, qui Spiritum sanctum asserunt creaturam. Legentes enim in propheta, « Ego sum firmans tonitruum, et creans Spiritum, » ignorantia multiplicis in hac parte sermonis, putaverunt Spiritum sanctum ex hoc vocabulo demonstrari, cum in praesentiarum spiritus nomen ventum sonet. Necnon in Zacharia audientes locutum Dominum, quod ipse sit qui creat spiritum hominis in eo, existimaverunt Spiritum sanctum etiam in hoc capitulo significari, non animadvertentes quod animam hominis, aut spiritum (quem tantum in homine esse jam diximus) spiritus appellatio significet. Ergo ut praelocuti sumus, quomodo unumquodque dictum sit, consideremus, ne forte per ignorantiam in barathrum decidamus erroris. Siquidem in aliis rebus ex consortio vocabulorum error eveniens, confusionem et pudorem ei qui erravit importat; de supernis vero et divinis lapsus ad prava, ad aeternam poenam deducit et tartarum [al. barathrum], maxime cum semel deceptus noluerit resipiscere, sed suum defensare impudenter errorem. Decebat etiam, et magnitudo voluminis exigebat, ut finem acciperet oratio.

We have necessarily come round to these points so that, since the name "spirit" is scattered frequently in the divine Scriptures, we may not slip on the name but take each instance according to the variety of places and meanings. So, examining with all zeal and care where and how the word "Spirit" is used, let us crush the sophisms and deceitful snares of those who assert that the Holy Spirit is a creature. For reading in the prophet, "I am he who makes firm the thunder and creates spirit", through ignorance of the manifold use of the word in this matter they thought that the Holy Spirit was shown by this word, whereas here the name "spirit" means wind. And hearing in Zechariah that the Lord said that he is the one who creates the spirit of man within him, they thought that the Holy Spirit was signified in this chapter too, not noticing that the name "spirit" signifies the soul of man, or the spirit which we have already said is in man. So, as we said before, let us consider how each thing is said, lest through ignorance we fall into the pit of error. For in other matters an error arising from a shared word brings confusion and shame to the one who erred; but a slip into falsehood about heavenly and divine things leads to eternal punishment and Tartarus, especially when one who has once been deceived refuses to come to his senses but shamelessly defends his error. It was fitting, too, and the size of the volume required, that the discourse should come to an end.

Amos 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Zech 12:1 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Because "spirit" has many senses, the opponents' proof-texts (Amos 4:13, Zech 12:1) about wind and the human spirit do not make the Holy Spirit a creature.

  • Quotations: Amos 4:13; Zech 12:1.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (sense uncertain); split word; uncertain characters in the digital text): ignerantia multiplicis → ignorantia multiplicis; ex hoc vocabulo demon strari → ex hoc vocabulo demonstrari; spiritus nomen ven(??)(??)m sonet → spiritus nomen ventum sonet; quem tentum in homine → quem tantum in homine; semel deceptus no uerit resipiscere → semel deceptus noluerit resipiscere.

Topics: Trinity, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 59 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/59). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-59) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 60

60PL 23

Verum quia infert se quaestio adversus ea quae superius disputavimus: quam idcirco tunc praetermisimus, ne textum sermonis irrumperet, et inter piam praedicationem impia contentio poneretur, necessarium puto ad propositum respondere, et lectoris arbitrio, quid super his sentiat, derelinquere. Disputantibus ergo supra, quod animam vel mentem hominis nulla creatura juxta substantiam possit implere, nisi sola Trinitas, quia tantummodo secundum operationem, et voluntatis errorem, sive virtutem, animus de his quae creata [al. sociata] sunt impletur: oborta est quaestio nostra, quasi sententiam solvens, quod creata substantia, quae in Scripturis Satanas appellatur, ingrediatur in aliquos, et cor quorumdam implere dicatur. Nam ad eum qui medietatem pretii de agro vendito sibi, aliud profitens, reservaret, a Petro apostolo dictum est: « Anania, quare implevit Satanas cor tuum? » Et de Juda loquitur ipse Salvator, quod intraverit in eum Satanas, Ad quod postea respondendum est. Interim nunc disputemus adversum id quod scriptum est, « quare implevit Satanas cor tuum? » quomodo Satanas mentem alicujus et principale cordis impleat, non ingrediens in eum et in sensum ejus, atque, ut ita dicam, aditum cordis introiens, si quidem haec potestas solius est Trinitatis; sed quasi callidus quidam et nequam ac fallax fraudulentusque deceptor, in eos animam humanam malitiae affectus trahit, per cogitationes et incentiva vitiorum, quibus ipse plenus est. Denique et ipse Elymas magus filius diaboli, juxta malitiam nequitiamque subsistens, plenus omni dolo et malitia, scribitur « Satana patre ejus, » hanc ei voluntatem, quasi ex consuetudine vitiorum in naturam ver l(??)(??)te. Arguens itaque eum apostolus Paulus atque corripiens ait: « O plene omni iniquitate, et omni dolo, fili diaboli, inimice justitiae Dei » Quia enim versipellis et callidus, omnem in se dolum fraudulentiae susceperat, appellatur filius diaboli, quia implebat ipse omnem principale illius fraude et iniquitate, et omni malitia; in tantum illi(??) iens eum atque decipiens, ut ipse Satanas implesse animam ipsius, et habitare in eodem putaretur, quem ad omnes suae perversitatis dolos, ministrum sibi ac famulum praeparaverat.

But since a question arises against what we argued above, which we passed over then so as not to break the thread of the discourse and set an impious dispute in the midst of pious preaching, I think it necessary to answer it as proposed and leave to the reader's judgment what he thinks of it. When we argued above that no creature can fill the soul or mind of a man by substance, but only the Trinity, since the mind is filled by created things only by way of activity, error of will, or virtue, our question arose as if overturning that statement: that a created substance, which in the Scriptures is called Satan, enters into some and is said to fill the heart of some. For to the man who, while professing otherwise, kept back for himself half the price of the field he had sold, the apostle Peter said: "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart?" And the Saviour himself says of Judas that Satan entered into him. To this we shall reply afterwards. For now let us discuss the text "Why has Satan filled your heart?", how Satan fills someone's mind and the governing part of the heart: not by entering into him and into his mind, and, so to speak, going in through the entrance of the heart, since this power belongs to the Trinity alone; but as a cunning, wicked, false, and fraudulent deceiver, he draws the human soul into the feelings of wickedness through the thoughts and incitements to vices of which he himself is full. So Elymas the magician too, a son of the devil, subsisting in malice and wickedness, full of all guile and malice, is written to have Satan as his father, this will having been turned in him, as it were, by habit of vice into nature. So the apostle Paul, rebuking and reproving him, says: "O you full of all iniquity and all guile, son of the devil, enemy of the righteousness of God." For because he was crafty and cunning, and had taken into himself every guile of deceit, he is called a son of the devil, since the devil filled his whole governing part with fraud, iniquity and all malice, deceiving and beguiling him so much that Satan himself was thought to have filled his soul and to dwell in the man whom he had prepared as his minister and servant for all the deceits of his perversity.

Acts 5:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 22:3 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 13:8–10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:44 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Answering an objection: Satan "fills" a heart not by entering it in substance, which only the Trinity can do, but by drawing it into evil through deceit and suggestion, as with Ananias and Elymas.

  • Several words are damaged in the digital text near the end ("in naturam ver l(??)(??)te", "illi(??) iens"); translated by sense. "Governing part" renders "principale" (Greek ἡγεμονικόν). Quotations: Acts 5:3; Luke 22:3 (John 13:27); Acts 13:8-10; John 8:44 as an echo.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; uncertain characters in the digital text): fraudule(??)(??)sque deceptor → fraudulentusque deceptor; Arguens itaque cum apostolus Paulus → Arguens itaque eum apostolus Paulus.

Topics: Trinity, The devil and demons

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 60 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/60). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-60) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 61

61PL 23

Ad id vero quod secundum posueramus [Vat. proposueramus] exemplum, quia in Judam introisset Satanas, hoc dicendum est. Observans diabolus quibusdam motibus et operationum signis, ad quae potissimum Judae cor esset vitia proclivius, deprehendit eum patere insidiis avaritiae, et reperta cupiditatis janua, misit in mentem ejus quomodo desideratam pecuniam acciperet, et per occasionem lucri, proditor magistri et Salvatoris sui exsisteret, argentum pro pietate commutans, et suscipiens pretium sceleris a Pharisaeis atque Judaeis. Haec ergo cogitationis occasio locum tribuit Satanae, ut in cor ejus introiens, impleret eum pessima voluntate. Introivit ergo non secundum substantiam, sed secundum operationem, quia introire in aliquem, mercatae naturae est ejus, quae participetur a pluribus. Impar(??)(??)cipabilis ergo diabolus est, non creator, sed creatura subsistens. Unde et convertibilis atque mutabilis, e sanctitate decidit atque virtute. Diximus supra μετοχικόν [erat μετοχικώς], id est, quod participatione capiatur, esse incorruptibile et immutabile, et consequenter aeternum. Quod autem mutari potest, factum esse et habere principium. Porro quod incorruptibile sit, esse et retro et deinceps sempiternum. Non ergo, ut quidam putant, participatione naturae, sive substantiae implet quempiam diabolus, aut ejus habitator efficitur, sed per fraudulentiam, et deceptionem, et malitiam, habitare in eo creditur quem replevit. Hac autem fallacia etiam presbyteros, qui adversus Susannam in crudelitatem se verterant, intravit, implens animas eorum incendio libidinis, et sera senii voluptate. Scriptum est enim: « Venerunt autem et duo presbyteri, pleni iniqua cogitatione.» His insidiis implevit et universum populum Judaeorum, dicente propheta de eo: « Vae gens peccatrix, populus plenus peccatis, semen pessimum, filii iniqui, » Semen quippe nequam diabolus, et filii ejus, propter iniquitatem et plenitudinem, dicti sunt peccatores. Si autem ab his qui ejus in Scripturis filii nominantur, juxta substantiae participationem non capitur [al. nuncupantur], siquidem impossibile hoc esse in creaturis frequenter ostensum est, neque alius quis potest eum capere participatione substantiae, sed tantummodo assumptione fraudulentissimae voluntatis. Operationem quippe et studia non solum bonorum operum, sed etiam malorum in creaturis diximus; naturam vero atque substantiam solius in alios posse Trinitatis intrare.

As to the second example we had set out, that Satan entered into Judas, this must be said. The devil, observing by certain movements and signs of action to which vices Judas's heart was most inclined, caught him open to the snares of avarice; and, having found the door of greed, he put into his mind how he might get the money he desired and, for the sake of gain, become the betrayer of his master and Saviour, exchanging piety for silver and receiving the price of the crime from the Pharisees and Jews. This occasion of thought gave Satan room to enter his heart and fill him with a most evil will. So he entered not by substance but by activity, since to enter into someone belongs to that nature alone which is shared by many. So the devil is not shareable; he is not creator but subsists as a creature. That is why, being alterable and changeable, he fell from holiness and virtue. We said above that what is shareable (μετοχικόν), that is, what is received by participation, is incorruptible and unchangeable, and consequently eternal; and that what can be changed has been made and has a beginning; and that what is incorruptible is everlasting both backward and forward. So the devil does not fill anyone, as some think, by participation in his nature or substance, nor does he become his indweller; but he is believed to dwell in the one he has filled through fraud, deception and malice. By this deceit he also entered the elders who turned to cruelty against Susanna, filling their souls with the fire of lust and the late pleasure of old age. For it is written: "And the two elders came, full of wicked thought." With these snares he also filled the whole people of the Jews, as the prophet says of it: "Woe, sinful nation, people full of sins, most wicked seed, lawless sons." For the devil is the wicked seed, and his sons, because of their iniquity and fullness, are called sinners. And if he is not received by participation of substance by those who are named his sons in the Scriptures (for it has often been shown that this is impossible in creatures), neither can anyone else receive him by participation of substance, but only by taking on a most deceitful will. For we have said that the activity and pursuit not only of good works but also of evil ones are found in creatures, but that only the nature and substance of the Trinity can enter into others.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Luke 22:3–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:14–16 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 1:4 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Satan entered Judas through his avarice, by activity, not substance; as a changeable creature the devil cannot be shared, so only the Trinity can indwell by substance.

  • "To that nature alone": the text reads "mercatae naturae", evidently corrupt (for "solius" or the like); translated by sense. "Not shareable" follows a damaged word ("Impar(??)(??)cipabilis", probably "imparticipabilis"). Migne's note on μετοχικόν is not translated. The Susanna quotation is Sus 28 (an addition to Daniel outside the Protestant canon). The sentence on "the whole people of the Jews" applies Isa 1:4 and is translated as written. Quotations: Luke 22:3-6; Isa 1:4.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word; uncertain character in the digital text; uncertain characters in the digital text): ad quae po tissimum → ad quae potissimum; deprehend(??)t eum → deprehendit eum; quomodo deside(??)atam pecuniam → quomodo desideratam pecuniam; argentu(??)n pro pietate → argentum pro pietate; atque mutabi lis → atque mutabilis; Quod autem mutari pote(??)t → Quod autem mutari potest; quod in· corruptibile → quod incorruptibile; Semen quippe nequam diabo lus → Semen quippe nequam diabolus; Si autem ab bis qui → Si autem ab his qui.

Extrabiblical texts: Sus 28 (Susanna [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Trinity, The devil and demons

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 61 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/61). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-61) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 62

62PL 23

Abunde, ut reor, occursum est propositiae quaestioni. Quia vero ineptum et stultum videtur, adversus fatua respondere, et si quid in buccam ruerit [al. irruit] impiorum, hoc velle dissolvere; non enim tantum impietas est, scelerata proponere, quantum et de sceleratis cum resistente velle tractare; idcirco illud quod solent jactare, praetereo sacrilega adversus nos audacia proclamantes: Si Spiritus sanctus creatus non est, aut frater est Dei Patris, aut patruus est unigeniti Jesu Christi, aut filius Christi est, aut nepos est Dei Patris, aut ipse Filius Dei est, et jam non erit unigenitus Dominus Jesus Christus, cum alterum fratrem habeat. Miseri atque miserabiles, non sentientes de incorporeis et invisibilibus, juxta corporalium et visibilium disputari non licere naturam. Fratrem esse vel patruum, nepotem vel filium, corporum nomina sunt, et imbecillitatis humanae vocabula. Trinitas vero omnes has praetergreditur nuncupationes. Et quotiescunque in aliqua de his cadit; nominibus nostris, et incongruis vocabulis non suam naturam loquitur. Cum igitur sancta Scriptura amplius de Trinitate non dicat, nisi Deum Patrem esse Salvatoris, et Filium generatum esse a Patre, hoc tantummodo debemus sentire quod scriptum est. Et ostenso quod Spiritus sanctus increatus sit, consequenter intelligere, quod cujus non est creata substantia, recte Patri Filioque societur.

The proposed question has, I think, been answered fully. But since it seems silly and foolish to answer fatuities and to want to refute whatever comes into the mouths of the impious (for it is not so much impiety to propose wicked things as to want to discuss wicked things with an opponent), I pass over what they usually throw out, crying out against us with sacrilegious audacity: "If the Holy Spirit is not created, he is either the brother of God the Father, or the uncle of the only-begotten Jesus Christ, or the son of Christ, or the grandson of God the Father, or himself the Son of God, and then the Lord Jesus Christ will no longer be only-begotten, since he has another brother." Wretched and pitiable men, not perceiving that about incorporeal and invisible things one may not argue according to the nature of corporeal and visible things! Brother or uncle, grandson or son, are names of bodies and words of human weakness. But the Trinity goes beyond all these designations. And whenever it falls under any of them, it is spoken of in our names and inadequate words, not according to its own nature. Since, then, holy Scripture says no more about the Trinity than that God is the Father of the Saviour and that the Son was begotten by the Father, we must think only what is written. And once it has been shown that the Holy Spirit is uncreated, we must consequently understand that he whose substance is not created is rightly joined with the Father and the Son.

Notes and citation

Summary: Didymus dismisses the objection that an uncreated Spirit must be the Father's brother or the Son's son or brother: family names belong to bodies, and Scripture says only that the Son is begotten of the Father.

  • A similar objection is reported by Athanasius (cf. Letters to Serapion 1.15).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; split word): proclamati tes → proclamantes; ani frater e t Dei Patris → aut frater est Dei Patris; de incorporeis el invisibilibus → de incorporeis et invisibilibus; et im becillitatis → et imbecillitatis; Cum igitur santa Scriptura → Cum igitur sancta Scriptura.

Topics: Trinity, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 62 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/62). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-62) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 63

63PL 23

Haec juxta eloquii nostri paupertatem in praesenti dicta sufficiant· timorem meum, quod de Spiritu sancto loqui ausus sim, indicantia. Quicunque enim in eum blasphemaverit, non solum in hoc saeculo, verum etiam in futuro non dimittetur ei, nec ulla misericordia et venia reservabitur illi qui conculcaverit Filium Dei, et injuriam [al. contumeliam] fecerit Spiritui gratiae ejus, in quo sanctificatus est. Quod quidem et in Deo Patre est intelligendum. Nam qui blasphemaverit in eum, et impie egerit, sine venia cruciabitur, nullo pro eo Dominum deprecante, sicut scriptum est, « Qui autem in Dominum Deum peccaverit, quis orabit pro eo » Necnon et qui Filium negaverit coram hominibus, negabitur ab eo coram Patre, et angelis ejus,. Ergo quia nulla venia in Trinitatem conceditur blasphemantibus, omni studio et cautela est providendum, ut ne in brevi quidem parvoque sermone de ea disputantes, labamur. Quia potius si quis hoc volumen legere voluerit, quaesumus, ut mundet se ab omni opere malo, et cogitationibus pessimis: quo possit illuminato corde ea intelligere quae dicuntur, et plenus sanctitate atque sapientia, ignoscere nobis, sicubi voluntatem nostram non implevit effectus, et tantummodo consideret qua mente quid dictum sit, non quibus expressum sit sermonibus. Sicut enim pietatis sensum nobis audaciter juxta nostram conscientiam vindicamus, ita quantum de eo loqui pertinet, venustatem rhetoricam facundiam que, juxta consequentiam textumque sermonis, procul abesse simpliciter confitemur. Studii quippe nostri fuit, de Scripturis sanctis disserentibus, pro intelligere quae scripta sunt, et imperitiam mensuramque nostri non ignorare sermonis.

Let these things suffice for the present, said according to the poverty of our speech, showing my fear at having dared to speak of the Holy Spirit. For whoever blasphemes against him will not be forgiven, neither in this age nor in the age to come; and no mercy or pardon will be reserved for one who has trampled on the Son of God and outraged the Spirit of his grace, in whom he was sanctified. This must be understood of God the Father too. For one who blasphemes against him and acts impiously will be tormented without pardon, with no one interceding with the Lord for him, as it is written: "But one who sins against the Lord God, who will pray for him?" And one who denies the Son before men will be denied by him before the Father and his angels. So, since no pardon is granted to those who blaspheme against the Trinity, every care and caution must be taken so that, discussing it even in a short and small treatise, we do not slip. Rather, if anyone wishes to read this volume, we ask that he cleanse himself from every evil work and from wicked thoughts, so that with an enlightened heart he may understand what is said, and, full of holiness and wisdom, forgive us wherever the result has not fulfilled our wish, and consider only with what intent each thing was said, not in what words it was expressed. For as we boldly claim for ourselves, according to our conscience, a sense of piety, so, as far as speaking of it is concerned, we simply confess that rhetorical charm and eloquence, in the sequence and texture of the discourse, are far from us. For our aim, discussing the holy Scriptures, was to understand what is written, and not to be unaware of the inexperience and measure of our speech.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Matt 12:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 10:29 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 2:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:33 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Didymus closes in fear of blaspheming the Spirit, asks readers to purify themselves and pardon his plain style, and states that his aim was to understand Scripture.

  • "To understand what is written": the Latin has "pro intelligere", which seems corrupt; translated by sense. Quotations: Matt 12:32; Heb 10:29; 1 Sam 2:25; Luke 12:9 (Matt 10:33).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word; uncertain character in the digital text): in prasenti dicta sufficiant → in praesenti dicta sufficiant; in quo sancti ficatus est → in quo sanctificatus est; est intelligendur → est intelligendum; negaverit co ram hominibus → negaverit coram hominibus; non quibus expressum sci munibus → non quibus expressum sit sermonibus; et imperitiam mensu(??)amque → et imperitiam mensuramque.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Didymus, Spir. 63 (PL 23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/didymus-spiritu-sancto/63). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-didymus-spiritu-sancto-63) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Jerome's Latin version (the Greek is lost), PL 23; no public-domain English or FOTC volume, so re-read against the Latin.